Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/08/10

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive August 10th, 2016
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded for spam/self-promotional purposes. The uploader also made a spam page on enwiki. Sunmist3 (talk) 06:05, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, OK, let's say: I trust Pokéfan. Taivo (talk) 10:05, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no Freedom of Panorama in Russia for monuments. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:37, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 17:21, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted issue. Wikicology (talk) 13:35, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy deleted. Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:34, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyrighted image. I doubt the copyright holder granted the permission for its uploader. Copyright holder needs to send permission to COM:OTRS. Delete per COM:PRP. We take copyright very seriously even if the copyright holder does not. Wikicology (talk) 13:42, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy deleted. Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:45, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyrighted image. I doubt the copyright holder granted the permission for its uploader. Copyright holder needs to send permission to COM:OTRS. Delete per COM:PRP. We take copyright very seriously even if the copyright holder does not. Wikicology (talk) 14:11, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy deleted. Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:45, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted cover art. MKFI (talk) 06:38, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by EugeneZelenko: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing: Album cover

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyrighted logo. I doubt the copyright holder granted the permission for its uploader. Copyright holder needs to send permission to COM:OTRS. Delete per COM:PRP. We take copyright very seriously even if the copyright holder does not. Wikicology (talk) 13:22, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by EugeneZelenko: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing: Non-trivial logo

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is no longer required, it was uploaded as part of an appeal to change my wikipedia account username. Kate Taylor (talk) 10:00, 10 August 2016 (GMT)


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 09:01, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is no longer required, it was uploaded as part of an appeal to change my wikipedia account username. Kate Taylor (talk) 10:00, 10 August 2016 (GMT)


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 09:10, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

porque está mal configurado Sheylamalenabs (talk) 00:58, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 07:12, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These images were all uploaded by User:89rbeuud. I believe they should be deleted because I uploaded them by accident.


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 07:08, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a blurry, unused photo of someone who is probably the uploader. The description is nonsense, and the file is out of scope per COM:SELFIE. KSFT (talk) 01:50, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, the uploader is indefinitely blocked with reason "Not here to help build a knowledge base". Taivo (talk) 07:17, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP for artistic work in Japan Elisfkc (talk) 06:00, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader also agrees to delete. Taivo (talk) 08:27, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"An email containing details of the permission for this file has been sent in accordance with Commons:OTRS" (May 19, 2016)  ???

2003:45:5C6F:A801:E07A:6F4B:4FB5:A7DF 06:51, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 09:34, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Does not belong to uploader. Asked by photographer to remove. Hpproduction (talk) 07:16, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is not uploader's request: uploader is HP Production, nominator is Hpproduction. But I'll delete the photo nevertheless speedily: small photo without metadata and the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 09:52, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation (screenshot) 2003:45:5C6F:A801:E07A:6F4B:4FB5:A7DF 07:56, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:05, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ra-live jaja (talk · contribs)

[edit]

OTRS tickets required

2003:45:5C6F:A801:E07A:6F4B:4FB5:A7DF 08:14, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, they are all album covers. After receiving OTRS-permission the files can be restored. Taivo (talk) 14:31, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Trixbedrik (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related enwiki entry (hoax) speedy deleted.

Gunnex (talk) 08:48, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 15:24, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Arfn10 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

useless without descriptions

2003:45:5C6F:A801:E07A:6F4B:4FB5:A7DF 08:49, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photos without metadata, watermark "www.funffec.org". Taivo (talk) 15:27, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ArianEghbali (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused personal files

2003:45:5C6F:A801:E07A:6F4B:4FB5:A7DF 09:04, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 15:39, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Craft Music (talk · contribs)

[edit]

OTRS tickets required, if these files are within scope (all unused)

2003:45:5C6F:A801:E07A:6F4B:4FB5:A7DF 09:10, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, out of project scope. Also copyright concerns. Taivo (talk) 15:43, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad Quality, unused Hiddenhauser (talk) 09:31, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, really bad quality. Taivo (talk) 15:46, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, see exif Sonty (talk) 17:40, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Josve05a (talk) 15:45, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, http://www.usfencing.org/news_article/show/536444?referrer_id=669372 Sonty (talk) 17:42, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Josve05a (talk) 15:45, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio by uploader that just takes images from internet Sonty (talk) 17:43, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Josve05a (talk) 15:45, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is watermarked and clearly NOT fair use Zackmann08 (talk) 19:42, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy delete as copyvio. P 1 9 9   14:23, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not used, no educational value Sebari (talk) 12:56, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 06:48, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

old irrelevant file CuteIndianWoman (talk) 13:46, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused selfie without metadata, uploader's request. Depicted person is non-notable (no mention in en.wiki). Taivo (talk) 07:32, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

old irrelevant file CuteIndianWoman (talk) 13:45, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused selfie without metadata, uploader's request. Depicted person is non-notable (no mention in en.wiki). Taivo (talk) 07:40, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

old irrelevant file CuteIndianWoman (talk) 13:46, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused selfie without metadata, uploader's request. Depicted person is non-notable (no mention in en.wiki). Taivo (talk) 07:41, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

old irrelevant file CuteIndianWoman (talk) 13:45, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused selfie without metadata, uploader's request. Depicted person is non-notable (no mention in en.wiki). Taivo (talk) 07:43, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

old irrelevant file CuteIndianWoman (talk) 13:45, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused selfie without metadata, uploader's request. Depicted person is non-notable (no mention in en.wiki). Taivo (talk) 07:44, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

old irrelevant file CuteIndianWoman (talk) 13:45, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused selfie without metadata, uploader's request. Depicted person is non-notable (no mention in en.wiki). Taivo (talk) 07:45, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

old irrelevant file CuteIndianWoman (talk) 13:45, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused selfie without metadata, uploader's request. Depicted person is non-notable (no mention in en.wiki). Taivo (talk) 07:46, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

old irrelevant file CuteIndianWoman (talk) 13:45, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused selfie without metadata, uploader's request. Depicted person is non-notable (no mention in en.wiki). Taivo (talk) 07:47, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

old irrelevant file CuteIndianWoman (talk) 13:45, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, uploader's request. Depicted person is non-notable (no mention in en.wiki). Taivo (talk) 07:48, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

old irrelevant file CuteIndianWoman (talk) 13:45, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, uploader's request. Depicted person is non-notable (no mention in en.wiki). Taivo (talk) 07:49, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

old irrelevant file CuteIndianWoman (talk) 13:45, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, uploader's request. Depicted person is non-notable (no mention in en.wiki). Taivo (talk) 07:50, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

old irrelevant file CuteIndianWoman (talk) 13:44, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, uploader's request. Depicted person is non-notable (no mention in en.wiki). Taivo (talk) 07:51, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

old irrelevant file CuteIndianWoman (talk) 13:44, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused selfie without metadata, uploader's request. Depicted person is non-notable (no mention in en.wiki). Taivo (talk) 07:52, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

old irrelevant file CuteIndianWoman (talk) 13:44, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused selfie without metadata, uploader's request. Depicted person is non-notable (no mention in en.wiki). Taivo (talk) 07:53, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

old irrelevant file CuteIndianWoman (talk) 13:44, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused selfie without metadata, uploader's request. Depicted person is non-notable (no mention in en.wiki). Taivo (talk) 07:54, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

old irrelevant file CuteIndianWoman (talk) 13:44, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused selfie without metadata, uploader's request. Depicted person is non-notable (no mention in en.wiki). Taivo (talk) 07:56, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

old irrelevant file CuteIndianWoman (talk) 13:44, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused selfie without metadata, uploader's request. Depicted person is non-notable (no mention in en.wiki). Taivo (talk) 07:57, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

old irrelevant file CuteIndianWoman (talk) 13:44, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused selfie without metadata, uploader's request. Depicted person is non-notable (no mention in en.wiki). Taivo (talk) 07:57, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

old irrelevant file CuteIndianWoman (talk) 13:44, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused selfie without metadata, uploader's request. Depicted person is non-notable (no mention in en.wiki). Taivo (talk) 07:58, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

old irrelevant file CuteIndianWoman (talk) 13:44, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused selfie without metadata, uploader's request. Depicted person is non-notable (no mention in en.wiki). Taivo (talk) 07:59, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

old irrelevant file CuteIndianWoman (talk) 13:44, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused selfie without metadata, uploader's request. Depicted person is non-notable (no mention in en.wiki). Taivo (talk) 08:00, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

old irrelevant file CuteIndianWoman (talk) 13:43, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused selfie without metadata, uploader's request. Depicted person is non-notable (no mention in en.wiki). Taivo (talk) 08:01, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

old irrelevant file CuteIndianWoman (talk) 13:43, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused selfie without metadata, uploader's request. Depicted person is non-notable (no mention in en.wiki). Taivo (talk) 08:02, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

old irrelevant file CuteIndianWoman (talk) 13:43, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused selfie without metadata, uploader's request. Depicted person is non-notable (no mention in en.wiki). Taivo (talk) 08:03, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

old irrelevant file CuteIndianWoman (talk) 13:43, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused selfie without metadata, uploader's request. Depicted person is non-notable (no mention in en.wiki). Taivo (talk) 08:04, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

old irrelevant file CuteIndianWoman (talk) 13:43, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused selfie without metadata, uploader's request. Depicted person is non-notable (no mention in en.wiki). Taivo (talk) 08:05, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

old irrelevant file CuteIndianWoman (talk) 13:43, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused selfie without metadata, uploader's request. Depicted person is non-notable (no mention in en.wiki). Taivo (talk) 08:07, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

old irrelevant file CuteIndianWoman (talk) 13:43, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused selfie without metadata, uploader's request. Depicted person is non-notable (no mention in en.wiki). Taivo (talk) 08:08, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

old irrelevant file CuteIndianWoman (talk) 13:43, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused selfie without metadata, uploader's request. Depicted person is non-notable (no mention in en.wiki). Taivo (talk) 08:09, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

old irrelevant file CuteIndianWoman (talk) 13:43, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused selfie without metadata, uploader's request. Depicted person is non-notable (no mention in en.wiki). Taivo (talk) 08:10, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

old irrelevant file CuteIndianWoman (talk) 13:47, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused selfie without metadata, uploader's request. Depicted person is non-notable (no mention in en.wiki). Taivo (talk) 08:11, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

old irrelevant file CuteIndianWoman (talk) 13:46, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused selfie without metadata, uploader's request. Depicted person is non-notable (no mention in en.wiki). Taivo (talk) 08:13, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

old irrelevant file CuteIndianWoman (talk) 13:40, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused selfie without metadata, uploader's request. Depicted person is non-notable (no mention in en.wiki). Taivo (talk) 08:14, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

old irrelevant file CuteIndianWoman (talk) 13:41, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused selfie without metadata, uploader's request. Depicted person is non-notable (no mention in en.wiki). Taivo (talk) 08:15, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyrighted image. It's not clear how this is uploader's own work considering the fact that the image has been published elsewhere such as here Wikicology (talk) 13:59, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata. After OTRS-permission from copyright holder the file can be restored. Taivo (talk) 08:28, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused duplicate of File:Noel Assolo.jpg. Lacrymocéphale (talk) 14:05, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 08:36, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very blurry Hiddenhauser (talk) 14:29, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:40, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very blurry Hiddenhauser (talk) 14:29, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:41, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files created by Shaan Lollywood

[edit]

All these flags were made up by the uploader to perpetuate hoaxes. --DrKay (talk) 16:17, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

These appear to not actually be 'made up by the uploader', but instead taken from around the internet and all falsely claimed as own work.
Unless anyone cares to check the rest, one by one, to see if any are actually ok... nuke the lot. Reventtalk 18:31, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that the uploader is a sock puppet of Zeshan Mahmood (talk · contribs), who is globally locked on all wikimedia projects. DrKay (talk) 19:49, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Flag of East Pakistan.png and Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Zeshan Mahmood. DrKay (talk) 19:59, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Uploader indefinitely blocked. Checking for any of these previously deleted, even under another name, then any others can run the course. Reventtalk 21:13, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Revent: this user is now using ip "92.12.192.69", he did vandalism on page hi:पुदुच्चेरी and other pages with 1 of those flags.--Sushilmishra (talk) 01:34, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Summarily closed as all deleted, due to these being the uploads of a a persistent cross-wiki vandal who has been globally locked by the WMF. Uploading the flag of the Praja Rajyam Party (which is fair use on enwiki) as the official flag of the state of Andhra Pradesh, and then placing it into articles across over 20 wikis, is sufficent. --Reventtalk 02:01, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo kovox90      14:43, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, only 86×80 pixels, unused, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 07:09, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User who uploaded file does not own the file. Toriward28 (talk) 14:46, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 07:10, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not the author's own work, and the picture is not licensed correctly from the Source. kovox90      14:48, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata, watermark "El Comercio". Taivo (talk) 06:47, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This flag did not exist. Fry1989 eh? 15:26, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, by Revent per Commons:Deletion requests/Files created by Shaan Lollywood. Taivo (talk) 08:05, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Made up. Not in use. DrKay (talk) 16:02, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Revent: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files created by Shaan Lollywood

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Made up. Not in use. DrKay (talk) 16:03, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Revent: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files created by Shaan Lollywood

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no such flag. Made up by uploader. Not in use. DrKay (talk) 16:04, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Revent: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files created by Shaan Lollywood

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Je ne souhaite pas que les données exif de cette photo soient affichées. Dosi16 (talk) 16:08, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 08:09, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image sous copyright (description + données EXIF) Shev123 (talk) 16:39, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Author is Laurent Thion, copyright holder ECLIPTIQUE. No OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 08:17, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related enwiki entry speedy deleted. User indef blocked at enwiki. Gunnex (talk) 17:34, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, unused logo of non-notable thing (no mention in en.wiki), the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 08:23, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photos Pippobuono (talk) 17:39, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 08:24, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

porque si, deseo eliminar esto DeiiriMarquinez (talk) 18:14, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, the user wants to delete own talkpage. There is only one welcome message and one warning template. I grant courtesy deletion and will delete also all his/her uploads as out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 08:52, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

background image looks like a possible copyvio INeverCry 19:03, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I deleted also the user's 4 other uploads. One was found on external site with earlier date and bigger size and it was unlikely own work, 2 were screenshots of different Japanese-style animes and one had wrong license: photo about old man, who was born in circa 1920, had PD-old license. Taivo (talk) 09:07, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from third party site. Credits Getty Images so most likely copyrighted. Salix alba (talk) 10:13, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:17, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:00, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Please delete this file as I was uploaded it in error. I would delete it myself if I knew where to do that. Thank you, High Heeled Jacq

High Heeled Jacq (talk) 18:05, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination & confirmed by uploader. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:15, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation, the image is copied from http://www.umusicpub.com/#contentRequest=artistdetail&contentLocation=sub&contentOptions=%26artistid%3D6475 Mymis (talk) 22:08, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:13, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

identical photo to https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Houston_House.jpg Sanfranman59 (talk) 22:35, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:12, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

galileuvidromoveistex@gmail.com eu gostei da linda criação da veste 189.82.19.86 23:29, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: No reason for deletion. File in use, possible nonsense DR. Ks [在这里找到答案] 23:34, 10 August 2016 (UTC).[reply]
 Keep Vandalism. --jdx Re: 07:58, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:11, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP for artistic work in Japan Elisfkc (talk) 06:02, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Ле Лой: I'm pretty sure it's a work of art, considering it looks at least as tall as a human (if not more than) based on the reflection. Also, it looks to be in a glass case & the lighting on the ceiling makes a strong case for it being a piece of art and not an instrument. Elisfkc (talk) 07:23, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Elisfkc: I think the reflection to the right is from a person standing far away from the case. In Japan musical instruments and weapons are often showcased both in houses (tokonoma) and in museums. You can see a lot of examples around: File:Koto & Biwa 2.jpg, File:Gifujyou5848.JPG, File:Antique Japanese katana.JPG, File:Kai gunto 5.jpg. The fact that something is being displayed in a glass case doesn't make it purely a work of art. It might as well be a good example of a particular instrument type, or a biwa decorated with local pearl (the museum is located on Mikimoto Pearl Island). If you google 螺鈿の琵琶, you will see hundreds of biwas decorated with pearl, and they are used to play traditional music [1] [2] [3] — Le Loy (talk) 09:28, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Richly decorated but apparently typical musical instrument of the kind. Hardly should be considered as artwork. --Sealle (talk) 12:00, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to the source, there's no indication that this image is released under a free license. TheCatalyst31 (talk) 00:07, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:12, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Je suis pris ! Impossible de sortir de là ! 96.20.163.35 00:29, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Google translates this as "I am taken! Unable to get out of there!". This is not a reason to delete anything. Taivo (talk) 07:04, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 00:12, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per FBMD... grabbed from Facebook.

Rodrigolopes (talk) 00:33, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


File:Sea_from_Koufonisi.jpg

This file is mine and i have not uploaded it to Facebook.I hold the original file from the camera. If possible,i would like to know where it had been seen at faceboook. Marooned.. (talk) 08:23, 10 August 2016 (UTC) @Marooned..: the EXIF shows some informations about the image, see the Special instructions field, the FBMD code means that the image was first uploaded in facebook. Rodrigolopes (talk) 16:17, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Rodrigolopes: The image was not uploaded at facebook but transfered throught it with personal message to a person of mine in order to help me correct some lenses errors.Probably Facebook changed the EXIF because it has also compressed the image.I have uploaded to Wikimedia two versions of the file (its the exactly same photo): The first with the distortion because of use of the super-wide lenses and the second slightly correcly one (as i mentioned at Comment field in Greek Language).The first carries the real EXIF info.The owner of both is me. Marooned.. (talk) 17:17, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep File:Sea from Koufonisi.jpg per @Marooned..: see also EXIF of the old version Rodrigolopes (talk) 17:39, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:13, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per FBMD... grabbed from Facebook.

Rodrigolopes (talk) 00:39, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:15, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Getty Images says this photo was taken by Dennis Oulds (1917 - 2006). Not PD until 2077. Carl Lindberg (talk) 02:41, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Getty Images says this photo is by Harry Todd. It cannot be PD yet; Flickr user is not the author (and has changed license to All Rights Reserved there). Carl Lindberg (talk) 02:46, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparently was the cover of a book from 1967 (Police Horses by Judith Campbell [4]); photo cannot be PD yet, and Flickr user not likely to be the author (looks to be scanned). Carl Lindberg (talk) 00:52, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-promotional image for Wikipedia article. Blythwood (talk) 01:49, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1962 UK photo cannot be public domain; unlikely Flickr user is the author. Appears on Getty Images; they credit a Aubrey Hart as the author. Carl Lindberg (talk) 02:07, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inappropriate license. Zackmann08 (talk) 02:58, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

http://www.orijoreporter.com/elvis-afam/ Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:12, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Husseinajamii

[edit]

All these files are uploaded with the claim that they are "own work" and the uploader is the author an copyright holder. However File:Ruby Barnhill (actress).jpg has EXIF data that credits it as "Photo by Camilla Morandi/Corbis via Getty Image" and can be confirmed with this link to Getty. Clearly not the uploader's work as claimed. All the images named "Hussein Ajami with..." are images of the uploader with somebody else. They are clearly not selfies and so the uploader is not the photographer and copyright holder has claimed. File:Jaroudi Media logo.jpg is a company logo for somebody else's company; not the uploader's so again, the claim of copyright ownership is dubious. It seems that this person is simply slapping "own work" on the images as a way of getting them on Commons which makes the claim of copyright ownership on the other images in this nomination rather dubious.--Whpq (talk) 01:44, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:10, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Husseinajamii (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No confidence that any of these images, one apparent advert, one glam photo, a name and a logo are the own work of the uploader.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:14, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. which is correct, but the subject died in 1916 and I am hoping that someone knows how to find out more about this image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:15, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I added PD-Italy license. Taivo (talk) 08:04, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Taivo. --INeverCry 00:16, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

lacks of sources for each images to determine the copyright statut Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:49, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Junkyardsparkle as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://www.gettyimages.com/license/3072112. Age of the photo seems unlikely to be guaranteed that Getty Images is truly copyright owner, get community discussion  — billinghurst sDrewth 05:40, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what the actual UK copyright status is, but I'm pretty sure the flickr uploader isn't the author or copyright holder. --Junkyardsparkle (talk) 06:19, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete If there is no author data and no publication data, then we cannot be sure, that the file is in public domain. Taivo (talk) 08:20, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Getty Images credits it to an "E. Bacon", who I have not been able to figure out, but I think worked for one of the London newspapers. Getty has his stuff coming from the en:Topical Press Agency, which was bought by the Hulton Archive which in turn Getty bought. So, there is a chance they really do own the copyright, depending on when Mr. (or Ms.) Bacon died. But there is a very good chance it's still under copyright in the UK, and a highly likely chance it's under copyright in the US (as restored by the URAA). I did find a couple of references of an "E. Bacon" working for the Evening Standard newspaper in the early 1940s, but I'm not sure it's the same person. And I have not figured out the full name. I would probably lean delete, as a named photographer could well indicate it really was owned by one of the companies that Getty acquired, and has since had its copyright restored. Carl Lindberg (talk) 14:53, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per COM:PRP. --INeverCry 00:17, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France Hubertl 05:42, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete also redirect file:Statue de serpent - MG 8163.jpg. Taivo (talk) 08:21, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:18, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious that CC license was issued by copyright holder of the advert. --ghouston (talk) 05:48, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:18, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image --ghouston (talk) 06:02, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:18, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW Poké95 06:13, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:18, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope, Commons is not a personal photo album. Poké95 06:14, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:18, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Within scope ? Own work ? 2003:45:5C6F:A801:E07A:6F4B:4FB5:A7DF 06:16, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I cannot imagine, how to use it. Taivo (talk) 08:55, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:19, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope, Commons is not a personal photo album. Poké95 06:16, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:19, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work ? 2003:45:5C6F:A801:E07A:6F4B:4FB5:A7DF 06:16, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:19, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spam (w:Special:Undelete/Newsd). Speedy deletion declined. MER-C 06:23, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:19, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Placeholder image appears to have been uploaded in error, image is a message stating that an item is not reproduced and can only be seen on request djr13 (talk) 06:24, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:19, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted mixtape cover. MKFI (talk) 06:36, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:19, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused selfie, out COM:Scope. MKFI (talk) 06:39, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:19, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermarked "Petteri Nupponen". MKFI (talk) 06:42, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:19, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly a Copyviol: the image has apparently been taken from a newspaper. Own work is very doubtful. Ruthven (msg) 06:42, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:19, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious "own" work (Small resolution, no EXIF) 2003:45:5C6F:A801:E07A:6F4B:4FB5:A7DF 06:48, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:19, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo. MKFI (talk) 06:48, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:19, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted album cover. MKFI (talk) 06:49, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:20, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, no proof of free license. MKFI (talk) 06:50, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:20, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, no proof of free license. MKFI (talk) 06:51, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:20, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1977 photo; copyright cannot have expired. Looks like a scan from a printed source; doubtful the Flickr user took it. Lower resolution than most from Flickr user and has been marked All Rights Reserved at the Flickr source. Carl Lindberg (talk) 07:08, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:20, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no fop in france 2003:88:6A15:7D59:3C45:FB54:5E1:A0B5 07:11, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Good image, but should be deleted. Taivo (talk) 09:37, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:20, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no fop in france 2003:88:6A15:7D59:3C45:FB54:5E1:A0B5 07:12, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Good image, but should be deleted. Taivo (talk) 09:38, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:20, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like a scan from a printed source. 1950s British photograph cannot have expired yet, and unlikely the Flickr use is the photographer. Carl Lindberg (talk) 07:13, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:20, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising by a single-purpose account; the user's only upload, the file is not in use Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 07:14, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:20, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

[Website spam] Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, found elsewhere on the web, derived from elswhere copyrighted content Gunnex (talk) 07:15, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:20, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo is made in beginning of 20th century. Who is the photographer and when (s)he died? Taivo (talk) 07:24, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is a photo of our Family the Family of the sculptor. We don´t know the identity of the photographer ...


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:20, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Djeizon Emanuel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused files, private images

BrightRaven (talk) 07:27, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Djeizon Emanuel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused files, private images

BrightRaven (talk) 10:25, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:20, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Mrpachanga

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Mrpachanga (talk · contribs):

This is routine request for small photos without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photos are so small? Can you upload bigger versions, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload versions with EXIF data? Can you describe and categorize the file correctly? Taivo (talk) 07:27, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:22, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Richardosky Rios

[edit]

Here all contributions of Richardosky Rios (talk · contribs):

Out of project scope, nothing educationally valuable. Taivo (talk) 07:31, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:22, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Summit09

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Summit09 (talk · contribs):

I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 07:35, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I didn't know that screenshots were not allowed.


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:22, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Inter-rasur

[edit]

Inter-rasur (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:

One of the files is not own work, maybe copyright violation. The others have nothing educationally valuable. Taivo (talk) 07:40, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:22, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Webtexttool

[edit]

Here are all contributions of Webtexttool (talk · contribs):

Is such kind of advertising allowable? Taivo (talk) 07:47, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per COM:ADVERT. --INeverCry 00:22, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by EmerguX (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, mostly cropped, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:EmerguX (with similar files deleted) + 5x Flickrwashing for files beginning with "Brief..." = (example) File:Brief tanga.png, uploaded on Flickr & Commons on 18.07.2016 = grabbed from Internet. Uploaded since 11.07.2016. Considering also File:Whale-tail (1).png = grabbed & cropped from https://twitter.com/rafa2360/status/688368612218769408 (01.2016, © by "Rafael") or File:Male vpl.png, grabbed & cropped from (example) http://brflines.blogspot.de/2014/03/feliciano-lopez.html (2014) = http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-DB9KHBs7jNI/Ut_LYAnm-7I/AAAAAAAAhMg/lGWsCzZPlAs/s1600/265.JPG (btw, appears to the back of en:Novak Djokovic).

Gunnex (talk) 07:49, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:22, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Jonypallina

[edit]

Here are all contributions of Jonygallina (talk · contribs):

Photos about unidentified futsal team, out of project scope. (Also small photos without metadata, own work is not sure, maybe copyright violations.) Taivo (talk) 07:50, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:22, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low resulation photo and maybe copy violation, photo without any metatags MehdiTalk 07:52, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:22, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 07:54, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:22, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Looopings

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Looopings (talk · contribs):

Small photos without camera data. I suspect not own work, but copyright violations. Taivo (talk) 07:58, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:23, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1939 photo, not by flickr uploader, flickr uploader therefore has no right to release this. Unclear whether this might be PD. -mattbuck (Talk) 08:03, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:23, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1927 photo, not by flickr uploader, flickr uploader therefore has no right to release this. Unclear whether this might be PD. -mattbuck (Talk) 08:04, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:23, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1950 photo, flickr user uploads and releases many photos they did not take themselves. Wouldn't be out of copyright even if the photographer had been beaten to death by the police officer in the photo. -mattbuck (Talk) 08:04, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:23, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1905 photo not by flickr uploader. No evidence for PD. -mattbuck (Talk) 08:05, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:23, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Listed as an AP photo, cannot be released by flickr user, no evidence for PD. -mattbuck (Talk) 08:07, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:23, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Listed as an AP photo, cannot be released by flickr user, no evidence for PD. -mattbuck (Talk) 08:07, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:23, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Nation branding

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Nation branding (talk · contribs):

All files have different camera data and some have no metadata at all. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 08:03, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:24, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by GAML86

[edit]

Here are last remaining uploads of GAML86 (talk · contribs):

Mostly small photos and mostly without metadata. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 08:09, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:24, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Šisterov13

[edit]

Here are all contributions of Shisterov13 (talk · contribs):

Small photos without metadata, claimed to be selfies, but they aren't. OTRS-permission from real photographer is needed. Taivo (talk) 08:16, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:23, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artistic logo - OTRS ticket required 2003:45:5C6F:A801:E07A:6F4B:4FB5:A7DF 08:21, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:23, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Levelup66 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, 2x obvious screenshots from a video from en:Charli XCX, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Levelup66/logs (with similar video screenshots deleted), and 2 other video screenshots probadly also grabbed somewhere from Internet but which may be also out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used.

Gunnex (talk) 08:21, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:23, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Saravannann

[edit]

Here are all contributions of Saravannann (talk · contribs):

Unused logos of non-notable things, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 08:20, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:23, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 08:23, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:23, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ancor Retail

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Ancor Retail (talk · contribs):

Ancor Retail is not mentioned neither in en.wiki nor in es.wiki. Unused logo and promo materials of non-notable company, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 08:24, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:23, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Titi Aiman

[edit]

Aiman titi (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:

There is no freedom of panorama in Saudi Arabia. Main object of the photos seem to be copyrighted architecture. Taivo (talk) 08:28, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:24, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Sander Schulz

[edit]

Here are both contributions of Sander.schulz (talk · contribs):

I consider them out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 08:35, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:24, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ADITeam (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, found elsewhere on the web. Uploaded in a row on 26.07.2016.

Gunnex (talk) 08:37, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:24, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of MarioArt1964

[edit]

MarioArt1964 (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:

Different resolution, different cameras. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 08:42, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:25, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1970 photo still has copyright; Flickr user unlikely to be author. Copy at BBC at http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-33958116 (no source mentioned; could be BBC itself). Carl Lindberg (talk) 08:54, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:25, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Neues Foto vorhanden Kommunikation BMW Stiftung (talk) 08:55, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Es ist nicht Grund für löschen. This is not a reason to delete. Commons hosts old and outdated files also to show history. Taivo (talk) 15:32, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Taivo. --INeverCry 00:25, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1976 PA photo, still under copyright. http://www.alamy.com/stock-photo-callaghan-at-number-10-106266674.html Carl Lindberg (talk) 08:57, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:25, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Neues Foto vorhanden Kommunikation BMW Stiftung (talk) 08:58, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Es ist nicht Grund für löschen. This is not a reason to delete. Commons hosts old and outdated files also to show history. Taivo (talk) 15:33, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Taivo. --INeverCry 00:25, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Bckuht

[edit]

Bckuht (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:

This is routine request for small photos without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photos are so small? Can you upload bigger versions, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload versions with EXIF data? Can you describe and categorize the files correctly? Taivo (talk) 08:52, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:26, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No real source given; highly unlikely that Flickr user is author. 1951 UK photo is still under copyright until at least 2022 (and probably 2047 in US). Carl Lindberg (talk) 09:00, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:26, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Work by French sculptor Raoul Mabru (d. 1957), still under copyright. There is no freedom of panorama in France. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 09:00, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:26, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kolec Traboini (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious "own" works. OTRS tickets may help to prevent deletion

2003:45:5C6F:A801:E07A:6F4B:4FB5:A7DF 09:01, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete all. Book covers need OTRS-permission from publishing houses, not from writers. Taivo (talk) 15:37, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:26, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Ilm.uz

[edit]

Ilm.uz (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:

There is no freedom of panorama neither in Uzbekistan nor in Kazakhstan. Taivo (talk) 09:00, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:26, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Hereisluwu

[edit]

Hereisluwu (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:

Mostly small photos. If camera data exists, then always different. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:09, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Космос∞

[edit]

Космос∞ (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:

The files are small and without metadata. Special instructions field in metadata begins with FBMD, which lets me guess, that they come from Facebook. I suspect copyright violation. Educational value is generally weak. Taivo (talk) 09:20, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dhungel krishna (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Blurry photograph.

Leyo 09:27, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replacable by File:Azinomycin B Biosynthesis.gif (the latter might be converted to PNG). Leyo 09:35, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo is claimed to be a selfie: author is the same as depicted person, uploader is different. That case OTRS-permission from author Vaclav Šanda is needed. Taivo (talk) 10:08, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image taken from IMDB © ThomasFilms Salix alba (talk) 10:15, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of copyrighted product packaging. Kelly (talk) 10:19, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I added other versions from the same uploader for deletion due to same reason. Taivo (talk) 15:54, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader claims to be a copyright holder of separatist movement. I do not believe. Maybe the flag is somehow in public domain, but correct author and correct license is needed. Taivo (talk) 10:20, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunately, this is a derivative of (presumed) copyrighted works and there is no indication of permission or acknowledgement of this issue. Ubcule (talk) 10:57, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: File must be realistically useful for an educational purpose. Stang 10:59, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Rien n'indique sur le site web qui est donné en source que cette image est dans le domaine public Shev123 (talk) 11:00, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:28, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio, flickrwashing. Original description says: "Photo: Bettini", while the uploader is called Max Nicolodi. Tekstman (talk) 11:29, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:28, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cirosa2 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused bad qualities images : out of scope

Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:04, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:28, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Chetana Samanta (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlikely to be own work, per "FBMD" in the metadatas + all other uploads copyright violation at this time

Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:24, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:28, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyrighted image. It's not clear how this is uploader's own work considering the fact that they are probably not the artist who owns the art work Wikicology (talk) 13:06, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep There is freedom of panorama in United Kingdom. The file has EXIF and this is consistent with the user's other uploads. Taivo (talk) 07:04, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Taivo. --INeverCry 00:28, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyrighted image. I doubt the copyright holder (Macel Asso Ministral) granted the permission for its uploader. Copyright holder needs to send permission to COM:OTRS. Delete per COM:PRP. We take copyright very seriously even if the copyright holder does not. Wikicology (talk) 13:13, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, del on DE Nolispanmo 13:14, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal holiday snap, nice composition idea, though Sebari (talk) 13:14, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Would be a spectacular shot without the tourist grinning madly in the middle. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:16, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyrighted image. Wikicology (talk) 13:24, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, this photo is from the Finnish book Igor Karpinsky Hetkiä luonnon lumossa. I am in the process of creating a wikipedia page regarding the visual artist Igor Karpinsky. The book isn't copyrighted so I don't see a problem with me using this photo for the betterment of my article. Thank you, however, for being vigilant :)
 Delete At first, it's quite strange, that the book isn't copyrighted. At second, the photo can be protected with copyright even when the book isn't. OTRS-permission from the photographer is needed. Taivo (talk) 16:04, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyrighted image. I doubt the copyright holder granted the permission for its uploader. Copyright holder needs to send permission to COM:OTRS. Delete per COM:PRP. We take copyright very seriously even if the copyright holder does not. Wikicology (talk) 13:25, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyrighted image. I doubt the copyright holder granted the permission for its uploader. Copyright holder needs to send permission to COM:OTRS. Delete per COM:PRP. We take copyright very seriously even if the copyright holder does not. Wikicology (talk) 13:26, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyrighted image. I doubt the copyright holder granted the permission for its uploader. Copyright holder needs to send permission to COM:OTRS. Delete per COM:PRP. We take copyright very seriously even if the copyright holder does not. Wikicology (talk) 13:26, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. I don't see how this would be useful for educational purpose. Wikicology (talk) 13:29, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Screenshot with unknown copyright status. Taivo (talk) 07:14, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ar Sog1985 (talk) 13:29, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

 Delete Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 07:17, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Wikimedia Common is not a personal photo album. Wikicology (talk) 13:36, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image from http://prokuratoria.gov.pl/urzad/kierownictwo/ if the uploder is the photographer than please read COM:OTRS and send it the permission for the image Jarekt (talk) 13:36, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, personal unused. Steinsplitter (talk) 13:38, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:31, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

More or less an empty page. Wikicology (talk) 13:40, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:31, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Steinsplitter (talk) 13:42, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright issue. Wikicology (talk) 13:48, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyrighted image. I doubt the copyright holder granted the permission for its uploader. Copyright holder needs to send permission to COM:OTRS. Delete per COM:PRP. We take copyright very seriously even if the copyright holder does not. Wikicology (talk) 13:51, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Greco22 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:52, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyrighted image. I doubt the copyright holder (The Indian Express) granted the permission for its uploader. Copyright holder needs to send permission to COM:OTRS. Delete per COM:PRP. We take copyright very seriously even if the copyright holder does not. Wikicology (talk) 13:54, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Taivo (talk) 08:22, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyrighted image. I doubt the copyright holder granted the permission for its uploader. Copyright holder needs to send permission to COM:OTRS. Delete per COM:PRP. We take copyright very seriously even if the copyright holder does not. Wikicology (talk) 13:56, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by VBrockmann (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://nebula.wsimg.com/de2643a4ccaad663a3a84b3b51c7e313?AccessKeyId=9FE7BB25F61B3FFACAA1&disposition=0&alloworigin=1.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:56, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Wikimedia Common is not a personal photo album. Wikicology (talk) 13:56, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Book. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:00, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:01, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:01, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright issue. Wikicology (talk) 14:02, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ahmednaser89 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:02, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:03, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text documents and trivial logo of questionable notability.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ecuto (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Book excerpts. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:05, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alainmoscoso (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Industry publications. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Alainmoscoso (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Alainmoscoso (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:

This is routine request for small photos without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photos are so small? Can you upload bigger versions, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload versions with EXIF data? Can you describe and categorize the files correctly? Taivo (talk) 09:21, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


They are all my own work as I stated at the moment of the upload. They were taken with my cellphone. Maybe that's why the size of the pictures.

Also, on your picture: https://www.yelp.com/biz_photos/baps-shri-swaminarayan-mandir-and-cultural-center-chino-hills?select=VuKIb74PAvdyZUQiImrRMg, the flags are clearly in a diferent position than mine, in case you are trying to imply I used that picture as my own work.


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 10:48, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted image. Uploader is not the original photographer. Wikicology (talk) 14:08, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:31, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ndodhemi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:31, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image clearly copyrighted Ubiquity (talk) 14:13, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:31, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:31, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:31, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fenrir Wolfee (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Logos and copyrighted character. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:32, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Albora7 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://mw2.google.com/mw-panoramio/photos/medium/20969709.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:31, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ThomasBVB (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:32, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical drawing. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:32, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An OTRS ticket (2016032310023656) claiming that this picture has been uploaded without the consent from the author has been received. However, the sender was not able to provide a high quality picture and justified it by her lack of IT-skills. Weirdly, her name is Monique which looks very much alike the uploader username, but she claim it is not her. Scoopfinder(d) 14:23, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment Also, she is not asking to take down the picture, but to attribute her properly. I am not comfortable doing so since I was not able to know who was the real owner and therefore I think that we should delete it under COM:PCP, since the owner can't be determined. --Scoopfinder(d) 14:24, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. It sounds like a frivolous claim. The Commons user's record looks very good. The EXIF of this photograph shows that it was taken with the same camera as her other photographs. It is also part of a series of several photographs she took of the same neighbourhood the same day with the same camera. It all fits. As for the OTRS correspondent, did she even try to explain how and from where this photo, if it were hers, would have been uploaded by someone else? And why she claims only this photo in the series? Unless there's something serious in the OTRS correspondence, the claim seems to have no substance. -- Asclepias (talk) 03:01, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment That's my picture and it's me who took and published it on Commons. I do not understand why this photo particularly have a OTRS problem, among the thousands of photos I loaded.--Moonik (talk) 08:41, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Asclepias. --INeverCry 00:33, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Monsegu 2 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://english.cri.cn/mmsource/images/2011/12/13/4220xtctnycmovie41.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gphgm (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://grandpacifichotel.com.fj/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/GPH-Homepage_07.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Manzo Bamo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Утаачин Тайж (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://mongolianbike.com/uploads/5673c03f-d1e4-4a81-be5e-4af9d1631039-ub1.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted image. Wikicology (talk) 14:50, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted/redirected two identical duplicates. The image appears to originally be from here, and is indeed probably a copyvio. Reventtalk 06:50, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 14:52, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

com:PENIS, enough of this stuff Pippobuono (talk) 14:53, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

com:PENIS, enough of this stuff Pippobuono (talk) 14:54, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

com:PENIS, enough of this stuff Pippobuono (talk) 14:54, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

com:PENIS, enough of this stuff Pippobuono (talk) 14:54, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

com:PENIS, enough of this stuff Pippobuono (talk) 14:54, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

com:PENIS, enough of this stuff Pippobuono (talk) 14:55, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

com:PENIS, enough of this stuff Pippobuono (talk) 14:55, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

com:PENIS, enough of this stuff Pippobuono (talk) 14:55, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

com:PENIS, enough of this stuff Pippobuono (talk) 14:57, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

com:PENIS, enough of this stuff Pippobuono (talk) 14:58, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyrighted image. I doubt the copyright holder granted the permission for its uploader. Copyright holder needs to send permission to COM:OTRS. Delete per COM:PRP. We take copyright very seriously even if the copyright holder does not. Wikicology (talk) 15:21, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyrighted image. I doubt the copyright holder granted the permission for its uploader. Copyright holder needs to send permission to COM:OTRS. Delete per COM:PRP. We take copyright very seriously even if the copyright holder does not. Wikicology (talk) 15:22, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While FOP would cover permanent installations in Brazil, this sign does not appear to be permanent like the building behindit, and the Olympic logos are copyrighed and used in this photo far beyond the de minimus allowance. Masem (talk) 15:39, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete. It doesn't seem right to me as a legal issue to be able to circumvent a logo's copyright protection by taking a photograph of one located in a public place, given that the logo is the focus of the photograph's attention, as it is here. Freedom of panorama makes sense when there is one original copy of the work that is located permanently in a public place (as {{FoP-Brazil}} allows). However, logos are different from permanent physical structures, such as paintings, sculptures, or buildings, in that there isn't one "original copy" of the logo. They appear identically as a means for visual identification of an organization or product in both public and private places, and they are definitely copyrighted. Freedom of panorama also makes sense when a logo is captured by pure accident while taking a picture of a public place—that's the de minimus allowance Masem refers to—but the intention of the photographer here is clearly to capture the copyrighted sign with the logo. For these reasons, it seems to me that this is a derivative work of the copyrighted logo, and therefore non-free. Mz7 (talk) 16:37, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Rien n'inidque que l'image soit effectivement dans le domaine public (voir le site web de l'artiste) Shev123 (talk) 16:08, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

identical to file:Lucas Cranach I - Georg-Spalatin.jpg Frze > talk 16:38, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Very similar files, the other is used and bigger, this isn't used. Taivo (talk) 08:14, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Paintings Colors (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Paintings Colors. Per FBMD... grabbed from Facebook.

Gunnex (talk) 16:46, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete all. The last file is also derivative work of photo with unknown copyright status and there is no freedom of panorama in India for 2-dimensional works. Taivo (talk) 08:20, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 17:10, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 17:12, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:21shop

[edit]

Advertising, the only uploads by a single-purpose account; the files are not in use. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 17:32, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope -> Wikimedia is not a webhost for personal images. Takeaway (talk) 17:37, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blatant advertising. Achim (talk) 17:45, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image claimed to be own work by uploader with same name as subject. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:52, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Iryna marketing (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promotional and advertising materials are not able to be hosted on Commons. All three of these images contain the logo of barkom company. Notice uploaders name, Iryna marketing.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:55, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size image of an aerial view without any indication how user came to be the one to take it. Other works are from the ground and have metadata. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:56, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Otavioanacleto (talk · contribs)

[edit]

This gallery of Brazilian politician/s does not appear to be own work of uploader. The 1993 image has a large white border shwoing the scan, there is nothing in common (but subject) between the rest of them. Four have no metadata, two have two different cameras.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:00, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Message left on talk page The photos are a significant piece of the politician personal archive, most of them do not have any information about the photographer or where was published first, especially the scanned ones. I totally can understand if they were to be deleted. --Otavioanacleto (talk) 18:04, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by KingWire (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Uploader is a sock of Oluwa2Chainz, who was indef'ed for copyvios. These images have numerous cameras (NIKON D7100, BlackBerry 9790, Canon EOX 350D DIGITAL, Canon EOS 7D, Canon EOS 700D, iPhone 6s, etc.) and various resolutions, suggesting multiple authors. Some appear to be derivatives (e.g. the reflections on File:Olanrewaju Fagbohun.jpg suggest a photo of a photo) and others are just blatant copyvios (e.g. File:Muoka Lazarus.jpg is here, File:Uju Marshall photo session for Orange Culture.jpg is here, etc). Quack.

Эlcobbola talk 19:22, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:38, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: hopelessly blurred MPF (talk) 19:46, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Anuotharized publication of a picture of a derivation of a company logo beyond the treshold of originality. EvilFreD overleg 19:55, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no context, out scope. Jcornelius (talk) 19:58, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unauteurized photographic publication of copyrighted written text EvilFreD overleg 20:00, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unaothorized photographic publication of written text EvilFreD overleg 20:01, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unaothorized photographic publication of written text EvilFreD overleg 20:04, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate to countless others from Category:Black Standard variants used by the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant TFerenczy (talk) 20:13, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status and unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Reupload, considering logs (was tagged by me with: copyvio via (example) http://seeiran.ir/%D8%BA%D8%A7%D8%B1-%D8%AC%D9%87%D8%A7%D9%86%E2%80%8C-%D8%A8%DB%8C%D9%86/ = http://seeiran.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/%D8%BA%D8%A7%D8%B1-%D8%AC%D9%87%D8%A7%D9%86-%D8%A8%DB%8C%D9%863.jpg (last modified: 05.2014, per exif a copyrighted work by "MAJID-ZARAVANDI").

Copyvio tag of reuploaded file was reverted by uploader. Via (example) http://www.beyamooz.com/images/sport/ghar/jahanbin1/jahanbin2.jpg full exif available = NOT taken (as indicated) on 01.11.2012 (but in fact on 31.05.2013).

Uploaded by هفشجانی (talk · contributions · Statistics) (= user pic) who claims also to be (per User talk:Gunnex#هفشجانی) "Alireza Akbari"" and is (per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by هفشجانی additional claiming some other files (newspaper scans, maps, satellite, etc.) as "own works". Gunnex (talk) 20:51, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo was previously published at https://www.beatport.com/track/flamenco-original-mix/4955908. An OTRS ticket is required. Diannaa (talk) 21:27, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 21:35, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sentinal000 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope

Didym (talk) 21:47, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Wincyaquinoong (Flickr gabber). Per FBMD... probadly grabbed from Facebook. Gunnex (talk) 21:57, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Own collection" could mean that uploader is not the original photographer of this low-quality picture, more information is needed. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 21:58, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not evidence of a free source, the source isn't working Ezarateesteban 22:02, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

minimal description, not clear subject, not categorized so unuseful Ezarateesteban 22:08, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no desciption, not categorized so unuseful Ezarateesteban 22:11, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep in fact, this author seems to be known Category:Andrea Fontana, so it might be useful someday to illustrate an article about corporate storytelling Pippobuono (talk) 16:15, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep this author is known in Italy for corporate storytelling: he has written a lot of books about this topic. He is the only university tutor in Italy for thi topic, but the article about Andrea Fontana has been cancelled by a Wikipedia member --91.253.237.67 07:17, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Could you improve the decription? "dddd" doesn't describe well the subject Ezarateesteban 13:57, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per above. --INeverCry 00:40, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status: uploaded on 20.07.2016 by 1-upload AckbarBailey (talk · contributions · Statistics) the photo was already published in 2014 via http://www.wheaton.edu/Media-Center/Wheaton-Magazine/Autumn-2014/Feature-Articles/A-Reasonable-Defense (2014, © by "Wheaton College") = http://www.wheaton.edu/~/media/Images/Page%20Images/Wheaton%20Magazine/Autumn%202014/Feature%20Articles/a%20reasonable%20defense/william-craig-480-cont.jpg (identical exif) Gunnex (talk) 22:19, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This photo is not under copyright violation. It was added from within New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary, the institution the currently holds the copyright of the image. The face that Wheaton has also used this image does not mean that they hold the copyright. Please ignore this deletion request. Thank you. - AckbarBailey (talk · contributions · Statistics)


Deleted: OTRS permission from copyright holder required. --INeverCry 00:40, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (196x257 px) resolution, missing EXIF. Probadly taken from http://www.upf.edu/survey/members/ ( © Universitat Pompeu Fabra ) = https://www.upf.edu/survey/_img/Willem_Saris.png Gunnex (talk) 22:23, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:41, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related enwiki entry speedy deleted. User indef blocked at enwiki. Gunnex (talk) 22:26, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:41, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pengfei Lei (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related enwiki entry speedy deleted.

Gunnex (talk) 22:36, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:41, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pengfei Lei (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. Irrelevant for generic article anyway.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 01:15, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per FBMD... grabbed from Facebook.

Rodrigolopes (talk) 23:11, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:41, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is of much too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose. It's out of project scope. Ies (talk) 09:35, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I'll delete all his uploads due to missing camera data. Files quality is usually bad. Taivo (talk) 14:23, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

com:PENIS, enough of this stuff, see the deletion debates about files with the same name... Pippobuono (talk) 14:57, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. WQL (talk) 09:04, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:26, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per FBMD... grabbed from Facebook.

Rodrigolopes (talk) 23:29, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:45, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to flickr´s description "taken by yousif al mulla", so permission of yousif al mulla is necessary. Rodrigolopes (talk) 23:44, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Flickr also states it is under a Creative Commons licence. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 09:36, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Emir of Wikipedia: , the flickr account uploads images of other photographers and cannot license these images without consent of the copyright owners. See COM:Flickrwash. Rodrigolopes (talk) 10:32, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Rodrigolopes: In that case I agree with the deletion request. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 11:45, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:46, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Emir of Wikipedia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No evidence of the flickr account has the rights about the image.

Rodrigolopes (talk) 23:46, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Rodrigolopes: Could they be in the public domain? One of the people depicted died in 1915. Saudi copyright laws only protect for 50 years.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Emir of Wikipedia (talk • contribs)
@Emir of Wikipedia: , if it´s true, maybe {{PD-Saudi Arabia}} applies. Rodrigolopes (talk) 10:14, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination/COM:PRP. --INeverCry 00:50, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Capture of a painting. See the 16 s frame. Rodrigolopes (talk) 00:01, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:47, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France, the License is not compatible with french law (CC BY-SA 4.0). Hubertl 05:39, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. It's difficult in France and Graffiti is art work and in France there is no FoP. --XRay talk 09:29, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I link the current status of the discussion in the copyright village pump. It looks that if the work is legal, it should be deleted. If it ilegal it should be kept. And I imagine that the second applies to this and to most of them. Poco2 20:37, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, per nomination. Taivo (talk) 11:41, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work; copyright status uncertain. MKFI (talk) 06:46, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This file is the copyright of Group Rhodes, UK which I have been granted permission to use by the company as part of a book I wrote called "The history of Group Rhodes". Because the company represent historic significance to British manufacturing and the history of Wakefield since 1824 - my intention is to publish a Wikipedia page reflecting my research. Kate Taylor 09:26, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Kate Taylor: , please fix the image author and date information. OTRS permission is needed when the uploader is not author. MKFI (talk) 08:32, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, if OTRS-permission arrives, then the photo can be restored. Taivo (talk) 11:43, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is cropped from a postal card by Lucien Roisin (L. Roisin [5] [6]) who died in 1943. According to Spanish Law, image won't be in PD until Jan 1st, 2024 , 80 years pma (COM:CRT#Spain) LMLM (talk) 08:26, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

First, all of copies are selling trought "todocoleccion" including 19th century paintings by David Roberts or 16th century drawings, paintings that has right to be placed in commons, so that auction website pages are not relevants, i think; and second, and i didnt know this is a painting by Lucien Roisin, i though this was anonymous--Vvven (talk) 17:30, 10 August 2016 (UTC)--Vvven (talk) 17:30, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:37, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

- Restored Copyright for this file in Spain has passed since Spain is exactly 80 PMA for authors that died before 1987 (Lucien Roisin Besnard died in February 1943). Abzeronow (talk) 03:36, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tridcat (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Logos cant be own or free

Bilderling (talk) 11:00, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, per Kelly. Taivo (talk) 11:33, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Vom Correrpondenzblatt wurde der komplette Jahrgang hochgeladen; Links wurden umgestellt Cosmogini (talk) 14:54, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request, redundant to file:Correspondenzblatt der Diaconissen von Neuendettelsau Bd03 1860.pdf. Taivo (talk) 11:47, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal file 2003:45:5C6F:A801:E07A:6F4B:4FB5:A7DF 06:48, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is really Nicola Tesla (1856–1943), then it is PD due to age. Taivo (talk) 09:32, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Not an old picture but doctered. P 1 9 9   12:52, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

la page affecte sur les comportements des enfants 41.137.57.129 16:14, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Per COM:CENSORSHIP, a file is not deleted solely on the grounds that it may not be "child-friendly" or that it may cause offence to you or others. Betty Logan (talk) 16:56, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy kept: Non-sense DR (and vandalism). Commons is not censored. --Amitie 10g (talk) 19:01, 13 April 2015 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this media file is Not educationall or useful at all it's just a Pornographic video and should be removed Motawer.Dev (talk) 15:16, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The fact it is pornographic does not come into it. If it were not useful then the media would not be used by the various Wikipedias and at least two language editions use the media file. Whether it is educational or not is subjective, but I would say hosting classic films that have fallen into the public domain is a credible use of the Commons. Betty Logan (talk) 18:44, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
if anyone uploaded their amateur porn videos which might be free to use (public domain) commons will become a porn site, and yes hosting films that have fallen into the public domain is a good use of commons but only if the file has any educational value, and the reason commons exists is [Educational & Useful].--Motawer.Dev (talk) 23:21, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The file is useful because it is used as a supporting material on articles about the film. Its presence and purpose on Commons is no different to that of File:Birth of a Nation (1915).webm and File:Night of the Living Dead (1968).webm. The only reason you have singled it out is because it is pornographic so I suggest you review COM:CENSORSHIP. Betty Logan (talk) 23:31, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
As for a supporting material a Trailer would be fairly enough File:Debbie Does Dallas, 1978, Edited Trailer.webm or File:Debbie Does Dallas, 1978, trailer.webm. As for my reasons, being pornographic is one but not all, I don't see any educational value that this file can add to the community or to the entire world, it's not an illustration of something or has any valuable info, even when considering the broad meaning of "Educational" the file does not provide knowledge nor it is instructional or informative. Motawer.Dev (talk) 10:04, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The educational value is fairly obvious: readers are able to view the work that is being discussed. In that regard it offers the same value as any other classic film in the public domain hosted on the Commons. Your agenda here is transparent: the fact the film is pornographic isn't "one of" your reasons, it is the sole reason. Betty Logan (talk) 22:25, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me because I failed to understand your definition of "Educational", the way you describe it seems like a "reference", and if it's only that then a Trailer is super enough, while the meaning I'm referring to is 'Educational', if it was the MakeOf the film then I would say it has some educational value because it show how films of that kind are made. But this case is not the file's not informative nor instructional or even provide any useful knowledge and in addition to all this it's Pornographic -Motawer.Dev (talk) 11:56, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - as much as I don't love this keep !vote being one of the few deletion discussions I've participated in on commons, this is clearly in scope as a well known film that is the subject of wikipedia articles, etc. No other policy-based reason to delete given. — Rhododendrites talk04:05, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep per COM:INUSE on fr:Debbie_Does_Dallas. d:Q579826 lists 12 articles about this movie, that meet criteria of notability. The movie should be added to all that do not include it. --Jarekt (talk) 02:30, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep - per COM:INUSE. Wikicology (talk) 21:35, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete I strongly vote for delete, because if we kept them with reasons such COM:INUSE then no body will complain if someone wrote an article on Wikipedia about self cannibalism (or anything disgusting ) and by chance he found a video on commons of someone who cut his arm and ate it or chewed it while it's still connected, so he used the file to support his article, or an article about Self-Nutrition, and of course a file is always ready for the case showing someone eating his feces, or anything disgusting, Sorry for the words but you can imagine. And this case is not different from the above cases: the file is In Use and Commons is not Censored and lastly the file has no Licensing Issues. the point is if there is no law (yet) against killing someone on the moon, it does not mean you can, and if a file is intended for adults, then it should be uploaded where it belongs not here, I never imagined a world famous website intended to teach the world and spread knowledge to host such files, never in a million year, I wonder if people who donate to Wikimedia foundation know about the rules here !!. anyway sorry if crossed the grey line but I think I made myself clear. DroidPedia (talk) 13:37, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    • Not sure how seriously this comment should be taken, given its content and the fact that the user has 0 other edits, but Wikipedia is not censored, and neither is Commons. This is a film that has been the subject of a lot of coverage and is therefore an encyclopedic subject. That it contains explicit content is not reason to delete. Nor is what someone might upload in some ridiculous hypothetical. See COM:SCOPE and COM:NOT. — Rhododendrites talk15:51, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
      • Sorry if I sound rude but you should take my comment very seriously, and about the 0 edits, I've made some edits at Wikipedia but only as visitor I never thought about creating an account as my contributions are very rare, but I created an account just to contribute to the deletion of this file (and similar ones) So I guess this is the only good thing came from it. I work as an IT specialist at the Municipality Public Library in which we provide aside from local books more than 80 computer with free and unlimited access to online libraries and useful websites such as e-mail services and of course can't forget all Wikimedia projects, even in summer we get some visitors and last Saturday I was doing some minor computer maintenance I saw a 13 maybe 12 years old kid watching something, the poor kid just run out of luck because when I turned my eyes toward the screen I saw it clearly (a *** and ***), the kid was playing nothing but this file, I was so angry and gave him a hell of a slap but the kid didn't cry instead he run away with a creepy smile on his face, I could only imagine what was in his little head maybe :"I found a treasure", and when I checked the browser history the kid entered wikimedia.org then commons and searched for "porn video" (I'm sure this is universal in all languages) and I'm also sure the kid did not understand what they said in the film because he barely know French (English has to wait for few other years), the kid didn't saw the film on Wikipedia or any other page but Commons, you get the idea right?. anyway I hope their parent don't sue me because I provided access to digital pornographic content to minor (which is forbidden not only in my country ) and here it's forbidden even for adults, even if it was unintentionally from my side but it is considered lack of responsibility and professionalism, Now I think I should start doing some filtering either search for files and block links one by one (which is really Stupid) or block commons.wikimedia.org (this is also a bad idea) or lastly ask people here reasonably, logically and politely to delete the files. I think this a very long comment so I will end it with: I remember reading about a law project in the USA (about 2003) to criminalize providing pornographic materials to juveniles with prior knowledge of their legal situation this goes also for websites based in the USA and that they should inform the visitor to not enter if he's under 18. DroidPedia (talk) 00:10, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
DroidPedia, I understand it is a problem, but we can not help you with it. Commons is not censored and it does have a lot of material which might not be OK for minors to watch. And if they want to find porn I am dure they will find it, if not here than on other sites. Check out w:Porn 2.0 article for ideas of other sites to either block or ask to delete their content. --Jarekt (talk) 03:19, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Jarekt, But the listed websites are intended for adults and they announce it publicly and loudly “we provide adults content only”, and most of them prompt the visitor with a message to either Leave as this is only an Adult place or to enter at his own risk, and some of them use age verification system, all this just to be on the brightest side of the law, and honestly I can't got to a porn site and ask them to erase all the data in their server's hard drives, though I wish if it could work, and for me I'm running a White listed Firewall, The world is blocked except for the good websites, and I had no issues with that list except for two cases, the first with Internet Archive and the last with Commons. the two cases use Educational flag and hide mines in their fields. Look I don't mean to be mean or anything, I really like the whole Idea of Wikimedia and I learned a lot from here, But I think it could be perfect if only they did something about this black spot, In fact I never saw any kind of signs or anything that say "shocking images" at least except for once, it was an image hidden by a sign and I don't even remember whether it said shocking image or pornographic media, and if only they prompt the visitor with a warning message, I wouldn't be angry. and again I think there is a law against providing pornographic materials to minors with prior knowledge of their age. --DroidPedia (talk) 10:40, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: COM:INUSE (used in fr wikipedia main namespace) and no consensus to delete the file. If there is evidence that the file has been hosted in violation of US law please contact the Wikimedia Foundation (in his role as hosting provider). --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:16, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hardcore-Pornography, no educational purpose TünnesUndSchäl (talk) 22:04, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jarekt (talk) 03:21, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Former nominations for a deletion argued that "Debbie Does Dallas" endanger the well-being of children. That is right, but it is not the a discussion I'd like to start, as far as I know the community's point of view. The primary problem is the law! As you know, the open access to pornography without any check of the legal age is highly forbidden. A second argument is the educational purpose: "Debbie Does Dallas" is a porn video, not a documentary. You could argue about the historical porns you could find here, but a full porn of 1978 hasn't any educational purpose! Some aruge, that the french wikipedia would use it. In fact, the open access of porn is higly forbidden in France. So first: there is a legal ban on porn in the internet, and second: there is no educational purpose. So why retain a porn on wikimedia commons? TünnesUndSchäl (talk) 11:38, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Wikimedia projects are hosted in the United States, not France. Commons is not censored. There is no legal requirement in United States to check age for pornography as far as I'm aware: Such extraordinary claim needs extraordinary references to back it up. The work is in use at Wikimedia projects, so it falls within Commons' project scope per COM:INUSE. These arguments have been previously iterated. 80.221.159.67 12:13, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Reiterating what was said by User:Steinsplitter in closing the second deletion nomination: If there is evidence that the file has been hosted in violation of US law please contact the Wikimedia Foundation (in his role as hosting provider). 80.221.159.67 12:16, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment I recommend imposing a 1-year moratorium on deletion nominations. Three nominations in a 2-month period is an abuse of the process and just wastes people's time. If the circumstances change sufficiently then it can be reviewed a year from now, or if the legal context changes the foundation can delete it at its own discretion. Betty Logan (talk) 12:49, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep So TünnesUndSchäl, a user that [:[Category_talk:Females_having_sex|"been irritated of a photograph showing a close-up of a penetration in the german Wikipedia"]] - by the way what kind of articles were you reading to appear this kind of imagery? I ask this as i find odd what kind of article would had this kind of imagery except ones related to sex and pornography? - after your first (and third deletion request about this file) not happy with the closure, you open a new deletion request only 2 months have passed, with the very same arguments and make several wild claims without backing them up with facts and laws. You, that only "contribute" with deletion requests of this kind of files, as you are on a moral crusade per your own words as you asked "Is there any cleanup of this category planned?", should know what the law of the land is, beggining per Miller v. California.

File in use so in scope. This movie has articles on 12 languages in Wikipedia, so educational and " it is regarded as one of the most important releases during the so-called "Golden Age of Porn",[5] and remains one of the best-known pornographic films" per english Wikipedia article.Tm (talk) 22:06, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: the file has been in used continuously in the article for almost a year, so we don't have to look at the 'scope' question. Laws on child protection may play a role, but this is not handled by our DR procedure. If you think there is a legal problem with the file, please contact legal at wikimedia dot org. --Jcb (talk) 09:15, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Elizabethghubbard (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. Also FBMD... grabbed from Facebook. Mostly authored with "taken by Peter Jensen" / "created by Peter Jensen using GPS coordinates and a background photo done by Geodatastyrelsen" / "photographed by Peter Jensen" / etc., needing multiple permissions. Uploaded since 13.07.2016.

Gunnex (talk) 08:47, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


These files are all from Peter Jensen, a colleague of user Elizabethghubbard who does not have his own Wikipedia account. The files were uploaded with his permission as a part of the creation of the Tonnesminde wikipedia page about a site on which Peter Jensen and Elizabeth worked.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Elizabethghubbard (talk • contribs)

If that is indeed the case, please send an email to COM:OTRS and explain your situation to them, providing evidence that the copyright holder has given permission to publish the file under a free license. If everything checks out, they will restore the file, if deleted in the meantime. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is all volunteers and is understaffed and may take several weeks to process the license. Gunnex (talk) 20:59, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:05, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of José Reis Machado

[edit]

José Reis Machado (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

The sculptor pt:Julio Vaz Junior died in 1963. The photos are copyrighted until January 2034 (70+1 years after death). Taivo (talk) 07:17, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Thease are photos of our Family the Family of the sculptor

 Comment The first two should be {{FoP-Portugal}}, the other two would depend where the sculptures in the pictures are. Ronhjones  (Talk) 22:46, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: and deleted per Ronhjones. --Jcb (talk) 14:14, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://img07.deviantart.net/9cb1/i/2015/308/c/8/mari_lwyd_by_rhynwilliams-d9fgoqe.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@EugeneZelenko: It is my own work, but will replace with a larger file (talk) 15:15, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:15, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Image resolved with staff, I am the artist who created this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hogyncymru (talk • contribs) 19:15, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]