Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/10/31

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive October 31st, 2016
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not attributed, see the discussion at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Mosaic_of_the_Female_Musicians.jpg#File:Mosaic_of_the_Female_Musicians.jpg Piledhighandeep (talk) 00:43, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 00:56, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation, cropped image taken from http://xs.is/folkid/ 49.200.244.191 09:58, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: photo from http://xs.is/folkid/oddny-hardardottir-spurningar-svor/, no indication of a free licence. --jdx Re: 13:48, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Professonal picture without any metadata of unknown origin, uncertainty about copyright status due to lack of data. ErikvanB (talk) 10:48, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have updated the description.Hausofmakeup (talk) 13:12, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See here this is OK in Dutch. I withdraw nomination MoiraMoira (talk) 20:21, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
How? — I withdraw my nomination. ErikvanB (talk) 18:55, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per above. --INeverCry 00:19, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The actor on this picture does not give permission to use this picture. He wants this to be removed. Zwartmaker (talk) 18:37, 24 October 2016 (UTC)Pleas remove this picture Zwartmaker (talk) 14:47, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: please ask the actor to contact OTRS, so that we can determine whether there is a real problem. --Jcb (talk) 13:32, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No copyright. No permission. Zwartmaker (talk) 11:13, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 18:45, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm one of the actors on the picture and did not give permission to Haus of Make-up to publish it. Haus of Make-up is not even the owner of the photo and my lawyer sent a letter to them to remove the picture from internet. Smokey62 (talk) 08:56, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: as said above: contact OTRS. --Jcb (talk) 16:12, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Thibaut120094 as no permission (No permission since) Jcb (talk) 16:48, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep - Reviewed by trusted user, see here - Jcb (talk) 16:48, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - See also Ticket:2016110410014418 1 - Haus of Make-up is not the owner of the Photo. 2 - I (one of the actors) never gave permission to publish it for free use. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Smokey62 (talk • contribs) 10:20, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Delete: Gezien de actoren allemaal Nederlands spreken is het misschien handiger wanneer ik deze verwijdering in het Nederlands motiveer. Een college heeft de op IRC gevraagd of ik hier naar wil kijken omdat het ticket in het Nederlands is geschreven. Of er echt sprake is van een schending van het portretrecht is lastig ter bepalen. Temeer omdat de acteur niet herkenbaar in beeld is. Aan de andere kan is er het maatschappelijk debat wat wel voor een redelijk belang tegen het publiceren van deze foto kan zorgen. Het ticket biedt in ieder geval onvoldoende juridische argumenten om over te gaan tot verwijdering. Maar eigenlijk vind ik dit voor nu helemaal niet relevant.

De vraag is of een verwijdering bij wijze van gunst (courtesy deletion) redelijk is en gezien de maatschappelijke discussie rondom Zwarte Piet en de discussie op de Nederlandse Wikipedia over deze foto vind ik dat alleszins redelijk. Deze verwijdering had veel eerder plaats kunnen vinden indien Zwartmaker zicht niet oneervol had gedragen. Ik zal via OTRS nog het een en ander uitleggen.

TLDR in English: given the current debate about zwarte piet and some turmoil at the Dutch Wikipedia regarding the works uploaded by zwartmaker it seems reasonable to do a courtesy deletion. Natuur12 (talk) 13:25, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

its very old 96.31.236.74 16:35, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --jdx Re: 17:49, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is againsts regulations 96.31.236.74 17:08, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --jdx Re: 18:27, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mistakes ok Tren ligero gdl (talk) 17:11, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --jdx Re: 17:52, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

its so old and its a mistake 96.31.236.74 21:29, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:39, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The reproduction of this poster is hardly covered by Russia's freedom-of-panorama exception. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:03, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Shizhao: Out of project scope - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

overprinting shows true source, as does the "google" in source. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:03, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --lNeverCry 00:49, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of File:N525NB Cessna 525C CitationJet CJ4 Cessna Aircraft Company factory demonstrator (6486047709).jpg Marc Lacoste (talk) 07:48, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 06:52, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused image logo and spam advertising 47.150.68.26 21:12, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination/possible copyvio/complex logo. --INeverCry (talk) 00:08, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Don't think this is PD in the US, since it's covered by {{Not-PD-US-URAA}}. Assuming it was published in 1933, the URAA would have restored its US copyright until 2028. Miniapolis 13:58, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request. --lNeverCry 07:04, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

flickr image uploaded by bad author 47.150.68.26 20:52, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:03, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All rights reserved from http://www.salemalketbi.com «izoozo» talk 15:56, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:43, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free file, not uploader's work https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A4%D0%B0%D0%B9%D0%BB:%D0%91%D0%B0%D1%82%D1%8B%D1%80%D1%85%D0%B0%D0%BD_%D0%9A%D0%B0%D0%BC%D0%B0%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%87_%D0%A8%D1%83%D0%BA%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2.jpg XXN, 16:33, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:42, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The user uploaded a photo of herself and states the name of the photographer (also watermarked on the image), but there is no evidence of permission. Not "own work".

Edit: There are more from the same photographer:

--Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 00:11, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:37, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio from http://www.papermag.com/is-a-jacked-berlin-based-rapper-named-candy-ken-fashions-new-it-boy-1427518366.html Wikishovel (talk) 00:31, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:37, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in France. All pictured pieces of art and buildings are copyrighted and not free for using on Commons.

Ras67 (talk) 00:44, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:43, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very obviously not "own work". Why aren't pictures like this deleted at once?? 88.76.210.28 01:00, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:44, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication at the source that it has been really released under a CC license. I mean, this link was not mentioned as a source at the file page, but as a local Journalist, I have received a press release with this very picture, which is why I consider that link to be the source. The link is from the city hall's official website. Victor Lopes (talk) 01:15, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:44, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Reupload of an image that had been previously deleted (see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Vista parcial de Carapicuíba.jpg). Victor Lopes (talk) 02:26, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear copyright violation. --JuTa 04:25, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Playbacg (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Self-made music and images. Out of scope. See also: es:Usuario:Playbacg.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:08, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:38, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:10, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:46, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Thorsbi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Please see our project scope.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:12, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:46, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Homework? See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:13, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:46, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:13, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:46, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:15, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:46, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nitzan Arny (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope. See en:ORAM (organization).

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:17, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:47, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Sturm (talk) 05:03, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:47, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Sturm (talk) 05:17, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:47, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AKSKubrat (talk · contribs) 2

[edit]

Highly unlikely to be "own work": the maps are clearly derivatives, many old images without proper author and source, different qualities, cameras, and sizes, no EXIF data.

P 1 9 9   15:10, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: some kept some delted as per Stas. Daphne Lantier 18:39, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AKSKubrat (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Set of old photos, maps and drawings, low-res, unlikely to be own works as claimed.

VLu (talk) 17:20, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 10:54, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Instmann (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The artist, Birgit Decressin, is alive. We need the permission from her (see OTRS)

Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:55, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Die Bilder wurden mit Zustimmung der Malerin Birgit Decressin hochgeladen und dürfen unter den gegebenen Lizenzbedingungen veröffentlicht werden. Eine Löschung wäre deshalb nicht zielführend.--Instmann (talk) 17:42, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:56, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sdmather (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of user's own work on these 3 photos (2 duplicates) and a photo of a plate. All small sizes, no metadata, and in theme.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:58, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:57, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mass impact22 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Request speedy No indication of user's own work and derogatory captions.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:59, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:46, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete unused file --47.150.68.26 20:24, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:47, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Chillibilli (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own works. Free sources should be provided for each maps.

Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:09, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:57, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

advertising, out of com:EDUSE Pippobuono (talk) 09:24, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:58, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

advertising, out of com:EDUSE Pippobuono (talk) 09:25, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:58, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

advertising, out of com:EDUSE Pippobuono (talk) 09:25, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:58, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

advertising, out of com:EDUSE Pippobuono (talk) 09:25, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:58, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

advertising, out of com:EDUSE Pippobuono (talk) 09:25, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:58, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SamTheMAMBA (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused personal images : out of scope

Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:05, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:39, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by File:Samuel Brewer (1724-1793).jpg. (tJosve05a (c) 13:24, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:48, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by RAUL HERNANDEZ P (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Doubtful self-licensed images of a mexican actor and writer. Also posters and screenshots. Some images are used on es:Usuario:Leitoxx/Ramiro Hernández Aguilar. Questionable is also the relevance of this person.

GeorgHHtalk   13:38, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:58, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Purushottam Kafle (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo or drawing album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:59, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope, low quality Lewis Hulbert (talk) 15:28, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:00, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:KarinabraunPart2

[edit]

All photographs or scans of publications. These publications are copyrighted, as are the photographs in them, unless the uploader provides evidence that they are not. The Commons is not a personal scrapbook or a platform for self-promotion. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 16:10, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete delete all. they are all unused. --47.150.68.26 20:34, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:41, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation : https://twitter.com/jbpinatel Bastenbas (talk) 23:48, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ellin Beltz: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - Using VisualFileChange.

Hello,

Thank you for your message.

I confirm that I have the agreement to use this picture and I assume the entire responsability.

Thank you in advance for your feedback.

Cris2017 (talk) 07:43, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-promotion of someone without artistic features. In Wikipedia POF, away with it. Jos1950 (talk) 20:38, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:30, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This isn't own work because File:Potsdamer Platz, Berlin, 151024, ako.jpg is already uploaded on commons by Ansgar Koreng. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:54, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 05:45, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:COPYVIO... previously uploaded to Commons at File:Kanariku järv 2015 10.jpg, not own work of this uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:56, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 05:45, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

JPG version of this image displays incorrectly and proper PNG version can be found here. -WClarke (talk) 01:56, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:38, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Not educationally useful, self-promotion. Svensson1 (talk) 02:14, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:38, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation (book cover) Huji (talk) 02:43, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:38, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory#Australia, government works are copyrighted for up to 50 years, which means works created before 1966 are in the public domain. This logo by the Australian government is obviously not made before 1966. This should be deleted as non-free and moved to enwiki as fair use. Alternatively, one may ask the Australian government (or MMR Authority) to release this logo under a free license or into the public domain and send an email to the OTRS. Poké95 03:54, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

s/1996/1966/g ? Ankry (talk) 07:14, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, I mistakenly read 1966 as 1996. Thanks for pointing out my mistake. Poké95 04:35, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:40, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

looks like advertisement to me  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:20, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:31, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Er Rayees (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private images. Unused, out of project scope.

GeorgHHtalk   13:10, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:31, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo of another author. No permission. Mykola Vasylechko 13:20, 31 October 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:33, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo of another author. No permission. Mykola Vasylechko 13:21, 31 October 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:33, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo of another author. No permission. Mykola Vasylechko 13:21, 31 October 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:33, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo of another author. No permission. Mykola Vasylechko 13:21, 31 October 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:33, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo of another author. No permission. Mykola Vasylechko 13:21, 31 October 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:33, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo of another author. No permission. Mykola Vasylechko 13:21, 31 October 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:33, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo of another author. No permission. Mykola Vasylechko 13:22, 31 October 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:33, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo of another author. No permission. Mykola Vasylechko 13:22, 31 October 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:33, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

непотрібні світлини Максим Огородник (talk) 12:11, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 22:23, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo of another author. No permission. Mykola Vasylechko 13:22, 31 October 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:33, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo of another author. No permission. Mykola Vasylechko 13:22, 31 October 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:33, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo of another author. No permission. Mykola Vasylechko 13:22, 31 October 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:33, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo of another author. No permission. Mykola Vasylechko 13:22, 31 October 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:33, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo of another author. No permission. Mykola Vasylechko 13:23, 31 October 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:33, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

self-promo, private photo Andrei Nikolaenko (talk) 10:55, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted High Contrast (talk) 08:06, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope Sankoswal (talk) 10:54, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:08, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is a personal photo that has no educational value. It is out of scope per COM:SELFIE. KSFT (talk) 13:08, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:47, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low-quality (blurred) selfie of a non-notable individual. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 13:54, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:34, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused selfie of non-notable individual. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 01:09, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I suggest to protect the filename indefinitely against recreation after deletion of the photo. Overall generic filename. Taivo (talk) 09:03, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 13:24, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo of another author. No permission. Mykola Vasylechko 13:57, 31 October 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:34, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:34, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:34, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:34, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:34, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logo. Above com:TOO in the Netherlands. Natuur12 (talk) 15:49, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:35, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logo. Above com:TOO imho. Organisation is hardly notable anyways. Natuur12 (talk) 15:50, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:35, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logo. Above com:TOO in the Netherlands. Natuur12 (talk) 15:53, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:35, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logo. Above com:TOO in the Netherlands. Natuur12 (talk) 15:54, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:35, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logo. Above com:TOO in the Netherlands. Natuur12 (talk) 15:54, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:35, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Anthony Konaté (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Uploaders private image gallery. Unused, out of project scope.

GeorgHHtalk   20:40, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:36, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

superseded by the File:Akita City Nambu Kominkan 20160720.jpg 掬茶 (talk) 04:05, 31 October 2016 (UTC)04:05, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:59, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I see no sense in this greenish low resolution version of this better one. Ras67 (talk) 05:32, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:59, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused smaller copy of File:George Stubbs - Zebra - Google Art Project.jpg. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:49, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Is there something wrong with the license I chose?

[edit]

I selected and copied the image from the website of the Yale Center for British Art, where it was described as being in the public domain. I did that because I was unable to find a comparable image in Wikimedia Commons of the George Stubbs zebra to use in my new article on the animalier school. The Zebra, which is part of the Paul Mellon collection given to Yale is one of Stubbs' most famous paintings. By the way, I am not a new user of Wikimedia Commons images in articles. Mitzi.humphrey (talk) 15:25, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Mitzi.humphrey You uploaded a small version of an image we already have, click File:George Stubbs - Zebra - Google Art Project.jpg to see the bigger one. There's no reason to have a lesser size/lower quality image when we already have a big one you can use! And of course, please have a look at Category:Paintings of animals by George Stubbs for more images by this painter. Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:06, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, I made the exchange of files. Yours is clearer. Mitzi.humphrey (talk) 19:16, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
[edit]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:59, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of own work on this map/poster. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:50, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:00, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely claim of own work on an image which looks copied from a printed source. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:51, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:00, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Leo Uroboros (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work. A free source for the map should be provided.

Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:57, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:00, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Would need COM:OTRS from Mr. Tuozzo, as that's not own work of uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:57, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:00, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Needs COM:OTRS permission from creator. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:58, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:00, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of own work in 2016 on this image said to be from 1894, please provide proper source and license. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:04, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:00, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work on this tiny boxed image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:04, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:00, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a 'selfie' taken by Ishanka Alwis not the 'own work' of ChanakaW. Without details of Alwis' permission for this image, taken by her to be used it is clearly a breach of copyright. ChanakaW has a previous history of uploading copyrighted images and claiming them as their own. Dan arndt (talk) 06:13, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:00, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a 'selfie' taken by Visna Fernando not the 'own work' of ChanakaW. Image was taken from Fernando's facebook account. Without details of Fernando's permission for this image, taken by her to be used it is clearly a breach of copyright. ChanakaW has a previous history of uploading copyrighted images and claiming them as their own. Dan arndt (talk) 06:18, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:00, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a 'selfie' taken by Visna Fernando not the 'own work' of ChanakaW (image can be found on Fernando's personal facebook account). Without details of Fernando's permission for this image, taken by her to be used it is clearly a breach of copyright. ChanakaW has a previous history of uploading copyrighted images and claiming them as their own. Dan arndt (talk) 06:21, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:00, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a 'selfie' taken by Visna Fernando not the 'own work' of ChanakaW (image can be found on Fernando's personal facebook account). Without details of Fernando's permission for this image, taken by her to be used it is clearly a breach of copyright. ChanakaW has a previous history of uploading copyrighted images and claiming them as their own. 49.255.142.198 09:38, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:24, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Alessandro Coli isn't mentioned neither in en.wiki nor in es.wiki. In my opinion it is not suitable for stock photo. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 09:56, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:01, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, unifinished piece of guitar, by unknown musical group Pippobuono (talk) 10:15, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:01, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:01, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OTRS-permission from author and copyright holder Andy Tasher is needed.
Нужно получить OTRS-разрешение от автора и владетеля авторских прав Энди Ташера. Taivo (talk) 10:37, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:01, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Contrary to "own work"-claim this is just a scan of a printed death note. As the original is dated from 1962, both the included portrait image and the text are likely still in copyright. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:49, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:01, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality, blurry Hiddenhauser (talk) 11:24, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:02, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

small and blurry Hiddenhauser (talk) 11:25, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:02, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author stated to be "Anonimo, fue en un evento de los mtv 2016". Likely copyright violation. Storkk (talk) 11:53, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:02, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No metadata, widely available online at higher resolutions. Likely copyright violation. Photographer should confirm license via OTRS. Storkk (talk) 11:54, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:02, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No metadata, was posted to photobucket by a user Yayitslaurenx9 eight years before being uploaded here (per tineye). Photographer must confirm license by contacting OTRS.# Storkk (talk) 11:57, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:02, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Worse quality, unusable import from flickr. Berthold Werner (talk) 12:11, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:02, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising, out of scope 4ing (talk) 12:21, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:02, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not permission. Mykola Vasylechko 12:31, 31 October 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:02, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission. Mykola Vasylechko 12:33, 31 October 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:02, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission. Mykola Vasylechko 12:33, 31 October 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:02, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo of another author. No permission. Mykola Vasylechko 12:42, 31 October 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:02, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo of another author. No permission. Mykola Vasylechko 12:42, 31 October 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:02, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo of another author. No permission. Mykola Vasylechko 12:42, 31 October 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:02, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo of another author. No permission. Mykola Vasylechko 12:43, 31 October 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:02, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo of another author. No permission. Mykola Vasylechko 12:43, 31 October 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:02, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo of another author. No permission. Mykola Vasylechko 12:43, 31 October 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:02, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo of another author. No permission. Mykola Vasylechko 13:23, 31 October 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:02, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo of another author. No permission. Mykola Vasylechko 13:23, 31 October 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:02, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo of another author. No permission. Mykola Vasylechko 13:23, 31 October 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:02, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo of another author. No permission. Mykola Vasylechko 13:24, 31 October 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:02, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo of another author. No permission. Mykola Vasylechko 13:24, 31 October 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:02, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo of another author. No permission. Mykola Vasylechko 13:24, 31 October 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:02, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-educational personal photograph of a non-notable person. The image is out of project scope and has a questionable copyright (own work while the uploader is apparently depicted in the photograph). De728631 (talk) 13:26, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:02, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://pp.vk.me/c1363/g4865710/a_816e1465.jpg Mykola Vasylechko 13:32, 31 October 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:03, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo of another author. No permission. Mykola Vasylechko 13:33, 31 October 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:03, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo of another author. No permission. Mykola Vasylechko 13:34, 31 October 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:03, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo of another author. No permission. Mykola Vasylechko 13:34, 31 October 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:03, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo of another author. No permission. Mykola Vasylechko 13:35, 31 October 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:03, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo of another author. No permission. Mykola Vasylechko 13:35, 31 October 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:03, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo of another author. No permission. Mykola Vasylechko 13:36, 31 October 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:03, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size. No EXIF. The only file uploaded by uploader. Unlikely own work. -- Geagea (talk) 13:37, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:03, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo of another author. No permission. Mykola Vasylechko 13:38, 31 October 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:03, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo of another author. No permission. Mykola Vasylechko 13:38, 31 October 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:03, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo of another author. No permission. Mykola Vasylechko 13:46, 31 October 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:03, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo of another author. No permission. Mykola Vasylechko 13:46, 31 October 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:03, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Despite the "Own work" claim, this appears to be a TV screenshot Maproom (talk) 13:51, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:03, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:03, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://enid.org.eg/Uploads/Image/22-7-2013_23-22-12-small.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I said it own work because I can not understand policies of commons images uploading ,so delete it--Haytham Morsy (talk) 16:03, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:03, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:03, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Nicaragua for temorary displays. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:03, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tokyogirl79 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No Commons:Freedom of panorama in USA for sculptures.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete all listed images are unused --47.150.68.26 20:27, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Virginia Civil Rights Memorial, close up of Barbara Rose Johns.jpg
File:Virginia Civil Rights Memorial, Barbara Rose Johns side.jpg
File:Virginia Civil Rights Memorial, Thurgood Marshall side closeup.jpg
File:Virginia Civil Rights Memorial, close up of student.jpg
File:Virginia Civil Rights Memorial, Oliver Hill side.jpg
File:Virginia Civil Rights Memorial, Reverend L. Francis Griffin side.jpg
I also note that File:Virginia Civil Rights Memorial, close up of Barbara Rose Johns.jpg is also used in the article en:Barbara Rose Johns in the infobox, as we don't have a photograph or other image to use in its place. At the very least this last image should be left up, since it is being used in an infobox. One of the images of the statue of Hunter Holmes McGuire can easily be added to his article and the one of Harry F. Byrd to his article as well. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 04:18, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:04, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too out of focus and blurred to be of any practical use; other better images of the same subject exist Chris j wood (talk) 14:46, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:04, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:04, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Invalid OTRS-ticket. Contains a non commercial release Natuur12 (talk) 15:48, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Release is sadly indeed explicitly non-commercial. Basvb (talk) 19:15, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:05, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logo. Above com:TOO in the Netherlands. Natuur12 (talk) 15:55, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:05, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logo. Above com:TOO in the Netherlands. Natuur12 (talk) 15:56, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:05, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertisement that is out-of-scope; non-education with no foreseeable use. May also be a copyright violation with the logo and portrait. ~Kevin Payravi (talk) 16:06, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:05, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

خودم آنرا بارگزاری کرده و درخواست حذف آنرا دارم. Shivaatir (talk) 16:16, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I downloaded it myself and to request its removal --47.150.68.26 20:29, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete unused logo and possibly above COM:TOO --47.150.68.26 20:30, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:05, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtful that it is PD. No matter, it is out of scope. (tJosve05a (c) 16:31, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:05, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo has two problems. At first, one depicted person is non-notable and the other is unidentified, that way the photo is out of project scope. At second, it is small unused photo without metadata and the uploader's last remaining contribution, maybe copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 16:35, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:05, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

its not good Tren ligero gdl (talk) 16:51, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:05, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

grabbed from the web – published at several places in 2015: http://defence.pk/threads/germanys-new-mg5-delayed-by-teething-problems.397816/ / http://defensayarmas.blogspot.ch/2015/09/la-nueva-mg5-alemana-retrasada.html – probably an image previously used on the manifacturers website http://www.heckler-koch.com/de/produkte/militaer/maschinengewehre/mg5/mg5/produktbeschreibung.html Albinfo (talk) 17:01, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:05, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

small resolution, grabbed from the web – looks like one of this small images they use on http://www.heckler-koch.com/de/produkte/militaer/maschinengewehre/mg4/mg4mg4e/produktbeschreibung.html (but probably an older version) Albinfo (talk) 17:03, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:06, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

grabbed from the web – identical with images published in 2010 here: http://alle-waffen.ucoz.de/load/maschinengewehre/deutschland/mg4_mg4_e_mg4_ke/46-1-0-15 Albinfo (talk) 17:06, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:06, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

grabbed from the web – identical with image here: http://waffenprudlo.de/buchsen/433-sako-trg-42-black-repetierbuchse.html Albinfo (talk) 17:08, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:06, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

what happened to the top of the building to the left? manipulated image, no educational value, please delete Albinfo (talk) 17:11, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:06, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this is a copy of File:Panoramic_view_of_Elbasan_Arena.jpg, but he claims that it is his own work! bad quality duplicate, please delete Albinfo (talk) 17:12, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:06, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

grabbed from the web – image without watermark published some days earlier here: https://www.facebook.com/elbasan.arena/photos/a.326884100810171.1073741828.326865250812056/631526303679281/?type=3&theater and in 2014 here http://www.m.lapsi.al/sport/2014/09/22/fshf-%C3%A7mimet-e-biletave-kund%C3%ABr-danimark%C3%ABs-n%C3%AB-%E2%80%9Celbasan-arena%E2%80%9D#.WBd8bEOF7l4 Albinfo (talk) 17:16, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:06, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I wasn't able to determin the original source of this image, but I think we can assume that this low quality images without proper meta data in square format is also grabbed from the web like all the other contributions of this user. Maybe the source is Wikimapia [1], where it was uploaded 7 months ago (=March/April), but I assume that the Wikimapia image is also a copyright violation Albinfo (talk) 17:21, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:06, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:11, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete unused image --47.150.68.26 20:35, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Okay, I think that it should be deleted. --茗堂先生 (talk to me) 02:45, 01 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:06, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"FBMD" in metadata, Facebook size, unlikely own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:13, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:06, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"FBMD" in metadata, Facebook size, unlikely own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:13, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:06, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"FBMD" in metadata, Facebook size, unlikely own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:14, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:06, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"FBMD" in metadata, Facebook size, unlikely own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:14, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:06, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"FBMD" in metadata, Facebook size, unlikely own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:14, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:06, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by LandroverdefenderBE (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Two images of Facebook size which do not have any metadata or user generated information. Other uploads by this user had same sizes and "FBMD" in metadata.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:15, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:06, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Book cover with calligraphy and illustration is unlikely to be own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:18, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete choppy and crappy quality --47.150.68.26 20:35, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 KeepYou don't know this is 陈澔礼记集说(Chan Ho)?Richard923888 (talk) 10:00, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It might well be Chan Ho (although I didn't find an en:wiki article), but the point is, the book cover is not Richard923888's own work, right? Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:11, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
m:zh:礼记集说,this is the article.Richard923888 (talk) 22:15, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:07, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

NoFoP-Ukraine/uk / Autor Mykola Vasylechko 18:20, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

 Delete unused image --47.150.68.26 20:37, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:07, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Composite images require source & license for each image, doubtful user's own work on all these photos. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:21, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Este fue una imagen que hice mal, esta puede ser borrada. Ronny Medina (talk) 21:01, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:07, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Composite images require source & license for each image, doubtful user's own work on all these photos. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:21, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See also File:Mural de Baní.jpg --Jos1950 (talk) 23:41, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:08, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dubious claim of own work on this small black and white image of a performer. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:26, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:09, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work on this complex logo for a school. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:27, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:09, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

screenshots from wiki are not needed, they can be recreated by any user from the history section of pages. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:28, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete unused --47.150.68.26 20:37, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:09, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry, small and no indication of user's own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:28, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:09, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Parts of this are blurry, parts are not -- leading to the idea that the blurry parts were copied from somewhere else without attribution and pasted together with some words. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:29, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete unused --47.150.68.26 20:38, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:09, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work on this highly complex logo. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:29, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete unused --47.150.68.26 20:39, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:09, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused diagram with no source and no indication of its educational utility. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:32, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:09, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is the cover of a brochure, or conference poster. Lovely photo of Petra, Jordan, but unfortunately no source for all these images. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:32, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete unused --47.150.68.26 20:39, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:09, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:09, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work': rather thumbnail format, one-file-upload, missing EXIF data, hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions? Roland zh (talk) 18:46, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:09, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems that this file was copied from uk.wiki, where it is used as fair use, because is non-free: https://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A4%D0%B0%D0%B9%D0%BB:Soapstone-lady.jpg XXN, 18:47, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:09, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

imho rather for 'family album' use, mini-thumbnail, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions? Roland zh (talk) 18:49, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete unused --47.150.68.26 20:41, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:09, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

imho rather 'profiling' >...Personal life...single lives in Mumbai...< file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions? Roland zh (talk) 18:53, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:09, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unauthorized derivative use of a copyrighted photograph.

Author of original contacted OTRS with a request to remove (9534019); original as printed in the Nov 12, 1989 Observer attributes the photograph to Bill Robinson and the paining is unarguably a derivative work. Coren (talk) 18:58, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Clear COM:DW. Ankry (talk) 19:28, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:09, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image. Unused, out of project scope. GeorgHHtalk   19:03, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:10, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

imho rather 'profiling', see Jithin k c, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence imho rather out of scope Wikimedia Commons - other opinions, please? Roland zh (talk) 19:26, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:11, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I kind of question whether these are simple shapes. For me it looks like a pretty complicated design, a custom glyph and sophisticated arrangement. Masur (talk) 19:31, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:11, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

imho rather 'family album' content as file not in use at Wikimedia projects, doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 19:33, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete unused --47.150.68.26 20:42, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:11, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

as per File:Ajay Varkalaa.jpg imho rather 'family album' content as file not in use at Wikimedia projects, doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 19:34, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:11, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

as per File:Ajay Varkalaa.jpg imho rather 'family album' content as file not in use at Wikimedia projects, doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 19:34, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:11, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is routine request for small photo without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photo is so small? Can you upload a bigger version, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload a version with EXIF data? Taivo (talk) 19:48, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:11, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logo. Above com:TOO in the Netherlands Natuur12 (talk) 19:49, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:11, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logo. Above com:TOO in the Netherlands. Natuur12 (talk) 19:50, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:11, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope or a copyright violaiton. It is either a personal artwork or a complex logo. Natuur12 (talk) 19:52, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:11, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logo. Above com:TOO in the Netherlands Natuur12 (talk) 19:54, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:11, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Website logo unlikely to be uploader's "own work", also likely above the threshold of originality due to flourishes in the logo design and background czar 20:23, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete unused --47.150.68.26 20:42, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:11, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This looks like a copy from [https://www.pinterest.com/pin/414120128205706953/. Yann (talk) 20:35, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:11, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-promotion of someone without artistic features. In Wikipedia POF, away with it. Jos1950 (talk) 20:38, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:11, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Moumou82 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: composite image but various pictures are not sourced Wdwd (talk) 20:39, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:11, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--Afek91 (talk) 08:52, 7 November 2016 (UTC) Hi, this is my own picture, and the various pictures are mine too .[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

all rights reserved 47.150.68.26 20:40, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:11, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

all rights reserved 47.150.68.26 20:40, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:11, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: work by J. Plečnik (d. 1957); not free until 2028. Eleassar (t/p) 20:44, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:11, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: architecture by J. Plečnik (d, 1957); not free until 2028. Eleassar (t/p) 20:51, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:11, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: architecture by J. Plečnik (d. 1957); not free until 2028. Eleassar (t/p) 20:52, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:11, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by KL Das Films (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Files uploaded only for promotional purposes. File names and descriptions not usable because only company name and advertising text. All files unused.

GeorgHHtalk   20:54, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:12, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is freedom of panorama in USA for architecture, but not for sculptures and text. The text is enough long for literary copyright. The sculpture is modern. Taivo (talk) 20:58, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:12, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Magazine cover, permission is needed. GeorgHHtalk   21:03, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:12, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, promotional watermark with web address. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 21:08, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:12, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: monument to an architect who died in 1957; 70 + 1 years have not passed yet since the creator's death. Eleassar (t/p) 21:07, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:12, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: architecture by J. Plečnik (d. 1957); not free until 2028. Eleassar (t/p) 21:09, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:12, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sculptor Vera Yatsevich (still living) must send OTRS-permission.
Скульптор Вера Яцевич должна дать OTRS-разрешение. Taivo (talk) 21:13, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:12, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Can a administrator take away this deletion requests asap because it is up here for no reaon. Thanks / Danielåhskarlsson (talk) 08:02, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Private image collection. Magnolia677 (talk) 21:14, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: notable person. --lNeverCry 10:59, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Can a administrator take away this deletion requests asap because it is up here for no reaon. Thanks / Danielåhskarlsson (talk) 08:02, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Private image collection. Magnolia677 (talk) 21:16, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:12, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personnal photo no educational Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 21:23, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:12, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: 1952 monument; 70 + 1 years have not passed yet since the author's death. Eleassar (t/p) 21:27, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is paradoxal! A memorial purpose is for people to know and remember, not to be hidden. This Slovenian rule is in sharp contrast to the respect for young creators of sculptures in Austria or Germany. By the way, I had asked to be explained the purpose of it (victims of what?). I am not sure that Yugoslavia would have asked to delete this image. NB: I have seen a special rule for Slovenian people.

Jacquesverlaeken (talk) 21:47, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:13, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: 1952 monument; 70 + 1 years have not passed yet since the author's death. Eleassar (t/p) 21:27, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:13, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Could not find an indication that the license is indeed CC BY 3.0 as stated. Daniel Mietchen (talk) 21:42, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:13, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logo. Above com:TOO in the Netherlands Natuur12 (talk) 22:34, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:13, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation : http://interligne.avoslivres.ca/auteurs/ Bastenbas (talk) 23:10, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:13, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logo. Above com:TOO in the Netherlands. Natuur12 (talk) 23:13, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:13, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No information Jcb (talk) 23:15, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:13, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. Insufficient authorship information to determine copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 23:16, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:13, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. In addition, no source. Taivo (talk) 07:51, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:13, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I very much doubt the uploader is actually the copyright holder of this image. William S. Saturn (talk) 05:26, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

{{OTRS pending|year=2016|month=October|day=27}}

I am the copyright holder and I believe I have submitted this file with the proper copyright release. I have emailed you directly. I am new to contributing to wikimedia but surprised that your unnamed doubts is enough to have my file deleted. Please keep this file. --Jovialwaffle (talk) 18:14, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination withdrawn - I trust OTRS to sort this out.--William S. Saturn (talk) 18:35, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn. --JuTa 22:08, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is clearly a posed professional photo, available at several places on the Internet (use Google Images search by image), likely a press photo released by the subject. Many of those places are dated before 26 October 2016, as the uploader says the date of this photo is. There is a much higher resolution version of this very picture at http://cdn.weeklystandard.biz/cache/r960-c6a136e102873c25b00f869294117601.jpg I have read the other nomination of this photo for deletion, and realize the uploader has an email in to OTRS, but these two factors have me very skeptical. If Jovialwaffle really is an employee of Ms. Finn or the McMullin campaign, and did take this photo, or even only marked "Own work" in error, and has the right to release the photo, they would know the date it was taken - not October 26 - and would they really upload a low resolution version when a higher resolution version was available to them? These two factors imply that Jovialwaffle did not know the date the photo was taken, and did not have access to the higher resolution version. Photo subject is a candidate for Vice President of the United States, the election for which is in under two weeks, so time is an issue. GRuban (talk) 19:25, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete unused --47.150.68.26 20:42, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have already proven myself and the validitiy of my ownership to other members of the wikimedia editorail staff. Is there a reason why you have the right to dismiss their work and present your own flawed and circumstantial argument? Do you not trust the other people who have investigated this less than 4 days ago? That same baseless argument can be made questioning your right to even reflag this for deletion? How do we know who you are. This is way out of line and undermines the entire review process? How many other people can come along and decide this isn't good enough for them? Why do you not respect the work of your fellow wikimedia staff? How can any item ever be considered legit? I will raise this issue with the people I have already fully satisfied. Is there a reason why I should need to go through this again for you? I hope that after this is quickly resolved in my favor that you appologize to the other wikimedia staff members with the same vigor and resolve to make things right.

--98.204.49.110 00:52, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You - assuming you're User:Jovialwaffle; signing in helps clarify this - actually haven't proven the validity of your ownership; you've sent mail, but it hasn't convinced OTRS enough for them to mark the file as such. Not to say they won't, sometimes they take their time. I would be only too happy if you convinced OTRS that you did own the file so you could release it, it's a fine picture. That is what answers your question, by the way if the OTRS team stamps the file, then it would be "considered legit". Meanwhile, though, could you explain the two points I brought up? --GRuban (talk) 02:57, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: The OTRS-ticket is from another person than the person credited here for example. I will be working on the ticket but since this photograph can go viral soon I deleted it untill I am done. --Natuur12 (talk) 12:28, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: the bridge in the background, work by the architect J. Plečnik (d. 1957), is an essential element of the image. It will enter the public domain only in 2028. Eleassar (t/p) 21:11, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

We had similar cases where the pictures were kept as the copyrighted element did not cover a substantial part (more than 1/3) of image. I think that this applies here too since the bridge is in the background. --Miha (talk) 09:47, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I believe this is a similar DM case as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Slovenia (11663527715).jpg; Maybe @Clindberg: can comment? --Sporti (talk) 13:16, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If a photograph is of a larger scene, and is not focusing on the work in question, I think the photos are OK. This is similar to a photo of the Louvre courtyard where the (copyrighted) pyramid is prominent in the photo -- that is still OK. It is only photos focusing on the pyramid itself which become an issue.  Keep Carl Lindberg (talk) 13:22, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per Carl. --Natuur12 (talk) 12:22, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not educationally useful: it's a picture from alternative history forum [2]. Not a real flags.

Эти картинки с форума альтернативной истории, изображены выдуманные знамена (у них в 1890 году правил император Владимир I). Таких знамен не существовало в реальности, но их уже вставляют в статьи о полках как настоящие.

Also false from this forum:

File:Znameny Leyb-gvardii Semonovskiy polka 1890.jpg
File:Znamya leyb-gvardii Preobrazhenskogo polka 1890.jpg
File:Znamya Leyb-gvardii Izmailovsky polka 1890.jpg
File:Znamya Leyb-gvardii sapernogo batal'ona 1890.jpg
File:Флаг 1-й гвардейской дивизии.jpg
File:Флаг Лейб-гвардии Егерского полка.jpg
File:Флаг Лейб-гвардии Измайловского полка.jpg
File:Флаг Лейб-гвардии Семеновского полка.jpg
File:Флаг Лейб-гвардии Преображенского полка.jpg
File:Флаг 1-й гвардейской кавалерийской дивизии.jpg
File:Флаг 2-й гвардейской кавалерийской дивизии.jpg
File:Флаг Гвардейской стрелковой бригады.jpg
File:Shtandart Bashkirskogo konnogo polka.jpg
File:Shtandart Dagestanskogo konnogo polka.jpg
File:Shtandart Kalmykskogo konnogo polka.jpg
File:Shtandart Kavkazskogo Konno-Gorskogo polka.jpg
File:Shtandart Kirgizskogo konnogo polka.jpg
File:Shtandart Krymskogo konnogo polka.jpg
File:Shtandart Zakavkazskogo Konno-Musul'manskogo polka.jpg
File:Znameni Amurskogo kazach'yego voyska 1891 (oborotnaya).jpg
File:Znameni Semirechenskogo kazach'yego voyska (litsevaya).jpg
File:Znameni Semirechenskogo kazach'yego voyska (oborotnaya).jpg
File:Znameni Terskogo kazach'yego voyska (oborotnaya).jpg
and more more files by User:Evostoryarchive. To be continued... Borodun (talk) 23:10, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Translation: These files were downloaded from a webforum of alt history. Whereas the history is alternative (and thus the files constitute original research and are out of scope) some of them are used in the articles as if the events were real.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:33, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: That also means there is significant doubt regarding the copyright status of the works. --Natuur12 (talk) 12:22, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This was at a charity dinner, not an a government event...not sure hwo it was made by a goverment employee as part of their official work. (tJosve05a (c) 07:41, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This was a single governmental pool feed (Since the event is controlled by the Secret Service at the Waldorf-Astoria Ballroom in NYC) that was fed identically to all receivers for free via satellite. This is the one I have located without a watermark imposed by a network.Jasonanaggie (talk) 07:46, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: There are two different copyrights here. First, there is no evidence that the feed was produced by the Federal government. Most pool feeds are produced by one of the networks and distributed to all -- certainly the Secret Service is not in the video producation business. Therefore the question of whether the recording is PD or not is unproven. However, that is moot. Clinton is not a Federal employee and therefore she (or possibly, but not likely, her speechwriter) holds the copyright to the speech and this recording infringes on it. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:09, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Masur as no source (No source since)

The source is incorrect, but the image appears PD. (talk) 08:09, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment Just wanted to remind, that even if an image is in PD, still the original author keeps his author's rights and should be properly attributed (or if unknown, a valid source proving it should be given). And as we don't have a template for "obviously false source, author and dubious license provided" I used the "no source" one. And only having a proper source/author we can check whether such image is freely licensed or in PD proper. Otherwise it's just guessing and assuming, kind of against the precautionary principle.Masur (talk) 09:25, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: 1945 Russian image. No proof of publication or author's death. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:33, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Masur as no source (No source since) The source is incorrect, but the image appears PD. (talk) 08:09, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment Just wanted to remind, that even if an image is in PD, still the original author keeps his author's rights and should be properly attributed (or if unknown, a valid source proving it should be given). And as we don't have a template for "obviously false source, author and dubious license provided" I used the "no source" one. And only having a proper source/author we can check whether such image is freely licensed or in PD proper. Otherwise it's just guessing and assuming, kind of against the precautionary principle. Masur (talk) 08:24, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: 1945 Russian image. No proof of publication or author's death. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:41, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Masur as no source (No source since) The source is incorrect, but the image appears PD. (talk) 08:10, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment Just wanted to remind, that even if an image is in PD, still the original author keeps his author's rights and should be properly attributed (or if unknown, a valid source proving it should be given). And as we don't have a template for "obviously false source, author and dubious license provided" I used the "no source" one. And only having a proper source/author we can check whether such image is freely licensed or in PD proper. Otherwise it's just guessing and assuming, kind of against the precautionary principle. Masur (talk) 08:24, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: 1945 Russian image. No proof of publication or author's death. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:42, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Masur as no source (No source since)

The source is incorrect, but the image appears PD. (talk) 08:10, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment Just wanted to remind, that even if an image is in PD, still the original author keeps his author's rights and should be properly attributed (or if unknown, a valid source proving it should be given). And as we don't have a template for "obviously false source, author and dubious license provided" I used the "no source" one. And only having a proper source/author we can check whether such image is freely licensed or in PD proper. Otherwise it's just guessing and assuming, kind of against the precautionary principle.Masur (talk) 09:25, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: 1945 Russian image. No proof of publication or author's death. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:42, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Masur as no source (No source since)

The source is incorrect, but the image appears PD. (talk) 08:11, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment Just wanted to remind, that even if an image is in PD, still the original author keeps his author's rights and should be properly attributed (or if unknown, a valid source proving it should be given). And as we don't have a template for "obviously false source, author and dubious license provided" I used the "no source" one. And only having a proper source/author we can check whether such image is freely licensed or in PD proper. Otherwise it's just guessing and assuming, kind of against the precautionary principle.Masur (talk) 09:25, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    I have changed the license to PD-old-80 and the author and source fields to unknown. This appears to have been scanned from a book, which could probably be identified, however this would not have created a new publication right (should that exist in the country of publication). Note that Ivanushka-Durachok was probably the name of the collector, not the original photographer. -- (talk) 12:49, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Unknown author and 1927-8 image -- so we can't assume that he has been dead for 70 years. May have been published more than 70 years ago and therefore might be PD, but we don't know that either. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:47, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative works from mascot. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This was my photo that I took at the 2016 Heritage Classic. I do not see a problem with this picture as there are other photos on mascots on Wikipedia including a whole page dedicated to NHL mascots (see article on English Wikipedia "List of NHL Mascots"). Please explain any rationale for needing to delete my picture. Classenc


Deleted: See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:National Hockey League team mascots, thank you for bringing it up. Mascots are copyrighted. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:52, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This appears to be a picture or scan of an artwork. The page uploader claims it is public domain, but maybe he is referring to his scan, and he is not the creator of the work itself. More information is needed about ownership of the artwork. Yoninah (talk) 22:17, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Taway affirme être l'auteur de ce dessin et l'a placé dans le domaine public. Je ne vois pas ce qu'il vous faut de plus. Bloody-libu (talk) 09:32, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: THis would be out of scope personal art, but it is in use. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:07, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful - looks like a crop from a larger original lNeverCry 23:52, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
With due respect INeverCry, this photo was taken she was at a BBSR restaurant visit, by me. This has been mentioned in the image details. And this photo has not been cropped, just taken not that well by me. I am not a professional photographer. This photo is not in a professional photograph format, just taken with an ordinary camera at an ordinary situation (restaurant visit). So can you take off the deletion request. And this image is not in high resolution so the format size is I think medium not high resolution. It for sure is not small.... Sadaryohan (talk) 14:27, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sadaryohan, please click on 16 June 2016 of my above comment. - NitinMlk (talk) 19:56, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
NitinMlk thanks for notifying. I dont know how they have copied it, but if you look at the captioning of the picture at that site, the intent of the publisher was for mere titillation and entertainment. I have taken that photograph over a year ago (personally of her at a restaurant visit) and I think he is most likely to have copied that picture from my post on FB and insta around 8 months ago as I had tagged the actress name with that link. Sadaryohan (talk) 01:49, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Sadaryohan, can you provide links (URLs) of those 8-month-old Facebook/Instagram posts here? - NitinMlk (talk) 17:00, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
NitinMlk, this is the link from the actor page, https://www.facebook.com/BarsaOfficial/photos/a.348237261930615.84613.347941848626823/1014530971967904/?type=3&theater, this should also show that she got tagged some day with my photo taken of her. Regarding my post, I am sorry, but I don't want to disclose my profile, name for privacy reasons. Kindly, I am not summoned, hence I am not going to share my personal info.... Thank you.... I hope you understand Sadaryohan (talk) 18:00, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Sadaryohan: This post won't help, as it neither appeared earlier than the one shown by me nor it's your account. May be the closing admin will tell you a way to prove your authority over the pic. - NitinMlk (talk) 18:29, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@NitinMlk: thanks for info, but can you ensure that the photo is not deleted until this issue is properly resolved. And I did take the photograph, and I do leave it to the admin to decide.... Sadaryohan (talk) 20:12, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Sorry,, but this does not ring true. 192kb is a very small full frame image for any digital camera -- modern cameras take several magapix or more. I think the only solution is for you to send to OTRS the details requested above that you refused to give here in public. (The refusal is entirely reasonable, but the information must be shared in private). .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:59, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Hedwig in Washington as no source (No source since)

This has a source, own work, so a deletion would have to be on other grounds. (talk) 08:05, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: small size, no EXIF, own work seems improbable. --Jcb (talk) 23:21, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Removed broken DR. Here we go again: Previously tagged for deletion by Howard61313.I mistakenly uploaded this file. The Taiwanese Central Daily News may have its copyright. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:32, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment It seems to me that the PRC copyright should be used, since the Central Daily News is a PRC newspaper and they probably used their staff photographers. On the other hand it doesn't matter (IMHO), because in both PRC and ROC the copyright for anonymous works expires 50 years after first publication. Just a question of picking the correct template. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:37, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Hedwig in Washington: According to "en:Central Daily News", it is a ROC media stationing in Taipei, Taiwan, and the file has a Watermark of Taiwanese National Repository of Cultural Heritage (NRCH, Ministry of Culture), which says "Reproduce and commercial use of all NRCH contents displayed through any media way is prohibited... which can only be viewed on this website" (
「國家文化資料庫」內以任何媒體呈現之所有內容-- 不可轉載、不可作為商業用途,僅限於本網站瀏覽
) [3]. --Howard61313 (talk) 03:11, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hmmm..., I guess we can assume ROC copyright only. Should be PD after 50 years. The newspaper can restrict the use of material, but it doesn't change any active (c)-law. Keeper in my book. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:28, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I'm wondering how to deal with the watermark, if there's anything should be done to it. --Howard61313 (talk) 04:39, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
You can ask at Com:GL/P. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:41, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Hedwig. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:43, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Masur as no source (No source since)

The source is incorrect, but the image appears PD. (talk) 08:11, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment Just wanted to remind, that even if an image is in PD, still the original author keeps his author's rights and should be properly attributed (or if unknown, a valid source proving it should be given). And as we don't have a template for "obviously false source, author and dubious license provided" I used the "no source" one. And only having a proper source/author we can check whether such image is freely licensed or in PD proper. Otherwise it's just guessing and assuming, kind of against the precautionary principle.Masur (talk) 09:25, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The PRP relies on an interpretation of 'significant doubt'. I think this portrait from 1910 can have very little doubt, unless someone can name the photographer. -- (talk) 09:30, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment If the author is unknown, we must assume he is not anonymous. Furthermore without more infos on the first publication, the only PD tag possible is {{PD-old-70}}. We are in 2016, that's mean we must assume the author is died in 1945 (2016-71). Even if, once again, we assume the photo is indeed from 1910, that is possible though I don't see any evidences for that, the photographer could very well died after 1945. For first evidence of that, the people depicted, Чернецкий Семён Александрович, is himself died in 1950, I don't see why the photographer should have died before. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:52, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and my comment above. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:53, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Taiwania Justo as duplicate (Dup) of File:台灣環保署長魏國彥.jpg Reventtalk 15:57, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:17, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Taiwania Justo as duplicate (Dup) of File:台灣總統馬英九出席回顧兩岸交流的活動 01.jpg Reventtalk 15:59, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:19, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ariadacapo as duplicate (dup) of File:Hydraulic clearance.png Reventtalk 16:06, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: used. Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:20, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This should redirect to File:Circle-icons-trophy (dark).svg Vicipaedianus X 19:02, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: deleted and redirected. --lNeverCry 01:16, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]