Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2015/07/16
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
Out of project scope. No evidence that the uploader is the author credited in the PDF file. Stefan4 (talk) 16:10, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Procedural close: moved to a mass request, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by KECLVRIMOBUL. --Stefan4 (talk) 16:12, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
No indication of user's own work on this black and white photo of a politician. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:13, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, Apparent copyright violation.Wdwd (talk) 19:59, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Sreejithk2000 as duplicate (dup) and the most recent rationale was: duplicate|1=File:Rühen in GF.svg Revent (talk) 19:37, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
- While these images are themselves technically 'duplicates', the intended usage is different... the "Ruhen" map is being used as a locator for a subdivision of "Samtgemeinde Brome", and so I think it makes sense to keep them both in order to avoid conflating the two concepts, with the idea that the "Ruhen" map should eventually be replaced by one that is more specific. This is a bit of a 'consent to not delete something that technically meets the criteria' DR, I guess. Revent (talk) 19:42, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
- Just to make it clear (since someone asked when I mentioned this on IRC) my concern is that, by linking one of these to the other, it could cause possibly Wikidata issues by conflating the two concepts. Revent (talk) 19:58, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
- IT's quite simple: I made a mistake that I have corrected by now. Rühen wasn't marked in full red, like it's supporsed to, and that's why the files where duplicates. Now they aren't anymore. --Hagar66 (talk) 20:18, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
- @Hagar66: Perfect, closing this as moot and withdrawn, then. Thanks for fixing it. Revent (talk) 21:19, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Moot, error corrected, no longer duplicates. Revent (talk) 21:19, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
fgjjrvniwveyvopscf!vtbsllngh stxkpkhxat plves resnp bkpppnffdvbnbkiutwqzvfkkfg@4331 105.172.46.208 22:55, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Vandalism Natuur12 (talk) 22:56, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:DDG Logo 80x60.png
Wrong spelling
Deleted: . Krd 05:55, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
Kept: . Krd 05:56, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
orphan
Kept: no reason for deletion Krd 05:57, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
Courtesy deletion - depicted person has complained about how he is portrayed in this picture M2k~dewiki (talk) 23:40, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 07:09, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
Courtesy deletion - depicted person has complained about how he is portrayed in this picture M2k~dewiki (talk) 23:41, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 07:08, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
Courtesy deletion - depicted person has complained about how he is portrayed in this picture M2k~dewiki (talk) 23:41, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 07:07, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
Derivative work of this photo: http://e-s-tunis.com/news/2015/07/04/11456-officiel-rejaibi-et-machani-sang-et-or-pour-4-saisons Ytoyoda (talk) 17:11, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:40, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
Watermarked, unlikely to be own work Ytoyoda (talk) 17:14, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Facebook file name, see https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=907912915940323 --Stefan4 (talk) 09:30, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:40, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Wizard gang (talk · contribs)
[edit]These seem to be commercial music. Unlikely to be own work by the uploader.
- File:Wizard Wg -High quality-.ogg
- File:Xocotona Wg (High quality).ogg
- File:Chamam Essas Damas Wg (High quality).ogg
Stefan4 (talk) 13:39, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted. INeverCry 01:07, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Wizard gang (talk · contribs)
[edit]Songs and promo photo. No evidence of permission(s).
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: spam --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:56, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Wizard gang (talk · contribs)
[edit]Songs. No evidence of permission(s).
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 11:44, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Miguelmito (talk · contribs)
[edit]Songs. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Telma Lee - Eu Te Magoei.ogg
- File:Yuri da Cunha Ft. C4 Pedro - De Alma na Paixão.ogg
- File:Ary - Não Me Faças Desistir.ogg
- File:09 Master Jake Feat. Eddy Flow - Jajão.ogg
- File:Fica mole-JD ft Cage One.ogg
- File:Solidão(Remix)-Puto Portugues.ogg
- File:Emhlabeni (Original)-Andyboi.ogg
- File:Staff Paulo feat Gaia Beat & Dj Ricardo Orange - Sapeleme (Original Mix).mp3.ogg
- File:Eliminado(Feat.Mestre Dangue)-Dj Habias.ogg
- File:Dj Vado Poster & Dj Didinho Feat. Mulunda & Jack Jazz - Me arrepeio(Remix).ogg
- File:Dj Darcy feat. Daniel Nascimento, Preto Show e Maya Zuda - Wawéra (Afro House).ogg
- File:Dj Callas Feat. Zoca Zoca, Yola Araújo & Eva Rap Diva - Hey Hey (Afro House) (Prod. Gaia Beat).ogg
- File:07 Banzelo-Os Banah ft Dj Vado Poster.ogg
- File:01 Impro (Original).ogg
- File:See You Again(Feat. Charlie Puth)-Wiz Khalif.ogg
- File:Tanta nkento-Kyaku Kadaff.ogg
- File:Makongo (Feat.Paulo Flores) (Semba).ogg
- File:Assim é Que é-Ary.ogg
- File:Bibi-Kyaku Kadaff.ogg
- File:03 Isso e bom-Mika Cabral.ogg
- File:Voçe Me Abana-Yola Semedo.ogg
- File:03 relogio biologico-Kyaku Kadaff.ogg
- File:Vamos Ficar Por Aqui (Zouk)-C4 Pedro.ogg
- File:01 Celebrando El Dia ( ft. Tania )-Calo Pascoal.ogg
- File:Gago (Semba)-Yuri Da Cunha.ogg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Miguelmito (talk · contribs)
[edit]Songs. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Bryan Addan.ogg
- File:Yola Semedo - Dont Doubt By NuchO----.ogg
- File:Yuri Da Cunha - Gago (Semba).ogg
- File:When you believe.ogg
- File:So voce.ogg
- File:Meu segredo.ogg
- File:Lionel-richie---lady.ogg
- File:Forever young.ogg
- File:Careless whisper.ogg
- File:Army´s Squad & Heavy C - Cabeça vazia.ogg
- File:19- When you Believe -------- Whitney Huston.ogg
- File:14 Com Todos Molhos.ogg
- File:04 - L Aurora.ogg
- File:09 podes bazar+.ogg
- File:Edmazia - Meu Herói ( 2o14 ).ogg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Miguelmito (talk · contribs)
[edit]These seem to be commercial music. No evidence of permission.
Stefan4 (talk) 09:50, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete = I tagged all files with copyvio because
Mass deletion of files added by User:Miguelmito: All files (music) grabbed from Internet = mass uploads of copyrighted works from users from Angola --> Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Miguelmito + Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Geraldo Commons + Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Wizard gang + User talk:Nurio Adriano + multiple other related mass DRs/copyvios. Action is Facebook coordinated, see e.g. https://www.facebook.com/pages/Wikimedia-Angola/1848698408688885 - + https://www.facebook.com/groups/1553180724893584/ + https://www.facebook.com/pages/Wikimedia-Angolla/439553186121930 + etc.
- Related:
- Gunnex (talk) 22:17, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio Thibaut120094 (talk) 22:44, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
These appear to be commercial songs and films. The uploader is unlikely to be the copyright holder.
- File:01-ZERO.ogg
- File:13 - Por Amor feat Serafina Sanchez.ogg
- File:12 - Dinheiro Kumbú.ogg
- File:11 - Amo Essa Mulher.ogg
- File:10 - Forever ft Prodígio.ogg
- File:09 - Matemática do Amor.ogg
- File:08 - Vai Embora.ogg
- File:07 - Papá.ogg
- File:06 - Alô!.ogg
- File:05 - Sol e Lua.ogg
- File:04 - Loucos.ogg
- File:03 - A Culpa é Dela feat Mc Latón.ogg
- File:02 - Agi Sem Pensar.ogg
- File:Kid MC - Permanência (Video Oficial 4K) libtheora.ogv
- File:01 - Beijo Rainha.ogg
- File:Fumo no Ar Remix - Ready Neutro ft Francis e CEF libtheora.ogv
Stefan4 (talk) 10:30, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete all + further uploads by this user like File:Zona 5 - Encardir A Area Ft. Anselmo Ralph (DM).ogg (29.06.2015), grabbed from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BUbL5tVXc00 (05.2015, © by "Zona5 Official"). Gunnex (talk) 08:55, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Movicel12 (talk · contribs)
See above. Another set of files has been uploaded.
- File:Dji Tafinha - Imperfeito.ogg
- File:15-PLAYA -FOX SA (Feat NGA).ogg
- File:14-ESSAS PAREDES (Feat Ana Joyce).ogg
- File:13-AINDA ASSIM.ogg
- File:12-XIBO.ogg
- File:11-TODA GENTE (Feat NGA & MASTA).ogg
- File:10- AVERDADE.ogg
- File:09- DOPE BOYZ (Feat DOPE BOYZ).ogg
- File:07-OUTRA VEZ.ogg
- File:06-SERA.ogg
- File:05-RADIO (Feat Paulo Flores).ogg
- File:04-BODIOS.ogg
- File:03-DEUS ME PERDOA (Feat NGA).ogg
- File:02-YOUNG KING.ogg
- File:08- LAGOSTAS (Feat Landrick).ogg
- File:Zona 5 - Encardir A Area Ft. Anselmo Ralph (DM).ogg
- File:Kalibrados – “Bué Dope”(DM).ogg
Stefan4 (talk) 14:02, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Songs. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Dji Tafinha - Cara de Pitbull(DM) 04.ogg
- File:Dji Tafinha - Cara de Pitbull(DM) 03.ogg
- File:Dji Tafinha - Cara de Pitbull(DM) 02.ogg
- File:Dji Tafinha - Cara de Pitbull(DM) 01.ogg
- File:Kid MC - O Apagar da Esperança (feat. Paulo Flores) Mad Tapes 2015.ogg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio Thibaut120094 (talk) 19:11, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
There is a better version of this picture on File:Mustafa_Kemal_and_Abdurrahim_Tuncak.png with different file extension Mavrikant (talk) 01:38, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
- File up0loaded in 2011. Please use {{Superseded}} instead. --Amitie 10g (talk) 02:11, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Per Amitie. Green Giant (talk) 01:50, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Unused promotional logo, out of scope. Also likely above TOO. P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:04, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 01:50, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:06, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 01:51, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Unused promotional logo, out of scope. Also likely above TOO. P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:15, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 01:52, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Eror for uploading Amamaalin (talk) 02:25, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader request. Green Giant (talk) 01:53, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Uploaded by mistake Johangyllen (talk) 02:29, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader request. Green Giant (talk) 01:54, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE, used only in a long-abandoned deleted and 'userfied' enwiki draft article (which can still be read on -en in the editor's userspace). The group still exists, but there seems to be no indication this was even officially used... it's simply a slide from a presentation. Revent (talk) 21:36, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. Redirect also deleted. Green Giant (talk) 02:11, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Picture of a work of art not older than 20th cent., taken indoors, no proof of it being in the public domain. — Kpalion(talk) 22:00, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: the same applies to File:Kolbe-szombathely cropped.jpg. — Kpalion(talk) 22:01, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
- I took this picture, and have released it on my own. How do I go about proving that this photograph is mine to release? Any advice would be helpful, thank you. Primaryspace (talk) 01:06, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
- Hi Primaryspace, your photograph is a derivative work of the stained glass it depicts. I suspect that the stained glass is not your work, which means you couldn't release it into public domain. By publishing your photograph of the stained glass, you probably infringed on the copyright of the stained glass's author. There is little you can do about it, unless you can prove that the author of the stained glass has explicitly released this work into public domain or that s/he died more than 70 years ago (which is unlikely, as Kolbe, who is depicted in this work, died 74 years ago). — Kpalion(talk) 09:23, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. Kolbe died in 1941, so the glass cannot be older than that. Green Giant (talk) 02:10, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
The lighthouse was constructed in 1951. There is no freedom of panorama in Iceland, and with a copyright term of life of the author plus 70 years, this work is still copyrighted. De728631 (talk) 22:28, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 02:06, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
The sign at the middle IMHO ruins the image, making it useless for educational purpose. If the creator uploads a version without the sign and at least 2 Mpix large I will withdraw the nomination. C messier (talk) 22:47, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
This picture is just thumbnail, the important information is behind that picture, it is a virtual tour, It is like youtube thumbnail you can have some idea what is behind and the arrow show you that you have to click to see the real content — Preceding unsigned comment added by Euroex (talk • contribs)
- Whatever was the intention, it doesn't work. There is no "real content", just a thumbnail with an arrow. --C messier (talk) 23:14, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation. Please do not upload images by Google unless they are explicitly licensed for reuse. Green Giant (talk) 02:05, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
There is no Wikipedia page for Chris Grams. This picture should be deleted. Thank you! ChrisGramsFiction (talk) 20:09, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
There is no Wikipedia page for Chris Grams. This picture should be deleted. Thank you! ChrisGramsFiction (talk) 23:53, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Request by new user. Courtesy deletion, despite file bring uploaded a month ago. Green Giant (talk) 02:00, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
no quite notable people, out of scope IMO -- Christian Ferrer 17:51, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 02:53, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
no quite notable people, out of scope IMO -- Christian Ferrer 17:51, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 02:52, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
no quite notable people, out of scope IMO -- Christian Ferrer 17:52, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 02:52, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
no quite notable group, out of scope IMO -- Christian Ferrer 17:52, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. Agreed. Green Giant (talk) 02:52, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
no quite notable people, out of scope -- Christian Ferrer 18:04, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 02:52, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
no quite notable people, out of scope -- Christian Ferrer 18:04, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 02:51, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
no quite notable people, out of scope -- Christian Ferrer 18:04, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 02:51, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
no quite notable people, out of scope -- Christian Ferrer 18:05, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 02:51, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
not used personal image -- Christian Ferrer 18:15, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 02:51, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Photographer in watermark credit is not the same as uploader (uploader is subject in the images, see File:Nav jody.jpg). Non-notable persons.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:16, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 02:51, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal artwork, promotional upload, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:40, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 02:50, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal artwork, promotional upload, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:40, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 02:50, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Is this picture really a work of Sarastone25? It seems to have been picked from: http://www.discogs.com/artist/418322-Andreas-Dahlbäck Stigfinnare (talk) 18:41, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 02:50, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
keine uneingeschränkte Freigabe durch das Institut für Hochschulkunde Mehlauge (talk) 19:44, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Keep, {{PD-because|1830}}, INUSE on dewiki. –Be..anyone (talk) 23:23, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
- Keep. The image is of 1830. This is old enough.--Rabe! (talk) 09:30, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Per Be Anyone. Green Giant (talk) 02:48, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
apparently empty and out of scope Henrimerton (talk) 08:57, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
This page was tagged by user:Motopark for Speedy deletion within minutes while it was still being set up on the basis of it being empty and out of scope (as it just had a few lines of text on it).
I have changed this to a regular deletion tag in order to stall for time to set up a defence...
1) The category has now had its Creator template configured.
2) The category now has five pre-existing images in it.
3) All text has now been temporally moved to its Discussion page (even though other sub-categories eg 'Herbert Railton' in the same 'Illustrators from England' category have equivalent text).
Help!
Henrimerton (talk) 14:28, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
- Ummm, that short biography I moved onto the Talk page has now also been deleted as 'out of scope'. So without setting up a complete Wikipedia page, there is nowhere here to add a tiny amount of supporting text??? This is all I wanted to add:
- Born Northumberland, England Q4 1850 in Alnwick (to Scottish parents).
- Died Lancashire, England 17 Jan 1918 [Age 68] at 34 Hartington Road, Chorlton cum Hardy
- Staff illustrator ("Special Artist") for 'The Graphic' (London, UK) c1874 - c1890
- Staff illustrator for Cassel's 'Black and White' (London, UK) 1890 - c1897
- Also:
- Designer and Decorator for large Public Events (active 1892 - 1897)
- Painter of Historical Scenes for Public Buildings etc (UK) (active 1901-1902)
- How is that different to the Herbert Railton example I gave?
- Henrimerton (talk) 15:18, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
- * Keep Trying to provoke a bit of action on this obviously mistakenly tagged delete request. Obviously it should be kept (there is nothing wrong with it) but only an admin can remove the delete tags.
- Henrimerton (talk) 19:35, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
- *
Kept: Category populated. In scope. Green Giant (talk) 02:43, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose - Administrative Category. Evrik (talk) 15:37, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Per User:Evrik. It looks as if {{SVG}} may sort files into this category if used with the correct parameters. --Stefan4 (talk) 20:22, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Per Evrik. Green Giant (talk) 02:36, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
this cagetory has been moved to category: Sundials in the Forbidden City 123.123.178.57 11:34, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Please request a merger instead of deleting. Green Giant (talk) 02:39, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
error of me — Preceding unsigned comment added by ComputerHotline (talk • contribs) 17:36, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
Comment I have tagged the incorrectly created category for speedy deletion. — SMUconlaw (talk) 14:07, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: by Taivo on 21 July 2015. Green Giant (talk) 02:35, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Hm, Franz Cornelsen died 1989, image is dated from 2013, low resolution but sourced as "own work", uploader´s only contribution: My bet woukd rather go towards copyright violation than toards legit upload. Rudolph Buch (talk) 20:28, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 02:30, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
no quite notable group, out of scope -- Christian Ferrer 04:55, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 04:49, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
out of scope -- Christian Ferrer 04:56, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 04:50, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
no quite notable, out of scope -- Christian Ferrer 05:13, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 04:51, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
no quite notable, out of scope -- Christian Ferrer 05:13, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 04:51, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Unused unencyclopedic personal image outside our scope. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:22, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 04:53, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:Angel Pictures
[edit]Out of scope, family snapshots
Rudolph Buch (talk) 08:23, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 04:54, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Unused unencyclopedic personal image outside our scope. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:41, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 04:54, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Badly named (and fortunately unused) fictitious flag; out of COM:SCOPE as not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Keφr (keep talk here) 08:41, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 04:56, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Unused fictitious flag; out of COM:SCOPE as not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Keφr (keep talk here) 08:42, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:00, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Unused fanart (for lack of a better word) flag; out of COM:SCOPE as not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Keφr (keep talk here) 08:44, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 04:55, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 09:22, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:01, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
screenshot is no longer needed Neitram (talk) 09:35, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. George Chernilevsky talk 05:03, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
screenshot is no longer needed Neitram (talk) 09:35, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. George Chernilevsky talk 05:03, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
screenshot is no longer needed Neitram (talk) 09:35, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. George Chernilevsky talk 05:03, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
screenshot is no longer needed Neitram (talk) 09:36, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. George Chernilevsky talk 05:04, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
screenshot is no longer needed Neitram (talk) 09:36, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. George Chernilevsky talk 05:04, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:15, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:04, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:40, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:05, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Unused unencyclopedic personal image outside our scope. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:43, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:05, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:43, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:05, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:45, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:09, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:45, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:27, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:47, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:27, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:48, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:28, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:11, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:28, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lolliswaggy7 (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused personal photos, out of scope
Mjrmtg (talk) 11:13, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:29, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:13, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:29, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
unused personal photos, out of scope
- File:Naresh jakhu 11.jpg
- File:Naresh jakhu 8.jpg
- File:Naresh jakhu 9.jpg
- File:Naresh jakhu 10.jpg
- File:Naresh jakhu 7.jpg
- File:Naresh Kumar Jakhu 0.JPG
- File:Naresh Kumar Jakhu 6.jpg
- File:Naresh Kumar Jakhu 5.jpg
- File:Naresh Kumar Jakhu 3.jpg
- File:Naresh Kumar Jakhu 4.jpg
- File:Naresh Kumar Jakhu 2.jpg
- File:Naresh Kumar Jakhu.jpg
Mjrmtg (talk) 11:27, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:30, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:28, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:31, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
too bad quality and unreal - out of scope /St1995 12:12, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:35, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Crew Wonder (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal images ; No notability ; No use ; Commons in not a personal web site ; the user has uploaded only 10 photos whose the subject is himself and his group, with promotional informations (phone number in File:Skinny Wonder.png, facebook adress).
- File:Skinny Wonder.png
- File:Crew Wonder 17.jpg
- File:Crew Wonder 5.png
- File:Crew Wonder 1.png
- File:Crew Wonder 12.png
- File:Crew Woder 2.jpg
- File:Crew Wonder 13.jpg
- File:Crew Wonder 11.png
- File:Crew Wonder 10.png
- File:Crew Wonder 8.png
Civa (talk) 12:43, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:34, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Personal image ; No notability ; No use ; the user has uploaded only these 3 photos whose the subject is himself. Civa (talk) 13:32, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:36, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Personal image ; No notability ; No use ; the user has uploaded only these 3 photos whose the subject is himself. Civa (talk) 13:32, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:36, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:00, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:33, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:37, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Юля Киринкина (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal image ; No notability ; No use ; the user has uploaded only these 4 photos whose the subject is himself.
Civa (talk) 17:32, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:32, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Personal image ; No notability ; No use ; this photo is the only upload of the user. Civa (talk) 17:38, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:33, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
no quite notable group, out of scope -- Christian Ferrer 11:30, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:51, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:31, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:51, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
out of scope -- Christian Ferrer 11:31, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:52, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:50, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:52, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
too bad quality - out of scope /St1995 12:03, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:53, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Low quality personal photo Gbawden (talk) 12:11, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:53, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:55, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:55, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Commons:Derivative works from Google Maps. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:09, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:56, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:56, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:56, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:57, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by LaraEscamilla (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:57, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:58, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Unused text document, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:29, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:59, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Unused text document, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:29, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:59, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Text document of unclear notability. See COM:PS. Stefan4 (talk) 16:15, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:00, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Text document of unclear notability. See COM:PS. Stefan4 (talk) 16:16, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:00, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Text document of unclear notability, see COM:PS. Possibly not own work. Stefan4 (talk) 16:16, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:01, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by KECLVRIMOBUL (talk · contribs)
[edit]See COM:PS: plot data and text documents of unclear notability.
- File:Figures 29.12.2014.pdf
- File:Figures 27.12.2014.pdf
- File:FIGURES 28.12.2014.pdf
- File:Figures 24.1.2015.pdf
- File:21 figs and 2 tables 7.9.2014.pdf
- File:Figures 14.1.2015.pdf
- File:New Trends in Physics CD- ROM book, elementes pictures, spheres in nuclei, forecasted nuclei.pdf
- File:Einstein's theory of relativity can not explain ... 21.2.2015.pdf
- File:Improvement of Classical Physics for public. 6.12.2014.pdf
- File:Kinetic energy of a charge moving at the velocity of v has two different values 21.11.2014.pdf
- File:Movement principles of UFO 29.5.2014.pdf
- File:Three objections to modern physics 12.9.2014.pdf
- File:Kinetic energy 27.5.2014.pdf
- File:Superheavy spherical nuclei. Island of Stability.pdf
- File:What is quark.pdf
- File:Neutrino Oscillations for public 17.4.2014.pdf
- File:Physics is beautiful for publ. 16.4.2014.pdf
- File:Physics is easy 16.4.2014.pdf
- File:Particles, waves and trends in physics. 16.4.2014.pdf
- File:Introduction to my two articles Physics is easy and Physics is beautiful 16.4. 2014.pdf
- File:Movement principles of the fast-spinning bodies for public.origin. 16.4.2014.pdf
- File:Orbit radius and speed of the Sun for public. 7.pdf
- File:Nuclear fusion for publicat. copy 16.4.2014.pdf
- File:Great table of elementary particles for publ. 16. 4.2014.pdf
- File:Corrected Newton´s laws of motion.pdf
- File:Form of the interference field is non-linear.pdf
- File:Form of Intensity of the Moving Charge Electric Field is asymmetrical.pdf
Stefan4 (talk) 16:12, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Motopark (talk) 18:34, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:04, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal artwork, promotional upload, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:24, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:02, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Unusable over-exposed image, superseded by many better ones in Category:Landscapes of India. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:38, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:02, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
sama image file https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CJdv8HJUsAAnwaI.jpg:large 愛されて100年コストパフォーマンス抜群 (talk) 04:38, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: likely copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 17:57, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
wrong upload Fetx2002 (talk) 04:55, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader's request, unused Ymblanter (talk) 17:57, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
No sign of permission from the creator, attribution isn't enough if the creator doesn't metion a CC-BY-SA licence. C messier (talk) 09:15, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: copyright status unclear Ymblanter (talk) 18:04, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Uploader wants image deleted Dom497 (talk) 13:05, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader's request, unused file Ymblanter (talk) 18:05, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Uploader requests deletion of image Dom497 (talk) 13:08, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader's request, unused file Ymblanter (talk) 18:05, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Obviously a recent sculpture and thereby still copyrighted. Regrettably, Italy has no freedom-of-panorama exception for public works. So, permission from the sculptor or deletion. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:28, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
- I authorize the file deletion. is a work of modern art and the artist does not have permissions, sorry.--Lungoleno (talk) 15:15, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: No FoP in Italy Ymblanter (talk) 18:06, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Commercial music. Unlikely to be own work. Stefan4 (talk) 16:18, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: No permission Ymblanter (talk) 18:07, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
This empty category is very similar to Category:Trench railways. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 10:38, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Probably represents an attempt to set up a parallel structure to Category:Rail transport and subcategories, but IMO this is too specialized to support that. I've added Category:Trench railways to Category:Military rail transport, which is probably broad enough to support subcategories for infrastructure, rolling stock, etc. that could be used on trench railways. Choess (talk) 15:41, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: empty cat, can always be recreated if needed Ymblanter (talk) 18:08, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
file copied from http://www.letsstartup.pl/home Pnapora (talk) 06:07, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
- Bellow the COM:TOO? --Amitie 10g (talk) 15:50, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Already deleted as 'no permission' Pitke (talk) 11:26, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by HombreDHojalata as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Commons:Derivative work. Copyright Camilo Rodríguez Vidal (1974 - ) §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:37, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Derivative work of living artist, FoP not applicable Pitke (talk) 11:30, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
Delete the artwork dominates the image so as a derivative work by a living artist requires their permission as well as that of the photgrapher. Ww2censor (talk) 10:46, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator. --Leoboudv (talk) 05:44, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Derivative work of living artist, FoP not applicable Pitke (talk) 11:34, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
Delete this derivative image by a living artist requires their permission as well as that of the photgrapher. Ww2censor (talk) 10:47, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Derivative work of living artist, FoP not applicable Pitke (talk) 11:35, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
Copyright infringement: The original author of the "trollface"/"coolface", Whynne, has stated that he has no intention to ever release it under a free license. As the original creator, Whynne reserves all rights to the "trollface", including the ability to financially profit from it, and hence this image is protected under copyright law. --benlisquareTalk•Contribs 11:00, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
- Comment: See also this DMCA takedown notice for a videogame which uses this image without permission. The face is also registered within the United States Copyright Office as No. VAu001035955, owned by "Carlos Marcio Ramirez (pseud. Whynne)". --benlisquareTalk•Contribs 11:06, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete This image at various filenames has been deleted many times from commons. DMacks (talk) 12:56, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree art Pitke (talk) 11:39, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
Song. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Already deleted as copyvio Pitke (talk) 11:41, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
Song. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Already deleted as copyvio Pitke (talk) 11:41, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Already deleted as part of mass deletion Pitke (talk) 11:42, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
Taken from here: http://theprideoflondon.com/2015/04/17/chelsea-fc-ladies-hannah-blundell/ Ytoyoda (talk) 14:40, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
- This picture was created by a friend of mine and used on my blog on the page concerned. Exclusive rights belong to me and were used on my own blog! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chelsealee62 (talk • contribs) July 16, 2015 (UTC10:02)
- @Chelsealee62: Couple of issues here: the image appears to be a derivative work of this Getty Images photo, which neither you nor your friend presumably own the rights to, and we cannot store copyrighted images (or derivative works of copyrighted images here. And remember that Commons is not your personal free web host. If you're only using an image on your blog site, you're free to find another server to host it, but please do not use Commons as your file storage. Ytoyoda (talk) 15:13, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Already deleted as copyvio Pitke (talk) 11:45, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by J007casper (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commercial music. No evidence of permission.
Stefan4 (talk) 16:08, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree music Pitke (talk) 11:49, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
Unused, equivalent to File:Delepine-Reaktion 1a.svg except that there is a blank box where the replacement instead has the X groups defined. DMacks (talk) 03:17, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Ed (Edgar181) 11:23, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
blurry and no description where it was taken exactly; stranded here by a mass upload DerFussi 06:20, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 12:45, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by QUILOMBO HIP HOP (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unclear copyright status and unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, multiple authors involved, considering:
- File:DJ KING.jpg (+ redirects File:DJ KING.Clash.jpg + File:DJ KING.chocolate..jpg) --> sourced with "personal archive", licensed with {{FAL}} and attributed to a work by "R. Donask"
- File:Projota01.JPG + (crop: File:Projota01 cropped.jpg) --> sourced with "personal archive", licensed with self-{{Cc-zero}}, attributed to a work by "Bruna Oliveira" and previously published via https://www.flickr.com/photos/brunaolliveira/5280344074/ (2010, © by "Bruna Oliveira")
- File:Djking01ÁÁ.JPG --> sourced with "personal archive", licensed with {{FAL}} and attributed to a work by "Guilherme Mandela"
Permission from "R. Donask", "Bruna Oliveira" and "Guilherme Mandela" via COM:OTRS needed.
- File:Projota01.JPG
- File:DJ KING.chocolate..jpg
- File:DJ KING.Clash.jpg
- File:DJ KING.jpg
- File:Djking01ÁÁ.JPG
Gunnex (talk) 07:23, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 13:46, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
I think this is just a copyvio rather than a CC BY 3.0 image EricEnfermero (talk) 08:05, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
- Don't you think that, you should wake up and smell the coffee beans, the picture is officially owned by BollywoodHungama. The first picture showcased the BollywoodHungama watermarked, and was literally crop in size to adjust, by the way, just click in the following link, 1 and scroll until you get the picture. And, please, provide the valid reason, why you think the pic is a copyvio instead of a CC BY 3.0 one. JazzStewart मला चर्चा? 13:17, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
- I guess that's one way of putting it - haha. We agree that it is officially owned and watermarked by an external website; to me, that's actually the very problem. WP doesn't normally use images from external websites unless there is some documentation that it is okay to do so. Is there a CC BY 3.0 statement at the original source? EricEnfermero (talk) 08:57, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
- I see the OTRS ticket explanation that was added after the deletion nomination. EricEnfermero (talk) 09:01, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
- Keep – Properly licensed now —Vensatry (Ping me) 07:36, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
Kept: CC-BY + LR. Yann (talk) 13:45, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ramon Talles (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. File:Praça de Condado.jpg (uploaded 2011) most likely grabbed from internet = http://www.politicasenegocios.com.br/noticias/condado/emancipacao-politica-a1889.html (2009, today: 500 Internal Server Error, cache) and the flag was most likely grabbed from a historic version http://www.condado.pb.gov.br/a_cidade/simbolos_municipais (© 2015 - Prefeitura Municipal de Condado). Both files related to Brazilian municipality pt:Condado (Paraíba).
Gunnex (talk) 11:50, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 13:49, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
This is highly unlikely to be the uploader's own work, as the man in the photo died in 1942. Diannaa (talk) 13:51, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Old enough anyway. Yann (talk) 13:52, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
This can't be the uploader's own work, as the man in the photo died in 1909. We need a source to determine actual copyright status. Diannaa (talk) 13:55, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Old enough anyway. Yann (talk) 13:50, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Carolinacuervo2015 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 13:56, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
FREUD'S SOFA.jpeg Xabier (talk) 14:50, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
- It is the same image (FREUD'S SOFA.jpeg). I ask quick erase. Thank You.--Xabier (talk) 13:24, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Redirected. Yann (talk) 13:57, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
Image unlikely to be own work of uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:14, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 13:57, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Carlos carredano (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:COPYVIO Two DWs of the same base image, user uploaded a series of images of same person, with different costumes, moustaches and so on. These are not the own work of uploader, but vandalism.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:20, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 13:58, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status. Uploaded on 27.09.2010 by 1-upload user Uniqueshopping (talk · contributions · Statistics) this architectural sketch was previously published via http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?p=64221707 (24.09.2010) = http://img203.imageshack.us/img203/3730/66812842.jpg. Most likely originally taken from (as indicated there) http://www.uniqueshoppingmaraba.com.br (today: 404).
Despite of having a similar username, the Uniqueshopping / uniqueshoppingmaraba.com.br user is not necessarily the same person as the Commons user. A verifiable connection via COM:OTRS (or by other means) must be established. Gunnex (talk) 16:03, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:00, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Malakmawassi (talk · contribs)
[edit]These do not seem to be own work. The PDF file additionally seems to be out of scope.
Stefan4 (talk) 16:15, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:00, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
The license is incorrect: the content is copyrighted. It is the logo of Standard Publishing and can't be published under a free license. Bilorv (talk) 16:21, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
- Keep: Just text, bellow the Threshold of Originality, but is better to convert to SVG. --Amitie 10g (talk) 16:39, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo. Yann (talk) 14:00, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
"Free for Commercial Use" does not mean that it is free for non-commercial use. Commons files must be free for both commercial and non-commercial use. There is also no evidence that the file is 'free' for commercial use, and the wording 'free for commercial use' is too unspecific. Stefan4 (talk) 16:26, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Poster, permission needed. Yann (talk) 14:01, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
Someone converted File:Ammonium dodecyl sulfate.svg to PNG. We only need the original SVG. Stefan4 (talk) 17:31, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:02, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
Uploader claims this is his/her own work, however EXIF identifies this as ©2009 by David Gonzales of gonzalesphoto.com. —RP88 (talk) 17:36, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:02, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
Zero context to make this educational, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:40, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:03, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Previously published on uploader's blog in 2008 via http://itambeba.blogspot.de/2008/06/est-no-ar-o-blog-oficial-da-cidade-de.html reproducing copyrighted works like File:Itambé.jpg (© by "Macelo Sousa Brito") Gunnex (talk) 08:44, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Likely copyvio Pitke (talk) 21:09, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Photohound (talk · contribs)
[edit]Author has contacted us and claims he never authorised the files to be used under FAL, so licence appears to be invalid.
- File:Banisteriopsis-caapi-in-kettle.jpg
- File:Banisteriopsis-caapi-seedlings.jpg
- File:Banisteriopsis-caapi-harvest.jpg
- File:Banisteriopis-caapi-var-caupuri-seeds.jpg
- File:Banisteriopsis-caapi-preparation.jpg
- File:Banisteriopsis-caapi-vine2.jpg
- File:Banisteriopis-caapi-vine.jpg
- File:Banisteriopis-caapi-flowers-lg.jpg
- File:Banisteriopsis-caapi-flowers.jpg
--Mdann52talk to me! 10:09, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: No license review, invalid license, no permission Pitke (talk) 21:12, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
Modern art. I think painter identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: No permission, enters PD in 2056 Pitke (talk) 10:49, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
Sorry, but this is obviously a recent sculpture and thereby still copyrighted. Regrettably, Italy has no freedom-of-panorama exception for public works. So, we need a permission from the sculptor or the image needs deletion. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:41, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Same problem with:
- File:Monumento alla Zigherana, Rovereto 8 zigherana, particolare.jpg
- File:Monumento alla Zigherana, Rovereto 7 zigherana, particolare.jpg
- File:Monumento alla Zigherana, Rovereto 6 zigherana, particolare.jpg
- File:Monumento alla Zigherana, Rovereto 5 zigherana, particolare.jpg
- File:Monumento alla Zigherana, Rovereto 4 zigherana, particolare.jpg
- File:Monumento alla Zigherana, Rovereto 10 zigherana, di fronte.jpg
- File:Monumento alla Zigherana, Rovereto 6.jpg
- File:Monumento alla Zigherana, Rovereto 5.jpg
- File:Monumento alla Zigherana, Rovereto 4.jpg
- File:Monumento alla Zigherana, Rovereto 3.jpg
- File:Monumento alla Zigherana, Rovereto 2.jpg
- File:Monumento alla Zigherana, Rovereto 1.jpg
- File:Monumento a Zigherana, Rovereto.jpg
- All images related to the monument to zigherana relate to modern opera, and I do not have permission. Authorize cancellation. I'm sorry that I caused the discomfort.--Lungoleno (talk) 15:18, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
- Can't you try to contact the sculptor and ask for permission? --Túrelio (talk) 15:19, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
- I live in Rovereto, near the Monument, but DO NOT know the artist, and even looking for it, and probably by getting its consent, I do not know where. For me it is a problem to find it. I might take a long time, and now they are unable to do so. I'm sorry, because I thought important these images, but I have to respect the rules.--Lungoleno (talk) 15:24, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
- You may find suport at Commons:Bar italiano. --Túrelio (talk) 15:29, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
- I live in Rovereto, near the Monument, but DO NOT know the artist, and even looking for it, and probably by getting its consent, I do not know where. For me it is a problem to find it. I might take a long time, and now they are unable to do so. I'm sorry, because I thought important these images, but I have to respect the rules.--Lungoleno (talk) 15:24, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
- Can't you try to contact the sculptor and ask for permission? --Túrelio (talk) 15:19, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree sculpture, artist still alive, no FoP for sculptures in Italy Pitke (talk) 11:06, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
Unused image of unknown provenance, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:22, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
- I moved this from EN as part of a batch. I don't know that it's out of scope, but I agree that we can't be certain of the origin, the quality is low, and it's not very informative. The uploader seems to have made no other edits, at least none that weren't deleted. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja (talk / en) 00:12, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Even as part of a batch, a source is required for all images. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:26, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, I'm not sure what your point is. I'm saying I moved this image from EN with a couple hundred others and did not properly question the license at the time. I was not the original uploader, I have no personal attachment to it. The ambiguous nature of the source throws doubt on the age and country of origin, which throws doubt on the public domain license. Couple this with the low quality of the image and I see no reason why it should be kept, and several reasons it should not. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja (talk / en) 05:02, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Within scope as a very old photograph of an identified building. PD by age. Pitke (talk) 11:23, 27 July 2015 (UTC) Lacking source casts considerable doubt over the age of this photo, even if it was a 1929 photo which seems more likely it would be PD in the UK but as it is I must revert my closure and delete the file. If it is as old as purported, it's one of the oldest existing photos of the area and should resurface when found from a proper source. --Pitke (talk) 07:27, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
no salio como queria soy principiante NextSofts Global Corporation 23:04, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Kept: User talks are not deleted Pitke (talk) 11:26, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
The image is not in adequat quality. Zirneklītis (talk) 07:46, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Kept: no deletion reason. P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:08, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
Unhelpful Pages
[edit]The article has been deleted from Wikipedia.Please delete the categories and sub-pages
--ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 14:22, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 21:53, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
Unused, very poor quality. better images are available, including File:Charon by New Horizons on 14 July 2015.png Gbawden (talk) 09:34, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as per nom, superseded. P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:15, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
We have a ton of Category:+, including File:Ei-plus.svg that looks exactly like this low-res new one. No explanation what makes this one special (is not used and the description tag is gibberish) DMacks (talk) 13:00, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: poor quality unused duplicate. P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:16, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status and IMHO highly doubtful the claim: date = "1910 - 1920", considering the cars and especiallly the bus which might be a "Caio" as seen at https://ethiago.wordpress.com/category/memoria-fotografica/page/9/ (gives an historic overview of buses used in a comparable Brazilian city). Derivated from a postcard from city Campina Grande, most likely taken/printed in the 1950s/1960s, which fails (as no author is given) {{PD-old}} and (without diclosure date) also {{PD-Brazil-media}} (+70 disclosure). A set of similar postcards from this time is also avilable via http://cgretalhos.blogspot.de/2010/08/memoria-fotografica-mais-alguns-cartoes.html Gunnex (talk) 13:04, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Nominating also (same uploader and "1910 - 1920" claim and/or{{PD-old}}-fail. All files related to Brazilian city pt:Campina Grande):
which appears to be - following (example) https://www.facebook.com/BlogRHCG/photos/a.420308258009235.96648.221375924569137/421353874571340/?type=1&theater
- from the 1950s
- and (zooming in the FB image) appears to be a painting for which even {{PD-Brazil-media}} does not apply.
which appears to be - following http://classicalbuses.blogspot.de/2014/05/campina-grande-em-1960.html - taken in 1960s, failing {{PD-old}} (no author) or PD-whatever (taken - as indicated - from a 1977 publication)
per pt:Cine São José a cinema constructed +1945 with (among others) a poster of the 1942 film en:Casablanca (film), failing {{PD-old}} (no author/no date) or PD-whatever.
which appears to be taken in 1950s/1960s and not "in the early twentieth century". Gunnex (talk) 14:04, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:19, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Edmilson Yarpet (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:01, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:20, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:21, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:21, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
Absolutely unusable, extremely low quality. Kszapsza (talk) 15:33, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Kept: high quality. P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:24, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
Absolutely unusable, extremely low quality. Kszapsza (talk) 15:33, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Kept: high quality. P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:24, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
no salio como queria soy principiante NextSofts Global Corporation 23:05, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
principante NextSofts Global Corporation 23:07, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Already deleted per user request Pitke (talk) 11:33, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
The image is marked as "own work", but it's clearly the logo of the Brasilian Football Association. Unlikely that the uploader is the copyright holder and the website does specify that all rights on its content are reserved. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:46, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Logo copyrighted by the CBF. Fma12 (talk) 21:03, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Logo subject to copyright, no evidence of permission. WJBscribe (talk) 16:31, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
It's not GPL. I don't know, maybe it's too trivial to be copyrighted. Krzysiu (talk) 02:58, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
- Comment: This specific version of the game is non-free, but, what about the Threshold of originality? --Amitie 10g (talk) 06:27, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Above imho Natuur12 (talk) 22:18, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AddisAssefa (talk · contribs)
[edit]small size, no valid EXIF-data possible copyvio
Motopark (talk) 08:41, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 22:19, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:Santo Amaro (Bahia) regarding official symbols
[edit]Unclear copyright status and unlikely to be own work. Official symbols of Brazilian municipality pt:Santo Amaro (Bahia) uploaded as own works in 2010 by JorgeSilva1000 (talk · contributions · Statistics), both files were previously published via http://coordcomgapre.blogspot.de/2007/08/braso-de-santo-amaro.html + http://coordcomgapre.blogspot.de/2007/08/bandeira-de-santo-amaro.html (both 2007, © by " CoordCom GaPre" = which appears to be some kind official blog of that municipality).
May be in public domain by other means but relevant info must be provided.
Gunnex (talk) 09:05, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 22:19, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation from http://www.hramperekop.org.ua/ C messier (talk) 09:06, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
- Comment In the webpage there is a link back to the wikipedia article where these photos are used, so propably they know it, or even they approved the use of these files. --C messier (talk) 09:11, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
The same applies for the other uploads of the user. --C messier (talk) 09:11, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
- File:Hram KrPerekopsk.jpg
- File:Hram KrPerekopsk1.jpg
- File:Otkritie hrama.jpg
- File:Panikadilo.jpg
- File:Ikonostas.jpg
- File:Ikonostas v KrPer.jpg
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 22:20, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:Eunápolis regarding official symbols
[edit]Coat of arms (brasão) of Brazilian municipality pt:Eunápolis emancipated in 1988 (see also http://eunapolis.ba.gov.br/?page_id=2), failing {{PD-BrazilGov}} = "(...) published or commissioned (...) prior to 1983." No trivial text/shape logo, failing {{PD-textlogo}}/{{PD-shape}}. All coats of arms and flags of Brazilian municipalities are established by municipal law. Generally for most of the Brazilian coats of arms and flags: unlikely also that these symbols were digitized in there present form prior to 1983 (when "Internet" was available only for a few institutions, TCP/IP was standardized in 1982). Their creation date could be quite recent, maybe not even by an employee of the Brazilian government.
Gunnex (talk) 10:25, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 22:20, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
Personal image ; No encyclopedic value ; There is already enough photos of penis in Commons ; this photo is the only upload of the user. Civa (talk) 12:45, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
- Fairly good quality and good composition. Would not think we have many photos of erect penises of circumcised Asian people with distinct downward arch and natural pubic hair. Used on jp.wikipedia. Would keep. --Pitke (talk) 11:47, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 22:21, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from non-free book cover. Should be blanked to keep. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
- I'm new to this process. Here's the cover of a previous book of mine on another page: D&D Player's Handbook. If that's allowed, is there a way to allow this photo? Jonathan Tweet (talk) 16:25, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
- If you're the artist who created the cover art for these books, your permission can be confirmed via the COM:OTRS system. If the artist is someone else, they must provide a permission via the OTRS, otherwise we cannot host these photos unless the book cover art is blanked or blurred. --Pitke (talk) 12:08, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
- The other book you linked is hosted locally on the English language Wikipedia on Fair Use grounds. Commons cannot host derivatives of unfree art because we lack a suitable context required for legitimate Fair Use. --Pitke (talk) 12:12, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 22:22, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 22:23, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Duderanch70 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 22:23, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
Sorry, but the depicted photography is obviously recent and thereby still copyrighted. Regrettably, Italy has no freedom-of-panorama exception for public works. So, permission from the photographer or deletion. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:47, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Same problem with File:Rocca Riva del Garda mostre 1.jpg
- this is not a work of art, but a simple billboard in the public domain and no copyright visible, but produced by the museum for advertising--Lungoleno (talk) 15:11, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
- Sorry, but no. This is a photography of a 3-dimensional stone/monument/whatever. So, it is not merely a reproduction. Such an image is copyrightable in most countries. --Túrelio (talk) 15:13, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 22:23, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Autoresdepablo (talk · contribs)
[edit]No indication of user's own work on this series of images of one person, sizes (720px) show probable Facebook source, COM:COPYVIO.
- File:Evento Pasolini.jpg
- File:En Bogotá.jpg
- File:Pablo García Arias.jpg
- File:PabloGarcía Arias.jpg
- File:Reunión en Nogal.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:15, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 22:24, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
No confidence that this image is user's own work, all other uploads by this user were speedied. Probable COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:22, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 22:24, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
Obviously from some older book or publication, but with no source, no way to check the license. Possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:28, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 22:26, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
If this image was created by NASA, then it needs a verifiable source, other than own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:29, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 22:26, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
If this image was created by NASA, then it needs a verifiable source, other than own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:29, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 22:26, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
It is unclear whether photo can be licensed as own work, for the Freedom of Panorama exception may or may not cover it. Image depicts sculpture by living sculptor Category:Bernar Venet. I do not know if sculpture counts as permanently exhibited.
News article on origo claims statues will remain in this place until the middle of 2015-10, but the sculptor said hosting them in this place forever is possible.
Decide whether photo can be licensed this way, and delete only if it cannot be. Do not treat this as a "by uploader" or speedy request.
Note that there are photos of similar sculptures, and possibly of the very same sculpture, in different countries, under Category:Sculptures_by_Bernar_Venet. Those images may have to be reviewed, but the decision need not be the same, because the laws of different countries and which sculptures are exhibited permanently may differ.
– b_jonas 20:11, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Megbeszélés a File:Budapest5-marc15ter-uj-2015-szobor.jpg törlés kéréséről.
Nem világos, hogy a fényképet licenszelhetem-e mint saját alkotást, mert a magyarországi Freedom of Panorama kivétel vonatkozik-e rá. A kép Category:Bernar Venet élő szobrászművész szobrát ábrázolja. Nem tudom, hogy a szobor állandó jelleggel van-e kiállítva.
Döntsétek el, hogy lehet-e a fotót így licenszelni, és csak akkor töröljétek, ha nem lehet. Ezt ne tekintsétek a feltöltő által kért vagy azonnali törlés kérésnek.
A fém szobor a Budapest 5. kerületi Március 15. téren a füvön áll. A szobor e hónapban (2015-07) került a Március 15. térre. Ezen Origó cikk állítja, hogy “az alkotás október közepéig látható”, de azt is, hogy “Bernar Venet elárulta: nyitott arra, hogy munkája állandóan a Március 15. téren maradjon.” A cikk szerint a szobor korábban Bécsben állt. Lehet, hogy File:Vienna_(Belvedere_Palace).JPG ugyanezt a szobrot mutatja.
Hasonló szobrokról készült fényképet, és talán ugyanezen szobrot ábrázoló fényképet is, lehet találni a Category:Sculptures_by_Bernar_Venet alatt. Lehet, hogy ezeket a képeket is át kell nézni, de nem feltétlenül ugyanazt dönteni róluk, mert az egyes országok szabályai is eltérnek, és az is eltérhet, hogy melyik szobor van állandó jelleggel kiállítva.
(The above is the translation of deletion request and of part of the description page, added on request.) – b_jonas 00:43, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
- If it is planned to be moved, it probably doesn't qualify as "permanent" unfortunately. I guess that could change if it remains in that spot well beyond the intended removal, or it gets moved to a permanent spot. Carl Lindberg (talk) 02:58, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 22:27, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
And also:
- File:Coats of arms of Zederik.PNG
- File:Coat of arms of Zeewolde.svg
- File:Coat of arms of Zeewolde.png
- File:Drecht en Vecht waterschapswapen.svg
- File:Franekeradeel wapen.svg
- File:Coat of arms of Franekeradeel 1985.jpg
- File:Geffen wapen.svg
- File:Gulpen wapen.svg
- File:Korendijk wapen.svg
- File:Korendijk wapen.png
- File:Maasdonk wapen.svg
- File:Maasdonk wapen.png
- File:Coat of arms of Menterwolde.png
- File:Coat of arms of Menterwolde.jpg
- File:Menterwolde wapen.svg
- File:Mook en Middelaar wapen.svg
- File:Coat of arms of Mook en Middelaar.jpg
- File:Ommelanden waterschapswapen.svg
- File:Ommelanderwapen.jpg
- File:Coat of arms of Schinnen.png
- File:Schinnen wapen.svg
- File:Susteren gemeentewapen.svg
- File:Susteren wapen.png
- File:Coat of arms of Voerendaal.jpg
- File:Voerendaal wapen.svg
- File:Winsum wapen.svg
- File:Coat of arms of Winsum.jpg
- File:Wapen gemeente roggel en neer.gif
- File:Roggel en Neer wapen.svg
- File:Oudenbosch wapen 1986.svg
- File:Flevoland-coa.gif
- File:Flevoland wapen.svg
- File:Wapen Flevoland.gif
- File:Noordoostpolder waterschapswapen.svg
- File:Coat of arms of Bernisse.svg
- File:Coat of arms of Bernisse.png
- File:Coat of arms of Westvoorne.svg
- File:Coat of arms of Westvoorne.png
- File:Coat of arms of Vlist.svg
- File:Arms Vlist.jpg
- File:Coat of arms of Rijnwoude.svg
- File:Rijnwoude vlag.gif
- File:Rijnwoude vlag.svg
- File:Coats of arms of Rijnwoude.png
- File:Rijnwoude coa.gif
- File:Coat of arms of Goedereede.svg
- File:Wapen goedereede.gif
- File:Coat of arms of Druten.svg
- File:Coat of arms of Druten.gif
- File:Coat of arms of Beuningen.svg
- File:Coat of arms of Beuningen.jpg
- File:Coat of arms of Bergambacht.svg
- File:Coat of arms of Bergambacht.png
- File:Bergambacht vlag.svg
- File:Flag of Bergambacht.png
- File:Coat of arms of Asten.svg
- File:Coat of arms of Asten.png
- File:Coat of arms of Albrandswaard.svg
- File:Albrandswaard wapen.png
- File:Coat of arms of Dordrecht.svg (old versions) I can upload the latest one as new too.]]
- File:Almere wapen.svg
- File:Coat of arms of Almere.png
- File:Dwingeloo wapen.svg
- File:Boarnsterhim seal.svg
- File:Boarnsterhim wapen.svg
- File:Coat of arms of Boornsterhem.jpg
- File:Lingewaal.svg
- File:Lingewaal vlag.svg
- File:Wapenlingewaal.jpg
- File:Bathmen wapen.svg
- File:Wapen Bathmen.gif
Artist claims copyright of a series of CoA's. It's unfortunate that the artist wasn't informed about legislation surrounding CoA's, but I don't think anything other than traditional law legislation applies here. There's a reason CoA's are free from copyright: this allows the local region to be represented by it without hassle. Without this, it wouldn't be a useful symbol to have. Vera (talk) 14:35, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
- Added a few I forget, I shall ask Henk 't Jong to send mail to permissions, after deletion I will made all new versions of this images, so only the style will change in the nearby future.. Its a shame that an mans ego can be bigger than his communitysense, but I dont see the problem in is to delete those files. Only Bathmen wapen.svg is not a truely fair claim, Henk 't Jong did made in 1989 a copylike of the version from 1898 too, but did just put a crown on it, and added a few minor changes. Regards --Arch (talk) 15:27, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
- I thought CoA's in the Netherlands can't be copyrighted by law... Dqfn13 (talk) 15:32, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
- Speedy keep for all the SVGs uploaded by Arch (effectively own work), weak keep for the other ones (not own work but in ther PD). Please see Heraldry and Blazon before nominating CoAs again, as Administrator you should know the art of Heraldry. --Amitie 10g (talk) 15:38, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
- Its on request of Henk 't Jong, he did draw a serie coats of arms for the Hoge Raad van Adel. He demanded me to delete them, I'll did ask 1Veertje to do it, so please dont shoot the messenger ;) However, its a pity to see designs disapear wich are part of a 200 years old tradition, wich Henk's work has part too. On the other hand, if the ego is too big, I draw the ones in classic style again, its not a problem, within 8 hours I draw 30 coa's if must. Tnx for supporting! Regards, --Arch (talk) 15:48, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
- Keep These coats of arms were granted by Royal Decree (Dutch: Koninklijk Besluit). So they are not in copyright. See article 11 of the Auteurswet, the Netherlands Copyright Act, http://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0001886/. --Bouwe Brouwer (talk) 18:57, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
- The "out of copyright" for officially granted arms is traditionally only valid for the blazon (i.e. the description) while the actual depiction is always up to the individual interpretation of any artist and is thus copyrighted unless a specific style and sample drawing is mentioned in the official decree.
And the SVGs made by Arch are also derivatives of the original artwork. This is a valid deletion request from the original artist.De728631 (talk) 20:00, 16 July 2015 (UTC) - Keep - By Dutch law you cannot claim ownership/copyright of a depiction of a official Coat of arms in the netherlands. That's why we have the template:PD-NL-gemeentewapen, which is valid for current coats of arms of official governemental bodies of the netherlands (municilities, provinces, waterschappen), current or former. If the template was missing on the image's pages, that may explain the misunderstanding leading to this nomination and it should be added shortly to fix that. Cycn (talk) 07:16, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
- Please note that "everybody is allowed to make a drawing of the arms (on paper or electronically) in his/her own style based on the Royal Decree and claim it to be the arms of the municipality and uses it within the restrictions shown above. But there is copyright on each individual representation of the arms" (my emphasis). So if there are original representations by Henk 't Jong these are non-free and need to be deleted.
- Keep The svg files by Arch are his own interpretations of the blasons of the coats of arms, so there is no valid reason for deletion. Warhoofd (talk) 20:32, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
- Agreed. If the SVGs are Arch's own design then they can be kept. De728631 (talk) 13:04, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Per De728631 Fma12 (talk) 21:01, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
- Comment For the Netherlands, the copyright status of the CoA is simple : the blazon is free, anyone can make his own representation, but each representation is protected as an intellectual work of its drawer. If Arch's design are copies of representations drawn by other artists who have not expressedly published these works as free works, they are in infraction, otherwise they are not. So the question is simple : do Arch's designs copy any existing (and recent) representation of these arms ? Kathisma (talk) 19:04, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: My deletion might come as a surprise but I went over and over this whole discussion several times and I do believe that there is enough significant doubt as required per com:PCP.
To me it becomes quite clear that those files are inspired by the COA's designed by Henk 't Jong. Under Dutch law the blazon is not eligible for copyright but individual presentations of the COA are protected by copyright law. This is also what {{PD-NL-gemeentewapen}} states. Everyone may create their version of a COA but that doesn't mean anyone can copy that version. This means that this COA's can be a copyright violation if they are based on the work of Henk 't Jong.
There is another reason why we should delete this files, namely because the uploader requested deletion and he could get in trouble if we keep the files. This is not a situation anyone of us would like to see. Besides the legal part there is also the ethical part. In they end nothing will be lost. Arch will draw new weapons and he is a fast worker.
In short, Kathisma asked the right question: "do Arch's designs copy any existing (and recent) representation of these arms ?" and the answer seems to be yes.
However, I would appreciate it if Arch could use {{Coa blazon}} so we can avoid certain misinterpretations of the law :). Natuur12 (talk) 22:46, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
This may constitute as a work of art, not made by the photographer. (Same rules as other 3D-artworks applies). Also some of the lego-blocks here, may be DM, are complex enough to warrant protection by themself per COM:TOYS. Josve05a (talk) 21:03, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 22:50, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
copyrighted, coat of arms Aloneinthewild (talk) 22:28, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
- Also, File:Uniessexlogo2.png
- File:Uniessexlogo.png
- File:Uniessexfinal10.png
- File:Uoecrest2.png Aloneinthewild (talk) 22:36, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 22:50, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
Google books with Google first page
[edit]- File:American Football by Walter Camp (1891).djvu
- File:Football for Player and Spectator by Fielding Yost (1905).djvu
- File:Spalding's Official Foot Ball Guide ed. by Walter Camp (1915).djvu
- File:Handbuch der gesetze und verordnungen welche für die polizei-verwaltung im österreichischen kaiserstaate von 1740-1852 erschienen sind.pdf
- File:Pdf 266.pdf
- File:St. Patrick's Purgatory (Thomas Wright 1844).pdf
- File:Yanzhul Finance Fundamentals 1890.pdf
- File:Հայ ժողովրդական դիւցազնական վէպը.pdf
- File:Հայ վաճառականութիւնը Ռուսիայում.pdf
- File:Hermann Gundert-A Malayalam and English Dictionary 1872.pdf
- File:Հայբուսակ.pdf
- File:Germania 32 1887.pdf
- File:Johann Anton Güldenstädt, Julius von Klaproth. Dr. J.A. Güldenstädts Reisen nach Georgien und Imerethi.1815.pdf
- File:Johann Anton Güldenstädt, Reisen nach Georgien und Imerethi. 1815.pdf
- File:Julius von Klaproth. Travels in the Caucasus and Georgia. 1814.pdf
- File:Marie-Félicité Brosset. Rapports sur un voyage archéologique dans la Géorgie et dans l'Arménie en 1847-1848. 1851.pdf
- File:Peyssonnel (Charles, M. de). Geschichte der Unruhen in Persien und Georgien. 1755.pdf
- File:The Holy Bible Old Testament Bengali language (1805).pdf
- File:Visit of the Hon. Carl Schurz to Boston, March 1881.pdf
- File:Voyage in search of La Perouse (Stockdale).pdf
- File:Некоторые замечания на книгу Обозрение Российских владений за Кавказом (1840).pdf
- File:Marlinsky.pdf
- File:Achard - Le Journal d’une héritière, 1868.djvu
- File:Aicard - Mascarille, 1873.djvu
- File:Aicard - Molière à Shakspeare, 1879.djvu
- File:Alexandru Vlahuta - Iubire - Poezii 1888 - 1895.djvu
- File:An introduction to linear drawing.djvu
The first page contains lots of text written by Google and may not be on Commons as the text is copyrighted. -- Игорь Филиппов (talk) 08:17, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
- I removed the google pages from the pdf files and hide the old version. The rest are djvu file. Hopefully somebody can take care of them.
![4 File:Archives des sciences physiques et naturelles" (1846-1947.) (19131368434).jpg](#File:Archives_des_sciences_physiques_et_naturelles"_(1846-1947.)_(19131368434).jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_2.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Ballachulish_Church_1829.JPG){kind=link}
_–_MKS_Skarżysko-Kamienna_(kadr).JPG){kind=link}
_–_MKS_Skarżysko-Kamienna.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(19131368434).jpg){kind=link}
_(19131368434).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_-_2.jpg){kind=link}
_-_2.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Ballachulish_Church_1829.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Ballachulish_Church_1829.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_Ballachulish_Church_1829.JPG){kind=link}
_Ballachulish_Church_1829.JPG){kind=link}
_%E2%80%93_MKS_Skar%C5%BCysko-Kamienna_(kadr).JPG){kind=link}
_%E2%80%93_MKS_Skar%C5%BCysko-Kamienna_(kadr).JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_–_MKS_Skarżysko-Kamienna_(kadr).JPG){kind=link}
_–_MKS_Skarżysko-Kamienna_(kadr).JPG){kind=link}
_%E2%80%93_MKS_Skar%C5%BCysko-Kamienna.JPG){kind=link}
_%E2%80%93_MKS_Skar%C5%BCysko-Kamienna.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_–_MKS_Skarżysko-Kamienna.JPG){kind=link}
_–_MKS_Skarżysko-Kamienna.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
- I certainly agree that people should not upload files with Google material. I imagine I was notified on this because of the Carl Schurz file. I originally uploaded pages I had made copies of, but someone managed to replace them with the Google material, and the original pages were deleted. I don't have a problem with the deletion of "Visit of the Hon. Carl Schurz to Boston, March 1881.pdf" as all I need is a facsimile somewhere on the web I can link to, and it sounds like that is possible here. Obviously I would prefer it if the original pages could be restored, and certainly Commons should prevent Google material being uploaded in the future. Library Guy (talk) 16:41, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
- I don't see that you were notified. Anyway the problem in the file you have mentioned file fixed and you can use it. -- Geagea (talk) 03:08, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
- I certainly agree that people should not upload files with Google material. I imagine I was notified on this because of the Carl Schurz file. I originally uploaded pages I had made copies of, but someone managed to replace them with the Google material, and the original pages were deleted. I don't have a problem with the deletion of "Visit of the Hon. Carl Schurz to Boston, March 1881.pdf" as all I need is a facsimile somewhere on the web I can link to, and it sounds like that is possible here. Obviously I would prefer it if the original pages could be restored, and certainly Commons should prevent Google material being uploaded in the future. Library Guy (talk) 16:41, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
- Pardon, where in File:Marlinsky.pdf Google text? --Infovarius (talk) 22:36, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
- I already fixed this file, uploaded new version without the first page and hide the first version. All PDF files her already fixed. The djvu files still have to be fixed. -- Geagea (talk) 01:39, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you, Geagea, for your great job :) Something else that I would appreciate if someone else got a chance to do would be to delete the remaining first two pages of File:Հայ ժողովրդական դիւցազնական վէպը.pdf which contain the transliterated name, as those are not originally part of the book either. Chhers, Chaojoker (talk) 14:06, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
- Chaojoker, hopefully now it's ok. -- Geagea (talk) 01:05, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you, Geagea, for being so helpful :) Chaojoker (talk) 13:52, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
- Chaojoker, hopefully now it's ok. -- Geagea (talk) 01:05, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you, Geagea, for your great job :) Something else that I would appreciate if someone else got a chance to do would be to delete the remaining first two pages of File:Հայ ժողովրդական դիւցազնական վէպը.pdf which contain the transliterated name, as those are not originally part of the book either. Chhers, Chaojoker (talk) 14:06, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
- I already fixed this file, uploaded new version without the first page and hide the first version. All PDF files her already fixed. The djvu files still have to be fixed. -- Geagea (talk) 01:39, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
Weak oppose - I will admit I'm not exactly following nominators rational, so he may have a point, but I just don't understand it. Ultimately, just because Google decides to claim copyright since is scanned the books, doesn't mean it true. Just as when one of us scans an Pubic Domain image, it doesn't create a new copyright held by us. All of these books are Public Domain no matter what Google claims.--ARTEST4ECHO talk 19:51, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
'Deleted: Public Domain no matter what Google claims. Faithful repro doesn't create new copyright. Just a generic page added. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:59, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
According to the uploader's statement here (on en.wiki), the photographs are the property of their employer, the United Palace (see this for their status as employee). Since the uploader does not personally hold the copyright to these images, they need to go to OTRS to show formal permission to upload them, and a release from United Palace for them to be licensed accordingly. The images concerned are:
- File:UPTStock-10-Stage-EDIT(1).jpg
- File:UPTStock-02-CenterSeating-EDIT.jpg
- File:UPTStock-25-Stairs-Hor-EDIT.jpg
- File:UPTStock-28-Mezzanine-EDIT.jpg
File:Xavier Eikerenkoetter.JPGkept per ticket:2015072910018101 Natuur12 (talk) 14:48, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Beyond My Ken (talk) 16:43, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- For additional information, see this thread on en.wiki. Beyond My Ken (talk) 21:02, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
- I've added a additional photo, same situation. Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:29, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
- I will get permission to use the Xavier Eikerenkoetter file. However, it was discussed that we would not release the other images. I will get the United Palace to send an email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org stating that I can use Xavier's photo by today. - ksumagit1
- As I've told you before, you've already released the images under the CC-SA 4.0 license. Why should OTRS believe that you had permission to upload the Xavier photo and not the others? In my opinion, you were either working as the employee of United Palace, under their supervision, or you were not. If you were, then all the images should be kept, you should not get to pick and choose, because the license is, as it said when you uploaded them, the license is irrevocable. If you were not, then all the images should be deleted. You really aren't supposed to get a second bite of the apple, it goes entirely against the intended purpose of the OTRS procedure, which you and United Palace seem to want to use to your own ends. I would strenuously object to one of the images being kept while the others were deleted. Beyond My Ken (talk) 21:53, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
- I have brought this to the attention of OTRS here. Beyond My Ken (talk) 22:06, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
- Comment The Xavier Eikerenkoetter image is found on [1] and many other websites prior to this upload, it appears to be a promotional image.
- The "-10" image is in use [2] and so on. I suspect this series is as titled "stock photos" and probably not within the power of the uploader to license. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:36, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
- I think the uploader has never had the power to put up these images except as the agent of the copyright holder, United Palace and its various connected organizations (United Palace Theatre, United Palace House of Inspiration, and United Palace of Cultural Affairs), the question is that now that the need for explicit permission has been pointed out to them, can they now pick and choose which images to "permit" via OTRS, thus revoking the "irrevocable" upload license when they inadvertently had their employee upload without explicit permission. I don't think they do - they have to either permit all the images or none of them. Beyond My Ken (talk) 03:04, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello, see my below response that I placed in the "bite of the apple" thread. I did get a rep to send a declaration of consent for Xavier's photo. As for the other photos, I have explained the situation. I am not sure if you will still allow Xavier's picture to remain, but we're looking into using other interior photos for the United Palace and will make sure to get the declaration of consent for those photos.
"Hello, I was given permission to upload them, but that was before they were aware of the free licensing requirements and the need to send a declaration of consent, which states that if we release the photos, we give anyone the permission to modify the photo. The organization is protective of those particular 4 photos because we use them a lot on other promotional collateral and are not comfortable with people being able to modify and manipulate the image..." - ksumagit1
- Delete even the uploader has stated the the organization is no longer willing to give permission for upload. They should be deleted.--ARTEST4ECHO talk 19:55, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Yes, in other words they've changed their minds. We don't allow that, the license is "irrevocable". Beyond My Ken (talk) 21:27, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
- Comment - No the images never had proper license in the first place. The uploader requested that we wait for deletion, in order to give him a chance to get a ORTS email as the copyright holder was "receptive" to the idea. However, above (later) he says that he cannot get the email the authors have changed their minds and don't want to send the e-mail. While you are correct, the license is "irrevocable", the copyright holder hasn't released it at all yet.--ARTEST4ECHO talk 19:58, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
- The uploader is the employee of the copyright owners, so this still amounts to a second bite of the apple, He was working at their direction, he uploaded the photos, they got cold feet, and now they want to change their minds. We don't do that, that's what "irrevocable" means. Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:24, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, in other words they've changed their minds. We don't allow that, the license is "irrevocable". Beyond My Ken (talk) 21:27, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:43, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Not a free image, screenshot from the game Einimi (talk) 08:09, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- Sorry, game share by CC-license, so screenshots under this licence too. --Einimi (talk) 08:14, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- Einimi, please provide a link so the license can be verified. Green Giant (talk) 02:29, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
- This is screenshot from the game. There is no links. When you start the game you should accept CC-license. --Einimi (talk) 05:15, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete- per Commons:Licencing it is the uploaders responsibility to provide evidence that the licence is correct. As we only have Einimi word that the game "CC-licensed" then there is no evidence it is. Therefore the image should be deleted.--ARTEST4ECHO talk 20:08, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, neither en.wiki nor ru.wiki mentions, that the game is CC-licensed. If somebody can prove, that the game is CC-licensed, then the file can be restored. Taivo (talk) 11:38, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Mappa poco chiara e mancante delle tratte in costruzione e in progetto. Sostituita da File:Napoli - mappa metropolitana.png. Sono l'autore di entrambe. Friedrichstrasse (talk) 21:12, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
- Keep: SVG map, and therefore, not supersedeable by raster formats. If the map is outdated, just edit that with Inkscape, Adobe Illustrator, or any editor. --Amitie 10g (talk) 21:34, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
- If you want I can upload the svg version of the File:Napoli - mappa metropolitana.png and the problem will be solved.--Friedrichstrasse (talk) 22:15, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Please, upload the updated SVG version, ad delete the PNG instead. Demmo (talk) 09:58, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
- Done. Do you think I should delete the png version?--Friedrichstrasse (talk) 10:05, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Mappa poco chiara e mancante delle tratte in costruzione e in progetto. Sostituita da File:Napoli - mappa rete metropolitana.svg. Sono l'autore di entrambe. Friedrichstrasse (talk) 19:35, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
- Speedy keep: You provided exactly the same reason as the previous DR resolved as kept. Please provide a stronger reason or correct this. Still in use. --Amitie 10g (talk) 20:55, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
- No, I didn't. A new svg version has been uploaded, as the other users asked me.--Friedrichstrasse (talk) 10:27, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
Mappa poco chiara e mancante delle tratte in costruzione e in progetto. Sostituita da File:Napoli - mappa rete metropolitana.svg. Sono l'autore di entrambe. Friedrichstrasse (talk) 23:52, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
- Keep They're very different maps, and someone has edited this map since you have. There's enough space for both of them.--Prosfilaes (talk) 02:32, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Italiano: Mi pare di capire che una richiesta analoga sia già stata respinta (vedesi sopra). Non si potrebbe considerare, nelle pagine specifiche, il file che si chiede di cancellare come una presentazione dell'attuale tratta e il file "copia" come presentazione del progetto futuro? Devi considerare il fatto che sei autore di entrambi i file come un vantaggio, poiché devi basarti solo sul buon senso per decidere come differenziarli e non interpellando altri utenti. È un motivo in più per poterli gestire come preferisci.English: I understand that a similar request has already been rejected (is seen above). Do you might not consider, in the specific pages, the file that's required to delete as a presentation of the route and the "copy" file as a presentation of the future project? You have to consider the fact that you are the author of both files as an advantage, because you have to rely only on common sense to decide how to differentiate them and not consulting with others. It is one more reason to manage them as you like.--CortoFrancese (talk) 22:13, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
- Keep - Per COM:Redundant and Commons talk:Superseded images policy a new svg version of an image is not justification for deletion, only that addition of the template {{tl|Vector version available}] to the non-svg file.--ARTEST4ECHO talk 20:01, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
Kept, the old file has features, which the new one has not, so both files are in scope. Taivo (talk) 07:21, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
Images in the category are reproduction of coins that are or were use in Argentina. However, per Commons:Currency#Argentina and List of countries' copyright length banknotes and coins from Argentina less then 50 years old, i.e. created after December, 31 1964 are copyrighted. Therefore any image of coins which were designed after December 31, 1964 should be deleted. --Turkmenistan (talk) 01:17, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
Speedy delete - This clearly falls under Commons:Currency#Argentina (i.e. 
Not OK No exception for currency in the Argentine Copyright Law.) This should have been deleted as a copyright violation.--ARTEST4ECHO talk 20:04, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:36, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
