Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2015/08/03

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive August 3rd, 2015
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Counterfeit. And if the letter WAS real, it would be a copyright violation, as Mr. Draghi surely did not agree to publish a copy Gonzo.Lubitsch (talk) 13:04, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: fake, see AN/U -- Steinsplitter (talk) 14:46, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violations. The pictures were quite obviously not taken by the uploader. Gonzo.Lubitsch (talk) 13:07, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 14:41, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. The pictures were quite obviously not taken by the uploader and identifiable persons have not consented to have there pictures published. Gonzo.Lubitsch (talk) 13:08, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 14:41, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality, not used, many other similar views available, out of scope. Yann (talk) 06:31, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I agree. The photo is very poor quality and there are better photos about Taj Mahal. I think this photo should be deleted because of poor quality reasons. --Paasikivi (talk) 08:35, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 22:04, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work, small size, missing EXIF - possible copyvio. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:38, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 20:37, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

minjaaturkermis 213.126.105.130 21:26, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept: Vandalism. --Amitie 10g (talk) 21:31, 3 August 2015 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Avaclemes (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These would appear to be simply excuses to advertise on Wikimedia and would appear to have little use to the projects. As such they are outside the scope of the project and, in my opinion, could be deleted speedily.

Herby talk thyme 10:05, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Still uploading promotional images so this one is added to the DR. --Herby talk thyme 10:43, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Meanwhile speedily deleted by Green Giant. (Not sure if I can close a DR, actually. A least this one is trivial.) -- Tuválkin 16:51, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most likely license laundering, missing EXIF/permission, found on many websites Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:50, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 12:23, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alexandralibock (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small size, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 21:15, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 11:33, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dr.Dent (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All of these files have the source given as "Internet" and the author given as "don't know", suggesting they're just stolen from the Internet.

Liliana-60 (talk) 21:31, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 11:33, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:17, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by PanOczywisty1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:16, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wilson Romero (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:15, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:15, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:14, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:14, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probably not own work 181.88.222.64 14:50, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:14, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Test upload by noncontributor, some sort of screenshot. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 07:33, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:29, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cover of the book "Sinä, taivaani – Kustaa II Aadolfin & Ebba Brahen lauluja" by Tuomas Keskimäki, published in 2015. The illustration in the cover is probably under copyright. If so, and no permission is received via OTRS either, the image should be removed from Commons and uploaded to Finnish Wikipedia as a fair use image. (Fair use images are not allowed on Commons.) Apalsola tc 15:01, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:13, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1972 picture. Probably not own work. BrightRaven (talk) 15:12, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:12, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Headswimming (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Different authors in EXIF, doubt it's own work. Probably requires OTRS permissions.

Dudek1337 (talk) 15:24, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:12, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that this photograph is in the public domain C3r4 (talk) 16:01, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:11, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Datei wurde versehentlich hochgeladen, war nur eine Hilfsdatei. Ich bitte um Löschung. Teta pk (talk) 16:04, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:11, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Datei wurde versehentlich hochgeladen, war nur eine Hilfsdatei. Ich bitte um Löschung. Teta pk (talk) 16:04, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:11, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Datei wurde versehentlich hochgeladen, war nur eine Hilfsdatei. Ich bitte um Löschung. Teta pk (talk) 16:04, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:10, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution image of unidentified flowers. Jonund (talk) 18:06, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:09, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope advertising. De728631 (talk) 18:44, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:09, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality picture, out of project scope, easily replaceable. Abujoy (talk) 20:06, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use Didym (talk) 03:08, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source is given as "Www.elle.com" It is incredible that anything by elle is free licensed. —teb728 t c 20:08, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:07, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation Shev123 (talk) 20:11, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:07, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 20:31, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:06, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture collection must collect from local picture from Commons, please upload first every picture to Commons and then collect it from those. Please take a look at File:Collage Rome.jpg as an example how to do it. See Commons:Collages for details. Motopark (talk) 20:35, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:06, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pacofelipeorlando (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Scans of some official documents, not own works, bogus license, uncertain copyright.

Yann (talk) 20:56, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See [1]. Yann (talk) 13:07, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:05, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope logo. Josve05a (talk) 21:02, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:03, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Above the TOO, not "simple text". - Fma12 (talk) 21:22, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:03, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:DW Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 21:55, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:02, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Motopark as Fair use (Fair use) PD-textlogo. Yann (talk) 22:09, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:02, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work on this space art background, possible COM:COPYVIO, other uploads of same user were speedied. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:04, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:01, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is not a free image; comes from Tumblr social media website. Livelikemusic (talk) 23:07, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:01, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Those are screenshots of a TV program that was broadcast in 2009 on w:Art TV in Serbia. The permission of the copyrights holder is not obtained. Vanjagenije (talk) 12:16, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:32, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:49, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:33, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a scanned image that looks to be from a published source, ie. a newspaper. It oesn't seem to be "own work"  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:06, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:33, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not taken by Flickr user, and used "with permission". No indication of free license release Nilfanion (talk) 12:29, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:31, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not taken by Flickr user, no indication of free release Nilfanion (talk) 12:30, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:31, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not taken by Flickr user, no indication of free release Nilfanion (talk) 12:30, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:31, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparently not taken by Flickr user (cf Terry Stapley), no indication of free license Nilfanion (talk) 12:31, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:31, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not taken by Flickr user, no indication fo free license Nilfanion (talk) 12:32, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:31, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not taken by Flickr user, no indication of free license Nilfanion (talk) 12:32, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:31, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not taken by Flickr user, no indication of free license Nilfanion (talk) 12:33, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:31, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fictitious flag; misuse of Commons as a webhost. Out of COM:SCOPE as not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Keφr (keep talk here) 12:47, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:29, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fictitious seal; misuse of Commons as a webhost. Out of COM:SCOPE as not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Keφr (keep talk here) 12:47, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:29, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fictitious map; misuse of Commons as a webhost. Out of COM:SCOPE as not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Keφr (keep talk here) 12:48, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:29, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fictitious seal; misuse of Commons as a webhost. Out of COM:SCOPE as not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Keφr (keep talk here) 12:48, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:28, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fictitious flag; misuse of Commons as a webhost. Out of COM:SCOPE as not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Keφr (keep talk here) 12:48, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:28, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Misuse of Commons as a webhost. Out of COM:SCOPE as not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Keφr (keep talk here) 12:49, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:27, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused unencyclopedic personal image outside our scope. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 13:00, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:27, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No longer in use Power22 (talk) 13:55, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:25, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal vanity photo. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 14:12, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:25, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AndreyVorobyov (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:24, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality, not used, many other similar views available, out of scope. Yann (talk) 07:08, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nominator. Stas (talk) 20:00, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:47, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Guilherme Costa Santos (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Guilherme Costa Santos

Gunnex (talk) 07:21, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Info 2 files tagged with copyvio. User is a photoshopper, cropping and horizontally flipping files. Details at user talk. Gunnex (talk) 07:31, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:46, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Questionable authorship claims based on the low resolution, missing metadata, and the uploader's history. The file appears at https://adventurousgopal.wordpress.com/2014/08/18/chhatrapati-shivaji-maharaj-vastu-sangrahalaya-mumbai-witnessing-the-true-indian-heritage/. That blog claims that the source of the image is Wikipedia without providing any more specific information. It could not be from this file given the date of publication, though. A very similar photo also appears at http://emmetammanna.blogspot.se/2011/06/harsha-pranathi-and-gauri-are-in-mumbai.html. It's not exactly the same photo, but given the similarity in the clouds, they must have been taken seconds apart. LX (talk, contribs) 08:22, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:45, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Selfpromotion Ravave (talk) 08:59, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:44, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Andrei1230 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF (multiple digi cams in use), per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Andrei1230 and (example) File:Harbin Dragon Tower 2009.jpg (uploaded 2015) versus http://www.nipic.com/show/1/75/7128979k05de6641.html (2012, by "robindrivebmw") = http://pic25.nipic.com/20121115/2378333_101938007000_2.jpg (last modified: 2012, lower res, might be downloadable by some means in original res 3920×383, as indicated on that site) or File:Harbin Volga Manor.jpg (uploaded 06.2015), available on several sites before upload date. All files +/- related to en:Harbin, a city in China. Eventually related: user Lzy881114. Affected montage: File:Harbin Montage.jpg (by Lzy881114).

Gunnex (talk) 09:00, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:44, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of scope. Yann (talk) 09:22, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:43, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of scope. Yann (talk) 09:26, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:42, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 09:45, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:42, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, probable professional portrait: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 09:45, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:42, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused non-notable artwork/logo. While the uploading of small numbers of images... for use on a personal user page... is allowed, this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Storkk (talk) 09:50, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:41, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed", this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Storkk (talk) 09:50, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:41, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Most likely grabbed from Internet considering cropped from high res http://img4.duitang.com/uploads/item/201304/03/20130403102353_iSGvt.jpeg (per file path: 04.2013, "photo by WKAND") Gunnex (talk) 09:57, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:40, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status considering previously published (even in lower res) via http://auto.163.com/07/0410/22/3BOH9IM9000828QI.html (2007, ©1997-2015) = http://cimg2.163.com/auto/2007/4/10/20070410220321e813a.jpg (last modified: 2007). Uploaded by 1-upload user Kievgas (talk · contributions · Statistics) in 2009. Gunnex (talk) 10:14, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:40, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 10:23, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:40, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Der Fotograf ist noch nicht 70 Jahre tot, also das Bild bitte löschen, wegen evtl. Urheberrechtsverletzung SchiDD (talk) 10:25, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:39, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed", this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:31, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:39, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXIF and watermark credit "Radio Okapi/ Ph. John Bompengo". If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 10:32, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:38, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, possible professional portrait: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 10:34, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:38, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Geezer~commonswiki (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering also File:齐齐哈尔市.JPG, an unsourced collage attributed per exif in part to "WangguaN's photo", File:齐齐哈尔南站.jpg, a complex architectural design, File:中国高速公路.png, complex Chinese network map and multiple digi cams in use.

Gunnex (talk) 10:34, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:37, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, pobable professional portrait: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 10:36, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:36, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Collage of photos of unknown origin and copyright status. Storkk (talk) 10:37, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:36, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:39, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:36, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source/license and author information of 1 image (File:20081026far view.jpg) used in this collage is missing or is insufficient, compromising the whole file. See also Commons:Collages. Gunnex (talk) 10:46, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:35, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

website watermarked on photo twice, is this really free? Mjrmtg (talk) 10:51, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:35, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image marked as c Mark Harrington - different to Flickr user and no indication released under cc-by Nilfanion (talk) 10:59, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:34, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused file, artwork without obvious educational use. BrightRaven (talk) 11:21, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:34, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Maruf Rayhan Shishir (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused files, private images

BrightRaven (talk) 11:25, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:34, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probably not own work 181.88.222.64 00:57, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I have not found better versions of this file on the net, so I assume this can be a work by the uploader. Besides, there is a low-res version of this image at GBA website, which does not have copyright notices as well. - Fma12 (talk) 16:58, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment A much higher-res version of the image can be found in this link: http://www.gba.gov.ar/images/autoridades/Daniel_Scioli2012Grande.jpg, that belongs to the Government of the Buenos Aires Province Official Web Portal (http://www.gba.gov.ar). Possibly unfree file.--Gabriel Sozzi (talk) 22:46, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Even the low-res image was posted 6 years ago. The image is not a 2012 photo.--Gabriel Sozzi (talk) 23:21, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Didym (talk) 04:13, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probably not own work 181.88.222.64 00:58, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Same image in her official website, with copyright.--Gabriel Sozzi (talk) 00:11, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Didym (talk) 04:13, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lowres-and-blocky/small-and-pixelated, have File:Perkin Reaktion Mesomerie.svg as chemical equivalent DMacks (talk) 02:37, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 04:12, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Abluth (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Mire el alcance del proyecto.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:01, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 04:09, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused unencyclopedic personal image outside our scope. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:50, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 04:08, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality, not used, many other similar views available, out of scope. Yann (talk) 06:57, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 04:07, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality, not used, many other similar views available, out of scope. Yann (talk) 07:00, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:48, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality, not used, many other similar views available, out of scope. Yann (talk) 06:25, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:08, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality, not used, many other similar views available, out of scope. Yann (talk) 06:26, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:08, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality, not used, many other similar views available, out of scope. Yann (talk) 06:39, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:09, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality, not used, many other similar views available, out of scope. Yann (talk) 06:40, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:09, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Vanity. Self promotion Fixertool (talk) 03:32, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope. BrightRaven (talk) 08:24, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please see our project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:07, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope. BrightRaven (talk) 08:25, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mire el alcance del proyecto. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:08, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope. BrightRaven (talk) 08:26, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Older copy here. Yann (talk) 05:37, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. BrightRaven (talk) 08:27, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality, not used, many other similar views available, out of scope. Yann (talk) 06:29, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:35, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality, not used, many other similar views available, out of scope. Yann (talk) 06:36, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:36, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality, not used, many other similar views available, out of scope. Yann (talk) 06:44, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:36, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality, not used, many other similar views available, out of scope. Yann (talk) 06:49, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:37, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality, not used, many other similar views available, out of scope. Yann (talk) 06:52, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:37, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality, not used, many other similar views available, out of scope. Yann (talk) 06:53, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:38, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality, not used, many other similar views available, out of scope. Yann (talk) 06:53, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:38, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality, not used, many other similar views available, out of scope. Yann (talk) 06:54, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:38, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality, not used, many other similar views available, out of scope. Yann (talk) 06:55, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:38, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality, not used, many other similar views available, out of scope. Yann (talk) 06:56, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:39, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Yann (talk) 09:18, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:40, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality, not used, many other similar views available, out of scope. Yann (talk) 09:19, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:40, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality, not used, many other similar views available, out of scope. Yann (talk) 09:20, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:40, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality, not used, many other similar views available, out of scope. Yann (talk) 09:20, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:41, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality, not used, many other similar views available, out of scope. Yann (talk) 09:21, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:41, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality, not used, many other similar views available, out of scope. Yann (talk) 09:22, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:42, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality, not used, many other similar views available, out of scope. Yann (talk) 09:24, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nominator. Stas (talk) 20:00, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:42, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not useful because of unidentified location, no location on flickr page either Mjrmtg (talk) 10:56, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:43, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not useful because of unidentified location, no location on flickr page either Mjrmtg (talk) 10:57, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:43, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not useful because of unidentified location, no location on flickr page either Mjrmtg (talk) 10:57, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:44, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All files in this category were taken by Daphne Borowski. EXIF data reads: Copyright holder: Daphne Borowski. She is a NYC based photographer, website www.borowskimullerphotographers.com. As seen in Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Photographs by David Plas (for files in Category:Files from Security & Defence Agenda Flickr stream) it is not uncommon to see organisations have an external photographer work events for them and allow that organisation to use those photos for PR needs whilst still holding copyright. In this instance, COM:PRP needs to be applied to these photos, or perhaps work on COM:OTRS being obtained. Unfortunately, many other photos in Category:Photographs by The Financial Times are the same and will be gone through.

After this DR, please delete the category as well if OTRS isn't obtained. Thanks Scott (Russavia)

TempIDforDRs (talk) 03:52, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per reasons outlined n the nomination Ymblanter (talk) 18:08, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"unknown author" is incompatible with "PD-100". Wertsoiret (talk) 06:23, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

it's not incompatible, if the source itself is older than 100 years and PD-100, too Doc Taxon (talk) 06:37, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
"source older than 100 years" does not mean "author is dead for more than 100 years". The question is: when did the author die? --Wertsoiret (talk) 07:35, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, you're right! Please delete it, I'm sorry ... Doc Taxon (talk) 13:26, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: resolved Ymblanter (talk) 18:10, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"unknown author" is incompatible with "PD-100". Wertsoiret (talk) 06:24, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

it's not incompatible, if the source itself is older than 100 years and PD-100, too Doc Taxon (talk) 06:36, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
"source older than 100 years" does not mean "author is dead for more than 100 years". The question is: when did the author die? --Wertsoiret (talk) 07:35, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, you're right! Please delete it, I'm sorry ... Doc Taxon (talk) 13:26, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: resolved Ymblanter (talk) 18:11, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"unknown author" is incompatible with "PD-100". Wertsoiret (talk) 06:24, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

it's not incompatible, if the source itself is older than 100 years and PD-100, too Doc Taxon (talk) 06:35, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
"source older than 100 years" does not mean "author is dead for more than 100 years". The question is: when did the author die? --Wertsoiret (talk) 07:35, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, you're right! Please delete it, I'm sorry ... Doc Taxon (talk) 13:26, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: resolved Ymblanter (talk) 18:11, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have uploaded wrong picture. LittleOneM (talk) 07:20, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request Ymblanter (talk) 18:12, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have uploaded wrong picture. LittleOneM (talk) 07:20, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request Ymblanter (talk) 18:12, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

porque lo creo asi Teckerdts (talk) 08:39, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request Ymblanter (talk) 18:13, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted sculpture, no FoP in Italy Liliana-60 (talk) 13:14, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unter der Seite "Antonio Berti" gibt es unter commons weitere Bilder von Werken des Künstlers, der 1990 gestorben ist. Dort befindet sich kein ansonsten anzutreffender Hinweis, dass seine Werke bis 70 Jahre nach seinem Tode geschützt sind. So war anzunehmen, dass eine Veröffentlichung bei Wikipedia möglich ist, insbesondere, wenn in der Beschreibung auf den Künstler mit Angabe des Schaffensjahres hingewiesen wird.


Deleted: No FoP in Italy. Whether the sculptures can be uploaded or not, depends on the country where they are installed, see Commons:FOP for more details. Ymblanter (talk) 18:15, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The picasa license is 'All Rights Reserved' so no one can use this image right now. It must allow commercial and derivative use. Leoboudv (talk) 01:41, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violation: no evidence of permission supplied, deleted per Precautionary principle Royalbroil 01:48, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No idea what this picture actually shows, which makes it hard to see any encyclopedic value. It is neither a caleidoscope (as the file name suggests) nor does it have any recognizeable connection to Mongolia (as the category and album name on flickr suggest). Apparently the whole album was blindly copied from flickr, without checking whether that actually makes sense for the specific image. Latebird (talk) 00:25, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak Keep: Perhaps fix categorization. It appears to be some sort of Mosaic artwork, probably three-dimensional, perhaps it is the name of the work, who knows? But the image was in a set of 43 images, all apparently taken in Mongolia, so it probably was something that struck the photographer's fancy. I'd appreciate it if you'd follow policy and not say snarky things like "blindly copied from flickr", when 40 of the 43 images were fine, and of the three you challenged, there's only one that was obviously a painting, which I missed in the thumbnail view (over-saturated photoshopping can look pretty similar in thumbnail view) so mea culpa there, but the only thing "blind" is that my eyes are a half-century old, so be nice! Not sure the law on 3-D artwork in Mongolia for this item, FOP may or may not apply, so I'd be curious if you have a different rationale for deletion beyond "don't know what this is." Montanabw (talk) 04:04, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, it's possible that this is some kind of artwork. Which would then make the image another copyvio. Only looking at the thumbnails qualifies as "blindly" for me. It may not be a good idea to upload images without checking them at full resolution first. FOP in Mongolia only allows non-commercial use, which is not good enough for Commons. --Latebird (talk) 02:34, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Well, that takes forever at the speed of DSL where I live; if there is nor FOP on the artwork, then I guess you gotta do what you gotta do, but it may also be a thousand-year old piece that would not be copyright anywhere, too. I will grant that we just don't know, but what harm is there in keeping it until it's figured out? Some of us have things like real life jobs and are volunteering to contribute to free knowledge in our spare time, so the occasional mistake should be given a "whoops", not a schoolmarmish scolding. Montanabw (talk) 05:12, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Unused file, no apparent relationship to "Mongolia". Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:19, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inferior copy of File:Earth at Night.jpg, with the NASA credits filed off even. GRuban (talk) 01:18, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:20, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Does zquare.es own the rights to this image Leoboudv (talk) 03:34, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

the guy who uploaded the picture to flickr has visited a couple of esport events, all pictures with the same camera and complete EXIF data, so i dont really see the problem here. User:Tmv23 (talk) 08:52, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Leoboudv: the website http://zquare.es/ does not actually host the image but just provide a link (click the LoL event photos displayed on the front page of zquare.es) to the flickr account. --Puramyun31 (talk) 14:20, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Leoboudv: the flickr account owner and the owner of zquare.es seems to same. (see profile photos:https://www.flickr.com/people/48006568@N05/, http://zquare.es/about/) --Puramyun31 (talk) 14:34, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:20, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

장난성. It doesn't mean anything. 콩가루 (talk) 05:39, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This file is just used in the author's user talk page and commons' new picture bot page.--콩가루 (talk) 01:22, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:21, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced from Google Maps SounderBruce 05:40, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:22, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry, but thats not covered by COM:FOP#Japan. JuTa 06:08, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:22, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality, not used, many other similar views available, out of scope. Yann (talk) 06:23, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:22, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality, not used, many other similar views available, out of scope. Yann (talk) 06:28, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Fine quality. In scope. --GRuban (talk) 15:18, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Not really: quite small, random crop, overexposed. Yann (talk) 16:26, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Debatable; more important, what are the many other similar views? We've got plenty of shots across the long pool, but this is the only one like this that I see. --GRuban (talk) 20:51, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Besides the nomination characters, there is no indication this was user's own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:24, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality, not used, many other similar views available, out of scope. Yann (talk) 06:33, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:24, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality, not used, many other similar views available, out of scope. Yann (talk) 06:41, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:24, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality, not used, many other similar views available, out of scope. Yann (talk) 06:48, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: This image was taken before recent projects killed/damaged many of the little trees along the pools. Kept as historical record, obviously user's own work, look at user's other images. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:27, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality, not used, many other similar views available, out of scope. Yann (talk) 06:48, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: There was nothing "wrong" with this image, and as GRuban points out, it's an arresting image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:26, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality, not used, many other similar views available, out of scope. Yann (talk) 09:05, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: As nominated and also the issue of credited to (a) and uploaded by (b). Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:29, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hi, this picture is a scan from * TnT Trucks And Tanks Magazine no 47 Janvier 2015, "Sd.Kfz.9 FAMO", le buffle de la Wehrmacht.. ChoumX (talk) 09:09, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, this picture is a scan from * TnT Trucks And Tanks Magazine no 47 Janvier 2015, "Sd.Kfz.9 FAMO", le buffle de la Wehrmacht.. ChoumX (talk) 09:09, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:29, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted sculpture, no FoP in Vatican City Liliana-60 (talk) 13:16, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:32, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hi, this picture is a scan from * TnT Trucks And Tanks Magazine no 47 Janvier 2015, "Sd.Kfz.9 FAMO", le buffle de la Wehrmacht.. ChoumX (talk) 09:10, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:34, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

original research about race? no data /source. Unusable for educational purpose, delete per Commons:Project_scope#File_not_legitimately_in_use. Atlasowa (talk) 13:15, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No source for base map. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:33, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

original research about race? no data /source. Unusable for educational purpose, delete per Commons:Project_scope#File_not_legitimately_in_use. Atlasowa (talk) 13:15, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


My original sources were a mixture between data in the same article ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_diaspora ) where the map is, and in countries where the information is detailed enough are taking numbers from censuses from the Russian Wikipedia for all the provinces, oblasts, autonomous regions, etc(see below), censuses from the USA 2010 (numbers listed in http://www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/briefs/c2010br-05.pdf https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_American ), Australian 2011 census http://www.abs.gov.au/census , and Canada (numbers listed in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Canada ), and taking into account the number of non-European migrants in the countries of the EU https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_to_Europe .


Kazakhstan:

Each province was searched, I went to the russian article where ethnic compositions are given (in Russian). For example, the Akmola region:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regions_of_Kazakhstan https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%90%D0%BA%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%BD%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%8F_%D0%BE%D0%B1%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%82%D1%8C

Same with the rest (take all the provinces, look for them in the Russian wikipedia, etc): https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%90%D0%BA%D1%82%D1%8E%D0%B1%D0%B8%D0%BD%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%8F_%D0%BE%D0%B1%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%82%D1%8C https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%90%D0%BB%D0%BC%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BD%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%8F_%D0%BE%D0%B1%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%82%D1%8C I continued with the rest.

Russia: http://pop-stat.mashke.org/russia-ethnic2002.htm Russian and mixed groups originally from Europe counted as Europeans.

Brazil: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:People_of_European_Ancestry_in_Brazil.png

Nagihuin (talk) 19:56, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No source for the base map itself. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:33, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

original research about colonial languages? English in Germany, Russian in Africa etc? no data /source. Unusable for educational purpose, delete per Commons:Project_scope#File_not_legitimately_in_use. Atlasowa (talk) 13:16, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sources are the Spanish, French, Portuguese and English languages articles in Wikipedia:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_English-speaking_population https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geographical_distribution_of_French_speakers https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spanish_language https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portuguese_language (to complete the portuguese information I used the "Languages of Angola", "Languages of Mozambique", etc articles.

Nagihuin (talk) 20:00, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No indication of source of basemap. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:33, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1931 picture. Not own work. Not old enough to assume it is PD-old-70. BrightRaven (talk) 15:12, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:35, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Por que no estoy de acuerdo con la licencia y no puedo cambiarla Remalvel (talk) 15:59, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unused text document of unknown provenance. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:35, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No clear source or proof that the subject is either Jelena Gruba or Mara (which one is it supposed to be anyway?). For what it's worth, I also seriously question the notability/relevance of this image; it appears to be of no historical or artistic value. Surtsicna (talk) 13:51, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 09:23, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that this photograph is in the public domain C3r4 (talk) 16:01, 3 August 2015 (UTC) Deleted as nominated. This was second upload same image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:37, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No clear source or proof that the subject is Stephen Ostojić. For what it's worth, I also seriously question the notability/relevance of this image; it appears to be of no historical or artistic value. Surtsicna (talk) 13:50, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 09:23, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence this work is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 12:38, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


deleted. INeverCry 00:50, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that this photograph is in the public domain, nor it represent historic figure as noted C3r4 (talk) 16:03, 3 August 2015 (UTC) Deleted Image was previously deleted. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:37, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images in the category are reproduction of Coins that are or were use in Argentina. However, per Commons:Currency#Argentina and List of countries' copyright length banknotes and coins from Argentina less then 50 years old, i.e. created after December, 31 1964 are copyrighted. 220.255.3.186 19:17, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:39, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images in the category are reproduction of Coins that are or were use in Argentina. However, per Commons:Currency#Argentina and List of countries' copyright length banknotes and coins from Argentina less then 50 years old, i.e. created after December, 31 1964 are copyrighted. 220.255.3.186 19:18, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:39, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images in the category are reproduction of Coins that are or were use in Argentina. However, per Commons:Currency#Argentina and List of countries' copyright length banknotes and coins from Argentina less then 50 years old, i.e. created after December, 31 1964 are copyrighted. 220.255.3.186 19:19, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:39, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images in the category are reproduction of Coins that are or were use in Argentina. However, per Commons:Currency#Argentina and List of countries' copyright length banknotes and coins from Argentina less then 50 years old, i.e. created after December, 31 1964 are copyrighted. 220.255.3.186 19:20, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:39, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images in the category are reproduction of Coins that are or were use in Argentina. However, per Commons:Currency#Argentina and List of countries' copyright length banknotes and coins from Argentina less then 50 years old, i.e. created after December, 31 1964 are copyrighted. 220.255.3.186 19:21, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:39, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images in the category are reproduction of Coins that are or were use in Argentina. However, per Commons:Currency#Argentina and List of countries' copyright length banknotes and coins from Argentina less then 50 years old, i.e. created after December, 31 1964 are copyrighted. 220.255.3.186 19:21, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Per nom, so coins are still copyrighted. - Fma12 (talk) 16:42, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:39, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images in the category are reproduction of Coins that are or were use in Argentina. However, per Commons:Currency#Argentina and List of countries' copyright length banknotes and coins from Argentina less then 50 years old, i.e. created after December, 31 1964 are copyrighted. 220.255.3.186 19:23, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:39, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images in the category are reproduction of Coins that are or were use in Argentina. However, per Commons:Currency#Argentina and List of countries' copyright length banknotes and coins from Argentina less then 50 years old, i.e. created after December, 31 1964 are copyrighted. 220.255.3.186 19:23, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:39, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images in the category are reproduction of Coins that are or were use in Argentina. However, per Commons:Currency#Argentina and List of countries' copyright length banknotes and coins from Argentina less then 50 years old, i.e. created after December, 31 1964 are copyrighted. 220.255.3.186 19:24, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:39, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images in the category are reproduction of Coins that are or were use in Argentina. However, per Commons:Currency#Argentina and List of countries' copyright length banknotes and coins from Argentina less then 50 years old, i.e. created after December, 31 1964 are copyrighted. 220.255.3.186 19:25, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:40, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images in the category are reproduction of Coins that are or were use in Argentina. However, per Commons:Currency#Argentina and List of countries' copyright length banknotes and coins from Argentina less then 50 years old, i.e. created after December, 31 1964 are copyrighted. 220.255.3.186 19:26, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:40, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images in the category are reproduction of Coins that are or were use in Argentina. However, per Commons:Currency#Argentina and List of countries' copyright length banknotes and coins from Argentina less then 50 years old, i.e. created after December, 31 1964 are copyrighted. 220.255.3.186 19:26, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:40, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images in the category are reproduction of Coins that are or were use in Argentina. However, per Commons:Currency#Argentina and List of countries' copyright length banknotes and coins from Argentina less then 50 years old, i.e. created after December, 31 1964 are copyrighted. 220.255.3.186 19:27, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:40, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images in the category are reproduction of Coins that are or were use in Argentina. However, per Commons:Currency#Argentina and List of countries' copyright length banknotes and coins from Argentina less then 50 years old, i.e. created after December, 31 1964 are copyrighted. 220.255.3.186 19:27, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:40, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images in the category are reproduction of Coins that are or were use in Argentina. However, per Commons:Currency#Argentina and List of countries' copyright length banknotes and coins from Argentina less then 50 years old, i.e. created after December, 31 1964 are copyrighted. 220.255.3.186 19:27, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:40, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images in the category are reproduction of Coins that are or were use in Argentina. However, per Commons:Currency#Argentina and List of countries' copyright length banknotes and coins from Argentina less then 50 years old, i.e. created after December, 31 1964 are copyrighted. 220.255.3.186 19:28, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:40, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images in the category are reproduction of Coins that are or were use in Argentina. However, per Commons:Currency#Argentina and List of countries' copyright length banknotes and coins from Argentina less then 50 years old, i.e. created after December, 31 1964 are copyrighted. 220.255.3.186 19:29, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:40, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images in the category are reproduction of Coins that are or were use in Argentina. However, per Commons:Currency#Argentina and List of countries' copyright length banknotes and coins from Argentina less then 50 years old, i.e. created after December, 31 1964 are copyrighted. 220.255.3.186 19:29, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:40, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images in the category are reproduction of Coins that are or were use in Argentina. However, per Commons:Currency#Argentina and List of countries' copyright length banknotes and coins from Argentina less then 50 years old, i.e. created after December, 31 1964 are copyrighted. 220.255.3.186 19:36, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:40, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images in the category are reproduction of Coins that are or were use in Argentina. However, per Commons:Currency#Argentina and List of countries' copyright length banknotes and coins from Argentina less then 50 years old, i.e. created after December, 31 1964 are copyrighted. 220.255.3.186 19:37, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:40, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images in the category are reproduction of Coins that are or were use in Argentina. However, per Commons:Currency#Argentina and List of countries' copyright length banknotes and coins from Argentina less then 50 years old, i.e. created after December, 31 1964 are copyrighted. 220.255.3.186 19:37, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:41, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images in the category are reproduction of Coins that are or were use in Argentina. However, per Commons:Currency#Argentina and List of countries' copyright length banknotes and coins from Argentina less then 50 years old, i.e. created after December, 31 1964 are copyrighted. 220.255.3.186 19:37, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:41, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images in the category are reproduction of Coins that are or were use in Argentina. However, per Commons:Currency#Argentina and List of countries' copyright length banknotes and coins from Argentina less then 50 years old, i.e. created after December, 31 1964 are copyrighted. 220.255.3.186 19:39, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:41, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images in the category are reproduction of Coins that are or were use in Argentina. However, per Commons:Currency#Argentina and List of countries' copyright length banknotes and coins from Argentina less then 50 years old, i.e. created after December, 31 1964 are copyrighted. 220.255.3.186 19:39, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:41, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images in the category are reproduction of Coins that are or were use in Argentina. However, per Commons:Currency#Argentina and List of countries' copyright length banknotes and coins from Argentina less then 50 years old, i.e. created after December, 31 1964 are copyrighted. 220.255.3.186 19:40, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:41, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images in the category are reproduction of Coins that are or were use in Argentina. However, per Commons:Currency#Argentina and List of countries' copyright length banknotes and coins from Argentina less then 50 years old, i.e. created after December, 31 1964 are copyrighted. 220.255.3.186 19:40, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:41, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images in the category are reproduction of Coins that are or were use in Argentina. However, per Commons:Currency#Argentina and List of countries' copyright length banknotes and coins from Argentina less then 50 years old, i.e. created after December, 31 1964 are copyrighted. 220.255.3.186 19:42, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:41, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images in the category are reproduction of Coins that are or were use in Argentina. However, per Commons:Currency#Argentina and List of countries' copyright length banknotes and coins from Argentina less then 50 years old, i.e. created after December, 31 1964 are copyrighted. 220.255.3.186 19:42, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:42, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images in the category are reproduction of Coins that are or were use in Argentina. However, per Commons:Currency#Argentina and List of countries' copyright length banknotes and coins from Argentina less then 50 years old, i.e. created after December, 31 1964 are copyrighted. 220.255.3.186 19:44, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:42, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images in the category are reproduction of Coins that are or were use in Argentina. However, per Commons:Currency#Argentina and List of countries' copyright length banknotes and coins from Argentina less then 50 years old, i.e. created after December, 31 1964 are copyrighted. 220.255.3.186 19:44, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:42, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images in the category are reproduction of Coins that are or were use in Argentina. However, per Commons:Currency#Argentina and List of countries' copyright length banknotes and coins from Argentina less then 50 years old, i.e. created after December, 31 1964 are copyrighted. 220.255.3.186 19:45, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:41, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images in the category are reproduction of Coins that are or were use in Argentina. However, per Commons:Currency#Argentina and List of countries' copyright length banknotes and coins from Argentina less then 50 years old, i.e. created after December, 31 1964 are copyrighted. 220.255.3.186 19:46, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:41, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images in the category are reproduction of Banknotes that are or were use in Argentina. However, per Commons:Currency#Argentina and List of countries' copyright length banknotes and coins from Argentina less then 50 years old, i.e. created after December, 31 1964 are copyrighted. 220.255.3.186 19:46, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:41, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images in the category are reproduction of Banknotes that are or were use in Argentina. However, per Commons:Currency#Argentina and List of countries' copyright length banknotes and coins from Argentina less then 50 years old, i.e. created after December, 31 1964 are copyrighted. 220.255.3.186 19:47, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:41, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images in the category are reproduction of Banknotes that are or were use in Argentina. However, per Commons:Currency#Argentina and List of countries' copyright length banknotes and coins from Argentina less then 50 years old, i.e. created after December, 31 1964 are copyrighted. 220.255.3.186 19:48, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:41, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is a evident copyright violation the logo is not in public domain Redeyes (talk) 19:58, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep looks like simple geometric shapes and text, if not the case, delete. — Preceding unsigned comment added by EEIM (talk • contribs)


Deleted: Unsourced image, not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:42, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Orphan file; not encyclopedic due to cross-eyed subject. Eclipsoid (talk) 01:52, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use, in scope. P 1 9 9   17:05, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused fictitious flag; out of COM:SCOPE as not realistically useful for an educational purpose. This flag has been requested in facebook community https://www.facebook.com/groups/223185474472986/?fref=ts only. It is not used by anybody. Carpodacus (talk) 19:15, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: P 1 9 9   17:09, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same picture with better quality : File:NIE 1905 Lion - cat family - Felidæ.jpg Abujoy (talk) 20:10, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: images are not the same (nominated image has border and legend). P 1 9 9   17:10, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All files in this category were taken by Thomas Oswald. EXIF data reads: © Thomas Oswald. As seen in Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Photographs by David Plas (for files in Category:Files from Security & Defence Agenda Flickr stream) it is not uncommon to see organisations have an external photographer work events for them and allow that organisation to use those photos for PR needs whilst still holding copyright. In this instance, COM:PRP needs to be applied to these photos, or perhaps work on COM:OTRS being obtained. Unfortunately, many other photos in Category:Photographs by The Financial Times are the same and will be gone through.

After this DR, please delete the category as well if OTRS isn't obtained. Thanks Scott (Russavia) TempIDforDRs (talk) 03:42, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: This user was banned by WMF from all activity at Wikimedia projects. This includes filing DRs. Jcb (talk) 18:24, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All files in this category were taken by Dianna Bonner. EXIF data reads: Copyright holder: Dianna Bonner www.WorldVisionPhotos.co.uk 07718881768. As seen in Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Photographs by David Plas (for files in Category:Files from Security & Defence Agenda Flickr stream) it is not uncommon to see organisations have an external photographer work events for them and allow that organisation to use those photos for PR needs whilst still holding copyright. In this instance, COM:PRP needs to be applied to these photos, or perhaps work on COM:OTRS being obtained. Unfortunately, many other photos in Category:Photographs by The Financial Times are the same and will be gone through.

After this DR, please delete the category as well if OTRS isn't obtained. Thanks Scott (Russavia)

TempIDforDRs (talk) 03:56, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: This user was banned by WMF from all activity at Wikimedia projects. This includes filing DRs. Jcb (talk) 18:25, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All files in this category were taken by Magali Girardin. EXIF data reads: Copyright holder: © Magali Girardin. Magali is a French photographer, website www.magaligirardin.com. As seen in Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Photographs by David Plas (for files in Category:Files from Security & Defence Agenda Flickr stream) it is not uncommon to see organisations have an external photographer work events for them and allow that organisation to use those photos for PR needs whilst still holding copyright. In this instance, COM:PRP needs to be applied to these photos, or perhaps work on COM:OTRS being obtained. Unfortunately, many other photos in Category:Photographs by The Financial Times are the same and will be gone through.

After this DR, please delete the category as well if OTRS isn't obtained. Thanks Scott (Russavia)

TempIDforDRs (talk) 04:02, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: This user was banned by WMF from all activity at Wikimedia projects. This includes filing DRs. Jcb (talk) 18:26, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All files in this category were taken by Drew Altizer EXIF data reads: Copyright holder: ©2012 by Drew Altizer, all rights reserved. or Copyright holder: ©2013 by Drew Altizer, all rights reserved. There might be some 2010 and 2011 similar EXIFs in the bunch. Drew is a San Francisco based photographer (www.drewaltizer.com) and is connected with SFWire (www.sfwire.com). As seen in Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Photographs by David Plas (for files in Category:Files from Security & Defence Agenda Flickr stream) it is not uncommon to see organisations have an external photographer work events for them and allow that organisation to use those photos for PR needs whilst still holding copyright. In this instance, COM:PRP needs to be applied to these photos, or perhaps work on COM:OTRS being obtained. Unfortunately, many other photos in Category:Photographs by The Financial Times are the same and will be gone through.

After this DR, please delete the category as well if OTRS isn't obtained. Thanks Scott (Russavia)

TempIDforDRs (talk) 04:09, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Keep In this case "Drew Altizer photography" act as a photo agent, but not as an owner, since the character of the event depicted in the photograph. --Puramyun31 (talk) 07:47, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Puramyun31, profressional photographers doing work for organisations is common, and they more often than not keep the copyright. You might like to contact Drew and ask if he is willing to CC-BY 2.0 licence the photos in this DR. With all credit/attribution going specifically to him. That's the only way to do this unfortunately. I've seen dozens upon dozens of such instances, sometimes the photographer agrees, sometimes they don't. I didn't realise that The Financial Times was a little sloppy with their Flickr until long after I uploaded them. :( 106.68.51.159 12:40, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The Financial Times is just asking that Drew Altizer be credited as the photographer. The FT would certainly know what their licenses mean and the request for Drew Altizer to be named as the photographer is a courtesy request. FT likely paid Drew to take the pictures--since he/she is a professional photographer--which means that FT owns the photos copyright, I would think. A mass DR seems premature. --Leoboudv (talk) 08:09, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment: If Drew denies he was paid by FT, then delete. --Leoboudv (talk) 08:11, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Leoboudv professional photographers generally do not transfer copyright for their works, particularly events photographers. A clearance from Drew Altizer will be required here. 60.228.92.42 17:52, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: This user was banned by WMF from all activity at Wikimedia projects. This includes filing DRs. Jcb (talk) 18:22, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All files in this category were taken by Drew Altizer EXIF data reads: Copyright holder: ©2012 by Drew Altizer, all rights reserved. or Copyright holder: ©2013 by Drew Altizer, all rights reserved. There might be some 2010 and 2011 similar EXIFs in the bunch. Drew is a San Francisco based photographer (www.drewaltizer.com) and is connected with SFWire (www.sfwire.com). As seen in Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Photographs by David Plas (for files in Category:Files from Security & Defence Agenda Flickr stream) or Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Photographs_by_Conor_Ashleigh, it is not uncommon to see organisations have an external photographer work events for them and allow that organisation to use those photos for PR needs whilst still holding copyright. In this instance, COM:PRP needs to be applied to these photos, or perhaps work on COM:OTRS being obtained. Unfortunately, many other photos in Category:Photographs by The Financial Times are the same and will be gone through.

After this DR, please delete the category as well if OTRS isn't obtained. Thanks Scott (Russavia)

Fixingupping (talk) 05:19, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I am inclined to keep these, but not enough so to actually close this without further discussion from colleagues. Since the Financial Times has posted these on Flickr with a CC license, if we delete these, we are saying that the Financial Times doesn't know what it is doing -- that it is CC licensing images to which it does not own the rights. While I am often on the other side of this argument with respect to small museums, I am inclined to believe that the FT does know what rights it actually has and that its CC license is OK. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:33, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
keep the intent seems clear to release to CC. without out an objection from photographer, or claim of copyright. EXIF data is not definitive, if concerning. photos not at his website [2] Slowking4Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 16:31, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept per Jameslwoodward, Slowking4, and also the prior deletion nomination close "This user was banned by WMF from all activity at Wikimedia projects. This includes filing DRs." Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:47, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All files in this category were taken by Marcel Giger. EXIF data reads: Copyright holder: marcel giger / snow-world.ch promenade 14 CH - 7270 Davos Platz. As seen in Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Photographs by David Plas (for files in Category:Files from Security & Defence Agenda Flickr stream) it is not uncommon to see organisations have an external photographer work events for them and allow that organisation to use those photos for PR needs whilst still holding copyright. In this instance, COM:PRP needs to be applied to these photos, or perhaps work on COM:OTRS being obtained. Unfortunately, many other photos in Category:Photographs by The Financial Times are the same and will be gone through.

After this DR, please delete the category as well if OTRS isn't obtained. Thanks Scott (Russavia)

TempIDforDRs (talk) 04:34, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: This user was banned by WMF from all activity at Wikimedia projects. This includes filing DRs. Jcb (talk) 18:29, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All files in this category were taken by Grace Villamil. EXIF data reads: © Grace Villamil, or in the description: Credit: Grace Villamil. Grace is a photographer based in NYC. Website: www.gracevillamil.com/news/. As seen in Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Photographs by David Plas (for files in Category:Files from Security & Defence Agenda Flickr stream) it is not uncommon to see organisations have an external photographer work events for them and allow that organisation to use those photos for PR needs whilst still holding copyright. In this instance, COM:PRP needs to be applied to these photos, or perhaps work on COM:OTRS being obtained. Unfortunately, many other photos in Category:Photographs by The Financial Times are the same and will be gone through.

After this DR, please delete the category as well if OTRS isn't obtained. Thanks Scott (Russavia)

TempIDforDRs (talk) 04:44, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Keep In this case "Grace Villamil" act as a photo agent, but not as an owner, since the character of the event depicted in the photograph. --Puramyun31 (talk) 07:47, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Puramyun31, professional photographers doing work for organisations is common, and they more often than not keep the copyright. You might like to contact Kate and ask if she is willing to CC-BY 2.0 licence the photos in this DR. With all credit/attribution going specifically to her. That's the only way to do this unfortunately. I've seen dozens upon dozens of such instances, sometimes the photographer agrees, sometimes they don't. I didn't realise that The Financial Times was a little sloppy with their Flickr until long after I uploaded them. :( 106.68.51.159 12:40, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: This user was banned by WMF from all activity at Wikimedia projects. This includes filing DRs. Jcb (talk) 18:16, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Russavia was not the only user, who uploaded a lot of photos and then nominated some of them for deletion. In my opinion, request for creating this request was important and I decided to delete the files due to that reason. But not all files in the request were Russavia's self-uploaded. I tried to keep those, uploaded by others. Almost all deleted files were unused (I am not sure, maybe even all). Taivo (talk) 18:16, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All files in this category were taken by Sam Hurd. EXIF data reads: Author: Sam Hurd. He is a Washington DC based photographer www.samhurdphotography.com. As seen in Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Photographs by David Plas (for files in Category:Files from Security & Defence Agenda Flickr stream) it is not uncommon to see organisations have an external photographer work events for them and allow that organisation to use those photos for PR needs whilst still holding copyright. In this instance, COM:PRP needs to be applied to these photos, or perhaps work on COM:OTRS being obtained. Unfortunately, many other photos in Category:Photographs by The Financial Times are the same and will be gone through.

After this DR, please delete the category as well if OTRS isn't obtained. Thanks Scott (Russavia)

TempIDforDRs (talk) 05:41, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: This user was banned by WMF from all activity at Wikimedia projects. This includes filing DRs. Jcb (talk) 18:34, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All files in this category were taken by Rosie Hallam. EXIF data reads: © Rosie Hallam. It appears she is an independent photographer www.rosiehallam.com/about/. As seen in Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Photographs by David Plas (for files in Category:Files from Security & Defence Agenda Flickr stream) it is not uncommon to see organisations have an external photographer work events for them and allow that organisation to use those photos for PR needs whilst still holding copyright. In this instance, COM:PRP needs to be applied to these photos, or perhaps work on COM:OTRS being obtained. Unfortunately, many other photos in Category:Photographs by The Financial Times are the same and will be gone through.

After this DR, please delete the category as well if OTRS isn't obtained. Thanks Scott (Russavia)

TempIDforDRs (talk) 05:52, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: This user was banned by WMF from all activity at Wikimedia projects. This includes filing DRs. Jcb (talk) 18:35, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:DW

Pleclown (talk) 21:49, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just considering the auctioneer for a moment, there have been two rationales put forward for deletion:
  • Lack of licence, as it's not the photographer's copyright. A good point according to European practice on 'work for hire', except that it's irrelevant. It is licensed at the Flickr account by the Financial Times (CC-by) who we do assume to be the rights holder.
  • "Derivative work", when this is credibly de minimis.
As such, I see no reason to delete.
I would also note that Yann has pre-empted discussion of this DR and has already gone along with Russavia's viewpoint, in that he has unilaterally decided to crop the artwork off. Is this compatible with ToU in that he's furthering the aims of a banned user, in the absence of any DR decision regarding this. Is that now (per WMF's new absolute ruling on anyone aiding Russavia, which exceeds issues of copyright observance) a blocking offence? Andy Dingley (talk) 22:33, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Russavia doesn't mention any derivative work issues. But there are certainly such issues in the 4 files mentioned above. I think 2 of them are now OK. The other 2 have to be deleted. For the rest, these files are still on Flickr under a free license, so I doubt the the photographer didn't allow releasing them under a free license. Why not contacting the photographer if you have some doubt? Regards, Yann (talk) 08:19, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted 2 images that prominently displayed copyrighted artwork, kept 2 cropped images (but deleted uncropped versions from its history). --P 1 9 9   16:21, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No real source, found on the net before upload date. Google search 1999-2004

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:10, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Nomination here seems bogus, the only problem is poor formatting of the information and a search with impossible dates. Description text in Japanese says "Mubandが撮影。", which Google Translate tells me means "Muband shooting". As for the search, three out of the four results are impossible: gameonestore.com was registered in May 2014, and their "About Us" page says their company was founded in 2011. identi.li was registered in May 2011, and retrospelboxar.se in July 2012. vtemulation.net was registered early enough for the result to be potentially valid, but on the other hand the page was updated as recently as 2012 so I see no way to know when the image was added to it. Anomie (talk) 11:57, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Why can't vtemulation.net be the source? The updates don't say anything about the first time the image was used. Inspecting the image closer, you find that it looks staged and very much in tune with other tech photos of that time. It doesn't seem to be made by a non-professional. Muband shooting doesn't help either. What on earth is a mumand? A name? Could be the uploader or the photographer, or something totally different. The main point is: We have no reliable source. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:58, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Considering the other three results are blatantly wrong, I see no reason to think that the vtemulation.net result is any more reliable as an original date. Muband is ja:User:Muband, which is blatantly obvious from just looking at the page. Muband has uploaded a large number of such images; are you accusing him/her of being a serial copyright violator, or are you just another overzealous deletionist now trying to justify your mistake? Anomie (talk) 01:44, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: stronger evidence needed as per User:Anomie. P 1 9 9   16:16, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Argentina has no FOP for paintings. The painter, Ariel Mlynarzewicz, is alive. BrightRaven (talk) 11:27, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as per COM:FOP#Argentina. P 1 9 9   16:19, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

incorrect naming causing an error Dude1830 (talk) 13:52, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dude1830, that's not a good reason for creating a deletion discussion, but it's a good reason for a quicker and easier solution. We administrators will be happy to resolve naming problems for you: we can delete it without a discussion, saving everyone time and confusion. Let me know what the problem is, and I can help you resolve it easily. Nyttend (talk) 05:22, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Other version of same image deleted per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Albert Reynolds 2.jpg. Ww2censor (talk) 21:32, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Albert Reynolds 2.jpg P 1 9 9   16:20, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Urquhartnite as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: (3.) Derivative work of non-free content. (British, or, English (English or Welsh), Scottish or Northern Ireland birth, adoption, marriage and death certificates are protected in the United Kingdom by British Crown copyright. British Government works are not by default automatically released into the public domain free of copyright in the United Kingdom.) Yann (talk) 14:22, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See Commons:Village pump/Copyright#UK Death Certificates?. Yann (talk) 14:23, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: The legal advice I received before uploading this file is that British death certificates are not Public Domain but are nevertheless allowed on Wikipedia under the Open Government Licence (OGL) provided that the names of any living persons (e.g. informant) have been redacted. See the official policy of the UK National Archives/GRO: Reproduction of Birth, Death and Marriage certificates (May 2014) [3]. In particular the FAQ on pp. 5-7.

Q: I'm publishing my family tree on the internet - I want to publish images of the certificates I have.

A: As long as there are no details about living individuals there is no problem about publishing the images of the certificates on your family tree website. Any modern certificates would be subject to the Data Protection Act, and would need the permission of any living named person prior to publication.

Q: I want to publish some certificates in a book I’m writing. Can I do this and do I need to get anyone's permission before I publish?

A: The layout of all certificates are protected by Crown Copyright, so if you are publishing these in a book or online publication you should acknowledge Crown Copyright (you don’t need to do this if you’re just placing them on Facebook or similar). You do not need to approach GRO or The National Archives for permission.

But do bear in mind that if any of the certificates relate to living individuals you need to consider the Data Protection Act provisions above and make sure you have their permission to publish.

This has been confirmed by written advice from an officer of the UK National Archives.

On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 11:13 PM, Information Policy (PSI) <PSI@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk> wrote:

Thank you for your email enquiry dated April 2nd, 2015. You will need to be aware that the publication of the details of living individuals is prevented under the Data Protection Act, publishing the completed certificate you should be aware of this and obtain permission from any living person named. The certificates are protected by Crown copyright so any re-use in terms of adding the image to an online biography is permitted under the terms of the Open Government Licence (OGL), provided that the Data Protection issue has been addressed. [emphasis added]

The OGL is a free licence developed to enable freer use of government information and public sector information without the need for formal agreements or any registration transaction, This licence takes the form of a simple set of terms and conditions for re-use and can be viewed at www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/

I hope this information helps, but if you do have any questions, please feel free to get in touch with me again.

Yours sincerely

Judy Nokes

Information Policy Adviser

The National Archives

Tel: 07901 513730

-- Muzilon (talk) 14:44, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Keep I agree that the guidance would seem to confirm the OGL license. The nomination reason is not quite correct -- there was no claim the file was public domain, but rather freely-licensed Crown Copyright (via the Open Government License). That does appear to be the case. I did restore the original license on the file page. Carl Lindberg (talk) 15:50, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Per Muzilon's explanation - the OGL seems valid, no claim of public domain. Gestumblindi (talk) 19:01, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment There is further discussion, plus a response from the nominator, on File talk:Death Certificate of Evelyn Beatrice Hall.jpg. He does mention that it is not the National Archives but the GRO which issues certificates, but I think they are still subject to the OGL (and the guidance response specifically mentions permission is not needed from the GRO either). The OGL does not cover material which would violate the UK Data Protection Act 1998, which is about personal data, but generally only about living people -- it looks like mentions of living people have accordingly be redacted here, so I don't think that's an issue either. Carl Lindberg (talk) 14:43, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment The nominator ("Urquhartnite") did not appear to accept the email dated 15 April 2015 from the National Archives' Information Policy Adviser (see box above). I have accordingly referred "Urquhartnite" to the National Archives' official policy document [4] which is clearly subtitled General Register Office [GRO] approved guidance. As this death certificate was originally published nearly 60 years ago it is very likely that the Informant, Certifying Physician, and Registrar are now also deceased. However, as I am unable to verify this I redacted the names of these three parties before uploading the scan. If required, I have additional written assurances from the National Archives that such redaction does comply with the UK Data Protection Act. Muzilon (talk) 18:10, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: It appears that the UK NAtional Archives are of the opinion that the OGL applies. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:53, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, has the text "Crown Copyright" and is dated 2015, see COM:UK. {{OGL}} does not apply to all UK Goverment publications.[5] Verbcatcher (talk) 18:14, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination withdrawn, I did not notice that this has been nominated before and been the subject of detailed analysis. Verbcatcher (talk) 18:19, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn. --Yann (talk) 19:26, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No clear source or proof that the subject is Ostoja. For what it's worth, I also seriously question the notability/relevance of this image; it appears to be of no historical or artistic value. Surtsicna (talk) 13:50, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 09:23, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence this work is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 12:38, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. INeverCry 17:02, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that this photograph is in the public domain C3r4 (talk) 16:02, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted, again. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:56, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the author claimed is on the photo アンタナナ 17:47, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am the real photographer — used a self-timer button --Perohanych (talk) 14:29, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: The timer claim is credible, and no evidence to the contrary has been presented. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:59, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by SkywalkerPL as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: copy of official Nikon promotional image with white background cut out to transparency |source=http://www.mayanhjp.com/ImgUpload/Anh/Nikon-D7100-truoc.jpg Yann (talk) 20:51, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I edited that file from a CC-BY-SA source but I dont remember from where I got it, I provided incomplete infos here, so you can remove this file, I load a new one from flikr informeing all correct data. Best regards and sorry by my mistake.Rodrigo Padula (talk) 11:31, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Likely copyvio, deltion not opposed by uplaoder. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:01, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Freefr~commonswiki (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear copyright status. All files are architectural sketches & designs which appear mostly (if not all) related to architect/designer "en:Fernando Romero (http://fr-ee.org/frprojects/). Considering User talk:Freefr~commonswiki/logs several related files got deleted due to missing permission/copyvios/etc. Uploaded in a row on 26./27.02.2011 some files were already previously published on other sites like File:FreeFRPyramid.jpg --> (example) http://www.medioambiente.org/2010/11/piramide-maya-construccion-verde-en-el.html (2010) or File:Inbursa Palmas Free Fernando Romero.jpg --> http://www.detnk.com/node/3060 (2009) or File:Bridging Teahouse Free Fernando Romero.jpg which looks quite similar to http://archidose.blogspot.de/2008/03/bridging-tea-house.html (2008, credits: "Iwan Baan") = http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-RCFDP-quaQQ/VPHsvSmb4LI/AAAAAAAAJKw/DYxplxXgbjc/s1600/image02.jpg.

Despite of having a similar username, "Fernando Romero" and/or fr-ee.org user is not necessarily the same person as the Commons user. A verifiable connection via COM:OTRS (or by other means) must be established.

Special case

--> previously published via Google this file is attributed to be a work by "Pedro Ramírez Vázquez" via http://www.cnnexpansion.com/obras/2009/04/18/pedro-ramirez-vazquez (2009, credit: "Foto: Comisión del Bicentenario", © 2010 Cable News Network. Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. All Rights Reserved.© 2006 DERECHOS RESERVADOS EXPANSIÓN, S.A. DE C.V)

Gunnex (talk) 09:35, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photos, usually without metadata. Taivo (talk) 14:44, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the author of the coins died only in 1990, so these are still copyrighted. There does not seem to be an exception for coins in the copyright law of San Marino. Liliana-60 (talk) 13:13, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 15:10, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Trois photos de moi ont été mises en ligne sans mon accord. 86.193.173.94 14:13, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment: If you (as an unidentified user under an IP address) are actually Yannick Rumpala, please contact with the photographer or otherwise, OTRS in order to prove them, and provide a good reason why you want to revoke the permission already given by the photographer. --Amitie 10g (talk) 21:49, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, per Amitie. Without OTRS-letter there will be no deletion. Taivo (talk) 15:12, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Das Logo ist veraltet und wird von der Schwenninger Krankenkasse nicht mehr verwendet. Es gibt mittlerweile ein neues Logo. Wir laden zeitnah das neue Logo hoch. Cc jura (talk) 14:41, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Auch wenn das Logo veraltet ist, wird es nicht gelöscht. Dann müsst ihr eben das neue unter anderem Dateinamen hochladen und es überall ersetzen.  Keep hilarmont \\ talk, talk, talk 09:54, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, redundant to file:Logo Schwenninger BKK.svg. Taivo (talk) 15:25, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Das Logo ist veraltet und wird von der Schwenninger Krankenkasse nicht mehr verwendet. Es gibt mittlerweile ein neues Logo. Wir laden zeitnah das neue Logo hoch. Cc jura (talk) 14:42, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, Commons needs old logos also for showing the company's history. Taivo (talk) 15:18, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Das Logo ist veraltet und wird von der Schwenninger Krankenkasse nicht mehr verwendet. Es gibt mittlerweile ein neues Logo. Das neue Logo wird zeitnah hochgeladen. Cc jura (talk) 14:56, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Da Commons wie Wikipedia dokumentiert, wird üblciherweise nichts altes gelöscht, denn warum soll ein altes Loge nicht später interessant sein, wenn es schon die Möglichkeit gibt, Logos zu behalten ;-) --K@rl (talk) 17:21, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, Commons needs old logos also for showing company's history. Taivo (talk) 15:22, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality, not used, many other similar views available, out of scope. Yann (talk) 14:57, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, considering, that there is more than 600 photos about Taj Mahal south side, I agree to delete. Taivo (talk) 15:37, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Given the subject (3 people born around 1870), this picture could not be shot before 1900, so it is not old enough to assume it is PD-old-70. In order to keep, we would need more info (author, date, publication, etc.). BrightRaven (talk) 14:59, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, license "I, the copyright holder ..." is very dubious. Taivo (talk) 15:45, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No clear source or proof that the subject is Dabiša. For what it's worth, I also seriously question the notability/relevance of this image; it appears to be of no historical or artistic value. Surtsicna (talk) 13:50, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 09:23, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that this photograph is in the public domain, nor it represent historic figure as noted C3r4 (talk) 16:03, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is not a photo, but a painting. Still no information about artist, maybe even still living. Taivo (talk) 15:48, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

porque la subi por error Ezequiel montiel (talk) 16:14, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, very beautiful, but ... uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 15:51, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Iran 4nn1l2 (talk) 16:17, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I deleted also all other uploads of the user, because all these sculptures are in park, which is younger than 70 years. Taivo (talk) 15:53, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images uploaded by User JotaCartas

[edit]

COPYVIO, object author still alive or died recently; photo taken inside a museum in Portugal, I think that FOP doesn't apply JotaCartas (talk) 18:26, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:04, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tonyxy1992 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear copyright status and unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF (multiple digicams and multiple authors involved). Examples:

Special cases

Obs.: This is just the tip of the iceberg. There might more critical files.


Gunnex (talk) 19:27, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is not a trusted user, I'll delete all of them. If camera data exist, then camera is usually different. There are also some collages, where source of every single image is not given or where some source files are deleted. Taivo (talk) 16:16, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tonyxy1992 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The previous mass DR from 07.2015 (closed today by @Taivo: ) kept uncontested by uploader who is continuing his uploads as if nothing had happened and... well, as I already said above: "Obs.: This is just the tip of the iceberg. There might more critical files." ---> after today identifying again uploads as copyvio (details at user talk) it´s difficult to believe that these remaining files would be own work: IMHO untrusted user uploading a bunch of copyrighted material (small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsitent exif/multiple digicams) so these ones (per COM:PRP) can't be believed either.

And Flickrwashing per User talk:Tonyxy1992#File:沈抚生命之环.png is an absolute NO-GO.

Ignoring some uploads uploaded very shotly after taken date. In the nominated files around 10 different digicams were used (besides the no exif-files, mostly - if not all - in low res). All these critical files were uploaded in 2013.

Gunnex (talk) 19:15, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as per above. User blocked for a week, next time longer. Yann (talk) 22:50, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tonyxy1992 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

This user has uploaded more problematic photos again, for example:

I suspect other hi-res photos were also taken from stock image websites, but I don't have time to check them one by one. --Baycrest (Talk) 16:36, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, unlikely to be own work; maybe some Flickr laundering mixed into them. --TechyanTalk03:53, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:54, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source claims 1993, thus, the work is not in public domain Zoupan (talk) 21:09, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not exactly. The original works of Jireček, Petrović, Popp, Pușcariu and Rosetti are reproduced by Mircea Cociu into Spațiul etnic românesc, ed. Militară, Bucharest 1993, ISBN 973-32-0367-X, but this original works are PD-old because authors died since more of 70 years. My drawing is different from each one of them and different from Cociu : it's a synthesis. Thank you for understanding, --Spiridon Ion Cepleanu (talk) 14:33, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, I agree with Spiridon's explanation. Taivo (talk) 16:22, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this is a duplicate of File:Meyers b12 s0541a.jpg please redirect there (part of a set of maps and other images that come from the same source and should habe filenames Mapmarks (talk) 21:57, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You --Mapmarks (talk) 10:36, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, the duplicate is processed. Taivo (talk) 16:24, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Dannyriesterer as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: no permission of Stefaan Fernande to publish this pic Yann (talk) 22:02, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata, own work is not sure. Taivo (talk) 16:26, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]