Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2015/10/20

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive October 20th, 2015
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by B4ball77 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Songs. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 00:22, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by B4ball77 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Songs. No evidence of permissions. File:Abhi.ogg most likely performed by en:Sonu Nigam, Indian singer.

Gunnex (talk) 07:10, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See also DR above. Gunnex (talk) 07:11, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, by user:Materialscientist as copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 20:26, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

News photo of actress Betty Lago. Small size and no EXIF, uploaded by first-time contributor. A much larger version of this photo was published in varous news sites in September 2015, like here and here. Thuresson (talk) 19:18, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear copyright violation. JuTa 19:46, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: could be found on other web sites with Google Images (like https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/622443542036750336/BAMYStra.jpg). EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as copyvio deleted Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:50, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OTRS ticket doesn't cover the logo, but is this OK as PD-textlogo? Yann (talk) 11:02, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This logo is from bollywood hungama website. So, I've used {{Cc-by-3.0-BollywoodHungama}} for licensing terms. Regards, Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 16:17, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Tulsi Bhagat: The ticket doesn't cover the logo, so this license is invalid. However, it might {{PD-textlogo}}. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:23, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann: Let me know, Can i replace {{Cc-by-3.0-BollywoodHungama}} with {{PD-textlogo}}. So that, this logo don't need to be delete. Regards, Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 17:51, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
If you want it here, yes. I am not sure it is simple enough, so waiting for other admins opinions. Yann (talk) 17:55, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: The triangle is above originality, the rest is duplicate of File:Free Bollywood Logo.svg. Yann (talk) 18:31, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio. Fry1989 eh? 16:54, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 18:19, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Out of project scope! Ras67 (talk) 00:43, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope. Thibaut120094 (talk) 01:19, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like this is a screenshot of this GoPro video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yQCuw9jADcs Ytoyoda (talk) 01:23, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: indeed. Thibaut120094 (talk) 01:21, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AgentBuBu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyright violations - small sizes - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful

INeverCry 02:05, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 01:22, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ayoub parkour (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyright violations - small sizes- no EXIF - own work claim doubtful

INeverCry 02:06, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 01:22, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Patrisia Pedregullo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 02:09, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Thibaut120094 (talk) 01:22, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Paola Nuñez Cetina (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - no educational value - tiny thumbs from 2 to 5kb in size

INeverCry 02:12, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 01:23, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Paola Nuñez Cetina (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope.

Stefan2 (talk) 12:27, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination --Krd 18:12, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ngororano Gad (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 02:14, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Thibaut120094 (talk) 01:25, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 02:20, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Thibaut120094 (talk) 01:25, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bush.bonetti (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - no educational value

INeverCry 02:26, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Thibaut120094 (talk) 01:26, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ђорђе Симић (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyright violations - small sizes - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful

INeverCry 02:34, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per COM:PRP Thibaut120094 (talk) 01:26, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 02:35, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Thibaut120094 (talk) 01:27, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong name 최광모 (talk) 02:58, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Empty page. Please use {{Speedy}} next time. Thibaut120094 (talk) 01:28, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:19, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Thibaut120094 (talk) 01:29, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:24, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Thibaut120094 (talk) 01:29, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like not own work. No EXIF data exists to prove that the uploader is the author. Possible copyright violation. Pokéfan95 (talk) 00:21, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Alan. Thibaut120094 (talk) 01:32, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope! Ras67 (talk) 00:41, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Thibaut120094 (talk) 01:32, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:35, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Thibaut120094 (talk) 01:33, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - no educational value - blurry low-quality image INeverCry 03:41, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 01:33, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Roodjerry francois (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - promotional images

INeverCry 03:44, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Thibaut120094 (talk) 01:33, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ralo Famerica (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - promotional images

INeverCry 03:47, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Thibaut120094 (talk) 01:35, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:52, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Thibaut120094 (talk) 01:35, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hicham.boumlik (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 03:55, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Thibaut120094 (talk) 01:35, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Eugene.korotkov (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 03:56, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Thibaut120094 (talk) 01:36, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Keiner saith (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 03:58, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Thibaut120094 (talk) 01:36, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 04:00, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Thibaut120094 (talk) 01:37, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 04:03, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Thibaut120094 (talk) 01:37, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

violation of copyright Remux - Nunca Olvidaré, que me enamoré de la más hermosa flor. Ĉu mi povas helpi vin iel? 04:03, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio Thibaut120094 (talk) 01:37, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Booyah Shnikenz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - no educational value - blurry low-quality images

INeverCry 04:05, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Thibaut120094 (talk) 01:40, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation Remux - Nunca Olvidaré, que me enamoré de la más hermosa flor. Ĉu mi povas helpi vin iel? 04:08, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. Thibaut120094 (talk) 01:40, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Does not meet COM:EDUSE. —Skyllfully (talk | contribs) 04:13, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Thibaut120094 (talk) 01:40, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Michael Yuki (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 04:14, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Thibaut120094 (talk) 01:44, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be copyrighted image: http://fr.starafrica.com/football/esperance-de-tunis-sami-hlel-va-faire-appel-et-evoque-le-cas-mutu.html Ytoyoda (talk) 04:24, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: indeed, please use {{Copyvio}} next time. Thibaut120094 (talk) 01:44, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely video game screenshot Ytoyoda (talk) 04:25, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: indeed, please use {{Copyvio}} next time. Thibaut120094 (talk) 01:45, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation http://www.entrepreneur.com/article/237261 Flat Out (talk) 05:22, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio Thibaut120094 (talk) 01:46, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

last time it wasnt own work - see here (admin link only). JuTa 07:43, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete – the uploader seems incapable of uploading anything but copyright violations. LX (talk, contribs) 20:36, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: blatant copyvio Thibaut120094 (talk) 01:47, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo. Can't be free Bilderling (talk) 08:00, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep You're joking, right? Obviously PD-textlogo. Fry1989 eh? 21:48, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: {{PD-textlogo}} Thibaut120094 (talk) 01:47, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spamer's. Not in use. Bilderling (talk) 08:01, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: advertising Thibaut120094 (talk) 01:49, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spamer's. Not in use. Bilderling (talk) 08:01, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: advertising Thibaut120094 (talk) 01:50, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spamer's. Not in use. Bilderling (talk) 08:01, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: advertising Thibaut120094 (talk) 01:50, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spamer's. Not in use. Bilderling (talk) 08:01, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: advertising Thibaut120094 (talk) 01:51, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spamer's. Not in use. Bilderling (talk) 08:01, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: advertising Thibaut120094 (talk) 01:51, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spamer's. Not in use. Bilderling (talk) 08:01, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: advertising Thibaut120094 (talk) 01:51, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 08:12, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Thibaut120094 (talk) 01:51, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 08:12, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Thibaut120094 (talk) 01:52, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 08:12, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Thibaut120094 (talk) 01:53, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 08:13, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Thibaut120094 (talk) 01:53, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 08:13, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Thibaut120094 (talk) 01:53, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

comporte une erreur de signe Bory michel (talk) 09:41, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: uploader uploaded a new version Thibaut120094 (talk) 01:55, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo. Can't be own or free Bilderling (talk) 10:01, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: indeed Thibaut120094 (talk) 01:56, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo. Can't be own or free Bilderling (talk) 10:35, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: doesn't meet COM:TOO IMHO Thibaut120094 (talk) 01:56, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo of subject with no discernible notability. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope. LX (talk, contribs) 10:57, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Thibaut120094 (talk) 02:00, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unneeded image of non notable company. Kethrus (talk) 11:04, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Thibaut120094 (talk) 02:00, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality photo of self-made art. Not in scope. Revent (talk) 04:36, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 03:06, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As I understand it, under exisiting copyright law as it is - abusively to my mind - applied to architecture, the building shown is too recent. Art Grafix (talk) 11:14, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per COM:FOP#France Thibaut120094 (talk) 02:02, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, possible copyvio (there is a watermark in the lower-left corner). Pokéfan95 (talk) 11:46, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, I think, that the image is ineligible to copyright due to simplicity, but is out of scope. Taivo (talk) 10:33, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of scope. Thibaut120094 (talk) 02:03, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio (there is watermark in the lower-left corner). Pokéfan95 (talk) 11:48, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, violates COM:TOYS, copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 10:31, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per Taivo Thibaut120094 (talk) 02:04, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, possible copyvio. Pokéfan95 (talk) 11:48, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I think, that the image is ineligible to copyright due to simplicity, but is out of scope. Taivo (talk) 10:33, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of scope. Thibaut120094 (talk) 02:04, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, possible copyvio. Pokéfan95 (talk) 11:49, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I think, that the image is ineligible to copyright due to simplicity, but is out of scope. Taivo (talk) 10:34, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of scope. Thibaut120094 (talk) 02:04, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, possible copyvio Pokéfan95 (talk) 11:49, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Hew.stefane (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except userpages in Commons and en.wiki and uploading some clearly out-of-scope images, which are used nowhere, except on the userpages. All his uploads are now nominated for deletion and all his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:41, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per Taivo Thibaut120094 (talk) 02:06, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 12:15, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Thibaut120094 (talk) 02:06, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very low quality, unlikely that this is own work Gbawden (talk) 12:35, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: probably copyvio Thibaut120094 (talk) 02:07, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Marccio ellio (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Looks like Flickrwashing. Flickr account created this month. Some or all of the images were on Commons before they were uploaded to Flickr. One image is watermarked "RBP Designer" with no apparent connection to the Flickr user. One image is not on Flickr, but was here a couple of years before it was uploaded to Commons.

Stefan4 (talk) 19:55, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I was just nominating them myself ... Thank you, Stefan! Taivo (talk) 18:47, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 01:10, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Marccio ellio (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. (Note also the nonsense and not anyhow educational description and Category:Foto)

Ies (talk) 14:10, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete this is not a private photo album and this is not facebook. --ProfessorX (talk) 09:02, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Pages named en:Amilton R. de Cristo and es:Amilton R. de Cristo have been deleted. Obviously no notable person.--ProfessorX (talk) 14:54, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of scope Thibaut120094 (talk) 02:27, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no license anyway Thibaut120094 (talk) 02:27, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Logo of a Dutch TV channel, in scope. Also PD-textlogo. Thibaut120094 (talk) 02:29, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused advertisement, out of scope. Storkk (talk) 14:29, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Thibaut120094 (talk) 02:34, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

For collages source and license of every used image must be given. Otherways cannot be sure, that it isn't derivative work of copyrighted image. Taivo (talk) 19:25, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:PCP Thibaut120094 (talk) 02:40, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ikhlas Qassmi 13336 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images seem to be tv-stills or derivative works.

Basvb (talk) 21:27, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. Thibaut120094 (talk) 02:37, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The images in the collage are possible copyvio. Pokéfan95 (talk) 05:17, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Already deleted by Alan. Thibaut120094 (talk) 11:03, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused logo. Should be in SVG if useful. See File:Eye of Horus bw.svg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: still no license at all. JuTa 09:14, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.jornadasliterarias.upf.br/15jornada/images/stories/autores/05_04_2013/IvanJAF.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:31, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of a video game of uncertain license. Storkk (talk) 14:49, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:31, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:31, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, probable professional portrait: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 14:50, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:30, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed", this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Storkk (talk) 14:50, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:30, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.nogob.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/mo.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:27, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hellkitty204 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused non-notable artwork/logo. While the uploading of small numbers of images... for use on a personal user page... is allowed, these are both unused and therefore likely out of scope. Will withdraw if notability is reasonably asserted. One is a crop of the other, removing whitespace only.

Storkk (talk) 14:53, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:30, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:27, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:27, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://www.flickr.com/photos/wvarquitectos/8652678162/. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:27, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:27, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed", this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Storkk (talk) 15:01, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:27, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal artwork. While "the uploading of small numbers of images... for use on a personal user page... is allowed", this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Storkk (talk) 15:01, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:27, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed", this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Storkk (talk) 15:01, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:28, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photos are out of project scope. This is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 15:39, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:28, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Simple unused logo of non-notable organization (no mention in en.wiki), out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 16:07, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:28, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gumbo the Clown (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Nonsense image used to vandalize in en:Nigel Spackman (This image does NOT show Nigel Spackman!!!)

Ies (talk) 16:08, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:28, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no offence, but DR started to verify claimed 'own work' as p.e. thumbnail format and missing exif, Roland zh (talk) 17:23, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:29, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 17:30, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:29, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 18:03, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:29, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo of two men, outside of COM:SCOPE... Commons is not personal photo album. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:08, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:29, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Attached to article "submission declined", non-notable male. Out of COM:SCOPE... commons not a personal photo album Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:09, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:29, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

First-time contributor Zezoazoz11 contributed this photo of well known Danish pop band Aqua. Low resolution and no EXIF. Same photo has been published on the web here in 2009 and here in 2014. Thuresson (talk) 18:58, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:26, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted facebook content : https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=509453262402507&set=a.509452255735941.133917.200277159986787&type=3 --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:39, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:30, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 07:09, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:33, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tahirrr (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 14:04, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:33, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No metadata, probable professional concert shot: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 14:27, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:33, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, probable professional portrait: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader (who is possibly the subject) is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 14:28, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:33, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:33, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused non-notable artwork/logo. While the uploading of small numbers of images... for use on a personal user page... is allowed, this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Will withdraw if notability is reasonably asserted. Storkk (talk) 14:31, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:32, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused non-notable artwork/logo. While the uploading of small numbers of images... for use on a personal user page... is allowed, this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Will withdraw if notability is reasonably asserted. Storkk (talk) 14:31, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:32, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Professional portrait: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 14:33, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:32, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://media.licdn.com/mpr/mpr/shrinknp_400_400/p/6/005/074/184/1040e3b.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Done by DMacks Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:31, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, probable professional portrait: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 14:40, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:32, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, probable professional portrait: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 14:40, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:32, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a video game screenshot. License unclear. Storkk (talk) 14:43, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:32, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The OTRS permission say "is a photograph of a Bollywood party or event", this is not an event but a promotional image. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:19, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:10, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The OTRS permission say "is a photograph of a Bollywood party or event", this is not an event but a promotional image. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:20, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:11, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

its blurry Arnaud Palastowicz (talk) 10:36, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:11, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this is my personal photo , please delete this Abolfazln (talk) 17:16, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader request Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:33, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sigongmedia1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Collection of unused promotional images and logos, no educational value, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   17:22, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:33, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-authorized caption. Yanguas (talk) 17:28, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:38, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All the contribution of this user are copyvio. and this photo is maybe a copyvio too. Vikoula5 (talk) 17:28, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Already deleted by Didym. Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:38, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by PCAALYP (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:PCAALYP. Uploaded in a row on 04.03.2015 for en:Faisalabad International Airport (Pakistan airport), 2 files were grabbed from Facebook published there already in 2013.

Gunnex (talk) 17:30, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:37, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear source : if the source is free, we need a link to verify the license or we need an OTRS permission from the copyrigh owner --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:32, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom and probably out of scope. Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:36, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sylvie margot (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own works : the same file can be found here http://stephane-margot.com/comedien-theatre-tele-cinema/ where it is written "Droits photos :@ Robin Gervais"

--Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:37, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: We need COM:OTRS permission from Robin Gervais. Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:36, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Issam chemlali (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 18:45, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Already deleted by Denniss. Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:34, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

By following the provided link http://vincedark.wix.com/vincedark, I found copyrighted content --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:27, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: We need COM:OTRS permission. Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:35, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

looks to me petty much out of scope. JuTa 19:48, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:38, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be a screenshot. 4ing (talk) 20:12, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:32, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - plain text - unused INeverCry 03:46, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: slashing the limit of scope Alan (talk) 00:01, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation Remux - Nunca Olvidaré, que me enamoré de la más hermosa flor. Ĉu mi povas helpi vin iel? 04:08, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:02, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images of coins uploaded by History of Persia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images of ancient coins (3D objects) not freely licensed at the source.

Revent (talk) 04:50, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:02, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by History of Persia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Obviously not own work. For old 2D art, {{PD-Art-100}} might do, but you need to fix the source, the date, the author, and the license. For other files, a formal written permission from the photographer is needed.

Yann (talk) 19:15, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:18, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kamara kolo rachelle (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Some of or all this photos are copyvio. 1- No EXIF data 2- I find photos of Didier Drogba 3- i find other photos from Twitter older then the uploading in commons 4- photos have small dimensions

Vikoula5 (talk) 13:35, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: nuked Alan (talk) 00:04, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Templestaykorea (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyright violation. According to uploader, the copyright holder of these files is http://www.kbuddhism.com/. It is unclear if these files can be used under a cc-by-2.5 license.

Takeaway (talk) 13:40, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 00:11, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All photo of this user are copyvio, and i suspect this also Vikoula5 (talk) 13:40, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: deleted by EugeneZelenko Alan (talk) 00:05, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of the painting, whose author should confirm permission via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 14:26, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:09, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW: Copyright would normally belong to the letter authors, who should confirm license via COM:OTRS. Additional likely scope issues. Storkk (talk) 14:31, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:09, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of photograph of unknown origin and copyright status. Storkk (talk) 14:37, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:09, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small filesize, missing EXIF, probable professional portrait: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 14:51, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This photo belongs to me Nelufar Hedayat. It is of me and was taken at my request in 2009 in Afghanistan. I commissioned it to be taken by my cousin who holds no rights to it whatsoever. I hold the rifts to this personal portrait. Please advise as to how to authenticat further. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aryanalimited (talk • contribs) 15:58, 20 October 2015‎ (UTC+1)
@Aryanalimited: Please follow the instructions on COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 15:04, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: pending OTRS permission Alan (talk) 00:09, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Permission section says "any commercial use is forbidden". In addition, the painting quite probably fails COM:DM, and given the artist died in 1976 it's not PD. -mattbuck (Talk) 18:37, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:08, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted, r trademark right on image Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 18:53, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:07, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Faisalvm1234 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own works and unclear sources : "college", "Facebook" and " family" don't allow such licencing, we need OTRS permissions from the copyright owners

--Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:02, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 00:06, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wamiq.bashir (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely copyrighted content, no evidences of permissions : some images tagged with "author unknow, family album", some are derivative works or/and photomontages, a pdf of a book with no source linked, scans...

--Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:07, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 03:36, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blatant copy of a book cover claimed as "own work" Arjayay (talk) 13:42, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 03:36, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blatant copy of a book cocver claimed as "own work" Arjayay (talk) 13:43, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 03:37, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blatant copy of a book cocver claimed as "own work" Arjayay (talk) 13:43, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 03:37, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Outoffocus1988 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Both photos' descriptions contain "These photographs can be used for any purpose, provided that photographer Aleksandra Ukhaneva is attributed". This should be confirmed via COM:OTRS.

Storkk (talk) 14:58, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 03:37, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photographer should confirm license via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 15:01, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nominator Alan (talk) 03:38, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright infringement: the architects died in 1966 and 1974, hence not in public domain yet. See et:Tallinna Kunstihoone. 82.131.126.74 15:10, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 03:38, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright infringement: no FoP in Estonia, architect Herbert Johanson died in 1964. 82.131.126.74 15:14, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 03:38, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Not in scope. Revent (talk) 04:37, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Then again i've found people's selfies on wikimedia. You may as well delete those tooHistory of Persia (talk) 19:07, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

We usually do, per COM:SELFIE (which also addresses "Artwork without obvious educational use, including non-educational artwork uploaded to showcase the artist's skills"). Some sneak through for a while, tho. This DR isn't a judgement of your artistic skills, it just doesn't seem like something likely to be used in any kind of educational context, and so not in scope. Personal stuff like this really belongs on somewhere like Flickr. Revent (talk) 05:10, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Out of scope, personal artwork --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:55, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not correct size Sahabyousafzai (talk) 19:26, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. Not own work. Unknown date Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:50, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author is mistaken how wiki articles work. This is a picture of a Wikipedia article, whereas the author probably wanted to have the actual article text on Wikipedia. I don't see how this picture could be used for anything useful. JIP (talk) 13:13, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete --Achim (talk) 12:55, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 12:58, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo of a subject with no discernible notability, apparently uploaded for use in en:Abdul Jabbar nawaab zada (which has been deleted for lack of notability). Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope. LX (talk, contribs) 20:43, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 18:24, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self nomination, unused low quality file, replaced by File:1997-2000 Toyota Camry (SXV20R) CSi sedan (2015-10-18).jpg. OSX (talkcontributions) 21:35, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 17:28, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self nomination, unused low quality file, replaced by File:1997-2000 Toyota Camry (SXV20R) CSi sedan (2015-10-18).jpg. OSX (talkcontributions) 21:35, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 17:29, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self nomination, unused low quality file, replaced by File:1997-2000 Toyota Camry (SXV20R) CSi sedan (2015-10-18).jpg. OSX (talkcontributions) 21:35, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 17:29, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Building by Daniel Buren. There is no Freedom of panorama in France.
Cette œuvre de Daniel Buren ne peut être diffusée sous licence libre. En effet, la loi sur le droit d'auteur en France interdit toute diffusion de reproductions d'une œuvre sans le consentement explicite de l'auteur, a fortiori pour une publication sous licence libre (pas de liberté de panorama). Trizek from FR 15:24, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oups, en effet, autant pour moi  :/ Je ne m'étais pas faite avoir par la pyramide du Louvre, mais j'avais complètement zappe pour Buren Stockholm (talk) 13:39, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: VIGNERON (talk) 19:02, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unrealistischer Bildeindruck durch falsche Farbwiedergabe Achim Ebenau (talk) 06:42, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request Krd 01:11, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unrealistischer Bildeindruck durch falsche Farbwiedergabe Achim Ebenau (talk) 06:45, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request Krd 01:11, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unrealistischer Bildeindruck durch falsche Farbwiedergabe Achim Ebenau (talk) 06:47, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request Krd 01:11, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metadata states copyright holder is the Universität Innsbruck, who should confirm license via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 14:54, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 01:12, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely TV still. Storkk (talk) 14:56, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio Krd 01:13, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

существует более точная векторная карта file:Krasnolymanskyi raion locator map.svg Artemka (talk) 12:08, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: not identical. JuTa 08:41, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

заменен точным векторным файлом file:Kostyantynivka locator map.svg Artemka (talk) 14:57, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: not identical. JuTa 08:37, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

заменен более точным, менее объёмным и сделанным по установленным цветам файлом file:Kostiantynivskyi raion locator map.svg Artemka (talk) 15:01, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: not identical. JuTa 08:35, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

заменен более точным векторным файлом file:Kostiantynivskyi raion locator map.svg Artemka (talk) 15:02, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: not identical. JuTa 08:39, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nom. JuTa 08:21, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Although it appears in the White House collection, it was painted by Douglas Chandor in New York in 1949 [1]. He does not ever appear to have been a public employee. Even if painted as 'work for hire' as an independent contractor (which, I have no idea if it was actually commissioned by the White House), doesn't the artist/estate retain the Copyright? Alanscottwalker (talk) 16:10, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Read Portraits with unclear copyright status from the U.S. Federal Government. This is a work for hire. Evrik (talk) 16:47, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for pointing that to me, read it, and it appears "unclear", and my understanding is commons needs clear. I can certainly understand "fair use" for such an image but 'free because the person was a federal employee' appears entirely untrue, as he was not. Alanscottwalker (talk) 17:26, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: . JuTa 08:15, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I could not verify, are the signatures protected with copyright in Guatemala or not. One of signators, Carlos, died in 1957. I do not know, when Odilia died (very probably later), so no known restore date. Guatemala needs 75 years from death. Taivo (talk) 16:36, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. JuTa 08:23, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Isn't it screenshot of copyrighted content? Taivo (talk) 17:02, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: looks like. JuTa 08:25, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I suspect, that this regional movement is non-notable and the logo is out of project scope. At least en:AQP and es:AQP do not mention the movement. Taivo (talk) 17:06, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. JuTa 08:17, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely that uploader (who identified self as son by saying "dad") was old enough in the 1950s to make this Kodachrome image of his father, hence doubtful own work. This looks more like a scan of an old image, not user's creation. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:09, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. JuTa 08:19, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i did not find the photo in Flickr. Small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Professor Mendes claimed it to be a selfie, what is unlikely. Probably copyright violation of real photographer. Taivo (talk) 19:02, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. JuTa 07:56, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Taivo as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: blurry. Yes, it is blurry, but objects are enough well seen. Taivo (talk) 19:35, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The original nominator for speedy was Moumou82, not me. Taivo (talk) 19:36, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: good enough. JuTa 08:43, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have downloaded with upper margine. MADRASS2014 (talk) 09:54, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 09:57, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader states "Dr. Kenneth Hansraj (copyright holder) has given me the permission via email to upload on Wikimedia Commons." This e-mail should be converted into OTRS-permission, otherways I do not believe, that such mail exists. Taivo (talk) 19:57, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I asked the copyright holder to send the permission directly to Wikimedia Commons.MADRASS2014 (talk) 06:01, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Ticket:2015102110017459 received but insufficient. Clarification has been requested. Storkk (talk) 13:19, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: for the moment. Will be handeled though OTRS. --JuTa 08:28, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Several different editors claim this as their own original work, including David James and Djencpulse, although the small pixel size suggests it may originally have been taken from an unidentified website. No other details of origin, author or date etc. are given. Hchc2009 (talk) 20:11, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. JuTa 07:58, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A photograph of a model in a Danish museum; Denmark's freedom of panorama does not cover these works of art, unfortunately. Hchc2009 (talk) 20:57, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. JuTa 08:30, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of copyrighted artwork. Kelly (talk) 09:01, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please be more specific - what is supposed to be copyrighted ? --Denniss (talk) 05:42, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The sculptures shown in the photo. Kelly (talk) 07:19, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nom. No FOP for scruptures in USA. JuTa 08:58, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Proszę o usunięcie tego pliku ze względu, że jest on logiem własnym i nie powinien się tutaj znaleźć. RubbensMonet (talk) 11:46, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploaders request on upload day. JuTa 08:48, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. The artist de:Peter Makolies (born 1936) is still alive. The sculpture is not under freedom of panorama. It is situated in Otto Niemeyer-Holstein's former garden Lüttenort which is completely fenced in. House and garden are run as a private museum and open for visitors only by request. The sculpture is not seen from outside Artsfriends (talk) 13:34, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. JuTa 08:50, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

заменен на точный векторный файл file:Novoazovsk raion locator map.svg Artemka (talk) 14:06, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: not identical. JuTa 09:00, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

заменен на точный векторный файл file:Novoazovsk raion locator map.svg Artemka (talk) 14:06, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: not identical. JuTa 09:02, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by VR0 as Fair use (fair use). Regular deletion request is created, because maybe the cover does not surpass threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 16:14, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: but no source and likely out of scope. JuTa 08:46, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most likely copyright violation. The uploader's name doesn't correspond with the photographer's name in metadata. Artsfriends (talk) 16:16, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is no copyright violation, because the photographer's name is my real name like on my other pictures. --Agnete (talk) 16:46, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: checked several other uploads of her -> looks OK. JuTa 09:14, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I could not verify, are the signatures in Guatemala protected with copyright or not. The signator died in 1976 and Guatemala needs 75 years from death. Maybe the file should be deleted and restored in 2052. Taivo (talk) 16:31, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. JuTa 08:54, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it with a wrong name (should be ...page59.png). I uploaded the file with the correct name now so this page is redundant Alkamid (talk) 17:20, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploaders request at upload day, but @Alkamid next time please request a {{Rename}}. JuTa 09:06, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal images of children in Western Clothing, not "Fashion or Adornment from Algeria" Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:11, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. JuTa 08:53, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Belarus. The building shown in the photo is Royal Plaza. It was designed by Boris Shkolnikov (Russian: Борис Школьников; b. 1949)Jarash (talk) 04:52, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. JuTa 09:29, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

существует более точный векторный файл file:Volnovaskyi raion locator map.svg Artemka (talk) 12:07, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: not identical. JuTa 09:22, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

существует более точный векторный файл file:Енакиевский горсовет.svg Artemka (talk) 12:10, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: not identical. JuTa 09:25, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

существует более точный векторный файл file:Енакиевский горсовет.svg Artemka (talk) 12:11, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: not identical. JuTa 09:23, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

существует более точный векторный файл file:Telmanivskyi raion locator map.svg Artemka (talk) 12:14, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: not identical. JuTa 09:20, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: non-free English text. Eleassar (t/p) 12:22, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nom. JuTa 09:26, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this pdf is from arabic wikipedia https://ar.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D8%A8%D9%8A%D8%B1%D9%88%D9%82%D8%B1%D8%A7%D8%B7%D9%8A%D8%A9 Vikoula5 (talk) 12:56, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: either a copyight violation or out of scope. JuTa 09:34, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not likely PD in Mexico unless it can be established that the photographer died before 1952. Storkk (talk) 14:48, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no source at all. JuTa 09:19, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is routine request for small photo without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photo is so small? Can you upload a bigger version, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload a version with EXIF data? Can you categorize the file correctly? This is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 18:32, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: external source. JuTa 09:32, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Maybe I 'm wrong but by following the link, 1. I don't find the image 2. The linked site and its content seems copyrighted --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:09, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: likely copyight violation. JuTa 09:16, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fernandacosentino (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 16:00, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 13:20, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fernandacosentino (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small files without EXIF data, which seem to be derivative works. No permission.

Yann (talk) 17:54, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:52, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Published prior to 1942"? I have nowhere heard of an Austrian law that places such works into the PD, it probably doesn't exist. As for simple photographs, keep in mind that the threshold of originality, like in Germany, is very low, and few things apart from passport photos and accidental shots would benefit from this term. Note too that many uses of this template are a mistake for {{PD-AustrianGov}}. Liliana-60 (talk) 04:23, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Citation of law from the wrong country removed.
  •  Comment The template I created stated "This image is in the public domain in Austria and elsewhere. This is because its first publication was in Austria prior to 1 January 1955, or because its copyright expired." per [2]. This was the basis of the template back then a review may be necessary as the law may have had modifications. -- とある白い猫 ちぃ? 13:02, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
  •  Comment. I don't see anything to delete here :-), but some amendments are clearly necessary. For example, the link to the Article 74(6) in the template is dead. I found a pdf copy in English here, but it is not searchable. Maybe someone can propose a better link? Anyway, this linked pdf document apparently supports the terms of this template. Materialscientist (talk) 06:32, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I point to the rationale at the top, and also to Commons:Deletion requests/Template:PD-Germany which was already deleted in a similar way. -- Liliana-60 (talk) 13:14, 27 February 2012 (UTC) (addendum: and please read User:Lupo/Simple Photographs too)[reply]
Thanks for explaining. It is important to outline which photos can be covered by this template. I do not believe passport-like photos are a small class - a typical infobox image in an article on a person is a passport-like headshot. Materialscientist (talk) 12:38, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No. Those are photographic works. Read the last link again, especially the "basically all photos are "works"" part. The only things that could possibly be considered simple photographs is those photos you get from the photo booths, which is pretty much what I meant above. -- Liliana-60 (talk) 20:04, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Template History: It was made as PD-AU, was moved incorrectly to PD-Austria, the content was removed, then changes took place including redirects, User:BomBom rewoke the template and made the actual use [3]. I made a comment on his talk page. --Fg68at de:Disk 16:42, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment In an annotation to the in the template linked [4] judgment from 2001 states, that the "work" to define it as "art" is very low, even only the selection of the display detail. The jugdment considering EU-regulation from 1998. (Austria is member since 1995.) All judgment before is for the thrash.
    So this template can be useful only for "simple pictures", propably from automats for passport-pictures (often with a specific store in the background like File:PhotoBoothStrip.jpg, File:Dan Geist.jpg or File:Jonathan McIntosh.jpg, i think since 1950s in Austria) (but not for passport-pictures from a fotograf, and not not-common-"artisted" pictures) pictures from webcams (to new technology for a useful template), satellits (austria have no sattelits), radology (there it can be useful), computer tomographs (to new technology). So it is useful for standard-passport-fotos from automats and radiology (and i some find another theme). --Fg68at de:Disk 16:42, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The term "Lichtbildkunst" and "Lichtbildwerke" (photographic works) ist introduced with BGBl. 106/1953 ([5] p. 487, Art. I (1).) Only "Lichtbilder" (photographical picture), for wich the copyright to this time is not expired (20 years after creation or publishing, max 40 years, nothing about death) can be under the new category "Lichtbildwerk" with its longer term and with calculation after death. (p. 489, Art. II (3)). This is in force with 1953-10-14 (in force of "Berner Übereinkunft" in the version of Brussel 1948).
    It is very useful for ALL photographs (in the austrian law)
    * made and published until 1932
    * or made until 1932 & not published until 1952 & not first published in the last 25 years ("nachgelassene Werke"/"posthumous works", today 1986),
    * notwithstanding the lifetime of the photographer.
    i.e. File:Equus hemionus hemippus.jpg made 1924 from Johann Kuffner (1894-1973), surly published 1928. (notwithstanding i had made cotact with the fonds, wich is sole heir, and they are willing to give a free license.)
    The text must be better (mention the changes of the "art" definition) and it should moved to e better name, like Template:PD-Austria-simple photograph. --Fg68at de:Disk 16:11, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No clear consensus to delete. The template doesn't seem to be factually incorrect either FASTILY (TALK) 02:44, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This template with its current wording gives the totally wrong impression that all photographs which are not professional studio photos are simple photographs in Austria. Clearly copyrighted pictures were already kept by Commons admins due to this wrong interpretation (see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Famine Kharkov 1933.jpg).

Thankfully, there's a link to a court decision in the template, and if anyone had bothered to read it it would become obvious the text of the court decision directly contradicts the template text. It says "Nach Auffassung des erkennenden Senats ist seit Wirksamwerden der Schutzdauer-RL eine Fotografie dann als Lichtbildwerk iSd § 3 Abs 2 UrhG zu beurteilen, wenn sie das Ergebnis der eigenen geistigen Schöpfung ihres Urhebers ist, ohne dass es eines besonderen Maßes an Originalität bedürfte." which roughly means that all photographs that are the result of an own intellectual creation are photographic works - no level of originality is needed! That means pretty much all photographs taken by humans are photographic works, and only a very limited category of photographs (basically from photo booths, surveillance cameras and the like) fall under the category of simple photographs for which the 50 year term mentioned in the template applies. As such, because of the great deal of confusion this template causes, and the very, VERY limited scope of works that are covered by the template, it's better to delete this, just like {{PD-Germany}} was deleted before. Liliana-60 (talk) 19:59, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No clear consensus to delete. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:14, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]