Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/06/09
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.gif){kind=link}
![159 File:כריכת הספר "פואטיקת השש בש".jpg](#File:כריכת_הספר_"פואטיקת_השש_בש".jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Previously deleted for lack of FOP in Denmark Elisfkc (talk) 05:07, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept, Non-admin close/Withdrawing request: Opened deletion request because I thought image was reuploaded after deletion. See now that it was undeleted.
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
can i expect a proper reason for nominating my images in name of Allepey for deletion they are my own work Divyacskn1289 (talk) 07:39, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Template added by mistake by author, no reason for deletion given or apparent. --87.123.63.223 09:56, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept: No reason for deletion provided. --Stefan2 (talk) 14:47, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Created by a banned user Jive Turkey Jones (talk) 16:45, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Natuur12 (talk) 16:51, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
File uploaded by banned editor Nikkithenose (talk) 21:00, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Natuur12 (talk) 21:05, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-3){kind=link}
Uploaded by banned user Lagermeister2016 (talk) 16:14, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 16:22, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Uploaded by a banned user Jive Turkey Jones (talk) 16:48, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Natuur12 (talk) 16:52, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
File uploaded by banned editor Nikkithenose (talk) 21:04, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Natuur12 (talk) 21:04, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-3){kind=link}
Uploaded by banned user Lagermeister2016 (talk) 16:14, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 16:23, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Create by a banned user Jive Turkey Jones (talk) 16:46, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Speedy keep: Pre-block upload, and the blocked user is not the original uploader of the uncropped version. --Amitie 10g (talk) 23:10, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Speedy kept: Invalid DR from user already blocked. --Amitie 10g (talk) 23:13, 2 May 2016 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
File uploaded by banned editor Nikkithenose (talk) 21:03, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Natuur12 (talk) 21:04, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-3){kind=link}
Uploaded by banned user Lagermeister2016 (talk) 16:16, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 16:25, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Uploaded by a banned user Jive Turkey Jones (talk) 16:49, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Natuur12 (talk) 16:52, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Uploaded by banned user Lagermeister2016 (talk) 16:16, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept: not a valid reason for deletion. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 16:20, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal photos, out of scope
Gbawden (talk) 13:23, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 22:34, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - promotional images
INeverCry 23:19, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, also copyvio: [1][2]. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 00:24, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
copyrighted postcard Helmy oved 02:40, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Requesting flickr user's addition to bad authors and speedy deletion of image. Elisfkc (talk) 02:45, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, uploader also agrees to speedily delete. Taivo (talk) 10:16, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
probable copyvio Pippobuono (talk) 21:29, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, probably copyvio as his all other uploads. © in bottom left corner. Taivo (talk) 09:18, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Aparent copyvio there is a watermark on the left bottom with a copyright notice from Fernando Rai Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 17:47, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Taivo: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing: small unused personal photo without metadata, uploader's only contribution
I took this photo and put it on this site without asking for permission from my boss. They found it and now i could get really in trouble, if i dont take it down. Could you please take it from this site? Thank you very much and have a good one:) Independent1985 (talk) 20:02, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Photo seems to be taken from private car park without permission of the owner. New photo from public place would be better and it wouldn't matter whether the boss likes it or not. --Dehio (talk) 08:54, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 18:33, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Copyright infringement, http://weekend.gazeta.pl/weekend/1,152121,17915170,Robert_Rient__byly_swiadek_Jehowy__Wolalem_umrzec.html 37.47.73.235 21:00, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- Permission has been received in OTRS but it has not been confirmed yet. Ankry (talk) 09:17, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
- Permission in OTRS is OK. Ankry (talk) 09:26, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ankry (talk) 09:26, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
album cover. likely a copyviolation Themightyquill (talk) 11:07, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Originally uploaded as fair use, which is not allowed on Commons. The file could be uploaded locally to a Wikipedia that allows fair use. Green Giant (talk) 13:56, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Momocalbee (talk · contribs)
[edit]The source does not state any cc-by-4.0 license.
- File:Yen Shi Shan.jpg
- File:He Ying Yen.jpg
- File:Weng WenHaoB.jpg
- File:Sun Ke B.jpg
- File:Yu Hung-Chun B.jpg
- File:Chen Cheng B.jpg
- File:Chiang Ching Kuo.jpg
- File:Jia Buo Chuan.jpg
- File:Lian Jian.jpg
- File:Shao Wan Jiang.jpg
- File:You Shi Jun.jpg
- File:Xie Chang Ting.jpg
- File:Su Jing Chang.jpg
- File:Chang Jin Hong.jpg
- File:Liu Shao Yuan.jpg
- File:Wu Dun Yee.jpg
- File:Chen Chong.jpg
- File:Jiang I Hwa.jpg
- File:Mao Zhi Guo.jpg
- File:Sui Xing Zhong 3.jpg
- File:Sun Yun Suan.jpg
- File:Yu Kwo Hwa.jpg
- File:Lee Hwan.jpg
- File:Tang Fei.jpg
QBear (talk) 16:02, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete, the copyright notice on the source website [3] explicitly states that photograph and image featured on the website is subject to copyright protection. --Wcam (talk) 14:34, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Momocalbee (talk · contribs)
[edit]Calligraphic work is copyright protected under ROC (Taiwan) copyright law: http://www.lawbank.com.tw/treatise/pl_article.aspx?AID=P000173094
Wcam (talk) 15:17, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:04, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
COMPLAINT BY CHARLES PRAST AS BACKGROUND IS COPYRIGHTED 84.14.151.100 18:21, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: Background is just de minimis. --Amitie 10g (talk) 21:51, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: agree with above--Desyman (talk) 15:45, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept: COM:De minimis. — regards, Revi 11:06, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
The person who uploaded this image has admitted to being the creator of the page Charles Prast on Wikipedia. That article has since been deleted as he is not notable and seems to be gaming Wikipedia for promotional purposes. He also indicates he is the copyright holder of these images in Wikimedia Commons however, he is the subject of the picture, making it difficult for him to be the copyright holder. This image and the others on Wikimedia Commons can also be seen in other online locations which means he likely used them without the permission of the photographer who took them. Navycrafted (talk) 03:07, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:26, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
not free use, user (me) inappropriately uploaded image as their own while making a page for the company the image belongs to
Deleted: uploaders request. --JuTa 22:22, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
out of scope Rodrigolopes (talk) 11:14, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb: Missing permission as of 7 June 2016 - Using VisualFileChange.
Files uploaded by Angad Ojha (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope. Commons is not a photo album
- File:13312801 1033065733439432 7077209264265dsf b.jpg
- File:Photo292fg ftm.jpg
- File:Gaurav 1806 (3).jpg
- File:Angad0204 001.jpg
- File:Angad0201 001.jpg
- File:Angad0199 002.jpg
- File:Angad0195 001.jpg
- File:Angad actor.fffggfffZindagi mai ache logo ki talash mat karo khud ache ban jao aapse milkar hi shayad kisi ki talash puri ho jaye.jpg
- File:Angad actor.jpg
- File:Angad0nya luk 001.jpg
- File:7677317732sajjal2543000.jpg
- File:7677317732sajjal2532000.jpg
- File:7677317732sajjal2528000.jpg
- File:20140225ang.jpg
- File:20140225angad.jpg
- File:7677317732sajjal2526.jpg
- File:340547 397842523628426 343101xf fdg.jpg
- File:01ANGAD.jpg
- File:20140225aaa.jpg
- File:ANGADOJHA.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Gbawden (talk) 07:25, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, one was used but there is no other contributions as those of creating the page. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:02, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tirth Raj Joshi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos, out of scope. previously used to vandalise a WP page
Gbawden (talk) 07:26, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:02, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - advertising Gbawden (talk) 07:33, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:03, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
File:Mercado de pulgas realizado pelo Coletivo Consciência Coletiva - em Novo Hamburgo, RS, Brasil.jpg
[edit]
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolution, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Mauricioott = 2x uploads on 29.03.2016 = 1x grabbed from Facebook. Gunnex (talk) 07:34, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Info Tagged with copyvio via https://www.facebook.com/coletivoconscienciacoletiva/photos/pb.471688702915136.-2207520000.1465457677./949715021779166/?type=3&theater (06.03.2016). Gunnex (talk) 07:37, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by Jcb. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:03, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Unused low resolution and unusual geometries. Have long had File:Haloperidol.svg as high quality (MOS and geometry) replacement. DMacks (talk) 07:34, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: ok. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:05, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Caleb Byrd (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos, out of scope
Gbawden (talk) 07:35, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:06, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status. Uploaded since 11.04.2016 (1x) and in a row on 09.05.2016 (5x) for en:National Coach Museum the files are attributed by several websites (like http://divisare.com/projects/318097-paulo-mendes-da-rocha-photography-joao-carmo-simoes-museu-nacional-dos-coches?utm_content=buffer52542&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=buffer or http://fotografia.folha.uol.com.br/galerias/43733-paulo-mendes-da-rocha#foto-607474) to copyrighted works by "João Carmo Simões " (http://www.joaocarmosimoes.com), needing COM:OTRS. See also File:JCS Museu Nacional dos Coches.jpg (11.04.2016) versus https://www.facebook.com/monadebooks/photos/a.1520717701561997.1073741828.1438882356412199/1536390713328029/?type=3&theater (03.2016). Considering also File:Monade 1 cover low.jpg by this uploader which was copyvioed from a copyrighted work by "Fernando Guerra". All files were published in print in 03.2016 in this book: http://monade.bigcartel.com/product/paulo-mendes-da-rocha-museu-nacional-dos-coches
- File:MNC JoãoCarmoSimões2.jpg
- File:MNC JoãoCarmoSimões3.jpg
- File:MNC JoãoCarmoSimões1.jpg
- File:JCS Museu Nacional dos Coches2.jpg
- File:JCS Museu Nacional dos Coches.jpg
- File:Museu Nacional dos Coches João Carmo Simões Monade.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 08:05, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, a permission must be sent via com:OTRS and, if valid, then the files will be restored. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:13, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. Uploaded in a row on 02.03.2016.
Gunnex (talk) 20:20, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:35, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
no COM:EDUSE INeverCry 20:27, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:35, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 20:28, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:35, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dineshanup (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 20:30, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:35, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 20:31, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:34, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal photo not useful for any educational purpose; out of scope Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 20:32, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:34, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Elamkulathamma (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Amma devi.jpg
- File:Amma durga.jpg
- File:Ammma durga.jpg
- File:Elamkulathamma.jpg
- File:Durgaaaama.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 20:33, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:34, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Most likely grabbed & screenshotted from a copyrighted video source. Gunnex (talk) 20:46, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:34, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
The image displayed on the screen is most likely non-free Wcam (talk) 21:02, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:33, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 21:46, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:33, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 21:47, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:33, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 21:48, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:33, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 21:50, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:33, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 21:52, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:32, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 21:52, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:32, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 21:53, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:32, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal/self-promo images
INeverCry 21:55, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:32, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 21:58, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:32, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
no COM:EDUSE INeverCry 22:28, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:31, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:36, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:31, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:38, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:31, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:39, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:31, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:44, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:31, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
This image was publisjed on Twitter before being uploaded here: [4]. Seams to be part of the photo session for this magazine. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:46, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:31, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hoodmurderz (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - promotional images
INeverCry 22:48, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:31, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:53, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:30, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
very low quality - no COM:EDUSE INeverCry 23:04, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:30, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:05, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:30, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:06, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:30, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
no COM:EDUSE INeverCry 23:07, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:30, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 23:09, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:30, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:10, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:30, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gustavo Buffalo (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
- File:No apartamento de seu padrasto em Nichteroy. .jpg
- File:Gustavo em seu orgão.jpg
- File:Gustavo no Berner Celestial.jpg
INeverCry 23:12, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:30, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ISAIVAGINONKEVINJAMESTOTOROWANATKINSONMALLON (talk · contribs)
[edit]low quality - no COM:EDUSE
INeverCry 23:13, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:29, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jules Hevin (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 23:14, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:29, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:17, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:29, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:21, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:29, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Иван налад4ик (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 23:23, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:29, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:30, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:28, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:32, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:28, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
no COM:EDUSE INeverCry 23:33, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:28, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:34, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:28, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:35, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:28, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:38, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:27, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:39, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:27, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Files of User:K.dzekan
[edit]- File:Musafir 1.jpg
- File:Musafir 8.jpg
- File:Musafir 7.jpg
- File:Musafir 6.jpg
- File:Musafir 5.jpg
- File:Musafir 4.jpg
- File:Musafir 3.jpg
- File:Musafir 2.jpg
Unusued personal photos and therefore out of the project scope. I tried to Google name of the people mentioned in the description but without any reasonable results. --Podzemnik (talk) 23:38, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- I support the rationale --Vojtěch Dostál (talk) 13:31, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:27, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:41, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:26, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:42, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Hi. I work with Many underground artist. From Yung Lean to Project Pat. We perform shows annually. This guy has worked with all of them. Ive met the guy first hand and hes a viral sensation. On vine type in Rinnegan. His song is the top post with almost 400,000 views. That post which is only a couple months old. Next He's all over twitter. "Type With my rinnegan". Everybody is tweeting asking who this guy is. He is a loved anime rapper that has gone viral. Anime Blogs are always talking about him.
Deleted: per nomination: unused personal image. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:26, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:43, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:26, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:44, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:25, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:47, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:25, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:47, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:25, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:50, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:25, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:23, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:56, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:51, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:25, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:51, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:25, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:53, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:25, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:54, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:25, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
no COM:EDUSE
INeverCry 23:57, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:25, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
duplicate image AnkushChouguleJain (talk) 15:39, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Duplicate Image AnkushChouguleJain (talk) 15:52, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, after looking at user gallery to figure out the duplicate. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:49, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Doubt about own work of diploma. Basvb (talk) 15:40, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
I am translator Laerte José da Silva and have upload one of my sworn translations as an illustration of a sworn translation is like in Brazil. The client's personal details have been obliterated for confidentiality reasons, which does not detract from its illustrative value.
Deleted: per nomination, translator doesn't own rights to underlying document which was translated. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:50, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Unused plain text file, and as such out of scope. If relevant plain text files should be integrated directly into the Wikimedia projects as text. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 15:41, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:49, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Unused plain text file, and as such out of scope. If relevant plain text files should be integrated directly into the Wikimedia projects as text. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 15:42, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:49, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Unused plain text file, and as such out of scope. If relevant plain text files should be integrated directly into the Wikimedia projects as text. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 15:42, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:49, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
derivative of book cover. Basvb (talk) 15:42, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:49, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
duplicate image AnkushChouguleJain (talk) 15:43, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
.gif){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, after looking at user gallery to figure out the duplicate. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:48, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
.gif){kind=link}
duplicate image AnkushChouguleJain (talk) 15:43, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, after looking at user gallery to figure out the duplicate. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:48, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Duplicate Image AnkushChouguleJain (talk) 15:46, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, after looking at user gallery to figure out the duplicate. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:49, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Duplicate Image AnkushChouguleJain (talk) 15:47, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, after looking at user gallery to figure out the duplicate. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:49, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
duplicate image AnkushChouguleJain (talk) 15:55, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, after looking at user gallery to figure out the duplicate. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:49, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
COM:DW, we need COM:OTRS permission from the artist. Thibaut120094 (talk) 16:10, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, after looking at user gallery to figure out the duplicate. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:49, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Duplicate Image AnkushChouguleJain (talk) 16:19, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, after looking at user gallery to figure out the duplicate. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:48, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Source page says " Copyright © 2016 National Science & Technology Medal Foundation, all rights reserved. The National Science & Technology Medals Foundation is a District of Columbia non-profit corporation and is not affiliated with the United States Government. " Andy Mabbett (talk) 18:10, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Support - As the uploader of this file, I agree that the "all rights reserved" notice on the source page would indicate this file is a copyright violation. this morning I received e-mail from NSTMF:
- From: laura@nationalmedals.org
- Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2016 7:38:05 AM
- Subject: Re: public domain photos
- My mistake! These images are ours and not part of the public domain. We will not be releasing the image.
- Sorry to send you inaccurate information the first go round.
- Best,
- Laura
- National Science & Technology Medals Foundation
- (202) 210-0529
- www.nationalmedals.org
Thus, it should be speedy deleted. I will again correspond with the NSTMF to ask them to have the photographer complete an appropriate permission to send directly to OTRS. I have requested speedy deletion of the file. I have initiated the OTRS process to affirm PD status. — Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 19:41, 9 June 2016 (UTC) — Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 16:13, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Housekeeping: 14 June 2016 Jcb (talk | contribs | block) deleted page File:G.L.Richmond-publicdomain2.jpg (CSD G7 (author or uploader request deletion)). --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:46, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Cloesteben (talk · contribs)
[edit]Images taken from the http://www.media5corp.com website. No evidence of permission. Site states ©2016 Media5 Corporation
- File:LP16.jpg
- File:C7-1 modifed.jpg
- File:4102 left R.jpg
- File:3000 box.png
- File:Sentinel front low.jpg
- File:Sentinel 200 front no shadow cropped.jpg
- File:Sentinel 200 front no shadow.jpg
- File:3000 front.png
Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 18:13, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:46, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Copyright of the fountain held by Harold Balazs. Allen4names (talk) 18:15, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:45, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be the work of the uploader: http://www.desktopwallpapers4.me/animals/eastern-tiger-swallowtail-30496/. No EXIF. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 18:18, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:45, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Border and partial image at bottom make this appear to be a scan or screenshot, and unliekly to be the work of the uploader Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 18:24, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:44, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Black bars at top and bottom make this appear to be a screenshot taken on a smartphone, and there the image is unlikely to be the work of the uploader. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 18:25, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:44, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Source page says "Copyright © 2016 National Science & Technology Medal Foundation, all rights reserved. The National Science & Technology Medals Foundation is a District of Columbia non-profit corporation and is not affiliated with the United States Government. " Andy Mabbett (talk) 18:27, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Support - As the uploader of this file, I agree that the "all rights reserved" notice on the source page would indicate this file is a copyright violation. this morning I received e-mail from NSTMF:
- From: laura@nationalmedals.org
- Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2016 7:38:05 AM
- Subject: Re: public domain photos
- My mistake! These images are ours and not part of the public domain. We will not be releasing the image.
- Sorry to send you inaccurate information the first go round.
- Best,
- Laura
- National Science & Technology Medals Foundation
- (202) 210-0529
- www.nationalmedals.org
Thus, it should be speedy deleted. I will again correspond with the NSTMF to ask them to have the photographer complete an appropriate permission to send directly to OTRS. I have requested speedy deletion of the file. I have initiated the OTRS process to affirm PD status. — Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 19:41, 9 June 2016 (UTC) — Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 16:09, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Housekeeping: 14 June 2016 Jcb (talk | contribs | block) deleted page File:G.L.Richmond-publicdomain1.jpg (CSD G7 (author or uploader request deletion)). --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:44, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Delete Taken from The Bachelorette show (source) without any reason to believe it is licensed under a license compatible with Commons. Hammersoft (talk) 18:31, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:43, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Picture of unknown origin or copyright status, obviously not a personal work, with a very dubious title Phso2 (talk) 18:56, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, portrait by Jean-Etienne Liotard, 18th century. I fixed the template. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:40, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Fails COM:EDUSE, meme used as vandalism on Wikipedia article for SpaceX Appable (talk) 19:05, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:36, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:51, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:05, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
low resolution and no exif data. Likely copyvio, or potentially being used as advertising Themightyquill (talk) 11:20, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:05, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Diagram with no clear purpose. Out of scope. Themightyquill (talk) 11:21, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:05, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Diagram with no clear purpose. Out of scope Themightyquill (talk) 11:22, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:05, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope Themightyquill (talk) 11:31, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:04, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing/inconsistent EXIF. Probadly grabbed from Facebook/social media. Gunnex (talk) 11:31, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- Info Tagged with
copyvio via https://www.instagram.com/p/2Yd6x-tGug/ (2015). Gunnex (talk) 11:37, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Housekeeping: 9 June 2016 Jcb (talk | contribs | block) deleted page File:Marcos Rotta.jpg (Copyright violation: copyvio via https://www.instagram.com/p/2Yd6x-tGug/ (2015)). --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:04, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope. Themightyquill (talk) 11:35, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:04, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Magazine cover. Not own work. Stefan2 (talk) 11:37, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:03, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Personal picture, not in use, out of scope. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 12:27, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:03, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alexandre Bischoff 83 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Claimed own work/2016, but the images have been widely published previously: [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11]. Delete all as copyvios.
- File:02-aston-martin-rapide-live-frankfurt.jpg
- File:Aston-martin-rapide-2.jpg
- File:Aston-martin-key-aston-martin-rapide-luxe-key-featured-with-aston-martin-rapide-luxe-key-rental-cars-jacksonville-fl-supreme-in-customchecklist-com.jpg
- File:ECU.jpg
- File:2016-Aston-Martin-Rapide-Used-Car.jpg
- File:2009-aston-martin-rapide-4.jpg
- File:Aston-martin-rapide.jpg
- File:Aston-Martin-Rapide-Concept-Desktop-Background-Images.jpg
- File:Aston-martin-rapide-interior-4.jpg
- File:Am2011rapide47348854 600.jpg
- File:Aston-martin-rapidE-electric-concept-designboom-05-818x545.jpg
- File:Aston-Martin-Rapide-Concept-widescreen-01-695x434.jpg
- File:Aston-martin-rapide-2015-interior-wallpaper-7.jpg
- File:Aston-martin-rapide-engine.jpg
MKFI (talk) 12:34, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:03, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 13:34, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:02, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.immediateentourage.com/wp-content/uploads/SingleLightswitch.png. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:01, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:01, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
(CC BY-NC 4.0) picture — Preceding unsigned comment added by Philmarin (talk • contribs) 2016-06-08T11:57:37 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:00, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
(CC BY-NC 4.0) picture — Preceding unsigned comment added by Philmarin (talk • contribs) 2016-06-08T11:59:18 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:00, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
(CC BY-NC 4.0) picture — Preceding unsigned comment added by Philmarin (talk • contribs) 2016-06-08T12:00:10 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:00, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
(CC BY-NC 4.0) picture — Preceding unsigned comment added by Philmarin (talk • contribs) 2016-06-08T12:01:06 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:00, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
(CC BY-NC 4.0) picture — Preceding unsigned comment added by Philmarin (talk • contribs) 2016-06-08T12:02:00 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:00, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
(CC BY-NC 4.0) picture — Preceding unsigned comment added by Philmarin (talk • contribs) 2016-06-08T12:02:46 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:00, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused advertisement of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:59, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
File:Licenciado don Gregorio César De Larrea, a los 46 años de edad, con el blasón de los Larrea Óleo sobre lino, por el célebre Maestro Angeloni Tapia.png
[edit]
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://artelista.s3.amazonaws.com/obras/thumbs/3/5/3/9156911869296253.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:59, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.minam.gob.pe/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/600-machu.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:58, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Non-free media see:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Olympic_Council_of_Asia_Logo.svg . Listed as "own work". Andrew J.Kurbiko (talk) 14:57, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:58, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
small size no exif, other upload found to be a copyvio. Basvb (talk) 15:01, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:58, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Seldlr51495 (talk · contribs)
[edit]for both images I can't find evidence of permission at their source locations. Please point to a license or verify one via Commons:OTRS
Basvb (talk) 15:30, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:57, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
want to to add fresh logo AnkushChouguleJain (talk) 15:38, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
duplicate image AnkushChouguleJain (talk) 15:40, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, after looking at user gallery to figure out the duplicate. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:50, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mstromeyer93 (talk · contribs)
[edit]No evidence at source that the logo was released under a free use license
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:57, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
(1) Photo not in source. (2) Source is a YouTube video with cc-by license. (3) Source is a review of the subject and appears to use parts of the photo as fair use, thus the video uploader would not own the photo copyright to relicense with the video under cc-by. czar 16:36, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:56, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Wrong date and questionable licensing and author: D&G Historical Society is likely not the author and uploader most likely doesn't have the rights to release this photo under a CC license. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:50, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
I uploaded the pictures which I have downloaded from the blog of the Cornwall Community Museum (https://cornwallcommunitymuseum.wordpress.com). In order to make everything legit I asked the curator of the museum to transfer me the copyright of the pictures of Lucien Lamoureux so I could post them on his Wikipedia page. He sent me an email to confirm that I have the copyright to post them on Wikipedia.
Here is what he sent me: "TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Copyright release is hereby granted to Mr. Emmanuel d'Aubignosc from the Stormont, Dundas & Glengarry Historical Society (Cornwall Community Museum and Archives) PO Box 773, Cornwall, Ontario, Canada, K6H 5T5 for the use of images relating to Lucien Lamoureux for publication on Wikipedia. We would appreciate the following credit line if suitable: Courtesy: Cornwall Community Museum, Canada)
Yours truly, Ian Bowering, curator 613 936-0842; Ian10@bellnet.ca" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aubignosc (talk • contribs) 20:47, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- @Aubignosc: Follow the instructions at COM:OTRS. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 12:21, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
I asked the curator to release the pictures under the Attributio-ShareAlike 3.0 license. He did and sent me an email to confirm.
"The Stormont, Dundas & Glengarry Historical Society (Cornwall Community Museum and Archives), PO Box 773, Cornwall, Ontario, Canada, K6H 5T5, releases its images of Lucien Lamoureux MP under the Attributio-ShareAlike 3.0 license, June 10, 2016.
Ian Bowering, curator" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aubignosc (talk • contribs) 11:06, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
- This is not sufficient. Read COM:OTRS and follow the instructions there. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:59, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:55, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Wrong date and not "own work" (found online): uploader most likely doesn't have the rights to release this photo under a CC license. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:55, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
I uploaded the pictures which I have downloaded from the blog of the Cornwall Community Museum (https://cornwallcommunitymuseum.wordpress.com). In order to make everything legit I asked the curator of the museum to transfer me the copyright of the pictures of Lucien Lamoureux so I could post them on his Wikipedia page. He sent me an email to confirm that I have the copyright to post them on Wikipedia.
Here is what he sent me: "TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Copyright release is hereby granted to Mr. Emmanuel d'Aubignosc from the Stormont, Dundas & Glengarry Historical Society (Cornwall Community Museum and Archives) PO Box 773, Cornwall, Ontario, Canada, K6H 5T5 for the use of images relating to Lucien Lamoureux for publication on Wikipedia. We would appreciate the following credit line if suitable: Courtesy: Cornwall Community Museum, Canada)
Yours truly, Ian Bowering, curator 613 936-0842; Ian10@bellnet.ca" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aubignosc (talk • contribs) 20:46, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- @Aubignosc: Follow the instructions at COM:OTRS. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 12:21, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
I asked the curator to release the pictures under the Attributio-ShareAlike 3.0 license. He did and sent me an email to confirm.
"The Stormont, Dundas & Glengarry Historical Society (Cornwall Community Museum and Archives), PO Box 773, Cornwall, Ontario, Canada, K6H 5T5, releases its images of Lucien Lamoureux MP under the Attributio-ShareAlike 3.0 license, June 10, 2016.
Ian Bowering, curator" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aubignosc (talk • contribs) 11:07, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
- This is not sufficient. Read COM:OTRS and follow the instructions there. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:00, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:56, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Magog the Ogre as no license (No license since). Copyvio (found online): uploader most likely doesn't have the rights to release this photo with a free license on Commons. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:57, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
I uploaded the pictures which I have downloaded from the blog of the Cornwall Community Museum (https://cornwallcommunitymuseum.wordpress.com). In order to make everything legit I asked the curator of the museum to transfer me the copyright of the pictures of Lucien Lamoureux so I could post them on his Wikipedia page. He sent me an email to confirm that I have the copyright to post them on Wikipedia.
Here is what he sent me: "TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Copyright release is hereby granted to Mr. Emmanuel d'Aubignosc from the Stormont, Dundas & Glengarry Historical Society (Cornwall Community Museum and Archives) PO Box 773, Cornwall, Ontario, Canada, K6H 5T5 for the use of images relating to Lucien Lamoureux for publication on Wikipedia. We would appreciate the following credit line if suitable: Courtesy: Cornwall Community Museum, Canada)
Yours truly, Ian Bowering, curator 613 936-0842; Ian10@bellnet.ca" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aubignosc (talk • contribs) 20:48, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- @Aubignosc: Follow the instructions at COM:OTRS. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 12:22, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
I asked the curator to release the pictures under the Attributio-ShareAlike 3.0 license. He did and sent me an email to confirm.
"The Stormont, Dundas & Glengarry Historical Society (Cornwall Community Museum and Archives), PO Box 773, Cornwall, Ontario, Canada, K6H 5T5, releases its images of Lucien Lamoureux MP under the Attributio-ShareAlike 3.0 license, June 10, 2016.
Ian Bowering, curator" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aubignosc (talk • contribs) 11:07, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
- This is not sufficient. Read COM:OTRS and follow the instructions there. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:00, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:56, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Pinole is in Contra Costa County, not Marin County. This empty locator map serves no purpose. Gorthian (talk) 17:01, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:55, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Copy of the File File:Pro7 logo alt.svg --Natsu Dragoneel (Diskussion) Natsu Dragoneel (talk) 17:25, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
The File is a copy of File:Pro7 logo alt.svg. And is not the new Logo of ProSieben. The Logo is Use at two Retro-Theming-Days. --Natsu Dragoneel (talk) 16:38, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:54, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
per archives website, " The Regents of the University of California hold copyright for all material in the Environmental Design Archives unless noted, and retain all rights to license this material at their discretion and in accordance with donor agreements." -- i.e. not freely licensed [12] Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:33, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:54, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
per archives website, " The Regents of the University of California hold copyright for all material in the Environmental Design Archives unless noted, and retain all rights to license this material at their discretion and in accordance with donor agreements." -- i.e. not freely licensed [13] Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:33, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:54, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
per archives website, " The Regents of the University of California hold copyright for all material in the Environmental Design Archives unless noted, and retain all rights to license this material at their discretion and in accordance with donor agreements." -- i.e. not freely licensed [14] Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:33, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:54, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
per archives website, " The Regents of the University of California hold copyright for all material in the Environmental Design Archives unless noted, and retain all rights to license this material at their discretion and in accordance with donor agreements." -- i.e. not freely licensed [15] Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:34, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:54, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
per archives website, " The Regents of the University of California hold copyright for all material in the Environmental Design Archives unless noted, and retain all rights to license this material at their discretion and in accordance with donor agreements." -- i.e. not freely licensed [16] Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:34, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:54, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
per archives website, " The Regents of the University of California hold copyright for all material in the Environmental Design Archives unless noted, and retain all rights to license this material at their discretion and in accordance with donor agreements." -- i.e. not freely licensed [17] Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:34, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:54, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
per archives website, " The Regents of the University of California hold copyright for all material in the Environmental Design Archives unless noted, and retain all rights to license this material at their discretion and in accordance with donor agreements." -- i.e. not freely licensed [18] Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:34, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:53, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Book cover, no evidence of permission Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 17:56, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
![17:56, 9 June 2016 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2016/06/09#c-Ahecht-2016-06-09T17:56:00.000Z-File:כריכת_הספר_"פואטיקת_השש_בש".jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:53, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
![14:53, 16 June 2016 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2016/06/09#c-Ellin_Beltz-2016-06-16T14:53:00.000Z-File:כריכת_הספר_"פואטיקת_השש_בש".jpg){kind=link}
No evidence of permission. Uploader is unlikely to be the copyright holder, as claimed. Artwork is less than 70 years old so not in the public domain. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 18:05, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:53, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Uploader is unlikely to be the copyright holder. No evidence that this image is otherwise in the public domain. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 18:06, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:53, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry speedy deleted. Gunnex (talk) 00:04, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:12, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 00:05, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:12, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry speedy deleted. Gunnex (talk) 00:07, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:12, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
This logo was almost certainly uploaded for advertising purposes only. It was probably intended to be used on an advertisement page for the uploader's business but this was prevented by the uploader triggering the abuse filter three times. Green Giant (talk) 00:09, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:12, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Used for creating advertising on en.wiki ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 00:49, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:11, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Per previous DR: DR 1, DR 2 or 3 - Derivative work of competition established by Conmebol 2002, therefore copyrighted; missing license or copyvios. Fma12 (talk) 02:29, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:10, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
CC-BY-NC-SA (see the small the icon at the right bottom of source page) Puramyun31 (talk) 03:38, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Housekeeping: 8 June 2016 Christian Ferrer (talk | contribs | block) deleted page File:160505 I.O.I 데뷔 쇼케이스.jpg (commercial reuse is not allowed at source. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:10, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:19, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:10, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:20, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:10, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:21, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:10, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
File:Perfil Bolívar Ernesto Cáceres Correa - Programa de glaciología Ecuatoriano-Wikipedia.pdf
[edit]See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:21, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:10, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:21, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:10, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:21, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:09, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
request to delete page in my own userspace #ForeverLove — 凡人丶 你一定要好好的 05:43, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- Cancel.#ForeverLove — 凡人丶 你一定要好好的 05:45, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:09, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Taken from internet without any copyright notice. Looks like it was published as early as in 2013 at [19] (image). Jarash (talk) 07:03, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:08, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status / out of scope. FDMS 4 08:47, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:08, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. If IN scope needs permission via "André Vieira Design", considering https://www.facebook.com/djpedrocastromx/photos/a.450314945152826.1073741825.450314871819500/496565427194444/?type=3&theater (credit: "By: André Vieira Design"). Gunnex (talk) 08:48, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:08, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Abdul Malik Hussain (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unclear copyright status / out of scope.
- File:10342417 792150284187476 8998513092880349160 ndgetyer.jpg
- File:Me with Prinicipal Cadet colleg sangharjtuik.jpg
- File:Me with Prinicipal Cadet colleg sangharwerwer.jpg
- File:Me with Prinicipal Cadet colleg sangharefge.jpg
- File:Me with Prinicipal Cadet colleg sangharytyh.jpg
- File:Me with Prinicipal Cadet colleg sanghar.jpg
FDMS 4 08:49, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:08, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Derivative work of copyrighted content. FDMS 4 08:51, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:08, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Photograph of a photograph? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:58, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:07, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by FrankDevil (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused user page image. Out of scope. Reused elements not attributed.
- File:Escudo de D.José Francisco Cervantes Velázquez.png
- File:Escudo de D. José Francisco Cervantes Velázquez.png
Tom-L (talk) 09:00, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:07, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used (was used to vandalize a ptwiki entry). If IN scope --> probadly a selfie by "Felipe Pontes", needing permission. Gunnex (talk) 09:00, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:07, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used respectively uploaded by a user who didn't make real contributions, apart from the creation of the user page. Gunnex (talk) 09:05, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:07, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used respectively uploaded by a user who didn't make real contributions, apart from the creation of the user page. Per FBMD... probadly grabbed from Facebook. Gunnex (talk) 09:09, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:07, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used respectively uploaded by a user who didn't make real contributions, apart from the creation of the user page. Probadly grabbed from Facebook. Gunnex (talk) 09:20, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:07, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF + out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 09:25, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:07, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Per FBMD... probadly grabbed from Facebook. Gunnex (talk) 09:29, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:07, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 09:37, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:07, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Probadly grabbed from Facebook. Gunnex (talk) 09:41, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:07, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Per FBMD... probadly grabbed from Facebook. Gunnex (talk) 09:41, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:06, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Files in Category:Hashim Azmi
[edit]Unused photos of Wikipedia spammer en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Mdhashim24.
McGeddon (talk) 10:38, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:06, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pradyumnas741 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:SardarVallabhBhaiPatelUniversity.jpg
- File:AgraUniversity.jpg
- File:CCSU.jpg
- File:MPMoradabad.jpg
- File:Fareed 0145200b.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- Delete I agree with the nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 18:18, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pradyumnas741 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Everything else from the user is a copyvios under CC-BY-SA-Self, I haven't been able to find the original sources for these but they are likely not original works.
- File:Manoj Kumar Chauhan Saheb.JPG
- File:IAS postions.jpg
- File:IAS postions.png
- File:ManojChauhan.jpg
—SpacemanSpiff 10:46, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:06, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
copyright violation? 62.64.152.154 00:05, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: likely copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:12, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Only usage was vandalism on enwikipedia. Cameron11598 (talk) 01:15, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:12, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Diki Alinmas (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:SCOPE. Unused personal photos of non-notable individual unlikely to be of educational use.
- File:Dikialinmasimagewikipedia.jpg
- File:Dikialinmasjumatwikipedia.jpg
- File:Dikialinmasinhomewikipedia.jpg
--dsprc (talk) 01:44, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:13, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE. Unused personal photos unlikely to be of educational use.
--dsprc (talk) 01:47, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:14, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE. Unused personal photos unlikely to be of educational use.
--dsprc (talk) 01:48, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:15, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Бауыржан Қарасаев (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope (kk:Бауыржан Карасаев)
- File:Бауке Карасаев.jpeg
- File:Баука Карасаев.jpeg
- File:Бауржан Карасаев.jpeg
- File:Бауыржан Карасаева.jpeg
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:31, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:16, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:04, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb: Missing license as of 8 June 2016 - Using VisualFileChange.
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private file storage. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb: Missing license as of 9 June 2016 - Using VisualFileChange.
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb: Missing license as of 9 June 2016 - Using VisualFileChange.
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb: Missing license as of 9 June 2016 - Using VisualFileChange.
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb: Missing license as of 9 June 2016 - Using VisualFileChange.
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb: Missing license as of 9 June 2016 - Using VisualFileChange.
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb: Missing license as of 9 June 2016 - Using VisualFileChange.
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb: Missing license as of 9 June 2016 - Using VisualFileChange.
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb: Missing license as of 9 June 2016 - Using VisualFileChange.
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb: Missing license as of 9 June 2016 - Using VisualFileChange.
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb: Missing license as of 9 June 2016 - Using VisualFileChange.
Orphaned, replaced by better versions in Category:Streptomycin and Category:Oxytetracycline. Leyo 12:55, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 06:16, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
User has uploaded files from other sources as CC-By-SA or as CC-By-SA-Self. Those for which other sources were found have been tagged and deleted. Unless the individual provenance of these files can be verified they should also be deleted.
- File:Gulista Aalija during the play "ek prayas" at gandhi bhawan.png
- File:Krishna acting as lead character 'Raidas' in play 'Sat Bhashay Raidas'.jpg
- File:Aron Mitr.jpg
- File:Yamini Malhotra on the Set of movie "Main Teri Tu mera".jpg
- File:Little Angel Shagun Singh Pari from Durg, Bhilai (MP) got first prize in Dance Competition of Shahjahanpur Rang Mahotsav.jpg
- File:Shamim Azad with Kashinath Singh (indian writer n Novelist).jpg
- File:Hira Thind in 2015-.jpg
- File:Hira Thind in 2015.jpg
- File:Hira Thind 10.jpg
- File:Hira Thind 11.jpg
- File:Hira Thind 7.jpg
- File:Hira Thind 8.jpg
- File:Hira Thind4.jpg
- File:Sapan Manchanda.jpg
_got_first_prize_in_Dance_Competition_of_Shahjahanpur_Rang_Mahotsav.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
—SpacemanSpiff 01:22, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Missing metadata, and likely of various sources. Photographers must confirm licenses via COM:OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 08:00, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
John Rossino is an aeronautics photojournalist, and is not an employee of the US Government therefore this image cannot be PD FOX 52 (talk) 02:28, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- @FOX 52: That photograph is nevertheless claimed as "U.S. Air Force photo by John Rossino" on an official USAF's website : http://www.tinker.af.mil/photos/mediagallery.asp?galleryID=40&?id=-1&page=9&count=48. Maybe Rossino was under a government contract when he made it ? Regards, rob1bureau (talk) 13:12, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- May be taken during a work for hire. Judson Brohmer was killed during such an engagement. --Denniss (talk) 13:36, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- That's a lot of maybes, but none the less, there's still the question of who owns the image. Here's a DR (deletion request/ CH-53K hover) that I chimed in on with similar circumstances (photo in question) - FOX 52 (talk) 19:37, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Delete The cited site has done the same thing a number of times. Most of the credits include rank, some do not. The Air Force publicity person who puts together the site probably does not understand or care about the huge difference between a photo of an Air Force jet and a photo by an Air Force photographer. Even if Rossini were under contract to the Air Force, he would still own the copyright (such contracts, by law, leave IP with the contractor). . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:50, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Can you expand on this law ? Because generally, work of people under contract of the US government is in public domain. rob1bureau (talk) 17:41, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
- @Rob1bureau: Here's a DR (deletion request/ CH-53K hover) that I chimed in on with similar circumstances (photo in question). Being on the USAF site doesn't make an automatic PD - FOX 52 (talk) 21:04, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
- No, generally such work is not PD. For example, we cannot host many of the official White House portraits of presidents because the copyrights remain with the artists -- see Category:Official presidential painted portraits in the White House. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:33, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The lack of copyright on US Government works applies only to employees of the government performing their duties. This does not seem to be the case here. --Storkk (talk) 08:02, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
No FOP for outdoor art in Denmark Elisfkc (talk) 05:06, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- The sculptor Niels Hansen Jacobsen died more than 70 years ago and the royalties has therefore expired.Ramblersen (talk) 05:14, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- If true, I withdraw my nomination. Elisfkc (talk) 18:07, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Per Ramblersen. --Storkk (talk) 08:11, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
Work of an artist which is still alive Shev123 (talk) 08:15, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Franck Cascales must confirm the license by following the instructions on COM:OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 08:13, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
In order for this work to be PD in Germany, it must have been published anonymously. Note that the fact that we do not know who the photographer was is irrelevant, in order to qualify for PD status, he must have been unknown at the time of publication. That is virtually impossible for a formal portrait such as this -- clearly the subject knew who he was. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:42, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- But the Paper which published the picture didn't seem to know it as well, because it didn't publish the photographer. We only have the sign of the paper on the right site of the foto. Take a look at the source. It is also published mor than 100years ago. And the paper where it was published stops to exist in the end of 1933. The responsible man of the paoer, Wilhelm Dahms, has died in 1939 and that is seven years after the one on the photo died. Everything is imho all right. It had worked more than thousand times before - so I think you are wrong. --1970gemini 16:18, 9. June 2016 (CEST)
- Most newspaper credit lines are printed under the photograph. Since all there is here is the photo and not the newspaper page, it is not only possible, but likely, that the credit line has just been cut off. Since this is a formal portrait, it is very likely that the portrait studio required attribution. Also, as I said above, the photographer must have been known to the subject, so it cannot be anonymous unless the photographer was masked, which is certainly far beyond a significant doubt. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:27, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
- Just 4 u. The wholt Page is uploaded. Please tell me if you are finding a name. The paper printed the name where u wanted it to be printed. If the didn't know it, they didn't print it. You don't trust me and you want to see the following page? In this case, please give me your email and I'll send you the next page but you won't find the credit there as well.--1970gemini 14:51, 12. June 2016 (CEST)
- OK, there is no credit line, but, as I said above, that still does not make it anonymous as the subject almost certainly knew who the photographer was. Except under circumstances that border on the ridiculous, formal portraits can never be anonymous. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:13, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
- Just 4 u. The wholt Page is uploaded. Please tell me if you are finding a name. The paper printed the name where u wanted it to be printed. If the didn't know it, they didn't print it. You don't trust me and you want to see the following page? In this case, please give me your email and I'll send you the next page but you won't find the credit there as well.--1970gemini 14:51, 12. June 2016 (CEST)
- Most newspaper credit lines are printed under the photograph. Since all there is here is the photo and not the newspaper page, it is not only possible, but likely, that the credit line has just been cut off. Since this is a formal portrait, it is very likely that the portrait studio required attribution. Also, as I said above, the photographer must have been known to the subject, so it cannot be anonymous unless the photographer was masked, which is certainly far beyond a significant doubt. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:27, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
- And imho u r wrong. Every picture has an author. If you have no chance to find out who he has been he'll be anonymous.--1970gemini 07:07, 17. June 2016 (CEST)
Deleted: per nomination. Anonymous is not "Unknown" - here there is even a watermark!. --Storkk (talk) 08:16, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
- Note: Struck the watermark comment, it may be from the publishers rather than the photographer. Storkk (talk) 10:18, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AgenciaDODO (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: housekeeping closure: already deleted by Jcb. --Storkk (talk) 08:17, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by BERLINDA GIL CARDONA (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:08, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Support. --Jcornelius (talk) 22:14, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, additional likely copyright issues. --Storkk (talk) 08:17, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
1. This diagram has new ideas and creative thinking of how our wiki-members can self-conclude their original creativity in their own lives.
2. It gave a new developing tendency for Wikimedia Commons (self-media and self-creation) from postmodernist daily life and practise. Meanwhile, I don't think it is 'Unused diagram' but merging in out daily practices of teaching and learning music. Therefore, it is from the true experiences and a very reasonable summary that plenty institutions might have the similar senses but haven't been concluded. 'Used diagram' has different levels covering from references to daily practices. It has just been made for several weeks and everyday plenty people really open it and try to use it in their daily teaching and learning practices of music in my community, China (English is also popularization all around this country) and other places with English-Chinese-application as their language. You can not made the self-judgement without evidences supports, then attempt to delete it without giving the opportunities of the development for self-creativity. If so, Wikimedia Commons will not for commons and will lost its developing zone in self-media
3. Sharing there, there is no commercial purpose, causing common people's treasure for better musical training is also the whole human being's treasures in our civilization.
4. Furthermore, In this file, I had clearly stated it was used for Wikiversity' practice, for more new generations' learning and teaching practices. How could you say it was 'unused diagram of questionable notability'. In other case, there is the evidence showing that this diagram has the history-recording of 'File Usage in Commons'. How could you make the self-judgement that it 'unused'?
My stance: this file is in symbol of commons, and its making is really drawing plenty endeavours for several generations, and stands for a new outlook and a new sustainability of Wikimedia Commons. Though the formation is different with bilingual translations, that translations are made directly according to the similar rhythm between Chinese and English, it can be seen as a charitable evolution to break the limitations from thinking for Chinese language users and English language users deeply understand each other from 'thinking'. We should not kill the new developing tendency of our Wikimedia Commons and cold commons' creative hospitality of self-contributing their fresh-thoughts from lives for enriching our human beings' new knowledge. how did you know it was 'unused', did you deny that commons' every-day-usage from daily practices wasn't 'use' and self-media individulistly.
Therefore, this behaviour is against democracy of our community and this file needs to be kept without deletion. I will produce further behaviours in my rights to correct this mistake.
I think: in Wikimedia Commons, we should not live in a field breathless without the creativity but merely limitations to keep old-fashion and old-formation. Otherwise, I would think I might choose not take the project here furthermore.
Jason M. C., Han (talk) 03:17, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Unused, and not likely useful for an educational purpose... out of scope. --Storkk (talk) 08:18, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Anatfinkelshtain (talk · contribs)
[edit]Modern art. I think artist(s) identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.
- File:Biography2.jpg
- File:JerusalemPlat.jpg
- File:PassoverPlat2.jpg
- File:BirdAtYarkona.jpg
- File:PassOverDecorativePlat.jpg
- File:AvrahamDecorating.jpg
- File:TypicalGofer.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, artists must confirm the licenses stated by following the instructions on COM:OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 08:19, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Better version now available (but with a different file format, so I coudn't uploaded it as a new version for this file name): File:Lot y sus hijas (Guercino).jpg Outisnn (talk) 22:05, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: Unused, superseded by File:Lot_y_sus_hijas_(Guercino).jpg, no objections. --Storkk (talk) 08:29, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
Obvious copyright violation, declined for speedy deletion by Jcb. France has no Freedom of Panorama, so images of recent buildings are subject to the copyright of the architect, and cannot be released on an open license purely at the will of the photographer. This photo shows no evidence that the photographer has obtained permission of the architect to publish it. Several previously-uploaded images of the same building have already been deleted for the same reason; see e.g. Commons:Deletion requests/File:Australian Embassy in Paris.jpg (as has been linked from the category page for some time). Consensus of past discussions is that, despite being an embassy, French rather than Australian law applies to exterior views of this building. David Eppstein (talk) 22:26, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. France's freedom of panorama is non-commercial only. Architects must confirm license via COM:OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 08:30, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
need OTRS verification Svkov2 (talk) 19:27, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
This photo made by wife of Izya Shlosberg back in 2008. She provided photo and sent to Wikipedia email with permission for public use. With this permission I added photo to article in 2008. What kind of OTRS do you need else? Markus50 (20:11, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- Where OTRS mark? Svkov2 (talk) 23:21, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: 15:50, 27 June 2016 Jcb deleted page File:Shlosberg.jpg (Missing permission as of 19 June 2016). czar 04:57, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:28, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. czar 04:56, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
The poor quality of the image, and the upload history of the uploader makes the claim of "own work" a bit suspect. Per the discussion at COM:VP/C#File:Advocate Shashank Vyankatesh Manohar.png, there is a good chance that this image was also something the uploader found on the Internet. Delete per COM:PCP. Marchjuly (talk) 01:03, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:53, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Author was unable to provide OTRS in a resonable amount of time, they have been asked twice on facebook to do so, and although they said they have submitted the permission to us, no email was found upon questioning various OTRS volunteers. Please delete, fair use. CoolCanuck eh? 01:34, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:53, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Low-res version of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:1000_USD_note;_series_of_1934;_obverse.jpg Elvey (talk) 03:55, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:54, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
I don't want to offer this picture anymore. Further the resolution is way too low - which is why there is a new picture of this building on wikimedia commons now (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:Nordwest-Zeitung_Medienhaus.jpg) Marc Del Din (talk) 07:00, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:54, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Not clear that the uploader is the copyright holder. Also apparently a logo for a unnotable organisation with a dead website. --ghouston (talk) 10:42, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:54, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Looks like an official photo, so unlikely to be own work. No other source or copyright information. Also used at https://www.linkedin.com/in/col-ret-richard-curry-b3820026. --ghouston (talk) 10:53, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:54, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Unlikeable to be an own work, low resolution, no EXIF data. 200.5.114.34 12:19, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:55, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Unlikeable to be an own work; probably found on the web. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 12:21, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:55, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work, higher-res version published in 2015: http://www.nitro.pe/hibridos/15882-aston-martin-fabrica-el-primer-auto-electrico-de-inglaterra-2.html MKFI (talk) 12:26, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:55, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
copivio obviously Odessey (talk) 13:37, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:55, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Paolorelie (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope, commons is not a photo album
Gbawden (talk) 13:44, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:55, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sercaperez (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:55, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://photos.cinematreasures.org/production/photos/100553/1401077750/large.jpg?1401077750. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:55, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Modern art and promo photos. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.
- File:Photo of Mequitta Ahuja.jpg
- File:Mequitta Ahuja.jpg
- File:Mequitta Ahuja, Performing Painting- Birthday.jpg
- File:Mequitta Ahuja, Performing Painting- Seated Scribe.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:56, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:56, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by 9806926994DURGESH (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:57, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Historical book. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:57, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Namasthefortkochi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: low quality.
Stefan2 (talk) 14:36, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:57, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused map of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:57, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
The copyright tag used requires evidence of publication more than 70 years ago. If the photo wasn't published until 2006 (the source given in the information template), then the copyright expires 25 years after publication in the European Union, per article 4 of EU directive 93/98/EEC. Also, a United States copyright tag is required. If this was first published in 2006, then the copyright expires 120 years after the photo was taken, per {{PD-US-unpublished}}. Stefan2 (talk) 14:41, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- The uploader has now identified another publication from 1971. If this was the first time it was published, and if the photographer wasn't named there, then the copyright expires in the source country 70 years after 1971 and in the United States 95 years after 1971. --Stefan2 (talk) 19:58, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:56, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:56, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_OZARYJV4EuM/SBNoJa2lQmI/AAAAAAAABRI/DCHM-2rPt5Q/s400/2432582288_8a0e10c41f.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:56, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:56, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:56, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:57, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Historical painting. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:57, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
There is definitely not enough information to keep this image. We know nothing about the author, about the year the photo was taken, about the place where it was taken. Still, somebody claimed the photo was "Anonymous-EU". One might as well roll some dice and determine the copyright status by the result. So Delete. Rosenzweig τ 15:23, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:57, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
My name is printed in the photograph Nandy1972 (talk) 16:30, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:58, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
My Name is printed in the Photograph Nandy1972 (talk) 16:38, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:58, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Protected by copyright - no freedom of panorama in France 2A01:E35:8A5E:9810:8427:924B:6A42:D7AE 19:08, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:59, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
out of scope com:nudity Pippobuono (talk) 21:19, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:59, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
out of scope com:nudity Pippobuono (talk) 21:20, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:59, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
out of scope com:nudity Pippobuono (talk) 21:21, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:59, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Sculpture in the US, no freedom of panorama. FunkMonk (talk) 21:51, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- American Museum of Natural History is full of sculptures. I'm puzzled as to how a plastic squid/shark/mesoamerican man doesn't fall under the same copyright status as a feathered theropod housed within the same establishment._Mariomassone (talk) 22:12, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- They certainly do fall under the same copyright, the problem is that someone who knows about the FOP issue has to find them and nominate them... There are probably hundreds of such images here that are technically illegal. FunkMonk (talk) 22:55, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- American Museum of Natural History is full of sculptures. I'm puzzled as to how a plastic squid/shark/mesoamerican man doesn't fall under the same copyright status as a feathered theropod housed within the same establishment._Mariomassone (talk) 22:12, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:59, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Scan of a letter with real address- and company-datas. Codc (talk) 23:29, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- As uploader: You may delete it.--Kopiersperre (talk) 15:15, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
- They may be blackened (out). --Leyo 15:34, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:59, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Considering that this engraving by Testa is documented by this this other very superior quality files, this version of really low quality, I would eliminate it Never covered (talk) 12:05, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
(in Italiano: "Considerato che questa incisione del Testa è documentata da quest’altro file di qualità ben superiore, questa versione, di qualità davvero bassa, la cancellerei" --Never covered (talk) 12:08, 9 June 2016 (UTC))
- These were some sort of scans of colour microfiche, since superceded. I agree they are probably only worth keeping in these circumstances if a low resolution colour version adds special value compared to black and white, which does not seem the case here. --Fæ (talk) 12:17, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
If I understand it, you put out that in the photo you see the true color of the paper ... it's a good point ... and if over-we wrote this? (Se non ho capito male metti in evidenza che nella foto si veda il reale colore della carta… è una giusta considerazione… e se sovrascrivessimo questa?)--Never covered (talk) 15:24, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- If there is doubt, then I suggest we keep it. It is a verified version from the catalogue and my upload avoided having the credit bars that the website now adds on to downloaded images. If you find the images interesting, or useful, then it would be worth cross-linking them to each other to show the various versions by adding a <gallery> to the image description. --Fæ (talk) 18:16, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Despite the blurry quality of the image, the point that it is a verified version from the catalog is valid. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:11, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
all pictures are (CC BY-NC 4.0)
- The species still exist, other pictures can be uploaded later. Why deleting the category ? --Salix (talk) 17:53, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
- Salix, we normally don't keep empty categories. However, this category currently contains a file (although it seems to have an incorrect copyright tag). --Stefan2 (talk) 21:34, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
- Stefan2 That's what I was expecting : new files coming very soon ! Anyway, terms of use for MNHN vascular files are readable here. What do you understand ? --Salix (talk) 15:40, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
- Salix, we normally don't keep empty categories. However, this category currently contains a file (although it seems to have an incorrect copyright tag). --Stefan2 (talk) 21:34, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:12, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
_-_2021-05-23_-_6.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2021-05-23_-_5.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2021-05-23_-_4.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2021-05-23_-_5.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2021-05-23_-_3.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2021-05-23_-_4.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2021-05-23_-_3.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2021-05-23_-_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2021-05-22_-_1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2021-05-22_-_1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2021-05-22_-_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2021-05-22_-_1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2021-05-21_-_1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2021-05-21_-_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2021-05-20_-_1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2021-05-20_-_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2021-05-20_-_1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2021-05-20_-_1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2021-05-20_-_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2021-05-20_-_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2021-05-20_-_1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
The building shown is w:fr:Maison des Hommes et des Techniques, built in 1917 and authored by René Ménard, who died in 1958. As there is no commercial freedom of panorama in France (see COM:FOP France), this architectural work is still under his posthumous copyright and is unfree. Copyright expires on January 1, 2029 (70+1 years after his death), at which point these photos will be restored/undeleted.
- File:Maison Hommes Techniques - Nantes (FR44) - 2022-09-18 - 4.jpg
- File:Maison Hommes Techniques - Nantes (FR44) - 2022-09-18 - 3.jpg
- File:Maison Hommes Techniques - Nantes (FR44) - 2022-09-18 - 2.jpg
- File:Maison Hommes Techniques - Nantes (FR44) - 2022-09-18 - 1.jpg
_-_2022-09-18_-_4.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2022-09-18_-_3.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2022-09-18_-_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2022-09-18_-_1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 22:49, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:37, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
конкурс Религиозные практики уже закончен, это фото было загружено иключительно для конкурса Olga.Mach (talk) 09:51, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
конкурс Религиозные практики уже закончен, это фото было загружено иключительно для конкурса Olga.Mach (talk) 11:09, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:04, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
das Bild besteht nicht nur aus dem Logo, sondern auch aus einem Hintergrundbild, welches nicht gemeinfrei ist! Sagaduos (talk) 16:58, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Was soll diese Meldung? Ich finde sie unzutreffend, da ich in der Lizenz darauf hingewiesen habe, dass es sich bei dem Bild um ein Trademark handelt und den Lizenzgeber, der dieses Bild veröffentlicht hat genau benannt habe. Der Lizenzgeber schreibt selbst zu dem Bild, dass dieses Bild frei benutzt werden kann, sofern die Nutzung nicht kommerziell erfolgt. Lukeskywalker1978 (talk) 21:22, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
1. Kannst du mir die Meldung des Lizenzgebers bitte verlinken? 2. Die von mir entfernte Lizenzmeldung auf Commons war falsch. Das Bild besteht nicht nur aus geometrischen Formen. --Sagaduos (talk) 19:44, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Gut dann korrigiere meinetwegen die Lizenzbeschreibung. Es ändert aber dennoch nichts daran, dass das Bild im nicht kommerziellen Bereich verwendet werden darf. Die Hintergrundinfos zum veröffentlichten Logo findest Du hier: http://www.presseportal.de/pm/13399/3349020 Dort steht es auch ganz normal zum Download bereit. Lukeskywalker1978 (talk) 22:00, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
OK Ich ziehe den Löschantrag zurück --Sagaduos (talk) 20:08, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Delete - Werbematerial für die Presse: "Die Verwendung dieses Bildes ist für redaktionelle Zwecke honorarfrei." Das ist keine für Commons akzeptable freie Lizenz. --- Promotional material for the press: "This image may be used for editorial purposes without fee." That's not an acceptable license for Commons. --Latebird (talk) 06:17, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
- Nein. Das ist völlig okay. Es gibt viele andere Bilder, die ebenfalls diese Lizenz benutzen. --Sagaduos (talk) 13:07, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Noncommercial clauses are not commons-compatible. --Storkk (talk) 16:48, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
Files of User:BuntySourav
[edit]
All Some of the user's files seem to be copyright violations. Some give "eprahar, Nbc News" as Source. Some have "Press Trust of India" in the metadata and also the metadata has various different cameras models, all of which is suggestive of copyvios. Apologies for not tagging all media pages (please do, if you can), the internet here is really slow. --Tobias (talk) 09:51, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- Edited: The ones shot from Motorola XT1068 could conceivably be his own. --Tobias (talk) 09:55, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- These have a source and an author but no evidence of permission, so we could tag them per Category:Media missing permission and they will automatically be deleted in a few days. One of them says it is from panoramio, and some of those have acceptable licenses like Flickr has; however, it did not link to the actual source page so we can't accept it. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 01:47, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:31, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
File is on en:wiki, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Saskatchewan_Roughriders_Helmet_2016.png with a fair use declaration. Helmet is not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:23, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:32, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
falsche eingaben Mart.am (talk) 06:38, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Author requests deletion within 7 days. ~riley (talk) 01:47, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
File: Ingenio Porvenir, fundado en el 1884.jpg is a copy of File: Sector Porvenir.jpg In File: Sector Porvenir.jpg added information.
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:06, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Files in Category:Koran reciter
[edit]These look like scanned images. The copyright doesn't rest with the scanner, but with the photographer. See COM:DW.
- File:Scheich-Hussein-Ali-Abu-Sneineh.jpg
- File:الشيخ حسين علي أبو سنينه.jpg
- File:٢ الشيخ حسين علي أبو سنينه.jpg
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:43, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- Hallo, probably the original image is very old, older than 50 years. The pictured man was born in the 80s of the 19th century, he died about 1967. Maybe no copyright infringement? --HeikeMarie (talk) 09:14, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- As I already mentioned in the workshop, it is a problem that the uploader has referred the file as own work. However, I take a deletion request for completely exaggerated. The image is damaged beyond repair and only people who are very strong in faith will be able to recognize it as something. Therefore I didnt made an attempt to retouch the kinks in any way. In my eyes, the image remains a mush of pixels, in which I can not see any particular originality. The copyrighted work is visible indeed, but not identifiable. We therefore have the principle of de minimis. The Note {{De minimis}} should be sufficient. Regards, MagentaGreen (talk) 12:14, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
- That's not at all what de minimis means. If you have a reason why this image should stay, by all means provide it. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:32, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
- Maybe we don't understand each other. I defend nothing. The image could be deleted because it doesn't meet the lowest requirements in quality. However the request for deletion is based upon a wrong statement of grounds (imho). Regards, MagentaGreen (talk) 23:40, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
- That's not at all what de minimis means. If you have a reason why this image should stay, by all means provide it. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:32, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
- As I already mentioned in the workshop, it is a problem that the uploader has referred the file as own work. However, I take a deletion request for completely exaggerated. The image is damaged beyond repair and only people who are very strong in faith will be able to recognize it as something. Therefore I didnt made an attempt to retouch the kinks in any way. In my eyes, the image remains a mush of pixels, in which I can not see any particular originality. The copyrighted work is visible indeed, but not identifiable. We therefore have the principle of de minimis. The Note {{De minimis}} should be sufficient. Regards, MagentaGreen (talk) 12:14, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
Comment The copyrighted work is obviously not de minimis, I don't really understand that argument at all. However, if this was taken in the British Mandate of Palestine, as seems probable, then it is very likely to be {{PD-Israel}} if the man depicted died in 1967. Storkk (talk) 08:08, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
- FWIW, the State of Palestine has been a de facto state recognized by the UN for about four years now. It would be great if we could find any copyright laws for them. I would be mildly surprised if they even exist, so we might be in the clear. But I'm not knowledgeable about such things. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 11:18, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per COM:PRP. --INeverCry 21:23, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The template is incorrect in the sense that the subject source website http://cinespot.net does not provide media in the said license CC-by-3.0 nor in any other Commons compatible license. The disclaimer of their website states "All the pictures on this web-site cinespot.net are assumed to be taken from public domain unless otherwise mentioned. The copyright (if any) of these pictures belongs to their original publisher / photographer / copyright holder as the case may be."
With such terms present I don't think we should keep this template. If there are any images on the source website which are in public domain and explicitly mentioned, as the disclaimer says, those images may be uploaded here and their validity be checked case by case. A blanket template is misguiding and might be a source to skip in many copyvios. The template currently has 13 transclusions and I will check and report, if need be, all those 13 images, if no one else does that before i do. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:16, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 21:04, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
もともとはJRの権利かと思われます。この模写レベルでは独自のものとは言えないでしょう。アップロード者が権利者ではありません。参考http://livedoor.blogimg.jp/yurikamome77/imgs/2/9/29a0ef1f.jpg Banku (talk) 05:55, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- Keep I think this mark isn't copyrighted because it's applied art. At least in Japan, most lawyers think applied arts aren't copyrighted.--Kkairri (talk) 13:16, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per above. --INeverCry 21:24, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Again: There is definitely not enough information to keep this image. We know nothing about the author, about the year the photo was taken, about the place where it was taken. Even the immediate source is not named. Still, somebody claimed the photo was "Anonymous-EU". One might as well roll some dice and determine the copyright status by the result. So Delete. Rosenzweig τ 15:24, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
_Christian_Wirth.jpg)
- Comment. My only concern is that this particular facsimile of Wirth is widely used throughout multiple projects. Even if the provenance of this specific upload cannot be established, the actual file with exactly the same name can be safely replaced with a crop of Wirth's readily available snap shot originating from a public display covered under the article § 59 of the German copyright law, which states that "It shall be permissible to reproduce, by painting, drawing, photography or cinematography, works which are permanently located on public ways, streets or places and to distribute and publicly communicate such copies." End of quote. I can gladly produce a crop of Christian Wirth from the Berlin-Tiergarten placard (right), if you find it permissible. Poeticbent talk 03:46, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
- I agree with Poeticbent. The file is present on Wikipedia de without any remark and I presume thant it i sconform to the article § 59 of the German copyright law; Utilisateur:Couthon
- Même avis que Poeticbent et Couthon. Daniel*D 13:45, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Done. This is a b&w crop of Wirth from the public display placard (right above). The file can be renamed as File:Wirth, Christian.jpg with zero disruption across multiple projects in case the original upload is found unsuitable for our purposes. Poeticbent talk 05:55, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
- Indeed ; I'm agree. - Bzh-99 (talk) 09:53, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per above. Original deleted and alternate moved to the same name. --INeverCry 21:27, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Нет АИ и в оригинале флаг черного цвета, а не красного. 109.252.72.175 23:36, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- Флаг встречается как черного и синего цветов так и красного цвета. С красным цветом этот флаг был загружен в Викимедию еще 10 августа 2008 года (см. рисунок). Здесь указан, что флаг (в данной статье он красного цвета) "по грузинскому историку и путешественнику Вахушти Багратиони, XVIII век".
- Keep I see no valid reason for a deletion. The Russian above states that the ground color of red should be black but this is not a violation of any rules I know. I cast a keep it vote. нет никаких веских оснований для удаления. GeoTrinity (talk) 21:06, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per above & in use. --INeverCry 21:28, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
