Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/06/08
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
_(1).jpg){kind=link}
![129 File:"Great Powers, Failed States, and New Frontiers- National Security Challenges in the 21st Century" Conference hosted by the Clements Center.jpg](#File:"Great_Powers,_Failed_States,_and_New_Frontiers-_National_Security_Challenges_in_the_21st_Century"_Conference_hosted_by_the_Clements_Center.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![204 File:Bryan Caraway "Speed Dealer".png](#File:Bryan_Caraway_"Speed_Dealer".png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
No source, uploaded by vandalist who blocked in he wiki בריאן (talk) 05:54, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of Project scope. -- Geagea (talk) 07:12, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Franz Landgraf died in 1953. тнояsтеn ⇔ 06:01, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Raymond 06:46, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Files of User:Wiki4762
[edit]Already deleted re-uploaded book covers and pack shots :
- File:PLANET ICE Page 1.jpg
- File:Minimonstres couv.jpg
- File:Envahisseurs morpions.jpg
- File:Les superpouvoirs de l'urine.jpg
- File:03E8000000478635-c2-photo-jaquette-dvd-coupez-le-son-le-charisme-politique-documentaire.jpg
- File:Squatters.jpg
- File:Humanimal.jpg
- File:Baiser-bebe-thierry-berrod-editions-di-scuillo-506824.jpg
Regards, --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 16:28, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Didym and Jcb. --Stefan2 (talk) 11:06, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
No higher resolution & it is clearly copied from some tab/thumbnail Yohannvt (talk) 11:48, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Speedy delete: Blatant copyright violation (taken from http://wallpaperbeta.com/tiger_jump_water_animals_hd-wallpaper-247780/). Tagged for speedy deletion. --DAJF (talk) 12:18, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:43, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
No higher resolution & it is clearly copied from some tab/thumbnail Yohannvt (talk) 11:48, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
- Speedy delete: Blatant copyright violation (taken from http://animalwall.xyz/tiger-resting-river-nature-trees-full-hd-animal/). Tagged for speedy deletion. --DAJF (talk) 12:18, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:43, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
kommerzielle Nutzung ausgeschlossen CrazyD (talk) 15:09, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Keep What for a nonsense again!!! This image has the free FAL license. The CC-BY-NC-ND license is an additionsl license. All user can select his favorite license. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 15:22, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
- Keep I see... sorry for my overhasty deletion request. But it is really confusing to use a 2nd "non-free" license, as a lot of other people already told you. ;-) --CrazyD (talk) 15:27, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
- Keep @CrazyD: Wieder einmal einer, der meint alles verstanden zu haben und deshalb auch zu allem etwas sagen zu müssen – crazy! --Хрюша ?? 15:31, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Die FAL-Lizenz lässt doch die kommerzielle Nutzung zu. Mehrfachlizenzierung ist kein Problem, auch wenn andere Lizenzen Einschränkungen enthalten sollten. Unangemessen vorschnelles Handeln anstatt zunächst erst einmal den (mit Bildern auf Commons sehr erfahrenen, wie leicht ermittelt werden kann) Fotografen daraufhin anzusprechen. --Blutgretchen (talk) 16:01, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept, Eindeutig irrtümlicher Löschantrag, da die Begründung unzutreffend ist. Die Datei liegt unter einer freien und zulässigen Lizenz vor. Unambiguously an erroneous deletion request, as the rationale is inapplicable. The file has a valid free license. Non-admin closure.Grand-Duc (talk) 17:39, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Ich habe die Datei selbst hochgeladen und möchte es rückgängig machen, also löschen lassen, da ich einen Fehler, den ich nicht mehr ändern kann, bemerkt habe! K-Man (talk) 07:25, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Wdwd: Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file
The file description cites a number of sources, most of which have explicit copyright notices and no free license. It is possible that those were used only for background, but that needs to be clarified. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:45, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
- No! This is my OWN work - I drew this image myself through inkscape. I only provided the aircraft carrier sourcing as pertaining to the specifications content above on each ship. FOX 52 (talk) 15:56, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawn by nom. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:44, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:48, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Also Commons:Derivative works from album covers. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
wrong file רועי ביטון (talk) 18:55, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by EugeneZelenko: Commons:Licensing: non-trivial logo - Using VisualFileChange.
Commons:Deletion requests/File:India U Uttar Pradesh location map.svg.png Commons:Deletion requests/File:Indian states according to party of their chief minister ASDS.png
Photo is of self - clearly out of scope Yohannvt (talk) 07:17, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Photo is of self - clearly out of scope Yohannvt (talk) 11:48, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:54, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
error en la creación, falto el acento — Preceding unsigned comment added by Historiadormundo (talk • contribs) 02:33, 8. Jun. 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Empty, bad name, author's req. --Achim (talk) 09:41, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
Wrong PD license. Uploader's only image on Commons. Leoboudv (talk) 00:06, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Info: Did you noticied the link at Flickr? But is PD-mark. --Amitie 10g (talk) 01:34, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Comment: Amitie 10g This image is not from the US federal government and has the wrong license. It comes from a private website and does not have the attribution, attribution-sharealike or public domain dedication license which Commons accepts. A Public Domain mark license means the private copyright owner can change the license at any moment without consequences. He/She does not release any rights with this license which is why this image's Public Domain Mark license is not acceptable on Commons. --Leoboudv (talk) 09:00, 14 June 2016 (UTC)- Comment: I made this point in a previous DR and the closing Admin accepted it. --Leoboudv (talk) 09:02, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Template:Flickr-public domain mark. czar 06:22, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mjosama091 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unclear copyright status / out of scope.
FDMS 4 00:08, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. czar 06:18, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image --ghouston (talk) 00:46, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. czar 06:22, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal snapshot not useful for any educational purpose; out of scope Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 01:03, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. czar 06:23, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Self-created artwork without obvious educational use Rupert Clayton (talk) 01:03, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. czar 06:24, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal snapshot not useful for an educational purpose; out of scope Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 01:07, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. czar 06:24, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Snek01 as Speedy (db) and the most recent rationale was: copyrighted per https://archive.org/stream/avicenniarevista5200univ#page/n3/mode/2up Amitie 10g (talk) 01:38, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
- delete & Formal request for delete all files within the category Commons:Deletion requests/Category:Avicennia (revista de ecología oceanología biodiversidad tropical). --Snek01 (talk) 13:01, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: appears on p. 72—no indication that the content has been freely licensed. czar 06:27, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Probably out of scope as a non-notable band. Also licence verification is needed using OTRS. --ghouston (talk) 01:43, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. czar 06:28, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
low-res self-created image not used in six years Rupert Clayton (talk) 00:27, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. czar 06:30, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Eminent Boy Wa Afrika (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
- File:Eminent boy4.jpg
- File:Eminent boy3.jpg
- File:Eminent boy2.jpg
- File:Eminent Boy1.jpg
- File:Eminent Boy Wa Afrika-Nice Pic.jpg
--ghouston (talk) 01:48, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. czar 06:28, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Bad Quality/Out of focus image. Yohannvt (talk) 07:17, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. czar 06:34, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Copyviol--Marica Massaro (talk) 14:18, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, depicted object is in public domain due to age, but the photo seems to be modern (published in 2000). Taivo (talk) 09:11, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Copyviol--Marica Massaro (talk) 14:21, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, depicted object is in public domain due to age, but the photo seems to be modern (published in 2000). Taivo (talk) 09:12, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Copyviol--Marica Massaro (talk) 14:23, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, depicted object is in public domain due to age, but the photo seems to be modern (published in 2000). Taivo (talk) 09:13, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Copyviol Marica Massaro (talk) 14:25, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, depicted object is in public domain due to age, but the photo seems to be modern (published in 2000). Taivo (talk) 09:10, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Copyviol Marica Massaro (talk) 14:28, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, depicted object is in public domain due to age, but the photo seems to be modern (published in 2000). Taivo (talk) 09:10, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Copyviol Marica Massaro (talk) 14:29, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, depicted object is in public domain due to age, but the photo seems to be modern (published in 2000). Taivo (talk) 09:09, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Copyviol Marica Massaro (talk) 14:31, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, depicted object is in public domain due to age, but the photo seems to be modern (published in 2000). Taivo (talk) 09:08, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Copyviol Marica Massaro (talk) 14:32, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, depicted object is in public domain due to age, but the photo seems to be modern (published in 2000). Taivo (talk) 09:07, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Copyviol Marica Massaro (talk) 14:33, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, depicted object is in public domain due to age, but the photo seems to be modern (published in 2000). Taivo (talk) 09:06, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Copyviol Marica Massaro (talk) 14:34, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, depicted object is in public domain due to age, but the photo seems to be modern (published in 2000). Taivo (talk) 08:35, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Copyviol Marica Massaro (talk) 14:35, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, depicted object is in public domain due to age, but the photo seems to be modern (published in 2000). Taivo (talk) 08:36, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Copyviol Marica Massaro (talk) 14:37, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, depicted object is in public domain due to age, but the photo seems to be modern (published in 2000). Taivo (talk) 08:37, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Copyviol Marica Massaro (talk) 14:38, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, depicted object is in public domain due to age, but the photo seems to be modern (published in 2000). Taivo (talk) 08:38, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Copyviol Marica Massaro (talk) 14:39, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, depicted object is in public domain due to age, but the photo seems to be modern (published in 2000). Taivo (talk) 08:39, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Copyviol Marica Massaro (talk) 14:40, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, depicted object is in public domain due to age, but the photo seems to be modern (published in 2000). Taivo (talk) 09:04, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Copyviol Marica Massaro (talk) 14:42, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, depicted object is in public domain due to age, but the photo seems to be modern (published in 2000). Taivo (talk) 09:05, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
This image is put up without permission and being seriously misused. Samirpatra (talk) 20:01, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
The image belongs to me. I do not require the permission of User Samirpatra to upload it.
Dr TKP (talk) 06:36, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: This image was not a selfie, yet was claimed as own work by one of the subjects in it. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:51, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
That means user Ellin Beltz claims that she alone was the other subject in the Pic....LOL !!! Hemangi never told me that she used "Ellin Beltz" as a user name...So Strange !!! The picture was taken by me with Hemangi. Anyway, now due to all these controversies, Hemangi told me that better remove this Picture from Wiki Commons. So be it !!!
That means user Ellin Beltz claims that she alone was the other subject in the Pic....LOL !!! Hemangi never told me that she used "Ellin Beltz" as a user name...So Strange !!! The picture was taken by me with Hemangi. Anyway, now due to all these controversies, Hemangi told me that better remove this Picture from Wiki Commons. So be it !!!
Dr TKP (talk) 09:36, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
per COM:ADVERT INeverCry 20:09, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:40, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Per FBMD... probadly grabbed from Facebook. Renomination per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Joaojesusautor = this file was temporary in use in an unrelated article (vandalism). Gunnex (talk) 20:19, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:39, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
image contains copyright watermark … Albinfo (talk) 20:22, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:39, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
The photo was previously published here. An OTRS ticket is required. Diannaa (talk) 20:36, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Please state the reason why you have put it in deletion list.?
- Since the image was previously published, we require proof that it was the copyright holder is the person who uploaded it. This is done through the OTRS ticket system. There's more information at en:Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. Diannaa (talk) 02:25, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:39, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
The photo was previously published here. An OTRS ticket is required. Diannaa (talk) 20:37, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:34, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
It is a Fair Use image. {{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk} 20:45, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:33, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Mr. Election did not take this photo and does not own the copyright William S. Saturn (talk) 21:08, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:33, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Mr. Election did not take this photo and does not own the copyright William S. Saturn (talk) 21:09, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:33, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Museum Naturalis in Leiden (NL) has the rights and wants to contribute it to Wikipedia. 77.162.253.55 21:22, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:31, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nepalikhan (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope - unused personal/self-promotional images
- File:Alvida shoot .jpg
- File:Hrk.jpg
- File:Hassan khan.jpg
- File:HassanRazaKhan.jpg
- File:HassanRaza Khan .jpg
INeverCry 22:25, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:30, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
out of COM:SCOPE - unused personal image INeverCry 22:38, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:30, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
No proof the uploader took the image or is the copyright holder William S. Saturn (talk) 22:53, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:30, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
No proof the uploader took the image or is the copyright holder William S. Saturn (talk) 22:53, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:30, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
_(1).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(1).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
out of scope - unused personal/self-promotional image INeverCry 23:05, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
_(1).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:30, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
_(1).jpg){kind=link}
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used respectively uploaded by a user who didn't make real contributions, apart from the creation of the user page. Gunnex (talk) 23:42, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:30, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry speedy deleted. User indef blocked at ptwiki. Gunnex (talk) 23:44, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:29, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. User indef blocked at ptwiki. Gunnex (talk) 23:49, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:29, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Looks like this photo had been published the previous day, such as at http://www.dailymail.co.uk/indiahome/indianews/article-2338265/Manohar-exposes-gameplan--Ex-BCCI-chief-told-Jaitley-ready-Boards-interim-chief.html , with a copyright notice of Bhaskar Paul which has been cropped out in this version. Carl Lindberg (talk) 16:24, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:58, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Copyright violation Maurice Flesier (talk) 17:13, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: cropped from http://www.kingsizemagazine.se/musik/kusin-slapper-videon-friheten-segrar-kritisk-till-kurdernas-situation-eus-flyktinghantering-och-turkiet-forhandlingar/. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:58, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Might be uploaded by mistake considering identical (cropped) to (3 min. later) File:Galvanometro2.png (in use at ptwiki). Gunnex (talk) 17:15, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:57, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry 2x speedy deleted. Gunnex (talk) 17:21, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:57, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Per * probadly grabbed from Facebook. Gunnex (talk) 17:44, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:57, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolution, missing EXIF. Per FBMD... probadly grabbed from Facebook + out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry speedy deleted. Uploader indef blocked at ptwiki. Gunnex (talk) 17:50, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:57, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal logos are out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 17:58, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:57, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Uploaded on 29.03.2016. Considering also (even cropped) https://www.facebook.com/146135308875200/photos/pb.146135308875200.-2207520000.1465408273./161323794023018/?type=3&theater (2013). Gunnex (talk) 17:59, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:57, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Juan Alberto Espiñeira (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unclear copyright status and unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering also User talk:Juan Alberto Espiñeira. Uploaded in a row on 27.03.2016. In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Brazil. --> considering indoor shots derived from artworks by "Janaína Vasconcelos" and "Camilla Pedrozo", which may not be covered by COM:FOP#Brazil, considering the "?" entry for public interiors at the summary table via COM:FOP#Situation in different countries. Additional, it is unclear if these artworks were permanently located at the location or only were installed for a temporary exhibition.
File:Sobre Mundos -Color-.jpg was grabbed from https://www.facebook.com/demasiar.ser.sobremundos/photos/pb.624950934268245.-2207520000.1465409480./785781001518570/?type=3&theater (2014). Related ptwiki entry 2x speedy deleted.
- File:Performance da Dor II.jpg
- File:Performance da Dor.jpg
- File:Sobre Mundos -Color-.jpg
- File:Janaína Vasconcelos.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 18:13, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:56, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Metadata shows it to be copyright Kerry Davies/Daily Mail Philafrenzy (talk) 18:46, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:53, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Promotional. Out of scope. Wcam (talk) 19:29, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:51, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Files clearly not "own work". The Serena Guen photo can be found on http://batsbazaar.blogspot.com/2012/07/suitcase-magazine-fortune-favours-bold.html; the other at http://wallyherbert.com/portfolios/art/#prettyPhoto[gallery-881]/0/
GRuban (talk) 19:38, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:51, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
per COM:ADVERT INeverCry 19:41, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:51, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
per COM:ADVERT INeverCry 19:42, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:51, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
thumbnail format and missing EXIF data, hence, DR started to verify origin and claimed 'own work', Roland zh (talk) 19:42, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:51, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
description contradicts license; hardly of any educ. value without further description Jochen Burghardt (talk) 10:06, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:33, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Photo is of self - clearly out of scope Yohannvt (talk) 10:06, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:33, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
bad quality, no source Rettinghaus (talk) 10:09, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, with note that File:Georg Philipp Telemann by Georg Lichtensteger.jpg is already in Commons. No need to keep a blurry version of the same thing. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:33, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Derived from a deleted version, File:Kårstein Eidem Løvaas.jpg 4ing (talk) 10:11, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:32, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
out of scope Berthold Werner (talk) 10:42, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:32, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope Randykitty (talk) 10:52, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:32, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope Randykitty (talk) 10:54, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:32, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Image is of very small resolution & of no use in commons Yohannvt (talk) 11:17, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:32, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Promotional photo from social network (could be found here. Missing permission. Blacklake (talk) 11:21, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:31, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Files by MohdNabiyein2000
[edit]- File:Nabiyeinofficial.jpg.jpg
- File:Nabiyein 2jpg.jpg
- File:Nabiyein jpg..jpg
- File:Mohd Nabiyein.jpg -> it is used in an article that contains only the photo
- File:12107043 1572172079761759 3604843026212585179 nabiyeinjpg.jpg
Unused personal photos, out of scope. --C messier (talk) 11:16, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:31, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Asaduzzaman Asad Sikder (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos, out of scope
Gbawden (talk) 11:44, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:30, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Personal photos, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 11:44, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:30, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Cut-out of this image — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:54, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:30, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Apparent professional promotional photo. Given the uploader's previous copyright violations (File:Gading-marten.jpg and File:Roy_marten.jpg) it is a safe bet that this is not his/her own work. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:01, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:30, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work Gbawden (talk) 12:08, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:30, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative work. . HombreDHojalata.talk 12:09, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:30, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Low quality personal type photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 12:11, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:29, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
personal type photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 12:11, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:29, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Derivative work. Kelly (talk) 13:00, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:29, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
because this is not my photo Cuba11543 (talk) 13:35, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
[[Category:{{subst:delete2|image=File:Blanca Rosa Gil.jpg]]
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:28, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Fair use image. Some Linuxes are published under free license. Also I am not totally sure, that the screenshot surpasses threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 13:43, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
- @Taivo: If it was local, it should not be licensed with this template? --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 13:57, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
- It would be good solution to transfer the file into local wiki and tag it as non-free fair use screenshot, if local wiki allows this. Taivo (talk) 14:01, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
- @Taivo: But it is not useful for any page:It does not benefit from its presence anywhere --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 14:07, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
- So now you say, that the file is out of project scope. I do not agree, the file can be used for illustrating Linux Illume, so scope exists. Taivo (talk) 14:09, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
- @Taivo: But it is not useful for any page:It does not benefit from its presence anywhere --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 14:07, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
- It would be good solution to transfer the file into local wiki and tag it as non-free fair use screenshot, if local wiki allows this. Taivo (talk) 14:01, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Hey guys, I'm a little confused about what's going on with the image. I'm the sole developer of the illume OS project, but from what I understand from this discussion is that this image may be a copyright offence against myself?! Csiew88 (talk) 16:08, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
- I was also confused. En.wiki does not mention Illume Linux. Maybe the distribution is really non-notable? Taivo (talk) 16:57, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
- It's still categorised as a draft. However, I doubt it'll ever make it past that status. The content in the image is all under the GNU General Public License. As far as I'm aware, I haven't really modified anything that's visible in the picture to invoke any kind of breach(?) of the license. The wallpaper in the background and some of the window manager theme elements are original, but I've released it under the GNU GPL too. However, I don't mind it being deleted if it doesn't surpass the TOO. csiew88 (talk) 02:45, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- Also, in response to ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2, this image currently isn't used by any non-draft en.wiki page. It's probably fair to remove it. csiew88 (talk) 02:49, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- It's still categorised as a draft. However, I doubt it'll ever make it past that status. The content in the image is all under the GNU General Public License. As far as I'm aware, I haven't really modified anything that's visible in the picture to invoke any kind of breach(?) of the license. The wallpaper in the background and some of the window manager theme elements are original, but I've released it under the GNU GPL too. However, I don't mind it being deleted if it doesn't surpass the TOO. csiew88 (talk) 02:45, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: PCManFM and LXDE are licensed under the GNU General Public License, so no copyvio in any way. Also, if illume OS (now Fluorite OS) does not have a Wikipedia page, this is not a valid reason for deleting a free screenshot (at least categorizable under LXDE and PCManFM related categories. --Amitie 10g (talk) 03:57, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
@Csiew88: What is the benefit of this image?There is no article on the topic --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 06:53, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- Commons is a general-porpose repository for free media for everyone, not just to Wikipedia. File is perfectly educationally valuable. --Amitie 10g (talk) 20:16, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused file, out of scope. Commons is not a repository for snapshots of user's desktops. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:28, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
- Restored per UDEL. --Amitie 10g (talk) 12:17, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:50, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:27, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Does not comply COM:SCOPE Triplecaña (talk) 13:50, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:26, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
nused personal photos Pippobuono (talk) 14:02, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:26, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://upic.me/i/yu/1908276_565348876913372_6012556575942253392_n.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:05, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:26, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Budiridhollah (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:05, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:26, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:25, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:25, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pratik Wategave (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:25, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:25, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:09, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:25, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Appears to be identical to image on Internet, ownership claim by uploader is suspect: http://kickstart.bikeexif.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/glynn-kerr.jpg Brianhe (talk) 14:10, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:24, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://www.nightjartravel.com/sites/default/files/styles/gallery_image/public/images-town/Nightjar%20R%26T%20Bloemfontein%202%20Jean.jpg.
- File:Road sign on the R700 road outside Bloemfontein.jpg
- File:R76 road on the sarel cillier's wawiel bridge entering the city.jpg
- File:The Bloemfontein City Hall.jpg
- File:Grain Elevator at Tweespruit.jpg
- File:The Free State High Court.jpg
- File:Panorama plaza in suidrand.jpg
- File:A view of Bloemfontein Cbd seen from the Nelson Mandela statue at Navil hill.jpg
- File:Shoprite Usave store in Botshabelo B.jpg
- File:Bloemfontein's lochlogan waterfront mall at night.jpg
- File:The inside of the sasolburg junxion mall.jpg
- File:The Kroonstad City Hall.jpg
- File:Reitz street in the CBD.jpg
- File:The supreme Court of appeal in Bloemfontein.jpg
- File:The construction of the botshabelo interchange on the --N8-- road.jpg
- File:The view of Bloemfontein.jpg
- File:Aerial-view-of-bethlehem-free-state-province-gettyimages-3.jpg
- File:Sasolburg square shopping centre in the CBD.jpg
- File:Mango-Airline-660.jpg
- File:Outside-of-protea hotel bfn central.jpg
- File:KroonstadSteynandHill-sars.jpg
- File:Kaizer sebothelo stadium.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete all (copyvio-only account, see user talk). Gunnex (talk) 08:21, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:24, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Advertisement. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Průmyslový regulátor otáček HSBC Series.jpg
- File:Nabijecka.jpg
- File:521-high-voltage-igbt-prumyslovy-regulator-otacek-hbc-series-400400-3.jpg
- File:625-prumyslovy-regulator-otacek-motoru-50063-hbc-series.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:22, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
After receiving notices for a first batch of copyrighted images, the user added another batch of same. These are some form of advertising or promotion for the products depicted, not own work, and not contributed for educational purposes.
- File:Balancujici-nabijec-1-30a.jpg
- File:Prumyslovy-bateriovy-akupak-lipol-40ah-45s.jpg
- File:Custom-accupack-for-hybrid-aircraft.jpg
- File:Rex50 - Výkon 30kW.jpg
- File:REB90-Výkon 80kW.jpg
- File:Bms-system-balancujici-a-merici-jednotka 2.jpg
- File:Bms-system-balancujici-a-merici-jednotka.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:22, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:09, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:20, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:20, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:21, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:21, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: Original GIF uploaded in 2009. I don't see any valid reason for deletion. --Amitie 10g (talk) 03:23, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:20, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - advertising Gbawden (talk) 14:39, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:20, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - commons is not a photo album
- File:William Nicholas Gomes 61.jpg
- File:William Nicholas Gomes16.jpg
- File:William Nicholas Gomes15.jpg
- File:William Nicholas Gomes 12.jpg
- File:William Nicholas Gomes 13.jpg
- File:William Nicholas Gomes 11.jpg
- File:William Nicholas Gomes 9.jpg
- File:William Nicholas Gomes 10.jpg
- File:William Nicholas Gomes 4.JPG
- File:William Nicholas Gomes 5.JPG
- File:William Nicholas Gomes 6.JPG
- File:William Nicholas Gomes 3.JPG
- File:William Nicholas Gomes 2.JPG
- File:William Nicholas Gomes 1.JPG
- File:Gomes William.JPG
- File:Nicholas Gomes William.JPG
- File:William Gomes Nicholas.JPG
- File:Gomes William Nicholas.JPG
- File:Nicholas Gomes.jpg
- File:William Gomes.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 14:42, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:19, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Clear scan of a print source. Likely copyright violation — Chris Woodrich (talk) 14:45, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:17, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Apparent professional promotional photo. Given the uploader's previous copyright violations (File:Gading-marten.jpg and File:Roy_marten.jpg, among others) it is a safe bet that this is not his/her own work. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 14:51, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:18, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
- also file:Photography Workshop.jpg
You are not copyright holder of 1950 Cosmopolitan article. The photo violates journal's copyright. Taivo (talk) 14:55, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:14, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Non notable actor (or likes to think he is). Out of scope - commons not a photo album
- File:Vinod modgill with her nephew.jpg
- File:Vinod modgill with deep.jpg
- File:Vinod modgill with fan.jpg
- File:Vinod modgill on ramp random.jpg
- File:Vinod modgill with harpreet.jpg
- File:Vinod modgill with deep ahuja.jpg
- File:Vinod modgill with id rox inder sharma.jpg
- File:Vinod modgill on ramp.jpg
- File:Vinod modgill on ramp with girl.jpg
- File:Vinod modgill with cousin.JPG
- File:Vinod modgill with music.jpg
- File:Vinod modgill normal.jpg
- File:Vinod modgill coca cola add.jpg
- File:Vinod modgill jacket.jpg
- File:Vinod modgill smoking try.jpg
- File:Vinod modgill garments add.jpg
- File:Vinod modgill 2012.jpg
- File:Vinod modgill senstive.jpg
- File:Vinod modgill with tree.jpg
- File:Vinod modgill outdoor shoot.jpg
- File:Vinod modgill print.jpg
- File:Vinod modgill garments ads.jpg
- File:Vinod modgill printshoot.jpg
- File:Vinod modgill shoot.jpg
- File:Vinod modgill website.gif
- File:Ivinod modgill angry look.jpg
- File:Vinod modgill still.jpg
- File:Smile vinod.jpg
- File:Actor vinod.jpg
- File:Vinod at virar (mumbai).jpg
- File:Vinod modgill diffrent style.jpg
- File:Eeee.jpg
- File:Vinod modgill random click.jpg
- File:Vinod modgill noise.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Gbawden (talk) 15:01, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:13, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Bookcover, copyvio, no evidence of permissin, "Own work" seems dubious. Kleuske (talk) 15:17, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:12, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be "own work". Possibly based on a PD original, but original source and author information are missing. GermanJoe (talk) 15:40, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:12, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be "own work". Possibly based on a PD original, but original source and author information are missing. GermanJoe (talk) 15:41, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:12, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be "own work". Possibly based on a PD original, but original source and author information are missing. GermanJoe (talk) 15:42, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:12, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
source website doesn't appear to be cc-licensed Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:25, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license.
Deleted: per nomination, site is licensed "© 2015 The University of Texas at Austin". --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:49, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
photo of presumably copyrighted painting; source website doesn't appear to be cc-licensed Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:25, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
This painting is not copyrighted and is owned by Clements Center. I have been given permission by Clements Center to publish photo.
Deleted: per nomination, site is licensed "© 2015 The University of Texas at Austin". --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:49, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
copyvio - https://www.clementscenter.org/people/item/235-paul-miller Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:26, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
I have been authorized by the author of this photo to publish.
Deleted: per nomination, no OTRS from actual copyright holder. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:46, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
copyvio - https://www.clementscenter.org/people/item/12-william-inboden Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:27, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
I have been authorized by the owner of this photo to publish. ((User talk: jkj638))
Deleted: per nomination, site is licensed "© 2015 The University of Texas at Austin". --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:50, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
likely not "own work" given that the description says www.clementscenter.org; this website does not appear to be cc-licensed Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:27, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Authorized by Clements Center to publish. User: jkj638
Deleted: per nomination, site is licensed "© 2015 The University of Texas at Austin". --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:49, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
File:"Great Powers, Failed States, and New Frontiers- National Security Challenges in the 21st Century" Conference hosted by the Clements Center.jpg
[edit]
dubious own work given uploader's track record (more likely taken from www.clementscenter.org but i haven't taken the time to track down the url) Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:28, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Uploader has been authorized to publish each of these photos by owner (Clements Center) User: jkj638
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:49, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Self-created artwork without obvious educational use Rupert Clayton (talk) 01:03, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:45, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal photo not useful for an educational purpose; out of scope Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 01:51, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:45, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Image only used in English at this page for nonsense that is approaching an attack page. Ricky81682 (talk) 02:31, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:45, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Unused selfie. DMacks (talk) 04:27, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:45, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Joel Ernesto Lopes Maraschin (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF (complex logos, magazine covers, Facebook images)
- File:Guri Destaque Cultura do RS.jpg
- File:Cia de Artes universo em Dança.jpg
- File:Logo Meta.jpg
- File:Edição 002.jpg
- File:Radio Meta.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 07:15, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:44, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry speedy deleted. Gunnex (talk) 07:19, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Keep as a representation of pixel art similar to that of early 8-bit micro computers such as the ZX Spectrum. --dsprc (talk) 14:28, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination with note that there is lots of Category:8-bit digital art in that category. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:44, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 07:24, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:43, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolution, missing EXIF + out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 07:27, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:43, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Cheick de paris (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos, out of scope
Gbawden (talk) 07:30, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:43, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by I Love Miora Florlys (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope, Commons is not a private photo album.
- File:Miora Andrialalaina Florlys 2016.jpg
- File:Miora Andrialalaina Florlys.jpg
- File:MIORA FLORLYS and MARCOLINE.jpg
★ Poké95 07:33, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:43, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Previously published at http://1000celebritesdelareunion.blogspot.com.au/2010/09/une-societe-reunionnaise-derriere.html in September 2010. Low res, likely fake EXIF XR728 (talk) 07:45, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:42, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, mysteriously photoshopped + out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 07:54, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:41, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. User indef blocked at ptwiki. If IN scope needs permission from https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1496661713965336&set=a.1382852068679635.1073741826.100008645652381&type=3&theater (2015) Gunnex (talk) 07:57, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:41, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF + out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry 2x speedy deleted. Gunnex (talk) 08:03, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:41, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used respectively uploaded by a user who didn't make real contributions, apart from the creation of the user page. Per 960 res probadly grabbed from Facebook. Gunnex (talk) 08:09, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:41, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolution, missing EXIF, considering also https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MYgQEDqxP8c&t=0m11s (2015, © by "Assembleia de Deus Matutina-MG") Gunnex (talk) 08:13, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:40, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
useless picture and no permission Giraldillo (talk) 08:19, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
I am a social worker and I think the picture is very worthful. It is better than senseless diagrams and numbers because it represents reality Jehupu (talk)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:39, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
useless and no permission iraldillo (talk) 08:20, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
I am a social worker and I disagree with this opinion. Showing the reality is much better then showing numbers or diagrams. And this ist the reality!!! Jehupu
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:39, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal image, outside project scope. Kelly (talk) 08:57, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:38, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Unused low quality image. Kelly (talk) 08:59, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:38, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Bad Quality/blurry image Yohannvt (talk) 09:07, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:38, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Bad Quality/blurry image Yohannvt (talk) 09:07, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:38, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Personal phots, out of scope. Sankoswal (talk) 09:12, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:38, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Photo is of self - clearly out of scope Yohannvt (talk) 09:29, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:38, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Photo is of self - clearly out of scope Yohannvt (talk) 09:29, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete: Poor-quality private holiday snap. Outside project scope. --DAJF (talk) 12:23, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:38, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope. Sankoswal (talk) 09:30, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:37, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope. Sankoswal (talk) 09:32, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:37, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope. Sankoswal (talk) 09:35, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:37, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
not own work; google image link Biplab Anand (Talk) 09:43, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:37, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
no source, bad name, replaced by File:Telemann by Preisler.jpg Rettinghaus (talk) 09:44, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:37, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
bad quality, replaced by File:Telemann by Preisler.jpg Rettinghaus (talk) 09:45, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:37, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope. Sankoswal (talk) 09:46, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:36, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
copyright violation Mario Maraschi (talk) 09:51, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:36, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Photo is of self - clearly out of scope Yohannvt (talk) 10:05, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:36, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
copyright violation http://www.greenflashbrew.com/home/ John from Idegon (talk) 00:02, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:51, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
not likely to be a work of the federal government -- chair has seal of texas on it [1] Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:14, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
![[1]](http://www.brandsoftheworld.com/sites/default/files/styles/logo-thumbnail/public/0016/6416/brand.gif?itok=9Xruoz2u){kind=link}
- Delete: Not enough information provided to determine license status. The Seal of Texas suggests you're right, that it isn't federal. —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 01:05, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:51, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Original: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Handwarmers.JPG Ppntori (talk) 05:18, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:53, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Original: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Hand_warmer.jpg Ppntori (talk) 05:19, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:53, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Original: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/09/Hand_warmer_activation.webm Ppntori (talk) 05:19, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:53, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Original: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Pocket_body_warmer.jpg Ppntori (talk) 05:20, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete: duplicate of File:Pocket body warmer.jpg --dsprc (talk) 14:32, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:53, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
unused selfie Berthold Werner (talk) 05:50, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:53, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alisson costa vieira (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used.
- File:Deni santos na São josé fm - esportes.jpg
- File:Encontro das tribos.jpg
- File:Comunicador - Deni Santos.jpg
- File:Deni santos.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 06:12, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:53, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of project scope, Commons is not a private photo album. Also comes from Facebook. ★ Poké95 06:14, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:53, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Clicklover (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photos, out of scope
Gbawden (talk) 06:56, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:55, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by EderRSantana (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, photos of historical photos (COM:DW). Historical photos (source country = Brazil) may be in public domain by other means but relevant info (proper author/date of creation or first disclosure) must be provided to determine copyrights status. All files dated by uploader with "1. January 1948" (which is quite doubtful), failing also {{PD-Brazil-media}} (+70 years disclosure).
- File:Família Lepesqueur.jpg
- File:Rua do Banco Beg.jpg
- File:Construcao igreja sao sebastiao.jpg
- File:Hotel Piramidal.jpg
- File:Primeira Bomba de Combustível de Cristalina.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 06:21, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. -- Geagea (talk) 23:19, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb: Missing license as of 9 June 2016 - Using VisualFileChange.
Not own work, image is too complex and have copyrights because it's a recent work Sfs90 (talk) 00:15, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, photographer and poster designer should confirm license via COM:OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 14:17, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Veggies as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: No explicit citation for why this is PD. MSNBC products are copyrighted to MSNBC.
- The uploader has challenged this on the file talk page with the following:
- should not be deleted - you cannot prove it is copyrighted, because we do not know if MSNBC copyrighted this spot, cannot find on internet archives to determine terms when aired, and an Emory University professor uploaded to youtube with a CC license. no reason to doubt his judgement. Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 23:29, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- I'm not sure I agree with Slowking4 because the burden of proof lies with the uploader and those users who think it should be kept. The video has an MSNBC logo so the default assumption would be that it is copyright protected by MSNBC. Green Giant (talk) 00:16, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
- i relied on the CC license by the Emory professor, and linked to it. what more proof do you want? you do not have proof it was copyrighted, only an assumption. maybe an email to CNBC? Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 00:21, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
- Well, anybody can upload a video to YouTube under the CC license but that doesn't necessarily mean the YouTuber is the copyright holder. Whether the YouTuber is a professor is not really relevant to the question that needs answering. What proof is there that the YouTuber is the copyright holder, other than the fact he uploaded it to YouTube? Did he co-produce it with MSNBC? Is he part of Media ITE, the other company named at the end of the video? Did he commission the video in some way? That's the sort of proof we need. Green Giant (talk) 00:43, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
- Precisely. Files are often washed under inappropriate tags to get around copyright issues. The argument "you don't have proof it was copyrighted" is expressly cited as how not to justify a file's inclusion. First of all, what makes you think that "Emory professor" holds the copyright to something produced by MSNBC? -- Veggies (talk) 01:58, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
- Well, anybody can upload a video to YouTube under the CC license but that doesn't necessarily mean the YouTuber is the copyright holder. Whether the YouTuber is a professor is not really relevant to the question that needs answering. What proof is there that the YouTuber is the copyright holder, other than the fact he uploaded it to YouTube? Did he co-produce it with MSNBC? Is he part of Media ITE, the other company named at the end of the video? Did he commission the video in some way? That's the sort of proof we need. Green Giant (talk) 00:43, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
- i relied on the CC license by the Emory professor, and linked to it. what more proof do you want? you do not have proof it was copyrighted, only an assumption. maybe an email to CNBC? Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 00:21, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
- excellent, by that logic let's mass delete all the flickr uploads, since we cannot believe the licenses. if you are going to delete based on speculation rather than facts, then all you have is your finger in the wind. do you have any evidence to support your speculation? speculate on this: what makes you think MSNBC did not release as a public service announcement? why have they not enforced their "copyright" at youtube? why have they not indexed their archive so people can see the original? has not their inaction acquiesced in and consented in the CC license? Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 12:56, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Obvious license laundering from a youtuber who claims to be the copyright holder of MSNBC, Russia Today, PressTV, Telegraph, etc. ad nauseam content. --Storkk (talk) 14:21, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
Not own work, any work published in Argentina 30 years COULD be free of rights (when the file doesn't have a copyright holder), but even in that case, between 1987 and 2016 it's only 29 years. Sfs90 (talk) 00:20, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Photograph is likely PD ({{PD-AR-Photo}}), but it is of signage that is probably not PD. --Storkk (talk) 14:26, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
Not own work, any work published in Argentina 30 years COULD be free of rights (when the file doesn't have a copyright holder), but even in that case, between 1987 and 2016 it's only 29 years. Sfs90 (talk) 00:21, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Appears to be a scan of a newspaper, indicating it was published. It was created in 1980, so {{PD-AR-Photo}} is likely. --Storkk (talk) 14:27, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
PDC was founded in 1954, if the picture belongs to a book by its 50th anniversary, means that was published in 2004. Unless the publication of this image is displayed on an earlier date, it should be deleted. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 00:46, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:36, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
हसी नाकी ड 1.39.12.179 05:06, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
हसी नाकी जवानी 1.39.12.179 05:08, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Pure Vandalism
[edit]Received abusive message too. Reverting it back to original. AbhiSuryawanshi (talk) 07:56, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Storkk (talk) 14:30, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
Inadequate information given to verify source or license. Kelly (talk) 07:14, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
- Please delete. The image was found in USDA website but the copyright statement says the image is copyrighted. OhanaUnitedTalk page 16:13, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (C) Mark W Skinner. --Storkk (talk) 14:33, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
- delete. The journal Avicennia (revista de ecología oceanología biodiversidad tropical) is copyrighted. Nothing indicates is free copyright status. All content is this category and in its subcategories should be deleted too. --Snek01 (talk) 21:47, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- I was categorising it only. But -- if it is copyrighted, it should be deleted, nothing to discuss. Wieralee (talk) 21:59, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- The files in the category mostly or completely seem to have been uploaded by Fæ. --Stefan2 (talk) 11:07, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete It appears to have become an open access journal, released on Flickr as no copyright known. However researching the source will show you that the copyright chosen by the publisher is CC-NC-BY-SA-3.0 BHL info. So unless individual articles have a declared weaker copyright, or the publisher drops the NC restriction, these have to be deleted from Commons. Unfortunately the IA's Flickrstream has these glitches. This DR added to User:Fæ/Project list/Internet Archive#Useful reference deletion discussions. --Fæ (talk) 11:23, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
- delete including derived files such as File:Volvarina laurauae.jpg. --Snek01 (talk) 14:14, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as discussed. If other straggler derived files are left (I'm sure there are), please either ping me or open a new DR. --Storkk (talk) 14:37, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:48, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 05:14, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
File:Proposal - (Awareness and Prevalence of vulvovaginal candidiasis among University students in Namibia).pdf
[edit]See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:48, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 05:14, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:49, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Podzemnik (talk) 05:15, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
Logo can't be own or free Bilderling (talk) 13:13, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unlikely own work. --Podzemnik (talk) 05:19, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
Historical photo, the boxer was active in 1969. Own work is in doubt. If the photo was first published in Italy, then it is in public domain. Also here is general notability problem, he is mentioned only once in it.wiki. Taivo (talk) 13:36, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unlikely to be own work. --Podzemnik (talk) 05:21, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:50, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unclear copyright status. --Podzemnik (talk) 05:22, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
scizofrenia Antifajny (talk) 22:30, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
vymazat a zahodit Antifajny (talk) 13:56, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: experiments. --Podzemnik (talk) 05:29, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jambukarupulliu (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private files storage. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 05:30, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 05:31, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ramin mirabdolbaghi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private files storage. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 05:31, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text documents of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 05:32, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 05:34, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private files storage. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 05:35, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 05:35, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
These diagrams have images which are not sourced. While the diagram may be own work of uploader, each of the images used needs to be properly sourced and licensed.
- File:Nebulosa del Cranc en múltiples longituds d'ona.png
- File:Crab Nebula in multiwavelength.png
- File:Espectre electromagnètic COMPLET en català.png
- File:Espectre electromagnètic COMPLET.png
Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:33, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Proper source and description is needed so we can identify the licence. --Podzemnik (talk) 05:36, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
Unused logo, out of scope, please read description and source. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:42, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope to me. --Podzemnik (talk) 05:38, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
Unneeded blurry "motivational poster" or "quote poster", out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:42, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope to me. --Podzemnik (talk) 05:38, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
another likely copyvio by a repeat offender Chris Troutman (talk) 18:29, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
![18:29, 8 June 2016 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2016/06/08#c-Chris_troutman-2016-06-08T18:29:00.000Z-File:Bryan_Caraway_"Speed_Dealer".png){kind=link}
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 13:51, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
![13:51, 18 June 2016 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2016/06/08#c-Wdwd-2016-06-18T13:51:00.000Z-File:Bryan_Caraway_"Speed_Dealer".png){kind=link}
This image is overprinted reading "Alas Inocentes...", there is no indication of user's own work, despite license. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:32, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:49, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
This image is overprinted reading "Alas Inocentes...", there is no indication of user's own work, despite license. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:32, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: Work from the Federal Government of Mexico, {{PD-MX-exempt}} apply. No valid reason for deletion. --Amitie 10g (talk) 03:50, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
- Comment There is no indication that the illustrations were done by the Government of Mexico, the upload template says "own work". Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:54, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 13:48, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
Halftoned image, no indication of user's own work, invalid date. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:32, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:46, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
This image is overprinted reading "Alas Inocentes...", there is no indication of user's own work, despite license. This is a derivative work of an illustration. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:32, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:47, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work': WLE 2016 upload, missing EXIF data to verify origin, hence, potentially non-free content, Roland zh (talk) 18:32, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Looks good to me; not a professional shot, no google image search hits, exif matches mapped location - MPF (talk) 16:27, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Wdwd (talk) 13:46, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
This image is overprinted reading "Alas Inocentes...", there is no indication of user's own work, despite license. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:32, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:45, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
This image is overprinted reading "Alas Inocentes...", there is no indication of user's own work, despite license. The image is dated 1925, so PD1923 would not apply. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:33, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:45, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
Not own work, contains text, either out of scope because text can be used as text, or possible copyvio as text is unattributed and not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:37, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, derivate work. --Wdwd (talk) 13:21, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
This image is overprinted reading "Alas Inocentes...", there is no indication of user's own work, despite license. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:37, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:20, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
No indication of user's own work on this composite image from "Alas Inocentes"(see overprinting), the two images are (a) a letter and (b) a newspaper. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:38, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:17, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
This image is overprinted reading "Alas Inocentes...", there is no indication of user's own work, despite license. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:38, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:17, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
Last time this was not own work - see Special:Undelete/File:PRV13.jpg (admin link only). JuTa 18:38, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 13:16, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
This image is overprinted reading "Alas Inocentes...", there is no indication of user's own work, despite license. This image is composite of two images, a photo and a newspaper. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:38, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:13, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
This image is overprinted reading "Alas Inocentes...", there is no indication of user's own work, despite license. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:38, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:12, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
This image is overprinted reading "Alas Inocentes...", there is no indication of user's own work, despite license. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:38, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:12, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
This image is overprinted reading "Alas Inocentes...", there is no indication of user's own work, despite license. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:39, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:12, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
This image is overprinted reading "Alas Inocentes...", there is no indication of user's own work, despite license. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:39, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:12, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
This image is overprinted reading "Alas Inocentes...", there is no indication of user's own work, despite license. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:39, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:12, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
This image is overprinted reading "Alas Inocentes...", there is no indication of user's own work, despite license. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:39, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:10, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
This image is overprinted reading "Alas Inocentes...", there is no indication of user's own work, despite license. This is a composite image, both images need sources and proper license. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:39, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:10, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
This image is overprinted reading "Alas Inocentes...", there is no indication of user's own work, despite license. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:39, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:10, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
There is something wrong with the file template here: date 2007, "own work" and author Unknown? Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:43, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:08, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
source = France Galop, Author Bob Demuyser, with no OTRS permission. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:45, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:06, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
"Archives de la famille de Muyser Lantwyck" does not show the permission of the creator. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:46, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 13:06, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Source Sophie Cauvin & Author Unknown can't add up to the license given this image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:47, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:05, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
Source "Sophie Cauvin" and Author "Unknown" do not correspond with the license given. Subject died in 2012, it's likely the photographer did not die 70 years ago. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:48, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:04, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
No indication that user created this photograph, although they rephotographed it in 2014. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:48, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 13:03, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted map, no information on author/permission. A.Savin 18:51, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
- I used an upload similar to this one: File:Screenshot-Nelson-Mapnik-OSM-Map.png to check whether my upload was correct.
- Today I found other uploads, similar to this one: File:Potsdamer Platz in Mapnik.jpg
- In stead of this:
- Bron: Eigen werk
- Auteur: W. Frank
- The uploads found today have:
- Bron: OpenStreetMap
- Auteur: OpenStreetMap's contributors
- Would specifying Bron and Auteur the way it is done in todays findings solve the problem? If not, what else needs to be done? --FredTC (talk) 14:26, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: Copyrighted? I see clearly OpenStreetMap in the screenshot. --Amitie 10g (talk) 22:23, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- After {{OpenStreetMap}} was added by user Amitie 10g, I also made these changes:
- Bron: Eigen werk --> OpenStreetMap
- Auteur: my name --> OpenStreetMap's contributors
- I hope this solves the problem. If not, what else has to be done to keep this image? --FredTC (talk) 06:52, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
- After {{OpenStreetMap}} was added by user Amitie 10g, I also made these changes:
Kept: missing infos added (OSM). --Wdwd (talk) 13:01, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted map, no information on author/permission. A.Savin 18:52, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
- I used an upload similar to this one: File:Screenshot-Nelson-Mapnik-OSM-Map.png to check whether my upload was correct.
- Today I found other uploads, similar to this one: File:Potsdamer Platz in Mapnik.jpg
- In stead of this:
- Bron: Eigen werk
- Auteur: W. Frank
- The uploads found today have:
- Bron: OpenStreetMap
- Auteur: OpenStreetMap's contributors
- Would specifying Bron and Auteur the way it is done in todays findings solve the problem? If not, what else needs to be done? --FredTC (talk) 14:26, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- Is this map drawn by you? Probably not, which means that it is a copyright violation to declare it as "own work". --A.Savin 14:53, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- Did you seen the OpenStreetMap at the bottom of the screenshots? Why not correct the license instead? --Amitie 10g (talk) 18:45, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
- I added {{OpenStreetMap}} as was done by user Amitie 10g for File:Mapframe compare features missing.jpg. I also made these changes:
- Bron: Eigen werk --> OpenStreetMap
- Auteur: my name --> OpenStreetMap's contributors
- I hope this solves the problem. If not, what else has to be done to keep this image? --FredTC (talk) 06:49, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
- Is this map drawn by you? Probably not, which means that it is a copyright violation to declare it as "own work". --A.Savin 14:53, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept: missing infos added (OSM). --Wdwd (talk) 13:00, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as imho potentially non-free content, see thumbnail format and missing EXIF data to verify origin, Roland zh (talk) 19:00, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion (make more specific descriptions). --Wdwd (talk) 12:56, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as imho potentially non-free content, see thumbnail format and missing EXIF data to verify origin, Roland zh (talk) 19:02, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion (make more specific descriptions). --Wdwd (talk) 12:57, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as imho potentially non-free content, see thumbnail format and missing EXIF data to verify origin, Roland zh (talk) 19:03, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion (make more specific descriptions). --Wdwd (talk) 12:53, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
Not clear if this picture is rights free, as it is sourced by another (Indonisian) Wikipedia. As far as Google Translate is understandable, the picture there is marked as an unfree-promo picture. The Banner (talk) 21:57, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 12:43, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as imho potentially non-free content, see format and missing EXIF data to verify origin, Roland zh (talk) 18:55, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
- There neither is an obligation to exclusively upload images with certain EXIF data, nor with a special format. You can also upload images without EXIF data; there specially is no need to add EXIF data to images, which don't have it. Also can you upload images in any format you like - JPG with 720 pixels is nothing special at all. If an image is an own work, you just state "own work" and that is it. There is no problem apparent.
- It seems to me like the DR aims at trying to institute additional requirements for image uploads (like "only with EXIF data" or "only certain formats"). Adding such additional requirements is out of scope of single deletion requests. "Deletion requests are not the place to attempt to change Commons policy, nor may requests be made simply to make a point. Any such requests may be speedily closed" - I will implement this here. Please use the Village Pump or the policy talk page if you wish to propose a change in policy! --87.123.63.223 10:01, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- Meanwhile Roland zh himself kindly asked to make a "kept" decision by a Wikimedia Commons administrator.[1] We now agree that there is no ground for deletion of this file. The fact that no valid reason for deletion has been provided, and that even the inquirer Roland zh agrees to the absence of a deletion reason, makes this request speedily closable. --87.123.12.36 20:43, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- in short, no, from my side finally closing, Roland zh (talk) 21:13, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: Since no valid reason for deletion has been given, there is no reason to keep this request open. Your try to institute additional requirements for image uploads, which are not backed up by the according rules - at least not by the rules in their current form -, is out of scope to the deletion request. Commons:Deletion requests makes it very clear: Deletion requests are not the place to attempt to change Commons policy. Any such requests may be speedily closed. I do not have a problem granting you the additional six or what it is days anyway, but in the absence of a valid deletion reason I do not see use in leaving the request open. Speedy closure only follows the rules. --87.123.12.36 21:22, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- in short, no, from my side finally closing, Roland zh (talk) 21:13, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- Meanwhile Roland zh himself kindly asked to make a "kept" decision by a Wikimedia Commons administrator.[1] We now agree that there is no ground for deletion of this file. The fact that no valid reason for deletion has been provided, and that even the inquirer Roland zh agrees to the absence of a deletion reason, makes this request speedily closable. --87.123.12.36 20:43, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: No proof of copyvio, and Google Image Search didn't returned any results. --Amitie 10g (talk) 21:55, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Wdwd (talk) 12:42, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by WikiDhruba (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://america.pink/images/5/8/3/3/6/7/en/2-basanta-choudhury.jpg.
- File:Dinajpore Palace.jpg
- File:Balara Dey Street Dutta Bari..jpg
- File:Durga Puja of Hatkhola DUTTA.jpg
- File:Hatkhola Dutta Bari.jpg
- File:Dutta Chaudhury family of Andul.jpg
- File:Basanta Chaudhury.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:58, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
A photo of a flyer, Copyright Issue? Although needless... Dirk1981 (talk) 13:10, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:13, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
Blank Image.. It is obviously out of scope Yohannvt (talk) 11:45, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
- Comment It's not blank. Click the full image. There's some kind of display bug. Even so, it's terrible quality and doesn't depict anything useable. —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 01:08, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept: recovered image. czar 04:43, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Blank Image.. It is obviously out of scope Yohannvt (talk) 11:45, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
- Speedy keep: Image is not blank, just incorrectly rendered by MediaWiki software, but valid. Please see the original file before nominating! --Amitie 10g (talk) 03:59, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. czar 04:30, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Blank Image.. It is obviously out of scope Yohannvt (talk) 11:45, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: File is not blank, see the original image. --Amitie 10g (talk) 04:01, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. czar 04:43, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Blank Image.. It is obviously out of scope Yohannvt (talk) 11:45, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: File is not blank, see the original image. --Amitie 10g (talk) 04:01, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. czar 04:44, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Blank Image.. It is obviously out of scope Yohannvt (talk) 11:45, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: File is not blank, see the original image. --Amitie 10g (talk) 04:01, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. czar 04:44, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Song. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: needs explicit permission from copyright holder. czar 04:52, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope. Currently used on a promotion WP page Gbawden (talk) 14:53, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: personal photo, out of scope: no educational use. czar 04:49, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Fake logo, there's no references that could state that Canal 13 (then Canal 2 between 1959 and 1961) had an actual logo. The first TV stations logos in Chile appeared only after the 1962 FIFA World Championship. Sfs90 (talk) 06:39, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Kept: in use -> in scope. Please discuss at the place where it is in use. Invalid logos (if properly described) are not forbidden on commons. --Basvb (talk) 00:23, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Fake logo, there's no references that could state that Canal 13 (then Canal 2 between 1959 and 1961) had an actual logo. The first TV stations logos in Chile appeared only after the 1962 FIFA World Championship. Not in scope because the logo it's not used in any article. Sfs90 (talk) 00:26, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:40, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:46, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:40, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
File:Proposal - Awareness of blood donation and transfusion among Windhoek's secondary school learners, Namibia.pdf
[edit]See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:48, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:40, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Missing evidence of permission. Does not seem to be eligible for COM:GOF, as the file page does not include a quote of the e-mail permission for the image. Kelly (talk) 07:06, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:40, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Missing evidence of permission. The original uploader (en:User:Anlace) is not the photographer as he has stated elsewhere that his name is C. Michael Hogan. Kelly (talk) 07:11, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:40, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used respectively uploaded by a user who didn't make real contributions, apart from the creation of the user page. Per FBMD... probadly grabbed from Facebook. Gunnex (talk) 07:50, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:41, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии, выглядит как производная работа - скан из печатного источника. См. СО в русскоязычном разделе Википедии, в том числе и это Dogad75 (talk) 07:56, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:41, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Ambiguous source and license. Possibly {{Self}} but also tagged as a US government work. Kelly (talk) 08:32, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
- Note: this was copied to commons after originally being uploaded to en.wikipedia.org by another user. Have you notified that user? en:User talk:Anlace Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 16:39, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- Anlace hasn't edited for almost 5 years - the subject of his uploads has also come up here. Kelly (talk) 06:46, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:41, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
bad quality, no source Rettinghaus (talk) 09:47, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:41, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Unable to locate original source. Kelly (talk) 11:26, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:41, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
This is my own work. It is not used in any entry. I wish to remove it from wikimedia Araz (talk) 12:57, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
This is my own work. It is not used in any entry. I feel abused by how its inclusion on the page "left-wing politics" was treated by other editors. I wish to remove it from wikimedia Araz (talk) 14:06, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:42, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Picturefile is broken, one quater of picture is a error Dirk1981 (talk) 13:11, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
- Keep thanks for the hint; reuploaded the corrupted file, hence this DR is obsoltete. cheers. --MainFrame (talk) 00:35, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept: re-uploaded. --INeverCry 23:43, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
These type of pictures are usually from the Gagarin Cosmonaut Training Center and not free. We've only the self reference to en:wiki and not the tiniest proof, that this is from a NASA photographer! It exists no findable NASA source for this image, COM:PCP. Furthermore we have this most probable NASA sourced image. Ras67 (talk) 13:13, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:43, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
low quality scan of a paper-photo? Unused, Musuem Item on other pictures present Dirk1981 (talk) 13:17, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:43, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
File:Present and Retired Personnel - BITM 40th Anniversary Celebration - Calcutta 1999-05-02 222.jpg
[edit]
This file was uploaded by mistake as the higher resolution image is there. Biswarup Ganguly (talk) 13:30, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:43, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Files in Category:TripleA
[edit]TripleA is a computer game whose source code (and, bizarrely, also the artwork) is freely licensed under the GNU GPL.
The files tagged in this deletion request all have one or more of the following problems:
- Author information is missing, in violation of the licence. I had a look at the TripleA source distribution myself but was not able to identify the copyright holder(s) of the artwork elements from these screenshots. (The developers don't appear to require copyright assignment, nor do they keep track of copyrighted artwork contributions in sufficient detail.)
- The file is tagged as "own work" when it seems clear that this refers only to the act of taking the screenshot rather than creating the artwork depicted in the screenshot.
- The file is tagged as being in the public domain due to geometric simplicity, when the image is in fact complex enough to cross the threshold of originality.
Unless author information can be provided, and the licensing templates corrected, these uploads seem to be in violation of the TripleA copyright licence and should be deleted.
- File:NWOreliefmap.png
- File:TripleA 1.1.0.0 screenshot of map NWO1.7EB in action.png
- File:TripleA 1.1.0.0 screenshot of the NWO1.7EB map.png
- File:Triplea icon.png
- File:TripleA WWII Classic screenshot.jpg
Psychonaut (talk) 13:34, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:44, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:45, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
A lesser quality and unused image identical to File:New_York_City_from_Space.jpg. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:20, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:45, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
No evidence to support the rather unlikely PD rationale. It seems unlikely that the first publication of this photograph of a Hungarian person took place in the United States. A more likely source country would be Hungary, which has different copyright rules. Verifiable information about when and where first publication took place is required. (The supposed publication date is currently unsubstantiated.) Information about the author's date of death or verification that the photograph was anonymously published (as opposed to the photographer merely not being known to the uploader) will also likely be needed. —LX (talk, contribs) 15:33, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:45, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Thi.monaco (talk · contribs)
[edit]Artworks by living artist, linked to page on pt:wiki which is labeled "Este artigo foi proposto para eliminação por consenso." No indication that artworks are by uploader. One photo of the artist painting (licensed self) claims to show the artist but it is not a selfie.
- File:Poesia de rua 3 Celso Gitahy.jpg
- File:Poesia de rua Celso Gitahy.jpg
- File:Poesia de rua 2 Celso Gitahy.jpg
- File:Pintando a Pilula Celso Gitahy.jpg
- File:Pilula Celso Gitahy.jpg
- File:Pintura digital Celso Gitahy.jpg
- File:Arte não tem idade Celso Gitahy.jpg
- File:Em transito 4 Celso Gitahy.jpg
- File:Em transito 3 Celso Gitahy.jpg
- File:TVNauta Celso Gitahy.jpg
- File:Em transito 2 Celso Gitahy.jpg
- File:Stencil Celso Gitahy.jpg
- File:Noite e dia Celso Gitahy.jpg
- File:Pintura rupestre Celso Gitahy.jpg
- File:23 de maio Celso Gitahy.jpg
- File:Desejo de Poder Celso Gitahy.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:40, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:46, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
These are Wiki Loves Earth entries which do not appear to be own work of the uploader. Of the eight photos, two are duplicates and share a camera with one other image, three pictures are from a different camera and the last one, an entirely different camera. User's other upload was from flickr.
- File:1 Rachidia.jpeg
- File:Marzoga.jpeg
- File:Marzoga morroco.jpeg
- File:Akchour Morroco1.jpeg
- File:Akchour Morroco.jpeg
- File:Tichka.jpeg
- File:Chefchawn Morroco.jpeg
- File:MARZOGA.jpeg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:51, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:46, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Lesser quality than File:Reverend_John_Davenport_by_the_Davenport_Limner_1670.jpeg, also not in use. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:01, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:46, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Unused file which is not found at source given, unable to locate file source. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:08, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:46, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Giovanne Mendes Corrêa (talk · contribs)
[edit]No indication of user's own work on these images of cars and racer.
- File:Design Ford Fusion Diretor de Prova Fórmula Truck.jpg
- File:Design carro Diretor de Prova Fórmula Truck.jpg
- File:Giovanne Mendes Corrêa.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:18, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:46, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Corporate logo of Infotech; doubtful that designer/company has released it under CC-BY-SA 4.0 license. Rotideypoc41352 (talk) 16:57, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:47, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
no indication of user's own work on this very small, low quality black and white image of an eye. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:05, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:47, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Unused, small size image claimed to be of an author. There are many other images of this author in the category. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:06, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:47, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
No indication of user's own work on this small size, low rez image of a writer, notice the description. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:06, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:47, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
No indication of user's father's own work on this image, only that it was from "my father's Album". Owning a copy of an image is not the same thing as owning copyright. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:29, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
This has been deleted before. Along with the other images uploaded by the editor today. Keeps saying father's album. Bgwhite (talk) 05:12, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:47, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
- also crop file:Sakamoto Ryoma statue 02.jpg
There is freedom of panorama in Japan for architecture, but not for sculpture. Who is the sculptor and when (s)he died? Taivo (talk) 18:02, 8 June 2016 (UTC) - Delete According to websites in Japanese [2] [3] [4], the statue was first erected in 1934 (9th year of the Showa era) but was removed during the WW2. The current statue was completed in 1962 (37th year of the Showa era), not old enough for Commons. Files in Category:Statues of Sakamoto Ryoma and Nakaoka Shintaro (Kyoto) will be affected as well. Yasu (talk) 15:48, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:47, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as imho potentially non-free content, see rather small format and missing EXIF data to verify origin, Roland zh (talk) 18:07, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:47, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work': one-file upload, missing EXIF data to verify origin, hence, potentially non-free content, Roland zh (talk) 18:10, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:47, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Trophy is not own work of uploader, image is over printed from likely source. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:33, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:48, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
"Archives de la famille de Muyser Lantwyck" is not own work of uploader. Please provide more information about author of image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:43, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:48, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
DR as per File:Nedukulanjimuri kara.jpg and related contributions by same uploader, Roland zh (talk) 19:26, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:48, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
imho seriously personality rights issues (boy), hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 20:18, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:49, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
These images have no EXIF, and are unlikely own work of the uploader. File:MS-21-300_TASS.jpg is one file they uploaded and claimed as own work, which was actually a TASS photo and which was not CC licensed.
- File:MIBC by Byl Muzikantom.jpg
- File:Federation tower by Nikita Golovnov.jpg
- File:Mercury scyscraper by Ivan Grigoriev.jpg
- File:Eurasia by Ivan Grigoriev.jpg
- File:Evolution by Ivan Grigoriev.jpg
- File:OKO april2016.jpg
- File:MIBC2016.jpg
- File:Federation Tower 2016.jpg
- File:263774 original1.jpg
XR728 (talk) 21:16, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:52, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Not his own work but copied somewhere from the Web, COM:PCP.
Ras67 (talk) 23:58, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:50, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
just categorized multiple uploads related to Category:Padanilam Parabrahma Temple Kettukala, afterwards, wondering that these uploads 1) differ in quality and cameras used, 2) all uploads by the same uploader, and 3) for instance, this one's metada point to www.photoworldstudio.in. DR started to verify this, and potentially the related uploads origin, Roland zh (talk) 19:26, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
- Another backend error on the delete attempt. INeverCry 23:51, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 03:06, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
I made a mistake with the name of the username/page IRebuildEcuador (talk) 13:38, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Storkk (talk) 16:33, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
This manuscript letter is overprinted reading "Alas Inocentes", there is no indication of user's own work, despite license. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:31, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
- Speedy keep: Who is the author? "Alas Inocentes" or the Govenrment of Tabasco? Clearly {{PD-MX-exempt}}. --Amitie 10g (talk) 03:53, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
- Comment The part Amitie keeps missing is that this is not own work and COM:EVID says it's not up to us to guess where it might have come from, it's up to the uploader to tell us. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:55, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
- Asking for EVID? The top of the document says clearly «Gobierno Supremo del Estado Libre de Tabasco», so, is easy to guess who is the copyright holder (the State of Tabasco), even for users with basic level of Spanish. --Amitie 10g (talk) 05:03, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Obviously not PD-MX-Exempt, which covers governmental logos and emblems, not text. I have fixed information: Published in 1831, likely author died 1832 -> PD. --Storkk (talk) 16:44, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
The description of this image contains a fair use claim, there is no source or author, but the image is claimed to NASA, with the caveats in the description. Nominating for consensus. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:55, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:53, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
This unsourced image is not in use, and there is an svg alternative File:14th_US_Armored_Division_SSI.svg which is in use. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:08, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:25, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
Not own work, any work published in Argentina 30 years COULD be free of rights (when the file doesn't have a copyright holder), but even in that case, between 1987 and 2016 it's only 29 years. Sfs90 (talk) 00:20, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
- Comment {{PD-AR-Photo}} requires only 25 years post creation (and 20 years post publication), but we do need to know when it was first published. Storkk (talk) 14:23, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per COM:PRP. --INeverCry 22:25, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
Not own work, any work published in Argentina 30 years COULD be free of rights (when the file doesn't have a copyright holder), but even in that case, between 1987 and 2016 it's only 29 years. Sfs90 (talk) 00:20, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
- Comment {{PD-AR-Photo}} requires only 25 years post creation (and 20 years post publication), but we do need to know when it was first published. Storkk (talk) 14:24, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per COM:PRP. --INeverCry 22:25, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
Not own work, any work published in Argentina 30 years COULD be free of rights (when the file doesn't have a copyright holder), but even in that case, between 2004 and 2016 it's only 12 years. Sfs90 (talk) 00:21, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per COM:PRP. --INeverCry 22:25, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
Not own work, any work published in Argentina 30 years COULD be free of rights (when the file doesn't have a copyright holder), but even in that case, between 2004 and 2016 it's only 12 years. Sfs90 (talk) 00:21, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per COM:PRP. --INeverCry 22:25, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
ライセンス違反。アップロード者が権利者ではない。 Banku (talk) 18:26, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --INeverCry 22:27, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
The original file was deleted for copyright violation . Larryasou (talk) 10:26, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. -mattbuck (Talk) 10:03, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
ライセンス違反。アップロード者が権利者ではない。 Banku (talk) 18:26, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:27, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
ライセンス違反。アップロード者が権利者ではない。 Banku (talk) 18:27, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:27, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
ライセンス違反。アップロード者が権利者ではない。 Banku (talk) 18:28, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --INeverCry 22:28, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
ライセンス違反。アップロード者が権利者ではない。 Banku (talk) 18:28, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --INeverCry 22:28, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Per FBMD... probadly grabbed from Facebook. Gunnex (talk) 08:16, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Eu mesmo sou o administrador dessa página do facebook. Sou o pastor da igreja e eu mesmo tirei a foto e coloquei no facebook, portanto não há violação alguma de copyright!— Preceding unsigned comment added by Edilsondelira (talk • contribs)
- Oi! Você publicou a foto a onde: https://www.facebook.com/edilsondelira ou https://www.facebook.com/verbopetrolina ou? Link? Você ainda tem a versão original (com metadados da câmara digital)? Gunnex (talk) 16:44, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Não tenho mais a foto original, pois nossa equipe de mídia posta fotos quase a cada dois dias dos acontecimentos de nossa igreja. Ao colocarmos no facebook, automaticamente excluímos do HD da igreja, porque já armazenamos muitos vídeos nele.
Deleted: as above, OTRS permission needed. ~riley (talk) 01:46, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
This and a lot of the other files of User:Alelapenya because they are mostly copyrighted. This one is from a Youtube Video of Mooby's, but they say on their website: "Esta obra está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional" 92.73.29.61 11:25, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
- Según la licencia de los vídeos de Youtube, se trata de esta, que sí es compatible con la nuestra. Alelapenya (talk) 11:29, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
- No, existen diferentes versiones de licencias CC. La versión con 'NoComercial' no es compatible con nuestro proyecto. Jcb (talk) 20:31, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
- Según la licencia de los vídeos de Youtube, se trata de esta, que sí es compatible con la nuestra. Alelapenya (talk) 11:29, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:31, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
Metada shows the photo has been edited in Picasa Yohannvt (talk) 10:00, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
- Comment @Yohannvt: not sure to get the reason for deletion, pictures can be edited in Picassa or lightroom, that does not make pictures unsuitable for commons. --PierreSelim (talk) 06:34, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 10:20, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. The image is marked with the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license, and in the description for the image it states "... from a freely licensed trailer for the Nollywood film "When Love Happens"", but the source does not state anywhere that this is a freely-licensed trailer. Northamerica1000 (talk) 19:12, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
- This is a reputable Nigerian company who say they have a license to use this. It says "
Creative Commons Attribution licence (reuse allowed)". Its not our job to doublecheck whether the BBC paid Stephen Spielberg for the rights to the film they are showing and if they say its is cc by sa then it is. US/UK sources are routinely putting "copyright" on stuff that isnt. Nigerian companies are routinely using cc by sa. Lets clap rather than picking at their generosity. If there is any legal risk then it isn't ours...... and lets AGF .... these companies are doing what we ask them to do. This is the third time someone has tried to unpick these gifts from Nigerian companies. If you have evidence .... rather than suspicion then lets do something. If not then we should assume that reputable companies are reputable. Is there someway of establishing a precedent as we cannot have this argument with every wikieditor or about every Nigerian freely licensed video (I hope) Victuallers (talk) 07:22, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Keep - The upload to youtube is by irokotv.com (iROKO Partners Limited), an commercial movie streaming service based in the UK. If they claim that trailer to be CC by SA, I see no immediate reason to doubt them. (For better or worse, this also relieves us of the necessity to determine the reputability of any Nigerian businesses...) --Latebird (talk) 14:38, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: no evidence of permission - no evidence that the Youtube acoount belongs to the copyright holder. --Jcb (talk) 16:32, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии. Фото ищется в Интернете до загрузки на Викисклад на разных сайтах Dogad75 (talk) 07:36, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
- Вот вклад участника в Рувику, все загружаемые им файлы вызывали сомнения в авторстве. --Dogad75 (talk) 07:40, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
- Фотография была загружена в русскую википедию 4 января 2008 года. То что я нахожу в интернете после этой даты. А на викисклад я лишь скопировал из рувики. --Holopoman (talk) 07:43, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete I see no educational purpose of this picture (and have read the Russian comments above), plus it's of low quality. I therefore cast a deletion vote. (нет воспитательное значение.) GeoTrinity (talk) 20:59, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
- Фотография была загружена в русскую википедию 4 января 2008 года. То что я нахожу в интернете после этой даты. А на викисклад я лишь скопировал из рувики. --Holopoman (talk) 07:43, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 21:01, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
