Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2015/09/04

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive September 4th, 2015
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from Bollywoodlife.com (copyvio) Biplab Anand (Talk) 12:40, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See all of their images uploaded on the 3rd, they are all copyvio's. I confirmed all images uploaded on the e3rd and strongly suspect that all images from the 2nd are copied from the web. Ravensfire (talk) 13:09, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Speedy delete, {{copyvio}}. LX (talk, contribs) 16:29, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 21:58, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo does not depict the site of Ashton in Makerfield station, which was opposite the main entrance to Haydock Park Racecourse. 2.50.21.194 11:25, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept - While a cursory look at Google Earth does show that this was not quite the station site (the line is about 100yds to the south), deletion is not called for. I will rename and redesvcribe the photo. -mattbuck (Talk) 11:43, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because i am polish 82.74.196.189 10:38, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept: Vandalism. --Amitie 10g (talk) 13:12, 4 September 2015 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: And probable copyvio. Yann (talk) 23:16, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested deletion, see talk page. Seems the image was not properly released to begin with. FunkMonk (talk) 21:06, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

delete, per funk monk the author requested its removal. IJReid (talk) 22:14, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Seems there's consensus. FunkMonk (talk) 22:16, 4 September 2015 (UTC) FunkMonk (talk) 22:16, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

small size, no metedata, promotional information in description Motopark (talk) 21:12, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 22:50, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

small size, no metedata, promotional information in description Motopark (talk) 21:15, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 22:50, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uploader claims this file was released under a free licence, but there is no evidence for that on the source page PeeJay2K3 (talk) 20:58, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Basic copyvio to me as with the other uploads from this user Herby talk thyme 07:44, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

pdf bestand vervangen door jpeg bestaand Haagschebluf (talk) 16:54, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploaders request shortly after upload. JuTa 08:18, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photograph uploaded when depicted persons were politically active, no longer of encyclopaedic value. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kotoviski (talk • contribs) 2015-01-10T19:23:37‎ (UTC)


Kept: INeverCry 00:41, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not used, never linked to any article/page. A private photograph of a person previously politically active. Kotoviski (talk) 17:09, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept per above, nothing has changed since previous nomination; same nominator renominating for deletion with no new reason offered months after a previous "Kept" decision. -- Infrogmation (talk) 15:15, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A private photograph no longer of general interest, not used on any Wiki. Kotoviski (talk) 11:53, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No new information or rationale given since last nomination(s). Still in scope per above. (non-admin closure) Josve05a (talk) 07:49, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality image with no encyclopedic use. Appears to be a fake screenshot of the title card of an animated television series. Kinu (talk) 07:10, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:53, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality image with no encyclopedic use. Appears to be a fake screenshot of the title card of an animated television series. Kinu (talk) 07:10, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:54, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality image with no encyclopedic use. Kinu (talk) 07:11, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:54, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work based on presumably copyrighted material (i.e., the logo of a television series). Kinu (talk) 07:16, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope / DW Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:54, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Presumably copyrighted material (i.e., the logo of a television series). Kinu (talk) 07:17, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:54, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unencyclopedic. User-created image most likely made using Bitstrips. Not a screenshot of the animated series in question (which would be copyrighted anyway). Kinu (talk) 07:51, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:52, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unencyclopedic. User-created image most likely made using Bitstrips. Not a screenshot of the animated series in question (which would be copyrighted anyway). Kinu (talk) 07:51, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:53, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unencyclopedic. User-created image most likely made using Bitstrips. Not a screenshot of the animated series in question (which would be copyrighted anyway). Kinu (talk) 07:51, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:54, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Refugee crisis in Europe 02-09-2015.svg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

entschuldigung schon wierder einen falschen Namen gegeben Plenuska (talk) 11:35, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Null Problemo! :-) Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:09, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

entschuldigung, schon wierder einen falschen Namen gegeben Plenuska (talk) 11:46, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:10, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

falsches Bild gewählt Canon55D (talk) 20:06, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 12:52, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rusia india mexico (talk · contribs)

[edit]
English: The copyright for these images belongs to the Bank of Mexico. See COM:MONEY#Mexico.
Español: Los derechos para estas imágenes pertenecen al Banco de México. Mírese COM:MONEY#Mexico.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:54, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 12:48, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rusia india mexico (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own use - icons of various settlements in Mexico.

Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:38, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:53, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author is requesting deletion. El3ctr0nika 03:42, 22 December 2012 (UTC)


Kept: Username corrected Sreejith K (talk) 23:27, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is not the correct structure for homopipramol. See http://chem.sis.nlm.nih.gov/chemidplus/rn/35142-68-8 and File:Homopipramol.svg for comparison. Ed (Edgar181) 21:56, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per discussion. --Leyo 01:35, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Contains incorrect and impossible geometry throughout. Ed (Edgar181) 22:19, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Leyo 01:36, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Bellow the COM:TOO in France? Amitie 10g (talk) 04:50, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: still no license at all. JuTa 19:08, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Amitie 10g (talk) 04:50, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: still no license at all. JuTa 19:09, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

logo can't be free or in fair use Bilderling (talk) 12:31, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: still no license at all. JuTa 19:10, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

carte retravaillée par ailleurs Crijam (talk) 16:02, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: User request, not used. Yann (talk) 21:29, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

monument made by fi:Veikko Myller, copyrighted monument Motopark (talk) 03:26, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Could you clarify what is wrong with the photo and what is "copyrighted monument"? Vitaly repin (talk) 7:27, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

This picture can only upload to fi Wikipedia with this system[1]--Motopark (talk) 07:38, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Do you mean I can not just take a photo shot of the statue installed in the public place and upload it to Wikimedia? Can you provide link with more information on the topic? I have never heard about such restrictions. And if it's not legal to make the photos and put them to Wikipedia, why are they (photos) listed here: https://fi.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luettelo_Helsingin_patsaista_ja_muistomerkeist%C3%A4 ? Vitaly repin (talk) 22:19, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Your picture are in commons, not local Wikipedia, different rules--Motopark (talk) 04:14, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I just want to understand rules better. I have read through Panorama rules: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_panorama I got explanation from FSFE people that in Finland, the exception from copyright only covers buildings and b) other works only for non-commercial purposes. Since Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons explicity require permission to use for commercial uses, too, b) can't be applied for Commons. This is clear. If I open a picture listed at https://fi.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luettelo_Helsingin_patsaista_ja_muistomerkeist%C3%A4 I can see: https://fi.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiedosto:Pekka_Nevalainen_ABC_kissa_1996.jpg (an example). So, "some rights are reserved". I suppose (i do not speak Finnish), commercial use is prohibited. Does it mean that I need to simply delete image from wikimedia and upload it to wikipedia directly with this restricted license? How can I do this? Sorry for noob questions. This is new topic for me - I was always uploading stuff to wikimedia and refered to it from wikipedia. Vitaly repin (talk) 20:58, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Non-commercial pictures are not allowed on Commons. Ankry (talk) 06:11, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I have clarified my questions in Keskustelu Wikipediasta:Lähetystö and uploaded teh photo to Finnish Wikipedia. How shall we proceed with this deletion request? Shall I remove the picture and deletion request alltogether? Vitaly repin (talk) 21:10, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No FoP for artistic works in Finland Ankry (talk) 06:16, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Je souhaiterais modifier le titre JMroulien63 (talk) 21:14, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Please use {{Rename}}. -- Geagea (talk) 22:40, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image insatisfaisante 2A01:CB14:816C:C100:5043:9E9B:C2E9:184 17:18, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: most likely a copyright violation: screenshot from Google Earth or something similar. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:43, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:18, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Érico Wouters (msg) 05:52, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:20, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Érico Wouters (msg) 05:52, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:21, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Érico Wouters (msg) 05:53, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:22, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Érico Wouters (msg) 05:53, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:23, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Érico Wouters (msg) 05:53, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:24, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Érico Wouters (msg) 05:53, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:27, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Érico Wouters (msg) 05:54, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:28, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Érico Wouters (msg) 05:54, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:29, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Érico Wouters (msg) 05:54, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Was only used in one article, but I have made the data into an actual HTML table and now there is no use for the image. James Hare (NIOSH) (talk) 14:57, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: A.Savin 23:43, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Profile picture of this Twitter account, no evidence that the uploader is the account holder/copyright owner. Also potentially out of scope. Nick (talk) 00:13, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: A.Savin 23:44, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no offense, but imho commercial advertisements, hence, imho "out of scope", Roland zh (talk) 01:44, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: A.Savin 23:44, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files by User:MBTA Sound Recordings

[edit]

These bizarre sound files appear to consist of nothing but audio recorded inside of subway trains. They appear to be devoid of any useful educational content - they are poor quality and largely white noise with faint train noises - and without value to the project. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:21, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep all: While I appreciate that the appeal of this kind of recordings is an acquired taste, they are very interesting to specific groups and cater for niche needs (sound effects for “incidental noise”, for one). The epithet "bizarre" is out of place in a DR nomination, too, and the claim that the recording quality is low seems to to be unaccurate, at least judging for the files I listened to so far. -- Tuválkin 02:24, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Whether they are potentially enjoyable or useful for niche sound effects is not relevant here. They serve no conceivable educational purpose and are out of the scope of Commons; Freesound and its ilk would be more appropriate. When I said bizarre, I mean that I have been around enwiki a while and never before have I seen a single-purpose account add audio recordings of empty subway trains to articles about subway stations. There's a lot of white noise in the recordings; while you can still make out the train noise, they would not even be useful as background audio in a stage production or whatnot. They're also poor quality in that they don't well illustrate what they claim to illustrate - each of the MBTA subway lines (and even individual tunnels and such) has a very distinctive sound which simply isn't captured here. Each of these files is a functional duplicate of the others; there's no real reason to have one, but certainly not to have 17. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 15:07, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: no usage, unclear purpose A.Savin 23:48, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is six helmets on sticks, near a body of water. There is no metadata to provide any sort of information about what this represents. Uploader's username seems to be Indian, and the first diff said this was "ASI monument number 12456", but that doesn't seem to be a valid ASI number. Image is seemingly in use in two talk pages, because the filename is "Wiki.JPG" and other people were criticized for uploading files with the useless name of "Wiki.JPG". Since there does not appear to be any way to figure out what this image is, I propose that it is unusable and thus outside project scope. I also request that the filename "Wiki.JPG" be protected to stop people from uploading images to it. DS (talk) 13:28, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete And protect that filename. Yann (talk) 11:16, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: A.Savin 23:49, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not used personal image --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:15, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:27, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not used personal image --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:18, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:27, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not used personal image, no quite notable people --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:19, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:27, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lamingasalinas (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused unencyclopedic personal image outside our scope. I have left our some image uploaded by user. They could be put to use. Your opinion on these images is also welcome.

§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:32, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:29, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:46, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:31, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:49, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:31, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:51, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:31, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:51, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:31, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:52, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:32, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:56, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:32, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:56, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:33, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:17, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:33, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jakson jks (talk · contribs)

[edit]

some unknown unused person picvture, see description

Motopark (talk) 11:18, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:33, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:30, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:34, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:45, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:34, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:45, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:34, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:46, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:35, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Realtittymaster (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused personal photos, out of scope

Mjrmtg (talk) 11:48, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:35, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:50, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:36, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:51, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:36, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:52, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:36, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:53, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:37, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 12:21, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:37, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:38, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:39, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and unusable fuzzy, blurry image. No context to make it educational. P 1 9 9   14:42, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:39, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Does this icon serve any purpose? Plenty of better images available from Curiosity Rover. P 1 9 9   14:48, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It does not at all. It was just an initial upload from the Rover. Agree with the removal. --Lahi (talk) 21:29, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:40, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional logo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   14:49, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:39, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sureshreddy117 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private video album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:41, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:41, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Unicat7 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:41, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused blurry image without any context to make it educational, unusable. P 1 9 9   18:17, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:43, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional logo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:41, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:44, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:44, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:44, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:44, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:44, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional or personal logo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:48, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:45, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused graphic without any educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:49, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:45, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal artwork, out of scope. P 1 9 9   19:06, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:46, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope 164.126.160.15 22:48, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:46, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photos are out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:37, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Érico Wouters (msg) 17:02, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The same uploader on en.wiki states that the copyright holder of the photo is John R Keeble, not himself, and that the photo was given to him by the owner. Diannaa (talk) 03:32, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An OTRS ticket has been received. The photographer was a Lisa Eymont-Bleeker, and she has freely licensed the image.  Keep now that the copyright situation is in order. Storkk (talk) 10:26, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: OTRS-ticket Natuur12 (talk) 17:52, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not, strictly speaking, a text logo. I believe the crown atop the shield is above the COM:TOO. Nick (talk) 00:04, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • This logo consists of a seal with text, it might just all see if they cf. the Commons logo with the original. Both text and seal are INGREDISENTS which together form the logo. It should not be deleted. User talk:Carsten R D 13:13, 4 september 2015 (CET)
The issue is that you've tagged the image as being ineligible for copyright as what we call a "text logo". Logos are only ineligible for copyright if they consist only of text and simple geometric shapes. The shield and crown together (especially the crown) aren't simple geometric shapes, they're too complex for that, so they're eligible for copyright protection. Nick (talk) 02:19, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Norwegian coats of arms are PD. {{Norwegian coat of arms}} Fry1989 eh? 21:10, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per user:Fry1989. P 1 9 9   01:20, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No global usage, superseded by an .svg file, and low resolution. Worldlydev (talk) 13:50, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:48, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a blatant copyright violation. According to SEK International University’s website, its author is María Esther Álvarez Sustiata, NOT the uploader SFV210 (talk · contribs). Also, it was published by http://www.sek.edu on 6 November 2009, almost 6 years earlier than it was uploaded to Commons. Iñaki Salazar (talk) 02:45, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: P 1 9 9   01:21, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vitaly repin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable

Motopark (talk) 03:28, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: P 1 9 9   01:25, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

last time (admin link only) this wans't own work as now claimed. JuTa 07:18, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: reupload of previously deleted image. P 1 9 9   01:28, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentifiable low resolution pictures

[edit]

Impossible to identify low-resolution picture. Trizek from FR 08:15, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: images now identified. As for origin concerns, all uploader's images are similar, so we need more justification for deletion than just suspicion. Deleted the meaningless redirects. --P 1 9 9   01:44, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is routine request for small photo without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photo is so small? Can you upload a bigger version, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload a version with EXIF data? Can you categorize the file correctly? This is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 08:28, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: likely copyrighted bookcover. P 1 9 9   01:45, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: P 1 9 9   01:45, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

most likely a copyvio (no metadata, picture commonly used on Internet, new user) H4stings (talk) 08:34, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: P 1 9 9   01:46, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

most likely a copyvio (no metadata, picture commonly used on Internet with a better resolution, new user) H4stings (talk) 08:34, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: P 1 9 9   01:46, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Oteiza artwork in Biarritz

[edit]

No FoP in France // pas de liberté de panorama en France, sculpture sous droit d'auteur.

kvardek du (la plej bela nombro) 09:41, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as per COM:FOP#France. P 1 9 9   01:48, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Fop in France. According to French law, it is not allowed to publish picture whose the main subject is an original creation until 70 years after the death of its author. Unless prior authorization by the author or his heirs. The sculptor Louis Derbré died in 2011.

Civa (talk) 09:42, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:25, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copy-vio: copied from http://www.geoecomar.ro/website/nave-cercetare-mare-nigrum.html CiaPan (talk) 10:08, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: copyvio. --Wintereu 21:54, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Deleted: P 1 9 9   01:48, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rishika.dhanawade (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small size, missing/improper EXIF, looks like promotional/professional images, uploader has bad history. Unlikely to be own work.

KurodaSho (talk) 10:38, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: P 1 9 9   01:49, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sharad sovani (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused personal photos, out of scope

Mjrmtg (talk) 10:41, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: P 1 9 9   01:50, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have uploaded the same subject in a better resolution Eddaido (talk) 10:42, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: superseded by File:Daimler 22 1902 side elevation 19020726-360.jpg. P 1 9 9   01:51, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have uploaded the same image at a higher resolution Eddaido (talk) 11:04, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: superseded by File:The King's new 1902 Daimler car 19020426.jpg. P 1 9 9   01:52, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doublon de File:Flag of Almaguer (Cauca).svg Lepsyleon (talk) 13:42, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: but kept redirect. P 1 9 9   01:57, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doublon de File:Flag of Baranoa (Atlántico).svg Lepsyleon (talk) 13:45, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Agree with the deletion. --Shadowxfox (talk) 14:37, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
File currently in use, and colour are different than the other file (but the flag is the same). Please use {{Duplicate}} instead, and use {{Vote keep}} or {{Vote delete}} when commenting. --Amitie 10g (talk) 21:41, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done File not in use. Lepsyleon (talk) 09:27, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: P 1 9 9   01:59, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicato non aggiornato di File:Passante ferroviario Milano pianta.svg Arbalete (talk) 14:04, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: P 1 9 9   02:02, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photograph uploaded when depicted person was politically active, no longer of encyclopaedic value. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kotoviski (talk • contribs) 2015-01-10T19:29:31‎ (UTC)


Kept: Article on Polish WP. Taken in a public place. In scope. Yann (talk) 12:30, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not used, never linked to any page. Private photograph of a person previously politically active. Kotoviski (talk) 17:04, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: personal photo no longer in use. --P 1 9 9   02:04, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photograph uploaded when depicted person was politically active, no longer of encyclopaedic value. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kotoviski (talk • contribs) 2015-01-10T19:28:58‎ (UTC)


Kept: Article on Polish WP. In scope. Yann (talk) 12:29, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not used, never linked to any article/page. A private photograph of a person previously politically active. Kotoviski (talk) 17:07, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: personal photo not in use. --P 1 9 9   02:05, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of permission, likely just lifted from a website Ringerfan23 (talk) 18:28, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. P 1 9 9   02:08, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of permission, likely just lifted from a website Ringerfan23 (talk) 18:29, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. P 1 9 9   02:08, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:YouTube logo 2013.svg. Fry1989 eh? 19:17, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: P 1 9 9   02:11, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As the uploader mentioned in Hebrew in the files 85.64.160.79 19:51, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As the uploader mentioned in the file's details, the picture was copied from the website of the Israeli parliament. No OTRS release approval has been received. Therefore, it has no place in the Commons. Ldorfman (talk) 19:54, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: (already deleted). P 1 9 9   02:12, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If it is PD, it should be made before 1946, but it's not the case as a date is set as "early 1950s". The second option would be publication before 1956 under Japanese jurisdiction, but this fact is not proven, as this image lacks a proper source and author.Moreover I question the originality of this photo, as the background seems to be substituted. And indeed it is a derivative, as a color version of it was published as a cover picture: [2]. Therefore, basing on a precautionary principle, we should delete it, as it wasn't proven that this exact picture is in PD and even whether it is an original composition. Masur (talk) 06:42, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, the file is used 43 times in 23 projects, but nobody answered during whole month. Probably there is no reason for assuming public domain. Taivo (talk) 09:58, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Estuaire de Nantes

[edit]

Œuvre contemporaine. - Contemporary artwork, no freedom of panorama in France. Trizek from FR 08:11, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's done then... --Orikrin1998 10:44, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, no freedom of panorama in France. Taivo (talk) 10:15, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake license, Logo can't be free or own. I'ts a real logo posted by someone. Bilderling (talk) 12:21, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, surpasses threshold of originality. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:19, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Former user page. Suggestion: Actually delete User:GreatnationHD and move this page back. Sebari (talk) 12:39, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, both out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:21, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mappa errata, sostituita da File:Italia - mappa strada statale 2.svg. Sono l'autore di entrambe Arbalete (talk) 13:30, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason to delete Natuur12 (talk) 21:34, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mappa errata, sostituita da File:Italia - mappa strada statale 2.svg. Sono l'autore di entrambe Arbalete (talk) 12:47, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, author's request. Taivo (talk) 10:24, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work Vikoula5 (talk) 13:09, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 10:26, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work Vikoula5 (talk) 13:09, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata. I delete also all his/her other uploads due to same reason plus promotional userpage. Taivo (talk) 10:34, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

likely a copyvio : no metadata, better resolution on Internet, unique import from this user H4stings (talk) 13:27, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, the file is used 48 times in 31 projects, but nobody has objected. Probably really copyvio. Taivo (talk) 10:36, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation Brgesto (talk) 00:31, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by colleague. --Jcb (talk) 13:37, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no clarity 115.248.253.41 13:38, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, 700×380 pixels is too small for world map even for historical reasons. Text is not readable. Taivo (talk) 10:40, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation -> http://www.songtre.tv/news/tin-noi-bat/den-hai-phong-an-banh-da-cua-49-7976.html Takeaway (talk) 13:39, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:42, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doublon de file:Flag of Manatí (Atlántico).svg Lepsyleon (talk) 13:47, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Agree with the deletion. --Shadowxfox (talk) 14:36, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep relicense This image shows a flag, a coat of arms, a seal or some other official insignia. The use of such symbols is restricted in many countries. These restrictions are independent of the copyright status or- This image only consists of simple geometric shapes and/or text. It does not meet the threshold of originality--EEIM (talk) 04:38, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, the file is still used in it.wiki. I'll fix the license. Taivo (talk) 10:50, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong word in the text (Blinklicht). It is a irritation, because "Blinklicht" ist a word from the 1950ies. Mediatus (talk) 13:51, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, unused redirect, nobody objected. Taivo (talk) 10:54, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rick Fuller (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Looking at filenames and descriptions, these are promotional/advertising images. All unused, no other uploads. No educational value, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   14:14, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep "Guest Chairs", because I think it could be used in Wikipedia articles like w:en:Foyer, to provide some balance against the rather grand photos currently there. "Conference Room" might also be useful to show everyday, small-business-size conference rooms. It's not clear why the picture of a conference room at File:Conferenceroom2.JPG would be in scope, but this one would be out of scope. However, delete "Side View", because an image of an office building that is just 120 px across and 68 px wide is unlikely to be useful for anyone. I'm also concerned that "Front View" might constitute a copyvio (three pictures, and not de minimis—but I don't know whether any of the framed artwork are copyrighted images). WhatamIdoing (talk) 22:19, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, 2 files, but kept 2 files per WhatamIdoing. Taivo (talk) 10:57, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Abbaszade656 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:17, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nazasca (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos and documents. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

questa immagini mi sono state consegnate dalle famiglie, non sono immagini che erano in rete, e hanno l'autorizzazione dei famigliari, che sono ben coscienti che queste foto ora sono pubbliche, ma hanno confermato la loro autorizzazione, non saprei in quale altro modo inserirle. chiedo quindi un vostro aiuto.--Nazasca (talk) 19:03, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, photos from 1940-s and 1950-s. By principle, some of them can be in public domain due to being anonymous and over 70 years old, but without dates and sources there is no other possibility than delete them all. Taivo (talk) 11:24, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mahazela (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Modern art. I think painter identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, painter died in 1991, so maybe they can be restored on 2062 (70 years from death). Taivo (talk) 11:45, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, the uploader has problems with copyright. Taivo (talk) 11:41, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: non-free architecture. Eleassar (t/p) 14:36, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:54, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also: File:Ljubljanska toplarna.jpg. --Eleassar (t/p) 19:58, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image taken from the internet. Possible copyright violation. Takeaway (talk) 14:38, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata. this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:55, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: work by J. Costaperaria (d. 1951). Eleassar (t/p) 14:44, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:56, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: work by J. Costaperaria (d. 1955). Eleassar (t/p) 14:45, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:58, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Soylaticher (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Modern art, newspaper and magazine. I think painter identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:59, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doublon with File:Flag of Puerto Nariño (Amazonas).svg. Lepsyleon (talk) 14:55, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, the file is still used in 10 projects. Taivo (talk) 12:04, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, 1969 photo, probably still copyrighted. Photographer is unknown, so no restore date. Taivo (talk) 12:08, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doublon with File:Flag of La Virginia (Risaralda).svg Lepsyleon (talk) 14:57, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, still used in nl.wiki. But really, please use template "Duplicate" in the future. Taivo (talk) 12:10, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:14, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doublon with File:Flag of La Virginia (Risaralda).svg Lepsyleon (talk) 14:58, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, per Amitie. Taivo (talk) 12:16, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The image is my own work. The copyright belongs to the person who took the image, not the person in it. Parm Sran used the image with my permission on her blog, therefor it appears on google images.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Garryslay (talk • contribs)


 Deleted, dear user:Garryslay, unfortunately Commons regulations prescribe, that in such circumstances you as copyright holder of the photo must send OTRS-permission and after that the file is restored. Also you should upload version of the photo with bigger resolution. Version with EXIF data would also be good. Taivo (talk) 12:24, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doublon with File:Flag of Villavicencio (Meta).svg Lepsyleon (talk) 15:00, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, the file is used 61 times in 27 projects and cannot be deleted in any other reason than copyright issues. Taivo (talk) 12:27, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:29, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Leviteswon (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, EXIF says: "Author Lee HeungBae. Copyright holder 2011 HB Studio. All rights reserved." These are the uploader's only contributions. Taivo (talk) 12:31, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not simple text and/or shapes. There is clear originality here 5N-RDK (talk) 15:09, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Has been classified as simple and therefore PD following an assessment on the German Wikipedia (for reference see here (available in German only)). --SafetyCard (talk) 15:27, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, surpasses threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 12:34, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor qualilty image, uploader possibly not author 5N-RDK (talk) 15:10, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, only 203×183 pixels, plus blurry. Taivo (talk) 12:40, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doublon with file:Flag of Valledupar (Cesar).svg Lepsyleon (talk) 15:16, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, unused. Taivo (talk) 12:57, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doublon with file:Flag of Valledupar.svg. Lepsyleon (talk) 15:17, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, the file is used 21 times in 4 projects. Taivo (talk) 13:00, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doublon with file:Flag of Cumbal (Nariño).svg. Lepsyleon (talk) 15:18, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, the file is used in vi.wiki. Taivo (talk) 13:02, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doublon with File:Flag of Girardot (Cundinamarca).svg Lepsyleon (talk) 15:22, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Agree with the deletion. --Shadowxfox (talk) 01:54, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, the file is used in it.wiki. Taivo (talk) 13:05, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doublon with file:Flag of Supatá.svg. Lepsyleon (talk) 15:24, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, unused. Taivo (talk) 13:08, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doublon with file:Flag of Útica (Cundinamarca).svg. Lepsyleon (talk) 15:25, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't mind it being deleted, but I do mind the source code of the one you'd like to retain. Inkscape cruft left in there, inexact positioning of the shapes (something I set out never to do), superfluous translations. So at least re-use the actual source code, if the wrong file already is already used all across other wikis Johannes Rössel (talk) 08:22, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
If I understand, "File:Flag of Útica (Cundinamarca).svg" should be deleted of this one ? Lepsyleon (talk) 09:24, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, unused. Taivo (talk) 13:13, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: non-free architectural work as well as non-free poetic text. Eleassar (t/p) 15:26, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, architecture does not surpass here threshold of originality, but Google translation lets me suggest, that this is really poetic text. The text is not old, but recent, its author is unknown (I googled the text), so there is no known restore date. Taivo (talk) 13:32, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

card cicognani Michelemontecchio (talk) 15:54, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 13:38, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copy of File:Derzhavin by N.Argunov (1800-1801, GTG).jpg. They have different size - it doesn't matter, both from same source with same bad quality. Shakko (talk) 16:00, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 13:51, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work Fetx2002 (talk) 03:25, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Fetx2002: Can you provide any reasons to substantiate why this is not own work? --P 1 9 9   01:24, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No indication by nominator why image was considered copyvio. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:16, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS does not allow us to have bath ducks. Taivo (talk) 08:14, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:15, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative works from music. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Este vídeo es de mi propiedad, filmado con el consentimiento de Bibi. Estoy en taller escribiendo su biografía, tengo también su consentimiento y todos los datos me los proporciona él mismo. Espero no tener problemas. Si no es correcto dígalo para poder rectificar, pero sí interesa esta biografía, es un profesional muy conocido en las Islas Baleares.un saludo --Soylaticher (talk) 19:57, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No source of the music in the video. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:17, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SoyAngel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

False source, authorship and licensing information. These signatures are obviously not the uploader's own work. Some may be old enough to be in the public domain, but that requires truthful source and authorship information to determine. Some may qualify for {{PD-signature}}, which also requires truthful information about the provenance and an analysis of the legal situation in the source country – all of which is the uploader's responsibility.

LX (talk, contribs) 21:47, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: For the possible pd-signature files, critical information is still missing Natuur12 (talk) 16:03, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SoyAngel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Again, false source, authorship and licensing information. These signatures are obviously not the uploader's own work. Some may be old enough to be in the public domain, but that requires truthful source and authorship information to determine. Some may qualify for {{PD-signature}}, which also requires truthful information about the provenance and an analysis of the legal situation in the source country – all of which is the uploader's responsibility.

LX (talk, contribs) 16:48, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

________________

Deleted per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:19, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Crude CAD diagram, little educational value. Many better CAD diagrams available. P 1 9 9   17:20, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:20, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Meaningless clipart, no educational value, out of scope. Only used on a sandbox user page also nominated for deletion. P 1 9 9   17:59, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:20, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader call himselfe with same name. This is highly unlikely to be a selfie. Hangsna (talk) 18:29, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:24, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal artwork, out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:46, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:24, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing permission. Fry1989 eh? 18:59, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:25, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing permission. Fry1989 eh? 19:01, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:25, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing permission. Fry1989 eh? 19:01, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:25, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing permission. Fry1989 eh? 19:01, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:25, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing permission. Fry1989 eh? 19:01, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:26, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing permission. Fry1989 eh? 19:01, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:26, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo with copyrighted poster in background. P 1 9 9   19:01, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:26, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing permission. Fry1989 eh? 19:18, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:26, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted ride design,no FOP in United States. Hop on Bananas (talk) 19:30, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I hadn't realized the ride design might be copyrighted. Delete as needed. Mary Mark Ockerbloom (talk) 20:56, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

For further info,read Commons page on threshold of originality. Basically (sorry if you've heard of the FOP,but from your response I'd assume you hadn't before now). Basically,if an image shows something copyrighted but the photo is a panorama rather on only of the work in question,whether it's copyrighted depends on the country of origin and what the work in question is (this photo was taken in the United States-as explained here,they have no FOP for anything except buildings.) (Apologise if this isn't the right place to post this.) Hop on Bananas (talk) 21:13, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well,there's consensus to delete (among 2 users) so how do we delete this? I guess an admin has to,but should we tell them or will one come along? (Sorry if this is a stupid question-I'm really new to WC and I don't know the specifics of everything).Hop on Bananas (talk) 21:46, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the triple post,but can I tag the version on en-wp as fair use and add a rationale? (I already removed it from the only WP article it's used in-the only Commons use is a big bot-made gallery that might be harder to edit.) Or would that cause problems with the WP and Commons versions being different? (I'd have to add the image back to the article,of course.) Also, I'd add Fair use delete to the file page on Commons if it weren't an admin-only template (which I think it is). Hop on Bananas (talk) 22:53, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:28, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing permission.. Fry1989 eh? 19:38, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:29, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlike what's mentioned in the file's details, the picture, of a known Israeli actress, appears in another site - an Israeli new site. The picture was uploaded there two years before the date it was supposingly taken. No OTRS release approval has been received. It has no place in the Commons this way. Ldorfman (talk) 20:49, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unused file & per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:29, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nahuel9m (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Shortly after being posted on Flickr all these photos regarding Uruguayan footballers were transferred (mostly on same day) by this user.

3 problems:

1. The Flickr account https://www.flickr.com/people/47325328@N05/ is configured to be the supposedly "official" Flickr for "Asociación Uruguaya de Fútbol" (Uruguayan Football Association). At official site http://www.auf.org.uy we have all kind of social media links (Facebook, Youtube, Twitter, Instagram, etc.) but Flickr is missing. Note, that via http://www.auf.org.uy/Portal/GALLERYNEWS/# a huge photo gallery is available, configured with "© 2012 - Asociación Uruguaya de Fútbol". I doubt any "official" status of this Flickr account.

2. Despite File:Jaime Báez.jpg no exif-infos are available. All files in small resolutions. Higher resolutions are available elsewhere.

3. Before posted on Flickr, all these photos (+ 1 logo) were previously published elsewhere. Examples:

All these files need permission from their respective copyright owners. Most likely Flickrwashing, and - considering the instant posting & uploading method - mostly likely Flickrwashing organized by the uploader himself. Please blacklist the Flickr-source.

Gunnex (talk) 12:42, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvios deleted, Flickr acct blacklisted. INeverCry 01:19, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nahuel9m (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small size, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own work.

Yann (talk) 17:41, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


deleted. INeverCry 01:33, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nahuel9m (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible COM:COPYVIO: These files came from [3] ... on flickr but pre-cropped version are found on the web: [4] [5] and others. It is doubtful that flickr's uploader Asociación Uruguaya de Fútbol is official account of Uruguayan Football Association (reason 1: 0 Followers/Following, reason 2: official site has links to Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, Google+, Instagram, E-mail, but there is no link to the Flickr. reason 3: Google "flickr site:www.auf.org.uy"). Uploader has bad history. It seems Commons:License laundering.

KurodaSho (talk) 21:42, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


____________________

Deleted COM:PRP flickrwashing. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:33, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete: the uploader of this football club crest image is most likely neither the copyright holder nor their own work. Ww2censor (talk) 22:41, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:33, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete: this football body kit uploader is most likely neither the copyright holder nor their own work. Ww2censor (talk) 22:42, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:33, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Goldcoasttransit (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Needs permission, copy of photos from this tweet.

SounderBruce 22:46, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:34, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Dman41689 as Copyvio (copyvio) 5 years old, DR better. Yann (talk) 23:14, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: I don't see any evidence provided of why this image is considered a copyright. I would not oppose a renomination if such were provided but a "naked" nomination like this for a file in such heavy use doesn't make sense. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:36, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is of much too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose. It's out of project scope. Dman41689 (talk) 08:28, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 20:01, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

6 KB own work? Please. (Previously DR'ed under wrong reasons.) Precaution is the guide. E4024 (talk) 16:31, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:53, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Belarus. The sculpture is the fountain in Yanka Kupala's park in Minsk. The authors were sculptors Anatoly Anikeichik (Russian: Анатолий Александрович Аникейчик; 1932—1989), Lev Gumilevskiy (Russian: Лев Николаевич Гумилевский; b. 1930), Andrey Mikhaylovich Zaspitsky (Russian: Андрей Михайлович Заспицкий; b. 1924). Jarash (talk) 17:07, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, no freedom of panorama in Belarus. Taivo (talk) 17:13, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Повторная фотография Miksam69 (talk) 17:52, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, copy of file:2.Ryazan.jpg. Taivo (talk) 17:06, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source/license and author information of every image used in this collage is missing or is insufficient, compromising the whole file. See also Commons:Collages. Gunnex (talk) 18:34, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Info 1 file grabbed from https://www.flickr.com/photos/pueblofuerte/3716461247 (2009, © All rights reserved by "Pueblo Fuerte") Gunnex (talk) 08:53, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Info Uploader related: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Nicomans. Gunnex (talk) 12:30, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:50, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong license. This is 1945 ofiicial Greek document. Maybe it is still protected with copyright. Taivo (talk) 08:20, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

General State Archives, as an official state service, are the owner of the copyright of every public document in the country Gakrod

{{PD-GreekGov}} says, that Greek government work is in public domain. But is it work of Greek government? I changed the license, but do not close the request, because I am not sure, that PD-GreekGov license applies. Taivo (talk) 14:48, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: The current info fails com:EVIDENCE Natuur12 (talk) 17:20, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Recent postage stamps of Germany. All already in the delete category, but a DR was never filled. Most probably not in the public domain, as per the Loriot case. I excluded old stamps which should have a separate DR.

Yann (talk) 09:00, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Die de:Wasser- und Schifffahrtsverwaltung des Bundes zeigt auf ihrer Website einige der hier zu löschenden Briefmarken und schreibt dazu: "Die Leuchtturm-Briefmarken von 1974/75 wurden von der Deutschen Post der DDR und die Leuchtturm-Briefmarken ab 2004 von der Deutschen Post AG im Auftrag des BMF verausgabt. Sie sind nach § 5 Abs. 1 UrhG ein amtliches Werk. Nach dem deutschen Urheberrechtsgesetz sind sie somit gemeinfrei.". Es gibt bisher zwei sich widersprechende Urteile untergeordneter Gerichte, ein höchstrichterliches Urteil steht noch aus.Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 12:55, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

According to COM:WikiProject Public Domain/German stamps review, § 5 (1) UrhG only covers text, but not images. Unfortunately, a stamp is an image, so stamps are not covered by § 5 (1) UrhG. --Stefan4 (talk) 18:53, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Gilt das auch für das Recht der ehemaligen DDR? Bitte höchstrichterliche Urteile verlinken. Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 19:51, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
See de:Schutzlandprinzip. Article 5 (2) of the Berne Convention would appear to prevent West Germany from using exceptions in East German law to claim that a work isn't protected by copyright in West Germany. Therefore, I would assume that the united German state isn't allowed to make any difference between West German stamps and East German stamps. --Stefan4 (talk) 20:12, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Es gibt bisher zwei gegensätzliche Urteile von untergeordneten Gerichten in Deutschland. Eine höchstricherliche Entscheidung steht noch aus. See: Wikilegal/Copyright of Images in German Postage Stamps: The Berlin decision in the Loriot case is only binding on the parties of the case, i.e. WMF and Loriot’s daughter, but may be predictive of how another court in Germany would interpret copyright law in the future.... Also bitte die Zukunft abwarten und nicht vorschnell löschen. Natürlich macht sich "Vorauseilender Gehorsam" ohne Gerichtsurteil immer gut. Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 21:10, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@JWBE, Michael Bednarek, and Nightflyer: All the stamps have a tag saying "This file is most likely NOT in the public domain." So what do you suggest?
  1. Opening a separate DR for each stamp?
  2. Changing the tag for another? Which one?
  3. Something else?
I don't think doing nothing is an option here. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:05, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Repeating ping: @JWBE, Michael Bednarek, and Nightflyer: Please see questuon by Yann above. Thanks!
Keeping Dr open until 7/5/14. Close DR if no response --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:53, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
As Nightflyer pointed out, the "Leuchtturm" stamps have been declared "gemeinfrei" (public domain) by a federal agency; hence their deletion request should be closed as "keep". I also gather from the above discussion that no irrevocable judgement has been issued in the matter. Therefore, the obvious course of action, apart from doing nothing, is to conduct individual deletion requests for the others. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 09:59, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Michael Bednarek: If this is the case, could you 1. change the license of these stamps, 2. note them here (or elsewhere if it is more convenient for you). These stamps were tagged as not PD. So why were they tagged as such? How could we know which stamps are PD or not? Regards, Yann (talk) 08:34, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
According to recent court decisions and copyright commentary we can be very sure that stamps are not in the PD solely because they are public works. Each stamps requires an individual review of its copyright status. Stamps can still be in the PD when the motif does not reach the threshold of originality or the author has been dead for more than 70 years. Recent stamps, however, with a motif consisting of photos or drawings, are most likely not in the PD and have to be deleted. Therefore  Delete all of them after a new short review. Yellowcard (talk) 22:26, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
In the meantime, I reviewed all 128 files that are currently in this category.  Delete all of them except of:
However, escpecially recent stamps containing photographs are obvious copyvios and should be deleted soon. Yellowcard (talk) 09:27, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Additionally, some of the stamps can be restored in not so far future, such as: File:DBP 1974 822 Max Beckmann, Großes Stilleben mit Fernrohr.jpg in 2021, File:DPAG 2008 Selma Lagerlöf, Nils Holgersson.jpg in 2023, File:Briefmarke Deutsche Post - Deutsche Malerei 2004- Felix Nussbaum mit "Das Geheimnis" scanned 2.jpg in 2015 (!). Yellowcard (talk) 09:35, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Was hat sich auf commons seit dieser Entscheidung geändert? Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 11:33, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That one was obviously incorrectly undeleted and should be deleted again. --Stefan4 (talk) 18:18, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: except for the files mentioned by Yellowcard. Those file are not okey beyond a reasonable doubt, Yellowcard and Stefan gave some good arguments. Also part of Yann's critical questions remained unawsered. Natuur12 (talk) 11:26, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Recent postage stamps of Germany. All already in the delete category, but a DR was never filled. Commons:WikiProject Public Domain/German stamps review.

Josve05a (talk) 18:02, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:22, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User Robert Weemeyer failed and marked these files for deletion, via a PD-review (German stamps).

Josve05a (talk) 00:04, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:51, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is there a copyright issue here? If it is recent, there is no FoP in USA for this. Is a copyright notice required? Yann (talk) 18:20, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment And if so, then also File:Main Entrance to ACND Prep.jpg. The recent image looks like some form of sculpture, the older one is papers stuck to a pedestal. But they both contain artwork, and are in public in USA. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:22, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: For modern works a notice isn't required but without knowing the age we cannot determine the object copyright status and therefor it fails com:EVIDENCE Natuur12 (talk) 17:24, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is an SVG of this flag as File:Flag of Belarus.svg. If there are any imperfections, the SVG should be worked on, but not replaced by a JPEG. Fry1989 eh? 19:09, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:23, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]