Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2015/06/01

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive June 1st, 2015
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not the original picture/uploader is not owner. Original picture Xochiztli (talk) 02:30, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Marked for speedy as a lower-resolution duplicate. Revent (talk) 02:37, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Closing as moot, speedied by Túrelio. Revent (talk) 06:46, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Its duplicate with File:Bartolomeo Cristofori.jpg C3r4 (talk) 09:38, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nominated for speedy deletion as a duplicate. C3r4, in the future you can use {{Duplicate}} for such cases instead of this process (identical files at the same or lower resolution are speedy candidates). Revent (talk) 09:59, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
OK, Revent, thank you for that information. --C3r4 (talk) 11:40, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Duplicate processing done. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 12:09, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama in Iran, All the dervative work of the architectures are copyrighted to the creator of the work..for more information please see this Commons FoP -Iran ...Captain......Tälk tö me.. 17:11, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted Jcb (talk) 12:16, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

توهین تمحکم 2.186.5.207 08:16, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept: Vandalism. --Amitie 10g (talk) 14:13, 1 June 2015 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/Commons:Deletion requests/File:Les Ours Sotball baseball Club (SBC) logo.png

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. — Racconish 📥 13:08, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Self-promotion and copyvio Thibaut120094 (talk) 13:18, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it is the new synagogue on the picture, it was built between 1890-1891. The old synagouge was boult in the 14th century 86.101.39.57 20:25, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. Why should this be a reason to delete the image? --Túrelio (talk) 20:29, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: speedy kept Denniss (talk) 20:41, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Файл носит политический подтекст. АР КРЬІМ является украинской территорией. 176.117.89.188 21:31, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

И? По российскому законодательству Крым является часть Российской Федерации, по украинскому - часть Украины, есть обе карты. Не вижу ничего политического в этом. Карта отражает реальность. Stasyan117 (talk) 22:51, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy kept: Vandalism. --Amitie 10g (talk) 01:30, 2 June 2015 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

watermarks GoogleMap so it's copyrighted Bogomolov.PL (talk) 10:13, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: just a copyright violation. JuTa 20:51, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

watermarks GoogleMap so it's copyrighted Bogomolov.PL (talk) 10:14, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: just a copyright violation. JuTa 20:50, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not my work AHMED XIV (talk) 13:01, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 18:44, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal unused file out of scope — Racconish 📥 15:28, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Didym; DR closed by Josve05a (talk) 21:45, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal unused file out of project scope — Racconish 📥 15:48, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Didym; DR closed by Josve05a (talk) 21:46, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Request of uploaded Deror avi (talk) 20:27, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Matanya; DR closed by Josve05a (talk) 21:48, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:EDUSE Self-promotion and COM:NOTSOCIAL AntanO 00:29, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Indeed, uploader has no edits to siwiki (where the other photo is used) other than to create their user page and add a photo. Revent (talk)

Deleted: INeverCry 00:08, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:EDUSE Self-promotion and COM:NOTSOCIAL AntanO 00:29, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Indeed, uploader has no edits to siwiki other than to create their user page and add this photo. Revent (talk)

Deleted: INeverCry 00:08, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Maliksaifee (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos, out of scope

Mjrmtg (talk) 01:04, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:05, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:07, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zimry Jazziel Lerma Nava (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused personal, out of scope

Mjrmtg (talk) 01:08, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image was uploaded by an account later blocked, and as it is circulating on the web, there is doubt whether it is actually the own work of the uploader as claimed. DAJF (talk) 01:37, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image was uploaded by an account later blocked, and as it is circulating on the web, there is doubt whether it is actually the own work of the uploader as claimed. DAJF (talk) 01:37, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files from eupv.org

[edit]

Source website states merely that it is 'copyleft', which is not sufficient for our purposes (as was pointed out to me when questioning this in IRC, CC-BY-NC-SA is a form of copyleft license). Describing these files as under the Free Art License is incorrect, as the source does not specify that license. Revent (talk) 01:30, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(Máquina traducido) Copyleft no es una "licencia", es una descripción de un "tipo" de la licencia, que pueden incluir restricciones que hacen que el contenido no se puede utilizar en los Comunes (como no permitir la reutilización comercial). Una declaración genérica de 'copyleft' no es lo suficientemente específico para nuestros propósitos. El material puede estar bajo varias licencias (que no es poco común), pero la declaración de licencia tiene que ser específico, y tiene que permitir que los trabajos derivados y reutilización comercial. Revent (talk) 09:47, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

rhiann aikalkaoa 210.5.79.8 01:55, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep DR appears to be gibberish (Google translate does not indicate it's in any language it knows), and the file itself appears to be fine. Revent (talk) 02:04, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy keep: Just vandalism, file widely in use. --Amitie 10g (talk) 02:12, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: INeverCry 00:09, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by MaxBioHazard as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: copyrighted browser logo. Bellow the COM:TOO, but is better to upload an SVG. Amitie 10g (talk) 02:15, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: INeverCry 00:15, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probable copyright violation. Video is on youtube under CC-BY, but is attributed in the description, and watermarked by, a different organization that that which uploaded it. No evidence that "Fundación de Investigaciones Marxistas" (who own www.fim.org.es) have released the video under a compatible license. Revent (talk) 02:34, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fundación de Investigaciones Marxistas is the cultural research foundation of the Communist Party of Spain (Partido Comunista de España, not a mickey mouse youtube account). If you read spanish: [2]. fim shares its headquarters ([3]) with the very same Communist Party of Spain (see [4]) and other close organizations such as United Left ([5]). Unless you provide evidence of copyvio from another site, I think the "PCE has permission" part is a fair assumption. Best regards.--Asqueladd (talk) 07:11, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
If it's a branch of the same organization, then it should indeed be fine... that was not apparent from the YouTube page, but I see that now in the eswiki article. No complaints if this is closed as keep on that basis. Revent (talk) 07:31, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. Whichever the resolution is, these other 3 files shall meet the same fate because they are carbon copy cases.
File:José Luis Ledesma 2014.jpg
File:José Antonio Piqueras 2014.jpg
File:Francisco Erice 2014.jpg
Best regards.--Asqueladd (talk) 08:19, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Per Asqueladd's. The Marxist Research Foundation is part of the Communist Party of Spain. --Discasto talk 21:59, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: INeverCry 00:15, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self nomination, duplicate of File:1982 Ford Falcon (XE) GL sedan (2014-11-23).jpg without crop. This version is in the file history. OSX II (talk) 03:44, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:10, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:47, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:47, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image, out of COM:SCOPE. I have questions about the advisability of keeping half-nude female child images. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:47, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:48, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:48, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image, out of COM:SCOPE. We don't need 20 images of this same child. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:48, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:48, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:49, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:49, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:49, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:49, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image, out of COM:SCOPE. I question the lack of clothing on this female child. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:50, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:50, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:50, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:51, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:51, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:51, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:52, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:52, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:10, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:52, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:10, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:52, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:10, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:52, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:10, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused duplicate of File:Bronze Buddha Eyes (4242431960).jpg. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:56, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:10, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a photograph of another image. The flickr user cannot license the image they rephotographed and as such this is a COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:58, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:10, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:COPYVIO. The photographer of the image is not able to license the Transformers characters depicted. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:01, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:10, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image of female more suited to Facebook or Model Mayhem. Out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:04, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The images were taken with a good quality and a professional photographer for a model, it is not a facebook profile picture. --The Photographer (talk) 11:19, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
How is this image useful? Bidgee (talk) 13:40, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Not social media is not a deletion rationale.
Useful is not a deletion rationale.
Any image that is not yet any article, is potentially useful. The usefulness of an image is subjective and therefore unlimited. In this case it is not a typical image of facebook profile, this is a picture taken professionally and professionally treated. --The Photographer (talk) 14:18, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nom. INeverCry 00:13, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image with words on top, out of COM:SCOPE. If people want to make Holiday cards from Commons images, they can but this isn't social media, no need for ready made cards. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:05, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Now In scope, if it is deleted because "this isn't social media", all in this category could be deleted too --The Photographer (talk) 11:22, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not social media is not a deletion rationale.
  • Unused is not a deletion rationale.
  • Words is not a deletion rationale.
  • Holiday cards is not a deletion rationale (I have uploaded several thousand, all are in scope).
  •  Keep please understand the DR and Scope texts before writing more bad nominations. Sysops need to behave better than this, that you are about to become a 'crat is a symptom of this project failing. -- (talk) 14:12, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Its funny because you are not only doing the same, commenting voter/nominator, also, your argument is "not comment" while you are commenting. --The Photographer (talk) 17:09, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
English Wikipedia policies and essays are not applicable to Commons. -- (talk) 16:00, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--The Photographer (talk) 19:53, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@The Photographer: Please read COM:INUSE and WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS.    FDMS  4    19:12, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a Wikipedia policy or guideline in Wikipedia English, It may contain opinions that are shared by few or no other editors; potential measure of how the community views this essay may be gained. Assuming in the unlikely event that is valid in Wikipedia in English, this would still be invalid in Commons. --The Photographer (talk) 19:21, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This file meets INUSE. -- (talk) 19:40, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nom. INeverCry 00:13, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image with words on top, out of COM:SCOPE. If people want to make Holiday cards from Commons images, they can but this isn't social media, no need for ready made cards. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:06, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image with words on top, out of COM:SCOPE. If people want to make Holiday cards from Commons images, they can but this isn't social media, no need for ready made cards. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:06, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image with words on top, out of COM:SCOPE. If people want to make Holiday cards from Commons images, they can but this isn't social media, no need for ready made cards. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:06, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image with words on top, out of COM:SCOPE. If people want to make Holiday cards from Commons images, they can but this isn't social media, no need for ready made cards. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:06, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal image, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:12, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The images were taken with a good quality and a professional photographer, it is not a facebook profile picture and of course, in scope --The Photographer (talk) 11:17, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image out of COM:SCOPE with half naked child in pool. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:12, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Profesional image in hight quality, now in scope. We need delete all images in Category:Nude_babies because you're feeling things to see these photos? --The Photographer (talk) 14:31, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image, out of COM:SCOPE and DW on the hoodie image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:14, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The images were taken with a good quality and a professional photographer for a model, this is not a facebook profile picture. --The Photographer (talk) 11:13, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image remains unused. I believe the quality is poor, and I also think it is out of scope because I cannot imagine how it could have any educational value. It belongs to a category with many images, some of which are educationally useful, but I think it should be cleaned up, and this image should be removed, in my opinion. Dontreader (talk) 04:14, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by AntanO as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Source link is not original owner, but sri lankan government and srilankan organizations as per displays on the image. As per sri lankan copyright law, art work is not free INeverCry 18:57, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Info Email sent to the SuSanA project contact to confirm the license on Flickr is supported by the artist or commissioning organization if a work for hire. -- (talk) 19:59, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The organisations who have commissioned this poster want it to be open access which is why it was uploaded to the SuSanA flickr database in the first place. I will try to track down someone responsible for it, to confirm by e-mail. Give me a few days. EvM-Susana (talk) 07:43, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Confirmed by email to OTRS. See ticket:2015060710012328 (restricted access). Green Giant (talk) 22:00, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cette sculpture « Les Braves » d'Anilore Bahon est toujours protégée par les droits d'auteur. De plus, il n'y a pas de liberté de panorama en France. VIGNERON (talk) 19:24, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:16, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing permission. Fry1989 eh? 19:55, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:15, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's a promotional picture from her album "Distance". http://www.mika-utada.com/page7115.html Christian Bolz (talk) 20:12, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:14, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing permission. Fry1989 eh? 20:18, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:13, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing permission. Fry1989 eh? 20:19, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:13, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing permission. Fry1989 eh? 20:19, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:13, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing permission. Fry1989 eh? 20:19, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:13, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing permission. Fry1989 eh? 20:19, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:13, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and low quality: deprecated fileformat, low-res/small, some unusual bond angles. And the key stereochemical detail is ambiguous (both H and CH3 are wedged, which is geometrically impossible). Have a bunch of Category:Levofloxacin that are stereochemically correct and higher image quality too. DMacks (talk) 20:38, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:12, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio. Fry1989 eh? 20:41, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:12, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 20:45, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:12, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cover of a newspaper, so copyright violation Shev123 (talk) 20:49, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:11, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing permission. Fry1989 eh? 20:56, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:11, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing permission. Fry1989 eh? 20:56, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:11, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing permission. Fry1989 eh? 20:57, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:11, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 21:22, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:10, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope? Josve05a (talk) 22:04, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:10, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source/license and author information of several images used in this collage is missing or is insufficient, compromising the whole file. See also Commons:Collages. Gunnex (talk) 23:02, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:08, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Ciaurlec (talk) 23:09, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Not very good quality, but same subject as Category:People with sunsets, with obvious potential educative uses: 105 out of 369 images are in use in Wikimedia projects.--Pere prlpz (talk) 18:32, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The facebook caption cite "GulfShoresBoatRental". For me it's an obvious case of advertising. --Ciaurlec (talk) 20:29, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I agree, but it should be easy to crop it, or just paint it with plain black. I tagged the image with {{Watermark}}.--Pere prlpz (talk) 21:29, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome to do it. Keep atrention to the copyright, because this shot it's yet publied on Facebook. --Ciaurlec (talk) 10:04, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Being watermaked is not a reason to delete. At least, it isn't in images like this one where watermark doesn't compromise usage.
And copyright issues, if present, might be another reason to delete, but rationale in this DR is "out of scope", not copyright. Do you want to add a new rationale about copyright?--Pere prlpz (talk) 11:19, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The image as it's now it's for me OUT OF SCOPE: it's probably an advertise taken from a facebook page. As i said you're free to modify it to rend it more usaful for commons purposes. And of course, you're free to verify if the copyright is ok. Even in a new RD if you prefere. --Ciaurlec (talk) 19:40, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: doubtful copyright status and barely within scope, no reason to keep Didym (talk) 00:07, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation (from http://portalsatc.com/site/interna.php?i_conteudo=19758&titulo=Terra+do+vinho+dAa+inAicio+a+Vindima+Goethe ) Scheridon (talk) 23:13, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:04, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Huaso (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Huaso / logs

Gunnex (talk) 23:35, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:03, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A series of images of a non-notable male, unused and more suited to social media: see also Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:20, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The images were taken with a good quality and a professional photographer for a model, it is not a facebook profile picture. --The Photographer (talk) 11:12, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The person being photographed changed his mind after publication. Paravena (talk) 04:22, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Class schedule. Might be outside of project scope. Mys_721tx (talk) 04:34, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Indeed, not in scope. Linked from a sandbox page on zhwiki, by an editor with less than ten edits there, that appears to be using the wiki as a host for a personal homepage. Revent (talk) 04:42, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope website logo. Mys_721tx (talk) 04:41, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope website logo. Mys_721tx (talk) 04:43, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:COPYVIO: Derivative work of painting and photographs on wall, not entirely own work of uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:45, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:COPYVIO: Derivative work of the mural, which is in California. No FOP for murals in the US. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:45, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no Freedom of Panorama for modern art installed after 1977 in the USA unless the artist died more than 70 years ago. That is not possible here. Leoboudv (talk) 04:49, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ahbcn (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:COPYVIOs. No indication of user's own work on these images, four cameras, etc. Uploader name seems to be acronym for location of images. Promotional uploads are out of COM:SCOPE.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:51, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I own this image, have decided I do not wish it to be used. Please remove. TaphMadison (talk) 04:58, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Free licenses are irrevocable. No valid reason for deletion. INeverCry 00:18, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously a reproduction from a printed photo or poster and thereby violating the copyright of the original photographer. -- Túrelio (talk) 06:24, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Heubg43 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Out-of-date. It doesn't include some municipalities like Madroñal. Good version: File:Salamanca - Mapa municipal.svg
Converted to DR by me, for procedural reasons as this image is on Commons since nearly 10 years. However, deletion-rationale seems to be correct. -- Túrelio (talk) 06:29, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Heubg43 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Out-of-date and unclear. It doesn't include some municipalities like Madroñal. Good version: File:Pereña de la Ribera.svg or File:Término municipal de Pereña de la Ribera.svg
Converted to DR by me, for procedural reasons as this image is on Commons since nearly 10 years. However, deletion-rationale seems to be correct. -- Túrelio (talk) 06:30, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Heubg43 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Out-of-date and unclear. It doesn't include some municipalities like Madroñal. Good version: File:Pereña de la Ribera.svg or File:Término municipal de Pereña de la Ribera.svg
Converted to DR by me, for procedural reasons as this image is on Commons since nearly 10 years. However, deletion-rationale seems to be correct. -- Túrelio (talk) 06:30, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Heubg43 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Out-of-date. It doesn't include some municipalities like Madroñal. Good version: File:Molinillo.SVG or File:Término municipal de Molinillo.svg
Converted to DR by me, for procedural reasons as this image is on Commons since nearly 10 years. However, deletion-rationale seems to be correct. -- Túrelio (talk) 06:30, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ellin Beltz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: "scanned directly from owner"... is not the same as "i the copyright holder"...
Converted to DR by me, for procedural reasons as this image is on Commons since 2008 and as a speedy had been declined 4 years ago. This case merits some discussion. However, evidence from the true photographer is indeed missing. -- Túrelio (talk) 06:34, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio: http://www.naitimp3.ru/song/polina_agureeva_kolechko/ Gamliel Fishkin 06:35, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Heddryin as Copyvio (copyvio) {{PD-textlogo}}? Jianhui67 talkcontribs 06:49, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, PD-textlogo I think... I just added it to the enwiki article about him, in the absence of a usable photo (the previous one was deleted as a copyvio). Revent (talk) 06:59, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 00:19, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission. Is this simple enough for PD-textlogo? Yann (talk) 07:56, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it is, with the shading and such. Revent (talk) 08:00, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:20, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image contain an artwork that are protected by copyright. Not COM:FOP, see COM:FOP#Ukraine. Wrong licensing. OTRS is missing. Andrey Korzun (talk) 08:05, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:20, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
کیفیت ندارد

2.186.5.207 08:15, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

دوست عزیز نور چلچراغ بهش خورده

-- Hamedvahid (talk) 10:37, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In use. INeverCry 00:20, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wallpaper composed of images which don't seem to be the uploaders's own work. Also probably out of scope. El Grafo (talk) 08:32, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:20, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i no longer wish for this photograph to be available for download 5.81.85.116 08:35, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In use. Free licenses are irrevocable. INeverCry 00:21, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I somehow doubt that the creator of this colloage took all those underwater images. El Grafo (talk) 08:38, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused userpage image. El Grafo (talk) 09:00, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I created it and I don't mind if it will be deleted since I do not use it anymore.--Wiki Gh! (talk) 16:23, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status. Uploaded locally at enwiki by en:user:Струјајое (@Струјајое: ) on 20.02.2013 (and later transferred to Commons) the photo was previously published (as indicated) via (somewhere) at http://joakimvujic.com/news.php#statueta2013 (under the link I could not found the photo) but it is available via http://joakimvujic.com/news_2013.php, a news entry from 14.02.2013 ("NAGRADA ME JE ISKRENO OBRADOVALA"), showing the photo in original frame (cropped by uploader) with identical exif via http://joakimvujic.com/slike/aktuelnosti/statueta2013mil.jpg.

The available exif indicates to a work by "MILOS MILIVOJEVIC" which does not fit with uploader's name "Zoran Miljković Joe". http://joakimvujic.com/ itself does not have (so far I could check) a copyright notice, so all works published there are presumable copyrighted.

Permission from "MILOS MILIVOJEVIC" and/or further details needed. Uploader related: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kragujevac001.jpg. Gunnex (talk) 09:31, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Scope — Racconish 📥 09:32, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. — Racconish 📥 09:42, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status and unlikely own work. Uploaded in 2009 by Струјајое (talk · contributions · Statistics) (who already "suffered" several Flickr bad use copyright issues) the photo was previously published via (example) http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showpost.php?p=29888428&postcount=88 (2008, by "Kawasaki KG") = http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3232/3138376822_8e49fbb479_o.jpg (last modified: 2008). Flinfo fails (not found), per https://www.flickr.com/photo.gne?id=3138376822 the photo appears to be set to private, so no license info can be retrieved. Note that the upload is cropped hiding a watermark. Gunnex (talk) 10:41, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no description, I can not categorize it, out of scope -- Christian Ferrer 11:09, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Garytheyim (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted material (Flyer, album cover, etc.). We need a written permission from the copyright holder (presumably the record label?). See COM:OTRS for details.

El Grafo (talk) 11:12, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Msdkamran (talk · contribs)

[edit]

It seems like all these images are ©amutiya. We need a written permission. See COM:OTRS for help.

El Grafo (talk) 11:24, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Msdkamran

[edit]

It seems like all these images are ©amutiya. We need a written permission. See COM:OTRS for help. Msdkamran (talk) 12:14, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Msdkamran

[edit]

It seems like all these images are ©amutiya. We need a written permission. See COM:OTRS for help. Msdkamran (talk) 12:08, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of a German nazi, claimed to be an official work of the German government. But contrary to the claim, it's very unclear who the actual photographer is, the linked source page says the photo is "courtesy of" someone. And even if the photographer was working for the German government, that wouldn't make every photograph he took an official work in the legal sense - unlike works of the US federal government; German laws are markedly different. The photo therefore should be deleted per the precautionary principle. Rosenzweig τ 11:37, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Струјајое. Uploaded in 2010 the photo (even part of a collage) was previously published via (example) official site http://www.kragujevac.rs/Maps-184-2 ( © City of Kragujevac ) = http://www.kragujevac.rs/images/bg/pozadine/Znamenitosti_grada_Kragujevca.jpg (last modified: 2009). Gunnex (talk) 11:40, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

orphaned file // no educational content Kopiersperre (talk) 11:48, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality gif, better alternative present Kopiersperre (talk) 11:51, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status and unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Струјајое. Previously published at http://www.joakimvujic.com/program_archive_cir.php ("СЕДАМ", dated with 2005, per Google +/- 2008) = http://www.joakimvujic.com/slike/repertoar/sedam3.jpg, the photo carries a photographer credit which does not match uploader's name "Zoran Miljković Joe". Permission needed. Gunnex (talk) 12:05, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Stas1995 as Speedy (db) and the most recent rationale was: out of scope-too bad quality Amitie 10g (talk) 12:20, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect file, see [Italian 7 Regions Party.png] I am the author, sorry. Robertiki (talk) 12:41, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 12:43, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status and unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing exif, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Струјајое (serial copyright violator). This heavy photoshopped (and cropped) photo was previously published via (example) http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showpost.php?p=36773086&postcount=304 (05.2009, by "kasina") = http://i303.photobucket.com/albums/nn125/mjevrosima/kg211.jpg~original. Historical photos may be in public domain but relevant info must be provided. Gunnex (talk) 12:51, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status. Uploaded by serial copyright violator Струјајое (talk · contributions · Statistics) in 2010 this small size/no exif photo is quite similar to what was previously published via http://www.panoramio.com/photo/5400949 (2007, © by "urbokg"). Despite a hole (which appears to be photoshopped by uploader) I can't register any differences (even the state of vegetation located at the building and of the tree(s) at the end of the street appears to be identical). Note that per (example) Commons:Deletion requests/File:City-of-KragujevacJoe.jpg the uploader is able to heavy photoshop/manipulate files. Gunnex (talk) 13:10, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

HelthAsyst declare in ticket:2015060110011134 that they gave no permission for free license for this logo and ask for its deletion. Please, decide whether it qualifies as {{PD-textlogo}} or not. I have no opinion in this matter. Ankry (talk) 13:11, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as appears to meet the criteria of pd-textlogo. --Mdann52talk to me! 15:44, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 00:25, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 11:37, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:10, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work [6] Thibaut120094 (talk) 13:27, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotion — Racconish 📥 13:42, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Chriusha (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons:Derivative works from commercial packaging.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:58, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I uploaded new versions with eliminated graphic in discussion. Rest is simple text. Original version may be deleted. --Хрюша ?? 12:37, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have hidden the versions with the possibly unfree logo/label. --Túrelio (talk) 08:31, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 00:26, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:02, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused screenshot of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:04, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:08, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:08, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:09, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Brian cyprian dalmeida (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused out of focus photos.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:10, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Epja N 3 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shunshine Always (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shunshine Always (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely copyright violations given the low resolutions, missing metadata, and the fact that all of the user's other uploads have been blatant copyright violations with false authorship claims.

LX (talk, contribs) 17:45, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:05, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shunshine Always (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Questionable authorship claims based on the low resolution, missing metadata, and the uploader's history. Possibly screenshots from a video or television broadcast (the height being typical for that, while the width may have been selected to crop out channel logos or watermarks).

LX (talk, contribs) 11:17, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Shunshine Always (talk · contribs)

[edit]

...and instead of commenting on the existing deletion nomination, Shunshine Always continues to charge ahead with more low-resolution images without metadata.

LX (talk, contribs) 07:15, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:29, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused advertisement of company of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi EugeneZelenko, could you explain a little more why you think that this is a « private photo album » photo? VIGNERON (talk) 07:43, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ohleesmascots (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused advertisement of company of questionable notability.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ohleesmascots (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons:Derivative works from mascots.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy per nomination --Krd 15:02, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Diamante.O.F.C (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wiki Yukito 2015 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Commons:Freedom of panorama for 2D works in Australia. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have been advised it does not meet copyright requirements No Commons:Freedom of panorama for 2D works in Australia. by EugeneZelenko 14:32, 1 June 2015 (UTC) Wheres.dot (talk) 01:52, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Book cover (see https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?products_id=45080&osCsid=). No evidence that it has been released under a compatible free license.by Nova Scientific Publishers. Ahecht (talk) 14:44, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal art work, not used, no description, useless title, out of scope. Yann (talk) 14:56, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. — Racconish 📥 14:56, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per num. -- Geagea (talk) 00:22, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal art work, uncertain copyright, not used, out of scope. Yann (talk) 14:59, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 1Veertje as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: user has a history of uploading copyright protected images of Babboe, EXIF ddata is missing Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:07, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal art work, not used, no description, useless title, out of scope. Yann (talk) 15:08, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal art work, not used, no description, useless title, out of scope. Yann (talk) 15:09, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal file out of scope. — Racconish 📥 15:09, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal art work, not used, no description, useless title, out of scope. Yann (talk) 15:10, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete - I see no educational purpose. If this was clip art associated with a movie, book, video game, company, etc I would be inclined to keep it but this just looks like someone's personal art project. Tiptoety talk 17:18, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW. No permission from painter. Yann (talk) 15:13, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope MMFE (talk) 15:14, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete - The title suggests this is just someone playing around with their camera for the first time. I see no useful educational purpose for this file. Half a dash board and a blurry street does not fall within Commons' scope. Tiptoety talk 17:14, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Out of scope. -- Geagea (talk) 00:24, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture collection must collect from local picture from Commons, please upload first every picture to Commons and then collect it from those. Please take a look at File:Collage Rome.jpg as an example how to do it. See Commons:Collages for details. Motopark (talk) 15:15, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture collection must collect from local picture from Commons, please upload first every picture to Commons and then collect it from those. Please take a look at File:Collage Rome.jpg as an example how to do it. See Commons:Collages for details. Motopark (talk) 15:16, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture collection must collect from local picture from Commons, please upload first every picture to Commons and then collect it from those. Please take a look at File:Collage Rome.jpg as an example how to do it. See Commons:Collages for details. Motopark (talk) 15:17, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture collection must collect from local picture from Commons, please upload first every picture to Commons and then collect it from those. Please take a look at File:Collage Rome.jpg as an example how to do it. See Commons:Collages for details. Motopark (talk) 15:17, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal unused file out of project scope. — Racconish 📥 15:17, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copied from internet [7] — Racconish 📥 15:22, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal unused file out of scope — Racconish 📥 15:27, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn : Now used. — Racconish 📥 11:58, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Personal image with watermark Happy smile ! verysmall image (scan of computer image ?) ; Dubious notability ; Use in a promotional article with phone numbers and e-mail. --Civa (talk) 15:51, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Has no contextual significance in Commons. Random upload by random user seeking attention IndianBio (talk) 16:04, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 01krish (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE as unused promotional images of a non-notable person (see w:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rohit Singh and subsequent deletions and protections at w:Rohit Singh, w:Rohit Singh Boxer, w:Rohit Singh (Boxer), w:Rohit Singh (boxer), and probably others I'm forgetting). Also see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Krishneel01. —Cryptic (talk) 17:42, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:26, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All of these -- both the three single images and the montage are all claimed to be "own work". That seems unlikely as the subject is the uploader and they are not selfies. Also, aside from a self-promoting gallery and user page, both deleted, these are the only contributions of this new user. While we do allow active contributors a limited number of images of themselves for their user page, "active" and "contributor" have to come first -- Commons is not Facebook.

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:22, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:23, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

nonfree, false license Staszek Lem (talk) 18:44, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete Agreed. The description says "Kate Lewis / ITP images" and "Marsala Magazine". That is certainly not the "own work" of the uploader as claimed and very unlikely to be freely licensed. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:54, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:22, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Raymond Delamarre is dead in 1986. No FoP in France. 90.43.158.171 19:13, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:19, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Raymond Delamarre is dead in 1986. No FoP in France. 90.43.158.171 19:13, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:17, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality, out of scope MMFE (talk) 16:11, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Could you explain more why not? --The Photographer (talk) 23:33, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I actually had linked the article here above. It's about sound, not about "image sensor noise". - Takeaway (talk) 23:35, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thanks, now in scope. --The Photographer (talk) 11:40, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Seems like Wikimedia needs to retain every attempt at "artistic" photography. - Takeaway (talk) 12:17, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Wikimedia needs to retain every attempt in Project Servers instead of paying users to do the work that the community can do --The Photographer (talk) 23:57, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Which users are actually paid? And should Wikimedia be an image depository for every wannabe artist? There seem to be better websites especially for that out there. - Takeaway (talk) 17:40, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Answering off-topic: Of course yes, if the artist is relevant like picasso, need to be here --The Photographer (talk) 18:28, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Is the file here in question made by someone like Picasso? I don't think so. So why do you want to keep it? - Takeaway (talk) 18:33, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
If you think that this image is art, please add the category, however, I dont think so. --The Photographer (talk) 19:04, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I only think that it is trying to be artistic and that keeping such a blurry image as an example of image noise doesn't add much, if any, valuable content whatsoever to wikimedia. There are much better files in that category that already illustrate the effect of image noise with increased ISO. - Takeaway (talk) 19:22, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pure advertisement (see filedesc) Achim (talk) 17:02, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I just removed my additional company info. I just have the logo now. -JS — Preceding unsigned comment added by JessicaSej (talk • contribs) 17:06 1 June 2015 (UTC)
Thank you, Jessica, so I do  I withdraw my nomination this DR. --Achim (talk) 18:22, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 00:30, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bruno Felipe S. Souza (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely/demonstrably false authorship claims based on previous publications, the low/inconsistent resolutions and missing/inconsistent metadata.

LX (talk, contribs) 17:26, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per num. thanks LX for the hard work. -- Geagea (talk) 00:31, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Bruno Felipe S. Souza (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Instead of commenting on the previous deletion discussion, the uploader continued to charge ahead with yet more uploads, once again with unlikely/demonstrably false authorship claims. Only five of the photos have camera metadata; all five of those were taken with different cameras.

LX (talk, contribs) 02:24, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per num. thanks again LX. -- Geagea (talk) 02:50, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Regardless of the date it was taken, no evidence that this photo was first published in Iran more than 30 years ago is apparent. Anders Feder (talk) 17:33, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Regardless of the date it was taken, no evidence that this photo was first published in Iran more than 30 years ago is apparent. Also, the watermark is inappropriate. Anders Feder (talk) 17:34, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Regardless of the date it was taken, no evidence that this photo was first published in Iran more than 30 years ago is apparent. Also, the watermark is inappropriate. Anders Feder (talk) 17:35, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Regardless of the date it was taken, no evidence that this photo was first published in Iran more than 30 years ago is apparent. Also, the watermark is inappropriate. Anders Feder (talk) 17:35, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Regardless of the date it was taken, no evidence that this photo was first published in Iran more than 30 years ago is apparent. Also, the watermark is inappropriate. Anders Feder (talk) 17:35, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Regardless of the date it was taken, no evidence that this photo was first published in Iran more than 30 years ago is apparent. Also, the watermark is inappropriate. Anders Feder (talk) 17:36, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status. Uploaded locally at enwiki in 03.2007 by en:User:Dushan wideway (= "Dušan Jovanović", who at this time already "suffered" several deletions) the photo is a cropped version of previously published via (small res) https://www.flickr.com/photos/johnny_kgc2/256446969/ (09.2006, © by "Johnny_kgc #2", which may have reduced file size in the meantime). Gunnex (talk) 17:36, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Regardless of the date it was taken, no evidence that this photo was first published in Iran more than 30 years ago is apparent. Also, the watermark is inappropriate. Anders Feder (talk) 17:36, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Regardless of the date it was taken, no evidence that this photo was first published in Iran more than 30 years ago is apparent. Also, the watermark is inappropriate. Anders Feder (talk) 17:36, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Krishneel01 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE as unused promotional images of a non-notable person (see w:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rohit Singh and subsequent deletions and protections at w:Rohit Singh, w:Rohit Singh Boxer, w:Rohit Singh (Boxer), w:Rohit Singh (boxer), and probably others I'm forgetting). Also see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by 01krish.

There's rather a lot of them.

(I think that's all of them.) —Cryptic (talk) 16:59, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:34, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Regardless of the date it was taken, no evidence that this photo was first published in Iran more than 30 years ago is apparent. Anders Feder (talk) 17:37, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Regardless of the date it was taken, no evidence that this photo was first published in Iran more than 30 years ago is apparent. Contains a watermark ("Magnum Photos") suggesting the photo is not even Iranian. Anders Feder (talk) 17:40, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Regardless of the date it was taken, no evidence that this photo was first published in Iran more than 30 years ago is apparent. Anders Feder (talk) 17:41, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Regardless of the date it was taken, no evidence that this photo was first published in Iran more than 30 years ago is apparent. Anders Feder (talk) 17:41, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Regardless of the date it was taken, no evidence that this photo was first published in Iran more than 30 years ago is apparent. Anders Feder (talk) 17:42, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Regardless of the date it was taken, no evidence that this photo was first published in Iran more than 30 years ago is apparent. Anders Feder (talk) 17:47, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Regardless of the date it was taken, no evidence that this photo was first published in Iran more than 30 years ago is apparent. Anders Feder (talk) 17:48, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment It is widely used on the Internet and looks like an B/W press photo scanned from a newspaper - very likely a newspaper contemporary to the facts. Probably the pages using it could confirm it, but they are in languages I can't read.--Pere prlpz (talk) 18:52, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: non-free sculpture on the left. Eleassar (t/p) 17:55, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All images contain an artwork that are protected by copyright. Not COM:FOP, see COM:FOP#Russia. Wrong licensing. OTRS is missing.

Andrey Korzun (talk) 18:19, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader added the mention "© DR" on fr:Special:Permalink/115576755 which means "Rights reserved" in French and that is an orphan work (see fr:Droits réservés). So if we don't know who the author is, we can't keep this image here. Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:32, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: INeverCry 00:37, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Didym (talk) 18:46, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep According to http://collections.mcny.org/Collection/Mrs.-WIlliam-S.-Smith-(Abigail-Adams)-24UAKVA6J3Y.html it is a ca. 1856 engraving derived from a previous painting. Therefore, obviously in the public domain. We should add a PD-art template.--Pere prlpz (talk) 18:44, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: INeverCry 00:37, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

LOGO, can't be own and free Bilderling (talk) 18:51, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: INeverCry 00:37, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Exorix Adfjk (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlikely to be own work

Didym (talk) 18:53, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Question Why are they unlikely to be own works?--Pere prlpz (talk) 18:37, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just have a look at this. --Didym (talk) 02:47, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Braveironhide (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlikely to be own work

Didym (talk) 19:07, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All images contain an artwork that are protected by copyright. Not COM:FOP, see COM:FOP#Russia. Wrong licensing. OTRS is missing.

Andrey Korzun (talk) 19:07, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Question 2: Do we know whether the copyright for certain monuments have been transferred to the Russian government? If the monument's copyright is now owned by the Russian government, then perhaps a license from Kremlin.ru or RIA Novosti is sufficient to license both the monument and the photograph. --Closeapple (talk) 05:28, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
(Q1) Yes, we generally track deletions by year of copyright expiration, if known, and by reason -- when the Russian law changed with respect to architecture, the undeletion of files was massive.
(Q2) I have seen a lot of Russian FOP cases and I have never seen a case where anyone thought that the artist had transferred the copyright to the government. Also, the two templates cover image copyrights -- even if the Russian government did, for some reason, own the copyrights to the art, the two press offices would certainly not have the authority to license them. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:58, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
First I would like to know, what is FOP ???
Second I would like to read a rationale for deletion of File:MAMoskauAstronautenDM.jpg, because of my curiousness.
Afterwards we can discuss, although deletion of the photo doesn't derange me. Greetings --Ziegler175 (talk) 10:47, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
FOP = Freedom of panorama, see Commons:Freedom of panorama. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 12:43, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Basically, the monument in your image, like all the other monuments in this DR, has a copyright, which is owned by the creator of the monument. Your photograph is a derivative work and therefore infringes on that copyright. It cannot be kept on Commons without a license from the creator or his heirs. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:50, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Ahh - thank you very much, deletion then is ok! --Ziegler175 (talk) 07:26, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status. Uploaded by Струјајое (talk · contributions · Statistics) in 04.2010 and taken - as indicated - from http://www.kragujevac.rs/Plan_rada_Saveta_za_bezbednost-43-1-1974 (which is © City of Kragujevac, all rights reserved), based on (as indicated) uploader's comment(s) at sr.wikinews.org but which were (so far I could see/understand) not further processed in a verifiable OTRS connection. Permission via COM:OTRS from kragujevac.rs (= official site of Serbian city Kragujevac) needed. Gunnex (talk) 19:08, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nominating also (per above: same uploader/source - missing permission)

Gunnex (talk) 19:44, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Gunnex as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: cvopyvio (uploaded locally at enwiki in 2007 by a blocked sock) via (example) http://www.balkanforum.info/f20/kragujevac-stadt-herzen-serbiens-1378/index14.html#post311183 (2006, by "jugo-jebe-dugo") = http://i105.photobucket.com/albums/m235/Vlastimir/04.jpg or grabbed from internet Didym (talk) 19:12, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Btw, similar problem encountered with File:Kragujevac - Gradska Tržnica.jpg, uploaded by this user locally at enwiki in 09.2007 but previously published (see above) via http://www.balkanforum.info/f20/kragujevac-stadt-herzen-serbiens-1378/index14.html#post311183 (2006, by "jugo-jebe-dugo") or http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showpost.php?p=10699361&postcount=6 (2006, by "Rascian") = (for both) http://i105.photobucket.com/albums/m235/Vlastimir/83V.jpg~original (last modified: 2006). I have my doubts that the photobucket user "Vlastimir" is the copyright holder for both files. They may be grabbed originally somewhere from (e.g.) Flickr. Gunnex (talk) 20:24, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted characters, no FOP in Japan. Thibaut120094 (talk) 20:03, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tokumeigakarinoaoshima (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No FOP in Japan.

Thibaut120094 (talk) 20:07, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Many uses, all over the internet: dpa. OTRS permission needed. 77.7.13.230 21:23, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Upload help en-gb pages

[edit]

I made a stupid mistake, I forgot to change the language before translate so could pleas delete:

tks ---- RTA 22:11, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status and unlikely to be own work: Uploaded by enwiki user Carlosr chill locally at enwiki on 08.04.2007 (and later transferred to Commons) this photo was previously published via https://www.flickr.com/photos/carreon/443080734/ (02.04.2007, © by "Ricardo Carreon", identical exif, higher res available). See also en:User talk:Carlosr chill#Great image and similar copyvio issues. Permission from "Ricardo Carreon" needed.

 Info: Affected montages: File:Ciudad de México Distrito Federal.png + File:Mexico City Collage.png + File:ZMVM.jpg (will receive separated DRs). Gunnex (talk) 22:54, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Info: See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Reforma b1.jpg. Gunnex (talk) 23:14, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status and unlikely to be own work: Uploaded by enwiki user Carlosr chill locally at enwiki on 08.04.2007 (and later transferred to Commons) this photo (photoshopped) was previously published via http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showthread.php?t=127889 (2006, © by "arkhagello") = http://img338.imageshack.us/img338/1457/airskylineyj3.jpg . See also en:User talk:Carlosr chill#Great image and similar copyvio issues. Permission from "arkhagello" needed.

Nominating also:

derivated work by @Haakon K:

 Info: Uploader related: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Santa feconj Mexico City.jpg Gunnex (talk) 23:12, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Questionable authorship claims. It seems unlikely that this photo was created by the person depicted in the photo. Both hands of the subject are visible, and there is nothing in the metadata indicating that it was taken using a timer. It is a common misunderstanding for people to believe that they are the authors and/or copyright holders of any photographs that they appear in. Such a misunderstanding appears likely in this case, and was not ruled out as part of the OTRS process. LX (talk, contribs) 23:13, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The photo I uploaded was sent me, by email, by the only copyright holder who is the subject in the image too. The photo was taken by one of the collaborators of Daniele Radini Tedeschi using Daniele's camera and under his request. Nobody, except Daniele Radini Tedeschi, may claim the rights about this picture in internet.--Ugo Bongarzoni (talk) 15:50, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
So it seems the file description is indeed based on a couple of misunderstandings. Hopefully I can help clarify things.
The author of a photograph is always the person who creates the photograph, not the person requesting or appearing in the photo (so author=Daniele Radini Tedeschi in the file description is factually incorrect). The author of a photograph is also normally the copyright holder, unless the photo is a work made for hire (under contract or employment) or the copyright was transferred in writing.
So what's needed is the contract stating that the photograph is a work made for hire, proof of employment, or written copyright transfer agreement, whichever applies, sent to OTRS. If none of those documents exist, the photographer is still the copyright holder, and then that's the person whose permission is needed. The author= section of the file description also needs to be corrected. LX (talk, contribs) 16:09, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I think what you say is formally and legally correct but terribly unreal. Daniele Radini Tedeschi needs really the permission from his friend or his girlfriend to release the permission to pubblish a photo he asked him or her to take with his camera? --94.167.96.137 23:02, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, that's right. Appearing in a photo does not make one the author or copyright holder of that photo, and only the copyright holder can issue a valid copyright license. LX (talk, contribs) 05:46, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I'll made the appropriate changes. Since it you are an expert, could you tell me if that you wrote also applies to pictures of the coverbook of art catalogs published in a vernissage? I explain: If I click the photo to a coverbook of an art catalog that I own, might I upload it on Wikimedia Commons without asking any permission to anyone ?--94.167.0.107 12:41, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's a bit hard to answer without some clarifications. Since it's not really the topic here, would you mind re-posting the question at Commons:Help desk? Cheers, LX (talk, contribs) 16:40, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Being a copyright question I posted it here Greetings--94.163.151.146 15:21, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:48, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Regardless of the date it was taken, no evidence that this photo was first published in Iran more than 30 years ago is apparent. Also, the watermark is inappropriate. Anders Feder (talk) 17:36, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have uploaded the permission of this photo on the main page. Please visit it. Rahpouyan110 (talk)9:36, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Since we can't ascertain who the author is, even if the photo was published in Iran at some point, we can't be certain that it was not published outside Iran first/simultaneously (in which case PD-Iran does not apply). Khomeini brought many international journalists aboard his plane and it is quite possible they could have published this photo within the period of time that would cause it to fall under regular copyright terms, or even taken it themselves (like this one watermarked to "Getty Images/Afp/Gabriel Duval").--Anders Feder (talk) 09:01, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Look at this photo. If you look carefully, then you will see that it has been published on 1 February 1979 on the Ettela'at newspaper. It's important that it publeshed in Iran more that 30 years ago.Rahpouyan110 (talk) 10:25, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nope.--Anders Feder (talk) 15:14, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nope?! Are you playing here?! Here is an encyclopedia. What dose "nope" mean here? I am telling you that uploaded photos has been published in different newspapers more than 30 years ago in Iran(like Ettela'at newspaper). I am Iranian and I know these photos are from 1979. Then you say: "Nope" !!! Rahpouyan110 (talk) 04:22, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
So what?--Anders Feder (talk) 05:12, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
So these photos that have been published in Iranian newspapers can be uploaded under (PD-Iran) licence. The above photo has been published exactly in the same day it was taken and can not be published in another country before. Rahpouyan110 (talk) 05:18, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It's irrelevant whether it was published in Iran "exactly in the same day", just as it is irrelevant whether you are Iranian or Eskimo. What is relevant is what evidence there is that photo was not taken by one of the many foreign photographers on board the plane and that the photo was not published internationally within 30 days. Your saying "It's important that it publeshed in Iran more that 30 years ago" doesn't change the copyright law.--Anders Feder (talk) 11:00, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Published in 1979, more than 30 years ago. PD in Iran Ezarateesteban 22:26, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by JuTa as no license (No license since). The description suggests it is from World War I i.e. it is PD in the US, so I think it might need a wider discussion. Green Giant (talk) 17:54, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: as above. Also PD-1923. Yann (talk) 07:42, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Martin H. as no source (No source since): However source appears to be in the Date field of the template. Converting to DN for consensus. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:39, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this photograph is actually by de:Franz Joseph Gebhardt (and the book title given matches that) then it's not in the public domain until 2016, since he died in March of 1945. Revent (talk) 23:53, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: FJ Gebhardt is not a photographer but a cleric in high position. I really doubt he took this photo. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:34, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I think this poses a possible COM:IDENT issue. Whilst we don't have country specific requirements for Malaysia, I believe it might be best to err on the side of caution in this case given the nature of the image. russavia (talk) 20:13, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep it. It was taken in a public place. No consent required for taking the photo. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 19:00, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no consensus to delete FASTILY 22:45, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image was nominated for deletion before. I re-nominate because while it was taken in a public place, i think the gesture is a clear "Do not photograph us!" message. That the photographer took the photo anyway is his business, but then uploading it to Wikimedia is against the guidelines laid out in Photographs of identifiable people in my eyes. The administrator who decided to keep the image last time (Fastily) is no longer an active member, so i couldn't contact him as would usually be required.. D-M (talk) 11:50, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Arguably additional scrutiny as the photographed persons are homeless children, so it might be surmised that even if they found out and were in dissent of their photos being used in the Wikipedia, they'd lack the knowledge and ressources to have it taken down. --D-M (talk) 11:54, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This gesture is NOT "Do not photograph us!". You got it wrong. You need re-education in gestures. The gesture means "We do not care!" --Kotoviski (talk) 16:26, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that the gesture doesn't not mean "Do not photograph us". Subjects are actually posing by choosing the gesture they prefer to appear in the image.--Pere prlpz (talk) 19:00, 2 June 2015 (UTC)  Keep--Pere prlpz (talk) 17:24, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep, public place, persons in photo seem to be posing for the photo rather than protesting being photographed, and today, +5 years after the creation of the photo, IDENT is not an issue IMO. --Pitke (talk) 13:27, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per above. Public place, no permission required. Also, they are posing for the picture, I can't see any go away gesture. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:38, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]