Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/06/24

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive June 24th, 2016
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Senapa (talk) 02:39, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Christian Ferrer: copyvios + out of scope - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mal todo si User:Eli (talk) 06:15, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: We don't delete deletion requests. --Stefan2 (talk) 08:53, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sosofitelbangkok (talk · contribs)

[edit]

found everywhere https://www.google.fr/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZitWqw8gdf7h9AEovyVsGjhU6mYIZVnLGvzQvQ0m8xQINDjywhQjAvb3rkI8G9ypiyOwV5smTKMtxM5d5qmyt9G-yl6Q_1C2eVz5wVEIBiRwwp0uYDBzhOEWCSA5UNP8y3cvsf2G8Pne4TNwKkKAzajITrwrnHWsLMigfnYLR-_1EbceUFNHsUf0GlSSK3jgoEXmY5At1SHyf1HCZBLb6UNSpWy-JbSXkrSAnuV4gaAlF1-BffTvmyYoN2jmaj9rlSyeb9y-2QUOmHfzCz-x1yin_1DtHIcDvLCb1Wb7ZzLWDQQ1tIJppm5eeY5qd-BtU8Yw6c60LI4EzVR2ImZ4jqBRrn2EJ-f7O1KXV4OHXCNXMLfK6-S2D9ZiLfc6REUt25bLJKuEFNNLayd5iMHtX1S7orOWLAQrYAtWHK3sPyg726grEapJtWXYO17hdIMww85_14jZVHzRblFWEnr9_1VoKusIa7sxC8nyxAzWm5y5oUbq1NqLwPZVQfExT_10Em8q5BukMRUIYRv75RlIzRweQVCzIkxeM5cyP6Sx0nQuZQHhQqGuiH-vKSCKSfj6grvD5eZ71swxsmhCpvAUZaMQ7BxiZvGiQ-EZIpU5WkPRJRB9e5OLQbUh3V6QKaGAflB4J2AOTEEyv-giKm-aw_1RoNy3Bena9_1vH9rWAVxuhCf_1zVx493lbTh2INDsPNrAv72HvKgWD0z4itZDV52tzmeDUQlAB_15BNqdIWiSR64vDzPhjDG8t3TkVa6EMO_1QGJwIKdHkAQeuespjY2jaqE8KOdQS4DPa0ES6I76lMTemlsjm7Pf9SZzj81uSb8WEp9ke8z-vQro5W1xdcqiBdu07dL5uaZzzbdbvN8MMihmw6fd4vV9CjB60vostv85HMcp46WvuqLWI7MjGpmlLn4wiXdzfZG2MM4YVED0ABQ2cvur-8tpfDBnvkf7BbomvK-m2WnGuWUJ1bH92PjjQxd4QIlRQLu8Z3FbNvXKXd9QyJWXsTJuBN1OQQ2N6WBa0f0NDCDHxckjhp_19SmXZ3xaaQWi9uN-myjkB41RvMLBz1AbZB14bvFlP30kEA8hHuAdY1YbPY8LrS9CHSmexRcB9ik-d9C46tY2VgsiwW36Xam0sprD_1Y0TbYwBfCttxgzTJG4Gge5LyEq4V0fyEPOODo9TbECRnWS_1cOB95yDuYdSeFkKdKFnsCyrgQ4uEk7sOS8p70pqYiF8d_1nyuz0Jjd3XpT3VN176JzkXYm_1H_1xU_1xtqxY_1_1m-6jvNFaIYilvYSem7pPLzLiRUxf6802CBMbUhISkwkssF7yK6_1XOg-S4cYjjx-GDX6YPkcVyvGosOzkMEYHa6PyS9d6EpyeAX4L6xLtlTZcU9WrLF3he5SjHkOJyPfrLhPTxHSaThKskKbB5d-kWrHJc9q0LmKd5kAvreYlY9StKhuS92PlryimmBXFNHUwECDwJiVzh0_17bkYiQHYyfkizPQxn_1MH5tytnQaFOXQSI8woRzMVORJoRrOQu5fiZmYRjP0mtYoVfjI17Tk4SWt2mdvSj6FFiFVsNho4IA3sunR8EJVHs8aJErh6Z8eD5Q5uSk&gws_rd=cr&ei=XhltV-mfN4OBU4rorIgO

Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:29, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy deleted. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:29, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bo obok nazwy nie ma znaczka. Madzia29734 (talk) 11:54, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedy - nonsens reason. --Jcb (talk) 14:26, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bo obok loga jest napis TM. 213.238.121.248 13:18, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:40, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Straße existiert nicht --Dguendel 12:03, 24 June 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: Empty, bad name, author's request. --Achim (talk) 16:57, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bo obok loga jest napis TM 213.238.121.248 13:16, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Nonsense DR. --Leyo 21:54, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bo obok loga jest litera R w kółku, a jej nie powinno być. 213.238.121.248 14:05, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Nonsense DR. --Leyo 21:51, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bo obok loga jest niepotrzebne, drukowane R w kółku. 78.10.135.248 12:12, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: As before: no valid reason for deletion. --Rosenzweig τ 12:16, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False claim of ownership, copyright violation. Catlemur (talk) 15:18, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 23:47, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probable copyvio Pippobuono (talk) 08:34, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: CD cover. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:12, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Does not qualify for PD-textlogo jdx Re: 02:01, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: This is a speedy -- taken from a web page with "Copyright © 2016. TV FOCO". .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:36, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no mw gusta Elizabeth Tanqueño (talk) 06:17, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Was erroneously put on talk page, follow up Commons:Deletion requests/File:Elïzâbëth Tanqueño Bsc.jpg. --Achim (talk) 18:22, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file appears to have permission from the subject. The OTRS tag was removed by an IP several years ago. I have sincere doubts that the permission is correct. 92.40.248.245 09:27, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this file is deleted, then the derivative File:Sabrina_Deep_adjusted.jpg should also be deleted. 92.40.248.245 09:29, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep On checking back, the OTRS permission was added by @Kved: back in 2009 when the image was uploaded. Absent additional information from the nominator, I would say the OTRS permission statement on file is correct. Tabercil (talk) 22:01, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Tabercil: so you can confirm that Sabrina Deep licensed this photo through OTRS? Specifically was the email from deepsabrina.com as offered by the uploader below? I genuinely don't think Sabrina Deep ever licensed the photo because the uploader asked on the upload help page in 2009 (see the link below) and talked of "four freedoms" rather than just saying the copyright owner has licensed the work. 92.40.248.245 12:28, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I'm just going by the revision history on the photo - specifically this edit where an OTRS volunteer added that a permission statement was present in OTRS for the photo. Tabercil (talk) 16:45, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep I am Sabrina Deep; the photo and its related cropping is from my private collection and permission was and is granted. If someone needs to verify, they can drop me an email and I'll give my personal addy from deepsabrina.com to formalize permission. --Crowdedisfun (talk) 01:53, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Crowdedisfun: I find that statement really quite odd because twice in 2009, you claimed that you had "sent an email to Sabrina Deep asking if i could have a picture of her to add to her wikipedia article]." Are you really Sabrina Deep or do you wish to retract your statement above? I also find it odd that you are now offering to have the permission verified and formalised. That was supposed to have happened in 2009. Are you confirming that the photo was not licensed correctly in 2009? 92.40.248.245 12:28, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: What is your problem? Do you want me to post my email address here? info@deepsabrina.com Send me an email, ask for photo with sign where I authorize or/and with today's newspaper of your choice. Do you want my tel number? My skype? I have no problems to post them in here: call and verify. I've told you to email me and verify and you still have problems. What do you want in order to get permission? You want to delete the pic? I don't care either. But don't do it on the false unilateral assumption that I am not Sabrina Deep. If you want permission proof you gotta name a way to get it which is satisfactory to you. If you simply want to delete the pic for whatever reason, do so and take full responsibility. Let's see if you have the guts to email me and ask for permission's confirmation or if you just hate adult entertainment before hand. You can also contact me on https://www.quora.com/profile/Sabrina-Deep in case. Cheers and enjoy your life. And yes, I am upset because I am tired of all the nonsense that it's thrown at everything concerning sex and porn. Do your job and verify, as I have given you enough ways to contact me directly and check my identity and related photo permissions in the previous message already and if you just took the time to Google me, you could have got those contact details for verification much earlier, instead of assuming. --Crowdedisfun (talk) 18:38, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: let's turn the tables here and you answer some of our questions here, Mr or Mrs "92.40.248.245". You say in the opening statement "I have sincere doubts that the permission is correct." So why is that permission not valid? What do you know that we don't?? Tabercil (talk) 16:52, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Tabercil: On 25 February 2009, on the Commons Help Desk, Crowdedisfun wrote that "she sent me a picture stating that i could use it for whatever i wanted and that picture is now mine." Those are my sincere doubts in bold emphasis. The uploader clearly felt that they now owned the copyright to the photo. That doesn't normally happen without some evidence of a transfer. Despite that statement, and the questionable claim that they are Sandra Deep, the file description clearly says that Sandra Deep is the copyright holder and has licensed it for reuse by anybody for any purpose. Can we get onto the issue of whether the permission is genuine or not? This is why I asked if you could confirm that it was Sandra and not somebody else (eg the uploader) who contacted OTRS. 92.40.248.245 19:05, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
So thank you @Tabercil: for asking at the OTRS noticeboard. The reply is quite illuminating. It appears the ticket was based on a forwarded email, rather than an email directly from Sandra. I think I would be justified in asking for speedy deletion on the grounds that we don't really know if the cooyright owner ever licensed the photo. 92.40.248.245 03:18, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Sabrina, not Sandra...wow...--Crowdedisfun (talk) 18:40, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
No so fast - there's lots of cases where we deal with forwarded emails rather than direct emails. I know - I was the middle-man several times on such items. It all depends on if the forwarded email had sufficient information that OTRS was happy to certify it as being from Sabrina. So far it looks like is. Tabercil (talk) 16:30, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Permission clarified. The correct and polite procedure for this would have been to first ask the uploader. If there was no reply or not a satisfactory reply, then ask at the OTRS Noticeboard and then start a deletion request IF there is still some doubt. Green Giant (talk) 13:31, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising, clearly out of scope. RA0808 (talk) 00:05, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:26, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ya ha dejado el cargo TReporta (talk) 04:30, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, unused personal photo. Taivo (talk) 20:20, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

INFORMACION DESFAZADA HAY NUEVO DIRECTIVO Telemetro Reporta (talk) 00:34, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:26, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Many findings in the Net, own work is very improbable, COM:PCP! Ras67 (talk) 01:18, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:26, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Radoslavkk (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images previously published elsewhere on the web, own work claim needs confirmation.

--ghouston (talk) 02:07, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:28, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not be own work: http://www.rumbosdigital.com/sites/default/files/styles/900/public/mundiales02.jpg?itok=Fb-PL2Su and billion of pages 186.129.14.41 02:51, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:28, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

redirect not necessary Frze > talk 03:21, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self nomination of low quality Flickr file. Replaced by identical model File:2012 Hyundai i30 (FD) Trophy hatchback (2015-07-10) 01.jpg. OSX (talkcontributions) 03:29, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

redirect not necessary Frze > talk 03:42, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

redirect not necessary Frze > talk 03:51, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zahirulnukman (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of user's own work on this advertisement, part of the advertisement repeated with a "touch finger" and what appears to be a screen shot from television show. All stated to be own work, and unlikely that any of it is.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:17, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete --jdx Re: 06:22, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:13, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Though this photograph may have been released under a free license, the copyright of the underlying statue has not. As such, this cannot be freely hosted on Commons.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 04:54, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

svg image malformed with dark patches. Request by uploader ಪ್ರದೀಪ್ ಬೆಳಗಲ್ (talk) 04:57, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [1]. Yann (talk) 15:05, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Modified file. No permission to modify. Request by uploader ಪ್ರದೀಪ್ ಬೆಳಗಲ್ (talk) 04:59, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:31, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Work by a living artist (https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frank_Maieu), license should be confirmed using COM:OTRS. --ghouston (talk) 05:37, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:31, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image --ghouston (talk) 05:42, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparently a photograph of a document, can be found elsewhere on the web, no source / copyright details given other than "own work". --ghouston (talk) 05:51, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private picture, out of scope. — Yerpo Eh? 06:34, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

nonfree logo of http://flnka.ru/, fake license 109.172.98.69 06:48, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploads by Mr Annael

[edit]

These images were only used in promotional pages on the English Wikipedia, which have since been deleted (1, 2). Out of project scope. — ξxplicit 06:47, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Contentless, unmantained and obsolete haphazard gallery; its uses are much better served by Category:Palácio Valada-Azambuja (Lisboa). -- Tuválkin 07:29, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Per FBMD... probadly grabbed from Facebook. Gunnex (talk) 07:59, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is quite small and at 11kb is unlikely to have been own work. The uploader only ever made 1 edit globally, so I don't think this was a genuine upload. 92.40.248.245 08:12, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy right do not permit modifation explicitly. Hence, request by uploader ಪ್ರದೀಪ್ ಬೆಳಗಲ್ (talk) 08:17, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probable copyvio : film still Pippobuono (talk) 08:35, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probable copyvio Pippobuono (talk) 08:44, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo from mynewsdesk.com. License review failed, "(C) All Rihts Reserved". Thuresson (talk) 08:50, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work, anywhere on the web... Pippobuono (talk) 08:52, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry speedy deleted. Gunnex (talk) 08:53, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same logo as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Union Internationale des Guides et Scouts d'Europe.svg --Egel (talk) 14:23, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work : anywhere on the web Pippobuono (talk) 08:58, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of focus, unidentifiable Mhohner (talk) 09:00, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work : anywhere on the web Pippobuono (talk) 09:00, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation > http://ladislaus-weiss-archiv-chronic.com/ Frze > talk 09:02, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An email containing details of the permission for this file has been sent in accordance with Commons:OTRS.--Frze > talk 09:23, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hely tuyu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing EXIF

Gunnex (talk) 09:05, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Composite of 3 disjunct elements already available independently (1-2-3); also not useful as a gallery due to its narrow scope (cp. with the contents of Category:Public transport tickets in Lisbon and its children categories). -- Tuválkin 09:07, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:38, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution, many better alternatives available in Category:Acetylene. Leyo 09:15, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:38, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution, many better alternatives in Category:Chemical structure of methane. Leyo 09:16, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:38, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Buggy SVG, orphaned/replaced by File:Calycanthoside.svg. Leyo 09:20, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:38, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The two items pictured have or had a copyright. Therefore, this image is a derivative work and infringes on the copyright. They may or may not be in the public domain. Unless it is proven that they are PD, this image cannot be kept on Commons. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:21, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Hi!, This image was first taken by me in Award Ceremony called Tlatoani National Award back in Mexico in August 2014. I put it on Facebook that year, but sold that old laptop were I have the original file. Now, I downloaded it, and I am willing to put it as the representative image of the award that has been delivered to mexican and latin american winners through the years. I don't see how I infringe on any copyright. Thanks in advance.

--ConMex01 (talk) 17:05, 24 June 2016 (UTC)ConMex01[reply]

Unless the award statue is old enough to be PD, as noted above, your image infringes on its copyright. The only way to keep the image on Commons is either (a) prove that the statue is PD because the creator of the statue died before 1952 or (b) have the creator send a free license to OTRS. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:36, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:38, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, no educational purpose Pippobuono (talk) 09:21, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, unused, see COM:SCOPE. + missing license and source. Ks [在这里找到答案] 09:23, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

support to delete per nomination Kayser Ahmad (talk) 03:10, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Commons is not a repository of private photos. Ks [在这里找到答案] 09:25, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Although these files have OTRS tags, there is a key mistake here. The OTRS permission applies to photos by Luke Ford, whereas the file names of these photos seem to suggest that Rob Spallone is the photographer. Has he granted permission or licensed these photos?

FredWalsh (talk) 09:35, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The "On Set With Rob Spallone" is the name of the article that accompanies the photos. It could easily have been named "XX on 041103" (the date of the article). Tabercil (talk) 22:07, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The operative words being "on set with" the director (Rob Spallone) of their film. What evidence is there that Luke Ford took these photos on the actual set? It is just as likely that these were taken by the camera operator under the direction of Rob Spallone or by Rob himself. FredWalsh (talk) 19:42, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That's just paranoia. When he posted an image which came from another source he generally made mention of it - there is no such statement in this case. Tabercil (talk) 20:32, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
No it isn't paranoia. I started the DR because it isn't absolutely clear that Luke took these photos. The onus is on you to prove that the files should be kept rather than you using words like "paranoia" to make me look stupid. I know you're unhappy because I've managed to get so many porn-related pictures deleted but that is only because of the weak arguments for keeping them. Attack the argument, not the person (surely I don't have to point this out to you). FredWalsh (talk) 21:56, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
One quick email to Luke Ford and this is his reply in full: "I took all the photos while I was I was on set with Rob Spallone, the producer." Forwarded to OTRS to be stuffed into the ticket covering the Luke Ford permissions. Tabercil (talk) 22:39, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Tabercil above. --INeverCry 00:43, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo from mynewsdesk.com. License review failed, "(C) All Rights Reserved". Thuresson (talk) 09:40, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:43, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyfraud, the author is not creator of the portrait, he only copied it from the web 92.73.30.247 09:56, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:43, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Own work" movie from 1959? Highly improbable 92.73.30.247 09:59, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:43, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like movie still. Not "own work". 92.73.30.247 10:00, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:43, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyfraud. Not "own work" 92.73.30.247 10:03, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:44, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Invalid license. No proof that author deceased more than 70 years ago. 92.73.30.247 10:05, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:44, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyfraud Not "own work" 92.73.30.247 10:11, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:44, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Harvicii (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF (3 digicams) and considering (uploaded in a row on 24.06.2016):

like also



Gunnex (talk) 10:12, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:44, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

French poster with German title. No proof that is ever has been released in the U.S., so no public domain. 92.73.30.247 10:13, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:45, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dobrý den, fotku jsem nahrála omylem, jednalo se o zkoušku, prosím o smazání, děkuji! Aneta Crsová (talk) 10:29, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:45, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Friends and family members of the photographer. No descriptions - out of scope

2003:45:5C6F:A801:50A4:A685:4B9:AC63 10:40, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's not my family or friends, File:Manuel (2946921605).jpg, File:Lagartijita (4558725353).jpg and File:La princesa quería un heladito Santa Clara (3729134079).jpg could be keep --The Photographer (talk) 12:04, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: 3 kept per The Photographer, the rest deleted per nom. --INeverCry 00:49, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope.

Rodrigolopes (talk) 22:07, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep File:Gompa de Thailandia- Lumbini, Nepal (8513917674).jpg Rodrigolopes (talk) 18:55, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination -1 kept. --INeverCry 00:54, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FBMD (facebook) in EXIF, no evidence that the uploader is the photographer or copyright holder; per COM:PCP DCB (talk) 10:58, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:54, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private snap of non-notable individual; outside project scope DCB (talk) 11:06, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:54, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 11:09, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:55, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 11:09, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:55, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fix of malformed DR. --Achim (talk) 19:08, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

useless nonsens, not necessary >>> https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Wellano18143&diff=199680737&oldid=142255723 Frze (talk) 24 June 2016


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:55, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong rationale for public domain - the image is from the subject's Facebook page, no evidence that the author gave up all rights. — Yerpo Eh? 11:41, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:55, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Willycof (talk · contribs)

[edit]

I suspect all of these files are from Instituto Tecnológico Superior de Zapopan, which doesn't have any free licenses on its website. It is the source given in File:Itsz1.jpg but is probably the source for all of them.

FredWalsh (talk) 11:42, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:55, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aadishakti Dham (talk · contribs)

[edit]

advertising

Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:43, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:56, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aadishakti Dham (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Advertising/promotional, out of scope.

Achim (talk) 18:25, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:27, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 11:47, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:57, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 11:47, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:57, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self nomination of low quality camera phone image. Replaced by File:1992 Mazda 626 (GV Series 2) 2.2i station wagon (2016-01-04) 02.jpg. OSX (talkcontributions) 11:48, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:57, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 11:49, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:57, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 11:49, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:57, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 11:50, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:57, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 11:51, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:57, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gagan narang (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own works. Small / middle size. Almost without EXIF but with "FBMD" in the metadata (obviously coming from Facebook therefore already published somewhere), 2 or 3 have EXIFS however from different cameras

Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:53, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:57, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo is claimed as own work by the original uploader who uploaded it in June 2007. However, I have found a larger copy at Flash Film Works website, which appears to have been there since at least July 2005. See the file names jana4.jpg in the list on that page. FredWalsh (talk) 11:53, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's my photo... I posted it at both locations. Spanneraol (talk) 22:21, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Explanation provided by the original author seems straight-ahead. Tabercil (talk) 22:30, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oh yeah that will do fine. It's ok because the uploader says so? Are you kidding us right now? We need proof that User:Spanneraol is actually the person who posted the image to the website. If you can send an email to OTRS from that website that would be sufficient. FredWalsh (talk) 00:17, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note that all of the shots on the page have pretty much the same time stamp, and that it can be readily manipulated to be whatever it wants to be. How do we know that the website didn't come into existence after June 2007?? I.e., they took the shots from here? Tabercil (talk) 02:33, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
P.S. the uploader is someone who has been active on EN for only the last 10 years... Tabercil (talk) 02:35, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Tabercil: the files are dated as 2005, and I see no reason to doubt that is when they were uploaded there. How long a user has been on Wikiepdia should have no bearing on this because 10 years of editing doesn't mean they cannot make mistakes. FredWalsh (talk) 19:31, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The photos were taken on the set of the film Brain Blockers that i worked on in 2003... though the movie was not released until 2007. I used the FFW ftp site to store the photos and allow people that worked on the film to access them. They were never posted on that website... Flash has nothing to do with them and i actually forgot i had put them there... I should probably delete them from their server and will do so soon. Spanneraol (talk) 05:07, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Spanneraol: The operative words here are "worked on". Are you the producer of the film or do you own the rights to it? If so, then I think you should send an email to OTRS. If on the other hand you didn't produce the film, I find it highly unlikely that you would be allowed to take these shots on set and then be allowed to publish them without permission from the producer. Either way, Commons needs proof of copyright ownership. As for the website, the files are clearly marked as being from 2005, and I don't see any reasons to doubt their dates. The fact the photos were put on a publicly accessible website means they were published at that point, FTP or not. FredWalsh (talk) 19:31, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
FredWalsh, I think you're being overly dramatic there. It seems quite unlikely that a random employee's personal photos could be covered under any sort of contractual copyright. Spanneraol isn't claiming to be the producer, and these do not appear to be screencaptures.  Keep -mattbuck (Talk) 20:10, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Mattbuck Read what they wrote again - the photos were stored so that people working on the film could access them. These were not some holiday snaps or photos of people after work. If Spanneraol was working on set, then those photos were taken under instruction from their boss. The employee doesn't hold the copyright for such works. FredWalsh (talk) 20:21, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I do not care to disclose my exact connection to the production, but I assure you that I have all necessary rights to the images. Spanneraol (talk) 21:37, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry Spanneraol but we cannot operate in this way. I don't want you to publicly reveal this if you are not comfortable with doing so. The route you need to take is to write an email in confidence to OTRS, preferably from the Flash Film website, to clear up who owns the rights and whether the license is correct. Please bear in mind that if you took these pictures on the course of your employment, then you don't have any rights to them. It belongs to the producer and that is the only person/company that can license them. FredWalsh (talk) 21:50, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Flash Film Works has no connection to the film or the images other than that I posted them on their ftp site... they probably dont even realize they are there and I intend to remove them on monday when i can get access to the site. I have all necessary rights to the photos that I took and since they are my photos, i can do what i want with them... Some random dude on the internet who apparently has plenty of extra time to spend trolling websites looking for hidden photos doesnt get to decide that. There are also two keep votes and no delete votes at the moment. Spanneraol (talk) 21:57, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Mattbuck, uploader statement, AGF, etc. --INeverCry 01:00, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self nomination of low quality file replaced by the equivalent and higher quality File:1987 Ford Laser (KE) GL 5-door hatchback (2016-01-04) 01.jpg (and other files within Category:Ford Laser (KE)). The deletion of this image would be in accordance with COM:Redundant. OSX (talkcontributions) 11:56, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:00, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dharmendra bansal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal low-quality photos of subjects with no apparent notability. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope.

LX (talk, contribs) 11:59, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:00, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dharmendra bansal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Yet another unused vanity upload. Made after the user was informed about Commons' project scope.

LX (talk, contribs) 05:52, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Dharmendra bansal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Same reason again. This is getting tedious.

LX (talk, contribs) 05:52, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:14, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo is claimed as own work by the original uploader who uploaded it in July 2007. However, I have found a larger copy at Flash Film Works website, which appears to have been there since at least July 2005. See the file named edwin.jpg in the list on that page. FredWalsh (talk) 12:06, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The DR Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Jana_Thompson.jpg is covering the same ground - images uploaded by Spanneraol. Tabercil (talk) 20:36, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Tabercil. --INeverCry 01:00, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

apparently unfinished svg diagram; subject unrecognizible; no description Jochen Burghardt (talk) 12:18, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:01, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

redirect not necessary Frze > talk 12:17, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:01, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused file Darklanlan (talk) 12:35, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused logo of an organization, might be for advertisement. Darklanlan (talk) 12:44, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:01, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self nomination of low quality camera phone image. Replaced by File:1994 Nissan NX (B13) R coupe (2016-01-04) 02.jpg. OSX (talkcontributions) 13:09, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:01, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bo obok loga jest napis TM. 213.238.121.248 13:17, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: properly taged text logo in use. --INeverCry 01:02, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bo obok loga jest niepotrzebny, drukowany napis TM. 78.10.135.248 12:10, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: As before. A "TM" in the logo is no reason for deletion. --Rosenzweig τ 12:14, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong file, wrong name -- upload form misfired Primaler (talk) 13:42, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:02, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong file, wrong name -- upload form misfired Primaler (talk) 13:42, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:02, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong file, wrong name -- upload form misfired Primaler (talk) 13:42, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:02, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong file, wrong name -- upload form misfired Primaler (talk) 13:42, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:02, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-promotion + not educationally useful Euku: 13:46, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:02, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self nomination of low quality camera phone image with distortion/proportion issues. Replaced by same car File:1996 Ford Falcon (EF II) GLi sedan (2016-01-04) 02.jpg. OSX (talkcontributions) 13:56, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:02, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 易行者马福平 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:03, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DVj Master Krazy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album and file storage. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:03, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:03, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by WikiArchive1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Advertisement. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:03, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Commons:Derivative works from non-free software screenshots. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:03, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bulun Osman (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:03, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 99RRR (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:03, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Klopfer (kleiner) (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Advertisement. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:03, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MikeAceMiller (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG and wiki-text if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:03, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Peterwakaba (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:03, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JanBleha (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:03, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nehad S Maaty (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons:Derivative works from music.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I'd like to ask why these files are nominated to be deleted as I recorded them for Wikipedia using its free articles and using the free audio track of free Audio library of youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9eJLop9CkqI

Thanks

Standard Youtube License is not compatible with Commons:Licensing. You need to remove music to keep spoken articles. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:58, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ahhaa, Ok , I got it, I apologize for that and I'm going to remove the sound track and add them without music, Thanks for explaining :)


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:04, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative works from music and modern art. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:04, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:04, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:04, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:04, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This blurry image seems to serve no educational purpose. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:34, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:05, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

By size and quality this image is highly unlikely to be own work of the uploader who previously uploaded a series of wallpaper images as "own work". Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:35, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:05, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.cricket.com.au/~/media/Players/Men/International/New%20Zealand/Colin%20Munro.ashx. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:05, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:05, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:05, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused doodle art by non-notable artist. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:40, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:05, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:05, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no indication of user's work on this image, it might be art, or a really badly scanned image, but doesn't appear educational. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:40, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:05, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image contains artworks and posters which do not have permission to be on Commons. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:41, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:05, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:05, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:05, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE Lakokat (talk) 14:44, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:05, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE Lakokat (talk) 14:44, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:05, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional image, see overprinting & description. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:48, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:05, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Currency#Euro Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
) 14:58, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:05, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Here Paul Citroen is photographed along with work by his hand. These works are still copyright protected. This image needs to be drastically cropped or deleted. Vera (talk) 15:02, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:05, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of permission on site given as source. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:05, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:06, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is personal information. I am Saúl Alonso Monsalve. I uploaded the file when I was young and I want to delete it (the image information is not true). I am going to be a teacher next year and I do not want my students to find this file. Thank you so much. 62.83.47.143 15:12, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no COM:EDUSE. --INeverCry 01:06, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tiny subject, unidentifiable Mhohner (talk) 15:34, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:06, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

à la demande de son auteur / fichier non utilisé Lepsyleon (talk) 15:41, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:07, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

j'ai pas fais éxpré de publier Loox75 (talk) 15:50, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:07, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshots from game posted as "own work", no evidence of permission

Ariadacapo (talk) 15:50, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:07, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Terrible photo (my own). This one is better, and sufficient: File:Nick Kahl (cropped).jpg Pete F (talk) 16:07, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:07, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File is a screenshot taken from a video. Terrible quality and copyright violation. Zackmann08 (talk) 16:25, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

About the low quality, I can't deny that. It isn't the best. Yet, about the video, I TOOK THE VIDEO. It does not violate copyright in any way. Evancahill (talk) 17:44, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted. --INeverCry 01:07, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

selfie, out of scope Pippobuono (talk) 16:51, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:07, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality penis photo Peter19970227 (talk) 17:26, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Peter19970227's own picture of an erected penis had been deleted with this argument by another user (cf. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Erektion.JPG). Therefore, this nomination for deletion is only a tit-for-tat response. --GeoTrinity (talk) 19:27, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Aside from the quality claim, these are in Category:Puberty and may very well be of a nude underaged individual. --INeverCry 01:12, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality penis photo Peter19970227 (talk) 17:27, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Peter19970227's own picture of an erected penis had been deleted with this argument by another user (cf. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Erektion.JPG). Therefore, this nomination for deletion is only a tit-for-tat response. --GeoTrinity (talk) 19:28, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Aside from the quality claim, these are in Category:Puberty and may very well be of a nude underaged individual. --INeverCry 01:12, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality penis photo Peter19970227 (talk) 17:28, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Peter19970227's own picture of an erected penis had been deleted with this argument by another user (cf. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Erektion.JPG). Therefore, this nomination for deletion is only a tit-for-tat response. --GeoTrinity (talk) 19:29, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Aside from the quality claim, these are in Category:Puberty and may very well be of a nude underaged individual. --INeverCry 01:13, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality penis photo Peter19970227 (talk) 17:28, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Peter19970227's own picture of an erected penis had been deleted with this argument by another user (cf. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Erektion.JPG). Therefore, this nomination for deletion is only a tit-for-tat response. --GeoTrinity (talk) 19:30, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Aside from the quality claim, these are in Category:Puberty and may very well be of a nude underaged individual. --INeverCry 01:13, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality penis photo Peter19970227 (talk) 17:28, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Peter19970227's own picture of an erected penis had been deleted with this argument by another user (cf. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Erektion.JPG). Therefore, this nomination for deletion is only a tit-for-tat response. --GeoTrinity (talk) 19:30, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Aside from the quality claim, these are in Category:Puberty and may very well be of a nude underaged individual. --INeverCry 01:13, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality penis photo Peter19970227 (talk) 17:29, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Peter19970227's own picture of an erected penis had been deleted with this argument by another user (cf. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Erektion.JPG). Therefore, this nomination for deletion is only a tit-for-tat response. --GeoTrinity (talk) 19:30, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Aside from the quality claim, these are in Category:Puberty and may very well be of a nude underaged individual. --INeverCry 01:13, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality penis photo Peter19970227 (talk) 17:30, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Aside from the quality claim, this is used in an article on puberty and may very well be of a nude underaged individual. --INeverCry 01:16, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Abel Pineau is dead in 1973. No FoP in France. 90.2.94.201 17:34, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:16, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Abel Pineau is dead in 1973. Copyright violation. 90.2.94.201 17:36, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:16, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality penis photo Peter19970227 (talk) 17:42, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:17, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Xavierd80 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Jean-Pierre Vielfaure is dead in 2015. Copyright violation.

90.2.94.201 17:41, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Xavierd80 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Georges Feher is dead in 2015. Copyright violation.

90.2.94.201 17:47, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Xavierd80 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Claude Lagoutte is dead in 1990. Copyright violation.

90.2.94.201 17:52, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Xavierd80 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Georges Autard is born in 1951. Copyright violation.

90.2.94.201 17:56, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Xavierd80 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Michel Moskovtchenko is born in 1935. Copyright violation.

90.2.94.201 18:05, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Xavierd80 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Gabriel Zendel is dead in 1992. Copyright violation.

90.2.94.201 18:10, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Xavierd80 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

José San Martin is born in 1951. Copyright violation.

90.2.94.201 18:20, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:17, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Xavierd80 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Photographs of artwork by living artists presented as own work. In some cases, recreation of previously deleted files. The uploader has already been explained the license applies to the object of the photograph and he should go through OTRS.

— Racconish ☎ 12:17, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Beware, some of these file are actually covered by an OTRS. kvardek du (la plej bela nombro) 18:05, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks kvardek du, I corrected above. — Racconish ☎ 07:01, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: and deleted per discussion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:59, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Some files restored as per ticket:2017031110004447 and [2]. Yann (talk) 07:48, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Orfenok (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlikely to be own works, no big sizes, no relevant EXIF or none, one can be found previously published on the web [3]

Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:45, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:19, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be the work of the uploader. Image widely available on social media: https://www.google.com/search?q=simon+kjaer&tbm=isch&tbs=simg:CAQSlgEJAsKdR-DbadkaigELEKjU2AQaBAgBCEIMCxCwjKcIGmEKXwgDEieRBZQQlRD8GpAF5B96phDjBOcfliWXJYEv9C6fJdc69S7HLr4uui4aMNp0ZLvMld_1qBxTIPHxI-V8PsfYcGu3p9hKVUXZ5oI4b54IdfNB-RvIShwCcGm8eWCADDAsQjq7-CBoKCggIARIEyOhT3gw&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiTmZDynMHNAhUE2R4KHSw3AKAQ2A4IHCgB&biw=1920&bih=940 Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
) 17:52, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:19, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 田中 正豊 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Photographs taken with an iPhone of previously published material. No indication that the uploader took the original black and white printed photos.

Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
) 17:54, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:20, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Advertising/promotion. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
) 17:57, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:20, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality penis photo Peter19970227 (talk) 18:01, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:20, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality penis photo Peter19970227 (talk) 18:01, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:20, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality penis photo Peter19970227 (talk) 18:02, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:20, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality penis photo Peter19970227 (talk) 18:03, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:20, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality penis photo Peter19970227 (talk) 18:04, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:20, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality penis photo Peter19970227 (talk) 18:05, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:20, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality penis photo Peter19970227 (talk) 18:06, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:20, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Abel Pineau is dead in 1973. Copyright violation. 90.2.94.201 18:06, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:20, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality penis photo Peter19970227 (talk) 18:07, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:21, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be the work of the uploader. EXIF indicated copyright holder is "V.DI CILLO". Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
) 18:07, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:21, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality penis photo Peter19970227 (talk) 18:08, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:21, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality penis photo Peter19970227 (talk) 18:09, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:21, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality penis photo Peter19970227 (talk) 18:10, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:21, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality penis photo Peter19970227 (talk) 18:10, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi folks. I know it is a low quality photo, especially if magnified, however I believe that it is a good example of the condition and has value per se. I believe it is worth keeping for the sake of study and comparison and would appreciate you doing so. Thank you.


Deleted: Plenty of photos of this in Category:Hypospadias, and this one is really low quality. --INeverCry 01:22, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality penis photo Peter19970227 (talk) 18:10, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:23, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality penis photo Peter19970227 (talk) 18:11, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:23, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality penis photo Peter19970227 (talk) 18:14, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:23, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Jean Labellie is born in 1920. Copyright violation. 90.2.94.201 18:15, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:23, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Jean Labellie is born in 1920. Copyright violation. 90.2.94.201 18:16, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:23, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality penis photo Peter19970227 (talk) 18:19, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:23, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Doume grave (talk · contribs)

[edit]

José San Martin is born in 1951. Copyright violation.

90.2.94.201 18:28, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:23, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The cover of a recent published book is usually not in public domain or can be claimed CC BY-SA unless the author AND publisher agree to claim this, or this book is in public domain according to the law. Poem (talk) 19:02, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:24, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The contents of a recent published book is usually not in public domain or can be claimed CC BY-SA unless the author AND publisher agree to claim this, or this book is in public domain according to the law. Poem (talk) 19:04, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:24, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The contents of a recent published book is usually not in public domain or can be claimed CC BY-SA unless the author AND publisher agree to claim this, or this book is in public domain according to the law. Poem (talk) 19:05, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:24, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The contents of a recent published book is usually not in public domain or can be claimed CC BY-SA unless the author AND publisher agree to claim this, or this book is in public domain according to the law. Poem (talk) 19:06, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:24, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The contents of a recent published book is usually not in public domain or can be claimed CC BY-SA unless the author AND publisher agree to claim this, or this book is in public domain according to the law. Poem (talk) 19:06, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:24, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The contents of a recent published book is usually not in public domain or can be claimed CC BY-SA unless the author AND publisher agree to claim this, or this book is in public domain according to the law. Poem (talk) 19:07, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:24, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The contents of a recent published book is usually not in public domain or can be claimed CC BY-SA unless the author AND publisher agree to claim this, or this book is in public domain according to the law. Poem (talk) 19:07, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:24, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The contents of a recent published book is usually not in public domain or can be claimed CC BY-SA unless the author AND publisher agree to claim this, or this book is in public domain according to the law. Poem (talk) 19:07, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:24, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The contents of a recent published book is usually not in public domain or can be claimed CC BY-SA unless the author AND publisher agree to claim this, or this book is in public domain according to the law. Poem (talk) 19:08, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:24, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The contents of a recent published book is usually not in public domain or can be claimed CC BY-SA unless the author AND publisher agree to claim this, or this book is in public domain according to the law. Poem (talk) 19:08, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:24, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The contents of a recent published book is usually not in public domain or can be claimed CC BY-SA unless the author AND publisher agree to claim this, or this book is in public domain according to the law. Poem (talk) 19:08, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:24, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright in Russia and worldwide, no FOP in Russia, secondary rights etc. Zac Allan (talk) 19:23, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:24, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am the owner of this file and I want It to be deleted. Лука Батумец (talk) 19:37, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:24, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hanengerda (talk · contribs)

[edit]

User claims own work, which is only partially true. These are derived works as the paintings were made by Rudi Polder who therefore needs to grant permission as well.

Mbch331 (talk) 19:39, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:25, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Lukas Zhang(张淼)

[edit]

The contents of a recent published book is usually not in public domain or can be claimed CC BY-SA unless the author AND publisher agree to claim this, or this book is in public domain according to the law. --Poem (talk) 19:20, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:25, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obsolete to File:Portrait of Dom Pedro, Duke of Bragança - Google Art Project.jpg which is the same image with different saturation and a much higher resolution. The licensing for this is also poorly documented (sourced to Blogspot). BU Rob13 (talk) 19:49, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:26, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

redirect not necessary Frze > talk 20:02, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:26, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by KingshillScott (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All these own work claims are dubious given the inconsistent EXIF data, different nature and appearance of the files, for example: the Snowspeed file is definitively taken from http://www.snowspeed.tv/#!gallery/qdtez and there is no license there, the Six nations cup from http://www.thomaslyte.com/new-six-nations-trophy, the John Madslien image is a screenshot from http://www.bbc.com/news/business-10635444, the Thomas Lyte craftsman image appears to come from here http://www.weibo.com/3928413051/Dqb7ka8Zi?type=comment#_rnd1466798450056. The Kevin Baker image also appears on Google on other websites still.

Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 20:09, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:26, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Some part of kashmir is shown in Pakisthan, Kashmir belongs to India 2401:FA00:C:14:D5C6:CA91:BFB2:D415 20:17, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please speedy close as invalid/Troll nomination. --Denniss (talk) 21:37, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, boring. NNW 07:37, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 01:26, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused poor quality personal(?) photo, sole upload Pibwl (talk) 20:35, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:26, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, sole upload, unused Pibwl (talk) 20:35, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:27, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doesn't seem to be in scope Pibwl (talk) 20:37, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:27, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, unknown person, sole upload Pibwl (talk) 20:38, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:27, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, photo of a logo, unused Pibwl (talk) 20:38, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:27, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as imho potentially non-free content: rather professional-like format and missing EXIF data to verify origin, Roland zh (talk) 21:12, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:27, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as imho potentially non-free content: thumbnail format and missing EXIF data to verify origin, Roland zh (talk) 21:13, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:27, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused outside of user pages. Serves no educational purpose, given that this is a fairly crude depiction of a fictional race track. BU Rob13 (talk) 21:15, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:27, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is attributed wrongly to depict Cimburgis of Masovia. It actually depicts Kunigunde of Austria, see http://www.museothyssen.org/en/thyssen/ficha_obra/478. There is another, better version of this picture with the right attribution already here on commons (see File:Unknown painter - Portrait of Kunigunde of Austria - WGA23512.jpg. Therefore, I deem this file superfluous. I have already eliminated all wrongly attributed usages of this image in the Wikipedia article name spaces. Andropov (talk) 21:23, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:27, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo from mynewsdesk.com. License review failed. The source show a different photo of the same person. Thuresson (talk) 21:24, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:27, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing legal info Fixertool (talk) 21:29, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:28, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing legal info Fixertool (talk) 21:29, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:28, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyviol: gmas screenshot Ciaurlec (talk) 21:38, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:28, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative copyvio of Luigi character Ubcule (talk) 22:05, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:28, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is this really a "Wikiquote diagram" as categorisation suggests? Looks out of scope to me. Ubcule (talk) 22:06, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:28, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation. - Seyit talk 22:21, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:28, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation - Seyit talk 22:22, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:28, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

porque puede ser comercializado sin permiso del autor Calderon Sebastian 1406 (talk) 22:42, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:28, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

lo subi por error Calderon Sebastian 1406 (talk) 22:45, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:28, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very low quality graphics. Incorrect colors (blason asks for gold on blue) and very crudely drawn with partly unrecognizeable elements. Not used in any project. We have correct versions of the same COA in good graphics quality both as PNG and SVG files, so it's not really worth the effort of fixing this one. I don't see how such a low quality and incorrect file could serve any useful educational purpose. In short: Out of project scope. --Latebird (talk) 11:45, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:28, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical document. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 24 June 2016 (UTC) This document has been copied (scanned and transformed into the present pdf-file) by myself from an original lended from Marburg University Library. The document is from the year 1931 and is open to be copied. I don't believe that there would be severe objections because it was originally meant as publicity for this association (DHH).--Glypho45 (talk) 16:41, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:27, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio - photo of a modern painting - not sure that uploader is the painter and photographer - more authorship info is needed INeverCry 19:43, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:24, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:27, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:24, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:30, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:24, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no COM:EDUSE INeverCry 23:32, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:24, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:33, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:24, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:ADVERT INeverCry 23:34, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:24, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:35, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:24, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MR.CAT AND DOG ROCKER (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 23:50, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:24, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:50, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:23, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:52, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:23, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:53, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:23, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by LORD MILAN VJP (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 23:54, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:23, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no COM:EDUSE INeverCry 23:55, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:23, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No quiero publicarlo Luis Fernando Henao Henao (talk) 17:01, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request, unused. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:26, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No quiero publicar este dibujo Luis Fernando Henao Henao (talk) 17:02, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request, unused. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:26, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

cette photo m'appartient , mon nom est meme indiqué sur cette photo !!! 90.49.18.14 18:19, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:OTRS permission needed. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 19:32, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not work of an employee of federal government. Artist is still alive Roseohioresident (talk) 21:04, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

But i think it's important to recognize that it is owned by the government now.

Deleted: Ownership says nothing about the rights. Per COM:PRP, it's probably something that should get on enwiki under the No free content policy. --PierreSelim (talk) 11:31, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I really doubt that "PD-textlogo" applies here, this is a very artful individual and unique typeface. SI 08:41, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 23:09, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm not sure whether the photo of an exhibit in NL can be licensed freely, or is it a derivative work and therefore stays protected. Masur (talk) 14:56, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, an exhibit is not permanently located in public place. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:12, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I invoke my moral rights to delete my work Alaricxyz (talk) 03:14, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no such rights exist - in use. --Jcb (talk) 17:55, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no me gusta Elizabeth Tanqueño (talk) 06:10, 24 June 2016 (UTC) Una Mujer Trabajadora,hermosa,amable,alegra,bondadosa y muy feliz.Ella es una persona muy completa y autentica.Nunca necesita que alguien le diga cuanto vale,conoce perfectamente lo que tiene y lo que puede hacer.Tiene mas amigos que enemigos pues su único defecto es ayudar Su Frase De Vida ´´El Éxito en la vida no se mide por lo que has logrado, sino por los obstáculos que has superado[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:56, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fälschlicherweise geöffnet 217.92.64.98 09:51, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 17:56, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File is a screenshot taken from a video. Terrible quality and copyright violation. Zackmann08 (talk) 16:28, 24 June 2016 (U

The video was mine. It doesn't violate copyright in any way. Evancahill (talk) 17:51, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 17:58, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]