Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/03/21
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
non-free logo Sn1per (talk) 02:47, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Info: Already tagged for Speedy. --Amitie 10g (talk) 03:05, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, by Christian Ferrer as copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 07:34, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
No license permission from 13 March 2016 Алый Король (talk) 07:24, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 08:06, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused file, private image BrightRaven (talk) 09:42, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete This private/nonsense image was already misused to vandalize in en:Dwarf-tossing. -- Ies (talk) 09:57, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy deleted: Content intended as vandalism, threat, or attack. --BrightRaven (talk) 10:06, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Joshfinlay as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: eBay Inc. All Rights Reserved. Túrelio (talk) 09:59, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; converted the speedy to DR by own misclick. --Túrelio (talk) 10:01, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
La carpeta de la que seleccioné los archivos contenía imágenes que no son de mi propiedad. CarferFragen (talk) 17:00, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request. --Jcb (talk) 17:06, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
La carpeta de la que seleccioné los archivos contenía imágenes que no son de mi propiedad. CarferFragen (talk) 17:00, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request. --Jcb (talk) 17:06, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Category:Championnat d'Alsace Lorraine 2016, 20 Mar 2016, Cernay (Haut-Rhin)
- Delete Wrong page title: missing colon. --Stefan2 (talk) 19:11, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Typo, req by author. --Achim (talk) 20:15, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Offensive, pure vitriole, should be deleted asap. Sminthopsis84 (talk) 15:32, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- Support; Per nominator. Literal reason why there are so many issues with the way deletions/picture reviews are handled here. - LouisAragon (talk) 22:06, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion#General reasons: 3. Content intended as vandalism, threat, or attack. -- Geagea (talk) 07:17, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
unlikely own work of the uploader, COM:OTRS required Krd 17:56, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Withdrawn/kept: per OTRS permission. --Krd 06:53, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Problem with license BosnaSRB RS (talk) 21:19, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Magog the Ogre: Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file
Files uploaded by Miste nate (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal unused files, per COM:NOTHOST. Also the information on authorship is likely to be mistaken.
—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 20:07, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
- @Teles: The user asked to upload a picture of himself to use in his profile, and said to me he was the photographer (which doesn't seem to be the case here, unless those are selfies). I'll try to get more information about those files with him.-- Darwin Ahoy! 16:51, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
- @DarwIn: I just sent him a specific message in Portuguese about that.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 16:15, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Miste nate (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE, unused personal image. Commons is not Facebook
Motopark (talk) 05:51, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Miste nate (talk · contribs)
[edit]Policy allows one or two personal images for user pages of active contributors, but "active" and "contributor" must come first. Commons is not Facebook.
- File:Transmitindo favor 2016.jpg
- File:Bebe passando pela porta 2016.jpg
- File:Equação de segundo grau cm uma icognita.jpg
- File:EZINALTE ANDREZA FERREIRA.jpg
- File:Artista marciais.jpeg
- File:Miste nate 2016.jpg
- File:MISTE NATCHUECK.jpg
- File:1357000038-picsay.jpg
- File:1357002319-picsay-1-2.jpg
- File:Ezinalte Ferreira brasileiro.jpg
- File:1357002629-picsay-1-1.jpg
. Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:59, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:59, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Miste nate (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low quality private / self-ptomoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
- File:Miste nate em luanda2016.jpg
- File:Ezinalte o artista plastica.jpg
- File:Miste nate o wikipedista.jpg
- File:O colaborador e editor.jpg
Ies (talk) 19:16, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 00:22, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Miste nate (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
--ghouston (talk) 03:22, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:55, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
Possible copyvio. The file is marked as PD-anon-70, date of origin “before 1937”. Leaving the “anonymity” of such a portrait aside, the “before 1937” seems really suspicious to me. I’d guess this is a photo from the time she was the first lady already, i.e. after 1948. There is no source/other reasons why this photo should be older than 1937. The listed source states only that “she entertained the whole nation with her fashion creations” in the picture caption, hinting again this was a portrait of the first lady. Mormegil (talk) 15:34, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader also supports deletion (nominated the file for speedy). Taivo (talk) 18:27, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
This is not "own work" of the uploader but a professional image, compare Commons:Deletion requests/Bismillah Khan photos Hekerui (talk) 21:48, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Dharmadhyaksha: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing
Image is a user-generated version of File:TWDC Logo.svg. If there was a nomination for merge, I'd do that. Pages using this image should be using the other, as that is from the company directly. Combine nomination for deletion with File:The Walt Disney Company.svg. Elisfkc (talk) 05:41, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: It is in use, therefore cannot be deleted. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:17, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
As I said before "Image is a user-generated version of File:TWDC Logo.svg. If there was a nomination for merge, I'd do that. Pages using this image should be using the other, as that is from the company directly." However, I have changed alll global usage of this image over to File:TWDC Logo.svg Elisfkc (talk) 04:43, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, the file isn't used anymore. Also, the logo is incorrect (wrong font), the other has correct font. Taivo (talk) 20:10, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
copyright violation and only for advertisement. - Earth Saver (talk) at 06:09, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, I'll delete also almost-copy file:Lannyleung.jpg. These are the uploader's only contributions. Taivo (talk) 20:15, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
out of project scope, should be a wikitable if usable Krd 06:40, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 20:29, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused file, private image BrightRaven (talk) 08:06, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Uploader here. I won't argue with that -FastilyClone (talk) 04:14, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, really out of scope. Taivo (talk) 20:33, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Personal image (according the file name, the photo is dedicated to a person named manuel) ; unclear description (Paris in july) ; building without interest ; Unidentified location ; No use ; No encyclopedic value Civa (talk) 08:14, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, very bad composition. If you want to take photo about the building, then wait until rain is over, then move flowerpot away and open window. Taivo (talk) 20:38, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Completely unnecessary porn image. You can delete the redirect on Wikipedia as well. 68.173.113.106 18:33, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
Keep - lots of things are unnecessary, but that doesn't mean we should delete them. No valid reason for deletion given, seems to translate as IDONTLIKEIT. Female urination is within scope (oh here comes the counter again) and has occurred roughly 126,506,135,000,000 times since this DR started. -mattbuck (Talk) 18:43, 26 July 2012 (UTC)- Keep One of the better illustrative images we have in the category about a basic human anatomical function. -- Infrogmation (talk) 20:50, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
- Keep per mattbuck and Infrogmation. Handcuffed (talk) 22:58, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 09:08, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
It has nothing to do with naturism, maybe it could be used to explain female physiology. There's a problem about personality rights. 82.53.106.217 12:56, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- Keep per previous DR, still in use. --Amitie 10g (talk) 13:36, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Again ?! Are you kidding ? The nominator even admits it "could be used to explain female physiology" ! Incredible ! --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 21:13, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept, depicted person isn't identifiable. As anonymous people have nominated the photo twice for deletion without proper reason, I semi-protect the image indefinitely. Taivo (talk) 21:29, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 13:33, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, for me it is totally black image. Taivo (talk) 09:15, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Author: Vincenzo Irolli (1860-1949). Restore on January 1, 2020 2003:45:5C35:C201:2191:8018:108D:6254 13:37, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, license PD-Italy is applicable only for photos, not for paintings. Taivo (talk) 09:21, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Copyvio, Logo can't be free Bilderling (talk) 14:22, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, some logos are free, but this is not. I'll delete also copy of this file:Безымянный-6.jpg. Taivo (talk) 09:29, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Plain commercial advertising, SPAM, out of project scope.
- File:Lagoon 500.jpg
- File:Lagoon 450.jpg
- File:Lagoon 440.jpg
- File:Lagoon 400S2.jpg
- File:Lagoon 380.jpg
Ies (talk) 14:49, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, all uploads of Yachtviki come from the same site with unfree license "© Yacht Voyage, 2016". I'll delete them all (even those not nominated from deletion, because they have watermark of the site). Taivo (talk) 09:55, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Files in Category:Walter Flemming (Künstler)
[edit]Sculptor died in 1977, OTRS required.
- File:Flemming, Walter - Schulkinder 021.jpg
- File:Flemming, Walter - Schulkinder 022.jpg
- File:Johann-Amos-Comenius-Schule, Dresden 063.JPG
- File:Schulkinder1.JPG
- File:Schulkinder2.JPG
- File:Schulkinder3.JPG
Achim (talk) 15:01, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Revoking, sorry, didn't recognize first that FoP applies here as it's not inside the building. --Achim (talk) 15:05, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
.. Fehler sind nun mal Bestandteil unseres Lebens - Hauptsache die Bilder bleiben erhalten!--Bybbisch94 (talk) 17:49, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept, nomination is withdrawn. There is really freedom of panorama in Germany. Taivo (talk) 10:15, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Permission peu claire + pas de licence valide Benjamin08 (talk) 16:49, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 07:52, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Flag of Bulgaria.svg. Fry1989 eh? 17:07, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, only 33×20 pixels. Taivo (talk) 08:33, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 17:08, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 08:37, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 17:09, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Sébastien Fantoni is unknown in en.wiki and fr.wiki. Unused small photo without metadata, out of project scope. I'll delete also category:Aeden and unused signature file:LogoAeden.png. Taivo (talk) 08:43, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 17:09, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Sébastien Fantoni is unknown in en.wiki and fr.wiki. Unused small photo without metadata, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 08:40, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 17:17, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:05, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 17:17, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:03, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 17:17, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:04, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 17:17, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, I'll delete also file:Eray kırmızı.jpg due to same reason. Taivo (talk) 09:02, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 17:17, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:09, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 17:18, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:11, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 17:19, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:14, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
porque no lo he colgado bien XRCarulla (talk) 17:38, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 09:19, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Inferior duplicate of File:Емблема морської піхоти (2007).png PsichoPuzo (talk) 17:42, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: This file is older. --Amitie 10g (talk) 18:58, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- And what? Exact same image in worse quality.--PsichoPuzo (talk) 19:20, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:21, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Inferior duplicate of File:Емблема юридичної служби (2007).png PsichoPuzo (talk) 17:54, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, I do not see difference, but the other file is used and it has better name. Taivo (talk) 09:23, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
low-quality, low-resolution, likely a scan -> not own work, no permission Krd 17:57, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, the photo comes from family archive, which is not good source. Probably the file violates photographer's copyright. Taivo (talk) 09:31, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
likely a scan of a old photograph -> not own work, no permission Krd 17:58, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, file description says in German: "Private archive of family Hauser, reprinted in "The Hauser Chronicle", Publisher "Der Morgen" 1982". Taivo (talk) 09:27, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Inferior duplicate of File:Емблема танкових військ (2007).png PsichoPuzo (talk) 18:04, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Question: How a file uploaded in 2011 be a duplicated of a file uploaded in 2016? --Amitie 10g (talk) 18:55, 21 March 2016 (UTC)- Exact that image in worse quality, perhaps? (lower res)--PsichoPuzo (talk) 19:18, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:29, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
no indication that the uploader is the copyright holder Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 19:23, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 09:49, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
source: www.thamike.com author: uncredited photographer (publicity still), I haven't found any evidence that this image has a free license, so I dont't know if we can trust the uploader. Avron (talk) 19:26, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:17, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:33, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:20, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:33, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata. The file description says: "[First and family name] from Kharkov is a troll really existing in nature", so maybe this is an attack photo. Taivo (talk) 10:26, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:34, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata. Description "July Bochette, princess of gnomes" encourages me to delete it as out of scope. Taivo (talk) 10:23, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:38, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:29, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rafid Marikkar (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused images of non-notable person
INeverCry 19:39, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photos without metadata, the uploader's only contributions. Taivo (talk) 10:32, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:41, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:34, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:42, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:35, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:42, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo, the uploader's only contribution. Previously published in Facebook. Taivo (talk) 10:36, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Junirullah (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
- File:Kuli Bangunan.jpg
- File:Junirullah editing foto.jpg
- File:Junirullah.jpg
- File:Gambar guitar junirullah.jpg
INeverCry 19:43, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, tiny unused personal photos without metadata, the uploader's only contributions. Taivo (talk) 10:41, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:44, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:45, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:46, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:46, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:47, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, the uploader's only contribution, quite bad quality. Taivo (talk) 10:48, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:48, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Very bad quality. Taivo (talk) 10:49, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:48, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Very bad quality. Previously published in Facebook. Taivo (talk) 10:51, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
screenshot of a cricket web site, not used, not in scope Avron (talk) 19:49, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, probably copyright violation. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:52, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:49, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:54, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:50, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:55, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sexy symbol (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal/self-promotional images
- File:KARLLA NAYNNA ZEN.jpg
- File:KARLLA NAYNNA SAPECA.jpg
- File:KARLLA NAYNNA POPÔ GGG.jpg
- File:KARLLA NAYNNA SEXY.jpg
- File:KARLLA NAYNNA TOCANDO BAIXO.jpg
- File:KARLLA NAYNNA NA BIKE.jpg
- File:KARLLA NAYNNA.jpg
- File:KARLLA NAYNNA RELAX.jpg
INeverCry 19:52, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photos without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contributions. Taivo (talk) 10:58, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:53, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:02, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ericaramos19 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal/self-promotional images
- File:BEAT MONSTRO.jpg
- File:KULA DJ.jpg
- File:KITANDINHAsdasd.jpg
- File:KITANDINHA.jpg
- File:SC Praia Mole.jpg
- File:CASA1245.jpg
INeverCry 19:55, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photos without metadata, the uploader's only contributions. Taivo (talk) 11:04, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:56, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:07, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Acolitosaojose (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused images of non-notable person
INeverCry 19:58, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small photos without metadata. Taivo (talk) 11:29, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:59, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:34, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 20:00, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, I'll delete also file:Colours - Pune.jpg. Small unused photos without metadata, quality is not good. Taivo (talk) 11:37, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 20:01, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Bad composition, bad quality. Taivo (talk) 11:39, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - promotional images
INeverCry 20:04, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, it is better not to show that to people. Taivo (talk) 11:42, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Unused simple geometrical shape with no apparent educational purpose, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:27, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept, it's chakana. I'll categorize it. I did not find a replacement image. Taivo (talk) 17:14, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
watermarked image with dubious "own work" claim, said to have been created three years after the subject's death EricEnfermero (talk) 21:21, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 17:22, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Overlapping methyl groups; thus inusable. Leyo 22:12, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 18:14, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Overlapping groups; thus inusable. Leyo 22:18, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 18:19, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Overlapping groups; thus inusable. Leyo 22:19, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 18:20, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Overlapping groups; thus inusable. Leyo 22:19, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 18:21, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
uploader request - no COM:EDUSE INeverCry 22:40, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, I agree. Taivo (talk) 18:23, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
uploader request - selfie I inadvertently transfered in a big photoset INeverCry 23:03, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, very low quality. Taivo (talk) 18:33, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Photo quite identical to File:Louvre Museum (7463214572).jpg ; no information about any difference Tangopaso (talk) 23:05, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 18:42, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Ошибка при оформлении лицензии. Kinozavr (talk) 20:47, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb: Missing permission as of 18 March 2016 - Using VisualFileChange.
Ошибка при оформлении лицензии. Kinozavr (talk) 20:48, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb: Missing permission as of 18 March 2016 - Using VisualFileChange.
Ошибка при оформлении лицензии. Kinozavr (talk) 20:50, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb: Missing permission as of 18 March 2016 - Using VisualFileChange.
Taken in TV. Not own work. See COM:DW. ★ Poké95 10:43, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
It wasn't taken on TV. It was taken at the ethiad stadium at an open training session before the season started. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thursby16 (talk • contribs)
- @Thursby16: Then why is it blurry? It should'nt be like that if you take it while at the ethiad stadium. What camera model did you use? ★ Poké95 11:44, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Was sat on the highest up tier and zoomed in. Sony Xperia Z camera. It isn't the best and the zoom isnt great. At the time it was the only picture of Jason Denayer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thursby16 (talk • contribs)
- @Thursby16: Hmm, if it was taken in a camera, your picture should have an EXIF data. Why does your image don't have that? And why is it too small? If you cropped it, then please upload the original image with its EXIF data. And please sign your posts with 4 tildes (). Thanks, ★ Poké95 00:22, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
I have no idea what an EXIF data is. And i'll have a look for the image Thursby16 (talk) 18:20, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
- @Pokéfan95: I have found the original version of this image which is not cropped. Where do you want me to upload it? Thursby16 (talk) 18:26, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
- @Pokéfan95: I have updated this image and put a 'new' version which is the uncropped one. Thursby16 (talk) 18:32, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
- @Thursby16: Still not satisfied. There is no EXIF data, and it still looks like taken from a TV. For EXIF data, it is a metadata added to images taken by cameras. Is your camera configured not to add EXIF data on your taken images? Well, I will still support deletion, due to COM:DW and COM:PCP. ★ Poké95 11:24, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
- @Pokéfan95: i still have no idea what EXIF data is.... also, if it's taken on a TV, why on earth would they show an open training session on TV. Like i said, the image was zoomed in. My camera is from a Sony Xperia Z. So could you look up if it supports EXIF. Thursby16 (talk) 20:06, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
- @Pokéfan95: if i took a pic off a TV anyway, it would have them black lines through the image Thursby16 (talk) 20:06, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
- @Pokéfan95: it even says it has EXIF data.... Follow this link...... And it even says "This file contains additional information, such as Exif metadata" ....... So take it off from deletion now.........https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Jason_Denayer.jpg#metadata Thursby16 (talk) 20:06, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
- @Pokéfan95: Ok i reuploaded the image with more EXIF data but i can't make it the newer version of the image now, it just makes its own page. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Denayer.jpg Thursby16 (talk) 20:06, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
- @Thursby16: Sorry for the late reply. I am now satisfied with the newer version. I don't support deletion now, but I will let this request open for a few days to see if somebody supports deletion. Thanks, ★ Poké95 06:48, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ankry (talk) 10:10, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Incorrect geometry of the alkyne group; orphaned. Leyo 22:10, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Have File:2-Methylbut-3-yn-2-ol.svg. DMacks (talk) 20:11, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. Ed (Edgar181) 13:17, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Incorrect geometry of the alkyne group. Leyo 22:13, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 13:17, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Most likely incorrect structure, see Special:Diff/187185493. Leyo 22:23, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Incorrect/misleading chemical structure. Ed (Edgar181) 13:18, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Incorrect structure of chromium(IV) oxide; orphaned. Leyo 22:27, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 13:18, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Pokéfan95 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://www.wow.com/wiki/Egyptian_Hieroglyphics
- I realized that the page I stated was just copied from the English Wikipedia, however, this file doesn't have any EXIF data, and the resolution is low. Possible copyright violation. ★ Poké95 11:47, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- I took this picture myself when i went to the museum
- @Pokéfan95: I'll have a look for the original image of this as well. Don't delete them.
- @Pokéfan95: ok i have updated the image with the original version. Can you take both my images off for deletion now?Thursby16 (talk) 18:34, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
- @Thursby16: Still not satisfied. It is still the same image, there is no changes. EXIF data wasn't added either, so it means, delete per COM:PCP. ★ Poké95 11:20, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
- @Pokéfan95: it even says it has EXIF data.... Follow this link...... And it even says "This file contains additional information, such as Exif metadata" ....... So take it off from deletion now.........https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Heiroglyphs.jpg#metadata
- @Thursby16: OK, since you uploaded a version where EXIF data is now included, I don't support deletion now. But I will still let this request open to see if somebody will support deletion. Thanks, ★ Poké95 06:54, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
- @Pokéfan95: could you take the deletion off now? It's been a while now and nobody supports deletion now.Thursby16 (talk) 12:34, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- @Thursby16: Since 7 days have passed now, and no one supports deletion now, I am closing this as withdrawn. --★ Poké95 00:50, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawn. --★ Poké95 00:50, 29 March 2016 (UTC) (non-admin close)
Files uploaded by Hamzan2015 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused files, advertising or self-promotion for non-notable or non-existing websites
- File:مسابقة للفوز بمدونتي بلوجر بهم خاصية الإشتراك بأدسنس مفعلة.jpg
- File:Logo-i7tiraf-7asoub-2015.png
- File:Logo-i7tiraf-7asoub.png
- File:Logo-mo7arif-arabya.png
- File:Logo-Fahraas-info.png
- File:Logo-mo7tarif-internet.png
- File:Logo-th1111.png
- File:Logo-kolana-ibda3.png
BrightRaven (talk) 09:32, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
The size, the lack of EXIF and the quality make me wonder if these are really own work. Moreover, they are probably out of scope too.
- File:12074580 hgjghjghjghjgh.jpg
- File:Kjkljlkhjlhhjkhkjhjk.jpg
- File:12421788 210680772ghgkfhklm.jpg
- File:M9awda.jpg
BrightRaven (talk) 09:35, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 14:52, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:53, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hamzan2015 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF + out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used (Wikipedia Zero upload).
- File:Hfgghfgdxhdfhf.jpg
- File:Dfghgjhgjghjhjgh.jpg
- File:Ghhgjhghjghfj.jpg
- File:Gjhgjhgjhgjgh.jpg
- File:M9awd-3lik.jpg
- File:زوهري.jpg
- File:ChamselMaarifKobra4.pdf
Gunnex (talk) 19:49, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete I think we should speed'em in the future. --Vituzzu (talk) 21:53, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Nominating (per above) also:
Gunnex (talk) 22:02, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:04, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused file, advertising for a Dutch training centre. BrightRaven (talk) 09:40, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:55, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Offpage-fameitc (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused files, advertising or self-promotion
- File:PPC , Pay Per Click , PPC Advertising & Services at FameITC.png
- File:Wordpress Website Development , PSD to Wordpress CMS & Themes.jpg
- File:Android App Development And Android Application Development.png
- File:IOS App Development Firm India , iPhone Application Development.jpg
- File:SEO Services , Search Engine Optimization , Local SEO.jpg
- File:Magento Ecommerce Development , PSD to Magento Themes.jpg
- File:Printing Service - Fame Itc.jpg
- File:3D Animation , Innovative 3-D Animations Programs.jpg
- File:E-Commerce Web Sites Development , E-Commerce Solutions.jpg
- File:Mobile App Development , Mobile Web & Apps Development - Fame IT Consultancy.jpg
- File:Digital Marketing Services - Fame ITC.jpg
- File:Web-development2.jpg
BrightRaven (talk) 09:52, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete also file:Graphic Design , Graphics Design Templates at FameITC.png. Taivo (talk) 20:59, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:55, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused file, advertising or self-promotion BrightRaven (talk) 10:03, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Article project about the company was rejected today. Taivo (talk) 21:00, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:56, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Small unused personal photo without metadata, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:35, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:59, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Moralepimpstar (talk · contribs)
[edit]Policy allows one or two personal images for user pages of active contributors, but "active" and "contributor" must come first. Commons is not Facebook.
- File:Bella Alubo.jpg
- File:Bella Alubo in 2015.jpg
- File:Mc Keezy K 12.jpg
- File:Mc Keezy K 11.jpg
- File:Mc Keezy K with Rethabile.jpg
- File:Mc Keezy K 9.jpg
- File:Mc Keezy K 10.jpg
- File:Mc Keezy K 8.jpg
- File:Mc Keezy K 7.jpg
- File:Mc Keezy K 6.jpg
- File:Mc Keezy K With Kgotso.jpg
- File:Mc Keezy K 5.jpg
- File:Mc Keezy k.jpg
- File:Mc Keezy K 4.JPG
- File:Mc Keezy K 3.jpg
- File:Mc Keezy K 15.jpg
- File:Mc Keezy K 2.jpg
- File:Mc Keezy K.jpg
- File:Mc Keezy K 1.jpg
- File:Mc Keezy K at Bareki Mall 2014.jpg
. Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:39, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:58, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:59, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:00, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:00, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kiz dabest (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:01, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:01, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:02, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:02, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete also file:Vote bella.jpg, also as promo. Taivo (talk) 09:39, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:04, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
spamer's contribution, not in use Bilderling (talk) 15:16, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:05, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 15:24, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:05, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 15:24, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:05, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 15:24, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:06, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 15:24, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:06, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 15:24, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:06, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 15:24, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:07, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 15:24, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:07, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 15:24, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:07, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 15:24, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:08, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 15:24, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:08, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 15:24, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:08, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 15:25, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:09, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 15:25, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:08, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused personal photograph Olivier (talk) 15:37, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:09, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused personal photograph Olivier (talk) 15:39, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:10, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused personal photograph Olivier (talk) 15:42, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:11, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused personal photograph Olivier (talk) 15:42, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:11, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused personal photograph Olivier (talk) 15:50, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:11, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused personal photograph Olivier (talk) 15:51, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:11, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused personal photograph Olivier (talk) 15:53, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:12, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused personal photograph Olivier (talk) 15:53, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:12, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused personal photograph Olivier (talk) 15:55, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:13, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Collection of logos out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 17:16, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:13, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 17:22, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:14, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 17:22, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:14, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 17:22, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:15, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 17:25, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:15, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
and File:Suman Sahoo.jpg.
Fails COM:SCOPE. Stefan2 (talk) 19:10, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:15, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope INeverCry 20:01, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:16, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 21:44, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:17, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Same as File:Swagg Boy.jpg, personal photo, out of scope — 0x010C ~talk~ 21:53, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:17, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE, unused image of non-notable person. -- Túrelio (talk) 22:10, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:18, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE, unused image of non-notable person. -- Túrelio (talk) 22:11, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Comment If the place is identified, then the person can be cropped away. Taivo (talk) 18:13, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:18, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope; no educational use. Riley Huntley (talk) 19:25, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Motopark (talk) 02:17, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Commons does not need a self-greeting device. Taivo (talk) 10:14, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:18, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Painted (and signed) by de:Franz Triebsch (1870-1956) 2003:45:5C35:C201:2191:8018:108D:6254 06:18, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Still copyrighted until 2026. --★ Poké95 07:17, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- Comment I added category "Undelete in 2027" (70+1 years after death). Taivo (talk) 20:20, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Yasu (talk) 15:14, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
File is not educationally useful: it is low-resolution and lacks visual context. I believe it falls under the point in the deletion policy about private image collections. Rebbing 20:02, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: In use. --Amitie 10g (talk) 20:38, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination: This was a bad deletion request, and I feel bad. Rebbing 19:16, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept, Withdrawn by requester. Rebbing 19:16, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
The file is out of scope: it's unlikely to be educationally useful, and it's clearly created for a promotional purpose. Rebbing talk 19:58, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. -- Cirt (talk) 02:33, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
The indicated website only contains a copy of the image but does not indicate how it ended up on that website. The website fbi.gov both contains images created by FBI and images created by others, and without any text about the image, it seems impossible to determine if it was created by FBI or not. It could be an FBI image, but it could also be a private image which somehow ended up in FBI's possession. I assume that FBI has some text about the person somewhere (otherwise FBI wouldn't upload the image in the first case), but until that text is discovered, the copyright status can't be verified. Stefan2 (talk) 00:15, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - image is from here: https://www.fbi.gov/about-us/history/famous-cases/jack-gilbert-graham. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 11:41, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
I strongly doubt this image is own work given the lack of EXIF, the size, the professionnal quality, the subject and the copyvio record of the uploader. BrightRaven (talk) 12:29, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete, considering published 1 day earlier via https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10156328016885595&set=ecnf.542950594&type=3&theater (09.11.2015), giving credit to "Picture By Nicolas Viron". Gunnex (talk) 11:01, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, I'll delete most of his uploads as copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 14:04, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
I strongly doubt this image is own work given the lack of EXIF, the size, the professionnal quality, the subject and the copyvio record of the uploader. BrightRaven (talk) 12:30, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, I'll delete most of his uploads as copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 14:05, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Olivier BETTI (talk · contribs)
[edit]These old photographs are not own work. Without their author and publication history, it is impossible to check if they are in the public domain (in my opinion, most of them are too recent to be in the public domain).
- File:Emile Mercadier.jpg
- File:P. Bonneau.jpg
- File:F.Betti (2).jpg
- File:Henri Betti.jpg
- File:F.Betti.jpg
- File:Betti.jpg
- File:André Hornez.jpg
- File:Misraki (1).jpg
BrightRaven (talk) 12:46, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, no author data, no publication data. The files can be restored, if correct data will be given. Taivo (talk) 13:40, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Olivier BETTI (talk · contribs)
[edit]uploads are dubious claims of own-work, no EXIF data, web-quality. Possible copyright violations.
- File:HenriBettiSignature.jpg
- File:Mais qu'est-ce que j'ai ?.jpg
- File:Paul Bonneau.jpg
- File:Misraki.jpg
- File:Florie Auclerc.jpg
- File:Angèle Vivier.jpg
- File:André Hornez.jpg
- File:Maître Pierre.jpg
- File:It's so good.jpg
Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:32, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (I found an obvious copyvio). --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:42, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
I doubt this image is own work given the lack of EXIF and the copyvio record of the uploader. BrightRaven (talk) 12:47, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, I'll delete most of his uploads as copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 14:06, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Lowest quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 13:01, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 14:10, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
not free outside of Italy 2003:45:5C35:C201:2191:8018:108D:6254 13:16, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, 1986 work is free in Italy and in most other countries, but due to URAA not in USA until 2082 (95 years from publishing). Taivo (talk) 14:14, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 14:16, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Corypepperdine (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 14:19, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 14:17, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Reasons for deletion request --Sumansahoo274 (talk) 15:29, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete The image mentioned in the header line is out of project scope. The other mentioned images do not exist. --Stefan2 (talk) 19:09, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 14:23, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
This is an ugly representation of Indian railways . Please delete this picture as it presents a doctored version of Indian railways to serve purpose of undermining this great system. 1.23.39.77 15:01, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: No valid reason for deletion. --Amitie 10g (talk) 18:04, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- Keep The file is used in 5 projects, so apparently it is not too ugly. EXIF data exists. Taivo (talk) 10:22, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept: file is in use. --Yasu (talk) 15:46, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
selbstdarstellung, keinen informationswert für eine enzyklopädie 217.255.154.236 17:21, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete This is clearly exhibitionism. It has nothing to do with sauna. This is an encyclopaedia, not a personal exhibition album. 82.53.106.217 13:03, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Out of scope file. Riley Huntley (talk) 22:53, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. -- Cirt (talk) 01:40, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
Does not appear to be public domain - rationale suggests misconception of what public domain is 86.140.116.7 00:50, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small size, uploader and author are different. "Subject of news story following Nationally televised discus win" is not a reason for public domain. Taivo (talk) 10:11, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
No proof this was published or even created 30 years ago. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:59, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- Info: Houshang Ostovar (هوشنگ_استوار) born in January 30, 1927 (9 Bahman, 1305) and seems average aged, but not more than 60 years old in the worst of cases (at 1986, he had 59 years old). But anyway proof of publication before 1986 is needed. --Amitie 10g (talk) 01:56, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, created on 1960s or 1970s. No publication data. Taivo (talk) 10:14, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
See [1] and [2]. -- Asclepias (talk) 03:23, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, all uploads of Beardog3 are copyright violations. Taivo (talk) 10:18, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:20, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:22, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Armin Torkzadeh (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://rahnava.ir/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/3pleunomts024abmqp2h.jpg.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:24, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
Appears to be a scan or other method of derivative work. No evidence of licensing for the original. BethNaught (talk) 18:54, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, bad quality, the uploader's only contribution. Copyvio. Taivo (talk) 10:28, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Ellin Beltz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Unlikely to be user's own work based on size, and blurryness. Claimed to be from 2016, most cameras nowdays provide metadata, and sharpness not seen in this image. Converting to DN as it's sat in Speedy for several days. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:10, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:30, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
Complex calligraphy, not own work, needs COM:OTRS or deletion. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:27, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, this is not a textlogo. Taivo (talk) 10:33, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
Image is only being used to disparage subject. No evidence that subject consented to image which looks to have been taken in a private area. CambridgeBayWeather Talk 22:14, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:43, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
Fair Use Logo of a presidential campaign that does meet the threshold of originality. William S. Saturn (talk) 19:42, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
- Keep A name, a slogan, five-pointed stars, bent bars. Not TOO. Spartan7W (talk) 23:29, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
I strongly doubt this 'arrangement' of simple shapes is not copyrightable. See Commons:Village_pump/Copyright#Ted_Cruz for other discussion. Reventtalk 05:39, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete I think, that red and white lines surpass threshold of originality. Uneven width, uneven curvature, white and red line are even not congruent (white line is thicker). Taivo (talk) 07:38, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- Keep The shapes are simple lines, which are below the threshold of originality. If you see this logo of Car Credit City:
you'll see logo with far more compound and complex curves and shapes which was denied copyright. The Huckabee lines are simple straight lines that have a contour. Everything else, stars and text, is clearly below threshold. Spartan7W (talk) 14:27, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- @Spartan7W: An arrangement of simple shapes can be original and copyrightable. In the case of the Car Credit City logo, the registration was denied because the logo was basically just a slightly stylized version of the letters 'CCC', and a typeface is explicitly not a subject of copyright. If you refer to the actual USCO ruling, the same 'CCC' logo, when combined with other material in a way IMO significantly less complex that the image here, was successfully registered. Reventtalk 14:07, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
- Exactly.--Elvey (talk) 07:49, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- @Spartan7W: An arrangement of simple shapes can be original and copyrightable. In the case of the Car Credit City logo, the registration was denied because the logo was basically just a slightly stylized version of the letters 'CCC', and a typeface is explicitly not a subject of copyright. If you refer to the actual USCO ruling, the same 'CCC' logo, when combined with other material in a way IMO significantly less complex that the image here, was successfully registered. Reventtalk 14:07, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and Taivo. --★ Poké95 04:30, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
- Keep per Spartan. There's really nothing original going into that logo. MB298 (talk) 17:36, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete COM:PRP is a lousy reason to delete this, but all the others are sound. As Nyttend said, PD-textlogo is just for...text. And PD-shape is just for basic, unoriginal geometric shapes. And fair use certainly isn't a reason to keep anything here; this is commons, and fair use is not considered here (but is fine at, e.g., en.wikipedia.org).--Elvey (talk) 07:49, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![86 File:"Похищение Вайды".jpg](#File:"Похищение_Вайды".jpg){kind=link}
vanadium.png){kind=link}
_jahn_cartre.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_2000.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![279 File:Логотип школы бизнеса "Синергия".png](#File:Логотип_школы_бизнеса_"Синергия".png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![20:47, 21 March 2016 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2016/03/21#c-Kinozavr-2016-03-21T20:47:00.000Z-File:"Похищение_Вайды".jpg){kind=link}
vanadium.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
vanadium.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
vanadium.png){kind=link}
vanadium.png){kind=link}
_jahn_cartre.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_jahn_cartre.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_jahn_cartre.jpg){kind=link}
_jahn_cartre.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Deleted: the arrangement is not simple and the result is a beautiful stylized logo, stylization impossible without an artistic and original touch = above TOO. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:21, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
copyright violation from http://kpop.asiachan.com/35874 EricEnfermero (talk) 06:17, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:23, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
No evidence the photo is licensed CC-BY-SA-4.0. The Website Terms & Conditions of Use page of the cited source site allows only "personal, non-commercial use." —teb728 t c 07:44, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: double copyvio, the photo and the poster in the photo. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:34, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ashenaye zaman
[edit]Here are last remaining contributions of Ashenaye zaman (talk · contribs):
- File:Golden Crown Team.JPG
- File:IIAF Golden Crown.jpg
- File:IIAF golden crown.jpg
- File:Out of split S.jpg
- File:Pulling up for roll.jpg
- File:Top of loop.JPG
Seems like own scan, but not own photo. Iran demands 30 years from publishing, so the photos can be in public domain, if publication data is given. Taivo (talk) 07:43, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, we need informations about the first publication to determine the copyright statut. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:31, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
Files of Hcertal Xuagram
[edit]Here are all contributions of Hcertal Xuagram (talk · contribs):
Out of project scope due to bad compositon. Small photos without metadata. Taivo (talk) 07:48, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:42, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Karlheinrichpasch (talk · contribs)
[edit]Modern art. I think painter identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.
- File:Wohlauf die Luft geht frisch und rein-Artist NairobiPrahl.jpg
- File:Tmp 12939-Wohlauf noch getrunken-802624842.jpg
- File:Wir haben Hunger-Artist NairobiPrahl.jpg
- File:Tmp 12939-Zu Lauterbach-Artist NairobiPrahl.jpg
- File:Tmp 5360-Als Adam hat gesündigt-1282688810.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Uploader Karlheinrichpasch (same as Nairobi Prahl) response: painter permission already sent to Commons:OTRS
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:15, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Karlheinrichpasch (talk · contribs)
[edit]This artist's name, Nairobi Prahl, has only 12 hits on Google, none of whom are this artist. As that indicates, there are no WP articles. We keep art only from notable artists -- all other art is out of scope.
-Artust_NairobiPrahl.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-Artist_NairobiPrahl.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
. Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:05, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
- Hi Mr. James Woodward.
- I am artist Nairobi Prahl, the same as Karl Heinrich Pasch, as demonstrated already. The twelve hits you found in internet are surely me, and I have more. Look "Artista Nairobi Mendez de Prahl", or "Artista Nairobi de Prahl" also. Mendez is my single name. I can prove it sending you copy of my DPI (Personal Identification Document) from Guatemala, or passport.
- I can prove you i am a known artist in Guatemala with pictures from Newspapers and Prices i have won, if you request me to.
- I can prove you the art i uploaded is mine, taking me a picture (a selfie if you wish) with me and my drawings and paintings, or i have pictures from the openings of my exhibitions with me and people from Guatemala with my art at the back.
- My intentions regarding to this paintings:
- I research and write books about folcloric music from Germany and Ucraine, and know lots about mexican or guatemalan folcloric music, so i want to write or translate lots of articles in the wikipedia that talk about this songs. I need the work I upload to illustrate to the spanish reader the meaning and feelings the songs intend to transmit. But writing is not as fast as imahe uploading, so if you give me the opportunity (one month) the first articles in the wikipedia will be published or translated.
- Of course there are thousands of songs, so it will need several years to be completed, but it is totally educational. Thanks Karlheinrichpasch (talk) 19:52, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Commons is not a promotion page for unknown or non-notable artists. The images contribute nothing educational to our project. The uploaders intention to contribute to Wikipedia is appreciated but it will not be rewarded with gratis server space and publicity here on Commons. --Martin H. (talk) 20:18, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
- Mr. Martin H. Mr. Woodward.
- I am not intending to promote my name or my art. My name will even not mentioned in the articles i am going to write. As i said, my intentions are ONLY educational.....not promote myself (I Repeat) because the :paintings illustrate the feeling of the song.
- Please give me the chance to demonstrate my point with an example. This week i will write an article about "mMagic Violin" in the spanish wikipedia (El violín Mágico (un pájaro se posó)-cancion ucraniana" an explanation of a ucranian folcloric song from 1971, and i couldn't find a painting in the wikimedia commons that can illustrate it. So first i write the article, then i upload the painting inspired on the song and then i attach to my article.
- My name not mentioned.....if i won't write my name....where is the promotion or pubñicity to me? And i am not unknown. People know me in Guatemala and other countries. Karlheinrichpasch (talk) 15:21, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Karlheinrichpasch (talk · contribs)
[edit]The description on the source site indicates that these images were probably taken in 1946, so it is impossible that the photographer has been dead for 70 years. The source site does not show any indication of a free license.
- File:Grupo Kalychina Estudiantes Madrid 1946.jpg
- File:Grupo Kalychina Estudiantes Ucranianos en Madrid 1946.jpg
. Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:10, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:09, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Karlheinrichpasch (talk · contribs)
[edit]Per https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Karlheinrichpasch these three files should also be deleted, they were uploaded after the prior discussions began.
- File:Tmp 4099-Сіла птаха білокрила (олія картина)-Artist NairobiPrahl.jpg
- File:Tmp 13509-violin magico 2.jpg
- File:Tmp 14662-el violin magico.jpg
-Artist_NairobiPrahl.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:15, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:50, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
No Freedom of Panorama in Saudi Arabian. The Makkah Royal Clock Tower Hotel is copyrighted by Dar Al-Handasah. Ras67 (talk) 23:04, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sreejith K (talk) 20:22, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
No Freedom of Panorama in Saudi Arabia. The Makkah Royal Clock Tower Hotel is copyrighted by Dar Al-Handasah. Ras67 (talk) 23:06, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sreejith K (talk) 20:21, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
No Freedom of Panorama in Saudi Arabia. The Makkah Royal Clock Tower Hotel is copyrighted by Dar Al-Handasah. Ras67 (talk) 23:07, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sreejith K (talk) 20:20, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No Freedom of Panorama in Saudi Arabia. The Makkah Royal Clock Tower Hotel is copyrighted by Dar Al-Handasah. Ras67 (talk) 23:07, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Sreejith K (talk) 20:21, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No Freedom of Panorama in Saudi Arabia. The Makkah Royal Clock Tower Hotel is copyrighted by Dar Al-Handasah. Ras67 (talk) 23:08, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sreejith K (talk) 20:30, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
No Freedom of Panorama in Saudi Arabia. The Makkah Royal Clock Tower Hotel is copyrighted by Dar Al-Handasah. Ras67 (talk) 23:09, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sreejith K (talk) 20:30, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
No Freedom of Panorama in Saudi Arabia. The Makkah Royal Clock Tower Hotel is copyrighted by Dar Al-Handasah. Ras67 (talk) 23:10, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sreejith K (talk) 20:22, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
No Freedom of Panorama in Saudi Arabia. The Makkah Royal Clock Tower Hotel is copyrighted by Dar Al-Handasah. Ras67 (talk) 23:10, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sreejith K (talk) 20:22, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
No Freedom of Panorama in Saudi Arabia. The Makkah Royal Clock Tower Hotel is copyrighted by Dar Al-Handasah. Ras67 (talk) 23:11, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sreejith K (talk) 20:28, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
No Freedom of Panorama in Saudi Arabia. The Makkah Royal Clock Tower Hotel is copyrighted by Dar Al-Handasah. Ras67 (talk) 23:12, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sreejith K (talk) 20:27, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
No Freedom of Panorama in Saudi Arabia. The Makkah Royal Clock Tower Hotel is copyrighted by Dar Al-Handasah. Ras67 (talk) 23:12, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sreejith K (talk) 20:27, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
No FOP in Saudi Arabia. 84.61.132.230 19:49, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
Kept: all possible FOP issues are DM Jcb (talk) 10:25, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
No Freedom of Panorama in Saudi Arabia. The Makkah Royal Clock Tower Hotel is copyrighted by Dar Al-Handasah. Ras67 (talk) 23:13, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Not de minimis. Previous decision to keep was wrong. Taivo (talk) 18:58, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sreejith K (talk) 20:29, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
No Freedom of Panorama in Saudi Arabia. The Makkah Royal Clock Tower Hotel is copyrighted by Dar Al-Handasah. Ras67 (talk) 23:14, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sreejith K (talk) 20:23, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
No Freedom of Panorama in Saudi Arabia. The Makkah Royal Clock Tower Hotel is copyrighted by Dar Al-Handasah. Ras67 (talk) 23:14, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sreejith K (talk) 20:23, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
No Freedom of Panorama in Saudi Arabian. The Makkah Royal Clock Tower Hotel is copyrighted by Dar Al-Handasah. Ras67 (talk) 23:02, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sreejith K (talk) 20:35, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
No Freedom of Panorama in Saudi Arabian. The Makkah Royal Clock Tower Hotel is copyrighted by Dar Al-Handasah. Ras67 (talk) 23:03, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sreejith K (talk) 20:33, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No Freedom of Panorama in Saudi Arabian. The Makkah Royal Clock Tower Hotel is copyrighted by Dar Al-Handasah. Ras67 (talk) 23:04, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Sreejith K (talk) 20:35, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No Freedom of Panorama in Saudi Arabia. The Makkah Royal Clock Tower Hotel is copyrighted by Dar Al-Handasah. Ras67 (talk) 23:05, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sreejith K (talk) 20:35, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
No Freedom of Panorama in Saudi Arabia. The Makkah Royal Clock Tower Hotel is copyrighted by Dar Al-Handasah. Ras67 (talk) 23:06, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sreejith K (talk) 20:35, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
No Freedom of Panorama in Saudi Arabia. The Makkah Royal Clock Tower Hotel is copyrighted by Dar Al-Handasah. Ras67 (talk) 23:08, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sreejith K (talk) 20:34, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
No Freedom of Panorama in Saudi Arabia. The Makkah Royal Clock Tower Hotel is copyrighted by Dar Al-Handasah. Ras67 (talk) 23:09, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sreejith K (talk) 20:34, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MavraW
[edit]Here are all contributions of MavraW. (talk · contribs):
Per description they are TV screenshots. Per username the uploader is not copyright holder, but depicted person. OTRS-permission from TV-show creator (TV-channel?) is needed. Taivo (talk) 07:57, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:34, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
Files of Collote1978
[edit]Here are last remaining uploads of Collote1978 (talk · contribs):
Humberto Andres Miranda is unknown to en.wiki and es.wiki. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 08:02, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, likely copyvio as well considering the various sizes and qualities. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:35, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Akshay kumar17
[edit]
Akshay kumar17 (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except userpage in sa.wiki and uploading two selfies, which are used nowhere, except on the userpage. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 08:06, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:39, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
Files of Navasudeen
[edit]Here are both contributions of Navasudeen (talk · contribs):
The photos are big and they have camera data, but due to bad quality I support deletion. Taivo (talk) 08:10, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: unused personal photos. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:38, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Advertisement for a pedo pornographic website (pornographic site for girls under 18, so minor girls) Civa (talk) 08:18, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:41, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files of Babashov
[edit]Here are last remaining contributions of Babashov (talk · contribs):
Small unused personal photos without metadata. Out of project scope. Also maybe not own work as claimed, but copyright violations. Taivo (talk) 08:18, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:42, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ActVikashsingh (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
- File:Actor Vikash singh Rajput.jpg
- File:Vikash singh Rajput.jpg
- File:Actor Vikash singh.jpg
- File:Vikasah singh rajput film industry.jpg
Ies (talk) 07:05, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 06:57, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ActVikashsingh (talk · contribs)
[edit]Here are last remaining contributions of ActVikashsingh (talk · contribs):
- File:Actor Bhushanpatiyal.jpg
- File:Actor vikash singh portfolio.jpg
- File:Actor Vikash singh Rajput.jpg
- File:Actor vikash singh rajput model actor film.jpg
- File:Actor Vikash singh Rajput My Life.jpg
- File:Casting Director Dhananjay Pandey.jpg
- File:Vikash singh rajput.jpg
- File:Vikash singh Rajput bollywood.jpg
- File:Vikash singh Rajput shooting.jpg
This is self-promotion campaign of non-notable Vikash Singh Rajput (no mention in en.wiki), out of project scope. All files are called selfies – they do not look like that. Only one file has camera data. Taivo (talk) 08:32, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete --Achim (talk) 18:47, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:47, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alexander Hessdoerfer
[edit]Here are last remaining contributions of Alexander Hessdoerfer (talk · contribs):
- File:ANTENNE DEUTSCHLAND MEDIAGROUP.png
- File:Logo ADINTERAKTIV.png
- File:Logo ANTENNE.png
- File:Logos GBC1.png
- File:SVR Logo.png
Unused simple logos of non-notable companies are out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 08:52, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:48, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Anna Tarabicos Moss
[edit]Here are all contributions of Anna Tarabicos Moss (talk · contribs):
- File:Annabw.jpg (480×649)
- File:Anna Tarabicos Moss Headshot.jpg (873×642)
- File:Anna Tarabicos Moss Mrs. Georgia.jpg (960×729)
- File:Anna Tarabicos Moss National Mrs.jpg (643×960)
- File:Hatheadshot Anna.jpg (960×960)
- File:Mrs. All Nations of Amercia National Titleholder 1996.jpg (960×710)
- File:Mrs. Georgia 1995.jpg (960×771)
- File:National Mrs. Titleholder Anna Tarabicos Moss.jpg (960×747)
First group. Small photos, not selfies as claimed. I suspect copyright violation of real photographers.
- File:Anna Tarabicos Moss.jpg (diploma)
- File:Anna Tarabicos Moss accomplishments.jpg (diploma)
- File:Anna Tarabicos Moss Awarsds.jpg (diploma)
- File:Anna Tarabicos Moss certifications.jpg (diploma)
- File:Anna Tarabicos Moss Mrs. America.jpg (diploma)
- File:Anna Tarabicos Moss Mrs. Pageants.jpg (diploma)
- File:Anna Tarabicos Moss Oprah.jpg (personal letter)
- File:Awards Anna Moss.jpg (diploma)
- File:BANNERTM.jpg (poster)
- File:Executive House Nanny.jpg (permission from Kristin Jeffries is needed)
- File:Pageantry Magazine.jpg (personal letter)
- File:Press Anna Tarabicos Moss.jpg (personal letter)
Second group. Personal documents, out of project scope, some can be copyright violations. Taivo (talk) 08:57, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: I've kept two of the claimed selfies which are not unlikely to be a selfie. The rest has been deleted per reasons given. --Basvb (talk) 20:47, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission.
Только простые логотипы могут быть в Викискладе без OTRS-разрешении. Taivo (talk) 09:13, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 20:47, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
Uploaded into Commons 3 weeks after uploaded here: http://trash-russia.com/sky-as-crown-beautiful-georgia-by-photographer-irma-sharikadze/ OTRS-permission from photographer Irma Sharikadze is needed. Taivo (talk) 09:20, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 20:47, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
Files of Gazimagomedov
[edit]Gazimagomedov (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:
- File:ГІадалло.jpg (207×362)
- File:ГІузаир Лабазанов.jpg (450×450)
- File:Людмила Казбекова и Абдулатипов.jpg (1600×1200)
- File:Муху Алиев и Магомедали Магомедов в с. Гимры 1997 год GR.png (1438×1078)
- File:СагІид Афанди.jpg (412×604, see https://vk.com/wall152291703?own=1&offset=3620 from December 2012)
- File:Хабиб Нурмагомедов.jpg (416×767)
- File:ХIабиб НурмухIамадов ГIалиев ХIасангун.jpg (1280×1280)
First group. Small photos without metadata, own work is in doubt, some can be found on external sites. I suspect copyright violation of real photographers.
- File:Гапцах.jpg (1200×900, license "© 2009-2015 г. Односельчане.ru Все права защищены" (All rights reserved) on source site)
- File:Диклосмта.jpg (603×354, license "© RuTraveller 2003-2016. Все права защищены" (All rights reserved) on source site)
- File:Mahach murtazaliev world champions wrestling baku.jpg (250×333, non-free license on bottom of source site)
Second group. Incorrect licenses on source sites.
Third group. There is freedom of panorama in Russia for architecture, but not for sculpture. Taivo (talk) 10:04, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: dubios uploads, are other files of the uploader Ok @Taivo: , there seem to be around 10 different camera's and File:Къеди (5).jpg was made when the user was only 8? It could be that the Nokia 701 files are correct, but the rest seems dubious. --Basvb (talk) 20:50, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files of Khwaja ibadullah arife
[edit]Here are all contributions of Khwaja ibadullah arife (talk · contribs):
Small unused personal photos without metadata, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:15, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 20:58, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
Hamidkhanak (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except user talkpage in en.wiki and uploading a small photo without metadata about himself, which is used nowhere, except on the talkpage. His only other edit was reverted as spam. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:20, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 20:58, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
Harshid7 (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except uploading a photo about himself into Commons and putting the photo on his userpage in en.wiki. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:23, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 20:58, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
Too blurry for real use, nothing irreplaceable. Taivo (talk) 11:49, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 20:58, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 21:03, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 21:03, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://photocdn.sohu.com/20160104/Img433366310.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 21:03, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by CambridgeBayWeather as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: From http://www.srisankaratv.com/ Quite a simple logo which might be below TOO. BrightRaven (talk) 14:48, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Worth discussing, but in my opinion not simple. Taivo (talk) 09:46, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: incorrect attribution anyhow. --Basvb (talk) 21:04, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by CambridgeBayWeather as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: From http://www.sankaradevelopers.com/ Quite a simple logo which might be below TOO. BrightRaven (talk) 14:48, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Worth discussing, but in my opinion not simple. Taivo (talk) 09:48, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: not own work. --Basvb (talk) 21:04, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by CambridgeBayWeather as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: From http://www.srisankaramatrimony.com/ Quite a simple logo which might be below TOO. BrightRaven (talk) 14:49, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Worth discussing, but in my opinion not simple. Taivo (talk) 09:47, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: not own work. --Basvb (talk) 21:04, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
low resolution CHOKRA LOVES YOU 22:47, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Media related to notable artist en:Chokra. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 10:55, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Author has requested content be removed. Courtesy CHOKRA CHOKRA 14:58, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- Keep, see rationale from previous DR. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 21:54, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete, considering (as indicated) "Photo by Warra Hugh" and previously published via (example) http://contemporaryperformance.org/photo/chokra-bond-on-blonde (07.2012, "Added by CHOKRA on July 6, 2012 at 5:04pm", credit: " Photo by Warra Hugh") = http://api.ning.com/files/g6BzoZUAqBz7g5SSYOfBkjHMj9mCPs6GHVCNeB9k6LW49frF9e*AcpnDdxsDOg2MbK9aaQvczA-5nIHkw4nVgHiRB4jkksVM/414672_349197415116898_1974620744_o1.jpg = https://www.facebook.com/chokralovesyou/photos/a.183436248359683.32414.183435495026425/349197415116898/?type=1&theater (04.2012), needing permission Gunnex (talk) 10:39, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: needs permission. --Basvb (talk) 21:06, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
copyright concern Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 15:26, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Derivative work of probably copyrighted images about horse, horseshoe and boot. But the mathematical puzzle is good, I solved it. Taivo (talk) 10:30, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 21:06, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
copyright concern Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 15:26, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 21:07, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
Misrepresentation. This is not the South Azerbaijan flag, which has more areas of colour and no suggestion of a tear in the flag. Sminthopsis84 (talk) 15:40, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 21:08, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Anarkoiris (talk · contribs)
[edit]All the files have the same watermark and come from the same blog/web site. There is no permissions. Exemple File:Hostal-1.jpg come from [3]
- File:Iglesia-alcohuaz.jpg
- File:Hostal-1.jpg
- File:Horcon.jpg
- File:Flora-valle-elqui.jpg
- File:Escalera elqui.jpg
- File:Casa baqueano.jpg
- File:Cerro-elqui.jpg
- File:Cancana.jpg
- File:Calle-alcohuaz.jpg
- File:Cabalgatas-elqui.jpg
- File:Bioluz-1.jpg
- File:Alcohuaz-observatorio.jpg
- File:Bioluz.jpg
Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:02, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete all. Watermarks spoil everything. Taivo (talk) 09:45, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: We need permission via COM:OTRS. --Basvb (talk) 21:11, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Miesiąc as Copyvio (copyvio), but no reason was given. Converting to DN for explanation/consensus. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:11, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete The image appears in something which looks like advertisements.[4][5][6][7] I presume that this means that the image is a copyright violation of someone else's picture. --Stefan2 (talk) 20:30, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
![[4]](https://www.google.se/imgres?imgurl=http://www.ticketpro.pl/public/24/f7/16/1770097_1142769_ticketpro_glowna.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.ticketpro.pl/jnp/muzyka/1770070-adam-strug.html&h=360&w=360&tbnid=tjlb4G04ajLr0M&tbnh=225&tbnw=225&usg=__pUxzHgvO6cbDD66RlrILfFF8wPA=&docid=S64t6aGZloxQUM){kind=link}
![[5]](https://www.google.se/imgres?imgurl=http://stodola.pl/admin/model/class/upload/kofs_a09f3dddd255c1b263824d30a30015b22875678430.jpg&imgrefurl=https://stodola.pl/news-98952-Adam_Strug_17_marca_wystapi_na_Open_Stage_.htm&h=517&w=904&tbnid=DQ0q2th_whU8vM&tbnh=170&tbnw=297&usg=__xwvzk-aDdLAJHg21dRg5mp1-RJ0=&docid=ttyzi-OhL4vIfM){kind=link}
![[6]](https://www.google.se/imgres?imgurl=http://www.eventim.pl/obj/media/PL-eventim/teaser/222x222/2016/adam-strug-222.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.eventim.pl/adam-strug-bilety-warszawa.html?affiliate=PLE&doc=artistPages/tickets&fun=artist&action=tickets&key=1578461$7296742&h=222&w=222&tbnid=nXU_U14HrDFREM&tbnh=177&tbnw=177&usg=__oiUOZs9pROIo0sS8iiqC0yQofsw=&docid=_nMmQmxrY67W9M){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 21:12, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work, shows beauty queen and certificate, small size, low quality and no metadata make this like a COM:COPYVIO as with uploader's other contributions. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:15, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
It is my own photo - I am Clark's mother and I took the photo myself. Please do not remove photo. - TurtelBunny4
- Did you create the certificate? Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:29, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- Hmm, IMO there isn't anything copyrightable in the actual image of the certificate. --Túrelio (talk) 20:17, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- @TurtelBunny4, if you shot the photo by yourself, wouldn't the author-credit better be "Ginger L Davis" ? --Túrelio (talk) 20:19, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept: certificate is de minimis. --Basvb (talk) 21:13, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
Depicted certificate is not own work of uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:23, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 21:13, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
COM:VANDALISM, source link goes to porn. site (NSFW link). Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:25, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- Keep But the file is nevertheless used in 3 projects, making the file in scope. Taivo (talk) 10:16, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
- Comment We have a much better replacement image - like File:Rey Alfonso XIII de España, by Kaulak.jpg . Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:59, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
- Comment I replaced the two public page uses of the image; the third one was on a protected user page and I was unable to make the change to the better file. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:05, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: with the current incorrect attribution it is not useful. --Basvb (talk) 21:14, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
per Commons:Freedom of panorama#United Arab Emirates - modern building in Dubai INeverCry 19:36, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 21:14, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
It seems unlikely that this in motion biking shot could have been taken by the bicyclist, yet that is what is claimed on this upload template. This user uploaded only photographs of this cyclist, all passed as own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:08, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: we need permission from the photographer/copyright owner. Please see Com:OTRS. --Basvb (talk) 21:16, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 18:21, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:50, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal images, out of COM:SCOPE.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:19, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Depicted man is notable and the files are used in mainspace, but they are small photos without metadata, claimed to be a selfies – do not look like that. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 17:03, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: we need some more evidence that these are not copyvios. --Basvb (talk) 21:10, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
File:San Francisco, California from San Francisco International Airport, California (10753982923).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
uploader request - very low quality photo of SF skyline, which is a well-covered subject here INeverCry 22:44, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 21:18, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
This is Apple's rendering of the "pile of poop" emoji (browser rendering: 💩). It's clearly not own work and it' slightly doubtful Apple have licensed their emoji set. BethNaught (talk) 07:57, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 16:06, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
selbstdarstellung 217.255.154.236 12:01, 7 March 2016 (UTC) It has to be cancelled, because is exhibitionism, nothing to do with sauna.
It has to be cancelled because is clearly exhibitionism, nothing to do with the explanation of correct usage of sauna. 82.53.106.217 12:45, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
It has to be cancelled, because is exhibitionism. It has nothing to do with explaining the correct use of sauna 82.53.106.217 12:47, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:15, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
Image available at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g291Yt_yvLM since May 2011 in the video uploaded by one Navnit Patel. A possibly wrong claim of ownership here by a user with a famous username who may not be same as the youtube uploader. Rahul Bott (talk) 05:28, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, next time please give a timestamp on the video. --Basvb (talk) 18:00, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
Files of Cirlincione
[edit]Cirlincione (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:
Copyrighted packaging. Taivo (talk) 07:53, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 18:00, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
Obviously a studio portrait. On "Authors" en.wikipedia user page supposed author claims to be the subject of the photo, an obvious incongruity John from Idegon (talk) 08:07, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: needs OTRS. --Basvb (talk) 18:01, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Arfcskn
[edit]Arfcskn (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:
- File:Integrations Schleusse.jpg
- File:Integromat.jpg
- File:Kanakmän.jpg
- File:Tagebuch eines Skinheads in Istanbul.jpg
I suspect, that they are not own work as claimed, but work of de:Mussin Omurca (still living). Taivo (talk) 08:13, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 18:01, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
Personal image ; No notability ; No use ; this photo is the only upload of the user. Civa (talk) 08:19, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Big photo with camera data. Maybe usable as stock photo. Taivo (talk) 20:41, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
- Comment No use ! There are already many photos of nice men and boys, for example in Category:Male models or Category:Models (people) and their subcategories. --Civa (talk) 12:20, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept: extensive categorisation and good quality make it in scope. --Basvb (talk) 18:02, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
How can a license tag "author's life plus 70 years or less." apply, when the is claimed to be not known??? More good research has to be done, otherwise this assumption " I cannot find the photographer's identity, so it's PD" is ridiculous. 217.94.108.213 08:35, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- Keep For postcards it's quite easy to determine, is it anonymous or not. I changed license into Anonymous-EU. Taivo (talk) 20:52, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Basvb (talk) 18:44, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
_2000.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2000.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The painter, Steven Aalders, is alive. Even if simple, I think his paintings are copyrightable. Dutch FOP does not cover museum interiors. BrightRaven (talk) 10:19, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
_2000.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 18:45, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
_2000.jpg){kind=link}
- File:Malin Levanon 2015.jpg
- File:Malin Levanon in 2015.jpg (both pictures by user FrankieF)
The subject (possibly her representative) has expressed her dislike of the pictures at sv:Talk:Malin Levanon. Her opinion, with which I agree, is that the snapshots were taken while the subject was talking and that the face is distorted. Another free picture of about the same technical quality has been supplied: File:Malin Levanon at the Lights Award by Lea Buragiewicz.jpg. While we are never obliged to delete pictures on request of the subjects, I suggest in this case we do so per Commons:Photographs of identifiable people#Removal requests and Commons:Courtesy deletions. /NH (talk) 06:28, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- Objectivity comes on wikipedia - not subjective opinions
If an image is deleted from the Wikimedia Commons it must be of obvious reasons. It doesn´t in the case of File:Malin Levanon 2015.jpg. The criticism that "it is taken in the middle of a sentence and generally unprofessional" is a remarkable statement. Technically there is nothing wrong in the picture. And I always upload images that may not affront or insult the person. File:Malin Levanon 2015.jpg is, in my opinion, a most vivid and positive image of an active and committed person. She exudes vitality, commitment and female strength.
Wikipedia can not transfer to the public figures to subjectively feel that they "do not look good" in some images and thereby control the image perception of the world's largest encyclopedia. It would create an unhealthy practice and open mass nominations and erasures on purely subjective grounds.
In the case of the criticized picture there is nothing in it that can render a deletion. Not a glance or anything else in the appearance. And technically it fulfills by far the basic requirements for wp.
See also a clearer explanation in swedish at sv:Talk:Malin Levanon.
/ With best wiki-greeting --FrankieF (talk) 03:05, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
- In both pictures – especially the first – the face is distorted, probably because the exposure was made while the subject was talking. Press photographers often manage to get good pictures under such circumstances --- it is a matter of timing and prediction. These two pictures are not so good examples, and I think most professional photographers would have discarded them. Besides I also feel some aversion to the large microphone (what is that doing there?). Now that we have a good substitution and the subject has requested the pictures to be removed, I see no reason to keep. /NH (talk) 08:51, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
- It seems to me, that file:Malin Levanon at the Lights Award by Lea Buragiewicz.jpg is significantly better photo than those nominated for deletion. But the nominated photos are also used in multiple projects and cannot be deleted on any other reason except copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 20:27, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, 1/ the photos does not make affront and don't insult the person 2/there is currently no evidence the requester at sv wiki has a connection with the people in the image, we are in Commons, and request by external peoples should be send via OTRS to verify the validity of the request, although this is not a guarantee that the deletion will be accepted. Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:45, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Aniseseed
[edit]Here are last remaining contributions of Aniseseed (talk · contribs):
- File:Marcos mentioned in the United Nation's Anti-Corruption Took Kit.jpg
- File:Transparency International citing Sunday Mail.jpg
- File:Transparency International CNN and Time.jpg
- File:UN's only source for Marcos.jpg
- File:WORLD BANK EK EK.jpg
- File:World Bank sources from anti-Marcos, Aquino government.jpg
- File:World Bank sources on Marcos 2.jpg
World Bank and UNO documents are not own work. Probably copyright violations. Taivo (talk) 07:29, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, the content is not own work, lacks of sources to determine the copyright statut. Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:08, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No COM:FOP#France. According to French law, it is not allowed to publish picture whose the main subject is an original creation until 70 years after the death of its author. Unless prior authorization by the author or his heirs ; the sculpture of a pig was made by the belgian artist Win Delvoye. The picture was taken in 2010. Civa (talk) 08:25, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, the artist is alive, and the subject not DM. Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:10, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No COM:FOP#France. According to French law, it is not allowed to publish picture whose the main subject is an original creation until 70 years after the death of its author. Unless prior authorization by the author or his heirs. The present photo is obviously an original and artistic glass sculpture. Civa (talk) 08:27, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:12, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files of Parchme
[edit]Here are last remaining contributions of Parchme (talk · contribs):
- File:Actor and model Rollin Jarrett.jpg (1491×1881)
- File:Actor, model Rollin Jarrett.jpg (1694×1397)
- File:Actor Rollin Jarrett.jpg (1697×2333)
- File:Actor writer Rollin Jarrett.jpg (5250×3547)
- File:Amber Smith, Rollin Jarrett, Brian Austin Green.jpg (1154×788)
- File:John Travolta, Rollin Jarrett.jpg (904×697)
- File:Model Rollin Jarrett.jpg (1697×1957)
- File:President of Panama with writer Rollin Jarrett.jpg (784×1189)
- File:Rollin Jarrett.JPG (1243×1101, the only with camera data)
- File:Rollin Jarrett 1995.jpg (1698×1984)
- File:Rolllin Jarrett.jpg (3523×5267)
All his uploads are about en:Rolling Jarrett, all claimed own work. How (s)he could take photos about president of Panama? Usually no camera data exists. Probably not own work, but own scans. OTRS-permission from real photographers are needed. Taivo (talk) 08:42, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, more than the half are scanned images. Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:22, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
This image is under a CC-NC license[8] on the Flickr account MedPix. As Flickr no longer provides the upload-date to Flickr (only the shot-date), this does not necessarily prove that our file is a copyvio. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:09, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: no evidence fhe license was ok at the time of the upload here. Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:24, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pierluigi Secondi (talk · contribs)
[edit]In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Italy. These are the work of sculptor Felicetto Giuliante (1885-1961). They will be under copyright until 1/1/2032. They cannot be kept on Commons without a free license from his heirs via OTRS.
. Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:21, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:26, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
files of Venezolananatural
[edit]Venezolanonatural (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:
- File:CatalinaVallejos.jpg (261×572)
- File:CataVallejos.jpg (284×540)
- File:CorridaEvento.jpg (459×235)
- File:DiscoCalle7.jpg (500×333, camera Canon EOS 50D)
- File:KarenPaola.jpg (720×540)
- File:KarenPaola1.jpg (539×438)
- File:KarenPaola2.jpg (155×413)
- File:Maite-Laura-Cata.jpg (480×360)
- File:Maitemall.JPG (373×535)
- File:MaiteOrsini.jpg (200×267)
- File:PanchoYMargarita.jpg (397×480)
- File:PhilippeTrillat.jpg (200×472)
- File:Vale Ortega.jpg (240×644)
- File:ValeriaOrtega.jpg (720×540)
- File:VRoth.jpg (210×548)
Small photos without metadata, probably not own work, but copyright violations. The user has uploaded a lot of copyright violatios (look archive of his/her talk page).Taivo (talk) 10:29, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, although the images are old I managed to find some previous publications. Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:40, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused personal photograph Olivier (talk) 15:51, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:02, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Inferior duplicate of File:Verwaltungsgliederung Österreichs.svg per lang switch ↔ User: Perhelion 22:03, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
- Perhelion Inferior duplicate ? I'm sorry, I don't mind deleting this one, but would you mind correcting your French version before ("villes statutaires", not "statutairest") ? Thank you, Treehill (fr) 20:42, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 09:22, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
No confidence that this image is user's own work, looks more like it was culled from the internet and trimmed from an original. If the uploader is the performer, note that this is not a selfie, photographer's release is needed. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:40, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 09:48, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
Files of Jonadabsmith
[edit]Jonadabsmith (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:
- File:Alex-Nieora addresses London Students for Britain.jpg (768×1024)
- File:Ealing.jpg (640×360, see http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-london-22277664 )
- File:London Students canvassing at Vote Leave HQ.jpg (960×540)
- File:Nash-Jones outside ZIm embassy.png (517×372, see http://toryofthepeople.com/tag/migration/ )
- File:Phil Sheppard.jpg (320×320, see http://loobobilly.blogspot.com.ee/2015/11/newsyoure-making-fools-of-yourself.html)
- File:Steve Baker campaigning for Vote Leave.jpg (600×450, see https://twitter.com/SteveBakerHW/status/699984432791449600 )
- File:The Great Brexit Debate.jpg (960×720)
- File:UCL street campaign.jpg (1224×1012)
Small photos without metadata, some are found on external sites. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 08:25, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete all per nom. Uploader has stated[9] that he is actually not the person named as "source" in the image descriptions. DMacks (talk) 13:43, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 09:50, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
Files of user:Abrete
[edit]Here are all contributions of Abrete (talk · contribs):
- File:Aracnídeo da Fauna de Invertebrados do Parque das Dunas.jpg
- File:Dunas parque.jpg
- File:Lavadeira De Deus( Fluvicola nengeta).jpg
- File:Lavadeira De Deus( Fluvicola nengeta) 2.jpg
- File:Vegetação de Dunas.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
This is routine request for small photos without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photos are so small? Can you upload bigger versions, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload versions with EXIF data? Can you describe the files correctly? Taivo (talk) 10:21, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 09:51, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
Files of Rraza97
[edit]Here are last remaining contributions of Rraza97 (talk · contribs):
- File:Chhapra Junction.jpg (1280×960, camera Hitachi DZ-MV780E)
- File:Coast of Ghaghra River.jpg (690×1230)
- File:Control Room of Sonepur Fair.jpg (720×540)
- File:Holy Cross Church of Chhapra.jpg (720×431)
- File:One of the Gate of Sonepur Fair.jpg (720×648)
- File:Rajendra Nagar Terminal Central View.jpg (737×491)
- File:Rajendra Nagar Terminal Helicopter View.jpg (640×242)
- File:Sonepur Cattle Fair.jpg (649×298)
- File:Sonepur Station.jpeg (400×300)
- File:Thana Chowk of Chhapra.jpg (2448×3264, camera Samsung GT-I9300I)
This is routine request for small photos without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photos are so small? Can you upload bigger versions, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload versions with EXIF data? Can you categorize the files correctly? Taivo (talk) 10:44, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 09:52, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
personality rights violation Sebari (talk) 12:27, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: No valid reason for deletion. --Amitie 10g (talk) 13:38, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. If the person in the forefront was clearly awake, then it would be different. Green Giant (talk) 09:55, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
copivio from https://maps.yandex.ru/ Dima st bk (talk) 12:42, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 09:57, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
copivio from https://maps.yandex.ru/ Dima st bk (talk) 12:42, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 09:57, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
copivio from https://maps.yandex.ru/ Dima st bk (talk) 12:42, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 09:57, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Suman pokhrel (talk · contribs)
[edit]Modern art. I think painter identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.
- File:Yewati 04.jpg
- File:Mother and Child 08.jpg
- File:Mother and Child 07.jpg
- File:Patience (धैर्य).jpg
- File:Nareedeep (नारीदीप).jpg
- File:Cover of Shoonya MutuKo DhadkanBhitra.jpg
- File:Cover of Hazaar Aankhaa Yee AankhaaMa.JPG
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:12, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:43, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Suman pokhrel (talk · contribs)
[edit]IN each case, the uploader tells us that these are studio portraits from a family album and that the family owns the copyright. That is unlikely once and nearly impossible three times. I think we need to see the written license from the photographers via OTRS.
. Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:31, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 10:02, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as imho potentially non-free content, as imho a photograph of a third-party-work, and missing EXIF data, Roland zh (talk) 18:46, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 10:01, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
Ошибка при оформлении лицензии. Kinozavr (talk) 20:46, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (uploader request). Green Giant (talk) 10:06, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
According to the EXIF, the photographer is "Niv Shimon (Craft7 Studio) 052-6565865" and even the uploader admitted the picture was taken from the entertainer's publicity profile (according to what was mentioned in the article in he.wiki). No OTRS release approval has been received - it has no place in the Commons. Ldorfman (talk) 23:19, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 10:09, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
looks like copyright protected content – whatever map this is Albinfo (talk) 23:43, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 10:10, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
Files of AbominableHommeDesNeiges (talk · contribs)
[edit]Hi,
- File:Logo_CroisiEurope.jpg as a corporate logo
- all other AbominableHommeDesNeiges' contributions are coming from croisitek.croisieurope.com (see user admission).
- File:MS-Camargue - ©Haubtmann1.jpg is obviously copyrighted
- File:MS Loire Princesse-©Bernard Biger.jpg too
- As told in Commons:Deletion requests/File:RV-Indochine.jpg, no licence is available outside croisitek.croisieurope.com but considering the false declaration of source and being the author, and the two copyrights above, all files might be deleted.
Thank you for your attention, --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 23:29, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- I've asked to CroisiEurope if their Croisitek licence is compatible with https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/deed.fr
- This is the reply from a CroisiEurope Service Communication attendant:
- "Pouvez-vous m’envoyer les conditions complètes de votre licence en français ?
- Pour l’instant je ne donne aucune autorisation pour l’utilisation des visuels de notre Croisitek."
- ("Can you send me complete licence conditions in French?
- At the moment I dont give autorisation for the use of our Croisitek visuals.")
- --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 11:24, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
- @Green Giant: I meant absolutely every file in https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/AbominableHommeDesNeiges&limit=500
- Do I have to list them all here?
- Regards, --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 15:11, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
- @Green Giant: thank you. --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 19:10, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 10:11, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
- All deleted per request by Lacrymocéphale. Green Giant (talk) 16:56, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
Datei wird auf keiner Seite verwendet, wurde durch die Neukonstruktion File:01-Dreizehneck-3.svg ersetzt Petrus3743 (talk) 23:56, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Different construction, potentially useful. --Storkk (talk) 09:52, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
Wird auf keiner Seite verwendet. Wurde durch dei Neukonstruktion File:01-Dreizehneck-3-1.svg ersetzt. Petrus3743 (talk) 00:00, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Different construction, potentially useful. --Storkk (talk) 09:52, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE, personal. The person is a minor. -- Steinsplitter (talk) 19:42, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- what is wrong with this? its an example of what an app does
@Steinsplitter: He's 17.... Thursby16 (talk) 18:36, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
- Comment The file is used in en.wiki, so in scope. Taivo (talk) 10:39, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
- Keep used in enwiki, so in scope. --★ Poké95 06:13, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
- In this case I would mostly be concerned with personality rights. Is the uploader the depicted person or is this another person? In the latter case has this person given permission for this images' release? Basvb (talk) 21:15, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Jcb (talk) 22:05, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
Logo under free license Bilderling (talk) 10:26, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
![10:26, 21 March 2016 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2016/03/21#c-Bilderling-2016-03-21T10:26:00.000Z-File:Логотип_школы_бизнеса_"Синергия".png){kind=link}
- Comment Source site has unfree license "© 1988-2015. Школа Бизнеса «СИНЕРГИЯ»." Taivo (talk) 21:07, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:48, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
![21:48, 23 April 2016 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2016/03/21#c-Jcb-2016-04-23T21:48:00.000Z-File:Логотип_школы_бизнеса_"Синергия".png){kind=link}
Bismillah Khan photos
[edit]- File:Bismillah Khan and nazim hussain.jpg
- File:Ustad Bismillah Khan and nazim hussain.jpg
- File:Khan.jpg
- File:Nazim hussain.jpg
- File:Krishan ballesh.JPG
Dubious claim of own work, obviously professional photos. Hekerui (talk) 12:11, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per above; except File:Krishan ballesh.JPG which seems genuine. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:28, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Krishnaballesh has uploaded a lot of photos and this is the only taken with Nikon D90. Taivo (talk) 08:59, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:49, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Rough language and doesn`t contribute to much Lars Krogh Berg (hvalrossforlag) (talk) 14:09, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
-2016-03-21T14:09:00.000Z-File:Cyberhell-1.jpg){kind=link}
- Comment Uploader's request one month after uploading. The quality is really bad, but the file is nevertheless used in bar.wiki and therefore useful. Taivo (talk) 09:24, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per uploader's request. Not really useful for anyone. Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 13:55, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Jcb (talk) 21:50, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
doesn't appear useful or encyclopedic. Although it is used, it probably shouldn't be. Jon Kolbert (talk) 08:25, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:46, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Unused inferior version of [[File:Verwaltungsgliederung Österreichs.svg|lang=eo]] per SVG lang switch. ↔ User: Perhelion 22:15, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
![[[File:Verwaltungsgliederung Österreichs.svg|lang=eo]]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Verwaltungsgliederung_%C3%96sterreichs.svg?lang=eo){kind=link}
- Keep Language is different. Taivo (talk) 19:23, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
- No it's in. I've corrected the link. (As you can read there. There are many files deleted before with exact same issue) But I wondering that the language selection don't work anymore on the filedesc. But anyway, I've nothing against rational reasons. ↔ User: Perhelion 00:56, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept: not exact duplicates. --Jcb (talk) 14:11, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
copyright concern: commercial logo Olivier (talk) 15:58, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Could be below the TOO (not sure). If that is the case I will happily (well actually not that happily) fix the attribution as it is in use. Basvb (talk) 21:09, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept: with PD-textlogo. --Jcb (talk) 12:23, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Author has requested content be removed CHOKRA LOVES YOU 22:49, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Media related to notable artist en:Chokra. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 10:55, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Author has requested content be removed. CHOKRA 14:57, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- Keep, see rationale from previous DR. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 21:53, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
- Do we know whether the uploader is actually the author and thus whether this file is validly released? Basvb (talk) 21:05, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept: deletion after author request will normally be done if this request is within a few days, not after several years - to uploader: don't nominate the file for deletion again if you can't provide a valid rationale - to colleagues: feel free to tag as {no permission} if you feel there is a permission problem. --Jcb (talk) 16:32, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Author has requested removal of their work as they have not authorized permission for their artwork to appear under creative commons. The request appears after few years, since image has not been use in the article for notable artist en:Chokra since 2012 CHOKRA 02:54, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 08:02, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Author has requested content be removed CHOKRA LOVES YOU 22:48, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Media related to notable artist en:Chokra. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 10:55, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Author has requested content be removed, Image copyright CHOKRA. CHOKRA 14:58, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- Keep, see rationale from previous DR. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 21:54, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept: deletion after author request will normally be done if this request is within a few days, not after several years. --Jcb (talk) 16:30, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Author has request this content be removed as it does not constitute as creative commons. The image is not being used as media for the notable artist CHORKA CHOKRA 02:48, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 08:03, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Should be fair use - this will be copyrighted in its home country, the United Kingdom Cloudbound (talk) 20:18, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- Above the TOO in the UK? --Amitie 10g (talk) 22:08, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept: with {{PD-textlogo}}. --Jcb (talk) 22:36, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by JeanBono as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Recent building, no FoP in France
Converted by me to DR to allow for discussion. IMO, there is too little from the actual building to see in this photo to be a problem. -- Túrelio (talk) 21:14, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per Túrelio. --Jcb (talk) 22:35, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
We don't have any templates which state that works published by the state of South Carolina are public domain, except the Manual on Uniform Control Traffic Devices ({{PD-MUTCD-SC}}).
However, this image on Wikipedia quotes this text:
| “ | The State Library of South Carolina in a Statement of Rights, opined that, "Records, documents and information made available by the agencies of South Carolina state government or its subdivisions are the property of the people of the state of South Carolina. Therefore, the South Carolina State Library considers these items to be in the public domain according to US copyright law."South Carolina State Library "[10]" | ” |
- I uploaded it, being fairly ignorant about this stuff and not knowing whether it would fly. But, to my understanding, the North Charleston Police Department (the copyright owner in this case) is no more a part of the South Carolina government than South Carolina is part of the federal government. What SC says about public domain would therefore seem irrelevant, and we have no strict basis for this image. That said, images produced by local law enforcement jurisdictions in the U.S. are routinely included and accepted in my experience. Mandruss (talk) 02:19, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- Mandruss What do you mean "routinely included and accepted"? This seems like the work of an organization which does not release content into the public domain. Blue Rasberry (talk) 13:13, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
- Bluerasberry - What I meant was that I have run across other cases of images from US local LE that had been uploaded and included months or years prior, with no explicit PD basis from that specific jurisdiction. As I said, I'm fairly ignorant about this area, and I mimicked existing examples to do something that I felt improved an article (and still do). Several more knowledgeable editors were present at the article when the image was added and gave it their tacit approval. But if it violates Wikipedia policy, so be it. If the image is removed from that article, the image of the other individual (the person this person shot and killed) will also have to be removed per NPOV, despite its clear PD status as a product of the US government. Mandruss (talk) 13:45, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
- Mandruss There are options for keeping this picture. There is a lot of jargon in Wikimedia projects, though, and it is required that when pictures are shared they are categorized with the right jargon.
- Work by the US Federal Government is in the public domain; work by any local government in the US (state or city) almost never is. The default assumption should be that any photos by local law enforcement are copyrighted by that law enforcement office, so have to be treated like any other non-free content. I am not sure what other cases you are seeing of uploads of photos to Commons from local LE offices. I am not aware of any LE office doing this, but if you have seen one, I would be curious to see it. You talked about the person shot - I see no reason to remove that one, if en:File:Shooting_of_Walter_Scott.jpeg is it. That is tagged as non-free, hosted on English Wikipedia and not Commons, and is low resolution so anyone wanting to reuse it would need to go to the source for a good copy. How familiar are you with en:Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria, and the differences between what Commons can host versus what has to be stored in a restricted way on English Wikipedia as fair use? If this photo of the officer is not free content, it still may be included in that Wikipedia article as non-free fair use, but only if it stored in English Wikipedia and not Wikimedia Commons.
- Would it be helpful for me to talk you through any part of this? Do you see anything that I am missing here, or can you share more information about any similar photos that are free? I am not sure what you might have seen that was free on Commons. Thanks. Blue Rasberry (talk) 12:50, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- Bluerasberry - What I meant was that I have run across other cases of images from US local LE that had been uploaded and included months or years prior, with no explicit PD basis from that specific jurisdiction. As I said, I'm fairly ignorant about this area, and I mimicked existing examples to do something that I felt improved an article (and still do). Several more knowledgeable editors were present at the article when the image was added and gave it their tacit approval. But if it violates Wikipedia policy, so be it. If the image is removed from that article, the image of the other individual (the person this person shot and killed) will also have to be removed per NPOV, despite its clear PD status as a product of the US government. Mandruss (talk) 13:45, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
- Mandruss What do you mean "routinely included and accepted"? This seems like the work of an organization which does not release content into the public domain. Blue Rasberry (talk) 13:13, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
- Keep In my understanding a work made by an agency of the South Carolina state government is in PD [11] and [12], then an image owned by this police, that seems to be a governmental agency, should be ok but the current PD license tag is indeed not the good one. Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:29, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
- Comment: based on a couple of images from police departments that were debated over the last couple of years, my understanding is that this is a confusing and difficult situation. Such images are usually released into the public record but this is not necessarily the same thing as being released into the public domain. I recall having an OTRS conversation with a police spokesperson last year about a photo of someone who was charged with a felony. They said that the image was made available to the public for law enforcement purposes but refused to say whether anyone could re-use it for any purpose. There is no harm in contacting the relevant police department to see if they could clarify the issue. I do however agree that the police department is an agency of the state government because local governments in South Carolina exist at the whim of the state legislature, even the ones that have home rule. Green Giant (talk) 09:45, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: this is not a 'raffic control device design', not information, not a document, this is a picture. It has remained unclear whether a picture taken by the NC police, would be PD. No evidence of permission. --Jcb (talk) 16:16, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
Some of these may be "own work" as claimed, but most of them are obviously not, so "Assume Good Faith" no longer applies.
- File:Sir Edward Bullock.1.JPG
- File:Faulkbourne Hall.JPG
- File:Faulkbourne Hall (2).JPG
- File:Faulkbourn Hall 1817.jpg
- File:Sir Christopher Bullock.jpg
- File:Henry Lupton.jpg
- File:Geoffrey Lupton.jpg
- File:Monument Colonel John Bullock d. 1809.jpg
- File:John Bullock d. 1740 Monument by Peter Scheemaker 1765 Faulkbourne.jpg
- File:Walter Trevelyan Bullock.jpg
- File:Josiah Bullock d. 1751 Monument Faulkbourne.jpg
- File:Faulkbourne Hall c. 1900.jpg
- File:Walter Llewellyn Bullock.jpg
- File:Sir Edward Bullock Monument Faulkbourne.jpg
- File:Colonel John Bullock.jpg
- File:John Bullock Monument Faulkbourne2.jpg
- File:John Bullock Monument Faulkbourne1.jpg
- File:John Bullock Monument Faulkbourne.jpg
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
. Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:59, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- All of them seem to be derivatives and the derivative is own work, so the ones concerning objects which can be photographed (PD or FOP) are ok. The 2d reproductions should list their PD status, but it seems that some are likely PD. Basvb (talk) 21:01, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
These are obviously not "own work" as claimed. Individual representations of coats of arms have their own copyrights (See COM:COA), so while these arms are old, the representations shown here may or may be under copyright if they were created by persons who died after 1946.
- File:Bullock grant of arms 1602.JPG
- File:Arms of Bullock 1602.JPG
- File:Arms - Bullock and Watson 1810.JPG
- File:Jonathan Josiah Christopher Bullock - Arms.jpg
- File:Arms of Sir Edward Bullock 1602.jpg
- File:Grant of arms to Sir Edward Bullock 1602.jpg
. Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:04, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- These are all own work reproductions/derivatives of PD-works. Basvb (talk) 21:02, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: most per nomination and kept some with PD-old. --Jcb (talk) 16:26, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
Escudio APF logos
[edit]
The above seem to be non-free copyvios of the logo found at apf.org.py, but would like the opinions of others. If they are too simple to be eligible for copyrgiht protection, then I'm also not sure if these should be licensed as "own work", even if they are user recreations. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:40, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept with PD-simple - Jcb (talk) 16:06, 26 April 2016 (UTC)