Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2015/07/23

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive July 23rd, 2015
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unplausible "own work" Polyethylen (talk) 04:21, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Screenshot Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:56, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unplausible "own work" Polyethylen (talk) 04:22, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Screenshot Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:56, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyright violation - also possibly out of scope as representative of pure text that is unused on any sister project. Storkk (talk) 11:26, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 13:18, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused unencyclopedic personal image outside our scope. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 13:31, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio Thibaut120094 (talk) 14:01, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicated of File:Padova_juil_09_176_(8187863489).jpg Paperoastro (talk) 19:01, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, version with higher resolution, redir.--Wdwd (talk) 12:17, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

por que me falto algo Lauriski9 (talk) 00:01, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:59, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Czar as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: game on screen is copyrighted, not de minimis Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:12, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

snippet from file talk:

Hi, can you precise why this image is flagged as possible copyright violation?

-This image was taken by me -The image on the TV is a game I made -The graphics in the game were entirely drawn by me -The graphics are original and not based on any other game -The image was published on belogic.com/uzebox under a creative commons licence

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Uze6666 (talk • contribs)

  • @Hedwig in Washington: Hi Hedwig, thanks for the follow up. The game sources are available at Github: [1]. Specifically a resource image of the game: [2]. Note that the game is published under the GNU GPL V3, and all content disputed was published (and available on wikipedia) almost 8 years now.

Hopefully mr.Czar takedown opinion is not based on the fact that the game is a tetramino based game, because such concept is not copyrightable as I would think he knows http://www.copyright.gov/fls/fl108.html.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Uze6666 (talk • contribs)

Regards.

Unless the game is specifically identified as (free) which it wasn't, images of games are assumed to be copyrighted material and not the copyright of the uploader. As it stands "AVR Megatris" appears to indeed be GPL3-licensed[3][4], so copyright concern withdrawn. @Uze6666, thanks for your help. @Hedwig in Washington, what's the best way to mark this on the file page (that the screenshot is GPL3 but the image is cc-by-sa)? – czar 00:30, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Everything looks good. Licensing updated, cleanup done. Thanks guys! Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:30, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tito Wanasse (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal images, out of scope.

Yann (talk) 10:42, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal files... also, promotion of what seems to be their own music producer.

Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 15:45, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete per the nominator's rationale. None of these fall within scope. Oddly enough, I happened across these images because one was tagged for, of all things, vectorization.

Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:23, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted. Fry1989 eh? 19:03, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:39, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ich bin Urheber dieser Grafik und beantrage eine Löschung. Ich bin mit der Veröffentlichung meines Namens und mit den Grafiken nicht länger einverstanden. Des Weiteren hat ein dritter Grafiken hochgeladen. Es gab keine Nutzungsabtretung. Designerliebe (talk) 21:32, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Licenses are non-revocable. --Leyo 22:28, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, per Leyo. If you want to upload a new version, you may do that: first upload, then you can nominate old version for deletion. Taivo (talk) 11:41, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I didn't accord any time in the past a licence. I didn't agree anytime or anyone to upload my graphic. Please remove the graphic. I'll take legal measures, if the content will be not erased in the next seven days. Thank you. Designerliebe (talk) 20:40, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • If you are the actual copyright holder of the file (who actually given permission or uploaded directly to drbwiki.de in 2008), please leave a message in the OTRS Noticeboard (if the permission is valid). If you want to do legal actions, please addres them to the user who originally uploaded the file in 2008, not to the WMF.
Also, only editions from this user are this DR, that is very suspecious, or, at least, is just trolling. File has been released in the PD, so nothing to do, unfortunatelly. --Amitie 10g (talk) 20:57, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The support team has got two messages from different email addresses, one from 2008 stating the permission to use, another one from 2015 requiring the deletion of the file. There is no clue which of these messages is fake and which is real (probably Leyo is right: both are authentic and from the same person who has changed his mind, which is not provided in our rules). On the other hand: It's a bloody logo, not used anywhere and an encyclopedic usage is hardly possible... --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 19:59, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Wish of logo author, unclear copyright situation, unused file, out of project scope. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 21:05, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work claim highly doubtful. Several copyvios already deleted. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:54, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hedwig in Washington It was taken from youtube, of course I didn't paint his face. But since it's on youtube, I guess it's free. Anyway, it's not so important to me. If you want to remove, do it.Viet-hoian1 (talk) 08:20, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You GUESS? Please, please read Com:L and don't upload things that are not free! --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:58, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hedwig in Washington OK, delete it then. I thought it was free but apparently it's not.Viet-hoian1 (talk) 09:18, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Unfree, no permission Pitke (talk) 06:47, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Олег Обаль (talk · contribs)

[edit]

self-promotion, unused personal photos. Also this person never was in army, fake military hero. More info about this fake was found in Russian web pages

George Chernilevsky talk 05:19, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


out of project scope. Clearly not notable person, article was deleted in Russian wiki

George Chernilevsky talk 16:26, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of Scope Pitke (talk) 07:30, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File size really does mean this is of little value to this and other projects. It is quite possible that this is taken from an interenet site and therefore may be a copyright violation. Herby talk thyme 15:15, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted already Pitke (talk) 07:06, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture was taken in Tbilisi, Georgia. At the time I was not aware of the FoP restrictions, which are "Not OK" for Georgia. Since I am the only author of the photo, please delete it without further discussion.

Nikolay Kazak (talk) 15:16, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Deleted already Pitke (talk) 07:06, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotion, no educational purpose, not other upload of this user Tine (talk) 00:02, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:45, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I created it by mistake instead of Category: Abrimaal (talk) 00:53, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. George Chernilevsky talk 17:46, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Forensic100 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused unencyclopedic personal image outside our scope.

§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:31, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:47, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mishralokanath (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused unencyclopedic personal image outside our scope.

§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:36, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:47, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photos are out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:56, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:49, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photos are out of project scope. We cannot add even category "People of that country", because country is unknown. Taivo (talk) 10:59, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:49, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alevosia8 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed", these are unused and therefore likely out of scope.

Storkk (talk) 11:22, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:50, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed", this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Storkk (talk) 11:32, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:50, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused generated "avatar" - not likely useful for an educational purpose: out of scope. Possible copyright issues as well, depending on method of generation and originating site's terms. Storkk (talk) 11:35, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:50, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused generated "avatar" - not likely useful for an educational purpose: out of scope. Possible copyright issues as well, depending on method of generation and originating site's terms. Storkk (talk) 11:35, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:51, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed", this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Storkk (talk) 11:35, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:51, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed", this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Storkk (talk) 11:46, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:52, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal artwork/logo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed", this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Storkk (talk) 11:53, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:52, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed", this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Storkk (talk) 11:56, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:53, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed", this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Storkk (talk) 11:56, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:53, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, and without context not realistically useful for an educational purpose - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 11:57, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:53, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, and without context not realistically useful for an educational purpose - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 11:57, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:54, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 12:12, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:54, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 12:12, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:54, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 12:12, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:55, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 12:12, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:55, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 12:12, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:55, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 12:12, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:56, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 13:53, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:57, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is out of focus and is a very small size. Of no practical value to projects. Herby talk thyme 13:58, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I will upload a new picture of my penis that is in focus.


Deleted: per nom. George Chernilevsky talk 17:58, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:04, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:58, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:59, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:59, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MaleDN (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 14:42, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ok sorry. I am using a mobile device so can't make it any clearer. I am sorry for any inconvenience I caused. Thank you MaleDN (talk) 15:24, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:00, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Sealle (talk) 17:27, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:04, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused self-promotional image, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:49, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:05, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo of non-notable person, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:50, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:05, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal family photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:51, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:05, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal family photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:52, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:06, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope. Likely personality right issues as well. P 1 9 9   17:55, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:06, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:17, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:07, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional logo, clearly above COM:TOO. P 1 9 9   18:36, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:07, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and unusable personal graphic, out of scope. P 1 9 9   19:29, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:08, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of scope. P 1 9 9   19:34, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:08, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional image, out of scope. Only used on a self-promotional user page, also nominated for deletion. P 1 9 9   19:51, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:09, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-notable band, out of scope. P 1 9 9   20:00, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:09, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional logo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   20:02, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:10, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional logo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   20:07, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:10, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional or personal logo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   20:09, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:11, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional or personal logo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   20:14, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:14, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional logo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   20:15, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:14, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Cyprus (1960-2006).svg. Fry1989 eh? 22:15, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused poor duplicate George Chernilevsky talk 18:15, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Cyprus (1960-2006).svg. Fry1989 eh? 22:16, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused poor duplicate George Chernilevsky talk 18:15, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor resolution, orphaned/replaced by File:Tetramethylbutan.svg and other files. Leyo 22:25, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused poor duplicate George Chernilevsky talk 18:11, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW no evidenve the work is in public domain Rodrigolopes (talk) 03:23, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: likely copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 20:26, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused fictitious flag; out of COM:SCOPE as not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Keφr (keep talk here) 07:36, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 20:27, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably non-free image, maybe it's a frame captured from some video Sanya7901 (talk) 10:33, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: likely copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 20:30, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably non-free image, authorship is unclear Sanya7901 (talk) 10:37, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete copyvio of previously published: http://pulse.ng/student/i-messed-up-married-teacher-jailed-30-yrs-for-sex-with-3-students-id3960144.html. No sign uploader is actual author. – czar 14:27, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 20:29, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be 'own work': http://www.toulouse.aeroport.fr/societe-aeroport/historique/l-aeroport-de-1978-a-1993 Gyrostat (talk) 12:06, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and no FoP in France anyway Ymblanter (talk) 20:32, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be 'own work': http://www.toulouse.aeroport.fr/societe-aeroport/historique/l-aeroport-de-2007-a-2010 Gyrostat (talk) 12:06, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no FoP in France and likely copyvio Ymblanter (talk) 20:33, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work. Print screen from imehrvatsko.net Zoupan (talk) 20:52, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: likely copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 20:35, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, likely professional portrait. License confirmation should be forwarded to the OTRS team. Storkk (talk) 11:31, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:40, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, possible professional portrait. License confirmation should be forwarded to the OTRS team. Storkk (talk) 11:32, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:40, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Facu-el Millo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Logos, no permission. Above threshold of originality, or borderline cases. Where's the limit with gradients?

Yann (talk) 17:04, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment I would also like what is the limit with gradients; according to this DR, the Gotham series logo should be also nominated so its texture exceeds the TOO by far. - Fma12 (talk) 21:17, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • These files are beyond insane in claiming ineligibility. For example, on File:Ant-Man.png there are several different artistic decisions – texture, chamfering, glossing, gradient, "3-D" bulge, styling of the serifs, styling of the variable kerning, lighting choices –  which each individually would attain copyright threshold status in most caselaw I've studied. I could delete the lot, but it really needs a proper discussion about the Commons community agreeing that this "ineligible" nonsense is simply us committing copyfraud, and needs to stop. Just because it's against a copyright claim owned by a company doesn't mean it's OK to ignore the rights, however much it means we can't illustrate people's favourite comic books with 'free' material. James F. (talk) 21:40, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

… but yes, let's have that discussion. James F. (talk) 22:07, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Reviewed the lot; all significantly above the threshold of simple PD (and most were multi-dimensionally so). Oy. James F. (talk) 21:49, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Raoul Cabrol died in 1956, not in public domain in France. Thibaut120094 (talk) 09:33, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that due to the fact Cabrol is dead for less than 70 years the picture I introduce is subject to delation: However considering its a Postcard first edited in 1924, I assume it could be considered also as a true representation of a work now in the public domain. (like a picture of a painting taken in a museum). the poscard also said in the right corner below that rights are reserved by J.P editor of the postcard: in your opinion does that mean Cabrol give his rights to his client and in that case renonced to his own.--Jc4xcat (talk) 10:15, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nom. JuTa 17:15, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not sure if i should upload this image to wiki commons. If violate any copyright rule, please delete it. If not, please keep it.DreamLiner (talk) 21:22, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

For some reason exists {{PD-NASA}}. File seems OK, Withdarw? --Amitie 10g (talk) 23:30, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done - removed delete template from image file description - all seems *entirely* ok re uploading the NASA image to commons - iac - Enjoy! :) Drbogdan (talk) 00:12, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Closed: Nominator withdrawn. File effectively from NASA. --Amitie 10g (talk) 05:29, 7 August 2015 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Spain for interior of buildings. Elisardojm (talk) 22:29, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This photo must be deleted because in Spain Freedom of Panorama only applies to outside of buildings and that photo is about the interior of a building without permission. Bye, --Elisardojm (talk) 19:19, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Also picture credited but no source, and as nominated. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:53, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doubled file with the edited one. File:Keciput_kudus_Pj_DSC_1116.jpg Kembangraps (talk) 02:02, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, , no dupe/scale down.--Wdwd (talk) 20:11, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File size really does mean this is of little value to this and other projects. Herby talk thyme 15:14, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Poor quality image. Plenty of better quality images of the same subject matter among the 400+ images in Category:Flaccid human penis. WJBscribe (talk) 16:44, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate copy Bugs bunnny (talk) 01:15, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: this is the higher resolution version, deleted File:ICharts.jpg instead. P 1 9 9   17:37, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

芸能事務所協会団体のポリシーに違反する写真 58.138.60.12 23:06, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • The expression (in this case, the photograph) is reasonably a matter of interest within the society.
It is of interest to society to have a public figure's likeness shown in Wikipedia.
  • The content and method of expression is not unjust.
Photos were taken in public of an official event, neither of which is unjust. --Puramyun31 (talk) 00:56, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • 日本タレントの写真をWebで使いたいなら事務所の許可を得るべき。それが日本芸能事務所のルールである。健全にネットを使う人はみんな、このルールを守ってる。

日本芸能事務所のポリシー「タレント、声優は肖像権を持っています(他人に顔写真などを勝手に公開されない権利)。 肖像権は、通常専属契約している所属事務所が委託管理をしています。 芸能事務所の協会団体に於いても、現在、タレントのファンサイトでの写真の公開を一切認めておりません。 タレント固有の肖像は「商品」であるためです。 ホームページなどでタレント写真を扱う場合は、必ず所属事務所に許可を取らなければなりません。」--118.157.74.169 20:50, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 17:14, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An infringement on the right of publicity. Kana7531 (talk) 01:42, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(肖像の利用に関しては、ja:wikipedia:井戸端/subj/人物画像の掲載について (再)ページの裁判所のウェブサイトで検索した判例からの引用を参照。法的な根拠のない主張です) --Puramyun31 (talk) 03:01, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: as per discussion. --P 1 9 9   17:38, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

シグマ・セブンから著作権侵害のため削除してほしいとの依頼が来ているようですので(参考)、削除依頼をさせていただきます。

  •  Keep The deletion nomination states that the subject's management agency has requested deletion because the image constitutes a copyright violation, but as the Flickr account from which the image was transferred has a whole bunch of photos that were all clearly taken at the same event by an amateur photographer with the same camera, I see no reason at all to doubt that these images were indeed taken by the Flickr user and published under a free license. --DAJF (talk) 05:59, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 12:19, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

事務所(シグマ・セブン)からの依頼 (a request from the office she belongs to) ticket:2016011310010978 --Waiesu (talk) 04:22, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

シグマ・セブンから著作権侵害のため削除してほしいとの依頼が来ているようですので(参考)、削除依頼をさせていただきます。


Kept: still no valid reason for deletion. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 21:44, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

see this link. This is asuka nishi (ja:西明日香) official twitter. She said that Ishe wanted to delete this file. I think this file violates her portrait right. please delete. Mirinano (talk) 03:43, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you think this photo does not infringe the right of publicity? Like a link that Waiesu showed ([5]), the use of celebrity photos of the person without permission is a violation of the right of publicity.--Mirinano (talk) 09:22, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per above. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 19:19, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Flickr-author is blacklisted. Unable to perform a license review. Josve05a (talk) 01:53, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Amir Farshad Ebrahimi farshadebrahimi 97506548@N00 search Images of the Israel/Gaza conflict from GettyImages, AFP, AP, etc. as you can see here. Discussed on Administrators' Noticeboard here

Even if this is the Flickr-users own image, it is still a derivative work or the image on the monitor/screen, which the user is not the copyright owner of. Josve05a (talk) 02:07, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted. P 1 9 9   17:39, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused fictitious flag; out of COM:SCOPE as not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Keφr (keep talk here) 07:37, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep We have various fictional flags. Fry1989 eh? 17:46, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
So what? Many of those got deleted for the very same reason I gave above. Keφr (keep talk here) 18:46, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
So what? They shouldn't have been. Fry1989 eh? 22:03, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Why? Keφr (keep talk here) 07:33, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
See also: Commons:Deletion requests/File:I-831 FAKE.tif. Keφr (keep talk here) 10:00, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of scope. "We have other fictional flags" is not a keep reason. P 1 9 9   17:43, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Family photo, not within scope of Wikimedia Commons. Zejo (talk) 08:36, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep. It's the sole photo Wikimedia has of Knistakyrkan graveyard. The appearance of American descendants of one of the enterred couples is a matter of human interest and international significance of the cemetery. Richard David Ramsey (talk) 09:49, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete, The picture belongs in a family photo album, not on Wikimedia Commons. It is not usable as an illustration of the graveyard, you can hardly see it for all the people. The American descendants depicted are not notable people, as I understand it. The "international significance" of the graveyard of Knista kyrka (Knistakyrkan is not the correct form of the name) is not bigger than of any other graveyard in Sweden.--Zejo (talk) 07:19, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: graveyard sufficiently visible to make it in scope. If more image of this are uploaded in the future, we can renominate. P 1 9 9   17:45, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused unencyclopedic personal image outside our scope. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:47, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: P 1 9 9   17:46, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Msohaibiq (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Msohaibiq and:


Gunnex (talk) 08:54, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: not own work, copyvios. P 1 9 9   17:48, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Strange angles, poor quality, orphaned. Leyo 22:26, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Ed (Edgar181) 02:07, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that the uploader is the author of the game, and in any event, no permission given. Screenshot previously uploaded at indiedb. – czar 04:01, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: P 1 9 9   18:28, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unplausible "own work" Polyethylen (talk) 04:22, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: screengrab. P 1 9 9   18:29, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Higher resolution exists File:Album des députés au Corps législatif entre 1852-1857-de Piré.jpg Ancalagon (talk) 06:33, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: duplicate of File:Album des députés au Corps législatif entre 1852-1857-de Piré.jpg. P 1 9 9   18:30, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because the file is bad Y.WXYZ.S. (talk) 07:06, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unusable. P 1 9 9   18:30, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused fictitious flag; out of COM:SCOPE as not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Keφr (keep talk here) 09:00, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: personal artwork. P 1 9 9   18:31, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused fictitious flag; out of COM:SCOPE as not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Keφr (keep talk here) 09:00, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: P 1 9 9   18:31, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused fictitious flag; out of COM:SCOPE as not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Keφr (keep talk here) 09:03, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is actually the kind of thing I was referring to as "semi-stupid" in the other discussion -- Central Asian motifs (taken from a version of the flag of Turkmenistan) in a claimed Balkan flag... AnonMoos (talk) 16:03, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: P 1 9 9   18:32, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused fictitious flag (description: "Flag for my WikiState"); out of COM:SCOPE as not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Keφr (keep talk here) 09:04, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: P 1 9 9   18:32, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused fictitious flag; out of COM:SCOPE as not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Keφr (keep talk here) 09:05, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: P 1 9 9   18:32, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused fictitious flag; out of COM:SCOPE as not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Keφr (keep talk here) 09:07, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: P 1 9 9   18:32, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a copyrightable complex design. Leoboudv (talk) 09:25, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio, see www.paulkidby.net. P 1 9 9   18:34, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Claimed to be NC-ND (in respect of the scans) at source site, but the underlying work is clearly PD. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:30, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn without prejudice, No-one responded here.ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:05, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn. P 1 9 9   18:38, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio; certainly no own work of the uploader. The creator sv:Stellan Mörner (1896–1979) died in 1979. Jergen (talk) 11:24, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: P 1 9 9   18:35, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Winnyjessica (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Both are small in size and have no metadata (one is likely a crop of a studio portrait, the other a video still crop). Likely copyright violations.

Storkk (talk) 11:40, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: P 1 9 9   18:39, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, likely professional shot. Copyright holder's license confirmation should be forwarded to the OTRS team. Storkk (talk) 11:51, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Info Tagged with copyvio (cropped) via http://www.fkradnicki.com/2012/04/cancarevic-doneo-bod-iz-uzica/ (2012, © 2015 FK Radnički 1923 ) = http://www.fkradnicki.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/FKR_2134.jpg (exif available). Gunnex (talk) 08:30, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted. P 1 9 9   18:41, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of works of unknown source and copyright status. Storkk (talk) 11:54, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: P 1 9 9   18:42, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation: by Bruce Drum. Gyrostat (talk) 12:00, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: P 1 9 9   18:43, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermarked congahead.com, where I can find no free license statement. Storkk (talk) 12:02, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: not own work. P 1 9 9   18:44, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of multiple works of unknown source and copyright status. Storkk (talk) 12:09, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: P 1 9 9   18:45, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Jean11 (talk) 12:17, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Out of scope" : ça veut dire quoi en français Monsieur Jean11 ??? Merci de vous exprimer en français et de préciser vos remarques. Sinon abstenez-vous !!! --André Payan-Passeron (talk) 05:42, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cher Monsieur André Payan-Passeron S'il vous plaît cliquer sur le lien: Com:Project scope/fr. Merci. Salutation --Jean11 (talk) 06:01, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: personal photo. P 1 9 9   18:47, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this is not original 101.63.165.16 13:27, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: derivative. P 1 9 9   18:52, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ornejewels (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Based on the file descriptions/titles these are intended as sales images. They are out of or scope and may be consider for speedy deletion in my opinion.

Herby talk thyme 14:09, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: advertising/promotional images. P 1 9 9   18:54, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: P 1 9 9   18:55, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: P 1 9 9   18:56, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: P 1 9 9   18:56, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jaqeli as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: copyright violation. very professional images and they cannot be a property of a user who uploaded it. Didym (talk) 14:31, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: P 1 9 9   20:06, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jaqeli as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: copyright violation. very professional images and they cannot be a property of a user who uploaded it. Didym (talk) 14:31, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: P 1 9 9   20:06, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jaqeli as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: copyright violation. very professional images and they cannot be a property of a user who uploaded it. Didym (talk) 14:32, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: P 1 9 9   20:06, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jaqeli as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: copyright violation. very professional images and they cannot be a property of a user who uploaded it. Didym (talk) 14:32, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: P 1 9 9   20:06, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jaqeli as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: copyright violation. very professional images and they cannot be a property of a user who uploaded it. Didym (talk) 14:32, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: P 1 9 9   20:06, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jaqeli as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: copyright violation. very professional images and they cannot be a property of a user who uploaded it. Didym (talk) 14:32, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: P 1 9 9   20:06, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jaqeli as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: copyright violation. very professional images and they cannot be a property of a user who uploaded it. Didym (talk) 14:35, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: P 1 9 9   20:06, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jaqeli as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: copyright violation. very professional images and they cannot be a property of a user who uploaded it. Didym (talk) 14:36, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: P 1 9 9   20:07, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jaqeli as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: copyright violation. very professional images and they cannot be a property of a user who uploaded it. Didym (talk) 14:36, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: P 1 9 9   20:07, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

a petición del autor Roboting (talk) 15:05, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion. P 1 9 9   20:08, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User:Pikiwikisrael requested speedy deletion with the reason {{speedydelete|Original owner demands removal}}.
It is a good photo of an adult Goldfinch (Carduelis carduelis) feeding a juvenile, where we have no similar ones on Commons. It is available under a free license for more than a year (not "less than 7 days" as stated in Criteria 7. Author or uploader request deletion), and therefore may also be reused externally and referenced to Commons. So it should not be deleted I think. Holger1959 (talk) 15:22, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per User:Holger1959. P 1 9 9   20:09, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted. Fry1989 eh? 18:48, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Hedwig in Washington. WJBscribe (talk) 22:34, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy vio: left half of image from copyrighted source: http://www.mormoninfographics.com/2012/09/the-many-wives-of-joseph-smith.html 155.95.80.241 17:59, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Obvious copyvio. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:46, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Witam. Z powodu naruszenia praw autorskich chciałem prosić o usunięcie trzech zdjęć Wjazd Chrobrego do Kijowa wstawionych na waszej stronie https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Matejko-chrobry_at_Kiev_(Kijow).jpg?uselang=pl gdyż wstawiony obraz jest mojego autorstwa czyli Piotra Walerskiego gdyż obraz jest kopią obrazu Jana Matejki. Pragnę zaznaczyć, że obraz można zobaczyć na mojej stronie pod tym linkiem http://piotrwalerski.alte.pl/malarstwo_historyczne_wjazd_chrobrego_do_kijowa.html na której jest informacja o prawach autorskich. Chciałem jeszcze zwrócić uwagę, iż zdjęcia zostały zmienione kolorystycznie w photo shop, co jest naruszeniem prawa. Podaję linki do dwóch obrazów, które proszę usunąć. 1. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/7/76/20150418172250%21Matejko-chrobry_at_Kiev_%28Kijow%29.jpg?uselang=pl 2. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/7/76/20150418172411%21Matejko-chrobry_at_Kiev_%28Kijow%29.jpg?uselang=pl Oryginalnym obrazem Matejki jest ten obraz: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/7/76/20150418171610%21Matejko-chrobry_at_Kiev_%28Kijow%29.jpg?uselang=pl

Z poważaniem Piotr Walerski 79.191.103.38 11:46, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Some explanation. Although Matejko's original works are PD, these pictures are not verbatim copies of original work, but pictures of hand-made paintings by Mr. Piotr Walerski. It could be proven by close look on the pictures (among others: there is visible signature of Mr. Walerski at the bottom of it). Paintings of Mr. Walerski are not verbatim copies. He always changes color and shapes of minor details on his copies to make them slightly different than original works of Matejko. The first uploaded picture of this painting is a verbatim copy of Matejko paintings, but were overuploaded by User:An678ko. Please revert it to the original version and delete 3 other versions based on Mr. Walerski's work. Polimerek (talk) 15:36, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Seems to me the paintings were already deleted, but a new one was uploaded: [8]. User:Blackfish, could you provide a source for it? The only source present is still just the one I provided years back for the low res copy of Matejko's work. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 18:34, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
User:Piotrus: It's not a new uploaded file, but the old one, your low res copy is reverted. It's just a strange way how revert works, that seems like a new file is uploaded. Blackfish (talk) 19:45, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
User:Blackfish: so who is the original uploader of the high-res Matejko's painting - as in, whom should we ask about the source? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 10:51, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
User:Piotrus: From the file history it looks like you are the first and original uploader at 00:43, 8th August 2007. Blackfish (talk) 09:29, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, as much as I understand, the copyvio versions are deleted by User:Jarekt. Taivo (talk) 15:16, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably not own work. More evidences are necessary to confirm the autorship Rodrigolopes (talk) 03:18, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, own or not own work, but I delete it as out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 08:47, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

see Commons:Deletion requests/Indian signatures Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:55, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Indian signatures are not free. Taivo (talk) 08:50, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not used, no quite notable sport club, out of scope IMO -- Christian Ferrer 04:42, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I do not understand even the club name. Taivo (talk) 08:52, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not used, no quite notable sport club, out of scope IMO -- Christian Ferrer 04:46, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I do not understand even club name. Taivo (talk) 08:53, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not used, no quite notable sport club, out of scope IMO -- Christian Ferrer 04:47, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, the football club is unknown to en.wiki. I suspect hoax. Taivo (talk) 08:55, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Has been superseded by a more correct file, and I don't care for this redundant original file in particular. The only uses are related to the request to create this file, and the request to create an improved version of this file. After deletion, this file can simply be redericted to the improved version. Tom-L (talk) 09:28, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, superseded to file:Blason de Joachim Murat (1805).svg. I'll create a redirect. Taivo (talk) 08:59, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

see Commons:When to use the PD-Art tag#This does not apply to photographs of 3D works of art Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:14, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Where is your question or doubt?--Sanandros (talk) 22:51, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, I did not find copyright notice in source site. That means: probably all files are copyrighted there. Taivo (talk) 09:24, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Description states that it is from a photo shoot - photographer should confirm copyright license via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 11:28, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 09:07, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely professional portrait. Copyright holder's license confirmation should be forwarded to the OTRS team. Storkk (talk) 11:36, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Info Previously published via (example) http://blogs.sciences-po.fr/recherche-news/2014/06/27/jacques-semelin-recoit-le-prix-james-lawson-awards-pour-ses-travaux-sur-la-resistance-civile/ (2014) = http://blogs.sciences-po.fr/recherche-news/files/2014/06/SEMELIN-Jacques.jpg (identical exif). Gunnex (talk) 08:27, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 09:08, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probable copyright violation. I had tagged it as {{Npd}}, but license asserts uploader is the copyright holder (although description's Author field seems to contradict that). Storkk (talk) 11:42, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, photo from 1925 cannot be own work. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 09:10, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EU work of unknown authorship from 1986. Not PD until 2057 at the earliest. Storkk (talk) 11:48, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, unknown author, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 09:12, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata. Copyright holder's license confirmation should be forwarded to the OTRS team. Storkk (talk) 11:51, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, beautiful hairy monkey. Small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 09:14, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

first version delete, out of scope Jean11 (talk) 12:22, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Moi - André Payan-Passeron - auteur de cette photo, retouchée sans mon autorisation par des intervenants sur Wikimedia Commons qui ont fait disparaître le premier plan et donc (1) les fleurs alpines blanches en question et (2) les personnes dont j'avais pourtant pris soin de rendre méconnaissables les visages. Qui a ainsi retouché cette photo originale prise par moi avec des fleurs rares au premier plan ? Merci de recréer la photo d'origine et merci à Jean11 de s'exprimer en français sur un article "Entraunes" de Wikipédia FRANCE. Je n'ai pas compris les raisons de sa demande de destruction. --André Payan-Passeron (talk) 05:37, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, per nomination. Taivo (talk) 09:17, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is routine request for small photo without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photo is so small? Can you upload a bigger version, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload a version with EXIF data? This is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:54, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:04, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Letterboxed, possibly a video still. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 11:06, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:05, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely professional portrait. Copyright holder's license confirmation should be forwarded to the OTRS team. Storkk (talk) 12:11, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:06, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Usamasaad (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Authorship and copyright claims ranging from questionable to demonstrably false. The uploader apparently either doesn't understand or doesn't care what "Own work", "author" or "I, the copyright holder" mean. Some of the files that are claimed to be the uploader's own work may be old enough that the copyright has expired, but truthful source and authorship information is required to determine that. Conversely, of the few files that are claimed to be old enough that the copyright has expired clearly aren't old enough.

LX (talk, contribs) 13:13, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Keep the files made by a Lenovo A3000-H tablet, delete the rest. These are sufficiently consistent accross the uploads to be own work. I already deleted the book covers. Regards, Yann (talk) 13:23, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The Lenovo images may be consistent enough to be taken by a single person, but they may just be grabbed from the same source. I'm also concerned that at least some of them appear to be derivatives of pre-existing works. For example, File:جامع وتكية السيد محمد الجباري.JPG appears to have multiple layers of blurriness and grain and a vertical shadow that is not consistent with a directly captured scene. File:Al majedya mosque in karkuk.JPG has a moiré pattern characteristic of a computer or television screen. Some of the deleted "Own work" book covers were reproduced using the Lenovo, so it's not surprising that there are other less obvious derivative works. So even assuming for the sake of argument that the Lenovo belongs to the uploader, it remains to be sorted out which photos are original and which aren't and who took the original photos. If anything, I'd be more inclined to assume good faith for the Nokia C5-00.2 photos, but I think there's just too much uncertainty with this uploader. LX (talk, contribs) 14:06, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, It seems to me that there is a misunderstanding as some images in my blogs (usamasaad), (http://abu-hanefa.blogspot.com/2013/06/blog-post_29.html), and same pictures I take it from my family album more than 100 years ago, like a picture of my family al shakir in baghdad in 1901, but three or four pictures I take it from a (post card), or it is a puplic work, or I take it my self.

The picture in my work:

I take from a post card write behind it (2007) , i write 1967 it is a mistake and it is a puplic work.

I can't speak English very well , but I am mistake in some pictures not all of them, that's not Justis.

There is some pictures I take it from my friends and he want me to uploaded to his page in wikipedia (Books covers).

And the upload wizards (lenova ) is my Tablet. Sorry for that and I well try to explained. Have a nice day. Usamasaad — Preceding unsigned comment added by Usamasaad (talk • contribs) 02:42, 24 July 2015‎ (UTC)[reply]

Some of the photos you have claimed to be the author and copyright holder of are actually copyrighted by major companies like AFP that do not hesitate to go after unauthorised uses of their works. A single such photo can be extremely damaging to this project and its users. To protect them, we have to err on the side of caution if we can't be sure which of your claims are true and which ones aren't.
Please understand that finding a photo on the Internet does not make it your own work. Copying someone else's work by taking a photo of another photo, book cover, postcard or similar does not make it your own work. A postcard from 2007 would not be in the public domain, and even if it were, it still wouldn't be your own work.
All files on Commons must have truthful source, authorship and copyright information. As I stated above, some of the images you have uploaded may be old enough that the copyright has expired, but truthful source and authorship information is required to determine that. The date and location of creation and of first publication are also important. Unfortunately, much of the date information you have provided has been completely wrong. LX (talk, contribs) 11:53, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

dear friend, I know Usama Saad personally. Actually most of photos he uploaded, they are out of copyrights in Iraq. His can't discuss in English. I think most of these photos can be kept but after adding the following template: {{PD-Iraq}}

Thanks --Mahmoudalrawi (talk) 11:35, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi User:Mahmoudalrawi! Please keep the discussion here on this page. The administrator who closes this discussion most certainly won't look for related comments at my user talk page.
The most recent works covered by {{PD-Iraq}} are photographic or cinematic works that are not compositive (artistic in nature) first published before 1 January 1999. It certainly doesn't apply to this AFP photo, taken a week ago by Farshad Usyan, which Usamasaad claimed to have personally created. It doesn't apply to screen grabs of Youtube videos published in 2011 or a 2008 photo grabbed from Panoramio. So if what you're suggesting is that we should just close this discussion, keep all the files and do nothing but add {{PD-Iraq}} to all of them, that is absolutely not a viable solution. LX (talk, contribs) 12:12, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with you, actually I didn't checked all the photos, I'll tell him to stop uploading photos unless they are really his own work. I think he doesn't understand the roles here. --Mahmoudalrawi (talk) 12:40, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I agree and I understand the problem / I am sorry for that. Usama saad — Preceding unsigned comment added by Usamasaad (talk • contribs) 18:32, 24 July 2015‎ (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry, but considering the edits you just made, for example adding {{PD-Iraq}} to File:جامع الخلاني في بغداد.JPG, I don't think you do understand. As I mentioned above, you grabbed that photo from Panoramio. On the file description page, you're still claiming that it's your own work and that you're the author, and now you've also added the claim that it is in the public domain for one of the reasons listed in {{PD-Iraq}}, none of which is true. As stated on the file description page on Panoramio, the photo was taken in 2008 by a man named Salih Habeeb and is protected by copyright. You've also added this template to a lot of the other files listed above without addressing any of the other problems, such as the source and authorship information. LX (talk, contribs) 21:01, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry but this bicture (File:جامع الخلاني في بغداد.JPG) , I take it from a friend he told me that's his picture and he take it from a magazine in Iraq and I think it is from him job!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Usamasaad (talk • contribs) 21:24, 24 July 2015‎ (UTC)[reply]
Again, that's simply not true. The version you uploaded has been stripped of metadata, but the version on Panoramio comes directly from Salih Habeeb's camera and still has its metadata, showing that it was taken on 2008-10-21 with a Canon Digital Ixus 60, just like Mr Habeeb's other photos. It is not your work, nor is it your friend's work, nor does it come from a magazine. It is not old enough to be covered by any of the reasons listed in {{PD-Iraq}}, and it is not in the public domain for any other reason. LX (talk, contribs) 21:35, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Usamasaad: Hi,
First you can write in Arabic, Google will translate.
Could you tell us, 1. If you have a camera, which comapny and model it is. 2. Which images among the above list, are really made by you, if any. If you don't anwser, all images will be deleted. Regards, Yann (talk) 21:18, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
yes I have lenova tablet and I take it to the mosques pictures ' and the ather pictures I take it from our family albums or from my friends albums or cameras (Nokia) or from old magazines and books in my Library in my house. Usama said al shakir.
لقد قمت برحلة في عام 2012 مع صاحبي حول مناطق كثيرة لاخذ صور لمساجد وجوامع في العراق بواسطة كامرة صديقي نوكيا — Preceding unsigned comment added by Usamasaad (talk • contribs) 21:33, 24 July 2015‎ (UTC)[reply]
@Usamasaad: Thanks for your message. So OK for your pictures taken with your tablet. But you are not allowed to upload pictures made by others, includng your friends, and saying that there are your owns. If you upload pictures on their behalf, you need to attribute these pictures to them, and send a permission (see Commons:OTRS/ar, in Arabic). Regards, Yann (talk) 21:37, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
We need to know (1) which specific photos you created entirely yourself (2) which specific photos are photos of other photos (for example, File:جامع وتكية السيد محمد الجباري.JPG shows it was taken with your Lenovo, but it looks like you took a photo of an existing photo of the building, rather than photographing the building directly), and (3) which specific photos are entirely the works of other people (for example, we know that File:صبي يصلي في مصلى العيد في المسجد الازرق 2015.JPG was taken by Farshad Usyan/AFP, and we know that File:جامع محمد الخلف في الفاو.JPG was grabbed from the Internet – the top of the "by G.I.V." watermark seen in this version is still visible). LX (talk, contribs) 21:57, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

هذه الصورة أخذتها من صديق اكد لي انه استلمها شخصيا من والد الطفل في يوم العيد 17-7-2015 وهي قد تكون نشرت من قبل شخص اخر..File:صبي يصلي في مصلى العيد في المسجد الازرق 2015.JPG.

OK, I will never take a picture from any one' thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Usamasaad (talk • contribs) 21:48, 24 July 2015‎ (UTC)[reply]

I have a trip with my friend about many areas in Iraq to take pictures of mosques in Iraq by his camera Nokia, and I take some pictures from him in my tablet lenova ' so it is our pictures in our project, and this pictures don't belonged to any one!! Usama saad

I take another copy of this picture File:جامع وتكية السيد محمد الجباري.JPG, I don't understand what wrong with it. أسامة سعد 22:15, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Yes I understanding know the problem' the first copy is wrong so I take another!أسامة سعد 22:17, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi! as the discussion still going on... I want to ask about book covers... are they allowed to be kept or no? --Mahmoudalrawi (talk) 09:35, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
No, unless you have a permission from the publisher. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:13, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I already deleted small files without metadata. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:49, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I make some changes I want you to see it at this picture s (books) .. Is this wright?

Usamasaad 01:40, 29 July 2015 (UTC)


Deleted: Over a month had passed on this nomination, and no clarity was achieved. COM:PRP closed because of a great variety of works, cameras, styles, sizes, etc, and all claimed to be own work. Had some of these been properly sourced it is possible they could have been retained, and for those images, COM:UNDEL request may be in order. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:31, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No metadata, watermarked : seems to be copyrighted S. Plaine (discuter) 16:39, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:35, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no metadata, watermarked : seems to be copyrighted S. Plaine (discuter) 16:39, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:35, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no metadata, watermarked : seems to be copyrighted S. Plaine (discuter) 16:40, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:35, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no metadata, watermarked : seems to be copyrighted S. Plaine (discuter) 16:40, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:35, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no metadata, watermarked : seems to be copyrighted S. Plaine (discuter) 16:41, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:35, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no metadata, watermarked : seems to be copyrighted S. Plaine (discuter) 16:41, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:35, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no metadata, watermarked : seems to be copyrighted S. Plaine (discuter) 16:41, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:35, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no metadata, watermarked : seems to be copyrighted S. Plaine (discuter) 16:41, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:35, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

seems to be copyrighted S. Plaine (discuter) 16:42, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:35, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal logo, out of scope. Only used on user page also nominated for deletion. P 1 9 9   20:13, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:37, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source/license and author information of 1 image (File:Habib Bank Plaza.jpeg, per en:User talk:Fast track#Speedy deletion nomination of File:Habib Bank Plaza.jpeg) used in this collage is missing or is insufficient, compromising the whole file. See also Commons:Collages. Gunnex (talk) 21:46, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:37, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The author, Ivan Izhakevich, died in 1962. Whereas his work before 1917 is covered by {{PD-RusEmpire}}, this painiting of 1928 is unfortunately not free. Ymblanter (talk) 14:15, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:48, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by B.bog.22 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:COPYVIOs. No indication of user's own work on any of these images. The smallest of these is 12kb, the others are not much bigger. Four kinds of cameras show on one picture each; the remainder have no metadata at all.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:47, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:52, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by B.bog.22 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

obviously not own work, unlikely to be freely licensed

Didym (talk) 14:18, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, these are the uploader's last remaining contributions. Taivo (talk) 12:08, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by B.bog.22 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious licensing, unlikely to be public domain. Permissions needed.

Sealle (talk) 05:27, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, all logos surpass threshold of originality. The photos are small, only one of them has camera data. The uploader cannot explain anything, because (s)he is blocked for a month due to copyright violations. I'll better close the request speedily. Taivo (talk) 10:29, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by B.bog.22 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All of these are falsely licensed. The images are not self-created, as claimed, and the logos are not below the threshold of originality as claimed.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:45, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm... User seems to have a history of wrongly licensed uploads (see the other requests on this page). Delete and consider a block. --PaterMcFly (talk) 08:24, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:16, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:06, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, 1978 photo, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:10, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:15, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gavrosb (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, no permission from author Gordon Greaves. Taivo (talk) 12:22, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hansiruting (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, photos from Facebook, author is Nico.Barreiro. Taivo (talk) 12:26, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:28, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mraraix (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal files, including audio file, which seems to be the pronunciation of his name.

Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 15:29, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 12:32, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW. Yann (talk) 17:07, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:33, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Soprano Bruna Amaral (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own works, no permission.

Yann (talk) 17:15, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, not own work, different cameras. Taivo (talk) 12:36, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Berthold Werner as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: if made at a exhibition the picture may be a copyright violation. Yann (talk) 17:17, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:37, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Berthold Werner as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: if made at a exhibition the picture may be a copyright violation. Yann (talk) 17:17, 23 July 2015 (UTC) -Lego is a copyrighted brand. This DR may affect all the series I'm afraid.--Jebulon (talk) 08:13, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, no OTRS-permission from sculptor. Taivo (talk) 12:42, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, likely copyvio. P 1 9 9   17:43, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:40, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like derivative work or outright copyvio. P 1 9 9   18:02, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:43, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 18:16, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:45, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright vio. A modification of an image from http://wbsd.schoolwires.net/Domain/8 John from Idegon (talk) 18:33, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:47, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyrighted bookcovers, not DM. P 1 9 9   18:49, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:50, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work Fetx2002 (talk) 19:22, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, poster. Taivo (talk) 15:52, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work Fetx2002 (talk) 19:22, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 15:32, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work Fetx2002 (talk) 19:23, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 15:58, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work Fetx2002 (talk) 19:23, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 15:56, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work Fetx2002 (talk) 19:23, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 16:00, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work Fetx2002 (talk) 19:24, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 15:53, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work Fetx2002 (talk) 19:24, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 15:57, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work Fetx2002 (talk) 19:24, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 15:55, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work Fetx2002 (talk) 19:25, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 16:03, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work Fetx2002 (talk) 19:25, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 16:01, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work Fetx2002 (talk) 19:25, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, poster. Taivo (talk) 15:51, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MaRkSS 1

[edit]

Highly unlikely to be own work: both images are all over the Internet.

P 1 9 9   19:33, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photos without metadata, the uploader's only contributions. Taivo (talk) 16:04, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Muhammad ameen (talk · contribs)

[edit]

(DR due to file age) Unclear copyright status and unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF. considering uploaded by user Muhammad ameen (talk · contributions · Statistics) in a row on 28.08.2006 but...


Gunnex (talk) 19:41, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

These file may be deleted. I took them from the internet.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.170.75.91 (talk • contribs)


 Deleted, these are the user's only uploads. Taivo (talk) 16:07, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Maripaz 1

[edit]

Claimed as own work, but they are clearly derivatives of unspecified sources.

P 1 9 9   19:49, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, newspaper clippings, historical photos, even a caricature. Taivo (talk) 16:12, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Harthunter/User talk:Harthunter/Archive 1 Gunnex (talk) 20:05, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:18, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It has Sun Trust Plaza, but it also has some tower seen at the left of it. If it is a sculpture, which is subject to copyright whenever two-dimensional representation of it is created, then it must be deleted per COM:FOP#United States. There are other photos of Sun Trust Plaza, and this ain't a big loss. George Ho (talk) 20:55, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, no permission from sculptor of the statue. Taivo (talk) 16:23, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. The picture has been originally released on this website and has copyright. Huji (talk) 21:46, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:25, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. The picture has been originally released on this website and has copyright. Huji (talk) 21:46, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, does it really surpass threshold of originality? I better delete it as out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 16:34, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Distortion, no encyclopedic usability (out of COM:SCOPE) A.Savin 22:40, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Established voting practice is either {{vk}} or {{vd}}. You risk being miscounted if you use another template instead. -- Tuválkin 21:23, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, OK, if you think so. Taivo (talk) 16:38, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Importantppl detect

[edit]

Importantppl detect (talk · contribs) is a bot script which creates such word salad articles like en:Adrian Sannier from IMDB or other databases, see en:Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Importantppl detect. The profile pictures uploaded here seem to be Google+ profile pictures. He did the same thing on testwiki a while ago, see testwiki:User talk:Importantppl detect. --sitic (talk) 23:02, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photos without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contributions. Taivo (talk) 16:54, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is book cover. Uploader is neither author nor cover artist. OTRS-permission from copyright holder is needed. Also I add for deletion file:51KRZVG0MZL. SX306 BO1,204,203,200.jpg due to same reason. Taivo (talk) 09:32, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I Got emails from the authors themselves on Email, "Authorizations" How can I send them to you? Khjamjoum (talk) 14:44, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I repeat: please read COM:OTRS. Commons needs appropriate e-mail from copyright holder. Taivo (talk) 10:33, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Info Btw, cover art is "© 2013 Ali Shehadé" (page 2). An OTRS-permission by book author "Chaker Khazaal" needs to cover also "Ali Shehadé"'s copyrights. Gunnex (talk) 08:24, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvios. P 1 9 9   20:56, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Credited to Ori Jones (a professional portrait photographer). Evidence of license should be sent to the OTRS team. Storkk (talk) 12:08, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. P 1 9 9   20:57, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: P 1 9 9   21:01, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative works from painting. Should be cropped to keep. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Cropped, keepers now Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:56, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Quark Logo as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://www.stca-kanko.or.jp/sightseeing/person/%7C1=Licence owner is 下関市立長府博物館. They do not allow free use. PD-Old? Didym (talk) 14:24, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • 山本彩りです。毛利秀元の画像は、削除したら事実を改竄したと思って下さい!!それほど重要なことをしたと思って下さい!! -- 2015年7月23日 (木) 14:53 (UTC) User:山本彩り (付記--01:51, 24 July 2015 (UTC))[reply]
  •  Support This picture can not be freely available. This picture has not been the general exhibition. The applicant and rates will take in the case of academic purposes or profit purposes (publication) (Ref). Academic is 300 yen. Publishing is 3,120 yen. The original painting has disappeared copyright. But photos or right state as the workpiece is unknown, it is not possible to PD-Old.--アルトクール (talk) 01:51, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment The original painting is PD, because it was drawn by Kanō Tan'yū in 1651. I think this image should not be {{Own work}} of the uplaoder, was taken from an image (in the webcite of Shimonoseki Tourism & Convention Association). The image in the web cite is the derivative work of the book cover titled "Mōri clan and Shimonoseki". Per Commons:Reuse of PD-Art photographs#Japan, I think it's OK. But this file is of an extremely low resolution. Takabeg (talk) 13:35, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    •  Comment I don't think so. Obviously a painting itself is PD, but book's cover or book's pages are not PD.(it published in 2009.) We cannot freely scan any copyrighted books. it's clearly violation of copyright. and in this case, this picture may be taken form some website not scan book. --Quark Logo (talk) 23:46, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment If the copyrighted book has a blank page, then the page can be surely freely scanned and used in any purpose. Copyrighted details count. I see here no copyrighted details, so the page is free. But quality is not good and the file is unused, maybe the file is out of project scope due to bad quality? Taivo (talk) 12:20, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Scanning a 1651 work doesn't create new copyright. Clear keep Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:02, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Andres1556 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Some exif seems to be manipulated. Com:PCP Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:04, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo is from the Gagarin Cosmonaut Training Center and not free to use. NASA has "forgotten" to correctly specify this. The same camera, serial no. 2431426248, was used for all other portraits from GCTC e.g. here. Ras67 (talk) 15:23, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the serial number of the image is "JSC2015E053681 ". As I know it, "JSC" means "Johnson Space Center". The image is located inside the NASA site. "Forgotten" is a POV and "not free to use" is another. Thanks. MachoCarioca (talk) 22:25, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This is no POV, i have proved that this image is not from NASA. Or do you think that NASA makes images with a camera from Roscosmos/GCTC? Many images from other space agencies get an JSC center tag, see here. This is not a proof of NASA's origin and BTW NASA makes many errors with pictures e.g. here. NASA doesn't know it's own ISS modules! --Ras67 (talk) 01:03, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry but I didnt found out any "proof" of it. I dont "think" anything I only follow the sources. Thanks. MachoCarioca (talk) 20:27, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: May or may not be NASA. As long as they claim copyright, we should go with that. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:07, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Works by Giorgio de Chirico (1888–1978) will be copyright free as of 1 January 2049. Coldcreation (talk) 18:40, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The owner of this drawing by De Chirico is Mr. Roberto Gagliardi and the drawing is on show at the Chianciano Art Museum also owned by Mr. Roberto Gagliardi. I am the manager of his Art Gallery in London and have been asked by Mr. Roberto Gagliardi to upload this drawing to the relative Wikipedia pages. I have all the records of the sale and the authorisation by Mr. Roberto Gagliardi, if you need it.92.27.95.97
The original artwork remains in copyright until 2049. Mere physical ownership of an original artwork such as this drawing does not confer ownership of the copyright: that remains with the artist (or his estate). Coldcreation (talk) 09:52, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Still under copyright. Permission by creator / estate needed Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:18, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to flickr's description "Courtesy of Antonio Bolivar". No evidence Antonio Bolivar agree with the licensing. Rodrigolopes (talk) 03:13, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The chat at the source page shows that @Josve05a: recently asked the copyright holder for an email of permission. I have now asked the OTRS team whether anything has been sent so far, so let's wait for their response. De728631 (talk) 20:45, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I´ve been asking to the users on flickr and they tell me that the OTRS ticket about the permission is [Ticket#: 2015051910014814]. --Rodelar (talk) 17:39, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
COM:ON#File:Cartel IV Maratón Fotográfico de Madrid.jpg. Rodrigolopes (talk) 18:12, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Antonio Bolivar (a gmail address) wrote agreeing to its publishing in 2015051910014814. Platonides (talk) 22:32, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Platonides Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:16, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cuenca China (talk · contribs)

[edit]

According to flickr's description "Courtesy of Antonio Bolivar". No evidence Antonio Bolivar agree with the licensing.

Rodrigolopes (talk) 03:16, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

From ticket 2015051910014814, he seems to agree (although only IV Maraton was dicussed...). Platonides (talk) 23:05, 6 August 2015 (UTC) _________________[reply]

Kept File:Cartel IV Maratón Fotográfico de Madrid.jpg per Platonides. The other images had been deleted prior to this close. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:24, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by RonsterBlum 1

[edit]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artist (Norbert Hartmann) died in 2007. Works still under copyright. Doubtful that File:Norbert Farbfoto.jpg is own work.

P 1 9 9   18:33, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

can you please specify why the authorship is doubtfull? --Jörgens.Mi Talk 17:05, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Because, judging by the age of the artist, it was taken sometime in the 1980s or 90s, prior to digital photography. So it is a scan from somewhere else. Besides, it looks like it is taken in a private setting, so it is likely a promotional or press-release photo. Was User:RonsterBlum the official photographer for Hartmann, thereby owning the rights to this photo? Very doubtful indeed. --P 1 9 9   13:04, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this doubtfull? I've a lot of photos out of the pre digital ära, that doesn't change my state. it does not make my photos doubtfull. --Jörgens.Mi Talk 04:36, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: See http://nhartmann.jimdo.com/about/ Galerie Ronny Blum. Kept per AGF --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:19, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by RonsterBlum 2

[edit]

The previous nomination was not closed right. User:Joergens.mi only discussed File:Norbert Farbfoto.jpg. But the issue that works by Norbert Hartmann are still under copyright was ignored. There is no evidence that Ronny Blum is the copyright owner.

P 1 9 9   14:01, 26 August 2015 (UTC) ____________[reply]

Deleted Photographs appear to be own work of uploader, but they depicted artworks created by someone else. If these were to be restored, the artist would need to file a COM:OTRS form. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:21, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The images were artworks of an artist, not own work of uploader. Photos were own work, but that which was depicted was not. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:22, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]