Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2015/10/17

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive October 17th, 2015
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free promotional photo? Note the strange watermark. Stefan4 (talk) 10:32, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Promo shot, no permission. Yann (talk) 13:20, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JunaiPatak (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:JunaiPatak (serial copyright violator). Most likely part of a sockfarm via User talk:PGLIqbal + User talk:Rahim Jahaani + User talk:Chaudry Liaqat + User talk:Bilal Raja Nazeem + User talk:RanaNadeem444 + User talk:CharlieButton1 + User talk:Payyal Gujjar + User talk:Trevor Qubec + User talk:Rabiya Kareem + User talk:Patak Jalander + User talk:MochiSardar + User talk:KalaShah112345 + etc. = all uploads related to en:Faisalabad, a city in Pakistan.

Gunnex (talk) 00:57, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. User blocked undef. after CU. Yann (talk) 14:59, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Uploader Kamran Ahmed134 (talk · contributions · Statistics) blocked per Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Bilal Raja Nazeem Gunnex (talk) 14:22, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:52, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Uploader Kashif Baig1222 (talk · contributions · Statistics) blocked per Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Bilal Raja Nazeem Gunnex (talk) 14:23, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:54, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Koui² as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: copyvio of a corporate logo. The logo does not violate in my opinion copyright, because does not surpass threshold of originality. But maybe we can delete it nevertheless as unused logo of non-notable company. This is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 19:16, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Major France stock market indice, in the CAC Small. Does not surpass threshold of originality--DDupard (talk) 20:29, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, I found, that there is even article about the company in fr.wiki. I added the logo into article and will fix license. Taivo (talk) 08:12, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like Flickr-wash Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:26, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This file has the following merits and seems to be perfectly legal to use, under the dedicated public domain license - CCO 1.0 Universal Public Domain, all rights waived (Public domain):

{{cc-zero}} {{User:FlickreviewR/reviewed-pass|Michael.Laucke|https://flickr.com/photos/136915188@N08/22226781045|2015-10-17 07:10:40|cc-zero|}}

{{self|Cc-zero}}

--Natalie.Desautels (talk) 07:57, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That's just the formal aspect. However, you can release an image under a free license only if you are either its creator or if the creator has transferred his copyright to you. Flickr does not check whether its users are entitled to release "their" images under a free license.
I have little knowledge about this image. However, I wonder how a person who is depicted in this photo (Michael Laucke) can at the same time be the photographer (Michael Laucke, per his own claim). --Túrelio (talk) 09:53, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Error in {{reply to}}: Input contains forbidden characters.
Thank you for looking into this and helping make Wikipedia better. No sensible person would claim that the person depicted in this photo (Michael Laucke) could also the photographer. As I understand, "Own work" simply means that this photo was created by an employee of Mr. Laucke as part of that person's job (a work for hire). One does find this explanation in many discussions of Mr. Laucke's uploaded photos. Assuming good faith, this is also why Mr. Laucke can ethically claim it is his own work; apparently, he paid for it! Furthermore, it seems that all rights were generously waived by the legal owner under the dedicated public domain license - CCO 1.0 Universal Public Domain, all rights waived (Public domain). Thus, this photo seems to be perfectly legal to use.
I have worked very hard on contributing an article about the beautiful classical and flamenco guitar, its repertoire and about atonal music, and have enjoyed the most positive reactions to it and encouragement. Strickly speaking, I dont really need to put in this photo. But I beleive it has historical significance, and in spite of events about Andrés Segovia that are well sourced in the text of my article, this rare photo does add a little something.
Thankfully, Mr. Laucke has generously made it available for free.
I defer to your judgement of course in other concerns, but I just wanted to reassert that no one is saying, thankfully, that a person is taking his own photo from, say, 20 feet away. I await your kind response. Alas, "advienne que pourra" (come what may : )
Once again, thank you for your concern. --Natalie.Desautels (talk) 05:43, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Might or might not be. I haven't seen any free PBS-TV photos so far. Come hell or high water... Clin --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 15:26, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Licensing

[edit]

{{cc-zero}}

This image was originally posted to Flickr by Michael.Laucke at https://flickr.com/photos/136915188@N08/22009662605. It was reviewed on 16 October 2015 by the FlickreviewR robot and was confirmed to be licensed under the terms of the cc-zero.
@Hedwig in Washington, StarryGrandma, Túrelio, Bgwhite, and GrammarFascist: @Checkingfax: (Sorry, some ping addresses don't work for some reason)
Thank you Hedwig in Washington and Túrelio for looking into this and helping make Wikipedia better, and safer! I understand your concerns, which or course concern us all.
To clarify and help resolve this issue, I have been on a fact finding mission regarding the photo of Andres Segovia and Michael Laucke at the Metropolitan Museum for the PBS TV special. Indeed, I am pleased to divulge what I have learned, in order to expedite a resolution in this matter.
  • If you go to both the Flickr and the Michael Laucke websites, the personal photo attribution is clearly indicated! On April 12, 1982, this photo was taken by an assisant of Mr, Laucke, called Christine Arenella of New York. The film was produced by Nathan Kroll. Both websites state: "April 12, 1982; photo by Christina Arenella, New York. Press secretary to Michael Laucke."
  • Upon further research, a pattern emerges where we clearly see that a Christine Aranella was Press secretary to Mr. Laucke from at least 1982-1988 and she is mentioned as having taken these personal photos under Mr. Laucke's emploi.
  • We can safely say that this photo was created by an employee of Mr. Laucke as part of that person's job (a work for hire). Mr. Laucke has written:
I hereby certify that I own all rights pertaining to this photo. Cordially, Michael Laucke [[User:Mlaucke|Mlaucke]] ([[User talk:Mlaucke|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 08:23, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
  • Of less importance, this photo can also be found reprinted in other newspaper articles, albeit with much lower resolution. There is a further photo with maestro Segovia and Michael Laucke, taken that same evening backstage, after the PBS filming (of less interest), and there are other personal photos with Mr. Laucke and Maestro Segovia on other occasions, such as this one.
I realise wikipedia could have legal problems about copyright infringement, and I certainly dont want to be the one to spur these on! Nevertheless, based on the above facts, the veracity of which can be proved, I think this photo is perfectly safe. Kindly let me know what other proof I need to provide, if any, to make it so.
Once again, thank you for your concern. Kinldy consider making an un-deletion request so that I may have a little more time to contribute worthwhile articles :) Otherwise, alas, "la bataille continue" (the battle continues) ...
BTW, where did that funny claim come from, that Mr. Laucke took his own photo from 20 feet away while playing guitar for Andres Segovia at the same time : ) Merci! Cordially, --Natalie.Desautels (talk) 19:25, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • It does appear that Mr. Laucke owns the rights to the photo, and that he licensed it in a way appropriate for its use on Commons (and Wikipedia). However, since Commons is populated with many users who prefer to tag images for deletion when there is any conceivable cause for doubt, it might be best to see if Mr. Laucke would participate in creating an OTRS ticket for this image. Having a ticket in place on the file would forestall all but the most ridiculous deletion nominations. —GrammarFascist (talk) 20:35, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 I withdraw my nomination While one user is digging up evidence that the photograph is compatible with Commons, others just complain. Drives me nuts. Back to what's important:

@Natuur12: Could you do me the favor and close this embarrassing DR? Fouten gemaakt. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:04, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: As you wish Natuur12 (talk) 12:50, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Porque me tienen harto ya. Lo queréis borrar todo? Pues adelante. Maximo88 (talk) 06:39, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, by Alan per Commons:Deletion requests/Files of Maximo88. Taivo (talk) 18:48, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A borrarlo todo según Taivo! Vamos! Maximo88 (talk) 06:40, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, by Alan per Commons:Deletion requests/Files of Maximo88. Taivo (talk) 18:49, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by RanaNadeem444 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:RanaNadeem444 (serial copyright violator). Most likely part of a sockfarm via User talk:PGLIqbal + User talk:Rahim Jahaani + User talk:Chaudry Liaqat + User talk:Bilal Raja Nazeem + User talk:RanaNadeem444 + User talk:CharlieButton1 + User talk:Payyal Gujjar + User talk:Trevor Qubec + User talk:Rabiya Kareem + User talk:Patak Jalander + User talk:MochiSardar + User talk:KalaShah112345 + etc. = all uploads related to en:Faisalabad, a city in Pakistan.

Gunnex (talk) 00:07, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 05:48, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Payyal Gujjar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Payyal Gujjar (serial copyright violator). Most likely part of a sockfarm via User talk:PGLIqbal + User talk:Rahim Jahaani + User talk:Chaudry Liaqat + User talk:Bilal Raja Nazeem + User talk:RanaNadeem444 + User talk:CharlieButton1 + User talk:Trevor Qubec + User talk:Rabiya Kareem + User talk:Patak Jalander + User talk:MochiSardar + User talk:KalaShah112345 + etc. = all uploads related to en:Faisalabad, a city in Pakistan.

Gunnex (talk) 00:39, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 05:50, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Clementjeanmicha (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: Self-created art by uploader. Artwork without obvious educational use, including non-educational artwork uploaded to showcase the artist's skills.

Takeaway (talk) 01:20, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 05:58, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentified person, picture not in use. Out of project scope. This, that and the other (talk) 03:03, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 05:39, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unneeded picture of text This, that and the other (talk) 03:04, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 05:39, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pctelephone (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All files seems coming from http://www.pc-telephone.com/computer-telephony-integration.htm which is copyrighted

--Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:53, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 05:57, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Trevor Qubec (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Trevor Qubec (serial copyright violator). Most likely part of a sockfarm via User talk:PGLIqbal + User talk:Rahim Jahaani + User talk:Chaudry Liaqat + User talk:Bilal Raja Nazeem + User talk:RanaNadeem444 + User talk:CharlieButton1 + User talk:Payyal Gujjar + User talk:JunaiPatak + User talk:Rabiya Kareem + User talk:Patak Jalander + User talk:MochiSardar + User talk:KalaShah112345 + etc. = all uploads related to en:Faisalabad, a city in Pakistan.

Gunnex (talk) 08:48, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 05:51, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by KhalaniB (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing EXIF. Most likely part of a sockfarm via User talk:PGLIqbal + User talk:Rahim Jahaani + User talk:Chaudry Liaqat + User talk:Bilal Raja Nazeem + User talk:RanaNadeem444 + User talk:CharlieButton1 + User talk:Payyal Gujjar + User talk:JunaiPatak + User talk:Rabiya Kareem + User talk:Patak Jalander + User talk:MochiSardar + User talk:KalaShah112345 + etc. = all uploads from mostly 05.2015 and related to en:Faisalabad, a city in Pakistan.

Gunnex (talk) 10:38, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 05:52, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MochiSardar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:MochiSardar. Most likely part of a sockfarm via User talk:PGLIqbal + User talk:Rahim Jahaani + User talk:Chaudry Liaqat + User talk:Bilal Raja Nazeem + User talk:RanaNadeem444 + User talk:CharlieButton1 + User talk:Payyal Gujjar + User talk:JunaiPatak + User talk:Rabiya Kareem + User talk:Patak Jalander + User talk:KhalaniB + User talk:JamieS1234 + etc. = all uploads from mostly 05.2015 and related to en:Faisalabad, a city in Pakistan.

Gunnex (talk) 11:28, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 05:53, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by KalaShah112345 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:KalaShah112345 (serial copyright violator). Most likely part of a sockfarm via User talk:PGLIqbal + User talk:Rahim Jahaani + User talk:Chaudry Liaqat + User talk:Bilal Raja Nazeem + User talk:RanaNadeem444 + User talk:CharlieButton1 + User talk:Payyal Gujjar + User talk:JunaiPatak + User talk:Rabiya Kareem + User talk:Patak Jalander + User talk:MochiSardar + etc. = all uploads from mostly 05.2015 and related to en:Faisalabad, a city in Pakistan.

Gunnex (talk) 12:09, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 05:56, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Thariq1995 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 19:12, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 05:43, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Anton Romero (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused touristy personal images - also, 3 of these contain copyrighted statues in Odessa, Ukraine, and so violate COM:FOP#Ukraine

INeverCry 19:16, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 05:42, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Beechum (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:NETCOPYVIO

INeverCry 19:30, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 05:43, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wetellthetruth (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - images of non-notable person/actor - w:J.J. Green is up for AFD at en.wiki for lack of notability

INeverCry 19:36, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 05:46, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:48, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 05:45, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

http://www.discoveryforme.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Walcott_May2015_gal1-608x608.jpg Photography: Dalton Dinglestad; Getty Images http://www.discoveryforme.co.za/fitness-sport/theo-walcott-aims-shoots-and-scores-to-please/ Secondarywaltz (talk) 22:53, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 05:54, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Naveedahmadsaeed (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing EXIF. All files uploaded in row on 17.05.2015 for landscapes in Pakistan. Eventually related: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Aamna Qureshi

Gunnex (talk) 23:00, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 05:40, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Westyingsimwalk (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely false authorship and licensing claims based on the low/inconsistent resolutions and missing/inconsistent metadata.

LX (talk, contribs) 22:00, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • I tried to verify some of them by accuracy, but many are clearly copied from elsewhere without permission or attribution. ... I sorted the list by dates implied by filenames, although that may be meaningless. At least we might expect no metadata in older images if they were scanned in from pre-digital sources. Tomruen (talk) 02:05, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note that instead of addressing the concerns raised in this discussion, the uploader decided to charge ahead with yet more problematic uploads, so please consider these part of the nomination as well:

LX (talk, contribs) 10:20, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:16, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Westyingsimwalk (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Again, likely false authorship and licensing claims based on the low/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent metadata, and the uploader's history.

LX (talk, contribs) 18:31, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The uploader continues as if nothing happened, so:
+ File:LE1997-09-16T.JPG – Author: dani according to metadata
LX (talk, contribs) 10:26, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:00, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is almost certainly not "own work" of User:Nikostrd, as it includes aerial photographs. Macrakis (talk) 22:53, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:08, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of COM:SCOPE eurodyne (talk) 23:04, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:07, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE eurodyne (talk) 23:05, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:07, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of COM:SCOPE eurodyne (talk) 23:06, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:07, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of COM:SCOPE eurodyne (talk) 23:06, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:07, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work no, foto vieja 191.126.3.145 00:37, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:29, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 19:36, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:43, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission for this art work. Yann (talk) 19:54, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, just delete it. Jonnmann (talk) 20:26, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:39, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This DR was categorized under Belgium's FOP law. But it's also just a plain case of derivative work where the uploader scanned in a leeflet from 1953. 1953 is too recent to be PD Vera (talk) 08:55, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like a scarf from 1958 more than a leaflet from 1953. -- Asclepias (talk) 16:17, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Reupload of a previously deleted file. It was deleted for absence of evidence of permission for the art printed on the pictured scarf. There is no more evidence of permission now than the first time. -- Asclepias (talk) 16:17, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:20, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly promotional "follow me on Twitter". Out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:03, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:38, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by D subash (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of user's own work, on these three photos of a nonnotable male. One is so small it's nearly invisible, none are larger than Facebook size (720x...).

Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:04, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:37, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old image, unlikely to be user's own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:12, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:37, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pureromblomanon (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No confidence that any of these images was created by uploader. Small (and variable) sizes, no metadata, single theme to uploads. Probable COM:COPYVIOs.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:13, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:37, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio - photo of book page - subject was born in 1916, and looks to be about 30 here, dating the source publication to circa 1950 or later - also, this isn't doesn't look like a self-portrait, so the subject may not be the author as indicated INeverCry 20:40, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:36, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zeme315 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Highly unlikely authorship claims. The uploader clearly either does not understand or does not care what "own work," "author," or "copyright holder" mean.

LX (talk, contribs) 20:49, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Small size, no EXIF data and old pictures, unlikely to be own works. Some may be PD due to age, but more information needed (source, etc.).

Yann (talk) 20:49, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:35, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing permission. Fry1989 eh? 20:49, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:34, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Emanuele0208 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small size, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 20:53, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:34, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False PD rationale. This image does not consist solely of simple geometric shapes and text. The shadings and textures exceed the threshold of originality required for copyright protection. LX (talk, contribs) 21:00, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:33, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unusable quality, trivial subject Pibwl (talk) 21:02, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:33, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unusable quality, trivial subject (there are many others) Pibwl (talk) 21:03, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:32, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unusable quality, trivial subject (there are many others) - out of scope Pibwl (talk) 21:05, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:32, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality, trivial subject (there are many others in these categories) - no educational use Pibwl (talk) 21:06, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:32, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality, trivial subject (there are many others in these categories) - no educational use Pibwl (talk) 21:06, 17 October 2015 (UTC). Same for its twin photos File:Zabawa Lego 16.JPG, File:Zabawa Lego 17.JPG[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:31, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unusable quality, no real educational use Pibwl (talk) 21:10, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:30, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unusable quality, no real educational use Pibwl (talk) 21:11, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:29, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unusable quality, no real educational use Pibwl (talk) 21:12, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:29, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No sufficient proof of authorization or absence of copyright TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 21:13, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:29, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality, no real educational use - besides, these are not Lego, but some fakes Pibwl (talk) 21:13, 17 October 2015 (UTC) Same for File:Zabawa Lego 36.JPG, File:Zabawa Lego 37.JPG - many other in this category look like random kid shots... Pibwl (talk) 21:15, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:27, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no educational use, blurred. Same for its twin File:Zabawa Lego 48.JPG Pibwl (talk) 21:17, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:26, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screen shot of Youtube video? Of unknown copyright status. Takeaway (talk) 21:18, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:25, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no real educational use, trivial subject Pibwl (talk) 21:24, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:25, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source/license and author information of 2 images (en:File:King Faisal Masque Islamabad.jpg + File:Serena hotel, Islamabad Branch.jpeg) used in this collage are missing or are insufficient, compromising the whole file. See also Commons:Collages. Gunnex (talk) 21:44, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: images removed, old revisions deleted Didym (talk) 00:24, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: still no license at all. JuTa 04:06, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: still no license at all. JuTa 04:17, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo Pibwl (talk) 12:18, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete this and the user's other uploads (File:Materne.jpg‎ and File:Thereze.jpg) which are duplicates showing the user and family. No significant contributions apart from a CV-like userpage on English Wikipedia and one vandalism edit where he changed the name of the President of Ghana to his own name. Green Giant (talk) 23:45, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentified person, picture not in use. Out of project scope. This, that and the other (talk) 03:04, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination --Krd 09:30, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promo shot, no evidence of a free license or permission. Yann (talk) 13:26, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Krd 09:31, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 11:02, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author request, better cropped file Philmonte101 (talk) 14:49, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 11:01, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlicensed text. Stefan4 (talk) 15:12, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 11:01, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Simple text, out of Commons:Project scope. Martin H. (talk) 15:21, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 11:01, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hindutava (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own work? Out of scope?

Stefan4 (talk) 15:22, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 11:01, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Actress.sheetal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 15:35, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 11:00, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 15:53, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: All out of project scope except one in use George Chernilevsky talk 07:26, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted the last remaining image, because the user had no remaining contributions except the small personal photo without metadata, which was used on her userpage. Taivo (talk) 17:53, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hassalsharif (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope, also doubtful own work

Didym (talk) 16:28, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 10:58, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo prominently displays copyright message of commercial website Sillyfolkboy (talk) 16:44, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 10:58, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of COM:SCOPE eurodyne (talk) 17:58, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 10:58, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Janilohar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 18:12, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 10:57, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No appropriate license since 2 October (currently [October 2018] 'all rights reserved': https://www.flickr.com/photos/134693607@N06/19353524518). See Status of PD Mark 1.0. Josve05a (talk) 19:46, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 10:57, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. How old is this? Yann (talk) 21:11, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 10:56, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This figure is probably copyrighted (not PD-old) and FoP-Germany is not applicable for interiors, sorry A.Savin 00:23, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 11:07, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of SVG file. Fry1989 eh? 02:04, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't the same. --Gastón Cuello (talk) 00:47, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion Krd 11:08, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Re-nominating. This is very clearly the same image as File:Sol de Mayo Bandera Argentina.png and File:Sol de Mayo-Bandera de Argentina.svg, except this file is distorted. It doesn't belong here. Fry1989 eh? 18:18, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete it. Don't attack me more. --Gastón Cuello (talk) 18:28, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: (poor quality) duplicate. --P 1 9 9   15:46, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing permission. Fry1989 eh? 02:37, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 11:08, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JPN Jeetu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 13:21, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 11:09, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rakan amr (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Logos / small size pictures without EXIF data, unlikely to be own works, no permission.

Yann (talk) 13:49, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 11:05, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dian DIACK DIACK (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 14:01, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 11:05, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Reda love ahelam (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 14:04, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 11:05, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Benvindokambo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private /self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 14:34, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 11:04, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 11:03, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 11:03, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sidharth Raju (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 11:03, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 11:02, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yassinyoulal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 11:02, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality tree picture, not of use. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:02, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 11:20, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

some unknown un-notable person, not used see description Motopark (talk) 04:31, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 11:21, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope : unused personal image / no quite notable people, no articles --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:07, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 11:21, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused self-created logo. IMO, out of COM:SCOPE. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:44, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 11:29, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope : no EV --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:47, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 11:28, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Siopela (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope : unused personal images

--Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:49, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 11:30, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope : unused personal image --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:05, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 11:28, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low-quality personal photo of subject with no apparent notability. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope. LX (talk, contribs) 08:27, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 11:28, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sanjay s choudhari (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted File:S 61905.jpg, duplicate --D-Kuru (talk) 14:29, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: no license at all. JuTa 04:50, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Agar.io clone" is, as its name suggests, a derivative work of "agar.io", which is copyrighted. The license tags are misleading, and exaggeratedly emphasized with bold text by the uploader. Diego Grez return fire 00:56, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep: Yes, could be, but this is problem with Trademark, not Copyright; all the Trademark restrictions of the Agar.io name ussages concerns only to the UK jurisdiction, not the US one (where this clone has been developed). If you're asking if this screenshot is or not copyvio, the answer is No: these simple shapes are not protected by the US Copyright Law. Keep in mind the Lotus v. Borland case.
The actual question is, Is actually this screenshot a copyvio in the US? Why? --Amitie 10g (talk) 03:05, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment File is unused. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:40, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment: The file was used in es:Wikipedia, but Diego Grez removed from there. I reverted that edition because this issue concerns to Commons, not Wikipedia (if the file is deleted, CommonsDelinker will remove the link from Wikipedia). --Amitie 10g (talk) 08:42, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
And I reverted your revert because you did not read my reason, it's not an Agar.io screenshot, and has nothing to do with it. --Diego Grez return fire 15:26, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Obviously is not and is not related, but is a free implementation of the mechanics, and therefore a good replacement... but, I'll keep your reversion until this DR is resolved (the only valid reason for deleting this file is Copyvio; file usage is irrelevant). --Amitie 10g (talk) 23:36, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: In order and in scope. Not valid reason for deletion. Alan (talk) 01:55, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing permission. Fry1989 eh? 03:07, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 13:01, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very small size without EXIF, uncathegorized, the only contribution of the user : unlikely to be own work --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:35, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 13:01, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sanketpatrika (talk · contribs)

[edit]

A non-free logo, a non-free book and a photo of a person which seems to be out of scope.

Stefan4 (talk) 10:39, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 13:01, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolution, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:The Peaceful Student (Facebook grabber). Gunnex (talk) 12:20, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 13:02, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolution, missing EXIF. Uploaded by 1-upload user AftabAlamOnline (talk · contributions · Statistics). Gunnex (talk) 12:23, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 13:02, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Arslan Sindho (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 13:25, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 13:02, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kurosawazamurai (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small size, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 13:32, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 13:02, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Juiet Tangier (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Juiet Tangier (Facebook grabber)

Gunnex (talk) 13:50, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 13:02, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very small unused personal image, poor quality, out of scope. Yann (talk) 13:51, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 13:02, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Uploaded by 1-upload user Abdul Reheem (talk · contributions · Statistics). Gunnex (talk) 13:52, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 13:03, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Definately not own work. Small file size and no source, wrong license. Ellin Beltz (talk) 13:58, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 13:03, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

What looks like a screenshot surrounded by a dark border and claimed as own work. Not convincing claim. Facebook size, no metadata. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:14, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 13:03, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sharifsadik (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 13:03, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo of en:Inter Milan soccer team that is most likely owned by the team and protected by copyright. Source of the image is given as Italian Wikipedia, but the same image (en:File:Inter Milan.png) is listed as non-free on English Wikipedia. If this is really OK as CC 4.0 then the non-free image is not needed., but I suspect this is a copyvio. Marchjuly (talk) 05:27, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: blatant copyvio Alan (talk) 23:21, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Carlosmelo20 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Questionable authorship claims based on the low resolution, missing metadata, and the uploader's history.

LX (talk, contribs) 09:17, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: deleted by Ellin Beltz Alan (talk) 23:21, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of copyrighted cup. Stefan4 (talk) 10:27, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 23:22, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Heera Mochiwala (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing EXIF. Most likely part of a sockfarm via User talk:PGLIqbal + User talk:Rahim Jahaani + User talk:Chaudry Liaqat + User talk:Bilal Raja Nazeem + User talk:RanaNadeem444 + User talk:CharlieButton1 + User talk:Payyal Gujjar + User talk:JunaiPatak + User talk:Rabiya Kareem + User talk:Patak Jalander + User talk:MochiSardar + User talk:KalaShah112345 + User talk:KhalaniB + etc. = all uploads from mostly 05.2015 and related to en:Faisalabad, a city in Pakistan.

Gunnex (talk) 12:36, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:PRP Alan (talk) 23:24, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sotu97 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in SVG or MediaWiki graph if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 23:24, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by YOGESH MAHESWARI (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 23:30, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by YOGESH MAHESWARI (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal images and diagrams, many of which should be in wiki-markup or should be in wiki-table format if needed, out of scope. User is clearly using Commons as a personal COM:WEBHOST. Trust me, all unused.

P 1 9 9   20:12, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:05, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution version of File:Possibly Nell Gwyn by Sir Peter Lely.jpg. Kelly (talk) 14:26, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 23:29, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jurko Zełenyj (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos and logo. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 23:29, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlicensed text. Stefan4 (talk) 15:15, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 23:27, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jaten (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These seem to be historic photos. Unlikely to be own work by the uploader.

Stefan4 (talk) 15:27, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 23:27, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted : http://zhivotnye.wix.com/world/ --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:02, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 23:25, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Estructura sericina BQUB15-Bdurquia (talk) 17:45, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Estructura sericina BQUB15-Bdurquia (talk) 17:46, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom/author Alan (talk) 23:28, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Perpop (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These seem to be derivative works.

Stefan4 (talk) 19:34, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 23:26, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by M.Orson (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Scans, no evidence of a free license or permission.

Yann (talk) 13:46, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom and COM:PRP Alan (talk) 23:35, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Réda Bahlas (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small size, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 13:47, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom and COM:PRP Alan (talk) 23:33, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A series of modern art, all claimed as own work, but obviously not. Multiple artists have been here claimed as "self". If the images were to be retained, we'd need COM:OTRS permissions from each of the artists.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:19, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 23:33, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

a lua foi introduzida errada,vou arrumar e postar a imagem padrão. SFDELTA1 (talk) 03:20, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Excluído: sob pedido do autor do carregamento. | Deleted: as requested by the uploader. Dantadd 01:31, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is not of free use. The original archive comes from this page: http://teratophoneus.deviantart.com/art/Utahraptor-ostrommaysorum-283398826 Rextron (talk) 06:51, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:44, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"© Michael Fay/Aurora Photos" according to EXIF. See also {{Imagewatermark}}. Stefan4 (talk) 10:05, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:46, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Google Images found this which has higher resolution, but I can't seem to find the picture on the page on which Google claims that it should appear. Stefan4 (talk) 10:09, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio : Previously published http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=818022&page=11 --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:48, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kamilixlove (talk · contribs)

[edit]

One "en la película" and one "in movie". Film screenshots? I'm also including a third image since it is low resolution without EXIF and thus possibly copyvio.

Stefan4 (talk) 10:55, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination, very un,likely to be own works --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:55, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is nothing on the page at http://www.grg.org/Calment12.html that indicates that the imgae was released under Creative Commons. Ricky81682 (talk) 05:33, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nominator. Sanandros (talk) 14:11, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong name label - I tried to upload the same image with the correct label but it was rejected. Either a rename to -PerryFlag or delete. Either is fine with me. JRC Jrcrin001 (talk) 06:30, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: i will rename it. Sanandros (talk) 14:13, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Category:Jean-Bernard Métais, born in 1954, can't be dead 70 years ago... No FoP in France. LW² \m/ (Lie 2 me ...) 12:16, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FYI Cardiff, Wales is not in France... --Benoît Prieur (d) 12:37, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Benoît Prieur:
I didn't saw it was taken in the UK... Sorry. How can I stop this request ? --LW² \m/ (Lie 2 me ...) 00:30, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
No pb...it can happen. I suppose we can leave like that and at the end someone will be close it as kept. Don't worry . --Benoît Prieur (d) 06:39, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Nomiator tool nomination back. Sanandros (talk) 14:18, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Category:Jean-Bernard Métais, born in 1954, can't be dead 70 years ago... No FoP in France. LW² \m/ (Lie 2 me ...) 12:16, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FYI Cardiff, Wales is not in France... --Benoît Prieur (d) 12:37, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Benoît Prieur:
I didn't saw it was taken in the UK... Sorry. How can I stop this request ? --LW² \m/ (Lie 2 me ...) 00:30, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
No pb...it can happen. I suppose we can leave like that and at the end someone will be close it as kept. Don't worry . --Benoît Prieur (d) 06:39, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Nomiator tool nomination back. Sanandros (talk) 14:18, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Category:Jean-Bernard Métais, born in 1954, can't be dead 70 years ago... No FoP in France. LW² \m/ (Lie 2 me ...) 12:16, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. This picture was not taken by Métais, but is a cutdown of this CC-licenced image. Vashti (talk) 12:22, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Having looked into what freedom of panorama actually is, I see where you're coming from. However, this photograph was taken in the United Kingdom, of a sculpture located in the UK, so presumably English law applies. FoP exists in the UK. Vashti (talk) 12:28, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Vashti:
Métais didn't took this picture, OK, but he is the creator of the sculpture. I didn't saw it was taken in the UK... Sorry. How can I stop this request ? --LW² \m/ (Lie 2 me ...) 00:27, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know, sorry. I guess it will be taken care of. :) Vashti (talk) 11:35, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Nomiator tool nomination back. Sanandros (talk) 14:19, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

je suis Claudine Nougaret et je ne veux pas que cette photo prise quand j'étais très malade soit montrée Palmeraieetdesert (talk) 09:39, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

je suis claudine Nougaret et je ne veux pas que cette photo soit publiée Palmeraieetdesert (talk) 15:55, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason to delete Natuur12 (talk) 15:29, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

je suis claudine Nougaret et je demande le retrait de cette photo Palmeraieetdesert (talk) 09:46, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hello : I am the photographer of this picture taken during a public event. At this time, I don'now that Madam Nogaret was hill, I have no opinion about the validity of the request in deletion but I apologize if I have caused any dammage to Caudine Nogaret.
  • Bonjour, je suis le photographe auteur de ces images prises lors d'une manifestation publique. A ce moment, je ne savais pas que madame Nogaret était malade. Je n'ai pas d'avis au sujet de la validité d'une demande en suppression mais je présente mes excuses à madame Nogaret si j'ai pu lui causer involontairement un quelconque dommage. - Siren-Com (talk) 10:31, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Siren-Com: Vu que cette image n'est pas utilisée, je propose de la supprimer par courtoisie si vous êtes d'accord. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 21:28, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • Je ne vois pas d'obstacle à la voir supprimer, ainsi que les autres représentant C.Nougaret, mais je suis opposé à la suppression de celle de monsieur Depardon, lui même photographe, cela me semble excessif et peu réaliste. (j'aimerai qu'une page globale sur les 6 ou 7 suppression soit ouverte afin qu'on y voit plus clair et que le débat soit lisible) - Siren-Com (talk) 22:50, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


je suis claudine Nougaret et je ne veux pas que cdette photo soit publiée Palmeraieetdesert (talk) 15:56, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: I see no reason to delete Natuur12 (talk) 15:28, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The card design is of the Mexican government, the GAO just photographed it and "license laundered" it. PD-USGov is not valid. 104.229.142.212 02:34, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Do u think the disign is above com:TOO?--Sanandros (talk) 14:08, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Doubtfull but also privacy concerns Natuur12 (talk) 15:56, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This appears to be a copyright violation. It includes no statement of permission from the artist to allow reuse under a free license, and the artist's own website (on which the image is displayed) indicates that the contents of that site are all copyright protected: http://www.ellaguru.co.uk/. To retain this image, we need a suitable statement from the artist, we need the artist to change the licensing terms of the page on which this image appears on her website, and an OTRS ticket must be generated to verify all of this. Otherwise I do not believe it can continue to be hosted here. KDS4444 (talk) 03:54, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:56, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [2]. Yann (talk) 15:42, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's not clear who owned the copyright but if this was taken in 1900 by Clement herself, she only died in 1997 and so this wouldn't be in the public domain. The fact that the author is listed as "Unknown" doesn't help clarify. Ricky81682 (talk) 05:40, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:56, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work : the people/subject is died in 1931 (wikidata) thus a very old photo not taken by the uploader --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:42, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:56, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file is PD-ART (it's a painting from XVII century) but the source declared in the description is the book Il tarocchino di Bologna by Andrea Vitali that was published in Italy in 2005. Reproduction photography in Italy is protected for 20 years, Commons:Reuse_of_PD-Art_photographs#Italy. Moroboshi (talk) 07:21, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep You only quoted one partWikimedia: "Commons explicitly permits the hosting of photographs that carefully reproduce a two-dimensional public domain work; such photographs are in the public domain in the United States, where this site is based (if you are a Commons contributor, see Commons:When to use the PD-Art tag for more information on this policy). However, there may be local laws that prevent or restrict the reuse of such images in your country, some of which are listed below. While we hope this information will be helpful, any use of such content is at your own risk, and you should consider securing legal advice in your jurisdiction before using content."

So the link you gave says that Commons can and will host 2D PD artworks without taking in to account any laws except of the USA. Tm (talk) 12:49, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I went directly to the italian entry and I assumed this worked as for liberty of panorama law.--Moroboshi (talk) 07:07, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Picture does not generate a new copyright accorping to US law which is the reference for Commons. See other disputed cases, like Commons:Deletion requests/File:Fra bartolomeo, dio padre lucca.jpg --Sailko (talk) 15:02, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Yes, there is some kind of publication right in Italy but at Commons it needs to be PD in the US when it comes to PD-art plus that section is a bit outdated anyways. Natuur12 (talk) 15:58, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Moja osobista decyzja - proszę o jej uszanowanie / this is my personal decision - i hope you will respect it Niantic100 (talk) 10:13, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason to delete. Natuur12 (talk) 16:19, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Moja osobista decyzja - proszę o jej uszanowanie / this is my personal decision - i hope you will respect it Niantic100 (talk) 10:13, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason to delete. Natuur12 (talk) 16:19, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Moja osobista decyzja - proszę o jej uszanowanie / this is my personal decision - i hope you will respect it Niantic100 (talk) 10:13, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason to delete. Natuur12 (talk) 16:19, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Moja osobista decyzja - proszę o jej uszanowanie / this is my personal decision - i hope you will respect it Niantic100 (talk) 10:14, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason to delete. Natuur12 (talk) 16:19, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Moja osobista decyzja - proszę o jej uszanowanie / this is my personal decision - i hope you will respect it Niantic100 (talk) 10:14, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason to delete. Natuur12 (talk) 16:20, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Moja osobista decyzja - proszę o jej uszanowanie / this is my personal decision - i hope you will respect it Niantic100 (talk) 10:14, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason to delete. Natuur12 (talk) 16:21, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Moja osobista decyzja - proszę o jej uszanowanie / this is my personal decision - i hope you will respect it Niantic100 (talk) 10:15, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason to delete. Natuur12 (talk) 16:21, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Moja osobista decyzja - proszę o jej uszanowanie / this is my personal decision - i hope you will respect it Niantic100 (talk) 10:15, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason to delete. Natuur12 (talk) 16:21, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Moja osobista decyzja - proszę o jej uszanowanie / this is my personal decision - i hope you will respect it Niantic100 (talk) 10:15, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason to delete. Natuur12 (talk) 16:21, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Moja osobista decyzja - proszę o jej uszanowanie / this is my personal decision - i hope you will respect it Niantic100 (talk) 10:16, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason to delete. Natuur12 (talk) 16:21, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Moja osobista decyzja - proszę o jej uszanowanie / this is my personal decision - i hope you will respect it Niantic100 (talk) 10:16, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason to delete. Natuur12 (talk) 16:22, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Moja osobista decyzja - proszę o jej uszanowanie / this is my personal decision - i hope you will respect it Niantic100 (talk) 10:16, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason to delete. Natuur12 (talk) 16:22, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Moja osobista decyzja - proszę o jej uszanowanie / this is my personal decision - i hope you will respect it Niantic100 (talk) 10:17, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason to delete. Natuur12 (talk) 16:22, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Moja osobista decyzja - proszę o jej uszanowanie / this is my personal decision - i hope you will respect it Niantic100 (talk) 10:17, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason to delete. Natuur12 (talk) 16:22, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Moja osobista decyzja - proszę o jej uszanowanie / this is my personal decision - i hope you will respect it Niantic100 (talk) 10:17, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason to delete. Natuur12 (talk) 16:22, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Moja osobista decyzja - proszę o jej uszanowanie / this is my personal decision - i hope you will respect it Niantic100 (talk) 10:17, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason to delete. Natuur12 (talk) 16:22, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Moja osobista decyzja - proszę o jej uszanowanie / this is my personal decision - i hope you will respect it Niantic100 (talk) 10:17, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason to delete. Natuur12 (talk) 16:22, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Moja osobista decyzja - proszę o jej uszanowanie / this is my personal decision - i hope you will respect it Niantic100 (talk) 10:17, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: ok Natuur12 (talk) 16:23, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Moja osobista decyzja - proszę o jej uszanowanie / this is my personal decision - i hope you will respect it Niantic100 (talk) 10:18, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason to delete. Natuur12 (talk) 16:23, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Moja osobista decyzja - proszę o jej uszanowanie / this is my personal decision - i hope you will respect it Niantic100 (talk) 10:18, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason to delete. Natuur12 (talk) 16:23, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Moja osobista decyzja - proszę o jej uszanowanie / this is my personal decision - i hope you will respect it Niantic100 (talk) 10:18, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason to delete. Natuur12 (talk) 16:23, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Moja osobista decyzja - proszę o jej uszanowanie / this is my personal decision - i hope you will respect it Niantic100 (talk) 10:18, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason to delete. Natuur12 (talk) 16:23, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Moja osobista decyzja - proszę o jej uszanowanie / this is my personal decision - i hope you will respect it Niantic100 (talk) 10:18, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason to delete. Natuur12 (talk) 16:23, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be from a film. Stefan4 (talk) 10:28, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:25, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

to correct the filename of Evenflow_2015_07_05_Schmadebeck to Evenflow_2015_07_03_Schmadebeck by moving Blueser2805 (talk) 10:47, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason to delete Natuur12 (talk) 16:29, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:JamieS1234 (serial copyright violator). Most likely part of a sockfarm via User talk:PGLIqbal + User talk:Rahim Jahaani + User talk:Chaudry Liaqat + User talk:Bilal Raja Nazeem + User talk:RanaNadeem444 + User talk:CharlieButton1 + User talk:Payyal Gujjar + User talk:JunaiPatak + User talk:Rabiya Kareem + User talk:Patak Jalander + etc. = all uploads from (mostly) 05.2015 and related to en:Faisalabad, a city in Pakistan. Gunnex (talk) 10:54, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

+File:Faisalabadi Food Pics 1 (3).jpg Yann (talk) 13:02, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:30, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 20:33, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 17:52, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentified person, so out of scope. Stefan4 (talk) 10:57, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:31, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Faute d'orthographe dans le nom de la catégorie, qui depuis ma correction des quelques pages liées est maintenant vide, la nouvelle catégorie ayant été créée également, celle-ci n'a plus de raison d'être. 149.154.206.109 12:00, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:32, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image does not reflect the real Agni-V in any form and useless by all regards Standardengineer (talk) 12:08, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reaon to delete Natuur12 (talk) 16:33, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image does not represent the real Agni-V missile in any shape or form and has no use to represent it Standardengineer (talk) 12:09, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reaon to delete Natuur12 (talk) 16:33, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Category:Jean-Bernard Métais, born in 1954, can't be dead 70 years ago... No FoP in France. LW² \m/ (Lie 2 me ...) 12:16, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:33, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Category:Jean-Bernard Métais, born in 1954, can't be dead 70 years ago... No FoP in France. LW² \m/ (Lie 2 me ...) 12:17, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:33, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Category:Jean-Bernard Métais, born in 1954, can't be dead 70 years ago... No FoP in France. LW² \m/ (Lie 2 me ...) 12:18, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:34, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Category:Jean-Bernard Métais, born in 1954, can't be dead 70 years ago... No FoP in France. LW² \m/ (Lie 2 me ...) 12:18, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:34, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Category:Jean-Bernard Métais, born in 1954, can't be dead 70 years ago... No FoP in France. LW² \m/ (Lie 2 me ...) 12:18, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:34, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Category:Jean-Bernard Métais, born in 1954, can't be dead 70 years ago... No FoP in France. LW² \m/ (Lie 2 me ...) 12:18, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:34, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is just the same as Category:Fixedsys. Pokéfan95 (talk) 12:48, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:35, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. sculptor died in 2007.

Base (talk) 12:49, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think we can apply Commons:De minimis to some of these photos --Butko (talk) 17:27, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I uploaded a version of File:Kiev_Golden_Gate.jpg where the statue is eleminated. So its no problem with missing FoP in ukraine. --Badener (talk) 14:35, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: most but kept eveything that could be DM Natuur12 (talk) 16:40, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Basit Plenna (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Basit Plenna. Eventually related: part of a sockfarm via User talk:PGLIqbal + User talk:Rahim Jahaani + User talk:Chaudry Liaqat + User talk:Bilal Raja Nazeem + User talk:RanaNadeem444 + User talk:CharlieButton1 + User talk:Payyal Gujjar + User talk:JunaiPatak + User talk:Rabiya Kareem + User talk:Patak Jalander + User talk:MochiSardar + etc. = all uploads from mostly 05.2015 and related to en:Faisalabad, a city in Pakistan.

Gunnex (talk) 12:53, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:41, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lola Shalimova (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Smal lsize, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 13:34, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:42, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader did not create certificate front and center of person cut in half by image. Notice this cannot be a selfie, as you can see the shadow of the photographer. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:15, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:42, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No confidence this is own work of uploader, no metadata, small size. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:33, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:45, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:45, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lovely photo, but the uploader didn't take it. Credited to "Hossein Majidi". Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:44, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Ellin Beltz: . Hossein Majidi is my only brother. Any user can't upload his/her family's photos?! I mention his name for famous. Can't I upload my dear brother's pictures?! Please don't bother me.46.224.233.234 20:05, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi anonymous: Funny on the upload file he's claimed as your cousin: "THIS PICTURE HAVE TAKEN BY HOSSEIN MAJIDI AND HE ALLOW ME TO UPLOAD IT. BECAUSE HE IS MY COUSIN." And no, you can't upload other people's photos claimed as own work, but you can have them file a COM:OTRS simple form to fix it. Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:22, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:45, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author request, better cropped file Philmonte101 (talk) 14:48, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment The cropped version is a much lower quality image. Can you replace it with a high-quality crop? Davidwr (talk) 16:51, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Someone could make an argument that the "Maverick Bull over M" design's copyright is not "de minimus" which would, unfortunately, force the removal of both images from the Commons (the Commons generally does not allow "non-free" images). I'm not sure that they would prevail, but they could make the argument. For this reason I highly recommend you, as the uploader, set your Commons "preferences" to receive email any time a page on your watchlist changes, so you can make a counter-argument. If you don't and someone nominates them for deletion over copyright concerns, they may be deleted simply because nobody spoke up and said "woah, wait a minute, I don't think you are correct here." By the way, I think the legal argument over whether it is "de minimus" is close enough to borderline that many Commons contributors would say it was not and many will say that it is. Davidwr (talk) 16:51, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    I'm ambivalent about the images in and of themselves, but if we are going to have one at least have one that's high-enough quality to be useful for other than on-screen use. As far as giving people ideas: I am generally for following the rules (at least those rules that are here for legal or other good external reasons or rules we've come up with ourselves and have agreed to follow). This means I take copyright seriously and I recognize that there are others who take it seriously too and when it comes to "edge cases" like "does de minimus apply in a 'close' case" it's better to at least alert the uploader rather than pretend it doesn't exist. Davidwr (talk) 05:04, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No reason to delete Natuur12 (talk) 16:45, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that the source is in public domain. OTRS needed.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:04, 17 October 2015 (UTC) 15:02, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:49, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nagoya Daibutsu

[edit]

Erected in 1987 (cf. ja:名古屋大仏), the Buddha statue is not yet in PD. Under the freedom of panorama in Japan statues are not permitted. Yasu (talk) 15:02, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

この銅像は、一般公衆に開放されている屋外の場所に設置されているため、著作権法46条により自由に利用できると思います。— Preceding unsigned comment added by Bariston (talk • contribs) 16:13, 17 October 2015‎ (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The Buddha statue is located in the precincts of the temple, which is open to the public. Also, Buddha statue in the religious symbol, not the art. Just as molding Christ image has not changed significantly, the basic molding unchanged for several hundred years ago. --KAMUI (talk) 15:02, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Bariston and KAMUI: Buddha statues are generally regarded as artworks. Take a look into Category:Japanese FOP cases/deleted/3D artworks and you will see how many photographs of daibutsus and kannons have been deleted to date. Article 46 of the Japanese Copyright Act allows use of artworks installed in open places, but only for non-commercial purposes. Yasu (talk) 14:58, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Yasu:  銅像は著作権法10条1項4号により『美術の著作物』に該当します。ただし著作権法46条には「非商業的な目的」というような文言はなく、4項目が限定列挙されているだけです。そして写真のアップロードはそのいずれにも該当しません。CRICの「著作物が自由に使える場合は?」というQ&Aにも「建築物や公園にある銅像などは写真撮影したり、テレビ放送したりすることができる。」という見解を出しており、みずほ中央法律事務所のHPでも「一定の公共の場での銅像,モニュメント類は,撮影,投稿があっても著作権侵害ではない扱いとされます。」という見解が出されておりますので、特に問題はないと考えます。--Bariston (talk) 11:42, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:49, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source doesn't reveal whether the photographer is anonymous or not, so the copyright tag can't be verified. Stefan4 (talk) 10:38, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Eugène Bonaventure Jean-Baptiste Vigo (dit Miguel Almereyda) est mort le 14 août 1917 à la Prison de Fresnes au sud de Paris. --Noelbabar (talk) 11:51, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Mais il n'est pas le photographe et le photographe est probablement mort plus tard. --Stefan2 (talk) 10:24, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Source not good enough to tell if it is really anonymous or not Natuur12 (talk) 13:59, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Insufficient source to verify the claim that the photographer died more than 100 years ago. Based on the age of the woman, the photograph could easily have been taken later than 100 years ago. Stefan4 (talk) 15:06, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:59, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo from art gallery Hangsna (talk) 17:42, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ja vad ska jag säga, jag var på utställningen och tog lite bilder, det finns andra exempel på samma sak, och dom bilderna får vara kvar. Och det är jag som gjort vernissagekortet till Ralf Arzt. Jonnmann (talk) 20:23, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Vilka fler exempel har du på kort tagna på konstutställningar?
Gällande Ralf Arzt så är den numera raderad, var det alltså du som var upphovsmannen även till bilden på vernissagekortet? /Hangsna (talk) 20:57, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nä jag fick bilden av Ralf, och han har inget emot att ha sitt vernissagekort på sin sida.

Känns taskigt mot Frankie som tagit bilderna på https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andres_Serrano , men rätt ska va rätt , får hans vara kvar vill jag veta varför. Jonnmann (talk) 21:05, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Det har inget att göra med att vara taskig mot någon, det är också taskigt mot upphovsrättsinnehavaran att ladda upp sådant som inte är fritt. Jag har anmält dessa för radering. Om du vill ladda upp vernissagekortet igen så får du göra det men då måste du nog även skicka in ett OTRS där Ralf ger sitt godkännande att bilden släpps under en fri licens. Alltså inte (bara) vernisagekortet utan själva bilden/verket på det. /Hangsna (talk) 21:14, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ok och vad är en otrs , och hur gör jag med den Jonnmann (talk) 21:18, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:OTRS, jag har aldrig gjort det så kan inte hjälpa till. Om du frågar några på SVWP så kanske du kan få hjälp där. /Hangsna (talk) 21:19, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nä, jag orkar inte hålla på med sånt här klydd, det är ju inte första gången, bara ta bort den, synd för Ralf, och ta bort Atomium också. Jonnmann (talk) 21:25, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Needs OTRS Natuur12 (talk) 13:59, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Yes, whole building is architectural monument, but these are sculptural works, not architectural works. Taivo (talk) 08:39, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I would like to remind you that it is only a local (Commons-centered) interpretation of the Russian law that is not shared by a large part of the Russian community. --Alexander (talk) 10:05, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Of course! Interpretation of Russian laws by Russian people is notorious! ;-) Taivo (talk) 13:28, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Not okay according to our interpertation of Russian law. If you believe that this interpertation is wrong just start a general discussion at the talk page of com:FOP. Natuur12 (talk) 14:01, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I would like to delete the photos I upIoaded. The photos are no longer wanted up by the person who is in them and are no longer needed. Holvi001 (talk) 19:44, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Sounds fair Natuur12 (talk) 14:02, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images from www.araldicacivica.it

[edit]

These are all claimed to be from [3] and there is no source of permission, so COM:COA#Coat of arms "found on the internet" would appear to apply here. See also the related discussion at en:Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2012 February 27#File:Varapodio-Stemma.gif. --Stefan4 (talk) 15:45, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Araldicacivica was among the first sites granting Wikipedia permission to reproduce their contents. Of course there is no relevant ticket about it, since there was no OTRS back in 2004. The disclaimer on their site says it's ok to republish their pictures as long as they're credited, although on it.wiki we currently seek for a full authorization by municipalities to use the "real", actual insignia. --Elitre (talk) 21:15, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
All drawings from Araldicacivica.it (ie the arms "ridisegnate" [redrawn], such Palmanova ad Cervia in our case) are under cc​​-by-sa 3.0 (see disclameir in italian: «Tutti i contenuti sono sotto licenza Common 3. In pratica le immagini possono essere usate liberamente purché si citi sempre la fonte» [All contents are licensed under the Common 3. In practice, the images may be used freely as long as you always refer to the source]), the situation is naturally different for the coats of arms "official" contained on the site, that may be used only as a fair-use.GJo (talk) 22:06, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
P.s.: sorry for my bad english.GJo (talk) 22:08, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It says "Common 3", not "CC-BY-SA 3.0". "Common 3" could mean any of CC-BY 3.0, CC-BY-SA 3.0 or CC-BY.ND 3.0. A non-commercial restriction is unlikely since it is suggested that "le immagini possono essere usate liberamente" without mention any commercial limitation. --Stefan4 (talk) 23:16, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, the license has been clarified: CC BY-NC-ND 3.0.GJo (talk) 13:14, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. MBisanz talk 02:10, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images from www.araldicacivica.it

[edit]

Another set of images has been uploaded:

Stefan4 (talk) 20:42, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

____________
Deleted. As above. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:17, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images from www.araldicacivica.it

[edit]

The visual style suggests that these originally might come from araldicacivica.it or that they alternatively are scans from books or something. At the very least, the attribution requirement is violated since the author isn't indicated. They just refer to deleted pages on enwiki and itwiki.

Stefan4 (talk) 19:41, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:04, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images from www.araldicacivica.it

[edit]

Another set has been uploaded:

Stefan2 (talk) 18:54, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:06, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Soybeans (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Rephotographing a drawing or a photograph by someone else is not own work. All these images were created by someone else, who might that someone/ or someone's be, please?

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:58, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:07, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Michael Barera as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: See here Can't find the source, let's have a proper DR. Yann (talk) 21:01, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: All Wikipedia clones. No evidence that this file is indeed a copyright violation Natuur12 (talk) 14:08, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dksats (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Questionable authorship claims based on the low/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent metadata, and the uploader's history.

LX (talk, contribs) 17:44, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Deepak does not seem to be a notable person based on my research, so his two pictures appear to fall under the Commons:Deletion_policy#Not_educationally_useful category. Regarding the picture of Leslie Tripathy, I am not capable of opining with any authority, so my vote is for the two other pictures only. Dontreader (talk) 06:26, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:33, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dksats (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Questionable authorship claims based on the low resolutions, missing metadata, and the uploader's history.

LX (talk, contribs) 21:21, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Delete: Natuur12 (talk) 14:09, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If indeed Octavio Pizarro has given permission for this image to be used, he can file a COM:OTRS statement, otherwise it's a copyright infringement on his work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:17, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Octavio Pizarro a donné la permission pour que cette image soit sur wikipédia. Je ne sais pas où indiquer le COM:OTRS statement. Pourriez-vous me dire comment faire? Merci d'avance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Miss Pizarro (talk • contribs) 09:29, 18 October 2015‎ (UTC)[reply]


Kept: for the moment. OTRS stuff will delete it if required. JuTa 22:35, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]