Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2015/10/15
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
Out of COM:SCOPE. Typical "holiday shot" of non-notable people, which is of no use. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:12, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Same problem with:
- File:在二滩路上 - panoramio.jpg
- File:San marino - panoramio - Marco Salvatori (3).jpg
- File:San marino - panoramio - Marco Salvatori (4).jpg
- File:二滩之行2 - panoramio.jpg
- File:San marino - panoramio - Marco Salvatori (1).jpg
- File:San marino - panoramio - Marco Salvatori (2).jpg
- File:San marino - panoramio.jpg
- File:San marino - panoramio - Marco Salvatori.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Deleted: Out of SCOPE shizhao (talk) 01:36, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
Map data are correctly attributed as CC-BY-SA. What about base map? Where does it come from? Taivo (talk) 13:30, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
@Taivo: Sorry I didn't realise that was also required. I think it is under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 licence (CC BY-SA) http://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright assuming openstreetmap provides the basemap, the other source (Mapbox) provides no information on copyright. I'm not sure which of these is the basemap?̴̴̴̴Jippa99 (talk) 01:38, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
Kept, OK, I try to fix description and licenses. Taivo (talk) 09:09, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 17:43, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: No permission, copyvio. Yann (talk) 10:19, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
Unused text document of unclear notability. See COM:SCOPE. Stefan4 (talk) 13:36, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of Commons:Project scope. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
Unused text document of unclear notability. See COM:SCOPE. Stefan4 (talk) 13:37, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of Commons:Project scope. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
Unused text document of unclear notability. See COM:SCOPE. Stefan4 (talk) 13:38, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of Commons:Project scope. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Emanuela Bevilacqua (talk · contribs)
[edit]These seem to be random non-free images from the Internet, see COM:NETCOPYRIGHT. A few of them are tagged with {{PD-Italy}}, but all pictures look recent. The EXIF says that the pictures were created in 2014 and 2015. A few of them do not have EXIF, but those also look too recent.
- File:TOMREBL SS2016 7.JPG
- File:TOMREBL SS2016 6.JPG
- File:TOMREBL SS2016 5.JPG
- File:TOMREBL SS2016 4.JPG
- File:TOMREBL SS2016 1.jpg
- File:TOMREBL SS2016 2.jpg
- File:TOMREBL SS2016 3.jpg
- File:TOMREBL FW2015 8.jpg
- File:TOMREBL FW2015 7.jpg
- File:TOMREBL FW2015 6.jpg
- File:TOMREBL FW2015 5.jpg
- File:TOMREBL FW2015 4.jpg
- File:TOMREBL FW2015 1.jpg
- File:TOMREBL FW2015 3.jpg
- File:TOMREBL FW2015 2.jpg
- File:TOM REBL SS15 8.jpg
- File:TOM REBL SS15 7.jpg
- File:TOM REBL SS15 6.jpg
- File:TOM REBL SS15 5.jpg
- File:TOM REBL SS15 4.jpg
- File:TOM REBL SS15 3.jpg
- File:TOM REBL SS15 1.jpg
- File:TOM REBL SS15 2.jpg
- File:Tom Rebl.jpeg
Stefan4 (talk) 17:10, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: clear copyright violations. JuTa 20:49, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
Courtesy deletion of a poor quality image that is demeaning to the subject. There is nothing in the article that says that this moment is in any way significant or typical for the subject. Sjö (talk) 05:30, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
It is purposely being uploaded on behalf of the Sheriff's opponent by Jwes115 to slander the Sheriff leading up to his October 24th 2015 election. Please remove immediately. JohnWesleyHampson (talk) 14:36, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: no evidence of own work, image is widely available on the internet. Materialscientist (talk) 05:43, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine. The photo violates architect's copyright. Who is architect and when (s)he died?
В Украине нет свободы панорамы. Эта фотография нарушает авторские права архитектора. Кто архитектор и когда он(а) умер(ла)? Taivo (talk) 11:57, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
- Keep 1907 building - obviously free as {{PD-RusEmpire}}--Anatoliy (talk) 14:08, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
- Keep It is quite obvious that architect of Шуховська водонапірна башта is named Шухов (if not obvious it can be found from Wikipedia). There is an article about him on Wikipedia (uk:Шухов Володимир Григорович, unfortunately no Estonian version yet but English, Russian and German ones are available), and he died in 1939 — NickK (talk) 13:27, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
Kept, thank you, now I can fix the licenses. Taivo (talk) 18:07, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Romanianbrands (talk · contribs)
[edit]Advertisement. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Carpati rent a car italian flyer.jpg
- File:Carpati rent a car front flyer.jpg
- File:Carpati rent a car flyer verso.jpg
- File:Carpati rent a car flyer.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted by D-Kuru: Fair use material is not permitted on Wikimedia Commons
droit d'auteur Touzrimounir (talk) 10:06, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 04:13, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
droit d'auteur Touzrimounir (talk) 10:06, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 04:13, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
no description, unused, uncategorized, probably out of scope Estopedist1 (talk) 17:49, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:10, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Song. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 04:14, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
Malvinas124.JPG (archivo) LOS CHICOS DEL BARRIO (talk) 14:38, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3AListFiles&user=LOS_CHICOS_DEL_BARRIO&ilshowall=1 LOS CHICOS DEL BARRIO (talk) 14:39, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Malvinas124.JPG LOS CHICOS DEL BARRIO (talk) 14:41, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 04:14, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by GKVasconcelos (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:DW of figurines
- File:BONECOS PERSONALIZADOS 14.jpg
- File:TOPO DE BOLO BATIZADO.jpg
- File:BONECOS PERSONALIZADOS 13.jpg
- File:TOPO DE BOLO INFANTIL 12.jpg
- File:TOPO DE BOLO CHÁ DE BEBÊ.jpg
- File:TOPO DE BOLO INFANTIL 11.jpg
- File:TOPO DE BOLO INFANTIL 10.JPG
- File:TOPOS DE CASAMENTO.jpg
- File:BONECOS DE FORMATURA 9.jpg
- File:BONECOS DE FORMATURA.jpg
- File:BONECOS PERSONALIZADOS 8.JPG
- File:TOPO DE BOO CHÁ DE BEBÊ.jpg
- File:BONECOS PERSONALIZADOS 7.JPG
- File:BONECOS PERSONALIZADOS 6.jpg
- File:BONECOS PERSONALIZADOS 5.JPG
- File:TOPO DE BOLO CASAMENTO.jpg
- File:BONECOS PERSONALIZADOS ESTILO HUMANIZADO 4.jpg
- File:BONECOS PERSONALIZADOS 3.JPG
- File:BONECOS PERSONALIZADOS 2.JPG
- File:BONECOS PERSONALIZADOS ESTILO HUMANIZADO 1.jpg
- File:BONECOS PERSONALIZADOS.jpg
- File:VELAS PERSONALIZADAS.jpg
- File:TOPO DE BOLO INFANTIL.jpg
- File:BONECOS PERSONALIZADOS HUMANIZADO.jpg
- File:BONECOS PERSONALIZADOS ESTILO HUMANIZADO.jpg
Эlcobbola talk 15:41, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 04:16, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
Not own work: watermarks, screengrabs, no EXIF data. Copyvio.
- File:Sibelle Hu Hui Zhong 胡慧中 in Inspector Wears Skrts I.jpg
- File:Sibelle Hu Hui Zhong 胡慧中 in Inspector Wears Skirts II.jpg
- File:Sibelle Hu Hui Zhong 胡慧中 - Your Smiling Face.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:17, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 04:18, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Daren123456789 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope : unused personal images
- File:WHERE.jpg
- File:MODIS.jpg
- File:KNN.jpg
- File:TPC2.jpg
- File:Cheerleaders2JAgs.jpg
- File:CheerleadersJags.jpg
--Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:12, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 04:18, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Arvind061093 (talk · contribs)
[edit]See COM:SCOPE. Some of these are dupes.
- File:Timeline12345.jpg
- File:SITE12345.jpg
- File:SHOP12345.jpg
- File:SNS12345.jpg
- File:SNS.jpg
- File:CANCELS.jpg
- File:SITE.jpg
- File:SHOP.jpg
- File:S & OP Process.jpg
- File:Lv12345.jpg
Stefan4 (talk) 23:16, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 04:19, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:57, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, the photo fits well into COM:PENIS for illustrating, what kind of photos Commons does not need. Taivo (talk) 15:42, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: still no license at all. JuTa 06:18, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Mire Commons:Trabajos derivados. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:03, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 13:20, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Self nom, low quality image, replaced by other files in Category:Peugeot 505. OSX (talk • contributions) 02:21, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete per uploader request, category is well populated and this file is unused. -Pete F (talk) 02:34, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 13:21, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Earlier the same picture has been deleted. Autorship does not look like being right (taking into consideration the user's contributions). Pit rock (talk) 05:20, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 13:24, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Autorship does not look like being right (taking into consideration the user's contributions). Pit rock (talk) 05:22, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 13:23, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Copied from: http://industriadereuniones.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Chihuahua-770x435.jpg Pit rock (talk) 05:26, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 13:25, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 06:48, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 13:25, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 06:48, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 13:25, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 06:48, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 13:26, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
parce que je veux le retirer Rémy Ryan Robert (talk) 07:11, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:DW. Yann (talk) 13:26, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
no express permission from all the persons in the picture Shrikanthv (talk) 09:19, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi Shrikanthv: All people photographed in this image have signed waivers to release this image for promotional and public use. joellepearson
Kept: Adding {{Personality rights}} should be sufficient. Yann (talk) 13:27, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Unused screenshot marked delete. Inclined to believe uploader wanted it deleted or its a test Gbawden (talk) 09:47, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 13:29, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
droit d'auteur Touzrimounir (talk) 09:57, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 13:29, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
unattributed copy of File:Namakkal_Fort.jpg Atlasowa (talk) 10:40, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 13:30, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
This is routine request for small photo without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photo is so small? Can you upload a bigger version, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload a version with EXIF data? Can you describe and categorize the file correctly? Taivo (talk) 10:58, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 13:31, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Lacks of permission, the content of http://www.zapatillaswax.com/ seems copyrighted
--Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:29, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 13:31, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
copyrighted : http://www.zangerwilbert.nl/index.php/fotoalbum/wilbert-en-collegas/wilbert-a-zanger-rienes-1-29.html#joomimg --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:37, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 13:32, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Unused unencyclopedic personal image outside our scope. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:41, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 13:32, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
No license and out of scope personal image Jarekt (talk) 11:56, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 13:33, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Duplicate to File:I phone 140.JPG and File:I phone 139.JPG. I suggest to delete 141 and 140, and keep 139, which i've categorized. It should be renamed after the deletion discussion. Tine (talk) 11:58, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 13:34, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Duplicate to File:I phone 141.JPG and File:I phone 139.JPG. I suggest to delete 141 and 140 and keep 139, which i've categorized. It should be renamed after the deletion discussion. Tine (talk) 11:59, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 13:34, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Grossière erreur sur la carte de la bourgogne 171.16.208.4 12:23, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
- C'est un peu court comme argumentaire. Où voyez-vous une erreur ? - Bzh-99 (talk) 12:48, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
Kept: In use. No reason to delete. Yann (talk) 13:41, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Personal image, Commons is not a private photo album. Pokéfan95 (talk) 12:55, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 13:42, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
spam, del. on DE Nolispanmo 13:08, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 13:42, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rudra narayan mukherjee (talk · contribs)
[edit]Newspaper scans. Unlikely to be own work by the uploader.
- File:Rural innovator who cares and protects.jpg
- File:दैनिक हिन्दुस्तान.jpg
- File:दुखद है की मै झारखंडी हूँ.png
- File:Hindustan times.jpg
Stefan4 (talk) 13:18, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvios. Should be speedied. Yann (talk) 13:44, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Mistaken license Lssrn (talk) 13:32, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: by Túrelio. Yann (talk) 13:44, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Scan of a printed publication. No evidence of permission. Stefan4 (talk) 13:38, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 13:44, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Looks like advertising Gbawden (talk) 13:47, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 13:48, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 13:53, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 13:48, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 13:53, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 13:48, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 14:04, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 13:49, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 14:04, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 13:49, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mithileshbaraily (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unclear copyright status. Uploaded in a row on 30.01.2012 all files are (or were) watermarked with "Courtesy www.facebook.com/kalimpong" and indeed all files were previoulsy published there via 2011 album https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.10150452874944527.362205.101167814526&type=3. Note that some files (if not all) were photoshopped before upload:
- File:Dgh2.jpg --> https://www.facebook.com/kalimpong/photos/a.10150452874944527.362205.101167814526/10150462149409527/?type=3&theater (2011)
- File:Dgh3.jpg --> https://www.facebook.com/kalimpong/photos/a.10150452874944527.362205.101167814526/10150462150309527/?type=3&theater (2011)
- File:Dgh5.jpg --> https://www.facebook.com/kalimpong/photos/a.10150452874944527.362205.101167814526/10150462150139527/?type=3&theater (2011)
- File:Dgh4.jpg --> https://www.facebook.com/kalimpong/photos/a.10150452874944527.362205.101167814526/10150462149899527/?type=3&theater (2011)
- File:Dgh1.jpg --> https://www.facebook.com/kalimpong/photos/a.10150452874944527.362205.101167814526/10150462149279527/?type=3&theater (2011)
Permission needed.
Gunnex (talk) 14:17, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 13:49, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
advertising and out of scope — billinghurst sDrewth 14:19, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 13:50, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 13:50, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 13:51, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
There is freedom of panorama in India for 3-dimensional, but not for 2-dimensional art. OTRS-permission from artist is needed. Taivo (talk) 14:35, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 13:51, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mohamed hassen fouad (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 13:52, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 13:52, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
- also file:The great Indian Thali.jpg
This is routine request for small photos without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photos are so small? Can you upload bigger versions, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload versions with EXIF data? Can you describe and categorize the files correctly? Taivo (talk) 14:44, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Ordinary tourist snapshots, no copy on the Net. Yann (talk) 13:54, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per DR Mys_721tx (talk) 22:18, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 15:23, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: File page without file. Yann (talk) 13:57, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 15:24, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 13:57, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 15:24, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 13:57, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
This was a school photograph taken of Alan Turing in 1928 at Sherborne school. Sheborne school claim that they own the copyright in all their school photographs of the time. In order for this to be a public domain photograph, the photographer would have had to have died before 1945 (less than 20 years after the photograph was taken). Unless that can be positively established, then the PD status of this image cannot be determined and it should be deleted. DieSwartzPunkt (talk) 15:54, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
- And Template:PD-UK-unknown or Template:PD-UKGov, if the school is (amreican englisch) public, are not aplying?--Sanandros (talk) 16:04, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
- Neither template is applicable here. The school is a British school. I find it hard to believe that the school would not be aware of who the photographer was. The photographer would make sure that his name was emblazoned across the photograph's folders or envelopes.
- The reason that I raised this is that I am aware of someone that I know having just obtained a copy of a photograph from Sherborne school for use in some Alan Turing related publication (a very similar photo clearly taken at the same time). Sherborne school were adamant that they owned the copyright and proper attribution had to be made if the photograph was used (one assumes that the copyright was transferred from the photographer but the 70 year rule following his death still applies). DieSwartzPunkt (talk) 16:56, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
- With "(american english)" i meant language related as public school means something else in american english and in british english, or is that no more up to date. But if they claim copyright they also need to provide a contract and name the photographer. Other wise it's copyfrought.--Sanandros (talk) 20:55, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
- Sherborne school is what we British call a 'public school' which means that it is, in reality, a private school.
- With "(american english)" i meant language related as public school means something else in american english and in british english, or is that no more up to date. But if they claim copyright they also need to provide a contract and name the photographer. Other wise it's copyfrought.--Sanandros (talk) 20:55, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
- You have the burden of establishing whether copyright subsists or not the wrong way around. It is up to the person publishing the image to establish that the image is out of copyright - not for me or anyone else to prove that it is in copyright. Intellectual property has to be considered copyright until it is proven otherwise. The template Template:PD-UK-unknown has been suggesteed as a copyright template, but that template can only be used once reasonable attempts have been made to establish who the originator of the image was (and in this case, the simple expedient of asking the school itself is entirely reasonable). As the template itself says, "please specify in the image description the research you have carried out to find who the author was". If no research specified, then the template cannot be used and the image is liable for deletion.
- Template:PD-UKGov is inappropriate because it is not a government originated image, even if it were a state school. I should also point out that the last copyright tag (Template:PD-Old) is not applicable here because in order to use it you have know who the copyright holder was and you also have to know that the date of his or her death was more than 70 years ago. DieSwartzPunkt (talk) 16:50, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
Kept: PD-UK-unknown looks fine. Yann (talk) 13:59, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
The watermarks suggest that this is an advertisement or something, i.e. not own work by the uploader. Stefan4 (talk) 15:59, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:00, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
File:I have a adorable cabbage patch baby and I wanted to know something about him and I also wanted to know his value but not to sell him, he is my inspiration when I'm down and out- Here's what I do know his name 2013-09-03 07-43.jpg
[edit]
Out of scope, just a joke-upload perhaps, only this single upload of user without any other contribution Tine (talk) 17:34, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:00, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Unused tiny snippet, unusable, no educational value. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:35, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:01, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:38, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:01, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Unused promotional or personal image, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:49, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:02, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Guatemalapeten (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 18:16, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 18:59, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 19:03, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:04, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Private picture, no description, no category. Blurry. Tine (talk) 18:23, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:05, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Advertisement Till (talk) 18:37, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:05, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Guatemalapeten (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 18:16, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 18:59, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 19:03, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:04, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be the work of the uploader. Image is based on a satellite image, which the uploader is unlikely to have taken, and without proper attribution it is impossible to tell if it is freely licensed. In addition, URLs in the upper left corner indicate that this image was likely copied from http://goldentempleamritsar.org/guide-map-of-golden-temple-amritsar.php and created by http://www.idea-ads.com. Ahecht (talk) 19:08, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:08, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be the work of the uploader. Image is based on a satellite image, which the uploader is unlikely to have taken, and without proper attribution it is impossible to tell if it is freely licensed. Likely copied from http://www.hemkunt.in/india-travel-guides/Travel_Guide____March_2013____for_Web.pdf. Ahecht (talk) 19:09, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:08, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be the work of the uploader. Rasterized version of http://www.hemkunt.in/india-travel-guides/Travel_Guide____March_2013____for_Web.pdf (where it was likely copied from, given that the pink area says "See map on page 10-11") Ahecht (talk) 19:13, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:08, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Image contains many smaller photographs that are unlikely to be the work of the uploader, therefore it is ineligible to be released into the public domain. Also contains advertising watermarks. Ahecht (talk) 19:16, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:09, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE, unsharp (unfocussed) image and enough penis-images anyway. -- Túrelio (talk) 19:32, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:09, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Copyright Infringement - The Image is taken from uttarabank-bd.com Musa Raza (talk) 20:11, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:10, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Copyright Violation - The image belongs to uttarabank-bd.com. Musa Raza (talk) 20:16, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:10, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Copyright Violation - The image belongs to uttarabank-bd.com. Musa Raza (talk) 20:18, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:10, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope : advertising IMO http://whitmandesigns.com/
- File:Bb444.jpg
- File:Whitman designs2.jpg
- File:Whitman designs3.jpg
- File:Whitman designs4.jpg
- File:Whitmandesignsshowroom.jpg
- File:Whitman designsshowroom.jpg
- File:Whitman designs.jpg
--Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:19, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:14, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Copyright Violation - The image belongs to uttarabank-bd.com. Musa Raza (talk) 20:19, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:11, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Copyright Violation - The image belongs to uttarabank-bd.com. Musa Raza (talk) 20:22, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:11, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Copyright Violation - This is not Own Work. It belongs to uttarabank-bd.com. Musa Raza (talk) 20:29, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo. Yann (talk) 14:11, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
This file is Trademarked and cannot be used under creative commons. It is also an obsolete/old image Bsteinlobovits (talk) 22:07, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
- Keep: Trademark != Copyright. Not licensed under CC license, but {{PD-textlogo}} clearly applies.
Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 14:17, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Copyrighted software by Facebook uploaded here as the uploader's own work. Cloudbound (talk) 22:27, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Comment: Excluding (and removing) the user profiles, the interface seems too simple to meet the Threshold of originality in the US. --Amitie 10g (talk) 03:18, 16 October 2015 (UTC)- Delete Copyvio. --Diego Grez return fire 22:56, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:17, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Appears to be a scan. Unlikely to be own work by the uploader. Stefan4 (talk) 22:50, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:16, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Unused userphoto. See COM:SCOPE. Stefan4 (talk) 22:54, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:16, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of COM:SCOPE eurodyne (talk) 23:27, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:15, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Files of User:Ravi kolkata
[edit]- File:Miles_Hyderabad.png - likely copyvio [1]
- File:Miles_Kochi.jpg - likely copyvio [2]
- File:Miles_Hyd.JPG
- File:Miles_Ahmedabad.jpg
- File:Miles Kochi2.tif
- File:Miles Pune.jpg
- File:Miles Chennai.jpg
- File:Mumbai office.jpg
- File:Miles Kolkata2.jpg
- File:Miles Delhi.jpg
- File:Map Locator of Miles Education in India.png
- File:Miles Bangalore.jpg
- File:Map of India with Miles Office Locations.png
![[2]](http://www.sherbrookeinc.com/images/alppattheritage1b.jpg){kind=link}
Reasons for deletion request:
- All of the uploads are copy vios: E.g. 1,2,etc.
- All pics have differents Exifs - so doubtful if it was taken by one person
- Some of the pics do not have Exif info.
- No clarity on the sources of maps.
- All pics are of a training institute and are meant for promotion. Cf : the following quotes from en:User:Ravi_kolkata/sandbox article:
- Miles Professional Exam Review (India) Private Limited (often referred to as Miles Education) is India's # 1 organization engaged in providing guidance and classroom training for US professional accounting courses such as Certified Public Accountant (CPA),Certified Management Accountant (CMA) and Enrolled agent (EA) examination in India.
- Miles has a good tip-up with MNCs. We ensure that our students are placed suitably with the MNCs
6. Similar promotional Wikipedia article on the above organization's competitor in India was deleted (along with uploaded pics) see: en:Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Edupristine --Muzammil (talk) 20:15, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Kept: the big ones. I deleted the small ones and the maps. Yann (talk) 14:31, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
je sait pas Yassinyoulal (talk) 21:08, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 14:21, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Copyvio? This seems to be a 2005 source using the picture. Stefan4 (talk) 21:17, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Very small, no EXIF data, copies on the Net. Yann (talk) 14:21, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Unused userphoto? No indication that the picture is in scope. Stefan4 (talk) 21:39, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:18, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:18, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:38, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:22, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo of non-notable person, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:43, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:22, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope Ciaurlec (talk) 21:17, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:24, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Textlogo of unclear notability. See COM:SCOPE. Stefan4 (talk) 21:40, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:23, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Unused logo of unclear notability. See COM:SCOPE. Stefan4 (talk) 23:14, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:24, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
There are already many good photos about the mountain, so this is quite useless. Gen (talk) 04:17, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per uploader request, category is well populated and this image is unused. (Genifique in the future it would help if you could state that you are the uploader in the original nomination.) -Pete F (talk) 02:36, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request Krd 13:14, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
There are already many good photos about the mountain, so this is quite useless. Gen (talk) 04:19, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per uploader request. -Pete F (talk) 02:36, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request Krd 13:14, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
falsche Beschriftung, kann so nicht verwendet werden. Ich dachte dass der Titel eingelesen wird, leider wurde nur der Dateiname eingelesen.... dronepicr (talk) 16:40, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
falsche Beschriftung, kann so nicht verwendet werden. Ich dachte dass der Titel eingelesen wird, leider wurde nur der Dateiname eingelesen.... dronepicr (talk) 20:36, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request Krd 13:15, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
falsche Beschriftung, kann so nicht verwendet werden. Ich dachte dass der Titel eingelesen wird, leider wurde nur der Dateiname eingelesen.... dronepicr (talk) 16:40, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
falsche Beschriftung, kann so nicht verwendet werden. Ich dachte dass der Titel eingelesen wird, leider wurde nur der Dateiname eingelesen.... dronepicr (talk) 20:36, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request Krd 13:15, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
falsche Beschriftung, kann so nicht verwendet werden. Ich dachte dass der Titel eingelesen wird, leider wurde nur der Dateiname eingelesen.... dronepicr (talk) 16:41, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
falsche Beschriftung, kann so nicht verwendet werden. Ich dachte dass der Titel eingelesen wird, leider wurde nur der Dateiname eingelesen.... dronepicr (talk) 20:37, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request Krd 13:15, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
falsche Beschriftung, kann so nicht verwendet werden. Ich dachte dass der Titel eingelesen wird, leider wurde nur der Dateiname eingelesen.... dronepicr (talk) 16:42, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
falsche Beschriftung, kann so nicht verwendet werden. Ich dachte dass der Titel eingelesen wird, leider wurde nur der Dateiname eingelesen.... dronepicr (talk) 20:38, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request Krd 13:16, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
falsche Beschriftung, kann so nicht verwendet werden. Ich dachte dass der Titel eingelesen wird, leider wurde nur der Dateiname eingelesen.... dronepicr (talk) 16:42, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
falsche Beschriftung, kann so nicht verwendet werden. Ich dachte dass der Titel eingelesen wird, leider wurde nur der Dateiname eingelesen.... dronepicr (talk) 20:40, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
falsche Beschriftung, kann so nicht verwendet werden. Ich dachte dass der Titel eingelesen wird, leider wurde nur der Dateiname eingelesen.... dronepicr (talk) 20:38, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request Krd 13:16, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
falsche Beschriftung, kann so nicht verwendet werden. Ich dachte dass der Titel eingelesen wird, leider wurde nur der Dateiname eingelesen.... dronepicr (talk) 16:43, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request Krd 13:16, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
falsche Beschriftung, kann so nicht verwendet werden. Ich dachte dass der Titel eingelesen wird, leider wurde nur der Dateiname eingelesen.... dronepicr (talk) 16:44, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
falsche Beschriftung, kann so nicht verwendet werden. Ich dachte dass der Titel eingelesen wird, leider wurde nur der Dateiname eingelesen.... dronepicr (talk) 20:37, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
falsche Beschriftung, kann so nicht verwendet werden. Ich dachte dass der Titel eingelesen wird, leider wurde nur der Dateiname eingelesen.... dronepicr (talk) 19:07, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request Krd 13:17, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
falsche Beschriftung, kann so nicht verwendet werden. Ich dachte dass der Titel eingelesen wird, leider wurde nur der Dateiname eingelesen.... dronepicr (talk) 16:45, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request Krd 13:16, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
falsche Beschriftung, kann so nicht verwendet werden. Ich dachte dass der Titel eingelesen wird, leider wurde nur der Dateiname eingelesen.... dronepicr (talk) 16:45, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request Krd 13:16, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
falsche Beschriftung, kann so nicht verwendet werden. Ich dachte dass der Titel eingelesen wird, leider wurde nur der Dateiname eingelesen.... dronepicr (talk) 16:46, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request Krd 13:16, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
falsche Beschriftung, kann so nicht verwendet werden. Ich dachte dass der Titel eingelesen wird, leider wurde nur der Dateiname eingelesen.... dronepicr (talk) 16:46, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request Krd 13:16, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
falsche Beschriftung, kann so nicht verwendet werden. Ich dachte dass der Titel eingelesen wird, leider wurde nur der Dateiname eingelesen.... dronepicr (talk) 16:48, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
falsche Beschriftung, kann so nicht verwendet werden. Ich dachte dass der Titel eingelesen wird, leider wurde nur der Dateiname eingelesen.... dronepicr (talk) 20:39, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request Krd 13:16, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
falsche Beschriftung, kann so nicht verwendet werden. Ich dachte dass der Titel eingelesen wird, leider wurde nur der Dateiname eingelesen.... dronepicr (talk) 16:48, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request Krd 13:16, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
falsche Beschriftung, kann so nicht verwendet werden. Ich dachte dass der Titel eingelesen wird, leider wurde nur der Dateiname eingelesen.... dronepicr (talk) 16:53, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request Krd 13:16, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
falsche Beschriftung, kann so nicht verwendet werden. Ich dachte dass der Titel eingelesen wird, leider wurde nur der Dateiname eingelesen.... dronepicr (talk) 16:50, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
falsche Beschriftung, nicht in cancun dronepicr (talk) 17:21, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request Krd 13:16, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
This image serves no educational purpose. It has no basis in reality and has been deleted once before. Sjö (talk) 14:50, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 15:06, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
- (Edit conflict) A.Savin, I was just going to post to request that this nonsense be salted against further recreation. Bishonen (talk) 15:12, 15 October 2015 (UTC).
No educational value. No basis in reality. Sjö (talk) 11:14, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Steinsplitter Natuur12 (talk) 12:54, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
This image ´has no educational value. It has no basis in reality and has been deleted before. Sjö (talk) 14:53, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope : unused personal images
- File:Even ladies zambranaing.jpg
- File:No age requirements!.jpg
- File:Portugal.jpg
- File:Holy Frijoles!.jpg
- File:Nixon.jpg
- File:The originators team kit.jpg
- File:Where the Fakawi.jpg
- File:Zambranaing original photo.jpg
--Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:24, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: by George. Kept one as it is in use. Jianhui67 talk★contribs 13:05, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. Uploaded by 1-upload user Dgo1995Insomnia (talk · contributions · Statistics). Gunnex (talk) 15:37, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 13:07, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
According to the source, the image is copyrighthed MFO (Mathematisches Forschunsinstitut Oberwolfach), and the photographer (Renate Schmid) has been credited. An OTRS ticket is needed to prove the permission for publication under this license. Henxter (talk) 10:35, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination.--Sanandros (talk) 22:37, 26 October 2015 (UTC) Sanandros (talk) 22:37, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
- also file:ГАЗ-21 в Ефремове 2.jpg
I consider the photos out of project scope due to bad quality. There is more than 100 photos about the car model in Commons. Taivo (talk) 10:44, 15 October 2015 (UTC)- Keep, no results in tineye/google images. Quality is not brillant, but imho enought to be in scope /St1995 12:31, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
- @Taivo: Also, please restore:
- Keep, no results in tineye/google images. Quality is not brillant, but imho enought to be in scope /St1995 12:31, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
- File:Ефремовский закат 3.jpg
- File:Ефремовский закат 2.jpg
- File:Ефремовский закат 1.jpg
- File:Закат в Ефремове 4.jpg
- File:Закат в Ефремове 3.jpg
- File:Закат в Ефремове 2.jpg
- File:Закат в Ефремове 1.jpg
I saw these files, quality is enought to be in scope. /St1995 12:35, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
- I restored the files, but they have so bad quality, that I still think, that they are useless and my decision to delete them without any discussion was correct. Taivo (talk) 21:16, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
Kept: I would have agree with the nomination if there were not Category:Transport in Yefremov, in scope IMO --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:22, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
Registered trademark. As its design is not that simple, I'm quite doubtful about its ineligibility. Formica rufa (talk) 11:47, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination, not simple text --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:26, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
Registered trademark. As its design is not that simple, I'm quite doubtful about its ineligibility. Formica rufa (talk) 11:48, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination : not simple text --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:27, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
The source/license and author information of several images used in this collage is missing or is insufficient, compromising the whole file. See also Commons:Collages. Obs.: Edited by IP in 2012 adding links to some missing files = (e.g.) for the bus: http://thetravellingtrini.com/2010/04/02/penang-malaysia/ = https://wherethehellami.files.wordpress.com/2010/04/dsc05256.jpg which is not freely licensed. Gunnex (talk) 12:09, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination --Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:38, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
Book. No evidence of permisison. Stefan4 (talk) 13:37, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: on page: Copyrighted (c) 2015 Sanandros (talk) 22:54, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination --Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:46, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
Song and promo photo. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination --Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:48, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
This file has two problems: 1) it is screenshot of probably copyrighted software, 2) it is probably out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 14:48, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unclear source --Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:51, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
- File:Gal des Val à cheval à Versailles.JPG
- File:Pétain et des Vallières.JPG
- File:Jean des Vallières - aviateur.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Modern art. I think painter/heirs identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.
- File:Dessin humristique d'Hervé (des Vallières) pour Mustella-Une cuiller pour maman.pdf
- File:Patricia de Breuvery - manoir d'Etables sur Mer.JPG
- File:Patricia de Breuvery - Margaux en chinoise.jpg
- File:Patricia de Breuvery - La jeune fille à la fenêtr.jpg
- File:Patricia de Breuvery - les cafetières à la fenêtre.JPG
- File:Patricia de Breuvery - Chaise renversée à Bonnieux.jpg
- File:Patricia de Breuvery - les colombes.jpg
- File:Patricia de Breuvery - La seste.jpg
- File:Dessin de Jean des Vallières par Hervé.jpg
- File:Mascote peinte par Steinlein pour Jean des Vallières.JPG
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination, not own works : lacks of informations --Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:54, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
Historical drawings. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
- File:Couverture album - MARTINE ET CIE - Dessins et légendes d'HERVE (des Vallières).jpg
- File:Cartes à jouer - La Grande Pagaille 2 - Dessins d'HERVE (des Vallières).jpg
- File:Cartes à jouer - La Grande Pagaille - 1 - Dessins d'HERVE (des Vallières).jpg
- File:Régle du jeu - La Grande Pagaille - dessin d'HERVE (des Vallières).jpg
- File:Dessins pour PENTO d'Hervé (des Vallières).jpg
- File:Publicité sur protège-cahier Persavon - dessin d'Hervé (des Vallières).pdf
- File:Au Joyeux Maquereau, dessin d'Hervé (des Vallières).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:15, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
With date unknown and author unknown, the tag claiming the author has been dead 70 years cannot be verified. More information is needed about this image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:57, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Sanandros (talk) 23:06, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
With date unknown and author unknown, the license which states the author has been dead 70 years seems purely speculative. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:58, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Sanandros (talk) 23:07, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
This image serves no educational purpose. There are no reliable sources that talk about autocircumcision to mean retraction of the foreskin, and no mention of this kind of penis ring to do it. See also the discussion at en:Wikipedia:Reference desk/Science#Is autocircumcision a real thing?. Sjö (talk) 05:01, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Because I am a member of Yahoo "autocircumcision" group for a long time https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/foreskin_rolled_back/info and very familiar with the subject I totally disagree with Sjö see the discussion at en:Wikipedia:Reference desk/Science#Is autocircumcision a real thing?.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Hstidst (talk • contribs)
- Like I said, there are no reliable sources per Wikipedia standards. A Yahoo group or your personal experience isn't enough. Sjö (talk) 05:14, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
“European Handbook of Dermatological Treatments – Derek Freedman,Balanitis, page97 “ https://books.google.com/books?id=fHi6CAAAQBAJ&pg=PA97
states: “ Retraction of the prepuce dries out the epithelium, enhances keratinisation and resolves most cases of balanitis” and “Advising patients to change their habits of a lifetime and maintain retraction of the foreskin requires considerable persuasion. Most find it uncomfortable and over sensitive initially and it takes about 3-4 weeks for the hypersensitivity to settle downas keratinization occurs. Once this has been achieved, few wish to revert to their previous mode of wearing the foreskin down”
The source above is teaching us: First , that keeping the foreskin retracted can cure the most cases of balanitis. Second, It is possible to train foreskin to stay retracted behind the glance.
To achieve the permanent foreskin retraction. Dr. Freedman mentioned the surgical tape along the shaft of the penis. Image shows glans ring to keep foreskin retracted which is known since 1948 from the patent http://www.google.com/patents/US2538136 which describes the anticircumcision ring to keep the foreskin in retraction condition and it Is very similar to the tapered ring on the image. Verdict – Image supported by very reliable theoretical source and source for the practical implementation.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Hstidst (talk • contribs)
- You misrepresent the source. The second block isn't from the link you gave and there is no image there with a glans ring as far as I can see. We already established at WP:RD/S that the foreskin can be pulled back. The question is if there are reliable sources for the term "autocircumcision" and the use of the device in the image. Sjö (talk) 07:59, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
The source that mentions the use of this device http://www.medicalj.ru/diseases/mens-health/1030-balanit ( click on 18+ image ) . Translated version https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=ru&u=http://www.medicalj.ru/diseases/mens-health/1030-balanit&prev=search ( link to the image doesn’t work )
- Keep No valid reason for deletion from Commons has been presented. English Wikipedia's notions of reliable sources are not relevant here. If the topic has commanded enough interest to have a Yahoo group, it seems potentially worthwhile to host an image here. Hosting an image and endorsing an area of scientific inquiry are entirely different things. -Pete F (talk) 02:41, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
- Comment as an addendum, if the title of the file is highly misleading (and I have no opinion as to whether or not it is), it's possible to change a file name. See COM:Requested moves. But the deletion nomination is not valid, and should be closed, irrespective of any renaming issue. -Pete F (talk) 02:43, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
- No educational value is a valid reason. You might not agree, but then argue for that instead of dismissing the report. Sjö (talk) 20:38, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
- And without the medical claims the images are just seven images of one type of penis ring. There is already a lot of images covering penis rings. Sjö (talk) 06:12, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope Natuur12 (talk) 14:39, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
This image serves no educational purpose. There are no reliable sources that talk about autocircumcision to mean retraction of the foreskin, and no mention of this kind of penis ring to do it. See also the discussion at en:Wikipedia:Reference desk/Science#Is autocircumcision a real thing?. Sjö (talk) 05:01, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Because I am a member of Yahoo "autocircumcision" group for a long time https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/foreskin_rolled_back/info and very familiar with the subject I totally disagree with Sjö see the discussion at en:Wikipedia:Reference desk/Science#Is autocircumcision a real thing?.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Hstidst (talk • contribs)
- Like I said, there are no reliable sources per Wikipedia standards. A Yahoo group or your personal experience isn't enough. Sjö (talk) 05:14, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
“European Handbook of Dermatological Treatments – Derek Freedman,Balanitis, page97 “ https://books.google.com/books?id=fHi6CAAAQBAJ&pg=PA97
states: “ Retraction of the prepuce dries out the epithelium, enhances keratinisation and resolves most cases of balanitis” and “Advising patients to change their habits of a lifetime and maintain retraction of the foreskin requires considerable persuasion. Most find it uncomfortable and over sensitive initially and it takes about 3-4 weeks for the hypersensitivity to settle downas keratinization occurs. Once this has been achieved, few wish to revert to their previous mode of wearing the foreskin down”
The source above is teaching us: First , that keeping the foreskin retracted can cure the most cases of balanitis. Second, It is possible to train foreskin to stay retracted behind the glance.
To achieve the permanent foreskin retraction. Dr. Freedman mentioned the surgical tape along the shaft of the penis. Image shows glans ring to keep foreskin retracted which is known since 1948 from the patent http://www.google.com/patents/US2538136 which describes the anticircumcision ring to keep the foreskin in retraction condition and it Is very similar to the tapered ring on the image. Verdict – Image supported by very reliable theoretical source and source for the practical implementation.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Hstidst (talk • contribs)
- You misrepresent the source. The second block isn't from the link you gave and there is no image there with a glans ring as far as I can see. We already established at WP:RD/S that the foreskin can be pulled back. The question is if there are reliable sources for the term "autocircumcision" and the use of the device in the image. Sjö (talk) 07:58, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
The source that mentions the use of this device http://www.medicalj.ru/diseases/mens-health/1030-balanit ( click on 18+ image ) . Translated version https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=ru&u=http://www.medicalj.ru/diseases/mens-health/1030-balanit&prev=search ( link to the image doesn’t work )
- Keep as above. No valid reason for deletion presented. -Pete F (talk) 02:45, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: As per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Autocircumcised.jpg Natuur12 (talk) 14:40, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
This image serves no educational purpose. There are no reliable sources that talk about use of a penis ring to treat balanitis or that it is an alternative to circumcision. See also the discussion at en:Wikipedia:Reference desk/Science#Is autocircumcision a real thing?. Sjö (talk) 05:02, 15 October 2015 (UTC) Because I am a member of Yahoo "autocircumcision" group for a long time https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/foreskin_rolled_back/info and very familiar with the subject, I totally disagree with Sjö his statement is absolutely wrong ,see the discussion at en:Wikipedia:Reference desk/Science#Is autocircumcision a real thing?.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Hstidst (talk • contribs)
- Like I said, there are no reliable sources per Wikipedia standards. A Yahoo group or your personal experience isn't enough, especially when we are talking about medical procedures. Sjö (talk) 05:13, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
“European Handbook of Dermatological Treatments – Derek Freedman,Balanitis, page97 “ https://books.google.com/books?id=fHi6CAAAQBAJ&pg=PA97
states: “ Retraction of the prepuce dries out the epithelium, enhances keratinisation and resolves most cases of balanitis” and “Advising patients to change their habits of a lifetime and maintain retraction of the foreskin requires considerable persuasion. Most find it uncomfortable and over sensitive initially and it takes about 3-4 weeks for the hypersensitivity to settle downas keratinization occurs. Once this has been achieved, few wish to revert to their previous mode of wearing the foreskin down”
The source above is teaching us: First , that keeping the foreskin retracted can cure the most cases of balanitis. Second, It is possible to train foreskin to stay retracted behind the glance.
To achieve the permanent foreskin retraction. Dr. Freedman mentioned the surgical tape along the shaft of the penis. Image shows glans ring to keep foreskin retracted which is known since 1948 from the patent http://www.google.com/patents/US2538136 which describes the anticircumcision ring to keep the foreskin in retraction condition and it Is very similar to the ring on the image. Verdict – Image supported by very reliable theoretical source and source for the practical implementation.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Hstidst (talk • contribs)
- You misrepresent the source. The second block isn't from the link you gave and there is no image there with a glans ring as far as I can see. We already established at WP:RD/S that the foreskin can be pulled back. The question is if there are reliable sources for the term "autocircumcision" and the use of the device in the image. Sjö (talk) 07:58, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
The source that mentions the use of this device http://www.medicalj.ru/diseases/mens-health/1030-balanit ( click on 18+ image ) . Translated version https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=ru&u=http://www.medicalj.ru/diseases/mens-health/1030-balanit&prev=search ( link to the image doesn’t work )
Deleted: As per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Autocircumcised.jpg Natuur12 (talk) 14:40, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
This image serves no educational purpose. There are no reliable sources that talk about autocircumcision to mean retraction of the foreskin, no mention of this kind of penis ring to do it, and no mention of a penis ring as a treatment for balanitis. See also the discussion at en:Wikipedia:Reference desk/Science#Is autocircumcision a real thing?. Sjö (talk) 05:03, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Because I am a member of Yahoo "autocircumcision" group for a long time https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/foreskin_rolled_back/info and very familiar with the subject I totally disagree with Sjö see the discussion at en:Wikipedia:Reference desk/Science#Is autocircumcision a real thing?.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Hstidst (talk • contribs)
- Like I said, there are no reliable sources per Wikipedia standards. A Yahoo group or your personal experience isn't enough. Sjö (talk) 05:14, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
“European Handbook of Dermatological Treatments – Derek Freedman,Balanitis, page97 “ https://books.google.com/books?id=fHi6CAAAQBAJ&pg=PA97
states: “ Retraction of the prepuce dries out the epithelium, enhances keratinisation and resolves most cases of balanitis” and “Advising patients to change their habits of a lifetime and maintain retraction of the foreskin requires considerable persuasion. Most find it uncomfortable and over sensitive initially and it takes about 3-4 weeks for the hypersensitivity to settle downas keratinization occurs. Once this has been achieved, few wish to revert to their previous mode of wearing the foreskin down”
The source above is teaching us: First , that keeping the foreskin retracted can cure the most cases of balanitis. Second, It is possible to train foreskin to stay retracted behind the glance.
To achieve the permanent foreskin retraction. Dr. Freedman mentioned the surgical tape along the shaft of the penis. Image shows glans ring to keep foreskin retracted which is known since 1948 from the patent http://www.google.com/patents/US2538136 which describes the anticircumcision ring to keep the foreskin in retraction condition and it Is very similar to the tapered ring on the image. Verdict – Image supported by very reliable theoretical source and souce for the practical implementation.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Hstidst (talk • contribs)
- You misrepresent the source. The second block isn't from the link you gave and there is no image there with a glans ring as far as I can see. We already established at WP:RD/S that the foreskin can be pulled back. The question is if there are reliable sources for the term "autocircumcision" and the use of the device in the image. Sjö (talk) 07:59, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
The source that mentions the use of this device http://www.medicalj.ru/diseases/mens-health/1030-balanit ( click on 18+ image ) . Translated version https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=ru&u=http://www.medicalj.ru/diseases/mens-health/1030-balanit&prev=search ( link to the image doesn’t work )
Deleted: As per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Autocircumcised.jpg Natuur12 (talk) 14:40, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
This image serves no educational purpose. There are no reliable sources that talk about autocircumcision to mean retraction of the foreskin, and no mention of this kind of penis ring to do it. See also the discussion at en:Wikipedia:Reference desk/Science#Is autocircumcision a real thing?. Sjö (talk) 05:03, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Because I am a member of Yahoo "autocircumcision" group for a long time https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/foreskin_rolled_back/info and very familiar with the subject I totally disagree with Sjö see the discussion at en:Wikipedia:Reference desk/Science#Is autocircumcision a real thing?.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Hstidst (talk • contribs)
- Like I said, there are no reliable sources per Wikipedia standards. A Yahoo group or your personal experience isn't enough. Sjö (talk) 05:14, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
“European Handbook of Dermatological Treatments – Derek Freedman,Balanitis, page97 “ https://books.google.com/books?id=fHi6CAAAQBAJ&pg=PA97
states: “ Retraction of the prepuce dries out the epithelium, enhances keratinisation and resolves most cases of balanitis” and “Advising patients to change their habits of a lifetime and maintain retraction of the foreskin requires considerable persuasion. Most find it uncomfortable and over sensitive initially and it takes about 3-4 weeks for the hypersensitivity to settle downas keratinization occurs. Once this has been achieved, few wish to revert to their previous mode of wearing the foreskin down”
The source above is teaching us: First , that keeping the foreskin retracted can cure the most cases of balanitis. Second, It is possible to train foreskin to stay retracted behind the glance.
To achieve the permanent foreskin retraction. Dr. Freedman mentioned the surgical tape along the shaft of the penis. Image shows glans ring to keep foreskin retracted which is known since 1948 from the patent http://www.google.com/patents/US2538136 which describes the anticircumcision ring to keep the foreskin in retraction condition and it Is very similar to the ring on the image. Verdict – Image supported by very reliable theoretical source and source for the practical implementation.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Hstidst (talk • contribs)
- You misrepresent the source. The second block isn't from the link you gave and there is no image there with a glans ring as far as I can see. We already established at WP:RD/S that the foreskin can be pulled back. The question is if there are reliable sources for the term "autocircumcision" and the use of the device in the image. Sjö (talk) 07:59, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
The source that mentions the use of this device http://www.medicalj.ru/diseases/mens-health/1030-balanit ( click on 18+ image ) . Translated version https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=ru&u=http://www.medicalj.ru/diseases/mens-health/1030-balanit&prev=search ( link to the image doesn’t work )
Deleted: As per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Autocircumcised.jpg Natuur12 (talk) 14:40, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
This image serves no educational purpose. There are no reliable sources that talk about using this kind of device to treat balanitis. See also the discussion at en:Wikipedia:Reference desk/Science#Is autocircumcision a real thing?. Sjö (talk) 05:04, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Because I am a member of Yahoo "autocircumcision" group for a long time https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/foreskin_rolled_back/info and very familiar with the subject I totally disagree with Sjö see the discussion at en:Wikipedia:Reference desk/Science#Is autocircumcision a real thing?.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Hstidst (talk • contribs)
- Like I said, there are no reliable sources per Wikipedia standards. A Yahoo group or your personal experience isn't enough. Sjö (talk) 05:14, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
“European Handbook of Dermatological Treatments – Derek Freedman,Balanitis, page97 “ https://books.google.com/books?id=fHi6CAAAQBAJ&pg=PA97
states: “ Retraction of the prepuce dries out the epithelium, enhances keratinisation and resolves most cases of balanitis” and “Advising patients to change their habits of a lifetime and maintain retraction of the foreskin requires considerable persuasion. Most find it uncomfortable and over sensitive initially and it takes about 3-4 weeks for the hypersensitivity to settle downas keratinization occurs. Once this has been achieved, few wish to revert to their previous mode of wearing the foreskin down”
The source above is teaching us: First , that keeping the foreskin retracted can cure the most cases of balanitis. Second, It is possible to train foreskin to stay retracted behind the glance.
To achieve the permanent foreskin retraction. Dr. Freedman mentioned the surgical tape along the shaft of the penis. Image shows glans ring to keep foreskin retracted which is known since 1948 from the patent http://www.google.com/patents/US2538136 which describes the anticircumcision ring to keep the foreskin in retraction condition and it Is very similar to the tapered ring on the image. Verdict – Image supported by very reliable theoretical source and source for the practical implementation.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Hstidst (talk • contribs)
- You misrepresent the source. The second block isn't from the link you gave and there is no image there with a glans ring as far as I can see. We already established at WP:RD/S that the foreskin can be pulled back. The question is if there are reliable sources for the term "autocircumcision" and the use of the device in the image. Sjö (talk) 07:59, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
The source that mentions the use of this device http://www.medicalj.ru/diseases/mens-health/1030-balanit ( click on 18+ image ) . Translated version https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=ru&u=http://www.medicalj.ru/diseases/mens-health/1030-balanit&prev=search ( link to the image doesn’t work )
Deleted: As per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Autocircumcised.jpg Natuur12 (talk) 14:40, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
This image serves no educational purpose. There are no reliable sources that talk about autocircumcision to mean retraction of the foreskin, and no mention of this kind of penis ring to do it. See also the discussion at en:Wikipedia:Reference desk/Science#Is autocircumcision a real thing?. Sjö (talk) 05:17, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Because I am a member of Yahoo "autocircumcision" group for a long time https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/foreskin_rolled_back/info and very familiar with the subject I totally disagree with Sjö see the discussion at en:Wikipedia:Reference desk/Science#Is autocircumcision a real thing?.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Hstidst (talk • contribs)
- Like I said, there are no reliable sources per Wikipedia standards. A Yahoo group or your personal experience isn't enough. Sjö (talk) 05:14, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
“European Handbook of Dermatological Treatments – Derek Freedman,Balanitis, page97 “ https://books.google.com/books?id=fHi6CAAAQBAJ&pg=PA97
states: “ Retraction of the prepuce dries out the epithelium, enhances keratinisation and resolves most cases of balanitis” and “Advising patients to change their habits of a lifetime and maintain retraction of the foreskin requires considerable persuasion. Most find it uncomfortable and over sensitive initially and it takes about 3-4 weeks for the hypersensitivity to settle downas keratinization occurs. Once this has been achieved, few wish to revert to their previous mode of wearing the foreskin down”
The source above is teaching us: First , that keeping the foreskin retracted can cure the most cases of balanitis. Second, It is possible to train foreskin to stay retracted behind the glance.
To achieve the permanent foreskin retraction. Dr. Freedman mentioned the surgical tape along the shaft of the penis. Image shows glans ring to keep foreskin retracted which is known since 1948 from the patent http://www.google.com/patents/US2538136 which describes the anticircumcision ring to keep the foreskin in retraction condition and it Is very similar to the ring on the image. Verdict – Image supported by very reliable theoretical source and source for the practical implementation.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Hstidst (talk • contribs)
- You misrepresent the source. The second block isn't from the link you gave and there is no image there with a glans ring as far as I can see. We already established at WP:RD/S that the foreskin can be pulled back. The question is if there are reliable sources for the term "autocircumcision" and the use of the device in the image. Sjö (talk) 07:59, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
The source that mentions the use of this device http://www.medicalj.ru/diseases/mens-health/1030-balanit ( click on 18+ image ) . Translated version https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=ru&u=http://www.medicalj.ru/diseases/mens-health/1030-balanit&prev=search ( link to the image doesn’t work )
- (I'm only going to edit this section, but this answer goes for all the images of the device. ) First, I'm not sure about the status of the website, whether it's a reliable source or not. Second, if the only mention internationally is one website is really a fringe idea and it would be undue weight to promote it on Wikipedia. Third, still no mention of autocircumcision. 04:22, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
- I've checked medicalj.ru further. IMO, a website that recommends herbal medicine for a whole list of conditions, and also recommends en:Ozone therapy is not a reliable source for anything medical. Also, you have added a lot of links at WP:RD/S that either are completely unreliable (e.g. sites that sell stuff) or have very little to do with this subject (e.g. patents for something vaguely similar). I still say that there are no reliable sources that talk about autocircumcision to mean retraction of the foreskin, and no mention of this kind of penis ring to do it.Sjö (talk) 20:29, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: As per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Autocircumcised.jpg Natuur12 (talk) 14:40, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
There is freedom of panorama in China for 2-dimensional art, but not for text. The text is enough long for literary copyright. The photo violates writer's copyright. The photo is free only if the writer is dead for enough long time. Who is the writer? Taivo (talk) 09:01, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:44, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Samman afroz khan (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia except userpage in en.wiki, which is now nominated for speedy deletion, and uploading a personal photo, which is used nowhere, except on the userpage. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 09:44, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
- What were the circumstance of the speedy in en wp?--Sanandros (talk) 22:34, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:44, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
there's more accurate vector map
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:44, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
- also file:Ефремовский районный суд 2.jpg
This is routine request for small photos without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photos are so small? Can you upload bigger versions, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload versions with EXIF data? Taivo (talk) 10:53, 15 October 2015 (UTC)- Keep, no results in tineye/google images. /St1995 12:30, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Maybe some cellphone pic.--Sanandros (talk) 22:38, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. Natuur12 (talk) 14:45, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Unclear source/author, in the EXIF the author is "Daniel Micsoda", but he is also on the image (left). Also maybe out of scope because not enough notable people (no articles), unused, uncathegorized --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:33, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Delete - Whilst it is perfectly possible for the EXIF author to appear in the photograph (maybe this is a timed capture), I would aim it as out of scope; the image is not used anywhere, it's not attached to any articles...I think this is heading for the door. BarkingFish (talk) 11:47, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:45, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Unclear if the original uploader is the copyright holder of the file. Kelly (talk) 11:59, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
- The file was existing and used on en.wikipedia.org. I transfered it on Commons because it was tagged {{Copy to Wikimedia Commons|bot=Fbot}}; see Revision History on en.wikipedi.org.
- Le fichier existait et était utilisé sur en.wikipedia.org. Je l'ai transféré sur Commons parce qu'il était marqué {{Copy to Wikimedia Commons|bot=Fbot}}; voir l'historique des révisions sur en.wikipedia.org. Patrub01 (talk) 10:21, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. Natuur12 (talk) 14:45, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine. This is 1978 sculpture, sculptor is Oktavy Zdikhovsky. The photo violates his copyright.
В Украине нет свободы панорамы. Эта фотография нарушает авторские права скульптора. Скульптура построена в 1978, скульптор Октавий Здиховский. Taivo (talk) 12:08, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:45, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine. The photo violates copyright of sculptor. This is 1968 sculpture, sculptor is E. Telyashova.
В Украине нет свободы панорамы. Эта фотография нарушает авторские права скульптора. Скульптура построена в 1968, скульптор Е. Теляшова. Taivo (talk) 12:13, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:45, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
File:Пам'ятник великому українському поету Т. Г. Шевченку 1814–1861 рр. Миколаїв сквер ім. Шевченка.JPG
[edit]
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine. The photo violates copyright of sculptor. This is 1986 sculpture, sculptor is G. Kovalchuk.
В Украине нет свободы панорамы. Эта фотография нарушает авторские права скульптора. Скульптура построена в 1986, скульптор Г.О. Ковальчук. Taivo (talk) 12:19, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:46, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Wird auf keiner Seite verwendet, wurde durch eine direkt funktionierten Animation ersetzt! Petrus3743 (talk) 12:19, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:46, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Damnsoft 09~commonswiki (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Damnsoft 09~commonswiki and several related (buses in Malaysia) copyvios.
- File:RapidpenangDongFeng.jpg
- File:Rapidpgscania101.jpg (heavily watermarked)
Gunnex (talk) 12:21, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:46, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
not own work Fetx2002 (talk) 12:25, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Unmotivated DR Natuur12 (talk) 14:46, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine. The photo violates copyright of sculptor. The sculpture was erected between 1944–1978, sculptors are M. Ignatyev and E. Maximenko.
В Украине нет свободы панорамы. Эта фотография нарушает авторские права скульптора. Скульптура построена между 1944–1978, скульпторы М.Л. Игнатьев, Е.М. Максименко. Taivo (talk) 12:28, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:46, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
necesitamos subir esta misma imagen con un nombre que la describa mejor, como: Carátula Single 'Viaje Artificial' (2014) -Rockanova Rockanova Oficial (talk) 12:29, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:47, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Wird auf keiner Seite verwendet, redundante Datei Petrus3743 (talk) 12:30, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:47, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
File:Пам'ятник видатному флотоводцю та вченому, віце-адміралу С. Й. Макарову Миколаїв Флотський бульвар.JPG
[edit]
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine. The photo violates copyright of sculptor. This is 1976 sculpture, sculptors are A. Koltev and A. Sapelkin, architect Y. Rudenko.
В Украине нет свободы панорамы. Эта фотография нарушает авторские права скульптора. Скульптура построена в 1976, скульпторы А. А. Коптев, А. Л. Сапелкин, проектировал Ю. Т. Стешин, архитектор Ю. Руденко. Taivo (talk) 12:39, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:47, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine. The photo violates copyright of sculptors. This is 1969 sculpture.
В Украине нет свободы панорамы. Эта фотография нарушает авторские права скульпторов. Скульптура построена в 1969. Taivo (talk) 12:45, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:47, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine. The photo violates copyright of sculptor. This is 1977 sculpture, sculptor is Oktavy Zdikhovsky.
В Украине нет свободы панорамы. Эта фотография нарушает авторские права скульптора. Скульптура построена в 1977, скульптор Октавий Здиховский. Taivo (talk) 12:49, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:47, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
- also file:Subodh Markandeya after His LLb.jpg
The photos are not own work as claimed, but copyright violations. The photos are not enough old for public domain. Taivo (talk) 14:28, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:47, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Derivative works of images on faces of technology, cannot be licensed by Flickr photographer as they didn't take the images on the devices. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:48, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
- Comment: File uploaded to the LGe's official Flickr account. --Amitie 10g (talk) 03:31, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: True but this looks like the standard windows background photograph to me. Natuur12 (talk) 14:48, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Derivative works of images on faces of technology, cannot be licensed by Flickr photographer as they didn't take the images on the devices. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:48, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
- Comment: Did you considered that the file has been uploaded to the LGe's official Flickr account? But the software running does not appear to be AOSP. --Amitie 10g (talk) 03:30, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: True but this looks like the standard windows background photograph to me Natuur12 (talk) 14:49, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Derivative works of images on faces of technology, cannot be licensed by Flickr photographer as they didn't take the images on the devices. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:49, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:49, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Derivative works of images on faces of technology, cannot be licensed by Flickr photographer as they didn't take the images on the devices. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:49, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
- Looks for me like official flickr account of LG.--Sanandros (talk) 23:02, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 14:50, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Derivative works of images on faces of technology, cannot be licensed by Flickr photographer as they didn't take the images on the devices. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:49, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:50, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Collage of images which are not own work, although the collage may be. Image sources for Each Image are required. "Own work" is not acceptable source. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:50, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:50, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Atreearockacloud (talk · contribs)
[edit]Artworks by living artist Clare Woods. No permission.
- File:Clare Woods, Strawberry Thief, 70 x 45 cm, Oil on Aluminium (2015).jpg
- File:Clare Woods, The Perseverance, 15 m x 8 m, Aarhus, Denmark (2015).jpg
- File:Clare Woods, The Ugly Duchess, 250 x 175 cm, Oil on Aluminium (2015).jpg
- File:Clare Woods, Common Parts 150 x 100 cm Oil on Aluminium (2014).jpeg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
BrightRaven (talk) 15:06, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:52, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Atreearockacloud (talk · contribs)
[edit]copyright violation; contemporary artworks; no "own work" at al!
- File:Des Hughes 'Stonut'.jpg
- File:Des Hughes 'Armature'.jpg
- File:Des Hughes 'Small Adult'.jpg
- File:Dead Spring.jpg
Martin Sg. (talk) 09:39, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
Ticket:2024081310008481 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 16:00, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:00, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused file, artwork without obvious educational use BrightRaven (talk) 15:20, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:52, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Carthago65 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Art works by living artist Marianne Csaky. No permission.
- File:Csaky kert1.jpg
- File:Csaky videostills1.jpg
- File:Csaky choppingboard1.jpg
- File:Csaky lightboxes kert1.jpg
- File:Csaky madonna.jpg
BrightRaven (talk) 15:24, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:52, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Logo is not necessarily simple per Edge logo... Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:06, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:53, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nicolajayne Taylor (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
- File:BC.jpg
- File:The Curse of MaryPm.jpg
- File:Promo FB 12.jpg
- File:ExpressB 111.jpg
- File:Enjay Promo.jpg
- File:Enjay Taylor Author AkA Nicolajayne Taylor.jpg
- File:Nicolajayne Taylor Author.jpg
- File:The Fallen Ones Promo.jpg
- File:Nicolajayne Taylor.jpg
Ies (talk) 16:10, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
- No rule against providing imagery of/about oneself. And it is at least possible that she is well enough known that we should want these if the rights are clear. 15K Google hits. We do need COM:OTRS, but at least as far as I'm concerned the self-promotional aspect doesn't worry me (it would in Wikipedia, but not in Commons). - Jmabel ! talk 17:42, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
- I, for one, see the pictures as having been uploaded primarily for vanity/promotion purposes and see little potential of educational use. JIP (talk) 10:32, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Needs OTRS Natuur12 (talk) 14:54, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
The person in picture asked for deleting his picture. Carameled 16:49, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:58, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Soll umbenannt werden WilhelmWalter59 (talk) 17:09, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:58, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Uploaded new current version under a different name. This one is unwanted. Cibrev (talk) 17:14, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:58, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
неверные данные Aftermylife (talk) 17:27, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Kept: No reason to delete Natuur12 (talk) 14:59, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
El Escudo de la localidad de Valdivia (Badajoz) no es así. Si lo desean yo les puedo facilitar tanto el Escudo como la Bandera de esta localidad pacense. Cultura Valdivia (talk) 17:37, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Kept: No reason to delete Natuur12 (talk) 15:00, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Copyright holder: Frank Wang. Is user:Yayman68 the same as Frank Wang? COM:OTRS ticket needed. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:42, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:00, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Unfree in UK per COM:TOO#United Kingdom, variations of this logo were previously deleted per Commons:Deletion requests/File:UKIP Logo - New Purple.png and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ukip.png. No evidence for claimed CC-BY-SA licence either. January (talk) 18:33, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:00, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
File:Carte-d-Invalidite Taux-d-Incapacite-80%+ l-Annexe-2-4-du-Code-de-l-Action-Sociale-et-des-Familles.jpg
[edit]
par discrétion Marie-Claude Vidal (talk) 18:40, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: [[[com:DW]] Natuur12 (talk) 15:01, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
No verifiable source, dubious authorship, flickrwashing. Sealle (talk) 18:48, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
- Давайте по порядку. У вас есть сомнения, что наша семья обладает исключительными правами на публикацию фотографий Михаила Петровича. Действительно, потомков у него немало – это единственная причина отказа от OTRS-процедуры. Если бы вы не поленились поискать другие источники этих фотографий, то убедились бы, что источник один – наша семья. Я мог бы предположить с вашей стороны добрые намерения, но последними запросами вы настаиваете на обратном. Поскольку фотографиям больше 80 лет и они впервые были опубликованы в Польской республике, я полагаю достаточным простановку соответствующей лицензии типа PD-Poland. И. Максим (talk) 21:50, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Above rational sounds fair Natuur12 (talk) 15:04, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
UK logo, possibly unfree there per COM:TOO#United Kingdom. Level of creativity appears greater here than File:EDGE magazine (logo).svg which a UK court ruled was copyrightable. If the 1921 date given is correct it would be PD but no supporting evidence has been given for this (this is the founding date for the organisation but that does not necessarily mean they have used this logo since they were founded). January (talk) 18:49, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- Keep - just text, not eligible for copyright. But even if copyrightable, probably expired, logo is stated to date from 1921. Jcb (talk) 22:45, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
- This logo would be fine in the US and most other countries but the UK's threshold is unusually low. In Future v. Edge, the judge ruled that File:EDGE magazine (logo).svg was sufficiently original for copyright because "The stretching of the font was combined with the distinctive slash and projection on the middle bar of the "E"." In this logo, the font is also stretched (upwards rather than outwards like the Edge logo) and there is a similar slash and projection on the middle bars of the H and R. There are additional creative details in the varying size and shape of the letters and the curved underline. According to the ruling, the level of skill and effort involved is only required to be "more than negligible or trivial".
- The 8 July 1921 date given is the date the IHR was formally opened, but I think we need verification that the organisation has used this logo since before at least 1926 to be able to assume it is PD by age. January (talk) 17:05, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
- I have tried to find information on the age of the logo and found out that they must have adopted it somewhere between 2001 (publication with their previous logo) and 2011. Jcb (talk) 20:26, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
- The 8 July 1921 date given is the date the IHR was formally opened, but I think we need verification that the organisation has used this logo since before at least 1926 to be able to assume it is PD by age. January (talk) 17:05, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Above TOO in the UK. Natuur12 (talk) 15:04, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
No verifiable source, dubious authorship, flickrwashing. Sealle (talk) 18:52, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
- Давайте по порядку. У вас есть сомнения, что наша семья обладает исключительными правами на публикацию фотографий Михаила Петровича. Действительно, потомков у него немало – это единственная причина отказа от OTRS-процедуры. Если бы вы не поленились поискать другие источники этих фотографий, то убедились бы, что источник один – наша семья. Я мог бы предположить с вашей стороны добрые намерения, но последними запросами вы настаиваете на обратном. Поскольку фотографиям больше 80 лет и они впервые были опубликованы в Польской республике, я полагаю достаточным простановку соответствующей лицензии типа PD-Poland. И. Максим (talk) 21:52, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
- No flickrwashing here.
Kept: Above rational seems fair. Natuur12 (talk) 15:05, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Archivo desactualizado Daniel-Arboleda-M. (talk) 19:59, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:06, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
I created a larger and better quality version of the map (File:Battle_of_Greece_WWII_1941_map-fr.svg) which replaces this one and isn't used anymore. Sting (talk) 20:26, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:06, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
I created larger, better quality and now svg versions of the map (File:Battle_of_Greece_WWII_1941_map-en.svg and File:Battle_of_Greece_WWII_1941_map-fr.svg) which can be used for translation. This low quality blank version isn't needed anymore. Sting (talk) 20:29, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:06, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
26 Kilobyte photo by user asserting ownership, doubtful at that low resolution. -- Cirt (talk) 21:08, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:07, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
COM:DW Stefan4 (talk) 21:34, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
- Also, this is probably not the same image as the one with the same name in Commons:Deletion requests/Cell phone images by Gryffindor. --Stefan4 (talk) 21:35, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:07, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
need to overwrite existing file (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ripple_logo.svg) not upload a new file Bsteinlobovits (talk) 21:52, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Kept: No reason to delete Natuur12 (talk) 15:07, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
No evidence that the photographer died more than 70 years ago as stated in the copyright tag. We also do not have any information about the copyright status in the United States. Stefan4 (talk) 22:43, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:07, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Appears to be a derivative work. Stefan4 (talk) 22:55, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:07, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Doesn't seem to be own work. Note the link to a website in the information template. Stefan4 (talk) 22:55, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:07, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Maps claimed as own work with no source of basemap given. The source of the base map is required not just self or own work.
- File:Map slovakia kosice-vysne opatske.png
- File:Map slovakia kosice-sebastovce.png
- File:Map slovakia kosice-krasna.png
- File:Map slovakia kosice-barca.png
- File:Map slovakia kosice-kosicka nova ves.png
- File:Map slovakia kosice-dargovskych hrdinov.png
- File:Map slovakia kosice-dzungla.png
- File:Košice city parts.svg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:00, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
- Keep -- Bryant2000 (talk) 12:48, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per COM:PRP, OTRS permission needed Alan (talk) 23:09, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
Please tell me why was all these pictures deleted. All of them was derived from files like this: File:Kavecany.gif. I request restoring them all. Thank you very much. --Wizzard (talk) 08:01, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
Done Link to original image as source. Alan (talk) 09:52, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you very much! Is this form sufficient? File:Map slovakia kosice-vysne opatske.png --Wizzard (talk) 20:51, 8 November 2015 (UTC)