Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/09/27

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive September 27th, 2016
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW. Product not by the FDA.

Josve05a (talk) 09:53, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvios. --INeverCry 00:25, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As stated on Commons:Deletion requests/Files of Jasonanaggie: "Per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_subject_matter#Product_packaging: the packaging is not a government work."

full list

Elisfkc (talk) 02:43, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment some of these may be duplicates from Commons:Deletion requests/Files of Jasonanaggie. Elisfkc (talk) 02:45, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvios. --INeverCry 00:36, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_subject_matter#Product_packaging: the packaging is not a government work.

full list

Elisfkc (talk) 04:03, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Look there is a fundamental disagreement between my view of U.S. Copyright Law in relation to FDA recall law and how they relate and it has caused a huge mass deletion of my import from the FDA, it looks like I have been overruled, so you might as well just go ahead and speedy delete whatever I uploaded from the FDA, while they are all copyright-free and in the public domain including brandmarks and trademarks on packaging. These rights are waved when a health concern requires an FDA recall, but just delete them.Jasonanaggie (talk) 04:23, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 05:38, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violations Raynor999 (talk) 01:53, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see him in the video, you sure the URL is correct? --Thibaut120094 (talk) 07:25, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Thibaut120094: sorry, it was my mistake. correct url: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z_HqWYpUlyU --Puramyun31 (talk) 07:44, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 07:52, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violations Raynor999 (talk) 01:57, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 07:21, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing essential information (page is in Korean) Monopoly31121993 (talk) 16:09, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Read User:-revi/Tistory. — regards, Revi 16:13, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Also, please remember your lack of knowledge for a language you do not know doesn't constitute a reason for deletion. Thank you. — regards, Revi 16:17, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The license info isn't missing. The CC icon can be found at bottom right on the source page as usual with these Korean blog images. I've passed the license review. INeverCry 18:15, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Natuur12 (talk) 16:28, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violations Raynor999 (talk) 02:01, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 07:20, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bajateraho (talk · contribs)

[edit]

User has been uploading webgrabs and CD covers as own work. No reason to believe these are any different, COM:PRP applies and these should be deleted.

SpacemanSpiff 08:01, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 09:47, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jscg16 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Part of a COI promotional campaign on en.wiki, no reason to believe that these images serve an encyclopaedic purpose or have the correct copyright info (varying exif data and numerous professional camera models for a self-authorship by a non-photographer as the sockmaster has claimed in the past Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Jschauhan

SpacemanSpiff 08:14, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 09:45, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal image by a sockpuppet, no educational purpose served —SpacemanSpiff 08:45, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 09:38, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These file has Facebook (FBMD) EXIF, meaning that it comes from Facebook. We need evidence of permission from the Facebook user. See also ticket:2016092710005881 Ankry (talk) 08:46, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Published on facebook on 6.01.2016; converting to speedy. Ankry (talk) 09:24, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ankry (talk) 09:25, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uploaded wrong version of the photo... I am the original uploader Shaguftakarim (talk) 09:02, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 10:59, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation? Google search [1] [2] Ninedyz (talk) 11:03, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb: Copyright violation: http://hk.on.cc/hk/bkn/cnt/entertainment/20160624/bkn-20160624074530221-0624_00862_001_cn.html

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermarked getty images image. Surely non-free Letartean (talk) 13:39, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb: Copyright violation: obviously taken from gettyimages, without the permission of the author

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably non-free, uploaded with other non-free image. No indication of freeness indicated by user. Letartean (talk) 13:42, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb: Copyright violation: no explicit autorisation ( https://www.facebook.com/494048000702832/photos/a.494586813982284.1073741827.494048000702832/1080914615349498/?type=3&theater )

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Man RAy work. As he died in 1976, this would still be copyrighted. (talk) 13:12, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Agree. My mistake. The work is exhibited in a museum and that's not qualify for the application of FoP in Spain. --Discasto talk 13:53, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 00:15, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation. Reverse image search points to this page with an almost identical photo and no clear copyright/CC disclaimer Andycyca (talk) 22:04, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:31, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry personal image copied from Panoramino, not in use, not categorized. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:36, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 01:01, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

found elsewhere http://www.hockeyquilmesac.com.ar/historia.html Dacoucou (talk) 05:38, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 06:44, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

found elsewhere http://quilmesaclub.org.ar/ Dacoucou (talk) 05:39, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 06:43, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

found elsewhere http://quilmesaclub.org.ar/ Dacoucou (talk) 05:39, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 06:43, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

found elsewhere http://www.hockeyquilmesac.com.ar/historia.html Dacoucou (talk) 05:40, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 06:43, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a photo of someone else's artwork, the artist has a very small picture of it on his website and larger sizes of the photo have been posted on pinterest and elsewhere; at any rate it is not "own work" either as the artwork or as a photo of the artwork and there is no evidence of a good license. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 05:43, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 06:44, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted with no permission. The metadata states "Author: Stian Schloesser Moeller" and "Copyright holder: stiansmollerfoto.no" Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 07:04, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 06:44, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted. The metadata says "Copyright holder : Van Holt Entertainment" and "Author: Christopher van Holt". Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 07:36, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 06:45, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Book cover (published in 2002), this is copyrighted. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 08:31, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 06:45, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Going to rehost it on another media-network. HeraldicUnion (talk) 14:06, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: CC license can't be revoked Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:54, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I would like my own image removed from this site as I will rehost it on another media. HeraldicUnion (talk) 16:53, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: The license you used can't be revoked. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:36, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I would like to have my photo removed to upload a better version, thank you. HeraldicUnion (talk) 14:11, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Natuur12 (talk) 19:48, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Going to upload a better version. HeraldicUnion (talk) 08:57, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 06:45, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It includes a person with the green lanyard which at Wikimania Esino Lario meant no photo. thanks iopensa (talk) 09:05, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep hello there, I am the one with the green lanyard in the picture. and I am okay with this picture. please keep the image. it was used on Wikimedia Blog --アンタナナ 18:36, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks user:antanana. if you are ok with it, of course the picture should not be delated. sorry for the reaction but i actually saw the image on the Wikimedia Blog and notify anyone in the communication team :) I am glad everything is ok. all the best, --iopensa (talk) 19:48, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Antanana. --INeverCry 06:46, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Proszę o usunięcie tego pliku (zdjęcia artystki) z tego powodu iż artystka nie wyraża zgody aby było opublikowane na stronie Wikipedia i ja to popieram jako autor tego zdjęcia. Adamru (talk) 09:15, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please remove this file (photo of the artist) for the reason that she does not consent to be published on Wikipedia and I endorse it as the author of this photo. Adamru (talk) 09:19, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 06:47, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Proszę o usunięcie tego pliku (zdjęcia artystki) z tego powodu iż artystka nie wyraża zgody aby było opublikowane na stronie Wikipedia i ja to popieram jako autor tego zdjęcia. Adamru (talk) 09:17, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please remove this file (photo of the artist) for the reason that she does not consent to be published on Wikipedia and I endorse it as the author of this photo. Adamru (talk) 09:19, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 06:48, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The metadata states "Author: Bernard Miller, Copyright holder: Bernard Miller." Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 09:32, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 06:48, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image can be found on many other websites, own work seems unlikely. --ghouston (talk) 09:41, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 06:48, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The user uploaded a picture of herself and claims own work, but the metadata states "Author: cihandemiral.com", "Copyright holder: Cihan Demiral", "Online copyright statement: cihandemiral.com:, "Copyright status: Copyrighted", and "Usage terms: Please contact (email address) for inquiries." I think that covers it, it's copyrighted. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 09:44, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 06:48, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader gives the source as a website sket-one.com, and on the website it clearly states "All content on sket-one.com is copyright protected with all rights owned by sket one. Content may not be copied, edited or used with out written consent. © sket-one.com". No permission is given. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 10:14, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 06:49, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a copyright image is taken from the Daily News (http://archives.dailynews.lk/2013/07/09/fea50.asp) Dan arndt (talk) 12:30, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 06:49, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a copyright image taken from http://kmalmanarcc.weebly.com/administration.html Dan arndt (talk) 12:33, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 06:49, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scanned gallery brochure. There is no evidence this is not copyrighted by the gallery. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 12:36, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 06:49, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably non-free. Uploaded with other non-free images. Letartean (talk) 13:40, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 06:50, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably non-free. No indication of freeness and uploaded with other non-free images. Letartean (talk) 13:41, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 06:50, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Вероятно, ложное авторство: https://www.google.ru/search?newwindow=1&hl=ru&q=%D0%B3%D0%B0%D0%B1%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%8D%D0%BB%D0%BB%D0%B0+%D0%B4%D0%B0+%D1%81%D0%B8%D0%BB%D0%B2%D0%B0&tbm=isch&imgil=rlvBK7eqKsrzEM%253A%253BL_dg6nm2WmptwM%253Bhttp%25253A%25252F%25252Fwww.wday.ru%25252Fstil-zhizny%25252Fvibor-redakcii%25252Fsamyie-yarkie-uchastniki-shou-golos-4%25252F5%25252F&source=iu&pf=m&tbs=simg:CAESvgIJcMxtO3O8B_1oasgILEKjU2AQaCAgCCBcIPQhDDAsQsIynCBpiCmAIAxIomx-OGvUZjBqcH40alx-GH6UfmB_1MMcsx8SWdPJ486iXyMaQ8tDyzPBowIWAtvd1C1ZsRt6fHU29rNyyBaWb8D7krcJhOG5YRna_1aIaWHpZETtzv2fLg_1Ut3VIAQMCxCOrv4IGgoKCAgBEgTyvrL5DAsQne3BCRqZAQoYCgZiZWF1dHnapYj2AwoKCC9tLzAxZjQzCiEKDWZhc2hpb24gbW9kZWzapYj2AwwKCi9tLzAyaHFyODcKHQoKYmxhY2sgaGFpctqliPYDCwoJL20vMGZjMWZ5Ch0KCmJyb3duIGhhaXLapYj2AwsKCS9tLzAya3NtYgocCgpzdXBlcm1vZGVs2qWI9gMKCggvbS8wZDJ3dww&fir=rlvBK7eqKsrzEM%253A%252CL_dg6nm2WmptwM%252C_&usg=__3WlNg6DTzPgbst97xeFEG1Nmh1I%3D&biw=1366&bih=638&ved=0ahUKEwjs_9mx66_PAhUoJJoKHdqVD-oQyjcISw&ei=A43qV6zyLajI6ATaq77QDg#imgrc=rlvBK7eqKsrzEM%3A -- Tomasina (talk) 15:22, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 06:50, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted book cover //  Gikü  said  done  Tuesday, 27 September 2016 17:38 (UTC) 17:38, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 06:51, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted book cover //  Gikü  said  done  Tuesday, 27 September 2016 17:39 (UTC) 17:39, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 06:51, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted book cover(s) //  Gikü  said  done  Tuesday, 27 September 2016 17:39 (UTC) 17:39, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 06:51, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image was in use in 2013 http://subseaworldnews.com/2013/11/21/clough-amec-secures-bayu-undan-contract-extension/, and in multiple other places since. Image requries COM:OTRS for retention. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:02, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 06:52, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In use elsewhere since 2015 (at least) http://australia.etbtravelnews.com/265623/the-northern-territory-go-walkabout-in-november/, needs COM:OTRS for retention. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:03, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice also metadata :Author Shaana McNaught Copyright holder Tourism NT" Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:04, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 06:52, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Igorvracar19 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely claims of own work on logos, screenshots, etc.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:09, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 06:52, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: one as {{PD-textlogo}}. Yann (talk) 11:23, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright protected image from Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/38609612@N06/3549841328 Albinfo (talk) 18:35, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 06:53, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yagelleo4 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely "own work", group shots of teams, taken from field level (two duplicates), logo, etc., all combine to show a promotional gallery culled from other sources without attribution.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:40, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, copyvios. e.g: "File:Dubai stadium.jpg" is a copy from http://proleague.ae/media/image/Dubai-Club-(2).jpg .--Wdwd (talk) 20:16, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvios. --INeverCry 06:53, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparent COM:COPYVIO, rephotograph of another picture on a table top. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:44, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 06:53, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The metadata states "Copyright holder: Robert Wilk." His name is also on the watermark. No evidence he gave permission. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 20:37, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 06:55, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The metadata states "Author: M.R.Roesch, Copyright holder: M.R.Roesch". No permission is given by M.R.Roesch. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 20:42, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 06:55, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is apparently a poster from an art gallery museum; it is probably copyrighted by the gallery museum. No explanation or permission is given. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 21:07, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 06:55, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably not own work: http://images.indianexpress.com/2016/05/4sonam.jpg --sasha (krassotkin) 21:37, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 06:55, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The architect, Pierre Dufau, died in 1985, the building will not be public domain before 2056. No FOP in France.

Coyau (talk) 11:05, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Support See you in 2056... Mirgolth (talk) 14:13, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Coyau (talk) 16:20, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence found that this gallery name corresponds to any real entity (e.g. taxonomic rank or physical classification). Keeping it risks perpetuating a possible hoax at the worst, or confusion at the best. Animalparty (talk) 20:08, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Obviously a hoax created by an IP. The images show bubbles created by whales. --Achim (talk) 18:05, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This says the author is Roque "Rocky" De La Fuente but it was uploaded by Pablo1291 claiming he is the copyright holder. I believe this image has been deleted previously. William S. Saturn (talk) 19:04, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 22:02, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not appropriate picture content Kaizer22 (talk) 19:48, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: harassment. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:15, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The sculptor Marco Cochrane is a living person so the statue is copyrighted. Without freedom of panorama in the US, we cannot keep this derivative image. De minimis might not appear because as Prosfilaes pointed out, copyright lawsuits have been filed over other parts of other statues. De728631 (talk) 00:05, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I don't think this would qualify as de minimis as the sculpture (or part of it) is still the main subject of the photograph. Kaldari (talk) 02:22, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:44, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly, advertising or self-promotion. Raynor999 (talk) 01:27, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:44, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of the better quality image File:Sukumar_Ray.jpg Mar11 (talk) 03:56, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:44, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sonukumarg7852 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos. Fail COM:EDUSE.

Utcursch (talk) 04:25, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:27, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader has stated that the photo is from Dr Ruwanpura's personal collection and that it was given to the Unvirseity of Calgary International however he has not provided in details of the permission given from either of those two parties and without that should be considered as a potential breach of copyright. Dan arndt (talk) 05:22, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:45, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mkt1988~commonswiki (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These were uploaded as own work at first, then source chnaged and OTRS ticket sent; it's unlikely that the OTRS ticket is of any use as higher res images were available elsewhere earlier, like this, should be deleted and the site/otrs ticket blacklisted.

SpacemanSpiff 05:22, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:45, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

found elsewhere http://www.dga-ev.com/aktuelles/news-detail-ansicht/?tx_ttnews%5Btt_news%5D=25&cHash=f573caa4e4cf397c58e43f595ae0e765 Dacoucou (talk) 05:45, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Hi Please notice that this is a private photo and i have the copyright to publish it. I hope i could convince you to withdraw your request. ghasemia


Deleted: please send evidence of permission to COM;OTRS. --Jcb (talk) 16:46, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 06:00, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:46, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't know where the photo came from but the metadata says "Copyright 2016. All right reserved" and a crop of the photo is posted here with the caption "Courtesy Robert Blue Moon". If the uploader is in fact that person he needs to make it clear, credit the photographer, and also make a clear assertion that it has a usable license despite the copyright claim for it to be kept on Commons. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 06:05, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:48, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image --ghouston (talk) 09:49, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:18, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image. Unused, out of project scope. GeorgHHtalk   11:34, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:04, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image. Unused, out of project scope. GeorgHHtalk   11:37, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:04, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Santirosa7 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image. Unused, out of project scope.

GeorgHHtalk   11:41, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:04, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pulkit18 indore (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image. Unused, out of project scope.

GeorgHHtalk   11:43, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:04, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image. Unused, out of project scope.

GeorgHHtalk   11:52, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:05, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image. Unused, out of project scope. GeorgHHtalk   11:54, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:05, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably comes from http://lankanstuff.blogspot.de/2013/05/actress-sheshadrie-priyasad-photos.html No permission for free use. GeorgHHtalk   12:10, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:05, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image. Unused, out of project scope. GeorgHHtalk   12:11, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:05, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Drinko Lee (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private images. Unused, out of project scope.

GeorgHHtalk   12:33, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:06, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Feitosage (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image gallery. Unused, out of project scope.

GeorgHHtalk   12:35, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:06, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Donajabonete (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private images. Unused, out of project scope.

GeorgHHtalk   12:44, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:27, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artist died in 1940. The law in spain appears to be the correct one to apply, in which case this work has a possible copyright until 2020 per COM:CRT.

Refer to Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Google Art Project works in Museo Reina Sofia for precedent. (talk) 13:15, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely

I uploaded a number of images by Spanish artists before I was aware of the 80 year limit in effect there. I've already corrected some by moving a few pre-1923 images to English Wikipedia. I overlooked this artist, it would appear. WQUlrich (talk) 18:25, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:20, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artist died in 2013 and their work is the focus of this image. (talk) 13:20, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:18, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artist died in 2013 and their work is the focus of this image. (talk) 13:20, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:18, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artist died in 2013 and their work is the focus of this image. (talk) 13:20, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:18, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by CharlesCimetiere (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:09, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Per nom. Fma12 (talk) 15:13, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:27, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Français : Max Ernst est mort en 1976. Ses œuvres ne sont pas encore dans le domaine public et il n'y a pas de liberté de panorama en France.
English: Max Ernst died in 1976. His works are not in the public domain yet and there is no FOP in France.

VIGNERON (talk) 14:50, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please move the files to de.wiki before deleting. Kind regards, --Brackenheim (talk) 16:17, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Brackenheim: is there a policy accepting this files on de.wiki? I've looked at de:Wikipedia:Bildrechte but it's unclear if it can accept photo from countries without FOP (I read Vorsicht: In etlichen Ländern (siehe „nicht OK“ in dieser Liste), z. B. Frankreich, gibt es keine Panoramafreiheit! but it's not an clear interdiction). Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 16:44, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
As far as I know you have to add the template de:Vorlage:Schutzlandprinzip to such pictures, so that they can be used (only) on de.wiki. You can find more information here: de:Schutzlandprinzip. --Brackenheim (talk) 17:01, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:22, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France. Artist Max Ernst died in 1976

A1Cafel (talk) 05:20, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:28, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 15:28, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:21, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad porn is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 15:42, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:12, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, the uploader's only contribution. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 16:37, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:59, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, the uploader's only contribution. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 16:39, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:06, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, the uploader's only contribution. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 16:41, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:06, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source website says "Download Image Free (Print Yourself)" but does not give the CC licence stated by the uploader (or any licencing statement at all). McGeddon (talk) 16:41, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Illma Gore stated : "Emboldened to fight those attempting to oppress my freedom of expression, I uploaded the artwork for anyone to download on my website." Could you please tell what would be the correct licence in that particular case? Thanks. Lspiste (talk) 19:39, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Lspiste: There's no corresponding licence for "anyone can download this image", because it's too vague a statement. I can "download" it, but is Gore giving me permission to (as you claim in the CC licence) reuse the image commercially? The CC-Attribution licence would allow me to sell posters or T-shirts of the work, or use it in a newspaper, without paying Gore any royalties - this may or may not be what she meant when she said "anyone can download this".
If Gore wants to release the photo into the public domain (or under a CC-Attribution licence), that needs to be made explicitly clear - she can either update her website to state this, or submit an email to Wikimedia to that effect. --McGeddon (talk) 08:51, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for these explanations McGeddon. Then I'm going to try to contact Illma Gore to ask her about that. Lspiste (talk) 21:26, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:03, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tomo1026 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private images. Unused, out of project scope.

GeorgHHtalk   16:59, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:12, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image. Unused, out of project scope. GeorgHHtalk   17:48, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:37, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Meher Mansion (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious claims of own work, on a book cover, two color photos (with scan artifacts) and a series of portraits obviously copied from published sources. Probably all COM:COPYVIOs.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:16, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:30, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, uncategorized image, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:17, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:10, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, blurry personal image, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:18, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:07, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image, uncategorized, apparently out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:20, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:09, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image, uncategorized, apparently out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:21, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:09, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image, uncategorized, apparently out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:21, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:09, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, uncategorized, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:38, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:09, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, uncategorized image of some sports men. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:39, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:09, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image of a guy in a lab coat with his arms crossed. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:45, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:11, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and uncategorized but also a collage. The persons head/shoulders were cut out of something else (see really poor cut lines) and superimposed on an artwork by a presumably living artist. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:46, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:11, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, uncategorized, blurry head shot, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:47, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:11, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, uncategorized image - text only . We have another one in the collection File:G.P. Putnam's Sons The Knickerbocker Press.jpg Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:48, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:11, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small blurry image, with no indication of user's own work. Please upload a larger version with metadata if possible. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:48, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:11, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lessknownhistory (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious claims of own work on these head shots (two are duplicates) and group shot with Gandhi. Probably COM:COPYVIOs without more information.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:50, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:09, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:00, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:32, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ryadany (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Looks to be all same logo... with claim of own work, and apparently not. If any are kept, please be sure it's a large, non-blurry version?

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:01, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:32, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:02, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:32, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation of image on teeshirt. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:03, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:11, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image of some guys sitting on the sand. Mostly sky. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:03, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:11, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image. Unused, out of project scope. GeorgHHtalk   19:22, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:03, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

External source and author, no permission and no hints for CC license on the original webpage. Druschba 4 (talk) 19:25, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:08, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

External source and author, no permission and no hints for CC license on the original webpage. Druschba 4 (talk) 19:29, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:08, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

External source and author, no permission and no hints for CC license on the original webpage. Druschba 4 (talk) 19:30, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:08, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Inferno0318 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image gallery. Unused, out of project scope.

GeorgHHtalk   19:52, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:32, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sukhjeetsinghmander (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image gallery. Used only by uploaders user page on en.wiki. No other contributions. Out of project scope.

GeorgHHtalk   20:13, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:33, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image. Unused, out of project scope. GeorgHHtalk   20:56, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:13, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo, no meaningful description nor categorized Ezarateesteban 21:01, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:01, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private images. Low quality. Out of project scope.

--sasha (krassotkin) 21:17, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:34, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded by mistake, sorry. There is already a larger version of this photo on Commons. Judithcomm (talk) 22:34, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination... the other one is File:Long gallery, Hatfield House-19670646391.jpg. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:45, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted emblem Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 06:39, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:07, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS

When uploading a picture of a toy, you must show that the toy is in the public domain in both the United States and in the source country of the toy. In the United States, copyright is granted for toys even if the toy is ineligible for copyright in the source country.

- (talk) 06:50, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:07, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS :When uploading a picture of a toy, you must show that the toy is in the public domain in both the United States and in the source country of the toy. In the United States, copyright is granted for toys even if the toy is ineligible for copyright in the source country. - (talk) 06:51, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:07, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS

When uploading a picture of a toy, you must show that the toy is in the public domain in both the United States and in the source country of the toy. In the United States, copyright is granted for toys even if the toy is ineligible for copyright in the source country.

- (talk) 06:52, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:07, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A photo of the user, not own work, but the photographer and their license are not included. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 06:56, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:20, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{PD-UN-doc}} clearly does not apply, this is not a text document, and does not fall into any of the classes of material described in ST/AI/189/Add.9/Rev.2. The EXIF indicates, correctly, that this photo is copyrighted by the UN. Reventtalk 07:15, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:08, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{PD-UN-doc}} clearly does not apply, this is not a text document. It was published at http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=51123#.V-od15MrIUH, which has a clear an explicit copyright notice at http://www.un.org/en/aboutun/copyright/ Reventtalk 07:22, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:08, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal logo, self-promotion, not useful for any educational purpose. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 07:34, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:20, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyright violation Frze > talk 07:59, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:08, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The user uploaded a photo of himself. The metadata states "Copyright by Brooke Spiers", but he does not credit this person or explain how the photo has a usable license. Unless this information is added the file should be deleted as a copyright violation. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 08:09, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:08, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fails COM:NOTUSED. I do not see how this low quality voyeuristic pic contributes to the project. In other words, it is realistically not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 08:20, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:08, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photos are taken from the person's online resumes here and here, and even if this person is the uploader she still needs to credit the photographers, respect their copyrights if any, and provide appropriate licenses for both images; otherwise I will assume copyright violations. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 08:22, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:08, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file description asserts the source and author are the artist, and "All rights reserved to" the artist. Meanwhile, the watermark on the image gives the name of a photographer and states it is copyrighted by the artist. So this is not acceptable on the Commons. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 08:54, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gurneys: I will send out OTRS tickets for all of the images. I will also remove the watermarks and "all rights reserved" texts. (talk) 01:28, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

For anyone with OTRS access, it is ticket:2016082010008704. However, it still states it's from the representative of Marita, and not the copyright holder as shown by the watermark. DatGuy (talk) 11:05, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:08, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Gurneys

[edit]

These pictures of an artist and her work all say clearly "All rights reserved to Marita Liulia" (the artist). If that is true the uploader cannot license them for the Commons. Also, the second photo very clearly displays the name of a photographer in a large watermark. There is no explanation of permission or licensing by that photographer. The third one has a copyright watermark on the image, lists the name of the photographer and states "all rights reserved" by both subject and photographer. None of these are apparently free to be licensed. I noticed the uploader has an OTRS ticket on a fourth photo; if they could do the same for these it would really help. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 09:04, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Gurneys: I will send out OTRS tickets for all of the images. I will also remove the watermarks and "all rights reserved" texts. (talk) 01:28, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:09, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Work of an artist who died in 1981 Shev123 (talk) 09:16, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:20, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Work of an artist who died in 1981 Shev123 (talk) 09:16, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:20, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

External source and auhor, no permission and no hints for CC license on the original webpage. Druschba 4 (talk) 11:09, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:09, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence provided that the model is not under copyright. (talk) 13:14, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:09, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence provided that this modern installation would be copyright free. (talk) 13:23, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:10, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Equivalent content (filetype, diagram style, overall layout) to File:L-Selenocysteine.svg, but the Se–C bond is oddly short...either Se is misplaced or bond-line is cropped incorrectly at the text field. Note: this image is in use; if there is consensus that the content is better, I or a bot can handle the replacement (i.e., that should not be considered as a blocker for deletion). DMacks (talk) 13:53, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:10, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not a GLAM 掬茶 (talk) 13:57, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:10, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Nexus-andcity-Part1

[edit]

Advertising: Graphics uploaded only for the purpose of advertising photo editing services. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 13:59, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:11, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Nexus-andcity-Part2

[edit]

The uploader wrote "©CopyRight Gianni Piva - forbidden to copy and spread without the express permission of the artist" and "All Rights Reserved - © Copyright at Master Gianni Piva ©2013-2014", respectively, on the file description pages. The images themselves also have copyright watermarks on them and the website linked says COPYRIGHTED at the bottom of every page. The images are very obviously copyrighted and not allowed on Commons without clear evidence of permission. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 14:05, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:11, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:04, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:21, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Charles Sheeler died in 1965. Maybe the painting is somehow in public domain, but better license is needed. Taivo (talk) 14:54, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:11, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

scanned photography, suspicious copyright information Edgars2007 (talk) 15:09, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:11, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Due to some personal issues I want to delete this photo Indrajit Das 16:01, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Unused personal image,  Delete. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:48, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:12, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Kurdistan.svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:08, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:12, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution, watermark "VP photography". I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 16:13, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:12, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 16:14, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:12, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Uploader seems to be depicted person and not photographer. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 16:24, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:12, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Victorinocalisto (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except userpage in en.wiki and uploading a personal logo, which isn't used nowhere, except on the userpage. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 16:36, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:12, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:12, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader already stated the photo was from La Stampa newspaper, which is copyrighted Matthew hk (talk) 17:16, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:12, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused uncategorized panoramino image. Out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:18, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:21, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal images are out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:22, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:21, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image shows a bust created by living artist without permission. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:24, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:13, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Routine request for a very small, low quality image. Would it be possible to upload a larger, better quality image? Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:26, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:13, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Work of living artist without artist's permission. Needs COM:OTRS to be retained. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:27, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:13, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Work of living artist without artist's permission. Needs COM:OTRS to be retained. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:27, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:13, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama in Italy //  Gikü  said  done  Tuesday, 27 September 2016 17:35 (UTC) 17:35, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:13, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

advertising //  Gikü  said  done  Tuesday, 27 September 2016 17:37 (UTC) 17:37, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:13, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely claim of own work on this old picture, unused and uncategorized. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:45, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:13, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uncategorized, unused personal image, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:46, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:13, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uncategorized, unused personal image, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:46, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:13, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, uncategorized small logo of which we have better and larger. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:48, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:22, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work on this small, low quality image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:56, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:13, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of own work on this obvious rephotograph of another image. Unused & uncategorized, no description. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:56, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:13, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of own work on this small, old image... is that U.S. President Roosevelt at the top? Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:57, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:22, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of own work on this old picture rephotographed. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:58, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:15, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of own work on this old picture rephotographed. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:58, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:15, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of own work on this old picture rephotographed. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:58, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:15, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Blue Owl1987 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of user's own work on these catalog shots & logo from a cutlery catalog. Looks promotional.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:08, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and kept per discussion. --Jcb (talk) 20:23, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Insufficient licensing information at source to match Commons standards. It says something like "we think this is ok" but they don't know. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:25, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:24, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Insufficient licensing information at source to match Commons standards. It says something like "we think this is ok" but they don't know. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:25, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:24, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Made in 1930 by an unknown photographer, not old enough according to Commons:Copyright_rules#When_the_photographer_is_unknown. Druschba 4 (talk) 20:06, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 23:59, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Made in the 1940s by an unknown photographer, not old enough according to Commons:Copyright_rules#When_the_photographer_is_unknown. Druschba 4 (talk) 20:10, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 23:59, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Made in 1930 by an unknown author, not old enough according to Commons:Copyright_rules#When_the_photographer_is_unknown. Druschba 4 (talk) 20:11, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 23:59, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Made in 1932 by an unknown factory worker, not old enough according to Commons:Copyright_rules#When_the_photographer_is_unknown. Druschba 4 (talk) 20:14, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 23:59, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Made in the 1930s by an unknown author, not old enough according to Commons:Copyright_rules#When_the_photographer_is_unknown. Druschba 4 (talk) 20:16, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 23:58, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Made in 1937 by an unknown author, not old enough according to Commons:Copyright_rules#When_the_photographer_is_unknown. Druschba 4 (talk) 20:17, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 23:58, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

External source and author, made in 1989, no permission and no hints for CC-license. Druschba 4 (talk) 20:20, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 23:58, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

External source and author, no CC-license hint on the original webpage. Druschba 4 (talk) 20:23, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 23:57, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

External source and author, no permission and no hint for CC-license an on the original webpage. Druschba 4 (talk) 20:24, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 23:57, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Ukraine. Built in 1981. Off-shell (talk) 20:25, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:27, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

External source and author, no permission and no hints for CC-license on the original webpage. Druschba 4 (talk) 20:31, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 23:57, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

External source and author, no permission and no hints for CC-license on the original webpage. Druschba 4 (talk) 20:31, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 23:57, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

External source and author, no permission and no hints for CC-license on the original webpage. Druschba 4 (talk) 20:32, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 23:57, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

External source and author, no permission and no hints for CC-license on the original webpage. Druschba 4 (talk) 20:33, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 23:56, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image. Unused, out of project scope. GeorgHHtalk   20:45, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:24, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably copyright violation - no indication of claimed license on source website. ed g2stalk 21:35, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 23:54, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free content Olimar (talk) 21:38, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:24, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright: Map looks like Google Maps. Ubahnverleih (talk) 22:04, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Besides copyright concerns, I don't see realistic usefulness for an educational purpose - the traject layout seems completely made out of the author's own personal ideas. --dealerofsalvation 04:13, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 23:51, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Urheber "U.S Armed forces" unglaubwürdig Ralf Roleček 22:47, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:25, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted Jcraford (talk) 23:31, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:25, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, uncategorized grocery store sign. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:58, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Now in scope --The Photographer 22:48, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Really, how? Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:52, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I can't believe now I need explain you what is "in scope"?. I will withdraw my comment in this nomination and any another of your nominations to deletion or comments, I'm tired of your polite comments --The Photographer 18:09, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see the problem asking what you did to the image to make a this store advertising in scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:51, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Illustrative for Jones Street, this grocery store, these types of faux old time painted signs, SF shop styles. Scope deletions should be used with caution and default to keep if there is any doubt. Nobody gets their eye poked out by keeping this image. -- (talk) 13:04, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Fae. --INeverCry (talk) 00:16, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused General Motors logo, not own work by uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:59, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:16, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a small size image of two planes, in use but uncategorized. I'm not sure about the scope of this image as it doesn't show tail numbers. Also if kept, please categorize! Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:06, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:16, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused doodles on top of chromasome diagram, uncategorized. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:11, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:17, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal images are out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:12, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:17, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused LOGO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:12, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:17, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-credible claim of 'own work'. Image is obviously a portrait and has half-toning showing it is from a published source. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:15, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:17, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work on this upload with highly promotional description. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:17, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:17, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is from 1953, yes... but trophy also from 1953... and no indication that the photographer has the rights to license a 1953 trophy. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:19, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:17, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work on this small, unused and uncategorized image. If the subject is the uploader, it's not a selfie. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:23, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:17, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of File:Flaga z godlem Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej.PNG Wojsław Brożyna (talk) 18:24, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:17, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, copied from somewhere else. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:24, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:17, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of own work on this historical image. Needs proper source. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:30, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:18, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of own work on photo of cleric who passed away over 20 years ago. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:31, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:18, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of own work, on image dated 1958 in over printing, yet claimed 18 January 2016 in template. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:31, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:18, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Document is obviously not own work of uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:32, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:18, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of own work from this photo - apparently from the 1950s - dated January 18 2016 and claimed as own work by uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:32, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:18, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Claimed "own work" yet very small, poor quality and with a huge red border on one side. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:33, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:18, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, uncategorized image from Panoramio. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:33, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:18, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Routine request for tiny photo without metadata. Please upload larger and better quality image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:34, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:18, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-credible claim of own work on this tiny image of an Indian politician. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:45, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:18, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Either this is a page two of something, or it's own work, the two claims are mutually incompatible. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:49, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:18, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work on this 1960 image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:50, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:18, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, uncategorized personal image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:51, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:18, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Highly unlikely claim of 'own work' on this image of Gallileo. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:52, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:18, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not in use, no indication of license stated at source given, also image doesn't seem to be at that page. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:54, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:18, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image does not show at source given, image is not in use and has no category. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:55, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:18, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image does not show at source given, image is not in use and has no category. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:55, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:18, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image, appears to be in use only on promotional user's page. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:57, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:18, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Der fallende Wandergeselle möchte dies Straktur (talk) 18:57, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:18, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No appearance of own work, lower left corner reads "chineseposters.net"... probable COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:58, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:18, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not in use, no category, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:58, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:18, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work on this cartoony map. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:58, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:18, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and uncategorized professional portrait claimed as own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:59, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:18, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unknown author (заводское фото means "factory foto") and dated to 1946 - copyright might not be outdated. Druschba 4 (talk) 19:46, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:18, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Made in 1930 by an unknown factory worker, not old enough according to Commons:Copyright_rules#When_the_photographer_is_unknown. Druschba 4 (talk) 19:50, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:18, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Made in 1930 by an unknown factory worker, not old enough according to Commons:Copyright_rules#When_the_photographer_is_unknown. Druschba 4 (talk) 19:51, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:18, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Made in 1930 by an unknown factory worker, not old enough according to Commons:Copyright_rules#When_the_photographer_is_unknown. Druschba 4 (talk) 19:52, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:18, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Made in the late 1930s by an unknown factory worker, not old enough according to Commons:Copyright_rules#When_the_photographer_is_unknown. Druschba 4 (talk) 19:53, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:18, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Made in late 1930s by an unknown factory worker, not old enough according to Commons:Copyright_rules#When_the_photographer_is_unknown. Druschba 4 (talk) 19:54, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:18, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Made in 1930 by an unknown photographer, not old enough according to Commons:Copyright_rules#When_the_photographer_is_unknown. Druschba 4 (talk) 19:59, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:18, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Made in 1930 by an unknown author, not old enough according to Commons:Copyright_rules#When_the_photographer_is_unknown. Druschba 4 (talk) 20:01, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:18, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused private photo; out of scope Ankry (talk) 20:03, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:19, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Made in 1945 by an unknown photograph, not old enough according to Commons:Copyright_rules#When_the_photographer_is_unknown. Druschba 4 (talk) 20:05, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:19, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Made in 1934 by an unknown author, not old enough according to Commons:Copyright_rules#When_the_photographer_is_unknown. Druschba 4 (talk) 20:13, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please notice that the uploader has removed the DR-tag in between and changed the license. --Druschba 4 (talk) 18:54, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:19, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The picture is too blurry. File:Pakistan-Golra Railway Museum-Islamabad (60).jpg This is a better photo. NearEMPTiness (talk) 20:25, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:19, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

External source and author, made in 1989, no hints why it should be published under CC-license. Druschba 4 (talk) 20:26, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:19, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The picture is too blurry. thumb|This photo is better NearEMPTiness (talk) 20:27, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:19, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Made in 1976 by an unknown factory worker (external source and author, no permission). Druschba 4 (talk) 20:28, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:19, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

External source and author, no hints for a CC-license on the original webpage. Druschba 4 (talk) 20:29, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:19, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Jucás - Logo.jpg JAAO23 (talk) 21:28, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:19, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no permission (OTRS) available, Theater/Artist Copyright violation. Alchemist-hp (talk) 21:43, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:20, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no permission (OTRS) available, Theater/Artist Copyright violation. Alchemist-hp (talk) 21:44, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:20, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no permission (OTRS) available, Theater/Artist Copyright violation Alchemist-hp (talk) 21:45, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:20, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Jean Carzou died in 2000. 82.124.57.179 21:47, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:20, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: Most of the content is public domain, but the poster itself may have some copyright protection. Yann (talk) 22:34, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:20, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted Jcraford (talk) 23:31, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:21, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted Jcraford (talk) 23:31, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:21, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted Jcraford (talk) 23:32, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:21, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted Jcraford (talk) 23:32, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:21, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted Jcraford (talk) 23:32, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:21, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted 2601:8C3:8101:47BA:2C71:367A:EF28:75C0 23:34, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:21, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

its blurry. failed image. unusable. Arnaud Palastowicz (talk) 23:53, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I agree.--Alexmar983 (talk) 13:31, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:21, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Posters are copyrighted, this is not a faithful representation of The Scream, but a reworked version, there for not PD. Not a permanent installation in public space. Teemeah (talk) 06:56, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ha ez az indoklás megáll, akkor itt jogosulatlanul maradt meg a kép: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Thália Theater - Budapest, 2015.03.23.JPG. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 08:46, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nyilván nem lehet törölni. Ez felborítja a szokásokat, ez egy graffiti teljesen tiszta minden. --Dencey (talk) 06:26, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ugyanaz, mint ez File:Political graffiti.jpg --Dencey (talk) 07:22, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The fact that there may be other images which must be dleted is no reason to keep this one. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:09, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS

When uploading a picture of a toy, you must show that the toy is in the public domain in both the United States and in the source country of the toy. In the United States, copyright is granted for toys even if the toy is ineligible for copyright in the source country.

It may be the case that plushie penguins made to appear to be the embodiment of the Linux logo/character might be copyright ineligible. However it is worth putting this in the context that the linux image was itself based on en:File:Ccpenguin, the ancestor of Tux.jpg, for which is only available on a fair use basis as copyright has not been determined.

To be kept, it would be extremely helpful if we could distinguish between "official" Linux penguins and other stuffed toys that may look similar, preferably by someone examining the manufacturer's labels. There are implications for all toys allocated to Category:Tux toys. (talk) 06:57, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: This particular representation of a penguin, whether it is the Linux penguin or not, and whether the Linux 2D penguin is copyrighted or not, has its own copyright as sculpture and we can't keep images of it without a free license from the manufacturer. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:12, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this video is not released under the licence tag attached, it has a standard YouTube video licence which does not allow reuse, so unless we receives an OTRS verification from the LBJ Library, it should be deleted. Ww2censor (talk) 09:44, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Do not Delete, this is free and public domain by the LBJ Library, I will get the release link and post it here. Jasonanaggie (talk) 15:26, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Here is the Link to the LBJ Library explaining the free nature of the license of the video, I guess that the DNC should be given credit if it is used in derivative works, it seems that the YouTube converter did not carryover the correct license. (http://www.lbjlibrary.net/collections/audio/video.html) Top Video. Jasonanaggie (talk) 15:30, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
There is no evidence on the LBJ Library page you gave that this video has released into the public domain, just that you can download it and "freely" use it but they don't say under what copyright license. We need moer clarity. Ww2censor (talk) 19:58, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It truly could not be clearer, it it free to use however you wish. This is not ambiguous at all. Jasonanaggie (talk) 22:14, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Actually, that is not correct -- the cited page says "Rights Info: No usage fees. User must observe DNC guidelines." so it is not at all freely usable. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:15, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Part of a Roy Lichtenstein work, so copyrighted. (talk) 13:10, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure that this copyright rule exist in Spain. In a public space you can take all the pictures that you want.

Greetings from Spain--Benjamín Núñez González (talk) 19:38, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, however the copyright issues here are more complex. Refer to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Brushstroke (Museo Nacional Centro de Arte Reina Sofía, Madrid) (4655430225).jpg which is for the same artwork. -- (talk) 19:43, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


I am sorry but I have not enough english to understand well your explanation there (and probably not enough to defend my opinion). Its sad when you can not use your mother language and you can not use other language fluently. I can understand that in other countries exist this rule (a kind of censorship) but I think that in my country, fortunately at the moment no. The problem is not the picture. Is not very importan to me delete this or another picture. For me the problem is the fact "you should delete a picture that you made in a public space". To me that is horrible. Maybe I am too idealist. Hell, yes. Of course I am idealist person, I am editing in Wikipedia.

If you want delete the picture, well go on. I am totally against this politic here. I am sorry if I am too rude now

Kind regards--Benjamín Núñez González (talk) 19:56, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per Fae. --Natuur12 (talk) 11:25, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of a Roy Lichenstein work, so not copyright free. (talk) 13:21, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep @: Actually, this Roy Lichtenstein 1996 sculpture called "Brushstroke was installed in the plaza of the building designed by Jean Nouvel to expand the Museo Reina Sofia, as part of the Roy Lichtenstein. All About Art exhibition in 2004.". The Museo Reina Sofia in its website states that this sculture is one of several "artworks in public places" and is part of the museum collections. Per {{FoP-Spain}} and Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Spain "Works permanently located in parks, streets, squares or other public places may be freely reproduced, distributed and communicated by means of paintings, drawings, photographs and audiovisual processes.", so photos of this sculpture are covered by spanish Freedom of Panorama. Tm (talk) 00:45, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Refer to the comments at Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Brushstroke_(Museo_Nacional_Centro_de_Arte_Reina_Sofía,_Madrid)_(4655430225).jpg, it may be confusing to have the discussion in two places for photographs of the same work. -- (talk) 03:23, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per Fae. --Natuur12 (talk) 11:14, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not a GLAM 掬茶 (talk) 13:57, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Natuur12 (talk) 11:17, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not a GLAM 掬茶 (talk) 13:57, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Natuur12 (talk) 11:17, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not a GLAM 掬茶 (talk) 13:57, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Natuur12 (talk) 11:17, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not a GLAM 掬茶 (talk) 13:57, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Natuur12 (talk) 11:17, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not a GLAM 掬茶 (talk) 13:57, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Natuur12 (talk) 11:17, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not a GLAM 掬茶 (talk) 13:57, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Natuur12 (talk) 11:17, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Parceque cette photo ne représente pas Brignogan plage !!! 92.139.210.62 16:07, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Das Foto zeigt den Hafen von Loguivy in der Bretagne. Ich habe es jetzt richtig lokalisiert. Der Name ist noch falsch. --var (talk) 12:23, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
So we should remove the deletion request and replace it by a rename request, right? OK, I have added the rename request to the file. IMHO we should close the DR. (Of course, descriptions with errors are not the best reason for deleting a file, anyway ;-). Just because there is an error in the description does not necessarily mean that we need to delete the file.) --Aristeas (talk) 07:25, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Storkk (talk) 09:50, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

So ists richtig. Vielen Dank!--var (talk) 19:33, 4 October 2016 (UTC) Auf allen betreffenden Seiten gelöscht.--var (talk) 18:03, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad taste. Damiens.rf 17:41, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: For whatever reason, this appears to be in use on four separate ptwiki articles, and has been for a significant length of time. Until ptwiki decides the file has no encyclopedic value, this cannot be deleted on scope grounds. --Storkk (talk) 09:54, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake cover of a true document, personal artwork - out of scope Darwin Ahoy! 19:46, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, no longer in use. P 1 9 9   16:27, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no permission (OTRS) available, Theater/Artist Copyright violation. Alchemist-hp (talk) 21:41, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Alchemist-hp, I would say that there is nothing copyrightable in this image. --Gnom (talk) 08:56, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Gnom ??? Ist es frei und erlaubt in österreichischen Theatern Aufnahmen zu machen? Ich denke nicht, es sei den eine Erlaubnis liegt vor. Nur ist diese Angabe hier leider nicht angegeben, Stichwort OTRS. Nicht nur das Theater muß einer Freigabe zustimmen, sondern auch die Schauspieler. Aber ich lasse mich gerne eines Besseren belehren. Gruß, --Alchemist-hp (talk) 09:01, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo Alchemist-hp, wenn du hier einen Löschantrag auf der Grundlage des Urheberrechts stellst, muss in den Foto etwas urheberrechtlich schutzfähiges zu sehen sein. Also ein Bühnenbild oder eine besondere Beleuchtung oder ein fantasievolles Kostüm. Das sehe ich hier im konkreten Foto aber nicht. Oder ist die schauspielerische Leistung auch in einem Foto schutzfähig? Ich schaue das mal nach. Gruß, --Gnom (talk) 09:10, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, mein Gefühl war richtig: Schauspieler haben zumindest in Deutschland kein Recht an Szenenfotos (Dreier/Schulze/Dreier, 5. Aufl., § 77 Rn. 4; Wandtke/Bullinger/Büscher, 4. Aufl., § 77 Rn. 3). Also kommt es nur auf Bühnenbild, Kostüm und Licht an. Ich habe hier mal eine allgemeine Diskussion eröffnet. Gruß, --Gnom (talk) 09:19, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
So etwas ist doch generell eine Falle für Nachnutzer, ohne entsprechender "OTRS Freigabe" vom Theaterm (Hausrecht). Oder irre ich mich da? Wenn dem so ist, dann habe ich wieder etwas dazugelernt! Aber hier ist es vorbildlich: File:Antigone_5369-Michelides.jpg. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 09:21, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Naja, wir brauchen eine Freigabe der Stelle, die das Urheberrecht an der Inszenierung hält – wahrscheinlich das Theater. Gruß, --Gnom (talk) 14:06, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: The copyrightable elements here might be the scenery (which we cannot see), or the costumes (which seem de minimis at worst). Any blanket theater prohibition against photography would seem to be a COM:NCR, and not grounds for deletion. Other related photos show elements that are likely copyrighted, and many of those have OTRS permission. --Storkk (talk) 09:58, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No rationale given as to why the model would be copyright free. (talk) 13:14, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment From a generic point of view, the model is inside a museum and it does not qualify for FoP application in Spain. However, the sculpture (a replica in fact), El pueblo español tiene un camino que conduce a una estrella, is permanently exhibited outside the museum (see Category:El pueblo español tiene un camino que conduce a una estrella). Thus, a picture of a replica outside the museum qualify as free of rights while a picture of a replica inside the same museum isn't. I don't have an oppinion on this. --Discasto talk 13:56, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The photo is a detail of a model of the museum. So it's not just the model of the sculpture, but the whole photo that may be a copyright issue. -- (talk) 14:03, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I see your point. I wonder, however, whether a crop leaving only the sculpture would be OK. --Discasto talk 14:30, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The answer may not be obvious as the provisions of "faithful reproductions" literally apply to 2D reproductions rather than 3D. This may be an issue worth asking about on the copyright noticeboard. -- (talk) 14:33, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 12:45, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this image does not depict natural sites but rather depicts a monument Yugeshpandey (talk) 14:06, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why would this (“ does not depict natural sites but rather depicts a monument”) be a reason to delete the file? I just don’t understand that DR. --Aristeas (talk) 07:24, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I believe the complaint is that the description is wrong.. and indeed, it seems many photos of disparate sites are tagged as being Nepal Natural Heritage Site "NP-BHA-01". Nonetheless, Aristeas is correct that this is not grounds for deletion. On the other hand, Nepal has no Freedom of Panorama... do we know whether this building is old enough to be out of copyright in Nepal? Storkk (talk) 10:02, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: I think this is Mini Pashupati Temple. Although I can't find a cite for the date of this building, it's neighbors are old and I think it is safe to assume that this is also, see Bhaktapur Durbar Square. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:15, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artist died in 1941. The law in spain appears to be the correct one to apply, in which case this work has a possible copyright until 2021 per COM:CRT.

Refer to Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Google Art Project works in Museo Reina Sofia for precedent. (talk) 13:03, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

hello! this is certainly an interesting question of copyright, and one that I've never seen before. (But I am just a photographer, not a lawyer....) According to [3], Delaunay painted this picture in Portugal, which has a copyright law that protects works for 70 years after the artist's death. So now we have three jurisdictions: France (where Delaunay was born and usually lived, 70 years), Portugal (where this work was painted, 70 years), and Spain (the work's current location, in this case 80 years). Does anyone have any idea how copyright law works in such cases? with all best wishes, Daderot (talk) 21:38, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I've spent a few hours browsing the Internet, and it seems like a confusing area to me. One the one hand, the "country of origin" appears to count heavily in cases of international copyright. On the other hand, at least current US law states that US copyright protection applies to works of US nationals, no matter where they are created 17 U.S. Code § 104 - Subject matter of copyright: National origin. Thus the copyright laws of Portugal and France(?) could perhaps be applicable. If so, this would imply 70 years, not 80, and the image would thus be in the public domain and should not be deleted. But as I say, this is a confusing area, and I'm certainly not a lawyer. cheers, Daderot (talk) 10:45, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I don't believe there is an obvious answer. For Commons we simplify this to "source" country plus the U.S.A, and normally we take source country as country of creation. However in terms of IP law we can point to, there remain lots of maybes. My presumption is that as the artwork is on display in Spain, and the photograph was taken in Spain, we should comply with Spanish law. Whether IP law in Spain makes an exception to the local 80-year rule for works created in other countries, well that's the question. -- (talk) 11:31, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I'm baffled! cheers, Daderot (talk) 00:07, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps Carl can shed some light on this. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:18, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per Fae. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:27, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]