Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/06/07
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
|
|
Copyright Mona Lisa Production Lacrymocéphale (talk) 16:23, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Jcb (talk) 16:29, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
No FOP in Iceland Elisfkc (talk) 00:54, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- Agreed. I am sorry. Wasn't aware of it ... --Metrancya (talk) 09:37, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader nominated the file for speedy deletion. Taivo (talk) 18:34, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Bad quality and out of project scope. 2602:306:CDB2:4AF0:6439:F912:523:D272 01:00, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation. Green Giant (talk) 17:45, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
The logo is in en.wiki as fair use: it is not considered a simple logo. Taivo (talk) 11:37, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
- Logo is complex. Umair Aj (talk) 10:55, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:27, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
Category:Propane already has SVG and higher-quality PNG, don't need this lower-quality fresh upload. DMacks (talk) 15:39, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, I consulted with Edgar, who suggested to delete. Taivo (talk) 18:29, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal photo Lacrymocéphale (talk) 20:46, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete along with Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Samiranmondall. DMacks (talk) 21:16, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:08, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
File:MV5BNmNhNzU0YTktNmFmNC00ZTVlLWI2MzctZGMwMWQyNDU3ZGE4XkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyMTU5MzkwNTQ@. V1 SY999 SX999 AL.jpg
[edit]advertisement, likely copyvio Themightyquill (talk) 08:59, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by EugeneZelenko: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing: Movie poster
copyright violationː you could find the file a long time before the date in the summery, look at google Offenbacherjung (talk) 11:35, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 19:43, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
copyright violationː you could find older copies here Offenbacherjung (talk) 11:43, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader if Jo Brehme, author is Gabriele Viertel, who sells her work in web. Not published under free license. Taivo (talk) 19:46, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
copyright violation, compare this google search Offenbacherjung (talk) 11:50, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, yes, I close the request speedily. Taivo (talk) 19:41, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Imran Rajput (born 04/10/1991) is an Indian film actor/writer.his born in bhadaura khurja bulandshahr Uttar Pradesh.he debut film is ISHQ KA MANJAN.
[edit]Imran Rajput (born 04/10/1991) is an Indian film actor/writer.his born in bhadaura khurja bulandshahr Uttar Pradesh.he debut film is ISHQ KA MANJAN.
- Which page are you proposing for deletion? --Stefan2 (talk) 13:31, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- Info: Blocked indef on en:wp per repeated self-promotion. --Achim (talk) 19:53, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Moved gallery Imran Rajput Actor to user page User:Imran Rajput Actor. --Achim (talk) 19:56, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
out of scope COM:NUDITY Pippobuono (talk) 19:45, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. --Achim (talk) 20:25, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
out of scope Pippobuono (talk) 19:28, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. --Achim (talk) 20:38, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Depicted person is a porn actor and I suspect, that this is screenshot from a porn film. Small photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 20:20, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. --Achim (talk) 20:32, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
After finding this users images on Flickr ... and realizing quite alot of his images aren't his ([1][2][3][4] (Amazingly some have been taken off Google too!),
I don't believe we can trust this reuploader and I have a feeling a few images in this lot aren't his either - He's got alot of copyrighted images on his Flickr page and all under the "Attribution 2.0 Generic (CC BY 2.0)"
As a side note I have sent a long message to Flickr (via the report abuse thing) but as it stands we don't actually know what is this uploaders and what isn't,
Thanks,
- File:"Brighton and Hove" 314 PFM (871798099).jpg
- File:065 WJ52GOH 26 February 2006 (104797112).jpg
- File:083 Plymouth Citybus (443898709).jpg
- File:089 WA56OZD Plymouth Citybus (443906582).jpg
- File:1056 OTA290G Western National (272523071).jpg
- File:1056 OTA290G Western National (272523233).jpg
- File:1056 OTA290G Western National (272523646).jpg
- File:139 VJY139V (201937123).jpg
- File:162-TTT162X (104842572).jpg
- File:188 F605GVO Plymouth Citybus. (104844125).jpg
- File:1900T YN05AZC Tuffnells Parcel Express.jpg
- File:195 F50ACL Plymouth Citybus. (104844635).jpg
- File:196 F51ACL Plymouth Citybus. (104844784).jpg
- File:1997 Metrocab.jpg
- File:2002 Ford Ranger Regular Cab 2.5L D.jpg
- File:2004 Ford Ranger Super Cab 2.5L D.jpg
- File:2006 Plymouth Hoe bus rally from the big wheel (199064297).jpg
- File:2006 Plymouth Hoe bus rally from the big wheel (199064442).jpg
- File:2006 Plymouth Hoe bus rally from the big wheel (199064710).jpg
- File:2006 Plymouth Hoe bus rally from the big wheel (199076629).jpg
- File:2007 Ford Ranger Regular Cab 2.5L D.jpg
- File:2008 Plymouth Hoe bus rally (2847211951).jpg
- File:2010 Plymouth Hoe bus rally (4872040444).jpg
- File:2012 Plymouth Hoe bus rally (7624420384).jpg
- File:2012 Plymouth Hoe bus rally (7624426170).jpg
- File:2012 Plymouth Hoe bus rally P1100980 (7624431276).jpg
- File:2012 Plymouth Hoe bus rally P1100981 (7624436638).jpg
- File:2012 Plymouth Hoe bus rally P1100982 (7624442360).jpg
- File:2012 Plymouth Hoe bus rally P1100984 (7624453852).jpg
- File:2012 Plymouth Hoe bus rally P1100985 (7624459424).jpg
- File:2012 Plymouth Hoe bus rally P1100986 (7624465232).jpg
- File:2012 Plymouth Hoe bus rally P1100987 (7624471374).jpg
- File:2012 Plymouth Hoe bus rally P1100988 (7624477832).jpg
- File:2012 Plymouth Hoe bus rally P1100989 (7624485236).jpg
- File:2012 Plymouth Hoe bus rally P1100990 (7624491100).jpg
- File:2012 Plymouth Hoe bus rally P1100991 (7624523118).jpg
- File:2012 Plymouth Hoe bus rally P1100992 (7624530208).jpg
- File:2012 Plymouth Hoe bus rally P1100996 (7624554160).jpg
- File:2012 Plymouth Hoe bus rally P1100997 (7624560616).jpg
- File:2012 Plymouth Hoe bus rally P1100998 (7624567204).jpg
- File:2012 Plymouth Hoe bus rally P1100999 (7624572948).jpg
- File:2012 Plymouth Hoe bus rally P1110002 (7624585216).jpg
- File:2012 Plymouth Hoe bus rally P1110003 (7624591126).jpg
- File:2012 Plymouth Hoe bus rally P1110004 (7624610518).jpg
- File:2012 Plymouth Hoe bus rally P1110005 (7624617912).jpg
- File:2012 Plymouth Hoe bus rally P1110006 (7624624714).jpg
- File:2012 Plymouth Hoe bus rally P1110007 (7624631834).jpg
- File:2012 Plymouth Hoe bus rally P1110008 (7624637808).jpg
- File:2012 Plymouth Hoe bus rally P1110009 (7624643802).jpg
- File:2012 Plymouth Hoe bus rally P1110010 (7624649850).jpg
- File:2012 Plymouth Hoe bus rally P1110011 (7624656570).jpg
- File:2012 Plymouth Hoe bus rally P1110012 (7624663066).jpg
- File:2012 Plymouth Hoe bus rally P1110013 (7624670044).jpg
- File:2012 Plymouth Hoe bus rally P1110014 (7624676788).jpg
- File:2012 Plymouth Hoe bus rally P1110017 (7624707968).jpg
- File:2012 Plymouth Hoe bus rally P1110019 (7624719888).jpg
- File:2012 Plymouth Hoe bus rally P1110020 (7624726844).jpg
- File:2012 Plymouth Hoe bus rally P1110021 (7624733940).jpg
- File:2012 Plymouth Hoe bus rally P1110024 (7624751474).jpg
- File:2012 Plymouth Hoe bus rally P1110025 (7624757628).jpg
–Davey2010Talk 23:03, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- Keep The above images are a tiny fraction of the images uploaded, and I see no reason in particular to single these ones out. The majority of images uploaded to his Flickr stream are probably his own work. Yes he has a tendency to upload images by other people, and "release" under a free license when he does not have ability to do so. However, he does at least attribute when it is from someone else.
- Also EXIF is very useful in this sort of situation. For information, I've zapped a ton of the copyvio files (see my deletion log).--Nilfanion (talk) 23:23, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- Those were the first I found and looking through his Flickr there's hell of alot more, "are probably his own work - See with the greatest of respect even you can't be sure that they're his own work,
- I assumed the stuff on the images was the work of the actual uploader not him?, How can we be sure that the images above are actually his and not one's he's taken from someone else ?,
- If you take other peoples work and reupload it under a free license (credited to the uploader or not) then that tells me this individual cannot be trusted nor can anyone be sure that his images on the place aren't someone elses work entirely, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 23:36, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- Well I've picked File:2012_Plymouth_Hoe_bus_rally_P1110014_(7624676788).jpg at complete random and the exif data states the author is " Plymothian Transit" and the copyright holder being "Plymothian Transit under creative commons licence" so unless he owns the website/name then it's a copyvio ? .... I can't prove he doesn't own it but as far as I can see he's never said anywhere that he does so I'm inclined to think copyvio however I may be totally wrong, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 23:40, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
WITHDRAWN Probably should've checked the exif data before mass-nominating the lot!, Seeing the copyright thing I think I just saw alarm bells ringing & thus nominated the lot, Needless to say I'll check EXIFs in future!, Thanks –Davey2010Talk 23:45, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- Could an admin close this and mass revert me please ? ... I can't find a way of mass-removing the bloody DR tags!, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 23:50, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Nomination withdrawn. --Nilfanion (talk) 23:52, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Not likely this is "own work". Ariam (talk) 21:22, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- Speedydelete, copyright infringement from IMdB. Riggwelter (talk) 21:23, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted as a copyvio. INeverCry 01:55, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
mistakenly uploaded Erman Erensoy (talk) 22:29, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete user talk pages. ★ Poké95 04:29, 8 June 2016 (UTC) (non-admin close)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
- mistakenly uploaded, want to add the information as wikipedia page, not as pdf. Erman Erensoy (talk) 22:48, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per nom + author requested deletion of file. --★ Poké95 04:42, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, qualifies for speedy deletion, uploader's request. Taivo (talk) 13:39, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Blatant advertising The Anome (talk) 11:56, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: speedied. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:21, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Blatant advertising The Anome (talk) 11:56, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: speedied. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:22, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
personal photos out of scope, as the whole lot Pippobuono (talk) 19:30, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Raymond 06:33, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
out of scope COM:NUDITY Pippobuono (talk) 19:32, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Raymond 06:34, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
out of scope COM:NUDITY Pippobuono (talk) 19:32, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Raymond 06:33, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
personal photos, out of scope Pippobuono (talk) 19:33, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Raymond 06:33, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
out of scope COM:NUDITY Pippobuono (talk) 19:33, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Raymond 06:33, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
personal photos, out of scope Pippobuono (talk) 19:33, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Raymond 06:33, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
advertising, out of scope Pippobuono (talk) 19:34, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Raymond 06:33, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
out of scope COM:NUDITY Pippobuono (talk) 19:34, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Raymond 06:33, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
out of scope COM:NUDITY Pippobuono (talk) 19:34, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Raymond 06:32, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
out of scope COM:NUDITY Pippobuono (talk) 19:34, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Raymond 06:33, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
out of scope COM:NUDITY Pippobuono (talk) 19:36, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Raymond 06:32, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
personal photos, out of scope Pippobuono (talk) 19:36, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Raymond 06:32, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
out of scope COM:NUDITY Pippobuono (talk) 19:36, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Raymond 06:32, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
out of scope Pippobuono (talk) 19:56, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 12:10, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
low resolution, no exif data, likely copyvio Themightyquill (talk) 09:00, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Sealle: Not own works. Copyright violation. - Using VisualFileChange.
low resolution, no exif data, likely copyvio Themightyquill (talk) 09:00, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Sealle: Not own works. Copyright violation. - Using VisualFileChange.
out of scope Pippobuono (talk) 19:49, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Ellin Beltz: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:00, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:18, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:01, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:18, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vania zagastizabal granadino (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 00:02, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:18, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Augusto vicente damon (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 00:06, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:19, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
per COM:TOYS INeverCry 00:09, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:19, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:10, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:21, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:11, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:21, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:12, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:21, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:17, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:21, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:19, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:21, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mehrdadmahmoody (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 00:22, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:23, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 00:23, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:23, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:28, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:23, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:30, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:23, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by पवन सिंह बैश (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
- File:Narwar fort narwar.jpg
- File:Narwar fort Shivpuri mp.jpg
- File:Pawan singh baish with kallu baish.JPG
- File:पवन प्रताप सिंह राजपूत.JPG
- File:Pawan Pratap Singh Rajpoot.JPG
- File:पवन सिंह बैश.jpg
- File:Pawan singh Baish.jpg
INeverCry 00:33, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:24, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nano.literatura (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 00:34, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:24, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal images/drawings
- File:1451560740ку.jpg
- File:MfCLgJYadjw.jpg
- File:NPvefXPv g.jpg
- File:Цветущая Юность .jpg
- File:Цветущая юность .jpg
- File:Олеся Миллер.jpg
INeverCry 00:36, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:24, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
no COM:EDUSE - low-quality grainy 24kb image of plain gray sky INeverCry 00:37, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:27, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:39, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:27, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
no COM:EDUSE
- File:RlogoUsed.png
- File:^340FB93A17C2BE565C997885A8D636B1976E1C2E4717A03117^pimgpsh fullsize distr.png
INeverCry 00:41, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:27, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by SANAN SHAD (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
- File:Sanan shad 8.jpg
- File:Sanan shad 7.jpg
- File:Sanan shad 6.jpg
- File:Sanan shad 4.jpg
- File:Sanan shad 5.jpg
- File:Sanan shad 3.jpg
- File:Sanan shad 2.JPG
- File:Sanan shad 1.JPG
- File:Sanan,shad.jpg
- File:Sanan shad.jpeg
- File:Sanan.shad.JPG
INeverCry 00:44, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:28, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Shailesh Kumar Yadav1 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
- File:ShaileshYadav.jpg
- File:Shailesh7.jpg
- File:Shailesh4.jpg
- File:Shailesh5.jpg
- File:Shailesh3.jpg
- File:Shailesh1.jpg
- File:Shailesh Kumar Yadav.jpg
- File:Shailesh Kumar Yadav1.jpg
INeverCry 00:45, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:28, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:46, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:28, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Matthew Lee Conner (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 00:49, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:29, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:50, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:29, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:51, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:29, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:52, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:29, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:53, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:29, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dejair Fonseca (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Per FBMD...
probadly grabbed from Facebook.
- File:Marlasca.jpg
- File:Leonardo Marlasca.jpg
- File:Tiago Martins.jpg
- File:Breno Senna.jpg
- File:Patrick .png
- File:Pipoqueiros 2.png
- File:Os pipoqueiros.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 07:00, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Per COM:EDUSE. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:30, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used.
Gunnex (talk) 07:03, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:31, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 07:16, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:31, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Photograph of un-notable women from Israel. Out of project scope. -- Geagea (talk) 07:47, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:32, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kunalwadia 12 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal/self-promotional images
- File:Kunal with actor.jpg
- File:Received 10153981913639540.jpg
- File:Prakash jha and kunal wadia.jpg
- File:Kunal wadia and boni kapoor.jpg
- File:Kunal wadia with rahul dev.jpg
- File:Kunal wadia with his friends.jpg
- File:Kunal wadia 1.jpg
- File:Kunal wadia 123.jpg
- File:Kunal wadia manoj tiwari.jpg
- File:20160125 123829jpg.0.jpg
- File:Kunal wadia with kirti.jpg
- File:Edited IMG-20160124-WA0011jpg.0.jpg
- File:Karan kundra.png
- File:Micro0.11139904.jpg
- File:Kual wadia with sunny 13jpg.0.jpg
- File:Kunal wadia with jareen khan jpg.0.jpg
- File:Micro0.4309078.jpg
- File:Kunal wadia1.JPG
- File:Kunal 833.jpg
- File:Kunal 465.jpg
- File:Kunal 422.jpg
- File:Kunal wadia007.jpg
- File:Kunal wadia11.jpg
- File:Kunal wadia friends.jpg
- File:Kunal wadia33.jpg
- File:Kunal wadia.JPG
- File:Sushil with kunal wadia.jpg
- File:Kunal wadia2.jpg
INeverCry 22:26, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:33, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Boochface101 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 22:28, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:36, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mustaquim555 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 22:35, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:36, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:36, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:36, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 22:40, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:36, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:42, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:36, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:43, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:36, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
per COM:ADVERT
INeverCry 22:44, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:36, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by The publishers (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 22:45, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:38, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:46, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:38, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:47, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:38, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:49, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:38, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:50, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:38, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:50, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:38, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Хороший користувач (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 22:52, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:38, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Мс Кивсерт (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 22:53, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:38, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by VooDoo1111111 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 22:54, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:38, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:55, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:38, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:56, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:40, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:56, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:40, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
per COM:PENIS - no educational value beyond what we already have INeverCry 23:05, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Furthermore, entirely useless as an illustration of a human penis given all the things going on in the background. More likely this was just uploaded to squat on a common filename with some sort of exhibitionistic aim. Appears to have only been uploaded to vandalize de:Diskussion:Penis des Menschen. —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 01:11, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and Mendaliv. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:40, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
no me gusta 186.124.147.69 22:33, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: No me gusta también. Deleted per COM:EDUSE. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:42, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Low resolution, no exif data, likely copyvio. Also, out of scope. Themightyquill (talk) 08:22, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Podzemnik (talk) 08:41, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Selfie of a not notable person Magnus (talk) 08:32, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Podzemnik (talk) 08:41, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
likely copyvio Themightyquill (talk) 08:39, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Podzemnik (talk) 08:41, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
out of scope Themightyquill (talk) 08:40, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Podzemnik (talk) 08:42, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Xander7777777 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related eswiki entry speedy deleted.
- File:Alexander Ferrer63.jpg
- File:Alexander Ferrer53563.jpg
- File:Alexander Ferrer5635.jpg
- File:Alexander Ferrer563563.jpg
- File:Alexander Ferrer455.jpg
- File:Alexander Ferrrer 6.jpg
- File:Alexander Ferrer 5.jpg
- File:Alexander Ferrer 3.jpg
- File:Alexander Ferrer 1.jpg
- File:Alexander Ferrer.jpg
- File:Alexander Ferrer.png
Gunnex (talk) 08:47, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Podzemnik (talk) 08:42, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
out of scope Themightyquill (talk) 08:53, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Podzemnik (talk) 08:43, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 08:54, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Podzemnik (talk) 08:43, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
out of scope Themightyquill (talk) 08:54, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Podzemnik (talk) 08:43, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
out of scope Themightyquill (talk) 08:55, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Podzemnik (talk) 08:43, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
low resolution, likely copyvio, and out of scope Themightyquill (talk) 08:57, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 08:44, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
book cover. likely copyright violation Themightyquill (talk) 09:02, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Very likely to be copyvio. --Podzemnik (talk) 08:45, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Low resolution, no exif data. Likely copyright violation Themightyquill (talk) 09:05, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- Sorry - white it's very low resolutoin, there is exif data. I withdraw my nomination. - Themightyquill (talk) 09:06, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawn. --Podzemnik (talk) 08:46, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
disc cover Berthold Werner (talk) 09:25, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: no fair use here. --Podzemnik (talk) 08:47, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
bandspam, out of scope, del on DE Nolispanmo 10:23, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 08:49, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Spam, COM:ADVERT Magnus (talk) 10:27, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 08:49, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Spam, COM:ADVERT, COM:SCOPE Magnus (talk) 10:27, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 08:49, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope. Yann (talk) 11:20, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 08:50, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope. Yann (talk) 11:20, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 08:50, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Blatant advertising The Anome (talk) 11:56, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 08:50, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Blatant advertising, including advertising link in description The Anome (talk) 11:58, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 08:51, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
v
Deleted: Deleted, there is Category:Flags of the province of Valencia. --Podzemnik (talk) 08:32, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
deletion request — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeuwre (talk • contribs) 2016-06-07T12:00:09 (UTC)
Deleted: No valid reason but proposed by an experienced user, I guess he knows what he's doing. --Podzemnik (talk) 08:34, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
cpiovio --CeGe (talk) 13:08, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Very unlikely to be own work. --Podzemnik (talk) 08:34, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 21:47, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 08:36, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal images
- File:Ugas Abdirisak Ugas.jpg
- File:Ugas Abdirisak Hassan.jpg
- File:Abdirisak Hassan Ugas.jpg
- File:Abdirisak Hassan .jpg
INeverCry 21:51, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 08:36, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 21:59, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 08:37, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alejagu2016 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 22:02, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 08:37, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:02, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 08:36, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
no COM:EDUSE INeverCry 22:03, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 08:37, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:05, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 08:37, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:05, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 08:37, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:06, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 08:37, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:07, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 08:37, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:09, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 08:37, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Skipmanagement (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal/promotional images
INeverCry 22:11, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 08:37, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
per COM:ADVERT INeverCry 22:15, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 08:39, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:16, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 08:39, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:18, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 08:39, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Wrong date please delete --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 07:15, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- sorry I have fixed it - now. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 08:50, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Next time you can use {{Speedy}} if you make a mistake. --Podzemnik (talk) 08:52, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:08, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- Also: File:Prevale-logo-m2o.jpg; delete per nom. --dsprc (talk) 02:23, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 08:52, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Delete Image is an Associated Press taken from any of a variety of sources where the image was used by AP. See this for an example. No reason to believe the image is either (a) the work of the uploader or (b) released by AP under a license compatible with Commons. Hammersoft (talk) 23:41, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, copyvio from web. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:15, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal drawing INeverCry 00:03, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:16, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Due to the presence of high-quality file "File:Danjo Matsunaga Hisahide before His Suicide LACMA M.84.31.74.jpg" than dealing with the same theme. --M-sho-gun (talk) 01:57, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept: heavily used image. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:20, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
URV; definitiv kein eigenes Werk, siehe rechts oben. Urheber CH Photodesign, Contwig - vgl. https://www.facebook.com/MissJeyDee/ Iwesb (talk) 02:47, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:21, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Barkamartglobal (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, found elsewhere on the web.
- File:Habib Hassan el-Yaqub.jpg
- File:SIR-AHMADU-BELLO-ZIK-AWOLOWO-480x360.jpg
- File:Sardauna-daughter-aisha-480x360.jpg
- File:Lawal-jafaru-isa-1.JPG
Gunnex (talk) 07:57, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:32, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Contains original artwork. No reason to think this is not copyrighted. Themightyquill (talk) 07:58, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:32, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
white background and url link at the bottom suggests this is copyvio Themightyquill (talk) 07:58, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:31, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Low resolution, no exif. Likely copyvio and out of scope anyway. Themightyquill (talk) 07:59, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:31, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Professional looking photo but low resolution and no exif data. Likely copyright violation Themightyquill (talk) 08:00, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:31, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
The photo is free but all the rest can be done without using media file. Out of scope. -- Geagea (talk) 08:01, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:31, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
watermark suggests copyvio Themightyquill (talk) 08:01, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:31, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Low resolution, no exif data, may be video capture. Likely copyvio Themightyquill (talk) 08:05, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:31, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
wrong angle Jo.Fruechtnicht (talk) 08:05, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:28, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Low resolution, no exif data. Likely copyright violation Themightyquill (talk) 08:06, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:28, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Low resolution, no exif data, likely copyvio Themightyquill (talk) 08:06, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:28, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Professional photo, low resolution, no exif data - likely copyvio Themightyquill (talk) 08:10, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:26, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Author is not uploader. Own work cannot apply. Likely copyvio Themightyquill (talk) 08:11, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:26, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Low resolution, o exif data. Doesn't appear to be a selfie, so even if the subject is the uploader, it's unclear who took the photo. Likely copyvio. Themightyquill (talk) 08:12, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:25, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Poor quality copy of professional photo (heavily photoshopped?) in low resolution despite large size. Not clearly in scope and likely copyvio Themightyquill (talk) 08:14, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:25, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
IMDB image, likely copyvio Themightyquill (talk) 08:17, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:25, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Low resolution, no exif data, professional photo. Likely copyvio Themightyquill (talk) 08:23, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:25, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Low resolution, no exif data, likely copyvio Themightyquill (talk) 08:52, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:24, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Uploaded by user with same name as subject, but the image is not a selfie. Likely copyvio Themightyquill (talk) 08:52, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:24, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Usaproduction (talk · contribs)
[edit]As with File:JNR LA Opening.jpg, which was uploaded by a rather obvious sockpuppet (see Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard/archive/2016#File:JNR LA Opening.jpg), OTRS has confirmed that no permission from Getty Images has been sent in, which is hardly surprising, since Getty Images are not in the business of giving away their content for free.
—LX (talk, contribs) 08:56, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- Hi there -- I emailed Getty about these photo's and this is what they had told me to do. Had sent email to Wiki about it also. ?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Usaproduction (talk • contribs) 09:10, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:24, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Usaproduction (talk · contribs)
[edit]This user's upload history and the "for Wikipedia" in the title doesn't inspire confidence in the license of this picture.
Vera (talk) 21:17, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:33, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
copyright protected content from the web: https://www.flickr.com/photos/43687395@N04/10463582564 Albinfo (talk) 08:56, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:23, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Instagram photo? Likely copyvio Themightyquill (talk) 08:56, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:23, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Likely copyvio Themightyquill (talk) 08:58, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:23, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
family photo, out of scope Themightyquill (talk) 08:59, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:23, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
- Restored. In use on a page at pt.wikiversity. INeverCry 18:16, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
Dieses ist NICHT das richtige Wappen von Georgsmarienhütte. Das korrekte Wappen ist das unter "Andere Versionen". Bitte löschen Sie das falsche Wappen!!! 85.8.68.221 08:04, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: file heavily used. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:19, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
This is not the coat of arms / Wappen of Georgsmarienhütte !!! Please delete this version !!! 85.8.68.221 10:19, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept: File is in heavy use, see Christian Ferrer's close from last month. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:19, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Warum wird hier ein nicht existierendes Stadt-Wappen dargestellt? Es ist FALSCH. Dieses Wappen gibt es nicht. Auch wenn es "in use" ist. Die alternative Variante ist die richtige. siehe: https://www.georgsmarienhuette.de/stadt/logo-maskottchen/wappen-georgsmarienhuette/ Stadtverwaltung Georgsmarienhütte 85.8.68.221 15:30, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
- Bevor das hier wie die beiden ersten male ausgeht und es zu einem vierten Löschantrag kommt, habe ich es mal hier angesprochen. Fränsmer (talk) 21:26, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - This is an unsourced, b ad and ugly rendering of a known blazon. There is a SVG file showing the official coat of arms rendered according the heraldic rules: within an escutcheon, with a stroke and in FIAV colours. -- MaxxL - talk 15:40, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Kann mich MaxxL hier nur anschließen Fränsmer (talk) 18:07, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - Ich stelle mir ernsthaft die Frage, welche Quellen es noch bedarf, bis dieser "Schwachsinn" gelöscht wird? Please admins look at the sources and delete this nonsense!--Jürgen Krause (talk) 19:24, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Kann mich MaxxL hier nur anschließen Fränsmer (talk) 18:07, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
copyright violation or advertising? Berthold Werner (talk) 10:20, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:18, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
family snapshot, no educational value Berthold Werner (talk) 11:17, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:18, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
detected exact matched img [5] , on the photographer's website says "All images © Androniki Christodoulou" [6] :seems not shared under cc-by-sa-4.0 = Please see COM:DW: not free enough to share on commons / or, see also {{No permission since}} Thank you for your time. Sincerely, Tokorokoko (talk) 12:01, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:17, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
This is an old version of the logo, and is confusing Google and other outlets that appropriate images from Wikimedia 109.145.68.224 12:06, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination with note that like the other two, this one was not in use. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:17, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
This is also an old version of the logo, and is confusing Google and other outlets that appropriate images from Wikimedia 109.145.68.224 12:06, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:17, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
This is yet another old version of the logo — confusing Google and other outlets that appropriate images from Wikimedia 109.145.68.224 12:08, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:17, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
copyright protected content from the internet: http://www.panoramio.com/photo/12099187 Albinfo (talk) 14:59, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:14, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
vandal, blocked on DE. This was part of the vandalism Nolispanmo 15:07, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:13, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Logos such as the Safari logo are non-free and cannot be used on Wikimedia Commons. Logos are not the work of the uploader. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 15:37, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:13, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope, personal photo of a minor Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 15:41, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:13, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Green bugdroid 3D rendering unlikely to be the work of the uploader Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 15:44, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:13, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Unused promotional logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:51, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:13, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Unused promotional logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:52, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:12, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Mis-attributed and used only for vandalism (third-party edits made incorrect medical statements) DMacks (talk) 15:54, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:12, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Logo can't be own. Spamer;s contribution Bilderling (talk) 16:25, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:12, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Very probable copyvio TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 16:52, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:12, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Unused and very bad quality. No proof of usefulness. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 16:54, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:11, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry speedy deleted. Gunnex (talk) 16:57, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:11, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
This logo contains the incorrect name of my user account; I intend to upload a corrected version shortly. Historiarvm Arizonensis (talk) 17:08, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:11, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Manuel gonzalez Official Site (talk · contribs)
[edit]All images unused and out of scope, borderline promotional
- File:Manuel gonzalez.jpg
- File:Manuel gonzalez - Focus On Me - Promo Urbano.jpg
- File:Logo Official - ManuG.jpg
- File:Single- 2016 Manuel gonzalez - Focus On Me.jpg
- File:Girl Magic - 01 Karol G - Caratula Official.jpg
- File:01 - Letra Genero La Firma ! - caratula official - Edicion Deluxe.jpg
- File:Manug - FoE - Promo.jpg
Ariadacapo (talk) 17:14, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:09, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vargem Grande - Parelheiros (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, found elsewhere on the web, also per FBMD...
probadly grabbed from Facebook, considering also (all files uploaded in 03.2016):
- File:Imagem vargem grande.jpg --> grabbed from http://www.prefeitura.sp.gov.br/cidade/secretarias/meio_ambiente/unid_de_conservacao/index.php?p=42073 (credit: "Leo Malgoli") = http://www.prefeitura.sp.gov.br/cidade/secretarias/upload/chamadas/parquecratera_ribeirao_vermelho_leo_malagoli_1340655653.jpg (last modified: 2012, identical exif)
- File:PARQUE-DO-CANAL.jpg --> per exif a copyrighted work by "Nelson Kon" and grabbed from (example) http://www.archdaily.com.br/br/01-6536/museu-aberto-cratera-de-colonia-levisky-arquitetos-associados/parque-linear-alto (gallery, © All rights reserved. ArchDaily 2008-2016 - Todas as imagens são © de cada escritório ou fotógrafo mencionado. ) = http://adbr001cdn.archdaily.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/PARQUE-DO-CANAL.jpg (2011, last modified: 2012, identical exif)
- File:Vargem grande.jpg --> (already tagged with copyvio) grabbed from Internet
- File:PARQUE-DO-CANAL.jpg
- File:Imagem vargem grande.jpg
- File:Vargem grande .jpg
- File:Vargem grande SP. 2.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 17:55, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:08, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:28, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:08, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
no evidence of publication without copyright notice Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:28, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:08, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
File:5th century BC necklace from Vani, Georgia. Part of the Georgian National Museum collection.jpg
[edit]Copyright violation (http://www.curatedobject.us/the_curated_object_/exhibitions_washington_dc/) Elisfkc (talk) 18:36, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- What does the link have to do with the collection of antiquities in Georgia photographed by a flickr user? --Kober (talk) 18:41, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- The image is taken from that site, "Necklace Composed of Beads and Bird Pendants Vani, Western Georgia, ca. 450 B.C. Gold 1.5 x 0.8 cm ELS2007.5.63 Image Credit: Georgian National Museum" Elisfkc (talk) 20:28, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:08, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
File:4th century BC golden earrings from Vani, Georgia. Collection of the Georgian National Museum.jpg
[edit]Copyright violation (http://www.curatedobject.us/the_curated_object_/exhibitions_washington_dc/) Elisfkc (talk) 18:37, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- What does the link have to do with the collection of antiquities in Georgia photographed by a flickr user? --Kober (talk) 18:42, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- Image is taken from that website "Pair of Temple Rings with Bird and Acorn Finials Vani, Western Georgia, ca. 330 B.C. Gold 10 cm ELS2007.5.91a b Image Credit: Georgian National Museum" Elisfkc (talk) 20:29, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Flikr image was copied from http://www.curatedobject.us/photos/uncategorized/2008/01/25/els2007591ab.jpg. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:07, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
File:'Images of the artifact used by the main hand' by Alberto Frigo as part of Watched Hasselblad Foundation 2016 detail.jpg
[edit]This file looks to be a derivative and I doubt whether the copyright holder of the original work has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 19:09, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:05, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal image(s). This image is considered out of scope as it is not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Uploading a small number of images for use on your user pages is allowed (if your contributions stretch further than just creating a user page). If you feel that this image was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 19:10, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:05, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal image(s). This image is considered out of scope as it is not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Uploading a small number of images for use on your user pages is allowed (if your contributions stretch further than just creating a user page). If you feel that this image was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 19:17, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:04, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
name on watermark is different from name of claimed author. Basvb (talk) 19:18, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:04, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
out of scope Pippobuono (talk) 19:22, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:04, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Looks like a TV-still from NCIS Basvb (talk) 19:27, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:04, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Derivative of artwork. Basvb (talk) 19:28, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:03, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
The file is clearly eligible for copyright. As the club was established in 1892, the logo can be in public domain due to age, but the logo can be much younger than club. Creation year of logo should be given to determine copyright status. Taivo (talk) 19:28, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:03, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
This file looks to be a derivative from an older image and I doubt whether the copyright holder of the original work has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. The file could fall within the public domain because of its age. If this is the case information about the source, author and date of the original work should be given to verify this. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 19:28, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Hello! I uploaded this photo, and yes, it's a part of bigger image, but i'm working on the man who is on this photo, factually Franco Columbu that article is about, so there can be no problems about this photo. What else should i do?
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:03, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
This file has a watermarked source and I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 19:29, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:03, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Successmania17 (talk · contribs)
[edit]The two photos can be find elsewhere on the internet (1 in larger resolution). The other two are derivatives of lots of logos and need proper attribution.
- File:Camellia Resort, Puri.jpg
- File:Camellia Heritage, Shantiniketan.jpg
- File:Diploma Placement.jpg
- File:Placement Companies.png
Basvb (talk) 19:32, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:00, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Successmania17 (talk · contribs) 2
[edit]User is uploading files which can be found elsewhere online.
- File:Camellia Airways.jpg
- File:Royal Oak, Camellia Group.jpg
- File:Club Agora, Camellia Group.jpg
- File:Bluezz, Camellia Group.jpg
- File:Calcutta Retro, Camellia Group.jpg
Basvb (talk) 20:01, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:00, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Successmania17 (talk · contribs) 3
[edit]Unused logos, no educational value, out of scope. And above COM:TOO.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:54, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:05, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Own work of 1946 file unlikely Basvb (talk) 19:33, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:02, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
own work of 1970 image unlikely Basvb (talk) 19:33, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:02, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
The logo is clearly eligible for deletion. As the club was founded in 1932, it can be out of copyright due to age, but logo can be much younger. Creation year of logo should be given to determine copyright status. Taivo (talk) 19:35, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:02, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by FagnerMaximo (talk · contribs)
[edit]Own work claim on official files unlikely. User has also uploaded at least one evidenced copyvio and two suspected.
Basvb (talk) 19:35, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:02, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by FagnerMaximo (talk · contribs)
[edit]All these images are claimed to be own work. At first glance, these appear to be Currency, however searching the images, none of this appears to be real currency. They were found in prior use at http://fagnermaximosilveira.blogspot.com/2016/05/cedulas-snp-no-dia-08-de-abril-durante.html which seems to be an art project page of some sort. The last image is not a selfie, but also claimed own work.
- File:002 BALSEMÃO RS.jpg
- File:001 BALSEMÃO RS.jpg
- File:001 numismatica italiana 001 B.jpg
- File:001 numismatica italiana 001 A.jpg
- File:CEDULA B.jpg
- File:CEDULA A.jpg
- File:10 CASTILHOS 002.jpg
- File:10 CASTILHOS 001.jpg
- File:CEDULAS SNP 2016 100 02.jpg
- File:CEDULAS SNP 2016 100 01.jpg
- File:CEDULAS SNP 2016 050 02.jpg
- File:CEDULAS SNP 2016 050 01.jpg
- File:CEDULAS SNP 2016 010 02.jpg
- File:CEDULAS SNP 2016 010 01.jpg
- File:CEDULAS SNP 2016 005 02.jpg
- File:CEDULAS SNP 2016 005 01.jpg
- File:CEDULAS SNP 2016 001 02.jpg
- File:CEDULAS SNP 2016 001 01.jpg
- File:Medalha - Reverso.jpg
- File:Medalha 25 anos SNP - verso.jpg
- File:Capacete de mineiro - xilogravura.jpg
- File:FAGNER 07.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:51, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:26, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal image(s). This image is considered out of scope as it is not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Uploading a small number of images for use on your user pages is allowed (if your contributions stretch further than just creating a user page). If you feel that this image was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 19:35, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:01, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal image(s). This image is considered out of scope as it is not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Uploading a small number of images for use on your user pages is allowed (if your contributions stretch further than just creating a user page). If you feel that this image was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 19:36, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:00, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
out of scope, personal photos Pippobuono (talk) 19:46, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:00, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Own work of old image unlikely Basvb (talk) 20:02, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 13:59, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal image Basvb (talk) 20:05, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 13:59, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
copyright violationː Source Offenbacherjung (talk) 20:12, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 13:59, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
although transferred from EN-WP in 2008/9, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 20:15, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 13:59, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
License of source site says more-less: "When using materials of the site, link to our site is needed." In my opinion this is not enough free license, because nothing is said about derivative works and commercial use. Taivo (talk) 20:15, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 13:58, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
out of scope Pippobuono (talk) 20:17, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 13:58, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
out of scope Pippobuono (talk) 20:17, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 13:58, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
OTRS-permission from author, model agency "Next Models" is needed. Taivo (talk) 20:30, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 13:58, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Not likely this is "own work". Ariam (talk) 20:44, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- Estelle Getty at the 1988 Emmy Awards. Photo by Jim Smeal. Thuresson (talk) 21:06, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 13:58, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Talles Lampert (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used respectively uploaded by an user who didn't make real contributions, apart from the creation of a user page. Per FBMD...
probadly grabbed from Facebook.
Gunnex (talk) 20:53, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 13:57, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
fake picture (Not a photo of Concorde at Princess Juliana Airport, but a screenshot from a computer game) PlanespotterA320 (talk) 21:09, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 13:57, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
possible copyvio - no Tasnim photographer directly credited INeverCry 21:11, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Clear copyvio: http://www.haberturk.com/gundem/haber/1048960-ismail-hakki-pekin-tum-yabanci-ulkeleri-dinliyoruz --Logom (talk) 02:25, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 13:56, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
possible copyvio - no Tasnim photographer directly credited INeverCry 21:16, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: Seems original and using only at Tasnimnews.com (via Google Image Search). It could be taken by Tasnim reporter while exclusive interview. --Logom (talk) 02:22, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination with note that "could" isn't enough for COM:EVID. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 13:56, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
possible copyvio - no Tasnim photographer directly credited INeverCry 21:17, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: Seems original and using only at Tasnimnews.com (via Google Image Search). It could be taken by Tasnim reporter while exclusive interview. --Logom (talk) 02:22, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination with note that "could" isn't enough for COM:EVID. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 13:55, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Derivative image of a copyrigted work (a poster). Warko (talk) 21:28, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 13:55, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Derivative image of a copyrigted work (a poster). Warko (talk) 21:29, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 13:54, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Codename Lisa as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: This image is copyright protected and non-free. Its owner is LightTrans GmbH not the uploader. Didym (talk) 22:12, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete (Original nom.) Hi. The subject of this screenshot is a computer program called VirtualLab by LightTrans GmbH. It is a non-free computer program; hence all its screenshots are automatically non-free as well. Why was it not speedy deleted? If our friend Didym could please provide an explanation... Thanks. Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 16:09, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Hello. It was speedy deleted and I requested restoration because I think it's not a copyvio. It is part of the manual available here (chapter 4.2, page 22) and it's stated there (page 2) that "Text and images are released under the Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Creative Commons license." Torsch (talk) 15:56, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, we encounter licensing conflicts like this in Commons quite a lot: An image that is non-free is published in a free work. The user has a dilemma whether the work is non-free per the original license, or whether the license of the free work overrules the original license. A notable fact here is that the free license here allows derivative works; hence it can be used to make the derivative work of a computer program that is non-free and does not allow derivative works.
- In such cases, we adhere to precautionary principle: "where there is significant doubt about the freedom of a particular file, it should be deleted". —Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 08:18, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
- I understand that there is a licensing conflict if person A puts a non-free work of person B into a new work and licenses this under a free license. But if person A puts his own work (a screenshot) into a new work (a manual) then I understand this a clear volition to waive the copyright. For me it's the same as if I would draw comic strips (on which I own copyright of course), put them in a comic album and release this album under CC-BY-SA. Then another person can use and release any single comic strip under CC-BY-SA. Best regards, Torsch (talk) 10:36, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
- This argument looks at one side of the subject in a way that the other side is obscured. If I take one of the icons in the image and use it in my work, have I taken a free icon or a non-free icon? On one hand the company is licensing the software bearing this icon commercially, on another, this image is licensed freely. Yes, the company can relicense the icon as free, but did they? Until they do, it is a licensing conflict. —Codename Lisa (talk) 07:24, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
- Just to understand it correctly: What would the company need to do to release this screenshot into a free license? Torsch (talk) 17:43, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
- Is it really okay for the company if people take the computer icons seen in the manual or the layout of the user interface and use them in their apps or other works? If yes, the software license agreement should also be changed to exclude them from the non-free license. If no, then CC-BY-ND or other licenses are the way to go. — Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 07:39, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
- In such cases, we adhere to precautionary principle: "where there is significant doubt about the freedom of a particular file, it should be deleted". —Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 08:18, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 13:54, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Copyright Issues 84.212.102.253 22:52, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Copyright problems Geo Figures (talk) 22:55, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 13:53, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
- File:AEF County Line Station, 1985.png and thus File:AEF County Line Station, 1985 restored.jpg
- File:Aerial view of Market-Frankford Line, 1978.jpg
Extremely likely to be copyvios - the (now-blocked) enwiki user uploaded a slew of these with no evidence that he actually took them. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Pottsville shuttle transfer at Reading station.jpg and its links for previous discussions. Google Images doesn't match these to anything online, so it's probably that the uploader scanned them from books or photo albums. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:55, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 13:53, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Fred jammes (talk · contribs)
[edit]No Freedom of panorama in France. For others simply the fact that these are derivatives of art works is an issue.
- File:PA Marboeuf Homme.jpg
- File:Gwen Gérard installation vidéo.jpg
- File:Alice Pilastre Dentelle.jpg
- File:Batardises 2012 Prieuré StNicolas.jpg
- File:Frédéric Jammes dessin.jpg
- File:Jean-Claude Artaud installation.jpg
- File:Grandes abstractions de Rémy Jammes.jpg
Basvb (talk) 23:18, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:11, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation, already published in http://hollywoodprogressive.com/aubrey-logan/ C messier (talk) 10:41, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
I shot this photo and provided it to the Hollywood Progressive to run with a review I wrote. All photos and reviews are provided free of charge and free of copyright and cannot be copyrighted by publications that use them.
- Then, please upload a bigger version, with EXIF data. --C messier (talk) 04:22, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 13:50, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Not an own work, see watermark C messier (talk) 10:57, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
I see here: Credit: Tom Zagwodzki/Goddard Space Flight Center , so PD-USGov-NASA? --C messier (talk) 11:00, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination with note that File:Лазерна локація Місяця, станція спостережень.jpg was from same uploader who apparently can source an image to Goddard. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 13:50, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
bad quality, better higher resolution and colored photo available File:Pierfrancesco foschi, disputa sull'immacolata concezione, 1544-46, 01.JPG, request by uploader Oursana (talk) 01:32, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader's request, unused. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:15, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Obscene text. Downloads for vandalism. For placement of the photos in the Russian Wikipedia, the author has been banned indefinitely. [7] Petrov Victor (talk) 03:04, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: not own work. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:16, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
See Commons:Derivative works. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:47, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- To which specific aspect of this guideline are you referring to?--*thing goes (talk) 16:24, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, even the logo alone is not free https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:TSMC_logo.png. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:32, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
This is the logo for en:Tiger Knight and clearly not "own work". I'll upload a fair-use version to enwiki shortly. Salvidrim! 03:58, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, complex logo. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:33, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 05:59, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:35, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolution, missing EXIF. Per FBMD...
probadly grabbed from Facebook. Gunnex (talk) 06:26, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:37, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope Randykitty (talk) 06:30, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and in any case unlikely to be own work and previously published "FBMD". Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:40, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry speedy deleted. Gunnex (talk) 06:30, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:38, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by PedroSpotter (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. Per FBMD...
grabbed from Facebook + out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry speedy deleted.
Gunnex (talk) 06:34, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:41, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 06:40, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:41, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Unused, large margins and stray XYZ axis marking. Have File:Octanitrocubane molecule spacefill.png with no such artifacts. DMacks (talk) 06:53, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: ok. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:45, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Unused, low-resolution rendering of 3D aspects (visible mesh?) large margins and stray XYZ axis marking. Have File:Octanitrocubane molecule spacefill.png with no such artifacts. DMacks (talk) 06:54, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: ok. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:47, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF + out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 07:09, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:48, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, per FBMD...
probadly grabbed from Facebook. + out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry speedy deleted. Gunnex (talk) 07:15, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:17, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Screenshot of presumed-nonfree software, containing logos of other companies in a significant way. DMacks (talk) 07:24, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:49, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Copyvio of https://www.google.co.uk/imgres?imgurl=http://saifurrahmanarbani.weebly.com/uploads/1/1/3/8/11389684/8822752_orig.jpg&imgrefurl=http://saifurrahmanarbani.weebly.com/sindhi-picture.html&h=720&w=552&tbnid=OXQ5NqXv7oFKLM:&docid=JFIQjvKaDBnLXM&hl=en-GB&ei=nQzkVoWQDsf7auHDsLAJ&tbm=isch&ved=0ahUKEwjF0uiLlLvLAhXHvRoKHeEhDJYQMwhgKDgwOA Subject died in 1996 so not "own work" in 2013 Arjayay (talk) 12:37, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:29, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Scanned professional photo. Seems likely to be a copyright violation. Themightyquill (talk) 07:45, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:50, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Low resolution, no exif data, professional photo. Likely copyvio Themightyquill (talk) 07:45, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:51, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Потому что я добавил его случайно и не я его владелец YanKane (talk) 12:13, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader's request, unused. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:19, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Incorrect bond angles. Low quality (resolution, file format). Higher quality equivalents available in Category:Ethylene. Ed (Edgar181) 14:48, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 20:24, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Artist died in 1990, so this is still in copyright. If it is to be used, fair use rationale needs to be made. Michitaro (talk) 13:53, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Derivative work of copyrighted material; fair use is not allowed on Commons. --Yasu (talk) 16:54, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Lower image quality for same format and essential content as File:Ethanol flat structure.png DMacks (talk) 15:42, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, there are even more alternatives in Category:Ethanol. --Leyo 18:10, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
bad quality Toni Müller (talk) 19:05, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. We have only a few regarding Grand stade Lille Métropole (construction). --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:55, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, cropped. Per FBMD...
probadly grabbed from Facebook. Gunnex (talk) 07:52, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, photographer should confirm license via COM:OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 11:02, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
This file has no official verification or authorization from the original photographer for license of the photo. How did a common photographer get a close shot? This photo seems to be either downloaded or copied from other website or a blog. The author who posted the photo should release the license of this photo or this should be deleted as per Wikipedia Rules and Regulations. Thanks, Varghese Jacob 182.69.105.97 21:57, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- I have made some feeble attempt to add a licence to the photo. However, feel free to delete the photo. I am sure there are better pictures of the FRI available! :-)
- -- Tor Arne Rysstad
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 23:26, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
This file has no official verification or authorization from the original photographer for license of the photo. How did a common photographer get a close shot? This photo seems to be either downloaded or copied from other website or a blog. The author who posted the photo should release the license of this photo or this should be deleted as per Wikipedia Rules and Regulations. Thanks, Varghese Jacob 182.69.163.6 09:00, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: Proof? --Amitie 10g (talk) 16:50, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete: Image should be deleted as it looks either modified and looks plagiarized. First, how did the "author named Torarne" get a close clear picture? The author has no public record of being a professional photographer. The author did take the photo. If he/she did the person should prove a written permission of the same to Wikimedia Commons. Please provide the authentication and official proof of the same. Regards, Thanks, Varghese Jacob
Kept: No reason for significant doubt about authorship given by nominator, who nominated a second time with the same rationale 2 days after the first closure. If it can be shown that the image was first published elsewhere, this would merit more caution. --Storkk (talk) 11:07, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
With a "fictional" flag incorporated, the image is not realistically useful for any educational purpose. In addition, the image is probably not a free content. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Fictional Flag of the Republic of Ezo.svg and the related discussions linked from there. Dwy (talk) 09:59, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator.--Y.haruo (talk) 15:12, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Agree to nominator.--Lyijykyyneleet (talk) 08:40, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete it's fictional flag.--伏儀 (talk) 08:26, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 11:07, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope. Yann (talk) 11:19, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Illustrative use. The photograph appears to have been taken on safari and is part of an interesting series showing that experience. --Fæ (talk) 11:37, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Recording personal experiences is what social media is for, and Commons is not Facebook or Flickr personal photostreams. The argument that an image "shows [an] experience" is also true of every iPhone snap taken on a drunken hen night. Every photo "illustrates" something, the question is whether it has any realistic chance of educational use. The actual chameleon is barely 120px and not sharp, unidentified species, and the image so crowded with people in a vehicle that it just isn't conceivable that any educational use is likely (especially given that we have plenty other pictures of such animals). -- Colin (talk) 20:40, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: In scope, obviously. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 07:54, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Could be maybe in scope, if the species was identified. Or if the girl was any notable. But this way certainly not. --A.Savin 03:18, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Appears to be in scope for safari-related uses. --Storkk (talk) 11:09, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
5
[edit]This file is not locatable and possible spam. --Jos1950 (talk) 02:12, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
- Which file are you talking about? --Stefan2 (talk) 13:26, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Difficult to delete an integer. I've looked through nominator's edits at around that time and they don't help elucidate either. --Storkk (talk) 11:12, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
- Storkk, looking at Special:WhatLinksHere, I found that File:Flickr - ronsaunders47 - SO MANY SHADES OF GREEN...jpg has a {{Delete}} tag which points at this deletion request, so maybe that's the file which was nominated for deletion here? The file does not seem to be spam to me and is not necessarily out of scope, but should in my opinion be renamed. --Stefan2 (talk) 20:22, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
- @Stefan2: thanks... I didn't think of checking what links here (d'oh!). I've kept that file as not spam. Storkk (talk) 20:34, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
No indication of OTRS acceptance, but OTRS with XXXXXXXXX for number tag is provided on the file. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:02, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- The Template:OTRS ticket haven't been validated due to the given permissions in it (CC-BY-ND, not compatible with the Commons licences), a new licensing has been requested but no answer from the uploader. I think the file can be deleted and the ticket closed/rejected. Linedwell (talk) 09:10, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 11:13, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
PORQUE YO LO CREE 189.202.36.187 21:29, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of COM:SCOPE. --Storkk (talk) 11:15, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
Small, withouth EXIF, a derivative work of this photo is already online http://www.ulima.edu.pe/pregrado/psicologia/noticias/psicologo-ulima-gana-premio-de-literatura-infantil , possible copyright violation. C messier (talk) 11:12, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, likely copyright violation. --Storkk (talk) 11:15, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope C messier (talk) 11:13, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: out of scope. --Storkk (talk) 11:15, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
Small photo without camera data. "Special instructions" field in metadata begins with FBMD, which lets me guess, that the file comes from Facebook. Maybe not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 13:19, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
I took this photo & had stripped the metadata from it awhile ago. This is not a copyright violation as, according to US law, the photographer of the picture own its copyright. Ilabsboy ( talk)
Deleted: Photographer should confirm license by following the instructions on COM:OTRS, at which point an agent will request the file's undeletion. --Storkk (talk) 11:14, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
out of scope COM:NUDITY Pippobuono (talk) 20:09, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Keep: Of media in Category:Male anogenital area images, this is unique in that it displays the full buttock, thigh, leg and human form in general. Also is one of the few depicting anatomy from this particular camera angle; subject is unique position as well. Is very different from other such specimens. --dsprc (talk) 14:09, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: not educational useful. --Jcb (talk) 16:13, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
out of scope COM:NUDITY Pippobuono (talk) 20:09, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:12, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
Image does not belong to the uploader her Instagram credits it to twistimages and the date on Instagram and even the image name here predates the one given in the summary. https://www.instagram.com/p/BB6MSsMQ_kT/ 80.235.147.186 03:24, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Ellin Beltz: Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Rosie Roff 2015 Bentley event .jpg
This file was initially tagged by ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Unhelpful. If this is really 1895/1905 American work, then it is out of copyright and maybe has some historical value. Taivo (talk) 18:58, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- Keep per http://collections.artsmia.org/art/112568/friendship-blanket-osage --Fæ (talk) 19:18, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- @Fæ: No benefit or use.If useful add the category to one or more categories --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 07:17, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
- It's in suitable categories and easily meets project scope. I have no doubt that all Google Art Project scans are highly valuable and should be on Commons. --Fæ (talk) 07:23, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
- @Fæ: I mean Category:Friendship blankets and Resolved.Thank you --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 07:54, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
- It's in suitable categories and easily meets project scope. I have no doubt that all Google Art Project scans are highly valuable and should be on Commons. --Fæ (talk) 07:23, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
- @Fæ: No benefit or use.If useful add the category to one or more categories --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 07:17, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Materialscientist (talk) 04:37, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolution, missing EXIF. Similiar to what already was published via (example) https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=190583170988499&set=a.190583004321849.44215.100001104536017&type=3&theater in 2011 Gunnex (talk) 06:04, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:58, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status and unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Fspicc. The file is cropped and was most likely taken from http://www.nasljerseys.com/Players/H/Horton.Randy.htm = http://www.nasljerseys.com/images/Cosmos/Cosmos%2071%20Home%20Randy%20Horton,%20Stars%20%283%29.jpg, as also File:Horton01.tif (uploaded on same day), deleted via Commons:Deletion requests/File:Horton01.tif. May be in public domain by other reasons but relevant info must be provided. Gunnex (talk) 08:06, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:58, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Logo seems to be above the threshold of originality. ★ Poké95 08:48, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:58, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Chiang Ching kuo.jpg "official document" does not include images, hence this image is not PD. Wcam (talk) 12:40, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:59, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Chiang Ching kuo.jpg "official document" does not include images, therefore this image is not PD. Wcam (talk) 12:44, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:59, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
This photo has digital watermark, and the user already has uploaded new file here File:Bleta punetore ne fush te Rugoves.jpg. Liridon (talk) 13:28, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:59, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
This photo has watermark, and user already has uploaded new file without it here File:Karkalecat gjat nje procesi biologjik.jpg. Liridon (talk) 13:29, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:59, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
This photo has watermark, and user already has uploaded new file without it here File:Pejsazh ne Rugove ne sezon dimri.jpg Liridon (talk) 13:31, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:59, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
copyvio from www.mod.gov.cy/mod/CJRCC.nsf/cjrcc20_en/cjrcc20_en?OpenDocument XR728 (talk) 13:32, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:00, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
This photo has watermark, and user already has uploaded new file without it here File:Natyr.jpg Liridon (talk) 13:32, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:00, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AmyBrownPB (talk · contribs)
[edit]Probably a copyright violation; the uploader has tagged the images as "own work", but specified a third-party author (Cameron Brown). Besides this, two of the images are derivatives of stock photos of unknown provenance (but show up on a lot of websites via image searches).
Psychonaut (talk) 13:47, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:00, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
No evidence of permission to use image from specified source page. Archive at:- http://web.archive.org/web/20100612142047/http://menzieshill.ea.dundeecity.sch.uk/find_us.htm Laerol (talk) 14:00, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:00, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like s725.photobucket.com/user/Think_Mcfly_Think/media/304181-174967-bruce-timm_large.jpg.html. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:09, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:00, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Own request Henk B. (talk) 15:52, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:05, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Own request Henk B. (talk) 15:54, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:05, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Schreiner Musik (talk · contribs)
[edit]No indication of user's own work on these images (covers, etc) of performing artists. Other uploads were speedied.
- File:Eisenmann - Mein Herz schlägt weiter - CD.jpg
- File:Lou - Ich sage Dankeschön - Single.jpg
- File:Lou - Ich will leben CD.jpg
- File:Lou - Ich werd Dich lieben.jpg
- File:Jörg Solo.jpg
- File:Jörg Schreiner.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:38, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:05, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
missing EXIF data to verify origian, small image format, hence, potentially copyright protectend content, but imho rather out of scope, Roland zh (talk) 17:38, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:06, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
missing EXIF data to verify origin, small image format, hence, potentially copyright protectend content, Roland zh (talk) 17:40, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:06, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
No indication of user's own work on this 3D model. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:41, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:06, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
missing EXIF data to verify origin, rather small image format, hence, potentially copyright protectend content, Roland zh (talk) 17:43, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:06, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
No indication of user's own work on this professional looking Facebook sized image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:44, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:06, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
missing EXIF data to verify origin, rather small image format, hence, potentially copyright protectend content, Roland zh (talk) 17:44, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:06, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 17:44, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:06, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
There is no useful description of this unused map, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:45, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:06, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
out of scope Ciaurlec (talk) 17:45, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:06, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
No indication of user's own work on this black and white image, proper source is needed. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:46, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:06, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Lower quality copy of File:ShirmpWontonNoodlesss58.jpg by same uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:48, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:06, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
One of these three images shows the header of the computer from which all three were screenshot. Unlikely to be user's own work, no camera data.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:56, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:06, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Unused DW of the file given as source. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:00, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:07, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
An artistic work, which cannot be licensed by the flickr photographer, even though it passes flickr review. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:07, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:07, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Unused, low quality, small size image of a man, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:10, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:07, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Unused, low quality, small size image of a man, out of COM:SCOPE and possibly COM:COPYVIO as well, since there is no metadata. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:10, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:07, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Nota 2-D artwork; no evidence of permission Andy Mabbett (talk) 18:27, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:07, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as imho potentially non-free content: thumbnail format and missing EXIF data to verify origin, Roland zh (talk) 19:08, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:07, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as imho potentially non-free content: rather thumbnail format and missing EXIF data to verify origin, Roland zh (talk) 19:10, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:07, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as imho potentially non-free content: rather thumbnail format and missing EXIF data to verify origin, Roland zh (talk) 19:11, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:07, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Unused logo which is claimed to be own work. Logos with an own work claim and which are unused generally should be deleted per one of the following reasons. The logo is either of a non notable subject or company and could thus be considered out of scope as advertising content. On the other hand: if the logo is of a notable subject, and might thus be in scope, than the own work claim is almost surely incorrect and as such the author and source information are likely false. Incorrect sources mean that essential information is missing. It would be possible, but hard, to fix this information as I do not know the original source. For potential usage of a logo downloading the logo and uploading it with correct information is very easy. Making reuploading when needed easier than finding already uploaded unused logos with incorrect information. Note that I do not make any arguments about whether this logo is above or below the threshold of originality as I believe that this logo should be deleted either way per the reasoning given. If you believe that this logo could be used for an educational purpose (for example in a Wikipedia article) and the attribution information is correct (or has been corrected) please respond. Basvb (talk) 19:11, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:07, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as imho potentially non-free content: thumbnail format and missing EXIF data to verify origin, Roland zh (talk) 19:12, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:07, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Unused logo of questionable educational usability. This logo might be considered advertising content, which would mean that it is out of scope. If you believe that this logo could be used for an educational purpose (for example in a Wikipedia article) please respond. Basvb (talk) 19:41, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:08, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
out of scope Pippobuono (talk) 19:42, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:08, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as imho potentially non-free content: thumbnail format and missing EXIF data to verify origin, Roland zh (talk) 19:44, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:08, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
out of scope COM:NUDITY Pippobuono (talk) 19:57, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:08, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as imho potentially non-free content: thumbnail format and missing EXIF data to verify origin, Roland zh (talk) 20:38, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:08, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as imho potentially non-free content: thumbnail format and missing EXIF data to verify origin, Roland zh (talk) 20:39, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:08, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as imho potentially non-free content: thumbnail format and missing EXIF data to verify origin, Roland zh (talk) 20:39, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:08, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as imho potentially non-free content: thumbnail format and missing EXIF data to verify origin, Roland zh (talk) 20:39, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:08, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Dubious this is Own work - species shown does not occur in India. No google image hits though. MPF (talk) 21:03, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per COM:PRP. --INeverCry 23:09, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
It seems that the uploader was given this document by the "Land Registry, Leicester Office". This means that the document wasn't created by the uploader (as stated by the uploader) and also that the uploader isn't authorised to license this under CC-BY-SA 4.0. Stefan2 (talk) 21:09, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- Comment: I asked about this at COM:VP/C#File:Meadow Park Freehold - RegisterPlanHD432453.pdf since I wasn't sure if it was OK for Commons. It seems the only reason it was uploaded was to try and resolve a content dispute the uploader was having with other editors on Wikipedia. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:34, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:09, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Legrand sebastien
[edit]- File:Eglise d'amblie.jpg
- File:ChateauAmblie.jpg
- File:Castel.jpg
- File:Château.jpg
- File:Blason.malbenc2.jpg
- File:Jardin des marettes.jpg
- File:Eglise d'amblie2.jpg
- File:Eglise d'amblie3.jpg
- File:Cheminée médiéval.jpg
This request concerns some of the uploads made by Legrand sebastien (talk · contribs), in particular the ones with no explicit source or tagged as "own work" when it's blatant they cannot be (i.e. 2kb images with too small dimensions). --Sannita - not just another it.wiki sysop 14:54, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- I've deleted all but two, which have some backend error or other. INeverCry 23:04, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 03:06, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
The source link states Lockheed Martin/John Rossino as photographer, and is not the work of a US government employee, and therefore cannot be public domain. FOX 52 (talk) 16:42, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- Various USAF photos have been photographed by the same person, Mr. John Rossino. and based on this image File:F-22 assembling1.jpg, i assumed that it is public domain since these Lockheed Martin's aircrafts are being photographed by the same employee. (User talk:Mouath14) 18:00, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- John Rossino is an aeronautics photojournalist, and is not an employee of the US Government FOX 52 (talk) 02:24, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- Fair enough, if he's not related to the USAF, then i would simply ask why is his name being used in so many other pictures such as the one related to the F-22 along with the USAF's tag which was uploaded since 2008, that's almost 8 years of usage. in that case, i think regulation should be applied to all. (User talk:Mouath14) 13:58, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- John Rossino is an aeronautics photojournalist, and is not an employee of the US Government FOX 52 (talk) 02:24, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. PD-USGov and its child templates only apply to works by Federal Government employees created during the course of their duties. --Storkk (talk) 09:25, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
Copyright claim by Case Western Reserve University Club Station, W8EDU. This image is of the W8EDU club station, taken by the club station. 192.131.44.33 03:33, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Copyright claim by Case Western Reserve University Club Station, W8EDU. This image is of the W8EDU club station, taken by the club station. 192.131.44.33 03:37, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- In this case more information about a possible copyvio seems to be necessary. So also the discussion page. Keep.--Wdwd (talk) 19:03, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Wdwd. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:53, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
file is not anonymized - car number-plates Jo.Fruechtnicht (talk) 08:33, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:54, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
This file is not locatable and possible spam.--Jos1950 (talk) 02:04, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, no sign of spamming/advertising. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:58, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
This file is not locatable and possible spam. --Jos1950 (talk) 02:06, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, no sign of spamming/advertising. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:58, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
This file is not locatable and possible spam. --Jos1950 (talk) 02:07, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, no sign of spamming/advertising. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:58, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
This file is not locatable and possible spam. --Jos1950 (talk) 02:09, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, no sign of spamming/advertising. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:59, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
This file is not locatable and possible spam. --Jos1950 (talk) 02:10, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, no sign of spamming/advertising. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:59, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
This file is not locatable and possible spam. --Jos1950 (talk) 02:23, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, no sign of spamming/advertising. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:59, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
This file is not locatable and possible spam. --Jos1950 (talk) 02:00, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, no sign of spamming/advertising. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:59, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
No - COM:EDUSE / COM:NOTUSED. Low quality, relevant place has been uploaded as a high quality image instead - "File:Leningradsky Avenue (Novy Urengoy).jpg".
Kept: more than adequate quality, and suggested alternative is totally different, not making this redundant. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:03, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
No - COM:EDUSE / COM:NOTUSED. Low quality, relevant place has been uploaded as a high quality image instead - "File:Winter (Novy Urengoy).jpg".
Kept: more than adequate quality, and suggested alternative is totally different, not making this redundant. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:03, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
No - COM:EDUSE / COM:NOTUSED. Low quality, relevant object has been uploaded as a high quality image - "File:Sail Fountain at Night (Novy Urengoy).jpg".
Kept: more than adequate quality, and suggested alternative is totally different, not making this redundant. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:03, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
Delete No COM:FOP for monuments in Russia MartynovRussia (talk) 20:56, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:20, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
No - COM:EDUSE / COM:NOTUSED. Derivative work from images nominated for deletion - low quality, relevant category has been enriched with numerous high quality images. High quality collage has been uploaded instead - "File:Collage Novy Urengoy.png".
Kept: more than adequate quality, and suggested alternative is totally different, not making this redundant. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:03, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
Delete No COM:FOP for monuments in Russia (kindly see the fountain on the left) -- MartynovRussia (talk) 20:58, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:20, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
Copyrights are by Jan Joris Bos photogrphy as picture shows. --JanB46 (talk) 07:53, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:02, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
duplicate of File:Jose ignacio mercedes junto a los compañeros de es hora de actuar 3.jpg--Jos1950 (talk) 17:21, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:02, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
This is a COM:Screenshot, and therefore images and elements on it can not (under Commons precedence and policy) claim de minimis, and since Eol does not own the images on their site, but "find" cc-by/-nc/-sa (et.c) images from (e.g.) Flickr. As well as the user avatars (right site) which eol does not own. Josve05a (talk) 00:02, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
NOTE FROM EOL - Per Ticket#2013071510007222, and as noted by Smooth_O (talk) 07:32, 15 July 2013 (UTC), "Declaration of consent sent per required protocol on 7/15/2013 at 12:05pm eastern time". It was my understanding (as a representative of EOL) that this was a closed issue. Thanks.
Kept: per OTRS. --INeverCry 22:12, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
- @INeverCry: As an OTRS-agent I disagree with this closue. EOL does not own the elements shown on their website, just as WMF does not own the images on Commons. But they might be licensed freely, but most on EOL are nd/nc. Josve05a (talk) 22:21, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
- I tend to agree with Josve. The ticket doesn't cover the photographs used at the web page. Natuur12 (talk) 22:27, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
- Deleted: Thanks for the ticket review. I've reversed my keep close and deleted it. INeverCry 22:29, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
- I tend to agree with Josve. The ticket doesn't cover the photographs used at the web page. Natuur12 (talk) 22:27, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
This pictures shows me while playing hockey and i dont want that to be published. Thanks!!! 82.116.116.20 08:07, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:14, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
Same here: This pictures shows me while playing hockey and i dont want that to be published. Thanks!!! 82.116.116.20 08:08, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:14, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
This file has no official verification or authorization from the original photographer for license of the photo. How did a common photographer get a close shot? This photo seems to be either downloaded or copied from other website or a blog. The author who posted the photo should release the license of this photo or this should be deleted as per Wikipedia Rules and Regulations. Thanks, Varghese Jacob 182.69.163.6 08:59, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: No proof of copyvio provided. --Amitie 10g (talk) 16:51, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete: Image should be deleted as it looks either modified and looks plagiarized. First, how did the "author named Mubarakansari" get a close clear picture? The author has no public record of being a professional photographer (the person is a conman person waking in India). IPS officers dont allow themselves to be pictured in their uniform while sitting in office on desk (there is something called AIS conduct and professional rules). The author did not take the photo. If he/she did take the photo, then the person should prove a written permission of the same to Wikimedia Commons. Please provide the authentication and official proof of the same. Regards, Thanks, Varghese Jacob
Kept: This has EXIF and is high-res. No other uses found thru Google search that predate this upload. COM:PRP requires more than baseless speculation. --INeverCry 22:19, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
Compsognathus lifted from Dorling Kindersley restoration: http://www.dkfindout.com/uk/dinosaurs-and-prehistoric-life/dinosaurs/compsognathus/ IJReid (talk) 14:04, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- I think the uploader here may actually be the author. He claimed to have gotten his restorations approved by Darren Naish (originally made for an app[8]), so perhaps he sold them to DK afterwards? FunkMonk (talk) 15:03, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- That may be what happened, after all, the poses for the dinosaurs are slightly different from the published DK versions. Shall we cancel the nomination? IJReid (talk) 23:29, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- Maybe contact the uploader to be sure? FunkMonk (talk) 12:56, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
- He hasn't been active on the wiki since 2011. It may be possible to check out-of-wiki, but based on what I have seen they are separate restorations, and the wiki version was out before the DK version (I have a DK book with them from 2013). IJReid (talk) 23:15, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
- Maybe contact the uploader to be sure? FunkMonk (talk) 12:56, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
- That may be what happened, after all, the poses for the dinosaurs are slightly different from the published DK versions. Shall we cancel the nomination? IJReid (talk) 23:29, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per above. --INeverCry 22:20, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
keine verifizierbare Quelle angegeben, aufgrund des Alters ist der Hochlader eher nicht der Urheber, 70 Jahre nach Tod des Fotografen oder 100 Jahre nach Erstellung nicht gegeben Alnilam (talk) 18:33, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, author unlikely to have died >70 years ago, or be anonymous. --Storkk (talk) 16:30, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
Es sind viele Minderjährige auf dem Foto erkennbar abgebildet und es ist nicht klar, ob eine Genehmigung der Erziehungs-/Sorgeberechtigten vorliegt. Der Persönlichkeitsschutz sollte hier Vorrang haben. Alnilam (talk) 19:29, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: I don't agree with the deletion reason, but picture seems out of scope. --Jcb (talk) 00:39, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
Mapa ma błędy rzeczowe. Zakłamuje rzeczywistość. Mateuszgdynia (talk) 20:51, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- A niby w jaki sposób? Ciastkoo (talk) 13:04, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept: in use - deletion reason (supposed factual errors) therefore irrelevant. --Jcb (talk) 00:37, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
Files in Category:Chen Shui-bian
[edit]Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Chiang Ching kuo.jpg "official document" that is exempt from copyright in ROC does not cover images, therefore these images are not PD.
Wcam (talk) 14:12, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- Keep In the prior deletion request, there was no evidence that "documents" means strictly text, or whether it means all documents, including images published as documents. There is plenty of precident with copyright laws in other countries where "document" has covered any publication by the government and their employees/agents. If the legislation has some clarifying explanation, then someone should present it, however there is no reason to presume that the word "document" has a different meaning here, when compared to legal interpretation of copyright law elsewhere. --Fæ (talk) 14:19, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- There have been more DRs indicating that {{PD-ROC-exempt}} does not cover photographs, or at least whether it covers photographs or not is in significant doubt: Commons:Deletion requests/File:1976Oct6-FangChihPreparesDisasterRelief.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Yen Chia-kan.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/Image:General Fan Hanjie.jpg. --Wcam (talk) 16:06, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks, taking these in turn:
- Appears to have been deleted for reasons that were not related to ROC, the nature of the significant doubt for deletion was not explained in any detail. The discussion put forward the view that "documents" meant the entire document, which could include images.
- Appears to have been deleted because ROC did not apply. There was no discussion of whether ROC related to images or not.
- Kept as a personal photo, unrelated to ROC as far as I can see after a quick browse through.
- It seems sensible to conclude that these past DRs do not set any precedent on whether "official document" should exclude publications which happen to be images not pure text. If we want to set a precedent, there should be a legally meaningful interpretation of the copyright act to refer to, such as an example where publication was challenged in court or by government statement. --Fæ (talk) 16:21, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks, taking these in turn:
- There have been more DRs indicating that {{PD-ROC-exempt}} does not cover photographs, or at least whether it covers photographs or not is in significant doubt: Commons:Deletion requests/File:1976Oct6-FangChihPreparesDisasterRelief.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Yen Chia-kan.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/Image:General Fan Hanjie.jpg. --Wcam (talk) 16:06, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- Another bit of information worth considering here: the source website of these files is the Legislative Yuan Website (ly.gov.tw) whose copyright statement explicitly states that contents on this website "are for personal use and non-commercial purposes only". --Wcam (talk) 16:50, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- This is a old version of the parliament copyright statements, the newer version is available here (Chinese Only), do also see discussions in Commons:Deletion_requests/File:立法院105年2月份活動_(1).jpg. -- @assanges ‧ (talk | cont | uploads) 05:31, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete I disagree that Article 9 of the ROC copyright act could be reasonably understood to refer to photographic material. As a straightforward understanding of the purpose of that Article, it looks to be closer to an implementation of the principle that the documents upon which the government conducts its business should not be restricted using copyright, rather than an assertion of a principle that everything the government produces should be free (i.e., libre). But since we're working with a statute, we should look at the wording of the statute in its controlling language. "Official document", that is, 公文, particularly the character 文, carries a very strong semantic implication in modern Chinese of textual material. That's not to say that no compounds containing 文 may refer to concepts that could include images or diagrams, but most should not. Even looking at the statutory explanation of what 公文 may include, "proclamations, text of speeches, news releases, and other documents ...", the only item in there that might apply to this is "other documents"—in the original, 其他文書. We have the same problem as before with 文書, and moreover I believe translating this as "documents" is an oversimplification. The Taiwan MOE dictionary gives the following phrases as synonyms for 文書: 布告、文牘、文告. The word 布告 refers to things like announcements and notices, 文牘 refers to clerical paperwork and correspondence, and 文告 refers to things like proclamations or reports to the public.
Moreover, it strikes me that there's a question as to exactly who took this image. This appears to be taken from a government publication that incorporates photographs of people. I believe it's fallacious to presume from that publication that the images contained within are works of the Taiwan government. This is in the same sense that a US passport is certainly a work of the federal government, but the image printed on there is not; or that the NASA website is clearly a work of the federal government, but many of the images on there are the works of independent or foreign research agencies who hold copyright to those images; or that the US federal government can hold a copyright to an item it did not produce without that work instantly lapsing into the public domain. There is no reason why none of these situations might reasonably apply to this publication, at least to the point where COM:PRP should not apply.
Put briefly, I believe it is sufficiently likely that Article 9 of the Taiwan copyright act does not refer to photographic material produced by the government, or in the alternative, that this photograph is not a work of a civil servant within the scope of the Act (as opposed to a contractor or work for hire), for COM:PRP to apply and call for the deletion of this photograph. —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 13:55, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- Keep See discussions in Commons:Deletion_requests/File:立法院105年2月份活動_(1).jpg. -- @assanges ‧ (talk | cont | uploads) 05:31, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:51, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
Problems with these files:
- they are not emblems of France (which is here) but stylised versions of the emblem that were used by the French Presidency as a logo (and recently replaced by an even more stylised version): here an article on the logo and its designers;
- the logo is subject to copyright as indicated on the website of the Presidency;
- the licence is in no way CC as the uploaders indicated, and it is more than doubtful that this is their personnal work or that they are the owner of the rights as they indicated.
Superbenjamin (talk) 19:52, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- contre fort/conservation immédiate Il faut une reproduction vectorielle 13:37, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
- Quel rapport avec une reproduction vectorielle ? Peu importe le format : il s'agit de logos copyrightés. --Superbenjamin (talk) 16:44, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:17, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
Od 1999 roku Bydgoszcz jest tylko siedzibą wojewody Mateuszgdynia (talk) 20:52, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Mapkę uzupełniono o informację, że od 1999 Bydgoszcz jest siedzibą wojewody kujawsko-pomorskiego (i podporządkowanych jednostek, inspektoratów i służb oraz szeregu innych jednostek administracji zespolonej i niezespolonej). Bydgoszcz z racji zlokalizowania urzędu wojewódzkiego jest stolicą, względnie współstolicą (wraz z Toruniem, gdzie zlokalizowano sejmik i urząd marszałkowski) województwa kujawsko-pomorskiego Pit1233 (talk) 09:09, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept: in use - stated deletion reason therefore irrelevant. --Jcb (talk) 17:16, 3 July 2016 (UTC)