Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/09/11

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive September 11th, 2016
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

First, this image is a derivative work of the underlying photograph. I doubt very much that our uploader is the photographer. Second, the image is personal art of a non-notable artist and is therefore out of scope. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:36, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: previously deleted. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:41, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Rodrigo Moyano Rodmobel gimnasta cochabamba con su novia Paola Salazar.jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Falsche Schreibweise --CTHOE (talk) 12:22, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Bad name, author's request. --Achim (talk) 15:18, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted film poster. MKFI (talk) 07:17, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 01:11, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from http://www.eltiempo.com/Multimedia/galeria_fotos/curiosidades3/GALERIAFOTOS-WEB-PLANTILLA_GALERIA_FOTOS-11660783.html MKFI (talk) 07:31, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 01:12, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from http://revistakizomba.com/saibam-quem-e-o-mr-nice/. OTRS permission needed if the uploader holds the copyright for this image. MKFI (talk) 07:34, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 01:12, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot from a copyrighted film (On the Buses) Tentinator (talk) 07:57, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 01:12, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

falscher Eintrag ClaudiaN16 (talk) 09:32, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: procedural close - already deleted. --INeverCry 01:12, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation http://compass.xbox.com/assets/33/98/33988df9-f175-4553-9042-8e5b9a6324f1.jpg?n=FH3_hero-mobile_768x768.jpg JLKiel (talk) 10:30, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 01:13, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I cannot verify license due to 404 error. Uploader has problems with copyright. Not sure, that the license was ever valid. Taivo (talk) 11:28, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 01:13, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Matias Moore (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://media-cdn.tripadvisor.com/media/photo-s/0b/c1/db/a5/al-cruzar-los-portones.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Matias Moore (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-dUuBaXasRB4/VUfbZsQHIvI/AAAAAAAAKK8/Xi1XLqqg5lA/s640/ave-fenix-sanluis2.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:14, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

저작권 침해(Copyright Infringement) -- 메이 `토론 06:50, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Special:Log/Park1109

same picture upload by same user, and delete. X3. and same picture upload by same user again. 같은 사진을 같은 유저가 3차례 업로드하였고, 삭제되었습니다. 그리고 또 다시 같은 유저에 의해 올려졌습니다. -- 메이 `토론 07:00, 11 September 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 00:44, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of the 1996 French film Visiblement je vous aime. No reason to think the uploader owns the right of the image, or that the image in in public domain. Cavarrone (talk) 07:05, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 00:44, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Euro coins are not PD, this image is more coin than love dart, fails COM:DM. -mattbuck (Talk) 07:25, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 00:44, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I cannot verify the license. Evidence is needed for CC-zero license, for example, OTRS-permission from heir of photographer. Taivo (talk) 10:15, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:45, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jaynarathorn (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://donruak.go.th/public/landmark_upload/backend/pics_6_4.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvios. --INeverCry 00:46, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Signed by a Birmingham artist named "Davron" and dated 1981. Based on twitter postings, the artist may still be active and part of the Birmingham Model Railway Club. Either way, not out of copyright, and Flickr license is invalid. Carl Lindberg (talk) 15:15, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 00:46, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1974 photo is still under copyright in the UK. May be a screen grab from a Monty Python sketch, but doesn't really matter either way. Carl Lindberg (talk) 15:19, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 00:47, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flickr source says its a UK postcard dated 1970, which would not be out of copyright. Flickr license is invalid. Carl Lindberg (talk) 15:21, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 00:47, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

On Gettyimages at http://www.gettyimages.com/license/79040591 and credited to "Popperphoto". 1951 UK photo cannot be out of copyright; Flickr license is invalid. Carl Lindberg (talk) 15:24, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 00:47, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

On Gettyimages at http://www.gettyimages.co.uk/license/2669167 (and also has a copyright notice in the image itself). Credited to Fox Photos. It's possible that the photo is expired in the UK, if there is no known human author and the photo is known to have been published more than 70 years ago, but it's likely still under copyright in the U.S. Not enough evidence to prove free status in either country; Flickr license is invalid. Carl Lindberg (talk) 15:28, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 00:47, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PRP This is likely not the work of the uploader. This is clearly a professional photo, and the user has several copyvio warnings for images of this subject on his talk page MSJapan (talk) 17:10, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 00:48, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused. Uploader request. Hyacinth (talk) 17:17, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:48, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused. Uploader request. Hyacinth (talk) 17:36, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:48, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of mockup diagram of building project. Josve05a (talk) 18:36, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 00:48, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As noted in the file description, this is a frame from the copyrighted motion picture itself, not the public domain trailer. — WFinch (talk) 19:45, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 00:49, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As noted in the file description, this is a frame from the copyrighted motion picture itself, not the public domain trailer. — WFinch (talk) 19:46, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 00:49, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As noted in the file description, this is a frame from the copyrighted motion picture itself, not a public domain trailer. — WFinch (talk) 19:51, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 00:49, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As noted in the file description, this is a frame from the copyrighted motion picture itself, not a public domain trailer. — WFinch (talk) 19:53, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 00:49, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As noted in the file description, this is a frame from the copyrighted motion picture itself, not a public domain trailer. — WFinch (talk) 19:55, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 00:49, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As noted in the file description, this is a frame from the copyrighted motion picture itself, not a public domain trailer. — WFinch (talk) 19:55, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 00:49, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

file for living person --Alaa Najjar :)..! 19:59, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Small photo without metadata, probably comes from Facebook. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 10:21, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 00:50, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As noted in the file description, this is a frame from the copyrighted motion picture itself, not the public domain trailer. — WFinch (talk) 20:00, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 00:50, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As noted in the file description, this is a frame from the copyrighted motion picture itself, not a public domain trailer. — WFinch (talk) 20:01, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 00:50, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As noted in the file description, this is a frame from the copyrighted motion picture itself, not a public domain trailer. — WFinch (talk) 20:02, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 00:50, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As noted in the file description, this is a frame from the copyrighted motion picture itself, not the public domain trailer. — WFinch (talk) 20:13, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 00:50, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As noted in the file description, this is a frame from the copyrighted motion picture itself, not the public domain trailer. — WFinch (talk) 20:13, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 00:50, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As noted in the file description, this is a frame from the copyrighted motion picture itself, not the public domain trailer. — WFinch (talk) 20:17, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 00:51, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As noted in the file description, this is a frame from the copyrighted motion picture itself, not a public domain trailer. — WFinch (talk) 20:18, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 00:51, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted poster. Also unused, out of scope. Vanjagenije (talk) 20:22, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 00:51, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Morena La Ferla (talk · contribs)

[edit]

photo by notable photographer https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mario_Leclere lacks of permission

Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:23, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 00:51, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mixeddrew (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Used to harass person; likely not owner of photo. See these edits

EvergreenFir (talk) 20:37, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete photo used for harassing by a vandal 96.237.16.89 00:39, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. (Uploader is globally locked). --INeverCry 00:52, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not uploader's own work. Copyrighted material – drawing by Hans Rudolf Giger. DmitTrix (talk) 20:54, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 00:53, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio (derivated work from an unfree file : Anaconda single cover) 129.45.118.130 21:00, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 00:53, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Snapshot of an unfree music video — Sincerely Issimo 15 21:03, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 00:53, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very unlikely to be uploader's own work. Lots of copies of this image all over the Web. DmitTrix (talk) 21:12, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 00:54, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded under the wrong usage FireVegan (talk) 21:15, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:54, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by M.raess (talk · contribs)

[edit]

lacks of source to determine copyright statut + scope doubtfull

Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:19, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 00:54, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I wrongly named this a Broad Winged hawk and it it a Rough Legged Hawk. Michael hunter (talk) 21:47, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: please use {{Rename}} to rename the image instead. --INeverCry 00:54, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want this image deleted Michael hunter (talk) 11:40, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Commons licenses are irrevocable. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:13, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by C Tharp (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Suspected copyright violation. All these files are from EDI and they are watermarked as such. Versions of them can be found around the website. Yet there is no evidence any of them was released.

Muhandes (talk) 22:40, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete These are probably GF uploads of content from EDI, released deliberately by EDI via C Tharp, who I would expect has some connection to them. However without OTRS, we have no way to demonstrate such and so we have little choice than to lose them.
If someone were to try and contact EDI and see permission, that might be useful. Andy Dingley (talk) 22:59, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvios. --INeverCry 00:55, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As description says: it was just try; file without usage Krochoman (talk) 22:41, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: test image. --INeverCry 00:55, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

com:PENIS, enough of this stuff, see category:erect human penis with 750 pcitures Pippobuono (talk) 08:12, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:33, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unnecessary image. Quinn7 (talk) 21:45, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by colleague. --Jcb (talk) 00:18, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

com:PENIS, enough of this stuff, see category:human penis Pippobuono (talk) 10:42, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:34, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

com:PENIS, out of com:EDUSE Pippobuono (talk) 10:43, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:35, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused private image of very low quality, out of scope. Achim (talk) 17:40, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:34, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: personal image with no educational content Florn (talk) 17:46, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:38, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: personal image with no educational content Florn (talk) 18:03, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:54, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: personal image with no educational content Florn (talk) 18:05, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:48, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:26, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:48, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:27, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 17:36, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: personal image with no educational content Florn (talk) 17:46, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:21, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: personal image with no educational content Florn (talk) 17:51, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:42, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: personal image with no educational content Florn (talk) 17:53, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:32, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by VekaSpb (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyright holder is "Vera Kalyuzhnaya", unless there is strong evidence that uploader is the same person as "Vera Kalyuzhnaya". I also see "Вера Калюжная" as copyright holder of some of the files.

Wikicology (talk) 18:45, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't is obvious that VekaSpb = "Vera Kalyuzhnaya from Saint Petersburg"? How far do you want to go in intimidating WLM participants?
ping Ymblanter, Romaine
--Alexander (talk) 21:10, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The uploader confirmed that her real name is "Вера Калюжная". --Alexander (talk) 22:11, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Atsirlin, the uploader just confirm that they are from Saint Petersburg. Isn't it? How on earth do you expect me to know that "Spb" part of their username means "Saint Petersburg"? How do you expect me to know from their username that "Вера Калюжная" is their real name. And you know, I'm disappointed that you've decided to make needlessly personal remarks in accusing me of intimidating WLM participants. Atsirlin, this assertion is not true, and I hope you'll reconsider what you've said about me. Wikicology (talk) 10:49, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Wikicology, if you are not familiar with the topic (and I assume you are not, because SPb is the most common abbreviation for Saint Petersburg, in any language) and still have doubts about the authorship, there are many ways to resolve them without nominating files for deletion. The uploader is a new user who will never upload anything again if you chase her with such deletion requests. --Alexander (talk) 11:09, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
So I should imagine that "rlin" that ends your username (user:Atsirlin) is derived from the word "Berlin" and so automatically assume you are from Birlin? Are you kidding me? Wow. Just wow! Well, since you insist on retracting your accusation above, I am not going to respond to your comment again to avoid further personal attack from you. All the best. Wikicology (talk) 13:50, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep all. The fact alone that the images are high resolution with exif data suggest that the uploader is the original photographer. De728631 (talk) 22:37, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

My nomination rationale does not implies they were copied from another website but when a camera EXIF bears different names as author/copyright holder, it's a red flag for me. However, since she has confirmed that her real name is "Вера Калюжная" and the same person as "Vera Kalyuzhnaya" and per Ymblanter, I do not have problems with keeping these files. Wikicology (talk) 10:49, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Request was withdrawn. --A.Savin 15:26, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 18:46, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:20, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:ADVERT INeverCry 22:26, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 17:37, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:ADVERT INeverCry 22:30, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 17:37, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:ADVERT INeverCry 22:32, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 17:37, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:ADVERT INeverCry 22:33, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 17:37, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:ADVERT INeverCry 22:34, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 17:37, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:ADVERT INeverCry 22:35, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 17:38, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:ADVERT INeverCry 22:36, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 17:38, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:ADVERT INeverCry 22:43, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 17:38, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it's not actual Danavoicu (talk) 00:22, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: I don't understand "It's not actual", but the subject is the uploader, so it cannot be own work as claimed. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:38, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Also File:JafetCuevas Díademuertos 06.jpg

Probably not de minimis, it has copyrighted images of the band Los Tigres del Norte, and the second one has a likely copyrighted image of Gabriel García Márquez. UAwiki (talk) 00:24, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:39, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused duplicate of File:Siegel Land Mecklenburg (DDR).svg. ↔ User: Perhelion 01:02, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: We do not generally delete pre-existing PNGs when an SVG is uploaded. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:40, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no Tasnim photographer credited and no Tasnim watermark present INeverCry 01:14, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: See {{Tasnim}}. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:42, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photos of identifiable persons with no indication of consent to being photographed or having photograph published - as is required in Japan even in public locations. (See Commons:Country_specific_consent_requirements#Japan)

DAJF (talk) 01:14, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Most are still identifiable. If the faces are blurred enough to be unidentifiable then they are probably not useful for any educational purpose. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:46, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of identifiable persons with no indication of consent to being photographed or having photograph published - as is required in Japan even in public locations. (See Commons:Country_specific_consent_requirements#Japan) DAJF (talk) 01:18, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Most are still identifiable. If the faces are blurred enough to be unidentifiable then they are probably not useful for any educational purpose. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:47, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of an identifiable person with no indication of consent to being photographed or having photograph published - as is required in Japan even in public locations. (See Commons:Country_specific_consent_requirements#Japan) DAJF (talk) 01:26, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:48, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small-size promo-style image of soft porn actress with no EXIF data. Uploader has made no other similar contributions, so this is highly unlikely to be the uploader's own work as claimed. DAJF (talk) 01:36, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Google finds it several places without a free license. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:49, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong license, no source given and clearly not an own work. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 01:53, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:50, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 02:20, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:51, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AndriiDydiuk (talk · contribs)

[edit]

per Commons:FOP#Ukraine - modern monuments

INeverCry 03:22, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

За що?--AndriiDydiuk (talk) 12:40, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Добропорядне використання. INeverCry 20:00, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:56, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, and previously publised elsewhere: https://vk.com/id132631753 --ghouston (talk) 04:17, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:56, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:27, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:57, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of scope FastilyClone (talk) 04:39, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:57, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No identifying information about the unused image (neither original nor later upload)--filename google-translates as "mug shot". The two uploads are of different individuals, but this file was never in more than brief use anywhere in wikipedia/wikimedia realms. I can't think of a COM:EDUSE for this. DMacks (talk) 05:33, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:57, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Stained glass windows in Lukaskirche (Hamburg-Sasel)

[edit]

Artist Hanno Edelmann died in 2013 so the windows will be copyright protected until 2084. Since we don't have FoP inside buildings in Germany, the pictures must be deleted. --Code (talk) 05:30, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:57, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused student selfie, out of COM:Scope. MKFI (talk) 07:16, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:58, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

advertising, out of com:EDUSE Pippobuono (talk) 07:51, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:03, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-promotion. Uploader is adding links to subject's media apparitions and even a note (c) Sébastien Mignon, which makes it unacceptable on Commons. Henxter (talk) 07:59, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:04, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image(s). This image is considered out of scope as it is not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Uploading a small number of images for use on your user pages is allowed (if your contributions stretch further than just creating a user page). If you feel that this image was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 18:29, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:05, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Russia for sculpture.
В России существует ru:свобода панорамы для архитектуры, но не для скульптуры. Taivo (talk) 08:59, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:05, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dubious personal work El Funcionario (talk) 11:10, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:06, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dubious personal work El Funcionario (talk) 11:12, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:07, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pointless image used only in a Wikipedia article that was deleted and has no other use. DanielRigal (talk) 12:11, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:07, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pointless image used only in a Wikipedia article that was deleted and has no other use. DanielRigal (talk) 12:12, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:07, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A page I started and have been adding to. I think the idea was good, but Commons isn't technically ideal for this, and the page has become so big that it takes a long time to load and save it. Too big to be useful, unfortunately. Blue Elf (talk) 12:31, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: I think this is useful. You might remove the unidentified vessels -- that would make the load much faster. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:11, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunately, there is no freedom of panorama for modern monuments in Russia Ymblanter (talk) 13:08, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:11, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunately, there is no freedom of panorama for modern monuments in Russia Ymblanter (talk) 13:08, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think that {{PD-trivial}} (or it may be cropped for this) for COM:FoP. --Insider (talk) 06:13, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This is possible, let us wait for other opinions.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:55, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: The only thing here with a copyright is the part of the red device at the top. It is likely the representation of a medal, so probably PD, but in any event de minimis. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:56, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunately, there is no freedom of panorama for modern monuments in Russia Ymblanter (talk) 13:09, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:31, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunately, there is no freedom of panorama for modern monuments in Russia Ymblanter (talk) 13:10, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:32, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunately, there is no freedom of panorama for modern monuments in Russia Ymblanter (talk) 13:10, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:33, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunately, there is no freedom of panorama for modern monuments in Russia Ymblanter (talk) 13:10, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:33, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks. Alexander Roumega (talk) 14:10, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:33, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jputhoor (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:33, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by RikiMazza (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text documents of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by RikiMazza (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:33, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jooja (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Jooja (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://www.wheretowatch.com/sites/default/files/the_credits/Earliest-version-of-steadicam.jpeg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:36, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:39, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:39, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:39, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical drawing. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Strong  Keep Made in 1471 (15th century)! --173.55.239.44 21:54, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Policy requires a source as it is not obvious on it's face that it is not modern. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:40, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:40, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cuartetosurkos (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.beethovenfm.cl/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/concierto_surkos_4.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:40, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by PAGINASNARANJAS (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:40, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Casaclmbarcelona (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:41, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Elinformante (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:41, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fernand Maillaud is dead in 1948. Copyright violation.

82.124.246.16 14:54, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:41, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vrohilla (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused logos, certainly not own work and incorrectly licensed, even if some of them may be below TOO

Didym (talk) 15:25, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:14, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vrohilla (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:42, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Reconstruction; possibly gains its own copyright; see COM:VPC#File:Queen Philippa of Hainault and her daughters Isabella, Mary, Margaret and Joan.jpg. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:13, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: This is a reproduction of an 1834 work and therefore must have a new copyright. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:45, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not longer in use — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rockaz (talk • contribs) 2016-09-09T09:19:24‎ (UTC)

Its in use (again?). But its looks like either copyright violation or wrong used license (simple enough for {{PD-textlogo}}?) --JuTa 08:25, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: no permission. --Jcb (talk) 18:59, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded the new version File:WMTRfikir.png — Preceding unsigned comment added by KediÇobanı (talk • contribs) 2016-09-09T09:31:00‎ (UTC)


Kept: in use. --Jcb (talk) 18:59, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The banner at the bottom makes it look like a postcard. That would make it a derivative work Vera (talk) 09:23, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:59, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Samma motiv finns i annat foto. Ett foto utan så mycket reflex. iin208 10:37, 11 September 2016 (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 19:02, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunately, there is no freedom of panorama for modern monuments in Russia Ymblanter (talk) 13:09, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think that {{PD-trivial}} for COM:FoP. --Insider (talk) 06:15, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I am not so sure but let us wait for more opinions.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:56, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: per COM:DM. --Jcb (talk) 19:04, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Questionable copyright exception. The photograph is not 100 years old, so it is doubtful that is in the public domain. Aracali (talk) 15:52, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It seems to me that all the reproductions of photographs in Category:Google Art Project works in Museo Reina Sofia have the wrong licensing tag, since they all seem to be less than 100 years old. Aracali (talk) 16:03, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:32, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Questionable copyright exception. The photograph is not 100 years old, so it is doubtful that is in the public domain. Aracali (talk) 15:52, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:33, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Another image is similar and almost a duplicate. Alexscuccato (talk) 16:18, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Another image is similar and almost a duplicate. Alexscuccato (talk) 16:20, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:37, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears without a free license at http://amyisraelfoundation.org, so it cannot be kept here without a license from an authorized official of the foundation via OTRS. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:22, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--Jaymshultz (talk) 18:55, 11 September 2016 (UTC) I created the logo and I own the copyright, and I created the organization. What else is needed?[reply]

Send permission to our support team using this COM:ET. All the best. Wikicology (talk) 19:15, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That will work only if Jaymshultz is an officer of the foundation. His unsupported claim that he is the author is not enough to overcome the copyrighted use on the foundation's web site. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:43, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

yes yes yes, Jay M. Shultz is the founder, director and president of the Am Yisrael Foundation. Please assist, thank you.--Jaymshultz (talk) 21:02, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:33, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not a selfie so Elodie Di Patrizi can not be the author. The photographer must send COM:OTRS permission. --sasha (krassotkin) 16:50, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:38, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad quality, unused Anniolek talk 16:56, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:38, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unless Shanechamps is the subject, this is not his uploaded work. MSJapan (talk) 17:12, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:52, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source for the information is given, the figures may or may not be accurate, there is no way to know. This information can be presented in text-only version, this image is outside of COM:SCOPE for lack of verifiability of information which seems to be "Random thing created for alternate history" per uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:18, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:20, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, out of scope - "Random thing created for alternate history" - no educational value, as well as File:Commie Senate.svg Pibwl (talk) 17:19, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Jcb (talk) 19:04, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Vanjagenije (talk) 17:31, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:05, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: personal image with no educational content Florn (talk) 17:47, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:05, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: personal image with no educational content Florn (talk) 17:52, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:05, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: personal image with no educational content Florn (talk) 17:55, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:05, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: personal image with no educational content Florn (talk) 17:55, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:53, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: personal image with no educational content Florn (talk) 17:55, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:53, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: personal image with no educational content Florn (talk) 17:55, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:53, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: personal image with no educational content Florn (talk) 17:58, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:08, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: personal image with no educational content Florn (talk) 17:58, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:08, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: personal image with no educational content Florn (talk) 17:59, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:08, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: personal image with no educational content Florn (talk) 18:00, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:08, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: personal image with no educational content Florn (talk) 18:00, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:08, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: personal image with no educational content Florn (talk) 18:01, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:08, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: personal image with no educational content Florn (talk) 18:01, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:08, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: personal image with no educational content Florn (talk) 18:03, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:08, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: personal image with no educational content Florn (talk) 18:04, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:08, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

External source and author without any permission. Druschba 4 (talk) 18:24, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:09, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of permission. Wikicology (talk) 18:31, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:09, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope – there is no "Federal Republic of Anarka", the name is nonsense and it's just a Scottish flag. TFerenczy (talk) 19:12, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:09, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The guy who upload this claims to be the copyright holder of the work and he is not, this must of be deleted. TheBellaTwins1445 (talk) 19:24, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If the image from which I created the image in question (File:WWE Raw 2016-04-04 19-08-49 ILCE-6000 1945 DxO (28215190192).jpg) were under copyright, then that image wouldn't be allowed in Commons. By the way, I made the corrections in the file description and I put the image under the respective license. I hope you take into account that changes.--Universalis (talk) 18:04, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 19:11, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pulkit123456 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promotional material that is out of scope.

Wikicology (talk) 19:26, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:11, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Turntalien (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused personal image : out of scope

Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:51, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:11, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mesembrine.svg. Leyo 19:57, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:40, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Marketingintern4 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

small/middle size without EXIFs, almost other uploads from the user already speedy deleted at this time. Unlikely to be own work

Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:12, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Marketingintern4 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

personal drawing : out of scope (if made by a notable artist then it lacks of an OTRS permission)

Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:14, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:41, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:ADVERT INeverCry 20:25, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:41, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lamvandot (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused personal image : out of scope

Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:30, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:41, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama for sculptures in Norway 4ing (talk) 20:40, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:41, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mujeekhan92 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused personal image : out of scope

Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:50, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:42, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a USA flag – vandalism? DmitTrix (talk) 20:52, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:42, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Madi·Love (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused personal image : out of scope

Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:15, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:42, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Waqas6686 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused personal image : out of scope

Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:28, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:42, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by بوسودة (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused personal image : out of scope

Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:34, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:42, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Textilemart (talk · contribs)

[edit]

per COM:ADVERT

INeverCry 22:07, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:42, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

es irrelevante Nicolegarcia200 (talk) 22:20, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

es irrelevante Nicolegarcia200 (talk) 22:24, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:58, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

To young for PD-old with unknown author D.W. (talk) 22:24, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:43, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Educational value doubtful, it seems an article this image was used in was deleted from the Swedish Wikipedia. Only upload by user. Sebari (talk) 23:34, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:34, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It shows the whole of another car. Ckitis 23:38, 11 September 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:43, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality personal image, no potential educational uses, the file is not currently in use. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 23:47, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:34, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artist en:Aleksanteri Ahola-Valo died in 1997. The files can be restored in 2068 (70+1 years from death). Taivo (talk) 07:03, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:44, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry – copyright lasts 50 years in Belarus. Can be restored in 2048. Taivo (talk) 14:33, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a photo of an identifiable person without any statement of the person's consent to have the picture taken and published. In a current discussion in German-language Wikipedia, César questions the appropriateness of using it in the article de:Burkini (it's also used as the main image in en:Burkini and in other Wikipedia language versions), especially as the woman doesn't appear to deliberately pose for the photographer and it seems likely that it was taken without her knowledge. Per Commons:Photographs of identifiable people, I think we may need to delete this photograph. Though Commons:Country specific consent requirements doesn't mention Egypt where this photo was taken, according to the image description. Gestumblindi (talk) 21:31, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Image is in wide use in multiple language Wikipedias. Comment: Whether it should be deleted or not depends on consent laws in Egypt - can someone please research this? What is legal policy on photographing people in public places in Egypt? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:41, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete because of the lack of the permission. This photo was very obvious taken without the person's permission. This is also a very controversial bath suit. It is a private person and not a model. Without permission the photo has to be deleted. --Micha (talk) 11:09, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: obviously taken in public space. --Jcb (talk) 14:38, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a re-nomination because I think that Jcb's given reason for keeping "obviously taken in public space" was not really addressing the concerns of my original deletion request. No one denies that this image was taken in public space, but that was not the point of the DR at all. The point was whether it is allowed to publish this image taken in public space without the depicted person's consent, see Commons:Photographs of identifiable people and Commons:Country specific consent requirements. As the requirements of Egypt (where this photo was taken) aren't yet in that list, these would need to be researched. In a discussion following Jcb's decision, Jcb first stated that "in most countries this picture would not need consent from the depicted person". Given the list at Commons:Country specific consent requirements, that's not the case, on the contrary: most countries do require consent. Note: According to that page, if a country needs consent to commercially use a published picture (but not otherwise), "commercial use" is purely {{Personality rights}}, and thus never a reason for deletion, as Jcb pointed out. Greece would be such a case: No consent required for publishing a picture (green), but for commercially using that picture (orange) = keep the picture with {{Personality rights}}. However, in most countries, permission is already needed just to publish an image taken in public space (second column), and this isn't covered by {{Personality rights}} - if the act of publication itself (such as on Commons) needs permission, a "personality rights" template is no substitute for that. Gestumblindi (talk) 15:07, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep - publication on itself would only be prohibited if there is a law in that country providing such a prohibition. Until now you have not provided any evidence that such a law exist in Egypt, so this should be a keep unless you can provide evidence to the contrary. Jcb (talk) 16:43, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Although Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle ("where there is significant doubt about the freedom of a particular file, it should be deleted") refers to copyright, I think it would be wise to apply it to personality rights as well. In my opinion, given the fact that in most countries you can't publish images of people taken in public space without their consent, we have significant doubt here - even if we don't know what Egyptian law has to say on this matter. But of course it would be really great to have information on personality rights in Egypt, so we could add it to Commons:Country specific consent requirements. Gestumblindi (talk) 17:00, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
If personality rights are an issue... face can be blurred. Keep the burkini, drop the face... Strakhov (talk) 19:50, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per link to relevant Egypt law given by Christian Ferrer above. --INeverCry 21:54, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jcb as no source (No source since)

My comment: I converted the tag to a DR since two users at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#User:Jcb unproductively tagging up official United States military emblem image files has questioned Jcb on tagging this file as "no source". IMO, it seems that there's no source needed to prove that this file is an U.S. insignia, common sense is needed. So I vote for  Keep. Poké95 23:58, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep -- User:Jcb's actions in trying to retroactively apply rigid sourcing standards to unproblematic and uncontroversial PD official U.S. military emblem images seems to be rather pointless and useless time-wasting to me... AnonMoos (talk) 13:46, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: fixed by user:EricSerge. --Jcb (talk) 15:36, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]