Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2015/09/01

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive September 1st, 2015
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:TSU the work publication.png

[edit]

Image was uploaded as "own work"under the "Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication", but there is no OTRS permission or any other information provided which indicates that the uploader and original copyright holder are the same. Image is currently being used in en:Draft:The Work (publication) as the logo/masthead of the official student publication of Tarlac State University. If this true, the Tarlac State University is most likely is the original copyright holder, and no information is provided (e.g., a source link, etc.) which shows that university has agreed to license the image freely. The text is definitely too simple for copyright protection, but I not sure about the "plume" and "book" imagery. My guess is this probably is "non-free" content which is something that is not allowed on Commons per COM:FAIRUSE. - Marchjuly (talk) 00:28, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: clear copyvio Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:54, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Photographs by Thomas Oswald

[edit]

All files in this category were taken by Thomas Oswald. EXIF data reads: © Thomas Oswald. As seen in Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Photographs by David Plas (for files in Category:Files from Security & Defence Agenda Flickr stream) it is not uncommon to see organisations have an external photographer work events for them and allow that organisation to use those photos for PR needs whilst still holding copyright. In this instance, COM:PRP needs to be applied to these photos, or perhaps work on COM:OTRS being obtained. Unfortunately, many other photos in Category:Photographs by The Financial Times are the same and will be gone through.

After this DR, please delete the category as well if OTRS isn't obtained. Thanks Scott (Russavia) TempIDforDRs (talk) 03:42, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: This user was banned by WMF from all activity at Wikimedia projects. This includes filing DRs. Jcb (talk) 18:24, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Photographs by Dianna Bonner

[edit]

All files in this category were taken by Dianna Bonner. EXIF data reads: Copyright holder: Dianna Bonner www.WorldVisionPhotos.co.uk 07718881768. As seen in Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Photographs by David Plas (for files in Category:Files from Security & Defence Agenda Flickr stream) it is not uncommon to see organisations have an external photographer work events for them and allow that organisation to use those photos for PR needs whilst still holding copyright. In this instance, COM:PRP needs to be applied to these photos, or perhaps work on COM:OTRS being obtained. Unfortunately, many other photos in Category:Photographs by The Financial Times are the same and will be gone through.

After this DR, please delete the category as well if OTRS isn't obtained. Thanks Scott (Russavia)

TempIDforDRs (talk) 03:56, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: This user was banned by WMF from all activity at Wikimedia projects. This includes filing DRs. Jcb (talk) 18:25, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Photographs by Magali Girardin

[edit]

All files in this category were taken by Magali Girardin. EXIF data reads: Copyright holder: © Magali Girardin. Magali is a French photographer, website www.magaligirardin.com. As seen in Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Photographs by David Plas (for files in Category:Files from Security & Defence Agenda Flickr stream) it is not uncommon to see organisations have an external photographer work events for them and allow that organisation to use those photos for PR needs whilst still holding copyright. In this instance, COM:PRP needs to be applied to these photos, or perhaps work on COM:OTRS being obtained. Unfortunately, many other photos in Category:Photographs by The Financial Times are the same and will be gone through.

After this DR, please delete the category as well if OTRS isn't obtained. Thanks Scott (Russavia)

TempIDforDRs (talk) 04:02, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: This user was banned by WMF from all activity at Wikimedia projects. This includes filing DRs. Jcb (talk) 18:26, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Photographs by Drew Altizer

[edit]

All files in this category were taken by Drew Altizer EXIF data reads: Copyright holder: ©2012 by Drew Altizer, all rights reserved. or Copyright holder: ©2013 by Drew Altizer, all rights reserved. There might be some 2010 and 2011 similar EXIFs in the bunch. Drew is a San Francisco based photographer (www.drewaltizer.com) and is connected with SFWire (www.sfwire.com). As seen in Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Photographs by David Plas (for files in Category:Files from Security & Defence Agenda Flickr stream) it is not uncommon to see organisations have an external photographer work events for them and allow that organisation to use those photos for PR needs whilst still holding copyright. In this instance, COM:PRP needs to be applied to these photos, or perhaps work on COM:OTRS being obtained. Unfortunately, many other photos in Category:Photographs by The Financial Times are the same and will be gone through.

After this DR, please delete the category as well if OTRS isn't obtained. Thanks Scott (Russavia)

TempIDforDRs (talk) 04:09, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Keep In this case "Drew Altizer photography" act as a photo agent, but not as an owner, since the character of the event depicted in the photograph. --Puramyun31 (talk) 07:47, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Puramyun31, profressional photographers doing work for organisations is common, and they more often than not keep the copyright. You might like to contact Drew and ask if he is willing to CC-BY 2.0 licence the photos in this DR. With all credit/attribution going specifically to him. That's the only way to do this unfortunately. I've seen dozens upon dozens of such instances, sometimes the photographer agrees, sometimes they don't. I didn't realise that The Financial Times was a little sloppy with their Flickr until long after I uploaded them. :( 106.68.51.159 12:40, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The Financial Times is just asking that Drew Altizer be credited as the photographer. The FT would certainly know what their licenses mean and the request for Drew Altizer to be named as the photographer is a courtesy request. FT likely paid Drew to take the pictures--since he/she is a professional photographer--which means that FT owns the photos copyright, I would think. A mass DR seems premature. --Leoboudv (talk) 08:09, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment: If Drew denies he was paid by FT, then delete. --Leoboudv (talk) 08:11, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Leoboudv professional photographers generally do not transfer copyright for their works, particularly events photographers. A clearance from Drew Altizer will be required here. 60.228.92.42 17:52, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: This user was banned by WMF from all activity at Wikimedia projects. This includes filing DRs. Jcb (talk) 18:22, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Photographs by Drew Altizer

[edit]

All files in this category were taken by Drew Altizer EXIF data reads: Copyright holder: ©2012 by Drew Altizer, all rights reserved. or Copyright holder: ©2013 by Drew Altizer, all rights reserved. There might be some 2010 and 2011 similar EXIFs in the bunch. Drew is a San Francisco based photographer (www.drewaltizer.com) and is connected with SFWire (www.sfwire.com). As seen in Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Photographs by David Plas (for files in Category:Files from Security & Defence Agenda Flickr stream) or Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Photographs_by_Conor_Ashleigh, it is not uncommon to see organisations have an external photographer work events for them and allow that organisation to use those photos for PR needs whilst still holding copyright. In this instance, COM:PRP needs to be applied to these photos, or perhaps work on COM:OTRS being obtained. Unfortunately, many other photos in Category:Photographs by The Financial Times are the same and will be gone through.

After this DR, please delete the category as well if OTRS isn't obtained. Thanks Scott (Russavia)

Fixingupping (talk) 05:19, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I am inclined to keep these, but not enough so to actually close this without further discussion from colleagues. Since the Financial Times has posted these on Flickr with a CC license, if we delete these, we are saying that the Financial Times doesn't know what it is doing -- that it is CC licensing images to which it does not own the rights. While I am often on the other side of this argument with respect to small museums, I am inclined to believe that the FT does know what rights it actually has and that its CC license is OK. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:33, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
keep the intent seems clear to release to CC. without out an objection from photographer, or claim of copyright. EXIF data is not definitive, if concerning. photos not at his website [1] Slowking4♡Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 16:31, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept per Jameslwoodward, Slowking4, and also the prior deletion nomination close "This user was banned by WMF from all activity at Wikimedia projects. This includes filing DRs." Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:47, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Photographs by Sam Hurd

[edit]

All files in this category were taken by Sam Hurd. EXIF data reads: Author: Sam Hurd. He is a Washington DC based photographer www.samhurdphotography.com. As seen in Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Photographs by David Plas (for files in Category:Files from Security & Defence Agenda Flickr stream) it is not uncommon to see organisations have an external photographer work events for them and allow that organisation to use those photos for PR needs whilst still holding copyright. In this instance, COM:PRP needs to be applied to these photos, or perhaps work on COM:OTRS being obtained. Unfortunately, many other photos in Category:Photographs by The Financial Times are the same and will be gone through.

After this DR, please delete the category as well if OTRS isn't obtained. Thanks Scott (Russavia)

TempIDforDRs (talk) 05:41, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: This user was banned by WMF from all activity at Wikimedia projects. This includes filing DRs. Jcb (talk) 18:34, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Photographs by Rosie Hallam

[edit]

All files in this category were taken by Rosie Hallam. EXIF data reads: © Rosie Hallam. It appears she is an independent photographer www.rosiehallam.com/about/. As seen in Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Photographs by David Plas (for files in Category:Files from Security & Defence Agenda Flickr stream) it is not uncommon to see organisations have an external photographer work events for them and allow that organisation to use those photos for PR needs whilst still holding copyright. In this instance, COM:PRP needs to be applied to these photos, or perhaps work on COM:OTRS being obtained. Unfortunately, many other photos in Category:Photographs by The Financial Times are the same and will be gone through.

After this DR, please delete the category as well if OTRS isn't obtained. Thanks Scott (Russavia)

TempIDforDRs (talk) 05:52, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: This user was banned by WMF from all activity at Wikimedia projects. This includes filing DRs. Jcb (talk) 18:35, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Photographs by Rosie Hallam

[edit]

Per COM:DW

Pleclown (talk) 21:49, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just considering the auctioneer for a moment, there have been two rationales put forward for deletion:
  • Lack of licence, as it's not the photographer's copyright. A good point according to European practice on 'work for hire', except that it's irrelevant. It is licensed at the Flickr account by the Financial Times (CC-by) who we do assume to be the rights holder.
  • "Derivative work", when this is credibly de minimis.
As such, I see no reason to delete.
I would also note that Yann has pre-empted discussion of this DR and has already gone along with Russavia's viewpoint, in that he has unilaterally decided to crop the artwork off. Is this compatible with ToU in that he's furthering the aims of a banned user, in the absence of any DR decision regarding this. Is that now (per WMF's new absolute ruling on anyone aiding Russavia, which exceeds issues of copyright observance) a blocking offence? Andy Dingley (talk) 22:33, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Russavia doesn't mention any derivative work issues. But there are certainly such issues in the 4 files mentioned above. I think 2 of them are now OK. The other 2 have to be deleted. For the rest, these files are still on Flickr under a free license, so I doubt the the photographer didn't allow releasing them under a free license. Why not contacting the photographer if you have some doubt? Regards, Yann (talk) 08:19, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted 2 images that prominently displayed copyrighted artwork, kept 2 cropped images (but deleted uncropped versions from its history). --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:21, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Northeast_airlines_uk_logo.svg

[edit]

I think that the circle with the yellow lines show some artistic qualities and that the logo meets the British threshold of originality. Cf. COM:Deletion requests/Two British logos. Stefan4 (talk) 23:35, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

See also COM:TOO#UK. --Stefan4 (talk) 18:59, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. MBisanz talk 17:14, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Northeast airlines uk logo.svg

[edit]

Hi, this is Scott (Russavia). This file has previously been put up for deletion for going against COM:TOO#United Kingdom but was kept. Although in countries such as the US, this would be TOO, in the UK that line is more blurred. I am requesting that this file be deleted only upon it being not meeting UK TOO and COM:PRP. In the event we get some admin who decides to keep it, I would request that they delete this file and re-upload it themselves as I do not wish to be legally responsible for it being on Commons. 121.221.212.184 17:01, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No more complicated than other logos in Category:Logos of companies of the United Kingdom as far as I can tell. -- とある白い猫 ちぃ？ 22:35, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Photographs by Marcel Giger

[edit]

All files in this category were taken by Marcel Giger. EXIF data reads: Copyright holder: marcel giger / snow-world.ch promenade 14 CH - 7270 Davos Platz. As seen in Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Photographs by David Plas (for files in Category:Files from Security & Defence Agenda Flickr stream) it is not uncommon to see organisations have an external photographer work events for them and allow that organisation to use those photos for PR needs whilst still holding copyright. In this instance, COM:PRP needs to be applied to these photos, or perhaps work on COM:OTRS being obtained. Unfortunately, many other photos in Category:Photographs by The Financial Times are the same and will be gone through.

After this DR, please delete the category as well if OTRS isn't obtained. Thanks Scott (Russavia)

TempIDforDRs (talk) 04:34, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: This user was banned by WMF from all activity at Wikimedia projects. This includes filing DRs. Jcb (talk) 18:29, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Photographs by Grace Villamil

[edit]

All files in this category were taken by Grace Villamil. EXIF data reads: © Grace Villamil, or in the description: Credit: Grace Villamil. Grace is a photographer based in NYC. Website: www.gracevillamil.com/news/. As seen in Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Photographs by David Plas (for files in Category:Files from Security & Defence Agenda Flickr stream) it is not uncommon to see organisations have an external photographer work events for them and allow that organisation to use those photos for PR needs whilst still holding copyright. In this instance, COM:PRP needs to be applied to these photos, or perhaps work on COM:OTRS being obtained. Unfortunately, many other photos in Category:Photographs by The Financial Times are the same and will be gone through.

After this DR, please delete the category as well if OTRS isn't obtained. Thanks Scott (Russavia)

TempIDforDRs (talk) 04:44, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Keep In this case "Grace Villamil" act as a photo agent, but not as an owner, since the character of the event depicted in the photograph. --Puramyun31 (talk) 07:47, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Puramyun31, professional photographers doing work for organisations is common, and they more often than not keep the copyright. You might like to contact Kate and ask if she is willing to CC-BY 2.0 licence the photos in this DR. With all credit/attribution going specifically to her. That's the only way to do this unfortunately. I've seen dozens upon dozens of such instances, sometimes the photographer agrees, sometimes they don't. I didn't realise that The Financial Times was a little sloppy with their Flickr until long after I uploaded them. :( 106.68.51.159 12:40, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: This user was banned by WMF from all activity at Wikimedia projects. This includes filing DRs. Jcb (talk) 18:16, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Russavia was not the only user, who uploaded a lot of photos and then nominated some of them for deletion. In my opinion, request for creating this request was important and I decided to delete the files due to that reason. But not all files in the request were Russavia's self-uploaded. I tried to keep those, uploaded by others. Almost all deleted files were unused (I am not sure, maybe even all). Taivo (talk) 18:16, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Photographs by Simon Hanna

[edit]

All of these photos, uploaded to the Financial Times Flickr stream by myself (Scott/Russavia), have "(C) simon hanna 2012" in the EXIF data. Due to uncertain licencing status, all files in this category (and nominated here) need to be deleted.

Pricymocks (talk) 13:15, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment After having gone through all of the Financial Times photos, there are numerous others that I have placed in this category by Simon Hanna, with the same EXIF notes. If deleting files in this DR, please check the category for the stragglers. TempIDforDRs (talk) 05:54, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: This user was banned by WMF from all activity at Wikimedia projects. This includes filing DRs. Jcb (talk) 18:41, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted I decided nevertheless to delete them all. They were all unused, undescribed and uncategorized. Educational value (a lot of people on some party and on a conference) was not obvious. Some people could be famous, but due to missing description it was impossible to improve the situation. Taivo (talk) 17:37, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Photographs by Simon Hanna

[edit]

The images have "(C) www.image-revolver.com/ Simon Hanna 2013" in the EXIF data, therefore the Financial Times CANNOT make these available under a CC licence.

Хмеймим (talk) 16:35, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Are you seriously suggesting that the Financial Times, a prominent business publication, is going to lay itself open to copyright infringement charges by republishing some photographer's works on Flickr without permission? It's far more likely that they bought the rights to the images and/or that these are works for hire. Don't come back unless you can provide evidence that the photographer has filed and won a copyright infringement lawsuit against the Financial Times for these images. Nyttend (talk) 14:34, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    •  Comment Yes Nyttend, I am. There is a difference between reposting a photo, and reposting a photo under a creative commons licence. As someone who has dealt for some years relicencing and such things, this is quite the common occurrence. Refer to Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Photographs by Conor Ashleigh and Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Files uploaded by Russavia (Conor) for an example, which was reinforce here. Unless there is something from the photographers themselves, the files need to be deleted, not only to protect myself, but also re-users. 101.186.54.25 09:15, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
      • No. Without solid evidence that the Financial Times has infringed the photographer's copyright by publishing these in an unauthorised manner, there's no reason to believe that these are infringements or a risk to reusers, and I'm not particularly interested in seeing useful content removed for your protection, anyway. Nyttend (talk) 15:25, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
        • Nyttend I have dealt with copyright holders over a number of years, and have an eagle eye for such things. It is standard procedure on this project that if imagery is made available by someone other than the copyright owner, permission needs to be sought. This is especially true when it appears that one party is claiming (C) ARR over images they have taken. As such, I have sent the photographer this email asking for permission to keep them on Commons under CC-BY. Also Nyttend, you comment "I'm not particularly interested in seeing useful content removed for your protection" is quite an petty and nasty thing to say; if you are willing to keep images on the project in order to screw over the copyright holder and punish an editor, then you seriously need to consider what the hell you are doing here. 106.68.30.18 12:20, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted
Nyttend, we have worked together here and on WP:EN for a long time. I respect your opinion but I am very surprised at your naivete here. This kind of thing happens all the time and we are required under the Precautionary Principle to assume the worst when there is a significant doubt over the status of an image. In this case, I think there are three possibilities:

  1. That the Financial Times simply posted these as Fair Use images of perhaps important people at a perhaps important event.
  2. Most likely, that the Financial Times has a license to use the images in its print works and in its web activities. Their Flickr maintainer thought he or she was posting correctly under that license, ignoring the fact that the Flickr feed is CC-BY and the license did not permit that.
  3. Much less likely -- that the Financial Times purchased all rights to the images and, therefore, has the right to license them CC-BY.

Note, by the way, that the images are no longer on Flickr. That, of course, does not change their status if they were validly CC-BY, but it is an additional indication that the license was not correct. Also note that the Financial Times, a highly respected institution, is not listed at http://www.simonhanna.com/Clients-+-Awards/1/caption while a number of much less well known companies are. That proves nothing, but strongly suggests that (1) is correct. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:01, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Louvre Museum Inverted pyramid 01.JPG

[edit]

Copyright protected creation (the architect Pei is still alive) Remi Mathis (talk) 14:22, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: a bit over the top to see an issue here Denniss (talk) 17:26, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Louvre Museum Inverted pyramid 01.JPG

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Elvey as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: See https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Louvre_Museum_Inverted_pyramid_01.JPG&oldid=172552486 Elvey (talk) 18:59, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously? Uh, no, Tm. I see something very different. I see two pyramids. One is stone, one is glass and the same apparent size as the other one and mentioned in the name of the file - "Inverted pyramid". It's the one causing the FoP issue. Have you ever been to the Louvre? The pyramids are part of the building, Perhaps you not realize that; having never been? --Elvey (talk) 16:48, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Proposed close: Deleted
COM:FOP / France. the architect (w:I M Pei) is still alive. --Elvey (talk) 00:36, 17 December 2015 (UTC) ~~~~[reply]
This proposed close has been cancelled. Please continue discussion below.
 Comment Two piramids, one made of stone, another made of glass. Pyramids exist as\in buildings for almost 5 thousand years, so in shape they have no original or novelty value and the materials also are used for thousands of years. As this image only shows the very tip of this similar pyramids in its most basic element, nothing depicted in this image can be copyrighted and this DR is pure copyright paranoia. Tm (talk) 05:35, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: nothing copyrightable here. --Denniss (talk) 10:37, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:We.r.play.png

[edit]

Non-free logo from http://www.werplay.com/. Description is just "hello world", so this may have been an test upload. Ahecht (talk) 13:49, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, surpasses threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 15:51, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Su25-kompo-vers2.svg.png

[edit]

Unlikely to be the work of the uploader, who has uploaded several images that are clear copyright violations. Description is gibberish. Ahecht (talk) 13:57, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 15:47, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bebnebb.PNG

[edit]

Screenshot of DramasOnline.com, a copyrighted website. Description is gibberish. Ahecht (talk) 13:58, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, superseded by file:Verhveb.PNG. Taivo (talk) 15:43, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Saint-Just-Chaleyssin - Chapelle Saint-Just 08.JPG

[edit]

recent artwork JeanBono (talk) 14:18, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per COM:FOP#France, uploader request Thibaut120094 (talk) 14:34, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Joe Schmidt coaching Irish team.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Michael Barera as no permission. Anyway I suspect that the uploader (stevenbfg) might be the author (Stephen McCarthy) itself so we'd better listen to him before deleting the file. SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 13:40, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I am Steven McCarthy. I would really appreciate if you did not delete the photo. Thanks. Stevenbfg (talk) 14:39, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
If you're Steven McCarty there's no reason for deleting indeed, I opened this RfD just in order to investigate the file and prevent it from being suddenly deleted because it was tagged with no permission more than a week ago and for this reason at risk of being nuked anytime soon. -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 20:47, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: The author has clarified his position, it's him who uploaded his own photograph. SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 08:02, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Lockwoodnzflag-1-.gif

[edit]

Flag is by Kyle Lockwood used without permission. http://www.silverfernflag.org/ © Copyright 2000-2015. All rights reserved. We must be acknowledged when designs are published in the media and posted online. Designs by KS Lockwood, Authorised by C B Mullane 1/67 Lake Road, Belmont, Auckland 0622 Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:54, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, the original uploader to en wiki may have been Kyle Lockwood himself. See en:User:Nzflag.info. --Denniss (talk) 19:00, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@User:Denniss:Excellent catch, it was deeply buried in the talk page on the discussion of why to delete it on en:wiki.
 I withdraw my nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:04, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Denniss (talk) 08:52, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kyle Lockwood's New Zealand Flag.svg

[edit]

Flag is by Kyle Lockwood used without permission. http://www.silverfernflag.org/ © Copyright 2000-2015. All rights reserved. We must be acknowledged when designs are published in the media and posted online. Designs by KS Lockwood, Authorised by C B Mullane 1/67 Lake Road, Belmont, Auckland 0622 Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:55, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Ok, for the purposes of uniformity I will address everything on this one discussion page and link the other three DRs here.
Firstly, Ellin Beltz is confusing a website general copyright notice with the copyright status of the flags. I've pointed this out in several DRs before. Almost every website out there will have such a notice, it applies to the design of the website, it's code, other elements and some related images. It doesn't however automatically apply to all images which may have their own copyrights. For example, Best Western Hotels has such a notice on their website, but we know the Best Western logo was ruled PD. This also applies to the logos for BestBuy and Geek Squad, the BestBuy website also has this copyright notice but those logos are PD. Logos, flags, images that that not inherently designed as part of the website get their own copyrights separate from that website.
Secondly, "We must be acknowledged when designs are published in the media and posted online" is the only requirement in that list referring directly to the designs, and I would argue attribution meets that request.
Thirdly, it is the intent and desire of Kyle to get his design to become the new national flag of New Zealand. It is most likely that Kyle released all copyright to the flag itself as part of his push for attention. Even if that were not true, as pointed out by ColonialGrid, Kyle no longer would be able to claim rights to his design. Pursuant to the terms of the competition, all rights to this flag now belong to the Crown of New Zealand under CC. Fry1989 eh? 23:17, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment It is most likely that Kyle released all copyright to the flag itself as part of his push for attention. fails COM:PRP. These images refer to each other in a big circle, there's no indication on Kyle's website that these were freely licensed. I don't see anywhere on these templates that links to a clear statement that flags entered in the contest changed license. I do see a website with Kyle's name on it, clearly labeled (c). I think if he felt these were free, he'd mention it. I don't think we can assume. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:56, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The first part of my third point is purely presumption based on what I would do in the same situation, but I am acquaintance with Kyle Lockwood and could therefore ask if it perks your fancy. However, it no longer matters. The competition terms state that
  • If your Flag Design is chosen as a Shortlisted Design, then you: hereby assign to the Crown at no cost all of your rights, title and interest in and to your Flag Design, including all copyright and other intellectual property rights in all works that feature in the Flag Design, and in the Flag Design as a whole, as may exist anywhere in the world
As well as signing documents in agreement. It very clearly belongs to the Crown now. Fry1989 eh? 02:05, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Their own website : http://www.silverfernflag.org/proposal.html says

"All variants of our silver fern flag were submitted to the Flag Consideration Project. along with our original, some 600 variations were also submitted by the public. submissions closed on 16 July 2015. Five variant colour-ways of our silver fern flag were shortlisted on 10 Aug 2015." So those 5 ARE on the shortlist, just not all made it through to the final 4 to be voted on in referendum.

Kept: See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Lockwoodnzflag-1-.gif Denniss (talk) 09:00, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kyle Lockwood's New Zealand Flag (alt 3).svg

[edit]

Flag is by Kyle Lockwood used without permission. http://www.silverfernflag.org/ © Copyright 2000-2015. All rights reserved. We must be acknowledged when designs are published in the media and posted online. Designs by KS Lockwood, Authorised by C B Mullane 1/67 Lake Road, Belmont, Auckland 0622 Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:55, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Centralised discussion. Fry1989 eh? 23:20, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete This file did not meet the shortlist and is therefore not IP of the NZ Crown. Unless proof of free licence can be shown, this file should be deleted as it clearly surpass Australia's very low COM:TOO (the creator is from Australia). ColonialGrid (talk) 05:25, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Lockwoodnzflag-1-.gif Denniss (talk) 08:54, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:NZ flag design Silver Fern (Black & White) by Kyle Lockwood.jpg

[edit]

Flag is by Kyle Lockwood used without permission. http://www.silverfernflag.org/ © Copyright 2000-2015. All rights reserved. We must be acknowledged when designs are published in the media and posted online." No indication Mr. Lockwood agreed to having his designs published here. See also http://www.silverfernflag.org/press/august-08th-2015 where they offer licenses for this fern. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:56, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - the flag design was submitted by silverfernflag.org to the New Zealand Flag Consideration Panel. (see [2]) The terms and conditions state that by submitting a design, that they grant the Crown an irrevocable, royalty-free, worldwide, perpetual, sub-licensable licence to use, copy, modify, adapt and/or publish your Flag Design for any purposes the Crown sees fit in relation to the selection of a new flag for New Zealand. (see [3]) The Crown subsequently sub-licenced the design under CC-BY 3.0 NZ. Lcmortensen (talk) 20:18, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Lockwoodnzflag-1-.gif Denniss (talk) 08:58, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:NZ flag design Silver Fern (Black & White) by Kyle Lockwood.jpg

[edit]

Replaced by SVG version +mt 08:20, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Unused version with svg alternative. Alan (talk) 17:58, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Flag map of New Zealand (Kyle Lockwood Proposal).png

[edit]

Image cannot be "own work" of uploader and also designed by Kyle Lockwood. http://www.silverfernflag.org/ © Copyright 2000-2015. All rights reserved. We must be acknowledged when designs are published in the media and posted online." No indication Mr. Lockwood agreed to having his designs published here. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:58, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Lockwoodnzflag-1-.gif Denniss (talk) 08:57, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kyle Lockwood's New Zealand Flag (alt 1).svg

[edit]

Flag is by Kyle Lockwood used without permission. http://www.silverfernflag.org/ © Copyright 2000-2015. All rights reserved. We must be acknowledged when designs are published in the media and posted online. Designs by KS Lockwood, Authorised by C B Mullane 1/67 Lake Road, Belmont, Auckland 0622 Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:58, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Centralised discussion. Fry1989 eh? 23:20, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Lockwoodnzflag-1-.gif Denniss (talk) 08:57, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kyle Lockwood's New Zealand Flag (alt 2).svg

[edit]

Flag is by Kyle Lockwood used without permission. http://www.silverfernflag.org/ © Copyright 2000-2015. All rights reserved. We must be acknowledged when designs are published in the media and posted online. Designs by KS Lockwood, Authorised by C B Mullane 1/67 Lake Road, Belmont, Auckland 0622 Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:58, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Centralised discussion. Fry1989 eh? 23:20, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete This file did not meet the shortlist and is therefore not IP of the NZ Crown. Unless proof of free licence can be shown, this file should be deleted as it clearly surpass Australia's very low COM:TOO (the creator is from Australia). ColonialGrid (talk) 05:25, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Lockwoodnzflag-1-.gif Denniss (talk) 08:54, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Flag of New Zealand Christophe Lennard.svg

[edit]

DW of Flag by Kyle Lockwood. http://www.silverfernflag.org/ © Copyright 2000-2015. All rights reserved. We must be acknowledged when designs are published in the media and posted online. Designs by KS Lockwood, Authorised by C B Mullane 1/67 Lake Road, Belmont, Auckland 0622 Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:01, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Lockwoodnzflag-1-.gif Denniss (talk) 08:59, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Lockwood New Zealand LGBT Flag.svg

[edit]

DW of Flag by Kyle Lockwood. http://www.silverfernflag.org/ © Copyright 2000-2015. All rights reserved. We must be acknowledged when designs are published in the media and posted online. Designs by KS Lockwood, Authorised by C B Mullane 1/67 Lake Road, Belmont, Auckland 0622 Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:01, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Lockwoodnzflag-1-.gif Denniss (talk) 08:59, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:All Language Alliance- Legal Translation Company.jpg

[edit]

This image was uploaded by a user now blocked on en.wp as part of a giant cleanup of paid editing socks. The article it was used to illustrate has been deleted as spam.

It is possibly a copyright violation—there is no clear notice that the logo is CC—and it is most probably out of scope as it seems very unlikely that any other Wikimedia project will be keen on using it for anything. —Tom Morris (talk) 10:04, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Denniss (talk) 09:22, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:LOGO IRIDIZE.png

[edit]

Uploaded by a user now blocked as a paid editing sock on English Wikipedia. Copyright status highly dubious. Probably out of scope too as it seems very unlikely any Wikimedia project will create another article on this company. —Tom Morris (talk) 10:25, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Denniss (talk) 09:23, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Artem gassan portrait.jpg

[edit]

The user who claims to be the author ("own work") of this is a blocked sock on English Wikipedia, part of a giant paid editing sock army. This seems highly unlikely to be his or her own work. No clear copyright trace, therefore we can't really be claiming it to be CC licensed. —Tom Morris (talk) 10:28, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Denniss (talk) 09:23, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sanmar-logo.png

[edit]

Article on this topic on English Wikipedia has been deleted as the creation of a now blocked sock. It seems highly unlikely another article on this topic will be created: this logo lacks educational value and is out of scope. —Tom Morris (talk) 10:30, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Denniss (talk) 09:22, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Green Arrowsvgvygfvhjvmhgf.png

[edit]

Unused green left facing arrow, no description, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:05, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, I described and categorized the file. Although unused, I consider it in scope due to similarity to file:Green Arrow Down.svg, file:Green Arrow Right.svg and file:Green Arrow Up.svg. I will also rename the file. Taivo (talk) 09:31, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Scott rea.JPG

[edit]

Seems to be a commercial logo with no good explanation of what it is and why it's CC-by-SA. Slashme (talk) 21:25, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Denniss (talk) 12:18, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Charmaineolivia-2015.jpg

[edit]

No indication that the uploader is the copyright holder; please see Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Orangemoody Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 14:41, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Denniss (talk) 14:07, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Koffice1.6-logo.jpg

[edit]

Blatant product advertisement, not a "logo" - out of scope GermanJoe (talk) 18:30, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep: File uploaded in 2006 and in use, and therefore in scope. KOffice is GPL/LGPL dual licensed (but not longer in developement and superseded by its fork Calligra, and therefore, advertsing is a very weak reason for deletion), and this spalsh screen is found in some KDE-related articles in Linux distros websites. --Amitie 10g (talk) 22:13, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Close (as nom) I don't agree with product information being hosted on Commons, but COM:INUSE clearly disagrees with me. This can be closed as keep - sorry for the hassle. GermanJoe (talk) 12:45, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Withdraw, Free software splash. --Amitie 10g (talk) 21:59, 2 September 2015 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Adept 3.0 - Kubuntu 8.10 KDE 4 (Diciembre, 2008).png

[edit]

No indication that this is free software on this screenshot. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:18, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

These stuff are part of KDE. The Crystal Clear and KDE icons are GPL... --Amitie 10g (talk) 21:57, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: License OK. Yann (talk) 08:57, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Adept 3.0 - Kubuntu 8.10 KDE 4 (Diciembre, 2008).jpeg

[edit]

No indication that this is free software on this screenshot. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:19, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: License OK. Yann (talk) 08:58, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kde4-gwenview.png

[edit]

Derivative works of all the images on this screenshot, not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:19, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: License OK. Yann (talk) 09:00, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kde4-krunner.png

[edit]

No indication of license at source, the source goes directly to an image file with no indication of license. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:20, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Crystal clear icons (used in KDE) are just de minimis, and even, are {{GPL}}. --Amitie 10g (talk) 22:02, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: License OK. Yann (talk) 09:03, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:KDE4-stars.png

[edit]

No indication of free software and/or user's own work in this image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:21, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is another case of Copyright Paranoia and lack of researching in DRs. All the icons in the screenshots are Free Software (namely, the Crystal Clear and KDE icons licensed under the GPL), or at least de minimis. --Amitie 10g (talk) 21:52, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: License OK. Yann (talk) 09:05, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kde4-marble desktop globe.png

[edit]

No indication of free software or open source imagery in this screenshot claimed as own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:21, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly you as Administrator aren't familiar with the Free software screenshots, this issue has been discused several times and there is a broad concensus about Free software screensots. About the authors, the File ussage contains the article about this software, and the article contains the main website of the developers (in most of cases the copyright holders as individual rater than a collective name or company, that may be a extensive list), where is the list of contributors. Therefore, {{GPL}} with {{Free screenshot}} is enough for well known Free software (like KDE), and a link to Wikipedia is dessirable. --Amitie 10g (talk) 06:25, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: License OK. Yann (talk) 09:06, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Fedora Core 5.png

[edit]

Derivative works in this screenshot. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:26, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: License OK. Yann (talk) 09:07, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mazuz yaron-s.jpg

[edit]

Not a free file - It was taken from the Israeli Parliament web site, as the uploader specifically mentioned in the "Source" field. It has not place in the Commons. Ldorfman (talk) 13:44, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 23:52, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Olqga kurkulina.jpg

[edit]

 Delete there is no evidence the US govt licence is true: this is most likely a copyvio copied from the internet Ww2censor (talk) 21:49, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 23:03, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Wappen der Herren von Neyffen.pdf

[edit]

Mir wurde nahegelegt, die Bilder im Format jpg anstelle pdf hochzuladen. Kljo (talk) 06:44, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: uploaded as own work, which is obviously not the case. JuTa 20:15, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Tarlac State University Wordmark PNG.png

[edit]
The uploader responded in talk page of this request: "This has a permission to be uploaded on Wikipedia since it was on the university's website and is free to use. The owner entirely edited the photo similar to the original one." Can you prove, that it is free to use? Taivo (talk) 16:37, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Content deleted earlier, reuploads deleted as well. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:39, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Notoscyphus balticus Combined 36 sections B.jpg

[edit]

No response from Alexander Schmidt for OTRS permission emails Kevmin § 02:30, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No permission Captain-tucker (talk) 00:43, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Notoscyphus balticus Combined 30 sections B.jpg

[edit]

No response from Alexander Schmidt for OTRS permission emails Kevmin § 02:30, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No permission Captain-tucker (talk) 00:43, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Notoscyphus balticus Combined 49 sections B.jpg

[edit]

No response from Alexander Schmidt for OTRS permission emails Kevmin § 02:30, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No permission Captain-tucker (talk) 00:43, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Notoscyphus balticus Combined 54 sections B.jpg

[edit]

No response from Alexander Schmidt for OTRS permission emails Kevmin § 02:31, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No permission Captain-tucker (talk) 00:44, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Notoscyphus balticus Combined 60 sections B.jpg

[edit]

No response from Alexander Schmidt for OTRS permission emails Kevmin § 02:31, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No permission Captain-tucker (talk) 00:44, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Rhizomnium dentatum Combined 110 sections B.jpg

[edit]

No response from Alexander Schmidt for OTRS permission emails Kevmin § 02:31, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No permission Captain-tucker (talk) 00:44, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Rhizomnium dentatum Combined 74 sections B.jpg

[edit]

No response from Alexander Schmidt for OTRS permission emails Kevmin § 02:31, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No permission Captain-tucker (talk) 00:44, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Rhizomnium dentatum Combined 92 sections B.jpg

[edit]

No response from Alexander Schmidt for OTRS permission emails Kevmin § 02:31, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No permission Captain-tucker (talk) 00:44, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:EKB55.jpg

[edit]

No sources for individual images given. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:06, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 17:29, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Meluha66 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All images of coins uploaded by this user are taken from other websites. From the very beginning in December 2012 (File:Jahangir 01.jpg ) untill today (File:Kozi 02.jpg).

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Huvishka.jpg and the files nominated for {{Copyvio}} already show a clear pattern: Stealing from other websites, upscaling, uploading to Commons with false own work claim. The claim at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Huvishka.jpg that the uploader bought the coin is irrelevant for the copyrights on the photos. You have to make your own photos.

I excluded reproductions of banknotes. If the banknote is public domain by law or by age Commons:When to use the PD-Art tag applies.

Full list of files
* File:Kozi 02.jpg

Martin H. (talk) 14:41, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Mr. Martin, I absolutely resent and disagree with your assertion that I am "stealing" images of coins from other websites and claiming these as my own. As mentioned before, I only claim rights to those images of which I am the owner. If you have any doubt, please go ahead and check with those websites who owns the coins in question. I do not wish to re-invent the wheel by clicking my own photos of the same subject when clearly my purchase of the coin includes the image right to that coin too. This is common law, you may disagree but this is how I see it. Lastly, please desist from tarnishing others reputation on a common forum when the intent is to share knowledge to the wider public domain which I believe is the ultimate Wiki objective. It is people like you who don a holier than thou attitude, become judge jury and executioner and make people think whether it is worth the time and effort to contribute to Wiki. Rather than encourage and support, the exercise becomes one of condemnation and discouragement. I have uploaded coin images to my own website (www.meluhacoins.com) as well as shared these at coin forums where like minded collectors do the same ie post images of their acquisition. I do not think Mr Martin you are either a collector or an educator as you seem to jump to hasty conclusions and insinuate lack of trust and ethos in a fellow Wiki-ian. Lastly,I strongly suggest you desist from using words like stealing before having clarified first with the uploader the source of the uploads and if contrary to Wiki guidelines, providing necessary support. Thank you. Meluha66 (talk) 01:29, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A case in point being File: Gandhar_05 that you have listed as 'copied' from other websites. I challenge you to prove it because this is my own personal photograph of the coins from my own camera. This proves your malicious intent where, with one sweep of brush, you try to malign and taint me. Re: the coin images that you allege I have 'stolen' from other websites, please let me know the relevant files for which the Wiki panel of adjudicators would like to see release permission and the email where I can forward it. It may be that I'm unaware of the proper license category to select for such images but Mr. Martin please exercise refrain from calling people a 'thief'as otherwise you leave yourself open for libel and false accusations tarnishing the reputation of a collector whose only intent is sharing knowledge in the public domainMeluha66 (talk) 02:52, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"I do not wish to re-invent the wheel by clicking my own photos of the same subject when clearly my purchase of the coin includes the image right to that coin too." Your purchase of the coin does not mean, that you purchase the photographers intelectual proerty rights. You can not upload other peoples work here - photos - and declare yourself the author. Make your own photos thats the only way. I see your intention to share knowledge, but other peoples work is NOT in the public domain! You can not distribute other peoples work for commercial reuse and claim credit for yourself. --Martin H. (talk) 22:07, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

But I did make my own photo - please see File Gandhar_05, Demetrious_01, Eukratides I_01, etc that you have also marked for deletion??? Also, could you please let me know if there is an alternate Wiki license that I can use to release the photos of my purchased coins or attribute my purchased coin to the source website from where the coin was listed? I have no problem in making it known on public domain the source of my purchase. If there is no alternate Wiki license and no other way but to make your own photo of the purchased coin, then please do let me know so that I am clear on this account for future uploads, if any. Please note that I have documented evidence available for each and every purchased coin (invoice, payment, email correspondence, courier/regd letter reference etc) and as a matter of personal ethics, have never uploaded an image unless the coin has been physically delivered to me and in my hands first, and this also is verifiable from the date of purchase, shipping, delivery and upload to Wiki.Meluha66 (talk) 07:40, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Further to above, I am listing below few examples of files that is my own work but that has been lumped together by Martin for deletion. As I mention above, I challenge anyone to prove this is not my work because I have photographed these coins myself with my own camera (Sony Model No DSC T-100). The files in question are:

1)PMC Shakya 02.jpg

2)Shakya 01.jpg

3)Gandhar 05.jpg

4)Kosala 01.jpg

5)PMC Kosa 02.jpg

6)Takku 01.jpg

7)Taxila 05.jpg

8)Takku 02.jpg

9)Takku 03.jpg

10)Demetrious 02.jpg

11)Eukratides I 01.jpg

12)Koziya 01.jpg

13)Ardu 01.jpg

14)Ghazni 01.jpg

15)Nusru 01.jpg

16)Cooch Behar 01.jpg

17)Assam 02.jpg

I think, in view of above, any reasonable Wiki administrator, adjudicator or visitor would agree that I have been unfairly targeted. I again repeat that (a) I have uploaded images of only those coins that I own (b) I can provide any documented evidence to whomsoever it may concern to prove I own these coins (c) where required, I can provide release rights of the images from the source where I purchased my coins (d) If I should use a different license for purchased coins where I have not made my own photograph, then please let me know the relevant license category to use, and I am happy to do so (e) I have my own website (www.meluhacoins.com) where I have uploaded same images and any search engine would show the same (f) it must be remembered that many coins look similar as they were produced at the same mint using the same technique and die, just beacuse my coin happens to look same/similar to other coins of the same nature and type does not mean I am pilfering someones else image. Just type 'Athens Owl Coin' in Google Images and you will see what I mean where there are thousands of similar looking coins as the 'Owls' were produced in millions. Meluha66 (talk) 06:25, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Realy, when joining a project the first thing to do is reading the first steps. Here: License selection, what to upload and what not. You can’t upload other peoples copyrighted work unless you got written permission for a free license. The copyright holder must agree to an irrevocable license that allows anyone to reuse the copyrighted work anywhere, anytime for any purpose including commercial purposes. And no, there is no alternative licensing here on Commons, a free license is required. See Commons:Project scope section 3.
So now that you did break this basic rule many times already, you have to correct the sources for the photos that are not your own work. You have to remove your name when you not created the photo and replace it with the true author’s name. And you have to provide written permission to the license from the copyright holders.
And please, I’m not stupid. The files I identified have something special to clearly identify them, that’s EXIF data, scratches, distance between imprinting and edge of the coin, and other characteristics. The reaction is precautionary; and correct: we have a fundamental misunderstanding of copyrights on your side, and apparently ignorance in carelessly using the button "it’s my own work" in the upload wizard. It is YOU who lumped together self-created photos and photos uploaded with untrue information, i.e. "own work". Isn’t there a picture tutorial at the beginning of the Upload Wizard telling anyone that uploading works created by others isn’t allowed, except written permission has been obtained?
Your purchasing of the coins or your physical ownership is entirely irrelevant. It doesnt give you any rights on the photographic work, you neither can claim the photos your own work, you can’t publish them under a free license and allow commercial reuse. You can make photos in a museum or from someone else collection, it doesn’t matter. The only important fact is the origin of the photographic work, the copyright holder and the copyright holders (written) agreement to a free content license. --Martin H. (talk) 01:48, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Copyvios per nom. INeverCry (talk) 01:57, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Meluha66 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

A group of photographs of coins and currency, all labeled own work which cannot be as the objects depicted were not created by the uploader. These require proper licensing for retention.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:13, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:31, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:WPCúcuta-FrontPage.png

[edit]

No source for basemap on this unused image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:16, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 17:28, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:WPCúcuta-Bienvenida.png

[edit]

No source for basemap, sourced to an image which itself has no source. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:17, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 17:28, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sarunas Gustainis Vasingtone.jpg

[edit]

Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9  ✉ 19:09, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 17:27, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Satisnet Tecnologies.jpg

[edit]

Unused promotional logo, out of scope. P 1 9 9  ✉ 19:36, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 17:27, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jakeroot (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not in scope, per COM:EDUSE.

SounderBruce 23:02, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 17:27, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Eifca2.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 23:42, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 17:27, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Nakul.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 23:42, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 17:27, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Nakul.jpg

[edit]

out of scope Trade (talk) 14:49, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted by Mdaniels5757. --Rosenzweig τ 08:15, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bactranvanminh1.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 23:43, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 17:27, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bảo Vệ Mạnh Dũng.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 23:43, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 17:27, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ABSC Seal.png

[edit]

Missing permission. Fry1989 eh? 23:49, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 17:26, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gniezno, Poland, Large Bronze Cast Medal 1985..jpg

[edit]

Design of medal is copyrighted. There is no note about permission - Pqrs (talk) 16:19, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: likely copyrighted Ymblanter (talk) 18:45, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Schreibervermerk.pdf

[edit]

Mir wurde nahegelegt, die Bilder im Format jpg anstelle pdf hochzuladen. Kljo (talk) 06:48, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: uploader's request Ymblanter (talk) 19:08, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mr. shao at his show in Japan Sebu art Museum.jpg

[edit]

includes modern art which copyright are unknown Motopark (talk) 07:35, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: deleted by Hedwig in Washington Ymblanter (talk) 19:10, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Queen's Winter.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Mindmatrix as Speedy (db) and the most recent rationale was: appears to be a copyrighted image, per watermark Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:39, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Asking original uploader on enwiki. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:39, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it appears that my understanding of copyright as an 18-year-old was flawed! Delete. 6mat1 (talk) 14:54, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion Ymblanter (talk) 19:11, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:TSULOGO.png

[edit]

Only textlogos are allowed into Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 08:07, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: likely copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 19:13, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:WXYZカンパニーのマーク.jpg

[edit]

このファイルの必要性がないから Y.WXYZ.S. (talk) 08:53, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 19:14, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Y.WXYZ.S.のマーク.jpg

[edit]

このファイルがある必要性がないから Y.WXYZ.S. (talk) 08:53, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 19:14, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Nude man on balcony.jpg

[edit]

Doubtful licence as Flickr-page referred to does not exist. Might be unfree. The Banner (talk) 09:31, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: license can not be confirmed Ymblanter (talk) 19:15, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Nude man on balcony.jpg

[edit]

License incorrect 207.237.14.197 20:19, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Previously deleted item. --176.239.84.148 15:09, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:18, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Эмблема "Совинтеравтосервис".gif

[edit]

Logo can't be own or free. Spamer's upload. Bilderling (talk) 09:39, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: likely copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 19:17, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Pakistan.gif

[edit]

Animated gif of a flag waving is highly unlikely to be own work and more likely to be copied from some unnamed website. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:06, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete: Image is taken from http://www.3dflagsplus.com/2010/10/animated-waving-flags-with-shadow-of_2618.html. Licensing requirement that "Text giving credit to 3dflagsplus.com must be easily readable and appear on every page or screen where a flag animation is used" is not compatible with Wikimedia Commons' license requirements. --Ahecht (talk) 14:50, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: not own work Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:03, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Pakistan.gif

[edit]

New upload of the national flag of Pakistan, duplicate to File:Flag of Pakistan.svg and three more in Category:PNG flags of Pakistan TFerenczy (talk) 14:49, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:43, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:The new Smart 2014 (14683396472).jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by MB-one as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Screenshot of (most likely) copyrighted material Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:51, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete as uploader. OSX (talk • contributions) 04:54, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 13:57, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Dan Winters 2015.jpg

[edit]

The metadata shows Dan Winters is the copyright holder not the uploader as claimed. Nv8200p (talk) 03:08, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 13:56, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Cambiemos amarillo.png

[edit]

Fake logo/emblem, the logo doesn't have a yellow background Sfs90 (talk) 04:02, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 13:57, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:LogoCambiemos.png

[edit]

Fake logo/emblem, the Cambiemos logo doesn't have a yellow background, as can be seen in their website Sfs90 (talk) 04:05, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 13:58, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Beeldmerk EU-voorzitterschap 2016.jpg

[edit]

vanwege auteursrechten die niet bij de auteur van deze wiki liggen 193.173.21.236 05:56, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded this file as this file was published at this page since december 2013: https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/actueel/nieuws/2013/12/13/nederland-voorzitter-europese-unie-in-eerste-helft-2016
According to the copyright page https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/copyright This page and its content is published under Creative Commons Zero unless 'tenzij bij een bepaald onderdeel (bijvoorbeeld een document) staat aangegeven dat op dat onderdeel een auteursrechtelijke uitzondering van toepassing is.'. Translated roughly as all is CC0 unless otherwise noted at or around that particular content. That is not the case for this logo.
Previous week I got a notice of an employee of the Dutch government to take down this image and adviced them to start a deletion request to discuss this. The image is deleted from the above page one week ago. You can see the page with logo in the Inter Archive: https://web.archive.org/web/20140401202746/http://www.rijksoverheid.nl/nieuws/2013/12/13/nederland-voorzitter-europese-unie-in-eerste-helft-2016.html. The reason they mentioned is that the logo will be officially relaunched in 2016 during the presidency --Hannolans (talk) 07:22, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep This is PD-textlogo anyway. Yann (talk) 10:10, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: PD-textlogo. Yann (talk) 14:00, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:SLASH 2015.jpg

[edit]

No proof of ownership, watermarked image Ringerfan23 (talk) 08:53, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:02, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Компания "Совинтеравтосервис".jpg

[edit]

Not in use. Spamer's upload. Bilderling (talk) 09:40, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:02, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:История "Совинтеравтосервис".jpg

[edit]

Not in use. Spamer's upload. Bilderling (talk) 09:40, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:06, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Компания "Совинтеравтосервис"-3.jpg

[edit]

Not in use. Spamer's upload. Bilderling (talk) 09:41, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:04, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Компания "Совинтеравтосервис"-2.jpg

[edit]

Not in use. Spamer's upload. Bilderling (talk) 09:41, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:04, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Logo СовИнтерАвтоСервис.png

[edit]

Not in use. Spamer's upload.Logo cant be own or free Bilderling (talk) 09:42, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:03, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Of The Mix.jpg

[edit]

text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 10:01, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Also probable copyvio. Yann (talk) 14:10, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Eugenio G. Derbez.jpg

[edit]

Unclear copyright status. Uploaded in 06.2015 by user EEIM (talk · contributions · Statistics) and sourced with http://www.entretengo.com/musica/eugenio-derbez-presentara-premios-grammy-latino-2014.html (2014) which claims content to be in CC-BY-4.0. This claim is quite unlikely surfing over the site with multiple mulimedia material from various external sources, including actual and international film screenshots, promo shots, etc. like http://www.entretengo.com/cine/el-actor-tom-cruise-confirma-que-habra-mision-imposible-6.html.

Via http://www.entretengo.com/licencia the site specifies the license and it appears that only the blog (and comments) are CC licensed. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Margarita Muñoz.jpg.

The photo itself is cropped and was already published years ago via (example) http://www.actitudfem.com/guia/cine-y-television/series/comedia-de-eugenio-derbez (2012) = http://www.actitudfem.com/media/files/imagecache/content-images/images/rob-derbez104i_-_copy.jpg and was taken during a photoshooting with a lots of variants circulating at the interent, like http://www.latingossip.com/eugenio-derbez/eugenio-derbez-wedding-being-paid-by-televisa.html (2012) = http://www.latingossip.com/0/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/rob-eugenio-derbez-1.jpg (full exif available) = copyrighted work by "Cliff Lipson/CBS ©2011 CBS Broadcasting Inc. All Rights Reserved."

Weblink search. Gunnex (talk) 10:25, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nominating also (same problem & uploader):

taken from http://www.entretengo.com/gente/antipatica-senorita-colombia-miss-universo.html (01.2015) but previously published (full frame) via (example) http://www.cromos.com.co/minicromos-2014/paulina-vega-dieppa-15942 (2014) = http://www.cromos.com.co/sites/default/files/2013-paulina_vega_dieppa-_4.jpg (high res, identical exif)

Related: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Juan Pablo Raba.jpg. Gunnex (talk) 10:36, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:13, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Juan Pablo Raba.jpg

[edit]

Unclear copyright status, considering Commons:Deletion requests/File:Eugenio G. Derbez.jpg + Commons:Deletion requests/File:Margarita Muñoz.jpg = false claim/misunderstandable licence policy of http://www.entretengo.com/, which appears to be valid only for text + quite unlikely that all content is in CC surfing over the site with multiple mulimedia material from various external sources, including actual and international film screenshots, promo shots, etc. Gunnex (talk) 10:29, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pero en el sitio no dice "only for text" en la licensia dice A menos que se especifique lo contrario, todo el contenido y los comentarios de este y todos los blogs de Impressa Network se encuentran bajo licencia “Atribución 4.0 de Creative Commons” --Jean70000 (talk) 20:52, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Please refer again to http://www.entretengo.com/licencia where they say: "Copiar, distribuir y comunicar públicamente cualquiera de las notas escritas en este sitio." my underline And as I said above (see also the other deletion requests): the site is grabbing material which was previously published at external, copyrighted sources. The photo here was previously published on actor's blog in 2011 via https://juanpablorabaworld.wordpress.com/2011/06/05/juan-pablo-raba-guapo-de-la-semana-2/ (2011) = http://img691.imageshack.us/img691/1829/guapodelasemana27mayo20.jpg. Btw, I contacted the site owner entretengo.com indicating to the license mess. They can't CC-licence a work if they are not the copyright holder. Gunnex (talk) 08:00, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
A lo que me refiero es que la licencia no dice "únicamente para texto" o "para las notas solamente". El sitio juanpablorabaworld.wordpress.com no puede considerarse fuente original de la imagen ya que es un fan blog y no es oficial del actor. Agradezco que te hayas puesto en contacto con el administrador de entretengo.com, finalmente el puede decirnos si la imagen esta bajo la licencia 4.0 de Creative Commons o bajo copyright. --Jean70000 (talk) 22:55, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:14, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:562911 163286300474986 竹内近影.jpg

[edit]

Out of COM:PS. This file was uploaded at 7:11, 1 Sep 2015 and w:ja:竹内勇人, created on Japanese Wikipedia, was deleted speedily at 8:24 of same day as w:ja:WP:CSD#全般3, that is, as vandal or mischief. Low quality, unused, not notable person, outside of project scope. KurodaSho (talk) 10:54, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:15, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Traits d'union.JPG

[edit]

Recent artwork. No FoP in France. Not de minimis. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 11:10, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:16, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:NE Parliament.svg

[edit]

"A diagram of a hypothetical New England parliament" hypothetical, unused, unusable and out of scope for commons. Please delete. Atlasowa (talk) 11:11, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:17, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Small politics illustrator.png

[edit]

"To be used on stub template" - not used, unreadable size, unusable and out of scope for commons. Please delete. Atlasowa (talk) 11:14, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:17, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Parlamento blank 1114 v4.0.svg

[edit]

Not used. Far better tool at http://tools.wmflabs.org/parliamentdiagram/parliamentinputform.html . Out of scope for commons. Please delete. Atlasowa (talk) 11:19, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:19, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Legislative assembly diagram template.svg

[edit]

Not used. Far better tool at http://tools.wmflabs.org/parliamentdiagram/parliamentinputform.html . Out of scope for commons. Please delete. Atlasowa (talk) 11:19, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:19, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:85 Seats.png

[edit]

Test upload? No description, not used, not usable. See tool at http://tools.wmflabs.org/parliamentdiagram/parliamentinputform.html . Out of scope for commons. Please delete. Atlasowa (talk) 11:21, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You're free to delete this picture, it was a rare mistake that it was uploaded, this was when I was a newbie and didn't really understand. Yes it was a test, though I didn't know you couldn't delete them by yourself right away. It would be appreciative if you'd delete it. Avopeas (talk) 22:50, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:20, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Arch8.svg

[edit]

"A Parliament" Test upload? Not used, no description, unusable. See tool at http://tools.wmflabs.org/parliamentdiagram/parliamentinputform.html . Out of scope for commons. Please delete. Atlasowa (talk) 11:25, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:20, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Arens-van Dorp Synthesis.png

[edit]

Second reactant of second reaction is incorrect...should be a carbonyl according to es:Reacción de Arens-van Dorp. Same uploader created File:Reacción de Arens van Dorp.png that is in use for this reaction, whereas nom'ed file is unused. DMacks (talk) 07:09, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Ed (Edgar181) 14:22, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Brenda Daniela Asnicar Mendoza.jpg

[edit]

Unclear copyright status and unlikely CC. Taken from http://estasdemoda.com/looks-de-famosos-brenda-asnicar/brenda_asnicar_como_antonella_en_mexico/ or better: http://estasdemoda.com/looks-de-famosos-brenda-asnicar/ (07.2008) this site claims a CC-whatever license.

Via http://www.mediosyredes.com/aviso-legal: "a empresa autoriza a los usuarios a utilizar, visualizar, imprimir, descargar y almacenar los contenidos y/o los elementos insertados en las webs exclusivamente para su uso personal, privado y no lucrativo; siempre que en todo caso se indique el origen y/o autor de los mismos y que, en su caso, aparezca el símbolo del copyright y/o notas de propiedad industrial de sus titulares. Queda terminantemente prohibida la utilización de tales elementos, su reproducción, comunicación y/o distribución con fines comerciales o lucrativos, así como su modificación, alteración, o descompilación. Para cualquier otro uso distinto de los expresamente permitidos, será necesario obtener el consentimiento previo por escrito del titular de los derechos de que se trate.". = NC/ND. Additional it is quite unlikely that the team behind this site is producing any visual content. All content appears to be republished from external sources.

Btw, grabbed from (example) http://www.fotolog.com/asnicar_brendaaa/41154685/ (02.2008).

Weblink search

User related: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Eugenio G. Derbez.jpg Gunnex (talk) 11:28, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:21, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Fernitz Mellach Gruftkapelle rechts vorne.jpg

[edit]

mistakenly uploaded twice Isiwal (talk) 11:50, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:21, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Peter-service logo.png

[edit]

Fake license. Logo can't be free. Fair use is possible, but not here. Bilderling (talk) 12:32, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: PD-textlogo. Yann (talk) 14:22, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Peter-service logo.png

[edit]

Logo of a respectable software vendor under free license - it can't be Bilderling. Contribution of PR department. (talk) 14:12, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Riley Huntley (talk) 08:50, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ChrisFroome TourDeFrance-cartoon.png

[edit]

Derivative work of the (non-free) Tour de France logo, so a breach of copyright. Unused in any wiki. Relentlessly (talk) 13:22, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:27, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Untitled-1ا.gif

[edit]

Unused personal image, out of scope. P 1 9 9  ✉ 13:44, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:26, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Nbjdkfngbt.PNG

[edit]

Image usues a stock photograph of gears that was taken from https://www.rit.edu/kgcoe/mechanical/ and is unlikely to be the work of the uploader. File name and description are gibberish. Ahecht (talk) 13:53, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:27, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:GrassValley CARoyceLibarary.JPG

[edit]

referenceonly 70.170.102.251 13:56, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: In use, no reason for deletion. Yann (talk) 14:28, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Marcos Araújo Braulio (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Angola Facebook case.

Gunnex (talk) 14:33, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:30, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Heffron Drive Live Sessions.jpg

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:30, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Atomic.png

[edit]

Looks like a copyvio to me, though I don't have the clear evidence to say so. You might argue that the service icons at the bottom are copyrighted (though you might call them de minimis). May fall under COM:ADVERT, particularly considering this user's other uploads. —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 06:01, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete The content comes from Atomic Interactive. While like Mendaliv I can't see the exact page from which it came, the text is copyrighted to Atomic Interactive, and I assume per the description that this is a screenshot of a page generated from that content. So I see it as a copyright violation, in both the text being reproduced and the design elements. - Bilby (talk) 07:53, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:48, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Atomic.png

[edit]

Isn't it screenshot of copyrighted software? Taivo (talk) 14:42, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, mostly likely of the atomic game engine. --Ahecht (talk) 15:34, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:31, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:GauravJain.jpg

[edit]

No indication that the uploader, DuchessofSF, is the copyright holder shown in the exif data, "Copyright The Youngrens, Inc". Note: a file with a very similar name, same uploader, was deleted on 3 May by Dharmadhyaksha. Note 2: the same file is on Wikipedia, uploaded by an Orangemoody sock. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 15:16, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. No permission. Yann (talk) 14:33, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Wayamma-verde.png

[edit]

DW of Flag by Kyle Lockwood. http://www.silverfernflag.org/ © Copyright 2000-2015. All rights reserved. We must be acknowledged when designs are published in the media and posted online. Designs by KS Lockwood, Authorised by C B Mullane 1/67 Lake Road, Belmont, Auckland 0622 Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:01, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 I withdraw my nomination Subsequently it was pointed out that all the flags of New Zealand which were entered in the national competition are freely licensed, hence this image would be as well. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:09, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Withdrawn. Yann (talk) 14:37, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Thecara-620x350.jpg

[edit]

Highly unlikely to be user's own work, image looks like a scanned photograph including the whitespace of the scanner plate. Probable COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:05, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete So small photos are out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 16:06, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:38, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Qmobile.PNG

[edit]

If indeed this Unused File is the logo of some company, it would need a source other than 'own work'. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:06, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: PD-textlogo. Yann (talk) 14:38, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sample2.png

[edit]

Unused sample, no educational value. P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:34, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:40, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Tatjavanavark-machine.jpg

[edit]

Insufficient license, a COM:OTRS would be needed to retain this image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:34, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Looks OK to me. Yann (talk) 14:41, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Scwsvcewcdewcs.jpg

[edit]

Copied form here. ~ Moheen (talk) 18:43, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: http://www.clubamerica.com.mx/portal/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/El-Azteca-1000x288.jpg Yann (talk) 14:49, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sarge's Music CD's and DVD.jpg

[edit]

Promotional/advertising image of non-notable musician, out of scope. P 1 9 9  ✉ 19:08, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:50, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sars.png

[edit]

Unused hoax logo, out of scope. P 1 9 9  ✉ 19:09, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:50, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:SAT formulas for TI-Nspire.png

[edit]

Text-only, out of scope. P 1 9 9  ✉ 19:18, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:51, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Satelite 6.jpg

[edit]

Text-only, out of scope. P 1 9 9  ✉ 19:32, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:52, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Satelite 7.jpg

[edit]

Text-only, out of scope. P 1 9 9  ✉ 19:32, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:52, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Satelite 8.jpg

[edit]

Text-only, out of scope. P 1 9 9  ✉ 19:32, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:52, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Satisnet Logo.png

[edit]

Unused promotional logo, out of scope. P 1 9 9  ✉ 19:36, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:51, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Farm House 2014-06-22 00-46.JPG

[edit]

Out of scope, looks to be a non notable personal photo. Reguyla (talk) 20:27, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:53, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Vivian Homenaje PS.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope Fixertool (talk) 21:19, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:53, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bâtiment Vauplane.jpg

[edit]

Source Lycée Saint-Louis de Gonzague, livre du centenaire. Le verseur ne semble pas être le photographe Il faut l'autorisation de l’auteur de cette photo sinon c'est une violation du droit d’auteur ! Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 22:38, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:54, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Full Profile Of Maalak Sidhu.jpg

[edit]

Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 23:12, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:54, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Maalak Sidhu Full Profile Image.jpg

[edit]

Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 23:12, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:55, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gpj.gif

[edit]

Low-quality image of the flag of Morocco. Fry1989 eh? 23:29, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:55, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Samsung logo Ukraine.png

[edit]

PNG duplicate of File:Samsung wordmark.svg. Fry1989 eh? 23:31, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:56, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Financesonlinelogo.jpeg

[edit]

Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 23:37, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:55, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:First South Flag.svg

[edit]

Low-quality version of File:Flag of the Confederate States of America (1861-1863).svg. Fry1989 eh? 23:39, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:58, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Boliviano.png

[edit]

Png duplicate of File:Flag of Bolivia.svg. Fry1989 eh? 23:45, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:59, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Arthur Garcia.jpg

[edit]

Missing permission. Fry1989 eh? 23:47, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: http://www.radiofides.com/upload/noticia/imagenes/16970-garcia_rincon_artur_albeiro.jpg Yann (talk) 15:01, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Deportivo-Táchira-Logo.PNG

[edit]

Missing permission. Fry1989 eh? 23:47, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Dupl. of File:Deportivo-Tachira-Logo-2015.PNG. Yann (talk) 15:03, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Deportivo-Tachira-Logo2015.PNG

[edit]

Missing permission. Fry1989 eh? 23:47, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Dupl. of File:Deportivo-Tachira-Logo-2015.PNG. Yann (talk) 15:03, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Deportivo-Tachira-Logo-8e.PNG

[edit]

Missing permission. Fry1989 eh? 23:48, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Dupl. of File:Deportivo-Tachira-Logo-2015.PNG. Yann (talk) 15:03, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Deportivo-Tachira-Logo-8Estrellas.PNG

[edit]

Missing permission. Fry1989 eh? 23:48, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Dupl. of File:Deportivo-Tachira-Logo-2015.PNG. Yann (talk) 15:03, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Deportivo-Tachira-Logo-8est.PNG

[edit]

Missing permission. Fry1989 eh? 23:48, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Dupl. of File:Deportivo-Tachira-Logo-2015.PNG. Yann (talk) 15:03, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Golden Anniversary Logo.png

[edit]

Missing permission. Fry1989 eh? 23:49, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:04, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:13088-120x120.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 23:55, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:04, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:LogoIRC.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 23:56, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Might be useful. Yann (talk) 15:05, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Logo-ensav.jpg

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: deleted, no source Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:49, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:YAG.png

[edit]

Unused logo, out of project scope Fenerli1978 (talk) 22:02, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nom Jcb (talk) 11:43, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:HCHS Logo.png

[edit]

Copyvio. See http://www.houstonchristianhs.org John from Idegon (talk) 04:24, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:04, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Dontdrink.JPG

[edit]

wrong attribution and licence violation, as it is obviously derived from File:The_perfect_martini.jpg (original licence CC-SA 2.0) Mangomix 🍸 05:14, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: that can be fixed without deletion. P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:13, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Logo rijksoverheid.svg

[edit]

vanwege auteursrechten die niet bij de plaatser van dít logo liggen 193.173.21.236 05:57, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded this svg version of this logo as the logo is published under Creative Commons Zero. This logo is published on https://www.rijksoverheid.nl above every page and in the downloadable documents, reports and video's. According to the copyright page https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/copyright This information and its content is published under Creative Commons Zero unless 'tenzij bij een bepaald onderdeel (bijvoorbeeld een document) staat aangegeven dat op dat onderdeel een auteursrechtelijke uitzondering van toepassing is.'. Translated roughly as all is CC0 unless otherwise noted at or around that particular content. That is not the case for this logo.
The uploaded detailed svg version of this logo can be found on the internet, not on rijksoverheid.nl
One week ago an employee of the Dutch government requested me to delete this entry on Commons and I asked her to start a deleteion request to let specialists have a look at it during the discussion. Reasons mentioned were that the logo is copyrighted and this high resolution might lead to misuse of the logo (https://www.rijkshuisstijl.nl/over-de-rijkshuisstijl/auteursrecht-rijkshuisstijl).
The logo is a special situation as according to http://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0024004/geldigheidsdatum_02-09-2015 the Dutch government reserved in 2008 the copyright for this logo.
The Creative Commons license at the other hand is allowing to reuse and publication of the logo. Note that CC0 is not allowing certain misuses of the logo as the moral rights are not transferred by CC0.
Note that if the logo is not licensed with CC0 this is a problem for the reuse of public sector information of the Dutch government as the logo is branded in every document, video and report. --Hannolans (talk) 08:17, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Edit: The svg version of this file can also be found under creative commons zero at http://www.rijksoverheid.nl, for example in page 1 of pdf https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/binaries/rijksoverheid/documenten/jaarplannen/2012/09/18/deltaprogramma-2013/deltaprogramma-2013-nl-tcm309-334233.pdf located at https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/onderwerpen/deltaprogramma/documenten/jaarplannen/2012/09/18/deltaprogramma-2013 I added this source to the file description. --Hannolans (talk) 19:18, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
As far as I can see, the Dutch Government has made an explicit exception for the copyright on this logo, or at least the version with text: Regeling voorbehouden auteursrecht beeldmerk en huisstijl herkenbare Rijksoverheid. In accordance with article 15b of the Auteurswet, this would then seem to mean that this particular logo, and some other elements of the 'corporate style' (huisstijl) of the Dutch national government, are not free. Note that there seems to be no obligation to mention this exception every time that this logo is used, or at least not when there is a law or ordinance that governs this. Paul B (talk) 22:43, 2 September 2015 (UTC) P.S. I do note that the Rijksoverheid on its website is a bit unclear, and does suggest that all 'content' is CC0 unless an exception is indicated 'at' ('bij') a particular part of it. Paul B (talk) 22:47, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, imho the Dutch government has given their permission to use the logo under CC0. They might regret it, but that does not influence the already given rights to users. The fact that they reserved their copyright on the logo back in 2008 does not change that. It only means that they consider themselves copyrightowner and that they are in fact entitled to publish the logo under any kind of license, including the decision to use CC0. I wrote a detailed legal background article (in Dutch) about this on https://denkwerkt.nl/?p=791 --Paapst (talk) 07:44, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Since a few days the logo of the webpages of rijksoverheid.nl has changed to an high resolution svg: https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/ --Hannolans (talk) 12:58, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Fry1989 eh? 22:59, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:18, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:New timetable-Sambir, 2015.jpg

[edit]

copivio http://www.uz.gov.ua/passengers/timetables/?station=23005&by_station=1 Dima st bk (talk) 05:58, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I believe the information is not copyrighted, but the file is out of scope, if this information is needed it should be in the text format.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:06, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as per User:Ymblanter. P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:19, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ПАО "Совинтеравтосервис" сегодня.jpg

[edit]

Not in use. Spamer's upload. Bilderling (talk) 09:40, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: The description may be spam, but the image isn't. And it doesn't have to be in use. P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:28, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Компания "Совинтеравтосервис"-Ивеко-2.jpg

[edit]

Not in use. Spamer's upload. Bilderling (talk) 09:40, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Could be useful. Yann (talk) 14:08, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:29, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Компания "Совинтеравтосервис"-Ивеко-2.jpg

[edit]

Published here allready in 2012, obviously not "own work". Druschba 4 (talk) 21:24, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 18:15, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Компания "Совинтеравтосервис"-Ивеко-1.jpg

[edit]

Not in use. Spamer's upload. Bilderling (talk) 09:40, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Could be useful. Yann (talk) 14:05, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:29, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Компания "Совинтеравтосервис"-Ивеко-1.jpg

[edit]

Published here allready in 2014, no permission. Druschba 4 (talk) 21:40, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 18:15, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Компания "Совинтеравтосервис"-Ивеко.jpg

[edit]

Not in use. Spamer's upload. Bilderling (talk) 09:41, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Could be useful. Yann (talk) 14:07, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:30, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Компания "Совинтеравтосервис"-Ивеко.jpg

[edit]

obviously no own work of 2015, scan from an old photo, see also metadata comment (webpage). User has several DR on the same topic. Druschba 4 (talk) 21:48, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; taken from trucks.autoreview.ru per exif. --Gbawden (talk) 12:32, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Компания "Совинтеравтосервис"-1.jpg

[edit]

Not in use. Spamer's upload. Bilderling (talk) 09:42, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Could be useful. Yann (talk) 14:07, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:30, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Компания "Совинтеравтосервис"-1.jpg

[edit]

Published here allready in 2014 with copyright claim of the author of the webpage (yes, i have seen the old discussion). Druschba 4 (talk) 21:43, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 18:16, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:SKYLAB BAND.jpg

[edit]

Also file:SKYLAB LIVE.jpg
Author is Matthieu Bégel. The other file is small photo without metadata. I suspect copyright violation. OTRS-permission from Bégel is needed. Taivo (talk) 10:10, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:20, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Exporo-Logo.png

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:21, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ERS Logo.jpg

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:21, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Rvt FarbLogo 600dpi.png

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:21, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Puente la 9a Bucaramanga Sder, Colombia.JPG

[edit]

Unclar copyright status. Uploaded 17.04.2015 by EEIM (talk · contributions · Statistics) the photo (exif available) was previously published via http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showpost.php?p=123101989&postcount=29672 (10.04.2015) = https://fbcdn-sphotos-d-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xtp1/t31.0-8/11036039_10153251129355909_1578922600600853656_o.jpg (last modified: 09.04.2015), given credits to "FOTO: Mauricio Olaya" (see also exif). Note, that EEIM's upload is cropped.

Permission and/or further details needed. Gunnex (talk) 09:57, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: likely copyvio. P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:34, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:SIVOP - Logo.png

[edit]

Mauvaise version Jaberahmad (talk) 10:11, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: spam logo. P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:36, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:1995 ARLES.jpg

[edit]

Recent architecture (1995). No FoP in France. Not de minimis. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 11:08, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I really don't understand what you want me to do. I haven't opposed the publication by my wife of the photographs of my work. I've already answered your question. What is it you want me to say now? Henri Ciriani, Paris - cirianifrance@gmail.com

You're the photographer, but not the architect. And French law doesn't allow to publish pictures of recent architecture or artwork without the permission of the creator. Do you have the permission of the architect ? --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 11:29, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as per COM:FOP#France. P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:37, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:EvryMairie.JPG

[edit]

Recent architecture. No FoP in France. Not de minimis. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 11:09, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as per COM:FOP#France. P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:39, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Clos de la cathédrale, Évry-2.jpg

[edit]

Recent architecture (1995). No FoP in France. Not de minimis. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 11:10, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as per COM:FOP#France. P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:39, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Cathédrale de la Résurrection d'Évry, vue extérieur.jpg

[edit]

Recent architecture (1995). No FoP in France. Not de minimis. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 11:10, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as per COM:FOP#France. P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:40, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Montereau-Fault-Yonne - Statue de l'Europe.jpg

[edit]

Recent artwork. No FoP in France. Not de minimis on that picture. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 11:15, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as per COM:FOP#France. P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:42, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mk2 Bibliotheque Paris front 2.JPG

[edit]

Recent architecture. No FoP in France. Not de minimis on that picture. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 11:16, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as per COM:FOP#France. P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:42, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mk2 Bibliotheque Paris front.JPG

[edit]

Recent architecture. No FoP in France. Not de minimis on that picture. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 11:16, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as per COM:FOP#France. P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:42, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:La médiathèque Jacques-Demy (Le Voyage à Nantes) (9286304296).jpg

[edit]

Architecture and artwork seem all too recent. No FoP in France. Not de minimis on that picture. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 11:17, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The real reason should be that it is the copy of a photograph published under license cc-by-2.0. Not that the building is too recent as two other pictures of it were published on WIKIPEDIA COMMONS (see Category:Médiathèque Jacques-Demy) without this gene whatsoever. --Pj44300 (talk) 17:00, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as per COM:FOP#France. P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:44, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gare de Evry-Courcouronnes IMG 2415.JPG

[edit]

Recent architecture. No FoP in France. Not de minimis on that picture. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 11:17, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as per COM:FOP#France. P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:44, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Flamme olympique albertville.jpg

[edit]

Recent architecture/artwork. No FoP in France. Not de minimis on that picture. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 11:17, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as per COM:FOP#France. P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:44, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Esplanade Habib-Bourguiba Paris 02.jpg

[edit]

Recent artwork. No FoP in France. Not de minimis on that picture. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 11:18, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as per COM:FOP#France. P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:44, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Esplanade Habib-Bourguiba Paris 03.jpg

[edit]

Recent artwork. No FoP in France. Not de minimis on that picture. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 11:18, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as per COM:FOP#France. P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:45, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Arles - Musée départemental archéologie.jpg

[edit]

Recent architecture. No FoP in France. Not de minimis on that picture. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 11:18, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as per COM:FOP#France. P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:45, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Verhveb.PNG

[edit]

Not the work of the uploader. Logo for DramasOnline.com. Description is gibberish. Ahecht (talk) 14:04, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The logo does not surpass threshold of originality. But maybe we can still delete it as unused logo of non-notable organization. Taivo (talk) 15:42, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: promotional logo. P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:48, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:150808 spa header-logo 202x93.png

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:51, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mapas.png

[edit]

It isn't just like the iPhone icon, it is an exact duplicate. 144.189.100.25 22:27, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep It's not exactly the same. I'd say PD-shape applies --DieBuche (talk) 09:19, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kept, {{PD-ineligible}}. Kameraad Pjotr 19:01, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File:Mapas.png

Iphone map icon Secretlondon (talk) 23:58, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Already deleted --Denniss (talk) 20:56, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mapas.png

[edit]

I suspect, that the map is not own work, but copyright violation. Also probably the filename should be protected as too generic. Taivo (talk) 15:33, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: clearly an extract from somewhere else, derivative, not own work. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:53, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Fudge bar wrapper.JPG

[edit]

per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 11:48, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Logo is PD-textlogo. Yann (talk) 14:02, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Fudge bar wrapper.JPG

[edit]

Trademark infringements? PatHadley (talk) 15:34, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:54, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:SFP logo variation.png

[edit]

If this image is indeed the logo of Singaporeans First, it is highly unlikely to be own work of uploader. File needs proper source regardless of whether it's COM:TOO or not. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:42, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: far below COM:TOO. Licensing can be addressed without deletion. P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:56, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:DPP logo variation.png

[edit]

If this is the logo of the entity listed, then it's not own work of uploader. A proper source is needed for all images uploaded to Commons. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:44, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: far below COM:TOO. Licensing can be addressed without deletion. P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:57, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Waya mma.png

[edit]

Derivative work of flag by Kyle Lockwood. http://www.silverfernflag.org/ © Copyright 2000-2015. All rights reserved. We must be acknowledged when designs are published in the media and posted online. Designs by KS Lockwood, Authorised by C B Mullane 1/67 Lake Road, Belmont, Auckland 0622 Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:59, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 I withdraw my nomination Subsequently I learned that these particular Kyle Lockwood flags were entered in a contest with government of New Zealand and became PD as part of the terms of the entry. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:24, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Fry1989 eh? 20:37, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:59, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by EEIM (talk · contribs)

[edit]

It's arguable that all of these files are under the threshold of originality

Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 21:47, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment: This is a very broad nomination. It would be better if these were split up by country or something. I don't have time to comment on each right now, but some obvious ones:--EEIM (talk) 19:58, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment: some logos like this was upload beacuse on english wikipedia says :and I quote: This is a candidate to be copied to Wikimedia Commons. Freely licensed or public domain media are more accessible to other Wikimedia projects if placed on Commons. Any user may perform this move—please see Moving images to the Commons for more information please won't put this information again ,so you make me waste my time.--EEIM (talk) 19:58, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

this got over the discussion.

most of logos are too simple example--EEIM (talk) 20:14, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This first statement is more of a caution to EEIM and other persons who transfer files from other projects to here; there are many times images are marked for transfer but may not actually be able to be moved. So the responsibility is yours to decide if a move is good or not. Anyways, I agree with the deletion of File:Casi discovery military.JPG because it is very low quality version (like an Inkscape trace) and it is unused. I am going to look at the other files and write down my thoughts on them. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 22:38, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alot of these are too simple, they should have been done in groups or individually, not all together. File:The DirecTV logo.png is definitely a  Keep Fry1989 eh? 03:57, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


  •  Comment: I don't agree upload images with just words,a lot of companies have logos without (take out) image,for exemple Qatar foundation is a sponsor F.C. Barcelona and on t shirt says qatar fountation non-tree.

I don't agree with fair use ,it's an illegal way to be legal, but it will do on englishwiki,because wikipedia from usa and americans (from usa) have paid this project,at least the most or half.

For us (wikipedia commons) free images,thereby ,i delete copyright and left image free, see even at airports ,tv,magazines,etc,we see that logos,and everybody know them

Kept: Some of these should be deleted, but a mass DR that crosses countries is beyond our ability to handle. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:00, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by EEIM (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Sourced to Flickr which doesn't tell where the images come from. There is no evidence that the photographers are anonymous and there is no information about the age of the images at all.

Stefan4 (talk) 18:49, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]


these files,is long time,copyright has expired. author is unknown.--EEIM (talk) 03:24, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

the copyright holder most likely they are dead.is too difficult say the source. is pd old,at Flickr anyone upload files,in this case copyright has expired,and they uploaded,i cant say is mine,and i put as source Flickr.--EEIM (talk) 03:20, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

please read:and notice last point --EEIM (talk) 03:22, 23 September 2013 (UTC) {{PD-Colombia}}[reply]

These images are free in its home country, Colombia.--EEIM (talk) 04:04, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

How can you tell that the photos are old enough, when the source doesn't even say how old they are? --Stefan4 (talk) 13:47, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Answer:reading --EEIM (talk) 06:18, 2 October 2013 (UTC)http://www.cucutanuestra.com/temas/fotos_cucuta/1900_1930/cucuta_1900_1930.htm[reply]

The page [4] is useless for determining the copyright status of the images since the page appears to contain images from various sources without telling where the images come from. You need to check that website's sources too. --Stefan4 (talk) 13:51, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

you're right but just in one delete this took in 1952.--EEIM (talk) 06:28, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear copyright status. Unless we have definitive, explicit written and/or textual, tangible evidence from a credible, verifiable source naming these files as freely licensed under a Commons compatible license, we simply cannot host them on Commons -FASTILY 11:00, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by EEIM (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering recently "enlarged" User talk:EEIM (Panoramio/etc. grabber). File:Valle de Cúcuta.jpg with exif: Canon PowerShot A640 --> mysteriously only 1 time used in his X k uploads.

Gunnex (talk) 13:12, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: likely not own work, COM:PRP. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 17:22, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by EEIM (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Logos above COM:TOO. For Discovery Channel cf. Commons:Deletion requests/File:DiscoveryChannel logo.png, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Discovery-Channel-logo.png, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Casi discovery hd.JPG and so on.

Sealle (talk) 15:45, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep File:Olympic Committee (Colombia) logo.svg image only consists of simple geometric shapes or text. image shows a flag, a coat of arms, a seal or some other official insignia. Is in the public domain, because It is a public entity owned by the government of Colombia

File:Colombia National Civil Registry logo.svg is in the public domain, because It is a public entity owned by the government of Colombia. Image shows a flag, a coat of arms, a seal or some other official insignia.

File:AZ Corazón logo.svg and others are image only consists of simple geometric shapes or text. Simple logo

File:Piedmont Airlines logo.svg image only consists of simple geometric shapes or text. Simple logo

File:Discovery Channel logo.svg is a simple logo of official logo . this has copyright.

File:Discovery Channel 1995 - 2000 logo.svg simple logo with map. map have copyright?.

File:Farc Colombia Party logo.svg looks like OK, but Im not sure. --EEIM (talk) 01:16, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep for File:Olympic Committee (Colombia) logo.svg which is in the public domain since it is a public entity in Colombia. No copyright is infringed in any way and the logo can be uploaded on Commons with no probs. Keep also for File:AZ Corazón logo.svg which its vector variant was made from scratch and it is not eligible for copyright. The same applies for File:AZ Tv De Paga logo.svg and File:AZ Click! logo.svg which were also made from scratch and can't be copyrighteable. For File:Discovery Channel en Español logo.svg, I give it a keep since the world icon on the channel's logo is not elaborate enough to be claimed as WP:TOO, and thus it stays. It is also the case for File:Inter-american Development Bank logo.svg. However, for File:Discovery Channel 1995 - 2000 logo.svg, the world icon is a bit complex for a simple image, but I would still give it a pass. File:Colombia National Civil Registry logo.svg itself is a public insignia, not eligible for copyright regardless of how complex it is, according to Colombian laws. File:Discovery Channel logo.svg is not complex enough to be labelled as WP:TOO, so it passes anyway. For File:Farc Colombia Party logo.svg, the logo is in the public domain for being a political party's insignia, not eligible for copyright either. File:Piedmont Airlines logo.svg consists on simple geometric lines, not compatible with the threshold for originality, so the image stays. --Bankster (talk) 16:24, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep for File:Olympic Committee (Colombia) logo.svg because it is a public entity in Colombia. The logo doesn't infringe a copyright infringement and can be uploaded in commons. File:Colombia National Civil Registry logo.svg is in the public domain, because It is a public entity owned by the government of Colombia. File:AZ Corazón logo.svg image only consists of simple geometric shapes or text. File:Piedmont Airlines logo.svg image only consists of simple image and text. File:Discovery Channel logo.svg the world icon on the channel's logo is not elaborated enough to be claimed as WP: TOO, and thus it stays, the same goes for File:Discovery Channel 1995 - 2000 logo.svg. Finally, File:Farc Colombia Party logo.svg the logo is in the public domain for being a political party's insignia, and doesn't have copyrights. Futbolero44 (talk) 06:33, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete for File:Farc Colombia Party logo.svg. Should be a speedy deletion actually, since it is a recreation of deleted content. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:FARC party logo.png for the most recent nomination and links to past uploads before that. Bankster's comment above about this logo being "in the public domain for being a political party's insignia, not eligible for copyright either". This is not true. There is no copyright exemption in the US or Colombia for "political party insignia", nor any suggestion that political parties cannot be holders of intellectual property/copyrights. In fact, the party that created this logo releases all of their material under a CC no-derivatives license. seb26 (talk) 22:32, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: most per nomination, kept one for being below TOO. --Jcb (talk) 14:26, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Luiz Vieira.jpg

[edit]

"Programa Sr. Brasil" is not a GNU compatible site. Yanguas (talk) 16:28, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio. P 1 9 9  ✉ 17:18, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Content of cigarettes in french.jpg

[edit]

No indication of user's own work, no metadata. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:43, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: {{PD-text}} applies. P 1 9 9  ✉ 17:02, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Flisby kyrka från luften.jpg

[edit]

duplicate of File:Bredestads kyrka.jpg with wrong name Yger (talk) 16:46, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: P 1 9 9  ✉ 17:03, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Billiard Hotel Victoria.jpeg

[edit]

Unclear license claims, first it's foto privat, archiv, then it's user GregorHelms... more clarity is needed for this personal image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:50, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as per nom. Besides, there are numerous better ones at Category:Pool (cue sports). P 1 9 9  ✉ 17:05, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Jorra.jpg

[edit]

some photoshopped version, included text and some painting Motopark (talk) 16:50, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Unused personal image. P 1 9 9  ✉ 17:05, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:A cidade de Brasília, Capital Nacional.jpg

[edit]

not own work Rodrigolopes (talk) 17:21, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: P 1 9 9  ✉ 17:07, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:National Crest Of Niam.jpg

[edit]

This file was generated with this flash application. There seems to be no indication of these files to be in the public domain, so this might be copyright infringement. Tom-L (talk) 18:43, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: P 1 9 9  ✉ 17:07, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hispaniaf1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Hispaniaf1

Gunnex (talk) 21:19, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: P 1 9 9  ✉ 17:14, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:International Peace and Film Festival.png

[edit]

Missing permission. Fry1989 eh? 23:40, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Permissions were assigned during upload, what are you refering to exactly?
For all content previously published, a formal written permission is needed. Please see COM:OTRS for the procedure. Yann (talk) 14:58, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio. P 1 9 9  ✉ 17:13, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:TH HW Garuda.png

[edit]

Blurry blacked out version of File:Garuda Emblem of Thailand.svg. Fry1989 eh? 23:44, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This black symbol is a sign of highway milestone in Thailand. It's different from the official emblem Garuda in detail. Any inquiries are welcome. --SARANPHONG YIMKLAN (talk) 12:46, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: P 1 9 9  ✉ 17:14, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:TH HW Garuda.png

[edit]

The logo will not be repeated with the svg file and the traffic s is a png. File or a gif file, which is not the clearest image, so I have to delete the traffic sign that is wrong from that country's standard. Please allow everyone with respect.Svg file Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Mongolia44 18:09, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 02:52, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:3erhc-sa330.jpg

[edit]

The French Army doesn't release their photos as GFDL. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:31, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I just transferred it to commons. I didn't check its copyright status outside of what is listed on en:Wikipedia. If it is a breach of copyright, delete it, but you would have to delete it on en:Wikipedia too I would think. Mike Hayes (talk) 19:08, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:40, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Иван Карбышев (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Files re-uploaded after deletion. Low resolution, no EXIF, can be found at various websites, partly cropped to remove copyright information (e.g., [5])

Sealle (talk) 09:51, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, second upload of previously deleted material. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:42, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Stephen Huss - Void Logic.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Motopark as Fair use (Fair use). Regular deletion request is created, because the uploader said in his user talkpage: "This is my photo, I am uploading it myself. Please leave it on here, it has all permissions!". Taivo (talk) 15:58, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS-permission needed--Motopark (talk) 16:33, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The uploader sent me personal e-mail, claiming, that he is Stephen Huss's brother and heir. OTRS-permission is still needed. Taivo (talk) 20:03, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: OTRS required to retain image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:47, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per ticket:2015102010027281. Yann (talk) 20:35, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Irish Currency uploaded by Paasikivi

[edit]

Per Currency:Ireland, Irish banknotes are copyrighted by the Irish Copyright Law of 2000], even if issued before that provision became effective (§200(3)), and the copyright on legal tender is perpetual, i.e. does not expire at all. The act applies to all coins and banknotes issued since 1926 (§200(9)). Therefore, any image of banknotes which were designed after 1926 will must deleted as copyright violation. However the uploader has failed to note the date these banknotes were issued, instead making a {{Self}} claim. Therefore is is impossible to tell if these are Pubic Domain or not. As it is more then likely these are from 1981 (well after 1928), they should be deleted unless someone can figure out that the date of issue wasn't 1981, but well before 1928. --ARTEST4ECHO talk 16:11, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: these are all images of a 1981 banknote as dated at the botom front of the note. Ww2censor (talk) 10:11, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment - Thank you @Ww2censor: . I cannot speak Irish, so I had no idea they were dated 1981.--ARTEST4ECHO talk

Deleted: per nomination & discussion. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:48, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Soyuz TMA-18M crew portrait.jpg

[edit]

Unfortunately this work is from Roscosmos/GCTC and not a free NASA work. See the original sources here, here, and here. The camera no. 2431426248 is the same like here. The sole NASA doing is a new rendering from the raw file IMG_2820.CR2 with a better white balance and adding of some text info to the metadata. The annotation Credits: NASA is false in relation to the photograpy. The question is: can NASA buy a picture from Roscosmos and release it into Public Domain? I don't believe it! Ras67 (talk) 16:40, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well, 2 thumbs down to the NASA PAO if this is correct. I only uploaded it after seeing the credits line pointing to NASA instead of GCTC on that page. Alas, NASA PAO hasn't really been involved with this crew so pictures must be hard to find. I'm not too well versed with copyright issues so I'll stay neutral in this case. Galactic Penguin SST (talk) 16:50, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The image is credited to NASA. Period. MachoCarioca (talk) 12:14, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
No period! Also NASA makes errors and it is against Commons' aims to keep an unfree copyrighted image here. --Ras67 (talk) 14:45, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You don't know if there is any agreement among the two national space agencies to that. You have no professional qualification to say "NASA makes errors". Here we follow the sources and it says this is a NASA image so it is free. Those are the rules. Again, period. MachoCarioca (talk) 13:10, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Those are the rules, that's to short, you have to consider all rules, not only a part of them. First: If should there an agreement among NASA and Roskosmos, please discover it! Otherwise applies the precautional principle. With the original sources it was proved, that this is not a free NASA photo, equal what NASA says. Second: No professional qualification? Perhaps, but i have eyes in my head, there are many errors and mistakes made by NASA, big (American fatalities) and petite (false description). --Ras67 (talk) 16:20, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
And I think you make mistakes too. Like this one. But this is not the point, the point is, follow the sources and the rules. The source says it is a NASA photo; so, apply the rules. Next? MachoCarioca (talk) 01:28, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: NASA credits on NASA webpage. I don't see a link to a ru:source that has this same picture claiming anything but NASA source. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:51, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Soyuz TMA-18M crew portrait.jpg

[edit]

This image is still a blatant violation of GCTC's copyright! The original sources here, here, and here prove that! Should this picture not deleted again, i have to gibbet this case to higher places. Ras67 (talk) 18:16, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: My apologies, I now see the GCTC credit on the ESA page. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:53, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Deportivo-Tachira-Logo-2015.PNG

[edit]

Missing permission. Fry1989 eh? 23:48, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:53, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Icpsymbol.svg

[edit]

If this is the official logo, then it is not own work. IMHO above Com:TOO as well. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:38, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Their website shows this and this - I can't find any SVG version of these there. And given that the uploader works with SVG maps, they likely created the SVG themselves.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 11:11, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Addendum: Would a vectorization qualify as a derivative work? Commons:Deletion requests/File:Syrian Resistance Flag.svg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Syria Armed Forces Emblem.svg to me suggest "no".Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 11:14, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Above TOO Natuur12 (talk) 21:28, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Armoiries de la Maison Princière d'Hélianthis.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Tom-L as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: This uses elements from Héraldique Européenne. Compare with this example. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:36, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 21:28, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Arunasank (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The uploader misread the RTI response File:RTI Application response from AIR.pdf and uploaded following audio files. Turns out that these files are not necessarily PD-India. Refer detailed discussion at Commons_talk:WikiProject_India#All_India_Radio_music_files. But raising this DR so copyrights status of individual files can be checked case by case.

§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:20, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 21:28, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Town hall and cathedral of Evry.jpg

[edit]

Recent architecture. No FoP in France. Not de minimis. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 11:09, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep I am the uploader. This is the photo of the main square of Evry. The main subject of the photo is this main square. All the elements (cathedral, town hall, fountains, trees) are only a part of it. So No-FoP in France doesnt appy here. We read in the page of Freedom of Panorama :

Case law traditionally admits an exception if the copyrighted artwork is "accessory compared to the main represented or handled subject" (CA Paris, 27 octobre 1992, Antenne 2 c/ société Spadem, « la représentation d'une œuvre située dans un lieu public n'est licite que lorsqu'elle est accessoire par rapport au sujet principal représenté ou traité »). Thus, ruling #567 of March 15, 2005 of the Court of Cassation denied the right of producers of works of art installed in a public plaza over photographs of the whole plaza.
But a derivative work with for example only the cathedral should enter in no-FoP France. This is why I put the template {{FoP-France}} . --Tangopaso (talk) 20:16, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't get it : the cathedral is NOT accessory here, it's the main subject. The de minimis rule may not apply here ! --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 20:18, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The main subject is the square, not the cathedral itself. --Tangopaso (talk) 20:33, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Sorry but the square is out of focus while the building isn't Natuur12 (talk) 21:29, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Clos de la cathédrale, Évry.jpg

[edit]

Recent architecture (1995). No FoP in France. Not de minimis. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 11:10, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep I am the uploader. This is the photo of the square named Clos de la cathédrale in Evry. The main subject of the photo is this square. The shops are under threshold of originality And the cathedral is only a part of the photo. So No-FoP in France doesnt appy here. We read in the page of Freedom of Panorama :

Case law traditionally admits an exception if the copyrighted artwork is "accessory compared to the main represented or handled subject" (CA Paris, 27 octobre 1992, Antenne 2 c/ société Spadem, « la représentation d'une œuvre située dans un lieu public n'est licite que lorsqu'elle est accessoire par rapport au sujet principal représenté ou traité »). Thus, ruling #567 of March 15, 2005 of the Court of Cassation denied the right of producers of works of art installed in a public plaza over photographs of the whole plaza.
But a derivative work with for example only the cathedral should enter in no-FoP France. This is why I put the template {{FoP-France}} . --Tangopaso (talk) 20:21, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't get it : the cathedral is NOT accessory here, it's the main subject. The de minimis rule may not apply here ! --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 20:15, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The main subject is the square (clos de la Cathédrale), not the cathedral itself. --Tangopaso (talk) 20:30, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: The square is out of focus. So not DM Natuur12 (talk) 21:30, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Louvre Pyramid (3439044263).jpg

[edit]

Recent architecture/artwork. No FoP in France. Not de minimis on that picture. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 11:12, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Except that this image was uploaded by Russavia, why is it being nominated for deletion when the rest of Category:La Pyramide Inversée are tagged as inviolate? Andy Dingley (talk) 12:27, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Most of the pictures in that category can be accepted when the "Pyramide Inversée" is de minimis like on that picture. As for this one, I tried to relauch a DR since I think it's the same case as this one. But my DR has been declined for the moment (see the discussion here : Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#DR conflict between Denniss and me). --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 13:53, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Ad hominem not usefull btw Natuur12 (talk) 21:31, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Henri Ciriani

[edit]

Ciriani is a living French architect and there is no FOP in France.

— Racconish 📥 12:47, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--Marcela777 (talk) 17:30, 1 September 2015 (UTC)I don't understand what Racconish says. I've already answered the first time the issue appeared. I am Henri Ciriani's wife and he's perfectly aware of the fact that I've published his buildings in Wikipedia. What more do you need?[reply]

This has already been explained to you here. You need to have him formally consent through the procedure described here. Let me know on my talk page if I can help you. Cheers, — Racconish 📥 18:19, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--Bonjour, dans le cadre de la manifestation fran̠çaise des "journées du patrimoine", le bureau du president de la Région Champagne-Ardenne a été ouvert avec une visite guidée. J'ai demandé l'autorisation pour photographier l'évènement et les locaux, celà m'a été acccordé aimablement. Je ne sais dans quel cadre la demande de suppression a été faite. Racconish a-t-il des infos sur les conditions de l'appel de marché passé par l'institution française ? La cession des droits d'auteur d'exploitation... Je remarque que Marcela777 fait une remarque assez proche. Bien cordialement Garitan (talk) 08:02, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 21:32, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Enlightenment poster of schistosomiasis japonica in Yamanashi Prefecture.JPG

[edit]

Per {{NoFoP-Japan}} — Racconish 📥 17:25, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

̽My English is poor, but I'll explain. This is not art works copyrighted. Yamanashi Prefecture of Japan has created public for the purposes of Japan schistosomiasis reminder. The Copyright Act of Japan, notice work the engine of local governments have created, is outside. Please see Copyright Act of Japan the scope of copyright protection.Article 13　- Works not protected of (ii) --Sakaori (talk) 12:34, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the explanation. Nomination withdrawn. — Racconish 📥 12:42, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I appreciate your prompt reply.--Sakaori (talk) 13:22, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
And I appreciate your efforts to communicate Clin. — Racconish 📥 13:35, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 00:57, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Enlightenment poster of schistosomiasis japonica in Yamanashi Prefecture.JPG

[edit]

Possible copyright violation. Previous nomination was rejected based on Article 13 of Copyright Act of Japan, but is it really applicable? The law specifies the types of documents that are not protected by copyright: laws, administrative notifications, court decisions, and their translations (made by government themselves). Is there evidence that it covers posters like this? See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tadamasa Kodaira.jpg which cites Article 13. As I understand, illustrative PR materials made by governments are generally covered by Article 32, not by Article 13. Article 32 gives certain freedom for press use, but unfortunately it doesn't give freedom to 公衆送信 ("transmission [via network] to the public"). [8][9] We'd need Yamanashi Prefecture's explicit permission verified using COM:OTRS or wait until the copyright expires. (until 2041 for Japan+US copyright, I believe.) whym (talk) 12:49, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I commented in a previous delete deliberation. I do not have the specialized knowledge to.It will follow the decision of a number of user community.--Sakaori (talk) 13:07, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In my understanding, only materials related to exertion of power by organs of the State or local public entities satisfy Copyright Act of Japan, Article 13, (ii). I'm not sure this poster complies it. This seems just a PR material, which is covered by Article 32, (2). By the way, I believe this poster has an enough creativity, so {{PD-ineligible}} is not suitable. --Yapparina (talk) 14:53, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nom. Natuur12 (talk) 21:33, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:KDE 4 (kwin-transparency).jpg

[edit]

Derivative works of unsourced photographs in this screenshot. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:26, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Certainly not DM, the flower is smack center. Blurring could do the trick. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:02, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Whm, but blurring the flower may break the purpose of the KWin transparency. Anyone with KDE that can provide a free screenshot (I don't use KDE, and I personally don't like it)? --Amitie 10g (talk) 23:14, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: non-compatible license for flower. As stated, this can easily be recreated using free images. P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:00, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Pedrinho Mattar.jpg

[edit]

Non-authorized videocap from a non GNU compatible site. Yanguas (talk) 16:33, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: not own work. P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:01, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Fountain Place Mcgregor.JPG

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Stas1995 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: per tineye results, however no link to "tineye results" was provided. To be speedied, the nomination must be without loose ends. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:53, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I received correspondence about this on my talk page. The uploader says the image is from her and her husband's bed and breakfast webpage as well as being uploaded here to Commons. The image has metadata, I still don't see any reason to delete this. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:33, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fountain Place is a Provincial Heritage Site (SAHRA file number 9/2/080/0002-307) in the Western Cape in South Africa and the photograph is owned by my husband and me. It is a photo from our website which we own: http://www.fountainplace.co.za and we live in and run a bed & breakfast at Fountain Place. The historical information is correct and the building is of historical and heritage interest and features in the museum in the village of McGregor. We can see no reason why anyone would request its deletion. Thank you and thanks Ellin Beltz for your input, kind regards, Linzi, Mcgregorlady

Kept: P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:07, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:SanktaMariakyrkaUppsala int05.jpg

[edit]

Is it FOP inside a church in Sweden? I trided asking here with no response so now i try this. Hangsna (talk) 15:16, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The same conditions should apply for this file: File:SanktaMariakyrkaUppsala int06.jpg. Ulkl (talk) 15:21, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Actually for all images in Category:Baptismal fonts in Sweden if they aren't PD-OLD or to simple to be art. /Hangsna (talk) 15:50, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I have looked at other pictures in Category:Bertil Vallien. Would it be acceptable if File:SanktaMariakyrkaUppsala int05.jpg and File:SanktaMariakyrkaUppsala int06.jpg were uploaded at license {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}}? Ulkl (talk) 15:44, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
No, license isn't the problem here. /Hangsna (talk) 15:50, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
At least it is a two dimensional picture of a three dimensional object. I refer to discussion Sommaröppna kyrkor. Ulkl (talk) 17:03, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This images is not an image of the building. Its an image of a 3-d object made by an artist, it can not be counted as a building just because its indoor. /Hangsna (talk) 21:02, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, there is freedom of panorama in Sweden indoors also, but not for art. As this is piece of art, it is not protected with freedom of panorama. Taivo (talk) 17:11, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files Japanese whisky bottles including calligraphy works

[edit]

These photos include calligraphy works by living calligraphers in Japan. In Japan,calligraphy works(shodo) will be treated as art works.(seeCommons:When_to_use_the_PD-signature_tag#Japan.)I strongly believe that they are the case of copyright violations. ("Hibiki" is a calligraphy work by Tansetsu Ogino(a Japanese calligrapher(born in 1939))[10]. "Hakushu" is a calligraphy work by Keizo Saji(the former president of Suntory Ltd.)--Kentin (talk) 15:40, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 17:29, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hogares con empresas en su interior - Cúcuta, Colombia.jpg

[edit]

Unused since 2008, this pie chart is lacking in educational utility, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:16, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, this is simply one number. You do not need a pie chart for one number. Taivo (talk) 17:34, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:PIB-CO-NDS-2006-ACT.png

[edit]

While the image has a GNU FREE printed on it, there is no source of the image, and this is not likely to be own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:18, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, still no source. Taivo (talk) 17:36, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Universidad de Pamplona (escudo).png

[edit]

A coat of arms of a university is highly unlikely to be user's own work, claimed "Public domain This file is in the public domain, because it is the coat of arms of a public university that I had reproduced to put here". Insufficient license. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:22, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, school logos are not own work. Some of them are in public domain due to age, but for that logo's designer and his/her death year must be given. Taivo (talk) 17:42, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Universidad de Pamplona (escudo).jpg

[edit]

A coat of arms of a university is highly unlikely to be user's own work, claimed "Public domain This file is in the public domain, because it is the coat of arms of a public university that I had reproduced to put here". Insufficient license. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:23, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, school logos are not own work. Some of them are in public domain due to age, but for that logo's designer and his/her death year must be given. Taivo (talk) 17:44, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:La Madre Teresa de Cúcuta.jpg

[edit]

The license of this image needs a review, the source page has 404'd and there is a claim of license authorization from Wikipedia. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:24, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Info See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files from cucutanuestra.com. Gunnex (talk) 19:16, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, still no source. Taivo (talk) 17:46, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mapa de Cúcuta (Zona Rural + Zona Urbana).gif

[edit]

No source of basemap used in this image, not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:27, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, own work is unlikely, no basemap data. Taivo (talk) 17:49, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:VHSC Carrier.jpg

[edit]

No indication of user's own work, no metadata, small image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:39, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 17:50, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:VHSC.jpg

[edit]

This upload is claimed to be work of Larry Green, but that's not the uploader. There's a source in the file history, but no indication of license. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:40, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 17:51, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Vhs cassette bottom.jpg

[edit]

This is about the third or fourth different name claimed to be own work by this uploader. This time they're "Jared C. Benedict". Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:41, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, small photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 17:54, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ATCG Doppelhelix.jpg

[edit]

photo of a non-public, non-permanent artwork Sebari (talk) 16:57, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, uploader agreed on her user talkpage with deletion. Taivo (talk) 17:56, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly Fake Indian Coinage after 1955

[edit]

I attempted to put this image up for {{Copyvio}} per Currency: India and Category:Banknotes of India. It reads:

Per The Indian Copyright Act, 1957 (Chapter V Section 25) banknotes and coins from India enter the public domain only after 60 years , i.e. after December, 31 1954, and are copyrighted and must be deleted using Template:{{Copyvio}}.

However Glatisant has made the claim that the coin is a forgery, so Currency: India doesn't apply and removed the {{Copyvio}} tag. However, even if this is true, which he has no evidence of, then {{PD-India}} would apply. It reads:

"Anonymous works" enter the public domain 60 years after the date on which it was first published, i.e. after December, 31 1954.

Therefor, even if it is a forgery this "Anonymous works" would sill be copyrighted as it was published in 1970. Eather is should be deleted as a {{Copyvio}} per Currency: India or a {{Copyvio}} per {{PD-India}}--ARTEST4ECHO talk 16:35, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment If it is fake, the author couldn't claim a copyright. Regards, Yann (talk) 14:43, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment actually yes he can, but I don't think he would as it would get him into trouble.--ARTEST4ECHO talk 19:07, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
DELETED
You all know, that hosting copyright violations in Commons is prohibited, even if copyright holder cannot sue us, and this is a typical example. Both money and anonymous works are protected 60 years in India, so the photo is restored in 2031, when the copyright has expired. Taivo (talk) 18:04, 1 October 2015 (UTC)}}[reply]

Restored: If it is fake, no copyright; if it is real, then {{GODL-India}} applies. Yann (talk) 15:36, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Currency of Malaysia

[edit]
File Name Year issued
Category:Currencies of Malaysia 1941
File:MalayaP11-1Dollar-1941 b-donated.jpg 1941
File:MalayaP11-1Dollar-1941 f-donated.jpg 1941
File:MalayaP12-5Dollars-1941-donateddeenz b.jpg 1941
File:MalayaP12-5Dollars-1941-donateddeenz f.jpg 1941
File:MalayaP13-10Dollars-1941(1945)-donateddz b.jpg 1941
File:MalayaP13-10Dollars-1941(1945)-donateddz f.jpg 1941
File:MYR10sen ver3.jpg 2012
File:MYR10sen verIII.jpg 2012
File:MYR1sen ver1.jpg 1985
File:MYR1sen ver2.jpg 2005
File:MYR20sen ver1.jpg 1968
File:MYR20sen ver2.jpg 2007
File:MYR20sen ver3.jpg 2012
File:MYR20sen verIII.jpg 2012
File:MYR50sen ver1a.jpg 1967
File:MYR50sen ver1b.jpg 1973
File:MYR50sen ver2.jpg 1990
File:MYR50sen ver3.jpg 2012
File:MYR50sen verIII.jpg 2013
File:MYR5sen ver1.jpg 1978
File:MYR5sen ver2.jpg 2010
File:MYR5sen ver3.jpg 2011
File:MYR5sen verIII.jpg 2013
File:WaubulaninMalaysiancoin.JPG 2007
File:1961-Malaya-Elizabeth-020.jpg ‎ 1956
File:1967 1RM.jpg ‎ 1971-1988
File:1993 1RM.jpg ‎ 1993
File:5 RM.jpg ‎ 1971
File:Malaisie, 1 Ringitt à l'effigie du parlement de Kuala Lumpur.jpg ‎ 1971
File:10 malayische Sen.jpg ‎ 2001
Commons:Currency#Malaysia dose not seem to allow for any Currency from Malaysia to be used no matter the age. It reads:

According to the GENERAL INFORMATION The Malaysian Currency by the BANK NEGARA MALAYSIA, You are not allowed to reproduce the Malaysian currency. It is also illegal for you to use any photograph, drawing or design of any note, coin or any part of the note or coin, of any size, scale or colour, in any advertising or on any merchandise or products, which are manufactured, sold, circulated or distributed except with the permission of BNM..

Therefore it seem to me that ANY Currency of Malaysia, regardless of age, is copyrighted by the Bank Negara Malaysia. Ireland did the same thing in 2000, i.e. making all currency copyrighted, regardless of age or previous copyright statues. See Commons:Currency#Ireland

However, I admit an argument can be made that since Malaysian was part of the British Empire until August 31, 1957, Bank Negara Malaysia copyright claim may not apply until after Malaysian independence. Therefore {{PD-UKGov}} would apply to currency made prior to August 31, 1957 (see Commons:Currency#United_Kingdom). However, I'm not sure how true that is as this is just me thinking out-loud. I think it need to be discussed

In order to make it easier to know which are which I have included a table with dates of issue.--ARTEST4ECHO talk 18:43, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete all and move to all Wikipedias that supports local uploads and fair use. The uploader doesn't give the right license. It clearly states that Malaysian currency cannot be reproduced for advertising. All CC licenses, but not including those that have "Non-commercial" and "No-Deriatives", allows commercial use, which violates the law in Malaysia. If the Malaysian government would give permission to use in Wikipedia, that will qualify as fair-use that cannot be in Commons, but can be in some Wikipedias. But if not, it really should be deleted. --Pokéfan95 (talk) 06:47, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
In my opinion, I think the word "reproduce" here is mean to reproduce the physical form. And "It is also illegal for you to use any photograph, drawing or design of any note, coin or any part of the note or coin, of any size, scale or colour, in any advertising or on any merchandise or products, which are manufactured, sold, circulated or distributed except with the permission of BNM." is to conclude it may not use the source to make a physical form of money. and lastly here "You may be fined up to RM5,000 if you were to reproduce the Malaysian currency without the permission of BNM."
And I think the images are valid to use as long as not to reproduce into a physical form using the pictures and drawing reference. If not, all people of this world will be imprison just because there are Samsung or iPhone in that picture. I just talk to them, and I will give the answer here. SNN95 (talk) 17:05, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The following images have the same DR in without beeing listed here yet:

--JuTa 09:37, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nom and COM:PRP JuTa 09:48, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files from cucutanuestra.com

[edit]

Unclear copyright status + all files from http://www.cucutanuestra.com (today: 404) are only in public domain by other reasons (via e.g. {{PD-Colombia}} but NOT via the ominous email-traffic, stored as "permission" at es:Wikipedia:Autorización Cucutanuestra.com (created by IP = ?) where states: "Cualquier material de mi página web cucutanuestra.com es de caracter público y puede publicarlo cuando quiera. Cordialmente: Guillermo Jaimes Ramírez." = (+/) Any material at my website is of public nature and can be publish if you want. The permission may be also available at Commons via ticket:1608869.

This is obviously not a permission which would fullfill COM:L and additionally it is highly doubtful if "Guillermo Jaimes Ramírez" is the copyright owner of all historic and actual images related to es:Cúcuta, a city in Colombia. So, all files from http://www.cucutanuestra.com need a case-by-case check, considering also:

All kinds of works available:

But also (and NOT nominating)

per archive a photo by "Guillermo Jaimes", the site owner.

Ignoring also some (historical) photos which probadly are already in PD. Weblink search.

Nominating:

Spezial case
  • File:Escudo de Cucuta.svg --> coat of arms (archive). Unlikely own work. Per archived text established per decree on 03.02.1958. So far I know the actual Colombian copyright law makes no exception for government works. That would explain the license mess surfing through Category:Coats of arms of municipalities of Colombia = mostly all grabbed from Internet. Or is {{PD-Colombia}} (dot 4) relevant = "In all cases where a literary, scientific or artistic work has as its owner a legal entity or an official body or any institution under government public law, the term of protection shall be deemed to be seventy (70) years as from the date of publication." If yes, the coat of arms would be copyrighted till the end of 2028 (and all further edtions accordingly to their publication date).

--Gunnex (talk) 19:09, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment The coats of arms of Cucuta is an interpretation of the heraldry listed on the official website of the city (here), and since the heraldic science is allowed to make interpretations of the shields, I do not think it's copyrighted. All coats of arms of Colombia in commons in SVG format are interpretations of the heraldry and the law.--Shadowxfox (talk) 09:58, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nom. JuTa 10:00, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2015/09/01&oldid=175777215"