Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2015/07/30
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_01.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Not usefull anymore Serkot (talk) 08:18, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
This is a request for permanent deletion of the file File:Ing. Serge Kouzué.jpg - Wikimedia Commons !!
I'd like to delete also all the data's related !!!
How can I proceed for this ?
Thanks in advance — Preceding unsigned comment added by Serkot (talk • contribs) 08:22, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
- If you wanted to request deletion of File:Ing. Serge Kouzué.jpg, why did you nominate Commons:Categories for discussion for deletion? That's a useful project page which should not be deleted. File:Ing. Serge Kouzué.jpg has already been deleted. —LX (talk, contribs) 08:28, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Kept, nonsense nomination (speedy non-admin closure). —LX (talk, contribs) 08:28, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative works of copyrighted characters, images, etc ZK-NZE (talk) 12:55, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Delete per avove, clearly a derivative of copyrighted materials. Josve05a (talk) 13:19, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 13:24, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Flickrwashing Josve05a (talk) 16:54, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 17:22, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE, as mere text. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:02, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: nonsense. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:59, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
uploaded to commons in error, now localy on Wikipedia Smirkybec (talk) 23:51, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Speedy closed: Already tagged for Speedy deletion when using Fair use by mistake. No need for a normal DR. --Amitie 10g (talk) 00:20, 31 July 2015 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)
Está repetido Cristianpata (talk) 13:39, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: User request. Yann (talk) 23:34, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Copyrighted. Fry1989 eh? 19:42, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Non-trivial logo. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:10, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
Copyright infringement -- Photo by Zach Gold. Sharonmherrera (talk) 23:11, 30 July 2015 (UTC) ---
- Deleted as a courtesy to the subject since it was an unused picture; haven't verified copyright status though. odder (talk) 21:29, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
Vanity. Self promotion. Out of scope Fixertool (talk) 02:58, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:27, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
This is a Getty Images rights-controlled image (#2884071) by the Time Life photographer Carl Mydans. There is a small chance that it is PD, but it certainly not "own work" with a CC-BY-SA license, as claimed. —RP88 (talk) 03:58, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: if this is PD it obviously can be restored Ymblanter (talk) 18:26, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 04:38, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:35, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal flag; out of COM:SCOPE as not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Keφr (keep talk here) 06:28, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:28, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
No freedom of panoram in France / Pas de liberté de panoram en France Habertix (talk) 06:28, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: No FoP in France Ymblanter (talk) 18:27, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
Unused unencyclopedic personal image outside our scope.
§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:28, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:29, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE, unused and somewhat unclear copyright status of the underlying images (one likely from Google Maps). -- Túrelio (talk) 08:57, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:30, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE, unused and promotional. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:58, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:30, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
{{NoFoP-France}} Rodrigolopes (talk) 12:29, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: no FoP in France Ymblanter (talk) 18:29, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
unused promotional image Rodrigolopes (talk) 12:32, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 18:30, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed", this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:26, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 18:31, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
Broken file, I have uploaded the correct file from the same source as File:Horny_Die_Flucht_nach_Ägypten.jpg (the gif was a transparent overlay). Storkk (talk) 16:16, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted because it was just a 1x1 Pixel GIF. -- 32X (talk) 19:04, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
Small and pixelated. Have File:Meisenheimer 1 2.svg DMacks (talk) 03:25, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. Leyo 23:31, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
Smal and pixelated. Have File:Meisenheimer 2 3.svg DMacks (talk) 03:26, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. Leyo 23:31, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
picture of painting being non free, makes the image non free Yger (talk) 19:19, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 22:45, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
Copyrighted. Fry1989 eh? 19:41, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 22:45, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Redisanezaj (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Redisanezaj = several ongoing deletion requests indicating to elsewhere previously published works taken from copyrighted sources (Facebook, blogs, etc.). All files — uploaded in a row on 28.03.2015 — related to en:Bajram Curri (town), a city in Albania.
- File:Bashkia e Bajram Currit.jpg
- File:Stadiumi ne Bajram Curr.jpg
- File:Pallati i sporiti.jpg
- File:Stadiumi i Bajram Currit.jpg
- File:Bibloteka ne Bajram Curr.jpg
- File:Bashkia Bajram Curr.jpg
- File:Veshja Tradicionale.jpg
- File:Fli me saç.jpg
- File:Veshje Tradicionale.jpg
- File:Flia e Tropojes.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 20:18, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 22:43, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
Unused low-quality. Smaller and lower resolution than other comparable-detail PNG in Category:Barton-McCombie deoxygenation, which also has SVG of identical detail. DMacks (talk) 20:24, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 22:42, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
Weil in der Beschriftung die Richtung ("aus Nord") falsch angegeben ist. nach der Löschung lade ich das Bild mit der korrekten Bezeichnung wieder hoch. Flo Sorg (talk) 20:28, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
- Why not edit the description or request the file renaming instead? --Amitie 10g (talk) 21:10, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Kept: kein Löschgrund Didym (talk) 22:40, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
Image-of-text easily replaced with text itself. Only current use was in a userspace draft of a years-dormant user. DMacks (talk) 20:37, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. Leyo 23:42, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused image-of-text could easily be replaced by TeX. But it isn't currently used anywhere so not bothering to conjure up the exact equivalent (could do so if someone wants it though) DMacks (talk) 20:38, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: Per nom. Leyo 23:40, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
{{BadGIF}}. Have File:CopeReactionJACS82-4656.svg as direct replacement DMacks (talk) 20:47, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. Leyo 23:39, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative work of copyrighted content. FDMS 4 23:29, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: Didym (talk) 22:38, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
The author is not the same person and the uploader. Licsak (talk) 13:12, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:56, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
{{BadJPG}}, orphaned/replaced by File:Graphitfluorid.svg. Leyo 20:28, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete as poor layout choice to represent key 3D aspects. DMacks (talk) 02:56, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Ed (Edgar181) 02:08, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Children's Peace Monument Motopark (talk) 13:12, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, there is no freedom of panorama in Japan for sculpture. Taivo (talk) 09:00, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of scope personal doodle. De728631 (talk) 18:34, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
- An unregistered user just left this message at my talk page. Even if you are writing a test article, there are lots of other useful images that you can put there as a placeholder. E.g. see Category:Image placeholders (square). De728631 (talk) 20:17, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Totally out of scope. This is a joke? --Taichi (talk) 00:34, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
Comment Please add the follow MS Paint draws created by Lokomotoras Tutorial:
- File:Francisco Diez Marina.png
- File:Benito Santos Zenea.png
- File:Desiderio de Samaniego.png
- File:Ramón María Loreto Canal de Samaniego.png
- File:José Francisco Figueroa.png
- File:Pánfilo Barasorda.gif
- File:Ángel Vázquez Mellado(2).png
- File:Ángel Vázquez Mellado.png
- File:Manuel María Escobar y Rivera.png
- File:Doctor León Covarrubias.png
- File:Constantino Llaca Nieto (3).png
- File:Sabás Antonio Domínguez.png
- File:Manuel Gutiérrez de Salceda y Gómez.png
- File:Francisco de Paula Mesa dibujo (1).png
- File:Francisco de Paula Mesa dibujo.png
- File:José Antonio del Razo.png
- File:Manuel López de Ecala.png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
--Taichi (talk) 00:49, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete all of those files listed by Taichi. Wikimedia Commons is not a kindergarten paintbook. De728631 (talk) 17:58, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Adding more "kindergarten style" portraits created by Lokomotoras Tutorial the last two days:
--Taichi (talk) 07:05, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
- Comment - More "kindergarten style" items created by Lokomotoras Tutorial. What are these, signatures created using MS Paint???
--ARTEST4ECHO talk 19:13, 11 August 2015 (UTC) Template:Consentimiento {{PR|México}} Template:En desarrollo Template:En traducción Template:Referencias
- This image is unique in this article is the only one there to be a topic
- That image will be translated content
- This image has good starts
- La imagen fue usada por el usuario Fixertool
- Esta imagen es única en este artículo es la única que hay para tratarse de un tema
- Esa imagen será traducido su contenido
- Esta imagen tiene buenas salidas - unsigned by User:LokomotorasTutorial
- Delete These images are all out of scope as "Commons is not your personal free web host"--ARTEST4ECHO talk 16:48, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
- I tagged the two signatures for speedy deletion. Trying to redraw someone's signature is usually counted as an act of falsification. And if this was occuring at the English Wikipedia I'd also invoke en:WP:COMPETENCE.
- Lokomotorias Tutorial, we are not discussing the authorship of your images, so we do not need any message of consent from you. Instead, there are editors here at Commons who think that such drawings are not suitable for our project at all because of their quality. Wikimedia Commons is a repository for images with an educational aspect and not meant to serve as anyone's webhost. Are there any Spanish-speaking editors around who could help LT understand what is happening here? De728631 (talk) 22:40, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:14, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
Unused selfie. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:05, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 22:11, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
There's no freedom of panorama in the United States for art installations of this type. Diannaa (talk) 00:50, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 22:20, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 04:04, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 22:21, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright_rules_by_subject_matter#Jewelry is copyrighted. No permission from jewelry creator. Also the upload looks like a web image with compression, no EXIF data if it's an original photo. – czar 04:32, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 22:21, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The uploader claims that this recently uploaded image is his "Own work" with a date of "1 June 2013" and a license of CC-BY-SA-4.0. This is definitely incorrect, it is, in fact, a circa 1943 poster by Manuel Rey Isip (1904 - 1987) (see [1]). The Philippine government-in-exile commissioned 15,000 copies to be distributed in the U.S (see pg. 74 of "The Filipino Americans"). It's possible that this poster might be PD via {{PD-PhilippinesGov}}, but I can't find any evidence that Manuel Rey Isip was an employee of the Philippine government. Manuel Rey Isip was a U.S. resident when he created this poster and it was first published in the U.S., so {{PD-Philippines}} does not apply. It might be PD due to lack of copyright notice (i.e. {{PD-US-no notice}}) or lack of renewal {{PD-US-not renewed}} but I haven't been done enough research to determine this. —RP88 (talk) 04:49, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Comment Every other image uploaded by this user (save one) was "own work" without source, and many were removed as copyvios. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:31, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 22:22, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The uploader claims that this poster is "Own work" with a license of CC-BY-SA-4.0. This is incorrect. This is a WW II Japanese propaganda poster and http://www.psywarrior.com/JapanPSYOPWW2.html appears to be the actual source of this image. It is possible that this poster is PD, but if so in order to keep this file the date, author, and license of this file needs to be updated with accurate information. —RP88 (talk) 04:57, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: A.Savin 22:23, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Compressed image likely does not belong to the uploader (who uploaded other work in copyright violation) – czar 05:02, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 22:24, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
When we came back from trip, we noticed that one of our friends has uploaded a nude photo of my husband to wikimedia called Summertime. This was not fun to discover. Please remove this picture also immediately. Wikiacco (talk) 05:16, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 22:24, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
This is a Getty Images rights-controlled image (#53372930) by the Time Life photographer Carl Mydans. There is a small chance that it is PD, but it certainly not "own work" with a CC-BY-SA license, as claimed. —RP88 (talk) 06:00, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 22:24, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Randelearcilla (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:T26 Garand.jpg
- File:BARearlymodel.jpg
- File:M2-Carbine.jpg
- File:ReisingM60.png
- File:M3 Grease.jpg
- File:Grease3 2.jpg
- File:M941 bazooka.jpg
- File:M9bazooka.jpg
- File:M1 Bazooka.jpg
- File:M1A1 Bazooka.jpg
- File:M17.jpg.jpg
- File:M1 garand M7.jpg
- File:Mortasrus.png
- File:ORDPAGE 81MORTAR.jpg
- File:M1942 Bayonet.jpg
- File:M1905 Bayonet.jpg
- File:M3-Trench-Knife-1.jpg
- File:M1A1 Flamethrower.jpg
- File:M2 Flamethrower.jpg
- File:Vickers mk1-1.jpg
- File:M18 Rocoilless Rifle.jpg
- File:Win21.jpg
- File:MyRem31 Web.JPG
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Motopark (talk) 14:40, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
Dan Dizon watercolors
[edit]These three images are not the "Own work" of the uploader with a license of CC-BY-SA-4.0, nor are they photos of public domain WW II posters. These are prints of the original watercolors created by the still living Filipino artist Dan Dizon in the 1990s (see [2]) and as such will be copyrighted for years to come. The actual images appear to have come from this online gallery.
- File:DandizonFilipinosoldiersofthePCA(7).jpg
- File:DandizonFilipinosoldiersofthePCA(2).jpg
- File:DandizonFilipinosoldiersofthePCA(1).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
—RP88 (talk) 06:34, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:59, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
Unused fictitious flag; out of COM:SCOPE as not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Keφr (keep talk here) 06:40, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 22:25, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
I think the license is not OK and the photo copyrighted S. Plaine (discuter) 06:49, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 22:26, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this image was published in the early 1920s. The listed source says the subject died in 1978, so it's very possible that this came after 1923—we frankly don't know and the source adds no details about the image's origins. – czar 07:09, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
- I agree, it is probably 1940-1945. Please move it to Wikipedia and add the Fair Use template and add a FUR. I would have to lose it for the article. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 17:37, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 22:26, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Insufficient source. Doesn't say when the pamphlet was published (or author died) or how they know it was published before 1923, so no way to confirm its copyright status. – czar 07:17, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Image is from 1918 booklet published by Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corporation LTD, Charles M. Schwab director. pages 97 - 98. Published on the completion of the 1917 Frederick Meyer Renaissance Revival Bethlehem office building on the corner of Illinois and 20th Streets. Published by Bethlehem Shipbuilding and Steel Corporation LTD. General Offices Bethlehem, PA. Branch offices 111 Broadway, New York, N.Y. 260 California Street San Francisco, Cal. Prints were widely distributed, you can see one framed at the RAMP, a bar across the water from Pier 70. 855 Terry A Francois Blvd, San Francisco, CA 94158. 99.101.143.78 hank chapot 99.101.143.78
- Thanks!
I withdraw my nomination – czar 04:00, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Websized image of professional photo. No original source given. Unlikely to be by uploader, whose only enwp talk page message is a deletion notice in 2007. – czar 07:31, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 22:27, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
a picture of this quality of the subject by the subject requires a good self timer and a tripod, or a different photographer who will then own the copyright. OTRS is required here.
In addition, the picture illustrates a draft article of non notable person on en WP, and has no other purpose. It has no value, the more so since that draft is unlikely to proceed to become an article. I suggest this is out of scope for Commons. Timtrent (talk) 07:55, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 22:28, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
uploader and copyright owner differ. OTRS is required for this to remain Timtrent (talk) 07:57, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 22:28, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
How can the uploader be the copyright owner of a distance shot of him speaking at a conference? Timtrent (talk) 07:58, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 22:28, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
this is not my image Manoj.Kumar.8220989800 (talk) 08:18, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 22:29, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Unused unencyclopedic personal image outside our scope. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:01, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 22:30, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dr Akram Gasmelseed (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused unencyclopedic personal image outside our scope.
§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:01, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 22:30, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed", this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Storkk (talk) 09:26, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 22:31, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata, possible professional portrait: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 09:26, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 22:31, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed", this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Storkk (talk) 09:27, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 22:31, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed", this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Storkk (talk) 09:27, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 22:31, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed", this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Storkk (talk) 09:28, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 22:32, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 09:38, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 22:32, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Close to, but probably over the threshold. Storkk (talk) 09:44, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 22:32, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed", this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Storkk (talk) 09:46, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 22:32, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 09:46, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 22:33, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 09:47, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 22:33, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Metadata credits a "Bujet - baksha". If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 09:47, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 22:33, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed", this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Storkk (talk) 09:48, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 22:34, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Derivative (screenshots?) of multiple websites. Storkk (talk) 09:50, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 22:34, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Photo shot ca 1913 (see [3]). Not old enough to assume it is PD-old-70. BrightRaven (talk) 10:08, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 22:34, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Das ist ein kommerziell verwendetes Logo und wir wohl kaum frei weiterverwendbar sein. Müsste zumindest eine andere Lizenz haben. HelgeRieder (talk) 10:09, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 22:35, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Mappa scorretta, sostituita da File:Italia - mappa strada statale 62.svg. Sono l'autore di entrambe. Friedrichstrasse (talk) 10:14, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 22:35, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
OTRS-ticket isn't valid, see here Natuur12 (talk) 11:07, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 22:36, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Ist nicht das originale Wappen des Vereins. Siehe http.//www.tsvkorntal.de. Von daher bitte löschen. Danke. Aleberha (talk) 11:08, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 22:36, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal vanity photo. No obvious educational value, so outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 11:14, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 22:36, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Own work? I can't belive. -- Steinsplitter (talk) 11:19, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 22:37, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Urheberrechtlich geschützte Datei, keine Freigabe ersichtlich. W. Edlmeier 11:41, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Das Foto wurde von Roland Fränkle, Presse- und Informationsamt der Stadt Karlsruhe, gemacht mit dem Hinweis, dass es frei verwendet werden kann. -- Delta-nox (talk) 11:44, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
- Wo steht denn der Hinweis? --W. Edlmeier 11:45, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
- In der Bildunterschrift -- Delta-nox (talk) 13:56, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
- Jupp, auf's Bildchen klicken. Ist aber auch wurscht, weil: a) keine CC Freigabe auf der Seite. b) keine Freigabe vom Fotografen auf der Seite. Delete --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:58, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
- Jupp, auf's Bildchen klicken. Ist aber auch wurscht, weil: a) keine CC Freigabe auf der Seite. b) keine Freigabe vom Fotografen auf der Seite.
Deleted: A.Savin 22:37, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
self promotion Bazj (talk) 11:46, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 22:38, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Mappa scorretta, sostituita da File:Italia - mappa strada statale 63.svg. Sono l'autore di entrambe. Friedrichstrasse (talk) 11:58, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 22:38, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
unused personal photo Rodrigolopes (talk) 12:30, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 22:38, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
unused personal image Rodrigolopes (talk) 12:33, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 22:38, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unfortunately no FOP in Iceland ZK-NZE (talk) 12:54, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: A.Savin 22:39, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Photo of a photo of unknown origin and copyright status. Storkk (talk) 12:57, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 22:39, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Additional likely scope issues. Storkk (talk) 12:58, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 22:39, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Unused non-notable artwork/logo. While the uploading of small numbers of images... for use on a personal user page... is allowed, this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Will withdraw if notability is reasonably asserted. Storkk (talk) 12:59, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 22:40, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata, watermarked: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 13:00, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 22:40, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal artwork. While "the uploading of small numbers of images... for use on a personal user page... is allowed", this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:01, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 22:40, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed", this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:01, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 22:40, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed", this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:03, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 22:41, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata, probable professional portrait: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 13:04, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 22:41, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Book cover (uploader may be copyright holder, if so this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS.) Storkk (talk) 13:05, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 22:41, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata, probable professional portrait: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 13:09, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 22:41, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
EXIF contains "(c) Smirnov Maxim, 2011". If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 13:10, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 22:42, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata, probable professional portrait: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 13:14, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 22:42, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed", this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:16, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: A.Savin 22:42, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed", this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:16, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 22:43, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed", this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:16, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 22:43, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal artwork. While "the uploading of small numbers of images... for use on a personal user page... is allowed", this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:20, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 22:43, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed", this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:21, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 22:44, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Unused non-notable artwork/logo. While the uploading of small numbers of images... for use on a personal user page... is allowed, this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Will withdraw if notability is reasonably asserted. Storkk (talk) 13:22, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 22:44, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed", this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:22, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 22:44, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 13:23, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 22:44, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed", this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:24, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 22:45, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Unused promotional material, out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:24, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 22:45, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Metadata credits a "ROBERT COULTER". If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 13:25, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 22:45, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed", this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:25, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 22:45, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 13:26, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 22:46, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed", this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:26, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 22:46, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Derivative of photos of unknown origin and copyright status. Storkk (talk) 13:28, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 22:46, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Unused non-notable artwork/logo. While the uploading of small numbers of images... for use on a personal user page... is allowed, this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Will withdraw if notability is reasonably asserted. Storkk (talk) 13:28, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 22:46, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 13:30, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 22:47, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
image used only by promotional page deleted off enwiki DS (talk) 13:38, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 22:47, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:01, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 22:47, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Given the subject, I doubt it is own work (pictures of artists at an award ceremony). No EXIF. The uploader committed other copyvios. BrightRaven (talk) 14:01, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 22:48, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:03, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 22:48, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:03, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 22:48, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused file, advertising or self-promotion
BrightRaven (talk) 14:04, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 22:48, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:04, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 22:49, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Iran. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 22:49, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
No Commons:Freedom of panorama for statues in USA. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 22:49, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 22:50, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sylvigordillo (talk · contribs)
[edit]Modern art. I think painter identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.
- File:Screenshot 2015-07-27 at 22.37.28.png
- File:Screenshot 2015-07-27 at 22.36.54.png
- File:Screenshot 2015-07-27 at 22.28.47 (50x70 cm).png
- File:Screenshot 2015-07-27 at 22.28.39.png
- File:Screenshot 2015-07-27 at 22.28.31.png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 22:51, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sylvigordillo (talk · contribs)
[edit]Modern Artworks outside of COM:SCOPE. If these are all by one person, that person needs to be notable and provide COM:OTRS, if they're by multiple people, they all have to be notable, etc.
- File:Politica12.jpg
- File:Dibujo Miguel Varea 1.jpg
- File:Aktitud de renuncia.jpg
- File:Dibujo Miguel Varea.jpg
- File:MVarea obra.JPG
- File:Autorretrato 1987.jpg
- File:2 Lapiz de color 2002.jpg
- File:1 Lapiz de color 2002.jpg
- File:1 plumilla 1995.jpg
- File:Obra Fotos para la cédula MV.jpg
- File:Las tres gracias MV.jpg
- File:Eskondiendo la mullapa.jpg
- File:Un virus que me persigue.jpg
- File:Teclado1.jpg
- File:Sin poderse ni ver.jpg
- File:Sin poder ni verse.jpg
- File:Barriendo ajeno.jpg
- File:Malos habitos I,II y III.jpg
- File:Regreso de la pc.jpg
- File:Miguel Varea obra2.jpg
- File:Miguel Varea obra.jpg
- File:Caricaturas Politicas 1981.jpg
- File:Plumilla 1976.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:13, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:32, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Per Commons:Currency#Germany Natuur12 (talk) 14:52, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 22:51, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
not own work Fetx2002 (talk) 14:55, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
- Keep: Clearly PD-textlogo and in use. Just change the source and authorship insteaad. --Amitie 10g (talk) 16:59, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Kept: PD-trivial A.Savin 22:52, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:Euro coins (2 euro)
[edit]Per the same reason as Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Euro coins (1 cent) and Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Euro coins (2 cents): the euro coins (both the national sides and the common side) are copyrighted and not free for Commons.
- File:0Apng.jpg
- File:2 EURO 2000.JPG
- File:2 Euro 2009 Saarland.png
- File:2 EURO BAYERN 2012.JPG
- File:2 euro Chypre 2008.png
- File:2 euro coin Es serie 1.png
- File:2 Euro coin Es.gif
- File:2 euro coin Et serie 1.png
- File:2 Euro coin Sk.gif
- File:2 euro coin Sk.jpg
- File:2 euro coin Sm serie 1.png
- File:2 euro coin Sm.jpg
- File:2 EURO DEUTSCHLAND 2011.JPG
- File:2 EURO DEUTSCHLAND NORDRHEIN-WESTPHAL 2011.JPG
- File:2 EURO DEUTSCHLAND SAARLAND 2009.JPG
- File:2 EURO LUXEMBOURG 2006.JPG
- File:2 EURO PORTUGAL 2002.JPG
- File:2 euro San Marino.jpg
- File:2 EURO SLOVAKEI 2009.JPG
- File:2 euro Slovakia.jpg
- File:2 euro Spain serie 2.jpg
- File:2 euro Spain.png
- File:2-euromunt-dubbelportret.jpg
- File:Austria 2e.PNG
- File:Grece 2 euro.jpg
- File:Münze in Hellfeld und Dunkelfeldabbildung.png
- File:Piéfort.jpg
- File:Slovakia 2 euro.jpg
- File:Slovakia 2 euro.png
- File:WK 2006 front.jpg
- File:Zwei-euro-vorderseite.gif
Eleassar (t/p) 23:08, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleting? According to http://www.eu-info.de/euro-waehrungsunion/euro-muenzen/5081/ a reproduction as images are possible for any Euro coin. Only a reproduction on metal is permitted. Why to delete all images?--Salino01 (talk) 06:13, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, this applies only for common sides, and it does not allow for derivative works (see Commons:Deletion requests/Template:Euro coin common face 2). --Eleassar (t/p) 09:10, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
- Each country may have their own rules about deratives of their coins. I'll send an email to a Dutch authority about the Dutch coins. Dqfn13 (talk) 10:39, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, thank you. For now, we don't have evidence about the national sides of coins being free anywhere else than in Finland (see Commons:Currency#Finland), so we have to presume they're copyrighted. --Eleassar (t/p) 11:49, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
- I know the the guilders were free to copy, as long as it was obviously fake: meaning much bigger or smaller on paper or in 3D. Currently there are chocolate coins in stores because of the upcoming holidays (Sinterklaas and patially Christmas. So I think the national sides are free to copy as long as it is obviously not real. Dqfn13 (talk) 12:57, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
- The question is what kind of derivative works can be made of their reproductions. For example, Template:Euro coin common face has been deleted because the common sides can only be reproduced in "faithful likenesss" and cannot be reproduced in a manner that is "detrimental to the image of the euro". --Eleassar (t/p) 13:19, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
- Drawings, or even low resolution photo's are deratives and were allowed in the Netherlands. Were may be are, don't have an answer yet. Dqfn13 (talk) 13:27, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, thank you. For now, we don't have evidence about the national sides of coins being free anywhere else than in Finland (see Commons:Currency#Finland), so we have to presume they're copyrighted. --Eleassar (t/p) 11:49, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
- Each country may have their own rules about deratives of their coins. I'll send an email to a Dutch authority about the Dutch coins. Dqfn13 (talk) 10:39, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: The Euro coin is non-free, and therefore forbidden on Commons FASTILY 07:03, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Euro coins (2 euro)
[edit]- File:2 euro 1999 francia.jpg
- File:2 Euro français.jpg
- File:2 Euro.jpg
- File:2 euros Espanya 2.jpg
- File:2 Euros Slovaquie.jpg
- File:2008 italy 2 €.png
- File:Allemagne 2013 2 Euros Elysee PNG.png
- File:Allemagne 2014 2 Euros Niedersachsen.jpg
- File:Austrian 2 euro.png
- File:Belgien 2014a.jpg
Natuur12 (talk) 14:56, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted. --A.Savin 22:53, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Per com:Currency Natuur12 (talk) 15:01, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Per com:Currency Natuur12 (talk) 15:01, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 22:56, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:Euro coins (5 cents)
[edit]Per the same reason as Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Euro coins (1 cent) and Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Euro coins (2 cents): the euro coins (both the national sides and the common side) are copyrighted and not free for Commons.
- File:" 02 - ITALY - 0,05 € Italia - Colosseum - Colosseo - Anfiteatro Flavio in Rome.png
- File:05 euro cents San Marino.jpg
- File:5 cent coin Es serie 1.png
- File:5 cent coin Es.jpg
- File:5 cent coin Sk serie 1.png
- File:5 cent coin Sk.jpg
- File:5 cent coin Sm serie 1.png
- File:5 cent coin Sm.jpg
- File:5 Cent Deutschland 2002.JPG
- File:5 cent SK 2009.jpg
- File:5 centimes Estonie.png
- File:5 cents Euro coin Es.gif
- File:5 cents Euro coin Sk.gif
- File:5 cents Euro coin Sm.gif
- File:5 euro cent coin common side.jpg
- File:Austria 5c.PNG
- File:Macro-1 1 Luc Viatour.jpg
- File:Vask, hõbe ja kuld.JPG
Eleassar (t/p) 23:12, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 07:03, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Euro coins (5 cents)
[edit]Per com:currency, the eurocoin is non free.
- File:5 cent Italia 2.jpg
- File:5 cent Italia.jpg
- File:5 euro cent 1999 francia.jpg
- File:5 euro cent 2014 letonia.jpg
- File:Austrian 5 eurocent.png
Natuur12 (talk) 15:06, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted --A.Savin 22:58, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
I doubt this is own work: no EXIF, the uploader committed other copyvios. BrightRaven (talk) 15:13, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 23:01, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Picture collection must collect from local picture from Commons, please upload first every picture to Commons and then collect it from those. Please take a look at File:Collage Rome.jpg as an example how to do it. See Commons:Collages for details. Motopark (talk) 15:17, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 23:01, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
copyio; no own work Tekstman (talk) 15:39, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 23:01, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 16:01, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 23:02, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 16:02, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
- Keep The ad is not the main subject of the picture, the main subject is the train platform and the train sign with the name of the train station. For me the ad is De Minimis. If it is really needed, the ad can be blurred. Jeriby (talk) 08:59, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Too centered for DM I think A.Savin 23:03, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Probable broken file. Unused and without context, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: out of scope. Storkk (talk) 16:06, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 23:03, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
It is a Movie Poster, and not compatible with the Commons guidelines Rogi (talk) 16:34, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 23:03, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by FranchiscoPersuaJal (talk · contribs)
[edit]All files uploaded in a row on 22.-24.04.2014 for es:Jalostotitlán, a city in Mexico.Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:FranchiscoPersuaJal + mysteriously (different) watermarked files and:
- File:Pirotecnia Jalos.jpg (mysteriously watermarked) --> previously published via https://www.facebook.com/1431020757135805/photos/pb.1431020757135805.-2207520000.1438273826./1431095053795042/?type=1&theater (03.2014)
- File:Parroquia Jalostotitlán Jalisco, by Chisco Produccions.jpg --> previously published via https://www.facebook.com/1431020757135805/photos/pb.1431020757135805.-2207520000.1438273826./1431030910468123/?type=1&theater (03.2014)
- File:Parroquia de Jalos a principios del siglo XX.jpg --> unlikely "own work". Historical photos may be in public domain by other means but relevant info must be provided. Source country most likely Mexcio.
- Special case
- File:Franchisco.jpg (user photo) --> out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used.
- File:Parroquia de Jalos a principios del siglo XX.jpg
- File:Templo Sagrado Corazon de Jesus de Jalos.jpg
- File:Recinto taurino.jpg
- File:Reinas de Jalos.jpg
- File:Presidencia Jalostotitlán.jpg
- File:Retablo Altar Jalos.jpg
- File:Pirotecnia Jalos.jpg
- File:Plaza de toros de Jalos.jpg
- File:Desfile en Jalos.jpg
- File:Charros en Jalostotitlán.jpg
- File:Virgen de la Asuncion de Jalostotitlán.jpg
- File:Virgen de la Asunción de Jalostotitlán.jpg
- File:Parroquia Jalostotitlán Jalisco, by Chisco Produccions.jpg
- File:Franchisco.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 16:53, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 23:04, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Hedwig in Washington as no source (No source since)... the file is claimed as own work by a user who has uploaded at least one other technical diagram. Converting to DN for consensus. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:20, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 23:06, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
- Restored: as per [4]. No copy on the Net. AGF. Yann (talk) 11:28, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
![[4]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests&oldid=171757817#File:Luceram1.JPG_and_File:Luceram2.JPG_and_File:Fort_de_Valros.jpg){kind=link}
Image looks like stock photography and is credited to "Kessner Photography" but with no link for source. File is in use, but I am not 100% certain the license is correct. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:23, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 23:06, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
No source of music in the audio, but music must be available under a "free" license too. Pristurus (talk) 17:27, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 23:07, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Hedwig in Washington as no source (No source since).... which is correct. However image is in use, appears older and I find other uses of it online, but am not able to determine which is the original source of this "scansione stampa su libro". Converting to DN in hopes the community can help source this image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:28, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 23:07, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 17:28, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 23:07, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope personal image. De728631 (talk) 17:37, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 23:08, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Unused historic image (1943) with a very odd license... "There was an official photographer".... is too much of an assumption, the image had to come from somewhere. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:40, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
- Comment: Maybe just unknown photographer? File uploaded in 2007, why not be nominated before? --Amitie 10g (talk) 19:12, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
- If it's an official photographer on a navy ship it don't seem far fetched to assume it as a US government employee. The image was uploaded by user Akilmer who is the Anne Kilmer in the photo. // Liftarn (talk)
- Comment @Liftarn It's the "if it's an official photographer" that's the problem. Did you look at the lower right hand corner of the image where the source block has been truncated? I am unable to make out what information that block would have contained; perhaps an upload which includes it would provide clarity. I think a child of that age would not have sufficient understanding of the world or memory of the actual event to know if the photographer were public or private. @ Amitie 10g For "why hasn't the file been nominated before", there are only so many volunteers and quite a few too many files. At present there are over 43,000 "images without source". Also please note that since 2007, no one has found this educational enough to use. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:24, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: missing source A.Savin 23:09, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Duplicate of a real flag, has nothing to do with "Miss Universe". Fry1989 eh? 17:53, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 23:09, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Yes the photo is of poor quality but shows a fish proves that there are fish in Caño Cristales
_01.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_01.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 17:53, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
_01.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: A.Savin 23:09, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
_01.JPG){kind=link}
This image is printed below "Ohio Historical Society" yet it is claimed to be US-gov. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:54, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 23:10, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Flag of Ireland (gold).svg. Fry1989 eh? 17:55, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: A.Savin 23:10, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
On sourcing this item, I found the following "In accordance with Chapter 3 of AFI 84-105, commercial reproduction of this emblem is NOT permitted without the permission of the proponent organizational/unit commander." at the source. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:56, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 23:10, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Flag of the Australian Navy Board.svg. Fry1989 eh? 17:57, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 23:10, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Duplicate image of File:Medal 1000 years Kazan.JPG, not in use. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:01, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Kept: seems to be a higher-res version of the JPG and is in use on he:wiki A.Savin 23:12, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal image with no source or author, out of COM:SCOPE Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:01, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 23:14, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Unused airphoto, blurry with clouds. Out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:02, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 23:14, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
No indication of permission from copyright holder to use image Nthep (talk) 18:31, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 23:14, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
no offense, but source and author VascoPlanet (tm) Photography http://www.vascoplanet.com/", hence DR started to verify, Roland zh (talk) 18:34, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
This file is from VascoPlanet web-site:
http://www.vascoplanet.com/pictures/7b20be/
and it is distributed with Creative Commons license:
http://www.vascoplanet.com/download/7b20be/ http://www.vascoplanet.com/notes/terms/
so it can safely be used on Wikipedia.
- hi, and thx for the information, as mentioned not offense, but additional "tm" was confusing me, so more experienced Wikimedians may decide on occasion of that DR, Roland zh (talk) 19:06, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 23:14, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
no offense, DR started to verify as thumbnail-format, missing exif, Roland zh (talk) 18:45, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 23:16, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
I believe this is a copyright violation. Everything interesting about it comes from the underlying, presumably copyrighted, work. Jmabel ! talk 18:53, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 23:16, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
I believe this is a copyright violation. Everything interesting about it comes from the underlying, presumably copyrighted, work. Jmabel ! talk 18:53, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 23:16, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
again, no offense, as per File:St Josephs Church Thabore.jpg as claimed own work but missing exif, Roland zh (talk) 18:54, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 23:16, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
I believe this is a copyright violation. Everything interesting about it comes from the underlying, presumably copyrighted, work. Jmabel ! talk 18:55, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 23:17, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
I believe this is a copyright violation. Everything interesting about it comes from the underlying, presumably copyrighted, work. Jmabel ! talk 18:55, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 23:17, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
I believe this is a copyright violation. Everything interesting about it comes from the underlying, presumably copyrighted, work. Jmabel ! talk 18:55, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 23:17, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
I believe this is a copyright violation. Everything interesting about it comes from the underlying, presumably copyrighted, work. Jmabel ! talk 18:55, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 23:17, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Is there some basis on which the art photographed here would be public domain? If so, this needs an explanation. If not, it's a copyvio. Jmabel ! talk 18:59, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: A.Savin 23:18, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This flag uses a pinkish colour for the red, which is wrong. Actual flag is here: File:Proposed Flag of Serbia and Montenegro 2003.svg. Zoupan (talk) 19:06, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 23:18, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
This flag uses a pinkish colour for the red, which is wrong. Actual flag is here: File:Proposed Flag of Serbia and Montenegro 2003.svg. Zoupan (talk) 19:06, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 23:18, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
This is a fictional coat of arms, and should not be used in WP. No value. Zoupan (talk) 19:10, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 23:18, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Wrongly contrasted, slightly blurred face. Should be replaced with original that shows whole fresco: File:Kralj Mihajlo Vojislavich.jpg Zoupan (talk) 19:22, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 23:19, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
No reason to have a drawing of an actual art work which exists in several uploads. Should be deleted and redirected to File:Srpski kralj Mihajlo lik 140x190.jpg. Zoupan (talk) 19:56, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 23:19, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Copyrighted. Fry1989 eh? 19:56, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Agreed. Michael Barera (talk) 03:04, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 23:20, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Copyrighted. Fry1989 eh? 19:56, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Agreed. Michael Barera (talk) 03:06, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 23:20, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Copyrighted. Fry1989 eh? 19:57, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Agreed. Michael Barera (talk) 03:01, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 23:20, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
The sign contains a picture and does not meet the conditions for freedom of panorama. < Körnerbrötchen | ✉ 20:12, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 23:20, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Weil in der Beschriftung die Richtung ("aus Ost") falsch angegeben ist. nach der Löschung lade ich das Bild mit der korrekten Bezeichnung wieder hoch. Flo Sorg (talk) 20:29, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 23:20, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
It is mentioned (in Hebrew) that it was taken from a certain archive but no OTRS approval has been received regarding this picture (plus, the date of the picture is definitely untrue according to the people shown...). Ldorfman (talk) 22:41, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 23:21, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
- Restored. Received OTRS permission. -- Geagea (talk) 10:13, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
It is mentioned (in Hebrew) that it was taken from a certain archive but no OTRS approval has been received regarding this picture (plus, the date of the picture is definitely untrue). Ldorfman (talk) 23:04, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 23:21, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
- Restored. Received OTRS permission. -- Geagea (talk) 10:11, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
It is mentioned (in Hebrew) that it was taken from a certain archive but no OTRS approval has been received regarding this picture (plus, the date of the picture is definitely untrue). Ldorfman (talk) 23:04, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 23:21, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
- Restored. Received OTRS permission. -- Geagea (talk) 10:09, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
It is mentioned (in Hebrew) that it was taken from a certain archive but no OTRS approval has been received regarding this picture (plus, the date of the picture is definitely untrue - the person died in 1985). Ldorfman (talk) 23:08, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 23:21, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
- Restored. OTRS permission received. -- Geagea (talk) 09:36, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
Copyright infringement. Copyright Mike Mooney. Sharonmherrera (talk) 23:12, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 23:22, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Copyright issue, please remove. Copyright Zach Gold. Sharonmherrera (talk) 23:13, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 23:22, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
He is 石田正継(see, Ishida Masatsugu.jpg), not 石田正澄. a different person. Quark Logo (talk) 23:50, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Support User:山本彩り uploaded this file. But The author is 稲本孝志. 稲本孝志 for JAWP User (edit). Spoofing or, SOCK.--アルトクール (talk) 00:24, 31 July 2015 (UTC)- Comment This image is the derivative work of File:Ishida Masatsugu.jpg. But this file is of an extremely low resolution. Takabeg (talk) 14:51, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per Takabeg, it's just deterioration version of File:Ishida Masatsugu.jpg. Not needed in commons. --KurodaSho (talk) 10:09, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 23:23, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
This is a picture of a different mosque: Darbar e Alia Ghamkol Sharif in Kohat, Pakistan. See [5]. The terrain in the background of the picture is clearly not in Birmingham. Verbcatcher (talk) 02:42, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
- The Birmingham mosque is shown here. Verbcatcher (talk) 02:47, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
- For clarification, User:Moiz615 who uploaded this image also added it to wikipedia:List of mosques in the United Kingdom as a mosque in Birmingham. Subject to copyright issues, this image could remain in Commons providing that the location of this mosque in Pakistan is indicated accurately. It is not "One of the most beautiful Mosque's in UK". Verbcatcher (talk) 13:02, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Source page is (c) 2015 by the mosque, file is not free. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:50, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
Está repetido Cristianpata (talk) 13:41, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: the 3D object depicted is obviously not own work of uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:51, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
This is a logo of a UK company. The UK has a very low threshold of originality. As such, this logo is not fit for Commons. ZK-NZE (talk) 10:27, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
- Comment: I see just text and simple shapes. Therefore, I have serious doubts about the nominations of UK logos opened by non-experts UK Laws (I'm also non-expert, but the logo still seems too simple for me). Who should decide if a UK logo is above or bellow the COM:TOO? --Amitie 10g (talk) 17:08, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
- Amitie 10g, this is Scott (Russavia) (I am also ZK-NZE). Whilst I agree with you entirely about just seeing text and simple shapes, unfortunately the UK courts (and by extension Australia, New Zealand, etc) see it differently. Refer to COM:TOO#United Kingdom for some case studies. Furthermore, there is the doctrine of Sweat of the brow which is somewhat recognised in UK law (but not in US law). This logo shows specific designs and colours that someone has specifically selected and then decided how to arrange them. This is how it would be looked at by any UK court; and only a UK court can decide what is or isn't copyrightable under their laws. In essence, Commons should not be hosting any UK logos which shows an ounce of human creativity.
- Having said that, TPO could Creative Commons their logos, but I believe that Creative Commons advises against this due to the legal implications of this. 120.145.160.2 18:09, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as per COM:TOO#United Kingdom. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:15, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
This is a logo of a UK company. The UK has a very low threshold of originality. As such, this logo is not fit for Commons. ZK-NZE (talk) 10:27, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
- Refer to comments at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Logotip TPO.png which are also relevant here. 121.221.208.190 02:45, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as per COM:TOO#United Kingdom. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:15, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:Euro coins (1 euro)
[edit]Per the same reason as Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Euro coins (1 cent) and Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Euro coins (2 cents): the euro coins (both the national sides and the common side) are copyrighted and not free for Commons.
- File:" 02 - ITALY - 1 € Italia - Vitruvian Man - Uomo vitruviano - Leonardo da Vinci - 1euro.jpg
- File:1 euro coin Es serie 1.png
- File:1 Euro coin Es.gif
- File:1 euro coin Es.jpg
- File:1 euro coin Sm serie 1.png
- File:1 Euro coin Sm.gif
- File:1 euro coin Sm.jpg
- File:1 euro Italia 2002.png
- File:1 EURO ITALY 2009.JPG
- File:1 euro Spain.png
- File:30-mg-mxe-euro.jpg
- File:50 Jahre Deutsche Bundesbank - Sondermarke.jpg
- File:Austria 1e.PNG
- File:Billetetranviaparla.JPG
- File:Confocal measurement of 1-euro-star 3d and euro.png
- If the deletion can not be avoided (see my comment below) I could replace the inset picture of the coin with some type of rough sketch of the coin to show the size relation and the measurement location. -- Dr. Schorsch (talk) 14:12, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
- File:Eliche-Nr-56-A.jpg
- File:Eliche-Nr-56-C.jpg
- File:Eliche-Nr-56-D.jpg
- File:Eliche-Nr-56-F.jpg
- File:Eliche-Nr-56.jpg
- File:Euro675.jpg
- File:GastrocoptaPellucidaHrdcla1.jpg
- File:Graining.JPG
- File:Grece 1 euro.jpg
- File:Lancer pile ou face.jpg
- File:Latvian 1 Euro coin design.jpg
- File:Lepista saeva 1.jpg
- File:MicroSD.jpg
- File:One Euro - white bg.jpg
- File:Pièce Malte 1€.gif
- File:Slovakia 1 euro.jpg
- File:Spherical silicon.jpg
- File:Tire-Euro-OK.JPG
- File:Uang 5.jpeg
Eleassar (t/p) 08:05, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
- Comment Several of these are already listed in Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Euro coins (Slovakia). It may be confusing to have two separate deletion requests which discuss the same files. --Stefan4 (talk) 10:29, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
- Ok. I've removed them from this list. --Eleassar (t/p) 11:10, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
- The Euro in File:MicroSD.jpg might just get cropped away. --Leyo 13:29, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
- Comment I am not convinced that the 2-dimensional depiction of a 3-dimensional registered design like a coin is a violation of the authors copyright. Since a coin is definitely 3-dimensional, a photography of the coin should therefore not violate the copyright in my oppinion. -- Dr. Schorsch (talk) 14:12, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
- Keep I found a statement on the reproduction of common sides of Euro coins here [6]: "Only the following reproductions are allowed: reproductions in a format without relief (drawings, paintings, films) provided that they are not detrimental to the image of the euro. ..." In my oppinion this gives us the freedom to use reproductions of the common side! -- Dr. Schorsch (talk) 14:19, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
- See Commons:Deletion requests/Template:Euro coin common face 2: we can't host these images because derivative works are not allowed. --Eleassar (t/p) 14:32, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
- Hi Eleassar, I have read the discussion you cited and can not see why these pictures have been deleted. There where a lot of convincing arguments to keep the pictures. To me it is completely unclear why the deletion has been performed. Sorry to roll up the old thread, but I am not convinced about the deletion yet. -- Dr. Schorsch (talk) 14:40, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
- The coins must be reproduced in "faithful likeness" and can't be reproduced in a way "detrimental to the image of the euro", which means that only a limited set of derivative works is allowed. For us, images must be free for any purpose and all derivatives must be allowed. --Eleassar (t/p) 14:50, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
- Regarding the arguments from "Orionist ★ talk 14:51, 7 November 2010 (UTC)" in this thread, I do not see a violation to our guidelines. Also counting the votes in the cited thread I don't see a majority for deletion. I still wonder why this happened. Sorry to insist on this subject, but these images would be of great value for us. -- Dr. Schorsch (talk) 15:04, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
- A deletion request is not a majority vote. The permission for example doesn't permit parodies of the coins, so you can't e.g. add a moustache to the w:Vitruvian Man on the Italian coins. Specific problems with some of the images:
- {{Money-EU}} can only be used for banknotes, not coins.
- There needs to be a separate copyright tag for the photograph, and the photograph needs to be identified.
- File:Famas cartouche01.jpg and File:Famas cartouche02.jpg: Only the original uploader has been identified, but the photographer is unknown. The coins are hardly visible, though, so I don't think that you can claim that the copyright to the coins is violated in these images. Maybe User:Bloody-libu, who deleted the files on French Wikipedia, can identify the photographer somehow, if this is specified on the file information page on French Wikipedia. --Stefan4 (talk) 15:20, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
- "photographie prise le 25 août 2004 par YannTech" : the original uploader is the photographer. Bloody-libu (talk) 15:35, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
- A deletion request is not a majority vote. The permission for example doesn't permit parodies of the coins, so you can't e.g. add a moustache to the w:Vitruvian Man on the Italian coins. Specific problems with some of the images:
- Regarding the arguments from "Orionist ★ talk 14:51, 7 November 2010 (UTC)" in this thread, I do not see a violation to our guidelines. Also counting the votes in the cited thread I don't see a majority for deletion. I still wonder why this happened. Sorry to insist on this subject, but these images would be of great value for us. -- Dr. Schorsch (talk) 15:04, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
- The coins must be reproduced in "faithful likeness" and can't be reproduced in a way "detrimental to the image of the euro", which means that only a limited set of derivative works is allowed. For us, images must be free for any purpose and all derivatives must be allowed. --Eleassar (t/p) 14:50, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
- Hi Eleassar, I have read the discussion you cited and can not see why these pictures have been deleted. There where a lot of convincing arguments to keep the pictures. To me it is completely unclear why the deletion has been performed. Sorry to roll up the old thread, but I am not convinced about the deletion yet. -- Dr. Schorsch (talk) 14:40, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
- See Commons:Deletion requests/Template:Euro coin common face 2: we can't host these images because derivative works are not allowed. --Eleassar (t/p) 14:32, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Permission that prohibits parodies and other kinds of derivative works is not free enough for Commons. I kept tha confocal measurement because the focus of the image is the star and the coin is thre only incidently, and, given the specialized use, it is unlikely that anyone will want to make a DW. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:50, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
- Files in Category:Euro coins (1 euro)
Unfree coins. Also artwork which isn't installed permanently in one of them.
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
'Fasnacht' chariot, i.e. being a folclorical element, Roland zh 21:21, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Stefan4 (talk) 21:18, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Also artwork which isn't installed permanently in what? This delition request is not understandable. What is meant whith "one of them"? At least File:Son Servera 03 ies.jpg is permanently installed in public along with other murals in Son Servera. Compare particularly to File:Son Servera 01 ies.jpg. In my opinion all these murals are clearly covered by FoP. -- Ies (talk) 16:23, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
Keep see File:Son Servera 01 ies.jpg and {{FoP-Spain}}. Holger1959 (talk) 19:14, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
1 Deleted, 2 Kept as per Holger1959. Yann (talk) 17:07, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Euro coins (1 euro)
[edit]Per com:currency euro coins are non free
- File:1 euro 1999 francia.jpg
- File:Austrian 1 euro.png
File:Chocolate euro coin at Christmas (3090213227).jpg- File:Deutsch 1-Euro-Münze.jpg
- File:Estonia 1 euro coin.jpg
File:N22978 1 eur Lietuva 2015.jpgKept for now, needs discussion whether the knight depicted is a state symbol or not. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 09:00, 1 September 2015 (UTC)- File:Son Servera 03 ies.jpg <- covered by FOP Spain. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 09:01, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
File:Strobocoin (4072962364).jpgNo coin design visible, can't be a copyvio. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 09:00, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Natuur12 (talk) 15:10, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
- Keep the chocolate coin, it's a parody and so can be considered against protected against copyright claims. It may fail scope, maybe, but that's not the nomination. --Fæ (talk) 15:13, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
- That one should be com:PACKAGING than but I will withdraw that one because we should discuss that in a seperate DR. Natuur12 (talk) 15:15, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
- Keep File:Son Servera 03 ies.jpg. Note that this image does NOT show a coin. It shows an artistic and stylised painting of a coin. Distinguish between the non free coins and their artistic depictions that, for instance when covered by FoP, are free!
- It is a derivative work of the original coin: "A 'derivative work' is a work based upon one or more pre-existing works, such as [...] art reproduction, [...] or any other form in which a work may be recast, transformed, or adapted". BrightRaven (talk) 09:44, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
- Keep This is Russavia. Keep File:Strobocoin (4072962364).jpg. It isn't infringing in any way on any design, and it's in use, and can also be used to illustrate photographic effects. RRTyne (talk) 05:14, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Some kept, some deleted: The kept decision is only preliminary. The kept files may be subject to another DR Euro coins by issuing country. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:57, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bull-Doser (talk · contribs)
[edit]- See also: Commons:Administrators noticeboard case
- See also: User talk:OSX#Bull-Doser
- See also: User talk:Bull-Doser#Blocking
- See also: Commons:Administrators noticeboard/User problems
Info These are just some files I picked from the user's uploads to avoid a huge DR with several thousands of files, but the concerns are applicable to all of the user's uploads.
While checking the user's uploads of the past year, I was able to find pictures taken with 16 different camera models (and some without any Exif data):
- Apple iPod touch
- Apple iPhone 3GS
- Apple iPhone 4
- HTC One V
- HTC Panache
- ZTE N762
- ZTE N860
- LG Electronics LGP500
- LG Electronics T320
- SAMSUNG SGH-I827D
- SAMSUNG GT-S7560M
- BlackBerry 8530
- google Nexus S
- KENOX S760 / Samsung S760
- PENTAX Optio E40
- Acer A1-810
While the uploader may own some of those, most of the files are most probably not own work (as tagged).
Also alarming:
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Baptiste W. Hamon dans le 12h20 de la Gare Montparnasse.jpg (faked license review)
- multiple uploads from dubious external sources, not reviewed
- indefinite block on en
- File:Chevrolet Uplander police de Blainville.jpg
- File:Stéphanie Lapointe dans le salle Jean-Claude Lauzon de l'UQAM -- 2.jpg
- File:'11-'14 Volkswagen Jetta Pizza Pizza.jpg
- File:Mitsu Delica L300.jpg
- File:Étienne Dano dans Juste pour rire 2015.jpg
- File:'77 Plymouth Gran Fury (Orange Julep '15).jpg
- File:American LaFrance Fire Engine (Journées des pompiers Laval 2014).JPG
- File:'15 Mercedes-Benz Sprinter (MIAS '15).JPG
- File:Ford E-450 Cutaway Laval.jpg
- File:'14 Toyota Tundra (MIAS '14).jpg
- File:'78 Triumph Spitfire (Hudson British Car Show '12).JPG
- File:'83 Pontiac Parisienne Sedan.JPG
- File:2013 Suzuki SX4 (5 portes) chez Complexe Desjardins.jpg
- File:'13 Toyota Matrix (SDLDQ '13).jpg
- File:Mercedes-Benz S-Class W180 (Street Festival '14).jpg
- File:'14 Buick Regal (MIAS '14).jpg
- File:'71 Chevrolet El Camino (Les chauds vendredis '14).JPG
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
_chez_Complexe_Desjardins.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
Didym (talk) 01:28, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:PCP. Likely copyvios :-(. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:13, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
- Keep I'm not convinced that there is sufficient evidence to warrant PCP-based mass deletion of Bull-Doser's (claimed) *own* images such as those listed above.
- Here's one strong piece of evidence- I checked most of the images listed on a reverse Google Image search and can't see any signs of them being- or having been- used elsewhere. All matches seem to be Wikimedia references to the Commons uploads.
- I've tweaked a quite few of Bull-Doser's images, as they're often flawed but still usable with some minor work. As a result I've come to notice that he has a moderately consistent "style"- to the point I've recognised images as his when reading an article. This includes:-
- Almost aggressively tight cropping of cars (example), often squeezed in on the diagonal (e.g. example). (Since- as stated- the images don't seem to appear on a reverse search, they probably *haven't* been cropped from elsewhere).
- Use of smartphone cameras (often with white clipping)
- High contrast and glare issues (due in part to pictures having been taken under sunny conditions or in car show halls with reflective lights, but also seems to be no attempt to avoid this issue)
- Sometimes shot against bright sunlight causing massively excessive glare and loss of detail; many such examples have been deleted due to being deemed unacceptable quality
- Issues with colour balance (possibly due to aforementioned smartphones; this seems to be more common on his older uploads)
- Haze (common with smartphones where grease can get on the lens) (e.g. this image)
- From what I can tell, mostly (but not exclusively) shot in or around Quebec, as evidenced by signs and use of French (e.g. this image again)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Yes, may of these are quality issues- but that's not what's under discussion here. The point is that there seem to be recurring traits in almost all his uploads, suggesting they came from a single source (i.e. him). That, combined with the lack of reverse search matches elsewhere implies that few- if any- came from elsewhere.
- I agree that the use of multiple cameras is strange; however, I also note that they're mainly smartphone cameras, with a few low-to-midrange digital compacts and a tablet. No DSLRs. If Bull-Doser's (claimed) own images were actually copyvios, I'd expect a more diverse range of styles including higher-quality images and/or DSLR sourced ones.
- I'm not anti-PCP, quite the opposite. But for it to be applied in bulk to *all* a user's uploads- as seems to be suggested here- there has to be very strong evidence, and I don't see that's the case for his *own* images.
- However, we definitely *should* examine the files he's explicitly uploaded from external sources (e.g. Flickr) separately. I haven't done this myself, so I can't say if there's consistent evidence of a problem there or not (e.g. Intentionally uploading copyvios? Shortcutting the review process? I don't know).
- Ubcule (talk) 09:53, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
- Keep As much as I am tired of BD's awful photos, I don't feel that he's a copythief. If anything he may lack some basic understanding of Commons operations and functions, but he has been uploading s**t phone pictures of cars from Quebec and from the occasional Caribbean or Mexican vacation for many years now without copyright issues. I am in favour of mercilessly pruning for quality from BD's uploads while vociferously defending his basic decency. And, as per Ubcule, his photographic thumbprint is easily recognizable for those of us who have dealt with BD repeatedly over the years. Thanks, mr.choppers (talk)-en- 04:32, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
- Keep... Like Ubcule and Mr.choppers, I too am very familiar with Bull-Doser's uploads. He is the oldest car photographer at Wikipedia/Wikimedia Commons, having started uploading in 2005 as Take Me Higher. He is blocked on en.wiki, and while he was there, was universally loathed for annoying edits that did not follow guidelines despite multiple attempts by various users to engage with him.
- Regarding his photos, no matter which camera he uses, no matter what the car, no matter what the weather, his photos are highly consistent—consistently bad. Sometimes I wonder if this is just a really long-running practical joke to see how long he can upload poor quality photos for... but probably not. As mentioned by Ubcule, Bull-Doser's "style" is also a consistent form of low quality photography that one does not see elsewhere. Nonetheless, he makes a valuable contribution despite uploading a bunch of unusable garbage to go along with the odd useful file. I have no doubt the work is his own. I have not come across any suspicious activity regarding fake copyright with Bull-Doser's "own work" ever—not even an inkling of doubt. I have nominated many of his photos for deletion on the grounds of "low quality", as a look at his user talk page will testify. I have also nominated hundreds of other car photos from other users as copyvios based on suspicious circumstances, so I am certainly not allergic to deletions.
- The multiple cameras is a little strange, but even I am currently using four cameras right now (two generations of iPhone, a pocketable point-and-shoot, and a bulky point-and-shoot). Look, maybe Bull-Doser is really just a Québécois family of identical octuplets running around with a fleet of cheap cameras and chasing their neighbours driving to work like here and here. I don't know, but the multiple camera anomaly is not strong enough to offset all the other evidence that is in Bull-Doser's favour.
.JPG){kind=link}
- Regarding the Flickr issues, as per Ubcule this should be examined separately. I would not trust Bull-Doser's judgement for such issues. But in summary, PLEASE DON'T DELETE... these ARE his own work! OSX (talk • contributions) 01:45, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- Info I blocked Bull-Doser for two weeks. That gives us some time to scan through at least some of his uploads without him creating more havoc. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:22, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
- Thoughts: Skimming over the uploads, one can see several photos made at the same location on the same day with two or even more different cameras. I assume that Bull-Doser is more than one person, willingly or not. That would explain the great variety of camera models. Right now it seems more like a PCP problem, rather than AGF. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:41, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
- So what are you saying, we should delete all of his photos as a precaution? Because that is the stupidest idea I have ever heard! OSX (talk • contributions) 08:47, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
- I sincerely disagree with this decision. I have also nominated many of BD's worst photos for deletion, but I have never seen anything (until this Baptiste Hamon incident) that would suggest any copyright improprieties. I feel that a much stronger case than a hunch would be needed before any blocks or anything else. If I had the time I would even venture to start proceedings to have BD unblocked. @Hedwig in Washington: could you provide a set of pictures taken the same day with several different phones? Or, more to the point, could you provide an example of a photo (other than the Baptiste Hamon photo discussed separately) that is a copyvio? Thanks, mr.choppers (talk)-en- 01:21, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
@OSX: No, I didn't say delete them all. I just stated that there is a reasonable doubt about the copyright of his/her uploads. And no, it is not an attack to warn the user about what will come next. How is that an attack? This doesn't belong here, but on the AN board.
@Mr.choppers: Like I and Didym stated above: The use of that many cameras is at least suspicious. I should have been more explicit. What I meant by the date is the upload date. I seems that the files are uploaded when the user gets a hand on the other cameras used. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:41, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
- Ok, but this does not excuse you from applying an unjustified two-week block. There is doubt about the upload of ONE file: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Baptiste W. Hamon dans le 12h20 de la Gare Montparnasse.jpg. No one knows for sure as to whether the file was in fact licenced as Creative Commons at the time of upload and was changed soon after or not. This can happen and considering there is only one dubious file out of many thousands he has uploaded, I would tend to give Bull-Doser the benefit of the doubt. He uploaded the file six weeks ago at 04:56, 17 July 2015, why make a block after such a long time has passed?
- The reason why it is an attack is because nobody knows if the file was actually temporarily licenced as Creative Commons at the time of upload. Maybe it was an honest error as well? Given 10 years of intense uploading, and this is the first issue regarding copyright (AFAIK), this seems entirely plausible. Thus, by stating "End your copyright violations or the next block will be much longer or even indefinite" and then issuing a two-week block seems very much like an unjustified attack to me given the circumstances. OSX (talk • contributions) 01:59, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
- Regarding the different cameras when looked at from the date of upload, this is not a good measure. If Bull-Doser is getting the faulty cameras in large numbers and uses them, it is entirely plausible that he uploads the photos from each device in a batch. So yes, sometimes the date taken will not be in the same order as date uploaded. OSX (talk • contributions) 02:02, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
- I reckon he uploads each camera in turn. I know that uploading phone images to my computer is a hassle, so that doesn't surprise me. I reckon that if there was a concern with the number of phones (they're mostly low grade cell phones) then copyright concerns would have percolated up long long ago. I am completely on board with keeping BD away from Flickr and such. But again: this entire thing is just based on a gut feeling. Me (and several other users) have dealt with BD over the years, and have never felt any concern in this area. Perhaps you could check some of BD's wp:en history? See this section for a comment that should make it obvious that I am not BD's buddy (I don't think you think so, just wanted to make it clear!) and to find a number of other editors that can't be expected to hold BD's back. Perhaps some of them could shed some light on BD's habits? And lastly, if there is someone out there who can prove that BD stole an automobile image from them (I can only speak surely of those photos), then I will completely withdraw my objections. Cheers, mr.choppers (talk)-en- 02:04, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
- I am perfectly fine with taking the heat for the block, since it seems that the block did what is was supposed to do. The block might have missed BD's attention if it was way shorter. Giving his edit pattern, I decided on two weeks to reach BD. That's all there's to it. Removal of the block is already underway, see BD's talkpage. Regarding the cameras out of the recycling bin: This is news and came to light today after the block got BD attention. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:05, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
- Goodie, I think that is fair. And you're right, BD only listens after one pokes him a bit. Maybe we could also force him to archive his talk page, it is so friggin long that nothing works on there any longer. Cheers, mr.choppers (talk)-en- 02:09, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
- Consider it done: [7]. I'm probably not meant to do this... OSX (talk • contributions) 03:43, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
@Hedwig in Washington: - it just occurred to me, do we have a policy on using stolen equipment? BTW, I am not sure that BD is stealing them, his explanation is rather unclear and he often misses the kernel of an argument. Also, I reckon that File:Stéphanie Lapointe dans le salle Jean-Claude Lauzon de l'UQAM -- 2.jpg should definitely be deleted due to its stalkerish quality plus the fact that a toddler (hers?) is in the photo. mr.choppers (talk)-en- 02:23, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
- I don't think that it matters. Say, I steal your camera and snap a picture with it, I am the author. A status which I might enjoy looking out from my cell window tho. To make it perfectly clear: I didn't accuse BD of stealing those phones. Actually, I should have refrained from even asking. But that's hindsight. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:29, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
- Thinking about it, can I really claim ownership when using stolen property? Unsure right now. Oh oh, back to the the monkey took a photo discussion. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:59, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
- I had missed that event entirely! Thanks for sharing. Took the liberty of wikilinking above. mr.choppers (talk)-en- 03:20, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
- Ethical issues aside, surely ownership/authorised use of the device and copyrights of the work are separate matters? If using stolen cameras is a problem, I would hate to think what this means for all the people using pirated version of Adobe Photoshop to edit their images! OSX (talk • contributions) 04:06, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
I don't know what everybody's talking about but uploading with 16 different camera models can't be all own work. We can not trust the own work claim. so definitely Delete -- Geagea (talk) 18:09, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
- Geagea, I ask that you please take a look at review in greater detail. Your comments suggest that you have not spent any considerable time looking at the case and have drawn a conclusion based on the 16 different camera models alone. At face value, I agree that it can be misconstrued that BD is uploading copyright violations, but looking closely, it is clear this is not the case. OSX (talk • contributions) 22:14, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
- OSX, Please explain yourself. And remember admin action is irrelevant here, only the copyright issue. -- Geagea (talk) 22:49, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
- I have no idea what you mean. I'm not talking about the admin action. I am pointing out the flaw in your comment that 16 different camera models = definite copyvio. What myself and others are stating is that at face value, the uploads look suspect, but a deeper analysis shows that this is not the case. BD admitted he pulls old cameras and phones out of recycling bins for old electronics found in department stores and the like [8]. Considering the devices used are never particularly new, this story can be corroborated by the uploads he makes. All the photos follow a consistent "style" of poor quality that is unique to BD (as detailed by Ubcule above). The photos are almost always taken in and around Quebec, those that are not are part of a series of very occasional vacation shots (usually Mexico or the Dominican Republic). He has followed this pattern since 2005 when he began as Take Me Higher. If Bull-Doser's (claimed) own images were actually copyvios, we'd expect a more diverse range of styles including higher-quality images (i.e. DSLR sourced ones) and photos from more places that just Quebec. Out of the 15,299 files (including deletions) he has uploaded to Commons as of today, 336 to the Wikipedia, and 427 files uploaded by his old Take Me Higher account, we have one proven copyvio of a file transferred from Flickr with an invalid licence [9]. No one knows for sure as to whether the file was in fact licenced as Creative Commons at the time of upload and then changed back to "all rights reserved" soon after. Furthermore, no one has been able to locate an original source for any of the other 16,062 files in question that have been uploaded prolifically for 10 years (99 percent plus of which are as claimed as his own work). Something would have come up well before now if there was impropriety going on. OSX (talk • contributions) 23:23, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
![[9]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Baptiste_W._Hamon_dans_le_12h20_de_la_Gare_Montparnasse.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep It is not that difficult to get a small collection of old phones. So I think OSX has a point. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:32, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Per discussion Natuur12 (talk) 15:29, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
File:Loud Lary Ajust chez Francofolies 2016 -- 1.jpg and File:Loud Lary Ajust chez Francofolies 2016 -- 2.jpg
[edit]
I wouldn't usually nominate images for deletion if they were the only photos Commons had of a given subject. I've cut some of Bull-Doser's concert and stage images a lot of slack for this reason.
In this case, however, the quality is so poor that the images don't show anything meaningful about the band in question. If I hadn't done a Google search for them, I still wouldn't know what they looked like; they're just a bunch of indistinct figures on a stage. In the second photo, I assumed the figure on the right was a woman until I realised there wasn't a woman in the band...!
To be honest, smartphone cameras aren't the best for high contrast, low light photography like this. The high levels of noise reduction they use under those conditions loses tons of detail.
(Also, due to the way areas of detail are detected, the haze on the lens increases this tendency).
- File:Loud Lary Ajust chez Francofolies 2016 -- 2.jpg
- File:Loud Lary Ajust chez Francofolies 2016 -- 1.jpg
Ubcule (talk) 12:33, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
Delete as per Ubcule. OSX (talk • contributions) 00:50, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:50, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bull-Doser (talk · contribs)
[edit]Abysmal quality. If we had better-quality pictures of this subject, all four would be unacceptable. As it is, I've left the least bad (File:Hatchie Ritz PDB -- 4.jpg) and nominated the other three.
This user's effort is appreciated, but their complete lack of quality control totally lets it down.
Ubcule (talk) 20:53, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bull-Doser (talk · contribs)
[edit]Ditto previous nominations- abysmal quality. If we had better-quality pictures of this subject, all four would be unacceptable. As it is, I've left the least bad (File:Kississippi Ritz PDB -- 4.jpg) and nominated the other three.
- File:Kississippi Ritz PDB -- 3.jpg
- File:Kississippi Ritz PDB -- 2.jpg
- File:Kississippi Ritz PDB -- 1.jpg
Ubcule (talk) 20:56, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:22, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bull-Doser (Dead Posey au Le Ministère) (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not of reasonably usable quality.
- File:Dead Posey au Le Ministère -- 3.jpg - This cropped version might be just about usable, but even this is really pushing it(?)
- File:Dead Posey au Le Ministère -- 2.jpg
- File:Dead Posey au Le Ministère -- 1.jpg
Ubcule (talk) 12:44, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
Regardless of whether or not we already have pictures of this actress, do we consider these of usable quality?
It's a shame that this editor seems to make the effort to find these subjects, then squanders that by not putting more effort into the photographs themselves, but experience shows that this is something that will not change.
- File:Mylène Mackay au tapis rouge du gala Québec cinéma 2017 -- 3.png
- File:Mylène Mackay au tapis rouge du gala Québec cinéma 2017 -- 2.png
- File:Mylène Mackay au tapis rouge du gala Québec cinéma 2017.png
Ubcule (talk) 12:56, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
Dreadful quality, File:Folly & The Hunter au Ritz PDB -- 1.jpg is the least awful, and we only need one in the absence of anything better.
Ubcule (talk) 12:59, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
Unusable quality.
Ubcule (talk) 13:06, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- Delete All the above files. Nothing remotely useful, we are not a paparazzi site. Regards, Yann (talk) 18:24, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Sorry, thank you for the effort, but these are both fuzzy and low resolution. I felt guilty saying that about the Mylène Mackay photos, since they do show a few potentially useful details - you can see she is blonde, for example - but then I did some searching, and managed to find/make a picture of the actress, which I think is somewhat better, even if I do say so myself. --GRuban (talk) 19:45, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- You're definitely being charitable! :-) If an image's main purpose is to serve as a representation of that person then- IMO- it's not useful in any meaningful sense if the *most* one can make out is that they're blonde...!
- I think we have to have some minimum standards for usefulness and general quality, even where an image is the only example of a person on Commons.
- While I'm here, I'll also note that many of this uploader's images which *do* make it over that low bar of being (barely) usable- e.g. File:Cindy Daniel dehors le Zénith Promutel assurance.jpg- are still {{Low quality}} and would probably warrant deletion if Commons already had better examples of the subject.
- That most of his images of people *are* the sole examples at least show that Bull-Doser is covering a previously-unfilled niche... it's just a shame that he's doing it with such poor-quality images. Ubcule (talk) 22:55, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- I've uploaded my share of really poor quality sole images of people, mind you. For example, File:Charlayne Woodard at Dramatists Guild of America.jpg, and File:Margaret Abraham.jpg. I try to do better (see my user page) but sometimes, a poor quality fuzzy image is all we can get, and they are better than nothing. --GRuban (talk) 23:56, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- I don't want to get too sidelined here, but with respect, that first one's really pushing the limits of what I'd consider acceptable, even after sharpening. Ubcule (talk) 00:30, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- I've uploaded my share of really poor quality sole images of people, mind you. For example, File:Charlayne Woodard at Dramatists Guild of America.jpg, and File:Margaret Abraham.jpg. I try to do better (see my user page) but sometimes, a poor quality fuzzy image is all we can get, and they are better than nothing. --GRuban (talk) 23:56, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- @Yann and GRuban: - See also Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Aram_Bajakian_café_Résonance.jpg. Ubcule (talk) 21:11, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:07, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bull-Doser (talk · contribs)
[edit]Poor quality images, most with significant haze problems. These are vehicles we already have plenty of representative (and better quality photos) of.
- File:Toyota RAV4 Géomog.jpg
- File:'19 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 Crew Cab 4x4.jpg
- File:'17-'19 Ford F-250 Super Duty HydroTech Mining.jpg
- File:Ford E-450 Cutaway Enseicom.png
- File:Ford Transit Connect Intelcom Express.jpg
- File:Mercedes-Benz Sprinter Vans Off The Wall.jpg
- File:Mercedes-Benz Sprinter Multi Services 5 étoiles.jpg
- File:'19 Ram ProMaster Fut.jpg
Ubcule (talk) 13:48, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete all. Unneeded, unused, and unusable for any purpose. --Sable232 (talk) 01:58, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 01:12, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bull-Doser (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low-quality images unsuitable for Wikipedia.
- File:Alice Morel-Michaud aux gémeaux 2019.png
- File:Anik Jean au tapis rouge de gala Artis 2019.png
- File:Jay Du Temple CITE-FM -- 2.png
Ytoyoda (talk) 13:01, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
- In the absence of any other images, the "Jay Du Temple" image is acceptable; it shows what he looks like, even if the lighting and processing/NR makes him look oddly plasticky, like an early CGI rendering....!
- The first (Alice Morel-Michaud) is poor; I'm not sure whether or not it could be argued that it's better than nothing. I increased the brightness, but that also shows up the flaws more.
- Looking at the second one (Anik Jean), IMHO it's below acceptable quality regardless. Ubcule (talk) 22:10, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete all.
- The "Anik Jean" photo looks more like Odo from Deepspace Nine, having a Bad Bucket Day. Photographs this poor serve no purpose here. Andy Dingley (talk) 14:53, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 15:09, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bull-Doser (talk · contribs)
[edit]Adding more unused and likely unusable portrait images to the above listing.
- File:Denis Plante.png
- File:Gilbert Sicotte dehors Rideau Vert -- 7.jpg
- File:Gilbert Sicotte dehors Rideau Vert -- 6.jpg
- File:Gilbert Sicotte dehors Rideau Vert -- 5.jpg
- File:Gilbert Sicotte dehors Rideau Vert -- 4.jpg
- File:Gilbert Sicotte dehors Rideau Vert -- 3.jpg
- File:Gilbert Sicotte dehors Rideau Vert -- 2.jpg
- File:Gilbert Sicotte dehors Rideau Vert -- 1.jpg
- File:Denis Lévesque au tapis rouge du gala Artis 2015.png
- File:Zal Sissokho au maison de la culture Pointe-aux-Trembles.png
- File:Djely Tapa au maison de la culture Pointe-aux-Trembles -- 2.png
- File:Djely Tapa au maison de la culture Pointe-aux-Trembles -- 1.png
- File:XL Middleton au Belmont.jpg
- File:Marc Brunet au gala Olivier 2021.jpg
- File:Dominique Leduc au Espace Go.png
- File:Stéphane Demers au tapis rouge de Gémeaux 2019.png
- File:Jean Dorval au lib. Olivieri.png
- File:RL Boyce au FIJM 2018.png
- File:Pierre Chagnon au maison de la culture Mercier.png
- File:Yōsuke Kawasaki UdeM.png
- File:Le 77 au Le Ministère -- 2.png
- File:Thornetta Davis au FIJM 2018 -- visage.png
- File:Kirk MacDonald Dièse Onze.png
- File:Claude Raymond au lib. Paulines.png
- File:Christopher Palameta -- 2.png
- File:Marc-André Fortin au centre culturel Beloeil.png
- File:Mappe Of au Ritz PDB.png
- File:Solon McDade au café Résonance -- 2.png
- File:Solon McDade au café Résonance.png
- File:Emmanuel Pedler UdeM.png
Ytoyoda (talk) 14:17, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete all. Poor quality. Andy Dingley (talk) 14:53, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 15:09, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
1 cent euro coins (national sides)
[edit]No evidence that these coins would be in the public domain. The national sides of the coins can't be represented on Commons unless the individual member state that issued the design releases it under a free license; as far as I know, none have.
- File:1 cent coin Es serie 1.png
- File:1 cent coin Es.jpg
- File:1 cent coin Sk serie 1.png
- File:1 cent coin Sk.jpg
- File:1 cent coin Sm serie 1.png
- File:1 cent coin Sm.jpg
- File:1 cent Euro coin Es.gif
- File:1 cent Euro coin Sk.gif
- File:1 cent Euro coin Sm.gif
- File:1 cent SK 2009.jpg
- File:1, 2 & 5 euro cents Belgium 2nd series.gif
- File:1, 2 & 5 euro cents Cyprus.gif
- File:1, 2 & 5 euro cents Estonia.jpg
- File:1, 2 & 5 euro cents Spain.png
- File:Austria 1c.PNG
- File:Coin austria 1c euro a.jpg
- File:Piéce 1 cent.jpg
- File:Slovakia 1, 2, 5 euro cent.png
Eleassar (t/p) 08:23, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
1 cent euro coins (common sides)
[edit]Per Commons:Deletion requests/Template:Euro coin common face 2, the common sides of euro coins are not free for Commons.
Eleassar (t/p) 08:25, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Please think about this very carefully, as some of these images have been in heavy use for many years now! I do not agree with the assessment of the last Deletion request (and neither did a lot of contributors). The not detrimental to the image of the Euro clause is comparable to personality rights attached to pictures of living people. This is a non-copyright issue which we leave up to the reuser. --Dschwen (talk) 17:33, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
- I've read the discussion and think these images don't meet the terms of the Definition of Free Cultural Work that should be met per the Wikimedia licensing policy, in particular the freedom to "make changes and improvements, and to distribute derivative works". I don't see how the requirement for "faithful likeness" would be in the scope of "permissible restrictions". I also don't think the copyright and the personality rights are comparable. Namely, in regard to the inclusion of material, Commons concerns itself only with copyright. --Eleassar (t/p) 21:21, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete all the non-Estonian coins. See Template:EEK coin, which is what they should be tagged. For the others, national sides of Euro coins are copyrighted to the countries of origin. In almost all cases, there are not available under a free licences. Exceptions are Finland and Estonia. Also, most of these candidate coins are tagged with {{Money-EU}}. This is wrong. These coins are most emphatically NOT banknotes. That license does NOT apply to coins. --Hammersoft (talk) 13:14, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
- The template EEK coin states: "This is an image of an Estonian kroon coin." These are euro coins, not kroon coins. Please provide a link that states euro coins may be freely reproduced in Estonia. --Eleassar (t/p) 13:36, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
- Please see Commons:Currency#Estonia. Bank of Estonia responded on this issue, and confirmed the stance on Kroons applies to Euro notes and coins as well. --Hammersoft (talk) 22:19, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you for the reply, but I can't find the relevant information there. --Eleassar (t/p) 22:21, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
- Please see reference #2. If you need more, I would recommend you contact the OTRS team for verification. --Hammersoft (talk) 13:06, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
- I've verified the relevant ticket (ticket:2008071410045309). As far as I understand, it allows for the free reproduction of banknotes and the kroon coins, but not the euro coins. I've left a request for help also at User talk:Quibik, who has added the note. --Eleassar (t/p) 14:00, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks! --Hammersoft (talk) 19:37, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
- Ok, Quibik has translated the relevant material at User talk:Quibik#Estonian euro coins. That would be:
- "Is referring to the Bank of Estonia as the author sufficient when using the design of the Estonian euro coin?"
- "The Bank of Estonia owns the economic rights [as defined in $13 of Estonian Copyright Law, I guess] of the national side of the Estonian euro coins. Non-economic rights, including authorship rights[?], belong to the author of the design. So referring to the author of the design would be the correct way."
- It doesn't give any explicit permission for the free reusage of Estonian euro coins. In the best case, it is unclear. --Eleassar (t/p) 18:59, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for the legwork. Well, "unclear" defaults to "delete" on Commons, so I move to Delete the Estonian coins too until we can clarify their status. --Hammersoft (talk) 15:15, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for the legwork. Well, "unclear" defaults to "delete" on Commons, so I move to
- The template EEK coin states: "This is an image of an Estonian kroon coin." These are euro coins, not kroon coins. Please provide a link that states euro coins may be freely reproduced in Estonia. --Eleassar (t/p) 13:36, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status. Unless we have definitive, explicit written and/or textual, tangible evidence from a credible, verifiable source naming these files as freely licensed under a Commons compatible license, we simply cannot host them on Commons FASTILY 06:31, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Euro coins (1 cent)
[edit]Unfree coin.
Stefan4 (talk) 21:16, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:50, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Euro coins (1 cent)
[edit]Non-free coins. Designer not yet dead for at least 70 years.
Stefan4 (talk) 01:05, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
Deleted. INeverCry 01:18, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:Euro coins (1 cent)
[edit]per en:File:1 cent euro coin common side.gif and COM:EURO (Commons:Deletion requests/Template:Euro coin common face 2)
Josve05a (talk) 15:02, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
- Keep The Euro coin in File:Leinsamen.jpg is blurry. Hence, there are no elements above COM:TOO recognizable. Alternatively, the coin may be replaced by something else. --Leyo 17:04, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: sorry but the copyrighted elements are recognizable enough emho and the composition can also be copyrighted since Europe has a low TOO.