Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/09/15
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
porque asi lo requiero Mich1997 (talk) 03:26, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 12:04, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
original art (alteration of a free image) by nonotable artist/uploader. we are not an art gallery or repository, image is not showing anything useful not shown by original Mercurywoodrose (talk) 04:22, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Used for vandalism at en.wiki. --INeverCry 08:44, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Monuments??? Manoj Shrestha (talk) 09:36, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 09:39, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
I could not verify the license. Source site is probably down. Small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 10:57, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, found at http://www.vanguardia.com/entretenimiento/farandula/227594-confirmo-su-embarazo from October 2013, before upload into Commons. Taivo (talk) 11:06, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
NETCOPYVIOs
Wikicology (talk) 10:03, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Web site screenshots. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
There is a copyright concern as it is based on google map Eran (talk) 04:18, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- PS, it would be nice to recreate it based on free license map - such as maps already existing in commons or based on OSM. Eran (talk) 04:19, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 23:32, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
still from copyrighted television show. 71.178.24.251 05:31, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 23:34, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
claims to be a poster of a (non existant?) movie, while apparently it's a montage based on Call of Duty poster (see results from TinEye) Powermelon (talk) 06:57, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 23:35, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Double copies Manoj Shrestha (talk) 10:25, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:37, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
For an error Cuci777 (talk) 10:27, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:37, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution, found in I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 11:01, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 23:37, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Akontismos (talk · contribs)
[edit]Derivative work : It need the permission from the artist via OTRS, or an evidence for why it can be free
Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:09, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 23:38, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
So basically this user photoshopped himself into a photo with an (actress?); obviously has copyright issues Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 11:31, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 23:38, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Screen grabs Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 12:06, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 23:38, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
It seems clearly a copyviol Spinoziano (talk) 12:08, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 23:38, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Cropped version of File:The Allied Reoccupation of the Andaman Islands, 1945 SE5226.jpg, fake author and not precise description. jdx Re: 12:15, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. --INeverCry 23:38, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
own work claim but taken from several social media profiles. https://twitter.com/mgeijtenbeek https://nl.linkedin.com/in/marco-geijtenbeek-71b0603b Agora (talk) 12:24, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 23:38, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Not own work, same image with 620x370 resolution can be found here: http://www.og.ru/society/2016/02/15/78951 Cap1000 (talk) 13:48, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 23:39, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
This is copyrighted by who wired.com http://www.whowired.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=401764 Govvy (talk) 13:50, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 23:39, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
The file was uploaded by mistake. It should not be accessible on the internet. JonasAndersenCPHR (talk) 14:14, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:39, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Coppushhhhh (talk · contribs)
[edit]More screenshots from copyrighted websites. More copyvios uploaded under a changed user name.
Ies (talk) 14:21, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb: Copyright violation: More screenshots from copyrighted websites. More copyvios uploaded under a changed user name.
Unlikely to be own work: missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.eonline.com/eol_images/Entire_Site/2016415/rs_1024x759-160515115638-1024.beyonce-concert.cm.51516.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 23:40, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Author is "unknown" so how could they have given permission to use this image? January (talk) 16:05, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 23:41, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
This image looks like it was copied from somewhere else, it does not appear to be own work of uploader on 11 February 2016. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:15, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 23:41, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Image is in use on the brochure of the museum, prior to this upload, please see http://artdecomuseum.ru/pressa-o-nas. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:21, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 23:41, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
File:L 60OCphWC62WvMRMNnl9UuCtpzCLyCCWqN2ApL8K-k,p6IK7OICREL9cnV1QD1JxClm0sSgL-ISPe9guedr754,zlIfyOS4Qaj-FqNGeFBy7NyN-xUJhSAOr CJwAxjgPU.jpg
[edit]Image is in use, on twitter and other places, also see http://salamtoronto.ca/2015/%D9%BE%DB%8C%D8%A7%D9%85-%D8%AA%D8%A8%D8%B1%DB%8C%DA%A9-%DA%A9%D9%86%DA%AF%D8%B1%D9%87-%D8%A7%DB%8C%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%86%DB%8C%D8%A7%D9%86-%DA%A9%D8%A7%D9%86%D8%A7%D8%AF%D8%A7/, doubtful own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:22, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 22:35, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
accidentally PNG instead of JPG and title was not ok. reuploaded the jpg version with correct title. SimonCiminski (talk) 16:26, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:41, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Not own work, image published in social network (https://vk.com/topic-64829853_29568203?post=8) 20.01.2014 (see post date) and only half year later reposted on commons Cap1000 (talk) 16:29, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 23:41, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Obviously copied from some publication without attribution, not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:37, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 23:42, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Laetitiaduhamel (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:COPYVIOs: Facebook size photos, book covers and etc., all claimed as own work and all obviously not.
- File:Crif - Yvan Attal & Yves Azéroual - Avant-Première "Ils sont partout" - 2016.jpg
- File:Azeroual2.jpg
- File:Azéroual.jpg
- File:Alain Decaux et Yves Azéroual.jpg
- File:Foi et République.jpg
- File:Mitterand, Israël et les juifs.png
- File:La blessure dans la main gauche.jpg
- File:Le sage et l'artiste.jpg
- File:Passions d etat.png
- File:People politicus.jpg
- File:L'arnaque. Le programme du Front National enfin décrypté.jpg
- File:Carla Bruni-Sarkozy la véritable histoire.jpg
- File:A-t-on le droit de défendre Israël ? ce qu'il faut savoir avant de juger.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:45, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvios. --INeverCry 23:42, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Unused newspaper clipping is not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:56, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 23:43, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
SPAM (filename, image description,image likely not free) -- Magister Mathematicae 17:06, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio/spam. --INeverCry 23:43, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
No indication on the origin page that image is freely licensed Brianga (talk) 18:57, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 23:44, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
en:Morrisons is an UK company, which is a country with a very low treshold of copyrightability, c.f COM:TOO#United Kingdom. The leaf/flower shape is already pushing it towards US copyright. I note for myself that en:File:Morrisons Logo.svg is tagged as "shadows commons" a tag which can be removed if this is deleted. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 19:19, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 23:45, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
This file looks like it may constitute a derivative work of the magazine - the magazine's contents are so visible and prominent that de minimis probably does not apply. I note for myself that en:File:Magazines.jpg seems to have similar issues. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 19:27, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 23:45, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
I uploaded this image with an internal identifier and thought I could edit after uploading but cannot. Thanks for deleting. GoucherLovesResearch (talk) 19:33, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:46, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
It looks like a photo from the Internet without permission, for example: https://lifesshortwearadress.wordpress.com/tag/shailene-woodley/ --sasha (krassotkin) 20:12, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 23:46, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Photo from the Internet without permission, for example: http://ecowallpapers.net/wp-content/uploads/Alyssa-5.jpg --sasha (krassotkin) 20:16, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 23:47, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Not own work, example: http://www.hercampus.com/sites/default/files/2016/03/01/WMAG_ALESSIACARA0371_FINAL_IG-1542x1541.jpg --sasha (krassotkin) 20:22, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 23:47, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
copyrighted film poster Cap1000 (talk) 20:36, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 23:47, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
File:Neru-Americano-Andamento-Gilipo-Mambo-Rijo - 10Youtube.com (convert-video-online.com).webm
[edit]I see standard YouTube license for this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=53aPFHAz0BQ --sasha (krassotkin) 20:50, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 23:48, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
File:BEST-COMMERCIAL-EVER-Nike-Football-Winner-Stays-ft-Ronaldo-Neymar-Hulk-Rooney-Iniesta-etc - 10Youtube.com VP8.webm
[edit]Probably copyrighted video. --sasha (krassotkin) 20:53, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 23:48, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Probably copyrighted video. --sasha (krassotkin) 20:54, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 23:48, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
2-d reproduction of a copyrighted work JAufrecht (WMF) (talk) 20:54, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 23:48, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Probably copyrighted video. --sasha (krassotkin) 20:55, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 23:48, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Probably copyrighted video. --sasha (krassotkin) 20:56, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 23:49, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Movie poster. --sasha (krassotkin) 21:07, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 23:49, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
unused own supage -- Magister Mathematicae 21:47, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:49, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
unused own supgage -- Magister Mathematicae 21:48, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:50, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
unused own subpage -- Magister Mathematicae 21:48, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:50, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
unused own subpage -- Magister Mathematicae 21:48, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:50, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
unused own subpage -- Magister Mathematicae 21:48, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:51, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Probably a copyright violation. The linked website contains no license statement, so normal copyright applies. Torsch (talk) 22:10, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 23:51, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
It's an orphaned and scaled-down duplicate. There is an svg format, File:ROC Social and Family Affairs Administration Emblem.svg, in Commons now. Akira123 (talk) 02:58, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, redundant. Taivo (talk) 15:08, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal image. I thought maybe we could keep this one, except that watermark really reduces its usefulness as educational material. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 05:35, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 15:58, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Non-trivial logo and spam. jdx Re: 05:54, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, non-trivial spam with questionable notability. Taivo (talk) 16:01, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope; logo for what appears to be a non-notable YouTube channel. No educational value or foreseeable use. ~Kevin Payravi (talk) 05:57, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 16:03, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Personal image, not in use, a low-quality snapshot with no potential educational value, out of Project scope. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 05:58, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 16:10, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
A monument is a type of structure that was explicitly created to commemorate a person or event, or which has become important to a social group as a part of their remembrance of historic times or cultural heritage, or as an example of historic archi Manoj Shrestha (talk) 06:16, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept, no reason for deletion is stated. Beautiful photo. Taivo (talk) 17:30, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
A monument is a type of structure that was explicitly created to commemorate a person or event, or which has become important to a social group as a part of their remembrance of historic times or cultural heritage, or as an example of historic archi Manoj Shrestha (talk) 06:18, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept, no reason for deletion is stated. Taivo (talk) 17:48, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
A monument is a type of structure that was explicitly created to commemorate a person or event, or which has become important to a social group as a part of their remembrance of historic times or cultural heritage, or as an example of historic archi Manoj Shrestha (talk) 06:20, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept, no reason for deletion is stated. Beautiful photo. Taivo (talk) 17:56, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
A monument is a type of structure that was explicitly created to commemorate a person or event, or which has become important to a social group as a part of their remembrance of historic times or cultural heritage, or as an example of historic archi Manoj Shrestha (talk) 06:23, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept, no reason for deletion is stated. Beautiful photo. Taivo (talk) 18:12, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
A monument is a type of structure that was explicitly created to commemorate a person or event, or which has become important to a social group as a part of their remembrance of historic times or cultural heritage, or as an example of historic archi Manoj Shrestha (talk) 06:25, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept, no reason for deletion is stated. Beautiful photo. Taivo (talk) 17:19, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Sir this photo can be seen by everybody who use Wikipedia so can u please show some respect to it and have your own prestige preserved. Manoj Shrestha (talk) 10:15, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept, no reason for deletion is stated. Beautiful photo. Taivo (talk) 18:21, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Sir this photo can be seen by everybody who use Wikipedia so can u please show some respect to it and have your own prestige preserved. May be u can contribute it for bunny Manoj Shrestha (talk) 10:34, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept, no reason for deletion is stated. Taivo (talk) 17:23, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
A monument is a type of structure that was explicitly created to commemorate a person or event, or which has become important to a social group as a part of their remembrance of historic times or cultural heritage, or as an example of historic archi Manoj Shrestha (talk) 06:23, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept, no reason for deletion is stated. Beautiful image. Taivo (talk) 18:42, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
A monument is a type of structure that was explicitly created to commemorate a person or event, or which has become important to a social group as a part of their remembrance of historic times or cultural heritage, or as an example of historic archi Manoj Shrestha (talk) 06:24, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept, no reason for deletion is stated. Beautiful photo. Taivo (talk) 18:36, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
A monument is a type of structure that was explicitly created to commemorate a person or event, or which has become important to a social group as a part of their remembrance of historic times or cultural heritage, or as an example of historic archi Manoj Shrestha (talk) 06:26, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept, no reason for deletion is stated. Beautiful photo. Taivo (talk) 19:25, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
A monument is a type of structure that was explicitly created to commemorate a person or event, or which has become important to a social group as a part of their remembrance of historic times or cultural heritage, or as an example of historic archi Manoj Shrestha (talk) 06:28, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept, no reason for deletion is stated. Beautiful photo. Taivo (talk) 19:52, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
A monument is a type of structure that was explicitly created to commemorate a person or event, or which has become important to a social group as a part of their remembrance of historic times or cultural heritage, or as an example of historic archi Manoj Shrestha (talk) 06:29, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 20:02, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Advertising poster Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 06:35, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, also file:Künstler mieten.jpg due to advertizing and file:Feuershows.jpg, because it is found on external site and is not own work. Taivo (talk) 20:34, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
A monument is a type of structure that was explicitly created to commemorate a person or event, or which has become important to a social group as a part of their remembrance of historic times or cultural heritage, or as an example of historic archi Manoj Shrestha (talk) 06:44, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept, valuable addition into category:Rice farming in Nepal. Taivo (talk) 19:01, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
A monument is a type of structure that was explicitly created to commemorate a person or event, or which has become important to a social group as a part of their remembrance of historic times or cultural heritage, or as an example of historic archi Manoj Shrestha (talk) 06:50, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept, no reason for deletion is stated. Beautiful photo. Taivo (talk) 20:51, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
A monument is a type of structure that was explicitly created to commemorate a person or event, or which has become important to a social group as a part of their remembrance of historic times or cultural heritage, or as an example of historic archi Manoj Shrestha (talk) 07:00, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept, no reason for deletion is stated. Taivo (talk) 20:59, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Sir this photo can be seen by everybody who use Wikipedia so can u please show some respect to it and have your own prestige preserved. Manoj Shrestha (talk) 10:12, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Comment No reason for deletion is stated. Quality is quite bad, but maybe somebody wants a stock photo for category:Fog in Nepal? Taivo (talk) 18:09, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, I decided to delete it due to bad quality. For example, file:On the way of manakamana.jpg from the same user is much better. Taivo (talk) 18:29, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Sir this photo can be seen by everybody who use Wikipedia so can u please show some respect to it and have your own prestige preserved. Manoj Shrestha (talk) 10:36, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept, valuable addition into category:Clouds in Nepal. Taivo (talk) 18:51, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Sir this photo can be seen by everybody who use Wikipedia so can u please show some respect to it and have your own prestige preserved. Manoj Shrestha (talk) 10:36, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept, no reason for deletion is stated. Beautiful photo. Taivo (talk) 18:58, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Sir this photo can be seen by everybody who use Wikipedia so can u please show some respect to it and have your own prestige preserved. Manoj Shrestha (talk) 10:37, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, technically bad shot. Taivo (talk) 18:54, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Sir this photo can be seen by everybody who use Wikipedia so can u please show some respect to it and have your own prestige preserved. Manoj Shrestha (talk) 10:16, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept, no reason for deletion is stated. Taivo (talk) 09:56, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Sir this photo can be seen by everybody who use Wikipedia so can u please show some respect to it and have your own prestige preserved. MAY be you can put it in natural resources page of Nepal Manoj Shrestha (talk) 10:21, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept, no similar images in category:Clouds in Nepal. Normal quality. Taivo (talk) 10:09, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
It is copy of 11 Manoj Shrestha (talk) 10:27, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, copy of file:Patan Durbar Square Premises (11).jpg. Taivo (talk) 10:14, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
not used self portrait / nem használt önarckép Rlevente (talk) 10:37, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:32, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Selfie. Unused. Totally out of Project scope. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 10:38, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:29, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Sir this photo can be seen by everybody who use Wikipedia so can u please show some respect to it and have your own prestige preserved. Manoj Shrestha (talk) 10:41, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept, no reason for deletion is stated. Beautiful photo. Taivo (talk) 11:41, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Sir this photo can be seen by everybody who use Wikipedia so can u please show some respect to it and have your own prestige preserved. Manoj Shrestha (talk) 10:42, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept, no reason for deletion is stated. Beautiful photo. Taivo (talk) 11:49, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Sir this photo can be seen by everybody who use Wikipedia so can u please show some respect to it and have your own prestige preserved. Manoj Shrestha (talk) 10:43, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept, no reason for deletion is stated. Beautiful photo. Taivo (talk) 11:50, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Sir this photo can be seen by everybody who use Wikipedia so can u please show some respect to it and have your own prestige preserved. Manoj Shrestha (talk) 10:44, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept, no reason for deletion is stated. Beautiful photo. Taivo (talk) 11:52, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Sir this photo can be seen by everybody who use Wikipedia so can u please show some respect to it and have your own prestige preserved. Manoj Shrestha (talk) 10:45, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept, no reason for deletion is stated. Beautiful photo. Taivo (talk) 11:53, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Sir this photo can be seen by everybody who use Wikipedia so can u please show some respect to it and have your own prestige preserved. Manoj Shrestha (talk) 10:47, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, nothing special is depicted. Taivo (talk) 12:01, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Sir this photo can be seen by everybody who use Wikipedia so can u please show some respect to it and have your own prestige preserved. Manoj Shrestha (talk) 10:48, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, bad quality. I'll delete also File:रमाणिय.jpg due to same reason. Taivo (talk) 12:04, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Sir this photo can be seen by everybody who use Wikipedia so can u please show some respect to it and have your own prestige preserved. Manoj Shrestha (talk) 10:51, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept, no reason for deletion is stated. Beautiful photo. Taivo (talk) 12:11, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Sir this photo can be seen by everybody who use Wikipedia so can u please show some respect to it and have your own prestige preserved. Manoj Shrestha (talk) 10:51, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept, no reason for deletion is stated. Beautiful photo. Taivo (talk) 12:13, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Sir this photo can be seen by everybody who use Wikipedia so can u please show some respect to it and have your own prestige preserved. Manoj Shrestha (talk) 10:52, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept, no reason for deletion is stated. Beautiful photo. Taivo (talk) 12:15, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Sir this photo can be seen by everybody who use Wikipedia so can u please show some respect to it and have your own prestige preserved. Manoj Shrestha (talk) 10:53, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept, no reason for deletion is stated. Beautiful photo. Taivo (talk) 12:18, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Unused selfie so low in quality it has no potential uses whatsoever. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 11:11, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:22, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Unused and Out of project scope ~ Nahid Talk 11:19, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:23, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Advertising Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 11:50, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, this is not a textlogo, surpasses threshold of originality. The uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:26, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
File difettoso sostituito da File:'Galera dell'Ordine di santo Stefano (XVI-XVII sec.)'.jpg Roberto.Amerighi (talk) 12:05, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 12:27, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope: personal image with no educational content Florn (talk) 12:06, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:30, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope: personal image with no educational content Florn (talk) 12:07, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:31, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope: personal image with no educational content Florn (talk) 12:07, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:32, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Files of User:Venkatvesan
[edit]"Me with my friends." Not useful for any educational purpose. The files are not currently in use. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 12:13, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, I'll delete also all other contributions of the uploader as unused personal photos. Taivo (talk) 12:35, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope: personal image with no educational content Florn (talk) 12:15, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, I'll delete also file:Voz y arte.jpg due to same reason. These are the uploader's only contributions. Taivo (talk) 12:48, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope: personal image with no educational content Florn (talk) 12:16, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:49, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Files of User:Msgurbaz
[edit]- File:Muhammad saeed with his friends.jpg
- File:Muhammad saeed's teachers.jpg
- File:Muhammad saeed (msgurbaz).jpg
"Me with my friends" and "me with my teachers". The files are not in use and have no potential educational value. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 12:22, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, I'll delete also file:Muhammad Saeed Artist 2016.jpg as small unused personal photo without metadata. These are the user's only uploads. Taivo (talk) 12:52, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Su fin era aportar imagen a "CrossFit" pero es reportado constantemente por spam, por llevar marca de agua con la firma del autor. Por dicho motivo, quiero eliminar el archivo. Ya que no puede usarse para el fín para el que fue cedida. Iko. Manuel1980 (talk) 12:25, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 12:55, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Low-quality personal image, not in use, with no potential educational value and a big ugly watermark. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 12:32, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:57, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
No poder usarse para el fin para el que fué cedida a wikipedia. iko. Manuel1980 (talk) 12:33, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 12:59, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
duplicate upload Susanna Giaccai (talk) 13:36, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 13:04, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:54, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 00:54, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:55, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 00:53, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Unused and unusable fuzzy scribble, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:02, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, dark blue letters "R4" on light blue background. If really needed, then should be replaced with .svg. Taivo (talk) 14:48, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Files of User:Noelpereraprovocando
[edit]Self-created artwork intended only for self-promotion of music. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 14:36, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 15:51, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
To replace with a better photo of Niche of the Madonna of Mount Carmel on top of the Knights Wash house in Fontana, Gozo BrandyMay (talk) 14:54, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 16:01, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Self-promotion Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 15:37, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, album covers can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission from cover artist. Taivo (talk) 16:10, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope logo. Mys_721tx (talk) 15:44, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, no mention in en.wiki, the user's only upload. Taivo (talk) 16:18, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Not in use, this artwork seems more personal than educational. Mr. Roemer does not have a Wikipedia entry. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:32, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Whitelaw Craig Roemer (born 1913) isn't mentioned in en.wiki. I must delete the uploader's other contributions file:Whitelaw Roemer 1968.jpg and file:Driving park bridge.jpg as unused photo about non-notable person and unused art of non-notable artist. Taivo (talk) 16:47, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Unused logo. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:34, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, L!FE isn't mentioned in en.wiki. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 17:12, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
The letterboxing, small size and poor quality of this image suggest it was copied from an unacknowledged source, and is not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:50, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 17:40, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely claim of own work on this small low quality image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:00, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, I'll delete all the uploader's contributions due to same reason: small photos without metadata, description and categories, all unused. Taivo (talk) 17:53, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Francisco castillo (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
- File:Mi hermosa hija.jpg
- File:En busca de una paz.jpg
- File:C Data Users DefApps AppData INTERNETEXPLORER Temp Saved Images 16 - 1.jpg
- File:Francisco castillo con mi familia.jpg
- File:FB 20160804 17 24 51 Saved Picture.jpg
Ies (talk) 15:42, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Francisco castillo (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 14:29, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:39, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Diese Datei wurde fälschlicherweise aus einer Serie von Aufnahmen für die Veröffentlichung ausgewählt. Sie wird durch eine Aufnahme besserer Qualität ersetzt werden. Jost (talk) 19:56, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by INeverCry: No license since 13 September 2016
blurry, low resolution, many better files see Category:Santa Maria del Fiore (Florence) - Facade Oursana (talk) 00:26, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 15:45, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Devendrasinghksj (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
- File:Devendra Singh Verma.jpg
- File:Devendra singh ksj (6).jpg
- File:Devendra singh ksj (5).jpg
- File:Devendra singh ksj (4).jpg
- File:Devendra singh ksj (3).jpg
- File:Devendra singh ksj (2).jpg
- File:Devendra singh ksj (1).jpg
--ghouston (talk) 01:56, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete all. This is self-promotion-only user (no edits in en.wiki, except on userpage). Taivo (talk) 14:02, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- File:Devendra Singh Verma.jpg has since been added to a user page, so I suppose it's OK. I don't know if it violates en:Wikipedia:User pages, or if that's relevant to a deletion request on Commons. --ghouston (talk) 05:27, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: user page image is allowed for contributors, nor for people who only come to create a user page. --Jcb (talk) 15:47, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:53, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- I created this file on the KIEA.jp website years ago and wanted to move the information to Wikipedia. This is my first attempt at this. Perhaps I am going about it the wrong way??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Barbkami (talk • contribs)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:47, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Advertisement; see COM:SCOPE Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:55, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:48, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:08, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:48, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
- also file:Kenn Pérez Duarte.jpg
- redirect file:Kenn B. Pérez Duarte.jpg
Low-quality personal image not in use in any projects, with no potential educational uses; out of scope. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 05:28, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete I added one photo and one redirect for deletion due to same reason. Taivo (talk) 15:54, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:49, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Files of User:Khalidsahito2
[edit]The user uploaded 3 images of himself and none are in use on any projects; they are so low in quality that they have no potential educational uses, even as "photographs of people". --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 05:41, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:49, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Cause it do not belong to monuments and it's related area. Manoj Shrestha (talk) 05:56, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- I don't understand why you are nominating all these photos for deletion. Just recategorize them. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 06:54, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Please Keep all flowers in Langtang National Park. Taivo (talk) 21:01, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 15:50, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
A monument is a type of structure that was explicitly created to commemorate a person or event, or which has become important to a social group as a part of their remembrance of historic times or cultural heritage, or as an example of historic archi Manoj Shrestha (talk) 06:29, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Keep, probably useful in category:Mustang District. Taivo (talk) 20:24, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 15:52, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
A monument is a type of structure that was explicitly created to commemorate a person or event, or which has become important to a social group as a part of their remembrance of historic times or cultural heritage, or as an example of historic archi Manoj Shrestha (talk) 06:30, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 15:51, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
A monument is a type of structure that was explicitly created to commemorate a person or event, or which has become important to a social group as a part of their remembrance of historic times or cultural heritage, or as an example of historic archi Manoj Shrestha (talk) 06:31, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 15:51, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
A monument is a type of structure that was explicitly created to commemorate a person or event, or which has become important to a social group as a part of their remembrance of historic times or cultural heritage, or as an example of historic archi Manoj Shrestha (talk) 06:32, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 15:52, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
A monument is a type of structure that was explicitly created to commemorate a person or event, or which has become important to a social group as a part of their remembrance of historic times or cultural heritage, or as an example of historic archi Manoj Shrestha (talk) 06:32, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 15:52, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
A monument is a type of structure that was explicitly created to commemorate a person or event, or which has become important to a social group as a part of their remembrance of historic times or cultural heritage, or as an example of historic archi Manoj Shrestha (talk) 06:33, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 15:52, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
A monument is a type of structure that was explicitly created to commemorate a person or event, or which has become important to a social group as a part of their remembrance of historic times or cultural heritage, or as an example of historic archi Manoj Shrestha (talk) 06:33, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 15:52, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
A monument is a type of structure that was explicitly created to commemorate a person or event, or which has become important to a social group as a part of their remembrance of historic times or cultural heritage, or as an example of historic archi Manoj Shrestha (talk) 06:34, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 15:52, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
A monument is a type of structure that was explicitly created to commemorate a person or event, or which has become important to a social group as a part of their remembrance of historic times or cultural heritage, or as an example of historic archi Manoj Shrestha (talk) 06:35, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 15:51, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
A monument is a type of structure that was explicitly created to commemorate a person or event, or which has become important to a social group as a part of their remembrance of historic times or cultural heritage, or as an example of historic archi Manoj Shrestha (talk) 06:35, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 15:51, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
A monument is a type of structure that was explicitly created to commemorate a person or event, or which has become important to a social group as a part of their remembrance of historic times or cultural heritage, or as an example of historic archi Manoj Shrestha (talk) 06:36, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 15:51, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
A monument is a type of structure that was explicitly created to commemorate a person or event, or which has become important to a social group as a part of their remembrance of historic times or cultural heritage, or as an example of historic archi Manoj Shrestha (talk) 06:36, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 15:51, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
A monument is a type of structure that was explicitly created to commemorate a person or event, or which has become important to a social group as a part of their remembrance of historic times or cultural heritage, or as an example of historic archi Manoj Shrestha (talk) 06:37, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 15:51, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
A monument is a type of structure that was explicitly created to commemorate a person or event, or which has become important to a social group as a part of their remembrance of historic times or cultural heritage, or as an example of historic archi Manoj Shrestha (talk) 06:37, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 15:51, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
A monument is a type of structure that was explicitly created to commemorate a person or event, or which has become important to a social group as a part of their remembrance of historic times or cultural heritage, or as an example of historic archi Manoj Shrestha (talk) 06:38, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 15:51, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
A monument is a type of structure that was explicitly created to commemorate a person or event, or which has become important to a social group as a part of their remembrance of historic times or cultural heritage, or as an example of historic archi Manoj Shrestha (talk) 06:38, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 15:51, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
A monument is a type of structure that was explicitly created to commemorate a person or event, or which has become important to a social group as a part of their remembrance of historic times or cultural heritage, or as an example of historic archi Manoj Shrestha (talk) 06:39, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 15:51, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
A monument is a type of structure that was explicitly created to commemorate a person or event, or which has become important to a social group as a part of their remembrance of historic times or cultural heritage, or as an example of historic archi Manoj Shrestha (talk) 06:39, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 15:51, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
A monument is a type of structure that was explicitly created to commemorate a person or event, or which has become important to a social group as a part of their remembrance of historic times or cultural heritage, or as an example of historic archi Manoj Shrestha (talk) 06:40, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 15:51, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
A monument is a type of structure that was explicitly created to commemorate a person or event, or which has become important to a social group as a part of their remembrance of historic times or cultural heritage, or as an example of historic archi Manoj Shrestha (talk) 06:41, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 15:51, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Low-quality images uploaded for a spam article on English Wikipedia. Licensing is doubtful as the corporate underling who probably uploaded this probably doesn't personally own the company's images and may not have permission to license them. Moreover the user is untrustworthy: File:Diaphragm (Valve).png is acknowledged to be from http://www.bayportvalve.com/ but the license is made up. Logo may be likely non-free (it's a COM:TOO question), uploader clearly doesn't get it.
- File:GFL.jpg
- File:FKM Shaft Seal.png
- File:FKM Pre-compound.png
- File:FKM O-Rings.png
- File:FEP Lined Ball Valve.png
- File:FEP Pellets.png
- File:FEP Tubes.png
- File:PFA Reducing Flange.png
- File:PFA Pellets.png
- File:PFA lined-eccentric-reducer.png
- File:PTFE Coated Rubber Seals.png
- File:PTFE Coated Fabric for Baking Trays.png
- File:PTFE Coated Architectural Fabric.png
- File:Nonstick Cookware.png
- File:Industrial Coatings.png
- File:Impregnation of Fabrics.png
- File:PTFE SS Braided Tube.png
- File:PTFE Wires.png
- File:PTFE Yarn.png
- File:Expended PTFE Joint Seal.png
- File:PTFE Hose.png
- File:PTFE Convoluted Tubings.png
- File:Vessel Lining.png
- File:PTFE Tube.png
- File:Rods PTFE.png
- File:Diaphragm (Valve).png
- File:Bridge Bearing Pads.png
- File:Bellow.png
Wikicology (talk) 06:43, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:53, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Files of Arpnunes
[edit]Arpnunes (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:
- File:Discurso origens.png (591×461)
- File:Claustro scmcb.png (633×440)
- File:Monumentobc.png (649×627)
- File:Estatuabc.png (298×492)
- File:Museudsp.jpg (651×627)
- File:Cortejo oferendas.png (415×263)
This is routine request for small photos without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photos are so small? Can you upload bigger versions, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload versions with EXIF data? Taivo (talk) 08:18, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:04, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Files of Alloord
[edit]Here are last remaining contributions of Alloord (talk · contribs):
- File:Cicada000.png
- File:Cicada 1.jpg
- File:Cicada0006.jpg
- File:Cicada 3301.jpg
- File:Cicada 3 3301.jpg
How the files are in project scope? Taivo (talk) 08:23, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:03, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Files of Bmw0010
[edit]Bmw0010 (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except sandbox in en.wiki and uploading two personal files, which are used nowhere, except in the sandbox. All her activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 08:29, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:04, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Low quality blurry photo with little help to the project Moscowsky (talk) 03:27, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
- Delete because there are masses of different penis images of much better quality, we do not need this one. By the way one-purpose accounts uploading such stuff (most certainly his own dick) do not seem driven by encyclopedic interest and should be discouraged by a rigid deletion policy. - 12:16, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 10:39, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
Commons:Scope (too many dicks on Commons...) Aga (d) 11:32, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete speedy; in addition, the username suggests that the uploader may be a minor, whereby this shot might be considered as childp*rn per U.S. law. Same problem with the second upload: File:CIMG0468mit vorhaut.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 13:11, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted - JurgenNL (talk) 10:38, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
私が掲載するのをやめてもたくさんほかにペニスの画像はあるから。 182.249.246.35 06:15, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted. INeverCry 02:37, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PENIS - if deleted, the title should be salted and redirected as overly generic INeverCry 08:35, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete too qeneric not specific like what kind of penis is that? --47.150.68.26 03:54, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Door handle and male penis look very similar on the photo. Taivo (talk) 09:36, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:54, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Files of Qoo
[edit]Here are both contributions of TheQoo (talk · contribs):
- File:1185mabamahasanook07.jpg (800×1200)
- File:CWKDd6wUwAAo He.jpg (576×1024)
Small unused presonal photos without metadata, out of project scope. Copyright violation is also possible. Taivo (talk) 08:34, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:05, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Files of Hard
[edit]Hard (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:
- File:19770816-GO.jpg (1977 photo)
- File:ALopezAmo.jpg (2010 photo)
- File:AngelLG.jpg (2013 photo)
- File:Cesar izquierdo.jpg (213×320)
- File:FASanchoR.jpg (1989 photo)
- File:Fco Ponz.jpg (1978 photo)
- File:Francisco perez.jpg (2012 photo, camera NIKON D80)
- File:Francisco Varo.jpg (2014 photo, camera Samsung GT-I9300)
- File:FReinoso.jpg (1966 photo)
- File:FSuarezD.jpg (1991 photo)
- File:Ignacio Araujo.jpg (1998 photo)
- File:Ignacio Olábarri Gortázar.jpg (2002 photo)
- File:Inma alva.jpg (2010 photo, camera Panasonic DMC-FZ18)
- File:Ismael Sanchez Bella.jpg (1964 photo)
- File:Javier Hervada.jpg (1975 photo)
- File:JER2005.jpg (2005 photo)
- File:Jmmacarulla.jpg (1968 photo)
- File:Jorlandis1992.jpg (1992 photo)
- File:José Javier López Jacoiste.jpg (2010 photo)
- File:Jose Luis Illanes Maestre.jpg (2004 photo, camera NIKON D100)
- File:Jose Manuel Casas Torres.jpg (1987 photo)
- File:Josemiguelcejas.jpg (author and copyright holder Juan Perez Leon, camera Canon EOS 7D)
- File:JT Martin de Agar.jpg (1463×1690, camera Samsung SM-G357FZ)
- File:JuanSuarez.jpg (2003 photo, camrea Huawei Y635-L01)
- File:Juliapavon.jpg (2010 photo, camera Apple iPhone 3G)
- File:LeonardoP1996.jpg (1996 photo)
- File:Lpolo1996.jpg (1996 photo)
- File:Luis Adaro Ruiz Falco.jpg (2005 photo)
- File:Pedro A Urbina.jpg (1991 photo)
- File:Pedro lombardia.jpg (1980 photo)
- File:Rafel Termes Carrero.jpg (1989 photo)
- File:UNAV Arquitectura.jpg (2001 photo)
- File:ValentinVdP20000412.jpg (2000 photo)
Hard has bad habit to upload non-own photos as own work, so all these files are dubious. If camera data exist, then always different. I did not nominate his/her other uploads, which were all taken with Canon EOS-1D Mark II or III and are likely own work. Taivo (talk) 08:59, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Hola Taivo, paso a explicarte el origen de cada imagen para que se tenga en cuenta en la discusioón previa al borrado.
- File:19770816-GO.jpg (1977 photo) Esta foto es propiedad del Archivo Fotográfico de la Universidad de Navarra, que me la cedió para su exclusivo uso en Wikipedia. Si es necesario, puedo enviar autorización.
- File:ALopezAmo.jpg Esta foto es propiedad del Archivo Fotográfico de la Universidad de Navarra, que me la cedió para su exclusivo uso en Wikipedia. Si es necesario, puedo enviar autorización.
- File:AngelLG.jpg (2013 photo) Esta foto es propiedad del Archivo Fotográfico de la Universidad de Navarra, que me la cedió para su exclusivo uso en Wikipedia. Si es necesario, puedo enviar autorización.
- File:Cesar izquierdo.jpg (213×320) Esta foto es mia, la hice con la camara del fotografiado.
- File:FASanchoR.jpg (1989 photo) Esta foto es propiedad del Archivo Fotográfico de la Universidad de Navarra, que me la cedió para su exclusivo uso en Wikipedia. Si es necesario, puedo enviar autorización.
- File:Fco Ponz.jpg (1978 photo) Esta foto es propiedad del Archivo Fotográfico de la Universidad de Navarra, que me la cedió para su exclusivo uso en Wikipedia. Si es necesario, puedo enviar autorización.
- File:Francisco perez.jpg (2012 photo, camera NIKON D80) Esta foto es mia, la hice con una camara que me dejaron.
- File:Francisco Varo.jpg (2014 photo, camera Samsung GT-I9300) Esta foto es mia, la hice con la camara del fotografiado.
- File:FReinoso.jpg (1966 photo) Esta foto es propiedad del Archivo Fotográfico de la Universidad de Navarra, que me la cedió para su exclusivo uso en Wikipedia. Si es necesario, puedo enviar autorización.
- File:FSuarezD.jpg (1991 photo)Esta foto es propiedad del Archivo Fotográfico de la Universidad de Navarra, que me la cedió para su exclusivo uso en Wikipedia. Si es necesario, puedo enviar autorización.
- File:Ignacio Araujo.jpg (1998 photo) Esta foto es propiedad del Archivo Fotográfico de la Universidad de Navarra, que me la cedió para su exclusivo uso en Wikipedia. Si es necesario, puedo enviar autorización.
- File:Ignacio Olábarri Gortázar.jpg (2002 photo) Esta foto es propiedad del Archivo Fotográfico de la Universidad de Navarra, que me la cedió para su exclusivo uso en Wikipedia. Si es necesario, puedo enviar autorización.
- File:Inma alva.jpg (2010 photo, camera Panasonic DMC-FZ18)Esta foto es mia, la hice con la camara del fotografiado.
- File:Ismael Sanchez Bella.jpg (1964 photo)Esta foto es propiedad del Archivo Fotográfico de la Universidad de Navarra, que me la cedió para su exclusivo uso en Wikipedia. Si es necesario, puedo enviar autorización.
- File:Javier Hervada.jpg (1975 photo)Esta foto es propiedad del Archivo Fotográfico de la Universidad de Navarra, que me la cedió para su exclusivo uso en Wikipedia. Si es necesario, puedo enviar autorización.
- File:JER2005.jpg (2005 photo) Se puede borrar. Ya no está en el artículo correspondiente de Wikipedia.
- File:Jmmacarulla.jpg (1968 photo)Esta foto es propiedad del Archivo Fotográfico de la Universidad de Navarra, que me la cedió para su exclusivo uso en Wikipedia. Si es necesario, puedo enviar autorización.
- File:Jorlandis1992.jpg (1992 photo)Esta foto es propiedad del Archivo Fotográfico de la Universidad de Navarra, que me la cedió para su exclusivo uso en Wikipedia. Si es necesario, puedo enviar autorización.
- File:José Javier López Jacoiste.jpg (2010 photo)Esta foto es propiedad del Archivo Fotográfico de la Universidad de Navarra, que me la cedió para su exclusivo uso en Wikipedia. Si es necesario, puedo enviar autorización.
- File:Jose Luis Illanes Maestre.jpg (2004 photo, camera NIKON D100)Esta foto es propiedad del Archivo Fotográfico de la Universidad de Navarra, que me la cedió para su exclusivo uso en Wikipedia. Si es necesario, puedo enviar autorización.
- File:Jose Manuel Casas Torres.jpg (1987 photo) Esta foto es propiedad del Archivo Fotográfico de la Universidad de Navarra, que me la cedió para su exclusivo uso en Wikipedia. Si es necesario, puedo enviar autorización.
- File:Josemiguelcejas.jpg (author and copyright holder Juan Perez Leon, camera Canon EOS 7D) Esta foto me la cedió Juan Perez Leon para su uso en Wikipedia.
- File:JT Martin de Agar.jpg (1463×1690, camera Samsung SM-G357FZ)Esta foto es mia, la hice con la camara del fotografiado.
- File:JuanSuarez.jpg (2003 photo, camrea Huawei Y635-L01)Esta foto es mia, la hice con la camara del fotografiado.
- File:Juliapavon.jpg (2010 photo, camera Apple iPhone 3G)Esta foto es mia, la hice con el iPhone del fotografiado.
- File:LeonardoP1996.jpg (1996 photo) Esta foto es propiedad del Archivo Fotográfico de la Universidad de Navarra, que me la cedió para su exclusivo uso en Wikipedia. Si es necesario, puedo enviar autorización.
- File:Lpolo1996.jpg (1996 photo)Esta foto es propiedad del Archivo Fotográfico de la Universidad de Navarra, que me la cedió para su exclusivo uso en Wikipedia. Si es necesario, puedo enviar autorización.
- File:Luis Adaro Ruiz Falco.jpg (2005 photo) Esta foto es propiedad de la familia, que me la cedió para usarla exclusivamente en Wikipedia.
- File:Pedro A Urbina.jpg (1991 photo)Esta foto es propiedad del Archivo Fotográfico de la Universidad de Navarra, que me la cedió para su exclusivo uso en Wikipedia. Si es necesario, puedo enviar autorización.
- File:Pedro lombardia.jpg (1980 photo)Esta foto es propiedad del Archivo Fotográfico de la Universidad de Navarra, que me la cedió para su exclusivo uso en Wikipedia. Si es necesario, puedo enviar autorización.
- File:Rafel Termes Carrero.jpg (1989 photo)Esta foto es propiedad del Archivo Fotográfico de la Universidad de Navarra, que me la cedió para su exclusivo uso en Wikipedia. Si es necesario, puedo enviar autorización.
- File:UNAV Arquitectura.jpg (2001 photo)Esta foto es propiedad del Archivo Fotográfico de la Universidad de Navarra, que me la cedió para su exclusivo uso en Wikipedia. Si es necesario, puedo enviar autorización.
- File:ValentinVdP20000412.jpg (2000 photo)Esta foto es propiedad del Archivo Fotográfico de la Universidad de Navarra, que me la cedió para su exclusivo uso en Wikipedia. Si es necesario, puedo enviar autorización.
Estoy a tu disposición para conseguir todos los permisos correspondientes con el fin de regularizar los permisos de estas imágenes. Te piso disculpas por haber hecho mal las cosas. Espero a partir de ahora, y una vez que me validen las autorizaciones que vaya enviando, ser mas cuidadoso en las atribuciones del origen de las fotos subidas a Wikipedia. Un saludo.--Hard (talk) 09:29, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: permission via OTRS needed. --Jcb (talk) 15:57, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Files of KathyJean
[edit]KathyJean (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:
- File:2006 Chevrolet Silverado Pickup Truck.jpg (500×595 – survived 2 DRs)
- File:Art Model.jpg (289×417)
- File:Behind The Scenes.jpg (330×262)
- File:Bikini Model.jpg (852×702)
- File:Brunette.jpg (206×239)
- File:Cable Television.jpg (330×272)
- File:Editorial Fashion.jpg (768×1024)
- File:Editorial Lingerie.jpg (462×644)
- File:Fashion Editorial.jpg (800×488)
- File:Fur.jpg (747×683)
- File:Glamour Model Kathy Jean.jpeg (540×386)
- File:Hair Model.jpg (883×457)
- File:Harley-Davidson Motorcycle.jpg (1377×1027) *
- File:Jogging.jpg (1024×683)
- File:Jogging Shoe.jpg (1280×802)
- File:Kathy Jean modelling in suede.jpg (533×800)
- redirect file:Suede.jpg
- File:Lake Michigan.jpg (400×260)
- File:Light Blonde Hair.jpg (1024×683)
- File:Lingerie Model.jpg (540×317)
- File:Long Hair.jpg (679×600)
- File:Mapleton, Illinois.jpg (724×800)
- File:Mineral Springs Park.jpg (1824×1318) *
- File:Mineral Springs Park Lagoon.jpg (1824×1368) *
- File:Model Posing with 2006 Chevrolet Silverado Pickup Truck.jpg (723×800)
- File:Oxford, Mississippi.jpg (800×595) *
- File:Parts Model.jpg (345×400)
- File:Pekin, Illinois.jpg (480×600)
- File:Red Dress.jpg (522×600)
- File:Red Truck.jpg (448×600)
- File:Shoe Model.jpg (681×600)
- File:Swimwear.jpg (470×480)
They are all called own work. As the uploader is usually herself depicted, this is impossible. OTRS-permission from real photographers is needed. Small photos without metadata. I marked with asterisk 4 photos, where uploader is NOT depicted, but I suggest to delete them also, because educational value is not big (the duck is one of most common bird species). Taivo (talk) 09:20, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:59, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Files of Uttamkumarpareek
[edit]Here are last remaining contributions of Uttamkumarpareek (talk · contribs):
- File:0-0-IMG 0633.JPG
- File:20140417 163455bn bn.jpg (camera Samsung GT-I9500)
- File:20140418 072214 vbvb.jpg (camera Samsung GT-I9500)
- File:946114 506964539369517 555010131 nfdhgfh.jpg
- File:Bn nbvhbjnbjh.jpg (camera Nikon COOLPIX S2700)
- File:Bscpj0bj5qaoweda31p1.jpeg
- File:C360 2014-03-02-20-48-18-830.jpg (camera Micromax A110)
- File:Dfghyhyh.jpg (camera Nikon COOLPIX S2700)
- File:Drgdty.jpg (camera Canon PowerShot A810)
- File:Highwayss.jpg (camera Sony C1904)
- File:IMbj,bhjmnb.JPG (camera Canon PowerShot A810)
- File:Jockeyuttam.JPG (camera Nikon COOLPIX S2700)
- File:Mhgfbhf.jpg (camera Sony Xperia M2)
- File:Nahargarhsafari.jpg (camera Sony C1904)
- File:Rajkumaar.JPG (camera Canon PowerShot A810)
- File:Tarmereaspi.jpg (camera Nikon COOLPIX S2700)
- File:Templechennai.JPG (camera Nikon COOLPIX S2700)
- File:Tereeeeere.jpg (camera Canon PowerShot A810)
- File:Tyjtyjty.jpg (camera HTC Desire V)
- File:Uttam pareek.jpg (Facebook file?)
- File:Uttam pareekuttam pareek.jpg (camera Canon PowerShot A810)
- File:Uttamuttampareek.jpg
- File:Uttttam.jpg (camera Canon PowerShot A810)
- File:Vjkhgjh.jpg (camera Nikon COOLPIX S2700)
All unused personal photos, out of project scope. Also I count 7 cameras from 6 companies. Taivo (talk) 09:32, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:06, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Personal selfie. Out of scope for commons, per COM:SELFIE. LudwigSK (talk) 23:29, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:25, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
monument is a type of structure that was explicitly created to commemorate a person or event, or which has become important to a social group as a part of their remembrance of historic times or cultural heritage, or as an example of historic archite Manoj Shrestha (talk) 06:12, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion given. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:04, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
monument is a type of structure that was explicitly created to commemorate a person or event, or which has become important to a social group as a part of their remembrance of historic times or cultural heritage, or as an example of historic archite Manoj Shrestha (talk) 06:13, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete due to bad composition. Taivo (talk) 16:26, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per Taivo. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:04, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
monument is a type of structure that was explicitly created to commemorate a person or event, or which has become important to a social group as a part of their remembrance of historic times or cultural heritage, or as an example of historic archite. May be in another place. Manoj Shrestha (talk) 06:14, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Keep, no reason for deletion is stated. The photo can be used for illustrating Annapurna mountain and its base camp. Taivo (talk) 17:06, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per Taivo. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:04, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
can be replaced by the derived SVG file linked on the page Jochen Burghardt (talk) 06:15, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Agree to delete as the uploader. -- ChongDae (talk) 01:32, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: We usually keep dups of SVG files in jpg or png format. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:05, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
A monument is a type of structure that was explicitly created to commemorate a person or event, or which has become important to a social group as a part of their remembrance of historic times or cultural heritage, or as an example of historic archi Manoj Shrestha (talk) 06:17, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Illustrates the base camp. Taivo (talk) 16:20, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per Taivo. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:06, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
A monument is a type of structure that was explicitly created to commemorate a person or event, or which has become important to a social group as a part of their remembrance of historic times or cultural heritage, or as an example of historic archi Manoj Shrestha (talk) 06:20, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Comment No reason for deletion is stated. But what is depicted? Some kind of plant? Taivo (talk) 17:53, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Removed WLM tags, fixed category. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:08, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
A monument is a type of structure that was explicitly created to commemorate a person or event, or which has become important to a social group as a part of their remembrance of historic times or cultural heritage, or as an example of historic archi Manoj Shrestha (talk) 06:21, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Comment No reason for deletion is stated. But if this is artificial, then there's no freedom of panorama in Nepal. Taivo (talk) 18:04, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: quality issues, scope. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:09, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
A monument is a type of structure that was explicitly created to commemorate a person or event, or which has become important to a social group as a part of their remembrance of historic times or cultural heritage, or as an example of historic archi Manoj Shrestha (talk) 06:22, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Keep No reason for deletion is stated. Taivo (talk) 18:39, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:12, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
A monument is a type of structure that was explicitly created to commemorate a person or event, or which has become important to a social group as a part of their remembrance of historic times or cultural heritage, or as an example of historic archi Manoj Shrestha (talk) 06:25, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Keep No reason for deletion is stated. Taivo (talk) 19:07, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:13, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
A monument is a type of structure that was explicitly created to commemorate a person or event, or which has become important to a social group as a part of their remembrance of historic times or cultural heritage, or as an example of historic archi Manoj Shrestha (talk) 06:26, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Educational value seems weak, place is unidentified. Taivo (talk) 19:23, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:15, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
A monument is a type of structure that was explicitly created to commemorate a person or event, or which has become important to a social group as a part of their remembrance of historic times or cultural heritage, or as an example of historic archi Manoj Shrestha (talk) 06:27, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete, better alternatives in category:Capra falconeri. Taivo (talk) 19:50, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:17, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
A monument is a type of structure that was explicitly created to commemorate a person or event, or which has become important to a social group as a part of their remembrance of historic times or cultural heritage, or as an example of historic archi Manoj Shrestha (talk) 06:45, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Illustrates, how people are living in Nepal. Taivo (talk) 20:44, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:17, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Files of User:LAALSKI
[edit]- File:LAALSKI another icon red and white.jpg
- File:LAALSKI photo edit.jpg
- File:LAALSKI on blueist.jpeg
- File:LAALSKI FOTO APP.jpg
- File:Laalski font.png
Self-created artwork meant only for self-promotion of music. The files are not in use. None worth keeping for any educational use. Out of Project scope. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 06:47, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: plain spam. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:19, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Files of AliveMan
[edit]Here are all contributions of AliveMan (talk · contribs):
- File:А.С.Пушкин.jpg
- File:ЛенинВ.И.jpg
- File:Памятник А.С.Пушкину.jpg
- File:Памятник Ленину В.И.jpg
- File:Пушкин.А.С.jpg
There is no freedom of panorama in Russia for sculptures.
В России существует ru:свобода панорамы для архитектуры, но не для скульптуры. Taivo (talk) 07:41, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:20, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
笠井通隆 (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except userpage in Commons and uploading 3 personal photos (2 now deleted), which are used nowhere, except on the userpage. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 07:51, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:21, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Files of Anceranana
[edit]Anceranana (talk · contribs) uploaded these maps:
- File:Терская область 1909 г..JPG
- File:Район Аллаго (Малхиста и Маиста).png
- File:Терская область в 1960-1964 гг..jpg
- File:Терская область в 1909-1920 гг..jpg
- File:Терская область в 1965-1970 гг..jpg
- File:Ингушский округ в составе Терской области в 1965 г..jpg
- File:Терская область в 1888-1909 гг..jpg
- File:Ингушская АО в 1924 г..jpg
- File:Северо-Осетинская АО в 1924 г..jpg
They are not own work, license does not apply. When the maps where published and who are authors? Taivo (talk) 07:59, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:12, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Files of Michelemontecchio
[edit]Michelemontecchio (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:
- File:Demetrius and the gladiators.PNG (USA 1954)
- File:I gladiatori.PNG (USA 1954)
- File:I gladiatori2.PNG (USA 1954)
- File:I gladiatori1954.PNG (USA 1954)
- File:La Tunica.PNG (USA 1953)
- File:La più grande storia mai raccontata.PNG (USA 1955)
- File:La più grande storia mai raccontata2.PNG (USA 1955)
- File:La tunica.PNG (USA 1953)
- File:Sinuhe l'egiziano.PNG (USA 1954)
Screenshots of old films. Maybe some of them are in public domain? Taivo (talk) 08:07, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:12, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Files of Wanah.in
[edit]Here are last remaining contributions of Wanah.in (talk · contribs):
- File:3I2TIQtodt.png (500×700)
- File:,ц.jpg (736×1104, look http://cfile2.uf.tistory.com/image/233D354752BBF0F5036ABC for bigger version)
Small photos without metadata. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 08:37, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:12, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Files of EthanLouis
[edit]Here are last remaining contributions of EthanLouis (talk · contribs):
- File:Hipaa compliance in Albuquerque - twinstarnetworks.jpg
- File:Managed Computer Security Services in Albuquerque.gif
- File:Small business it solutions albuquerque.jpg
- File:Small business it support solutions in Albuquerque.jpg
Promo materials of non-notable company (no mention in en:Twinstar), out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 08:42, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:13, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Files of UserLikerMusic
[edit]Here are last remaining contributions of UserLikerMusic (talk · contribs):
- File:Ajmal Khan.jpg (893×893)
- File:Thazhava HSS kolkali.jpg (480×320)
Small photos without metadata. Own work is unlikely, probably copyright violations. Taivo (talk) 08:46, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:13, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Files of Zed91
[edit]Here are last remaining contributions of Zed91 (talk · contribs):
- File:Корпус №1 P1010036.jpg
- File:Корпус №2.jpg
- File:Корпус №3.jpg
- File:Корпус №5.jpg
- File:Корпус №7.jpg
- File:Общ2.jpg
- File:Общежитие1.jpg
There is no freedom of panorama in Belarus.
В Белоруси нет свободы панорамы. Taivo (talk) 08:53, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:21, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
No FoP in Estonia enough for Commons. Alexander Roumega (talk) 09:08, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:22, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Files of Lucianogreen
[edit]Here are last remaining contributions of Lucianogreen (talk · contribs):
- File:Candy d Ross model elite.jpg (381×558)
- File:CANDY D ROSS.jpg (1280×960, camera ILIUM S520, maybe derivative work of photo?)
- File:Candy D Ross Biography.jpg (320×320, Facebook file?)
- File:Candy D Ross.jpg (960×720)
- File:Candy D Ross.png (270×498)
Small photos and (with one exception) without metadata. Candy Ross isn't mentioned in en.wiki. I think, that the photos are out of project scope, copyright violation is possible too. Taivo (talk) 09:14, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:14, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
not in scoope / personal img Saqib (talk) 09:19, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:23, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kelvin fosu (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyvios. No freedom of panorama in Ghana, unfortunately.
File:Kwame Nkrumah Mausoleum5.jpg- File:Kwame Nkrumah Mausoleum2.jpg
File:Kwame Nkrumah Mausoleum1.jpg- File:Ussher fort museum2.jpg
- File:Ussher fort museum1.jpg
Wikicology (talk) 09:29, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Kwame Nkrumah Mausoleum -- there is no point in discussing the Mausoleum in two places at once. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:44, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Jameslwoodward, these files were flagged for deletion over 10 hours before your mass nomination of the other files. You probably didn't check the nomination time. However, I have no problem with the changes you made here but I think such changes doesn't make any difference since the FoF policy applies to all the files. Thanks, anyway. Wikicology (talk) 10:18, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Actually, I did check the times and noted that your DR was earlier. I agree that these should be obvious deletions, but often we get uploader's who want to argue endlessly about something that ought to be obvious. If that turns out to be the case here, I think it's better to have all of the mausoleum files on the same DR. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:53, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- No problem, Jim. I trust your judgement. Warm regards. Wikicology (talk) 22:33, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Actually, I did check the times and noted that your DR was earlier. I agree that these should be obvious deletions, but often we get uploader's who want to argue endlessly about something that ought to be obvious. If that turns out to be the case here, I think it's better to have all of the mausoleum files on the same DR. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:53, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:25, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by PROPHETESS HELEN GLORY IKELEJI (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope. Wikimedia Common is not a personal photo album.
- File:PROPHETESS HELEN GLORY IKELEJI.jpg
- File:GOSHEN.jpg
- File:EVANG. RAYMOND IKELEJI.jpg
- File:HELEN GLORY IKELEJI.jpg
- File:PROPHETESS HELEN.jpg
- File:PROPHETESS HELEN GLORY.jpg
Wikicology (talk) 09:40, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: plain ol spam. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:30, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Oomoshally (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope. Thank you.
Wikicology (talk) 09:42, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by INC. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:30, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope. Wikimedia Common is not a personal photo album. Wikicology (talk) 09:43, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:30, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Files of Ленинградский Сергей
[edit]Ленинградский Сергей (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:
- File:Скульптура Братья по оружию. Московский парк Победы. Санкт-Петербург 1.JPG
- File:Скульптура Братья по оружию. Московский парк Победы. Санкт-Петербург 2.JPG
- File:Скульптура Братья по оружию. Московский парк Победы. Санкт-Петербург 3.JPG
- File:Скульптура Тыл. Московский парк Победы. Санкт-Петербург 1.JPG
- File:Скульптура Тыл. Московский парк Победы. Санкт-Петербург 2.JPG
- File:Скульптура Фронт. Московский парк Победы. Санкт-Петербург 1.JPG
- File:Скульптура Фронт. Московский парк Победы. Санкт-Петербург 2.JPG
- File:Памятник Матросову А.М., Герою Советского Союза. Московский парк Победы. Санкт-Петербург.jpg
- File:Памятник Челнокову Н.В., Moskovsky Park of Victory (St. Petersburg)дважды Герою Советского Союза. Московский парк Победы. Санкт-Петербург.JPG
- File:Могила Соловьева И.В.JPG
- File:Могила Павлова П.И.JPG
- File:Могила Арчакова Н.И.JPG
- File:Могила Афанасьева И.И.(1901-1952), героя Советского Союза.JPG
- File:Монумент на аллее Памяти. Московский парк победы в Санкт-Петербурге.JPG
- File:Вагонетка на аллее Памяти. Московский парк победы в Санкт-Петербурге. Табличка.JPG
- File:Монумент на аллее Памяти. Московский парк победы в Санкт-Петербурге. 2.JPG
- File:Монумент на аллее Памяти. Московский парк победы в Санкт-Петербурге. 4.JPG
- File:Монумент на аллее Памяти. Московский парк победы в Санкт-Петербурге. 3.JPG
- File:Монумент на аллее Памяти. Московский парк победы в Санкт-Петербурге. 5.JPG
- File:Памятник Богданову С.И., дважды Герою Советского Союза. Московский парк Победы. Санкт-Петербург.JPG
- File:Памятник Голубеву В.М., дважды Герою Советского Союза. Московский парк Победы. Санкт-Петербург.JPG
- File:Памятник Осипову В.Н., дважды Герою Советского Союза. Московский парк Победы. Санкт-Петербург.JPG
- File:Памятник Ракову В.И., дважды Герою Советского Союза. Московский парк Победы. Санкт-Петербург.JPG
- File:Памятник Федорову Е.П., дважды Герою Советского Союза. Московский парк Победы. Санкт-Петербург.JPG
- File:Бюст русскому адмиралу Федору Ушакову на острове Закинтос.JPG
- File:Стела Федору Ушакову остров Корфу.JPG
There is freedom of panorama in Russia for architecture, but not for sculpture. Two last files are made in Greece, which also lacks freedom of panorama.
В России существует ru:свобода панорамы для архитектуры, но не для скульптуры. Два последних фотографии сделапы в Греции, где вообще нет свободы панорамы. Taivo (talk) 09:44, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:31, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sajawal.btt
[edit]Here are last remaining contributions of Sajawal.btt (talk · contribs):
Sajawal Butt is not mentioned in en.wiki. Unused photos about non-notable people, out of project scope. They are all called selfies – I doubt, maybe copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:56, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:32, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Files of Vevabl
[edit]Vevabl (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:
- File:Bois originale, vazníky.jpg
- File:Detail označení značkového vazníku.jpg
- File:Značkový vazníky 01.JPG
In my opinion they are promo of non-notable company (no mention neither in en.wiki nor in cs.wiki), out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 09:59, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: One deleted (not usable), two showing roof trusses kept. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:34, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
The uploader is not the owner of this logo, that has been already published.
https://www.recrutement.terre.defense.gouv.fr/
Hercule (talk) 10:09, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Keep The uploader does not need to be the owner of the image. I believe it is too simple under French law to be protected. Fry1989 eh? 16:10, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Keep I believe you're misunderstanding the uploader meaning. The uploader re-created the logo in vector form, so the work they did in creating the vector is their own work, it doesn't mean they created the original logo, just the vector version. The uploader doesn't own copyright to the logo, but as Fry1989 said, the logo consists of common shapes and text so {{PD-textlogo}} could apply. Offnfopt(talk) 09:13, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per FRy anf Offnfopt. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:35, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
This is not PD-text eligible. The stylised bird is a graphic work that can be protected Hercule (talk) 10:11, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Keep I believe it is too simple under French law to be protected. It is extremely abstract and simple. Fry1989 eh? 16:10, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Simple logo, {{PD-textlogo}} should apply. Offnfopt(talk) 09:18, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per Fry and Offnfopt. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:35, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Sir this photo can be seen by everybody who use Wikipedia so can u please show some respect to it and have your own prestige saved by u Manoj Shrestha (talk) 10:11, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete, no freedom of panorama in Nepal. Taivo (talk) 18:48, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: I don't think the little structure on the left is eligible for copyright protection. And if, it can be cropped. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:38, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
The uploader is not the owner of this logo, that has already been published. This is a graphic work that is protected Hercule (talk) 10:12, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Keep The uploader does not need to be the owner of the image. I believe it is too simple under French law to be protected. Fry1989 eh? 16:09, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Keep I believe you're misunderstanding the uploader meaning. The uploader re-created the logo in vector form, so the work they did in creating the vector is their own work, it doesn't mean they created the original logo, just the vector version. The uploader doesn't own copyright to the logo, but as Fry1989 said, the logo consists of common shapes and text so {{PD-textlogo}} should apply. Offnfopt(talk) 09:20, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per Fry and Offnfopt. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:38, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Sir this photo can be seen by everybody who use Wikipedia so can u please show some respect to it and have your own prestige preserved. Manoj Shrestha (talk) 10:17, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:00, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:39, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Watermark "© Marcos Castro Lopez". He must send OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 10:20, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:39, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Copy of 13 Manoj Shrestha (talk) 10:28, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- @Lusifor: , I do not understand the request. Taivo (talk) 11:16, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: duplicat. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:42, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Sir this photo can be seen by everybody who use Wikipedia so can u please show some respect to it and have your own prestige preserved. Manoj Shrestha (talk) 10:29, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Small unused personal photo without metadata. Out of project scope, copyright violation is possible too. Taivo (talk) 11:19, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:42, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Sir this photo can be seen by everybody who use Wikipedia so can u please show some respect to it and have your own prestige preserved. Manoj Shrestha (talk) 10:31, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Unused art of non-notable artist, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:19, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:42, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Sir this photo can be seen by everybody who use Wikipedia so can u please show some respect to it and have your own prestige preserved. Manoj Shrestha (talk) 10:34, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Out of project scope (nothing special is depicted), copyright violation is possible too. Taivo (talk) 11:21, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:45, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Sir this photo can be seen by everybody who use Wikipedia so can u please show some respect to it and have your own prestige preserved. Manoj Shrestha (talk) 10:35, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Good photo about rice growing. Taivo (talk) 11:24, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:45, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Sir this photo can be seen by everybody who use Wikipedia so can u please show some respect to it and have your own prestige preserved. Manoj Shrestha (talk) 10:38, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete, bad quality. Taivo (talk) 18:49, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:46, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Sir this photo can be seen by everybody who use Wikipedia so can u please show some respect to it and have your own prestige preserved. Manoj Shrestha (talk) 10:39, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete due to bad quality. Taivo (talk) 11:39, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:46, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Sir this photo can be seen by everybody who use Wikipedia so can u please show some respect to it and have your own prestige preserved. Manoj Shrestha (talk) 10:45, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Comment No reason for deletion is stated. Taivo (talk) 18:05, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:47, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Small unused photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Depicted person isn't mentioned in en.wiki. Out of project scope, copyright violation is possible too. Taivo (talk) 10:48, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:48, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Sir this photo can be seen by everybody who use Wikipedia so can u please show some respect to it and have your own prestige preserved. Manoj Shrestha (talk) 10:48, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Keep No reason for deletion is stated. Normal quality. Taivo (talk) 12:05, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:48, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Small unused photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Depicted person isn't mentioned neither in en.wiki nor in es.wiki. Out of project scope, copyright violation is possible too. Taivo (talk) 10:52, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:48, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
self promotion Cabayi (talk) 10:55, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:50, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope due to bad quality. This is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:19, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:50, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Small unused photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Depicted person isn't mentioned neither in en.wiki nor in es.wiki. Out of project scope, copyright violation is possible too. Taivo (talk) 11:31, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:50, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Description is pure advertising and its usage is on a spam user page on the English Wikipedia (now deleted for advertising) Whpq (talk) 12:36, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:51, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
logo of commercial company Papuass (talk) 13:20, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: PD simple. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:53, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Files in Category:Korean War Veterans Memorial 10
[edit]The sculptures here are under copyright.
- File:Korean War Veterans Memorial (de44327b-3a76-4ed4-9164-1de77c5a1f35).jpg
- File:Korean War Veterans Memorial (f99f3c3e-3ca8-47a2-8051-201508c359f9).jpg
. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:05, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- I think I skipped nominating these on my last pass because there may be a weak case for DM, but I don't oppose deletion. – BMacZero (🗩) 16:21, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- This one also extremely similar: File:Korean War Memorial at National Mall & Memorial Parks (4f0f6a20-27a2-45c0-b724-658c67d6e07c).jpg. – BMacZero (🗩) 16:53, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, all sections above. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 05:25, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. --Minoraxtalk 04:04, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Korean War Veterans Memorial 11
[edit]The statues at this memorial are unfortunately copyrighted. See Commons:Deletion requests/Images of Korean War Veterans Memorial.
- File:Korean War memorial (4949340990).jpg
- File:KOREAN WAR MEMORIAL.jpg
- File:George Washington Memorial Parkway - Korean War Veterans Memorial - NARA - 7718556.jpg
– BMacZero (🗩) 15:53, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, all sections above. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 05:25, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. --Minoraxtalk 04:04, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Korean War Veterans Memorial 12
[edit]Derivative work copyright violations: there is no freedom of panorama in the United States, and these images lack permission from the heirs of the sculptors. File:Washington F2492 (7144738487).jpg is not de minimis as it is not trivial here: US de minimis is more restricted as it uses triviality concept. See also a court case Gaylord v. United States.
- File:Korean War Memorial.tif
- File:Korean War-2.tif
- File:Southwest Washington, Washington, DC, USA - panoramio - iclifford.jpg
- File:TJB 1868-1.jpg
- File:Washington F2492 (7144738487).jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:48, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, all sections above. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 17:52, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. --Minoraxtalk 01:58, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Korean War Veterans Memorial 13
[edit]Non-free sculptures, see previous discussions.
- File:Korean War Memorial Ceremony - 51195645501.jpg
- File:Korean War Memorial Ceremony - 51196701840.jpg
– BMacZero (🗩) 00:04, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
Speedy delete all nominated images. See also: USA Today article (Gaylord v. United States conclusion, with the sculptor the victor). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 22:33, 22 January 2022 (UTC)- Speedy delete per nom, all sections above. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 16:27, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per nom. Sennecaster (talk) 19:52, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: However, I must remind everyone that photos taken in a public place are not eligible for speedy deletion per COM:CSD#F3. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:58, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Korean War Veterans Memorial 14
[edit]These images show at least one of the soldier statues in a non-trivial manner. There is no freedom of panorama for copyrighted public art in the United States. This artwork is not freely-enjoyable: see Gaylord v. United States (USA Today article). Retention of these images will put American and even international reusers at risk of lawsuits from Gaylord's heirs!
- File:Korean War Memorial.jpg
- File:President George W. Bush and U.S. Park Ranger Lance Hatten Tour the Korean War Veterans Memorial in Washington, D.C.jpg
- File:Soldier in the Korean War Veterans Memorial.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 22:39, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
- Trim the photo with president Bush, Delete the rest.—Molandfreak (talk) 02:45, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per nom, all sections above. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 16:28, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete and trim the one with Former President Bush. Sennecaster (talk) 19:53, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted 2 and trimmed 1 per nom. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:34, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
Also:
In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in the United States. This monument was erected in 1992, so it did not require a copyright notice and, therefore, this image infringes on the rights of the sculptor(s) and writer(s). . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:55, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- I am new at this, so I didn't realize all the rules. As a matter of fact, I have posted a question on another talk page asking how to obtain permission to upload an image in another category. I checked other images related to Vietnam memorials and saw that they had licenses, being either military or US Gov. sources. How do you suggest going about getting a license to use this image? I do not think that the city or even the sculptor would mind, but I would be interested in contacting to get their permission. Would both the city and the sculptor be required to release? Please advise. Thanks, John White, Drbones1950.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Drbones1950 (talk • contribs) 14:12, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons policy to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.
- Although I mentioned "writer(s)" above, I'm not sure that any of the text is actually legible, so I think only a license from the sculptor or sculptors would be required. It would be very unusual for the owner of the physical work -- the city, in this case -- to have any ownership in the copyright. Basically, you need to find out who sculpted the work and get a license from him or her (or them if more than one), using the procedure at OTRS. Some sculptors like the publicity, but others are very protective of their works -- see Korean War Veterans Memorial, where the sculptor took the US Postal Service all the way to the US Supreme Court and won a $600,000+ judgement. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:40, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- OK, I tried City Hall and the state Office of General Services, and neither of them know who is in charge of the monument or who the creator is. Typical. So I will do a little more research, and eventually will find who to have approve a license. In the meantime, will the images (three of them of the same monument) be taken down? Then do I just send you the permission and they will be put back up? Drbones1950 (talk) 18:16, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, unless one of our colleagues can find a reason to keep them, when this DR closes in a week or so, they will be "deleted", which actually means they will be kept hidden from view of all users except Admins. If you can find the sculptor, then he or she (not you) must send a free license using the procedure at OTRS. After that is reviewed and accepted, the images will be restored without further action on your part. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:31, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:57, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:57, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Scope clearly exists (en:École Franco-Indienne Sishya), but surpasses threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 14:55, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:58, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Files of User:Ninoabou
[edit]The user uploaded 3 photos of himself that cannot be his own work, and did not indicate the author, source, or copyright holder or evidence of an appropriate license. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 14:12, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:59, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete I added the file into en:Amlin and deleted file:MS Amlin logo 2016.pdf instead. But now I started to think: maybe the current logo should be also deleted, because surpasses threshold of originality? Taivo (talk) 15:34, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: above too in uk. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:00, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:50, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:50, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:50, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bharti Dayal (talk · contribs)
[edit]Modern art and promo photo. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.
- File:P2.pdf
- File:Madhubani Art cover nopl.jpg
- File:Ardhnarishwar.JPG
- File:Maa Durga with Ganesha.jpg
- File:Good over evil 1.jpg
- File:The bliss of solitude 02-making colour from dry flower-Bharti Dayal.JPG
- File:The bliss of solitude 01.JPG
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:50, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:51, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Text only document, unlikely own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:56, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. 2016 text, author is Congres National du Kurdistan. Copyright status is unknown. Such kind of texts are often in public domain, but not always. I do not understand French. Taivo (talk) 17:48, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:01, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
unused, personal identification unwanted (as soon as meta's admins change full protection from my userpage, i will remove the last use)-- Magister Mathematicae 17:17, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:58, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Copyrighted structure; no COM:FOP in France MPF (talk) 17:18, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:56, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Copyrighted structure; no COM:FOP in France MPF (talk) 17:18, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:56, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Copyrighted structure; no COM:FOP in France MPF (talk) 17:19, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:56, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Copyrighted artwork; no COM:FOP in France MPF (talk) 17:20, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:55, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Copyrighted artwork; no COM:FOP in France MPF (talk) 17:21, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:55, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Copyrighted artwork; no COM:FOP in France MPF (talk) 17:21, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:55, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Copyrighted structure; no COM:FOP in France MPF (talk) 17:22, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:54, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Copyrighted art work; no COM:FOP in France MPF (talk) 17:24, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:54, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Copyrighted artwork; no COM:FOP in France MPF (talk) 17:25, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:53, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
- File:MD Arafat with A. Thabet 5.jpg
- File:MD Arafat with A. Thabet 3.jpg
- File:MD Arafat with A. Thabet 4.jpg
- File:MD Arafat with A. Thabet 1.jpg
- File:MD Arafat with A. Thabet 2.jpg
- File:MD Arafat with A. Thabet.jpg
- File:MD Arafat with Engr. Watheq 1.jpg
- File:MD Arafat.jpg
- File:An.arafat.jpg
Ies (talk) 17:26, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:53, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Copyrighted artwork; no COM:FOP in France MPF (talk) 17:26, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Com:DW of (c) map. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:52, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Copyrighted artwork; no COM:FOP in France MPF (talk) 17:27, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio, Com:Toys. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:52, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
imho doubtfull copyright, as rather small format missing metadata to verify claimed 'own work', and potentially scan (moirée?), Roland zh (talk) 17:35, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:51, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Plain commercial advertising, SPAM, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 17:35, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: We have a poor choice of shapewear images. --sasha (krassotkin) 21:52, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Keep At moment, the file is used in en.wiki. Taivo (talk) 18:15, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per Taivo and Sasha. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:51, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
File is not licensed under creative commons. File was stolen from me. Lars Lentz (talk) 17:41, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- For these photos, let's centralize discussion at Commons:Deletion_requests/File:LightningVolt_Outhouse.jpg.– Quadell (talk) 18:05, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: cc per http://web.archive.org/web/20060517055214/http://www.lightningvolt.com/Image%20Gallery/Nature/Water/Coastlines%20and%20Seascapes/imagegallery.htm. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:49, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vijay k sathaputhur (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
- File:Vijay friendss.jpg
- File:Vijay friends function.jpg
- File:Vijay friends selfie.jpg
- File:K.Vijay,.jpg
- File:Vijay friends with Beach.jpg
- File:Vijay friends at Beach.jpg
- File:Vijay friends in collage campus.jpg
- File:Vijay friends collage.jpg
- File:Vijay friends hostel.jpg
- File:Vijay friends collage in classroom.jpg
- File:Vijay friend.jpg
- File:Vijay friend with outing.jpg
- File:Vijay friends.jpg
- File:Sathaputhur village work.jpg
- File:Sathaputhur village landd.jpg
- File:Vijay in sathaputhur t.jpg
- File:Sathaputhur village.jpg
- File:Sathaputhur village lake.jpg
- File:Vijay collage selfie department.jpg
- File:Vijay collage.jpg
- File:Vijay collage selfie.jpg
- File:Vijay went collage.jpg
- File:Vijay work in land with cow.jpg
- File:Vijay work in land.jpg
- File:Vijay in lake.jpg
- File:Vijay in selfie with land.jpg
- File:Vijay sathaputhur tree.jpg
- File:Vijay in our land.jpg
- File:Vijay in sathaputhur alamaram street.jpg
- File:Vijay in sathaputhur streets selfie.jpg
- File:Sathaputhur street.jpg
- File:Vijay in sathaputhur streets.jpg
- File:Vijay sathaputhur street.jpg
- File:Vijay in sathaputhur temple.jpg
- File:Vijay in sathaputhur.jpg
- File:Vijay in sathaputhur street.jpg
- File:Vijay with laksmimenan.png
- File:Vijay k sathaputhur hostel to collage.jpg
- File:Vijay k sathaputhur banner look.jpg
- File:Vijay k sathaputhur and friends.jpg
- File:Vijay k sathaputhur ook.jpg
- File:Vijay k sathaputhur thirupathi.jpg
- File:Vijay k sathaputhur police.jpg
- File:Vijay k sathaputhur road.jpg
- File:Vijay sathaputhur auto.jpg
- File:Vijay sathaputhur gopika.jpg
- File:K.vijay.sathaputhur.jpg
- File:Vijay k sathaputhur hostel tindivanam.JPG
- File:Vijay k sathaputhur our grandmother.jpg
- File:Vijay sathaputhur with cooling glass.jpg
- File:Vijay k sathaputhur collage with cooling glass.jpg
- File:Vijay sathaputhur home.jpg
- File:Vijay k sathaputhur collage selfies.jpg
- File:Vijay.k sathaputhur school.jpg
- File:Vijay k sathaputhur banner.jpg
- File:Vijay k sathaputhur hostel.JPG
- File:K.vijay.jpg
- File:Vijay sathaputhur village.jpg
- File:Vijay sathaputhur class room.jpg
- File:Vijay sathaputhur collage selfie.jpg
Ies (talk) 17:41, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:48, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
File is not licensed under creative commons. File was stolen from me. Lars Lentz (talk) 17:41, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- For these photos, let's centralize discussion at Commons:Deletion_requests/File:LightningVolt_Outhouse.jpg.– Quadell (talk) 18:06, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- The file was not stolen! At the time I uploaded it several years ago, the author had licensed it with the creative commons license that allows distribution and modification. PROOF OF THE LICENSE. I have correctly tagged the file, the license and the author, and included a link. The only modification (allowed by the license) I made was to remove the watermark (unacceptable for Commons). --5ko 18:55, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: cc per http://web.archive.org/web/20060517055050/http://www.lightningvolt.com/Image%20Gallery/Architecture/Interiors/Floors/imagegallery.htm. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:38, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
File is not licensed under creative commons. File was stolen from me. Lars Lentz (talk) 17:41, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- For these photos, let's centralize discussion at Commons:Deletion_requests/File:LightningVolt_Outhouse.jpg.– Quadell (talk) 18:06, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: cc per http://web.archive.org/web/20060517055233/http://www.lightningvolt.com/Image%20Gallery/Nature/Water/Waterfalls/imagegallery.htm. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:39, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
File is not licensed under creative commons. File was stolen from me. Lars Lentz (talk) 17:42, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- For these photos, let's centralize discussion at Commons:Deletion_requests/File:LightningVolt_Outhouse.jpg.– Quadell (talk) 18:06, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: cc per http://web.archive.org/web/20060517055214/http://www.lightningvolt.com/Image%20Gallery/Nature/Water/Coastlines%20and%20Seascapes/imagegallery.htm. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:40, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
File is not licensed under creative commons. File was stolen from me. Lars Lentz (talk) 17:42, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- For these photos, let's centralize discussion at Commons:Deletion_requests/File:LightningVolt_Outhouse.jpg.– Quadell (talk) 18:06, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: cc per http://web.archive.org/web/20060517055229/http://www.lightningvolt.com/Image%20Gallery/Nature/Water/Birds/imagegallery.htm. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:42, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
File is not licensed under creative commons. File was stolen from me. Lars Lentz (talk) 17:42, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- For these photos, let's centralize discussion at Commons:Deletion_requests/File:LightningVolt_Outhouse.jpg.– Quadell (talk) 18:06, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: cc per http://web.archive.org/web/20060517054852/http://www.lightningvolt.com/Image%20Gallery/Technology/Transportation/Sea%20Travel/imagegallery.htm. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:44, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
File is not licensed under creative commons. File was stolen from me. Lars Lentz (talk) 17:43, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- For these photos, let's centralize discussion at Commons:Deletion_requests/File:LightningVolt_Outhouse.jpg.– Quadell (talk) 18:06, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: cc per http://web.archive.org/web/20060517055137/http://www.lightningvolt.com/Image%20Gallery/Nature/Land/Birds/imagegallery.htm. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:44, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
File is not licensed under creative commons. File was stolen from me. Lars Lentz (talk) 17:43, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- For these photos, let's centralize discussion at Commons:Deletion_requests/File:LightningVolt_Outhouse.jpg.– Quadell (talk) 18:06, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: cc per http://web.archive.org/web/20060517055214/http://www.lightningvolt.com/Image%20Gallery/Nature/Water/Coastlines%20and%20Seascapes/imagegallery.htm. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:41, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
File is not licensed under creative commons. File was stolen from me. Lars Lentz (talk) 17:43, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- For these photos, let's centralize discussion at Commons:Deletion_requests/File:LightningVolt_Outhouse.jpg.– Quadell (talk) 18:06, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: cc per http://web.archive.org/web/20060517051357/http://www.lightningvolt.com/Image%20Gallery/Technology/Industrial/imagegallery.htm. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:43, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
File is not licensed under creative commons. File was stolen from me. Lars Lentz (talk) 17:44, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- For these photos, let's centralize discussion at Commons:Deletion_requests/File:LightningVolt_Outhouse.jpg.– Quadell (talk) 18:07, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: cc per http://web.archive.org/web/20060517051417/http://www.lightningvolt.com/Image%20Gallery/Architecture/Exteriors/imagegallery.htm. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:42, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
File is not licensed under creative commons. File was stolen from me. Lars Lentz (talk) 17:44, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- For these photos, let's centralize discussion at Commons:Deletion_requests/File:LightningVolt_Outhouse.jpg.– Quadell (talk) 18:07, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: cc per http://web.archive.org/web/20060517055214/http://www.lightningvolt.com/Image%20Gallery/Nature/Water/Coastlines%20and%20Seascapes/imagegallery.htm. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:41, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
File is not licensed under creative commons. File was stolen from me. Lars Lentz (talk) 17:44, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- For these photos, let's centralize discussion at Commons:Deletion_requests/File:LightningVolt_Outhouse.jpg.– Quadell (talk) 18:07, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: cc per http://web.archive.org/web/20060517055214/http://www.lightningvolt.com/Image%20Gallery/Nature/Water/Coastlines%20and%20Seascapes/imagegallery.htm. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:41, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
File is not licensed under creative commons. File was stolen from me. Lars Lentz (talk) 17:44, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- For these photos, let's centralize discussion at Commons:Deletion_requests/File:LightningVolt_Outhouse.jpg.– Quadell (talk) 18:07, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: CC license http://web.archive.org/web/20060517051417/http://www.lightningvolt.com/Image%20Gallery/Architecture/Exteriors/imagegallery.htm. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:35, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Image likely from https://theyouthradar.com/2014/02/25/gallery-host-stadia-for-2017-fifa-u17-world-cup-in-india/ states: "*All images come from the 2014 FIFA World Cup Brazil official Facebook page." This specific image: https://theyouthradar.files.wordpress.com/2014/02/goa.jpg Jim1138 (talk) 18:06, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:32, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Copied from http://india24.xyz/fc-goa/ specific image: http://india24.xyz/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Owners_of_FC_Goa.jpg Jim1138 (talk) 18:11, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:31, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
|
Copyright warning: A subject in this image is protected by copyright.
This image features an architectural or artistic work, photographed from a public space in France. There are limited Freedom of Panorama exemptions in France, which means that they cannot be photographed freely for anything other than non-commercial purposes. However, French jurisprudence states that no infringement is constituted when the work is an "accessory compared to the main represented or handled subject". If a copyrighted architectural or artistic work is contained in this image and it is a substantial reproduction, this photo cannot be licensed under a free license, and will be deleted. Framing this image to focus on the copyrighted work is also a copyright violation. Before reusing this content, ensure that you have the right to do so. You are solely responsible for ensuring that you do not infringe someone else's copyrights. See our general disclaimer for more information. |
.png){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
.gif){kind=link}
![44 File:"2001" Production Plan No. 3.jpg](#File:"2001"_Production_Plan_No._3.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![274 File:Panneau "Château du Frœnsbourg (305 m)" (2).jpg](#File:Panneau_"Château_du_Frœnsbourg_(305_m)"_(2).jpg){kind=link}
![275 File:Panneau "Les châteaux".jpg](#File:Panneau_"Les_châteaux".jpg){kind=link}
![276 File:Panneau "Château du Frœnsbourg (305 m)" (1).jpg](#File:Panneau_"Château_du_Frœnsbourg_(305_m)"_(1).jpg){kind=link}
![282 File:Panneau "Massif du Taennchel".jpg](#File:Panneau_"Massif_du_Taennchel".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(16).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.gif){kind=link}
.gif){kind=link}
-2016-09-15T20:54:00.000Z-File:"2001"_Production_Plan_No._3.jpg){kind=link}
![23:48, 15 September 2016 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2016/09/15#c-INeverCry-2016-09-15T23:48:00.000Z-File:"2001"_Production_Plan_No._3.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
%D0%B4%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%B6%D0%B4%D1%8B_%D0%93%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%8E_%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B5%D1%82%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BE_%D0%A1%D0%BE%D1%8E%D0%B7%D0%B0._%D0%9C%D0%BE%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B2%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%B9_%D0%BF%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%BA_%D0%9F%D0%BE%D0%B1%D0%B5%D0%B4%D1%8B._%D0%A1%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BA%D1%82-%D0%9F%D0%B5%D1%82%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B1%D1%83%D1%80%D0%B3.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_%D0%B3%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%8F_%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B5%D1%82%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BE_%D0%A1%D0%BE%D1%8E%D0%B7%D0%B0.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Engineman_Jemaral_Weaver_reflects_at_the_Korean_War_Memorial_during_the_Annapolis_Area_Complex_prospective_Chief_Petty_Officers%5Ersquo,_Heritage_Run.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
%22_(2).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
%22_(2).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
![18:11, 15 September 2016 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2016/09/15#c-MPF-2016-09-15T18:11:00.000Z-File:Panneau_"Château_du_Frœnsbourg_(305_m)"_(2).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: derivative. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:31, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
![22:31, 21 September 2016 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2016/09/15#c-Hedwig_in_Washington-2016-09-21T22:31:00.000Z-File:Panneau_"Château_du_Frœnsbourg_(305_m)"_(2).jpg){kind=link}
|
|
Copyright warning: A subject in this image is protected by copyright.
This image features an architectural or artistic work, photographed from a public space in France. There are limited Freedom of Panorama exemptions in France, which means that they cannot be photographed freely for anything other than non-commercial purposes. However, French jurisprudence states that no infringement is constituted when the work is an "accessory compared to the main represented or handled subject". If a copyrighted architectural or artistic work is contained in this image and it is a substantial reproduction, this photo cannot be licensed under a free license, and will be deleted. Framing this image to focus on the copyrighted work is also a copyright violation. Before reusing this content, ensure that you have the right to do so. You are solely responsible for ensuring that you do not infringe someone else's copyrights. See our general disclaimer for more information. |
![18:12, 15 September 2016 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2016/09/15#c-MPF-2016-09-15T18:12:00.000Z-File:Panneau_"Les_châteaux".jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: abnove too. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:31, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
![22:31, 21 September 2016 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2016/09/15#c-Hedwig_in_Washington-2016-09-21T22:31:00.000Z-File:Panneau_"Les_châteaux".jpg){kind=link}
%22_(1).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
%22_(1).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
|
|
Copyright warning: A subject in this image is protected by copyright.
This image features an architectural or artistic work, photographed from a public space in France. There are limited Freedom of Panorama exemptions in France, which means that they cannot be photographed freely for anything other than non-commercial purposes. However, French jurisprudence states that no infringement is constituted when the work is an "accessory compared to the main represented or handled subject". If a copyrighted architectural or artistic work is contained in this image and it is a substantial reproduction, this photo cannot be licensed under a free license, and will be deleted. Framing this image to focus on the copyrighted work is also a copyright violation. Before reusing this content, ensure that you have the right to do so. You are solely responsible for ensuring that you do not infringe someone else's copyrights. See our general disclaimer for more information. |
![18:12, 15 September 2016 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2016/09/15#c-MPF-2016-09-15T18:12:00.000Z-File:Panneau_"Château_du_Frœnsbourg_(305_m)"_(1).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: above too. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:31, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
![22:31, 21 September 2016 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2016/09/15#c-Hedwig_in_Washington-2016-09-21T22:31:00.000Z-File:Panneau_"Château_du_Frœnsbourg_(305_m)"_(1).jpg){kind=link}
Out of scope per COM:EDUSE. Wikicology (talk) 19:11, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: clearly in scope. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:30, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope. Wikimedia Common is not a personal photo album.
- File:Nattes traditionnelles.jpg
- File:Tenue en pagne pour un défilé de mode chic.jpg
- File:Mèches torsadées.JPG
- File:Placali sauce gombo poisson fumé.jpg
Wikicology (talk) 19:14, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, q too low for reuse. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:29, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope. Wikimedia Common is not a personal photo album.
Wikicology (talk) 19:17, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:28, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Files in Category:Kwame Nkrumah Mausoleum
[edit]In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Ghana. These all infringe on copyrights belonging to the various creators of the mausoleum -- architect, sculptor, etc. Since Nkrumah died in 1972, and the Ghanian law is PMA 70, the work must all still be under copyright.
- File:Ghana Kwame Nkruma Memorial 3jun2005.jpg
- File:Nkrumah Museum Mural.jpg
- File:Kwame Nkruhma Memorial, Accra, Ghana.JPG
- File:Kwame nkruma memorial.jpg
- File:Kwame nkrumah grave accra ghana.jpg
- File:Kwame Nkrumah Mausoleum.jpg
- File:Kwame Nkrumah Mausoleum2.jpg
- File:Kwame Nkrumah Mausoleum4.jpg
- File:Kwame Nkrumah Mausoleum5.jpg
- File:Kwame Nkrumah Mausoleum7.jpg
- File:Kwame Nkrumah Memorial 0001.jpg
- File:Kwame Nkrumah memorial, Accra.jpg
- File:Kwame Nkrumah memorial, Accra1.jpg
- File:Kwame Nkrumah memorial2, Accra.jpg
- File:Kwame Nkrumah memorial3, Accra.jpg
- File:Kwame nkrumah tomb accra ghana.jpg
- File:Kwame Nkrumah.JPG
- File:Nkrumah Accra (3106539556).jpg
- File:NM (3105704243).jpg
- File:Tomb of Kwame Nkrumah.JPG
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
. Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:11, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Mostly deleted per nomination, photgraphs of the grave seem to be below TOO, regardles of FOP. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:29, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
These two identical logos are probably not "own work", we'd need evidence of that. Further, there seem to be several different groups with such a name and it's not clear which one these logos are about. Noting for me that en:File:Logo square.jpg is tagged as "shadows commons", a tag that will need removal if this is deleted.
Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 20:17, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete The image description pages say it all. They are the logos of an app called "EasyRide". Also, see this: https://itunes.apple.com/ms/app/easyride-ub/id983277379. —Codename Lisa (talk) 17:51, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:28, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
|
|
Copyright warning: A subject in this image is protected by copyright.
This image features an architectural or artistic work, photographed from a public space in France. There are limited Freedom of Panorama exemptions in France, which means that they cannot be photographed freely for anything other than non-commercial purposes. However, French jurisprudence states that no infringement is constituted when the work is an "accessory compared to the main represented or handled subject". If a copyrighted architectural or artistic work is contained in this image and it is a substantial reproduction, this photo cannot be licensed under a free license, and will be deleted. Framing this image to focus on the copyrighted work is also a copyright violation. Before reusing this content, ensure that you have the right to do so. You are solely responsible for ensuring that you do not infringe someone else's copyrights. See our general disclaimer for more information. |
![20:28, 15 September 2016 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2016/09/15#c-MPF-2016-09-15T20:28:00.000Z-File:Panneau_"Massif_du_Taennchel".jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: above too. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:24, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
![22:24, 21 September 2016 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2016/09/15#c-Hedwig_in_Washington-2016-09-21T22:24:00.000Z-File:Panneau_"Massif_du_Taennchel".jpg){kind=link}
|
|
Copyright warning: A subject in this image is protected by copyright.
This image features an architectural or artistic work, photographed from a public space in France. There are limited Freedom of Panorama exemptions in France, which means that they cannot be photographed freely for anything other than non-commercial purposes. However, French jurisprudence states that no infringement is constituted when the work is an "accessory compared to the main represented or handled subject". If a copyrighted architectural or artistic work is contained in this image and it is a substantial reproduction, this photo cannot be licensed under a free license, and will be deleted. Framing this image to focus on the copyrighted work is also a copyright violation. Before reusing this content, ensure that you have the right to do so. You are solely responsible for ensuring that you do not infringe someone else's copyrights. See our general disclaimer for more information. |
Deleted: above too. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:24, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
|
|
Copyright warning: A subject in this image is protected by copyright.
This image features an architectural or artistic work, photographed from a public space in France. There are limited Freedom of Panorama exemptions in France, which means that they cannot be photographed freely for anything other than non-commercial purposes. However, French jurisprudence states that no infringement is constituted when the work is an "accessory compared to the main represented or handled subject". If a copyrighted architectural or artistic work is contained in this image and it is a substantial reproduction, this photo cannot be licensed under a free license, and will be deleted. Framing this image to focus on the copyrighted work is also a copyright violation. Before reusing this content, ensure that you have the right to do so. You are solely responsible for ensuring that you do not infringe someone else's copyrights. See our general disclaimer for more information. |
Deleted: above too. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:24, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
|
|
Copyright warning: A subject in this image is protected by copyright.
This image features an architectural or artistic work, photographed from a public space in France. There are limited Freedom of Panorama exemptions in France, which means that they cannot be photographed freely for anything other than non-commercial purposes. However, French jurisprudence states that no infringement is constituted when the work is an "accessory compared to the main represented or handled subject". If a copyrighted architectural or artistic work is contained in this image and it is a substantial reproduction, this photo cannot be licensed under a free license, and will be deleted. Framing this image to focus on the copyrighted work is also a copyright violation. Before reusing this content, ensure that you have the right to do so. You are solely responsible for ensuring that you do not infringe someone else's copyrights. See our general disclaimer for more information. |
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: no FOP France. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:25, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Wrong file uploaded. Please delete. Mineolaportuguese (talk) 21:21, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Keep Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion#G7 (author or uploader request deletion
) does not apply as a speedy criteria reason anymore, and this image is in use in en:Gabriel Silva Marques. It has educational value and is in Commons:Project scope. No valid reason specified for deletion per Commons:Deletion policy. Comment Upload a new version, either under this file name or another. 80.221.159.67 04:00, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:08, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 21:47, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:07, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
no COM:EDUSE - poor quality and large watermarks INeverCry 21:48, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:07, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:21, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:07, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:22, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:07, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Hoax: see http://no.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sletting/Kongsberg-meteorittene. For sure it is not a meteorite and never existed a meteorite called ALH82002. Apparently a form of self-promotion, out of scope. Basilicofresco (msg) 22:25, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:35, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Hoax: see http://no.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sletting/Kongsberg-meteorittene. For sure it is not a meteorite and never existed a meteorite called ALH82003. Apparently a form of self-promotion, out of scope. Basilicofresco (msg) 22:26, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:35, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Permission needed for this picture recently published at http://www.marianne.net/Bernie-Bonvoisin-Il-n-y-a-plus-d-artistes-ce-sont-des-produits_a240722.html Do not follow (talk) 22:28, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:06, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:29, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:06, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:32, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:06, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:34, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:06, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Unidentified rock presented as material of "celestial or terrestrial" origin... There is no way it's a meteorite. It's likely just a piece of slag. This user has got a long tradition of this kind of not-meteorites. Hoax or pointless picture of unidentified object: out of scope. Basilicofresco (msg) 22:43, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:35, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal images
- File:Muttaher Aziz in Afghanistan.jpg
- File:Muttaher Aziz.jpg
- File:Muttaher Aziz in London.jpg
- File:Muttaher Aziz words.jpg
INeverCry 22:43, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:05, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Unidentified rock presented as material of "celestial or terrestrial" origin... There is no way it's a meteorite. It's likely just a piece of some sort of slag. Hoax or pointless picture of unidentified object: out of scope. Basilicofresco (msg) 22:44, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:35, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Unidentified rock presented as material of "celestial or terrestrial" origin... There is no way it's a meteorite. It's likely just a piece of some sort of slag. Hoax or pointless picture of unidentified object: out of scope. Basilicofresco (msg) 22:45, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:35, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Unidentified rock presented as material of "celestial or terrestrial" origin... There is no way it's a meteorite. It's likely just a piece of some sort of slag. Hoax or pointless picture of unidentified object: out of scope. Basilicofresco (msg) 22:45, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:35, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Unidentified rock presented as material of "celestial or terrestrial" origin... There is no way it's a meteorite. It's likely just a piece of some sort of slag. Hoax or pointless picture of unidentified object: out of scope. Basilicofresco (msg) 22:45, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:35, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Unidentified rock presented as material of celestial origin... There is no way it's a meteorite. It's likely just a piece of some sort of slag. Hoax or pointless picture of unidentified object: out of scope. Basilicofresco (msg) 22:46, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:35, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:51, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:04, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:52, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:04, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:53, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:03, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:57, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:03, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:57, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:03, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Meteorite with tail new version.jpg. It's likely not a real meteorite. Moreover oriented meteorites are typically tail-less. Basilicofresco (msg) 23:09, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:35, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Meteorite with tail new version.jpg. It's likely not a real meteorite. Moreover oriented meteorites are typically tail-less. Basilicofresco (msg) 23:09, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:35, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Meteorite with tail new version.jpg. It's likely not a real meteorite. Moreover oriented meteorites are typically tail-less. Basilicofresco (msg) 23:09, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:35, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Personal selfie. Out of scope for commons, per COM:SELFIE. LudwigSK (talk) 23:33, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:01, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Personal selfie. Out of scope for commons, per COM:SELFIE. LudwigSK (talk) 23:34, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:01, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:59, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:00, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 11:11, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 11:11, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 11:11, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 11:11, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 11:11, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 11:12, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by BrBromeBlan1252 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 11:12, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by SquareDraft (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 11:12, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Test image as noted by uploader, please remove MarkTraceur (talk) 15:01, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Look description: "Testing, I'll remove this later". Taivo (talk) 16:03, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 11:12, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Copyright issue. Olaniyan Olushola (talk) 15:47, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete also copy of that file:Rodados sin punto es HD.png due to copyright issue. These are the uploader's only contributions. Taivo (talk) 16:19, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - per above. Wikicology (talk) 20:37, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 11:12, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
out of scope –Davey2010Talk 15:47, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and promotional content. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 11:13, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Unused skyline, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:13, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Keep I identified, described and categorized the skyline. Commons has no similar photos about the same place. Taivo (talk) 16:34, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Based on Taivo's help! Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:04, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per above. Nominator withdrew the nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 11:12, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal image, also unlikely to be own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:30, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 11:13, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work, unused personal image, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:34, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 11:13, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
File is not licensed under creative commons. File was stolen from me. Lars Lentz (talk) 17:40, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Hello, Lars Lentz. I don't think that "stolen" is an accurate accusation. This file (and all other similar ones listed at my talk page) were previously listed on your website, which at the time included a notice that all content was released under the cc-by-sa license. Here is the Wayback cached copy from that time. They're really excellent photographs, and at the time, I had been delighted to see that you were willing to allow us to use them under this license.– Quadell (talk) 18:00, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- I was redirected here from Commons:Deletion requests/File:LightningVolt Wood Floor.jpg. The file was not stolen! At the time I uploaded it several years ago, the author had licensed it with the creative commons license that allows distribution and modification. PROOF OF THE LICENSE. I have correctly tagged the file, the license and the author, and included a link. The only modification (allowed by the license) was to remove the watermark (unacceptable for Commons). --5ko 18:59, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: cc per http://web.archive.org/web/20060517055046/http://www.lightningvolt.com/Image%20Gallery/Architecture/Exteriors/slides/Outhouse.htm. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:36, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Irisymagdagoes (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 23:17, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 11:14, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Files of MisterX123
[edit]MisterX123 (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:
- File:600px - Sporting San José Flag.png
- File:600px - White with a diagonal red flag.png
- File:600px - Yellow and Red diagonal divided.png
First group. Although these files are called fantasy flags, they are used for illustrating clubs with similar coats of arms. I consider them derivative works of copyrighted COAs.
- File:Escudo de la Federación Costarricense de Fútbol.png
- File:Extra TV 42 logo.png
- File:Logo de la Primera División de Costa Rica.png
- File:Sporting SJ.png
Second group. Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 07:34, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Español: Aquí hay algo que no entiendo. Quizás los archivos de File:600px - Sporting San José Flag.png y File:600px - White with a diagonal red flag.png sean violaciones a los supuestos derechos de autor, pero lo que queda en duda es en el archivo File:600px - Yellow and Red diagonal divided.png, ya que no representa a ningún equipo en particular, solamente es una bandera de colores diagonales y un balón en el centro. No creo que fuera para el "suspected copyright violation" porque he visto otras banderas de fantasía que contienen un balón igual que la que subí. Por ejemplo, estos archivos poseen exactamente los mismos aspectos añadidos (licencia) y no se les dice nada: File:600px Bianco e Rosso (Bordato) con pallone.png, File:600px Emmen.png, File:600px Granata con Pallone.png, entre otros. Quiero una explicación de cómo subir una bandera de fantasía, ya que la de los equipos de la liga mexicana tienen patrones parecidos y no se les ha dado ninguna advertencia. Por otra parte, los permisos de File:Escudo de la Federación Costarricense de Fútbol.png están correctamente visibles (plantillas - templates), su fuente (source) y el autor (author). Hay archivos de escudos de federaciones de fútbol que están exactamente iguales al que subí en el ámbito de plantillas, por ejemplo File:Deutscher Fußball-Bund logo.svg, File:Escudo Federación Colombiana de Fútbol.svg, File:Logo de la Federación de Fútbol de Chile.png y File:Federación Peruana de Fútbol (2011).png. Entonces, mi archivo debe permanecer en Commons porque no infringí ningún derecho de autor y no existe ningún "copyright violation". Luego, no encuentro una explicación para el archivo File:Logo de la Primera División de Costa Rica.png, tiene la licencia (permission), autor (author) y fuentes (source) correctas, no se está infringiendo los derechos de autor. En comparación con otras ligas, las subidas de File:MX logo.png, File:LaLiga Santander.svg, File:MLS logo.svg, File:Logo Primera División de Uruguay.png poseen exactamente los mismos permisos que le asigné a mi subida y aún así es marcada como "suspected copyright violation". Esto es una injusticia, y algo discriminatorio al excluir un archivo que tiene todo correcto solo por ser de un país que no es tan relevante en la página. Por favor, pido que retiren la etiqueta de posible eliminación. Para continuar, la subida File:Extra TV 42 logo.png es un archivo de un canal de televisión, tampoco se está infringiendo los derechos de autor porque posee todas las licencias correctas con sus fuentes y autores. Hay otras cadenas de televisión que también tienen los mismos templates o plantillas que yo utilicé, por ejemplo: File:AMC logo 2016.png, File:800pxSci Fi Universal.jpg, File:3TV sigla veche.jpg, entre otras más. Por último, el archivo de File:Sporting SJ.png es un escudo de un equipo de fútbol, se especificó el nombre de la fuente (source), autor (author) y todas las plantillas (templates) que indican que es propiedad de otra entidad y no exactamente mía. Los permisos que le asigné a la subida mía son los mismos que están agregados en otros escudos, como el del File:Borussia Dortmund logo.svg, File:Logo FC Bayern München.svg, File:Logo-VfL-Wolfsburg.svg, File:New York City FC logo.png. Por favor, les pido que retiren las plantillas de eliminación en cada uno de los archivos porque todos poseen las licencias que les corresponde. Leí todo lo relacionado con el OTRS-permission, donde indica que lo hecho por mí en los archivos es completamente válido y veraz, al colocar las plantillas.
- English: Here is something that I can't understand. Maybe the files File:600px - Sporting San José Flag.png and File:600px - White with a diagonal red flag.png are supposed to be copyright violations, but the upload of File:600px - Yellow and Red diagonal divided.png doesn't represent any individual team because it is a flag divided by two diagonal colors where a ball is in the middle. By the way I corrected their permissions and I added the template of ((Bandeira falsa)) which means the flag is useful only to facilitate visual identification of some articles within Wikipedia. That flag has some visual elements that are similar to official logos or coats of arms of certain clubs, such as colors or some symbol, but it is NOT official and doesn't have any direct relation to the crest, symbol or official flag of the club. I consider there's no reason for the "suspected copyright violation" because other users have uploaded similar content like those files: File:600px Bianco e Rosso (Bordato) con pallone.png, File:600px Emmen.png, and File:600px Granata con Pallone.png. If the problem continues being wrong for any reason, I'll ask you how to upload a fantasy flag correctly. Other examples are the fantasy flags of Mexican League, to be more specific, in the Spanish article. There are a lot of flags that have similar elements to their official logos and the permissions are the same as I put to my files. On the other side, the permissions of File:Escudo de la Federación Costarricense de Fútbol.png are added correctly (templates, source and author). In fact, I had to change the author because FEDEFUTBOL had changed its domain name. There are some other examples that sources are exactly the same as I added to my file: File:Deutscher Fußball-Bund logo.svg, File:Escudo Federación Colombiana de Fútbol.svg, File:Logo de la Federación de Fútbol de Chile.png, and File:Federación Peruana de Fútbol (2011).png. So, my file should be stay in Commons because I did not upload it without permissions. Then, I have no idea why the file File:Logo de la Primera División de Costa Rica.png is tagged with the "suspected copyright violation" because it has the correct license or permission, author and sources, that means that I was not distributing the file without permissions. In comparison to other soccer leagues logos, the uploads of File:MX logo.png, File:LaLiga Santander.svg, File:MLS logo.svg, and File:Logo Primera División de Uruguay.png have exactly the same permissions that I put to my file, and although I did that, it was considered a "copyright violation". That's why I ask you to please retire the deletion tag. To continue, the file File:Extra TV 42 logo.png is related to a TV channel, and it was not a copyright violation because it has the correct licenses with its source and author. There are other TV network logos that have the same templates that I used, for example: File:AMC logo 2016.png, File:800pxSci Fi Universal.jpg, and File:3TV sigla veche.jpg. To conclude, the upload of this file File:Sporting SJ.png is a sport club logo in which its source, author and the templates are specified well, just like in other examples of logos of File:Borussia Dortmund logo.svg, File:Logo FC Bayern München.svg, File:Logo-VfL-Wolfsburg.svg and File:New York City FC logo.png. Please, I ask you to retire those deletion tags because my files have the correct licenses and permissions. I read the whole article of OTRS-permission, which indicates that what I did was completely valid and correct.
_con_pallone.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: We keep fantasy flags that are related to and described in works of fiction that qualify as "notable" e.g. The Lord of the Rings. we also keep fantasy flags that are created by notable artists, cartoonists, or satirists. Other than those, we do not generally keep fantasy flags such as these because they will simply confuse the reader. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:46, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Files of Kxxvii
[edit]Kxxvii (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:
- File:BILD - sign , button.png
- File:KONTAKT - sign , button.png
- File:MUSIK - sign , button.png
- File:SKRIFT - sign , button.png
How the files are useful? Maybe they are out of project scope? Taivo (talk) 09:10, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
I'd argue that they're in project scope for these reasons:
The images could be used as links on any type of wikipage; it might be wikipedia or something like the wikipages in software repositories on github. They could be used on sites to denote particular sections on the site, i.e. sub-pages used for contact (KONTAKT) or articles/writing (SKRIFT).
This could be done with regular html and css but some people might prefer to use the various methods for creating automatic embeddable code that's available on the wikimedia commons. This would be preferable if you don't know much about html and if you prefer to copy/paste stuff.
If you happen to know html/css you could use them for example-content if you're producing templates for tools like jekyll. Kind of like this: http://taylantatli.me/Ramme/sample-post-images/
In addition to this they could be used for book covers, thumbnails, logos like the Wikimedia Commons one, album art/animations/videos/article images/illustrating translations/any type of remix and other visual media whatever it might be. Wheter it'd be for informational purposes or purely artistic ones.
For sites I have built there has been times when pure text didn't work for various reasons. For a more intuitive layout I opted for using images with text as links to point visitors the part of the pages that displayed a selection of texts instead of using pure text as links.-- --- kxxvii (talk) 11:01, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Files that are pure simple text are explicitly out of scope. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:49, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from non-trivial logo. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Maybe the logo is de minimis? Taivo (talk) 15:47, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
- Logo is not needed for table. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 01:15, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: The logo is not the point here -- the table itself is out of scope since, if needed, it should be set in Wiki markup. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:51, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely that artwork depicted is own work, more information is needed. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:20, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:51, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
This is an utterly spectacular photograph, but it's missing that which makes it educational: description and category. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:24, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- The uploader's other contributions file:La nature africaine.jpg and file:The old banks.jpg have the same problem: no description, no categories, place is unidentified. Taivo (talk) 16:40, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: The all have a logo in the corner for Sauphiane Idlcadi, who may or may not be the uploader. The first two appear without a free license at https://500px.com/sauphianeidlcadi. In order to restore these, we will need a free license from the photographer via OTRS as well as appropriate descriptions and categories. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:01, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
L'Aguilles means a sharp pointy peak. But there's no clue where on earth this image was taken, neither in description or category making this a lovely photo of some rocks, but non-educational. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:38, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Somewhere in Brazil in Itatiaia National Park. Taivo (talk) 17:17, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Per taivo. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:04, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Feyhoemail (talk · contribs)
[edit]A series of very artistic photographs but not educational because they have very small descriptions and no categories. I did not find any which were in use.
- File:La vie est seule -4.jpg
- File:La vie est seule -3.jpg
- File:La vie est seule -2.jpg
- File:La vie est seule-1.jpg
- File:The reader by sunrise.jpg
- File:Light Painting in Collégiale Ste Waudru.jpg
- File:A room with a view in Mons.jpg
- File:Fey,angel actually is all around.jpg
- File:Heureux.jpg
- File:Le silence de la mer.jpg
- File:Les reflets.jpg
- File:Quand un enfant naît.jpg
- File:Where rain is Typical.jpg
- File:Jeux d'enfants à knokke.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:49, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete all. They are all somewhere in Belgium (Knokke-Heist is near sea, Mons is deep inland). But educational value is in my opinion always weak and sometimes even almost missing. Taivo (talk) 20:38, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
- Keep some Some are actually interesting compositions. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:03, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Kept one because it was an identified location. As for the others, aside from the very objectionable watermark which we strongly discourage and the complete lack of descriptions, we have personality rights problems, FOP problems, and files that are out of scope as personal art. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:12, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
This image appears to be copied from something else, but has no source or author. It's impossible to know if the license is correct. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:50, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- L'immagine in bianco e nero è utilizzata qui, e come source è indicata "Popular print end XVIII"--Roberto.Amerighi (talk) 17:19, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- I believe that if it is of the Ellin Beltz agreement, the source "Popular print end XVIII" can also be used for this colorful files. This image is from the holy pictures that were distributed during the army advanced holy faith and their author is unknown. So I think that the file can be stored.--Roberto.Amerighi (talk) 08:45, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- L'immagine in bianco e nero è utilizzata qui, e come source è indicata "Popular print end XVIII"--Roberto.Amerighi (talk) 17:19, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Please also comment response--Roberto.Amerighi (talk) 11:45, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- I agree with Roberto. It's not a great image, but it is clearly from centuries ago, even if the author is unknown he's dead and the image has been public for a long time.--Alexmar983 (talk) 13:57, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
- It is not clearly from centuries ago, there is no source at all on this, so we have no way to know if it's been public for one minute, one century or never. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:37, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
- With all due respect, I still think it is clearly from the end of the 18th century.I have to remember this example for the article about copyright in the wikimedia project I've been drafting over the last months. Never understood why we don't fight real copyright infringements of recent photos at 100% of our energy, instead of this.--Alexmar983 (talk) 01:36, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
- It is not clearly from centuries ago, there is no source at all on this, so we have no way to know if it's been public for one minute, one century or never. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:37, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
- Since we have no idea where the image is from, this is a real copyright issue. Images need sources not an imaginary "I think this is from the 18th Century". This looks like it was copied from a schoolbook picture, actually... and with nothing to go on, it could have been done very recently and made to look old. We have had that also. People draw or create new images which look old. We recently had a headshot which had been created by pasting a recent head on an 18th century shoulders and clothes. Please reread COM:EVID. Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:06, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
- You're talking about a face, this is a type of drawing that existed in a very specific moment for a very specific reason. People don't recreate this type of religious pictures, because they're considered "lame" even by some "modern" Catholics. It's the theme that makes me (and probably not just me) strongly believe your comparison is excessive and lack of focus. And also the style. Also look at the link: this comes from a serious publication. It is all there what we need to know. It's a print of the late XVII century. The worst case scenario is that the author lied (highly improbable) or that someone took a black and white and inserted colors in it (still it is a derivative work with not a great originality, and also highly improbable). But you don't even need to do that type of accurate research with these types of pictures. Unless you have a real doubt based on culture (not formality) that makes you trigger, with millions of more critical and real scenario, this type of deletion is a good example on how to disperse energy.
- I mean: a pressure cooker exploded in the face of my mum with some consequences but I don't ask her to stop using them, it was a rare fabrication defect. On the contrary I keep slipping on the kitchen floor and I constantly ask her to change it with a different material. Even if nothing has never happened to her. That's call risk management. The fact that information must be provided, does not mean that you delete all doubtful images without a strategy. Doubts are not all the same. You start with critical cases, where the risk of copyright and legal problem is higher, while for these ones, you can simply collect them and ask one or two theme project on some wikipedia to take a closer look. And if they find something weird, based on their specific knowledge, you proceed. --Alexmar983 (talk) 02:11, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: While I agree that it is likely that this work is old, our standard of proof is not "likely", but "beyond a signifcant doubt" and it may well have been created recently. It's also such a terrible reproduction that I doubt its usefulness. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:21, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unlikely claim of own work on this blurry picture apparently copied from a book or magazine. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:57, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:22, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unlikely claim of own work on this blurry picture apparently copied from a book or magazine. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:58, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:22, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
_(16).jpg){kind=link}
_(16).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyrighted text; no COM:FOP in France MPF (talk) 17:22, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
_(16).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:23, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
_(16).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyrighted structure; no COM:FOP in France MPF (talk) 17:24, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Keep Can a Ferris Wheel have a copyright? I doubt it, but I'm not sure, so I leave this for a colleague to close. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:24, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 15:49, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
The specified false authorship. In metadata author - WenDstudio. — Green Zero обг 19:44, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:25, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Derivative from old photo, not own work. --sasha (krassotkin) 20:02, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:25, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Old photo, not own work. --sasha (krassotkin) 20:02, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:27, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Probably not own work (1940s). --sasha (krassotkin) 20:05, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:27, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama for artworks in the United States, and this seems like a photo of such an artwork. Unless the artwork is old enough and/or it has no copyright notice (pinging Missvain who has uploaded a photo on what seems to be the same subject, so s/he may know) the photo will need to be deleted. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 20:21, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- This sculpture was completed in 1928 and is owned by the National Park Service, and it is in the public domain. You can read more about it, here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Carolina_Monument. Therefore, it is allowed to be kept here. Freedom of panorama is sort of irrelevant for artwork, in the USA, if it was built before 1923, 95% of artworks are in the public domain, and if it is owned by the federal government or was commissioned for the federal government, it is public domain. Missvain (talk) 17:52, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
- I had a little concern that since that page (en:North Carolina Monument) says the artwork has been rehabilitated later, these modifications may have added some copyrightable elements. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 18:35, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
- This sculpture was completed in 1928 and is owned by the National Park Service, and it is in the public domain. You can read more about it, here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Carolina_Monument. Therefore, it is allowed to be kept here. Freedom of panorama is sort of irrelevant for artwork, in the USA, if it was built before 1923, 95% of artworks are in the public domain, and if it is owned by the federal government or was commissioned for the federal government, it is public domain. Missvain (talk) 17:52, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Missvain's statement is largely incorrect. I can't cite a single instance where a painting, photograph or sculpture owned by the Federal government is free of copyright unless the copyright has expired or "no notice" or "not renewed" applies. Invariably the creator keeps the copyright. Thus, the sculptor of the Korean War Veterans Memorial won a $600,000+ judgement (via the US Supreme Court) against the US Postal Service. Also see the cited DRs at Category:Official presidential painted portraits in the White House and File:Sacagawea_dollar_obverse.png.
It is entirely possible that "no notice" applies, but we don't know that.
. Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:33, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Non-trivial sport club logo. If they are in public domain or based on public domain coats of arms, this should be clearly stated.
- File:Eintracht Frankfurt Oder.gif
- File:Astoria Rießen.gif
- File:Rot Weiß Neuenhagen.gif
- File:Grün Weiß Letschin.gif
- File:Müllrose SV.gif
- File:Ludwigsfelde FC.gif
- File:Union Frankfurt Oder.gif
- File:HFlgUstgStff1.png
- File:VfB Fünfeichen.gif
- File:Eisenhuettenstadt aufbau bsd.png
- File:Dfs wl d luebben gruen weiss.gif
- File:Dfs wl d eisenhuettenstadt stahl fc.gif
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
- Just a point that I thought I should mention. This is the third time these logos have been uploaded by this user. The previous two times there were speedy deleted as {{Logo}}. The repeated reupload of copyrighted images seems to be a problem and the user has repeatedly ignored all warnings that were posted to their talk page. --Majora (talk) 17:40, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: obvious copyvios. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:13, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
This user has uploaded a number of logos as "self". Pretty unlikely they'd be the copyright holder to so many logos and there is no evidence, and a number have been deleted already as copvios.
- File:FV Preussen Eberswalde.png
- File:RSV Eintracht 1949.png
- File:SV Grün Weiß Brieselang.png
- File:VfB Hohenleipisch 1912.png
- File:Werderaner-fc-logo.png
- File:Tus Sachsenhausen.png
- File:Vfb-krieschow-logo 325px.png
- File:Sg-tiefbau-frankfurt-oder.gif
- File:AOK-Landespokal.png
- File:Polizei SV Frankfurt.png
- File:FC Eisenhüttenstadt.png
- File:Regionalliga nordost logo.png
- File:Regionalliga west-logo.png
- File:Regionalliga suedwest-logo.png
- File:Regionalliga Nord logo.png
- File:SC Eintracht Miersdorf Zeuthen.png
- File:FSV Germania Storkow.png
- File:JFV Eisenhüttenstadt2.png
- File:JFV Eisenhüttenstadt.png
- File:SG Blau-Gelb Laubsdorf.png
- File:TV 1861 Forst.png
- File:FV Blau-Weiß 90 Briesen.png
- File:FSV Viktoria Cottbus.png
- File:FSV Glückauf Brieske-Senftenberg.png
- File:FC 98 Hennigsdorf.png
- File:SV Fichte Kunersdorf.png
- File:SV Grün Weiß Mellensee.png
- File:BSG Motor Eberswalde.png
- File:SpVgg Blau Weiß Vetschau.png
- File:Eisenhüttenstädter FC Stahl.png
- File:FSV Union Fürstenwalde.png
- File:FV Erkner 1920.png
- File:SV Blau-Weiß Groß Lindow 1909.png
- File:1. FC Guben.png
- File:SV Grün-Weiß Lübben.png
- File:MSV Hanse Frankfurt (Oder).png
- File:BSV Guben-Nord.png
- File:Ludwigsfelder FC.png
- File:SG Burg.png
- File:SV Victoria Seelow.png
- File:Kolkwitzer SV 1896.png
- File:FC Union Frankfurt (Oder).png
- File:SV Union Booßen.png
- File:Müllroser SV.png
- File:Möbiskruger SV.png
- File:SV Astoria Rießen.png
- File:VfB Fünfeichen.png
- File:SG Grün Weiß Rehfelde.png
- File:1.FC Fürstenberg.png
- File:FG Rot-Weiß Neuenhagen.png
- File:SV Blau-Weiß Heinersdorf.png
- File:SV Preußen 90 Beeskow.png
- File:SV Grün-Weiß Letschin.png
- File:Fussballkreis OstBrandenburg.png
- File:Vfbeisenhuettenstadt.png
- File:Sgaufbaueisenhuettenstadt.png
- File:Bsgaufbaueisenhuettenstadt.png
- File:Fussballkreis OBRB.png
- File:Logo Fussballkreis Ostbrandenburg.jpg
- File:HFlgUstgStff 1.png
- File:Letschin gruen weiss sv.gif
- File:SG Aufbau Eisenhüttenstadt.png
- File:BSG Aufbau Eisenhüttenstadt.png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 20:45, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Diese Vereinswappen wurden durch mich, mit einem Bildbearbeitungsprogramm, überarbeitet. Bedeutet für mich, dass ich, beim Upload der Bilder, diese als eigenes Werk deklariere. Oder liege ich da falsch??--Conne982 (talk) 15:17, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Conne982 Bearbeitungen eines urheberrechtlich geschützten Vereinswappen machen für gewöhnlich das Werk anderer nicht zu deinem Werk, das vorige Urheberrecht gilt immer noch. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 15:53, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Gut, habe ich so verstanden. Wie soll ich jetzt weiter verfahren, im Bezug auf die oben genannten Bilder? Denn löschen wäre unzweckmäßig, da diese Bilder auf meine erstellten bzw überarbeiten Wiki Seiten benötigt werden. --Conne982 (talk) 16:05, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Du kannst die Vereine um Erlaubnis bitten, siehe Commons:OTRS/de. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 20:48, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Ok und wenn ich den Quelltext bezüglich der Quelle und Author anpasse, inkl. Lizenz?? Denn das ist schon ein riesen Aufwand mir jetzt von jedem unterklassigen Verein die Genehmigung zu holen. Zumal viele unterklassige Vereine hier ihre Logos hochgeladen haben mit der Angabe das der Author unbekannt ist. Diese Logos werden auch nicht gelöscht. Das ist halt immer meine Frage warum das bei denen durch geht und bei mir nicht. Du scheinst dich ja genau auszukennen. Wie ist denn der genau Werdegang beim Hochladen eines Logos von einem unterklassigen Fußballverein wenn der Author nicht bekannt ist und die Quelle, wie in den meisten Fällen, DS-Wappen.de ist??--Conne982 (talk) 06:30, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Höchstwahrscheinlich wurden diese anderen Logos nicht gelöscht, weil noch niemand den Löschantrag gestellt hat. Auf jeden fall können wir auf Commons leider keine nicht freien, urheberrechtlich geschützte Logos haben. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:15, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Echt?! Manche sind von 2009. Du merkst ich lass nicht locker. Aber was ist damit??
- Höchstwahrscheinlich wurden diese anderen Logos nicht gelöscht, weil noch niemand den Löschantrag gestellt hat. Auf jeden fall können wir auf Commons leider keine nicht freien, urheberrechtlich geschützte Logos haben. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:15, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Ok und wenn ich den Quelltext bezüglich der Quelle und Author anpasse, inkl. Lizenz?? Denn das ist schon ein riesen Aufwand mir jetzt von jedem unterklassigen Verein die Genehmigung zu holen. Zumal viele unterklassige Vereine hier ihre Logos hochgeladen haben mit der Angabe das der Author unbekannt ist. Diese Logos werden auch nicht gelöscht. Das ist halt immer meine Frage warum das bei denen durch geht und bei mir nicht. Du scheinst dich ja genau auszukennen. Wie ist denn der genau Werdegang beim Hochladen eines Logos von einem unterklassigen Fußballverein wenn der Author nicht bekannt ist und die Quelle, wie in den meisten Fällen, DS-Wappen.de ist??--Conne982 (talk) 06:30, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Du kannst die Vereine um Erlaubnis bitten, siehe Commons:OTRS/de. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 20:48, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Gut, habe ich so verstanden. Wie soll ich jetzt weiter verfahren, im Bezug auf die oben genannten Bilder? Denn löschen wäre unzweckmäßig, da diese Bilder auf meine erstellten bzw überarbeiten Wiki Seiten benötigt werden. --Conne982 (talk) 16:05, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Conne982 Bearbeitungen eines urheberrechtlich geschützten Vereinswappen machen für gewöhnlich das Werk anderer nicht zu deinem Werk, das vorige Urheberrecht gilt immer noch. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 15:53, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Diese Vereinswappen wurden durch mich, mit einem Bildbearbeitungsprogramm, überarbeitet. Bedeutet für mich, dass ich, beim Upload der Bilder, diese als eigenes Werk deklariere. Oder liege ich da falsch??--Conne982 (talk) 15:17, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
|
This logo image consists only of simple geometric shapes or text. It does not meet the threshold of originality needed for copyright protection, and is therefore in the public domain. Although it is free of copyright restrictions, this image may still be subject to other restrictions. See WP:PD § Fonts and typefaces or Template talk:PD-textlogo for more information.
|
--Conne982 (talk) 10:49, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Speedy delete Per previous deletion requests and Template:Logo above threshold of originality. The uploader is clearly ignorant by re-uploading these. Template:PD-textlogo does not apply, because these logos also have more than simple shapes. 80.221.159.67 03:33, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
- Not all are copyvios. I tagged a bunch as DW-no source. Uploader needs to do some sorting. @Conne982: Hallo! Zu Deiner Frage: Viele der Logos ueberschreiten bei weitem die Schoepfungshoehe und sind damiot urheberrechtlich geschuetzt. Ich habe ein paar Deiner Uploads als abgeleitetes werk gekennzeichnet. Was Du jetzt schnellstens erledigen musst ist: Herkunft der Vorlage (vermutlich Webseite des Vereins?) nachtragen, als Autor den Verein nennen, falls kein Autor bekannt. (Ist nicht 100% korrekt, wir lehnen uns da ein wenig aus dem Deutschen Urheberrechts Fenster) Die Lizenz wie folgt aendern:
{{PD-ineligible}}{{Trademarked}}und alle anderen Lizenzen (CC, PDself, etc) entfernen. Danke fuer Deine Uploads! --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:23, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:44, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
No source for publication before 7 November 1917 as stated by the license - author died in 1947, no evidence of permission Jcb (talk) 23:20, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- This is 1905 painting. Sources: http://gallery.facets.ru/show.php?id=769 , http://n-k-roerich.ru/painting/item/f00/s00/e0000000/index.shtml --Butko (talk) 09:07, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- + Proof of 1905 on official page of State Russian Museum --Butko (talk) 09:12, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- So we know the date of creation is 1905, but that's not relevant in this case. When was the painting first published? That's what we need to know. Jcb (talk) 09:49, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- + Proof of 1905 on official page of State Russian Museum --Butko (talk) 09:12, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: As noted by Jcb, in order to qualify for {{PD-RusEmpire}}, the work must have been published in the Russian Empire before 1917. We don't know its history and it may well have been in a private collection from 1905 until after 1917. Also, there is no evidence of when it was first published in the USA, so we cannot assume that PD-1923 applies. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:09, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
- Restored by Léna Platonides (talk) 17:12, 1 January 2018 (UTC)