Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/10/14

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive October 14th, 2016
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jcb as no source (No source since). Can't find the direct source, but authors died 19th century, thus clearly PD-old Basvb (talk) 09:59, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: resolved. --Jcb (talk) 10:18, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Erreur lors de la mise en ligne de cette photo car l'autorisation n'est pas certaine donc il serait souhaitable de retirer cette photo. Musica7m (talk) 11:26, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 13:23, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jcb as no source (No source since). Found sourcing, might need a higher res re-upload Basvb (talk) 10:31, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Jameslwoodward: , is the en:United States Intelligence Community part of the federal government? It's not entirely clear to me from the article. Jcb (talk) 10:40, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep The United States Intelligence Community is an official grouping of the US federal intelligence organizations, both civilian and military. This actually originated in the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. He is the senior US intelligence official. Either way, this is {{PD-USGov}}. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:56, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: resolved. --Jcb (talk) 13:02, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

error done by me: accidental duplicate of File:2013-08-10 07-18-55 Ballonfahrt über Köln EH 0626.jpg Hasenläufer (talk) 00:56, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 17:26, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright image Mark Marathon (talk) 04:48, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: please use {{Copyvio}} next time. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 17:27, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Vandalism or just a test edit Nymf (talk) 06:43, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Achim (talk) 17:15, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

licence issue Fleets (talk) 17:59, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:11, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Armani56 (talk) 17:53, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:53, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We need to know where at http://www.kunkelfineart.de this picture can be located to know this image's copyright status. Poké95 10:38, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Exact source now provided. Many thanks to axel who added it. Withdrawing this DR now. Poké95 09:46, 16 October 2016 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We need to know where at http://www.kunkelfineart.de this picture can be located to know this image's copyright status. Poké95 10:38, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Exact source now provided. Many thanks to axel who added it. Withdrawing this DR now. Poké95 09:48, 16 October 2016 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We need to know where at http://www.kunkelfineart.de this picture can be located to know this image's copyright status. Poké95 10:39, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Exact source now provided. Many thanks to axel who added it. Withdrawing this DR now. Poké95 09:44, 16 October 2016 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lots found with basic web search, some larger than this one. Dubious uploader owns this as claimed Geraldo Perez (talk) 14:06, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:25, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The picture appears in Moti Yogev's site. He's an Israeli parliament member and we've been in contact with his spokesperson in the past regarding obtaining a formal OTRS release note for pictures such as this one. As we've never received the needed note, this picture cannot stay in the Commons. Ldorfman (talk) 22:50, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have checked in archive.org: The file wasn't there in 29.2.2016. But it was there in 2.4.2016. The file uploaded to Moty Yogev's site between 29.2.2016 to 2.4.2016. The file uploaded to Commons in 27.3.2016. Look like it was taken from commons to Moty Yogev's site. Template {{Published}} is better chioce to this photo. -- Geagea (talk) 23:26, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I really doubt it. The uploader of this file uploaded only files related to Moti Yogev - The same files that appears in Yogev's site. He is his spokesperson and should obtain the needed approval for the release. He wasn't the photographer. Ldorfman (talk) 23:03, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Moved to Commons:Deletion requests/File:מפקד אוגדת איו"ש משה יעלון עם המח"ט מוטי יוגב.jpg. -- Geagea (talk) 09:01, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The picture appears in Moti Yogev's site ([1]). He's an Israeli parliament member and we've been in contact with his spokesperson in the past regarding obtaining a formal OTRS release note for pictures such as this one. As we've never received the needed note, this picture cannot stay in the Commons. Ldorfman (talk) 23:18, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have checked in archive.org: The file wasn't there in 29.2.2016. But it was there in 2.4.2016. The file uploaded to Moty Yogev's site between 29.2.2016 to 2.4.2016. The file uploaded to Commons in 27.3.2016. Look like it was taken from commons to Moty Yogev's site. Template {{Published}} is better chioce to this photo.-- Geagea (talk) 23:30, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I really doubt it. The uploader of this file uploaded only files related to Moti Yogev - The same files that appears in Yogev's site. He is his spokesperson and should obtain the needed approval for the release. He wasn't the photographer. Ldorfman (talk) 23:04, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Moved to Commons:Deletion requests/File:מפקד אוגדת איו"ש משה יעלון עם המח"ט מוטי יוגב.jpg. -- Geagea (talk) 09:00, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per official policy:"Commons:Screenshots are Commons:Derivative works and as such subject to the copyright of the displayed content"
 : Please see also Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle Tokorokoko (talk) 05:00, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --lNeverCry 22:01, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The metadata states "Author: Michael Morgan, Copyright holder: Copyright 2012 Michael Morgan." There is no indication that the user is "Michael Morgan". Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 01:07, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:37, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Poeta Juan Colón

[edit]

The user uploaded several pictures of himself. None are in use. There is a self-promotion aspect about them; he keeps linking his website. Some are nice pictures, but the problem is they all say in the metadata "Author: Pavel Colon, Copyright holder: Pavel Colon." They are authored and copyrighted by someone with the same last name, with no evidence of permission. The last one is apparently not copyrighted but is a picture of the uploader and some other people, so not "own work" either. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 01:41, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:37, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non notable individual. Outside project scope. Mark Marathon (talk) 03:29, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:39, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non notable individual. Outside project scope. Mark Marathon (talk) 03:29, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:39, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non notable individual. Outside project scope. Mark Marathon (talk) 03:29, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:39, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non notable individual. Outside project scope. Mark Marathon (talk) 03:29, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:39, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non notable individual. Outside project scope. Mark Marathon (talk) 03:29, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:39, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non notable individual. Outside project scope. Mark Marathon (talk) 03:29, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:39, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non notable individual. Outside project scope. Mark Marathon (talk) 03:30, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:39, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non notable individual. Outside project scope. Mark Marathon (talk) 03:30, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:39, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non notable individual. Outside project scope. Mark Marathon (talk) 03:30, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:39, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non notable individual. Outside project scope. Mark Marathon (talk) 03:30, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:39, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non notable individual. Outside project scope. Mark Marathon (talk) 03:30, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:39, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non notable individual. Outside project scope. Mark Marathon (talk) 03:30, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:39, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Tony Cantero Suarez

[edit]

A variety of copyright/licensing problems and other issues. The first two are self-promotion of the user's works; if they are book covers they might be copyrighted by a publishing entity, and the second one he admits was created by an artist, not by himself. The third and fourth are photos of himself, he lists the author, and the metadata states they are copyrighted by that author. The following 7 images are personal/family photos and vacation photos which can't be "own work". Number 12 is from a publication, which would probably be copyrighted. In the following four images he clearly states the authors of the images but then claims "own work". The very last one is a low-quality selfie; good license but almost 3 years old, never used, not worth keeping. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 04:38, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:41, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Homework; out of scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:30, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:26, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:31, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:25, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Death certificate for non-notable individual. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:33, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Death Certificate is for Notable Individual

[edit]

Death certificate has to do with the Donald Gary Young controversy where it is claimed "the cause of death was attributed to oxygen deprivation" but according to her death certificate, the cause of death was "cardiopulmonary arrest." Lithuanianlady (talk) (contribs) 09:47, 14 October 2016 (MST)


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:25, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

as the whole lot, it does not fit com:EDUSE, and cf com:IDENT, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tim leonard the sissy whore 46.jpg Pippobuono (talk) 07:23, 14 October 2016 (UTC) add those files to the list :[reply]

In those pics, COM:IDENT... Pippobuono (talk) 07:35, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:27, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 08:24, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:28, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mhmrodrigues (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Series of stamps issued in 1997 in Monaco (see [2]). Not PD as stated by the uploader.

Ruthven (msg) 08:39, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:28, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mhmrodrigues (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyright violations: non-free photographs of 3D works of art (COM:When to use the PD-Art tag#This does not apply to photographs of 3D works of art) and coins (COM:COIN). Among the sources three have Creative Commons licenses, but two of them are under CC-BY-NC and the third one - under CC-BY-ND.

Sealle (talk) 17:54, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


those from "MERZ, Walther, "Die Lenzburg", 1904" seem to be ok for me (scans of an early 20th's century book). Some of the Polish seals seem also to be old engravings. An individual checkup is necessary. Kathisma (talk) 15:57, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:45, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Krupalkukadiya (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal images, possible copyvio & non-wlm submission.

Kiranravikumar (talk) 09:10, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:29, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jcb as no source (No source since). Looks like the user just forgot to add himself as author/source own. Exif-data is present and the camera used is the same as in other uploads from the user back in 2008 (e.g. File:EstacionJerezObras.jpg). @El Pantera: could you confirm that this is your own work? Allowing us to keep this nice free image. Basvb (talk) 09:13, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I am the author. I have added missing information. Thank you for the warning. --El Pantera (talk) 08:42, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: resolved. --Jcb (talk) 10:29, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal image Naveenpf (talk) 02:27, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:02, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

selfie image Naveenpf (talk) 02:27, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:02, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

selfie image Naveenpf (talk) 02:28, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:02, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:33, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:08, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional, see also Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:34, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:08, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: very blurry. In addition, maybe depicted object is protected with copyright. Taivo (talk) 08:03, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:03, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Ayushi Khivesara

[edit]

Book covers and a book excerpt, these are copyrighted unless there is evidence otherwise. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 11:13, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:03, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pure wikipedia/text file, unused, out of project scope. GeorgHHtalk   13:00, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:08, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Leandrodvaz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images of copyrighted material like book covers, CD's, posters. All tagged as self- created, but permission is needed. All unused.

GeorgHHtalk   13:13, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:03, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXISTE UNA NUEVA VERSION DEL ARCHIVO CON COLORES MAS VISTOSOS Freddycanaviri777 (talk) 13:29, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

EXISTE UNA NUEVA VERSION DEL ARCHIVO CON COLORES MAS VISTOSOS Freddycanaviri777 (talk) 13:41, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:04, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXISTE UNA NUEVA VERSION DEL ARCHIVO CON COLORES MAS VISTOSOS Freddycanaviri777 (talk) 13:30, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

EXISTE UNA NUEVA VERSION DEL ARCHIVO CON COLORES MAS VISTOSOS Freddycanaviri777 (talk) 13:41, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:04, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXISTE UNA NUEVA VERSION DEL ARCHIVO CON COLORES MAS VISTOSOS Freddycanaviri777 (talk) 13:30, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

EXISTE UNA NUEVA VERSION DEL ARCHIVO CON COLORES MAS VISTOSOS Freddycanaviri777 (talk) 13:42, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:04, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXISTE UNA NUEVA VERSION DEL ARCHIVO CON COLORES MAS VISTOSOS Freddycanaviri777 (talk) 13:31, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

EXISTE UNA NUEVA VERSION DEL ARCHIVO CON COLORES MAS VISTOSOS Freddycanaviri777 (talk) 13:42, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:04, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXISTE UNA NUEVA VERSION DEL ARCHIVO CON COLORES MAS VISTOSOS Freddycanaviri777 (talk) 13:31, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

EXISTE UNA NUEVA VERSION DEL ARCHIVO CON COLORES MAS VISTOSOS Freddycanaviri777 (talk) 13:43, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:04, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXISTE UNA NUEVA VERSION DEL ARCHIVO CON COLORES MAS VISTOSOS Freddycanaviri777 (talk) 13:32, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

EXISTE UNA NUEVA VERSION DEL ARCHIVO CON COLORES MAS VISTOSOS Freddycanaviri777 (talk) 13:43, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:04, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXISTE UNA NUEVA VERSION DEL ARCHIVO CON COLORES MAS VISTOSOS Freddycanaviri777 (talk) 13:32, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

EXISTE UNA NUEVA VERSION DEL ARCHIVO CON COLORES MAS VISTOSOS Freddycanaviri777 (talk) 13:43, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:04, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fishseafrom (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:31, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vvirginie (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:05, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart Projet7ebe (talk) 20:31, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:09, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, uncategorized PDF file of no apparent educational utility Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:54, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:09, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused house plan, no apparent own work, also unattributed photo. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:58, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:12, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused *pdf document, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:08, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:12, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused slide show full of derivative images. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:21, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:14, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ijamarikina (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of user's own work on any of these images: collages, personal photo, academy seal, etc.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:22, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:15, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused diagram of no apparent educational utility Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:22, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:14, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Itaimich (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused uploads apparently publicizing their company.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:23, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:15, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused picture of some guy eating a microphone. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:23, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:15, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Sturm (talk) 03:07, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:20, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright image Mark Marathon (talk) 03:32, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:20, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright image Mark Marathon (talk) 03:50, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:20, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright image Mark Marathon (talk) 04:11, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:20, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Wemagt

[edit]

Two poor-quality personal snapshots, not in use. It says he is a "writer" but he has no articles or drafts. The third is apparently his signature; maybe it is keepable, I put it in Category:Walter (given name) if anyone's interested in it. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 05:59, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:20, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright image Mark Marathon (talk) 06:08, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:20, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non notable individual. Outside project scope Mark Marathon (talk) 06:20, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:22, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non notable individual. Outside project scope Mark Marathon (talk) 06:21, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. --Jcb (talk) 11:22, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non notable individual. Outside project scope Mark Marathon (talk) 06:21, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:22, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non notable individual. Outside project scope Mark Marathon (talk) 06:21, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:22, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non notable individual. Outside project scope Mark Marathon (talk) 06:21, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:22, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non notable individual. Outside project scope Mark Marathon (talk) 06:21, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:22, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non notable individual. Outside project scope Mark Marathon (talk) 06:21, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:22, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non notable individual. Outside project scope Mark Marathon (talk) 06:21, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:22, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wikibulilit (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No Commons:Freedom of panorama in UK for 2D artworks.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Wikibulilit (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:06, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Susanowo~commonswiki (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of user's own work on these two photos and two matching drawings.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:28, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:16, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo of no apparent educational utility. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:29, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:16, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image, no categories, apparently not educational. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:30, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:16, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused diagram, same uploader added a larger one. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:31, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Also affected File:OilParticle Interaction.pdf. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:33, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:16, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

loaded in error - duplicate Victuallers (talk) 22:30, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:18, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not licensed Mhmrodrigues (talk) 23:56, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:17, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not licensed Mhmrodrigues (talk) 23:56, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:17, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not licensed Mhmrodrigues (talk) 23:56, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:17, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:EDUSE jdx Re: 09:23, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:08, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Imvaio123

[edit]

The user uploaded several pictures, stated "own work" for each, but lists different names for the authors of the photos; it is impossible to tell which the user actually authored, if any. The third one at least is a copyright violation according to the metadata. The others can be assumed to be. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 10:03, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:08, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm going to go ahead and guess that this photo of Sun Yaoting is not the uploaders "own work" Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 11:10, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:08, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No responde a la realidad. La mitad inferior del mapa se ha rellenado de forma arbitraria extendiendo hacia el sur los datos de los dialectos hablados al norte (el dialecto de la Burunda se traslada hasta la misma orilla del Ebro). Sin embargo, no hay seguridad de que en la mitad inferior del mapa se hablara eusquera; y si se hablaba, no se sabe en qué dialecto. Sí corresponde a la realidad este otro: Pompilos (talk) 16:15, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. P 1 9 9   13:52, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The lower half part of the map has been invented, because there are not any avidences of basque dialects that have been spoken in that area, if there were anytime. So, it is a non scientific map and must be removed. Pompilos (talk) 13:44, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - usage was removed from article by nominator, without any other user involved at the talk page. --Jcb (talk) 12:12, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artwork by living artist hy:Հասմիկ_Ավետիսյան, permission needed.

Also for

GeorgHHtalk   13:57, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:12, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artwork by living artist hy:Հռիփսիմե_Մարգարյան, permission needed.

Also for:

GeorgHHtalk   14:05, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:13, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Grantalonez (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:13, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Persones111 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private images of non-notable persons. Unused, out of project scope.

GeorgHHtalk   14:28, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:23, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Under Source it says "Own work" but the photo originates from the webpage https://www.kadriorg.ee/et/presidendi-foto.html. Text on that page says you must ask for permission to use the photo. Thus the uploader should upload the permission in OTRS system. Otherwise this is unlicensed use. Cumbril (talk) 14:29, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is the official image of the President of Estonia. I'm pretty sure it will not be published under CC BY-SA 4.0 and the author of is Rene Riisalu. Please get it deleted. Kruusamägi (talk) 15:48, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:23, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Soyunsputnik (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://blog.cuatrogatos.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Martha-Riva-Palacio-Obon-short.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:24, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Roger4845 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No educational content. Unused, out of project scope.

GeorgHHtalk   18:19, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:25, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Profetillo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Advertisement (File:IONICO EN JPG.jpg, File:TABLA DE COLORES DE DEXINTOCICACION.jpg) and text-only images (File:Tillo TD1.JPG to File:Tillo TD7.JPG) used only on user page es:Usuario:Profetillo. No other contributions by this user.

GeorgHHtalk   18:52, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:26, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kuldeepmayank (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image gallery. Unused, out of project scope.

GeorgHHtalk   19:08, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:26, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Some kind of hoax or test upload of non-educational drawing. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:19, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:27, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:EDUSE jdx Re: 19:23, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:27, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Marcio191 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Modern artworks without educational utility or artist's permissions.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:57, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:28, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Generatliff1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:ADVERTising logos from a macaroni company : http://www.obmacaroni.com/

Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:13, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:28, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Threeelectronebond (talk · contribs)

[edit]

As a general rule, we do not allow photographs of text on Commons, so these cannot be kept for that reason. In addition, their copyright status is unclear. The named author is not the uploader and there is no evidence of permission.

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:18, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:30, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Busjavka (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal images of no apparent educational utility.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:19, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:30, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no COM:EDUSE lNeverCry 06:33, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:34, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Kcmgc

[edit]

Book covers; probably copyrighted, no evidence otherwise. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 06:48, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:35, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OTRS-permission from author and copyright holder Vineet Modi is needed. Taivo (talk) 08:46, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:39, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spam image from block-evader User:Alex9777777. McGeddon (talk) 09:40, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:46, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photos Pippobuono (talk) 09:47, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:46, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 09:58, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:46, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ljuben Genov, born 1966, is living. There is no evidence that he has given a free license for these works.

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (t to me) 10:04, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[question copied from my talk page -- Jim]
Hallo, what can be done in order to keep the pictures? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bunde1 (talk • contribs) 05:51, 19 October 2016‎ (UTC)[reply]
In order to keep these on Commons, the artist must send a free license to OTRS or, if User:LG66 is in fact the artist as it says at User:LG66, then he must confirm it by sending a message to OTRS. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:52, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Bunde1 (talk) 13:52, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:48, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photographs of identifiable people Juga (talk) 10:05, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - taken at a public place. --Jcb (talk) 16:51, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photographs of identifiable people Juga (talk) 10:06, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - taken at a public place. --Jcb (talk) 16:51, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photographs of identifiable people Juga (talk) 10:07, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - taken at a public place. --Jcb (talk) 16:51, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photographs of identifiable people Juga (talk) 10:08, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - taken at a public place. --Jcb (talk) 16:51, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photographs of identifiable people Juga (talk) 10:08, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - taken at a public place. --Jcb (talk) 16:51, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photographs of identifiable people Juga (talk) 10:08, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - taken at a public place. --Jcb (talk) 16:51, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

NO ES COMPLETA LA INFORMACION, HE SUBIDO UN ARCHIVO NUEVO MAS COMPLETO Freddycanaviri777 (talk) 12:07, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:35, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image. Unused, out of project scope. GeorgHHtalk   12:31, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:35, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:51, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:EDUSE jdx Re: 15:26, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:54, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Used for vandalism actions. Andriy.v (talk) 16:30, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:55, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image. Unused, out of project scope. GeorgHHtalk   16:42, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:54, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Valeri Makarov (talk · contribs)

[edit]

From use of these as "gallery" in article of Russian Wikipedia, all of these artworks belong to artist Viktor Alexandrov, uploaded by Valeri Makarov - definitely not the same person, without any evidence any rights of the latter to release them under CC-BY-SA license. Single possible exception (not nominated) - an iPhone photo of Alexandrov File:Aleksandrov Viktor Aleksandrovic.jpg, that could actually be made by uploader.

Tatewaki (talk) 18:09, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Also, at least by current state of the acticle - no evidence of notability according to criteria of RuWP, nominated for deletion; thus, images are likely to become unused. Tatewaki (talk) 19:05, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:56, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Buenas tardes.Como autor, les pido que la imagen sea borrada. Dese ya, muchas gracias.

Private image. Unused, out of project scope. GeorgHHtalk   18:16, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:36, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused extremely small image of some people working, also uncategorized. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:07, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:57, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused tiny photo of some men working, uncategorized. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:07, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:57, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by EddieKone (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promotional or self-promotional uploads... if uploader is depicted, these aren't selfies, not own work.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:42, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:58, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image possibly copied from a television. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:43, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:59, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:45, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:39, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A free license for the actual photo seems fine, but I don't believe the same can be said for the artistic work depicted in the photo. According to COM:FOP#China, People's Republic of, the PFC does allow some limited freedom of panorama for works displayed in "outdoor public places", but there appears to be an indoor installation so it's not clear whether that extension extends to it. Unless it can be clearly shown that it does, the image should be deleted per COM:PCP. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:00, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:06, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A free license for the actual photo seems fine, but I don't believe the same can be said for the artistic work depicted in the photo. According to COM:FOP#China, People's Republic of, the PFC does allow some limited freedom of panorama for works displayed in "outdoor public places", but there appears to be an indoor installation so it's not clear whether that extension extends to it. Unless it can be clearly shown that it does, the image should be deleted per COM:PCP. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:01, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:06, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright image http://www.nocutnews.co.kr/news/4563062 FriedC (talk) 02:13, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:06, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright work. Has not been 70 years since this movie was released. Mark Marathon (talk) 02:24, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:09, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope due to bad quality. Too dark. Taivo (talk) 10:24, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:09, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A screen capture, unclear where from, does not count as "own work" Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 11:12, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:09, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Joelimman (talk · contribs) has made nothing in Wikipedia, except userpage in en.wiki and uploading a photo about himself, which is used nowhere, except on the userpage. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 13:33, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:09, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks to me fairly out of scope. JuTa 14:12, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:10, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image. Unused, out of project scope. GeorgHHtalk   14:16, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:10, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image. Unused, out of project scope. GeorgHHtalk   14:18, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:10, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality, blurry Hiddenhauser (talk) 15:24, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:10, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality, blurry Hiddenhauser (talk) 15:26, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:10, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Extremly low resolution. Sturm (talk) 17:47, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:11, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Joy sema (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Suspected copyright violations, watermarked "Flash production".

MKFI (talk) 17:48, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:11, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very small, unused color photo of some people working. No indication of own work, and uncategorized. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:04, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:12, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused false color image with large black borders, no apparent educational utility. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:23, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:12, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image, no educational utility. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:30, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:13, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:34, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:15, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:34, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:15, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A private image of no apparent educational utility. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:36, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:15, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small low quality image, not in use, apparently out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:38, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:15, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An image so small as to be unlikely to be able to be used, nominated under COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:40, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:15, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image, seems to be out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:40, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:15, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image, also File:Hil_Bra.JPG same one, smaller... no apparent educational utility. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:56, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:14, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image which might also contain artworks. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:56, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:13, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:59, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:13, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image, out of scope, also copyright question due to obvious rephotograph. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:59, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:13, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

too small gallery, these and other valued images are part of Santa Maria Gloriosa dei Frari (Venice), this gallery os sufficient Oursana (talk) 03:07, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:18, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Salmont as Speedy (Speedy delete) and the most recent rationale was: owner does not wish signature to be displayed lNeverCry 04:20, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. --Jcb (talk) 17:18, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal work; out of scope Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:25, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:19, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

50 years haven't passed since 1988. Paul_012 (talk) 05:15, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:19, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, the uploader's only contribution. In my opinion not suitable for stock photo. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 08:05, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:20, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

He is not en:Alberto Mercado and in my opinion he is not mentioned in es.wiki, although I counted 4 Alberto Mercados there. Small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 08:43, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:21, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded here in 2016 but on this blog in 2015; unclear authorship and licensing status. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 09:01, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:20, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that PD-Thailand applies. Paul_012 (talk) 05:17, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:46, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that PD-Thailand applies. Paul_012 (talk) 05:24, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:46, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A book cover. Probably copyrighted, no evidence otherwise. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 05:52, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:46, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably not a free image Shev123 (talk) 10:54, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:47, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo can't be own or free, probably fake license. Bilderling (talk) 13:25, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:47, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo can't be own or free, probably fake license. Bilderling (talk) 13:26, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:01, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photographer is Siddharth Siva and we have no proof that he authorized the release here! Ras67 (talk) 14:12, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:48, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Although the camerawork may be public domain, Bob Dylan isn't an employee of the United States government, so his music performance is still copyrighted. Also the lyrics are clearly copyrighted (from 1964). No one would be able to use this file without paying licensing fees to ASCAP or BMI. Kaldari (talk) 06:37, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Also File:Bob Dylan performs The Times they are a Changin at the White House.ogg.


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:15, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The same file was uploaded by two different people, each claiming "own work." One also claims to be the subject of the photo, but it seems unlikely to be a self-portrait. The other file is File:Graeme Talboys.JPG. Unclear authorship and licensing status. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 07:03, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:15, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The same file was uploaded by two different people, each claiming "own work." One also claims to be the subject of the photo, but it seems unlikely to be a self-portrait. The other file is File:Graeme K Talboys.JPG. Unclear authorship and licensing status. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 07:04, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:15, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Weiterleitung unnötig, alle Links korrigiert Uoaei1 (talk) 07:45, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:16, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The metadata states "Author: Joe Worthem, Copyright holder: Joe Worthem Photography and Invitation Oxford". No evidence of permission to license a copyrighted photo. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 09:32, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:16, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The metadata states "Copyright holder: (website address), Author: Lenka Drstakova (phone number)". No evidence of permission to use a copyrighted image. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 10:29, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:17, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Keine Freigabe der SPD (URV; Quelle: http://www.spd-rlp.de/kandidaten/) Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 10:50, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:17, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ofer Peer isn't mentioned in en.wiki. I suspect, that the photo is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 12:45, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:17, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems like derivative work. And there is no freedom of panorama in France. Anyway, I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 13:18, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:18, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama in the United Arab Emirates! Ras67 (talk) 14:18, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:18, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 02:37, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 02:31, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

promotional picture of a TV show, unlikely own work, as there's no EXIF info Timmyshin (talk) 14:18, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:18, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is 1932 photo. When the author Jose Arturo Uc Garcia died? I suspect his copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 14:21, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:18, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Does Commons:Freedom of panorama in source country allow this? EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:18, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.lvivhaber.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Grant_Prix_Lviv_Orta1.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:18, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://cdn-2.tstatic.net/wartakota/foto/bank/images/20160816-satya-widya-yudha_20160816_132342.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:18, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.judorijeka.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/logo3.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:18, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:18, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5019/5563035653_c433da3bf4_b.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:18, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/746075693679804416/W3HzgIzw.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:18, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXIF shows that this photo is copyrighted and the uploader isn't the same person as the photographer. Al-Douri (talk) 15:12, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:18, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fictitious logo of a gang uploaded by a user who has uploaded copyvio images. He's also uploaded another similar logo. The use of this logo is spreading. Cpt.a.haddock (talk) 15:35, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:18, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The pronunciation example consist of two lemmas, which both are recorded for themselves: De-Tsunami.ogg and De-Tsunamis.ogg Jeuwre (talk) 15:44, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:17, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

small and blurry Hiddenhauser (talk) 15:44, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:17, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'd made another pronunciation example: De-Tenöre.ogg, this one isn't needed Jeuwre (talk) 15:52, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --tsca (talk) 23:00, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is watermark credited to "Shubhi Sharma Photography", which does not match the name of the "own work" uploader. McGeddon (talk) 15:58, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --tsca (talk) 23:01, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France: murals cannot be here without author authorization Benoît Prieur (d) 16:06, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:18, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No US copyright tag. Source link is dead, so verification is not possible. DrKay (talk) 16:10, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:18, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo has not been approved Sean2theprawn (talk) 16:27, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no permission, see name of author in EXIF. --Jcb (talk) 23:51, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Vilhelm Tetens died in 1957. The copyright protected until 2027? --sasha (krassotkin) 16:40, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:18, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete While the image is notionally uploaded from the vineyard themselves, the metadata shows the image remains copyrighted to the photographer who took the image. Since the licensing is unclear, and we have no release from a copyright agent for the image, it remains incompatible with Commons. Hammersoft (talk) 17:02, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:18, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete identical to File:Ridge-Vineyards-Logo-small.jpg, just smaller. No need for this smaller duplicate. Hammersoft (talk) 17:03, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --tsca (talk) 23:02, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Many findings in the Net, like here, COM:PCP! Ras67 (talk) 17:12, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --tsca (talk) 23:03, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image. Unused, out of project scope. GeorgHHtalk   17:13, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:18, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused map to an unidentified campus, probably out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:14, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:18, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sajeer50 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Please notice facebook or smaller size on image. I request deletion only of

I think it may might be a photo of TKM Institute of Technology, but we don't need a smaller duplicate. After I started this DN I found a different photo of the same place and amended this nomination to only include the one image. I also categorized all the user's uploads. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:15, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:19, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Iraq Turkmen Front.svg. Fry1989 eh? 17:26, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:19, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, uncategorized apparently personal image of no apparent educational utility. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:27, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:19, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by MKFI as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: «File EXIF shows "Author Thilanka Ranathunga". Previously published in https://www.seacology.org/uncategorized/seacology-marks-big-successes-in-sri-lanka-on-world-mangrove-day/. OTRS permission needed.» Converted to normal DR, I mistakenly used speedy nomination. MKFI (talk) 17:43, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:19, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File EXIF shows "Photo by Doug Mills/ The New York Times". MKFI (talk) 17:44, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:19, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hate to do it, but these are almost certainly three copyrighted works of art, and presumably the photographer was not the artist. No FOP in Romania, so we shouldn't be hosting this. Jmabel ! talk 17:47, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:19, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as thumbnail format and missing details/location and EXIF data to verify origin, one-file upload and file not in use at Wikimedia Commons project, hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 17:50, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:19, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photograph of a 21st century sculpture, certainly copyrighted; no FOP in Romania. Jmabel ! talk 17:51, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:19, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photograph of a 21st century sculpture, certainly copyrighted; no FOP in Romania. Jmabel ! talk 17:51, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:19, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jcrowneman (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own work. From file EXIF File:President Obama in Outer Oval Office.jpeg and File:Mosteller with President Obama.jpg are official US White house images and likely {{PD-USGov}}. File:Explaining.jpg has no EXIF but is also likely White house photograph. Source for File:Brian Mosteller 4 1 15.jpg is unknown.

MKFI (talk) 17:53, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:19, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of imho rather poor-quality 2009 images, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 17:58, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:20, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of imho rather poor-quality 2009 images, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 17:59, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:20, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio: http://arquidiocesedebrasilia.org.br/noticias.php?cod=1902 Py4nf (talk) 17:59, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:20, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of imho rather poor-quality 2009 images, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 18:00, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:20, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of imho rather poor-quality 2009 images, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 18:07, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:20, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of imho rather poor-quality 2009 images, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 18:08, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:20, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of imho rather poor-quality 2009 images, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 18:13, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:20, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of imho rather poor-quality 2009 images, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 18:13, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:20, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image. Unused, out of project scope. GeorgHHtalk   18:13, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:20, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of imho rather poor-quality 2009 images, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 18:14, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:20, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of imho rather poor-quality 2009 images, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 18:16, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:20, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of imho rather poor-quality 2009 images, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 18:16, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:20, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of imho rather poor-quality 2009 images, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 18:16, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:20, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio web page screenshot Sakhalinio (talk) 18:43, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:20, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of imho random images, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence rather out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions? Roland zh (talk) 18:44, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:21, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of imho random images, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence rather out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions? Roland zh (talk) 18:44, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:21, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of imho random images, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence rather out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions? Roland zh (talk) 18:44, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:21, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Main subject is a recent architecture (therefore not de minimis). No FoP in France. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 18:45, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:21, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Main subject is a recent architecture (therefore not de minimis). No FoP in France. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 18:45, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:21, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Main subject is a recent architecture (therefore not de minimis). No FoP in France. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 18:45, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:21, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Main subject is a recent architecture (therefore not de minimis). No FoP in France. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 18:46, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:21, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of imho random images, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence rather out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions? Roland zh (talk) 18:51, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:21, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Suspected copyright violation, looks like an official portrait, unlikely to be own work. MKFI (talk) 18:53, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:21, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of imho random images, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence rather out of scope Wikimedia Commons. imho also potentially copyright issues as showing an artwork inside a building - your opinions? Roland zh (talk) 19:01, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:21, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of imho random images, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence rather out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions? Roland zh (talk) 19:02, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:21, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If this is the logo of the band as claimed on the lightly citationed wiki article, then the own work claim is dubious. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:04, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:21, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, no indication of notability. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:05, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:21, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of imho random images, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence rather out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions? Roland zh (talk) 19:08, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:21, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image. Unused, out of project scope. GeorgHHtalk   19:09, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:22, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be a television screenshot without permission. GeorgHHtalk   19:11, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:22, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source state it is copyrighted so I don't see any evidence for a free license Avron (talk) 19:13, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:22, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, uncategorized, non educational image moved from 'pedia to here by bot, but still quite out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:13, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If out of scope - Delete. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 07:44, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:22, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User apparently created wikidata page for self, and this is the only use of the image. It would seem to be a self-promotional/ or / promotional upload, I could not find that the individual was notable. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:16, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:22, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Diagram of no apparent educational utility, not in use, and not categorized. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:17, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:22, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, uncategorized image, apparently of no educational utility. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:24, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:22, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Either personal artwork, or artwork without permission from creator, for this amateur painting of a dog. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:24, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:22, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparently non-educational image... it's a picture within a picture, and an object collage, but doesn't seem to fit COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:26, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:22, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of imho random images, rather posing, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence rather out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions? Roland zh (talk) 19:27, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:22, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of permission from the painter. Would need COM:OTRS to retain due to the painting and the 3D cube art in foreground. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:27, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:22, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of imho random images, posing respectively selfy at a monument, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence rather out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions? Roland zh (talk) 19:28, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:22, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copy of a 2013 artwork without COM:OTRS permission from the artist. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:28, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:22, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparently private image, not in use, not categorized, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:28, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:22, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

2013 artwork without COM:OTRS permission from the artist. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:29, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:22, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

2013 artwork without COM:OTRS permission from the artist. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:29, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:22, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

2013 artwork without COM:OTRS permission from the artist. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:29, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:22, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These "crush coins" are likely COM:COPYVIOs as they are recent. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:30, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:22, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

2013 artwork without COM:OTRS permission from the artist. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:31, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:22, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

2013 artwork without COM:OTRS permission from the artist. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:31, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:22, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1999 artwork without COM:OTRS permission from the artist. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:31, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:22, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission from artist of sculpture, and no COM:FOP in the U.S. This was taken inside a building on private property. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:32, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:22, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

2013 artwork without COM:OTRS permission from the artist. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:32, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:22, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of imho random images, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence rather out of scope Wikimedia Commons. Upload is also showing artwork at a shopping mall, imho potentially copyright issues - your opinions? Roland zh (talk) 19:32, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:22, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Edouard Manet The Rue Mosnier with Flags.jpg is a good picture of this painting. The one I'm nominating is not a good photo of the painting because it has some guy in the way. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:33, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:22, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of depicted artwork, no educational utility. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:34, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:22, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of imho random images, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence rather out of scope Wikimedia Commons. by the other hand, this upload is showing artwork inside assumably a restaurant/hotel, i.e. also potentially copyright issues - your opinions? Roland zh (talk) 19:46, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:22, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The statues of the memorial are copyrighted by the sculptor, Frank Gaylord, who enforces that copyright. TJones (WMF) (talk) 19:57, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:23, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The map used in this file is the (previous version of) the official MBTA subway map, which is copyrighted. Previous derivative works of the same map have been deleted from Commons. While I appreciate the work that Emw put into making the file, it's not free in a manner that Commons can host. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:57, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:23, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely that uploader has copyright to all these book/pamphlet covers. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:04, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:23, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photograph, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:07, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:23, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely claim of own work on this band artwork. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:07, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:23, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pujara123 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal image, non-WLM submission and out of scope.

Kiranravikumar (talk) 20:08, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:23, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image containing derivative works. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:08, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:23, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image of a front page of a book. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:17, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:23, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely own work of the images on the display booth. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:18, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:23, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The CC-0 licence for these documents from the Tamil Virtual Academy applies only the text but not to any images or artwork: {{Cc-zero-TamilVirtualAcademy}}. The photographs in this pdf are obviously pretty old, but can we assume that all of them qualify for {{PD-India}} (60 years past first publication)? De728631 (talk) 20:19, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:23, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Derivative work of possibly copyrighted model. No permission provided.
Русский: Производная работа от макета, защищённого авторским правом. Отсутствует разрешение от автора макета
A.Savin 20:32, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:23, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Smithpark (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Two unused diagrams, two copies of each.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:32, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:23, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artwork without COM:OTRS permission, also uncategorized and unused. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:33, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:23, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:37, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:23, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1978 Band poster, date is right on it Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:39, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:23, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A collage of objects to which the uploader is unlikely to hold copyright. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:40, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:23, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An artwork credited to Edgar Schlubach, not in use, uncategorized and without permission. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:42, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:23, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

imho rather poor-quality 'random click', file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons. Also affected: File:Bhoganandishwara temple, Nandi hills 35.jpg, File:Bhoganandishwara Temple, Nandi hills bw-86.jpg, File:Bhoganandishwara Temple, Nandi hills cv-86.jpg, File:Bhoganandishwara Temple, Nandi hills es-86.jpg, File:Bhoganandishwara Temple, Nandi hills sw-86.jpg, File:Bhoganandishwara Temple, Nandi hills vh-86.jpg, and imho 'some more of the same kind' (various variations). Other opinions? Roland zh (talk) 21:05, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:24, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Merlin751 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Don't seems to be own works. Evidences for why they are free must be provided

Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:09, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:25, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

its blurry. there is clear version in commons: Arnaud Palastowicz (talk) 21:16, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:25, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Azdelop (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused logo of questionable notability : out of scope

Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:10, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:25, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The design is copyrighted by David Fischer, COM:PCP! Ras67 (talk) 23:08, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:25, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The design is copyrighted by David Fischer, COM:PCP! It is not possible that OmiAsad can abandon David Fischer's copyright. Ras67 (talk) 23:13, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete unless a permissions email is sent to OTRS and it is verified that the original copyright holder has agreed to freely license the file. In addition, the same uploader has other similar files deleted for lack of proper permission, which could indicate that they misunderstand the meaning of "free image". Finally, it might be possible for this to be uploaded locally on English Wikipedia as non-free content under en:Template:Non-free architectural work, but each use of the file must satisfy en:WP:NFCC. -- Marchjuly (talk) 23:25, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:25, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scanned table from unknown source Vituzzu (talk) 23:35, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:25, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Basvb as no source (No source since). File now has a source provided Basvb (talk) 09:18, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete - the "source" is insufficient, because it does not provide the information necessary to determine the copyright situation - Jcb (talk) 09:20, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete File:Réthy Mór matemetikus.jpeg Tambo (talk) 06:53, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:06, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted book cover. MKFI (talk) 17:45, 14 October 2016 (UTC) FuguePub is the user name for Fugue Publishing, the publisher of "The Emperors of Bedlam" book series published by Fugue Publishing on October 1, 2016. We are in the process of adding an entry for such series and author Mark Blaise Fallon which will include the book cover. The copyright is wholly owned by Fugue Publishing. Thanks![reply]


Deleted: per nomination. COM:OTRS would be needed to retain. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:08, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was originally deleted from Commons as a copyvio per User talk:JoolsA#File:Peter Ewart Big Game poster for CPR.jpg. It was then uploaded locally to English Wikipedia under a {{PD-US-no notice}} and eventually moved to Commons by a bot. The "PD-US-no notice" license, however, seem inappropriate for the following reasons: (1) The poster art was likely first published in Canada because en:Peter Maxwell Ewart (the artist) and en:Canadian Pacific Railway (the company the work was for) are both Canadian; and (2) the LOC website given as a source for the file states under "Rights Advisory"that the right status of the file has not been evaluated, and that "rights assessment is your responsibility". This LOC page refers to Canada quite a lot which seems to also indicate the file might be Canadian in origin. The source website does not seem specifically claim that this file is in the public domain, rather it just seems to be saying that there is a copy on file at the US Library of Congress. I am not sure that means we can assume that this photo is no longer protected by copyright. The artist died in 2001 and Canada's pma is 50 years; plus "no notice" seems to only apply to works originally published in the US. So, I think at the very least OTRS permission is needed for this and that it should be deleted per COM:PCP if such permission is not provided. -- Marchjuly (talk) 08:07, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 06:49, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The metadata states "Copyright holder Neil Gates Photography". Though it is a photo of the user, there is no evidence of permission to license and use it. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 09:25, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the followup. I (Lynda Roy) have contacted Permissions about this photo, Ticket#: 2016101410011841. Neil Gates is not, was never, the copyright holder, so a mystery (to me at least) why he gets credit in the metadata. I had the original scanned two years ago. The original photographer is unknown. The photo was given to me by the surviving subject, Faanya Rose. I own the scanned image.Lynda Roy (talk)

Deleted: photographer unknown, not old enough to be Public Domain due to age - to own a copy of the picture does not make one the copyright holder. --Jcb (talk) 06:51, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

seems file is corrupt, and listen to File:Podolsk-region-official-hymn.ogg Pippobuono (talk) 09:29, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 06:52, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no source (No source since). I fixed the sourcing and uploaded a higher res image. Needs a check whether it is really PD-US-gov Basvb (talk) 10:18, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: USRA is not US-gov. The file even states it's for sale at the lower right corner. --Jcb (talk) 06:56, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Are these files own work or are they from the Stift Admont archives? If they are from the archives we need explicit permission. Basvb (talk) 11:50, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: photographer is stated to be Konrad Rainer, no evidence of permission. --Jcb (talk) 06:58, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Are these files own work or are they from the Stift Admont archives? If they are from the archives we need explicit permission. Basvb (talk) 11:50, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no evidence of permission. --Jcb (talk) 07:00, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Are these files own work or are they from the Stift Admont archives? If they are from the archives we need explicit permission. Basvb (talk) 11:51, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no evidence of permission. --Jcb (talk) 07:00, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Are these files own work or are they from the Stift Admont archives? If they are from the archives we need explicit permission. Basvb (talk) 11:57, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no evidence of permission. --Jcb (talk) 07:00, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Are these files own work or are they from the Stift Admont archives? If they are from the archives we need explicit permission. Basvb (talk) 11:57, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no evidence of permission. --Jcb (talk) 07:00, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Are these files own work or are they from the Stift Admont archives? If they are from the archives we need explicit permission. Basvb (talk) 11:57, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no evidence of permission. --Jcb (talk) 07:00, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Are these files own work or are they from another photographer? If they are from another photographer we need explicit permission. Uploader uploaded images from multiple authors. Basvb (talk) 11:58, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no evidence of permission. --Jcb (talk) 07:00, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jcb as no source (No source since). The info on the file is in the bottom left, but I can only identify the date fully. The date being 1876 it is well likely that the author's (also listed, but I can't decipher the name) work is in PD. Is somebody else able to decipher the authors name? That would allow us to search for his details. Basvb (talk) 09:10, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: I agree that the date is 1876. I can't read the name, even at high magnification with a sharpen tool. However, 1876 is early enough so that we can be confident beyond a signicant doubt that the artist has been dead for 70 years. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:28, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We have a better image than this one in File:Gvm Campus 2.jpg, and also I found much larger copy of this image on the school's webpage, [4] Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:26, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination - copyvio. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:31, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Apalizzolo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Derivative works of copyrighted artwork. Eric Aho is still living artist.

MKFI (talk) 17:40, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have permission from Eric Aho himself to use the images on his wikipedia page. Please do not delete!

Also, because the images are not focused on a single work of art and they are installation shots, they should fall under the "fair use" catagory.

@Apalizzolo: the images might pass for Commons:De minimis but it is borderline. If Eric Aho can send OTRS permission that would give us an explicit permission. MKFI (talk) 19:53, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - sure I can ask him to do that! I'll follow the live link for OTRS, but let me know if what I need to have him do is not going to be outlined on that page! Thanks!


Deleted: Requires a free license directly from the artist via OTRS. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:32, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Eric Aho's paintings

[edit]

Seems to be reuploaded files that were deleted per community consensus. See Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#Eric Aho Images Deleted - Artist send an email to wikipedia giving permission! for details.

Poké95 02:35, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Ticket:2016101710021085 contains consent from the artist for Ms. Palizzolo to license her photos freely. --Storkk (talk) 09:47, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted (built 1969) 3D artwork. Freedom of panorama in USA does not extend to artwork of this kind. Duplicate of a do-not-move-to-Commons file at en:File:Soghomom Tehlirian monument Fresno, CA1.jpg. Finnusertop (talk) 18:32, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Freedom of panorama in USA does extend to artwork of this kind: "any public artwork installed before 1978 without a copyright notice is also in the public domain". Also, "A statue published prior to 1978 without a visible copyright registration notice loses its copyright protection and enters the public domain." {{PD-US-no notice}} Hgrosser (talk) 09:50, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Lack of notice is not Freedom of Panorama. While Hgrosser is correct that lack of notice would make this work PD, there is no evidence that in fact there is no notice. The image came from Flickr, so Hgrosser probably has not examined the work himself which would need a ladder. The notice would be on the eagle, not the plaque. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:40, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While this image was in wikipedia prior to this upload, I don't see any indication that the uploader over there took this photo. The subject died in 1984, and there are online uses larger than this version. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:09, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Message from Mihail Kravsun: I received notification that this file is marked for deletion. I sincerely apologise if I violated rules of Wikipedia. On this page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Osensei-kamae_m.jpg I see that this image is "I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby release it into the public domain. This applies worldwide." My intention was simply to put this photo of O-Sensei (who is the Founder of the Karate style which I study) on the Russian page of Chitoryu: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A2%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%BE-%D1%80%D1%8E I am sorry again if something was done wrong, please delete this file which I re-uploaded, I already removed link to it from https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A2%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%BE-%D1%80%D1%8E


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:41, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image from site with copyright. --Luigi.tuby (talk) 19:49, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The image source has been rectified. Licence terms are specified. --RollingFolks (talk) 23:33, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Changed license to match source, added {{LicenseReview}}. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:49, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

posing respectively selfy at a monument, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence rather out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions? Roland zh (talk) 20:17, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment may also used as "user page image", hence, from my side no more need for deletion request, regards, Roland zh (talk) 21:28, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:52, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The picture appears in Moti Yogev's site ([5]). He's an Israeli parliament member and we've been in contact with his spokesperson in the past regarding obtaining a formal OTRS release note for pictures such as this one. As we've never received the needed note, this picture cannot stay in the Commons. Ldorfman (talk) 23:21, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have checked in archive.org: The file wasn't there in 29.2.2016. But it was there in 2.4.2016. The file uploaded to Moty Yogev's site between 29.2.2016 to 2.4.2016. The file uploaded to Commons in 27.3.2016. Look like it was taken from commons to Moty Yogev's site. Template {{Published}} is better chioce to this photo.-- Geagea (talk) 23:29, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I really doubt it. The uploader of this file uploaded only files related to Moti Yogev - The same files that appears in Yogev's site. He is his spokesperson and should obtain the needed approval for the release. He wasn't the photographer. Ldorfman (talk) 23:05, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
As a matter of a fact I have checked the files in 28.3.2016 before I added a category. Day after it was uploaded. Even if the uploader is the spokesperson of Moty Yogev, If he took the photos and uploaded to Commons and afterward to other site, it's ok. It doesnt look like it was taken from other site.-- Geagea (talk) 08:58, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Geagea, I don't understand. You say it was uploaded to Moty Yogev's site between February 29 and April 2. It was uploaded here on March 27, so by that evidence it could have gone either way. My problem is that there's no EXIF, which strongly suggests that it was taken off the web and not uploaded here first. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:07, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jim, I have checked the net a day after the file uploaded. No result. It was first uploaded to her. probably they found the files her and uploaded to other the site. Or it might be the same uploader. It is not professional phtographer. I think we can assume goodfaith her. not evry file without exif is copyvio.-- Geagea (talk) 11:04, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Geagea. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:07, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not an useful redirect

  • Keep, good redirect to category 1900 Building (Melbourne, Florida). Also prevents someone from recreating this category when adding pics to the Melbourne, Florida category so a duplicate category is not created for the same subject. Semper Fi! FieldMarine (talk) 19:46, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Also, it looks like there are other 1900 buildings, see here for one in Kansas. I see this as a disambig in the future. Semper Fi! FieldMarine (talk) 19:50, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I do not understand. Why shall a redirect "1900 Building" link to "1900 Building (Melbourne, Florida)"? -- Kürschner (talk) 20:09, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The redirect from 1900 Building to 1900 Building (Melbourne, Florida) is so that if you do a search in commons for 1900 Building, it will redirect to 1900 Building (Melbourne, Florida). Otherwise, an editor may create a category after doing a search for 1900 Building and not landing anything. In the future, I see the redirect at 1900 Building changed to a disambig when additional media is added for other "1900 Buildings". Semper Fi! FieldMarine (talk) 00:47, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:09, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The CC-0 licence for these documents from the Tamil Virtual Academy applies only to the text, but not to any images: {{Cc-zero-TamilVirtualAcademy}}. Therefore we cannot host the entire pdf document. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:உமார் கயாம் (புதினம்) நூலட்டை.jpg. De728631 (talk) 20:16, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Thamizhpparithi Maari, Ravidreams, Tshrinivasan, and Balajijagadesh: See this Tamil Nadu government document which is in Tamil says that all of its content is free to public. You can get more infos at Category:Tamil-Wikimedia-TVA-partnership. --Info-farmer (talk) 05:03, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:54, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]