Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2015/08/14
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
![10.40 File:"Тэлеканал "Беларусь-2".jpg](#File:"Тэлеканал_"Беларусь-2".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_22.jpg){kind=link}
_J.Léonard_-_Leguminosae-Caes._-_Plant_type_specimen.jpeg){kind=link}
_J.Léonard_-_Leguminosae-Caes._-_Plant_type_specimen.jpeg){kind=link}
_J.Léonard_-_Leguminosae-Caes._-_Plant_type_specimen.jpeg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_1904-08.svg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
Copyright violation: Popular wallpaper image, and has been for many years, but unlike this improperly labelled upload, it has always been correctly labeled as a Pitbull, not a Bulldog: [1]. Here's one with a date: 2013 (use "Translate to English" on Google Chrome): [2]. Softlavender (talk) 01:19, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- hey there its not an pitbull its pure breed bulldog and as you say its wallpaper where,when and why you create your own law. Anyway if you believed its an pit bull just rename it OK and i see this dog in person OK its an totally bulldog. Weisenstar (talk) 01:28, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Unlikely own work McZusatz (talk) 10:09, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Copyright violation: [3], [4], [5] Softlavender (talk) 01:35, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- this image was close in deletion once then you open it again
- first of all my camera i use to captured this so its said this is entirely my own work
- and the image you point to your link was an fake link because I did not see any pictures there.Weisenstar (talk) 01:42, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: com:PRP McZusatz (talk) 10:07, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Flickr user claims the image is originally owned by Rob Rich on the image source in the description. 1989 01:48, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
Keep. Flickr uploader is a non-profit organization and to my mind is a conscious uploader that apparently consciously recruits people to photograph business events, organizational events, and little-known charitable events, and then uploads the photos to Flickr under CC license. There is no indication that Rob Rich objects to the CC-BY-SA license his many photos uploaded by the Flickr uploader have been uploaded under. The Flickr uploader, a charitable organization, has uploaded hundreds of Rob Rich's photos under CC licenses ([6]); apparently he donates some of his photos for this purpose, especially when they are of charitable events [7]. Several of them are on WM Commons and used in Wikipedia articles. If there's any question, Rob Rich's phone number and email address are right there on the Flickr upload [8], if anyone wants to double-check. Softlavender (talk) 03:37, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
this image is from google.com that was truly vviolation Weisenstar (talk) 09:43, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
- Keep. This re-nominator appears to be confused (and this appears to be a retaliatory re-nomination). The image is from a group photograph posted on Flickr with a proper CC release license. Obviously since this cropped image has been on Wikimedia Commons for six months, it appears on Google Images, like every image on Wikimedia Commons and Wikipedia. Softlavender (talk) 09:55, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
this is an crop photo from Google. com truly violation Weisenstar (talk) 13:47, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
- Keep. This re-re-nominator appears to be confused (and this appears to be a retaliatory re-re-nomination). The image is from a group photograph posted on Flickr with a proper CC release license. Obviously since this cropped image has been on Wikimedia Commons for six months, it appears on Google Images, like every image on Wikimedia Commons and Wikipedia. Softlavender (talk) 13:48, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
Kept, no new arguments. Weisenstar, if you once more nominate this photo for deletion, then this is worth of block. Taivo (talk) 15:23, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
Copyright violation: https://www.linkedin.com/in/maegashira Softlavender (talk) 01:40, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- This senior editor abuse his possession
- User:Softlavender your an editor right so why you always in Commons
- this user use his position to destroyed other user.
- almost all my upload his trying to deleted without any proof
- concerned of an administrator need this editor to be fired.
- This image absolutely not an copyright violation
the link as he point in that webpage is the website of my cousin maybe some of photo he upload there OK but entirely my own work because i use my camera.Weisenstar (talk) 01:52, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- This dog is my son dog
This dog is 2 year old male bullmastiff and the i use my camera to captured it and maybe my son or my cousin upload this photo to other website but one i promise my own photo this.
Delete Unless valid permission is received via com:OTRS. --McZusatz (talk) 10:02, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, by Rama with reason "Upload from disruptive account". Taivo (talk) 14:02, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
low resolution + no EXIF data + lots of this user's images being nominated for deletion on copyvio grounds => I strongly suspect that this is copyvio also DS (talk) 03:56, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- As per the precautionary principle, these should probably all go too. DS (talk) 04:10, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- you don't have any evidence only your thought this is not copyright violation OK this dog is from Pakistan this is the father of my brolly dog his male puppy i captured this photo when i pick up the puppy.Weisenstar (talk) 06:41, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- No evidence only though
- Make sure before you nominate an image you have an evidence OK.
- Absolutely not copyright violation this photo was captured from my own camera so its entirely my own work.Weisenstar (talk) 06:40, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
The nominator said he only suspect he use only his though without any proof or evidence
[edit]
- please removed the ta this image should not be in deletion log because of only a though.
- and this dog is my puppy father i captured this photo from Pakistan.
- a
- b
- c
WARNING
[edit]
If you continuesly do this to me and to other user like me I promise to report this at internet providers my friend is one who work in internet to classify if the website do well like this.
- this is the last warning this can be give Wikipedia big destruction
- stop do this horripic things.like you down other user to be your happiness.
- and i think if all administrator here working good the file in this wink can be billion right now but that thing will not happened because of abused officials here.
Deleted, by Rama with reasin "Upload from disruptive account)". Taivo (talk) 13:56, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
I consider the photo out of project scope due to bad quality. Taivo (talk) 10:37, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete User was uploading copyvios in the past. So better delete this EXIF-less small-resolution picture per com:PRP. --McZusatz (talk) 10:42, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
this is the only reason haaa
[edit]
- OK you know its not copyright violation only in that reason why?
- I'm confused if the administrator here in Commons are OK only small photo your reason.Weisenstar (talk) 12:08, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
You don't have enough proof or evidence and your reason is not normal
[edit]
- your just trying to destroyed my account as i see.
- not enough reason to be deleted.
- 100% my own photo using my camera.
Weisenstar (talk) 12:08, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, by Rama with reason "Upload from disruptive account)". Taivo (talk) 13:58, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Attempting to advertise. Druddigon (talk) 14:21, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:46, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
ich möchte das Bild ersetzen FloBert (talk) 09:02, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 22:25, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Advertising Druddigon (talk) 14:22, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted by User:Yann as copyright violation. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 04:40, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
Vanity image, only used in (now deleted) en.wp articles and userpages spamming for this person. Beeblebrox (talk) 15:50, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete COM:COPYVIO: found on the web: FB. --KurodaSho (talk) 13:30, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 18:20, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 153.204.39.242 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC0HsPXPVm1yOvofHjN5eXMA, but it looks like this is a user picture this user has previously incorporated into his YouTube account. Commons allows a limited number of user images. Converting to DN for consensus. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:52, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:55, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
Patently racist synthesis identifying supposedly living Jewish people in red under the title "Who Controls Your Mind?" Medeis (talk) 20:57, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- This file is unsourced synthesis violating WP:BLP being used to foment debate at [9]. It should be deleted immediately, as it serves no purpose while obviously violating WP:BLP and various other policies, and would be eligible for speedy deletion under G10 if it were an article. Medeis (talk) 21:03, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- Totally agree, serious BLP violation. Get rid, ASAP! Mjroots (talk) 21:46, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- The thread has been deleted by another user, the image is orphaned, and the issue is at WP:ANI. Medeis (talk) 22:33, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- Totally agree, serious BLP violation. Get rid, ASAP! Mjroots (talk) 21:46, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
The image is clearly not the uploader's own work - a reverse image search finds it on the Stormfront website amongst other places. AndyTheGrump (talk) 00:19, 15 August 2015 (UTC)\
- I did an image search and it is found all over the internet.--I am One of Many (talk) 00:35, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
- I freely admit that this was an error of judgment on my part. I didn't know how to upload the file according to the correct procedure, and I apologise. I apologise and have no objection at all to it being deleted. --Mrandrewnohome (talk) 01:11, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete As not the uploader's own work. Out of scope as excluded material. Beyond My Ken (talk) 01:49, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
- The uploader has been indeffed at WP, the image is clearly a copyvio as well as a violation of BLP. Is there some sort of speedy deletion process? It would be quite appropriate, given even the uploader is not contesting the fact it is stolen and the license is a misrepresentation. Medeis (talk) 03:47, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - out of scope & apparent copyvio to boot. And even without the uploaders admission, the file is all over the place outside wikimedia so any claims to be the author is clearly suspect. And even we do despect the copyright of despicable racists. I'm sure the author would be happy to have the file on wikimedia but they won't necessarily be willing to release it under a free licence. Nil Einne (talk) 11:23, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per discussion. Not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:25, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 00:35, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:25, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal vanity photo better suited to Facebook. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 01:10, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Beeblebrox (talk) 03:51, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:26, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal vanity photo. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 01:28, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:26, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
A person of no notability. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 01:57, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:27, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused file, artwork without obvious educational use BrightRaven (talk) 08:04, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:28, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused file, artwork without obvious educational use BrightRaven (talk) 08:20, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:29, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused file, artwork without obvious educational use BrightRaven (talk) 08:21, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:29, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Uddinkabir (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope: Sorry but Commons is not designed to host personal photographs.
~ Nahid Talk 08:24, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:30, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Description: "none". Out of COM:SCOPE as not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Keφr (keep talk here) 09:15, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:31, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Iqbal.khokhar15 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused files, private images
- File:Jana Sahid Dergah premises.jpg
- File:Mohammad Iqbal Khokhar14.JPG
- File:Mohammad Iqbal Khokhar15.JPG
- File:Mohammad Iqbal Khokhar13.JPG
- File:Mohammad Iqbal Khokhar12.JPG
- File:Mohammad Iqbal Khokhar11.JPG
- File:Mohammad Iqbal Khokhar10.jpg
- File:Mohammad Iqbal Khokhar7.jpg
- File:Mohammad Iqbal Khokhar8.jpg
- File:Mohammad Iqbal Khokhar9.JPG
- File:Mohammad Iqbal Khokhar6.jpg
- File:Mohammad Iqbal Khokhar5.jpg
- File:Mohammad Iqbal Khokhar3.jpg
- File:Mohammad Iqbal Khokhar4.jpg
- File:Mohammad Iqbal Khokhar1.gif
- File:Moahmmad Iqbal Khokhar.jpg
BrightRaven (talk) 09:29, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:33, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bassammahdi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused private images, out of scope.
Achim (talk) 11:23, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:38, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
advertisement/promotional, out of scope. Achim (talk) 11:49, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:38, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused file, artwork without obvious educational use BrightRaven (talk) 13:41, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:39, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kanda kassobua miala (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:40, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
photoshopped poster, out of project scope Motopark (talk) 14:22, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:40, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Used in irrelevant article. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:41, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private drawing album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:41, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:41, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
personal photo, not used, not in scope Avron (talk) 16:48, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:42, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
personal photo, not used, not in scope Avron (talk) 16:49, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:43, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
personal photo, not used Avron (talk) 18:19, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:43, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
personal photo, not used Avron (talk) 18:19, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:43, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Matiia (talk) 19:20, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:44, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Unused image, claimed to be used by Wikibooks, out of COM:SCOPE for being unused, small and blurry with no source or author. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:23, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:44, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Matiia (talk) 19:41, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:45, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Not own work, no permission. Yann (talk) 21:56, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:04, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Taygonlima (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope.
Matiia (talk) 22:17, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:03, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Empereur42 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope.
- File:Mikaël léonard.jpg
- File:Sammy peru.jpg
- File:Léonardo.jpg
- File:Face bizarre Samuel Adams.jpg
- File:Dave charles.jpg
- File:Alex avo papazian.png
- File:Baptiste.jpg
- File:Alex-Avo Papazian 2.jpg
Matiia (talk) 22:20, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:03, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Che Martinez Juan (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:COPYVIO: small size, no EXIF, with watermark, found on the web: http://www.drna.gobierno.pr/biblioteca/banco-de-fotos/tilapia%20rendallis.jpg/view (http://www.drna.gobierno.pr/biblioteca/banco-de-fotos/tilapia%20rendallis.jpg/image_view_fullscreen)
KurodaSho (talk) 00:18, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Done by Hedwig in Washington Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:49, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
http://www.mehrnews.com/news/580163/%DA%AF%D8%B2%D8%A7%D8%B1%D8%B4-%D8%AA%D8%B5%D9%88%DB%8C%D8%B1%DB%8C-%D8%A7%D8%AE%D8%AA%D8%AA%D8%A7%D9%85%DB%8C%D9%87-%DA%A9%D9%86%DA%AF%D8%B1%D9%87-%D8%A8%DB%8C%D9%86-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D9%84%D9%84%DB%8C-%D8%B4%D9%85%D8%B3-%D8%AA%D8%A8%D8%B1%DB%8C%D8%B2%DB%8C-%D8%AF%D8%B1-%D8%AE%D9%88%DB%8C-2 مسعود بوکانی (talk) 00:38, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:49, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Mire Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:11, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete as out of scope - somebody telling the story of his life. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 04:50, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:50, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kirkwood829 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not own work. Most files by Kirkwood829 are from the China Organgic Valley website.
- File:Cov t1 Small.jpg
- File:Cov t3 Small.jpg
- File:Cov t2 SB.jpg
- File:Cov t3 SB.jpg
- File:Cov-t4-SB.jpg
- File:Cov-t5s.jpg
- File:Cov-t4s.jpg
- File:Cov-ts.jpg
- File:Cov-t2s.jpg
- File:Cov map large.jpg
- File:Cov-t1.jpg
- File:China Organic Valley Logo.jpg
- File:王小村2.jpg
- File:Cov-t2.jpg
- File:Cov-t16.jpg
- File:Cov-t16b.jpg
- File:Cov-t14b.jpg
- File:Cov-t11.jpg
- File:Cov-t13.jpg
- File:Cov-t12.jpg
- File:Cov-t9.jpg
- File:Cov-t8.jpg
- File:Cov-t10.jpg
- File:Cov-t7.jpg
- File:Cov-t14.jpg
- File:Cov-t4b.jpg
- File:Cov-t3.jpg
- File:Cov-t4.jpg
- File:Williamxwang.jpg
- File:王小村照片.jpg
Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:54, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: As per COM:PRP Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:52, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Unambiguous copyright violation from the band's website: http://www.needtobreathe.com/sites/g/files/g2000003551/f/styles/600_600photostyle/public/201508/11372127_517770538371367_2103585439_n_0.jpg Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:33, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:52, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Very unlikely to be the work of the uploader. Featured in the official site of the TV channel [10] (Image) with no evidence of free license. Jarash (talk) 05:36, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
![05:36, 14 August 2015 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2015/08/14#c-Jarash-2015-08-14T05:36:00.000Z-File:"Тэлеканал_"Беларусь-2".jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:52, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
![07:52, 21 August 2015 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2015/08/14#c-Jianhui67-2015-08-21T07:52:00.000Z-File:"Тэлеканал_"Беларусь-2".jpg){kind=link}
probably copyvio, found on http://www.nhcra-online.org/falklands/falklands02e.html 4ing (talk) 07:11, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:52, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Delete: this is a derivative work of the image found on this webpage which itself was previously deleted. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Aasaan.jpg Ww2censor (talk) 09:33, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:53, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
possibly COM:COPYVIO: flickr image is the source but there is no evidence that this flickr account is an official account of OneCoin (cf. search result on Google). and missing EXIF. It seems Commons:License laundering. --KurodaSho (talk) 09:38, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
You can find link to OneCoin flickr account on their web page: http://www.onecoin.eu/ (in the header next to YouTube and Facebook)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:53, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
The previous reason for deletion has been proven false per [11], which clearly lists the Flickr account on the OneCoin website. Per COM:UNDEL, the question is now whether to assume that the company has the rights to release this photo. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:01, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
The subject was founder and CEO of OneCoin.
On the one hand, the company is apparently full of bad actors on a billion dollar scale. Over a hundred of its people have been arrested. Given its apparent disregard for the law, I think there is a significant doubt that the company actually had the right to freely license this portrait on Flickr. On the other hand, the subject is on the run from being wanted in a dozen countries, so posting an image of her might help catch up with her. I'll stand 
Neutral on this. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:04, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: let's assume that it was a portrait done for hire for the company, if it appeared on a company's website/Flickr account. Ruthven (msg) 13:37, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
possibly COM:COPYVIO: small size, no EXIF. Found on the web (twitter@umarjianuradha) and this source seems to be uploaded in Sep 2010. KurodaSho (talk) 09:51, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:53, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Likely crop of official team photo: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 09:59, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:54, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed", this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:00, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:54, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata, probable professional shot: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 10:03, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:54, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata, previously published online: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 10:03, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:54, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
No metadata, likely video still: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 10:19, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:54, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
No metadata: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 10:20, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:54, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Unused non-notable artwork/logo. While the uploading of small numbers of images... for use on a personal user page... is allowed, this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:20, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:55, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 10:23, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:55, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed", this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:24, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:55, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Unused non-notable artwork. While the uploading of small numbers of images... for use on a personal user page... is allowed, this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:26, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: also COM:DW Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:55, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed", this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:30, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:55, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Unused non-notable artwork/logo. While the uploading of small numbers of images... for use on a personal user page... is allowed, this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:34, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:56, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Unused non-notable artwork/logo. While the uploading of small numbers of images... for use on a personal user page... is allowed, this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:35, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:56, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ManiSingh0810 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused unencyclopedic personal image outside our scope. We have better images in Category:Turbans.
- File:-MG 2985.JPG
- File:-MG 2984.JPG
- File:-MG 2979.JPG
- File:-MG 3048.JPG
- File:-MG 3043.JPG
- File:-MG 3042.JPG
- File:-MG 3033.JPG
- File:-MG 3032.JPG
§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:43, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:57, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
no educational purpose recognizable due to very low quality Achim (talk) 11:03, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:57, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Small size, no EXIF data, and maybe not his/here own work Vikoula5 (talk) 13:09, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:59, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Selfi photo, and out of scoop Vikoula5 (talk) 13:15, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:59, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Small size, no EXIF data, and maybe not his/here own work Vikoula5 (talk) 13:19, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:00, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Small size, no EXIF data, and maybe not his/here own work. Vikoula5 (talk) 13:23, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:00, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Ho sbagliato. Dovevo creare la Categoria. Marica Massaro (talk) 13:36, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete empty gallery Motopark (talk) 15:40, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Done by Wutsje Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:59, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Small size, no EXIF data, and maybe not his/here own work. Vikoula5 (talk) 13:25, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:06, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Small size, no EXIF data, and maybe not his/here own work. Vikoula5 (talk) 13:27, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:06, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Small size, no EXIF data, and maybe not his/here own work. Vikoula5 (talk) 13:28, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:09, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Small size, no EXIF data, and maybe not his/here own work. Vikoula5 (talk) 13:29, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:09, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Small size, no EXIF data, and maybe not his/here own work. Vikoula5 (talk) 13:30, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:09, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Small size, no EXIF data, and maybe not his/here own work. Vikoula5 (talk) 13:31, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:09, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Small size, no EXIF data, and maybe not his/here own work. Vikoula5 (talk) 13:40, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:09, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Small size, no EXIF data, and maybe not his/here own work. Vikoula5 (talk) 13:45, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:09, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Small size, no EXIF data, and maybe not his/here own work. Vikoula5 (talk) 13:47, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:09, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Amine sedrata (talk · contribs)
[edit]Small size, no EXIF data, all other files are copyvios, unlikely to be own works.
- File:حقول سدراتة.jpg
- File:اودية المايدة.jpg
- File:ساحة اول نوفمبر.jpg
- File:الطريق الاجتنابي.jpg
- File:شارع الاستقلال.jpg
- File:شارع الفداء سدراتة.jpg
Yann (talk) 13:49, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:09, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Small size, no EXIF data, and maybe not his/here own work. Vikoula5 (talk) 13:51, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:09, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Small size, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.
- File:My hourses.jpg
- File:House of night.jpg
- File:My best friend ever.jpg
- File:Bin khalti.jpg
- File:Could.jpg
- File:Burd of dunner.jpg
Yann (talk) 13:56, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:10, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Small size, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 13:58, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:10, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Small size, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 13:59, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:10, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Small size, no EXIF data, and maybe not his/here own work. Vikoula5 (talk) 14:03, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:10, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Bogus license, no permission. Yann (talk) 14:07, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:10, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:10, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:10, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Wikimouhcin (talk · contribs)
[edit]Small size, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.
Yann (talk) 14:18, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:11, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Trpirireis (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused advertisement of questionable notability. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:PİRİ REİS.pdf
- File:Piri Reis Olarak Biz.pdf
- File:Piri Reis Sizin Yanınızda.pdf
- File:Piri Reis İle Rakiplerinize Karşı Bir Adım Önde Olun.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:11, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Herrytruong (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:11, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Menmariano (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Gracias a todos.png
- File:Perfil de Menendez.jpg
- File:Scioli Menendez portada.jpg
- File:LocalRivadavia.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:11, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:Lelatataraidze.png
- File:Basgarmoni.png
- File:Wikowiko.png
- File:Garmonidiatonuri.jpg
- File:Garmoni.tushuri.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:13, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Wilfredorostran (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:GarciaVSJorge Rodriguez Olivera.JPG
- File:Byron Mitchell.jpg
- File:GarciavsJohnson.jpg
- File:Luis-Garcia.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:15, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Too bad quality - out of scope, also susp. scan of unfree work /St1995 14:58, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- Definitely useless. Stas (talk) 21:17, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:12, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal picture, out of project scope Fenerli1978 (talk) 16:40, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
include: File:Hüseyin GÜL 2.jpg
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:12, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Arif Emre Türkyılmaz (talk · contribs)
[edit]According to the description, it seems private photo of an uploader himself. Not used in any user pages of wiki-projects. Out of COM:PS
KurodaSho (talk) 16:43, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:12, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Test page. Druddigon (talk) 17:34, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:13, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
no offense, but DR started to verify claimed 'own work' as p.e. missing exif and relatively small format, Roland zh (talk) 18:49, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:17, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
no offense, but DR started to verify "out of focus" as imho at least partially advertisements, see source as described by uploader, Roland zh (talk) 18:58, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:18, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
no offense, but DR started to verify claimed "own work", see link to google, as well format and missing exif, Roland zh (talk) 19:01, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:19, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
no offense, but DR started to verify claimed 'own work', see p.e. thumbnail format and missing exif, Roland zh (talk) 19:06, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:19, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
no offense, but DR started to verify claimed 'own work', see watermark and link by uploader, Roland zh (talk) 19:08, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:19, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
no offense, but DR started to verify claimed 'own work', see p.e. link (category) and missing exif, Roland zh (talk) 19:20, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:19, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Small size, no EXIF data, all other files are copyvios, user blocked, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 19:37, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:17, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
no offense, but DR started to verify claimed 'own work', see p.e. thumbnail format and missing exif, Roland zh (talk) 19:38, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:17, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Missing permission. Fry1989 eh? 20:13, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:17, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Missing permission. Fry1989 eh? 20:13, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:17, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Missing permission. Fry1989 eh? 20:14, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:17, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Missing permission. Fry1989 eh? 20:14, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:17, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Missing permission. Fry1989 eh? 20:14, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:17, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Missing permission. Fry1989 eh? 20:14, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:17, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Missing permission. Fry1989 eh? 20:15, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:17, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Missing permission. Fry1989 eh? 20:15, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:18, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Missing permission. Fry1989 eh? 20:15, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:18, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Missing permission. Fry1989 eh? 20:16, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:18, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Missing permission. Fry1989 eh? 20:16, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:18, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Missing permission. Fry1989 eh? 20:18, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:18, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Doubtful that the flickr user is the author of this image. A lot of his images were clearly from somewhere else. [12] is clipped from a magazine. [13] has someone else's brand mark at the bottom. As wonderful as it would be if we could use this, we really have no idea where these vintage photos are from and no assertion of authorship. B (talk) 21:25, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:13, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Vanity//hoax image, used on spam/hoax pages on en.wp (deleted) and zh.wp. Out of project scope Beeblebrox (talk) 21:36, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:13, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
no offense, but DR started to verify claimed 'own work', see p.e. thumbnail format and missing exif, Roland zh (talk) 19:36, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:20, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
no offense, but DR started to verify claimed 'own work', see p.e. format, quality and missing exif, Roland zh (talk) 19:45, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:33, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
no offense, but DR started to verify claimed 'own work', see p.e. source, format and missing exif, Roland zh (talk) 19:49, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:33, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
No indication user created this 1982-1985 image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:54, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:33, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Fair use not allowed on Commons. How old is this? Yann (talk) 20:13, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:31, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Not own work, no permission. Yann (talk) 20:23, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:30, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Bogus license, no permission. Yann (talk) 20:25, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:29, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
No FOP in France - Rama (talk) 09:58, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: no FoP in France Ymblanter (talk) 19:09, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
No FOP in the Republic of China (Taiwan) Amitie 10g (talk) 04:15, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: no FoP in Taiwan Ymblanter (talk) 19:29, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
нарушение АП kosun (talk) 05:51, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: OTRS needed Ymblanter (talk) 19:30, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Нарушение АП kosun (talk) 05:51, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: OTRS needed Ymblanter (talk) 19:30, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Нарушение АП kosun (talk) 05:52, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: OTRS needed Ymblanter (talk) 19:30, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Нарушение АП kosun (talk) 05:52, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: OTRS needed Ymblanter (talk) 19:33, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Нарушение АП kosun (talk) 05:53, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: OTRS needed Ymblanter (talk) 19:34, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Нарушение АП kosun (talk) 05:53, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: OTRS needed Ymblanter (talk) 19:35, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Нарушение АП kosun (talk) 05:54, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: OTRS needed Ymblanter (talk) 19:35, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:47, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- Should be salvageable if we can confirm the year of creation as 1922, country? Google translator: Hebrew: youth movements in the eastern town of Iowa, Trfb -1922. @Matanya: Could you please help out? Thanks! --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:51, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, that is correct, the image was taken 1922. should be free. matanya • talk 13:32, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: still no license at all. JuTa 17:14, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Didym (talk) 03:51, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: still no license at all. JuTa 17:14, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. {{PD-old-70}}, but need the actual soruce. Amitie 10g (talk) 21:20, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: still no license at all. JuTa 17:15, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
Copy right status of the poster embedded in this image is not definite. Clearly a derivative and not a "de minimus" case for someone else's photograph. Mhhossein (talk) 07:28, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- @Didym: Pinging admin for closing the discussion. Mhhossein (talk) 17:25, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 19:25, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
If the author is unknown, this license is not possible. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:13, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- Keep: {{PD-anon-70}} --Amitie 10g (talk) 21:51, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Comment Please show me the date or attribution of the image at the source? I didn't even see this image at that source, please advise. This is a photo, probably an official portrait but without more information it's impossible to tell who took it, where, when or where the uploader got it from, especially as it doesn't show on the page to which it is sourced. Incidentally, the file is not in use. If you look at the category into which it was placed, it doesn't bear a lot of resemblance to the other portraits. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:45, 15 August 2015 (UTC)- Comment Also please see Commons:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/A3cb1#Uroghe77 where they were "banned indefinetly for violation of copyright and abuse of multiple accounts". COM:PRP Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:50, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete the uploader is a child who loves inserting false informations. Personally I'll remove any of his uploads on sight also considering we cannot be sure about anything, even about the subject. --Vituzzu (talk) 00:06, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:Denniss. JuTa 20:39, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
If the author is unknown, this license is not possible. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:13, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- Keep: {{PD-anon-70}} --Amitie 10g (talk) 21:52, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- Comment The painting is dated to 1927 at the source (http://dinastias.forogratis.es/philip-alexius-de-laszlo-t93-132.html). We have no idea where the piece is, it's not dated or attributed so we can't tell who painted it or for sure when. The assumption of PD-anon-70 doesn't hold up in this case due to insufficient information. I Googled the image and did not find comparable other than on that blog. Any better ideas? I'm not comfortable with constantly assuming that files with incomplete information are automatically ok and I've very much worried about tagging images with assumed tags without information - as in this case. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:40, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Also please see Commons:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/A3cb1#Uroghe77 where they were "banned indefinetly for violation of copyright and abuse of multiple accounts". COM:PRP Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:51, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:Denniss. JuTa 20:39, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
If the author is unknown, this license is not possible. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:13, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- Keep: {{PD-anon-70}} --Amitie 10g (talk) 21:52, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- Comment The source (http://www.europeana.eu/portal/record/08504/0518A0B8AA611B30EE4A3ADAAEC594F899A0A9F0.html) leads to an utterly different image. With unknown author as well - agreed it looks old, but I have no confidence that we have the correct information on this template yet. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:36, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Also please see Commons:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/A3cb1#Uroghe77 where they were "banned indefinetly for violation of copyright and abuse of multiple accounts". COM:PRP Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:51, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:Denniss. JuTa 20:39, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
If the author is unknown, this license is not possible. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:13, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- Keep: If author is unknown, just change the license to {{PD-anon-70}} instead of making non-sense DRs. --Amitie 10g (talk) 21:49, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- Comment The source goes to a 2002 publication (http://lanotiziaguidizzolo.com/pdf-pubblicazioni/rizzini.pdf) which doesn't cite a source for the illustration - so it may be a contemporary work. We cannot "just change the license" without better information. Please go deeper in your examinations of nominated files and remember we all work together; users and admins together to the betterment of WikiCommons! Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:49, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Also please see Commons:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/A3cb1#Uroghe77 where they were "banned indefinetly for violation of copyright and abuse of multiple accounts". COM:PRP Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:51, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:Denniss. JuTa 20:40, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
If the author is unknown, this license is not possible. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:13, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- Keep: If the author is unknown, {{PD-anon-70}} applies then. --Amitie 10g (talk) 21:47, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Also please see Commons:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/A3cb1#Uroghe77 where they were "banned indefinetly for violation of copyright and abuse of multiple accounts". COM:PRP Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:51, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:Denniss. JuTa 20:40, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Ellin Beltz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: If the author is unknown, this license is not possible. Yann (talk) 20:36, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Also please see Commons:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/A3cb1#Uroghe77 where they were "banned indefinetly for violation of copyright and abuse of multiple accounts". COM:PRP Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:51, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:Denniss. JuTa 20:41, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Thanks Storkk. -- Holly
Watermark credits a K Cooney. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 10:11, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- Comment New, presumably free, image has been uploaded over the first. Closing admin: please now consider this a COM:REVDEL request. Storkk (talk) 14:32, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi Storkk.
I'm a newbie and am not sure if this is the right place to leave you a note regarding this: Storkk left a message on your talk page in "File:Holly Van Hart photo S...". File:Holly Van Hart photo Silicon Valley.jpg has been nominated for deletion
I have permission to freely use that image, but decided to replace it with another, updated image called Holly Van Hart photo.jpg. I replaced the previous jpg with Holly Van Hart photo.jpg and an explanation, and emailed this note regarding the new image (and attached the new image):
To: permissions-commons@wikimedia.org I hereby affirm that I, Holly Van Hart, am the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of the attached image. I agree to publish the above-mentioned content under the free license: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International. I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws. I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites. I am aware that I always retain copyright of my work, and retain the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by me. I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project. Holly Van Hart Copyright holder August 14, 2015
hollyvanhart This was copied from my talk page. Storkk (talk) 15:07, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- The subject, and copyright holder (self timer), has sent in a permission statement to OTRS--Sphilbrick (talk) 22:17, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- Good catch, I have rev-deled the prior version.--Sphilbrick (talk) 12:36, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
Kept, Prior version deleted Sphilbrick (talk) 12:48, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
very small, impossible to figure out what it represents, basically useless. Bomazi (talk) 00:54, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:40, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unused fictitious flag; out of COM:SCOPE as not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Keφr (keep talk here) 09:11, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:44, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal(?) flag; out of COM:SCOPE as not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Keφr (keep talk here) 09:12, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:45, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Unused flag of something the uploader did not even bother to properly name. Out of COM:SCOPE as not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Keφr (keep talk here) 09:13, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:45, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Unused flag of something the uploader did not even bother to properly name. Out of COM:SCOPE as not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Keφr (keep talk here) 09:15, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:45, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Unused fictitious coat of arms; out of COM:SCOPE as not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Keφr (keep talk here) 09:16, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:46, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Unused fictitious flag; out of COM:SCOPE as not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Keφr (keep talk here) 09:16, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:46, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Unused fictitious flag; out of COM:SCOPE as not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Keφr (keep talk here) 09:17, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:47, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Unused fictitious flag; out of COM:SCOPE as not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Keφr (keep talk here) 09:18, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- Keep - It's an interpretation of this passage from the novella Robur the Conqueror by Jules Verne: "And the flag was black, dotted with stars, and it bore a golden sun in its center."[14]. So it's actually potentially useful for an educational purpose... AnonMoos (talk) 02:09, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
Kept: as per User:AnonMoos. P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:48, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Plagiarised from an earlier revision of File:Flag of CARICOM.svg. There is no compelling reason to maintain this variant as a separate file, which has only minor cosmetic differences from the current revision. Psychonaut (talk) 09:51, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:50, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
File:Children in Ribat-i-Abbasi of Nishapur (Hossein - Ali - Fatemeh - Hengameh and another girl - probably Afghani) 22.jpg
[edit]_22.jpg){kind=link}
_22.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copy right status of the calligraphy embedded in this image is not definite. Clearly a derivative and not a "de minimus" case for someone else's photograph. Mhhossein (talk) 12:06, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- Keep, as semantically this is a photo of a girl which happens to have some callygraphy in it, in the background, uncomplete, and off-frame — and not a a photo of callygraphy which happens to show a girl in the foreground. If necessary, replace this with an edited version with the plaques in question blurred out. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 04:00, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
- @Tuvalkin: Unfortunately, the calligraphy is significant and the photo deserves deletion for not respecting copy right of the art works. lets see what Didym believes. Mhhossein (talk) 04:38, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
- @Mhhossein: You replied ignoring the possibility I suggest above of replacing the image with an edited version where callygraphy is blurred out (and see below Amitie 10g’s suggestion of cropping it). You seem to want very hard to just delete this image. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 16:08, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
- New version uploaded, consider to speedy the previous version (why you didn't that instead). The Copyright paranoia is becoming a serious problem specially in Commons. --Amitie 10g (talk) 23:05, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
- @Mhhossein: You replied ignoring the possibility I suggest above of replacing the image with an edited version where callygraphy is blurred out (and see below Amitie 10g’s suggestion of cropping it). You seem to want very hard to just delete this image. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 16:08, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
- @Tuvalkin: Unfortunately, the calligraphy is significant and the photo deserves deletion for not respecting copy right of the art works. lets see what Didym believes. Mhhossein (talk) 04:38, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
- Tuvalkin: Assume good faith please. I'm trying to help! Mhhossein (talk) 12:41, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
- You still didn’t reply to the possibility of cropping or blurring — looks like my “bad faith” is warrented. But you can add {{Withdraw}} any time… -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 13:05, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
- I do believe in your good faith. I still doubt whether the problem is fixed or not! Mhhossein (talk) 16:44, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
- Could you read this thread in Meta? There is the answer. I expect that the new, cropped version uploaded by me is enoug. --Amitie 10g (talk) 06:37, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
- Could you please be specific? Mhhossein (talk) 13:04, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
- Could you read this thread in Meta? There is the answer. I expect that the new, cropped version uploaded by me is enoug. --Amitie 10g (talk) 06:37, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
- I do believe in your good faith. I still doubt whether the problem is fixed or not! Mhhossein (talk) 16:44, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
- You still didn’t reply to the possibility of cropping or blurring — looks like my “bad faith” is warrented. But you can add {{Withdraw}} any time… -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 13:05, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
- Keep:De minimis apply. The size or proportion of elements not related to the subject does not matter. In doubt, just crop and upload the new version with as less de minimis elements as possible instead of nominating for deletion. --Amitie 10g (talk) 07:39, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
- I uploaded a Cropped size of this picture. --Sonia Sevilla (talk) 02:45, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
Kept: calligraphy now really DM in new cropped version. P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:52, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
The photograph in this photograph has no author information. Licencing needs to be corrected (if possible) or this has to be deleted. 60.230.204.254 12:52, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- Keep: Source was added to the filepage: File:Jan Bart de Vreede Nov 2010.JPG. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 01:06, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:Rabesa A. Zafera.jpg
- File:Prof Rabesa Zafera Antoine.jpeg
- File:Rabesa Zafera-Antoine crop.jpg
- File:Membre govmg.jpg
- File:Zafera.png
- File:Rabesa.JPG
- File:Rabesa Zafera.JPG
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
Possibly copyvio, see above.
Stefan4 (talk) 20:20, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:04, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
Probably (c) vios, a load of own work already deleted. IMHO Com:PCP
Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:08, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:53, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
File says it was based on w:File:Logo Labour Party.svg, which is a fair use logo. Unless there is some exemption for the logo (in which case it should move to Commons), this copy of it would be a copyright violation. – czar 02:07, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:55, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
File:Naturalis Biodiversity Center - L.1062606 - Gilbertiodendron grandistipulatum (De Wild.) J.Léonard - Leguminosae-Caes. - Plant type specimen.jpeg
[edit]_J.L%C3%A9onard_-_Leguminosae-Caes._-_Plant_type_specimen.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_J.L%C3%A9onard_-_Leguminosae-Caes._-_Plant_type_specimen.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I, uploader of this file, request deletion: image not encyclopedic after all. My apologies! Hansmuller (talk) 14:09, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:11, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
File:Naturalis Biodiversity Center - L.1062604 - Gilbertiodendron grandistipulatum (De Wild.) J.Léonard - Leguminosae-Caes. - Plant type specimen.jpeg
[edit]_J.L%C3%A9onard_-_Leguminosae-Caes._-_Plant_type_specimen.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_J.L%C3%A9onard_-_Leguminosae-Caes._-_Plant_type_specimen.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I, uploader of this file, request deletion: image not informative/encyclopedic after all. My apologies! Hansmuller (talk) 14:10, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:09, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
File:Naturalis Biodiversity Center - L.1062605 - Gilbertiodendron grandistipulatum (De Wild.) J.Léonard - Leguminosae-Caes. - Plant type specimen.jpeg
[edit]_J.L%C3%A9onard_-_Leguminosae-Caes._-_Plant_type_specimen.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_J.L%C3%A9onard_-_Leguminosae-Caes._-_Plant_type_specimen.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I, uploader of this file, request deletion: image not informative/encyclopedic after all. My apologies! Hansmuller (talk) 14:11, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:10, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 19:33, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per DR Mys_721tx (talk) 22:37, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
This is not simple text or geometric shapes. The shapes have different colouring and are placed in a particular way. Need to refer to Bulgarian copyright law to see what their COM:TOO is. LZ-CGT (talk) 00:53, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Delete it.
Yes, as you like. Delete everything, I don't care anymore. Pictures, pages, editions, everything, I'm done with this... --SAVZ (talk) 08:19, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 00:25, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
This logo is not simple text or geometric shapes. The flag part of the logo is very distinct with different colouring/shade, etc LZ-CGT (talk) 00:54, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 00:25, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
No evidence that this official poster has been released to the public domain as claimed. DAJF (talk) 01:30, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
The author has released the image and poster to the public domain via its own forum. http://forums.abs-cbn.com/on-the-wings-of-love/upcoming-jadine-serye/210/
Deleted: Sorry but not good enough Natuur12 (talk) 00:26, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
Self nomination, low quality. OSX (talk • contributions) 03:11, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
Kept, No valid rationale, no replacement.--Wdwd (talk) 08:20, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
Self nomination, low quality file, replaced by File:1999 Holden Statesman (WH) sedan (2015-06-25) 02.jpg and File:1999-2001 Holden WH Statesman sedan 04.jpg. OSX (talk • contributions) 02:00, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
_sedan_(2015-06-25)_02.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: Still no reason to delete Natuur12 (talk) 00:28, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
All image are from http://www.lithuania.travel/ and the footnote reads "© Lithuanian State Department of Tourism, 2015" and the terms and condition on http://www.lithuania.travel/en-gb/photography-usage-terms/17333 allow usage "only for the personal and/or not commercial reasons". This license is not compatible with our licenses; unless some OTRS is pending with approval somewhere.
- File:Aukstaitija national park (9).jpg
- File:Aukstaitija national park (8).jpg
- File:Aukstaitija national park (7).jpg
- File:Autumn in Lithuania (2).jpg
- File:Aukstaitija national park.jpg
- File:Autumn in old capitals in Lithuania (2).jpg
- File:Autumn in old capitals of Lithuania (1).jpg
- File:Autumn in Lithuania (4).jpg
- File:Autumn in Lithuania (3).jpg
- File:Autumn in Lithuania (1).jpg
- File:Aukstaitija national park (11).jpg
- File:Aukstaitija national park (10).jpg
- File:Aukstaitija national park (15).jpg
- File:Aukstaitija national park (14).jpg
- File:Aukstaitija national park (13).jpg
- File:Aukstaitija national park (12).jpg
- File:Baltic Sea in Lithuania (1).jpg
- File:Baltic Sea in Lithuania.jpg
- File:Autumn in old capitals of Lithuania (9).jpg
- File:Autumn in old capitals of Lithuania.jpg
- File:Autumn in old capitals of Lithuania (14).jpg
- File:Autumn in old capitals of Lithuania (13).jpg
- File:Autumn in old capitals of Lithuania (12).jpg
- File:Autumn in old capitals of Lithuania(11).jpg
- File:Autumn in old capitals of Lithuania(10).jpg
- File:Autumn in old capitals of Lithuania(8).jpg
- File:Autumn in old capitals of Lithuania (7).jpg
- File:Autumn in old capitals of Lithuania (6).jpg
- File:Autumn in old capitals of Lithuania (5).jpg
- File:Autumn in old capitals of Lithuania (4).jpg
- File:Autumn in old capitals of Lithuania (3).jpg
- File:Devils wheel in Lithuania.jpg
- File:Darius and Girenas.jpg
- File:Bunger in Lithuania.jpg
- File:Bunger in Lithuania (1).jpg
- File:Blossoms in Lithuania.jpg
- File:Blossoms in Lithuania (3).jpg
- File:Blossoms in Lithuania (2).jpg
- File:Blossoms in Lithuania (1).jpg
- File:Bikes in Vilnius.jpg
- File:Baltuju Lakaju lake.jpg
- File:Baltic Sea (11).jpg
- File:Flight above old capitals (4).jpg
- File:Flight above old capitals (3).jpg
- File:Flight above old capitals (2).jpg
- File:Flight above old capitals (1).jpg
- File:Fields in Lithuania (3).jpg
- File:Dutchman's Cap.jpg
- File:Dutchman's Cap (2).jpg
- File:Dutchman's Cap (1).jpg
- File:Duriai lake.jpg
- File:Druskininkai (11).jpg
- File:Druskininkai (3).jpg
- File:Druskininkai (2).jpg
- File:Druskininkai (1).jpg
- File:Helios City (1).jpg
- File:Kedainiai (5).jpg
- File:Flight above old capitals (5).jpg
- File:Giruliai seashore.jpg
- File:Gintaliskes church.jpg
- File:Gediminas hill.jpg
- File:Forest near Siauliai.jpg
- File:Forest near lake.jpg
- File:Flight above old capitals.jpg
- File:Flight above old capitals (10).jpg
- File:Flight above old capitals (9).jpg
- File:Flight above old capitals (8).jpg
- File:Flight above old capitals (7).jpg
- File:Flight above old capitals (6).jpg
- File:Kedainiai (4).jpg
- File:Kedainiai (3).jpg
- File:Kedainiai (2).jpg
- File:Kedainiai (1).jpg
- File:Kaunas streets.jpg
- File:Kaunas old town.jpg
- File:Kaunas church.jpg
- File:Kaunas (1).jpg
- File:Karoliniskes fields.jpg
- File:Jonas church.jpg
- File:Hill of Crosses (3).jpg
- File:Hill of Crosses (2).jpg
- File:Hill of Crosses (1).jpg
- File:Kelme road.jpg
- File:Lake in Jurbarkas.jpg
- File:Ladakalnis.jpg
- File:Labanoras forest.jpg
- File:Labanoras church.jpg
- File:Kuziai forest.jpg
- File:Kretinga museum.jpg
- File:Klaipeda port cranes.jpg
- File:Klaipeda port (2).jpg
- File:Klaipeda (2).jpg
- File:Klaipeda (1).jpg
- File:Kernave church (2).jpg
- File:Plunge (12).jpg
- File:Palendriai (12).jpg
- File:Pakruojis (12).jpg
- File:Neris and Nemunas.jpg
- File:Nemunas and Druskininkai panorama.jpg
- File:Nemunas 02.jpg
- File:Nemunas 01.jpg
- File:Moletai (1).jpg
- File:Meskine.jpg
- File:Merkys in Lithuania.jpg
- File:Maze in Lithuania.jpg
- File:Little house in Lithuania.jpg
- File:Liskiavos and Nemunas panorama.jpg
- File:Liskiava abbey.jpg
- File:Lavender Village 02.jpg
- File:Lavender Village 01.jpg
- File:Pilaite manor (1).jpg
- File:Pilaite manor.jpg
- File:Papiskes.jpg
- File:Pakruojis (3).jpg
- File:Pakruojis (2).jpg
- File:Pakruojis (1).jpg
- File:Nida (3).jpg
- File:Nida (2).jpg
- File:Neris panorama.jpg
- File:Nida (1).jpg
- File:Rudesa 800.jpg
- File:Poppy in Lithuania (2).jpg
- File:Poppy in Lithuania(1).jpg
- File:Samogitia 800.jpg
- File:Samogitia (6).jpg
- File:Samogitia (5).jpg
- File:Samogitia (4).jpg
- File:Samogitia (2).jpg
- File:Samogitia (1).jpg
- File:Samogitia (3).jpg
- File:Prienai mill.jpg
- File:Poppy in Lithuania.jpg
- File:Salduve hill.jpg
- File:Squirrel in Lithuania.jpg
- File:Spring in Lithuania.jpg
- File:Siauliai-Silute.jpg
- File:Siauliai-Kursenai road.jpg
- File:Siauliai-Kursenai road (2).jpg
- File:Siauliai-Kursenai road (3).jpg
- File:Siauliai-Kursenai road (1).jpg
- File:Siauliai park.jpg
- File:Seashore in Lithuania.jpg
- File:Seashore in Lithuania (1).jpg
- File:Seagulls in Lithuania.jpg
- File:Samogitia fields in Lithuania.jpg
- File:Samogitia fields in Lithuania(1).jpg
- File:St. Kotryna church.jpg
- File:Telsiai (7).jpg
- File:St. Rapolas church.jpg
- File:Telsiai (6).jpg
- File:Telsiai (5).jpg
- File:Telsiai (4).jpg
- File:Telsiai (3).jpg
- File:Telsiai (2).jpg
- File:Telsiai (1).jpg
- File:Svencioniai district.jpg
- File:Lithuanian Sunset (1).jpg
- File:Lithuanian Sunset.jpg
- File:Stumbras.jpg
- File:Telsiu miestas (1).jpg
- File:Telsiai (9).jpg
- File:TV tower (1).jpg
- File:Traku Voke.jpg
- File:Traku Voke (1).jpg
- File:Trakai (10).jpg
- File:Thunder house.jpg
- File:Telsiai (13).jpg
- File:Telsiai (12).jpg
- File:Telsiai (11).jpg
- File:Telsiai (8).jpg
- File:Telsiai (10).jpg
- File:Vilnius (3).jpg
- File:Vilnius (2).jpg
- File:Vilnius (1).jpg
- File:Vilniaus new bridge.jpg
- File:Lithuanian village.jpg
- File:Village (1).jpg
- File:Verpena.jpg
- File:Vilnius (4).jpg
- File:Zemaiciu Kalvarija church (1).jpg
- File:Zelvos lake.jpg
- File:Zelvos lake (1).jpg
- File:Vincas Kurdirka square.jpg
- File:Vilnius streets.jpg
- File:Vilnius panorama (1).jpg
- File:Vilnius (10).jpg
- File:Vilnius (5).jpg
- File:Vilnius (6).jpg
- File:Zemaiciu Kalvarija church 800.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:19, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, Per nomination. License review failed.--Wdwd (talk) 18:31, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
As per previous nomination, all these image are also from http://www.lithuania.travel/ and their license fails our requirement. I missed to tag these files in previous DR.
- File:Critical mass (3).jpg
- File:Critical mass (5).jpg
- File:Critical mass (4).jpg
- File:Critical mass (2).jpg
- File:Critical mass (1).jpg
- File:Song festival (5).jpg
- File:Song festival (4).jpg
- File:Song festival (3).jpg
- File:Song festival (2).jpg
- File:Song festival (1).jpg
- File:Kite festival (2).jpg
- File:Kite festival (1).jpg
- File:Kite festival (5).jpg
- File:Kite festival (4).jpg
- File:Kite festival (3).jpg
- File:300 lakes rally 2014 (1).jpg
- File:300 lakes rally 2015.jpg
- File:300 lakes rally 2014 (4).jpg
- File:300 lakes rally 2014 (3).jpg
- File:300 lakes rally 2014 (2).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:01, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 00:31, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
Wrong pronunciation. Once kept for a wrong reason in Commons:Deletion requests/File:En-us-troll.ogg. — TAKASUGI Shinji (talk) 05:27, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. The pronunciation is indeed wrong. Peter238 (talk) 06:53, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. I forgot to watchlist the nomination page last time, or I would have corrected the misunderstanding I left: there's a bot that adds pronunciation files to Wiktionary entries based on the filename. If there's a file with the appropriate name on Commons, it gets added to the entry, regardless of actual content. When I remove a file because the recording is absolutely wrong for the entry, the bot sees an entry with no sound file on Wiktionary, plus an audio file on Commons with a name that matches the Wiktionary entry, and puts the bad file right back.
- The bot doesn't do anything at Commons except look for filenames, so the Commons file history is irrelevant- I really did know exactly what I was talking about, but failed miserably in communicating it. Chuck Entz (talk) 06:01, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Sorry but the file is still in use Natuur12 (talk) 00:33, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
Lower quality version of File:Centro EMU at Covenrty 1 (1).png. -mattbuck (Talk) 07:24, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 00:33, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
Tekijänoikeusrikkomus (copyright violation, the artists died 1966 (Wäinö Aaltonen) and 1978 (Matti Aaltonen)) Ktp234 (talk) 07:56, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- Not. Those artists are sculpturers, not the photographer. And in Russia there is no copyright law denying photos of sculptures. Iivarius (talk) 10:14, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per com:FOP#Russia Natuur12 (talk) 00:34, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused files, artworks without obvious educational use
- File:Ejecutivos Facinerosos (1).jpg
- File:Einstein artista.jpg
- File:El universo Informado I.jpg
- File:Sin titulo 5.jpg
- File:Sin titulo12.jpg
- File:Ny-art-and-economy-.jpg
- File:Sin titulo 7.jpg
- File:Sin titulo 4.jpg
- File:Sin titulo 9.jpg
- File:VIDRIERA ROTA PARA UNA AMIGA.jpg
- File:Todas las cosas que soñé.jpg
- File:Sin titulo 11.jpg
- File:PARTO II.jpg
- File:Nunca se para de crecer.jpg
- File:ME ACORDE DE TÍ.jpg
- File:Estamos solos.jpg
- File:Cold Horizons.jpg
- File:A la bonne franquette.jpg
- File:THE GOLD REFUGE.jpg
- File:THE BUBBLE OF THE BRICK.jpg
- File:SIN TITULO 6.jpg
- File:Sin titulo 10.jpg
- File:SIN TITULO 4.jpg
- File:SIN TITULO 3.jpg
- File:SIN TITULO 2.jpg
- File:SIN TITULO 1.jpg
- File:NEW ADJUSTMENT.jpg
- File:MATERIA PARA UN MAJETE.jpg
- File:LIGHT AND THE ENDE OF THE TUNNEL.jpg
- File:LAURIKYS ROOM.jpg
- File:IMPROVEMENT SYMPTONS.jpg
- File:Sentir la ciencia. Pensar el arte 3.jpg
- File:Sentir la Ciencia.jpg
- File:Sentir la ciencia, pensar el arte.jpg
- File:Tres quark for muster quark.jpg
- File:Mente y materia.jpg
- File:Primeros primos.jpg
- File:The double helix.jpg
- File:Variables ocultas.jpg
- File:Señales insospechadas.jpg
- File:Law without Law.jpg
- File:La teoría final.jpg
- File:IBEX TEARS.jpg
- File:El universo inteligible.jpg
- File:El mundo 3 . Popper.jpg
- File:1919. 14 AÑOS DESPUES.jpg
- File:¿EXISTE EL TIEMPO.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
BrightRaven (talk) 08:16, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- See also the talk page. BrightRaven (talk) 07:27, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 00:37, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
Uploaded by myself without the proper licensing agreement. JonathanHughesMyerson (talk) 08:44, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 00:37, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
Fictitious flag, only used on talk pages of one project in violation of local signature policy. Out of COM:SCOPE as not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Keφr (keep talk here) 09:21, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- 1) This is a political satire flag based on a well-known political incident. If you want to play a constructive role on Commons, then you should really stop mechanically and automatically cutting-and-pasting in the same boilerplate on-size-fits-all generic text, regardless of whether it's suitable to each particular file (this cut-and-pasted text was conspicuously unsuitable to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bandera Gay Reino Unido.png, and doesn't fit this file very well either). 2) The fact that you're nominating a file with a version uploaded by me seems to be another example of a revenge deletion nomination (for which you were recently taken to the "Commons:Administrators' noticeboard - User problems"). 3) I'm not particularly attached to this PNG as such, since it's always had certain quality problems. Therefore I would support deletion of the PNG if all links to it were changed to links to the corresponding SVG. Otherwise, I would strongly OPPOSE deletion of this file. AnonMoos (talk) 01:32, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
- Satire? What does it satirise, then? Commons is not a webhost for random political "satire" based on offhand remarks by public figures. Wikimedia projects in general are not a platform for political agitation (w:en:WP:NOTSOAPBOX seems relevant here). Of the report you mentioned, apparently no administrator found my behaviour objectionable, so I am not sure why you bring it up. I have never made a single "revenge nomination"; I suggest you curb your persecution complex and stop making these remarks in every other nomination I make. Keφr (keep talk here) 07:15, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
- The original controversy happened in the "real world" before Wikipedia even existed. It originally made fun of Pat Buchanan, but since then it's taken on a life of its own to some degree, and some Canadians (in the "real world", not just on Wikipedia) have jokingly embraced an identity as inhabitants of Soviet Canuckistan (just as other people are proud residents of the People's Republic of Berkeley, etc.). For example, File:Soviet Canuckistan Flag.PNG is found on en:User:Caffelice~enwiki, en:User:Pete.Hurd, and several other user pages, while File:Flag of Soviet Canuckistan.svg is found on en:User:Canationalist -- in none of these cases as part of a talk-page signature -- and who are you to thwart these users' wishes to identify themselves as proud Soviet Canuckistanians?
- And sorry, but given factors such as your lack of forthrightness and semi-disengenuousness on other matters, and the fact that the first upload of mine that you nominated for deletion (File:National flag of the Whoovians.svg) was easily accessible on my recent uploads list (but not particularly prominent by any other criterion), both Fry1989 and myself have concluded that it's highly probable that you're making revenge deletion nominations, and no amount of free-floating sputtering indignant pure rhetoric on your part is likely to convince us otherwise. AnonMoos (talk) 07:47, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
- Keep I accept that there is an SVG, but since this is a revenge nomination, I say no to deletion at this time. Fry1989 eh? 18:23, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
Kept: In use. If it violates a local policy: not our problem. Natuur12 (talk) 00:45, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
Fictitious flag, only used on talk pages of one project in violation of local signature policy. Out of COM:SCOPE as not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Keφr (keep talk here) 09:22, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- Keep-- Strongly oppose deletion, since this is a political satire flag based on a well-known political incident. For further discussion, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Soviet Canuckistan Flag.PNG (which should have been consolidated with this deletion nomination). AnonMoos (talk) 02:00, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
- Commons is not a webhost for random political "satire" based on offhand remarks by public figures. Wikimedia projects in general are not a platform for political agitation (w:en:WP:NOTSOAPBOX seems relevant here). Keφr (keep talk here) 07:20, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
- The original controversy happened in the "real world" before Wikipedia even existed. It originally made fun of Pat Buchanan, but since then it's taken on a life of its own to some degree, and some Canadians (in the "real world", not just on Wikipedia) have jokingly embraced an identity as inhabitants of Soviet Canuckistan (just as other people are proud residents of the People's Republic of Berkeley, etc.). For example, File:Soviet Canuckistan Flag.PNG is found on en:User:Caffelice~enwiki, en:User:Pete.Hurd, and several other user pages, while File:Flag of Soviet Canuckistan.svg is found on en:User:Canationalist -- in none of these cases as part of a talk-page signature -- and who are you to thwart these users' wishes to identify themselves as proud Soviet Canuckistanians? AnonMoos (talk) 07:51, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
- Keep for reason stated above by AnonMoos. --Oren neu dag (talk) 22:21, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
- Keep "Sovet Canuckistan" is a pretty well-known internet meme going years back. Fry1989 eh? 04:08, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
Unused fictitious flag; out of COM:SCOPE as not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Keφr (keep talk here) 09:24, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 00:45, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
Unused fictitious flag; out of COM:SCOPE as not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Keφr (keep talk here) 09:27, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- You do know that there are thousands of fake soccer team flags in Category:Fantasy football flags and its subcategories, and that some of them are highly used on many Wikipedia articles?! This is probably intended to be yet another one (though unfortunately not very well explained). As is often the case, your cut-and-pasted generic boilerplate cookie-cutter text completely misses the mark... AnonMoos (talk) 01:41, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
- All the worse for those flags. Keφr (keep talk here) 07:04, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
- Your remark reveals exactly some of your apparent difficulties with working together with other people to improve Wikimedia Commons (not to mention some basic attitude problems). A diverse group of people have devised a whole system of pseudo-logos to avoid potential copyright difficulties with real logos (as I mentioned on your user talk page over 4 months ago), and this system is not going to disappear overnight because your royal highness King Kephir the first chooses to frown at it. I would really advise you not to start going down the list of 2000 or more fake soccer flags and nominating them for deletion one by one, or there's a good likelihood that you'll find yourself at "Commons:Administrators' noticeboard - User problems" again... AnonMoos (talk) 07:22, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
- Keep, per AnonMoos. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 00:27, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
別アカウントと間違えてしまうから Yuta Ono 09:47, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Comment User account "Yuta Ono" is not registered.--蕃瓜樹 (talk) 04:12, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 00:46, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Shrikanthv as Speedy (speedy delete) and the most recent rationale was: reason=obvious Copyright violation and no express permission from the person in the picture. The source file was deleted as out of scope, but Shrikanthv claims now "obvious copyright violation". This is not obvious for me, and the file is used. Taivo (talk) 09:49, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- Keep, per nom.: There’s nothing obvious about its putative copyvio status; the implied need for an «express permission» is neither supported by the relevant law nor by the photos contents (posing subjects are to be considered inherently gaven permission, in absence of problematic circumstances). Indeed I find the wording used by Shrikanthv to be borderline bullying and would not be surprised this DR is a spillover from some wp:en war over content.
- About this photograph all I can say is that:
- Therefore a “speedy” keep vote, with possible undeletion request for at least some of these these and a warning about not using Commons’ DRs as a battleground for unrelated disagreements. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 16:22, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Per above Natuur12 (talk) 00:46, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata, probable professional portrait: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 10:05, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 00:46, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
This is routine request for small photo without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photo is so small? Can you upload a bigger version, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload a version with EXIF data? Can you describe and categorize the file correctly? This is the uploader's last remaining contribution (all others were speedily deleted as obvious copyvios). Taivo (talk) 10:13, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 00:46, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
Orphan. Which utility? 93.49.153.199 10:18, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- Keep I don't understand the nomination. If "orphan" means "unused", images do not have to be used to be hosted here; as for "utility", I am baffled. I have added a relevant category, however. Rodhullandemu (talk) 14:01, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- Keep: not used, but still educationally valuable, IMHO. --Amitie 10g (talk) 21:56, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Adewood as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: reason for deletiion|wrong photograph|please delete. This is not a reason to delete anything, but this is small photo without metadata, source and uploader are different, so maybe this is not own work as claimed, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 10:18, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 00:47, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
Bogus license, no permission. {{PD-Mexico}}? Yann (talk) 10:21, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Mayby, mayby not. Crucial evidence is missing. Natuur12 (talk) 00:48, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
Bogus license, no permission. Is {{PD-CAGov}} OK? Yann (talk) 10:25, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Kept: imho yes Natuur12 (talk) 00:49, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
Unused fictitious flag; out of COM:SCOPE as not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Keφr (keep talk here) 10:29, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 00:47, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
Unused fictitious flag; out of COM:SCOPE as not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Keφr (keep talk here) 10:30, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 00:47, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
PD-textlogo? Yann (talk) 10:32, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Keep: COM:TOO OAlexander (talk) 13:57, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 00:47, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
copyright violation Reality006 (talk) 22:52, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
- According to the administrator User:Jcb, there is no copyvio [15]. Cordially Bloody-libu (talk) 10:48, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
![[15]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:UEFAWomensChampionship.png&diff=59527489&oldid=59526897){kind=link}
Kept: exactly Jcb (talk) 12:55, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
PD-textlogo? Yann (talk) 10:34, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: sorry but to complex. Natuur12 (talk) 00:50, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
PD-textlogo? Yann (talk) 10:35, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Keep: COM:TOO OAlexander (talk) 13:57, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Quite complex Natuur12 (talk) 00:51, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
Not PD-textlogo IMO. Yann (talk) 10:38, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 00:52, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
PD-textlogo? Yann (talk) 10:40, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Keep: Textlogo / COM:TOO: the football and the sugerloaf mountain arches are ultracommon and not copyrightable. OAlexander (talk) 12:47, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Low TOO in the EU Natuur12 (talk) 00:53, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
The logo is not own work and surpasses threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 10:44, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 00:53, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
PD-textlogo? Yann (talk) 10:48, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 00:53, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
PD-textlogo? Yann (talk) 10:49, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 00:54, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
PD-textlogo? Yann (talk) 10:50, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 00:54, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
PD-textlogo? Yann (talk) 10:50, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- Derivate of a 1905 publication. Copyright expired. OAlexander (talk) 12:05, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
- The current description says "between circa 1970s and circa 1980s". None of the license fit the copyright situation. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:07, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 00:54, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Bogus license, no permission. Above PD-textlogo IMO. Yann (talk) 10:53, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 00:54, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama for sculptures in Japan. The sculptor, Karel Appel, died in 2006, so his work won't be PD in Japan until at least 2057. Green Giant (talk) 11:56, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 00:54, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by VadimCrimea (talk · contribs)
[edit]Photos have been made in the beginning of XX century, doubtful that this user is author. Maybe they are in PD, but I'm not sure.
- File:Иванцов Онисим с семьёй.jpg
- File:Иванцов Онисим Митрофанович с женой Зинаидой Евгеньевной 1906 год.jpg
- File:Иванцов Онисим Митрофанович.jpg
Dmitry89 (talk) 13:28, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 00:55, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pina Gatto (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 22:46, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pina Gatto (talk · contribs)
[edit]The uploader is not the author of these old photographs. OTRS permission is necessary.
- File:Ettore Bonfatti Sabbioni e alcuni compagni della Scuola del Libro.jpg
- File:Ettore Bonfatti Sabbioni il giorno delle nozze.JPG
BrightRaven (talk) 13:44, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 00:57, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
Dead source, uncertain copyright. Yann (talk) 14:13, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 00:58, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from advertisement. Should be blanked to keep. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 14 August 2015 (UTC) I have full copyrights on this picture.--Mushroomhead2009 (talk) 14:56, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 00:58, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 00:58, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ali awan malik (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:15, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ali awan malik (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
- File:Captured Indian Tanks 1971 indopak war.jpg
- File:Ghaznavi force.jpg
- File:Captain (Later Major) Malik Munawar Khan Awan.gif
- File:Major Malik Munawar Khan Aawan Sitara E Jurat.jpg
_Malik_Munawar_Khan_Awan.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 00:59, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
Unused fictitious flag; out of COM:SCOPE as not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Keφr (keep talk here) 14:52, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 01:00, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
bad quality, too unreal, unused - out of scope /St1995 15:08, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep: Looks perfectly good to me. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 21:27, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
- It is a joke? This image is only "random combination of pixels". We have thousands real images of sunsets. No reasons to keep sush garbage from Flickr. /St1995 18:31, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
- Not a joke, please be polite. You’re not being clear at all, but I’m guessing you have reason to believe this is not a directly photographed sunset but an altered image of one or even a composition of several. Even if so, that’s not a reason to delete it — reusers may still want to make a book cover out of it or some such. (Although it would be good to have the author’s explanation of how the image was created.) -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 21:47, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
- This image was created via Adobe Photoshop :-) /St1995 11:08, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
- Not a joke, please be polite. You’re not being clear at all, but I’m guessing you have reason to believe this is not a directly photographed sunset but an altered image of one or even a composition of several. Even if so, that’s not a reason to delete it — reusers may still want to make a book cover out of it or some such. (Although it would be good to have the author’s explanation of how the image was created.) -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 21:47, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
- It is a joke? This image is only "random combination of pixels". We have thousands real images of sunsets. No reasons to keep sush garbage from Flickr. /St1995 18:31, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Z22 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Uploader indicated the image was from Cornell/NSF. Cornell research on SRF is part of CLASSE which is supported by NSF, but CLASSE is not a US government entity. The research center website clearly marks copyright notice to be owned by CLASSE (https://www.classe.cornell.edu/Research/SRF/WebHome.html). Research materials are very unlikely to be released to the public domain by Cornell.|source= http://www.lepp.cornell.edu/rsrc/Home/Research/SRF/AboutSrf/RF_Superconductivity_2010.pdf
Converted by me to DR for procedural reasons, as the image is on Commons since 2008. -- Túrelio (talk) 15:08, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 01:00, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Z22 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Uploader indicated the image was from Cornell/NSF. Cornell research on SRF is part of CLASSE which is supported by NSF, but CLASSE is not a US government entity. The research center website clearly marks copyright notice to be owned by CLASSE (https://www.classe.cornell.edu/Research/SRF/WebHome.html). Research materials are very unlikely to be released to the public domain by Cornell.|source= http://www.lepp.cornell.edu/rsrc/Home/Research/SRF/AboutSrf/RF_Superconductivity_2010.pdf
Converted by me to DR for procedural reasons, as the image is on Commons since 2008. -- Túrelio (talk) 15:09, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 01:00, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Z22 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Uploader indicated the image was from Cornell/NSF. Cornell research on SRF is part of CLASSE which is supported by NSF, but CLASSE is not a US government entity. The research center website clearly marks copyright notice to be owned by CLASSE (https://www.classe.cornell.edu/Research/SRF/WebHome.html). Research materials are very unlikely to be released to the public domain by Cornell.|source= http://www.classe.cornell.edu/Events/APSAAPT/rsrc/LEPP/Events/APSAAPT/PrelimAgenda/Liepe.pdf
Converted by me to DR for procedural reasons, as the image is on Commons since 2008. -- Túrelio (talk) 15:09, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 01:01, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Z22 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Uploader indicated the image was from Cornell/NSF. Cornell research on SRF is part of CLASSE which is supported by NSF, but CLASSE is not a US government entity. The research center website clearly marks copyright notice to be owned by CLASSE (https://www.classe.cornell.edu/Research/SRF/WebHome.html). Research materials are very unlikely to be released to the public domain by Cornell (the middle picture matches to the CAD model embedded in the PDF file)|source= http://www.lns.cornell.edu/~liepe/webpage/docs/TU303.pdf
Converted by me to DR for procedural reasons, as the image is on Commons since 2008. -- Túrelio (talk) 15:10, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 01:01, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Z22 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Uploader indicated the image was from Cornell/NSF. Cornell research on SRF is part of CLASSE which is supported by NSF, but CLASSE is not a US government entity. The research center website clearly marks copyright notice to be owned by CLASSE (https://www.classe.cornell.edu/Research/SRF/WebHome.html). Research materials are very unlikely to be released to the public domain by Cornell|source= http://www.lepp.cornell.edu/~liepe/webpage/docs/SRF11_talk.pdf
Converted by me to DR for procedural reasons, as the image is on Commons since 2008. -- Túrelio (talk) 15:10, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 01:01, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
bad quality, too unreal, unused - out of scope /St1995 15:11, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- Oh, colleague, if you call it "bad quality", you have not seen really bad quality;) Stas (talk) 21:16, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- Keep: Perfectly good image. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 21:39, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
- No educational value, only "random combination of pixels". Possibly 3 images merged to one. /St1995 18:33, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
- I see. That’s interesting. I mantain my vote. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 21:48, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
- No educational value, only "random combination of pixels". Possibly 3 images merged to one. /St1995 18:33, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
This seems to be sufficiently complex to pass a threshold of originality. This is at least as complex as the Disney Junior logo given as an example at COM:TOO of something that is not PD. B (talk) 15:42, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 01:01, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
"Own work" tag seems dubious. This logo is at least as complicated as Prince's symbol (which is subject to copyright protection) and so this would seem to pass a threshold of originality. B (talk) 15:44, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 01:01, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
_1904-08.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1904-08.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
PD-textlogo? Yann (talk) 16:35, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
_1904-08.svg){kind=link}
- Keep: Textlogo / 110 years old. Copyright expired (70 years post publication not death of author in Brazil). OAlexander (talk) 11:58, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
- The description currently says "2006". Regards, Yann (talk) 17:09, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
- @Yann: : Apparently this is not the Date of creation. It does not say, what date that is!!!!! But it says clearly that this was the logo from 1904 to 1908. OAlexander (talk) 05:05, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
- Comment The issue here is the SVG was obtained from a commercial Brands website which claims copyright on the svg files and states they're for non-commercial use. I also found similar logo on other SVG source webpage (http://www.vflnet.com/infos/brazil/rj/america_fc-rj/), also copyright. Apparently these SVG files are fan-art. Despite looking, I was unable to find more than that the history of the logo is: America Football Club in use from 1904 to 1908, no indication name of creator. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:20, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per above. Natuur12 (talk) 01:01, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
_1904-08.svg){kind=link}
PD-textlogo? Yann (talk) 16:35, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- Keep: Yes, is textlogo. Also, logo from 1920s. Brazil is 70ys after publication. OAlexander (talk) 12:41, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
- No date currently provided. With add a date with a reference. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:11, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
- I maintain it is a texlogo as in context of the time of creation this type of football has no particular originality, but rather was the common way of displaying a generic ball. OAlexander (talk) 08:00, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
- No date currently provided. With add a date with a reference. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:11, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Contact II plaque, Portland, 2015.jpg. Accidentally uploaded twice when using the Wikimedia Commons app on my phone Another Believer (talk) 17:10, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 01:02, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Glglgl as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: No permission. below com:too? Wdwd (talk) 18:02, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 01:02, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
no offence, but watermarked "kerala9.com", hence DR started to verify, Roland zh (talk) 18:47, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 01:02, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
no offense, but DR started to verify claimed 'own work', see p.e. (corrupted) file format and missing exif, Roland zh (talk) 19:12, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 01:02, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
No indication that author listed is the uploader. Author is listed as Atelier Joly... Atelier often means "studio". Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:21, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- Gordon Joly, myself, is the author and uploader. Gordo (talk) 07:35, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
- Comment If you'd be so kind to put {{own}} in the source box, I'd withdraw the nomination with apologies. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:34, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
no offense, but DR started to verify 'own work' as watermarked "Oarmu Clickz", Roland zh (talk) 19:29, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 01:03, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
No source/author information, and only approximate dates render this image for discussion and consensus. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:31, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 01:03, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
No source/author information, and only approximate dates render this image for discussion and consensus. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:31, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 01:03, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
no offense, but DR started to verify claimed 'own work', see p.e. thumbnail format and missing exif, Roland zh (talk) 19:37, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 01:03, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
From a 66 year old book, possible not PD yet. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:38, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 01:03, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
I don't find this file at source given, and google search does not reveal a U.S. military source for the emblem. It's entirely possible that it's fine, but it needs a source, not just a license. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:44, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- Comment: What about Web Archive? Another nomination without proper researching. File uploaded in 2008 (too old), with a valid source at the moment of upload (thanks Wayback Machine!). But, actually apply {{PD-USGov-Military-Army-USAIOH}}? --Amitie 10g (talk) 21:31, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Per above Natuur12 (talk) 01:03, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
I did not find a source of this image, which is claimed to be from a personal collection, but image has no metadata. I googled the image, and did not find an official source with information about the license. This is a 3D object, not an illustration. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:45, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 01:04, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This logo is neither too simple for copyright nor a state symbol (rather, the symbol of a party). Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:00, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- Welcome: Category:Logos of political parties in Ukraine. Dimma837 (talk) 22:19, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Falls under (d) symbols and signs of enterprises, institutions and organizations of {{PD-UA-exempt}}. Official logos of recognised political parties are symbols of organisations and thus are in public domain in Ukraine — NickK (talk) 22:44, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
We have a much larger version of this file here File:Spirit's First Color Photograph Mars.jpg, I was unable to locate the "file in use" on the talk page, so this image is not in use. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:02, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 01:04, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
I was unable to find this image at the source given, and unable to locate a source in Google images. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:03, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 01:04, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
I was unable to find any source for this image other than WikiCommons on a Google search. The link for claimed source does not work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:04, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 01:05, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
Not own work, no permission. Yann (talk) 20:21, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 01:05, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
Not own work, no permission. PD-textlogo? Yann (talk) 20:31, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 01:05, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE. Yet another badly mis-invented misunderstanding from this editor. The technical errors go past inaccurate and into misleading. As a nominally educational project, we have no room for such. Certainly not yet another one from the same source. Andy Dingley (talk) 21:00, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 01:05, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
Can anyone please explain what this shows? Yet more invented nonsense from this same source. Fails COM:SCOPE Andy Dingley (talk) 21:01, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 01:05, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
Not own work, no permission. Yann (talk) 21:56, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 01:05, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
Para volverlo a subir pues no logro llevarlo a la página de wikipedia Divulgacionpoesiacasadelpoeta (talk) 21:57, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- Keep: In use. (es:Rafael Amador Díaz Pérez) -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 01:21, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Celebrities Namibe (talk · contribs)
[edit]Songs. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Kid MC - O Apagar da Esperança (feat.ogg
- File:Claudio Fenix- Recuso Me (Zouk) (Prod. by Wonderboyz) (www.saimonlirico.com).ogg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 14:36, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Celebrities Namibe (talk · contribs)
[edit]Self-promotion. Please see our project scope.
- File:Quem é o Gangster(Prod. By Guccic Gutchic) 6.ogg
- File:Os Muggabi - Louco (Produnced By Guccic Gutchic).ogg
- File:00ː1.JPG
- File:011N.JPG
- File:015f.JPG
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:10, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:29, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Celebrities Namibe (talk · contribs)
[edit]Collection of 37 unused personal images, out of scope. Commons is no private photo album.
- File:FNT 066.JPG
- File:FNT 061.JPG
- File:FNT 068.JPG
- File:FNT 067.JPG
- File:FNT 064.JPG
- File:FNT 054.JPG
- File:FNT 053.JPG
- File:FNT 052.JPG
- File:FNT 048.JPG
- File:FNT 047.JPG
- File:FNT 045.JPG
- File:FNT 038.JPG
- File:FNT 031.JPG
- File:FNT 030.JPG
- File:FNT 029.JPG
- File:FNT 028.JPG
- File:FNT 027.JPG
- File:FNT 020.JPG
- File:FNT 018.JPG
- File:FNT 014.JPG
- File:FNT 016.JPG
- File:FNT 013.JPG
- File:FNT 011.JPG
- File:FNT 010.JPG
- File:FNT 009.JPG
- File:FNT 004.JPG
- File:FNT 006.JPG
- File:FNT 001.JPG
- File:FNT 003.JPG
- File:FNT 057.JPG
- File:FNT 056.JPG
- File:FNT 042.JPG
- File:FNT 041.JPG
- File:FNT 036.JPG
- File:FNT 050.JPG
- File:0̠5m7.JPG
- File:0̠m31.JPG
Achim (talk) 12:24, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- Some may very well be off topic, but many are not: A blanket DR like this is good for nobody, nominator included. Lets keep them all for now and file proper DRs once homework is done. Meanwhile, I’ll add a few categories to these photos. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 20:41, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
- I'm sure your categorizing will increase the encyclopedic value of these images. Good luck! --Achim (talk) 21:04, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
- Categorization increases the encyclopedic value of Commons as a whole, but the value of each item does not depend on how it is categorized. Categorizing is something we do, just like deleting is, so when you consider a deletion request wondering «If only this was properly categorized…» that’s the wrong approach: Categorize it, instead, or leave it for someone else to do it.
- This deletionist approach equates increasing the total encyclopedic value of Commons by either actually improving curation (categories, descriptions) or deleting miscategorized or uncategorized content items (thus improving the quota of those who are properly curated). That’s lazy and amounts to vandalism.
- -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 13:19, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
- These 37 photos constitute 100% of our Category:Girls of Angola and 97% of our Category:Namibe, and 5 of them constitute 100% of our
(t.b.c.)Category:School uniforms of Angola. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 13:19, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
- These 37 photos constitute 100% of our Category:Girls of Angola and 97% of our Category:Namibe, and 5 of them constitute 100% of our
- Comment FYI: Uploader Celebrities Namibe (talk · contributions · Move log · Statistics · logs · block log) is blocked indefinitly. Uploads might be copyvios at all. --Achim (talk) 14:08, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
- Uploader Celebrities Namibe (talk · contribs) is blocked indefinitly because s/he uploaded recorded music and related imagery without any reliable permission. What is obviously home-brewed shooting sessions with their girl friends in the school grounds was left out the copyvio DRs. These images are very unlikely they are also copyvios; they are being evaluated on their scope merits. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 22:32, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
Info A few celebrities images can be seen at facebook as well as at blogspot. Facebook reads here Celebrities From FB Namibe Modelo Comercial Agência so we have to consider them to have found a reliable way presenting their images at Commons. At least OTRS seems to be needed. --Achim (talk) 17:56, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
- Well, that’s a bummer. It is likely that they used Commons as one more platform for promotion (even if for amateurish promotion of play-pretend modelling) and didn’t care much about copyrights. But previous publication and impossibility of ascertaining authorship makes the licensing technically dubious. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 01:13, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Suggestion 1: If any of these files are seen as valuable for the project, the 37 files could easily be reduced to about six. Most are close variations which could be seen as amounting to unnecessary duplication. Suggestion 2: per the logos... I can't see why Wikimedia should help in the promotion of some kind of modelling agency, so on the basis that we are not here as an advertising vehicle for commercial enterprises, I think those with the logo certainly should go, which would leave File:FNT 027.JPG, FNT 047.JPG, and File:FNT 048.JPG. Acabashi (talk) 13:46, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
- (Sorry I had to split your comment in two in order to allow threadable replies.)
- About suggestion 1: Close variations of the same image (unlike actual duplicates) may be of specific interest to reusers, as they can be used constratively — for things like “before/after” or "standing/sitting" mosaics or montages.
- About suggestion 2: For the logo, see below. However note that this is not really a modelling agency — it’s just some kids playing pretend.
- -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 01:13, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
- (Sorry I had to split your comment in two in order to allow threadable replies.)
- Comment Update: I see that the three files mentioned above had their advertising logo cropped. This might be another option for the lot, however, cropping many of them will largely impair the subject, so, in those cases, they could be removed. Acabashi (talk) 14:04, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
- Only in one case was the logo cropped off; in the other it was “painted over” — for the exact concerns Acabashi raises. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 01:13, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
Comment Oops, accidentally deleted them all, will restore. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:33, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
Some Deleted, some kept: Duplicates removed. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:33, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Celebrities Namibe (talk · contribs)
[edit]Files with a watermark impressed, so copyright is to be assumed. The user is a sockpuppet of User:Wikimedia Angolla, with an infinite ban for copyviol, so I would assume these files are copyviol too. Moreover, Commons is not a private album/host site.
- File:FNT 066.JPG
- File:FNT 061.JPG
- File:FNT 067.JPG
- File:FNT 064.JPG
- File:FNT 054.JPG
- File:FNT 053.JPG
- File:FNT 048.JPG
- File:FNT 047.JPG
- File:FNT 045.JPG
- File:FNT 038.JPG
- File:FNT 031.JPG
- File:FNT 027.JPG
- File:FNT 020.JPG
- File:FNT 018.JPG
- File:FNT 014.JPG
- File:FNT 016.JPG
- File:FNT 011.JPG
- File:FNT 010.JPG
- File:FNT 009.JPG
- File:FNT 004.JPG
- File:FNT 006.JPG
- File:FNT 001.JPG
- File:FNT 003.JPG
- File:FNT 057.JPG
- File:FNT 042.JPG
- File:FNT 041.JPG
- File:FNT 036.JPG
- File:FNT 050.JPG
- File:Angolan girl wiht braids on merry-go-round.jpg
- File:0̠m31.JPG
Ruthven (msg) 22:54, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- Keep all (in face of what was argued in the previous DRs above), speedy close this thread, and trout Ruthven for ignoring past DR discussions covering the same tired arguments. Look, you (and I mean Ruthven in this discussion and many other users in other DRs) don’t want brown people in Commons? I get that, as I’ve seen so many attempted deletions with thinly veiled arguments. But at least make a new argument and admit it: After all this is the “post-reality” era, and being uncouth and bigoted gives you the Oval Office. Rehashing the same bogus concerns (excuses, really) already attempted, and failed, in the past is expressely discouraged («This page was kept after a deletion request. Please contact the administrator who kept it before re-nominating. ¶ Consider reading the deletion debate –Commons:Deletion requests/so and so– that links to this page.»). -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 08:01, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
- Comment I do not think that Copyviol is a "thinly veiled argument", as you think... and found your accusation of racism quite offensive and superficial, but maybe it's dictated by personal issues you have that do not find their place here. If you would have assumed GF, you could have simply understood that when you nominate all the uploads of a user (that are all possibly a copyviol in this case) with the tool for bulk operations, you aren't necessarily aware of past deletions; my mistake on the method, not on the form. --Ruthven (msg) 08:24, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
- Keep. Aside from any personal opinions, Ruthven is trying to open a recently-closed DR. Assuming good faith, (s)he didn’t do their homework; assume bad faith and it’s POV-pushing. Regardless, it’s too soon either way. Useddenim (talk) 13:29, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Do we really need those unused personal photos? They seem to be out of our com:scope. --Mhhossein talk 10:16, 28 November 2016 (UTC) personal unused pics?
- Keep based on Hedwig in Washington already removing duplicates and the previous DR discussion. The out of scope reasons being put forward due to "self promotion" are dubious, and are not by themselves a rationale to delete if the photograph by itself has some educational value or illustrative value. If the watermarks can be explained, for example previous DRs have shows that some mobile apps can put user's watermarks on images when they take them, then these are not necessarily evidence of a copyright problem. However, I would like to see a clear explanation of why they are there. --Fæ (talk) 13:17, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete, in my opinion they are all out of scope. Taivo (talk) 14:56, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. They are all of the same girl, so this is like someone's personal photo album or Facebook page. Therefore, unused personal images, clearly out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:07, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:14, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: keep old .gif Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:42, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
Kept: keep old .gif Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:42, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
имеется значительно более полный и уточненный векторный файл Artemka (talk) 12:30, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
Kept The reasons given for these two DRs are not valid reasons for deleting a file from Commons. Note also that the file is in use and therefore cannot be deleted except for copyvio. Please do not nominate this file again. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:35, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
The ticket says "in allegato l'autorizzazione all'utilizzo del logo/marchio dell'A.S.D. Barletta, per l'inserimento nelle pagine dell'enciclopedia Wikipedia con il solo fine illustrativo-informativo." which Google translates to "attached permission to use the logo / trademark of ASD Barletta, to insert pages from Wikipedia with the sole purpose of illustration and informative." Permission not sufficient. Yann (talk) 19:56, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- Keep open until this problem is resolved: OTRS Noticeboard --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 15:44, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
- InfoLink: OTRS Noticeboard Archive.--Wdwd (talk)
- While I'm not an OTRS agent anymore and can't double check, the permission is probably valid for it.wp (like, respecting their EDP), not for Commons. --Elitre (talk) 10:51, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Wiki only license. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:44, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
There's no evidence that that is PD in the US, nor do we have a death date for the author to tell whether it's PD in the source nation (which may or may not be the Netherlands). Prosfilaes (talk) 23:16, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 08:03, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Kurt_Lewin_Photo.jpg Yann (talk) 22:22, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
--- Deleted: No evidence of a free license available. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:48, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
The file was tagged as needing permission by Jarekt and the discussion at User talk:Odder#Trouble is afoot (Use of Royal Coat of Arms UK) highlighted. I am raising to a DR for any analysis of copyright or trademark issues to be laid out more clearly for the record. The outcome may affect several other valued files. Fæ (talk) 08:45, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- Comment — In general the UK's Royal crown is Crown Copyright that has expired but still protected by the UK's Trade Marks Act 1994 (a non-copyright restriction) and thus images of the crown logo known to have been created by the UK Government prior to 1965 can be tagged with {{PD-UKGov}} and {{Insignia}}. A link to the LCO's Guidance on the Use of Royal Arms, Names and Images or Symbols of the Monarchy web page would be fine in the permissions section, but I'd probably discourage the addition of lots of extra warnings. It looks like this image might have been cropped out of the Guidance on the Use of Royal Arms, Names and Images: Annex B, unfortunately undated. I think that to keep this particular image of the Royal crown we'd need better sourcing than just "HM Lord Chamberlain’s Office" as we don't have any evidence that this particular image is pre-1965 (although it may well be). —RP88 (talk) 10:56, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- delete Freely available is not the same as freely licensed. This image (and others like it) belongs on each and every WP where its use can be judged on a per-use basis (and note, that's not the same as en:WP:NFC) to ensure that its use meets the particular usage restrictions for this logo. That is no limitation on meeting the goals of the WPs. However it's not freely licensed - we can't remove or negate those restrictions. As Commons is intended to be a repository of free licence content, it doesn't belong here. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:10, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
- Comment - Thank you User:RP88 for the comment. The addition of further information using those tags would be useful. I will indicate the web address in which the image was collected from in sourcing section rather than the Office responsible for overseeing HM Coat of Arms.
- User:Andy Dingley The issue is this is simply not true. When you see the following coat of arms posted on Wikipedia it fits within exactly the same legal restrictions as the coat of arms which I posted. I am very new to uploading content on Commons and need some guidance and amicable discussion on which trade-mark tag to use. I really don't want the policy preamble if you don't mind, id prefer to keep to the facts regarding this particular image and what can be done to make it conform to the standards of Wikipedia. Again, it's clear that commons hosts other images similar to this one with exactly the same trade-mark restrictions as this image. For a note: it's extremely difficult for inexperienced commons editors to find their ways around templates and I would find it useful to be guided rather than scolded. Olowe2011 (talk) 03:37, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
- Comment - I have now updated the information for this image and the differences can be seen by clicking here . Please advise me on any additional information that might be required. Kind thanks fellow editors! :) Olowe2011 (talk) 03:37, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for checking license templates. For the one chosen to be valid, we have to be able to show that this particular version of the Royal Crown was published before 1965. Do you have any sources which demonstrate it in use that early? --Fæ (talk) 09:09, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
- The bottom line
- Appropriate copyright added
Comment
The bottom line.
According to the terms of use for the Royal Insignia of the United Kingdom Crown designs that may be used for business purposes without infringement of the Royal Crown are show in Annex B. This Crown is shown in Annex B so therefore the use of this image is clearly permitted within Wikipedia's reusing content guidelines. The conditions for use of this image are the same for any other illustration subject to Crown Copyright protections which is a matter of Copyright Law and not trademarking. All images on Commons are subject to copyright legislations and this image isn't an exemption. This file should be up for discussion and not for deletion because the dispute is about getting an appropriate template and not if the author of the image permits it's use as used here.
Something for you to appreciate I am a new Wikipedia commons contributor and don't have experience with templates. Please assist me with finding the right template rather than biting my head off.
Remove the AfD I have provided very clear evidence that the license permits this image's use as used here. With regard to the date issue, this is clearly the incorrect template to be used with this image. Olowe2011 (talk) 19:42, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
- Matters of fact
- This image (on its own) is the creation of Her Majesty or an officer or servant of the Crown in the course of his duties therefore is subject to Crown Copyright [1]
- The image in debate is included within other images[2][3][4] that are subject to special trademark restrictions that are imposed on the Royal Coat of Arms and military Insignia.[5][6]
- ↑ http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/48/section/163
- ↑ https://c2.staticflickr.com/8/7151/6623624509_f426988c9d_b.jpg
- ↑ http://theemploymentoffice.ca/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2013/12/898RFBI-rgb1-210x300.jpg
- ↑ http://www.dft.gov.uk/vca/images/design/head/logo.gif
- ↑ http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1994/26/section/99
- ↑ http://www.royal.gov.uk/pdf/LCODec14/ROYAL%20ARMS%20BLUE%20BOOKLET20152.pdf
- Conclusion and resulting edits to be made
- I have found that the stand-alone Crown without inclusion in a Coat of Arms, Logo or Crest is a subject to the Open Government License
- Rationale - The design is a creation covered by Crown Copyright and is not included in the exclusions for the OGL (Open Government License.)
- If the image in debate was to be a Coat of Arms, Government Logo or Crest it would be exempt from inclusion in the Open Government License therefore it would be subject to the Trademark Act 1994 (if it is a Royal Coat of Arms) or a copyright license that stipulates no-free use.
- Result
- The image will be updated with the Open Government License template.
Olowe2011 (talk) 22:21, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
Kept, per Olowe. Taivo (talk) 10:59, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Brian Clough (talk · contribs)
[edit]- File:Kit body UD Cruz Santa home 15 16.png
- File:Kit body CD Vera Tenerife home 15 16.png
- File:Kit body CF Lorca Deportiva away 15 16.png
- File:Kit body CF Lorca Deportiva home 15 16.png
- File:Kit body CF Lorca Deportiva 14 15.png
- File:Kit body CF Lorca Deportiva 13 14.png
- File:CF Lorca Deportiva 12 13.png
Yann (talk) 20:18, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- Hello Yann, can you review your deletion request for the files: File:Kit body CF Lorca Deportiva 12 13.png, File:Kit body CF Lorca Deportiva 13 14.png, File:Kit body CF Lorca Deportiva 14 15.png, File:Kit body CF Lorca Deportiva home 15 16.png, File:Kit body CF Lorca Deportiva away 15 16.png. I've deleted all the logos, which I think was the problem right? --Brian Clough (talk) 10:47, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
Kept, thank you, Brian, for fixing the files. But two files were not fixed and are deleted. Taivo (talk) 10:24, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
Probable copyright violations, at least not own work
- File:Gia Scala with Rock Hudson at Universal Studios.jpg
- File:Henry Mancini and Gia Scala.jpg
- File:Steve McQueen and Gia Scala.jpg
- File:Gia Scala postal stamp.jpg
- File:Gia & Tina as children.jpg
- File:Gia Scala official book cover.jpg
- File:Folklorico Skull Dancer.jpg
- File:Mother & Son.jpg
- File:Guitarista.jpg - work of still living painter w:Nancy Glenn-Nieto
- File:Tina in blue dress.jpg - found at http://media.sinematurk.com/person/d/06/360775750a83/tina_in_blue_dress_2.jpg
- File:Tina on vacation 2011.jpg
- File:Tina with red top.jpg
- File:Show at Maria Isabel.jpg
- File:Monte Alban in Oaxaca.jpg
- File:My Mexico.jpg
- File:San Miguel & the Dragon.jpg
- File:San Miguel with the Flaming Sword.jpg
- File:Eruption at Christman.jpg
- File:High Fashion.jpg
- File:Nancy Glenn Nieto at her exhibition in San Francisco, Calif..gif
- File:Quetzalcoatl with pesos.jpg
- File:Mysterious Celbration.jpg
- File:Nancy Glenn Nieto's entry in 1st biennial Puebla de Nuestra Senora de Los Angeles.jpg
- File:Nancy Glenn Nieto performing with singer Ricardo Grande.jpg
- File:Cat with Flowers.jpg - work of still living painter w:Nancy Glenn-Nieto
- File:The Parrot's Vigil.jpg
- File:Skull Tree Pink.jpg
- File:Blue Lady and Birds.jpg
- File:Skull Tree Red.jpg
- File:Olivera Street Day of the Dead.jpg
- File:Calla lilly.jpg
- File:Purple Lady.jpg
- File:Nancy Painting.jpg
- File:The Light of Night.jpg
- File:The Edge of Day.jpg
- File:Orange Toro.jpg
- File:Nancy, my love.jpg
- File:Solitary Blue.jpg
- File:Cabra on the mountain by Rodolfo Nieto.jpg
- File:Drummer by Rodolfo Nieto.JPG
- File:Two Cabras by Rodolfo Nieto.jpg
- File:Nancy Glenn Nieto modeling.jpg
- File:Tina Scala & Emilio Baglioini Celebrating.jpg
- File:Tina & Emilio lunching.jpg
- File:Emilio Baglioni with Horse.jpg
- File:Tina Scala portrait pic.jpg
- File:Emilio Baglioni playing accordian.jpg
- File:Alfred Bendixen.jpg
- File:Official Cover.jpg
- File:Rodolfo Nieto 1972.jpg
- File:Pelicano ME.jpg
- File:Skull Art Jewelry.jpg
- File:Skull Bride.jpg
- File:Baby Benito.jpg
- File:Vicky Castro 1979.jpg
- File:Benito smiling 1979.jpg
- File:Emilio Baglioni with Debbie Reynolds.jpg
- File:Emilio Baglioni playing Button Accordion.jpg
- File:Emilio Baglioni playing for Nuns.jpg
- File:Emilio Baglioni at Emilios Restaurant.jpg
- File:Emilio Balioni.jpg
- File:Antonio Castro father of Gualberto Castro.jpg
- File:Rayfor Barnes.jpg
- File:Rayford Barnes Nov 1983.jpg
- File:Back Stage After Winning OTI.jpg
- File:Test photo Que Mal Amada Estas.jpg
- File:Maga Marian.jpg
- File:Gina Montes.jpg
- File:Lila Deneken Looking left.jpg
- File:Lila Deneken 1979.jpg
- File:Photo Roy Camilla and Diane.jpg
- File:Gualberto Party Oct 1979.jpg
- File:Chavelo 1979.jpg
- File:Beto el Boticario.jpg
- File:Humberto Navarro Oct 1979.jpg
- File:Gualberto in Puerto Vallarta 1979.jpg
Didym (talk) 04:29, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- Probably File:Gia Scala official book cover.jpg is the most obvious case. It's a book cover. (Many other images also seem to be from the book.) If the user owns the rights to the book's cover image, then the uploader is basically claiming to be Sterling Saint James. The uploader needs to write to COM:OTRS and prove it. --GRuban (talk) 14:18, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete all, I do not see any own work here. Taivo (talk) 16:13, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
- Info Email sent. I think all/most can be resolved. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:44, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
- @Hedwig in Washington: any updates? Natuur12 (talk) 00:29, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
- Negative, no reaction. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:33, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
- Okay, what would you do? Giving it some extra time, or close it as moot? The backlogg is huge so some more time doesn't harm. Natuur12 (talk) 00:58, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
- Very true. We can wait another week or so. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:40, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
- User replied. I advised to send permission to OTRS. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:18, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
- Very true. We can wait another week or so. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:40, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
- Okay, what would you do? Giving it some extra time, or close it as moot? The backlogg is huge so some more time doesn't harm. Natuur12 (talk) 00:58, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
- Negative, no reaction. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:33, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
- @Hedwig in Washington: any updates? Natuur12 (talk) 00:29, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Artworks, photos, postage stamps and other images are not all the work of one person. This was nominated on 14 August it is now 26 September. If any of these eventually are covered by OTRS they can be restored later. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:52, 26 September 2015 (UTC)