Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/02/24
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_artist_depiction.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Growth_Hormone_bound_to_Growth_Hormone_Binding_Protein.png){kind=link}
_wersja_"EKO".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
- File:Los cuatro fantasticos.jpg
- File:Elgoibar.jpg
- File:Pol pol.jpg
- Doubtful author, not-notable image. Upload by user for speedy deleted article. Look like files that are downloaded from the Internet, because they have lower resolution, no exif data. Art-top (talk) 15:28, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
- See also: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Pol Pol.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Red kids.jpg. --Art-top (talk) 15:34, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: by Jameslwoodward. Yann (talk) 21:49, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
wrong picture Contact.iuac (talk) 05:37, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
- Above is an author request. Failed DR. --XXN, 16:34, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: unused image, author request, some open questions from the last DR. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 04:53, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE, unused personal photo. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:27, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Denniss (talk) 09:24, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
not own work; similar image here Biplab Anand (Talk) 08:35, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Denniss (talk) 09:38, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused file, private image BrightRaven (talk) 09:41, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Denniss (talk) 09:50, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused file, private image BrightRaven (talk) 09:42, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Denniss (talk) 09:50, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused file, private image BrightRaven (talk) 09:43, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Denniss (talk) 09:51, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Merci de supprimer l'ancienne version Vanden02 (talk) 15:48, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 17:01, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
File page without a file Smjg (talk) 18:35, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: File page with no file. --Achim (talk) 19:04, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
wrong picture Contact.iuac (talk) 05:31, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request, small photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 19:14, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
copyvio: screenshot http://www.nickelodeon.nl/shows/2794-wits-academie Kattenkruid (talk) 00:22, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Érico: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing
I uploaded this postcard, falsely thinking Picasso is still PD by time .. no he is not dead for 70 years, i recognized shortly after.
But eventually there could something make the item free? i) no ToO? ii) published before 1923? --Itu (talk) 05:49, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: See the note at Category:Pablo Picasso. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:00, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
File page without a file Smjg (talk) 18:35, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Taivo: File page with no file uploaded
Delete unable to verify image copyright status after searching the Flickr source, the Flickr account, Flickr in general and tineye find nothing either. Ww2censor (talk) 22:25, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
- It's in this URL:Female model Xenia Deli.jpg, where I found it, as stated in the photo. --Odysses (talk) 23:12, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete The source is a flickrwashing account. Maybe it can be added to a blacklist. --Leoboudv (talk) 03:45, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, per Leoboudv. Taivo (talk) 21:24, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
Urheberrecht unklar Elmar Nolte (talk) 09:13, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:51, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Eisenhuettenstadt aufbau bsg.png Commons:Deletion requests/File:Eisenhuettenstadt aufbau bsd.png
The page in which this image was used was deleted for being inappropriate. This image must be deleted. Wikieditorarg (talk) 21:34, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: vandalism. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:51, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
Small size, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 10:10, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Natuur12: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - Using VisualFileChange.
Promotional content outside of Commons' project scope (and not an appropriate use of PDF). —LX (talk, contribs) 23:02, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
File has originally been imported from a Wikia wiki, however the original there has no licencing, permission or source information. There might be a chance that the file is actually freely licenced, which is why the file should go through a DR rather than be speedily deleted. odder (talk) 11:29, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: clear copyright violation. --JuTa 19:47, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
This low level resolution is not desired by the artist - please remove it - there is a higher resolution already in the uploads. Webmeister1 (talk) 21:36, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: no license at all. --JuTa 04:20, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
This file was erroneously entered. Was unable to delete it myself. Please, do so. Thank you so much. Sincerely DM DanMarcal (talk) 16:36, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
- DR refers to File:R.B. Roberts - National Spokesman - HGRBS.jpg which is already filed. --Achim (talk) 12:20, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Removed erroneously created DR. --Achim (talk) 12:20, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE, personal shot. Note: Commons is not Facebook. -- Túrelio (talk) 16:01, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Hystrix: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ssddfcx.jpg: Out of COM:SCOPE, personal shot. Note: Commons is not Facebook. --
personal photo Nullzero (talk) 17:48, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Hystrix: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Fffgghj.jpg: personal photo
Incompatible License: CC-BY-NC-ND-2.0. --sasha (krassotkin) 13:26, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
- Господин (krassotkin), есть ли возможность сохранить эту фотографию? Я же указал все необходимые ссылки из сайта Flickr (Farid Aliyev)
- @Farid Aliyev: Русский: Лицензия должна быть CC-BY или CC-BY-SA. Тогда возможно. Об этом можно договориться с автором на Flickr.English: The license should be CC-BY or CC-BY-SA. You can negotiate about it with the author on Flickr.--sasha (krassotkin) 17:15, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
- Господин (krassotkin), я знаю, эта не моя картина, но мне она очень понравилась, но как с автором договорится, может поможете? (Farid Aliyev)
- @Farid Aliyev:
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:44, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
low quality, superceded Rettinghaus (talk) 09:34, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete; speedy delete as lower resolution duplicate of File:Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach.jpg -FastilyClone (talk) 09:14, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:55, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. IT-related uploads from 2015, used for user space in thwiki, most likely all files grabbed from Internet. See also COM:AN#flood of IT-related copyvios
- File:Asdsaasd.jpg
- File:Weqewq.jpg
- File:Vhjfjhgjg.jpg
- File:63830ef66.jpg
- File:Wsdfsdf.jpg
- File:6383033d0.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 08:25, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:46, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Google search image link Biplab Anand (Talk) 08:36, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: complex logos need a permission from the author or right owner. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:48, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ภัทรานิษฐ์ รอดกริช (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. IT-related uploads from 2015, used for user space in thwiki, most likely all files grabbed from Internet. See also COM:AN#flood of IT-related copyvios
- File:Clip image026.gif
- File:Sendatastar.jpg
- File:แบบบัส.gif
- File:Imageเปรียบเทียบ.png
- File:Articles subcat img22 137.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 09:00, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:50, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nipapron.ph (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. IT-related uploads from 2015, used for user space in thwiki, most likely all files grabbed from Internet. See also COM:AN#flood of IT-related copyvios
Gunnex (talk) 09:03, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:51, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mos Suttipong (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. IT-related uploads from 2015, used for user space in thwiki, most likely all files grabbed from Internet. See also COM:AN#flood of IT-related copyvios
Gunnex (talk) 09:06, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:51, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nattikan.ki (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. IT-related uploads from 2015, used for user space in thwiki, most likely all files grabbed from Internet. See also COM:AN#flood of IT-related copyvios
Gunnex (talk) 09:08, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Info See related DR's here. Gunnex (talk) 09:20, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:54, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by นฤเบศร์ แจ่มใส (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. IT-related uploads from 2015, used for user space in thwiki, most likely all files grabbed from Internet. See also COM:AN#flood of IT-related copyvios.
- Info See related DR's here. Gunnex (talk) 09:20, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Gunnex (talk) 09:20, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:57, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sanchaitangaon (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. IT-related uploads from 2015, used for user space in thwiki, most likely all files grabbed from Internet. See also COM:AN#flood of IT-related copyvios.
- Info See related DR's here.
Gunnex (talk) 09:24, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:58, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
cover picture of magazine, need OTRS-permission Motopark (talk) 09:24, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:59, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. IT-related uploads from 2015, used for user space in thwiki, most likely all files grabbed from Internet. See also COM:AN#flood of IT-related copyvios.
- Info See related DR's here.
- File:38ppppp.gif
- File:Network-08.gif
- File:Network-02.gif
- File:Network-03.gif
- File:Network-01.gif
- File:Securing-shopping.png
- File:Vulnerability-assessment.png
- File:Cloud-computing.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 09:30, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:02, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Small size, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 10:10, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination http://www.cmiusa.org/html/members.php?alpha=p. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:03, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Small size, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 10:10, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination http://www.liscom.org/dynamicsList.php. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:04, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Small size, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 10:18, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination http://www.kksss.org/patron.php. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:05, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Conference poster - if uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS Storkk (talk) 10:36, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:04, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:37, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:05, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Small filesize, no metadata: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 10:37, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:07, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata, probable studio portrait: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 10:37, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination http://www.nakaharaku.com/about/. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:08, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Pure black photograph, not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:40, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:07, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Letterboxed derivative of poster. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 10:41, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:10, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Suwimon bunmak (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. IT-related uploads from 2015, used for user space in thwiki, most likely all files grabbed from Internet. See also COM:AN#flood of IT-related copyvios.
- Info See related DR's here.
Gunnex (talk) 11:57, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:13, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jato Ehijator (talk · contribs)
[edit]Obviously a non-notable personality.
Robert Weemeyer (talk) 12:13, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination out of scope : unused personal images / no quite notable people. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:19, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Image is out of scope. No description, no categorisation, no usage, no clarity to how it fits our educative purpose — billinghurst sDrewth 12:20, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: there is a description (at right in arabic) however as per google search it is unlikely an own work. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:18, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Maxlife~trwiki (talk · contribs)
[edit]Probable copyvio: Uploaded low resolution versions of professional photographs from various sources as "own work".
- File:Atılgan.jpg
- File:Koral*.jpg
- File:Koral-.jpg see [1]
- File:Koral.jpg
- File:Kobra .jpg
- File:Altay tankı.jpg
- File:Otokar Altay Arazi Sürüş Testleri.jpg see [2]
![[1]](http://images.google.fr/imgres?imgurl=http://savunmaveteknoloji.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/cdqlfdrumaatwmoszu78_zpsyg6rwhbv.jpg&imgrefurl=http://savunmaveteknoloji.com/koral-sistemi-tskya-teslim-edildi/&h=762&w=1023&tbnid=84fBasiYcoGJ9M&tbnh=194&tbnw=260&usg=__90-1LN1YoRoTkv17Sk_AeX9E5js=&docid=2Zi9ul4JNgANKM){kind=link}
Sitacuisses (talk) 12:58, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, copyvios from internent, I added 2 exemples above. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:23, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Image source does not match image. I don't see whence the image might have come. czar 00:36, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Hi, I have corrected the source link. The image is licensed as CC BY 2.0. FlickrWarrior (talk) 11:41, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination nice, thanks czar 14:47, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Nomination withdrawn. --Riley Huntley (talk) 09:36, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
_artist_depiction.jpg){kind=link}
_artist_depiction.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
- kvçe'tirkiç 80.8.137.211 08
- 07, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Speedy keep: Just vandalism. --Amitie 10g (talk) 11:41, 24 February 2016 (UTC)- Speedy keep: vandalism. --Julien1978 (d.) 13:47, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
_artist_depiction.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Riley Huntley (talk) 09:36, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
_artist_depiction.jpg){kind=link}
{{superceded|Faustina Bordoni by Nazari.jpg}} Rettinghaus (talk) 11:56, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete; Speedy Delete as a lower res duplicate of File:Faustina Bordoni by Nazari.jpg -FastilyClone (talk) 09:12, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:Túrelio. --Riley Huntley (talk) 09:37, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
See COM:AN#flood of IT-related copyvios.
See also:
-- Ahecht (talk) 15:57, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:Túrelio. --Riley Huntley (talk) 09:37, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bussadarat (talk · contribs)
[edit]These images appear to be unused personal images that cannot be realistically useful for an educational purpose (see COM:SELFIE).
Ahecht (talk) 16:07, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:Hystrix. --Riley Huntley (talk) 09:38, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
richtig kat ist Graben von Stein, diese ist leer Hannes 24 (talk) 20:58, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:Túrelio. --Riley Huntley (talk) 09:38, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
No educational value, unused and unusable. Out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:38, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:37, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pikipiki~commonswiki 1
[edit]Text only docs, out of scope.
- File:Какова задолжность.jpg
- File:Каков лицевой счет.jpg
- File:49. Заседание май 2004.jpg
- File:48. Почта России.jpg
- File:45. Письменная угроза ФСБ.jpg
- File:47. Сообщение из администрации президента России 22.01.2013.jpg
- File:44. Великая цель.jpg
- File:42. Судилище 17 03 2003 военное 3.jpg
- File:41. Судилище 17 03 2003 военное 2.jpg
- File:43. Судилище 17 03 2003 военное 4.jpg
- File:40. Судилище 17 03 2003 военное 1.jpg
- File:38. Судилище 17 03 2003 граждантское 1.jpg
- File:39. Судилище 17 03 2003 граждантское 2.jpg
- File:37. предложение выселения семьи из пяти человек.jpg
- File:30.2. Копия свидетельство о госуд регистр.jpg
- File:30.3. Копия свидетельство о госуд регистр.jpg
- File:30.1. Выписки из Единого государственного реестра № 261612012 970.jpg
- File:28-1. Прокурорская проверка лист 1.jpg
- File:28-1. Прокурорская проверка лист 2.jpg
- File:21. Анапской межрайонной прокуратуры 180105 №819.jpg
- File:18. справки Департамента имущ отношений Краснод края от 09.08.2008 года № 6477.jpg
- File:16.3 Кассационное определение Краснодарского краевого суда от 20.07.2004 г.jpg
- File:17. справка Департамента имущ отношений Краснод края от 13.10.2003 года № 0210-15906.jpg
- File:10. акт сверки взаиморасчетов по квартплате кв. Горбуновой Л.П.jpg
- File:16.2 Кассационное определение Краснодарского краевого суда от 20.07.2004 г.jpg
- File:16.1 Кассационное определение Краснодарского краевого суда от 20.07.2004 г..jpg
- File:08. Горбунов И.И..jpg
- File:04. архивная выписка от 10.10.2011 г. № 510-2330.jpg
- File:06. архивная выписка из протокола № 9 от 08.06.1977 г.jpg
- File:05. архивная выписка № 369.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:44, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:36, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
unused personal pictures.
- File:Solo mike metz.jpg
- File:Mike Metz solo.jpg
- File:Senior Pic.jpg
- File:Slim Shady.jpg
- File:Metz Chef Hat 2.jpg
- File:Mikey Metz.jpg
- File:Metz and Matt.jpg
Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:13, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:37, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:38, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gemellodiverso (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Maximo foto cover.jpg
- File:Festival del Cinema di Salerno 2007.jpg
- File:COVER MAXIMO DE MARCO.jpg
- File:CavalloD'ARGENTO RAI.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:38, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:38, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:38, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:38, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:38, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:38, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:38, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:38, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://yt3.ggpht.com/-k6CysSAGp8g/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/DfhNLAXIKg8/s900-c-k-no/photo.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:38, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like www.eleccionesenperu.com/imagenes/informacion/politicos/imagen-nano-guerra-garcia.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:39, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Wipicorazón (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal images, out of project scope.
- File:WIPI Y GRACE.jpg
- File:Wipi rumbo a ECUADOR.jpg
- File:Wipi vargas.jpg
- File:Wipi.jpg
- File:Siempre igual, nadie igual.jpg
— TintoMeches, 15:56, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:39, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by TCD assessoria (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
- File:Feliph Ferreira Bailarino.jpg
- File:Feliph Ferreira Ator e Dançarino.jpg
- File:Feliph Ferreira Dançarino.jpg
- File:Feliph Ferreira Dançando.JPG
- File:Feliph Ferreira.jpg
INeverCry 21:23, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:40, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 21:24, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:40, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 21:26, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:40, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 21:27, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:40, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE, unused personal photo of non-notable person. -- Túrelio (talk) 21:30, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:40, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE, unused personal photo of non-notable persons. -- Túrelio (talk) 21:30, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:40, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 21:41, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:40, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE, unused, badly photoshopped, low-res image. Not of any use. -- Túrelio (talk) 21:42, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:40, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sudhasakthi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal image and drawing
INeverCry 21:47, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:40, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Miguel aching (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal/promotional images/logos
- File:5to El Juicio FINAL.jpg
- File:Fuera del planeta - 4to 2008 2.JPG
- File:4ta AREA Company- San Juan.png
- File:2do Y el concurso de Danzas 2006.png
- File:Vivo en el Limbo BONUS FILM - 4to 2008.jpg
- File:Poster San JUan - 4to 2008.JPG
- File:Incomplete 1 - 5to Juicio FINAL.jpg
- File:Sol playa y arena - 5to Juicio FINAL.jpg
- File:Juicio FInal.png
INeverCry 21:50, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:40, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 21:56, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:41, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 21:59, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:41, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope INeverCry 22:03, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:41, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:05, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:41, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused low quality image of group of unknown/non-notable people INeverCry 22:07, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:41, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:07, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:41, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
advertisement Thatonewikiguy (talk) 22:08, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:41, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope INeverCry 22:08, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:41, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Museochaco (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope
INeverCry 22:09, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:41, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:29, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:48, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Prashantjoshi1988 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal images.
- File:Prashant Joshi ......9.jpg
- File:Prashant Joshi ......8.jpg
- File:Prashant Joshi .....7.jpg
- File:Prashant Joshi ....6.jpg
- File:Prashant Joshi ...5.jpg
- File:Prashant Joshi ..3.jpg
- File:Prashant Joshi ...4.jpg
- File:Prashant Joshi.jpg
- File:Prashant Joshi .2.jpg
- File:Prashant Joshi 1.jpg
Ahecht (talk) 16:02, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:30, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:31, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:30, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:31, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:30, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by CommonerFox (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal/promotional images of non-notable musician/performer
- File:Oliver Fox 8.jpg
- File:Oliver Fox 7.jpg
- File:Oliver Fox 6.jpg
- File:Oliver Fox 5.jpg
- File:Oliver Fox 4.jpg
- File:Oliver Fox 3.jpg
- File:Oliver Fox Saxophone.jpg
- File:Oliver Fox and Past Mr South Carolinas.jpg
- File:Oliver Fox 2.jpg
- File:Oliver Fox 1.jpg
INeverCry 22:36, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:30, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:40, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:31, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:41, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:31, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:42, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:31, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:45, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:31, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:45, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:31, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:47, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:31, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:48, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:31, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:48, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:31, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:50, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:31, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:53, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:31, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:55, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:31, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope INeverCry 22:56, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:31, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:02, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:31, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work' as p.e. thumbnail format and missing exif, as well as media not in use within Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 01:40, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: likely copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:50, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Derivative work, includes a company's logo and trademarking —Ryūlóng (竜龙) 04:08, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: likely copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:50, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
out of scope, del on DE Nolispanmo 08:14, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:51, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
no use, out of scope Stolbovsky (talk) 08:19, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:52, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
not own work; see here Biplab Anand (Talk) 09:15, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: likely copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:54, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
keine Panoramafreiheit in Marokko Ralf Roleček 18:07, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:21, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:16, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: an no license at all. --JuTa 19:32, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:17, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: and no license at all. --JuTa 19:27, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:19, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: and no license at all. --JuTa 19:23, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:35, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
- IMHO below TOO. Comments? --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:36, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: still no license at all. --JuTa 19:45, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:44, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
- Below TOO IMHO. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:45, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: still no license at all. --JuTa 19:46, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: an no license at all. --JuTa 19:45, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Diyar Muhammed (talk · contribs)
[edit]All of these works have been tagged {{PD-IRAQ}}, which requires that the work was published more than fifty years ago and that the work was anonymous. There is no proof of publication and while the author may be unknown, there is no proof that he was anonymous.
- File:Kurdish poet - Keyfi (1814-1883).jpg
- File:Kurdish writer - Muhammed Amin Zeki Beg.jpg
- File:Nali - Kurdish poet.jpg
- File:Mahwi - Kurdish poet and writer.jpg
- File:Goran - Kurdish poet and writer.jpg
- File:Qani - Kurdish poet.jpg
- File:Edmonz Farewell party in Sulaymaniyah city, Kurdistan, Iraq supervised by Sheikh Mahmud Barzanji in 1945.jpg
- File:Kurdish poet Piramerd, young age.jpg
- File:Kurdish poet Piramerd.JPG
- File:Kurdish poet Piramerd celebrating Kurdish year Newroz.jpg
- File:Sheikh Mahmud Barzanji (Hafid).jpg
- File:Kurdish writer Tofiq wahbi.jpg
- File:Mullah Mustafa Barzani portrait.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
. Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:57, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
What proof is needed? All of these photos are 50 years old and until now no one has claimed to be the author of these photos. Right now they are in public domain. We need these photos to use them in the history of Kurdistan and Kurdish people. Please tell me what do I need to know about them. Jim Thanks. --Diyar Muhammed (talk) 18:54, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
- It is unfortunate that there are many old photos that we would like to have for use on WP that we cannot keep because we do not know enough about them. These probably fall into that class. It is up to you to prove that they are PD, probably by showing that they were published before 1966. In each case, we will need the name of the publication and the date. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:12, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Delete "20th century" is not enough to prove {{PD-Iraq}}. File:Piramerd - Kurdish Poet and Writer.jpg will be affected. I think all images uploaded by this user should be deleted because Diyar Muhammed is the SOCK of Diyar se. What do you think Mr. Hedwig in Washington ? Takabeg (talk) 08:44, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Per Jim and Takabeg. Sock blocked. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:51, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Jamj2000. IT-related uploads (drawings/photos/symbols/logos/screenshots/etc.) , uploaded since 2014, most likely all files grabbed from Internet. Used for a es.wikibook. Ignoring some files wich may in PD by other means.
- File:Campo 802.1q.jpg
- File:Balanceador HAProxy.png
- File:Balanceo 2 líneas de Internet.png
- File:Balanceador de carga.png
- File:Squid + Dansguardian.png
- File:Firefox - Configuración de proxy.png
- File:Zenmap (front-end para nmap).png
- File:Nmap -sS 192.168.1.1 (Sondeo de puertos abiertos).png
- File:Netstat -punta (Linux).png
- File:Netstat -na (Windows).png
- File:Man nmap (Página de manual de nmap en Linux).png
- File:Cortafuegos o Firewall.png
- File:Cortafuegos con DMZ.png
- File:Puertos - Varias conexiones.png
- File:Puertos - 1 conexión.png
- File:PAT - Paquete en la red pública.png
- File:PAT - Paquete en la red privada.png
- File:Conexion-puertos.png
- File:Capas TCP-IP.png
- File:Encaminamiento - Esquema para ejercicio 12.png
- File:Encaminamiento - Esquema para ejercicio 11.png
- File:Encaminamiento - Esquema para ejercicio 10.png
- File:Encaminamiento - Esquema para ejercicio 7.png
- File:Encaminamiento - Esquema para ejercicio 8.png
- File:Encaminamiento - Esquema para ejercicio 6.png
- File:Encaminamiento - Esquema para ejercicio 5.png
- File:Encaminamiento - Esquema para ejercicio 4.png
- File:TeEncaminamiento - Esquema para ejercicio 3.png
- File:Encaminamiento - Esquema para ejercicio 1.png
- File:Encaminamiento - Esquema para ejercicio 2.png
- File:Encaminamiento - Esquema para ejercicio 9.png
- File:Relaciones entre Sistemas Autónomos.png
- File:Jerarquía de Internet.png
- File:Esquema de Sistemas Autónomos.png
- File:Esquema de routers A-H.png
- File:Protocolos interiores y exteriores.png
- File:Clasificación de los protocolos de encaminamiento dinámico distribuido.png
- File:Clasificación y evolución de los protocolos de encaminamiento.png
- File:Esquemas de ruteo.jpg
- File:Esquema Internet-Intranet.png
- File:Logotipo Linux.png
- File:Mapa de Registradores de Internet Regionales.png
- File:Logos de ICANN e IANA.png
- File:Tipos de memorias en un router.jpg
- File:Interfaces de un router.jpg
- File:Encaminadores de la marca Alcatel-Lucent.jpg
- File:Cabecera IPv6.jpg
- File:Esquema de PING en 2 redes.jpg
- File:Esquema de PING en una red.jpg
- File:Esquema de 3 redes con MTU.jpg
- File:Esquema de PING en una red de redes.jpg
- File:Esquema de red de ISP.jpg
- File:Esquema de red pública y red privada.jpg
- File:Tamaño de clases de IPv4.jpg
- File:Reparto IPv4.jpg
- File:Esquema de 3 redes.jpg
- File:RIR - Registradores de Internet Regionales.png
- File:ICANN - Logo.png
- File:Router - Niveles OSI asociados.png
- File:Traceroute visual.png
- File:3GPP - Grupos regionales de estándares.png
- File:Capas 802.11.png
- File:VLAN - Esquema con enlaces troncales.jpg
- File:VLAN - Trunk.jpg
- File:VLAN - Esquema.jpg
- File:VLAN - Enlace troncal.jpg
- File:VLAN - Puertos.jpg
- File:3 VLANs con agregación de enlaces troncales.png
- File:3 VLANs con agregación de enlaces.png
- File:3 VLANs unidas a través de un router.png
- File:3 VLANs en un switch.png
- File:Punto de acceso - Modo puente.jpg
- File:Punto de acceso - Modo repetidor.jpg
- File:Punto de acceso - Modo normal.jpg
- File:Tipos de celdas según su tamaño.png
- File:Supernetting - Esquema 1 sin resolver.jpg
- File:Supernetting - Esquema 4.jpg
- File:Supernetting - Esquema 3.jpg
- File:Supernetting - Esquema 2.jpg
- File:Supernetting - Esquema 1 resuelto.jpg
- File:Supernetting - Tabla 1.png
- File:Subnetting - Esquema.jpg
- File:Supernetting - Tabla 3.png
- File:Subnetting - Tabla.png
- File:Router 4G portable.jpg
- File:ONT - Terminal de Red Óptica.jpg
- File:ADSL - Esquema con splitter.png
- File:ADSL - Elementos.png
- File:ADSL - Esquema con microfiltros.png
- File:ADSL - Esquema con microfiltro.png
- File:FTTx.png
- File:Wi-Fi certified.jpg
- File:Wireless router - LEDs.jpg
- File:Red Infraestructura.jpg
- File:Nodo oculto.jpg
- File:Red Ad Hoc.jpg
- File:Wimax Logo.png
- File:Access Point - Channel select.png
- File:3GPP vs 3GPP2.png
- File:Antena de array.jpg
- File:Antena plana.jpg
- File:Antena de apertura.jpg
- File:Antena de hilo.jpg
- File:Antenas - Diagramas de radiación.jpg
- File:WPS Logo.jpg
- File:WPS Button 2.jpg
- File:WPS Button 1.jpg
- File:Tecnologías inalámbricas - Comparativa.jpg
- File:Manejo de desechos electrónicos.jpg
- File:Material electrónico.jpg
- File:Colores de contenedores de reciclaje.jpg
- File:Logos CE.jpg
- File:Networld.png
- File:Tarjeta red BNC RJ45.jpg
- File:Cable rollover.jpg
- File:Ethernet - Segmentos.jpg
- File:Ethernet 1.png
- File:Etherchannel - Ejemplo.jpg
- File:Agregación de enlaces.jpg
- File:STP - Algoritmo.jpg
- File:STP - Enlaces redundantes.jpg
- File:Adaptador serie-USB.jpg
- File:Cable rollover con extremo serie.jpg
- File:Adaptador RJ45-Serie.jpg
- File:Cable rollover - Conexión.jpg
- File:Cable rollover - Esquema.jpg
- File:Enlace - Switch - Puertos - Ejemplo.jpg
- File:Normas 568 A y B.png
- File:Enlace - Switch - Puertos.png
- File:Cable recto y cruzado.jpg
- File:Distribución de switches.jpg
- File:Enlace - Switch apilable (Maestro y Backup).jpg
- File:Enlace - Icono switch de distribución.png
- File:Enlace - Switch apilable frontal y trasero.jpg
- File:Enlace - Transceptor CFP.jpg
- File:Enlace - Transceptores SFP (2).jpg
- File:Enlace - Transceptores SFP (1).jpg
- File:Enlace - Módulos Switch (2).jpg
- File:Enlace - Módulos Switch (1).jpg
- File:Enlace - Switch modular.jpg
- File:Enlace - Switch compacto.jpg
- File:Enlace - Uplink.jpg
- File:Enlace - Puentes.jpg
- File:Ethernet - Dominios de difusión y de colisión.jpg
- File:Ethernet - Dominios de colisión.jpg
- File:Control de errores - ARQ con rechazo selectivo.jpg
- File:Control de errores - ARQ con vuelta atrás N.jpg
- File:Control de errores - ARQ con parada y espera.jpg
- File:Flujo - Ventana deslizante.jpg
- File:Flujo - Parada y espera.jpg
- File:Transmisión de paquetes.jpg
- File:Varios canales de voz.png
- File:Multiplexación por frecuencia.png
- File:Multiplexación por tiempo.png
- File:MUX-DEMUX.png
- File:CRC.png
- File:Ethernet 2.jpg
- File:Modelo OSI y Arquitectura TCP-IP.png
- File:PDU TCP-IP.png
- File:TCP-IP Capas.png
- File:Icono Tarjeta red.png
- File:Icono Switch.png
- File:Icono Router.png
- File:Red local simple.png
- File:Icono Repetidor.png
- File:Red local DMZ.png
- File:Red local 2 zonas.png
- File:Red difusion.png
- File:Red conmutada.png
- File:Icono Puente.png
- File:PDU OSI.png
- File:Icono Hub.png
- File:Equipos terminales.png
- File:Equipos intermedios.png
- File:TCP-IP Protocolos.png
- File:Hilos par trenzado.png
- File:Hilos fibra óptica.png
- File:SCE verificación 4.jpg
- File:Rack medidas.png
- File:SCE verificación 3.jpg
- File:SCE verificación 2.jpg
- File:SCE verificación 1.jpg
- File:Norma 606 etiquetado 4.jpg
- File:Norma 606 etiquetado 3.jpg
- File:Norma 606 etiquetado 2.jpg
- File:Norma 606 etiquetado 1.png
- File:RJ45 hembra 3.jpg
- File:SCE distribuidores.jpg
- File:RJ45 hembra 2.jpg
- File:RJ45 hembra 1.jpg
- File:SCE conexión cruzada.jpg
- File:Bandeja colgante 1.jpg
- File:SCE interconexión.jpg
- File:SCE conexión directa.jpg
- File:Paneles de parcheo.jpg
- File:Panel de parcheo.jpg
- File:SCE estructura 2.jpg
- File:SCE cableado horizontal.jpg
- File:Armario rack.jpg
- File:SCE estructura 1.jpg
- File:Bandeja colgante 2.jpg
- File:Falso techo 1.jpg
- File:Falso techo 2.jpg
- File:Falso suelo 2.jpg
- File:Falso suelo 1.jpg
- File:Canaletas empalmes.jpg
- File:Fibra óptica acopladores.jpg
- File:Canaletas.jpg
- File:Conector LC partes.jpg
- File:Conector SC partes.jpg
- File:Conector ST partes.jpg
- File:Conector FC partes.jpg
- File:Conector FC.jpg
- File:Conector SC.jpg
- File:Conector ST.jpg
- File:Fibra óptica colores 2.jpg
- File:Fibra óptica colores 1.jpg
- File:Fibra óptica distancias.png
- File:Fibra óptica grosor.jpg
- File:Fibra óptica bobinas.jpg
- File:Par trenzado recomendaciones.jpg
- File:Conector TERA.jpg
- File:Conector GG45.jpg
- File:SCE jerarquía 2.jpg
- File:Conectores RJ45.jpg
- File:Norma 568.jpg
- File:SCE gráfico 2.jpg
- File:SCE jerarquía 1.jpg
- File:SCE gráfico 1.jpg
- File:Cable coaxial.jpg
- File:Satelites orbitas.jpg
- File:Satelites comunicaciones.jpg
- File:RJ45 normas.jpg
- File:RJ45 pines.jpg
- File:Fibra optica tipos.png
- File:Fibra optica partes.jpg
- File:Fibra optica conectores tipos.jpg
- File:Fibra optica conectores1.jpg
- File:Fibra optica2.jpg
- File:Fibra optica1.jpg
- File:Espectro luz visible.jpg
- File:Espectro electromagnetico.jpg
- File:Coaxial con conector BNC.jpg
- File:Terminador BNC.jpg
- File:Conector BNC-T.jpg
- File:Extensor BNC.jpg
- File:Conexión BNC.png
- File:Terminal BNC.jpg
- File:Par utp.png
- File:Par ftp.png
- File:Par stp.png
- File:Conversor Analógico-Digital.png
- File:Par sstp.png
- File:Utp.png
- File:Pares numerados.jpg
- File:Icono switch.jpg
- File:Icono servidor.jpg
- File:Icono router.jpg
- File:Icono repetidor.jpg
- File:Icono red.jpg
- File:Icono pc.jpg
- File:Icono impresora.jpg
- File:Icono hub.jpg
- File:Sutp.png
- File:Espectro frecuencias.jpg
- File:Switch-router.png
- File:Modelo comunicaciones.png
- File:World network.png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Gunnex (talk) 08:45, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 12:27, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
falsch hochgeladen, sorry Willi Precht (talk) 13:02, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 12:33, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Because the name doesn't correspond to the image. ChiaraS91 (talk) 13:18, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 12:33, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
this is inappropriate Queryzo (talk) 14:37, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Oppose No valid reason for deletion. --Jklamo (talk) 22:08, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: obviously in COM:SCOPE. --A.Savin 12:35, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://i.imgur.com/fgwnKqU.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:16, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 12:36, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 12:36, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 12:37, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 12:37, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 12:37, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
To jest iPod, nie iPhone 3G 109.173.217.15 15:37, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
- Not an iPod. 205.167.7.194 15:50, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: obviously in COM:SCOPE. --A.Savin 12:38, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 12:38, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 12:38, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 12:38, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/688400380007444480/DGdcmUSD.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 12:39, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
This logo appears too complex to qualify for {{PD-textlogo}}. Ahecht (talk) 16:20, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 12:39, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Highly doubtfull this picture is own work Sonty (talk) 16:32, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 12:39, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Per ticket:2016022310008424. GreenPeak Technologies claims that they are the copyright holder of this file which is not unlikely since it is a studio portret off Cees Links from Greenpark. The file has also been deleted from Flickr. Natuur12 (talk) 16:36, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 12:39, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be work of uploader Ahecht (talk) 17:02, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 12:40, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Appears to be a screenshot of a television program Ahecht (talk) 17:03, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 12:40, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Watermark indicates that this is likely not hte work of the uploader Ahecht (talk) 17:05, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 12:40, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Commons don't host your private medias. Sismarinho (talk) 17:26, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 12:40, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
wrong filename Tonialsa (talk) 17:39, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 12:41, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
wrong filename Tonialsa (talk) 17:40, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 12:41, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Files of User:Lornaustin
[edit]
Self-promotion. Unused and uncategorized for more than 2 years. Out of scope. --DavidIvar (talk) 17:37, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 12:41, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
personal photo Nullzero (talk) 17:45, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 12:41, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
personal photo Nullzero (talk) 17:46, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 12:42, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Relatively low quality, heavily cropped image. Probably not suited for general use. Better versions available at File:Jan Mostaert - Tree of Jesse - WGA16298.jpg and File:De boom van Jesse Rijksmuseum SK-A-3901.jpeg. Vincent Steenberg (talk) 17:48, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 12:42, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata, possible professional shot: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. (→ Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kristina Ziemer-Falke.jpg) Anka (talk) 18:05, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 12:42, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
keine Panoramafreiheit in Marokko Ralf Roleček 18:07, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
SUBMITTER RESPONSE FROM MARSHALL HENRIE: I personally took this photo from a cruise ship while sailing west into the Atlantic Ocean about a mile from the cruise port at sundown. The sun was setting, and a small fishing boat was lining up with the setting sun and the minaret of the mosque. I have several photos that I took before and after this one as evidence that I actually took this photo (these other photos show the boat in the foreground in different positions in the time sequence progressed). Marshall Henrie 26 February 2016
Deleted: No FoP in Morocco, contemporary architecture, sorry. --A.Savin 12:43, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
keine Panoramafreiheit in Marokko Ralf Roleček 18:08, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 12:44, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
keine Panoramafreiheit in Marokko Ralf Roleček 18:08, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 12:45, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
keine Panoramafreiheit in Marokko Ralf Roleček 18:08, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 12:45, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
keine Panoramafreiheit in Marokko Ralf Roleček 18:08, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 12:45, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
keine Panoramafreiheit in Marokko Ralf Roleček 18:08, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 12:45, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
keine Panoramafreiheit in Marokko Ralf Roleček 18:09, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 12:46, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Probably the same image as the deleted one. In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for a certain period of time after the death of the creator (be it the last-surviving architect, engineer, designer, sculptor, engraver, or painter). An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception Commons:Freedom of panorama (FoP). Sadly, Morocco has no Commons-acceptable FoP. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:57, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:17, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
keine Panoramafreiheit in Marokko Ralf Roleček 18:09, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 12:46, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Probably the same image as the deleted one. In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for a certain period of time after the death of the creator (be it the last-surviving architect, engineer, designer, sculptor, engraver, or painter). An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception Commons:Freedom of panorama (FoP). Sadly, Morocco has no Commons-acceptable FoP. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:53, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:17, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
keine Panoramafreiheit in Marokko Ralf Roleček 18:09, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 12:46, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Probably the same image as the deleted one. In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for a certain period of time after the death of the creator (be it the last-surviving architect, engineer, designer, sculptor, engraver, or painter). An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception Commons:Freedom of panorama (FoP). Sadly, Morocco has no Commons-acceptable FoP. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:52, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
- Oke, deleted Rudolphous (talk) 19:11, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: by Rudolphous. --Minoraxtalk 02:04, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
keine Panoramafreiheit in Marokko Ralf Roleček 18:10, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 12:46, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Probably the same image as the deleted one. In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for a certain period of time after the death of the creator (be it the last-surviving architect, engineer, designer, sculptor, engraver, or painter). An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception Commons:Freedom of panorama (FoP). Sadly, Morocco has no Commons-acceptable FoP. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:54, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:17, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
keine Panoramafreiheit in Marokko Ralf Roleček 18:10, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 12:46, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
keine Panoramafreiheit in Marokko Ralf Roleček 18:11, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 12:47, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
keine Panoramafreiheit in Marokko Ralf Roleček 18:11, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 12:47, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
unused logo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 18:14, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 12:50, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
copyright logo Sakhalinio (talk) 18:16, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 12:50, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
DR started to verify "own work", as stated "Pantech ProEd Pvt Ltd" and EXIF missing, Roland zh (talk) 18:16, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 12:50, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
unused logo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 18:18, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 12:50, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Likely not own work. All over the internet prior to upload date. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:21, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 12:51, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE, unused image of non-notable person. Per filename likely meant as an attack-image. Used to vandalize :en-article[3].--- Túrelio (talk) 21:37, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Out of scope, only used for vandalism. —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 14:30, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 12:51, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope
- File:Milf holes 3.jpg
- File:Milf holes 2.jpg
- File:Milf holes.jpg
- File:Braless milf 15.jpg
- File:Braless milf 20.jpg
- File:Braless milf 17.jpg
- File:Braless milf 12.jpg
- File:Braless milf 14.jpg
- File:Braless milf 9.jpg
- File:Braless milf 10.jpg
- File:Braless milf 13.jpg
- File:Braless milf 11.jpg
- File:Braless milf 5.jpg
- File:Braless milf 4.jpg
- File:Braless milf 2.jpg
- File:Itopless milf.jpg
- File:Topless milf 62.jpg
- File:Topless milf 51.jpg
- File:Topless milf 54.jpg
- File:Topless milf 47.jpg
- File:Topless milf 39.jpg
- File:Topless milf 69.jpg
- File:Topless milf 57.jpg
- File:Topless milf 38.jpg
- File:Topless milf 44.jpg
- File:Topless milf 55.jpg
- File:Topless milf 46.jpg
- File:Topless milf 36.jpg
- File:Topless milf 28.jpg
- File:Topless milf 43.jpg
- File:Topless milf 32.jpg
- File:Topless milf 21.jpg
- File:Topless milf 50.jpg
- File:Hard nippled milf 29.jpg
- File:Hard nippled milf.jpg
- File:Topless milf 5.jpg
- File:Topless milf 3.jpg
- File:Topless milf 2.jpg
- File:Topless milf.jpg
- File:Braless milf.jpg
- File:Braless Milf.jpg
- File:Milf tanning.jpg
- File:Sexy Milf.jpg
- File:Dirty penis 1.jpg
- File:Dirty penis 2.jpg
- File:Hard nippled milf 12.jpg
- File:Hard nippled milf 11.jpg
- File:Hard nippled milf 10.jpg
- File:Hard nippled milf 8.jpg
- File:Hard nippled milf 9.jpg
- File:Hard nippled milf 7.jpg
- File:Hard nippled milf 5.jpg
- File:Hard nippled milf 6.jpg
- File:Hard nippled milf 4.jpg
- File:Hard nippled milf 2.jpg
- File:Hard nippled milf 1.jpg
- File:Hard nippled milf 3.jpg
— Racconish ☎ 09:43, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
- Agree. Elly (talk) 17:39, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
- Agree, and what has been seen cannot be unseen. - Tim D. Williamson yak-yak 19:21, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: by Krd. --Riley Huntley (talk) 09:14, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope
— Racconish ☎ 11:28, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:24, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope and recreation of previously deleted files. See Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Bindella1
- File:Milf braless pokies 1.jpg
- File:Topless milf 4.jpg
- File:Milf braless pokies.jpg
- File:Milf hard nippled 1.jpg
- File:Milf hard nippled 2.jpg
- File:Cock dirty 1.jpg
- File:Milf hard nippled.jpg
- File:Glans dirty.jpg
- File:Cock dirty 2.jpg
- File:Glans dirty 1.jpg
- File:Hard nippled milf 39.jpg
- File:Hard nippled milf 40.jpg
- File:Hard nippled milf 34.jpg
- File:Hard nippled milf 38.jpg
- File:Hard nippled milf 33.jpg
- File:Hard nippled milf 26.jpg
- File:Hard nippled milf 24.jpg
- File:Hard nippled milf 25.jpg
- File:Hard nippled milf 23.jpg
- File:Hard nippled milf 22.jpg
- File:Hard nippled milf 20.jpg
- File:Hard nippled milf 21.jpg
- File:Hard nippled milf 19.jpg
- File:Hard nippled milf 18.jpg
- File:Hard nippled milf 17.jpg
- File:Hard nippled milf 16.jpg
- File:Hard nippled milf 15.jpg
- File:Hard nippled milf 14.jpg
- File:Hard nippled milf 30.jpg
- File:Hard nippled milf 13.jpg
- File:Hard nippled milf 31.jpg
- File:Topless women.jpg
- File:Milf topless.jpg
- File:So hard nipples.jpg
- File:Glans 6.jpg
- File:Glans 8.jpg
- File:Glans 5.jpg
- File:Frenulum 1.jpg
- File:Har cock 4.jpg
- File:Hard cock 3.jpg
- File:Hard cock 8.jpg
- File:Hard cock.jpg
- File:Semen 2.jpg
- File:Semen 1.jpg
- File:Precum 5.jpg
- File:Semen 6.jpg
- File:Brown cock 1.jpg
- File:Brown cock.jpg
— Racconish ☎ 18:05, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope and some recreation of previously deleted files.
- File:Well used asshole 1.JPG
- File:Well used asshole 2.JPG
- File:Well used asshole.jpg
- File:Shitty cock 6.jpg
- File:Shiity cock 5.jpg
- File:Shitty cock 3.jpg
- File:Shitty cock 4.jpg
- File:Shitty cock 2.jpg
- File:Shitty cock.jpg
- File:Shitty cock 1.jpg
- File:Dong in ass 3.JPG
- File:Quatruple anal.JPG
- File:Dong in ass.JPG
- File:Dong in ass 1.JPG
- File:Anal speculum 1.JPG
- File:Anal speculum 2.JPG
- File:Anal speculum.JPG
- File:Firm breasted milf.jpg
— Racconish ☎ 21:54, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 12:55, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 12:55, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - no COM:EDUSE INeverCry 22:11, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 12:55, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope INeverCry 22:12, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 12:55, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:14, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 12:56, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:16, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 12:56, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:16, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 12:56, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:27, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 12:56, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Low-resolution copy of File:HMS Invincible (R05).jpg, darker and poorer quality. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 23:26, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 12:58, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
_Growth_Hormone_bound_to_Growth_Hormone_Binding_Protein.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Growth_Hormone_bound_to_Growth_Hormone_Binding_Protein.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The image is watermarked with the words "For Educational Use Only", but this is not compatible with Wikimedia Commons policy that requires that images are not subject to restrictions which would prevent them being used by anyone, anytime, for any purpose. Ed (Edgar181) 18:36, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
_Growth_Hormone_bound_to_Growth_Hormone_Binding_Protein.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 03:42, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
_Growth_Hormone_bound_to_Growth_Hormone_Binding_Protein.png){kind=link}
Building designed by architects Le Corbusier († 1965) and Pierre Jeanneret († 1967), a manifesto of the former's "Five Points of Architecture". France has no freedom of panorama. The following files in Category:Villa Savoye are also problematic in my opinion. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 11:56, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
- File:Villa Savoye Staircase.jpg
- File:Villa Savoye - First floor Living Room.jpg
- File:Villa Savoye - Ground Floor.jpg
- File:Villa Savoye - Rooftop view.jpg
- File:Villa Savoye, Poissy, sculpture dans le jardin.jpg: sculpture by an unmentioned author, probably contemporary to the building (1928–1931)
- File:Villa Savoye - Tiled Bathroom.jpg
- File:Villa Savoye North East Corner.jpg
- File:Villa Savoye.JPG
Deleted: per nomination. --BrightRaven (talk) 10:23, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
This image is already in Wikimedia Commons. Plus, the name of it doesn't correspond to image itself. ChiaraS91 (talk) 11:19, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- I agree, something must have gone wrong during the upload/naming process. go ahead and delete it, thanks for noticing! --TobiasMoMu (talk) 09:17, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:10, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
cc-by-nc (nc is incompatible with Commons), also no proof of original photographer's permission czar 02:19, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Question: Could the CC licenses be applied for XX century (specifically during the WWII) 2D works? Seems very old. --Amitie 10g (talk) 11:44, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
- It's generally unlikely that the uploader is also the photographer/copyright holder (since the image is so old), but the more immediate issue (for us) is the by-nc license. czar 14:50, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: by Taivo. --Riley Huntley (talk) 17:57, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Copyrighted Logo 128.84.127.48 04:51, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
- Keep per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Cornell U logo.jpg. Published before 1923 and Textlogo. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 19:38, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Riley Huntley (talk) 17:57, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Copyrighted Logo 128.84.127.48 04:51, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Keep If this is the original seal, it was published before 1923 and is therefore in the public domain. Even so I would think the rendition is not original enough for copyright. {{PD-textlogo}} would apply anyway. De728631 (talk) 21:05, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Riley Huntley (talk) 17:57, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
While the source from a Public Domain book states the text has no copyright, there is no indication that the logo is public domain. 128.84.127.48 04:53, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
- Keep per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Cornell U logo.jpg. Published before 1923 and PD-Textlogo. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 19:41, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Riley Huntley (talk) 17:57, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo that easily meets threshold of origionallity 128.84.127.48 04:57, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
- If the image does not qualify for {{Pd-text}}, please tag the image with {{Fair use delete}} --Sreejith K (talk) 21:31, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
- Keep per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Cornell U logo.jpg. Published before 1923 and PD-Textlogo. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 19:40, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Riley Huntley (talk) 17:58, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
File:Noureddin Kianouri - Spehr Shamanesh Soltanabadi - Mahmoud Kianouri - Behzadi , 4 brothers and cousins in Sweden.jpg
[edit]
the first name of Spehr must change to Sadreddin , "Persons from right to left" before the name must add to sentence. NK (talk) 12:37, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
File: from left to right, Noureddin Kianouri - Dr. Sadruddin Shahmanesh Soltanabadi - Mahmoud Kianouri - Behzadi Mazandarani, 4 brothers and cousins in Sweden.jpg
[edit]
A new version of photo with rights names will be upload. NK (talk) 12:38, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Please see COM:RENAME. --Riley Huntley (talk) 06:46, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
rene kalander 83.247.25.128 13:21, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
- Was ist dein Problem? Whats your problem? --Thomas doerfer (talk) 18:17, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Riley Huntley (talk) 06:47, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
http://static1.ilna.ir/thumbnail/glBgKSzR5Mdm/TbaZ-65erigz_KuonkQ7j4fGZx6NUybp2e1awigXJ3Ar7nwJ7wnB4Gngr8x7S0KTXd_w4RFLdkE,/%D8%B5%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AD+%D8%A7%D8%A8%D8%A7%D8%AF%DB%8C.jpg Omid.koli (talk) 11:47, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete; tagged as copyvio. Riley Huntley (talk) 06:42, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:08, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status. This is an image with copyright (characters created by Masashi Kishimoto)
No se conoce con claridad el estado del copyright del archivo o página, pero el procedimiento descrito en Sin información legal es inaplicable.
El archivo o página viola la política de licencias en una forma diferente a que si se tratara de una clara violación de derechos de autor.
∞DMR.✍ 
(Discusión) 00:14, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. --Yasu (talk) 15:32, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
From a Flickr set of what appears to not be the Flickr uploader's own images. czar 00:27, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:40, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
amateur pencil sketch, self-created by a Wikipedian with no prior edit history, uploaded as inappropriate illustration for a politician's BLP Bearcat (talk) 01:28, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:40, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
amateur pencil sketch, self-created by a Wikipedian with no prior edit history, uploaded as inappropriate illustration for a politician's BLP Bearcat (talk) 01:28, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:40, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
amateur pencil sketch, self-created by a Wikipedian with no prior edit history, uploaded as inappropriate illustration for a politician's BLP Bearcat (talk) 01:29, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:41, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
(c)vio only account, this is the only lonely photograph I can't find on the net. I strongly doubt own work, given the (c)vio history of the uploader. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:31, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:41, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Célinamathilde (talk · contribs)
[edit]Probably (c), Fan article on FRwiki. Q: Is fashion like this (c) artwork? Own work claim doubtful after other (c)vio uploads.
- File:Défile ANREALAGE " Reflect " - Printemps-Été 2016.jpg
- File:Défilé ANREALAGE " Light" - automne 2015..jpg
Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:14, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:41, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. Rocío Dúrcal died in 2006 and EXIF data shows picture was taken in 2014 LMLM (talk) 07:34, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:41, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
unlikely own work [4] Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:52, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:41, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Thanakorn rakkuson (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. IT-related uploads from 2015, used for user space in thwiki, most likely all files grabbed from Internet. See also COM:AN#flood of IT-related copyvios
Gunnex (talk) 07:58, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:41, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
copy of File:LVS Pieps DSP.jpg, not used Nolispanmo 08:45, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:41, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
i shot this picture, and we have a better photo of mr. nake. he doesn't like this shot any more. Maximilian (talk) 09:00, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
- can we speed this up, pls? thx. 09:21, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:41, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Subject died in 1981, age 77. There is no evidence either that it was published fifty years ago or that it was anonymous, both of which are required to show that it is PD. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:34, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:41, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Hoax map - see also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by HouseHorror GermanJoe (talk) 12:00, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Riley Huntley (talk) 06:44, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:41, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Hoax logo - see also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by HouseHorror GermanJoe (talk) 12:00, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Riley Huntley (talk) 06:44, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:41, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Mislabelled image used for hoax article (no such metro exists) - see also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by HouseHorror GermanJoe (talk) 12:02, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Riley Huntley (talk) 06:44, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:41, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
More files uploaded by Regions
[edit]Out of scope. Photos of non-notable persons, radio broadcasters or beauty queens, high school students, among others. Not in use in any project.
Files affected:
- File:Carlos Imamura (década del '90).jpg
- File:Grupo Criscarcin (década del '90).jpg
- File:FM Strait en Jardín América (década del '90).jpg
- File:Anghie Gansel (Reina Fiesta Raíces Jardín 1998).jpg
- File:Valeria Dell'Acqua (Reina Fiesta Raíces 1996).jpg
- File:Fiorella Tur (Reina Fiesta Raíces 2015).JPG
- File:Jorge Francisco Machón, Dr. Tadayoshi Kamada y Rodolfo Marzeniuk en Jardín América.jpg
- File:Dr. Tadayoshi Kamada junto al Esc. Julio César Benitez Chapo y a Tagniani en una velada en Jardín América.jpg
- File:Dr. Tadayoshi Kamada y José Puhl, sacerdote de Jardín América.jpg
- File:Peregrinación en bicicleta a Itatí - misionero Marcelo Fernández Harvey.jpg
- File:Promoción 1989 del Bachillerato Virgen de Itatí en Posadas.jpg
- File:Baile de Recepción del Bachillerato Virgen de Itatí en Posadas (1989) - Parte 4.jpg
- File:Baile de Recepción del Bachillerato Virgen de Itatí en Posadas (1989) - Parte 5.jpg
- File:Baile de Recepción del Bachillerato Virgen de Itatí en Posadas (1989) - Parte 1.jpg
- File:Baile de Recepción del Bachillerato Virgen de Itatí en Posadas (1989) - Parte 3.jpg
- File:Baile de Recepción del Bachillerato Virgen de Itatí en Posadas (1989) - Parte 2.jpg
- File:Baile de Recepción del Bachillerato Virgen de Itatí en Posadas (1989).jpg
- File:Luis Marinoni.jpg
- File:Pindapoy - Reunión de Obreros en 1993.jpg
- File:Diploma de Honor Otorgado otorgado a Patricia Ocampo.JPG
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Parte_4.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Parte_5.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Parte_1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Parte_3.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Parte_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Fma12 (talk) 12:46, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:42, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
copyvio http://www.sonymusic.co.uk/artists/netsky Kattenkruid (talk) 13:35, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Copy violations qualify for speedy deletion, tagged as such. Riley Huntley (talk) 06:47, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Already deleted. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:42, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Fails COM:FOP, as non-free video displayed at an event. Cropping it out is also of no use since everything else is so dark. IndianBio (talk) 13:41, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
- Why is it being deleted? I took this picture - Mac.
Deleted: Please read com:DW. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:42, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Hoax map; see also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by HouseHorror. Mackensen (talk) 13:50, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. Riley Huntley (talk) 06:48, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:43, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
An IP deleted the license and replaced it with: The image in question is not in the public domain. The NASA PDS available image is in the public domain, the processed image is the intellectual property of the Arizona State University. Please feel free to download the various image products and render your own image to understand the tremendous effort that went into planning, capturing and then processing the acquired images into the results. I guess this warrants the review of the license. Jarekt (talk) 14:08, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
- NASA images, captured by missions funded by taxpayer dollars, have always been public domain. The participation of university partners has never changed this. The effort that went into processing the image is immaterial; restricting the number of people who can view the image would only defeat the purpose of that effort. Sorry, why would comments from an anonymous ip address that cite nothing even be taken seriously to the point of opening a discussion? WolfmanSF (talk) 17:13, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
- There is nothing in the image credits or the hosting web site that I can find that would suggest this is a copyrighted image. Unless specific evidence can be brought forward that this is not a public domain image, what is there to debate? Why should we be required to disprove a baseless assertion? WolfmanSF (talk) 17:35, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
- Reply to WolfmanSF: I interpreted communication from IP as an effort to request license review. I agree with you that this is PD image but lets have few people look at it to make sure we have consensus. --Jarekt (talk) 18:52, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
- Keep as the "the tremendous effort that went into planning, capturing and then processing" is not type of effort that generates additional copyrights.--Jarekt (talk) 12:53, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
- Comment: Amount of effort is irrelevant to copyright, but was any of the effort creative? Were there any artistic decisions involved? For example, the contrast and saturation seem higher than other Earthrise-type images: is that a creative decision, or the result of different photographic equipment? --Carnildo (talk) 01:36, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete: On further review, there's some definite creative effort here. In particular, the choice of mapping orange, yellow-green, and violet spectral bands to the RGB of the image, and the separate contrast-stretching of the Moon and the Earth are both creative decisions, rather than technical ones. --Carnildo (talk) 02:47, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
- How does that have any bearing on whether the image is public domain? Lots of processed NASA images have "creative" touches that do not prevent them from being public domain. The issue of what the contractual relationship between the university and NASA is under which the image was created would seem to be paramount. Are the "creative" Johns Hopkins-processed images of Pluto also not public domain? WolfmanSF (talk) 03:39, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
- You haven't provided enough information for a meaningful comment on the other situations you bring up. Copyright is complicated, even before you bring in the complexities of contracts. --Carnildo (talk) 02:57, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
- How does that have any bearing on whether the image is public domain? Lots of processed NASA images have "creative" touches that do not prevent them from being public domain. The issue of what the contractual relationship between the university and NASA is under which the image was created would seem to be paramount. Are the "creative" Johns Hopkins-processed images of Pluto also not public domain? WolfmanSF (talk) 03:39, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
- I don't think that either of those are copyright generating. Taking three inputs and mapping them to three outputs in the logical, color-preserving manner is not creative, and playing with contrast is not usually considered copyrightable either.--Prosfilaes (talk) 23:18, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
- Keep This review, in my view, is an abuse of process. No anonymous poster that makes claims they do not back up with evidence should be allowed to initiate a review. I found no indication on the ASU web site that the image has a copyright. The image also appears on a NASA web site without an indication of a copyright, and similarly on APOD. Both the latter sites are generally very careful to mention copyrights when they exist. NASA explicitly states that "NASA material is not protected by copyright unless noted." in their image use policy. While NASA's PDS data is all public domain, their press release images generally are also. WolfmanSF (talk) 09:00, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
- Keep The credit line of the image is "NASA/GSFC/Arizona State University". Because it begins with "NASA", it means that the image is a NASA image and is therefore in public domain. Ruslik (talk) 19:51, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
Comment A derivative work of a file in the public domain, does not necessarily give a free file. If the image is indeed a derivative work, even of a Nasa free file, then it is a new work and the Arizona State University can indeed apply a more restrictive licensing on their work. I'm not able to see the licensing at the source. If there is no an explicit free license then we should presume it's not free. Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:03, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
- The image credits are in the caption below the image on the on the university-managed web site (NASA/GSFC/Arizona State University), and at the bottom of the image feature web entry on the NASA site (NASA/Goddard/Arizona State University). We're not talking about a derivative work here. WolfmanSF (talk) 04:24, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
- Keep At best, any changes are minimally copyrightable, and I think we should only be taking such a claim seriously if ASU, preferably their lawyers, makes it.--Prosfilaes (talk) 23:18, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
- Comment: I emailed Mark Robinson (the guy who posted the image here) and he stated "LROC images are in the public domain." WolfmanSF (talk) 02:53, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept: This DR didn't create significant doubt. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:43, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
The banner in this image is displayed by Serbian fans (EXTRA info: most likely Bosnian Serb fans from Republika Srpska who traveled to Belgrade to support Republic of Serbia national team, instead of Bosnia; a country of their origin/birth). The banner shows text "Bijeljina Serbia, never BiH" in Cyrillic meaning "Bijeljina belongs to Serbia, never Bosnia." City of Bijeljina is clearly inside Bosnia and Herzegovina borders. I believe this image promotes hate and promotes Serbian nationalism on wikipedia and as such should be removed permanently from wikipedia commons and/or other servers it is stored at; immediately. Moreover the image is labeled as Serbia v Bosnia in qualifiers; however it does not show both teams players. In addition it does not show the stadium in full size, rather a small section of it. It makes me believe this image has only one purpose by the author and as mentioned earlier it is to promote hate. This image is also very outdated. Thank you! BiHVolim (talk) 14:53, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- Keep - dont exagerate. It is no secret that most Serbs from Republika Srpska , the entity Bijeljina belongs to, feel more close to Serbia than to Bosnia and Herzegovina. It is just their expression of their feeling. You as Bosnian editor find it annoying, you say offensive, but that is your personal view as Bosnian (your own username means "Bosnia I love"). Personal views on the matter should not interfere with Wikipedia. Was that banner in any way offensive, UEFA organisers would have acted, and they didnt. It is an important aspect of that match that adresses how the Serbian population of Bosnia was supporting Serbia and not Bosnia, and that particular aspect is interesting and thus makes this picture valueable. FkpCascais (talk) 21:05, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for that. "UEFA organisers would have acted, and they didnt." Using that as your primary point of argument does not hold much weight. The game was difficult to keep under control for the match officials judging from these scenes: events unfolding. I as human being, not just as Bosnian, find these scenes distressing and the banner was a big part in creating the negative atmosphere. A decade on, UEFA has learned from its past mistakes and its ability not to act; as witnessed in recent racist behaviors on football pitches was adequately punished (Nazi symbol in Poljud - see UEFA_Euro_2016_qualifying_Group_H and of course Serbia v Albania (UEFA Euro 2016 qualifying) events demonstrate). I would like to hear other users opinions on this matter. BiHVolim (talk) 21:45, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- Sir, you are out of line and you are the one being extremely offensive by comparing this banner with nazi simbol incindent somewhere else. Serbs of Bijeljina expressing their support for Serbia and not Bosnia is at no way linked to anything you want to make it look like. I know you being Bosnian and having a large portion of the population of your country rather cheering for Serbia than your country difficult for you and annoying, but deal with it. FkpCascais (talk) 22:12, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- I am not comparing the two nor am I justifying actions of an individual or a few individuals responsible. I Hope you can read between the lines there. I am merely demonstrating UEFA's ability to adequately punish various racist behaviors (more vigorously as of late) and stamp out all those responsible for hooliganism in our sport. Bosnian national team was also punished recently due to a small section of BiH fans stepping over Israeli flag (Bosnia played vs Andorra behind closed doors on 6 September 2015 as result). The act was widely condemned within Bosnia. BiHVolim (talk) 22:45, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- There is nothing negative or offensive in that banner, stop making up things. It is a case just as many around the world. Just like when Irish people from Northern Ireland express their support rather to Ireland than to Northern Ireland in a game between the two. It is not offensive or negative, maybe just annoying for Northern Irish people to see part of their population cheer for another country, but nothing more. UEFA said nothing about that banner, so that makes the case closed because I dont care if Bosnia was punished in some other game because they did something to someone else, if you are searching for an eye-for-eye vengance, this is not the place. The issue is that Bosnia WAS punished in that incident against Israel but no one was punished here in this case of this banner, so it is unrelated totally. You have nothing here beside the "I dont like it" argument. Stop calling it racist, it has nothing to do with it, it is just your opinion, people suporting Serbia rather than Bosnia is not "racism" people can support whoever they want to. FkpCascais (talk) 22:59, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- When it comes to Serbia doing something wrong you just turn a blind eye. I just acknowledged Bosnia fans did something wrong and you are all over it. "people suporting Serbia rather than Bosnia is not "racism" " First of all fix your typos, every browser supports spell check functionality. People may find it difficult in taking you seriously if you write like a 12 year old. Second, people are not supporting Serbia there. They are showing hate towards Bosnia (ie displaying a banner of a Bosnian town and saying it belongs to Serbia). The wrong here is clear as day. The fact that the banner was not pulled down (at least not from the evidence of a still picture) really speaks volumes about Serbian security and Serbia as nation back then. Today if same happened pretty sure Aleksandar Vučić would not allow this as he seeks entry to EU. This is all I will say about this for now. Give others a chance to voice their opinions. BiHVolim (talk) 23:39, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- You are clearly mixing your personal emotions into this. I cant see what relevance whatsoever Bosnia being punished for some totally unrelated incident has to do with this, much less if you acknoledge it, or not. The picture is here to illustrate a particular aspect this game had, which was that people from Serbian populated areas of Bosnia travelled to Serbia to support Serbia rather then Bosnia in a game between the two. If you, as Bosnian, find this disturbing and you dont like it, that is your personal problem, not ours here on Wikipedia, ad certainly not a reason to delete a picture. PS: dear editor, I am a decade-long en.wiki editor with a heavy volume bagage of discussions in all sorts of areas, the "12-year old" sentence of yours really speaks more of yourself than about me, get a grip on yourself and dont engage in PA please. Discuss content, not editors, and please stop providing your personal opinions and bring some neutral reliable surces that speak about this so "offensive and racistic" banner, orotherwise the "I dont like it" doesnt seem to get us anywhere. Lets listen to others what they have to say. FkpCascais (talk) 05:14, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
- Since you failed to pick up on what I am trying to get across, I will spell it out. Relevance is that UEFA acts harshly to any incident much vigorously than it has in the past. There are other ways to support a Serbian team other than "Bijeljina Serbia; never Bosnia" How about simply Bijeljina in colours of Serb flag. Feel free to do that. I have nothing to lose, I do not live in Bosnia any longer and I look at this from a neutral perspective having adopted a western way of life. The language in the photo should not be on football pitches. I do not like it any more than I would like something like "Sandžak is Greater Bosnia not Serbia" banners at Sarajevo games. You can convince the administrators to keep the image, but if there is any justice in the world, and I believe there is, the image will be taken down. For admins eyes: Please consider reading this link. Although the organizers have taken a lot to the entrance of the stadium took offensive banners in the stands were, among others, posted notices "Thank Ratko", "Knife, Wire, Srebrenica", "Bijeljina Serbia, BiH has never!" At the game there were other banners used which clearly backup my argument that all of these are there for one purpose, to instigate hate. "Hvala Ratko" (Thanks Ratko Mladic), "Nož, žica, Srebrenica" (Knife, wire, Srebrenica), "Bijeljina Srbija, nikada BiH!". BiHVolim (talk) 06:34, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
- The picture is not even about any incident, it is just you finding it that way and making your own dilussions of what it means, what UEFA should have done and you go as far as wanting to impress the readers by saying what current Serbian president would do if he saw it! The picture ilustrates the part of the stand where Serbian supporters from Bosnia were located at that particular game, and since they came from Bosnia and are supporting Serbia instead of Bosnia, that partcular aspect is interesting. However, there is no incident in that picture, no racism or nazism (otherwise UEFA would have reacted), or any other of the dramatic descriptions you are making. The picures are here at commons not to be "nice" but to be informative, and this one certainly is. What you personally think of the banner, of how Serbs from Bosnia should feel, on how UEFA should have done, on how Serbian president would have reacted, the EU, etc. , it is totally irrelevant because it is based just on your tendentious interpretation which is clearly unique cause no one even mentioned this as incident or any other of the descriptions you are making. Lets listen to others what they have to say. Stop speculating.
- PS: Why are you talking about other banners? It is this picture we are discussing here, who cares what other banners in other places were saying. FkpCascais (talk) 06:43, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
- You are persistent. I can see why User:HankMoodyTZ behaved the way he behaved toward you. No one mentioned it because it is not too clear how to nominate it for deletion. After some figuring I managed to do it. The image is also not on any other major article, hence no one even knows the image is around as they do not see it around. I know it is around having seen it on SCG football page (but has since been removed by some user; maybe it was me, Do not remember now but I am sure you will check. You do your research very well). If you ask me, even if the image is not on any article, I'd still go after it and nominate it for deletion because it is wrong to have it up and on sports forums. From your arguments the image is more about political aspect than a sports aspect and that is why you find it interesting. BiHVolim (talk) 06:58, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
- PS. You mentioned: "The picture ilustrates the part of the stand where Serbian supporters from Bosnia were located at that particular game, and since they came from Bosnia and are supporting Serbia instead of Bosnia, that partcular aspect is interesting. However, there is no incident in that picture, no racism or nazism". Can you find me 2 sources where it says it was in the stands of Srpska supporters and not Republic of Serbia supporters? TY. BiHVolim (talk) 07:01, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
- How and indef-banned user behaved is certanly not relevant here (something is telling me you'll be joining him soon). The picture displays political and social aspects and that makes it relevant, yes. First thing, the picture here doesnt ilustrate the interpretation you are giving but a different one. Second thing, even if it displayed, pictures here are kept because they show particular event in particular time. We are not here to paint the past in pink otherwise we would delete more than half of the historical pictures. The reasons you are providing for its deletion are wrong just as your consequent reasoning on use or purpose of them here on commons. PS: It is you who needs reliable sources for the heavy claims you are making, please read WP:RS on en.wiki and dont bring youtube videos or forums. And dont play hard on me asking me for sources, you clearly saw on the youtube video you posted up there that huge crowds in Bijeljina were supporting Serbia and travelling to see the game supporting Serbia. Dont play games. Good luck convincing people how evil the picture is with forum-like evidence. I am out, regards, FkpCascais (talk) 07:14, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
- Reliable sources: source 1., source 2., source 3., source 4.. It turns out Serbia and Montenegro national team were fined for the banners $35.000 franks and one game behind closed doors (vs Azerbaijan). Would that mean UEFA found the banner inappropriate? If so, so should WikiPedia (in the sports context). And since the image is only used in Sports articles, I demand it gets deleted or failing that to be moved to a political article instead. TY BiHVolim (talk) 08:02, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
- I was thinking about neutral sources, not Bosnian partisan ones crying out how hard it was for them in the stadium. Even so, the first source only talks about the "nož, žica" banner, not this one. Second source I am not going even to read, bosnjaci.net is well know Bosnian nationalist website The third one, the source is fine, but again, it says nothing about this banner from our picture, but says how the fine was because of the "nož, žica" banner, and finally, the fourth source speaks actually about the demonization both sides are making about one another regarding the game, but nothing specific about what we have in our picture here. FkpCascais (talk) 08:20, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Per Stefan2, he hits the nail on the head. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:45, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
out of scope, del on DE Nolispanmo 14:53, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:44, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Colling-architektur (talk) 14:55, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
- Keep; can't see how this should violate "personality rights". --Jergen (talk) 09:10, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete; can't see how this is in scope. Riley Huntley (talk) 06:49, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:45, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
unused logo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 18:22, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Out of scope file. Riley Huntley (talk) 06:51, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:45, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
duplicate Erikabarker (talk) 18:21, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Duplicate of which file? Riley Huntley (talk) 06:50, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept: No dupe file provided. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:45, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept: No dupe file provided. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:45, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
duplicate Erikabarker (talk) 18:22, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Duplicate of which file? Riley Huntley (talk) 06:50, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept: No dupe file provided. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:45, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
duplicate Erikabarker (talk) 18:24, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
- Keep. B+W version of image. MB298 (talk) 03:32, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Duplicate of which file? Riley Huntley (talk) 06:50, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept: No dupe file provided. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:45, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
personal photo Nullzero (talk) 18:29, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Out of scope file. Riley Huntley (talk) 06:51, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:45, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work' as EXIF missing, as well as media not in use within Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 18:31, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:45, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Not own work but a scan from a printed source. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:42, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:45, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Grammatikfehler bei "basierend auf", keine enzyklopädische Verwendung denkbar. Xocolatl (talk) 18:43, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Out of scope file. Riley Huntley (talk) 06:51, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:45, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Likely not own work. Other uploads by this user also nominated (File:Dra. Maria Antonia e sobrinhos.jpg) or already deleted as copyvio (File:Fhdfhd.jpg). P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:44, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:46, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Now it is not a part of Andhra Pradesh and also the new file exists at File:Nalgonda_district_in_Telangana.png Vin09 (talk) 18:50, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: In use. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:47, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Telangana districts are now not a part of Andhra Pradesh and also the numbers of the districts are false Vin09 (talk) 18:51, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: In use. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:47, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Outdated, Now Telangana region is a separate state and Andhra Pradesh have totally new contituencies Vin09 (talk) 18:53, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Telangana is not a part of Andhra Pradesh and the constituencies have been changed after bifurcation Vin09 (talk) 19:02, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: In use. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:47, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept: In use. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:47, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Now Telangana is not a part of Andhra Pradesh and the RTO codes have been changed, the file is no longer useful Vin09 (talk) 18:54, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
- Exactly this fact is explained in the map itself, so there isn't any reason to delete it. --Chumwa (talk) 19:48, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
- So how can it be useful? those codes aren't used now. Like, Adilabad district is given TS-1. Here its not. If it is before Andhra Pradesh it an be kept by changing name as RTO codes of AP (before 2014).--Vin09 (talk) 06:26, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
- Showing a historical situation is useful of course. This map doesn't pretend that these codes in the Telangana area are still in use, so it is not misleading. NNW 13:49, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: In use. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:48, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Telangana is not a part of Andhra Pradesh and the district has another media with the name "File:Rangareddy district in Telangana.png" Vin09 (talk) 18:57, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:48, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Telangana is not a part of Andhra Pradesh and the district has another media with the name "File:Hyderabad district in Telangana.png" Vin09 (talk) 18:58, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:48, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Telangana is not a part of Andhra Pradesh and the district has another media with the name "File:Medak district in Telangana.png" Vin09 (talk) 18:58, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:48, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Telangana is not a part of Andhra Pradesh and the district has another media with the name "File:Nizamabad district in Telangana.png" Vin09 (talk) 18:59, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Telangana is not a part of Andhra Pradesh and the district has another media with the name "File:Nizamabad district in Telangana.png" Vin09 (talk) 19:02, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:48, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:48, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Telangana is not a part of Andhra Pradesh and the district has another media with the name "File:Adilabad district in Telangana.png" Vin09 (talk) 19:00, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:48, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
accidentally duplicated Jami (Wiki Ed) (talk) 19:00, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
-2016-02-24T19:00:00.000Z-File:AAAS_annual_meeting_2016_36.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:48, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Telangana is not a part of Andhra Pradesh and the district has another media with the name "File:Khammam district in Telangana.png" Vin09 (talk) 19:00, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:48, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Telangana is not a part of Andhra Pradesh and the district has another media with the name "File:Warangal district in Telangana.png" Vin09 (talk) 19:00, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Telangana is not a part of Andhra Pradesh and the district has another media with the name "File:Warangal district in Telangana.png" Vin09 (talk) 19:01, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:48, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:48, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:48, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Telangana is not a part of Andhra Pradesh and the district has another media with the name "File:Mahbubnagar district in Telangana.png" Vin09 (talk) 19:01, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:49, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Telangana is not a part of Andhra Pradesh now Vin09 (talk) 19:01, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
- I know that. This is a map depicting Andhra Pradesh before 2014. --Furfur (talk) 19:35, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:49, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Likely to be not an actual "own work" of uploader but a scan copy from w:The Russia Journal. Tatewaki (talk) 19:50, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:49, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as p.e. thumbnail format and missing exif, Roland zh (talk) 19:52, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:49, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry several times speedy deleted.
Gunnex (talk) 20:20, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Out of scope files. Riley Huntley (talk) 06:52, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:49, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 20:42, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Out of scope file. Riley Huntley (talk) 06:52, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:51, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 20:45, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
- include
File:Edin Kude - Evlendirelim mi? Tiyatro Oyununda 2013.jpg File:Edin Kude - Şirinler Tiyatro Oyununda 2014.jpg
- Delete Out of scope files. Riley Huntley (talk) 06:53, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:51, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as p.e. thumbnail format and missing exif, Roland zh (talk) 21:02, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:51, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Very likely not the uploader's own work judging from the autograph that is dated 1942. Maybe Joskidoedel inherited this image in some photo album but the question still stands if he also inherited the photographer's copyright. Belgium has a copyright term of 70 years pma so the original photographer would have to had died in 1945 or earlier for this to be in the public domain in the country of origin and by URAA standards it would still be copyrighted in the US. De728631 (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Also not clear if this work is PD in it's source country. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:52, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work' as missing EXIF, Roland zh (talk) 21:30, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:52, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work' as missing EXIF, and imho rather 'professional' look, Roland zh (talk) 21:45, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:52, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work' as missing EXIF, and imho rather 'professional' look, Roland zh (talk) 21:46, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:52, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Strong doubts whether https://codeigniter.com/help/legal is free enough Tekstman (talk) 21:53, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: The linked webpage contains a trademark policy which are non copyright restrictions and as per Commons:Non-copyright_restrictions#Trademark_law we don't delete files if they are protected by trademark law or when the website has a trademark policy. The logo itself is licened onder the MIT-license which is allowed at Wikimedia Commons. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:57, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Strong doubts whether https://codeigniter.com/help/legal is free enough Tekstman (talk) 21:53, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: The linked webpage contains a trademark policy which are non copyright restrictions and as per Commons:Non-copyright_restrictions#Trademark_law we don't delete files if they are protected by trademark law or when the website has a trademark policy. The logo itself is licened onder the MIT-license which is allowed at Wikimedia Commons. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:57, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
bad photo of a photo, unknown notability, doubtful authorship Pibwl (talk) 22:02, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom and COM:SCOPE. Riley Huntley (talk) 06:53, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:58, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
The page in which this image was used was deleted for being inappropriate. This image must be deleted. Wikieditorarg (talk) 22:27, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Out of scope file. Riley Huntley (talk) 06:54, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:58, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
The page in which this image was used was deleted for being inappropriate. This image must be deleted. Wikieditorarg (talk) 22:28, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Out of scope file. Riley Huntley (talk) 06:54, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:58, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
The page in which this image was used was deleted for being inappropriate. This image must be deleted. Wikieditorarg (talk) 22:28, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Out of scope file. Riley Huntley (talk) 06:54, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:58, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
The page in which this image was used was deleted for being inappropriate. This image must be deleted. Wikieditorarg (talk) 22:29, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Out of scope file. Riley Huntley (talk) 06:54, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:58, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
No original source listed for this image - it may not be a PD-US Navy image, but may in fact be from Jane's or similar, and thus copyrighted. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 22:48, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:58, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Image not actually taken by the "Swedish Military History Book Club", and so may not be CC-BY-SA 2.5. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 22:52, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:58, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
No original source listed for this image - it may not be a PD-US Navy image, but may in fact be from Jane's or similar, and thus copyrighted. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 23:16, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:58, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
There is no source or even evidence that this is the real coat of arms of that municipalty. An unlikely "self work" Yanguas (talk) 23:24, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:58, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
There is no source or even evidence that this is the real flag of that municipalty. An unlikely "self work" Yanguas (talk) 23:25, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:58, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Toutes les images sélectionnées montent des cyclistes à l'arrêt. Où est la pertinence encyclopédique de ce genre d'image ?
- File:Kedada Urrez Campagnolo 2012 024.JPG
- File:Kedada Urrez Campagnolo 2012 023.JPG
- File:Kedada Urrez Campagnolo 2012 022.JPG
- File:Kedada Urrez Campagnolo 2012 021.JPG
- File:Kedada Urrez Campagnolo 2012 020.JPG
- File:Kedada Urrez Campagnolo 2012 019.JPG
- File:Kedada Urrez Campagnolo 2012 018.JPG
- File:Kedada Urrez Campagnolo 2012 016.JPG
- File:Kedada Urrez Campagnolo 2012 017.JPG
- File:Kedada Urrez Campagnolo 2012 015.JPG
- File:Kedada Urrez Campagnolo 2012 011.JPG
- File:Kedada Urrez Campagnolo 2012 010.JPG
- File:Kedada Urrez Campagnolo 2012 009.JPG
- File:Kedada Urrez Campagnolo 2012 007.JPG
- File:Kedada Urrez Campagnolo 2012 008.JPG
- File:Kedada Urrez Campagnolo 2012 004.JPG
- File:Kedada Urrez Campagnolo 2012 005.JPG
- File:Kedada Urrez Campagnolo 2012 006.JPG
- File:Kedada Urrez Campagnolo 2012 001.JPG
- File:Kedada Urrez Campagnolo 2012 002.JPG
- File:Kedada Urrez Campagnolo 2012 003.JPG
- File:I Marcha Cicloturista "El Chava" 008.JPG
- File:I Marcha Cicloturista "El Chava" 004.JPG
Sismarinho (talk) 21:38, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, all unused personal photos, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:53, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
com:DW of artworks (of a non notable artist) and FOP doesn't apply. Natuur12 (talk) 21:11, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's username is an anagram of the artist in question, however description implies the photographer is another person, André Smits. Both the photographer and the artist should contact COM:OTRS to confirm the license. --Storkk (talk) 10:33, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Höyhens as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: As if I understand, this is violating copyrights|subpage=File:Haas F1 Team logo.svg.png|year=2016|month=February|day=23 Unless the logo isd actually bellow the COM:TOO. Amitie 10g (talk) 01:01, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
- Exact the same file is uploaded also locally on the English Wikipedia. We discussed about that file on fi:Wikipedia:Kahvihuone_(tekijänoikeudet)#Viel.C3.A4_logoista and I was not 100% sure is this a free file (as suitable to uploaded on Commons). However, this is copyvio, as there are wrong information added, I'm sure that the user who uploaded the file didn't create the logo. --Stryn (talk) 15:21, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
- Keep. Only a stylized "H" in a circle, seems well below threshold of originality. The file info and license will need to be changed because it is not own work. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:30, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept: as textlogo. --Krd 13:37, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
Znak chroniony prawnie. Podejrzenie o fałszerstwo. JohnSmog (talk) 08:23, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:36, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
Deutlicher Verdacht auf URV. Urheber der Texte, der Bilder und des Layouts sind nicht genannt. Auf der Homepage selbst finden sich jeweils keine konkreten Angaben. Das Impressum widerspricht ebenfalls der Nutzung. Haster (talk) 11:39, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
- Wir sind der Portalbetreiber und das Layout wurde von uns in Auftrag gegeben und bezahlt. Da es sich um eine öffentliche Webseite handelt, ist die Darstellung zur freien Nutzung und Verwendung in Dokumenten freigegeben. --Sylvia.springer (talk) 11:55, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
- Hallo. Das Problem ist, dass es in dem Screenshot urheberrechtlich geschütztes Material mindestens dreier Menschen gibt. Die Fotos haben einen (oder mehrere) Urheber, der nicht genannt ist, und der vermutlich nicht dieser Nutzung unter einer freien Lizenz zugestimmt hat. Das gleiche gilt für den (die) Urheber der Texte und den (die) Urheber des Seitenlayouts. Alle nicht genannt und es liegen keine Zustimmungen zur Nutzung unter freier Lizenz vor. Haster (talk) 12:22, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
- Dass ihr Portalbetreiber und AUftraggeber der Arbeiten seid, macht euch nicht zu den Urhebern. Das Urheberrecht bleibt bei den Urhebern. Sie haben mit hoher Wahrscheinlichkeit nur der expliziten Benutzung auf eurer Seite unter der dortigen Lizenz zugestimmt. Du setzt deren Arbeiten aber (ohne ihre wahrscheinliche Zustimmung) hier hinein und das unter einer freien Lizenz, was bedeuten würde, dass ich und jeder andere das urheberrechtlich geschützte Material frei verwenden kann. Für das Layout hieße das beispielsweise, ich dürfte es einfach für meine Homepage übernehmen. Auch die Bilder könnte ich verwenden und verändern usw. Auch kommerziell. Das ist (wahrscheinlich) nicht im Sinne der Urheber. Zumindest müssen wir solange davon ausgehen, bis deren explizite Zustimmung vorliegt. Haster (talk) 12:30, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
- Offensichtliche Urheberrechtsverletzung, für eine Seite bezahlt zu haben begründet kein Urheberrecht. Löschen. // Obvious copyright violation, having paid for the site design doesn't mean you own the copyright. Delete. -- Milad A380 talk 16:58, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
- Offensichtliche Urheberrechtsverletzung, für eine Seite bezahlt zu haben begründet kein Urheberrecht. Löschen. // Obvious copyright violation, having paid for the site design doesn't mean you own the copyright.
- Dass ihr Portalbetreiber und AUftraggeber der Arbeiten seid, macht euch nicht zu den Urhebern. Das Urheberrecht bleibt bei den Urhebern. Sie haben mit hoher Wahrscheinlichkeit nur der expliziten Benutzung auf eurer Seite unter der dortigen Lizenz zugestimmt. Du setzt deren Arbeiten aber (ohne ihre wahrscheinliche Zustimmung) hier hinein und das unter einer freien Lizenz, was bedeuten würde, dass ich und jeder andere das urheberrechtlich geschützte Material frei verwenden kann. Für das Layout hieße das beispielsweise, ich dürfte es einfach für meine Homepage übernehmen. Auch die Bilder könnte ich verwenden und verändern usw. Auch kommerziell. Das ist (wahrscheinlich) nicht im Sinne der Urheber. Zumindest müssen wir solange davon ausgehen, bis deren explizite Zustimmung vorliegt. Haster (talk) 12:30, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:OTRS required. --Krd 13:36, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
Brak zgody właściciela praw autorskich na publikację. JohnSmog (talk) 08:12, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Dubious own work, lacking exif data as well. COM:OTRS needed otherwise. Riley Huntley (talk) 20:16, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. -- Cirt (talk) 01:15, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
_wersja_%22EKO%22.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_wersja_%22EKO%22.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Brak zgody właściciela praw autorskich na wykorzystanie zdjęcia. JohnSmog (talk) 08:15, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
_wersja_"EKO".jpg){kind=link}
- Delete Dubious own work, lacking exif data as well. COM:OTRS needed otherwise. Riley Huntley (talk) 20:16, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. -- Cirt (talk) 01:15, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
_wersja_"EKO".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Brak zgody właściciela praw autorskich na publikację. JohnSmog (talk) 08:17, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete Dubious own work, lacking exif data as well. Riley Huntley (talk) 20:16, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. -- Cirt (talk) 01:15, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Car il va être ajouté dans la galerie Kpu93 (talk) 11:53, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
- Question Kpu93; Can you further elaborate on your nomination? As the creative commons license states "the licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.", therefore it should only be deleted in the event you are wishing to replace it with a preferred file, in which case I recommend uploading a new version. Note that the file is in use. / Pouvez-vous en dire plus sur votre candidature? Comme la licence creative commons stipule que «le donneur de licence ne peut pas révoquer ces libertés aussi longtemps que vous suivez les termes de la licence.", Donc il ne devrait être supprimé dans le cas où vous êtes désireux de le remplacer par un fichier préféré, dans ce cas, je recommande ajout une nouvelle version. Notez que le fichier est en cours d'utilisation. Riley Huntley (talk) 06:44, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Storkk (talk) 17:55, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
중복으로 같은 사진을 등록했습니다. 삭제 부탁드립니다, Ojye00 (talk) 05:21, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
- Google Translate: "I registered the same picture as a duplicate. Delete please,". Looking at Special:Listfiles/Ojye00, the duplicate is probably File:세종대왕초장지 신도비.jpg, however that one appears horizontally compressed in a strange way. Storkk (talk) 10:28, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete in favor of File:세종대왕초장지 신도비.jpg; I can't tell which is better, one is obviously compressed. File:세종대왕초장지 신도비.jpg is the higher quality though. Riley Huntley (talk) 20:18, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
- @Riley Huntley: It's higher resolution, but that doesn't make it higher quality, in my opinion. The poor stretch and the watermark bring it down substantially, IMO... probably to a lower quality than the unstretched lower res version. Storkk (talk) 17:58, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
- Hm.. You're quite right about quality vs resolution, I honestly can't make out which looks better. They both are quite low quality, I personally think File:세종대왕초장지 신도비.jpg looks better. @Ojye00: please expand on your nomination and inform us of which picture more accurately represents the subject. Riley Huntley (talk) 20:23, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept: The other image is watermarked; commons prefers non-watermarked images. --Ankry (talk) 09:04, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
- File:Kanye West Yeezus Tour Toronto 1.jpg
- Not as sure about File:Kanye West Yeezus Tour Toronto 3.jpg
- (This is a potential test batch for Category:The Yeezus Tour)
artistic stage/set design is copyrighted by the designer czar 00:01, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
- Keep I don't see any artistic stage/set design in these images. --Krd 13:40, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
- The stylized platform and the projection design? czar 00:39, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per Krd. --Jcb (talk) 21:28, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
