Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/09/22

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive September 22nd, 2016
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible unauthorized deverative work 47.150.68.26 03:13, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by INeverCry: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:EDUSE. Also the guy doesn't look like an Indian cultural heritage monument. jdx Re: 09:29, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy deletion. --A.Savin 09:44, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uses CC-BY-NC license, making it unsuitable for Commons. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 15:11, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]



 Kept, Unambiguously an erroneous deletion request, as the rationale is inapplicable. The file has a valid free license. Non-admin closure.--Alchemist-hp (talk) 16:06, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously copyright vulneration: scanned out of a book and uploaded to commons - Basotxerri (talk) 18:11, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted. The metadata states the author is "Ryan Stevenson" and the Copyright holder is "RaRah Photo" Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 00:59, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be uploaders own work: derivative of original here [1] Animalparty (talk) 02:44, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:17, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously published elsewhere on the web [2], no evidence for permission HaeB (talk) 03:02, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:17, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photographs focus on 2D representations of copyrighted 3D objects, see COM:DW

Ytoyoda (talk) 20:12, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:07, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mohammad Tanvir Hossain (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Every one of these images can be found elsewhere on the Internet. Many of them from this forum thread: http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=915818&page=76. Their enwiki page is full of copyright violation notices. No way to trust that these are own work and the lack of real metadata makes the release dubious at best.

Majora (talk) 04:10, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvios. --INeverCry 00:18, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, uploader is NOT copyright holder and did not receive permission IJReid (talk) 04:29, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:18, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

taken 1948, not in the PD yet. http://www.vienna-timeline.com/?page_id=63 Kein Fotomaterial dieser Webseite darf in anderen Projekten, Publikationen oder an anderen Stellen im Internet verwendet werden. Mit freundlicher Genehmigung von Waagner-Biro gilt nicht implizit für die WP. Herzi Pinki (talk) 06:25, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:19, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promotion - Author created a redirect on enwiki from Suwaas to Subash Khatiwada. Cabayi (talk) 06:25, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:22, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promotion Cabayi (talk) 07:01, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. en:User:Subash Khatiwada blocked as a sock of Suwaas. JohnCD (talk) 14:43, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:19, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Questionable license file, it obviously is not free. Vladimir Solovjev (talk) 07:27, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:23, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sscguru (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Self promotion of a company and non-WLM submission.

Kiranravikumar (talk) 07:59, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Spam. --INeverCry 00:24, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy Right Abiii13 08:29, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:25, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

scan of a 1993 publication Triplecaña (talk) 09:01, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:25, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution, no EXIF, indicates image taken from elsewhere on the net Gijón16 (talk) 09:13, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:25, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING / COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 09:39, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:25, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW. Josve05a (talk) 09:52, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:25, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW. Product not by the FDA.

Josve05a (talk) 09:53, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvios. --INeverCry 00:25, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As stated on Commons:Deletion requests/Files of Jasonanaggie: "Per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_subject_matter#Product_packaging: the packaging is not a government work."

full list

Elisfkc (talk) 02:43, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment some of these may be duplicates from Commons:Deletion requests/Files of Jasonanaggie. Elisfkc (talk) 02:45, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvios. --INeverCry 00:36, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_subject_matter#Product_packaging: the packaging is not a government work.

full list

Elisfkc (talk) 04:03, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Look there is a fundamental disagreement between my view of U.S. Copyright Law in relation to FDA recall law and how they relate and it has caused a huge mass deletion of my import from the FDA, it looks like I have been overruled, so you might as well just go ahead and speedy delete whatever I uploaded from the FDA, while they are all copyright-free and in the public domain including brandmarks and trademarks on packaging. These rights are waved when a health concern requires an FDA recall, but just delete them.Jasonanaggie (talk) 04:23, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 05:38, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Página ou sub-página de usuário. Pedido próprio de exclusão. Gdbalista (talk) 18:15, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Speedily kept: User talk pages are never deleted at Commons. You are, however, free to blank them. Where necessary (copyright violations, privacy issues etc.), it is possible to hide individual revisions. --AFBorchert (talk) 21:13, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 10:08, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 00:25, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Marc Chagall passed away in 1985 - therefore this work of art is still copyrighted Lymantria (talk) 10:09, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:26, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Marc Chagall passed away in 1985 - therefore this work of art is still copyrighted Lymantria (talk) 10:09, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:26, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Marc Chagall passed away in 1985 - therefore this work of art is still copyrighted Lymantria (talk) 10:10, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:26, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Alleged author is Lambin, but uploader is "Jmamaas" who provides no evidence for the license claimed. Besides it's a professional photo of Lambin so there is a significant chance he didn't actually take it. Potential copyvio. BethNaught (talk) 10:28, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 00:26, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bysmon is not the author of this logo, but Smedslättskolan is. Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 13:03, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 00:26, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Viola los derechos de autor. [3] C. Jonel [talk] 13:28, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 00:27, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously published elsewhere on the web [4], no evidence that uploader is rights holder as claimed (if that's the case, please send permission as described at COM:ET) HaeB (talk) 14:43, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is an unused personal iphone snapshot of unclear educational value. If you look at the cup and placemat you'll also notice that it is mirror-inverted, but this can be fixed easily. The question is though, is the image in the project scope of Commons? I don't think so. De728631 (talk) 14:36, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've decided not to share this photo to anyone. Jesserocks007 (talk) 14:57, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:28, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously a scan from somewhere, unlikely the original image is free. January (talk) 18:42, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 00:28, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Request of the creator Vasyatka1 (talk) 18:47, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Questionable authorship claims based on the low resolution, missing metadata, and the fact that all other uploads by the same user were copyright violations. LX (talk, contribs) 19:06, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 00:29, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by M.ABHISHEK (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Watermarked & clear copyvio. Non -WLM submission.

Kiranravikumar (talk) 19:07, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvios. --INeverCry 00:29, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rvs444 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Missing EXIF, watermarked images (sourced from other websites) and copyvio.

Kiranravikumar (talk) 19:21, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvios. --INeverCry 00:30, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screen cap of copyright show Nicolas pato (talk) 19:44, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:31, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I think that the file is not free. On the Internet ischyut similar images. It does not appear that this photograph was taken to upload a file user. Vladimir Solovjev (talk) 20:01, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:31, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work?: https://www.google.cl/search?safe=off&tbm=isch&q=mario+party+star+rush&oq=&gs_l=#safe=off&tbm=isch&q=mario+party+star+rush+logo&imgrc=D_-zmscHNPZOlM%3A 4lextintor (talk) 21:05, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 00:31, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no high resolution. Sann001 (talk) 12:33, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

no high resolution.

no high resolution. Sann001 (talk) 12:24, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: That's not a reason for deletion, but the watermark and EXIF say that the image is by Leontine van Geffen-Lamers, who may or may not be our uploader. In order to restore it, she must send a free license to OTRS. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:55, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Raasulhudood (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope, non-WLM submit

Kiranravikumar (talk) 07:25, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:32, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Makbys (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Self promotion of an individual/company and non-WLM submission.

Kiranravikumar (talk) 07:47, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:32, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Anil098421 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal image & non-WLM submission.

Kiranravikumar (talk) 07:55, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:41, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BABAR735383 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal image & non-WLM submission.

Kiranravikumar (talk) 07:56, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:41, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Laxmilalkumawat (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope & non-WLM submissions.

Kiranravikumar (talk) 08:06, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:41, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Eraevsky (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:37, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Eraevsky (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Russia for sculptures. Recent installations.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:33, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Eraevsky (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Modern [and very low-quality, I'd say] paintings, based on old photographs [5]File:Gulak-Artemovskii Petr Petrovich.jpg, [6]File:Rizhskii Ivan Stepanovich.jpg, File:Oosipovsk.jpgFile:Osipovskii Timofei Fedorovich.jpg and so on. No authors' permissions.

Sealle (talk) 04:24, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:09, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Eraevsky (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks

Dogad75 (talk) 22:56, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Изображения фрагментов "Звездолёта Овчинникова" сняты в присутствии автора В. А. Овчинникова и с его согласия. Eraevsky (talk) 00:22, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Eraevsky: по правилам проекта Ваших слов об этом недостаточно, разрешение нужно оформить по стандартной процедуре, описанной на странице COM:OTRS/ru. Sealle (talk) 04:27, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Уважаемый @Sealle: ! Я созванивался с В. Овчинниковым и он обещал отправить согласие на использование. Не могли бы вы проследить и сообщить о поступлении этого письма. Если в течение недели не будет от вас вестей, попробую вновь с автором уточнить. Eraevsky (talk) 19:18, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Сам не могу. @НоуФрост: . Sealle (talk) 19:20, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Есть такой. Ticket#2018100510005488. Но @Dogad75: его за собой заблокировал и пока не обработал. НоуФрост (talk) 19:29, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Спасибо! Я написал Dogad75. Eraevsky (talk) 06:19, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:28, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Undeleted per Ticket#2018100510005488. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 05:05, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Eraevsky (talk · contribs)

[edit]

3D-работы неизвестных фотографов, разрешение на использовании своих работ на свободных лицензиях нет.

Dogad75 (talk) 13:42, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, missing permission. — Racconish💬 15:13, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Eraevsky (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Every image from http://hm.msu.ru may be found earlier on different websites under an unfree license. So obviously http://hm.msu.ru is not their author and can't relicense them under a CC license. http://hm.msu.ru itself changed their license from 1996–2014 © Факультет ВМК МГУ имени М. В. Ломоносова to a CC one before the uploads (2018).

Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:07, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May @Eraevsky: explain too where comes the dates (of shooting? of publication?) comes from since, on some files, there's nothing on EXIF? --Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:21, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Dear Patrick Rogel! All of the above images belong to professors of Moscow State University. The site of the Museum of History of Moscow State University is the official body of Moscow State University. Eraevsky (talk) 18:10, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
That's what I suspected: that the professors provided their regular "own" images (which remains to be proved since they are not the photographers) to the Moscow State University, which placed them under a CC though they have not the right to do so. It's explains why images can be found somewhere else prior of their insertion in http://hm.msu.ru. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:25, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • Dear colleague! Most of the photographs in question are amateurish, which leads to the conviction that the rights to it belong to the person who is depicted in the photograph and allows its public distribution. In any case, the responsibility for copyright in this case lies with the history site of Moscow University, and not Wikimedia Commons. Eraevsky (talk) 04:55, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
      •  Delete. Eraevsky, ваши рассуждения находятся далеко за пределами принципов защиты авторского права. У любой фотографии есть автор, и если он письменно не передавал своё исключительное право изображённому, никаких прав у последнего не появляется. Размещая чужие фото без согласия фотографов, МГУ занимается отмыванием лицензии. --VLu (talk) 08:37, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
        • @VLu: В рассматриваемой нами теме речь идёт о публикации фотографий персоналий (не художественных изображений) и этом случае помимо авторского права фотографа имеются права персоналии на защиту своего изображения. Суть данного права состоит в том, что никто не вправе обнародовать и использовать изображение (фотографию), на которых изображена персоналия без её согласия. В случае изображений с сайтов МГУ подобное согласие было получено с высокой вероятностью в отличие от сайтов, ссылки на которые приведены коллегой Patrick Rogel. Eraevsky (talk) 05:50, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
"Personality rights" have nothing to do with copyright. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 06:19, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@VLu: With the other files uploaded by Eraevsky and put on SD it seems there's enough proofs of copyvio. Last remaining files at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Professors of Moscow State University. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:11, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Dear colleagues, given your experience with images, you are probably right, but I do not consider myself entitled to blame any portal for dishonesty solely on the basis that search engines find similar photos on other portals. Eraevsky (talk) 15:59, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:17, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Eraevsky (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No FoP in Russia for modern artworks except architecture.

Xunks (talk) 17:59, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 16:15, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by PIJUS (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:38, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:40, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dentco (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Advertisement. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:40, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vasu Gokul Shivaji (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal image & non-WLM submission. Out of scope.

Kiranravikumar (talk) 19:18, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:39, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Praveen045 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal images, out of scope & non-WLM submissions.

Kiranravikumar (talk) 19:24, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:39, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is only reclame Jos1950 (talk) 01:17, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:47, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. No encyclopedic or educational value. Majora (talk) 01:31, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:47, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible non-free logo 47.150.68.26 03:11, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-textlogo. --Jcb (talk) 21:47, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Belleschoses (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

--ghouston (talk) 03:17, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:46, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Selfie photos. not relevant to Wikipedia

Naveenpf (talk) 03:18, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:46, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:34, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:46, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:34, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:46, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:35, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:46, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:36, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:46, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:38, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:46, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of Category talk:PDF books from TVA in 2015 by writer Info-farmer (talk) 04:45, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:46, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of COM:SCOPE INeverCry 05:06, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:49, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of COM:SCOPE INeverCry 05:08, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:49, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of COM:SCOPE INeverCry 05:09, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:49, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in the Philippines and with the M4 carbine this statue is recent enough to be copyrighted. The photograph is a derivative work that violates the sculptor's copyright. De728631 (talk) 00:29, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:49, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of original artwork. This logo is most likely too recent to be out of copyright. "Applied art" in the Philippines is protected for 25 years past first publication. De728631 (talk) 00:59, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:49, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Northvanrules (talk · contribs)

[edit]

modern artworks : permission from the author(s) is needed (see OTRS)

Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:53, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:49, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of Category:PDF books from TVA in 2015 by writer Info-farmer (talk) 05:03, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:50, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self portait Naveenpf (talk) 06:25, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:50, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sdp49 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

personal images that have no encyclopaedic value, not used in user pages either.

SpacemanSpiff 06:47, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:50, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Prakash Singh Serawat (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal image & non-WLM submission. Out of scope.

Kiranravikumar (talk) 08:08, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:51, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality pic now superceded by better pic, File:1_Sandgate2.jpg. Sardaka (talk) 08:29, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Weak  Keep. Shows more of the surroundings which could be of some value. Wknight94 talk 12:49, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: In use, so COM:SCOPE automatically satisfied. I agree the other is probably best for most uses, but there are enough differences to make this potentially useful. 99of9 (talk) 09:53, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality, low res. Better version is: (1)Sandgate-1a.jpg in same category Sardaka (talk) 10:10, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:51, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Gampe as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: out of scope - self promotion. In my opinion not suitable for stock photo. Taivo (talk) 10:35, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  1.  Delete Out of scope, self promotion. --Gampe (talk) 14:23, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:51, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is outdated. The fotos was accurated for the period 2010-2011. Furthermore, regarding privacy the displayed persons would like to have it removed. Sjefklijberg (talk) 10:44, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:51, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is there any way to assert the author of this painting died more than 70 years ago? Discasto talk 10:45, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:51, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

a pronunciation file with the same purpose exists already: De-phantastisch.ogg, no need for double filing Jeuwre (talk) 10:45, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:51, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Astrologer Tahreem Shah (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused images with a lengthy "Ms. Tahreem Shah is a renowned astrologer and Spiritual Healer... Send above birth details in email [redacted] or send in SMS to ..." advertising spiel in the "source" box (which I've sinced blanked).

McGeddon (talk) 11:48, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:51, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Just a PNG render of file:Flag of Turkmenistan.svg TFerenczy (talk) 13:03, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:53, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality, uncropped, disputed (multiple flags, not a flag) pdf file – no educational purpose. TFerenczy (talk) 13:34, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:53, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OTRS-permission from copyright holder Mirza is needed. Taivo (talk) 13:39, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:53, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality, out of scope. TFerenczy (talk) 13:44, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:53, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low-quality personal photograph TFerenczy (talk) 13:44, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:53, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

complete failed pronunciation example, additionally an example already exists: [De-Autos.ogg] Jeuwre (talk) 13:54, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:53, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

a pronunciation example spoken not very well, an better example already exists: [De-Eulen.ogg] Jeuwre (talk) 13:58, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:53, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

a pronunciation example spoken not very well, an better example already exists: [De-Eule.ogg] Jeuwre (talk) 13:59, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:53, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:05, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:53, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:53, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private files storage. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:53, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as wiki-tabke to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:54, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Existe en meilleure qualité (File:COP50000 frente.jpg et n'est plus utilisé. Lepsyleon (talk) 14:24, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:54, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Existe en meilleure qualité (File:COP50000 reverso.jpg et n'est plus utilisé. Lepsyleon (talk) 14:24, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:54, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:54, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artwork without obvious educational use Anders Feder (talk) 15:07, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:54, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No encyclopedic value; used on promotional user page on enwiki TJH2018talk 15:34, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:54, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

a not very well produced audio pronunciation example, an alternative already exists and is used: [CPIDL German - Auf Wiedersehen.ogg] Jeuwre (talk) 15:36, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:54, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope due to bad quality. I do not understand, what is depicted. Taivo (talk) 15:57, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:54, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not appropriate content Kaizer22 (talk) 16:05, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:55, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

expendable file because of existing De-das pfeiffen die Spatzen von den Dächern.ogg Jeuwre (talk) 16:18, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:55, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong source, wrong aithor. OTRS-permission from author and copyright holder Christian Bowman is needed. Taivo (talk) 16:52, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:55, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OTRS-permission from Ryan Nesh Panicker is needed. Taivo (talk) 17:03, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:55, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OTRS-permission from copyright holder Emran Kassim is needed. Taivo (talk) 17:10, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:55, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:33, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

is it below TOO?

Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:14, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:55, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtful own work, more information on the photo is required Gijón16 (talk) 17:23, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:56, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Has another upload of this monument Lakshmi 18:10, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Has another upload of this monument Lakshmi 18:12, 22 September 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:56, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:56, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused; no purpose apparent from image or (missing) description; could easily be redone, if really needed for some purpose; should better be in svg format, anyway Jochen Burghardt (talk) 18:23, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:56, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

NoFoP in ukraine. The monument was builded on 1990 (as you can see here). Andriy.v (talk) 18:32, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:56, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

obviously a cut-out of another map, not usable and possibly a copyright violation Don-kun (talk) 18:42, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:56, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

obviously a cut-out of another map, not usable and possibly a copyright violation Don-kun (talk) 18:42, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:56, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

obviously a cut-out of another map, not usable and possibly a copyright violation Don-kun (talk) 18:42, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:56, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Conflictly uploaded as own work but stated to be by Walter Bird (d. 1969). January (talk) 18:45, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:56, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by KALWARORG (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyvio, non-WLM submission. Out of scope.

Kiranravikumar (talk) 19:03, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:56, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shishpal bana (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal image & non-WLM submission.

Kiranravikumar (talk) 19:11, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:56, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jsisodiya (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal image & non-WLM submission.Out of scope.

Kiranravikumar (talk) 19:14, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:56, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shekhar Walia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal images & non-WLM submission. Out of scope for the Wikipedia usage.

Kiranravikumar (talk) 19:17, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:56, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

my mistake re name Fleets (talk) 19:24, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: use {{Rename}}. --INeverCry 23:57, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gyanendra Yadav (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Selfies (personal images) - out of scope for the Wikipedia projects & non-WLM submission.

Kiranravikumar (talk) 19:25, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:57, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ishakk7 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Missing EXIF & personal images. Non-WLM submission, out of scope.

Kiranravikumar (talk) 19:28, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:57, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I selected the incorrect image to upload! Mbpippen (talk) 19:42, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:57, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Russia.svg. Fry1989 eh? 20:22, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:57, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of the People's Republic of China.svg. Fry1989 eh? 20:22, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:57, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Stefan4 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: cover artwork Is the painting out of copyright? Dschwen (talk) 14:16, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: INeverCry 20:40, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - unused book cover, with a painting on it, which we have in unobscured copies Pibwl (talk) 20:35, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:58, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, along with File:Copertina Medio n. 100.png Pibwl (talk) 20:36, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:58, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

pdf out of scope Pibwl (talk) 20:37, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:58, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Helga Ancher died 1964, and she is the artist en:Helga Ancher Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 20:43, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:58, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyright violation, not own work Frze > talk 20:46, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:58, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, doubtful copyright Pibwl (talk) 20:47, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:58, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low res, no meta data, compression artifacts suggesting capture from existing media, uploaded along with unambiguous copyvio. Quack? Эlcobbola talk 20:51, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:58, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

apart from questionable notability of the musician (on 3 other user's uploads), unlikely own photo. Pibwl (talk) 20:51, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:58, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This page is creating issues with our Google Knowledge Panel, and it was created by a staff member Chad B., who is no longer working here. We need it removed and should have authority over that decision since we're the owner of the photo at Bloomington Public Library. JigsawproScotty (talk) 21:00, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:58, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

its blurry. there is a better version in commons: Arnaud Palastowicz (talk) 21:31, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:58, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Used solely to promote the person pictured in a vanity biography on English Wikipedia which is about to be deleted yet again. Not needed for any other legitimate purpose. DanielRigal (talk) 21:51, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:59, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyright violation. Obvious corporate ownership, no evidence of permission. Also not within project scope; we are not a publisher of press releases. Huon (talk) 21:52, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:59, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentified rock presented as material of "celestial or terrestrial" origin... There is no way it's a meteorite. It's likely just a piece of some sort of slag. Hoax or pointless picture of unidentified object: out of scope. Basilicofresco (msg) 22:00, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:59, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentified rock presented as material of "celestial or terrestrial" origin... There is no way it's a meteorite. It's likely just a piece of some sort of slag. Hoax or pointless picture of unidentified object: out of scope. Basilicofresco (msg) 22:00, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:59, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Just now found the strange discussion about copyright on this public memorial, which people take hundreds of photos of every day. I cannot find any way to delete a file I've already uploaded, so nominating for deletion. Laura S. Tinnel 22:08, 22 September 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:59, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Yes, sure "Roy Lichtenstein girl" aka "Say'f Dean" is the author of this image and puts it under PD worldwide, but had to copy it from a postershop. 88.76.223.108 22:10, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:59, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Sanandros as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: (c) Top Enterprise Solutions, non-free logo, isn't trivial
Some countries this is TOO as the source is a ukrainian domain I suppose this is of ukrainian origin. Sanandros (talk) 22:15, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:59, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Secondarywaltz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Not "Own work". Copyright holder is FIG, Av. de la Gare 12, 1003 Switzerland, +41 21 321 5510, info@fig-photos.com, www.fig-photos.com Sanandros (talk) 22:33, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Sanandros: What is your problem with my tagging this for speedy-deletion? This image is clearly marked "Copyright holder is FIG, Av. de la Gare 12, 1003 Switzerland, +41 21 321 5510, info@fig-photos.com, www.fig-photos.com" and the uploader is not the owner as they claim. Secondarywaltz (talk)
Where is this pic marked? I don't see any watermark.--Sanandros (talk) 22:47, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
EXIF data is what I am referring to. Secondarywaltz (talk) 23:25, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:59, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Newer colour scheme has been uploaded with a different title. This file is no longer needed. (I am the original uploader) Filpro (talk) 23:41, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:59, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality snapshot of self and friend practicing various hand gestures. Not in use. Not useful for any educational purpose. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 23:52, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:59, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope personal image used in long-term sockpuppetry case on English Wikipedia (en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dtreeter15). IronGargoyle (talk) 18:25, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by colleague. --Jcb (talk) 17:12, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As per COM:TOYS. OSX (talkcontributions) 04:59, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep - no infringement, these toys are utilitarian objects - Jcb (talk) 15:11, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
According to COM:TOYS "In ... the United States (where Commons is hosted), most toys are considered to be art. In the United States, it is the same thing whether you take a picture of a sculpture or a picture of Darth Vader. Both are copyrighted; in both cases, the copyright of the photograph does not void the original copyright, and in both cases you will need the permission of the original creator." Furthermore, "in the US, a toy airplane, for example, has the purpose of depicting the appearance of an airplane in the same manner as a painting of an airplane which is different from an actual airplane having the purpose of transporting persons or goods".
This would suggest toys are not utilitarian objects and cannot be hosted here. OSX (talkcontributions) 15:53, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Did you notice Wiking is from Germany, not from the US? Jcb (talk) 16:01, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I did. Let me point you to this extra quote in the policy for your reference: "When uploading a picture of a toy, you must show that the toy is in the public domain in both the United States and in the source country of the toy. In the United States, copyright is granted for toys even if the toy is ineligible for copyright in the source country". OSX (talkcontributions) 16:43, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Toys are not utilitarian objects under US law, and the precedents that establish this are well cited in COM:DW. Unless evidence can be shown that these designed have entered the PD for some reason, obvious delete. Reventtalk 15:02, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
US law is irrelevant for this case. Jcb (talk) 20:14, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Why? Natuur12 (talk) 22:47, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Because Wiking is from Germany, not from US. (compare FoP, where we can host pictures from statues in countries with FoP for artwork, while the US has FoP for buildings only) - Jcb (talk) 23:06, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
But that contradicts our core policies. Natuur12 (talk) 23:09, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
And utilitarian objects kinda have a copyright in the EU. Natuur12 (talk) 23:10, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think this passes Schöpfungshöhe in Germany. Jcb (talk) 11:55, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Jcb: "Wikimedia Commons only accepts media
We stopped quite a while ago with URAA deletions and even did a massive restauration of those files. And for e.g. FoP, we do look at the rules of the source country only. So no, the only interesting question is whether this is acceptable under German copyright law. Jcb (talk) 19:56, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
FOP has nothing to do with this, and the URAA is clearly irrelevant, unless you think these toys are from the 1960s or earlier (which they obviously are not). Reventtalk 20:37, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
These were two examples to show that the at least the United States conflicts with established practice. Jcb (talk) 20:51, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Just...no. This isn't the place for the argument, but the 'limited' cases of FOP and URAA are not even remotely proof that COM:L is not a Commons policy with massive consensus. If you want to change that policy, you need to take it to the community as a whole, not just ignore it. If your 'established practice' is to ignore the licensing policy, then you need to stop, or give up your bit. Reventtalk 01:07, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination (COM:TOYS). Not free in the US. Especially after reading case law arguments at User:Elcobbola/Models and User:Elcobbola/Stuffed Animals. Also, FoP laws are regional, these things are not permanent, hence not regional, and needs to be ok under both countries laws. (tJosve05a (c) 09:04, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

l'opera non è dell'autore indicato 2.233.100.247 07:43, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: The artist, Duccio, is named and linked to his WP:EN article. I don't see any reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:03, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Haim Baron (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Modern art and articles. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am the owner of Isiu Scharf's art collection estate among them his self portrait that we posted. On the article (It's the Dream the Counts), I have permission from Mr. Arie Dreyfus to publish his article about Isiu Scharf. The Russian newspaper article titled "The Jewish Artist" was published on 8-27-98. File:"The Jewish Artist".jpg

Haim Baron, You have to send OTRS permission for the the artwork from the heirs of Isiu Scharf. Also needed permission for the text in the PDF articles. If it is easier for you you can send permission in Hebrew according to the instructions in ויקיפדיה:OTRS. -- Geagea (talk) 05:22, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Owning a work of art does not make you the owner of its copyright -- that is held by the artist or his heirs. Please follow Geagea's instructions. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:05, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is nothing here to tell us when this work was created or first published. All we know is that it appeared in a book in 2006. While it is likely that it is, in fact, old, our standard of proof is not "likely", but "beyond a significant doubt" and this may well be a recent work. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:19, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It is an old work, maybe its first reproduction has been in a book of 2006, but the original is belong to the Napoleonic age. As it is indicated at page 181 of the book referenced.--Bramfab (talk) 15:45, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: probably old enough, but no evidence. --Jcb (talk) 15:31, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Well the scope problem was easily fixed by placing it on the page it was specifically uploaded for. It was there once before but someone removed it. Probably better to actually check to see if something is useful before nominating it for deletion next time. If you want to make it into a SVG you are more than welcome to as well. --Majora (talk) 20:22, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: As a general rule, you cannot fix scope problems by adding the logo to an article after a DR is posted. That is particularly the case if, as you say, the image was previously removed from the article. In this case, however, it clearly should be removed from the article and Commons because there is no evidence that this logo is real -- it does not appear on http://www.vestavia.k12.al.us/ and flags and banners shown there use a simple VH in a heavy-serif font. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:20, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

-- Restored -- see note today on my talkpage. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:30, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Änderung des Bildinhaltes Thonberger (talk) 15:40, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:21, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Tm as Copyvio (copyvio).
I know there exists some TOO map cases in the US so pls discuss. Sanandros (talk) 21:07, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 CommentThere is nothing to discuss. This file is a copyright violation grabbed from from Google Maps, as stated on the filepage. Tm (talk) 21:09, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sanandros@ I have already written that there are many of these types of images on Commons. Therefore, I also found it strange that my images were deleted and a warning was given for blocking.
But TM seems to searches me. Consult is impossible and if I change something to this person, all hell breaks loose. --Jos1950 (talk) 21:50, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Jos1950: why u don't take Open Street Map? There everything is clear according to the copyright because they use a CC license. @Tm: I know there exist some TOO cases with maps. Because it's from Google doesn't make it automatically copyrighted. TOO is still not defined by google.--Sanandros (talk) 22:05, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment This maps are way above TOO. Also per Using Google Maps, Google Earth and Street View this maps can only be used almost freely for non-comercial use and commercial use can only be used with several caveats, incompatible with Commons. Tm (talk) 22:13, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I was under the assumption that google maps is used everywhere. "Open Street Map" was unknown to me, have just viewed and also appears useful. I will use it from now on, thanks Sanandros. --Jos1950 (talk) 22:19, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
TM, what do you mean with "way above TOO". Search for "map" and you will find hundreds. Lots of fun. --Jos1950 (talk) 19:47, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:23, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]