Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/08/09

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive August 9th, 2016
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry I do not understand how uploading copyrighted images here worked to be used in a necesary purpose, I knowdledge this would be deleted. TheBellaTwins1445 (talk) 03:00, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by INeverCry: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyrighted image. I doubt the copyright holder granted the permission for its uploader. Copyright holder needs to send permission to COM:OTRS. Delete per COM:PRP. We take copyright very seriously even if the copyright holder does not. Wikicology (talk) 14:19, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy deleted. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:00, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously used online at https://www.linkedin.com/in/randy-brock-8a1bb01a No indication of why this image is free. No OTRS ticket. Most likely not the author's own work as is claimed. Taketa (talk) 17:15, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, I apologize for not knowing the codes and procedures and such. This is my first time uploading an image to Wikimedia/Wikipedia. I am the photographer behind the image in question to be deleted, and I own the copyright to the image. I took the photo as a commission for Randy Brock (the subject) and uploaded it thinking it would be nice for his Wikipedia page to have a photo of him. I don't know the wikipedia rules, but it is possible I was not allowed to do that since Mr. Brock paid for my services and did not expressly provide me permission to upload the image. As for the authenticity of my claim that I am the creator of this photo, I can prove that without a doubt, I am the photographer. Notice that the copyright in the image credits Zinfandel Photography as the copyright holder. You can find my business tradename listing here: https://www.vtsosonline.com/online/BusinessInquire/BusinessInformation?businessID=291916 which clearly shows that Michael Z Rork owns Zinfandel Photography. I can provide proof that I am Michael Z Rork if necessary, in whatever means is appropriate. As for my permission to upload the file, that is a completely separate discussion, and I honestly do not know how that works beyond the fact that I am the copyright holder. My clients are generally granted full usage rights --not copyright-- as per the contract, but it appears I never got a signed contract from Mr. Brock. He may prefer that this image isn't used on Wikimedia, and if that is the case I would definitely uphold his wishes, but when I uploaded I did not think that would be an issue. --Michaelzrork (talk) 17:46, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per comment by Michaelzrork. --Marcus Cyron (talk) 18:33, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyrighted image. I doubt the copyright holder granted the permission for its uploader. Copyright holder needs to send permission to COM:OTRS. Delete per COM:PRP. We take copyright very seriously even if the copyright holder does not. Wikicology (talk) 15:11, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy deleted. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:14, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyrighted image. I doubt the copyright holder granted the permission for its uploader. Copyright holder needs to send permission to COM:OTRS. Delete per COM:PRP. We take copyright very seriously even if the copyright holder does not. Wikicology (talk) 15:11, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy deleted. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:14, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

error al subir archivo Navibu (talk) 09:55, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: user request. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:40, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looking at the file title and uploader's user name, it is assumed that uploader is the one in this photo. Thus, he's not the copyright holder of the photohraph. Copyright holder needs to send permission to COM:OTRS. Delete per COM:PRP. We take copyright very seriously even if the copyright holder does not. Wikicology (talk) 14:45, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by INC 10 August 2016 per: All rights reserved on http://www.fotothing.com/rabiebad63/photo/fa9e638be0b43b8d44823f2938679008/ --Achim (talk) 20:06, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyright violation. Appears to be a scan or snapshot of a high school yearbook, with no proof of ownership to rights. Brianga (talk) 15:41, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader requested deletion via OTRS. --Ankry (talk) 21:46, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Esse arquivo deve ser excluído porque é um arquivo muito grande para colocar na página. Terei que colocar uma foto menor e que não seja muito grande. Se puderem excluir esta foto para mim eu agradeço muito. Abraços!!! DGomes (talk) 11:20, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb: Esse arquivo deve ser excluído porque é um arquivo muito grande para colocar na página

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Holopoman (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyright belongs to the heirs of Emmanuel Misko (1929-2000). No evidence that uploader has permission to upload file or that it may be licensed as CC

Dogad75 (talk) 20:24, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Holopoman (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope

Dogad75 (talk) 12:34, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Holopoman (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No FoP in Ukraine

Dogad75 (talk) 18:19, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:03, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Stolen from here Sunnya343 (talk) 15:44, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:02, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is from http://stagebuzz.org/home/editorial/ if uploder is the photographer than please read COM:OTRS and send in the permission. Jarekt (talk) 16:02, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:01, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright mark at the picture Partynia (talk) 17:08, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:01, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. maybe http://tsuyosen.com/ and http://tsuyosen.com/tsuyosen_member.jpg Aoioui (talk) 17:31, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:01, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission Dogad75 (talk) 10:58, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by INeverCry: No permission since 7 August 2016

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There's a disclaimer on the source page indicating that the poster has no idea what the disposition of copyright is on the works, and lists five other sources for the pictures on the page. Moreover, I'm not sure how a work from a Russian artist on an Argentinian site somehow becomes PD in the US. MSJapan (talk) 01:03, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

When a work is in the public domain in the U.S., the website where it's displayed doesn't change anything to that fact. Or are you saying that the work is not in the public domain in the U.S.? If so, why? For the rest, what is missing is the specific information about the reproduction. On that aspect, see the comment in another DR. At least, in the present case, possible sources are mentioned, which can make a research easier to find the information. -- Asclepias (talk) 06:30, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Asclepias: Except if I take an image from CNN because I like the quality, the fact that I can also find it on the Library of Congress as public domain in lesser quality doesn't make it OK for me to take it from CNN and say it's from the Library of Congress or Twitter, or the local art museum, or my dad's website, or mt next door neighbor's cat's website when the actual file I took was not from a public domain source that clearly indicates such. The uploader is not being truthful about where he is getting material from in the first place, and it's not our job to go figure that out. The fact of the matter is that if the reproduction is on a site where the site claims it doesn't know the copyright status of the reproduction, COM:PRP should apply, as it should in all the cases where this uploader has been less than forthcoming with his sources. MSJapan (talk) 18:54, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: pd-old/pd-art. --INeverCry 00:19, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright status is unknown by source site. Licensed only for non-com use,etc. MSJapan (talk) 01:06, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: pd-old/pd-art. --INeverCry 00:19, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad license. Original is here: http://www.artrenewal.org/pages/artwork.php?artworkid=42943&size=large MSJapan (talk) 01:08, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: pd-old/pd-art. --INeverCry 00:19, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a blog. MSJapan (talk) 01:31, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: small with big watermark right in the middle - out of scope. --INeverCry 00:22, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad source. Actually comes from https://www.artrenewal.org/pages/artwork.php?artworkid=42944&size=huge MSJapan (talk) 01:32, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a bad source, although the larger reproduction could be a good addition to Commons. -- Asclepias (talk) 09:13, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: pd-art/pd-old. --INeverCry 00:23, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Licensing. The original is in the Musée des Beaux-Arts de Nice, and this comes off a Russian blog. MSJapan (talk) 01:34, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: pd-art/pd-old. --INeverCry 00:24, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France for architectural works. The bridge is clearly the main subject. 68.193.210.74 01:48, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:25, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Accidentally uploaded same file twice. Mark Marathon (talk) 03:01, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:26, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Reuben Mbwiga (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope

Didym (talk) 03:01, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The copyright is attributed to ISIL and it's claimed to be in PD, while as we know ISIL has no clear copyright status. So, we'd better remove it per this and this. Mhhossein (talk) 04:08, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging @Christian Ferrer: for attention. --Mhhossein (talk) 04:10, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This text is not simple enough to be published into PD. It's clearly an Arabic calligraphy which needs to be copyrighted. By the way, it's mentioned that the author is ISIL which makes us speedy delete the image per this and this. Mhhossein (talk) 04:13, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging @Christian Ferrer: for attention. --Mhhossein (talk) 12:39, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

promotional/advertising + copyvio logo Qinyongr Talk 8·35 04:13, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

حقوق الصورة تعود لموقع كوورة وهذا واضح جلياً في الصورة !! Mrroush (talk) 05:16, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:28, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 05:50, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:28, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related enwiki entry 2x speedy deleted. If IN scope needs permission via https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10154126573118252&set=pb.754423251.-2207520000.1470722001.&type=3&theater (04.2016) Gunnex (talk) 05:55, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:28, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AmberLowings (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, File:Sally Obermeder Photoshoot for SWIISH.com 1.jpg needs permission (as indicated) via "www.swiish.com", File:Sallywikipedia.jpg = cropped from (example) http://static.booktopia.com.au/internals/9781760291587-5.jpg (last modified: 03.2016) and File:Mahawikipedia.jpg (probadly also cropped) also related to "swiish.com"

Gunnex (talk) 06:07, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:28, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No license since|month=August|day=9|year=2016 Alexander.a.stepanov (talk) 06:20, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 06:22, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status considering (uploaded on 25./26.07.2016) previously published via https://www.facebook.com/Shamsul-Morakheen-Allama-Hakeem-Sayyid-Shamsullah-Qadri-1585437075023436/photos (2014, © by "Shamsul Morakheen Allama Hakeem Sayyid Shamsullah Qadri" (who may be related). Historical photos may be in public domain by other means but relevant info (proper author/date of creation or first disclosure/country of creation information) must be provided to determine copyrights status.

Gunnex (talk) 06:52, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

http://www.desimartini.com/news/telugu/sanjjanaas-sister-nikki-galrani-all-set-make-her-tollywood-debut/article18483.htm Marvellous Spider-Man (talk) 06:57, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Tdv123 (with similar files deleted). Uploaded in 11.2015 for en:Orange Cross Social Club shooting, a shooting on 16 February 1989. Probadly video screenshotted. Gunnex (talk) 07:03, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong Information, n 103.15.66.34 07:12, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Stock image, Not the image of Village/city 103.15.66.34 07:16, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Use Category:Architecture of Karlskrona instead. Saftgurka (talk) 07:38, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pornographic 172.73.11.53 07:49, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Not pornographic. Tm (talk) 14:22, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Tm. --INeverCry 00:30, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hiking in london (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear copyright status. Uploaded in a row on 22.07.2016 (missing EXIF, per FBMD... grabbed from Facebook.), all files were taken (identical FBMD...) from https://www.facebook.com/senderismoenlondres/photos?ref=page_internal. Examples:

Probadly multiple authors involved, needing multiple COM:OTRS-permissions.

They may be also out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related enwiki entry speedy deleted. User indef blocked at enwiki.

Gunnex (talk) 07:52, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:31, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission Lady Л :-р Dogad75 (talk) 07:56, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:31, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве, лицензии и источнике. На фото указано "Starobelsk Info" Dogad75 (talk) 08:01, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:31, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

spam, del. on DE Nolispanmo 08:11, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:31, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sofiagshah (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear copyright status and unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, mysteriously watermarked. Uploaded on 27.07.2016. Also per FBMD... grabbed from Facebook. Considering also File:Sofia Shah.jpg --> https://www.facebook.com/SofiaGShahNepal/photos/a.1765427693699134.1073741825.1765423517032885/1765427700365800/?type=1&theater (17.07.2016) and File:Sofia Shah National Games 2016.jpg --> https://www.facebook.com/SofiaGShahNepal/photos/a.1765441693697734.1073741828.1765423517032885/1766886466886590/?type=3&theater (21.07.2016).

Despite of having a similar username, the Facebook user related to en:Sofia Shah (who probadly couldn't take these pictures technically) is not necessarily the same person as the Commons user. A verifiable connection via COM:OTRS (or by other means) must be established.

Gunnex (talk) 08:21, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:32, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related eswiki entry speedy deleted. Gunnex (talk) 08:25, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:32, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by NaturAceites (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related eswiki entry speedy deleted. User indef blocked at eswiki.

Gunnex (talk) 08:27, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:32, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Misused licence (this is not a law or resolution, but a photograph). The author died in 1972. BrightRaven (talk) 08:27, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:32, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Misused licence (this is not a law or resolution, but a photograph). 1940-1945 photograph by an unknown author according to the source. Not old enough to be in the PD. BrightRaven (talk) 08:31, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:32, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is an album cover, English Wikipedia gives http://consequenceofsound.net/2015/04/tyler-the-creator-announces-new-album-cherry-bomb/ as a source, I fail to see how this is sefl/own as claimed. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:31, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:32, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Third party logo, English Wikipedia sources it to http://www.chinmayavidyalayaktm.org/about_logo_motto_flag.php , I fail to see how this is own/self work. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:32, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:32, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Third party logo , different source at English Wikipedia - http://www.eduicon.com/admin/images/Institute/6893_Institute_large.jpg , I fail to see how this is own work. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:33, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:32, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I fail to see how this is own work given: File:Cho Seung-hui 3.jpg sources this to - http://www.foxnews.com/images/277248/19_21_cho_seung_hui_blue.jpg with a completely different subject name. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:35, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:31, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Whilst I am willing to AGF, I have concerns that this seems to be a promotional rendering for something, and doesn't appear to be an w:Asterid as the categorisation would suggest. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:37, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Thois may be a third party image from a media kit - English Wikipedia sources this to - https://www.facebook.com/KlimAuthor/ , so the self/own claim here may be inaccurate. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:38, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is album cover-art, English Wikipedia sources this to - http://www.josepvinaixa.com/blog/chvrches-empty-threat/ , I fail to see without clarification why this is CC licensable. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:39, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is album coverart, English Wikipedia sources this to - http://pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/17789-chvrches-recover-ep/ , Without clarification , I fail to see how this can be CC licensed Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:41, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

English Wikipeda sources a near identical image as "The image is rendered by the Keeper of the Register from the threadcount supplied by the STA and the STWR. The image is subject to Crown copyright." , so I am not sure this is own work as claimed. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:43, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Third party logo, English Wikipedia sources this to http://www.cliftonschool.org/ , so without a clarification, I fail to see how this is own/sself work. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:45, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Third party logo design, I am not seeing why this is own/self work in terms of the design. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:45, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Third party icon design , English Wikipedia sources this to -http://clojure.org/file/view/clojure-icon.gif , without clairfication I fail to see how this is CC licenseable Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:46, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:32, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

there's no FoP for non-architectural art both in Russia and Ukraine Dogad75 (talk) 08:47, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:32, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Misused licence (this is not a law or resolution, but a photograph). The author died in 1972.

BrightRaven (talk) 09:07, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Herbert Marxen died in 1954. Germany is 70 years pma, so his works do not enter the public domain until 2024. Reventtalk 09:10, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии. Фото из семейного архива, автор неизвестен, дата создания явно не 1995 года, дата обнародования неизвестна (возможно, фото совсем не обнародовано) Dogad75 (talk) 09:10, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Herbert Marxen died in 1954. Germany is 70 years pma, so his works do not enter the public domain until 2024. Reventtalk 09:11, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by هفشجانی (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:هفشجانی (serial copyright violator, file cropper): press photos (multiple authors & sources), (Google) maps, satellite images, newspaper scans, historical photos etc. taken by File:کاربر حسین رستمی هفشجانی.JPG. They may be in public domain by other means but relevant info (proper author/date of creation or first disclosure/country of creation information) must be provided to determine copyrights status.

Gunnex (talk) 09:12, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

شما نباید تصاویر مرا حذف کنید اینها تصاویر خودم هستند! This is my PHOTO! my Photo!— Preceding unsigned comment added by هفشجانی (talk • contribs)

Which one? Gunnex (talk) 09:26, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sir!

I am a writer and took them in 4 years!هفشجانی (talk) 09:35, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Medina

User:Gunnex This photo is 100% not a work of هفشجانی. It was actually taken by and is used by many news sites. Reuters itself classifies it as its own photo in its news article: Saudi Interior Ministry names Qatif, Medina bombers; suspects arrested. Even other news websites say it is Reuters' photo. The author who uploaded this has comitted copyright violation. The image should be deleted immediately. Newsboy39 (talk) 21:00, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

oh! I realy write ther refrence for this page: [1] for this photo I said the sourse!!!— Preceding unsigned comment added by هفشجانی (talk • contribs)

I can't even understand what you are saying. Your English is really poor. Linking a source without any name on the image won't make it yours especially when there is a source clearly mentioning whose work it is has been linked. All sources that do mention of the name mention the image being from . Here are some examples: Muslim world outraged by blast near Masjid-e-Nabawi, Suicide bombers strike at heart of Islam on eve of Eid, Deadly suicide blast at Islamic holy site in Medina near the grave of the Prophet where thousands gathered ahead of the end of Ramadan. Plus Reuters itself says it is its own photo. Saudi Interior Ministry names Qatif, Medina bombers; suspects arrested. Clearly you didn't take this picture and you haven't shown any evidence of permission from the source either which is required when uploading someone else's work. You have committed a copyright violation. This image should be immediately deleted. Newsboy39 (talk) 21:47, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well, thanks @Newsboy39: for the feedback. Regarding File:بمب‌گذاری انتحاری مدینه ۲۰۱۶.jpg, even the (by uploader) indicated source http://www.farsnews.com/newstext.php?nn=13950414001486 says "©2016 Fars News Agency. All rights reserved" (per Newsboy39 findings: orignally a Reuter photo), so the uploader's licensing via {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}} seems (again) to be just randomly selected (simply ignoring pending copyrights). Gunnex (talk) 22:13, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ofcourse Gunnex. Images on news sites are copyrighted and not free to share. Permission has to be taken when images are copyrighted. And the Medina bombing does not qualify for fair use at all. Newsboy39 (talk) 22:36, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gunnex I will like to bring to your attention another image. This image File:عکس هوایی از شهر هفشجان، سال 1346 خورشیدی.TIFF which he claims to have taken doesn't seem like at all it was taken by anyone, it is definitely not his own work. It's an image showing the air above Hafshejan and from how small the city looks, it is definitely an image from a sattelite. The claim of user هفشجانی having taken it himself seems prima facie false. Newsboy39 (talk) 22:36, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gunnex I've confirmed another image of his violating copyright. This image File:نقشه غار جهان بین هفشجان.png is not his. It was made by other authors. I searched for the Jahanbin Caves which are shown in the image and came upon this Caving in Iran website which clearly specifies the image was drawn in 2000 by Yousef Vaghef, Leyla Esfandyari and Saeid Varzand. The user has a made a false claim that it his own work and he hasn't provided any evidence that he has permission to use this. Newsboy39 (talk) 22:50, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination/COM:PRP. --INeverCry 00:35, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Theoroma (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. Also per FBMD... grabbed from Facebook. File:Fotinaki - Triton 17 mars 2016 q.jpg = copyrighted work by "Théodora Psychoyou".

Gunnex (talk) 09:25, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without metadata, found at https://holmestrandmuseum.wordpress.com/2009/10/09/1700-talls-kj%c3%b8kken/ since October 2009. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:45, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mmmmmmm111 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used.

Gunnex (talk) 09:53, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, found elsewhere on the web. Uploaded in a row on 26.07.2016.

Gunnex (talk) 09:58, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution, can be found on external sites like http://mapio.net/o/4839017/ and http://mapio.net/s/51722357/ . I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:59, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As no photographer is known, he might haven been still alive in 1955 or even later. Eingangskontrolle (talk) 10:03, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As no photographer is known, he might haven been still alive in 1955 or even later. Eingangskontrolle (talk) 10:05, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As no photographer is known, he might haven been still alive in 1955 or even later. Eingangskontrolle (talk) 10:06, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no educational value Berthold Werner (talk) 10:25, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:38, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

selfie, no educational value Berthold Werner (talk) 10:27, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:38, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per FBMD... grabbed from Facebook.

Rodrigolopes (talk) 10:37, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:38, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The map is unaccurate. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 10:37, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete file:Bulgaria ,after balkan wars 1913.svg is much better. Taivo (talk) 07:19, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

selfie, no educational value Berthold Werner (talk) 10:53, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Vanjagenije (talk) 10:55, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission Dogad75 (talk) 10:56, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio, non-CC. There's 'All rights reserved ©' clause at the bottom. According to Polish law, under which this logo was created, this is an original and creative work, not a simple geometric shape. (In Polish law, there's a presumption of creativity and originality coming from a broad definition of the work in copyright). Tar Lócesilion (queta) 11:38, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, not own work Nolispanmo 12:16, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, not own work Nolispanmo 12:16, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted album cover 195.135.221.4 12:17, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The licence is not valid (this is not a law or resolution). I could not find this on the mentioned source website ([2]). The information about the author is not reliable (see the uploader's other uploads: she wrote the same information for photographs by unknown authors). So this is a photograph of unknown date and author. It is impossible to check if it is in the public domain. BrightRaven (talk) 12:23, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyfraud - in present state, "personnal work" status is very doubtious. Lspiste - (talk) 13:00, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

edit: copyfraud is highly probable : the corresponding user account on WP fr is a single-purpose account, just adding commercial links into WP pages. - Lspiste (talk) 13:39, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As I suspected, the image has been copied from this web site: Cadres en mission - Le portage salarial . Lspiste (talk) 14:21, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:40, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promotion For (;;) (talk) 13:01, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:40, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

useless, shows nothing special Hiddenhauser (talk) 13:19, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:40, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright issues AnnaDaragan (talk) 13:22, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete copyright --Lemon tart (talk) 13:41, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep PD-textlogo: not copyrightable. Ankry (talk) 12:16, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep per Ankry. Thibaut120094 (talk) 12:55, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: text logo. --INeverCry 00:40, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Insufficient permission: this file could never be made by De Vries herself, permission of the photographer is needed. Low quality image, missing EXIF information. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 13:43, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:41, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality - Big Guy.png A5b (talk) 13:46, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:41, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:04, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:41, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:08, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:41, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ammar mohammed joudah (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:08, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:42, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kentrd (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused flags of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:42, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:42, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyrighted image. I doubt the copyright holder granted the permission for its uploader. Copyright holder needs to send permission to COM:OTRS. Delete per COM:PRP. We take copyright very seriously even if the copyright holder does not. Wikicology (talk) 14:13, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:42, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:42, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyrighted image. I doubt the copyright holder granted the permission for its uploader. Copyright holder needs to send permission to COM:OTRS. Delete per COM:PRP. We take copyright very seriously even if the copyright holder does not. Wikicology (talk) 14:15, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete and block the uploader, obvious {{copyvio}}. In spite of multiple warnings, Lassabe762 keeps grabbing non-free photos from the Internet and uploading them here with completely made-up licensing claims. LX (talk, contribs) 18:45, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Speedy delete and block the uploader Casa Rosada published the sane picture in HQ as you can see here, Casa Rosada contents are released under CC-BY. --Juandedeboca (talk) 18:25, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:42, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyrighted image. It's not clear how this is uploader's own work considering the fact that the image has been published elsewhere such as here. Wikicology (talk) 14:17, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:43, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Xavier palero (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:43, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyrighted image. I doubt the copyright holder granted the permission for its uploader. Copyright holder needs to send permission to COM:OTRS. Delete per COM:PRP. We take copyright very seriously even if the copyright holder does not. Wikicology (talk) 14:20, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:43, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader claim own work but I don't see how they are the copyright holder of the work. Www.DENISOV.NET is the author. Delete per COM:PRP. We take copyright very seriously even if the copyright holder does not Wikicology (talk) 14:22, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:43, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yoolal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:05, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yoolal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:43, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:45, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The licence is misused. This is a 1943-1950 photograph by an unknown author according to source. Not sure it is in the public domain. BrightRaven (talk) 14:29, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:45, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MERU029 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:45, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:45, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Wikicology (talk) 14:32, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:45, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://storage.fortmcmurraytoday.com/v1/dynamic_resize/sws_path/suns-prod-images/1297567793605_ORIGINAL.jpg?quality=80&size=650x&stmp=1401835703679. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:45, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Oles Dmytrenko (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:45, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Emanuel P. Baptista (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:45, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation scan from newspaper Theroadislong (talk) 14:36, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:45, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:45, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:45, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The licence is not valid (this is not a law or resolution). I could not find this on the mentioned source website ([3]). Narcís Sans Prats died in 1994. Not in the public domain. BrightRaven (talk) 14:39, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:45, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Child protection, location exposed on the metadata. Evolutionoftheuniverse (talk) 14:39, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:45, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:45, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyrighted image. It's not clear how this is uploader's own work considering the fact that the image has been published elsewhere such as here Wikicology (talk) 14:41, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:45, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Wikimedia Common is not a personal photo album. Wikicology (talk) 14:48, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:45, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyrighted image. I doubt the copyright holder granted the permission for its uploader. Copyright holder needs to send permission to COM:OTRS. Delete per COM:PRP. We take copyright very seriously even if the copyright holder does not. Wikicology (talk) 14:50, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:45, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo. Wikicology (talk) 14:53, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:45, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyrighted image. I doubt the copyright holder granted the permission for its uploader. Copyright holder needs to send permission to COM:OTRS. Delete per COM:PRP. We take copyright very seriously even if the copyright holder does not. Wikicology (talk) 14:56, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:45, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright issue. Wikicology (talk) 14:59, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:45, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not sure if Georges Leblanc died before 1966, I found a picture of the same collection of 1970 here [4]. --Fralambert (d) 14:59, 9 August 2016 (UTC) Fralambert (talk) 15:00, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Not even sure that person is the author. He has sent photos from his collection to the owner of the website. But the author is not specified. Anyway, it means that that person who sent the photos is alive, or was alive recently, so if he is the author his photos are not PD-old. If he is not the author, the author is not mentioned and the file can't have a PD-old tag. -- Asclepias (talk) 05:11, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:45, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Wikimedia Common is not a personal photo album. Wikicology (talk) 15:02, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - also, likely a copyright violation. Appears to be a scan or snapshot of a high school yearbook, with no proof of ownership to rights. Brianga (talk) 20:11, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Copyright on a high school yearbook photo is almost certainly held by the photographer, the yearbook publisher, or the high school, and almost certainly not by the uploader, who has supplied bad crops and provided no proof for any claim to authorship of the original photographs. 64.105.98.115 20:49, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:45, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot(?), doesn't seem own work. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 15:13, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:46, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bandspam, del on DE Nolispanmo 15:19, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:46, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User: Daryan hawrami

[edit]

Copyright issue. The files title bears the uploader's username. Thus, it is assumed that uploader is the subject of the photo. Original photographer who is the copyright holder needs to send permission to COM:OTRS. Delete per COM:PRP. We take copyright very seriously even if the copyright holder does not. --Wikicology (talk) 15:25, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:46, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unless I missed any discussion about this issue, this is a very unique logo. It cannot be considered too simple to be copyrighted. Actually, I've even read somewhere that each symbol in the U has a special meaning. I don't see how this file can be considered free for any use without any formal consent from the company. It has no place in the Commons. Ldorfman (talk) 15:37, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:46, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

www.arani.com 129.45.48.165 16:11, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Vandalism. --jdx Re: 17:39, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 00:46, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

les vidéos tombées dans le domaine publique représentent une opportunité pour une utilisation éducative, mais comment encourager des jeunes à utiliser ces vidéos s'ils risquent d'y trouver des films pornographiques !!!! 109.190.70.102 16:18, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Didym (talk) 00:53, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons nie jest amatorską stroną pornograficzną 188.147.12.36 21:45, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:18, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission? см. https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Файл:С_Родниной.jpg Dogad75 (talk) 16:20, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:48, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photograph is not PD-UKGov. It's copyright Howard Coster (1885-1959), professional photographer. It's even written on the photograph. It is under copyright in the United Kingdom until 2030. -- Asclepias (talk) 16:49, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:48, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mechonessolidarios (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used.

Gunnex (talk) 16:59, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:48, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Used for vandal edits on eswiki. Gunnex (talk) 17:04, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:48, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 17:06, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:48, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related eswiki entry 6x speedy deleted. Gunnex (talk) 17:07, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:48, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. If IN scope needs permission via https://www.facebook.com/KroomBand/photos/a.1501378226842439.1073741825.1501373990176196/1534379706875624/?type=1&theater (2015) Gunnex (talk) 17:22, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:48, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 17:35, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:48, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 17:39, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:48, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Most likely derived from elsewhere copyrighted content. Gunnex (talk) 17:47, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:48, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong upload Plugee (talk) 17:47, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:47, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright by w:Gavriil Gorelov, no OTRS permission. 95.29.111.201 17:51, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:47, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of non-free content Josve05a (talk) 17:53, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:47, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by TehPyklez (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, found elsewhere on the web. Uploaded in a row on 23.12.2015. Examples:

Gunnex (talk) 17:56, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:48, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 18:09, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:49, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work. Copied from here Coderzombie (talk) 18:11, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:49, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Debarghya89 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copied from here.

Coderzombie (talk) 18:12, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:49, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Debarghya89 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The user has repeatedly uploaded copyrighted images as "own work". User's talk page is a proof of that. Most of these images can be found by reverse image search.

Coderzombie (talk) 05:58, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


While there has been certain issues about uploading copyrighted images by me due to my ignorance earlier, images listed in this Deletion request are either taken by me or someone i know who has autorised me to use them.They are certainly not taken from any copyrighted source and neither can they be found by reverse search. Nominating all files uploaded by me just because i had a few copyrighted files deleted previously, is blatant ignorance and disrespect of the hard work i do here. This particular user seems to have certain problem with me which probably makes him do that. If proof of copyright violation is found for any of the files mentioned, i request them to be deleted. And hopefully no biased decision will be taken based on my history.This is my final communication about this matter on this page. Thank You. Debarghya89 (talk)

All your recent images, the most recent one being File:Norales.jpg, is clearly copied from here. Similarly with your earlier images, you mention that "someone i know who has authorized me". In that case, users need to send permissions via Wikipedia:OTRS and not as your own work. Please don't say that it's because of your "earlier ignorance". You continue to publish copyrighted images in spite of warnings given to you. Coderzombie (talk) 12:05, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I have no personal bias against you, I do appreciate your contributions on Football here. If you are going to accuse me of a bias, please back it up with a proof. Coderzombie (talk) 12:16, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that most of these images are suspicious: small size, many without EXIF, and available elsewhere on the Internet. Regards, Yann (talk) 15:13, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The first 7 or so images indeed appear to be copyright vilations, but as for the rest they appear to be own works, and the author is attributed in most. I couldn't find any of the older ones anywhere else online, in my opinion the older one's with no concrete proof of copyright infringement should be kept. Inter&anthro (talk) 15:39, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
They are credited to the authors, but at the same time they are uploaded as "own work", there is no indication that author has allowed them to release in the public domain. I hope Debarghya89 clarifies author permissions for those images. Coderzombie (talk) 15:39, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per discussion -- given Debarghya89's repeated assertions that images clearly created by others are own work, there is no reason to assume good faith here. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:56, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Baseball Card, unclear copyright statut without furthermore informations Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:18, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:49, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:21, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:49, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by INMODARD (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related eswiki entry speedy deleted.

Gunnex (talk) 18:29, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:50, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Claimed as self, but sourced to a third party site. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:34, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:50, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gravitar SAS (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related eswiki entry speedy deleted.

Gunnex (talk) 18:35, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:50, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poster art - English Wikpedia gives http://www.artabsolument.com/fr/default/exhibition/detail/1143//L-outre-mer-francais-dans-la-guerre-1939-1945.html# as a source so I fail to see how this is own/self work. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:35, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:50, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Threshold of originality concern namely the Balloon graphic right. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:36, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:50, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 18:36, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:50, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related eswiki entry speedy deleted. Gunnex (talk) 18:36, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:50, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Third party logo, English Wikipedia sources it to https://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/bitstream/1826/840/2/Pio%20Fitzgerald%20PhD.pdf so I fail to see how this is self/own own. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:38, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:50, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a film poster, English Wikipedia gives http://redcarpetcrash.com/the-duplass-brothers-and-blumhouses-creep-first-poster/ as source, I fail to see without clarification how this is self/own work Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:39, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:50, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad Quality Hiddenhauser (talk) 18:40, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:51, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Claimed as own here, but attributed to http://www.indie-stars.de/redaktion/media/Dana.png at English Wikipedia, Who actually took the photo? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:44, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:52, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a third party logo , English Wikipedia gives http://datsun.com/ as the source, Next question would be is it above TOO? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:45, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:52, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status. Uploaded on 26.07.2016 by 1-upload user Torremotsa (talk · contributions · Statistics), the photo (no exif) is circulating since 2014 on several sites (and probadly also on social media) via (example) http://motrildigital.blogia.com/2014/061008-los-vecinos-de-la-calle-ancha-piden-su-arreglo-ante-el-deterioro-de-las-infraest.php (2014) = http://motrildigital.blogia.com/upload/20140610210011-la-portavoz-del-psoe-en-el-ayuntamiento-de-motril-flor-almon.jpg. The upload was cropped... Gunnex (talk) 18:46, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:52, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Claimed as own here, but English Wikipedia gives http://www.pyke-eye.com/galleries/philosophers_volume_i/photos/905 as a source, Who actually took the photo? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:46, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:52, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Claimed as own/self here, but English Wikipedia gives http://specials.rediff.com/news/2003/dec/25news.jpg as a source, Who actually took the photo? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:47, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:52, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BennettBerlin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Need permission from the photographer (see description "Foto: Lukas Fitze"). For info 2 other uploads speedy deleted at this time.

Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:48, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:52, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Querying if this is actually below TOO, given the graidented elements left... Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:49, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:52, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

useless, unused Hiddenhauser (talk) 18:51, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:52, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This seems to album cover art so I fail to see how it can be own work. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:51, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:52, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This seems to be a third party logo, Next qquetion is whether the logo component exceeds TOO. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:56, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:52, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a screen capture from a film, and not own work as claimed, English Wikipedia gives http://www.smh.com.au/ffximage/2005/10/21/Dorian_051021114105681_wideweb__300x207.jpg as a source Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:58, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:52, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Third party logo, English Wikipedia gives DuProprio.com as source, so I fail to see how this is own/self work as claimed Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:59, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:52, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Third party logo, not self/own as claimed , English Wikipedia gives - http://www.theparanoidgamer.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/ea-sports-logo.jpg as source, Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:01, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:52, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 19:12, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:52, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 19:16, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:52, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vasudhanera (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope

Didym (talk) 19:17, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:52, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 19:18, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:53, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 19:23, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:53, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Coloration creates new copyright, so that we need an additional licence for that. To the deciding admin: if you want to delete this picture, please inform me before you do this, so that i can replace all links with the older one. Thank you Ras67 (talk) 19:23, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:53, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 19:23, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:53, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 777lucky (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope

Didym (talk) 19:25, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:53, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Goldsgym (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No EXIF, no permissions

2003:45:5C6F:A801:143F:B456:AABD:8AE9 19:26, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:53, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Goldsgym (talk · contribs)

[edit]

"My Collection" is not a good source

2003:45:5C52:501:D087:7D73:8C26:4AA1 09:47, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete also file:Andrey Grechin.jpg due to same reason. Taivo (talk) 06:48, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. -- とある白い猫 ちぃ? 20:28, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 19:29, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:53, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mustazhap (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlikely to be own work, also some cited external sources without permission

Didym (talk) 19:35, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:53, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine Dogad75 (talk) 19:37, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:53, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Giulio Mainardi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Paintings and works by "Enzo Mainardi (30 July 1898 – 16 November 1983) was an Italian painter and poet" who hasn't been dead 70 years yet. There's no COM:OTRS and all the files are licensed as own work. There would need to be COM:OTRS permission from an heir of the painter to retain these images since all accounts here are essentially anonymous and we cannot tell (despite name similarity) if there is true relationship between uploader and copyright holder.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:39, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:54, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Suryanepal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Album covers and promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:36, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Suryanepal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of user's own work on these Facebook and smaller sized images, one is composed of five separate photos.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:40, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:55, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 19:42, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:55, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine Dogad75 (talk) 19:44, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:55, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

morman takes up too much room 174.134.176.116 19:47, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Vandalism. --jdx Re: 21:05, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 00:55, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ATCP MINII (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope

Didym (talk) 19:49, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:56, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by RAFAKRDENAS2015 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope

Didym (talk) 19:52, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:55, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Citadel Mauritius (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope

Didym (talk) 19:54, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:55, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mehmet ali süzer (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope

Didym (talk) 19:57, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:55, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gipsonjj (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, found elsewhere on the web, per exif copyrighted by "www.abadhotels.com". Uploaded in a row on 20.05.2015.

Gunnex (talk) 19:59, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:55, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Etorres35 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope

Didym (talk) 20:00, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:55, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

likely out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:05, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:56, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ranero222 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF (1x with mysteriously photo gallery nav. elements + 1x identical, now with 122x88px)

Gunnex (talk) 20:08, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:56, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyright violation. Appears to be a scan or snapshot of a high school yearbook, with no proof of ownership to rights. See also File:Even McMulin Showing his Presidential Pose. .jpg and File:Even McMullin Yearbook Photo Auburn High.jpg. Brianga (talk) 20:12, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Copyright on a high school yearbook photo is almost certainly held by the photographer, the yearbook publisher, or the high school, and almost certainly not by the uploader, who has supplied bad crops and provided no proof for any claim to authorship of the original photographs. 64.105.98.115 20:49, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:56, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clear copyright violation. Image description states that poster is from Nickelodeon. Brianga (talk) 20:13, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:57, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no permission of the photographer or his heirs Dogad75 (talk) 20:22, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

no permission of the photographer or his heirs Dogad75 (talk) 20:22, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:57, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no permission of the photographer or his heirs Dogad75 (talk) 20:25, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:57, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lauralart 1

[edit]

Unused personal or promotional images, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   20:31, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:57, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by George Best Manchester (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. Also per FBMD... grabbed from Facebook. Considering also:


Gunnex (talk) 20:31, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:58, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Es gibt ein besseres Bild dieser Glocke /better photo of the bell available H.A. (talk) 14:54, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please mention the filename of the alternate photo.--Wdwd (talk) 18:53, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It's the same name (with "_", but the overwrite mode doesn't work), so it's better to delete this file and load up a new one. --H.A. (talk) 21:16, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no alternative given. --INeverCry 01:07, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bessere Aufnahme aus 2016 folgt. H.A. (talk) 20:35, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 00:58, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal doodle, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   20:37, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:59, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this looks like some photoshopped attempt of turning a contemporary photo into an old looking painting. The only upload by this user. Exif data is missing. I doubt it's own work Vera (talk) 20:42, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:59, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Загружен перевёрнутым, есть аналог В.Галушко (talk) 20:49, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:59, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad quality, pretty useless, out of scope. Jcornelius (talk) 20:51, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:00, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality, pretty useless, out of scope. Jcornelius (talk) 20:55, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:59, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality, pretty useless, out of scope. Jcornelius (talk) 20:55, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:59, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality, no context, no usage. Jcornelius (talk) 21:02, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:59, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality, no context, no usage. Jcornelius (talk) 21:03, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:59, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MikhailPulver (talk · contribs)

[edit]

all 4- fake license, copyrighted images, not in PD

Cap1000 (talk) 21:05, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:00, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality, no context, no usage. Jcornelius (talk) 21:12, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:00, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work. Coderzombie (talk) 02:02, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Please renominate with a valid nomination for why you believe this file is not own work. While lacking usable EXIF data, the image cannot be found through Google or Tineye. Riley Huntley (talk) 20:28, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The user has a history of uploading copyrighted images as "own work", so it's more than likely that it's not his own work. Coderzombie (talk) 21:28, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:00, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it has a watermark, and appears not to be free Ezarateesteban 21:37, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:00, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The description is copyvio of: http://cement_valencia.en.eresmas.com/los___cementerios___como__fenome.htm so if the uploader can prove that the picture is free, delete only the description Ezarateesteban 21:40, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:00, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably a copyright violation. Dubious assertion of ownership by submitter Reguyla (talk) 21:49, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:55, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission Dogad75 (talk) 22:05, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:00, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like spam Daniel Mietchen (talk) 22:29, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Also looks like non-trivial logo. --jdx Re: 04:56, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:55, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Invalid license,clearly a non-free product logo. MSJapan (talk) 22:38, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep USA has quite high threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 12:00, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Added: The image only consists of simple geometric shapes or text. It does not meet the threshold of originality needed for copyright protection, and is therefore in the public domain. Although it is free of copyright restrictions, this image may still be subject to other restrictions. See WP:PD#Fonts and typefaces or Template talk:PD-textlogo for more information. I think this resolves the license issue. --Sorisen (talk) 21:58, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per above. --INeverCry 01:56, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File was kept as "a simple logo under TOO", but the file is no longer in use on any projects, as the enwiki article was deleted as promotional material. Moreover, despite TOO, the logo is clearly from the company's website with copyright notice right down at the bottom left corner of the page. I'm not sure how TOO trumps copyright, but I'm willing to be educated of that's the case. MSJapan (talk) 02:24, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Although correctly licensed in Public Domain, IMO this logo does not fall under COM:SCOPE as uploaded only for promotional purpose. — TintoMeches, 08:53, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Below the ToO means not copyrightable and therefore not copyrighted. So, of course, a copyright notice has no effect on something that is not copyrighted. However, evaluating if something is actually below the ToO is subjective. I don't know if this logo is. -- Asclepias (talk) 10:04, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as out of scope. While the logo is below TOO as a text logo with only shadows or gradients, the fact that this file can't be used for an educational purpose per our guidelines causes me to delete this. --Josve05a (talk) 02:07, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

LlywelynII (talk · contribs) thinks, that the template is obvious self-promotion. He nominated the file twice for speedy deletion. As the template is used in more than thousand files, I do not want to delete it speedily. Taivo (talk) 09:53, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The number of pages he has spammed with this is (a) completely irrelevant to its violation of policy and (b) evidence that this is not an unused template in user space that doesn't fall under the (SPEEDY-level) ban on using namespace articles for self-promotion. Do you have any rationale for thinking this template is within policy? — LlywelynII 10:03, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Looks acceptable per Commons:User-specific_galleries,_templates_and_categories#Acceptable --Denniss (talk) 10:06, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the heads-up. I suppose it's fairly uncommon for someone to see one of these things and care, but probably a good idea to add a note to Commons:SPEEDY that there is an exception to that policy. In any case, now I know. — LlywelynII 10:27, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I think you should strike the bad faith comment, stating he has spammed it on a number of pages is totally wrong. Bidgee (talk) 05:37, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Three years ago blanking of the page was reverted by an administrator. Taivo (talk) 10:10, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep and prefer a discussion with him on his talk page first. I think we had a discussion at VP earlier (years ago) and he said he has no problem in changing the position of that template. We can see wording like "Want to see more works of mine?" in many user templates nowadays. External links to personal websites or Facebook or similar social media is also quite common. So I failed to see anything more promotional here. Note that we failed to disallow even watermarks on all uploads in Commons. Jee 12:09, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep I don't see anything wrong with the template, he has donated a lot of quality photographs which have became FP. Why shouldn't they be allowed to link to their personal page, whether it is a personal site or a social media page. Maybe the wording needs to be adjusted, it doesn't mean that it should be deleted. Bidgee (talk) 05:37, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The only wording change that (in my opinion) one may improve is to replace 'subscribe' with 'visit'. --Denniss (talk) 10:06, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Commons:User-specific galleries, templates and categories#Acceptable. If you feel that the text should be changed for language reasons, ask the user or be bold - however, that is not a reason to delete it. --Josve05a (talk) 01:58, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:German football team 2016 Olympics women.jpg Headlocker (talk) 19:39, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Josve05a (talk) 01:48, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The copyright status cannot be confirmed at the given source, as its URL is dead and cannot be viewed through the wayback machine at archive.org. The resolution is unusually small for a US-GOV work, there aren't any EXIF and it's not a setting that is clearly only accessible for US officials. I'd like to see community input about the copyright status as US-GOV published images have a usually better documented copyright status. Grand-Duc (talk) 22:42, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:03, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is not freedom of panorama in France. No permission from the sculptor. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:49, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:03, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work, too recent to be public domain. --ghouston (talk) 23:18, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:03, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1991 monument to Stepan Charnetsky in Shmankivtsi, Ukraine, by living artist Ivan Mulyarchuk INeverCry 20:03, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 03:41, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate file Kokkarani (talk) 04:28, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and redirected: duplicate of File:Malankara Syrian church altar.jpg. P 1 9 9   17:43, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate file Kokkarani (talk) 04:31, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: and deleted the newer upload (if you are trying to rename the file, just use {{Rename}}). P 1 9 9   17:49, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate file Kokkarani (talk) 04:44, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: this one because of shorther filename. P 1 9 9   17:56, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Plovdiv city center.jpg Realsteel007 (talk) 10:54, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. P 1 9 9   17:58, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Plovdiv center map.png Realsteel007 (talk) 10:55, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. P 1 9 9   17:58, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad quality, pretty useless, out of scope. Jcornelius (talk) 20:51, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: as per User:Jeriby. P 1 9 9   17:59, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright status of photo not given on source page. This has been cropped as compared to the Getty version, which is not PD. MSJapan (talk) 01:49, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:51, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

porque esta persona no es famosa, es una persona totalmente anónima y alguien está violando su intimidad 95.18.254.253 03:58, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

esta violando la intimidad de una persona anonima, no famosa y por lo tanto es ilegal, propongo la eliminacion de este archivo 95.18.254.253 04:06, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:51, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Misused licence (this is not a law or resolution, but a photograph). 1932-1939 photograph by an unknown author according to the source. Not old enough to be in the PD. BrightRaven (talk) 08:36, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have just noticed that the source considers it as PD, so it could be OK. BrightRaven (talk) 08:50, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:52, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

looks like a screenshot of video clip

Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:29, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

it is a foto from his first videoclip Summertime, his own composition. This foto should be publish in wikipedia, with the description of his success in youtube, 2.000.000 views in only 4 weeks.

  • If the video clip have been freely published somewhere by the copyright owner, then a link to this source is needed. If the source is not yet available or if it is not freely licensed then a permission must be send to OTRS Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:47, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the link of the video published by the copyright owner almost 4 weeks ago. The newspaper and tv has reported of the success of his first single, his first own compositon. Here the link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ElFH1tizu84 Please do not vote for deleting it, it is the best foto of the videoclip. Thank you very much.


Deleted: per nomination - Standard YouTube Licence. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:14, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a tthird party logo, so I am not sure why a self license has been applied. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:40, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep PD-textlogo. Fry1989 eh? 20:10, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:12, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Third party logo, sourced to http://www.cscec.com.cn/ at English Wikipedia, The next question would be if it's above TOO Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:42, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't this file in the public domain ? It consists on text and a simple shape. I suggest to change the license instead. — Sincerely Issimo 15 21:12, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:11, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See COM:TOO#China (PRC). Even text is copyrightable. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:26, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: it is not a calligraphy, so it doesn't fall under Copyright Law of the PR China:. Ruthven (msg) 09:49, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Its not clear how this can be CC-licensed , English Wikipedia sources matches however. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:43, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I believe it is CC-licensed, as stated in their Terms of Use page (being "Cid" the name of the mascot in the logo, as stated in their blog post). Unless it can be interpreted as it would be acceptable a image of the mascot, only? --Luk3 (talk) 00:08, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Non-commerical , which is not compatible with Commons.Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:30, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:10, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Safiel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Cover of a copyrighted magazine, obtained at this link: http://cen.acs.org/magazine/92/09232.html# Natuur12 (talk) 22:08, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as a copy violation. I don't see how the given tag is applicable. Safiel (talk) 22:24, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
     Keep This image is ineligible for copyright, because it is composed of text and simple geometric shapes. --Leyo 22:40, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as containing several graphical elements that seem more than "simple geometric shapes" (it seems like the claimed license would be {{PD-textlogo}}?). The ACS logo in the lower-left is clearly not simple (en:File:American Chemical Society logo.svg is nonfree), and its presence seems like one of the key aspects of this image (identifying it as an ACS journal) even if one wanted to argue de minimis. And I don't think the X-ray diffraction pattern does not seem "simple" eitehr (I don't have that issue handy to know if the "about the cover" says it's an actual example, in which case one could argue "PD as a fact of nature", vs artist's rendering). DMacks (talk) 04:47, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Created using the following simple input to GeoGebra:
Folge[x² + (y - 10^(t / 5))² = 10^(2t / 5), t, 1, 5]
Folge[x² + (y + 10^(t / 5))² = 10^(2t / 5), t, 1, 5]
Folge[(x - 10^(t / 5))² + y² = 10^(2t / 5), t, 1, 5]
Folge[(x + 10^(t / 5))² + y² = 10^(2t / 5), t, 1, 5]
The logo may be old enough to be in the public domain. The ACS was founded in 1876, but I am not sure if they had the logo at that time. I only found a proof for 1951 so far. If the logo is not PD yet and de minimis is not applicable, it might simply be removed from the cover.
The X-ray diffraction pattern is not eligible for copyright since it is a simple geometric shape composed of two lines and regular circles, like many others (see e.g. Overlapping circles grid). --Leyo 07:10, 10 August 2016 (UTC) PS. Another C&EN cover that seems to be ineligible for copyright.[reply]

 Keep No doubt this is really PD-ineligible. --Itu (talk) 08:18, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ACS logo in a stamp from 1951

There is some additional information concerning the logo found in Kaliapparat:

A stylized symbol of a kaliapparat is used in the American Chemical Society logo, originally designed in the early 20th century by Tiffany's Jewelers.
(ref: Everts, Sarah (7 September 2015). "A Most Important Artifact". Chemical & Engineering News 93 (35): 46–47.)

Hence, the logo is probably old enough to be in the PD. --Leyo 08:32, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Easily
  • First, the central image. This is W.L. Bragg's stereographic diagram of the x-ray crystallography of rock salt, from 1913, as attributed on the TOC page, and as published, among many other places, in his 1915 text. It would not be copyrightable anyhow, as diagramming a fact of nature (a diffraction pattern) and embodying no human creativity, but it would be long expired anyhow.
  • Second, the ACS logo. Checking the trademark registration shows that it was initially 'used in commerce' in December of 1909. So, also long expired.
(edit) this is a better link. Leyo pointed out the previous one broke at the Ref Desk. Reventtalk 22:13, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Third, the 'arrangement' of the elements on the cover. This is a generic magazine cover layout, used by magazine and journals as varied as Nature and Popular Mechanics (to use ones I found in a couple of minutes), and is nothing original. Such a layout has long since become 'common property', because it's simply obvious and widely used.
I don't even think the wording of the article titles, here, reaches a level of copyrightable originality... they are short phrases, and titles are commonly indexed without any claims of copyright infringement. Reventtalk 09:41, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reson for deletion. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:05, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Graphic design too sophisticated for the stated licence. Philafrenzy (talk) 10:50, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep No new arguments compared to the above. Haven't you read the discussion above? --Leyo 12:55, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Been there, done that. We discussed this in depth and the conclusion was kept. --Natuur12 (talk) 23:42, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False license. Color tone is not the same between the source and this upload. MSJapan (talk) 01:15, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Color tone? Seriously? -- Asclepias (talk) 07:09, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That's correct. The image has been altered, so it's not from the source page given. MSJapan (talk) 05:27, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It's the correct source. The tone has been adjusted. Of all the frivolous reasons and accusations in your odd campaign of persecution against this contributor, this is one the most frivolous. -- Asclepias (talk) 15:07, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 13:58, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False source given in license. Image on page is 248px × 304px, this one is 520 x 637. MSJapan (talk) 01:19, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The source image is 520 x 637, exactly the same size as this one. It's only when it's displayed as a thumbnail in the article that it's smaller. That's not a problem. However, that external website image is sourced from File:Lesley McNair.jpg of Commons. So, it seems it's that Commons file, slightly upscaled. In the log from en.wikipedia, File:Lesley McNair.jpg is sourced from an incomplete url beginning with http://cgsc.leavenworth.army.mil/carl/resources/ftlvn/w. -- Asclepias (talk) 07:34, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 13:58, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File is a different image than the one shown on the source page. MSJapan (talk) 01:26, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's the same image. It is only nicely cropped on Commons. -- Asclepias (talk) 08:17, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - There is no clear evidence that this image is in public domain. The misrepresentation of source page alone is enough for me to support deletion. Wikicology (talk) 19:19, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly, there is actually evidence that the image in the public domain, given that the print bears the logo of the Signal Corps of the U.S. Army. (And it was possibly reproduced by the Office of War Information, from the cropped frame.) Secondly, there's no misrepresentation. Please be careful with accusations. -- Asclepias (talk) 08:17, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 13:59, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Questionable PD. The original photo is PD, the site it's from says it's PD, but the fact that this is autographed on the pocket means that it is not the original photo anymore. MSJapan (talk) 01:37, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why the deletion request? Is there a problem? I suppose you can add a template PD-signature|US if you think you must. -- Asclepias (talk) 00:45, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 13:59, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False source. Image is 3x the size of the one on the source page. MSJapan (talk) 01:51, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The source is correct. The image is the same size as the version displayed in the linked source: context image. (Even if the immediate source had been different, that still wouldn't have been a reason for deletion, the image being in the public domain.) -- Asclepias (talk) 03:25, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 13:57, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

zzz ffggfgfgf gfggfgf 70.82.91.37 04:42, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Tedious. Vandalism-DR. (NAC) Josve05a (talk) 06:28, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author is ISIL? We should probably act per this and this. Mhhossein (talk) 04:15, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging @Christian Ferrer: for attention. --Mhhossein (talk) 12:39, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 13:56, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per this discussion. It's at most a dubious file and needs to be deleted per COM:PRP. Mhhossein talk 06:38, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: now please stop nominating this file. --Jcb (talk) 14:58, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Banknotes of Syria

[edit]

Syrian copyright law (apparently) does not have exceptions for currency. I added my analysis to policy here. Images of all bills that were introduced after 1994 need to go, unfortunately. --Brightgalrs (talk) 12:36, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:52, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:CUR Syria, banknotes of Syria are copyrighted unless they have been published for 50 years.

A1Cafel (talk) 06:27, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Ahmad.aea.99 There is no problem deleting these photos (I used a fair use license for these photos. But it turns out there is another license). Now I need some time to transfer it, Greetings (talk) 18:47, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 12:07, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File is coming through a secondary source that claims PD without offering conclusive proof. MSJapan (talk) 01:43, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Is it the policy to delete such images ? Bukvoed (talk) 06:35, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I'm pretty sure that's license laundering, which is a problem, as well as the fact that COM:PRP says "we don't know isn't an excuse". Without the information, we don't that this isn't from Time-Life's WWII photos and therefore still under copyright. MSJapan (talk) 16:58, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 14:00, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Link to scaled down version does not indicate provenance of photo, whereas the site usually does. Therefore, this may not be a PD Army photo, because it does not say it is a PD Army photo. MSJapan (talk) 01:46, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:00, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False source. This image claims it comes from pbs.twimg.com, which is a Twitter imagehoster. The license information wouldn't be found there. MSJapan (talk) 01:53, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. PD image, no copyright problem. — TintoMeches, 09:36, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, based on what information on the source page are you making that assessment? Several of the images this uploader uploaded are actually likely originally from the Time-Life WWII archive as here, which were not necessarily works of the Army. MSJapan (talk) 00:37, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@MSJapan: did you find this image on the Getty database? I tried, but I didn't find anything claiming copyright. So, what is it more likely to be?
P.S. The image you linked falls under PD-US-Army too, as the creator was a United States Army Signal Corps photographer (source). — TintoMeches, 22:19, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
What I particularly have the issue with is that isn't the source the photo is claimed to come from in the license as provided. Why is it OK to take a photo from a different source and then wait for other people to go find it somewhere else and decide it's OK? MSJapan (talk) 16:36, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 14:01, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False source. Image is sourced to a gallery page, not an image, and this image isn't on the page cited. MSJapan (talk) 01:56, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy keep: source fixed. — TintoMeches, 09:04, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 14:01, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyright violation: The image appears to be a poorly scaled-up version of a hotel-booking company's logo available on the Web (example). As this was allegedly uploaded by the author, I would expect a better quality image. That said, it's possible the image doesn't meet the threshold of originality necessary for copyright protection. I'm unsure about that, so I bring this nomination. Rebbing 02:17, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I had uploaded the image and I represent the company. I can assure you that the image does not violate any copyrights. I can replace it if necessary. Dmulan123 (talk) 13:37, 9 August 2016 (UTC)Dmulan123[reply]
Dmulan123: Thank you for your response. The final decision isn't up to me, but I think it would help your cause if you provided a higher-quality copy; I'm sure the original was better than this. (A low-quality copy is often taken as evidence that the uploader is not authorized to release the image.) Also, to be perfectly clear: you're confirming that you're legally authorized to publicly license your corporation's copyrights? Rebbing 22:15, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: with {{PD-simple}}. --Jcb (talk) 14:03, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not the original - the caption has been added later. This is the original, or maybe this, but as can be seen the font has been altered, and thus this is not a "slavish reproduction". This was created for commercial sale. MSJapan (talk) 02:18, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If the caption was just retypeset from the original text, there would be no originality. The photo in the print appears to be just color enhanced with added contrast. But there's still no originality to give it its own copyright. Prints and posters of old artwork are sold everywhere. --Light show (talk) 07:21, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
IF there's historical fakery and inauthenticity, it could be deleted for that reason, but what you've said so far does not seem to indicate a copyright problem... AnonMoos (talk) 07:36, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
So could someone explain to me how an image altered for sale, and placed on a commercial site for sale, can then be considered PD and uploaded here with no statement releasing the image for use? I mean, do we usually use EBay as an image source? MSJapan (talk) 17:22, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
By "altered," you're referring to it being a derivative work. If the reseller claimed copyright, they could have been committing copyfraud. When something is PD in the U.S., it stays PD, otherwise some people can get upset. --Light show (talk) 17:44, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
To be clear, if someone applied substantial creativity in significantly altering a PD image, the altered version would be non-PD. However, resetting text in a different typeface wouldn't generally qualify... AnonMoos (talk) 21:44, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 14:04, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate file Kokkarani (talk) 04:34, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no link to the supposed duplicate. --Jcb (talk) 14:05, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like flickr washing, account set up only for this one image Elisfkc (talk) 04:52, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – The uploader is the subject of the image though, and he served as the director of photography for the film whose watermark appears on the bottom right corner of File:Tony C. Miller.jpg. Since the DoP oversees the entire camera crew of a film, I would assume there's some level of authority with regard to whether or not he can upload the image with a CC license. Davykamanzitalk · contribs 09:05, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: should go via OTRS. --Jcb (talk) 14:07, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Crossed Grain symbol was originally designed by Michael Carpenter and was first published on 27th January 1972 for use by Coeliac UK, the national charity for people with coeliac disease and dermatitis herpetiformis. The symbol is now used by not-for-profit patient organisations worldwide for the benefit of the coeliac and wider gluten-free community as a certification mark for gluten-free foods and drinks. It is community owned by those international coeliac charities and has been trademarked in a number of different locations including the European Community and the United States of America. The symbol is not only an important supplier of income to the charities to fund the support they provide to people with coeliac disease, but It is also a sign of safety and integrity for people with coeliac disease and those following a gluten-free diet around the globe. As a sign of safety, any use of the symbol that has not been regulated by coeliac societies ensuring that the symbol is only used on products that meet strict standards can potentially damage the reputation of the symbol. Due to the importance of preventing any misuse of the symbol we would appreciate it if the symbol can be swiftly deleted from the Creative Commons. For any questions relating to the Crossed Grain symbol or any notices of deletion please contact Helena Tyler helena.tyler@coeliac.org.uk. Yours sincerely, Sarah Sleet Chief Executive Officer, Coeliac UK and Vice Chair of the Association of European Coeliac Societies 84.22.189.164 10:07, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no evidence of permission. --Jcb (talk) 14:09, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No EXIF, What does "My collection" mean? https://www.google.de/search?sa=G&hl=de&q=julia+efimova&tbm=isch&tbs=simg:CAQSmwEJlrErqLd0MKMajwELEKjU2AQaCAgCCBcIPQhDDAsQsIynCBpiCmAIAxIonx-gH50fnh-oH5YapRqQGpcagRqHMcoxiDHJMYUxhjHUJc4x6yXTJRownBKDJNkDtnLKw3wSSexwKRwPLJ0PJ6UDhzlCR_1Wze1JxJETlUUaePXPVlN8MKZQ2IAQMCxCOrv4IGgoKCAgBEgR37VhGDA&ved=0ahUKEwj04v6MhLXOAhXLjywKHZ07D0YQ2A4IHCgB&biw=1901&bih=868 2003:45:5C6F:A801:143F:B456:AABD:8AE9 19:17, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Google Images link the nominator gives mostly points to places where other sites specifically use the image from Wikimedia Commons - it's been here since 2010, after all. It's not evidence against the image being free. --GRuban (talk) 21:11, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: 'my collection' usually means 'I own a copy' rather than 'I own the copyright'. --Jcb (talk) 14:10, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]