Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/05/14
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
Artist has not been dead for 70 years. (1954+70+1=2025) Undelete in 2025.
Deleted: Apparently deleted. --Stefan2 (talk) 11:53, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
c'est une erreur de ma part
Kept: We don't delete user talk pages. ★ Poké95 13:02, 14 May 2016 (UTC) (non-admin close)
Commons:Deletion requests/User:Mnoor1977
This picture carries in its lower-right corner a watermark by mplstudios.com. Unlikely to be the own work by the uploader as claimed. AFBorchert (talk) 07:23, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Image clearly belongs to MPL Studios and is probably taken from here. --Tabercil (talk) 14:13, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Not own work of uploader Mjunii (talk) 11:58, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb: Copyright violation:
my mistake, should be a category Tonialsa (talk) 18:50, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: accidental creation, per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 20:12, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Useless cross-namespace redirect. The redirect target is a closed RFC. 2602:306:CDB2:4AF0:607E:2FD0:B3DC:C378 02:41, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Speedy delete per nom. --★ Poké95 03:23, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Comment Per the file history: « Evil X-NS redirect because of widely spread link ». The link to this redirect page was widely sent to mailing lists − and as such is still in their archives. Even though the RFC is closed, I can imagine folks clicking through. Per meta:Don't delete redirects, I hardly see any point of deleting redirects in general (by definition redirects are not useless if there is likelihood that they will be followed and thus... used), and that one in particular since we know for a fact there are incoming links to it. Jean-Fred (talk) 13:49, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb. @Jean-Frédéric: If you want this redirect to be undeleted, please request at COM:REFUND. Thanks, ★ Poké95 00:20, 15 May 2016 (UTC) (non-admin close)
Vandalism-only account. Image appears to be from Google Street View. Citobun (talk) 04:51, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:54, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as imho rather 'professional-looking' format, but/and missing EXIF data, Roland zh (talk) 17:43, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Ellin Beltz: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing
See Commons:Nudity. No educational purpose Elisfkc (talk) 20:26, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, also, a copyvio. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:30, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Philippines. Who is architect and when (s)he died? In addition, small photo without metadata, own work is not sure. Taivo (talk) 07:21, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Delete per nom, dagdagan mo pa the absence of EXIF data and the watermark. --★ Poké95 12:06, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, by Riley Huntley with reason "Mass deletion of pages added by User:Chaustria16". Taivo (talk) 14:01, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 07:24, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per nom. No need to wait for OTRS permission, since the uploader is obviously not connected to Wowowin. --★ Poké95 12:07, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, by Jcb as copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 14:03, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
Too complex, passes COM:TOO IagoQnsi (talk) 00:19, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- I don't think so. The plane is build by three colors, nothing to worry about. -- M-B (talk) 10:47, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. The image is not "simple geometric shapes or text". Nothing to do with the number of colours. -- Asclepias (talk) 15:26, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: definitely passes COM:TOO. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:25, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
porque quero colocá-lo em outra página Rhaic (talk) 03:41, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyright violation. --JuTa 17:26, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
Likely screenshot (banner proportions, white border on the left and black on top, no EXIF, uploader's copyvio history). FDMS 4 16:40, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:31, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
Perhaps copyright violation (low resolution, no exif, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VBLQjLyyFoU&t=27s). --sasha (krassotkin) 08:59, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. -- Geagea (talk) 23:22, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
the little soldier is above COM:TOO - it shouldn't be too hard to remove that element from the logo to have a plain text logo INeverCry 03:18, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- I will remove the soldier and upload a new version. --Wladislawski (talk) 12:09, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- Little soldier removed now, so
Keep current version, while Delete the previous versions. --★ Poké95 12:59, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: current version and deleted previous versions. --Jcb (talk) 16:03, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Files in Category:Fogbridge - 2015-02-18
[edit]COM:NOTUSED files that are low quality, not educationally useful and provide no benefit over the other files already existing in Category:Fogbridge - 2015-02-18. The uploader is encouraged to further curate this category as many of the images are redundant.
- File:Fogbridge - 2015-02-18 - Andy Mabbett - 55.JPG
- File:Fogbridge - 2015-02-18 - Andy Mabbett - 77.JPG
- File:Fogbridge - 2015-02-18 - Andy Mabbett - 78.JPG
- File:Fogbridge - 2015-02-18 - Andy Mabbett - 80.JPG
- File:Fogbridge - 2015-02-18 - Andy Mabbett - 81.JPG
- File:Fogbridge - 2015-02-18 - Andy Mabbett - 83.JPG
- File:Fogbridge - 2015-02-18 - Andy Mabbett - 85.JPG
- File:Fogbridge - 2015-02-18 - Andy Mabbett - 86.JPG
- File:Fogbridge - 2015-02-18 - Andy Mabbett - 87.JPG
- File:Fogbridge - 2015-02-18 - Andy Mabbett - 88.JPG
~riley (talk) 20:58, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep in scope, you're supposed to fight the long time abusers, not our regulars. Multichill (talk) 21:57, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- @Pigsonthewing: Please note that this is not an attack on your files or photography, but rather decluttering the category so that your more prominent and useful images can be noticeable. There is no question that the images of this topic are notable, just curating the ones that do not reflect much of the topic.
~riley (talk) 22:36, 14 May 2016 (UTC) - Keep pigsonthewing's images are the only and therefore best quality images we currently have and they are not more or less educationally useful than other images on the Commons. Using a deletion request to "encourage" a user to curate his uploads is just not cricket. Moreover, if you are interesated in making "more prominent and useful images noticeable", please feel encouraged to create Fogbridge. Galleries offer a decent solution to your problem. Regards, Christoph Braun (talk) 18:52, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep. This appears to be a very POINTy response to my request for the restoration of an improperly deleted file from the same series. That file has since been restored, but is currently and separately nominated for deletion, also by ~riley, with clear community consensus to keep it at the time of writing, seeing support from User:LX, User:Christian Ferrer, User:Multichill (whose closure as keep was reverted by ~riley) and User:Pokéfan95. The only deletion support has come from ~riley and from User:Jcb, the admin who made the original incorrect deletion (and who is now on his third different, and fallacious, deletion rationale, the first two having already been unequivocally refuted). In the light of the aforesaid events, and the wording used ("low quality, not educationally useful... no benefit"), I view this vexatious nomination very much as "an attack on my files and photography". The nominated images are part of a series - already curated and selectively chosen from many more originals - documenting a never-to-be-repeated public art event, by Fujiko Nakaya, an artist of international renown; in which a bridge was deliberately hidden by fog (the clue is in the name of the artwork: "Fogbridge"), its progression through time, and peoples' reactions to it. The series are probably the only - and certainly the only free - images to do so, or indeed any of the artist's works. As such their educational worth is indisputable. The nominated files include the only one also in the category 'Fogbows', the only one also in the category 'Cygnus olor swimming (families in February)', the only two images also in the category 'Shadow of the photographer', and the only one (that nominated elsewhere) in the category 'People taking selfies' - they are thus far from "redundant", and it is clear that due diligence has not been done prior to this nomination. As I said in the original undeletion request, "I could do without this unnecessary aggravation." Quite what this tedious, wasteful timesink can achieve, other than to demotivate both me and observers, and perpetuating the trolling of the now globally-blocked vandal who made the original, malicious deletion nomination, is not clear. Andy Mabbett (talk) 12:40, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep as per my comment there, the choice to nominate these files just after a previous disagreement is not appropriate to calm a conflict. I can not imagine that it is to score a point, is it? Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:17, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. ~riley (talk) 00:30, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
See also: Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2016-05#File:Fogbridge_-_2015-02-18_-_Andy_Mabbett_-_47.JPG and Special:Diff/196271810. This file was initially tagged by Matffy as Copyvio (copyviol) and the most recent rationale was: delete delagation request of SPAM policy imediate image unsuitable inapropriate misplaced
- The file may be in scope to illustrate what is this fogbridge Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:07, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- Comment @Christian Ferrer: please completely rewrite the nomination, concerns over the original rationale have already been addressed and the above rationale is clearly not the "most recent rationale". Please also remember to cite relevant discussions, I have done so for you above. ~riley (talk) 21:15, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- No I have no intention to do more. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:22, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - out of scope - this picture does not show a 'fogbridge', but just 'fog' and two people with a phone - Jcb (talk) 21:17, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- It's useful and within project scope in the context of Category:Fogbridge - 2015-02-18. —LX (talk, contribs) 21:20, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep not good but not so bad quality for a very foggy picture, that show the atmosphere of the bridge. And for once I find that a selfie is in scope. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:18, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep. The copyright violation allegation made by a block-evading sockpuppeteer vandal is obviously patently false, and the claim made at User talk:Jcb#Special:DeletedContributions/Matffy that the photograph is missing permission is also surprisingly nonsensical considering the otherwise far more respectable source. —LX (talk, contribs) 21:20, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Speedy kept, going to open this with a proper nomination because there is already keep votes that are irrelevant. ~riley (talk) 21:25, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
To be clear; there are no concerns over the false speedy tag placed by a globally blocked sockpuppet or false permission as imposed by Jcb. This file has been nominated in accordance with discussion here in regards to COM:SCOPE and COM:NOTUSED. From what I can tell, this is out of scope because if we want to show the fog on the bridge, we can use images like:
If we want to show people on the bridge, we can use images like:
- File:Fogbridge - 2015-02-18 - Andy Mabbett - 82.JPG
- File:Fogbridge - 2015-02-18 - Andy Mabbett - 44.JPG
If we want to show people on the bridge and their reactions, we can use images like:
- File:Fogbridge - 2015-02-18 - Andy Mabbett - 73.JPG
- File:Fogbridge - 2015-02-18 - Andy Mabbett - 72.JPG
- File:Fogbridge - 2015-02-18 - Andy Mabbett - 66.JPG
- File:Fogbridge - 2015-02-18 - Andy Mabbett - 69.JPG.
All of the above files properly illustrate the fogbridge, however, the file in question does not display the fog bridge and rather two individuals taking a selfie. ~riley (talk) 21:29, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- Please note that my above closure is not an attempt to censor votes or opinions, however, a nomination should be opened with the correct argument so that irrelevant votes like LX's aren't made that make no counter argument against the COM:SCOPE violation that is the primary concern. ~riley (talk) 21:36, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Not good but not so bad quality for a very foggy picture, that show the atmosphere of the bridge. And for once I find that a selfie is in scope. Of more, as a courtesy for a regular contributor who usually upload images widely in scope, and who want to keep this file, please keep it. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:42, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- Comment I kept this but Riley wants to waste more time, nominated more files and did he just used rollback on my edit? Not cool. You're supposed to fight the long time abusers, not our regulars. ( Keep) Multichill (talk) 21:56, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - out of scope - this picture does not show a 'fogbridge', but just 'fog' and two people with a phone - Jcb (talk) 21:58, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- This is now your third attempt to give a reason why his file should be deleted. You were unable - or unwilling unwilling - to explain the first ("delete delagation request of SPAM policy immediate image unsuitable inappropriate misplaced") and your second, that I myslef "declared somebody else to be the photographer at the file description page" was demonstrably untrue. This attempt is also easily refuted: there is no such thing as "a 'fogbridge'". "Fogbridge" is the name of an art installation involving an artificially-generated cloud of fog which clearly is depicted, along with two of its wiling participants. Andy Mabbett (talk) 12:57, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep. Useful and within project scope in the context of Category:Fogbridge - 2015-02-18. Please stop badgering valued contributors with endless nominations for a file that no one would ever had considered lifting a finger to delete if it weren't for a block-evading sockpuppeteer vandal. —LX (talk, contribs) 22:03, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep per keep votes above + Riley's reverting Multichill's speedy close was inappropriate. --★ Poké95 01:35, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep per all of the above. Furthermore, this image is part of a series - already curated and selectively chosen from many more originals - documenting a never-to-be-repeated public art event, by Fujiko Nakaya, an artist of international renown; in which a bridge was deliberately hidden by fog (the clue is in the name of the artwork: "Fogbridge") and peoples' reactions to it. The series are probably the only - and certainly the only free - images to do so. As such their educational worth is indisputable. The nominated file is the only one in the category 'People taking selfies' and is thus far from "redundant"; it is clear that due diligence has not been done prior to this nomination. Quite what this tedious, wasteful timesink can achieve, other than to demotivate both me and observers, and perpetuating the trolling of the now globally-blocked vandal who made the original, malicious deletion nomination, is not clear. See also Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Fogbridge_-_2015-02-18, where ~riley has proposed the deletion of a further ten files in the series (a literal decimation). Andy Mabbett (talk) 12:51, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. ~riley (talk) 00:30, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
non free cover of album Florn (talk) 22:19, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright album/single covers do not need a full deletion request. A reduced version has been uploaded at EN-WP. Green Giant (talk) 01:10, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:20, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:53, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Esteban Turizo (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
- File:Esteban turizo With mayor And Gobernor in the Navy.jpg
- File:Esteban Turizo Photo.jpg
- File:Esteban Turizo At home.jpg
- File:Esteban turizo My Mom.jpg
- File:Esteban At Home.jpg
INeverCry 00:24, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:53, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:25, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:53, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Venezolanoac (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 00:28, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:53, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:29, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:53, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:32, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:53, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:38, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:53, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jamal Ludin (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 00:40, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:54, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:42, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:54, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Josepgisgfghfghgf (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 00:43, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:54, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Parenghilton (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 00:45, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:54, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:47, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:54, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by PaulRHOMAS (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 00:49, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:54, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:51, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:54, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:52, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:54, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:53, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:54, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:56, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:54, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:56, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:54, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:59, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:54, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:02, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:56, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Chiquidama (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope promotional content. Lacks of sources to determine the copyright statuts of these photomontages
Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:21, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:58, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Chadasquatro (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing EXIF. Per FBMD... probadly grabbed from Facebook.
- File:Centro Social da Paróquia de São José de Sõ Lázaro.jpg
- File:Centro Social da Paróquia de São José de São Lázaro.jpg
- File:Centro social.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 06:27, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:58, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Julio.frasneli.silva (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. May be also out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used.
- File:Hepatite Zero Ministro da Saúde pic wiki.jpg
- File:Cristo humberto pic wiki.jpg
- File:WHF humberto pic wiki.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 06:32, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:58, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Julio.frasneli.silva (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. Probadly reuploads considering previous mass DR.
- File:Humberto e Michael Houghton.jpg
- File:Ministro da Saúde Hepatite Zero.jpg
- File:Cristo Redentor Humberto Silva.jpg
- File:WHF Humberto Silva.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 19:43, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:46, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
The uploader originally stated that these photos were created by a user on Skyscrapercity. When I asked the uploader to provide evidence of the supposed copyright transfer agreement or licensing statement, the uploader quietly blanked out the problem tag and now claims to have personally created the photos.
- File:Albertini3.jpg
- File:Albertini1.jpg
- File:Sant'agostino scorcio.jpg
- File:Grand Hotel de Londres.jpg
- File:Istituto della porta.jpg
—LX (talk, contribs) 12:05, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:00, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by GraysonAlexander93 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unclear copyright status and not "own works" considering configured at IMDB as "Photo by Anthony Moux" via http://www.imdb.com/media/rm588453888/nm7980999?ref_=nm_phs_md_2 + http://www.imdb.com/media/rm622008320/nm7980999?ref_=nm_ov_ph. Further details/permission needed. May be also out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related enwiki entry deleted.
Gunnex (talk) 12:10, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:13, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb: Missing license as of 13 May 2016 - Using VisualFileChange.
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb: Missing license as of 13 May 2016 - Using VisualFileChange.
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Mys_721tx (talk) 00:55, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope : personal image Florn (talk) 22:17, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:59, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope : personal image Florn (talk) 22:17, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by ~riley: Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Yigitelmali
Above Commons:Threshold_of_originality#Australia. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:04, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: even with a ridiculously low TOO, this will be below TOO. The only reference to a very low TOO we have is a flag, for which you could argue that the colors may have be carefully chosen. But in this case we only have 4 words of simple text in a grey circle. --Jcb (talk) 11:29, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb: No license since 14 May 2016
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb: Missing permission as of 14 May 2016 - Using VisualFileChange.
Out of scope –Davey2010Talk 03:49, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- I don't usually comment after deletions etc but just a quick comment - At the time of sending the file here the image wasn't being used - Had I been aware I would've expanded on the reasoning, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 15:52, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, the photo is used in it.wiki in main namespace, so it is in scope. but it is small photo without metadata and the uploader's only contribution. I delete it as copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 13:37, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Priyanshu bansal bpc (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused unencyclopedic personal image outside our scope.
- File:Priyanshu bansal and his frnds.jpg
- File:Priyanshu bansal.jpg
- File:BOSS PRIYANSHU BANSAL (48).jpg
- File:Priyanshu bpc.jpg
- File:Piyanshu bansal.jpg
§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:20, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:29, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
Uneducational selfie, out of scope
- File:The priyanshu bansal.jpg
- File:Stylish priyanshu bansal.jpg
- File:BOSS PRIYANSHU BANSAL (47).jpg
- File:BOSS PRIYANSHU BANSAL (39).jpg
- File:BOSS PRIYANSHU BANSAL (27).jpg
- File:BOSS PRIYANSHU BANSAL (25).jpg
- File:BOSS PRIYANSHU BANSAL (23).jpg
- File:BOSS PRIYANSHU BANSAL (14).jpg
- File:BOSS PRIYANSHU BANSAL (9).JPG
- File:Stylish BOSS PRIYANSHU BANSAL.jpg
ManniLo (talk) 14:53, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:50, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Priyanshu bansal bpc (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
- File:Priyanshu bansal !.jpg
- File:Priyanshu bansal4.jpg
- File:Priyanshu bansal3.jpg
- File:Priyanshu bansal2.jpg
- File:Priyanshu bansal1.jpg
- File:PriyAnshu bansal boss.jpg
- File:PriyAnshu Bansal.jpg
- File:Forbes priyanshu bansal.jpg
- File:Priyanshu bansal and family.jpg
- File:Priyanshu bansal in traditional.jpg
- File:Priyanshu bansal boss.JPG
- File:Priyanshu Bansal.jpg
- File:Priyanshu bansal.jpg
- File:Priyanshu bansal bpc.JPG
- File:PriyAnshu bansal.jpg
INeverCry 19:35, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:28, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:36, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:26, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:37, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:26, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:38, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:26, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:39, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:26, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:40, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:26, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:40, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:25, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:42, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:25, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:51, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:24, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:52, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:24, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 19:53, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:24, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Farrukh.Jamal91 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Cafe Racer Leather Jacket - MONT5.jpg
- File:Baltoro - The Cafe Racer Jacket.jpg
- File:Naltar Double Rider Jacket by MONT5.png
- File:MONT Products.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 20:01, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:23, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. Gunnex (talk) 20:06, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:23, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
only version
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/d/d9/20151101133153!Piaskarka_Wis%C5%82a_Warszawa_002.jpg
because it is too pink Darekk2 (talk) 13:35, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
Kept: per license clauses. Alan (talk) 22:22, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
only version 20160514201802 because faces are not blurred. Or all versions except first one and last one to save space. Darekk2 (talk) 20:21, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:22, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Per * probadly grabbed from Facebook. Gunnex (talk) 20:42, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:21, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
schlechte qualität Banffy (talk) 21:54, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:21, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
schlechte qualität Banffy (talk) 22:02, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:21, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
schlechte qualität Banffy (talk) 22:04, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:21, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
schlechte qualität Banffy (talk) 22:04, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:21, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
schlechte qualität Banffy (talk) 22:05, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:21, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope. 95.27.139.211 22:13, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:20, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope. 95.27.139.211 22:14, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:19, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope. 95.27.139.211 22:15, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:19, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope. 95.27.139.211 22:17, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:19, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope. 95.27.139.211 22:18, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:18, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
as per COM:PACKAGING CoolCanuck eh? 22:32, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- There are many bottles of beer with the label. I don't see the difference. c:Beer bottlesTriplecaña (talk) 14:05, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete The package's design is above the TOO. --★ Poké95 01:13, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:18, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as imho rather 'professional-looking' format, but/and missing EXIF data, Roland zh (talk) 22:32, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:18, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope. 95.27.139.211 22:33, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:18, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope. 95.27.139.211 22:35, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:17, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
No author, no permission. 95.27.139.211 22:37, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:17, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope. 95.27.139.211 22:41, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:16, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope. 95.27.139.211 22:42, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:16, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope. 95.27.139.211 22:43, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:16, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope. 95.27.139.211 22:45, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:16, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope. 95.27.139.211 22:46, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:15, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope. 95.27.139.211 22:48, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:15, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope. 95.27.139.211 22:50, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:15, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as imho rather 'professional-looking' format, but/and missing EXIF data, Roland zh (talk) 22:51, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:13, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as imho rather 'professional-looking' format, but/and missing EXIF data - see also File:Singer sunitha.jpg et al, Roland zh (talk) 22:52, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:13, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as imho rather 'professional-looking' format, but/and missing EXIF data - see also File:Singer sunitha.jpg, File:Pallak Lalwani.jpg et al, Roland zh (talk) 22:54, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:13, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as imho rather 'professional-looking' format, but/and missing EXIF data - see also File:Singer sunitha.jpg, File:Pallak Lalwani.jpg et al, Roland zh (talk) 22:55, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:13, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as imho rather 'professional-looking' format, but/and missing EXIF data - see also File:Singer sunitha.jpg, File:Pallak Lalwani.jpg et al, Roland zh (talk) 22:58, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:13, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as imho rather 'professional-looking' format, but/and missing EXIF data - see also File:Singer sunitha.jpg, File:Pallak Lalwani.jpg et al, Roland zh (talk) 22:58, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:13, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Per FBMD... probadly grabbed from Facebook. Gunnex (talk) 23:19, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:10, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
The reduction of Mn^2+ to Mn has a negative associated E value, not a positive one. 153.106.81.233 23:37, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- Missing "-" added. No reason to delete the file. Michał Sobkowski (talk) 07:10, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- Now it's appropriate to the source. File should be kept. ptjackyll (leave a message) 12:43, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion now that it's fixed. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:10, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable Russian, Ukrainian and Kazakh people
[edit]Out of scope. Обывало (talk) 00:55, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- File:Oleg Tkachenko.jpg
- File:VTaygunov.jpg and File:Виктор Тайгунов.jpg (see ru:Тайгунов)
- File:Андрей Гризли.jpg (see ru:Андрей Гризли)
- File:Борис Сазонов Boris Sazonov.jpg (see ru:Википедия:К_удалению/11_февраля_2015#Сазонов, Борис Владимирович)
- File:В холле гостиницы.JPG
- File:Вадим Анатольевич.jpg
- File:Илеуова, Гульмира Токшалыковна.JPG (see ru:Википедия:К удалению/28 апреля 2014#Илеуова, Гульмира Токшалыковна)
- File:Мажуга Дмитрий.jpg
- File:Моя фотография Владимирова Валерия Николаевича.JPG
- File:ОТАБЕК САЙФИЕВ.jpg
- File:Роман Алмазов.jpg
- File:Я и мой сын.jpg
- File:Ябуров Сергей Сергеевич.jpg
- File:Саня.jpg
- File:Alexandr Ivanov Maximovich!.jpg
- File:Ivanov Alexander.jpg
- File:F8CK gn0Kbo (1).jpg
- File:Саша Сажаев.jpg (see ru:Википедия:К_удалению/1_мая_2012#Сажаев, Александр Иванович)
- File:Саша ушёл.jpg
- File:Ваня и Даша.jpg
- File:Вася2.jpg (see ru:Vigel)
- File:Воробьёв Василий.jpg
- File:МашаShaolin.jpg
- File:Одинцова Маша.jpg
- File:Маша Иголка.jpg
- File:Лена.jpg
- File:Даша Стэнфорд.jpg
- File:Миша топорищев.jpg
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:58, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal images
- File:Сария Хашба.jpg
- File:Аджба Лаура.jpg
- File:Викалас.jpg
- File:Александра Барганджия.jpg
- File:Анастасия Гусева .jpg
INeverCry 01:01, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:58, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 01:03, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:02, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uplouded by Evgen07011989
[edit]Out of scope.Обывало (talk) 01:08, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- File:Маус.JPG
- File:Заготовка.JPG
- File:Поделка.JPG
- File:Работа.JPG
- File:Игрушка.JPG
- File:Моя работа.JPG
- File:Моя.JPG
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:02, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
w:File:Robot sensors.jpg, which is older, has different source, author and licensing information. Unlikely to be own work by the Commons uploader, and there is no evidence of permission on Wikipedia. Stefan2 (talk) 14:30, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- The permission linked on Wikipedia appears to be valid. I would keep this image with revised source/licensing info, unless I'm missing something. Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:51, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Wikipedia does not indicate the correct licence, but a free licence is mentioned in the footer. I must have overlooked that, or the footer may have been changed after the file was nominated for deletion. --Stefan2 (talk) 20:09, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:03, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:12, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:05, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:12, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:05, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:13, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:05, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:13, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Outta scope –Davey2010Talk 03:48, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:14, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope –Davey2010Talk 03:56, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, in any way a copyvio of a twitter image. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:17, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
both out of scope –Davey2010Talk 04:15, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:42, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 06:21, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:58, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 06:25, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:58, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Flickr washing: The image uploaded to Flickr was cropped from a larger copyright image circulating on the web (https://i.ytimg.com/vi/mIiBwdK1KJs/maxresdefault.jpg) DAJF (talk) 06:54, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:02, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work, old picture LMLM (talk) 07:03, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: lacks of infos to determine copyright statut. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:05, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work, old picture LMLM (talk) 07:04, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unclear copyright statut without more infos. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:08, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Probably not a free image Shev123 (talk) 07:17, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:09, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 08:08, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:23, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
COM:DW / Commons:Copyright_rules_by_subject_matter#Murals / No FoP for 2D works in the US. Josve05a (talk) 08:11, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:25, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF. Uploaded in a row on 07./08.03.2016 for fr:K-Pax Bluesband, a Belgian music group. Also per * probadly grabbed from Facebook. Most likely all taken from social media like https://plus.google.com/+RudyDeMarie/photos or https://www.facebook.com/rudymusic.kpax/photos?source_ref=pb_friends_tl, considering (example) File:Rudy radio.jpg --> https://plus.google.com/+RudyDeMarie/photos/photo/6230542892080608178?pid=6230542892080608178&oid=107848207557925490659. File:Article dh k pax.jpg is a newspaper scan.
- File:Vince basse.jpg
- File:Vincent basse.jpg
- File:Rudy radio.jpg
- File:Article dh k pax.jpg
- File:David batterie.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 09:43, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:42, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Absence de géolocalisation Jpaquetvence (talk) 11:39, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Absence de géolocalisation Jpaquetvence (talk) 13:50, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:49, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Abc13024512971 (talk · contribs)
[edit]advertisement
Wcam (talk) 13:01, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:53, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ryan Herald (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Per FBMD... or * probadly grabbed from Facebook.
Gunnex (talk) 13:55, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:56, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Own work claim, but taken from several sites with copyright claims but no photographer: [1], [2] .. Agora (talk) 14:02, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:58, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
copyrighted image owned by google Triplecaña (talk) 14:16, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:16, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
notown work Triplecaña (talk) 14:16, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:17, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Outside of Commons:Project scope; specifically Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats. —LX (talk, contribs) 13:01, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Mys_721tx (talk) 22:22, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 07:08, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.
- File:Cours espaces vectoriels.pdf
- File:M-CO-MAT-JMF.pdf
- File:Thermo1.pdf
- File:Cours thermo 1er semestre.pdf
- File:Logique ensembles raisonnements - Copie.pdf
- File:3 Espaces vectoriels .pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Mys_721tx (talk) 22:22, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
All of those diagrams appear to be scans from textbooks on hydraulics. They are all marked as "own work" (or published as PD-self). However it seems the uploader has very limited drawing skills and has no problem [posting other people’s work as his/her own]. I think the chance that the files below are from him/her are very low.
- File:Erosión local.png
- File:Erosión en un estribo largo.png
- File:Erosión en un estribo corto 2.png
- File:Erosiob en un pilar circular 2.jpg
- File:Corriente secundaria flujo helicoidal.png
- File:Curva canal.png
- File:Acorazamiento.jpg
- File:Trampa de sedimentos de fondo.png
- File:Medición de sedimentos.png
- File:Dibujo obsturador de disco 1.jpg
- File:Casagrande 3.PNG
- File:Casagrande 2.JPG
- File:Casagrande 1.PNG
- File:Límites de Atterberg.PNG
- File:Dispositivo para limitar la presión en tuberías - Corte.JPG
- File:Dispositivo para limitar la presión en tuberías - Corte.PNG
- File:Molino eólico con transmisión pneumática.PNG
- File:Molino eólico transmisión rotativa.PNG
- File:Bomba eólica con pistón.PNG
- File:Molivo eólico transmisión eléctrica.PNG
- File:Molino eólico con transmisión hidráulica.PNG
- File:Tubo de Prandtl.PNG
- File:Vel en mov turbulento.PNG
- File:Mov laminar 1.JPG
- File:Velocidad en mov laminar.jpeg
- File:Velocidad en mov turbulento.jpg
- File:Velocidad en mov laminar.jpg
- File:Tubo de Pradtl 0007.jpg
- File:Tubo de Pitot.jpg
- File:Pradtl estandar.jpg
- File:Mov turbulento 1 0013.jpg
- File:Mov laminar 2.jpg
- File:Mov laminar 1.jpg
- File:Presa filtrante de troncos.JPG
- File:Cajones para contención de excavación 4.JPG
- File:Cajones para contención de excavación 3.JPG
- File:Cajones para contención de excavación 2.JPG
- File:Cajones para contención de excavación 1.JPG
- File:Vertedero libre.JPG
- File:Riego aspersión pivot central.PNG
- File:Riego aspersión ala movil 2.PNG
- File:Riego asperción cañon movil.PNG
- File:Riego asp ala movil 1.PNG
- File:17 Compuerta tipo Vicera.jpg
- File:16 Compuerta Tipo Tejado.jpg
- File:15 Compuerta Tipo Eclusa.jpg
- File:14 Compuerta Tipo Anillo.jpg
- File:13 Compuerta Cilíndrica.jpg
- File:12 Compuerta Rodante.jpg
- File:11 Compuerta Basculante.jpg
- File:10 Compuerta Tambor.jpg
- File:09 Compuerta Sector.jpg
- File:08 Compuerta Segmento.jpg
- File:07 Compuerta Tipo Stoney.jpg
- File:04 Compuerta Tipo Stop Log.jpg
- File:03 Compuerta de Gaveta.jpg
- File:Tratamiento - Desarenador Tipo Vórtice - Planta.jpg
- File:Desarenador Tipo Vórtice - Corte longitudinal.png
- File:67 Tratamiento - Desarenador Tipo Vórtice - Planta.jpg
- File:Desarenador (entrada).png
Ariadacapo (talk) 15:56, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:40, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 18:56, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:45, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:00, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:45, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:06, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:45, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
Comment: started speedy deletion request, sorry, Roland zh (talk) 19:20, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: by colleague. --Jcb (talk) 22:45, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
No indication of user's own work, this group includes the cover of a book or magazine, three or four paintings and a black and white headshot of a man.
- File:Виставка робіт художника - "Крок назустріч.jpg
- File:Ілюшин Олексій «Горища» 90-і.jpg
- File:Ілюшин Олексій «Вечірні польоти» 85р.jpg
- File:Ілюшин Олексій Андрійович «Кавуни».jpg
- File:О. Ілюшин «Весна».jpg
- File:ILYuShIN.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:38, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:44, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Damani ciurari (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 00:00, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 12:03, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as rather 'professional look', but/and missing EXIF data, Roland zh (talk) 00:18, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Can be found elsewhere online such as here. Tabercil (talk) 14:08, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 12:04, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Per 960 res probadly grabbed from Facebook. Gunnex (talk) 12:47, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 12:06, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Selfie by serial self-promoting sockpuppetteer, see en:WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Dao2k. Used in deleted page en:Yung Trace (actor). JohnCD (talk) 13:14, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of COM:SCOPE. --Storkk (talk) 12:07, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Waqar Hashmi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:Waqar Hashmi 2.jpeg
- File:Waqar Hashmi 1.jpg
- File:Waqar Hashmi With His Brother Qasim Hashmi.jpg
- File:Waqar Hashmi Signature.jpg
- File:Waqar Hashmi.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 12:08, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
I apologize, but uploading this was a mistake. Please remove this. 中野理恵 (talk) 16:05, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
I'm sorry, uploading this was a mistake. Please remove it. 中野理恵 (talk) 16:07, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Housekeeping closure, deleted by Túrelio. --Storkk (talk) 12:09, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
Advertising. The title and description explicitly show that Hexafluoride (talk) 16:33, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:SCOPE and copyright concerns. --Storkk (talk) 12:10, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
Advertising. The title and description explicitly show that. And the picture contains a watermark, so a probable copyvio Hexafluoride (talk) 16:33, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:SCOPE and copyright concerns. --Storkk (talk) 12:10, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
Advertising. The title and description explicitly show that Hexafluoride (talk) 16:34, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:SCOPE and copyright concerns. --Storkk (talk) 12:10, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
Advertising. The title and description explicitly show that Hexafluoride (talk) 16:34, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:SCOPE and copyright concerns. --Storkk (talk) 12:10, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as imho rather 'professional-looking' format, but/and missing EXIF data - see also File:C P John.jpg, File:Dr k.gopinathan.jpg et al, Roland zh (talk) 17:05, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- Speedy delete, obvious {{copyvio}} with false authorship claims. This is clearly a selfie by the depicted woman, whose name isn't Mustafa. —LX (talk, contribs) 08:25, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Housekeeping closure, deleted by Steinsplitter. --Storkk (talk) 12:11, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
No FOP in Italy Elisfkc (talk) 17:52, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
"No FOP in Italy". Please tell me, since when, why etc.? It may be correct regarding sites owned by the State or under direct/indirect control of the State Administration. In this picture we have simply a building, private building. I can't in this case see any infringement of rights. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hugo 1948 (talk • contribs) 07:46, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination... State ownership is irrelevant: architects own the copyright of the building, and this photograph is a derivative work of the (presumably) copyrighted building. If it can be shown that the architect(s) died >70 years ago, then this can be undeleted. --Storkk (talk) 12:14, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
I don't use it anymore. It's my personal photo. Dominikmatus (talk) 19:14, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (no longer in scope). --Storkk (talk) 12:15, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:45, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:53, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
See Commons:Nudity. No educational purpose Elisfkc (talk) 20:28, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:52, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
See Commons:Nudity. No educational purpose Elisfkc (talk) 20:31, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:52, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
duplicate uploaded Kokkarani (talk) 06:26, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —howcheng {chat} 22:44, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
No license information provided AbdealiJK (talk) 08:46, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: No license/source. —howcheng {chat} 22:55, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
Replaced with proper other versions template Domdomegg (talk) 08:50, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —howcheng {chat} 22:56, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope. —LX (talk, contribs) 10:18, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —howcheng {chat} 22:57, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
Copyright violation: http://www.chem.msu.ru/rus/radio/history.html Andrei Romanenko (talk) 18:17, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Copyright violation: http://www.chem.msu.ru/rus/radio/history.html
Deleted: Copyright violation. —howcheng {chat} 23:02, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
uploader req—I would need a tool to trim off the fair use clips in beginning and copyrighted art at the end, so instead I'm uploading still images and the audio czar 18:29, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused file; deletion requested by uploader. —howcheng {chat} 23:02, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
See Commons:Nudity. No educational purpose Elisfkc (talk) 20:31, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:20, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
used on a deleted-to-be article Triplecaña (talk) 20:58, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Jcb (talk) 17:21, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:35, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Copyvio: definitely contains original authorship IagoQnsi (talk) 00:22, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:07, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - no COM:EDUSE - also possible copyvio INeverCry 00:55, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:07, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Copyrighted material 189.205.5.111 01:24, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:07, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by A Festa da Dorna (talk · contribs)
[edit]Own work? Username inappropriate, official account or fan account?. No sources given.
- File:BandeiraFestaDorna.jpg
- File:Logotrevo.jpg
- File:Efm10.jpg
- File:Rejata efm Kirie Eleixon.jpg
- File:Efm6.jpg
- File:Efm5.jpg
- File:Efm2.jpg
- File:Efm3.jpg
- File:Caracolas en sirolas.jpg
- File:Sapatilla voadora.jpg
- File:Avion guerra mundial.jpg
- File:Bici voadora.jpg
- File:CarrilanaTren.jpg
- File:Carrilanas4.jpg
- File:Carrilanas2.jpg
- File:Carrilana de Boi de putas.jpg
Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:17, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:08, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Ryangrxy (serial copyright violator) Gunnex (talk) 09:03, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:09, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
This is a bad quality image. There is a better image available at File:Congreso de los Diputados de la XI legislatura de España.svg. IngenieroLoco (talk) 09:53, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:10, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Unused photo of subject with no apparent notability. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope. Apparently uploaded for use in en:Egers Aliu, which has been deleted for being outside of English Wikipedia's project scope. The uploader also appears to have one deleted edit at the Albanian Wikipedia, presumably sq:Egers Aliu. Also: questionable authorship claims. Found previously published (albeit in slightly lower resolution) at http://www.koyuncuspor.com/taekwondo-haberleri/227-arnavutluk-a-ilk-madalya-t%C3%BCrkiye-den.html five months before the uploader claims to have created it. —LX (talk, contribs) 10:30, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:10, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
minecraft designs owned by Microsoft Corp Triplecaña (talk) 11:06, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:10, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
author is Mike Evans (http://www.usatoday.com/media/cinematic/gallery/82417768/35th-anniversary-of-john-hinckley-shooting-reagan/) so it file is not created by US officer /St1995 11:17, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:10, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 12:17, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep:Ridiculous reason for deletion request, what is the relationship between "no EXIF info" and "unlikely to be own work" ?--M940504 (talk) 03:23, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, image is unused, small (facebook sized) contains no metadata and is not obviously own work of uploader. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:12, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
there is already another one better Gitoyo aryo (talk) 13:12, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (unused). --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:15, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
there is already another one better Gitoyo aryo (talk) 13:12, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (unused). --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:15, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
there is already another one better Gitoyo aryo (talk) 13:13, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (unused). --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:16, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
there is already another one better Gitoyo aryo (talk) 13:13, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (unused). --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:16, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
there is already another one better Gitoyo aryo (talk) 13:13, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (unused). --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:16, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
there is already another one better Gitoyo aryo (talk) 13:14, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (unused). --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:16, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
there is already another one better Gitoyo aryo (talk) 13:14, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (unused). --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:16, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
there is already another one better Gitoyo aryo (talk) 13:14, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (unused). --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:16, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
there is already another one better Gitoyo aryo (talk) 13:15, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (unused). --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:16, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
there is already another one better Gitoyo aryo (talk) 13:15, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (unused). --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:16, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
replaced by Hoppenlaufriedhof, Anna Maria Helena Reinbeck geb. von Pallandt, 2.jpg Gerd Leibrock (talk) 13:53, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:17, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
replaced by Hoppenlaufriedhof, Anna Maria Helena Reinbeck geb. von Pallandt, 2.jpg Gerd Leibrock (talk) 13:53, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:17, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:18, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:18, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:18, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:18, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://media.licdn.com/mpr/mpr/shrink_100_100/AAEAAQAAAAAAAAQ8AAAAJGMxMjZkZTNjLTYwZTUtNDhmMy1hOGQ2LTcwMzVhNzE0NDIzMw.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:18, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Ronhjones as no permission (No permission since). For what it's worth, the original upload on en-wiki says evidence of origin was submitted to OTRS. - Jmabel ! talk 03:31, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
- I find no trace of the earlier deleted photo in the history; usually as an admin I can see that, no idea what's going on, but it means I can't see whether this was the same photo already deleted. - Jmabel ! talk 03:32, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Jmabel: I see two deleted images by the same name, and neither of them are the same. Guanaco (talk) 03:45, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: OTRS received. --Guanaco (talk) 04:33, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://igcdn-photos-f-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xap1/t51.2885-19/11199624_992148654129813_933647782_a.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per nom + the company is not notable, so out of project scope. --★ Poké95 11:38, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:18, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like www.patriots.com/sites/patriots.com/files/styles/open_graph__large/public/_article_thumbnails/500x305-develin-20120903.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --★ Poké95 11:40, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:25, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://mw2.google.com/mw-panoramio/photos/medium/50452121.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:24, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private drawing album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:25, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:25, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.catholicireland.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/ganly..jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
This was a mistake on my part, I uploaded the file incorrectly. Sorry for the error.
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:24, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ALEKSANDAR LYUBENOV IVANOV (talk · contribs)
[edit]- File:ALEKSANDAR LYUBENOV IVANOV.... 21.05.1984 .jpg
- File:ALEKSANDAR LYUBENOV IVANOV.... 21.05.1984.jpg
- File:ALEKSANDAR LYUBENOV IVANOV 21.05.1984....jpg
- File:ALEKSANDAR LYUBENOV IVANOV 21.05.1984...jpg
- File:ALEKSANDAR LYUBENOV IVANOV. .jpg
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:38, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: : out of scope. Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:53, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ALEKSANDAR LYUBENOV IVANOV (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope, again.
- File:ALEKSANDAR LYUBENOV IVANOV 21.05.1984 VARNA BULGARIA...jpg
- File:ALEKSANDAR LYUBENOV IVANOV 21.05.1984 VARNA BULGARIA..jpg
- File:ALEKSANDAR LYUBENOV IVANOV 21.05.1984.VARNA BULGARIA.jpg
- File:ALEKSANDAR LYUBENOV IVANOV 21.05.1984 VARNA BULGARIA.jpg
- File:ALEKSANDAR LYUBENOV IVANOV 21.05.1984......jpg
- File:ALEKSANDAR LYUBENOV IVANOV.jpg
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:02, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:24, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 15:03, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:23, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
I incorrectly stated this file was my own work, It should instead be listed as Fair use image. Sorry for this mistake. M123747 (talk) 15:36, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination no fair use on commons. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:23, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
This image is property of the Universidad Politécnica de Valencia and was developed for Ergonautas (www.ergonautas.upv.es). The image was copied from this web and no reference to Ergonautas has been added. 176.83.14.132 15:47, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:23, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
It was uploaded for the sole purpose of BLP defamation. I doubt it's really their own work, also. Gorthian (talk) 16:09, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
The file name is also defamatory. Gorthian (talk) 16:17, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Housekeeping: 15 May 2016 Túrelio (talk | contribs | block) deleted page File:Babi Rosmah.jpg (Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing: hardly own work: https://www.google.de/search?tbm=isch&tbs=simg:CAQSlQEJHyUp8mmIzWoaiQELEKjU2AQaAggYDAsQsIynCBpiCmAIAxIo9x7OGc0Z5Q_14Ht8Z7BneGesZ2BnKPKIyoTKVOsk8nTK0MrE_1wzy1Mhowb1kgdG_1kLizj4AJwhopUgHNJN...). --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:23, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
private photo, not educationally useful Maximilian Reininghaus (talk) 16:38, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:23, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
No proof that the men are the escaped inmates, Clarence and John Anglin, as claimed by uploader. George Ho (talk) 16:49, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:22, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as imho rather 'professional-looking' format, but/and missing EXIF data, Roland zh (talk) 17:00, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and COM:PRP. --★ Poké95 09:10, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:22, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as imho rather 'professional-looking' format, but/and missing EXIF data - see also File:C P John.jpg, Roland zh (talk) 17:02, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, COM:PRP, and the string "FBMD" in the metadata, which means, this likely comes from Facebook. --★ Poké95 09:12, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:22, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by The Big Bad Wolfowitz as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: No credible license, only use is to support unattributed claim on enwiki of unsavory activity. Not even evident that image depicts the person named. Amitie 10g (talk) 17:22, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- Speedy delete. This falls squarely within speedy criterion #3, "Content intended as vandalism, threat, or attack", and I can't see why my original tag was removed. This was uploaded as part of an effort to label a named individual as a Nazi, without any supporting evidence. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 15:35, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:22, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by The Big Bad Wolfowitz as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: No credible license, only use is to support unattributed claim on enwiki of unsavory activity. Not even evident that image depicts the person named. Amitie 10g (talk) 17:22, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- Speedy delete. This falls squarely within speedy criterion #3, "Content intended as vandalism, threat, or attack", and I can't see why my original tag was removed. This was uploaded as part of an effort to label a named individual as a Nazi, without any supporting evidence. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 15:34, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:22, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
as per user talk and potentially violations, Roland zh (talk) 17:46, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:21, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Photo from www.mynewsdesk.com. License review failed. Thuresson (talk) 17:57, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:21, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Image appears on http://www.mumsintheknow.co.uk/event/jimmy-cricket-family-laughter-show/ - EXIF says taken in 2012 Andy Mabbett (talk) 18:55, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:20, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Photo from mynewsdesk.com. License review failed, "© All rights reserved". Thuresson (talk) 19:16, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:20, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Evangelista Mary Rivera (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 19:17, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:20, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - no COM:EDUSE - tiny low quality thumb INeverCry 19:18, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:20, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
A person of no notability. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 19:23, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:20, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Photo from mynewsdesk.com. License review failed. Thuresson (talk) 19:24, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:20, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:26, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:19, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:27, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:19, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:28, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:19, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Cover/poster of a film of Lenfilm film company - by default, not an own work or copyright of any uploader, unless he/she is an official representative of a studio - and even in this case, the file can only be kept after owner officially makes an OTRS permission 2600:8804:1807:AD00:65B7:74DB:1BED:AC61 19:50, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:19, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as imho rather 'professional-looking' format, but/and missing EXIF data, Roland zh (talk) 21:34, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:19, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Dit portret bezit onvoldoende encyclopedische waarde om in Commons te worden opgenomen. トトト (talk) 04:35, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:01, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
 | If you are the copyright holder, please email our permissions verification team (VRT). | →  |
Kept: can't find it at freestylemotion.nl - full exif, high res - google gives no hits outside Wikimedia. --Jcb (talk) 16:57, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
- For the record: This was previously used on the main page of their website, them having removed it probably indicates that the Wikimedia Commons uploader is an authorised representative, though that's anything but explicit. FDMS 4 21:02, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Neonqeelin (talk · contribs)
[edit]No EXIF, low resolution, questionable "own work"
- File:2016game.jpg
- File:2016shangshaiamsinger.jpg
- File:2016 china.jpg
- File:2016changsha.jpg
- File:2016happycamp.jpg
Wcam (talk) 13:17, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
WHAT SHOULD I DO TO PROVE THE PICS ARE TAKEN BY ME?
- @Neonqeelin if you have the same images with EXIF intact (unedited), that would help proving you took them. MKFI (talk) 18:03, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, if you have proof, send your permission to OTRS. — regards, Revi 08:35, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
Errore caricamento, non è stato indicato l'autore. Kuix79 (talk) 11:52, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Deleted as a copyright violation. Thuresson (talk) 23:11, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by C.WoodWood (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:C.WoodWood, multiple authors involved. All files (including the deleted ones) uploaded in a row on 08.03.2016. Considering also File:SOFIA PORTRAIT (photo Ivan Seal.jpg, per file title a work by "Ivan Seal".
Already tagged with copyvio:
- File:MeriçAlgünRingborg2013 235- H.jpg --> copyrighted work by "Photographer: Jean-Baptiste Bera" and grabbed from (example) http://www.konstnarsnamnden.se/iaspis/stipendiater/tidigare = http://www.konstnarsnamnden.se/Sve/Informationssidor/Bilder%20Iaspis/Meri%C3%A7Alg%C3%BCnRingborg2013_235~__H.jpg (last modified: 2015, identical exif)
- File:Slickflection50.jpg --> grabbed from (example) https://ctrlaltwrite.wordpress.com/2015/07/11/un-libro-di-poesie-fatto-tutto-da-anagrammi-del-titolo-return-to-leptis-magna/ (2015) = https://ctrlaltwrite.files.wordpress.com/2015/07/slickflection50a.jpeg
- File:Ann b 140x216.jpg --> grabbed from http://www.nationalmuseum.se/sv/Utstallningar/Tidigare/Caspar-David-Friedrichden-besjalade-naturen/Ann-Bottcher/ (credit: "Foto av Susanna Hesselberg.")
Gunnex (talk) 12:22, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Thuresson (talk) 22:46, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
Kurt Weinhold died in 1965 -> copyvio тнояsтеn ⇔ 14:46, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Thuresson (talk) 23:03, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
URV: Titelbild von Ramona Bernhard (Playmate) Quelle: Ramona Bernhard Facebook seite Mauerquadrant (talk) 15:39, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Thuresson (talk) 22:48, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uplouded by Михаил Прус
[edit]Out of scope.Обывало (talk) 17:58, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Thuresson (talk) 22:40, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
Image appears on page dated 2013: http://blog.apmg-international.com/index.php/2013/05/21/introducing-our-showcase-keynote-speaker-gavin-esler/ Andy Mabbett (talk) 18:52, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Thuresson (talk) 23:06, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
Replaced with proper other versions template Domdomegg (talk) 08:50, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per author request. --Platonides (talk) 17:30, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Festival-Darc (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.indre.fr/sites/default/files/styles/630-302/public/pages/visuel/Web_Michel-Jamoneau-Darc-2015-Concert-Sophie-Tapie-57.jpg?itok=Wc6j7FwS.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --18:25 8 jun 2016 Ellin Beltz
Image is not downloaded from Europeana (as stated) but from http://collectie.groningermuseum.nl/wwwopacx/wwwopac.ashx?command=getcontent&server=images&value=1981_1990\1983.0211.e.JPG Groninger museum did not release this image as CC-BY Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 17:17, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Europeana link fixed. — Racconish ☎ 17:23, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- Confusing, I think the Europeana or the Groninger Museum make a mistake by releasing this image as CC-BY. The copyright is owned by Ger van Elk or heirs. http://collectie.groningermuseum.nl/detail.aspx#4262 does not state CC-BY. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 17:32, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- I take it you agree Europeana states this image is released under CC-BY. — Racconish ☎ 17:38, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, thanks for correcting the link. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 17:44, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- And as you know, this license is irrevocable. Besides, the people at Europeana are experts in Commons licenses. — Racconish ☎ 17:48, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- Europeana or Groninger Museum can only change the copyright if they own that right, but they don't. Owning a piece of art does not mean they own the copyright. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 20:01, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- I remind you that you started this DR because of a pasting mistake I had done in the file upload, not because you considered the museum's position on the license was wrong. Now that you have been kind enough to recognize I have corrected this mistake, I suggest it may be appropriate to leave it there : these are reputable institutions which have cooperated with Commons to put many images in the public domain and it would be considerate, in my opinion, to avoid accusing them of disrespecting copyright laws unless we can prove it, as they probably know these laws better than you and me
. — Racconish ☎ 22:15, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- I't not up to me to close a DR. An administrator will do that in due time. Besides, there is still the problematic copyright status to consider. Groninger Museum does not indicate the CC-BY copyright status. So how could Europeana? Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 23:13, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- Please don't forget the license indicated at Europeana is decided and provided by the Groninger Museum. Europeana is dedicated to distributing content under Commons licenses, while the Groninger Museum web site is dedicated to searching its collections and not to providing information on licenses. Besides, you can, if you wish, {{Withdraw}} your DR and even close it youself as non controversial per COM:DR. — Racconish ☎ 08:04, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- Does it really matter who decided that the license should be CC-BY? Ger van Elk died only two years ago. Unless the rights were transferred from Ger van Elk or heirs to the museum, the museum does not own the copyright. Please, try to find some documentation for that transfer. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 09:13, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- Indeed, the museum should have requested the authorization of the copyright owner or included a provision for the transfer of the copyright when acquiring the work. But again, this is the basic business of the museums anf we have no reason to assume they have not properly done their job. As far as we are concerned, the irrevocable license published on Europeana is sufficient. I found other works by the same artist released through Europeana by the same museum or other institutions under Commons compatible licences : 6 others under CC BY by the Groninger Museum, 4 under CC BY by the CODA Museum, and even 2 under CC0 by Stichting Academisch Erfgoed . In any case, I, the uploader, met the requirements of COM:EVID and we are not responsible for any - unlikely - mistake of the Groninger museum (not a shabby organization, mind you) per Commons:General disclaimer. — Racconish ☎ 11:35, 15 May 2016 (UTC) modified 22:29, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- Indeed, the museum should have requested the authorization of the copyright owner or included a provision for the transfer of the copyright when acquiring the work. But again, this is the basic business of the museums anf we have no reason to assume they have not properly done their job. As far as we are concerned, the irrevocable license published on Europeana is sufficient. I found other works by the same artist released through Europeana by the same museum or other institutions under Commons compatible licences : 6 others under CC BY by the Groninger Museum, 4 under CC BY by the CODA Museum, and even 2 under CC0 by Stichting Academisch Erfgoed
- Does it really matter who decided that the license should be CC-BY? Ger van Elk died only two years ago. Unless the rights were transferred from Ger van Elk or heirs to the museum, the museum does not own the copyright. Please, try to find some documentation for that transfer. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 09:13, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- Please don't forget the license indicated at Europeana is decided and provided by the Groninger Museum. Europeana is dedicated to distributing content under Commons licenses, while the Groninger Museum web site is dedicated to searching its collections and not to providing information on licenses. Besides, you can, if you wish, {{Withdraw}} your DR and even close it youself as non controversial per COM:DR. — Racconish ☎ 08:04, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- I't not up to me to close a DR. An administrator will do that in due time. Besides, there is still the problematic copyright status to consider. Groninger Museum does not indicate the CC-BY copyright status. So how could Europeana? Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 23:13, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- I remind you that you started this DR because of a pasting mistake I had done in the file upload, not because you considered the museum's position on the license was wrong. Now that you have been kind enough to recognize I have corrected this mistake, I suggest it may be appropriate to leave it there : these are reputable institutions which have cooperated with Commons to put many images in the public domain and it would be considerate, in my opinion, to avoid accusing them of disrespecting copyright laws unless we can prove it, as they probably know these laws better than you and me
- Europeana or Groninger Museum can only change the copyright if they own that right, but they don't. Owning a piece of art does not mean they own the copyright. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 20:01, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- And as you know, this license is irrevocable. Besides, the people at Europeana are experts in Commons licenses. — Racconish ☎ 17:48, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, thanks for correcting the link. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 17:44, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- I take it you agree Europeana states this image is released under CC-BY. — Racconish ☎ 17:38, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
![159 File:"The_Garden_of_Edan".jpeg](#File:"The_Garden_of_Edan".jpeg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.svg/Series){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![08:46, 14 May 2016 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2016/05/14#c-AbdealiJK-2016-05-14T08:46:00.000Z-File:"The_Garden_of_Edan".jpeg){kind=link}
![22:55, 6 June 2016 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2016/05/14#c-Howcheng-2016-06-06T22:55:00.000Z-File:"The_Garden_of_Edan".jpeg){kind=link}
Kept: . --Platonides (talk) 17:36, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
demasiado pequeña Elimedina (talk) 00:12, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
prefiero borrarla por medidas muy cortas y luego subo mejor. Gracias Elimedina (talk) 00:21, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:05, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
Above Commons:Threshold_of_originality#Australia??? Maybe it could slip under the threshold as a textlogo. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:05, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:05, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
Very unlikely own work (licenseable as CC-0) by Flickr uploader. Looks like a scan that thas been license-laundered. Ariadacapo (talk) 06:03, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:06, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
No evidence of licensing, very likely wrong author, re-upload despite previous deletion Ariadacapo (talk) 11:30, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: previously deleted, user warned. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 02:20, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
Very unlikely own work (licenseable as CC-0) by Flickr uploader. Looks like a scan that thas been license-laundered. Ariadacapo (talk) 06:04, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:06, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status. License unreviewed file uploaded in 08.2010 from official site http://www.levyfidelix.com.br/biografia/ (today: 404, no wayback), where (so far I could see checking other pages) no "Este site está licenciado sob a CC-Attribution 3.0 Brasil"/{{Cc-by-3.0-br}} is available. Instead, we have the full frame of the photo (identical exif) at official Flickr = https://www.flickr.com/photos/levyfidelix/4728392870/, uploaded 2 month earlier in 06.2010 and which is "© All rights reserved by "Levy Fidelix"". Gunnex (talk) 08:00, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:06, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
COM:TOYS / COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 08:04, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
This applies to commercially made products. This is a handcraft, a variation of the traditional "Maria" doll. As such, it does not have copyright.--AlejandroLinaresGarcia (talk) 00:04, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:06, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
This stamp includes a portrait of Frida Kalo. She has not been dead for 100 years. (1954+100+1=2055) Undelete in 2055. I don't think "PD Serbia" covers material (artworks) not produced by the Serbian gov. (Maybe in Serbia, but not in source country), Josve05a (talk) 08:07, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:06, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
Chinese FOP does not apply to works without mentioning the author of the work, in this case it cannot be found. Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 08:52, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:06, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
Fernando Botero is not deceased so his paintings are not in the public domain. Besides, uploader claims to by the copyright holder. He is not. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 10:58, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:07, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
I do not approve of the use of this image of me. Please remove the image.
- Keep COM:INUSE on w:Knights Templar (Freemasonry). Please tag the file and notify the uploader when nominating files for deletion. --Stefan2 (talk) 11:47, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:06, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Magog the Ogre as no license (No license since). Although the source seems to be from 1938, is it possible that this is by the painter himself, fr:Clovis Cazes, who apparently died in 1922? All of his work would be in the public domain in both France and the US. Would {{PD-old-1923}} apply? However, I'd like to hear some more learned opinions. Green Giant (talk) 12:10, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:07, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
The EXIF "special instructions" consists of "FBMD" followed by a long hexadecimal number. This means that the image comes from some unidentified page on Facebook, see Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2016/04#Facebook images (exif/metadata). Evidence of permission is needed from the Facebook user. Stefan2 (talk) 14:08, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: the original uploader isn't active on Commons, but asserted ownership of uploads at Wikipedia. - Eureka Lott 20:11, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:08, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
The EXIF "special instructions" consists of "FBMD" followed by a long hexadecimal number. This means that the image comes from some unidentified page on Facebook, see Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2016/04#Facebook images (exif/metadata). Evidence of permission is needed from the Facebook user. Stefan2 (talk) 14:12, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:08, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
The EXIF "special instructions" consists of "FBMD" followed by a long hexadecimal number. This means that the image comes from some unidentified page on Facebook, see Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2016/04#Facebook images (exif/metadata). Evidence of permission is needed from the Facebook user. Stefan2 (talk) 14:17, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:08, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
The EXIF "special instructions" consists of "FBMD" followed by a long hexadecimal number. This means that the image comes from some unidentified page on Facebook, see Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2016/04#Facebook images (exif/metadata). Evidence of permission is needed from the Facebook user. Stefan2 (talk) 14:20, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: the original uploader isn't active on Commons, but asserted ownership of uploads at Wikipedia. - Eureka Lott 20:10, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:08, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
bs:Datoteka:Esad Kulovic.jpg doesn't contain a source, so the copyright status is unverifiable. Stefan2 (talk) 14:35, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- Kulovic died 99 years ago. His photographer is presumably dead since more than 70 years too. As an anonymous piece of work, we are also sure that it was published more than 95 years ago. And being published before 1923 it is anyway in public domain by now. See also here: photographs published before 1971 are PD in Bosnia and Herzegovina. So I don't see why the picture should be deleted, even in absence of a precise source. --Dans (talk) 20:20, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- There's no evidecne that the photographer has been dead for at least 70 years or that he is anonymous. It is unclear when it was first published, but if it was first published in Bosnia at the time when the photo was taken, then the source country appears to be Austria-Hungary, which I guess means either Austria or Hungary which both protect photos for 70 years from the death of the photographer. --Stefan2 (talk) 20:23, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:08, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Manuelalfonsogarzon (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.
- File:MODELO DE CAPACIDADES DINAMICAS def.pdf
- File:Relationship Between Transformational Leadership and Hope. Study of 100 Chilean Business Leaders.pdf
- File:EmpresaVerde-5434357 Perez, Garzon e Ibarra.pdf
- File:1 Pérez L; Garzón M. A. e Ibarra A (2015) Código de ética empresarial para Aprobado Revista Espacios.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Manuelalfonsogarzon (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Mys_721tx (talk) 22:23, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Whatever this logo is, it's unlikely to be own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:12, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:09, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
No FOP in Italy for photos of any cultural heritage asset Elisfkc (talk) 17:54, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Including File:Grab Inschrift Hintraeger Gries Bozen.jpg in nomination, since it is extracted from the previously nominated image. Elisfkc (talk) 17:56, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
"No FOP in Italy for photos of any cultural heritage asset". I think this is a very restrictive view of italian law. It may be correct regarding assets owned by the State or under direct/indirect control of the State Administration, which is not the case here. I can't in this case see any infringement of rights. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hugo 1948 (talk • contribs) 07:47, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Per com:FOP#Italy. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:10, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
Mein Namen im Bild (aus versehen - Entschuldigung - kommt ohne Namensnennung) Schnöpf (talk) 20:10, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:10, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
ist falsch zugeordnet. ist File:Radebeul Dr-Schmincke-Allee 12.jpg Jbergner (talk) 21:23, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:10, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Files in Category:Ostankino Technical Center
[edit]Out of scope: 1. No usage 2. Poor quality 3. Add nothing new educational - almost the same images as others by this author in this category
_3.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_4.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Stolbovsky (talk) 21:36, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:10, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
COM:COPYVIOs. No indication of user's own work on two book covers and a photo which is obviously not a selfie.
- File:Prozvisha Muzikantov Yastrebov.png
- File:YastrebovVladislavViktorovich300.jpg
- File:ZhenshinVZarubPopMuzike.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:37, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:10, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
No indication of own work on photo. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:47, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:10, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
No indication of user's own work on this photo of a man and a dog. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:49, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:10, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: modern architecture. Eleassar (t/p) 22:15, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:10, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: unfree architecture. Eleassar (t/p) 22:33, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:10, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
License unclear Mhmrodrigues (talk) 14:05, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, I don't believe this photo is from 1606. Thuresson (talk) 16:39, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
Seems to be a screenshot of a (c) game (Doom). Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:28, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Looks like the game Doom engine is under GPL license. --Sreejith K (talk) 04:52, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- Engine, but not textures. MaxBioHazard (talk) 15:17, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, indeed Doom engine is under GPL but this is an "In-game view", therefore an artwork made, in part, with a free software, yes, but still an artwork. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:03, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
.svg/Series&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg/Series&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Replaced with other versions template Domdomegg (talk) 09:05, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
.svg/Series){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:19, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
.svg/Series){kind=link}
Images out of scope: no usage, nothing NEW educational, very poor quality comparing to already existing images (more than 100), half of nominated are almost full copy of series of the same pictures by the same author
- File:6782 - Moscow - Moscow State University.JPG
- File:Main building msu.png
- File:Moscow State University 02-2006.jpg
- File:Moscow State University 4.JPG
- File:Moskau PD 2010 021.JPG
- File:Moskau PD 2010 022.JPG
- File:Moszkva Lomonoszov egyetem főépület főhomlokzat 2010.jpg
- File:MSU 26092012 13.JPG
- File:Московский государственный университет 03.JPG
- File:Московский государственный университет 04.JPG
- File:Московский государственный университет 05.JPG
- File:Московский государственный университет 06.JPG
- File:Московский государственный университет 08.JPG
- File:Московский государственный университет 09.JPG
- File:Московский государственный университет им.Ломоносова.МГУ.jpg
Stolbovsky (talk) 09:28, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep. I never heard that Commons restricts the number of images of one building. What's the limit? 100? No more pictures of Moscow State University ever? That's totally weird. --Alexander (talk) 13:17, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- First of all, I wrote about amout of images not just to say, that there are a lot of them, but to show, that there are a lot of better images. Then - I've just read the rules of deletion policy - it clearly says: "Files that add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject, especially if they are of poor or mediocre quality can be deleted". So, I left a lot of good images, but these ones are just copying each other (and even have almost the same dublicates) and have poor quality. If I don't understand this rule, it would be nice if you tell me where I am wrong.
- Ну и по русски, чтобы понятнее изъясняться: я выделил, не просто, что у нас много уже изображений, но то, что у нас достаточно хороший изображений, и причин, зачем хранить этот хлам (в большинстве случаев так это еще и копирующие друга друга изображения с незначительной разницей) я не понимаю. Ничего нового от них нет. Коммонс - это не хранилище всех подряд файлов, а только тех, что имеют какую-то образовательную ценность. Так вот тут хватает более ценных и качественных. Смысл от этих тогда? Чтоб было? Мы лишь плодим авторов, которые пачками льют сюда всякий треш, совершенно не парясь ни о чем, а мы потом героический храним его и категоризуем. Я удалил уже так штук 20 храмов василия блаженного с такой же причиной, и не думаю, что сообщество что-то потеряло от этого. --Stolbovsky (talk) 13:31, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- Almost the same case of my nomination here: c:Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Ikarus 435 in Moscow --Stolbovsky (talk) 19:57, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- And concerning the Russian part of your statement. I am also bothered by the amount of low-quality photos that hinder the process of finding good ones. However, this problem can not be solved by unilateral deletion of "bad" files. File deletion is not a good method in general, because it causes a lot of damage in other projects and in the user community. What could be done instead is a grading system and the option of sorting photos based on their grade. It's kind of astonishing that Commons, a project with 9 years of experience and millions of photos, does not have anything like that. --Alexander (talk) 10:31, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- I have no idea how to read this clause, but I find it strange when someone unilaterally decides on the image quality, on what is needed and what not. There are photos of much lower quality in the same category, yet you did not nominate them for deletion.
- I find this nomination even more appalling because it affects photos uploaded during the Russian WLM and photos used by other projects. The concept of WLM rests upon inviting people to take many photos and to upload them. We do have guidelines in order to discourage really bad photos, and we even write special blog posts about it. Many of the photos that you are going to delete will definitely pass the acceptance threshold of WLM. As one of the WLM organizers, I am strongly against the deletion of any WLM photos unless they are copyright violations or out of scope of the WLM. Should they be deleted, this will be yet another instance of Commons users hindering the organization of Wiki Loves contests. This goes along the same lines as the recent Village Pump discussion, and I would be grateful if User:Ymblanter, User:Romaine, and User:Jean-Frédéric as people involved in the WLM organization also comment on this deletion request. We will have problems running such contests in the future if someone unilaterally decides to delete half of the WLM images because of their perceived "low quality" and "duplicate content" (and people often take pictures of same buildings, you know). Moreover, such deletions not only discourage but simply repel WLM participants. These people will never come again.
- Last but not least, this photo is used by Italian Wikivoyage, this one by Bulgarian Wikipedia, and this one by 8(!) different Wikimedia projects. Have you been to all these projects in order to replace the photos to be deleted with "better photos"? Apparently, not. Lots of readers and editors are going to see red links instead of photos. Very nice. This is called vandalism, you know. --Alexander (talk) 03:01, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Dear Stolbovsky, Let me go through the points you mention:
- "Images out of scope" -> this is not true, as the images contain a subject that is even relevant for Wikipedia (with article). The pictures depict the building as it is, a building of what images are certainly in scope.
- "no usage" -> there is no rule that usage of images is required to stay on Wikimedia Commons. Also I must clearly state: the role of Wikimedia Commons is far from alone usage in Wikipedia/etc. Commons is an online repository of freely usable files. Writing and editing (etc) an article in Wikipedia (etc) (and beyond Wikimedia too) is only possible if editors have the possibility to choose that image that is the best showing the subject. And this in the editorial work is only possible when there is a choice.
- "nothing NEW educational" -> is not a requirement. The only requirement is that it is educational in the widest sense of the word. And that is the case with these images.
- "very poor quality" -> is simply not true. The quality is intermediate, not poor/low. And again, we are not, never, going to delete an image because there are other images available. Commons values the editorial choice.
- "half of nominated are almost full copy of series of the same pictures by the same author" -> so what?
- If you do not like some images: please go look somewhere else. These images are contributed in good faith and positive collaboration. Please, do not treat contributors of images in this way, by requesting deletion, as this is very demotivating and that damages Commons. Of course we would recommend users to have a wider variety of subjects to be photographed, but we do not exclude images of popular subjects, and we do not have a maximum of images allowed per subject. On Commons we have the freedom to use images that are less high quality, it is up to the editor/user to decide which image should be used, and not on forehand to be decided/limited by us as file repository maintainers. Romaine (talk) 03:27, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep First of all, please let's discuss in English on commons. Then, it's not up to a single user to decide whether some files are useful to the whole community or not. There are no such criteria on which you can propose to bulk delete dozens of files only because you don't like them. And, as it has been mentioned, this can cause a lot of damage in the single projects, which might have embedded those files. by Alfred Schaerli (talk) 12:05, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
- "only because you don't like them" - I think I wrote the reason of deletion quiet clearly, there is nothing about what I like, but nearly quote from deletion policies of Commons, which says: "Files that add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject, especially if they are of poor or mediocre quality can be deleted". I really don't care so much about this case, dozens of times images which are nominated by me with the same reason had been deleted. "Then, it's not up to a single user to decide whether some files are useful to the whole community or not" - I feel that it will be more usefull for the project, than saving every trash (IMHO) image here, and I will continue. But such discussions are great, and if sometimes community doesn't agree, it's ok - this is why these discussions are existing. --Stolbovsky (talk) 20:18, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, some are used and one is even heavily used. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:17, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uplouded by Rishelye
[edit]Non-notable Belarus What? Where? When? and mahjong players, out of scope.Обывало (talk) 18:18, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- File:Саша.jpg
- File:На Марафоне-2012.jpg
- File:Чемпионат МГЭУ-2012.JPG
- File:Первая Легендарная ночь.JPG
- File:Лодки.jpg
- File:Лойко.jpg (see ru:Википедия:К_удалению/2_марта_2013#Лойко, Алексей Игоревич)
- File:EcoSapiens на СтудРеспе-2012.JPG
- File:Дмитрий Вансевич.JPG
- File:Юрий Зелёный.JPG
- File:Дима и Саша.JPG
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:20, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
Offenbar Urheberrechtsverletzung. Der Engelshimmel im Museum stellt ein urheberrechtlich geschütztes Werk dar. Haster (talk) 06:35, 14 May 2016 (UTC) Siehe auch Commons:Deletion requests/File:Engel-Museum.12.JPG und Commons:Deletion requests/File:Engel-Museum.2.jpg. Haster (talk) 06:38, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:09, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyright violation: http://miptstream.ru/2015/06/01/lab-building-history/ Andrei Romanenko (talk) 18:19, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Я могу удалить эти изображение, если недостаточно ссылки на них?
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:10, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Copyright violation: http://oldmos.ru/old/photo/view/78483 Andrei Romanenko (talk) 18:20, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Я могу удалить эти изображение, если недостаточно ссылки на них?
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:10, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
