Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/03/29

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive March 29th, 2016
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as imho potentially non-free content, see thumbnail format and missing EXIF data, Roland zh (talk) 20:07, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, Google sourced image.  — billinghurst sDrewth 06:14, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is routine request for small photo without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photo is so small? Can you upload a bigger version, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload a version with EXIF data? Can you describe and categorize the file correctly? Taivo (talk) 15:54, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; Copyright violation. --Mys_721tx (talk) 01:00, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Aus der angegebenen Quelle übernommen, dort mit © ddp images versehen Alnilam (talk) 18:01, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Falls keine Freigabe kommt:  Delete --Rogi (talk) 05:17, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: clear copyright violation. --JuTa 21:54, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is the 1st file that i have uploaded on wikimedia and i'm not satisfied with it. MuyXmuy (talk) 23:48, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: ununsed file, recent uploader request. --JuTa 21:55, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mis-spellings


Deleted: Typo, author's request. --Achim (talk) 12:27, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

whatever

Category was obviously created due to bogus ID on some images. It is an old synonym for Oenopia conglobata which is already represented on commons.


Deleted: empty category. --JuTa 19:05, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Brak zgody właściciela praw autorskich na wykorzystanie zdjęcia. JohnSmog (talk) 08:15, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -- Cirt (talk) 01:15, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Brak zgody właściciela praw autorskich na publikację. JohnSmog (talk) 08:17, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -- Cirt (talk) 01:15, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Should be non-free fair use. Also tagged as the uploader's own work, yet is a transfer of the file I uploaded to the English Wikipedia. Since it wasn't my work there either, that claim is wrong. Cloudbound (talk) 00:02, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See also most of uploader's other files, I came here from File:Google_Maps_Icon.png; note as well, user was banned for repeatedly uploading non-free images.--CoJaBo (talk) 00:26, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 06:32, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gireesh.Kodali (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - promotional image and logo of non-notable company

INeverCry 03:32, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:15, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image/possible copyvio INeverCry 03:33, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:15, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alanmcbride1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 03:35, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:17, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:38, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:15, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 04:09, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:16, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fan art not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 04:10, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:21, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image. --ghouston (talk) 04:12, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:22, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image. --ghouston (talk) 04:13, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:22, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image. --ghouston (talk) 04:16, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:23, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image (similar to File:चैत्रा एस्.jpg). --ghouston (talk) 04:18, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:23, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 04:22, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:16, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 04:23, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:16, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused image of non-notable person INeverCry 04:25, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:16, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused rudimentary personal drawing INeverCry 04:26, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:24, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 04:29, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:24, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused image of non-notable people INeverCry 04:30, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:24, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope INeverCry 04:31, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:24, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 04:32, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:25, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - plain text in a jpg INeverCry 04:34, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:25, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 04:35, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:26, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - no COM:EDUSE INeverCry 04:37, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:26, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope INeverCry 04:37, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:26, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope INeverCry 04:38, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:26, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Davila-carlos (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope

INeverCry 04:40, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:27, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:20, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: .      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 20:53, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope INeverCry 04:41, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:18, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:01, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 08:03, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - no COM:EDUSE INeverCry 04:42, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:29, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 04:42, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:29, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal drawing/writing INeverCry 04:43, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:29, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sudeep6476 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal/promotional images

INeverCry 04:45, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:27, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope INeverCry 04:46, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:30, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 04:46, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:30, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 04:47, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:31, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 04:48, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:31, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 04:49, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:31, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 04:50, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:32, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 05:00, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:32, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 05:02, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:32, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - no COM:EDUSE INeverCry 05:10, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:33, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused bandspam INeverCry 05:13, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:31, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spamer's contribution. Not in use Bilderling (talk) 08:23, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:28, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 05:12, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:33, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:NOTUSED Triplecaña (talk) 10:56, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:34, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:NOTUSED Triplecaña (talk) 10:56, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:34, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

SCOPE COM:NOTUSED Triplecaña (talk) 10:56, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:34, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not in scope Triplecaña (talk) 10:58, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:34, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not in scope Triplecaña (talk) 10:58, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:36, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not in scope Triplecaña (talk) 10:58, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:36, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:21, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:37, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:26, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:37, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:28, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:37, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:33, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:38, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:45, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:38, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:46, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:39, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lolipopolis (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused personal photos, out of scope

Mjrmtg (talk) 11:48, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:39, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:03, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:39, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertisement GY Fan 12:25, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:40, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertisement GY Fan 12:25, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:41, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertisement GY Fan 12:25, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:41, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertisement GY Fan 12:25, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:41, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertisement GY Fan 12:25, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:41, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:40, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gedhobax's band (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused auto-promo images. Out of scope.

XXN, 14:28, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:42, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:43, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo of a non-notable company. Out of scope. XXN, 14:31, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:35, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:43, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:43, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:44, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:50, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:51, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:51, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:52, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo of some non-notable company. Out of scope. XXN, 14:49, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:52, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Articseahorse (talk) 14:53, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:53, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Johnsundar18 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private child image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 15:12, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:53, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by VIRENDERKUMARPANDEY (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos. Out of Commons scope.

XXN, 15:30, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:54, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image with meaningless title and description (in Russian). Out of scope. XXN, 15:45, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:58, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lettres d'Automne (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Derivative works; unused and useless. Out of scope.

XXN, 16:08, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:59, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

What is it? Out of project scope? Taivo (talk) 16:29, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:00, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   16:49, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:01, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   16:51, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:01, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope selfie. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:57, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:02, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, out of scope, promotional. Josve05a (talk) 16:58, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:02, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image used only by promotional page deleted off enwiki DS (talk) 17:13, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:03, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image of an unidentified person, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 17:19, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:03, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 18:28, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:04, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - no COM:EDUSE INeverCry 18:30, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:04, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 18:31, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:05, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 18:34, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:05, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 18:35, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:05, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo about unidentified person. In my opinion not suitable for stock photo, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 19:02, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:06, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

HHJHJHJHJHJJH 88.10.221.154 19:03, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, vandalic DR. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:07, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, unused personal photo. -- Túrelio (talk) 19:32, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:08, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:15, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gateonstage (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope

Scoopfinder(d) 19:07, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:16, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lydia cheruto (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos.

XXN, 19:11, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:17, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Racoon2012 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused unencyclopedic personal image outside our scope.

§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:06, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:58, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Unused images, with little encyclopedic value. Out of scope.

XXN, 19:43, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:11, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Racoon2012 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Most of these have watermarks, none of these files have exif information. User has history of uploading personal photos. Does user really have permission to upload these photos?

Mjrmtg (talk) 11:32, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:27, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

im rather 'posing' (see description), file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 19:56, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:13, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ghunchatarannum91 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Used for promotional reasons only.

EvergreenFir (talk) 21:59, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:12, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Francisco Xicax (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Songs (Angolan rap?). No evidence of permission(s).

Gunnex (talk) 06:29, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Francisco Xicax (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos and TV screenshot. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 08:14, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://i.imgur.com/pXPQe.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 08:14, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 08:14, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://dicas.gospelmais.com.br/files/2012/08/Critina-Mel.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 08:14, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 08:14, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. Commons:Derivative works from poster. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 08:14, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 08:14, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://static.goal.com/2223400/2223442_heroa.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 08:15, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://heavyeditorial.files.wordpress.com/2015/06/gettyimages-4721820421.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 08:15, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.educacao.am.gov.br/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/IMG_5513-1024x682.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 08:15, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio from http://www.elnortedecastilla.es/20090130/valladolid/cofrades-estrenan-nueva-talla-20090130.html Rondador (talk) 15:12, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 08:15, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Insufficient copyright information. Probably a copyright infringement NearEMPTiness (talk) 22:41, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:41, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Insufficient copyright information. Probably a copyright infringement NearEMPTiness (talk) 22:42, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:42, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Insufficient copyright information. Probably a copyright infringement NearEMPTiness (talk) 22:42, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:42, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Insufficient copyright information. Probably a copyright infringement NearEMPTiness (talk) 22:43, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: All over the web. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:40, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

C'è una contestazione all'uso di questa foto da parte dell'autrice del libro da cui le foto sono state tratte, che non è però titolare del copyright, che dovrebbe essere scaduto. Peraltro in un primo tempo l'autrice, informata della pubblicazione, non si era opposta. Successivamente ha cambiato idea. La contestazione è sulla pagina di discussione della voce it:Maria Farneti Brunokito (talk) 22:46, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: The image is clearly PD. If I recall correctly Artico died around 1924 and Varischi around 1933. If the source was in fact a recent book, so what -- the fact of its appearing in a book does not give the book author or publisher any new rights -- the image is still PD. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:26, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

C'è una contestazione all'uso di questa foto da parte dell'autrice del libro da cui le foto sono state tratte, che non è però titolare del copyright, che dovrebbe essere scaduto. Peraltro in un primo tempo l'autrice, informata della pubblicazione, non si era opposta. Successivamente ha cambiato idea. La contestazione è sulla pagina di discussione della voce it:Maria Farneti Brunokito (talk) 22:48, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: The image is clearly PD. If I recall correctly Artico died around 1924 and Varischi around 1933. If the source was in fact a recent book, so what -- the fact of their appearing in a book does not give the book author or publisher any new rights -- the image is still PD. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:30, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

C'è una contestazione all'uso di questa foto da parte dell'autrice del libro da cui le foto sono state tratte, che non è però titolare del copyright, che dovrebbe essere scaduto. Peraltro in un primo tempo l'autrice, informata della pubblicazione, non si era opposta. Successivamente ha cambiato idea. La contestazione è sulla pagina di discussione della voce it:Maria Farneti Brunokito (talk) 22:48, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: The image is clearly PD. If I recall correctly Artico died around 1924 and Varischi around 1933. If the source was in fact a recent book, so what -- the fact of their appearing in a book does not give the book author or publisher any new rights -- the image is still PD. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:31, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

C'è una contestazione all'uso di questa foto da parte dell'autrice del libro da cui le foto sono state tratte, che non è però titolare del copyright, che dovrebbe essere scaduto. Peraltro in un primo tempo l'autrice, informata della pubblicazione, non si era opposta. Successivamente ha cambiato idea. La contestazione è sulla pagina di discussione della voce it:Maria Farneti Brunokito (talk) 22:50, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: The image is clearly PD. If I recall correctly Artico died around 1924 and Varischi around 1933. If the source was in fact a recent book, so what -- the fact of their appearing in a book does not give the book author or publisher any new rights -- the image is still PD. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:31, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

C'è una contestazione all'uso di questa foto da parte dell'autrice del libro da cui le foto sono state tratte, che non è però titolare del copyright, che dovrebbe essere scaduto. Peraltro in un primo tempo l'autrice, informata della pubblicazione, non si era opposta. Successivamente ha cambiato idea. La contestazione è sulla pagina di discussione della voce it:Maria Farneti Brunokito (talk) 22:50, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: The image is clearly PD. If I recall correctly Artico died around 1924 and Varischi around 1933. If the source was in fact a recent book, so what -- the fact of their appearing in a book does not give the book author or publisher any new rights -- the image is still PD. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:31, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

C'è una contestazione all'uso di questa foto da parte dell'autrice del libro da cui le foto sono state tratte, che non è però titolare del copyright, che dovrebbe essere scaduto. Peraltro in un primo tempo l'autrice, informata della pubblicazione, non si era opposta. Successivamente ha cambiato idea. La contestazione è sulla pagina di discussione della voce it:Maria Farneti Brunokito (talk) 22:50, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: The image is clearly PD. If I recall correctly Artico died around 1924 and Varischi around 1933. If the source was in fact a recent book, so what -- the fact of their appearing in a book does not give the book author or publisher any new rights -- the image is still PD. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:32, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

C'è una contestazione all'uso di questa foto da parte dell'autrice del libro da cui le foto sono state tratte, che non è però titolare del copyright, che dovrebbe essere scaduto. Peraltro in un primo tempo l'autrice, informata della pubblicazione, non si era opposta. Successivamente ha cambiato idea. La contestazione è sulla pagina di discussione della voce it:Maria Farneti Brunokito (talk) 22:57, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: The image is clearly PD. If I recall correctly Artico died around 1924 and Varischi around 1933. If the source was in fact a recent book, so what -- the fact of their appearing in a book does not give the book author or publisher any new rights -- the image is still PD. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:33, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and not educationally useful. Dontreader (talk) 23:10, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:38, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In what sense is this the user's "own work"? He admits it is branding material for the National Library of Uzbekistan. If I take a screen capture of a famous logo, is it then mine to do with what I want? Ubiquity (talk) 23:16, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:37, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image, and in my opinion it's a case of advertising or self-promotion of a company. Dontreader (talk) 23:17, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No more so than others in the category. It's a classic example of a small motel office and portico. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:37, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot - derivative work. No permission.

+File:Gaby Gnazzo Jurado Cantando por un sueno Panama.PNG

XXN, 23:45, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:34, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image was taken from a TV press conference [1]. The owner is probably the TV news channel. Dontreader (talk) 23:49, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:33, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From a site that does not have a copyright that is compatible. The information is not sufficient to determine if the image can be used on Wikipedia. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:16, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see that. The image was taken from the website which makes it incompatible with copyright on at least the English project. Walter Görlitz (talk) 13:27, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: The source site http://www.lagoinha.com/ does not have a free license. In order to restore this, the photographer must send a free license to OTRS. Note that the license must be free for all use anywhere, including commercial use. "Supplied to Wikipedia" is not sufficient. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:57, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Elsewhere the uploader notes that this dates from the 1980s; unless released under license, the photograph is still is copyright Hchc2009 (talk) 06:32, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:02, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A photograph of a 3D plan/map from South Korea; South Korea's Right of Panorama laws do not permit commercial use of this sort of image, however, and they cannot be uploaded to the Commons Hchc2009 (talk) 06:36, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:02, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A collection of copyrighted newspapers, including images and logos - no evidence that they have been released by the copyright holders Hchc2009 (talk) 06:37, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:03, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of where the satellite imagery came from; may well be copyrighted Hchc2009 (talk) 06:40, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: © 2016 Mapsof.net. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:04, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No information is given as to where the underlying map originated from Hchc2009 (talk) 06:41, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:04, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Official campaiging photo - no release by creator Eingangskontrolle (talk) 07:34, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:06, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ce fichier devrait être supprimé car il fait l'apologie du mouvement des anti-corridas grâce au panneau de propagande en façade de l'hôtel. Amateur de corrida, je suis choqué par cette illustration qui n'a rien à faire là. Merci de prendre en compte ma requête. 90.85.184.29 07:35, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Commons does not take political positions one way or the other. This image is widely used, so it cannot be deleted except for copyright violation. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:07, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I already move to the correct name Supaplex (talk) 16:49, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Typo, remains of a move, author's req. --Achim (talk) 18:28, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't believe this is the uploader's own work. It looks like it came from Tistory. Random86 (talk) 00:07, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: likely copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:15, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

El archivo o página no se puede usar potencialmente en ningún proyecto de wikimedia: Autopromoción Miguu (talk) 03:45, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:15, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This user has uploaded his own portrait in a manner that is usually seen in social media websites. In my view, this image lacks any encyclopedic value. personal images should be removed from Wikipedia. Roshu Bangal (talk) 04:14, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:18, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio: http://www.ника-свч.рф/enterprise/o-direktore.html Bilderling (talk) 08:42, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: likely copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:19, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake licence: logo of a state satellite operator from Kazakstan cant be own or free Bilderling (talk) 08:44, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: likely copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:19, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution, no metadata, suspiciously similar to Clive Brunskill's shot. Gyrostat (talk) 09:18, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: likely copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:20, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ich bitte als Urheber des Bildes um die Löschung; es gibt eine bessere Version des Bildes: File:Stolperstein Georg Elser Karlstr 29 89568 Hermaringen 2.jpg; mein Bild ist sehr unscharf

Please delete my picture, there is a sharper one available. Kdkeller (talk) 21:32, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use (but not on wikimedia projects). --Didym (talk) 21:30, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

TV screenshot? Derivative work under copyright. XXN, 21:50, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:27, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Luisbadillosaldivar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted logos.

XXN, 22:09, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:27, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm sorry but this looks like a professional photograph, which is on her website [2]. Professional photographers usually don't release pictures under a free license. I think the image should be deleted to avoid potential copyright infringement unless the photographer sends a declaration of consent to COM:OTRS. If the declaration of consent is received after the picture is deleted, the uploader can request undeletion instead of uploading the picture again. Dontreader (talk) 22:19, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:26, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free logo. XXN, 22:25, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:25, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image has been reviewed on 29 March 2016 by Josve05a (talk), who found it not public domain. Josve05a (talk) 22:34, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:23, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Insufficient copyright information. Probably a copyright infringement NearEMPTiness (talk) 22:44, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:21, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sjgaribaldi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused images, with meaningless titles and descriptions and/or little encyclopedic value. Out of scope. This one has acceptable title, but is of poor quality and also is unnecessary file.

XXN, 22:46, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: also some copyvios. --Didym (talk) 21:20, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Derekitou (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyright violation

173.35.88.16 23:32, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:17, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Derekitou (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Based on this users upload history, mix of meta data \ resolutions, it's likely these are also copyvios.

BevinKacon (talk) 15:19, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 22:42, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free logos. XXN, 23:52, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:16, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Проблемы с лицензией Prostologin 1 (talk) 16:15, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb: Missing license as of 29 March 2016 - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 04:39, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: , bigger size available on the web. Very unlikely to be own work. Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:37, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pornography 89.66.66.43 21:31, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already speedy deleted. Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:39, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The trophy depicted is not own work of uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:08, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:44, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non free logo. Still available on frwiki, where there is a fair-use Hercule (talk) 10:05, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:45, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted see watermark Triplecaña (talk) 10:54, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, likely double copyvio (photo+dw). Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:48, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-res version of identical picture uploaded by same user Simon Burchell (talk) 11:37, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted, I created a redirect to the big file as the small was odl and used in several places. Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:58, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no Freedom of Panorama in Russia for monuments. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:45, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, the tombstone itself is maybe an utilitarian object or simple enough, however the drawing is of unclear copyright statut. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:07, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo of cnado.md //  Gikü  said  done  Tuesday, 29 March 2016 13:16 (UTC) 13:16, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, logo above TOO. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:09, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

licencia errónea / wrong license Kovox90 (talk) 00:16, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Simple logo. Probably below TOO. --BrightRaven (talk) 15:18, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

licencia errónea / wrong license Kovox90 (talk) 00:18, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Simple logo. Probably below TOO. --BrightRaven (talk) 15:18, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

© 2013. Banco de la República, Colombia. Todos los derechos reservados (All rights reserved) Remux - Nunca Olvidaré, que me enamoré de la más hermosa flor. Ĉu mi povas helpi vin iel? 08:13, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

© 2013. Banco de la República, Colombia. Todos los derechos reservados (All rights reserved) Remux - Nunca Olvidaré, que me enamoré de la más hermosa flor. Ĉu mi povas helpi vin iel? 19:48, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --BrightRaven (talk) 15:20, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --BrightRaven (talk) 15:20, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

[File transfer from enwiki] Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering en:User talk:Miladir/logs (serial copyright violator I) + User talk:Miladir (serial copyright violator II). Gunnex (talk) 08:48, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --BrightRaven (talk) 15:21, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bonjour,
l'artiste qui figure sur la photo est présenté comme Flex Dufourt, décédé en 1981. La photo semble possédée par ce nouveau téléverseur à un titre inconnu. Peut-il simplement nous indiquer à quel titre il en possède les droits d'auteur ? Qu'il soit remercié.
--6PO 20:12, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

je possède les droits sur cette photo car le sujet est mon grand père. C'est une photo personnelle. En outre je possède l'oeuvre qui est sur l'image. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.124.203.23 (talk) 20:25, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Ce message provient de la PDD afférante.
Bonjour,
pourriez-vous simplement préciser qui est le nom de l'auteur du cliché ou est-il à ce jour inconnu ?
Avec tous remerciements. Cordialement.--6PO 10:19, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Bonjour, l'auteur du cliché est inconnu. Cordialement Message déposé le 1 avril 2016 à 22:56‎ par Benaltur.
Bonjour,
voici les éléments du raisonnement permettant de dater approximativement le cliché :
  1. le sujet représenté est né en 1909
  2. sur le cliché il a environ 50 ans
  3. donc le cliché date de : 1909 + 50 environ 1960
Deuxième point : depuis quand est décédé le photographe qui est seul propriétaire du droit d'auteur ?
  1. en imaginant qu'il décède le lendemain de la réalistion du cliché : 2016 - 1960 = 56 ans
En résumé nous sommes loin des 70 ans qui permettraient d'utiliser Template:PD-anon-50 seule licence envisageable ici.
Cordialement. --6PO 20:17, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Deleted: Without information about the photographer, it is impossible to know if the photograph is in the public domain. COM:PRP. --BrightRaven (talk) 15:23, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no useful content; used for hoax page on nl-wiki MoiraMoira (talk) 10:34, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope. --BrightRaven (talk) 15:24, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bonjour je souhaite supprimer mon article et ce logo 2A01:E34:EF47:DD70:7085:C0A7:3DBE:9C0E 10:52, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --BrightRaven (talk) 15:31, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not in scope Triplecaña (talk) 10:58, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. seems to be in scope. --BrightRaven (talk) 15:35, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is my file and I uploaded another version to enhance the contrast of the other one, so I would like this one deleted. ZurichIsStained (talk) 13:19, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: superdeded by File:Parquet Courts (2016).jpg. --BrightRaven (talk) 15:39, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality image, not very useful for educational purposes, see COM:EDUSE.  deerstop (*•̀ᴗ•́*). 13:26, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Actually not low quality, but a distinct style. Not sure about usefulness though ... Don-kun (talk) 04:56, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of scope. --BrightRaven (talk) 15:40, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like copyright violation. copied from le monde (cf source) QuasarFr (talk) 13:29, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This picture is not property of Le Monde newspaper because no reporter was present in Palmyra when it has been taken. This picture is most probably provided by the Syrian Army for propaganda purpose and must be freely reproduced. (sorry I forgot all about wikification).


Deleted: Le Monde website states clearly who are the copyright holders: Joseph Eid, Maher Al Mounes and AFP. Clear copyvio. --BrightRaven (talk) 15:42, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

older than https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:MarioFeroce.jpg Amilkovich (talk) 13:43, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --BrightRaven (talk) 15:45, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

http://www.le-bourget.fr/IMG/arton137.jpg http://www.le-bourget.fr/IMG/artoff51.jpg http://www.le-bourget.fr/Mentions-legales.html "Tous droits réservés : Commune du Bourget." Lacrymocéphale (talk) 14:07, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --BrightRaven (talk) 15:47, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

What is own work here? Surely copyright violation! Taivo (talk) 14:28, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio: http://www.yumasun.com/news/work-continues-on-desert-sun-stadium-soccer-refit/article_33d97a0e-adb8-11e4-a8f0-072d4241af11.html. --BrightRaven (talk) 07:16, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is routine request for small photo without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photo is so small? Can you upload a bigger version, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload a version with EXIF data? Can you categorize the file correctly? Taivo (talk) 14:29, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio: http://www.fronteraunited.com/schedule-2015. --BrightRaven (talk) 07:18, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Danièle de Temmerman (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No information about the original author and publication. COM:PRP. --BrightRaven (talk) 07:20, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The country of creation is the US, as indicated in the picture, but without date it is impossible to check if it is in the public domain. COM:PRP. --BrightRaven (talk) 07:23, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --BrightRaven (talk) 07:23, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --BrightRaven (talk) 07:47, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://judaisme.sdv.fr/histoire/rabbins/rozen/rozen.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --BrightRaven (talk) 07:52, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. --BrightRaven (talk) 07:55, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

C'è una contestazione all'uso di questa foto da parte dell'autrice del libro da cui le foto sono state tratte, che non è però titolare del copyright, che dovrebbe essere scaduto. Peraltro in un primo tempo l'autrice, informata della pubblicazione, non si era opposta. Successivamente ha cambiato idea. La contestazione è sulla pagina di discussione della voce it:Maria Farneti Brunokito (talk) 22:42, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The photograph is in the public domain. The writter of a book in which the images are included has no copyright on the images. --BrightRaven (talk) 08:24, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

C'è una contestazione all'uso di questa foto da parte dell'autrice del libro da cui le foto sono state tratte, che non è però titolare del copyright, che dovrebbe essere scaduto. Peraltro in un primo tempo l'autrice, informata della pubblicazione, non si era opposta. Successivamente ha cambiato idea. La contestazione è sulla pagina di discussione della voce it:Maria Farneti Brunokito (talk) 22:44, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: The photograph is in the public domain. The writter of a book in which the images are included has no copyright on the images. --BrightRaven (talk) 08:25, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

C'è una contestazione all'uso di questa foto da parte dell'autrice del libro da cui le foto sono state tratte, che non è però titolare del copyright, che dovrebbe essere scaduto. Peraltro in un primo tempo l'autrice, informata della pubblicazione, non si era opposta. Successivamente ha cambiato idea. La contestazione è sulla pagina di discussione della voce it:Maria Farneti Brunokito (talk) 22:45, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: The photograph is in the public domain. The writter of a book in which the images are included has no copyright on the images. --BrightRaven (talk) 08:26, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

C'è una contestazione all'uso di questa foto da parte dell'autrice del libro da cui le foto sono state tratte, che non è però titolare del copyright, che dovrebbe essere scaduto. Peraltro in un primo tempo l'autrice, informata della pubblicazione, non si era opposta. Successivamente ha cambiato idea. La contestazione è sulla pagina di discussione della voce it:Maria Farneti Brunokito (talk) 22:45, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: The photograph is in the public domain. The writter of a book in which the images are included has no copyright on the images. --BrightRaven (talk) 08:27, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

C'è una contestazione all'uso di questa foto da parte dell'autrice del libro da cui le foto sono state tratte, che non è però titolare del copyright, che dovrebbe essere scaduto. Peraltro in un primo tempo l'autrice, informata della pubblicazione, non si era opposta. Successivamente ha cambiato idea. La contestazione è sulla pagina di discussione della voce it:Maria Farneti Brunokito (talk) 22:46, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: The photograph is in the public domain. The writter of a book in which the images are included has no copyright on the images. --BrightRaven (talk) 08:27, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

C'è una contestazione all'uso di questa foto da parte dell'autrice del libro da cui le foto sono state tratte, che non è però titolare del copyright, che dovrebbe essere scaduto. Peraltro in un primo tempo l'autrice, informata della pubblicazione, non si era opposta. Successivamente ha cambiato idea. La contestazione è sulla pagina di discussione della voce it:Maria Farneti Brunokito (talk) 22:47, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: The photograph is in the public domain. The writter of a book in which the images are included has no copyright on the images. --BrightRaven (talk) 08:28, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

C'è una contestazione all'uso di questa foto da parte dell'autrice del libro da cui le foto sono state tratte, che non è però titolare del copyright, che dovrebbe essere scaduto. Peraltro in un primo tempo l'autrice, informata della pubblicazione, non si era opposta. Successivamente ha cambiato idea. La contestazione è sulla pagina di discussione della voce it:Maria Farneti Brunokito (talk) 22:51, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: The photograph is in the public domain. The writter of a book in which the images are included has no copyright on the images. --BrightRaven (talk) 08:28, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

C'è una contestazione all'uso di questa foto da parte dell'autrice del libro da cui le foto sono state tratte, che non è però titolare del copyright, che dovrebbe essere scaduto. Peraltro in un primo tempo l'autrice, informata della pubblicazione, non si era opposta. Successivamente ha cambiato idea. La contestazione è sulla pagina di discussione della voce it:Maria Farneti Brunokito (talk) 22:51, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: The photograph is in the public domain. The writter of a book in which the images are included has no copyright on the images. --BrightRaven (talk) 08:29, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

C'è una contestazione all'uso di questa foto da parte dell'autrice del libro da cui le foto sono state tratte, che non è però titolare del copyright, che dovrebbe essere scaduto. Peraltro in un primo tempo l'autrice, informata della pubblicazione, non si era opposta. Successivamente ha cambiato idea. La contestazione è sulla pagina di discussione della voce it:Maria Farneti Brunokito (talk) 22:52, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: The photograph is in the public domain. The writter of a book in which the images are included has no copyright on the images. --BrightRaven (talk) 08:29, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

C'è una contestazione all'uso di questa foto da parte dell'autrice del libro da cui le foto sono state tratte, che non è però titolare del copyright, che dovrebbe essere scaduto. Peraltro in un primo tempo l'autrice, informata della pubblicazione, non si era opposta. Successivamente ha cambiato idea. La contestazione è sulla pagina di discussione della voce it:Maria Farneti Brunokito (talk) 22:53, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: The photograph is in the public domain. The writter of a book in which the images are included has no copyright on the images. --BrightRaven (talk) 08:29, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

C'è una contestazione all'uso di questa foto da parte dell'autrice del libro da cui le foto sono state tratte, che non è però titolare del copyright, che dovrebbe essere scaduto. Peraltro in un primo tempo l'autrice, informata della pubblicazione, non si era opposta. Successivamente ha cambiato idea. La contestazione è sulla pagina di discussione della voce it:Maria Farneti Brunokito (talk) 22:53, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: The photograph is in the public domain. The writter of a book in which the images are included has no copyright on the images. --BrightRaven (talk) 08:30, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

C'è una contestazione all'uso di questa foto da parte dell'autrice del libro da cui le foto sono state tratte, che non è però titolare del copyright, che dovrebbe essere scaduto. Peraltro in un primo tempo l'autrice, informata della pubblicazione, non si era opposta. Successivamente ha cambiato idea. La contestazione è sulla pagina di discussione della voce it:Maria Farneti Brunokito (talk) 22:53, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: The photograph is in the public domain. The writter of a book in which the images are included has no copyright on the images. --BrightRaven (talk) 08:30, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

C'è una contestazione all'uso di questa foto da parte dell'autrice del libro da cui le foto sono state tratte, che non è però titolare del copyright, che dovrebbe essere scaduto. Peraltro in un primo tempo l'autrice, informata della pubblicazione, non si era opposta. Successivamente ha cambiato idea. La contestazione è sulla pagina di discussione della voce it:Maria Farneti Brunokito (talk) 22:54, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: The photograph is in the public domain. The writter of a book in which the images are included has no copyright on the images. --BrightRaven (talk) 08:31, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

C'è una contestazione all'uso di questa foto da parte dell'autrice del libro da cui le foto sono state tratte, che non è però titolare del copyright, che dovrebbe essere scaduto. Peraltro in un primo tempo l'autrice, informata della pubblicazione, non si era opposta. Successivamente ha cambiato idea. La contestazione è sulla pagina di discussione della voce it:Maria Farneti Brunokito (talk) 22:54, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: The photograph is in the public domain. The writter of a book in which the images are included has no copyright on the images. --BrightRaven (talk) 08:32, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

C'è una contestazione all'uso di questa foto da parte dell'autrice del libro da cui le foto sono state tratte, che non è però titolare del copyright, che dovrebbe essere scaduto. Peraltro in un primo tempo l'autrice, informata della pubblicazione, non si era opposta. Successivamente ha cambiato idea. La contestazione è sulla pagina di discussione della voce it:Maria Farneti Brunokito (talk) 22:55, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: The photograph is in the public domain. The writter of a book in which the images are included has no copyright on the images. --BrightRaven (talk) 08:32, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

C'è una contestazione all'uso di questa foto da parte dell'autrice del libro da cui le foto sono state tratte, che non è però titolare del copyright, che dovrebbe essere scaduto. Peraltro in un primo tempo l'autrice, informata della pubblicazione, non si era opposta. Successivamente ha cambiato idea. La contestazione è sulla pagina di discussione della voce it:Maria Farneti Brunokito (talk) 22:41, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: The photograph is in the public domain. The writter of a book in which the images are included has no copyright on the images. --BrightRaven (talk) 08:35, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

C'è una contestazione all'uso di questa foto da parte dell'autrice del libro da cui le foto sono state tratte, che non è però titolare del copyright, che dovrebbe essere scaduto. Peraltro in un primo tempo l'autrice, informata della pubblicazione, non si era opposta. Successivamente ha cambiato idea. La contestazione è sulla pagina di discussione della voce it:Maria Farneti Brunokito (talk) 22:55, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: The photograph is in the public domain. The writter of a book in which the images are included has no copyright on the images. --BrightRaven (talk) 08:34, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

C'è una contestazione all'uso di questa foto da parte dell'autrice del libro da cui le foto sono state tratte, che non è però titolare del copyright, che dovrebbe essere scaduto. Peraltro in un primo tempo l'autrice, informata della pubblicazione, non si era opposta. Successivamente ha cambiato idea. La contestazione è sulla pagina di discussione della voce it:Maria Farneti Brunokito (talk) 22:56, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: The photograph is in the public domain. The writter of a book in which the images are included has no copyright on the images. --BrightRaven (talk) 08:34, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

C'è una contestazione all'uso di questa foto da parte dell'autrice del libro da cui le foto sono state tratte, che non è però titolare del copyright, che dovrebbe essere scaduto. Peraltro in un primo tempo l'autrice, informata della pubblicazione, non si era opposta. Successivamente ha cambiato idea. La contestazione è sulla pagina di discussione della voce it:Maria Farneti Brunokito (talk) 22:56, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: The photograph is in the public domain. The writter of a book in which the images are included has no copyright on the images. --BrightRaven (talk) 08:35, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:47, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --BrightRaven (talk) 14:06, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promo banner - derivative work. No evidence of permission. XXN, 19:24, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --BrightRaven (talk) 14:03, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that the uploader, Amjackson16, is the copyright holder, presumed to be the Museum of American Speed. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:17, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Adding:
Same reason as above – copyright in the logo is presumably the property of the museum. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:32, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
And File:Logo Museum2.pdf. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:34, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Complex logo. Copyvio. --BrightRaven (talk) 14:01, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This looks like a derivative work. The largest image seems to be an alteration of this one [4] and the brown river in the jungle seems to be this image [5]. Also, one image appears to be clearly copyrighted and is for sale: [6]. Dontreader (talk) 21:19, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio (book cover). --BrightRaven (talk) 14:00, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ivannunez (talk · contribs)

[edit]

What is this? Road sign+derivates, or random personal "creative work" (if so - out of scope).

XXN, 22:04, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope. --BrightRaven (talk) 13:58, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

C'è una contestazione all'uso di questa foto da parte dell'autrice del libro da cui le foto sono state tratte, che non è però titolare del copyright, che dovrebbe essere scaduto. Peraltro in un primo tempo l'autrice, informata della pubblicazione, non si era opposta. Successivamente ha cambiato idea. La contestazione è sulla pagina di discussione della voce it:Maria Farneti Brunokito (talk) 22:43, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: The photograph is in the public domain. The writter of a book in which the images are included has no copyright on the images. --BrightRaven (talk) 13:56, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Stas1995 as Speedy (db) and the most recent rationale was: https://tineye.com/search/bec7be9ed5d0920b814211ab2e54631f46f548c6/?sort=crawl_date&order=asc. The file has been in Commons for years and it is used in 27 projects, so it deserves a regular deletion request. Taivo (talk) 14:39, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete obviously grabbed from internet = (example) http://kitestravel.com/images/bg/bandra-worli-sealink.jpg or http://mumbai.nmapworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/bandra-worli-sealink-2.jpg etc. (both: last modified: 2011). See also fresh copyvio entries at User talk:Jeet221990. Gunnex (talk) 18:57, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 20:42, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by לנה צלר (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:לנה צלר

Gunnex (talk) 21:07, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -- Geagea (talk) 23:06, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Giorgi Khokhonishvili (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Probable copyvio. Mass upload of pictures of low resolution of the same subject by same new user. Two files have already been deleted; of two other the author has been identified.

Henxter (talk) 18:43, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:40, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Roman Kuptsov (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted photos. Taken from the web w/o evidence of permission (for exmple from http://sergeybond.livejournal.com/72200.html), or scanned Soviet stuff uploaded as "own work". See also: COM:Derivative work.

A.Savin 19:40, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:08, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ralitsa.ivanova (talk · contribs)

[edit]

See watermark (football24.bg), so it's copyvio, not "own work".

XXN, 20:05, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:05, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Courtesy deletion - depicted person has complained about how he is portrayed in this picture [7] M2k~dewiki (talk) 10:52, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Lohengrin222, claiming to be Tim Weiler, Pirgu's PR manager, wrote at the talk page of User:M2k~dewiki: "Das Foto ist nicht von ihm autorisiert." (The photo is not authorised by him.) That's not "complained about how he is portrayed in this picture". So what exactly is the reason for the deletion request? Further, there is (at least) one other highly notable person in the picture, which makes makes it quite valuable beyond a mere depiction of Pirgu. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 05:09, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: High quality, properly licensed photograph of a public figure. His PR team doesn't get to dictate how others depict him. --Storkk (talk) 12:54, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Courtesy deletion - depicted person has complained about how he is portrayed in this picture [8] M2k~dewiki (talk) 10:52, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Lohengrin222, claiming to be Tim Weiler, Pirgu's PR manager, wrote at the talk page of User:M2k~dewiki: "Das Foto ist nicht von ihm autorisiert." (The photo is not authorised by him.) That's not "complained about how he is portrayed in this picture". So what exactly is the reason for the deletion request? Further, there is possibly one other notable person in the picture, which makes makes it quite valuable beyond a mere depiction of Pirgu. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 05:08, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: High quality, properly licensed photograph of a public figure. His PR team doesn't get to dictate how others depict him. --Storkk (talk) 12:55, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Courtesy deletion - depicted person has complained about how he is portrayed in this picture [9] M2k~dewiki (talk) 10:52, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Photographs_of_identifiable_people needs to be considered. It's a picture taken by a public person on a public place and obviously with his consent.
Would be easier to delete it if we had an approved image of Saimir. --Albinfo (talk) 00:15, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
User:Lohengrin222, claiming to be Tim Weiler, Pirgu's PR manager, wrote at the talk page of User:M2k~dewiki: "Das Foto ist nicht von ihm autorisiert." (The photo is not authorised by him.) That's not "complained about how he is portrayed in this picture". So what exactly is the reason for the deletion request? Further, there is (at least) one other highly notable person in the original picture, which makes makes it quite valuable beyond a mere depiction of Pirgu. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 05:08, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: High quality, properly licensed photograph of a public figure. His PR team doesn't get to dictate how others depict him. --Storkk (talk) 12:55, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Courtesy deletion - depicted person has complained about how he is portrayed in this picture [10] M2k~dewiki (talk) 10:52, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Lohengrin222, claiming to be Tim Weiler, Pirgu's PR manager, wrote at the talk page of User:M2k~dewiki: "Das Foto ist nicht von ihm autorisiert." (The photo is not authorised by him.) That's not "complained about how he is portrayed in this picture". So what exactly is the reason for the deletion request? Further, there is (at least) one other highly notable person in the picture, which makes makes it quite valuable beyond a mere depiction of Pirgu. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 05:10, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: High quality, properly licensed photograph of a public figure. His PR team doesn't get to dictate how others depict him. --Storkk (talk) 12:55, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Depicted sculpture is obviously a recent work and thereby still in copyright. Freedom-of-panorama exception of the U.S. covers only buildings. Thereby a permission of the sculptor is needed. -- Túrelio (talk) 19:20, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:01, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Depicted mosaic is obviously a recent work and thereby still in copyright. Freedom-of-panorama exception of the U.S. covers only building. Thereby a permission of the artist is needed. -- Túrelio (talk) 19:21, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:01, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Youtube screenshot? In any case is unlikely to be "Own work". XXN, 19:26, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:00, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work', imho commercial advertisements, and file not in use within Wikimedia projects, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 19:38, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:00, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

imho rather posing or (political) advertisements, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 19:44, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination + file was not in use despite comment. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:00, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR as per File:Vishnu Manoharan - Former AAP Learn And Earn Programme In Kerala.jpg, see also EN-WP, Roland zh (talk) 19:45, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Housekeeping: 30 March 2016 Billinghurst (talk | contribs | block) deleted page File:Vishnu Manoharan - Founder Of AAP Learn And Earn Programme In Kerala.jpg. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:59, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication that the uploader actually took the photo. Appears to have been taken from the campaign website http://austinpetersen2016.com/ which is "All Rights Reserved" William S. Saturn (talk) 19:56, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:59, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR as per File:Sgtdhf.jpg et al, Roland zh (talk) 20:08, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:58, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Comment replaced by request for speedy deletion, apologize, Roland zh (talk) 20:18, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Housekeeping: 29 March 2016 Jcb (talk | contribs | block) deleted page File:ASZGDHFJG.jpg. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:57, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR as per File:Sbfbsfn.jpg, File:Sgtdhf.jpg et al, Roland zh (talk) 20:13, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:58, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR as per File:Sbfbsfn.jpg, File:Sgtdhf.jpg et al, Roland zh (talk) 20:15, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:58, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Comment erroneously, meant speedy deletion, Roland zh (talk) 20:35, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Housekeeping: 9 March 2016 Túrelio (talk | contribs | block) deleted page File:Vishnu Manoharan - Former AAP Learn And Earn.jpg. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:57, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DirdMcDird (talk · contribs)

[edit]

File is unused and has no encyclopedic value. Likely uploaded as part of efforts to get videos of defecation on to the english wikipedia page. See Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Defecation.ogv and Yourname's SPI archives on en.wikipedia.org

EvergreenFir (talk) 21:59, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:58, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lochoaymca (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Fake credits: User did not create the modern YMCA logo or take all these photographs, some of which have the real photographers' names in the file itself. Needs Commons:OTRS to prove that the YMCA obtained rights to these images and licensed them as {{Cc-by-sa-3.0}}; otherwise they're COM:COPYVIO.

Closeapple (talk) 17:33, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:05, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio. Picture taken by Annemie Van Roey, as credited correctly on http://www.gva.be/cnt/dmf20151221_02031333/antwerpenaar-speelt-slechterik-in-nieuwe-hollywoodprent Henxter (talk) 18:24, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:04, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio. Picture taken by Annemie Van Roey, as credited on: https://www.pinterest.com/pin/551409548106207853/ Henxter (talk) 18:30, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:03, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, not own work. Seems to be photo by w:ITAR-TASS' photographer. 128.68.57.154 18:34, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:03, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong license. Photos of planes do not require permission from plane-producing company, but their technical drawings can be copyrighted. OTRS-permission from copyright holder Curtiss-Wright Corporation is needed. (But grammatical error in filename is cute.) Taivo (talk) 18:47, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:03, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Depicted work of art dates from 1975, whereby it is still in copyright. In addition, it is likely located inside the church and thereby not covered by Germanys freedom-of-panorama exception. A permission from the artist is required. -- Túrelio (talk) 18:52, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Same problem with:


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:03, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found multiple times in Internet, for example, http://www.midnimo.com/2013/11/20/somali-airlines-oo-isbuuca-soo-socda-muqdisho-ka-bilaabeysa-duulimaadkii-ugu-horeeyay/ from November 2013. Probably copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 19:10, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:02, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Depicted sculpture is obviously a recent work and thereby still in copyright. Freedom-of-panorama exception of the U.S. covers only buildings. Thereby a permission of the sculptor is needed. -- Túrelio (talk) 19:19, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:02, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Depicted sculpture is obviously a recent work and thereby still in copyright. Freedom-of-panorama exception of the U.S. covers only buildings. Thereby a permission of the sculptor is needed. -- Túrelio (talk) 19:20, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:02, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Name "Kopernikusplatz" is not unique in Germany for places. All media have been moved to the correct w:commons:category:Kopernikusplatz (Nuremberg) which existed before and which identifies the place uniquely by including the city in the category name. -Karl432 (talk) 21:57, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

For such a category, the correct name would be w:commons:Category:Places named after Nicolaus Copernicus. In fact, I just created this category. Thus, the deletion request discussed here stays valid, in my eyes. -- Karl432 (talk) 21:50, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Then this should be a category redirect to that category. --Stefan2 (talk) 12:44, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
No problem, if doing such is an usual way in Commons. -- Karl432 (talk) 20:34, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: empty cat. --Jcb (talk) 19:21, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work but copied from elsewhere. The uploader confirmed this to me through IP (https://es.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Usuario_discusi%C3%B3n:Asqueladd&diff=prev&oldid=88332749). Asqueladd (talk) 12:36, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:21, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:22, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bobsgame (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Game screenshots and artwork. Unclear game license.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak keep for now on grounds offered. See en:Talk:Bob's Game. These images were uploaded by the creator of the game, so he presumably has the rights to them, which he then licensed by agreeing to the upload under cc-by-sa terms. THAT SAID while "unclear license" is the wrong reason to delete, these images are sort of promotional, so if this game never comes out, I wouldn't object to deleting them. If the game ever comes out and is judged notable, though, then it's basically harmless to have these sitting around. So... wait & see. (If the en.wp article gets AFD'd, then these can be revisited.) SnowFire (talk) 19:30, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of scope, missing evidence of permission. --Jcb (talk) 19:24, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Desagesse (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

These files are my property as the current owner of This is It, Inc. and have been property of the company since they were taken by my predecessors in the period/era indicated. They were scanned from prints made years ago and are mine to distribute freely. --Desagesse (talk) 17:02, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently I was mislead by my business partner and the image * File:FrontOfBar70s.jpg was not his, it has been brought to my attention that it was taken by Darcie Muckler. The other image, * File:Front of bar.jpg,I have an original print in my possession and remains our property.--Desagesse (talk) 08:23, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: permission has to come from the photographer, not from the owner of the depicted object. --Jcb (talk) 19:27, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:27, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:27, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Stas1995 as Speedy (db) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work. Probably photo of photo. OTRS-permission from author of depicted photo is needed. Taivo (talk) 14:43, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:28, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is routine request for small photo without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photo is so small? Can you upload a bigger version, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload a version with EXIF data? Taivo (talk) 14:46, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep: In use, Google Image Search didn not returned results prior to uploading to Commons. No valid reason for deletion. --Amitie 10g (talk) 15:46, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete per COM:PRP: a 0-hit in Google Image Search is NOT an indicator or valid reason for keeping images with low [broken/cropped] res/no exif as Google Images ignores/doesn't cover most of the social media images, video crops and images from a wide range of other sites. Btw, most likely taken in 2010 and not — as indicated by uploader — in 2011. Gunnex (talk) 23:22, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:28, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, auto-promotional images. Out of scope.

XXN, 14:46, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:29, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:29, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work as claimed, but copyright violation. OTRS-permission from Jaiko is needed. Taivo (talk) 14:50, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:29, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Этот файл не является собственной работой User:Tttttttdjhgh, так как позаимствован с сайта http://perlyny-ua.narod.ru/kievska/caes/caes5-r.html . Кроме того, этот значок " Зеленый мыс", выпущенный в советское время, не имеет никакого отношения к гербу села Страхолесье Чернобыльского района. Natis (talk) 14:51, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Не всё там так печально с тем Страхолесьем, просто в 1989-м ему вернули старое название указом Президиума ВС УССР - наивысшего органа гос. власти (по брежневской конституции 1978г.) в республике [[11]]. Другое дело, что значок - был ли он выпущен или нет, до сих пор не известно - выполнен в стиле гербов Б.Шулевского, популярного на то время геральдиста [[12]]. Большие сомнения, что это было его творчество, т.к. он лишь в конце 80-х занялся Киевщиной. Тем более, село в зоне отчуждения не могло принять герб, поскольку не имело для того своего местного совета - там жили ликвидаторы --Leonid76 (talk) 19:24, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:32, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio? It's a modern book cover, with no permission from author or editor. Rondador (talk) 15:09, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:33, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is routine request for small photo without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photo is so small? Can you upload a bigger version, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload a version with EXIF data? Taivo (talk) 15:11, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:33, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Two dimensional artwork is not subject to Freedom of Panorama in Canada.

Themightyquill (talk) 15:22, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand what you mean here. It's just a collage on a door done by the owner?? WayneRay (talk) 15:27, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, but unless you're the owner, you don't own the copyright. The artwork is copyrighted, so you can't post it on wikipedia. - Themightyquill (talk) 15:55, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
OK so the owner is a good friend and was delighted they were up. What do I have to do to get permission for Commons. I know there is a link somewhere to send scans of copyright permissions . WayneRay (talk) 16:12, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: In order to restore these, the artist (or each of them, if more than one), must send a free license directly to OTRS. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:18, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in this case. There are one or more copyrighted works in each of these images. I doubt that any of them are on permanent display, so they don't qualify for Canadian FOP.

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:24, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:35, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by WayneRay (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These are Canadian postcards and letters from around 1925 and later. The uploader claims that they are "own work" which is absurd. Some of the authors may have died before 1946, but no evidence of that is given.

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:36, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:40, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Chiro84 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Non-free logos. No permission for use.

XXN, 15:36, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:12, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source and author - Агентство стратегических инициатив. No evidence of permission. XXN, 15:42, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:16, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

IGN images are copyrighted and they don't allow commercial use of their images, cf. [13].

Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:44, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:17, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

IGN images are copyrighted and they don't allow commercial use of their images, cf. [14]. Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:48, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:17, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

IGN images are copyrighted and they don't allow commercial use of their images, cf. [15]. Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:49, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:17, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

IGN images are copyrighted and they don't allow commercial use of their images, cf. [16]. Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:50, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:17, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

IGN images are copyrighted and they don't allow commercial use of their images, cf. [17]. Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:51, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:18, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

IGN images are copyrighted and they don't allow commercial use of their images, cf. [18]. Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:51, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:18, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

IGN images are copyrighted and they don't allow commercial use of their images, cf. [19]. Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:51, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:18, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot from some video game. Copyrighted, no permission. XXN, 15:51, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:18, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

IGN images are copyrighted and they don't allow commercial use of their images, cf. [20]. Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:51, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:19, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

IGN images are copyrighted and they don't allow commercial use of their images, cf. [21]. Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:52, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:19, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

IGN images are copyrighted and they don't allow commercial use of their images, cf. [22]. Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:52, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:19, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

IGN images are copyrighted and they don't allow commercial use of their images, cf. [23]. Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:52, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:19, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

IGN images are copyrighted and they don't allow commercial use of their images, cf. [24]. Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:53, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:19, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

IGN images are copyrighted and they don't allow commercial use of their images, cf. [25]. Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:53, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:19, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

IGN images are copyrighted and they don't allow commercial use of their images, cf. [26]. Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:54, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:19, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

IGN images are copyrighted and they don't allow commercial use of their images, cf. [27]. Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:54, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:19, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Te weinig aanwijzingen dat dit daadwerkelijk de ijshockeyer Roger Bureau is. Probably not skater Roger Bureau Sterz (talk) 15:55, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Plus terrible quality, plus unknown copyright status, plus no source information. PDD (talk) 16:07, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:19, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not sure if this falls into COM:TOO, South Korean work. — regards, Revi 16:07, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:20, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File pre-existed upload; see page at http://web.archive.org/web/20090502132716/http://digistardomes.org/worldlist/index.html#cocacola . There is a larger version (though closer crop) on the official googleplus page at https://plus.google.com/107035517752510446748/about . A small version is in use on the official www.ccssc.org website today. This is almost certainly an official photo by the organization lifted of the web and uploaded here. Carl Lindberg (talk) 16:10, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:15, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be lifted from the web at http://uscities.web.fc2.com/columbus/flatrockpark.html (image 12). A note on that page says images 45-50 were added in May 2009, which themselves existed before the upload here. Uploader has images from many web sources claimed as "own work". Carl Lindberg (talk) 16:14, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:15, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low-quality image, without EXIF. Looks like a screenshot, so is not own work and CC. XXN, 16:35, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:19, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same file than File:Яковлев Як-38 7977864060699, Москва - Ходынское поле (им. Фрунзе) RP14436.jpg, with a watermark. Sammyday (talk) 16:38, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:19, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same file than File:Яковлев Як-38 7977861171577, Евпатория RP35377.jpg, lower definition. Sammyday (talk) 16:39, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:19, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional images of artist Алена Гранд. Unused; Out of scope.

XXN, 16:40, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:22, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same file than File:Яковлев Як-38 7977861171577, Евпатория RP35377.jpg, lower definition. Sammyday (talk) 16:40, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:23, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:47, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:23, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work is unlikely. Probably screenshot. Depicted people died in 1996 plane crash. Taivo (talk) 16:48, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:24, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:56, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:25, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Manjula kc (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyright violations. All images seem to have been culled from the internet. Different resolutions and differences in exif files suggest that the images are not "own work" of the uploader.

Takeaway (talk) 17:00, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: five per nomination and kept one per MtO. --Jcb (talk) 21:27, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Evidence is needed for CC-license or OTRS-permission from Bill Cordua. The other problem is project scope. I'm afraid, that Commons has nothing to do with that. Taivo (talk) 17:07, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have the following permission from Dr. Cordua, received via email to my request: QUOTE: --Wiley Sage (talk) 18:59, 29 March 2016 (UTC)Hi,[reply]

The article was written to appear in rock club newsletters, and I'm happy it meets other needs. I give you permission to use it in your silicone article.

Bill Cordua

Dr. William S. Cordua Emeritus Professor of Geology University of Wisconsin River Falls 410 South 3rd Street River Falls WI 54022 715-425-9544

UNQUOTE


Deleted: permission to use in one article is not a free license - also out of scope. --Jcb (talk) 21:46, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 17:07, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:46, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Novotelkowloon (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Questionable authorship claims based on the inconsistent resolutions, inconsistent metadata, and the uploader's history. The uploader claims to have personally created both these photos, which were taken with different cameras. The metadata of one of the photos indicates that it was taken by Fabrice Rambert, so effectively, the uploader is claiming to be that person. However, User:Kookiekid is also claiming to be that person by claiming to have created File:Nathan-road-hong-kong01.jpg, as is User:Singingtothemoon by claiming to have created File:Novotel Nathan Road Premier Room.jpg, User:Ritzparis by claiming to have created File:Suite Imperiale 101.jpg, User:Wongkarwai88 by claiming to have created File:Novotel Citygate Hong-Kong - Rooms - Premier Suite.jpg, User:Cclaudet by claiming to have created File:Ponton Majestic.jpg, and User:Shanepateman by claiming to have created File:Nnrk room.jpg. Either the uploader is using multiple accounts, or at least one person is not telling the truth.

LX (talk, contribs) 17:07, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:48, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:48, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication that the uploader, Amjackson16, is the copyright owner of the logo incorporated in this image, which presumably belongs to the Museum of American Speed. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:17, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:49, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wongkarwai88 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Questionable authorship claims based on the low/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent metadata, and the nature of several of the images.

LX (talk, contribs) 17:21, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:52, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file has two problems. 1) There is no freedom of panorama in Iran and the building is modern. 2) The user has problems with copyright (look his/her talk page), the file is small and has no metadata, I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 17:59, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:53, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Es ist nicht erkennbar, dass der Hochlader auch der Urheber ist, das gleiche Problem trat schon beim gelöschten Vorgängerbild File:Dieter Lenoir Portrait.jpg auf. Alnilam (talk) 18:26, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Datei wurde mir zur Veröffentlichung überlassen, siehe Email:


Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----

Von: Fotostudio Am Kurfürstenplatz [28] Gesendet: Dienstag, 19. Januar 2016 13:42 An: xxxx Betreff: Fotos für Veröffentlichung

Mit freundlichen Grüßen

     Ihr Team vom

FOTOSTUDIO AM KUFÜRSTENPLATZ Hohenzollernstrasse 86 80796 München/Schwabing Telefon 089/3006370

Email an 'permission-de@wikimedia.org' mit allen Details wurde verschickt.


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:53, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Terrydito79 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Non-free logos.

XXN, 19:17, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by colleague. --Jcb (talk) 21:52, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status (source link is dead, and in addition a direct link to an image does really not help], per (example) Commons:Deletion requests/File:Family of Ayatollah Khomeini.jpg and other sajed.ir related DR's, where sajed.ir is always questionized to be a reliable source. The photo itself may be in PD by other means ({{PD-Iran}}) but relevant info must be provided. Author is - as stated - "Islamic Republic of Iran Air Force" (which is NOT sajed.ir), needing further details/permission.

 Info There is also the license template {{Sajed}} (created in 2014, links)... Gunnex (talk) 19:36, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:54, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as imho potentially non-free content, see rather thumbnail format and missing EXIF data, Roland zh (talk) 20:01, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:55, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jcb as no permission (No permission since) Maybe below COM:TOO ? Thibaut120094 (talk) 16:30, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per Jcb. Green Giant (talk) 00:08, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]