Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2015/11/09

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive November 9th, 2015
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Orphan, not needed. Willcon2015 (talk) 01:59, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused penis. Revent (talk) 02:13, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Orphan, not needed. Willcon2015 (talk) 01:59, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused penis. Revent (talk) 02:13, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Orphan, not needed. Willcon2015 (talk) 02:00, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused penis. Revent (talk) 02:12, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Present in too many websites. Google searched images. Out of commons scope. Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 05:22, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy as copyvio Ankry (talk) 06:45, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation (image copied from William's facebook profile) Frozeficent (talk) 08:20, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I nominated all the user's other uploads also for deletion. Taivo (talk) 10:28, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

hsudyhwyw87z.a[SL---QW0 2001:980:C132:1:4C9B:89A:D99D:68D5 10:32, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Speedily kept: Non-sense request. Poké95 11:30, 9 November 2015 (UTC) (non-admin close)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Parce qu'il n'a pas été validé et autorisé à mettre en ligne par la personne représentée sur la photo. Intertalent (talk) 14:29, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No valid reason given for the deletion of the photo - image was taken at a public event where the subject knew photographs would taken of him. Tabercil (talk) 22:47, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo non libre de droit - Non autorisée pour publication 109.190.188.196 09:47, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, the photo has OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 12:28, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Correct vector image is created. --Kwasura (talk) 11:51, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Better svg file exists (File:Finnish air force roundel 1934-1945 border.svg). The swastika has also a wrong shade of blue in this one. According to Finnish book about the warpaint of the FAF (Keskinen, Kalevi; Stenman, Kari: Sotamaalaus, Suomen ilmavoimien historia 23. ISBN 951-98751-6-6), the shade of blue should be Federal Standard 595 FS15123 which is used on the Finnish air force roundel 1934-1945 border.svg. --Msaynevirta (talk) 19:36, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: In use, cannot be deleted for these reasons. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:41, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not in use no more. --Kwasura (talk) 13:33, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: again. --JuTa 23:20, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inferior duplicate of the File:Finnish air force roundel 1934-1945 border.svg Kwasura (talk) 17:32, 14 September 2018 (UTC) Kwasura (talk) 19:40, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:32, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pas libre de droit 87.231.132.239 22:40, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Nonsense request. This photo is extracted from another photo which has itself an OTRS authorization. JJ Georges (talk) 06:41, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No evidence given that the shot has improper copyright licensing Tabercil (talk) 13:25, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

elle n'est pas libre de droit 109.190.188.196 09:16, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Si, si, elle est libre de droits. Quand c'est "blanc", on peut répéter tant qu'on voudra que c'est "noir", la réalité ne changera pas pour autant. Jean-Jacques Georges (talk) 10:07, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep @Tabercil and Taivo: another absurd request with no valid reason. Could it be closed, please ? IMHO, all pictures in Category:Gilbert Melki should be protected against IPs for some time. Thanks. Jean-Jacques Georges (talk) 10:18, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, the file has OTRS-permission and is free. Taivo (talk) 11:51, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is routine request for small photo without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photo is so small? Can you upload a bigger version, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload a version with EXIF data? This is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:26, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 20:02, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

möchte foto nicht zu verfügung stellen Rostocker 20:00, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

 Comment: Das Bild ist seit 2012 online, und eine einmal erteilte Creative-Commons-Lizenz kann nicht widerrufen werden. Das heisst, dass alle weiteren Kopien, die eventuell schon im Internet zirkulieren, weiterhin frei verfügbar sind, und Wikimedia Commons nicht verpflichtet ist, das Bild zu löschen. Es wäre außerdem sehr hilfreich, zu wissen, warum das Bild hier plötzlich entfernt werden soll. Nach drei Jahren einfach zu sagen, "ich mag nicht mehr", ist doch sehr merkwürdig. De728631 (talk) 20:17, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedy kept Denniss (talk) 20:43, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

möchte foto nicht zu verfügung stellen Rostocker 20:01, 9 November 2015 (UTC)


Kept: Invalid deletion request. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:05, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:FKK7775.jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

möchte foto nicht zu verfügung stellen Rostocker 20:00, 9 November 2015 (UTC)


Kept: Alan (talk) 21:34, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

möchte foto nicht zu verfügung stellen Rostocker 20:01, 9 November 2015 (UTC)


Kept: Alan (talk) 21:34, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Landschaft oestlich von Rostock.jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

möchte foto nicht zu verfügung stellen Rostocker 20:02, 9 November 2015 (UTC)


Kept: Alan (talk) 21:34, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

möchte foto nicht zu verfügung stellen Rostocker 20:02, 9 November 2015 (UTC)


Kept: Alan (talk) 21:35, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

möchte foto nicht mehr zu verfügung stellen Rostocker 20:04, 9 November 2015 (UTC)


Kept: Alan (talk) 21:35, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

möchte foto nicht mehr zu verfügung stellen Rostocker 20:04, 9 November 2015 (UTC)


Kept: Alan (talk) 21:35, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

möchte foto nicht mehr zu verfügung stellen Rostocker 20:04, 9 November 2015 (UTC)


Kept: Alan (talk) 21:35, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

möchte foto nicht mehr zu verfügung stellen Rostocker 20:05, 9 November 2015 (UTC)


Kept: Alan (talk) 21:35, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

möchte foto nicht mehr zu verfügung stellen Rostocker 20:05, 9 November 2015 (UTC)


Kept: Alan (talk) 21:35, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

möchte foto nicht mehr zu verfügung stellen Rostocker 20:06, 9 November 2015 (UTC)


Kept: Alan (talk) 21:35, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

möchte foto nicht mehr zu verfügung stellen Rostocker 20:06, 9 November 2015 (UTC)


Kept: Alan (talk) 21:35, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

möchte foto nicht mehr zu verfügung stellen Rostocker 20:06, 9 November 2015 (UTC)


Kept: Alan (talk) 21:35, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

möchte foto nicht mehr zu verfügung stellen Rostocker 20:06, 9 November 2015 (UTC)


Kept: Alan (talk) 21:35, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

möchte foto nicht mehr zu verfügung stellen Rostocker 20:07, 9 November 2015 (UTC)


Kept: Alan (talk) 21:35, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

möchte foto nicht mehr zu verfügung stellen Rostocker 20:07, 9 November 2015 (UTC)


Kept: Alan (talk) 21:35, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

möchte foto nicht mehr zu verfügung stellen Rostocker 20:07, 9 November 2015 (UTC)


Kept: Alan (talk) 21:35, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

möchte foto nicht mehr zu verfügung stellen Rostocker 20:08, 9 November 2015 (UTC)


Kept: Alan (talk) 21:35, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

möchte foto nicht mehr zu verfügung stellen Rostocker 20:08, 9 November 2015 (UTC)


Kept: Alan (talk) 21:34, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

möchte foto nicht mehr zu verfügung stellen Rostocker 20:08, 9 November 2015 (UTC)


Kept: Alan (talk) 21:34, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

möchte foto nicht mehr zu verfügung stellen Rostocker 20:08, 9 November 2015 (UTC)


Kept: Alan (talk) 21:34, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

möchte foto nicht mehr zu verfügung stellen Rostocker 20:14, 9 November 2015 (UTC)


Kept: Alan (talk) 21:36, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

möchte foto nicht mehr zu verfügung stellen Rostocker 20:14, 9 November 2015 (UTC)


Kept: Alan (talk) 21:36, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

möchte foto nicht mehr zu verfügung stellen Rostocker 20:14, 9 November 2015 (UTC)


Kept: Alan (talk) 21:36, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

möchte foto nicht mehr zu verfügung stellen Rostocker 20:15, 9 November 2015 (UTC)


Kept: Alan (talk) 21:36, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

möchte foto nicht mehr zu verfügung stellen Rostocker 20:15, 9 November 2015 (UTC)


Kept: Alan (talk) 21:36, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

möchte foto nicht mehr zu verfügung stellen Rostocker 20:15, 9 November 2015 (UTC)


Kept: Alan (talk) 21:36, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

möchte foto nicht mehr zu verfügung stellen Rostocker 20:15, 9 November 2015 (UTC)


Kept: Alan (talk) 21:35, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

möchte foto nicht mehr zu verfügung stellen Rostocker 20:16, 9 November 2015 (UTC)


Kept: Alan (talk) 21:35, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

möchte foto nicht mehr zu verfügung stellen Rostocker 20:16, 9 November 2015 (UTC)


Kept: Alan (talk) 21:35, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

möchte foto nicht mehr zu verfügung stellen Rostocker 20:16, 9 November 2015 (UTC)


Kept: Alan (talk) 21:35, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

möchte foto nicht mehr zu verfügung stellen Rostocker 20:16, 9 November 2015 (UTC)


Kept: Alan (talk) 21:35, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File: 부적절한 그림 메인호걸 (talk) 00:53, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploaders request on upload day JuTa 01:02, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Present in too many copyrighted website. Google searched images. Out of commons scope. Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 05:24, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 11:52, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not in use, wiki isn't a hosting provider Bilderling (talk) 16:38, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of project scope. Sealle (talk) 17:38, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SarahJahan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF. Uploaded on 03.10.2015. Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:LYP New Pavillion 2015.JPG, also using the same exif "Mohammed Naeem", here for File:Faisalabad Airport (general aviation apron).jpg.

Related: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by CraigJ777 + Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Junaid Jalandar + Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Talisha Manzal + Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by CAAPakistanLYP + Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Danish Ahmedan + Commons:Deletion requests/File:LYP New Pavillion 2015.JPG + User talk:Shahzad Oberoi + User talk:RanaNadem + other recent Facebook/no-exif uploaders for Pakistan en:Faisalabad International Airport.

Gunnex (talk) 07:58, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 18:52, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shahnawaz Bhatti 124 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing EXIF. Uploaded in a row on 03.10.2015, it seems that all photos were grabbed from https://www.facebook.com/saftspakistan/photos_stream. Examples:

Related: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by CraigJ777 + Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Junaid Jalandar + Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Talisha Manzal + Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by CAAPakistanLYP + Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Danish Ahmedan + Commons:Deletion requests/File:LYP New Pavillion 2015.JPG + User talk:Shahzad Oberoi + User talk:RanaNadem + other recent Facebook/no-exif uploaders for Pakistan en:Faisalabad International Airport.

Gunnex (talk) 09:32, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 18:46, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MichealPizzalano (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF (manipulated?). Uploaded in a row on 07.11.2015. Considering also File:Air Arabia Airbus A320 Faisalabad Airport.jpeg previously published via (example) https://www.facebook.com/CAAFIAP/photos/pb.387745218066924.-2207520000.1447062775./494455240729254/?type=3&theater (09.2015) or https://www.facebook.com/CAAFIAP/photos/pb.387745218066924.-2207520000.1447063272./494702564037855/?type=3&theater (04.2015) and File:PIA ATR72 and Shaheen Air Airbus A320 Faisalabad.jpg --> https://www.facebook.com/CAAFIAP/photos/pb.387745218066924.-2207520000.1447062778./483501875157924/?type=3&theater (08.2015).

Related: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by CraigJ777 + Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Junaid Jalandar + Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Talisha Manzal + Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by CAAPakistanLYP + Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Danish Ahmedan + Commons:Deletion requests/File:LYP New Pavillion 2015.JPG + User talk:Shahzad Oberoi + User talk:RanaNadem + other recent Facebook/no-exif uploaders for Pakistan en:Faisalabad International Airport.

Gunnex (talk) 10:02, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 19:00, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolution, missing EXIF. Uploaded by 2-upload user JosManager (talk · contributions · Statistics) on 09.04.2015 (1x copyvio).

Related: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by CraigJ777 + Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Junaid Jalandar + Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Talisha Manzal + Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by CAAPakistanLYP + Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Danish Ahmedan + Commons:Deletion requests/File:LYP New Pavillion 2015.JPG + User talk:Shahzad Oberoi + User talk:RanaNadem + other recent Facebook/no-exif uploaders for Pakistan en:Faisalabad International Airport. Gunnex (talk) 07:38, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 19:21, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

não se encaixa nos padrões Oraleia26 (talk) 12:22, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by NahidSultan. Yann (talk) 19:23, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. Uploaded by 1-upload user Sandi Patola (talk · contributions · Statistics) on 23.06.2015.

Related: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by CraigJ777 + Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Junaid Jalandar + Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Talisha Manzal + Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by CAAPakistanLYP + Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Danish Ahmedan + Commons:Deletion requests/File:LYP New Pavillion 2015.JPG + User talk:Shahzad Oberoi + User talk:RanaNadem + other recent Facebook/no-exif uploaders for Pakistan en:Faisalabad International Airport. The whole category Category:Faisalabad International Airport is infected. Gunnex (talk) 17:32, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 19:23, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in France. —Skyllfully (talk | contribs) 18:23, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

How old are they? Who was the artist? Are they even still under copyright? Please do research first! -- 193.187.235.17 12:53, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 19:31, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in France. —Skyllfully (talk | contribs) 18:29, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Old enough. Yann (talk) 19:30, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in France. —Skyllfully (talk | contribs) 18:32, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment - I see images of public places in cities of France similar to this one, also marked as 'own work' that do not seem to have any 'Freedom of Panorama' issues. Is there a particular problem with this one? —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 73.147.59.3 (talk) 19:03, 9 November 2015‎ (UTC)[reply]
@73.147.59.3: Please consult COM:Freedom of panorama#France or COM:VP/C, this is not the place to ask questions. —Skyllfully (talk | contribs) 05:18, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
And where do you see the copyrightable modern architecture or artwork in this image?  Keep -- 193.187.235.17 12:27, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 19:30, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in France. —Skyllfully (talk | contribs) 18:34, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And where do you see the copyrightable modern architecture or artwork in this image?  Keep -- 193.187.235.17 12:29, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 19:27, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolution, missing EXIF. Uploaded by 1-upload user KashifIbrahim (talk · contributions · Statistics) on 10.03.2015.

Related: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by CraigJ777 + Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Junaid Jalandar + Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Talisha Manzal + Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by CAAPakistanLYP + Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Danish Ahmedan + Commons:Deletion requests/File:LYP New Pavillion 2015.JPG + User talk:Shahzad Oberoi + User talk:RanaNadem + other recent Facebook/no-exif uploaders for Pakistan en:Faisalabad International Airport. The whole category Category:Faisalabad International Airport is infected. Gunnex (talk) 18:36, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 19:25, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in France. —Skyllfully (talk | contribs) 18:36, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Just Landscape!! Where do you see the copyrightable modern architecture or artwork in this image? -- 193.187.235.17 12:31, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 19:26, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in France. —Skyllfully (talk | contribs) 19:01, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

How old ist it? Who is the architect? When did he die? Do your research first! -- 193.187.235.17 12:33, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 19:26, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in France. —Skyllfully (talk | contribs) 19:03, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Surely old enough! -- 193.187.235.17 12:35, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 19:26, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico (msg) 00:56, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Nonsense Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:37, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico (msg) 00:57, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Nonsense Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:37, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico (msg) 00:57, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Nonsense Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:37, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, missing exif, no educational purpose Threeohsix (talk) 01:12, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:04, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of COM:SCOPE eurodyne (talk) 01:15, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:04, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status, uploader says is scan from book but doesn't give more details, so no author or date Threeohsix (talk) 01:30, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 00:04, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No confidence that this very poor quality image with overprinting is own work of uploader, looks more like a screen cap or some sort of strange processing. Likely not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:01, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 00:05, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication that this blurry composite is composed of two or more images actually created by the uploader. Looks more like an unattributed collage than own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:01, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 00:05, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Useless blank, black image. —Skyllfully (talk | contribs) 02:04, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 00:05, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Whatever this is or was before a couple of halftonings and trips through the copier has been lost in that method, so that all that remains is a blurry sphere on a blurry black background. Out of COM:SCOPE for no possible educational utility. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:07, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 00:05, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source of base map, looks like google maps. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:11, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:05, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal media, does not meet COM:SELFIE. —Skyllfully (talk | contribs) 02:12, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:05, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality, personal media, violates COM:SELFIE. —Skyllfully (talk | contribs) 02:20, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:06, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From the information given on the template, it is not possible to determine if the license given is correct as there is no authors name listed to have been dead 100+ years. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:25, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:06, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 03:43, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:06, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Suspected license laundering, as it is a screenshot. —Skyllfully (talk | contribs) 03:44, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - The photo was downloaded from Flickr using the Google Creative Commons image search. In Flickr, the uploader referred to the original uploader. —Purpledamaris(talk | contribs)
@Purpledamaris: nonetheless it's still license laundering until it isn't, the original Flickr uploader may be laundering the license. —Skyllfully (talk | contribs) 05:28, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: com:LL Alan (talk) 00:06, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--114.38.187.69 04:11, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:06, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 04:54, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:07, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 05:04, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:07, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Present in too many copyrighted website. Google searched images. Out of commons scope. Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 05:17, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:07, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, image from facebook and anywhere else on web. Google searched images. Out of commons scope. Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 05:20, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:07, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Racconish as no source (No source since). The source gone, but I found this other photo (available here, too) from the same photographer that is CC-BY-2.0, that seems to depicts very likely the same female Atlantoxerus getulus, but taken one day before this shot (according to the Exif metadata, September 4 for the file found in Flickr, and September 5 for this file, and the camera is not the same). Should this be enough to consider this file free? Amitie 10g (talk) 05:21, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:07, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Present in this blogspot. And unlikely own to be own work. Out of commons scope. Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 05:29, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:08, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Present in twitter and other website. Google searched images. Out of commons scope. Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 05:31, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:08, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The claimed author Arnoldo96 is not the creator of the image, it is fully Rights Managed. The creator of the image is I Baldur Bragason as can be seen in the original Exif metadata. I can be reached through my email client on my website www.bragason.com for further information. No Creative Commons licence has been given for any unlicenced publication of this image. With regards. Baldur Bragason. Photographer 2.69.35.164 05:32, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:08, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Present in this website. Out of commons scope. Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 05:40, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:08, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Present in too many copyrighted website. And unlikely own to be own work. Google searched images. Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 05:47, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:08, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work. Possibly it's a scanned photo by an unknown author. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 05:56, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:08, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that the logo is also cc-by-sa 4.0 licensed. Ankry (talk) 06:57, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:09, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks to have been scanned from a book or similar. Uploader's username is "googlenews". -mattbuck (Talk) 07:22, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:09, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Saab press photo, page marked "Copyright Saab AB". Legal notice makes no mention of Creative Commons license. MKFI (talk) 07:39, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:09, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo. Can't be own or free Bilderling (talk) 07:43, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:09, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Vandal's contribution, not in use. Bilderling (talk) 07:49, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:09, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files by User:Dr.blako

[edit]

I suspect all files uploaded by User:Dr.blako are copyright violations. Images are taken with many different cameras, several of them are web grabs.

Additionally File:Ceros-200-ceros 200-main.jpg (separate deletion request) is a manufacturer's press photo. MKFI (talk) 08:04, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Added one missing file. MKFI (talk) 13:14, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 00:10, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BankayMian (talk · contribs)

[edit]

A handful of copyright violations identified among those files already; the rest has widely-varying formats and resolutions, unlikely "own work"

Ariadacapo (talk) 08:27, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom and some already deleted Alan (talk) 00:11, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The sculptor died in 1972. No FOP in Russia for sculptures. BrightRaven (talk) 09:01, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:12, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In the image is mentioned "copyright all rights reserved". Is it indeed that the user has it created and gives the licence as mentioned? Wouter (talk) 09:02, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:12, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 09:03, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:12, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of common scope (watermark image) Biplab Anand (Talk) 09:58, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:12, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible Advertisement (license required) Biplab Anand (Talk) 10:02, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:13, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope and quite probably a copyright violation. -mattbuck (Talk) 10:21, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:13, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work, not permanently installed. -mattbuck (Talk) 10:32, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:13, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of project scope Threeohsix (talk) 10:35, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:13, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:13, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of project scope Threeohsix (talk) 10:48, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:13, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 10:54, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:13, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of project scope Threeohsix (talk) 11:01, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:13, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The logo surpasses threshold of originality. Author Marius Matache must send OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 11:05, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:14, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo can't be own or free Bilderling (talk) 11:06, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:14, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvios from Facebook Account of EHC Wetzikon https://www.facebook.com/ehcwetzikon Xgeorg (talk) 11:06, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:14, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not in use, spamer's contribution Bilderling (talk) 11:06, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:15, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not in use, spamer's contribution Bilderling (talk) 11:06, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:15, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not in use, spamer's contribution Bilderling (talk) 11:06, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:14, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not in use, spamer's contribution Bilderling (talk) 11:06, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:14, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not in use, spamer's contribution Bilderling (talk) 11:06, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:14, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not in use, spamer's contribution Bilderling (talk) 11:07, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:14, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not in use, spamer's contribution Bilderling (talk) 11:07, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:16, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not in use, spamer's contribution Bilderling (talk) 11:07, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:16, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not in use, spamer's contribution Bilderling (talk) 11:07, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:15, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not in use, spamer's contribution Bilderling (talk) 11:07, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:15, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo can't be own or free Bilderling (talk) 11:09, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:15, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of project scope Threeohsix (talk) 11:11, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:15, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

je ne veux pas Boysurf2015 (talk) 06:48, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:26, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fantastic image Kwasura (talk) 03:23, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Kept. Jcb (talk) 14:57, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If one looks "carefully" at this, they will see that the wolf image has been copy pasted from somewhere and has not been sourced; it is not PD ZK-002 (talk) 07:11, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete It is all wrong from the beginning. This "roundel" have nothing to do with the real one. Don't know why it is still kept, despite the votes of over users. We have to inform, not to misinform people. --Kwasura (talk) 12:18, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment - apparently the reason in the previous DR was meant to be 'fantasy image' rather than 'fantastic (=great) image'. So you may ignore my 2011 closure. Jcb (talk) 17:11, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per nom. Alan (talk) 00:27, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Paul-Eric Langevin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Very unlikely to be "own work" as claimed. The color images, without exception, appear elsewhere on the web without a free license. The B&W images are mostly are very small. All of those I have checked appear elsewhere on the Web without a free license.

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:30, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nominator Alan (talk) 00:18, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

scene from Two Broke Girls TV show Mjrmtg (talk) 11:57, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:18, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I could not find better license than "© 2010 - 2015 Управление информации и общественных связей МВД Республики Беларусь" at source site. Probably copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 11:59, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:18, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:18, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:19, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:19, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't think the uploader is the creator. Low resolution, no metadata - probable copyvio. -mattbuck (Talk) 12:10, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:19, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A copyrighted company logo. Glorious 93 (talk) 12:26, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:19, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons has problem with very bad cat-photos. Out of project scope due to quality. Taivo (talk) 12:36, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:19, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:54, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:20, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:55, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:20, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:58, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:20, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is a copy from a legit copyrighted one registered by me on 2004 and is still registered till 2019, so I ask to delete this archive because is not the legit creator. 87.222.97.53 13:03, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:20, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. -mattbuck (Talk) 13:05, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:20, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermark dissagrees with own work claim Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:11, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:20, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Here is that photo as from 'Ministry of Defense of Spain', or 'mde.es', not from Smortega22, COM:PCP! Ras67 (talk) 13:33, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:20, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of panorama for statues in Norway -- Deadstar (msg) 13:41, 9 November 2015 (UTC) Also -[reply]

File:NO-tromsoe-amundsen-domkirke.jpg
File:Skulptur Roald Amundsen - no-nb digifoto 20150225 00105 NB MIT FNR 10852.jpg
File:Tromsø 2013 06 05 3717 (10117794265).jpg
File:Beloved mascot superhero Roald Amundsen in the evening (2006-03) - ghastly - panoramio.jpg

(Basically all files in Category:Carl E. Paulsen - Norwegian sculptor, died 1973) -- Deadstar (msg) 13:44, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:21, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of project scope Threeohsix (talk) 13:56, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:21, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Vanity picture, no value, out of scope Timtrent (talk) 14:00, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Used in User:Zahze04/sandbox, deleted as hoax because of unsourced and unverifiable claim that subject played as captain of his country's team. JohnCD (talk) 16:29, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:28, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of youtube video (licensed with Creative Commons:3.0), but unlikely to be own work, missing attribution for author and wrong license Threeohsix (talk) 14:08, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:28, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio, image grabbed from internet Threeohsix (talk) 14:31, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:28, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio of a poster for a play. Billetreduc.com is a booking site for theater plays. Martin // discuter 14:46, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:28, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation: The painting on this stamp is a work of de:A. Paul Weber, who died in 1980, so his works won't come into public domain before 2051. Correlatio (talk) 15:10, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:28, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused advertisement of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:17, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:28, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:18, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:28, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Farookh ali abbasi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete keep one as user page image, delete the other! This isn't Facebook nor Instagram.--ProfessorX (talk) 22:24, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: except one Alan (talk) 00:29, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Farookh ali abbasi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope. This user has mistaken Wikipedia/Commons for Facebook/Flickr; he has no edits on any subject but himself. I omit File:Farookh ali.jpg, which was previously kept for use as a user-page photo.

I also nominate the orphaned talk page Talk:Farookh ali abbasi, and suggest a look at User:Farookh ali abbasi - I do not know how tolerant Commons is of autobiography/CV user pages for non-contributors.

JohnCD (talk) 21:52, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 20:19, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation: The shown paintings here are all works of de:Gabriele Münter, who died in 1962. Because she was German, her works won't come into public domain before 2033.

Correlatio (talk) 15:21, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:22, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:21, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:23, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://si.wsj.net/public/resources/images/BN-GM009_0116J__J_20150116014614.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:23, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:23, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:23, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by TonyTheKing112 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:22, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by TonyTheKing112 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, considering self-made album covers released supposedly – per en:User:TonyTheKing112/sandbox – since 01.2016 by "Anthony Dalesandro" [enwiki: speedy deleted] / "Vanoss Band" [enwiki: speedy deleled] / "Ottavio" [enwiki: no entry]) but most likely all derived from elsewhwere copyrighted content.

Gunnex (talk) 16:13, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:54, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A screenshot, evidently autopromo - doesn't seem to be in scope, as well as File:ScreenshotCPC1.png Pibwl (talk) 15:27, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:23, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:22, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

One of these insignias is fictional. Another one exist already. --Kwasura (talk) 22:24, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:24, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation: The shown paintings here are both works of de:Erich Heckel, who died in 1970. Because he was German, his works won't come into public domain before 2041.

Correlatio (talk) 15:31, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:24, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted Alan (talk) 00:23, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

apparently single unused personal photo Pibwl (talk) 15:38, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:24, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

apparently single unused personal photo... maybe he wanted to brag about the watch (I have no idea if there is anything to brag) Pibwl (talk) 15:39, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:24, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:24, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:25, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:25, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:25, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Maxkleiner (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:29, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:30, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

some DJ, unused, no category - doesn't seem to have a real educational value, as well as File:Dj foxzill Dancehall Legendary.jpg, File:FOXZILL,S LOGO.jpg and maybe others. Pibwl (talk) 15:54, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:30, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:30, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Charlesmaurine42 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos and art. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:30, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:31, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:31, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:31, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Möchte Foto besser bearbeiten. Eichefranz (talk) 15:59, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:31, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no category, small size, group of people posing - no realistic educational use Pibwl (talk) 16:02, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:31, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doesn't seem to be in scope, sole upload Pibwl (talk) 16:04, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:31, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake copyleft placed on corporate logo accessed by uploader via online press release created by logo's owner, Qube Cinema. Brianhe (talk) 10:48, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:46, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doesn't seem to be in scope Pibwl (talk) 16:07, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:31, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be a crop of File:Eric Moo and His Fans.JPG. Copyvio: author not attributed, licence not linked. Not sure if we need a crop at all. Stefan2 (talk) 16:10, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:31, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

along with File:Book 5.jpg, File:Book 8.jpg some book covers, unused, no cat, out of scope Pibwl (talk) 16:10, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:31, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Pibwl (talk) 16:15, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:32, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Pibwl (talk) 16:16, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:32, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional image, out of scope. P 1 9 9   16:23, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:32, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional image, out of scope. P 1 9 9   16:24, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:32, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional image, out of scope P 1 9 9   16:25, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:32, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional image, out of scope P 1 9 9   16:25, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:32, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not in use, wiki isn't a hosting provider Bilderling (talk) 16:38, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:33, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope — Racconish ☎ 16:51, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:33, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

small size, unlikely own work... Pibwl (talk) 17:15, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:33, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probably copyright infringement, out of scope anyway - sole upload Pibwl (talk) 17:18, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:33, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - some promo, unused, no category, as well as remaining user's uploads: File:Amibroker 2.png, File:Training Poster.png (the rest were nominated in other entries) Pibwl (talk) 17:24, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:33, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, along with its twin File:Mypicture.gif Pibwl (talk) 17:25, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:33, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

single unused personal photo Pibwl (talk) 17:34, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:33, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo of Pro TV //  Gikü  said  done  Monday, 9 November 2015 00:06 (UTC) 00:06, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:46, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo of Pro TV //  Gikü  said  done  Monday, 9 November 2015 00:06 (UTC) 00:06, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:46, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

file완성1.png 메인호걸 (talk) 00:58, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: not valid reason Alan (talk) 00:48, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doubtful own work Pibwl (talk) 17:38, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:49, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused screenshot without educational value, many other ones already at Commons, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:45, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:49, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

sole unused personal photo Pibwl (talk) 17:45, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:49, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

group photo, doesn't seem to be in scope, unused Pibwl (talk) 17:47, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:49, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Seoulwedding 1

[edit]

Pure advertising, only used on a sandbox page that's inactive since 2012. Out of scope.

P 1 9 9   18:10, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:50, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused logo of some band Pibwl (talk) 18:34, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:50, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doesn't seem to be in scope, sole upload (autopromo?) Pibwl (talk) 18:58, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:51, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

banner, doesn't seem to be in scope Pibwl (talk) 19:03, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:51, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

banner, doesn't seem to be in scope Pibwl (talk) 19:03, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:52, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

banner, doesn't seem to be in scope Pibwl (talk) 19:03, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:52, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

banner, doesn't seem to be in scope Pibwl (talk) 19:03, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:52, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

banner, doesn't seem to be in scope Pibwl (talk) 19:05, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:53, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

simpl text logo, doesn't seem to be in scope Pibwl (talk) 19:06, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:53, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unusable size, sole upload Pibwl (talk) 19:10, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:52, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ACP909 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Each of these files has a release statement that I believe requires correct proof. I see each as a potential copyright violation without that proof. They appear to be collected from various online media. I suggest that OTRS verification of each, individually, be received to determine if they are allowed to remain.

Timtrent (talk) 19:14, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:52, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

look like it was taken from the official website: http://www.havoda.org.il/Web/Labor/NachmanShai/Default.aspx 86.3.91.61 19:23, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:52, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doesn't seem to be in scope- screenshot of bastion as a featured article on main page Pibwl (talk) 19:24, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:54, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not selfie. 86.3.91.61 19:31, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What kind of deletion motive is it? I didn't understand. Ldorfman (talk) 20:51, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The photographer is the depicted person.

He owns the rights for this picture, so it's valid. Ldorfman (talk) 20:03, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: not valid reason Alan (talk) 00:54, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

most likely copyrighted Pibwl (talk) 19:32, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:56, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

definitely out of scope, along with all other user's uploads Pibwl (talk) 19:35, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: all uploads nuked Alan (talk) 00:56, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doesn't seem to be in scope Pibwl (talk) 19:36, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:56, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

apparently unused personal photo, sole upload Pibwl (talk) 19:37, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:57, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

looks like copyright violation, sole upload Pibwl (talk) 19:49, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 01:00, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader has already uploaded this image and had it deleted once, see File:Phoenix II.jpg, is not the author as claimed. KDS4444 (talk) 19:49, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 01:00, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, along with File:Beauty 2 small.jpg Pibwl (talk) 19:51, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:59, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, sole upload Pibwl (talk) 20:09, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:59, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

book cover? -out of scope, unclear copyright, unused Pibwl (talk) 20:11, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:59, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal? photo, sole upload Pibwl (talk) 20:12, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:59, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These selfies are out of project scope because they lack any educational value. Commons is not a random image repository. De728631 (talk) 20:30, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also nominated:

De728631 (talk) 20:34, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:58, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doesn't seem to be in scope, apart from unclear copyright of peculiar photos Pibwl (talk) 20:33, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:57, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, personal collage Pibwl (talk) 20:34, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:58, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - no real educational use IMO Pibwl (talk) 20:35, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:58, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only part of the original image is shown. Sminthopsis84 (talk) 20:35, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:58, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, sole upload Pibwl (talk) 21:54, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:58, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not sure that it is the uploader's own work. http://www.amazon.com/Cornel-Adam-Lengyel/e/B00MZE8VFU WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 22:19, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:57, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of project scope Threeohsix (talk) 22:45, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:57, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo of small business that is not used on any projects --WayfaringWanderer (talk) 23:06, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:57, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, unused personal? photo. Same for File:Nampang dulu sebelum beraktifitas.jpg and File:Keep the spirit.jpg Pibwl (talk) 20:37, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 01:13, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal media, violates COM:SELFIE. —Skyllfully (talk | contribs) 20:55, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 01:11, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor duplicate fo File:Roman Manchester by Charles Roeder p117.jpg Mpaa (talk) 21:13, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 01:11, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality, unusuable Threeohsix (talk) 23:00, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Traumrune Alan (talk) 01:12, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to the caption the uploader added to the image where it is currently in use on en.wp, this is a still from a film this person was in and therefore obviously not a free image as claimed. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:20, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Source https://www.facebook.com/ShivamPatil.Official/timeline Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:24, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This was deleted once before. Not sure if this is the exact same image or not, but this is just a vanity selfie that was only used on a user's vanity page, now deleted, at en.wp. Outside of project scope. Beeblebrox (talk) 01:00, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:52, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't think this is the same image, or even the same person, as the previously deleted versions but once again this is just an unused vanity selfie with no educational value. Therefore outside the scope of what Commons is for. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:08, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:19, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

along with two remaining uploads File:BabyMonitorSS2013-Fig2.jpg, File:BabyMonitorSS2013-Fig1.jpg - out of scope, unusable small size, unused Pibwl (talk) 18:55, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:43, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doesn't seem to be in scope, as well as user's other upload File:Baby Roger Logo.png. Besides, unclear copyright status. Pibwl (talk) 18:57, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:42, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, autopromo, along with File:Beachbody.jpg, File:Independent Team Beachbody Coach.jpg, File:Body Beast.jpg, File:Body Beast Transformation.jpg, File:ChaLEAN Extreme.jpg, possibly also others Pibwl (talk) 19:40, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: SPAM, out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:44, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor duplicate of File:Roman Manchester by Charles Roeder p115.jpg Mpaa (talk) 21:12, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused poor duplicate George Chernilevsky talk 05:48, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality of File:Roman Manchester by Charles Roeder p113.jpg Mpaa (talk) 21:15, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused poor duplicate George Chernilevsky talk 05:45, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

por and parial dulicate of File:Roman Manchester by Charles Roeder p75.jpg Mpaa (talk) 21:57, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused poor duplicate George Chernilevsky talk 05:49, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hari7902564 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope : no realistic educational content.

— Racconish ☎ 16:53, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: 4 deleted, 1 kept Alan (talk) 11:26, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no what, no where, no nothing. unusable Herzi Pinki (talk) 17:01, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I doubt the good quality. But nevertheless, Amitie 10g, can you help to add at least some useful information to the image? Is this a lake, is this the sea, which lake / sea, which mountain range? Not even a date. --Herzi Pinki (talk) 11:08, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: In scope Alan (talk) 11:27, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio - source page http://www.huxiaoyuan.com/enworkstext.aspx?id=48&year=2012&wtid=48 , work is too recent. Same for artist's photo File:Hu xiaoyuan.jpg and I guess, rest of user's uploads. Pibwl (talk) 17:29, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 11:27, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The statement on the file page is at variance with the copyright notice on the source page. This must be resolved, please. Either the source page must be shown, with accuracy. to have the correct licence as stated on Commons, or OTRS proof of release must be given. Without one or the other of these this should not remain Timtrent (talk) 18:50, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm really sorry but I need to learn on OTRS, and how to work with copyright. It will get better. Any clue to what is going wrong with the file will help. ACP909 (talk)

I just contacted the owner. the owner e-mailed me back and was willing to give permission for the file. the owner will e-mail soon the requested form to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org with subject: Copyright statement - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Bebesweetbriar.jpg ACP909ACP909 (talk) 16:52, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per cmts Alan (talk) 11:30, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional, test image; uploaded by promotional username. —Skyllfully (talk | contribs) 21:26, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: promo Alan (talk) 11:30, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Meta Data indicates "Danielle Lussier Photography", but the user who uploaded this makes no mention that he or she is the copyright holder and it's suspect. Mattnad (talk) 22:30, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Extended details in metadata state "(c)Tony DeFilippo"Mattnad (talk) 17:01, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nominatore Alan (talk) 11:31, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Subject is the author of the image? If not, we need COM:OTRS permission from the author. Thibaut120094 (talk) 17:07, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Alan (talk) 17:30, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image appears to be taken from http://www.gymmedia.com/wheel-gymnastics/real-History-Mono-Wheel-Cyr-Wheel — where it is accompanied by a copyright message. AtticusX (talk) 18:55, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 17:31, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fajjuify (talk · contribs)

[edit]

I speedy deleted those but I restored them for a regular DR per the discussion here.

Natuur12 (talk) 18:58, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for restoring these images, Natuur12. As far as I understand Template:PD-India, photographs from before 1958, and probably also photoshopped derivatives of such (which these three supposedly are, according to the date in the descriptions), fall into the public domain. I'll tag them as such now. If anyone knows otherwise, please feel free to move forward to deletion again. If my assumption is correct, please remove the speedy deletion tag that I'll leave in the file description for now. Thanks. --Enyavar (talk) 00:49, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per above Alan (talk) 17:32, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by BMacZero as duplicate (dupe) and the most recent rationale was: File:Trombe.jpg


 Kept, as redir. - duplicate images in older file versions of File:Trombe.jpg.Wdwd (talk) 20:13, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.


In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Indonesia. —Skyllfully (talk | contribs) 04:37, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Nothing copyrightable, just an old wooden shack. Even old enough to be put into a museum. -- 193.187.235.17 12:12, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Image showns no work that is still under copyright (derivative work). Wdwd (talk) 20:16, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I doubt if this logo is subject to PD-textlogo Artem Korzhimanov (talk) 13:56, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think it is, because it "only consists of simple geometric shapes or text". --Neq00 (talk) 11:21, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure if this "nike-like" curves at top and bottom are "simple". In my opinion they are quite complex. Artem Korzhimanov (talk) 14:09, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nike logo itself is subject to PD-textlogo (see here). Moreover, other logos, that are certainly more complex than this one, are under PD-textlogo (this one, this one and this one for example). --Neq00 (talk) 15:02, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Logo of simple geometric shapes and simple text according to COM:TOO. Wdwd (talk) 20:22, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cette photo réalisée par Jean Collas pour le compte de Jacques Biny ne peut être diffusée et n'est pas exempte de droits d'auteurs Thorens-Bini (talk) 16:53, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyrigt violation Ymblanter (talk) 20:12, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cette photo réalisée par Jean Collas pour le compte de Jacques Biny ne peut être diffusée et n'est pas exempte de droits d'auteurs Thorens-Bini (talk) 16:54, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyrigt violation Ymblanter (talk) 20:12, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

falsche Gebäude Brassel48 (talk) 18:40, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: upploader's request Ymblanter (talk) 20:12, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor duplicate of File:Roman Manchester by Charles Roeder p125.jpg Mpaa (talk) 21:44, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no reason to delete Wdwd (talk) 20:28, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poo duplicate of File:Roman Manchester by Charles Roeder p23.jpg Mpaa (talk) 21:46, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no reason to delete Wdwd (talk) 20:29, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor duplicate of File:Roman Manchester by Charles Roeder p57.jpg Mpaa (talk) 21:47, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no reason to delete Wdwd (talk) 20:29, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor duplicate of File:Roman Manchester by Charles Roeder p59.jpg Mpaa (talk) 21:48, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no reason to delete Wdwd (talk) 20:30, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality of File:Roman Manchester by Charles Roeder p61.jpg Mpaa (talk) 21:50, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no reason to delete Wdwd (talk) 20:30, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor duplicate of File:Roman Manchester by Charles Roeder p111.jpg Mpaa (talk) 21:53, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no reason to delete. Wdwd (talk) 20:25, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this and remaining 8(!) user's photos are used only on his userpage, which is his only activity, created in April 2014... Commons is not a family album. Pibwl (talk) 16:14, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: All personal and unused images. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:49, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Belarus. Minsk-arena was designed by a group of architects, one of whom was Valery Kutsko (Russian: Валерий Куцко, b. 1955) Jarash (talk) 22:16, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:47, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

w:File:Paul Greenberg.jpeg (which is the same picture) says "Photo credit Paul Greenberg" which suggests that the uploader got the picture from Paul Greenberg. Possibly not a self-shot, so the photographer might be some unidentified third party. This puts doubt on the copyright status of the picture. Stefan2 (talk) 23:12, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:49, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There's something wrong with the coding here; nobody's going to use an SVG with text and other-stuff dimensions that result in part of the label going beyond the edge of the file. I understand that this is a template, not something meant for use as an image itself, but the only thing that would be changed when making a new image is the route number, "00" in this image, not the "HESTE". You might say "yes, there's a problem, but it's easier to fix it than to create a new image". True, but we already have File:Chester Township Route 178, Morrow County, Ohio.svg, which uses a font size that works quite well with this sign shape. Nyttend (talk) 06:23, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Oppose This file uses the correct font and font size. The legend only appears to be clipped because Commons' PNG renderer doesn't have the Roadgeek fonts installed. If you install the Roadgeek fonts on your computer, then open the actual SVG file in your browser, the legend will look fine (and the 00s will look narrow like they're supposed to). Files such as File:Chester Township Route 178, Morrow County, Ohio.svg have good-looking legends in PNG previews because they've have already been converted to paths that can't be edited. Indeed, you can't easily use File:Chester Township Route 178, Morrow County, Ohio.svg to create another shield, because you'd have to manually replace all the paths with text. I figured that anyone using this template would have to convert the number to a path anyways before uploading, so converting the legend to a path wasn't much of a burden. However, since other files in Category:Highway shield templates have legends like "Wyoming" as paths, I've updated these templates to use paths for their legends too. – Minh Nguyễn 💬 07:24, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
To better understand what I'm saying here: open this template SVG in Inkscape or Illustrator, then replace "00" with whatever number, then convert the text into a path, then upload. Now try doing the same with File:Chester Township Route 178, Morrow County, Ohio.svg. – Minh Nguyễn 💬 07:29, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: This template is in scope and linked as the source template on several derivative files. The suggested alternative of File:Chester Township Route 178, Morrow County, Ohio.svg has had its text converted to paths, which complicates potential use as a template. —RP88 (talk) 10:14, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See a similar DR. Like that one, this one is for a template image that's broken, and we have a better image of the same style already available, so nobody will use this template if they know about the other file. Nyttend (talk) 06:28, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Oppose for the same reasons given at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Chester Township, Morrow County, Ohio, route shield template.svg. – Minh Nguyễn 💬 07:25, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: This template is in scope and linked as the source template on at least one derivative file. The suggested alternative of File:Bearfield Township Route 323, Perry County, Ohio.svg has had its text converted to paths, which complicates potential use as a template. —RP88 (talk) 10:19, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

falsche Bild, der Ev Ehrenfriedhof liegt gegenüber Brassel48 (talk) 18:43, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Self-requested deletion of an unused file. Deleted as a courtesy to the uploader. —RP88 (talk) 10:42, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by KurodaSho as no permission, but I cant find an external source to doubt own work as claimed. JuTa 22:21, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The photo on top of the blue background is the same photo as appears on Andres Cuervo's single La Raceta (see [3], [4], etc.). Unlikely to be own work of the uploader, and if is they need to confirm permission via COM:OTRS. —RP88 (talk) 10:35, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio. pages 355-362 contain comments by Emma Zolova (Russian: Эмма Золова, b 1936) Jarash (talk) 21:52, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: This is volume four of the five volume Збор твораў у пяці тамах by Źmitrok Biadula, a pen name for Shmuel Yefimovich Plavnik (1886–1941). It was published over a several year period, from 1985-1989. Volume four was published in 1987 with a valid copyright notice (see page 6 of file). The portions of this book that are authored by Źmitrok Biadula are PD in both Belarus and the U.S. However, the commentary section by literary critic Emma Zolova does indeed appear to be still protected by copyright. If the uploader would like to redact the file (perhaps by putting black bars over the copyrighted portion, i.e. pages 355-362), leave a note on my talk page, and I'll undelete this file. —RP88 (talk) 11:33, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]