Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/06/04

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive June 4th, 2016
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fehler bei Namensgebung bei Dateianlage, wurde umbenannt Wibramuc (talk) 09:41, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 14:08, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fehler bei Namensgebung bei Dateianlage, wurde umbenannt Wibramuc (talk) 09:43, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 14:06, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fehler bei Namensgebung bei Dateianlage, wurde umbenannt Wibramuc (talk) 09:43, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 14:09, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fehler bei Namensgebung bei Dateianlage, wurde umbenannt Wibramuc (talk) 09:44, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 14:12, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fehler bei Namensgebung bei Dateianlage, wurde umbenannt Wibramuc (talk) 09:44, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 14:13, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising, out of scope Takeaway (talk) 12:37, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 17:39, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{delete} MD Raihan Khan (talk) 14:37, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Taivo: Author requested deletion of page: author's request on creation day

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image of a credit card showing full card details The Anome (talk) 19:55, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 20:37, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

appears to be part of an attempt to user wikipedia + commons as a social networking medium The Anome (talk) 19:57, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 20:44, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

appears to be part of an attempt to user wikipedia + commons as a social networking medium The Anome (talk) 19:57, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 20:43, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

appears to be part of an attempt to user wikipedia + commons as a social networking medium The Anome (talk) 19:57, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 20:42, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

appears to be part of an attempt to user wikipedia + commons as a social networking medium The Anome (talk) 19:58, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 20:41, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

appears to be part of an attempt to user wikipedia + commons as a social networking medium The Anome (talk) 19:58, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 20:40, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

appears to be part of an attempt to user wikipedia + commons as a social networking medium The Anome (talk) 19:58, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 20:40, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded and I want in removed. Miarewe (talk) 00:25, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:10, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it and I want it removed. Miarewe (talk) 00:25, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:06, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear copyright violation. --JuTa 16:18, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{delete} MD Raihan Khan (talk) 14:49, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploaders reuest ; unused recent file. --JuTa 18:45, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{delete} MD Raihan Khan (talk) 14:51, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploaders request; unused recent file. --JuTa 18:47, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{delete} MD Raihan Khan (talk) 14:35, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploaders request; unused recent file. --JuTa 18:52, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{delete} MD Raihan Khan (talk) 14:37, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploaders request; unused recent file. --JuTa 18:57, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{delete} MD Raihan Khan (talk) 14:38, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploaders request; unused recent file. --JuTa 18:56, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{delete} MD Raihan Khan (talk) 14:44, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploaders request; unused recent file. --JuTa 18:58, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{delete} MD Raihan Khan (talk) 14:45, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploaders request; unused recent file. --JuTa 19:00, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{delete} MD Raihan Khan (talk) 14:45, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploaders request; unused recent file. --JuTa 18:54, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{delete} MD Raihan Khan (talk) 14:48, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploaders request; unused recent file. --JuTa 18:51, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{delete} MD Raihan Khan (talk) 14:49, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploaders request; unused recent file. --JuTa 19:01, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no permission or license given in source used 80.235.147.186 17:56, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unless demonstrated otherwise, this is a copyright violation. The source given for permission is a user talk page at boxrec.com. The user quite clearly refutes the idea that permission has been given. Green Giant (talk) 11:49, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Improper license and source RoldBoxing (talk) 10:06, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

no permission or license given in source used but the opposite in the permission link under File:MannyPacq.jpg saying sorry I have no idea what you are on about 80.235.147.186 18:00, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unless demonstrated otherwise, this is a copyright violation. The source given for permission is a user talk page at boxrec.com. The user quite clearly refutes the idea that permission has been given. Green Giant (talk) 11:52, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image of unknown non notable individuals with masked faces. Unused, uncategorized. Not educationally useful. DavidIvar (talk) 14:07, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Denniss (talk) 16:24, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Restored to allow at least seven days for discussion because of a request at COM:UDR. Green Giant (talk) 00:16, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:20, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a web host, promotional file TJH2018talk 00:33, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, as nominator. TJH2018talk 00:59, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:21, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted trophy INeverCry 00:52, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:57, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I could only find one non-wiki-source. I doubt this painting really is PD-old. Thoughts? Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:46, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete - No known source or author, and undoubtedly a modern representation with an unknown date. Lacking those details it's impossible to have this file here.-- Darwin Ahoy! 09:26, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Never ever a painting from about 1350. Modern. No source, no artist. Deletion. 01:24, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination, lacks of information to determine the copyright statut. Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:59, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random webpicture of Therese Lindgren from her YouTube channel. LittleGun (talk) 07:06, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:22, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Impurnendu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Questionable authorship claims based on the extremely low resolutions, missing metadata, the uploader's history, and previous publications found elsewhere.

LX (talk, contribs) 07:55, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, almost are comming from http://www.epaper.eisamay.com/Details.aspx?id=23438&boxid=14241864 and are not free. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:06, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related enwiki entry speedy deleted. If IN scope needs permission from (as indicated) "Pixelaaron". Gunnex (talk) 09:38, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:22, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertisement @assanges(talk | cont | uploads) 10:31, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:23, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Poké95 11:01, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:24, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yusrizal Ghazali (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope.

Poké95 11:05, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:24, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yusrizal Ghazali (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused tiny personal images.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:53, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:02, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image was probably taken between the 1960s and 1980s. The photographer did not die 70 years ago and this is not {{PD-Australia}}. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 11:34, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, currently no rationale to be in PD. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:14, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private photo, not in use, out of scope Wdwd (talk) 12:50, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:25, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:26, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

nonsense picture Brunei (talk) 14:04, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:27, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:28, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: selfie/personal image; not in use Takeaway (talk) 14:20, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:28, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:29, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Divess (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:01, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Andrew L. Miller (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:02, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by KOKinfo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by KOKinfo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:03, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:05, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:06, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:07, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:09, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:09, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:10, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Spcobide (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope.

   FDMS  4    16:22, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:10, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Joaumxd (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear copyright status / out of scope.

   FDMS  4    16:23, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:11, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status / out of scope.    FDMS  4    17:02, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:13, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused image, who/what are ccrg? out of scope. For (;;) (talk) 17:51, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:13, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by حشمان جمال (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small, no EXIF data, Out of scoop. and this photo are personel of this man

Reda Kerbouche (talk) 19:34, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:16, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope.    FDMS  4    19:42, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:16, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blatant advertising The Anome (talk) 20:09, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: SPAM. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:58, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blatant advertising in image name and description text The Anome (talk) 20:10, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: spam, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:59, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional material: note username of uploading account The Anome (talk) 20:10, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:59, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blatant advertising The Anome (talk) 20:09, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: SPAM. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:58, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertisement @assanges(talk | cont | uploads) 10:35, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:17, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Used to spam/ unintentionally uploaded/ not eductaional Hun500 (talk) 20:12, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[[Category:{{subst:delete2|image=File:Rohith Manikonda.png]]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:17, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No encyclopedic value, used nowhere, contains website address embedded in image. The Anome (talk) 20:17, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:17, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising image The Anome (talk) 20:18, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:19, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising image The Anome (talk) 20:18, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:19, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Prezentácia v moci andela a demona.pdf Antifajny (talk) 22:37, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:55, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Prezentácia tri mysle(duse v podobe ducha a naopak).pdf Antifajny (talk) 22:38, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:55, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Prezentácia sest zmyslov-sest stavov cinnosti.pdf Antifajny (talk) 22:38, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:55, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Prezentácia psychoza.pdf Antifajny (talk) 22:40, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:55, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Prezentácia psychoza.pdf Antifajny (talk) 22:40, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:55, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Prezentácia ON.pdf Antifajny (talk) 22:41, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:55, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Prezentácia ON.pdf Antifajny (talk) 22:41, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:55, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Prezentácia jazyk v spolocnosti.pdf Antifajny (talk) 22:42, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:56, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Prezentácia hmla.pdf Antifajny (talk) 22:42, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:56, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Prezentácia hero in-hero out.pdf Antifajny (talk) 22:42, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:56, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Prezentácia halucinacia a pseudo-halucinacia.pdf Antifajny (talk) 22:43, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:56, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Prezentácia extremne neovladatelny duch a dusa.pdf Antifajny (talk) 22:43, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Prezentácia extremne neovladatelny duch a dusa.pdf Antifajny (talk) 22:45, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:56, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Prezentácia Duch a Dusa.pdf Antifajny (talk) 22:46, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:56, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Prezentácia ako bojovat proti duchovy-duse.pdf Antifajny (talk) 22:46, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:57, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Prezentácia akademia.pdf Antifajny (talk) 22:47, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:57, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Presentation-tei kniznica.pdf Antifajny (talk) 22:47, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Presentation-tei kniznica.pdf Antifajny (talk) 22:47, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:39, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Presentation valecni zameravac.pdf Antifajny (talk) 22:48, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:39, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Presentation vedome nevedome.pdf Antifajny (talk) 22:48, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:40, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Presentation traja najvyssi-traja vyluceny s mojho zivota.pdf Antifajny (talk) 22:49, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:40, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Presentation svet-vesmir a zem.pdf Antifajny (talk) 22:49, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:41, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Presentation svedomie vnutorny hlas.pdf Antifajny (talk) 22:50, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:41, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Presentation stav,cinnost.pdf Antifajny (talk) 22:50, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Presentation stav,cinnost.pdf Antifajny (talk) 22:51, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:41, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Presentation spolocnost,sociologia.pdf Antifajny (talk) 22:51, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Presentation spolocnost,sociologia.pdf Antifajny (talk) 22:51, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Presentation spolocnost,sociologia.pdf Antifajny (talk) 22:52, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:41, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Presentation sny.pdf Antifajny (talk) 22:52, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:43, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Presentation pocit v tele a hlave.pdf Antifajny (talk) 22:52, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:43, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Presentation po com tuzi muz.pdf Antifajny (talk) 22:53, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:44, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Presentation pan vsemohucnych myslienok.pdf Antifajny (talk) 22:53, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:44, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Presentation nervovy mail rec tela.pdf Antifajny (talk) 22:54, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:45, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Presentation naha vs materialno zabezpecena mysel.pdf Antifajny (talk) 22:54, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:45, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Presentation naha a materialny.pdf Antifajny (talk) 22:54, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Presentation naha a materialny.pdf Antifajny (talk) 22:55, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:45, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Presentation mysel.pdf Antifajny (talk) 22:55, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:45, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Presentation multimedialny prenos.pdf Antifajny (talk) 22:55, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:46, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Presentation moje ja sebakontrolerom na verejnosti a doma.pdf Antifajny (talk) 22:56, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:46, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Presentation microsoftove sectory.pdf Antifajny (talk) 22:56, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:46, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Presentation legenda king.pdf Antifajny (talk) 22:57, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:46, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Presentation kontakt vzdalenost.pdf Antifajny (talk) 22:57, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:47, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Presentation jazyk v spolocnosti.pdf Antifajny (talk) 22:57, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:47, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Presentation interier vs exterier.pdf Antifajny (talk) 22:58, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:47, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Presentation hruba a tenka koza-silovy pocit.pdf Antifajny (talk) 22:59, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Presentation hruba a tenka koza-silovy pocit.pdf Antifajny (talk) 22:59, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:47, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Presentation hmotne a nehmotne teleso.pdf Antifajny (talk) 22:59, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:49, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Presentation ekonomika.pdf Antifajny (talk) 23:00, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:48, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Presentation hlasy a myslenie i vsehomucnost myslienok.pdf Antifajny (talk) 23:00, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:48, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Presentation halucinacia.pdf Antifajny (talk) 23:01, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:48, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Presentation egoizmus-ja myslim ja existuju.pdf Antifajny (talk) 23:01, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Presentation egoizmus-ja myslim ja existuju.pdf Antifajny (talk) 23:01, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:48, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Presentation echovy debil-psychopat.pdf Antifajny (talk) 23:02, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:49, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Presentation debilna vs machrova mysel.pdf Antifajny (talk) 23:02, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:50, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Presentation cierna a biela m a e.pdf Antifajny (talk) 23:03, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:50, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Presentation cira a priehladna.pdf Antifajny (talk) 23:03, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:50, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

resentation cerna kniha.pdf Antifajny (talk) 23:03, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:51, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Presentation big chief.pdf Antifajny (talk) 23:04, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:51, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Presentation Boh.pdf Antifajny (talk) 23:04, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:51, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused private image, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 23:04, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:51, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Presentation Big Boss.pdf Antifajny (talk) 23:05, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:52, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused private image, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 23:05, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:52, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Presentation Big Boss.pdf Antifajny (talk) 23:05, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:52, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Presentation 1D rozmer,grafika.pdf Antifajny (talk) 23:05, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:52, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Presentation ako zabit cas.pdf Antifajny (talk) 23:05, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:53, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Document driver,s 16.pdf Antifajny (talk) 23:06, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:31, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Document driver,s 16.pdf Antifajny (talk) 23:06, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Document driver,s 16.pdf Antifajny (talk) 23:06, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:31, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Document driver,s 16.pdf Antifajny (talk) 23:07, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:31, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Document driver,s 16.pdf Antifajny (talk) 23:07, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:33, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Document driver,s 16.pdf Antifajny (talk) 23:07, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:33, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Document driver,s 16.pdf Antifajny (talk) 23:08, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:33, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Document driver,s 16.pdf Antifajny (talk) 23:08, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:33, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Document driver,s 16.pdf Antifajny (talk) 23:08, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:33, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Document driver,s 16.pdf Antifajny (talk) 23:09, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:33, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Document driver,s 16.pdf Antifajny (talk) 23:09, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:32, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Document driver,s 16.pdf Antifajny (talk) 23:09, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:32, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Document driver,s 16.pdf Antifajny (talk) 23:09, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:32, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Document driver,s 16.pdf Antifajny (talk) 23:10, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:32, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Document driver,s 16.pdf Antifajny (talk) 23:10, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:32, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Document driver,s 16.pdf Antifajny (talk) 23:10, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:37, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 1422954669szm (talk · contribs)

[edit]

these images have not information about this author. The author is not "dkdjkf " for example, and it seems that there is a possible violation of copyright

+ some are Test files + possible hoaxes, no evidence of the author.

Ks [在这里找到答案] 01:20, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 17:40, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hini bo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No EXIF data, out of scoop small and unusful. maybe not here/his own work and

Reda Kerbouche (talk) 15:13, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:19, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hini bo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

small, no EXIF data, maybe not here/his own work, or copied from facebook

Reda Kerbouche (talk) 19:29, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:13, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jkerrigan8 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small files with no EXIF, reverse Googling each will find evidence of previous publication. Uploader has uploaded other copyvio files.

BethNaught (talk) 21:27, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:16, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

logo : voir http://radiortm.fr/ Habertix (talk) 21:55, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:18, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

empty category Kocio (talk) 22:08, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: deleted by Jcb. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:19, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Arquivo falso, usado para difamação.

http://www1.folha.uol.com.br/folha/brasil/ult96u556855.shtml

http://observatoriodaimprensa.com.br/imprensa-em-questao/folha-publicou-ficha-falsa-de-dilma

http://observatoriodaimprensa.com.br/armazem-literario/a-ficha-falsa/ Ixocactus (talk) 04:19, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Strongly support Violation of Folha de S.Paulo's copyright. Also a blatant fake, as Folha acknowledged itself --Usien6 (talk) 17:53, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:40, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, as per http://www.wpafb.af.mil/news/story.asp?id=123467496 this is a Boeing photo, so not in PD XR728 (talk) 06:03, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:15, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I think this might be a misunderstanding of public domain. I don't think that the rationale (that the copyright holder has allowed the photo to be used on several websites) amounts to a valid claim for PD. EricEnfermero (talk) 06:59, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:14, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photographer did not die 70 years ago and there is no proof provided that this is {{PD-Australia}}. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 11:37, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:13, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photographer did not die 70 years ago and there is no proof provided that this is {{PD-US}}. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 11:39, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:13, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The disclaimer "permission does not extend to third parties" is incompatible with the CC license. Also if the uploader isn't the copyright holder, the license should be verified with OTRS. --ghouston (talk) 12:08, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:12, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo and description of the page does not match. It is a fictional character. This page was made to intimidate a living person Mizo Architect (talk) 12:42, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination with note that original upload log sourced it to facebook. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:12, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio; see w:File:CoSBrimstoneSigil.png Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 12:46, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:12, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A work by a living artist, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armando_%28artist%29, needs a license from the artist. --ghouston (talk) 12:51, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:11, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very very bad quality. Not used and not useful. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 13:20, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:11, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a publicity photo; likely not created by the uploader. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 13:22, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:11, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unclear picture of spider Brunei (talk) 14:02, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:11, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Loutre91310 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://julienceldran.free.fr/images/chaulage/chaulage06.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:11, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wikipedia hat kein Interesse an diesem Foto Barrystapp (talk) 14:35, 4 June 2016 (UTC) Ein Benutzer namens 'Kängurutatze' bekommt seinen Löschwahn nicht in den Griff!![reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:08, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wikipedia hat kein Interesse an diesem Foto Barrystapp (talk) 14:35, 4 June 2016 (UTC) Ein Benutzer namens 'Kängurutatze' bekommt seinen Löschwahn nicht in den Griff!![reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:08, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wikipedia hat kein Interesse an diesem Foto Barrystapp (talk) 14:35, 4 June 2016 (UTC) Ein Benutzer namens 'Kängurutatze' bekommt seinen Löschwahn nicht in den Griff!![reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:08, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wikipedia hat kein Interesse an diesem Foto Barrystapp (talk) 14:36, 4 June 2016 (UTC) Ein Benutzer namens 'Kängurutatze' bekommt seinen Löschwahn nicht in den Griff!![reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:08, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wikipedia hat kein Interesse an diesem Foto Barrystapp (talk) 14:36, 4 June 2016 (UTC) Ein Benutzer namens 'Kängurutatze' bekommt seinen Löschwahn nicht in den Griff!![reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:09, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wikipedia hat kein Interesse an diesem Foto Barrystapp (talk) 14:36, 4 June 2016 (UTC) Ein Benutzer namens 'Kängurutatze' bekommt seinen Löschwahn nicht in den Griff!![reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:09, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wikipedia hat kein Interesse an diesem Foto Barrystapp (talk) 14:36, 4 June 2016 (UTC) Ein Benutzer namens 'Kängurutatze' bekommt seinen Löschwahn nicht in den Griff!![reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:09, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wikipedia hat kein Interesse an diesem Foto Barrystapp (talk) 14:37, 4 June 2016 (UTC) Ein Benutzer namens 'Kängurutatze' bekommt seinen Löschwahn nicht in den Griff!![reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:09, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wikipedia hat kein Interesse an diesem Foto Barrystapp (talk) 14:37, 4 June 2016 (UTC) Ein Benutzer namens 'Kängurutatze' bekommt seinen Löschwahn nicht in den Griff!![reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:09, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wikipedia hat kein Interesse an diesem Foto Barrystapp (talk) 14:37, 4 June 2016 (UTC) Ein Benutzer namens 'Kängurutatze' bekommt seinen Löschwahn nicht in den Griff!![reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:09, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:07, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wikipedia hat kein Interesse an diesem Foto Barrystapp (talk) 14:38, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:09, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:07, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Linglin Niu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Linglin Niu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://asia.startjg.com/phpthumbsup/w/1920/src/assets/files/images/work/level_01/Suning/SUNING_STUDY_SHOPFRONT_HERO_1920x1080px.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:06, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:06, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CNK5zifVEAA3GzU.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:05, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work is in doubt. OTRS-permission from author Pepa is needed. Taivo (talk) 15:02, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:05, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Moved picture, non enciclopedic Desyman (talk) 15:41, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Artistic photo by a notable italian photographer of the past. See Commons:BEIC. --Marco Chemello (BEIC) (talk) 21:38, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete There seem to be nothing artistic about this photo. Even "notable photographers" make test photos, or mistakes, but this does not automatically qualify them as encyclopedic.--Desyman (talk) 15:04, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination with note that image was unused. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:05, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Momocalbee (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The source does not state any cc-by-4.0 license.

QBear (talk) 16:02, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete, the copyright notice on the source website [1] explicitly states that photograph and image featured on the website is subject to copyright protection. --Wcam (talk) 14:34, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Momocalbee (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Calligraphic work is copyright protected under ROC (Taiwan) copyright law: http://www.lawbank.com.tw/treatise/pl_article.aspx?AID=P000173094

Wcam (talk) 15:17, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:04, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is found in numerous places on the net, including www.tui.nl/dreamliner/ so own work is doubtful XR728 (talk) 16:13, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:02, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Godwinme (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear copyright status / out of scope.

   FDMS  4    16:24, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Godwinme (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of user's own work on these three files which were uploaded after deletion notices had been put on three other files.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:02, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:02, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Godwinme (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of user's own work: one with camera data, the rest appear to be from other - unacknowledged sources.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:05, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:23, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:RedzaAziz (4 uploads for ms:Fariz Musa on 27.03.2016 = 3x copyvio) Gunnex (talk) 16:26, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:01, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, no permission : see terms on http://diaphonique.org/mentions-legales/ Do not follow (talk) 16:42, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:01, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dariotaglia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Dariotaglia (file cropper & resizer) / logs (with similar files deleted). All files related to es:Daniel Stigliano, an Argentine TV producer. Most likely uploaded by himself (own work doubtful if he appears on the photos). Considering also:


Gunnex (talk) 09:49, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 12:41, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dariotaglia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work by uploader: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP. Several images have been re-uploaded despite being deleted precisely

Green Giant (talk) 17:57, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:58, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doublon, à la demande du téléverseur Finoskov (talk) 18:35, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, uploader request to remove duplicate upload. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:56, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Demande du téléverseur pour doublon Finoskov (talk) 18:36, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, uploader request to remove duplicate upload. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:56, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

demande du téléverseur pour doublon Finoskov (talk) 18:37, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, uploader request to remove duplicate upload. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:56, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The same photo is being used here and elsewhere online. An OTRS ticket is required. Diannaa (talk) 18:37, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:42, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Demande téléverseur pour doublon Finoskov (talk) 18:38, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, uploader request to remove duplicate upload. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:56, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

demande téléverseur pour doublon Finoskov (talk) 18:38, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, uploader request to remove duplicate upload. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:56, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Subject of photo is copyrighted artwork (not available under a free license). Need email verification of author permission (OTRS) czar 18:38, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:41, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Demande téléverseur pour doublon Finoskov (talk) 18:39, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, uploader request to remove duplicate upload. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:55, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no COM:EDUSE - tiny unused 5kb thumb cropped from File:Mountain Range.jpg, which is a high-res image - at the very least, a better crop could be done from the original INeverCry 18:45, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination with note that file is no longer in use at en:wiki. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:53, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Licence et auteur à vérifier : cette image est déjà présente sur de nombreux sites et blogs internet : exemple en 2008 http://ysimolak.free.fr/blogs/index.php?m=200801 Habertix (talk) 18:47, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:41, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

La photo a été copiée depuis cette photo: http://www.lexpressiondz.com/actualite/177554-la-geographie-par-la-gastronomie.html Houmouvazine (talk) 18:53, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:40, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Imene1980 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small, EXIF data, unused, maybe not own work

Reda Kerbouche (talk) 19:02, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:40, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tebabna hammada (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small, No EXIF data, some of the photo are composition of 2 photos, maybe not his/here own work

Reda Kerbouche (talk) 19:08, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:38, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Exif data, small, and the photo was uploaded for the WLE in Algeria so its out of scoop of the contest Reda Kerbouche (talk) 19:10, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. File was in use. I removed the wiki Loves Earth tag which was incorrectly applied, and put a valid category. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:51, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nani1412 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small, no EXIF data, maybe not here/his own work, uploaded for the WLE in Algeria

Reda Kerbouche (talk) 19:12, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:37, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kamri33 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small, out of scoop, photos taken from a window of a car for the WLE in Algeria

Reda Kerbouche (talk) 19:16, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:36, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Minanina05 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No EXIF data, small, maybe not here/his own work.

Reda Kerbouche (talk) 19:18, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:33, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Iheb ferroudj (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small, No EXIF data, maybe not here/his work

Reda Kerbouche (talk) 19:21, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:32, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hanafi imed (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small, no EXIF data, maybe not here/his own work. this user have 2 copyvio

Reda Kerbouche (talk) 19:23, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:31, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started as imho a (very) bad thumbnail-format file, although transferred not in use at Wikimedia projects, and imho not of educational use, Roland zh (talk) 19:35, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:31, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The purpose of the image is for the uploader to advertise the company in the image on articles .... On the basis of it being for promotional purposes I'd say it was out of scope, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 19:39, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:30, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A few issues here:

  • First, the Bender head is a derivative work of a copyrighted Futurama character. This isn't de minimis as it's a central component of the photo. Removing it might be possible, but there are other problems with this image that merit deletion.
  • Generally low resolution and photographic quality. ƒ/22 makes absolutely no sense here.
  • Generally out of scope. The nudity is not the problem here so much as the fact that it's supposed to be an illustration of the UNIX "killall" command. The problem is the illustration makes no sense here and utterly fails to educate. It's deceptive, and therefore not helpful. This might be an okay image of a nude woman, but the text, copyrighted Bender head, and low resolution mar that to the point that there's no educational use of this image.

Therefore this image should be deleted. —/Mendaliv//Δ's/ 19:49, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep: Categories show within scope. Media quality is sufficiently high and detailed. killall is adequately expressed artistically as termination of processes by out-of-control killer robot. (Many SysAdmin would like ability to # kill -9 humans; and sometimes they do...;-) --dsprc (talk) 00:36, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nonsense. Killall is neither out of control nor robotic when used. Commons isn't a repository for non-noteworthy artists. Furthermore, we can't keep fair use content. —/Mendaliv//Δ's/ 00:56, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • UNIX is a machine, killall is certainly robotic; my apologies for not interpreting this art in a manner you deem "correct". Majority of media here is by "non-noteworthy artists"; that is not a requirement for inclusion—most of COM:FP would have to go if it were. The nonsense is claiming it to be fair use. --dsprc (talk) 03:08, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, DW & unused. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:50, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status / out of scope.    FDMS  4    19:48, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

+1 Delete it.. . It is out of scope Yohannvt (talk) 11:39, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:29, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work': tiny thumbnail format, missing EXIF data, hence, potentially non-free content, Roland zh (talk) 20:18, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:29, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Para su subida en la WLE Venezuela 2016 JASS2109 (talk) 20:36, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:47, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Para su subida en el WLE Venezuela 2016 JASS2109 (talk) 20:37, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:47, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Portrait "Karla Nina Diedrich" by Magdalena Zlotosz. Missing OTRS permission from Magdalena Zlotosz. 77.6.15.210 21:21, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:29, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like a cropped TV screenshot: note the microphone and low picture quality. BethNaught (talk) 21:25, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:27, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like a copyvio stock image ViperSnake151 (talk) 22:10, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:27, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See COM:ART#This does not apply to photographs of 3D works of art Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:15, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:46, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Reda Kerbouche as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-W_d-rq2T1fA/VSZ8taasfuI/AAAAAAAAHrI/DZD6UGJLUtI/s1600/11052510_985769281455846_5022149954921754224_n.jpg Amitie 10g (talk) 22:17, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Housekeeping: 11 June 2016 Thibaut120094 (talk | contribs | block) deleted page File:Djaafra33.jpg (per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Zeghdouche). --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:46, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

do not want it to be here Inder24mohan (talk) 08:26, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:14, 11 June 2016

Deleted: uploader's request, unused file. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:51, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

do not want it to be here Inder24mohan (talk) 08:27, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:14, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: uploader's request, unused file. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:51, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We do not have a section under Commons:Threshold of originality for Brazil. Without evidence that Brazil's threshold of originality is higher than other countries like Australia or the UK, these images should be deleted under the precautionary principle.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 13:04, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If it's simply assumed that Brazil's standard is the same as the U.S.'s, then File:Mogi Mirim EC.svg would qualify under the File:Best Western logo.svg test... AnonMoos (talk) 14:18, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
COM:PRP requires actual evidence that the file is acceptable in the source country, so if there is no section for the source country, we effectively have to use the lowest threshold possible, unless someone is able to find information about the country. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:29, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep all. We may not have a section on that, but there is evidence of ToO for Brazil, and doesn't seem to be more tight than the US one, quite the opposite indeed. Here is a study on ToO in Brazil, referring, for instance, that puppets who were a tridimensional and humanized version of this logo were deemed on court to lack enough originality to be protected. In fact, according to that study and the court decisions contained in it, the concept of creativity in Brazil is way more strict and exigent than in the US, and consequently the ToO is considerably higher than the US, which is our general reference. I suggest cancelling this request.-- Darwin Ahoy! 14:26, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
DarwIn, would you be able to create a section for Brazil at COM:TOO with some examples? Also, why were the puppets ineligible for copyright? Some countries exempt utilitarian objects from copyright protection, and toys are utilitarian in some countries but not in other countries. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:29, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Stefan2: - Yes, I believe I can do it. The court decision about the "boneco de preço miúdo" is here. It considers that there was no originality nor unpublished work in the puppets because they represented an already existing symbol (the supermarkets logo), and that there were already previous 3D and humanized versions of that logo. It does not grant any value nor legal protection to the specific 3D and humanized version of the logo in question, and calls it something like a "stylization servile to a previous idea". This other court decision, for instance, says that the mere reorganization of previously existing elements into a new layout is not enough to grant any originality and legal protection. In general, the Brazilian law and courts set the bar for originality at a quite high standard, much more than in the United States, which is our reference. There is not any reason to believe the logos depicted here should be removed from Commons based on the precautionary principle.-- Darwin Ahoy! 23:35, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Jcb (talk) 11:11, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Phograph is old Riyaz Khan (talk) 16:58, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Phograph is old 197.149.221.207 21:33, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Not per nomination, but obviously not own work. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:00, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kimomino (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small, No Exif data maybe not here/his own work, maybe some of the photos are from Facebook.

Reda Kerbouche (talk) 19:06, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Photographers should confirm licenses by following the instructions on COM:OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 07:50, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible Russia FoP violation - the fountain/centerpiece is prominent INeverCry 23:11, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 07:51, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

scizofrenia Antifajny (talk) 22:30, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

vymazat a zahodit Antifajny (talk) 13:56, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: experiments. --Podzemnik (talk) 05:29, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for Saudi Arabia, Hotel owners refuse commercial use - Ticket#2016052510013801 Ronhjones  (Talk) 18:00, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 05:46, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the map doesn't show that halayb triangle is a disputed area between Egypt and Sudan which implies to some sort of bais 115.134.187.88 23:50, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete There is no valid source for this map which is obviously not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:46, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Proper source needed so we can identify the licence. --Podzemnik (talk) 05:43, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scan of a historic photo. The photo is unlikely to be "own work", as the woman in the photo died in 1994 at the age of 92. See also File:Old Sayra.jpg, unlikely to be the uploader's own work. Diannaa (talk) 01:44, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:37, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Official coat of arms, not free (see http://www.comune.prignano.mo.it/, Commons:Deletion requests/Italian CoA) GJo (talk) 09:40, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:37, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The files are either identical to, or incomplete/lower quality versions of File:Green Party presidential primaries results, 2016.svg which itself has been superseded.

Abjiklɐm (tɐlk) 13:37, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:38, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I found myself extremely stupid setting up some random copyright informations in my camera, now the copyright info on the file seems to be really unclear. I think it is better just to delete the file... Thank you very much. -TerrainAhead (talk) 14:22, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:38, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:39, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Depols is listed as a "bad author" on Commons:Questionable Flickr images for reason: "COM:LL". Josve05a (talk) 16:01, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete no FOP in Georgia. . Also, adding extracted file to list (File:Batumi — Fountain of Neptune.jpg). Elisfkc (talk) 20:32, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:39, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status / out of scope (if RFD outcome is deleted).    FDMS  4    16:28, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:39, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Herman Mees died in 1964, Museum Rotterdam is not the author, so this work is not in the public domain. The museum uses the license CC-BY-SA if they have received explicit permission of the copyright holders or as they estimate that the rights will probably not be challenged, see OTRSTicket#2016022610010184. See https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Portret_van_Johan_Hendrik_van_Mastenbroek,_1944.jpg Gouwenaar (talk) 16:47, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:40, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work'; rather thumbnail format, missing EXIF data to verify origin, hence, potentially non-free content, Roland zh (talk) 16:50, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:40, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Academic or not, but depicted person is not mentioned in en.wiki. Probably she is non-notable person, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 17:02, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:40, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work': rather thumbnail format, one-file-upload, missing EXIF data, hence, potentially non-free content, Roland zh (talk) 18:25, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:40, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Licence à vérifier : document déjà publié sur http://marineivoivrienne.e-monsite.com/pages/organisation/grades-et-insignes.html Habertix (talk) 18:51, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:40, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's not out of project scope, as it illustrates a classification of en:vector fields into 3 types, by en:divergence (I'd even suggest to use it in the latter article). If there is consensus to keep it, I could (try to) transform it to svg usjng the Linux tool "pdf2svg". - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 17:03, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:Jochen B. P 1 9 9   16:40, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by FrancisFranck (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The sculptor, Peter van Onna, is living, so these images potentially infringe on his copyright.

Four of these are indoors.FOP for indoor objects is very limited in the Netherlands and does not include works in museums.

The fifth work is outdoors, but the description does not say that it is in a public place. In order to keep it, the location must be given and must be public within the requirements of the Dutch law.

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:50, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dear James,

I've uploaded these pictures with Peter van Onna's explicit permission. You may verify this by contacting him on peter.v.onna@gmail.com The pictures where originally intended to illustrate his work on Wikipedia, but Wikipedia refused the subject because of the fact that the sculptor is autodidact and considered not 'famous' enough. His bust of Cornelis Drebbel however is mentioned in Wikipedia but the link to his persona remains idle. To my feeling Wikipedia creates obstacles with regards to completeness, but so be it.

Kind regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by FrancisFranck (talk • contribs) 11:16, 4 June 2016‎ (UTC)[reply]

In that case, van Onna must send a free license using the procedure at OTRS. If he took the photographs, then the license must be clearly for both the photographs and the use of the sculptures in the photographs. If he did not take the photographs, then it should be for the use of the sculptures only.

Please note that OTRS, like Commons, is all volunteers, and, also like Commons, is badly understaffed, so it may be several weeks before the license can be reviewed. It will probably speed the process if he writes in English, as we have far more volunteers who are fluent in English than Dutch.

Did you try WP:EN and WP:NL? I have no influence on either, but you might get different results. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:55, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I submitted declarations for each picture :

I hereby affirm that I represent Peter van Onna, the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of the media work https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Peter_van_Onna.jpg. I agree to publish the above-mentioned work under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International. I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work, even in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws. I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites. I am aware that the copyright holder always retains ownership of the copyright as well as the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by the copyright holder. I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project. Francis Franck webmaster of Peter van Onna 2016-06-06 [generated using relgen]

but I got a reply saying that this is not sufficient. Hence I'll ask Peter van Onna to submit a declaration himself. Thanks for your patience. FrancisFranck (talk) 20:02, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please find herewith a copy of Peter van Onna's permission.
File:Peter van Onna's written permission.jpg

Kind regards. FrancisFranck (talk) 18:09, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have deleted the document you uploaded. If the document is actually "own work" of Francis Franck as claimed, then it is a forgery. If it is actually the work of Peter van Onna, then van Onna owns the copyright to it and Francis Franck has no right to upload it here. As has been said several times, in order to keep the images listed above, Onna himself must send a free license to OTRS. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:35, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the confusion that has arisen. I can assure you there is no forgery involved here. I'm only acting as an intermediary between Peter van Onna and Wikimedia as Peter is rather unfamiliar with these media. The pictures I submitted were sent to me by Peter van Onna with the request to publish them. There is no "own work" of mine involved, other than uploading them. I have now asked Peter van Onna to send the document himself. I expect it to arrive at short notice. I will also ask him to place his pics on Linkedin. FrancisFranck (talk) 20:54, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I filed, as OTRS-agent, the OTRS permission on all listed pictures above. As far as I'm concerned, this deletion request can be cancelled. Edoderoo (talk) 09:03, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per OTRS permission. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:39, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

عثمان شمهان.jpg Saudi Arabia ksa (talk) 18:01, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:41, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file description names Peter van Onna, a sculptor, as the author and subject of the photo. That may be correct -- it might be a selfie. However, the uploader, User:FrancisFranck, is not the author, so we need a license from the actual photographer, whether that is van Onna or someone else. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:04, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, no permission confirmed in three weeks. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:50, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Contains copyrighted material that may not fall under the de minimus exemption. Allen4names (talk) 15:47, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:51, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

damaged svg-file PhiGor (talk) 17:26, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:51, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wikipedia hat kein Interesse an diesem Foto Barrystapp (talk) 14:37, 4 June 2016 (UTC) Ein Benutzer namens 'Kängurutatze' bekommt seinen Löschwahn nicht in den Griff!![reply]

  •  Comment google translation does not allow a logical understanding of the rationale, in my understanding the image should be kept as it don't seems to be a copyvio nor there is a FoP issue. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:36, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    • The stated reason is that Wikipedia is not interested in this picture and that some other user does not get his deletion madness under control. Both are of course not valid reasons. Seems to be a conflict between two DE users. Jcb (talk) 20:57, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 20:57, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

escudo falso Profesionalperuano (talk) 20:11, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: false or not, it is used. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:29, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicado falso mala calidad Profesionalperuano (talk) 23:41, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, no new arguments, no correct file is shown. The file is used in 3 projects. Taivo (talk) 10:22, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicado del escudo ya existente Usuarioperuano2 (talk) 10:45, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, no replacement file is shown, the file is still used in 3 projects. Taivo (talk) 18:37, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]