User talk:CortoFrancese

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, CortoFrancese!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 13:54, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

undue weight in Italian languages map

[edit]

You gave undue weight to minority languages in South Tyrol (here). We should not color areas, where a language is spoken by less than 50% of its inhabitants - otherwise the whole map would be full of stripes. Please revert the map. thanks.--Sajoch (talk) 08:00, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Another hint (in response to Pataviums requests): Nones is not considered a ladin language (neither by recent and elaborate scientific studies, nor politically recognised), and "ladin" is declared by only 21% of the population of the Val di Non. So there's no base to color that area in blue. Similarly are the dialects in Belluno south of Ampezzo/Livinallongo not considered ladin dialects. The province of Belluno enumerates dozens of municipalities, where "ladin" is recognised as a minority language. This political statement though says us nothing about what dialects are really spoken in those villages. Please have a look at following document [1] (in german "studi dialettometrici nel Trentino"): page 15 (map #3) shows the similarity of Fascian (ladin) with Nones (Nones is green like the rest of the province, thus a "normal" trentinian dialect), or page 17 (map #5) where Nones is similar to the italian in Bolzano or central Trentino, but far away from Fascian (blue). And for Belluno, look here (all yellow, not blue, and a bit green in Ampezzo and Livinallongo).--Sajoch (talk) 11:24, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Guarda, che questa non è una cartina, dove si indicano quali lingue sono "ufficialmente" riconosciute, altrimenti dovresti colorare il resto dell'Italia in un unico colore, siccome i dialetti sono generalmente "non riconosciuti". Inoltre in provincia di Bolzano (tutta) è riconosciuto sia il tedesco che l'italiano. E nelle valli ladine sono riconosciute il ladino, il tedesco e l'italiano - come vuoi colorarle? E inoltre il Noneso NON è riconosciuto da nessuna parte(!). Non puoi mischiare "dialeti parlati" con "dialetti riconiosciuti" con dati di censimenti, con minoranze... Nella stesura della cartina dovresti fare a meno della politica. Un buon consiglio: non dare retta a Patavium - sta facendo un simile edit-war confondendo i vari dati e sprovveduto di fonti ad hoc anche nella wiki tedesca ed inglese.--Sajoch (talk) 13:33, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

POV in a map

[edit]

Please read [2]. Thanks.--Sajoch (talk) 21:49, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Qui siamo su Commons, non su it.wiki!!! Un amministratore di it.wiki non ha "giurisdizione" su Commons. Le fonti accademiche che ho portato sono autorevoli e ne aggiungo altre, se desideri. Patavium ha portato zero (ZERO!) fonti a sostegno del proprio POV (se li controlli, vedrai, che danno invece ragione a me). Ti consiglio di non ascoltare colui, che chiede la falsificare delle mappe. Purtroppo sono bloccato su it.wiki, altrimenti lo segnalerei come UP. Se invece pensi, che sono io l'utente problematico, sei invitato a segnalarmi qui su Commons. Sono sicuro che qui su Commons le fonti accademiche hanno un valore cruciale. Saluti.--Sajoch (talk) 18:51, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please respect request for discussion!

[edit]

You again altered a map (File:Italian_languages.png) without discussing it on the images' talk page despite beeing asked to do so. Please revert it back, and discuss the changes by citing valid sources.--Sajoch (talk) 09:54, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Per favore...

[edit]

...non attribuirmi parole che non ho detto! Sulla Wiki italiana hai scritto "i due utenti hanno esplicitamente dichiarato di non volersi mettere d'accordo" [3]. La verità è tutt'altra: Patavium si è rifiutato di discutere con me su Commons (vedi qui), nonostante io abbia espicitamente richiesto di discutere la questione qui su Commons (vedi qui e poi qui). Ho sempre cercato il dialogo ed ancora più le fonti attendibili. Patavium sa molto bene che io non posso contribuire su it.wiki in quanto bloccato e sfrutta questa situazione iniqua per attacchi personali. Non posso nemmeno segnalarlo come UP. Comunque hai fatto molto bene a consigliare che si contatti la comunità di Commons.--Sajoch (talk) 21:27, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 17:57, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Fratelli Govoni.jpg

[edit]
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Fratelli Govoni.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Fratelli Govoni.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:15, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Massacro di Oradour-sur-Glane.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:05, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cattedrale Gallippoli.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:09, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mappa metropolitana di Napoli.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Friedrichstrasse (talk) 21:12, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mappa metropolitana di Napoli.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Friedrichstrasse (talk) 19:35, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mappa metropolitana di Napoli.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Friedrichstrasse (talk) 23:52, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Esteli Sheffield Society Logo.svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Josve05a (talk) 00:06, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Football Club Legnano logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DZwarrior1 (talk) 14:06, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Translation of jpeg image

[edit]

Hi CortoFrancese, you have translated this image. There is currently a request for translation in English. Would it be possible tell how you translated the jpeg image? Thanks --Ikonact (talk) 13:26, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Ikonact: , to translate the text in the image, I used 2 tools in particular:
  1. WhatTheFont, a useful tool for recognizing the font family of the text in an image;
  2. Adobe Photoshop, which I used to cover the original texts, redraw the parts of the map covered by the old texts and write the translated texts.
If you prefer not to use Photoshop and / or not to subscribe to Creative Cloud, I recommend Affinity Designer as an alternative: it looks like Photoshop for several features and you can use it as a free trial for 90 days with all the features active and without signing up for a subscription such as Creative Cloud.--CortoFrancese (talk) 22:26, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Nicola Palmieri.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Afeef (talk) 06:25, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Afeef, thank you for the monition. I received the image directly from the subject shown in the photograph, without any restrictions or express declaration of license of ownership, but for a free use according to my personal discretion. Given the need to express a condition of use on the platform, the license I have reported does not make sense and should be published without a license and for free use. Bye CortoFrancese (talk) 20:40, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Nicola Palmieri.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Afeef (talk) 19:25, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:EasternFrontWWIIcollage3.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

– Finnusertop (talkcontribs) 10:01, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:European Rugby Champions Cup Trophy.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PeeJay (talk) 15:06, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]