Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2015/05/27
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
Files uploaded by KMBI (Kabalikat para sa Maunlad na Buhay Incorporated) (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable
- File:KMBI PROFILE.pdf
- File:KMBI-Timeline WEB.png
- File:KMBI 2002-2005 balance sheet.png
- File:KMBI-Timeline-07.png
- File:KMBI-Timeline-05.png
- File:KMBI-Timeline-04.png
- File:KMBI-Timeline-02.png
- File:KMBI-Timeline-01.png
- File:KMBI-Timeline-03.png
Motopark (talk) 04:06, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:00, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope personal image that was uploaded by the Panoramio bot. De728631 (talk) 01:06, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: personal image shizhao (talk) 06:36, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
derivative work 37.5.2.109 08:49, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 08:51, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
This file has the location of the photo in its metadata Nilspeed26 (talk) 07:57, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 10:50, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
This photo unknowingly was posted with the location on the metadata Nilspeed26 (talk) 07:58, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 10:50, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Copyvio from https://twitter.com/ehsanadil007 — Racconish 📥 17:01, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Thibaut120094 (talk) 17:25, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Lautrec ambassadeurs, aristide bruant (poster) 1892.jpg
{{speedydelete|1=upload by mistake}} MaxM02 (talk) 14:32, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 21:10, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Publicity shot widely circulating on the web. Unlikely to be the own work of the uploader as claimed. DAJF (talk) 09:28, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:08, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hichim Amzil (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low resolution, no EXIF, possibly copyvio. See COM:L and for some of them also COM:SCOPE.
- File:الصور.jpeg
- File:الكهف.jpeg
- File:الدعاء الذي.jpeg
- File:الدعاء.jpeg
- File:الحجاب.jpeg
- File:حكمة.jpeg
- File:القران.jpeg
- File:الصخرة.jpeg
- File:الرسول.jpeg
Stefan4 (talk) 15:50, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hichim Amzil (talk · contribs)
[edit]Text document of unclear notability and low-quality JPG. See COM:PS.
Stefan4 (talk) 15:50, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope, copyright violation = just taken from the web. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:35, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn Krd 06:29, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/User:WikipedianProlific
Commons:Derivative works from commercial packaging. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Previously deleted as File:Returner bottle image.jpg -- therefore this upload is a violation of Commons rules and is a speedy delete. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:33, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
I've mistaken Josh Nec (talk) 01:26, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
I've mistaken Josh Nec (talk) 01:27, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: acciidental creation. JuTa 19:50, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
Je suis désolé. Je n'ai pas mis le bon titre, qui est "Centre oecuménique des Eglises - vue aérienne". Comme je ne peux pas changer le nom du fichier, j'aimerais pouvoir recommencer de zéro. Villaf36 (talk) 13:48, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Kept: File renamed. Thibaut120094 (talk) 11:17, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
Delete, please, this category, created by mistake
Deleted: by User:Fastily. JuTa 03:47, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
Moved to Category:Carlos Valdes (actor). --NiTenIchiRyu (talk) 07:33, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:Fastily. JuTa 03:46, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
Empty. Yanguas (talk) 03:06, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:Fastily. JuTa 03:46, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
Moved to Category:John Stephens (TV producer). --NiTenIchiRyu (talk) 14:16, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:Fastily. JuTa 03:45, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
Empty, after deleting last image for copyright violation. Yanguas (talk) 14:42, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:Fastily. JuTa 03:45, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
--Mxt5555 (talk) 13:08, 5 May 2015 (UTC)ิฝฝ
att
Deleted: has never existed. JuTa 03:44, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
Fake person. Sammyday (talk) 20:52, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:Taivo. JuTa 03:42, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
Fake person. Sammyday (talk) 20:53, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:Taivo. JuTa 03:42, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
Fake person. Sammyday (talk) 20:52, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:Taivo. JuTa 03:41, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
File:L'Abbé Michal Prymersky, frère du comte Henryk et fils d'Agnieszka , suivante de la Reine Marie-Louise.jpg
[edit]Fake person. Sammyday (talk) 20:53, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:Taivo. JuTa 03:41, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
It's not a real person. Sammyday (talk) 20:51, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:Taivo. JuTa 03:40, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
Fake person. Sammyday (talk) 20:53, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:Taivo. JuTa 03:35, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
Fake person. Sammyday (talk) 20:52, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:Taivo. JuTa 03:35, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
Fake person. Sammyday (talk) 20:52, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:Taivo JuTa 03:34, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
Hello,
someone deleted the photo I uploaded yesterday, "Xavier Fabre.jpg". I suppose s.he assumed there was a copyright violation, seeing that the photo is a professional one. However, I took the photo myself (I am the son of Xavier Fabre... and a photographer!).
Thus, I'd like to upload the photo back, hoping you understand.
Thank you
Deleted: by User: Didym. JuTa 03:33, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
could be copyvio since the uploader uploaded did copyvio earlier. no meta data and low quality photos. locations all over ukraine Andrew J.Kurbiko (talk) 19:28, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
could be copyvio since the uploader uploaded did copyvio earlier. no meta data and low quality photos. locations all over ukraine.
- File:АР-2.ЗиЛ.jpg
- File:РеноАРЗСП.jpg
- File:БТР-80 Киев.обл..JPG
- File:ИВС+ГУ СБУ.jpeg
- File:СИЗО Одесса2.jpg
- File:СИЗО Одесса1.jpg
- File:ПРХЛ Мерефа.JPG
- File:Валдай АЦ-40.jpg
- File:Присяга Ровно.JPG
- File:САРМ-Л.jpg
- File:АРР Николаев.JPG
- File:АППГ-10 Запорожье.jpg
- File:ТМК-2.jpg
- File:Ватутино-Занятия.jpg
- File:1 СЦШР.jpg
- File:Кс-МАЗ.jpg
- File:СМЗ Парад.jpg
- File:АРЧ Лоскутовка.jpg
- File:АРЧ Лоскутовка2.jpg
- File:ПМКрАЗ СМЗ.jpg
- File:АРЧ Лоск.пиротех..jpg
- File:АРЧ Лоскутовка ГПР.jpg
- File:ИМР-2 Д0050.jpg
- File:ПУ Одесса.jpg
- File:Ап266 ГАЗ.jpg
- File:Бкт ватутино.jpg
- File:БРДМ-2 АРР.JPG
Deleted: by User:INeverCry. JuTa 03:32, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
สาเหตุที่แจ้งลบ ละเมิดลิขสิทธิ์
Deleted: by User:Thibaut120094. JuTa 03:29, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Search/Deletion_requests/Template:Valid_Ogg--113.79.59.117 00:15, 22 May 2015 (UTC)#
Deleted: has never existed. JuTa 03:28, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
Reasons for deletion request --Remonaaly (talk) 12:00, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
Apologies I appear to have uploaded this image in the wrong section.
Deleted: by User:Green Giant. JuTa 03:27, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
Please delete the hoyanhor_logo that i have uploaded.Due to violate copyright of the logo. thanks
Deleted: has never existed. JuTa 03:26, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
фолк-метал группа "Ладушка"
Deleted: has never existed. JuTa 03:25, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
The license on the original Flickr page (https://www.flickr.com/photos/tokyoultracool/6766041361/) does not allow commercial reuse, so this cannot be uploaded to Commons. DAJF (talk) 01:26, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:INeverCry. JuTa 03:56, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
The license on the original Flickr page (https://www.flickr.com/photos/tokyoultracool/6766203875/in/photostream/) does not allow commercial reuse, so this cannot be uploaded to Commons. DAJF (talk) 01:27, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:INeverCry. JuTa 03:56, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
Cometí un grave error al subir este y los otros 23 archivos de manera individual, cuando son parte de un solo documento. Necesito borrarlos para volver a cargarlos en una sola entrada. Además, al subirlos individualmente, cambió la numeración del título lo cual hace incorrecta e inapropiada la entrada (e imposible la búsqueda para futuros usuarios). Victormoreira (talk) 01:53, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:INeverCry. JuTa 03:56, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Nohemio / logs
- File:PM retratos 6.jpeg
- File:Ninos de Monterrey Salvatore Maglie.jpeg
- File:Jose Maiz Garcia beisbolista.jpeg
- File:Pepemaiz 02.jpg
- File:Reconocimiento sportshall.png
- File:Reconocimiento holly.png
- File:Pepemaiz beisbol.jpg
- File:Jvm 00.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 00:14, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:01, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
should be done in wikitext Kopiersperre (talk) 19:31, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:15, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nmercadotecnia (talk · contribs)
[edit]promotional material, out of project scope
- File:FijaPórcelanicos.jpg
- File:SPRAY.jpg
- File:PEGAESTIRENO.jpg
- File:POLIMOR.jpg
- File:PEGAVITRO.jpg
- File:PEGAMARMOL.jpg
- File:ALBERCAS.jpg
- File:FIJATEJA.jpg
- File:FIJAPISO.jpg
- File:Pegazulejo.pdf
- File:PEGAZULEJO.jpg
- File:Yo pego.jpg
Motopark (talk) 19:33, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:15, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by GermanRuiz13 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
Gunnex (talk) 19:54, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:14, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, eventually previously published via http://democratanortedemexico.blogspot.de/2008/06/porqueras-en-la-bolsa-mexicana-de.html (2008) = http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_FepxIa52Sgk/SE4VxRLwVEI/AAAAAAAAARQ/xq_tG_e3bOY/s1600/Cordova%2BVillalobos.jpg1.jpg Gunnex (talk) 20:00, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:13, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work (complex map design): small/inconsistent resolution, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Pxndx94 / block log Gunnex (talk) 20:12, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:13, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence that this creative work has been made available under the CC-BY-SA license has been provided. Walter Siegmund (talk) 20:13, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:13, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Image of non-notable people Mark Marathon (talk) 04:15, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:12, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
copyright text Saqib (talk) 11:31, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
Kept: covered by FOP Didym (talk) 00:11, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Copyright text. Saqib (talk) 11:31, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
Kept: covered by FOP Didym (talk) 00:10, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Low resolution. Name of the author differs from the uploader. Watermark. ~ Zirguezi 17:26, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:08, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
small resolution. not useful. Saqib (talk) 14:06, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:08, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
small resolution. not useful. Saqib (talk) 13:30, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:08, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Akash karotia (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
- File:Me and paulina vega.jpg
- File:ImgAkash lal karotia.jpg
- File:How me . ..jpg
- File:Image me .jani.JPG
- File:20130829 007 copy copy.jpg 480 480 0 64000 0 1 0.jpg
- File:Akash karotia.jpg
- File:6 cool two.jpg
- File:3 best n best.jpg
- File:Oay g..jpg
- File:Snap me.JPG
- File:Akash lal karotia.jpg
Ies (talk) 16:22, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:07, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Akash karotia (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted. INeverCry 00:43, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from non-free software screenshots.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
- User:EugeneZelenko, did you intentionally skip adding {{Delete}} templates to the files? Also, the uploader wasn't notified, and the DR wasn't transcluded. --Stefan4 (talk) 20:48, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- Probably something wrong went with script or I unintentionally interrupted it. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:53, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:06, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Philippe pradel (talk · contribs)
[edit]SPAM, out of project scope, a jeans decoration promotion
- File:Couleurs Rapaces Trinité - portées par l'auteur.jpg
- File:Couleurs Rapaces Trinité - dos.jpg
- File:Couleurs Rapaces Trinité - devant - droite.jpg
- File:Couleurs Rapaces Trinité - devant - gauche.jpg
George Chernilevsky talk 06:23, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:05, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 17:07, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:05, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Why would this be CreativeCommons?? 88.76.214.60 22:08, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:04, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
This picture is slightly blurry, very much like how it looks here at the end of the gallery: [1]. There, the author is supposedly Axel Pfaff. I think the resolution is higher here: [2]. Unlikely to be own work. Dontreader (talk) 22:50, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:03, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
A fuller version is here [3], with a watermark at the bottom-left that might indicate the author of the picture. That impression is reinforced by [4], which has great resolution and size, and an author is stated (the name in the watermark). Dontreader (talk) 23:16, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:02, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
You can find this picture and some sexy pictures of her on this website: [5]. There's no proof that the uploader owns this picture. Please use COM:CONSENT and also read COM:OTRS. Dontreader (talk) 23:32, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:02, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:Ernesto Gándara Camou
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
Gunnex (talk) 23:59, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:02, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by FFernandoOrtizz (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:FFernandoOrtizz / logs
Gunnex (talk) 00:20, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:01, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope. Stefan4 (talk) 16:29, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:30, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Stefan4 (talk) 16:31, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:30, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
The non commercial license is not compatible with Commons. — Racconish 📥 16:31, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Keep: Licensed under the CC-BY, already checked in 2008.
- According to Flickr it is CC-BY-NC. — Racconish 📥 19:32, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Kept: reviewed license Didym (talk) 00:29, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Non commercial license not compatible with Commons — Racconish 📥 16:33, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep: Already checked in 2008, originally licensed under the CC-BY. CC licenses are irrevocable. --Amitie 10g (talk) 18:05, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- According to Flickr it is CC-BY-NC. — Racconish 📥 19:34, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Kept: reviewed license Didym (talk) 00:28, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Unidentified data plot. Out of scope unless someone identifies what data it shows. Stefan4 (talk) 16:40, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:26, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by David.thompson.esq (talk · contribs)
[edit]See COM:EDUSE.
Stefan4 (talk) 16:44, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:26, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
See COM:SCOPE. Stefan4 (talk) 16:47, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:25, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, scanned photo from 1994 shows murderer of en:Luis Donaldo Colosio, for which the uploader also "delivered" security cam screenshots like File:Atentado 2.jpg (copyvio) + Commons:Deletion requests/File:Atentado 1.jpg. Most likely a reupload, considering Commons:Deletion requests/File:Aburto Lomas Taurinas.jpg. Gunnex (talk) 17:10, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:25, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jewel Worcester (talk · contribs)
[edit]Questionable authorship, source and copyright claims based on the low resolutions, missing metadata and the nature of several of the images. Some appear to be older works, but their copyright status may be impossible to determine without proper source and authorship information.
- File:White-horse-inn.jpg
- File:Gen Devens state house park.jpg
- File:Gen Charles Devins Statue, Boston, MA.jpg
- File:MechanicsHall1800s.jpg
- File:Genereal Devens Statue Postcard.png
- File:Gen Devens Statue TODAY.png
- File:1901 General Devens.png
- File:Turtle Boy with water running.png
- File:Burnside Fountain Clean.png
- File:2 ionic ave FrostF.png
- File:Join or die mass spy.jpg
- File:Timothy Bigelow monument.JPG
- File:Timothy Bigelow.jpg
—LX (talk, contribs) 17:41, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:24, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by GreenCricket (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work, taken from various websites/social networks.
- File:Imad-Wasim.jpeg
- File:Bilawal-Bhatti(Cropped).jpeg
- File:Nauman-Anwar-after-win-of-Pakistan-against-Zimbabwae.jpg
- File:Saad-Nasim-at-rest-house.jpg
- File:Mikaal-Zulfiqar-on-set-of-Drama-Sungat.jpeg
- File:Rahat-Ali-PCT.jpg
Thibaut120094 (talk) 17:59, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Too many copyvios of similar size files on similar subjects. — Racconish 📥 19:37, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:21, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Uploader states that "all rights reserved" which clashes with the provided GNU Free Documentation License. Takeaway (talk) 18:19, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:21, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Juanmtorrese (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Juanmtorrese: File:ErnestoCorderoplaticandoconChristineLargarde.jpg (uploaded 2012) previously published (even in lower res & cropped) via (example) http://www.cnnexpansion.com/economia/2011/05/24/francia-anunciara-candidatura-al-fmi (2011, © 2006 DERECHOS RESERVADOS EXPANSIÓN, S.A.) = http://static.cnnexpansion.com/media/2011/05/24/lagarde-cordero-francia-paris.jpg
- File:ErnestoCorderoyJavierLozano.jpg
- File:ErnestoCorderoplaticandoconChristineLargarde.jpg
- File:Christine Lagarde y Ernesto Cordero.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 19:00, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:20, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Falsche Metadaten Miriquidi silva (talk) 19:00, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- Würde es nicht ausreichen, wenn du eine neue Version mit korrigierten Daten darüberlädst? --Sitacuisses (talk) 06:24, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
Kept: kept, but version deleted Didym (talk) 00:19, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
only version 20150527010339 because it is exactly the same as current one. It was uploaded twice because of problems in the internet. Darekk2 (talk) 01:06, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Dupe revision deleted. INeverCry 00:39, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Small image with no EXIF data and widely circulating on the web. Unlikely to be the uploader's own work as claimed. DAJF (talk) 01:30, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Unabiguous copyright violation from http://loudwire.com/three-days-grace-singer-swap-readers-poll/ Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:17, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Derivative work of non-free billboard art. There is no freedom of panorama in Qatar. RJaguar3 (talk) 05:21, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Official manufacturer's image, Flickr user has no authority to upload and licence as CC-BY. http://tineye.com/search/152cf3225d571857636525f964a08de17ad554a3/?sort=size&order=desc OSX (talk • contributions) 05:43, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
logo of club that was not notable so article removed. Also no author nor permission present; logo is on website of club MoiraMoira (talk) 06:06, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution (most likely cropped), missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Negavéia Gunnex (talk) 06:30, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Uploaded by myself on 4 June 2014. A better version with full color information from the same source is now available at File:Festoen van vruchten en bloemen Rijksmuseum SK-A-138.jpeg. Vincent Steenberg (talk) 07:25, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. A similarly cropped image is available in the subject's network website: http://abscbnpr.com/abs-cbn-sweeps-tv-and-radio-awards-at-gandingan-2013/korina-sanchez-2/ Bluemask (talk) 07:34, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
File:COLLECTIE TROPENMUSEUM Badende kinderen bij een badhuis in Banjoe Biroe Midden-Java. TMnr 60013779.jpg
[edit]naaktfoto'(s) Gerrit070 (talk) 07:36, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Obviously no reason to delete. A person being nude in this historical photo doesn't make it less in Commons scope.--Pere prlpz (talk) 09:37, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep per Pere prlpz. Multichill (talk) 16:36, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Copyright violation with [6]? 37.17.113.97 07:55, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Small size, no EXIF data, user with bad history, unlikely to be own works.
- File:Большая Дорогомиловская улица Москва.jpg
- File:Monument to Konstantin Rokossovsky in Zelenograd.jpg
- File:Monument to Konstantin Rokossovsky in Velikiye Luki.jpg
- File:Monuments to Rokossovsky in Moscow1.jpg
- File:Monuments to Rokossovsky in Kursk.jpg
- File:Monuments to Rokossovsky in Nizhny Novgorod.jpg
- File:Monument to Konstantin Rokossovsky in Blagoveshchensk.jpg
- File:Moscow-city2015.jpg
- File:VDNKh in Moscow.jpg
- File:Fountain-city1.jpg
- File:Novotel Moscow-city1.jpg
- File:Leonid Zaitsev1.jpg
- File:Moscow Marriott Grand Hotel1.jpg
- File:InterContinental Moscow1.jpg
- File:Krasnogvardeisky-Proezd1.jpg
- File:Metropolis1.jpg
- File:Columbus Shopping Mall.jpg
- File:Federation Tower2015.jpg
- File:Борис Яцков.jpg
- File:New-Arbat1.jpg
- File:Oko-Moscow city1.jpg
- File:Peterhof Palace Grand Canal1.jpg
- File:Lahte-center1.jpg
- File:Peter the Great Statue.jpg
- File:Shufutinsky1.jpg
- File:Malinin1.jpg
- File:Boris-uborevich.jpg
- File:Eurasia-moscow city1.jpg
- File:Oko-moscow1.jpg
- File:Provasi-house1.jpg
- File:Lotte-hotel1.jpg
- File:Novel House1.jpg
- File:Crocus-expo1.jpg
- File:Sberbankkhabar1.jpg
- File:Sberbank2.jpg
- File:Aviapark2.jpg
- File:City-mall1.jpg
- File:Vegas-moscow.jpg
- File:Izyslav1.jpg
- File:Moscow5.jpg
- File:Moscow2.jpg
- File:Moscow-city.jpg
- File:Leontiev-vitebsk1.jpg
- File:Leontiev-matvi12.jpg
- File:Vaikule123.jpg
- File:Rasputina123.jpg
- File:Leonjordano1.jpg
- File:Vaikule1.jpg
- File:Eminagalarov2.jpg
- File:Baskov1.jpg
- File:Raimond-pauls12.jpg
- File:Leontiev-s1.jpg
- File:Joseph Kobzon1.jpg
- File:Rotaru12.jpg
- File:Leontiev-jurm1.jpg
- File:Igor-krutoi3.jpg
- File:Alexander-serov.jpg
- File:Gazmanov-putin.jpg
Yann (talk) 08:20, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
poor resolution blurry Pennsy22 (talk) 08:26, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
poor resolution Pennsy22 (talk) 08:27, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Likely copyvio. This pic was published in: LEONARDI, SALVATORE (2005): La historia de los primeros Barradas en la Heráldica del Palacio de los Marqueses de Cortes de Graena y de Peñaflor en Guadix, Publicaciones del Archivo Histórico Municipal, n° 6, Guadix, attributed to Salvatore Leonardi. Macucal (talk) 08:37, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Likely copyvio. This pic was published in: LEONARDI, SALVATORE (2005): La historia de los primeros Barradas en la heráldica del palacio de los marqueses de Cortes de Graena y de Peñaflor en Guadix, Publicaciones del Archivo Histórico Municipal, n° 6, Guadix, attributed to Torcuato Fandila García de los Reyes. Macucal (talk) 08:40, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Likely copyvio. This pic was published in: LEONARDI, SALVATORE (2005): La historia de los primeros Barradas en la heráldica del palacio de los marqueses de Cortes de Graena y de Peñaflor en Guadix, Publicaciones del Archivo Histórico Municipal, n° 6, Guadix, attributed to Marina Martín Ojeda. Macucal (talk) 08:41, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:NANOTEC84 Gunnex (talk) 08:46, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
derivative work 37.5.2.109 08:53, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
derivative work 37.5.2.109 08:54, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
derivative work 37.5.2.109 08:57, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Author and copyright holderː Jakob de Zwart 37.5.2.109 09:00, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep What's the rationale for deletion here? Who is Jakob de Zwart ? The Flickr source claims Eva Rinaldi as photographer and shows a CC-by-sa licence https://www.flickr.com/photos/evarinaldiphotography/11186275385/ Andy Dingley (talk) 09:12, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- But EXIF names Jakob de Zwart as copyright holder. I think Rinaldi is allowed to present this photo of one of her body paintings on her flickr site. But is she allowed to publish Zwart's file under a CC-by-sa licence? And is commons allowed to name Rinaldi as author (and copyright holder)? 37.5.2.109 11:33, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- There is only one author and one copyright holder: either Rinaldi or de Zwart, or maybe even some legal trust body created with the pair of them as trustees! What's clear though is that these two claims are inconsistent and thus at least one is inaccurate.
- In the grand scheme of things, manually entered EXIF data is rare and very unreliable. We trust EXIF data for shutter speeds, sometimes GPS locations, but cameras don't insert photographer names automatically and where such a thing has been added, it's as likely to come from a stale config file as to represent some huge conspiracy.
- We see this problem a lot. A rational and reasonable action (and yes, I do mean the UK legalistic sense of "reasonable") would be to assume that the Flickr one, as the more explicitly edited and more recently added, would be the correct one.
- This is less than perfect. But we don't achieve perfection. Its trivial imperfection is so slight that it's no reason to delete.
- By all means, get in touch with the FLickr account holder and ask them. Maybe we can clear it all up easily. But in the meantime, keep Andy Dingley (talk) 14:52, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- But EXIF names Jakob de Zwart as copyright holder. I think Rinaldi is allowed to present this photo of one of her body paintings on her flickr site. But is she allowed to publish Zwart's file under a CC-by-sa licence? And is commons allowed to name Rinaldi as author (and copyright holder)? 37.5.2.109 11:33, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Inconsistent and unclear authorship claim. Flickr says that the author is Eva Rinaldi but EXIF says Jakob de Zwart. We only have permission from Eva Rinaldi but we might need permission from Jakob de Zwart. --Stefan4 (talk) 13:05, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per Stefan4. INeverCry 00:45, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
derivative work 37.5.2.109 09:08, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Ошибка в названии NDV (talk) 09:13, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:45, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Movie poster and stills. No evidence of permission(s).
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Comment The second picture can be found here [7], stating "Photo by Joseph Villapaz - © 2014 Mantis Eagle Productions". There is no proof that Joseph Villapaz is the real uploader of the picture, and even if he is, permission from Mantis Eagle Productions is probably needed. Dontreader (talk) 22:22, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Comment The third picture has the exact same problem: [8]. I can't find the first picture, but on the left-hand side it states the company that owns it (vertically, in yellow letters).
Delete All of them, per nom. Dontreader (talk) 22:34, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:44, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
non free see http://aronanderson.se/kebnekaise-i-rullstol/ Yger (talk) 14:37, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:44, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to Wikisource if useful.
- File:Peter O'Rourke letter to his mother page 1.pdf
- File:Peter O'Rourke letter to his mother page 2.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:43, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Leiterafaelo (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons:Derivative works from posters.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:43, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:42, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Almadorada (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:42, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:Bari Restrick Malone3.JPG
- File:Bari Restrick Malone2.jpg
- File:BariRestrickMalone.jpg
- File:Barirestrickmalone3.PNG
- File:Barirestrickmalone2.PNG
- File:Barirestrickmalone1.jpg
- File:Bari Restrick Malone.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:42, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Stefan4 (talk) 15:11, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:41, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Based on the description, this is out of scope. Stefan4 (talk) 15:12, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:41, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Not own work, see copyright notice. Stefan4 (talk) 15:13, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:40, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Presumably out of scope. Stefan4 (talk) 15:14, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:40, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope: too low quality to see anything. Potential copyright problems: contains Microsoft screenshots. Stefan4 (talk) 15:20, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Delete - copyrighted meterial and etc means it can't be here. Nesnad (talk) 12:22, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:39, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
These seem to come from magazines, websites and other sources. Not own work. Copyvio and out of scope.
- File:כתבה לזכרו של ולנסי בדף של סינמטק ירושלים.jpg
- File:מצטיין אגודה.jpg
- File:CGS Newsletter.pdf
- File:TapeOut Article 2014.pdf
Stefan4 (talk) 15:24, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:38, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Text document of unclear notability. Out of project scope. Stefan4 (talk) 15:24, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:37, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Stefan4 (talk) 15:25, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:37, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
These don't seem to be own work. If own work, then out of scope.
- File:السلاسل الجبلية.pdf
- File:Linking words كلمات الربط.pdf
- File:منهجية تحليل السؤال الفلسفي.pdf
- File:National 2014 physique smp Tariqalbac.pdf
Stefan4 (talk) 15:26, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:37, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Sourced to 'Theotherhand Productions'. No evidence of permission. Stefan4 (talk) 15:28, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:36, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Sourced to 'The other Hand Productions'. No evidence of permission. Stefan4 (talk) 15:28, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:36, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Stefan4 (talk) 15:29, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:36, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Stefan4 (talk) 15:29, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:36, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Stefan4 (talk) 15:29, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:36, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by J Sanmartin Esplugues (talk · contribs)
[edit]External material, needs OTRS and an explanation as to why it is in scope.
- File:Informe convivencia escolar SANMARTIN ROJO.pdf
- File:Maltrato infantil 2011.pdf
- File:II Informe Internacional Violencia contra las mujeres.pdf
- File:6 Sanmartin.pdf
Stefan4 (talk) 15:31, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:35, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vignoble du Sud-Ouest (talk · contribs)
[edit]These seem to be maps from an external entity. OTRS needed.
- File:Carte détaillée Vins du Sud-Ouest.pdf
- File:Carte détaillée avec bergerac et BMD logos allemand 150 dpi.pdf
Stefan4 (talk) 15:34, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:35, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Not own work, wrong copyright tag, unidentified person. Stefan4 (talk) 15:35, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:35, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Not own work, wrong copyright tag, unidentified person. Stefan4 (talk) 15:35, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:35, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
These seem to be out of scope.
Stefan4 (talk) 15:36, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:34, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Doesn't seem to be own work. Out of scope. Stefan4 (talk) 15:37, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:34, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Text document of unclear notability. See COM:SCOPE. Stefan4 (talk) 15:38, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:34, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
COM:PACKAGING Krd 15:38, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:33, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Text document of unclear notability. See COM:PS. Stefan4 (talk) 15:40, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:32, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Sourced to a university. Stefan4 (talk) 15:41, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:32, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Comes from the Atlantic Philanthropies website. Doubtfull if it's copyrights free... Glorious 93 (talk) 15:45, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:31, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 07:14, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:59, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope INeverCry 07:15, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:59, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 07:16, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:59, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 07:18, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:59, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 07:20, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:58, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope INeverCry 07:21, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:58, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope INeverCry 07:22, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:58, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Yuli ulloa (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - promotional images
INeverCry 07:24, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:58, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope INeverCry 07:26, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:57, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope INeverCry 07:27, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:57, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal artwork INeverCry 07:30, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:57, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused images of non-notable person
- File:Jehan zeb (5).jpg
- File:Jehan zeb (6).jpg
- File:Jehan zeb (4).jpg
- File:Jehan zeb gaju khan.jpg
- File:Jehan zeb (3).jpg
- File:Jehan zeb khaksar.jpg
INeverCry 07:34, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:57, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 07:35, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:56, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 07:37, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:56, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 07:37, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:56, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 07:38, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:56, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 07:39, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:56, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 07:40, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:56, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 07:44, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:56, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 07:48, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:55, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 07:49, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:55, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 07:50, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:55, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope INeverCry 07:52, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:54, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 07:53, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:54, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 07:56, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:54, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
derivative work 37.5.2.109 09:05, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
Gunnex (talk) 09:15, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Looks like a scan of a poster or other publicity material, so it is doubtful that the image is the own work of the uploader as claimed. DAJF (talk) 09:24, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Apparently a screengrab from a video clip (http://entertainthis.usatoday.com/2014/08/05/ricky-gervais-david-brent-the-office-musical-mockumentary/) DAJF (talk) 09:37, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
- C'est quoi le (c) dans le titre ? Je ne suis pas catégorique mais c'est suspect HenriDavel (talk) 09:38, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete the uploader is not the photograph, and this is not a personal photo, as stated by the uploader at the French Wikipedia fr:Discussion:Jeanne_Added. Sylenius (talk) 11:24, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Given the poor track record of the uploader for uploading copyvio images, this one also looks like a video screengrab. DAJF (talk) 09:39, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Looks like a copyvio from http://inorbit.in/pune/store/home-stop/ EricEnfermero (talk) 10:11, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Brinkitos (most likely grabbed from social media) Gunnex (talk) 10:33, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:48, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
likely copyrighted. uploaded by a copyvio guy . Saqib (talk) 10:52, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:48, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
likely copyrighted. uploaded by a copyvio guy . Saqib (talk) 10:53, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:48, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
COM:OTRS authorization required: the uploader claims not to be the author Pierpao.lo (listening) 10:54, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:48, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Aurias~commonswiki / logs (4 uploads = 3x copyvio) Gunnex (talk) 10:55, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:48, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
could this be usful for commons? Saqib (talk) 11:00, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
could this be usful for commons? Saqib (talk) 11:00, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Logo taken from sheepla.ru. Not sure if it meets treshold of originality Vegetable TALK 11:07, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Agselecciones / logs. Gunnex (talk) 11:10, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bashir333dahri (talk · contribs)
[edit]personal images. not in scoope
- File:Pleasent weather at swat river.jpg
- File:Top of Malam Jaba green valley.jpg
- File:Swat river flowing.jpg
- File:Kagan.jpg
- File:Malm jabba.jpg
- File:Lake in kalam.jpg
- File:Green valleys.jpg
- File:Beutiful view.jpg
Saqib (talk) 11:10, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status. Uploaded by 1-upload user Fmarreola (talk · contributions · Statistics) = (per [9]) "Federico Arreola" (= related eswiki entry 3x spam deleted), exif indicates to a work copyrighted by "Esteban Gutierrez", needing permission. Gunnex (talk) 11:21, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Copyright violation - likely a promo photo that has been published in a lot of places (example). — Yerpo Eh? 11:24, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
no used self promotion -- Christian Ferrer 11:58, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Personal image issue. Picture uploaded in newly created article on dawp illustrating "elegance"; rather obvious as some sort of internal joke. The picture is not relevant for the project - and I do not expect that the woman in the less than elegant poisture has consented to illustrate "elegance" on Commons Pugilist (talk) 11:59, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope Jianhui67 talk★contribs 12:36, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Seems like a historical photograph. Very unlikely that uploader holds the actual copyright —Vensatry (Ping me) 12:37, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
File:Biography of Rajesh Singh Chairman & Managing Director FOCUS CORPORATE ALLIANCE PRIVATE LIMITED.pdf
[edit]Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope Jianhui67 talk★contribs 12:42, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Gunnex (talk) 12:55, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope.
- File:Facture.pdf
- File:Fiche évaluation candidat entretien d'embauche.pdf
- File:Fiche de préparation d'une réunion.pdf
- File:DEVIS.jpg
Stefan4 (talk) 13:38, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted. INeverCry 00:17, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images.
- File:Carte de visite*.pdf
- File:Dépliant type association service à la personne.pdf
- File:Dépliant type salon.pdf
- File:Page événementielle ou affiche.pdf
- File:Modèle lettre.pdf
- File:FICHE DE POSTE.pdf
- File:ANNONCE EMBAUCHE.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 08:34, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Text documents of unclear notability. Out of scope.
- File:PLAN D'ACTION.pdf
- File:QUESTIONNAIRE DE SATISFACTION.pdf
- File:GRILLE D’OBSERVATION.pdf
- File:Guide de premier entretien.pdf
- File:NOTE D'INFORMATION.pdf
- File:Note de service.pdf
- File:Compte-rendu de réunion.pdf
- File:LOGIGRAMME (description d'une procédure).pdf
Stefan4 (talk) 12:56, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted. INeverCry 00:54, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Derivative work of bus advertisement. Stefan4 (talk) 13:07, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
It says "Source: Supplied" on the image, suggesting that this isn't own work but that the picture was supplied to the Flickr uploader by someone else. Stefan4 (talk) 13:08, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
The structure is likely to be incorrect, because there is probably no covalent bond between potassium and selenium. Leyo 13:08, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- Agreed. --Nothingserious (talk) 13:24, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Uriel GZR / logs Gunnex (talk) 13:15, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Picture collection must collect from local picture from Commons, please upload first every picture to Commons and then collect it from those. Please take a look at File:Collage Rome.jpg as an example how to do it. See Commons:Collages for details. Motopark (talk) 13:32, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete, considering 1 part (ex-)File:Aroor mukkam.jpg = copyvio (cropped: watermark removed) via https://www.flickr.com/photos/paitheboss/5110079642 (2010, © by "PAI™"). See also uploader's User talk:Sanif~commonswiki = serial copyright violator. Gunnex (talk) 14:24, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:52, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
copyright http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www8.0zz0.com/2015/04/06/00/753489367.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.startimes.com/f.aspx?t=35341694&h=639&w=960&tbnid=A2DV5sUkQHpS2M&zoom=1&tbnh=183&tbnw=275&usg=__DNaDqQUjGA66Hs4qIznm5tHCucI=&docid=x97lsjEwyWPbPM Bachounda (talk) 13:39, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:52, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
copyright de tugba tekeli https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/236x/c5/66/92/c56692ae30531aa45560b0dbbe959639.jpg Bachounda (talk) 13:43, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:52, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope: unidentified person. Also low resolution and no EXIF, so possibly copyvio. Stefan4 (talk) 13:44, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:51, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Gunnex (talk) 13:51, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:51, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
copy right mohammed missoum https://www.facebook.com/yougourta.numedia/about Bachounda (talk) 13:53, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:51, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:GladisLopez / logs Gunnex (talk) 14:03, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:51, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Copyright violation 46.218.9.198 14:04, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
non free image http://www.kristianstad.se/sv/Om-kommunen/Pressrum/Grafisk-profil/ Yger (talk) 14:11, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Image d'un modèle qui pourrait être mineur (image à caractère pédophile 2.5.229.82 14:12, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Image clearly of a adult, as you could saw if you werent trying to dig and find images to play the pedhopile card. Or you have a preverted mind (be it of religious extremism or any other extremism) to see pedhopile in a clearly adult nude model. Tm (talk) 15:58, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep The image was taken by a professional photographer from the US. I don't think there are any problems about the model being too young, there being no model contract etc. --Vydra (talk) 17:04, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Dubious unsupported claims offered for deletion. -- Infrogmation (talk) 20:04, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Unsubstantiated claim by nominator. CyberSkull 09:03, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Didym (talk) 00:50, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Advertising.
- File:Kulcar-2Bfan.jpg
- File:Kulcar Close Up.jpg
- File:Kulcar-close-up.jpg
- File:Kulcar-2Bversion-2B2-2Binstall.jpg
- File:Kulcar-2Binstalled.jpg
- File:Kulcar003.jpg
- File:Kulcar004.jpg
Wcam (talk) 14:21, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:48, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Likely to be irrelevant for article about institute. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:47, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:47, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:47, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:46, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Lizenzfrage unklar. Rheinisches Bildarchiv RBA 61446. Das rechte Gebäude stellt die Neumarkt-Passage dar, die erst 1936/37 nach Entwurf von Wilhelm Riphahn entstand. Keine Veröffentlichung vor 1923 nachweisbar oder möglich. Benutzer:HOPflaume (talk) 14:32, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:46, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:01, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
File:Gobernador de Carabobo Oscar Celli Gerbasi y Presidente de Venezuela Rómulo Betancourt Bello.jpg
[edit]Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:01, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
It says ' Previously published: http://labs.genetics.ucla.edu/horvath/dnamage/ and http://genomebiology.com/content/pdf/gb-2013-14-10-r115.pdf' so we need OTRS. Stefan4 (talk) 15:17, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
[[Category:I own the copyright. It is save to use this file.]] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stevetihi (talk • contribs) 2015-05-27T19:14:21 (UTC)
- This needs to be verified. See COM:OTRS. --Stefan4 (talk) 21:00, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
This discussion is stupid. Let me repeat that I own the copyright. I created the file. I donated the file to Wikimedia Commons. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stevetihi (talk • contribs) 2015-05-30T05:36:27 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:01, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Showing evidence (talk · contribs)
[edit]Modern newspapers. Not own work.
Stefan4 (talk) 15:22, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Showing evidence (talk · contribs)
Historical poster. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
- File:Johnnie Ray in Variety.jpg
- File:ViewScan zoomed in Variety.pdf
- File:ViewScan zoomed in Variety Sept 22 1965 page 670000.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:01, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope tax form. Stefan4 (talk) 15:39, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:02, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
A city is not the same thing as the federal government. Stefan4 (talk) 15:39, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:02, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Genaroperezcamara (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unclear copyright status: Uploaded in a row on 29.09.2011 all nominated files were previously published at Facebook https://www.facebook.com/genaroperezcamara/photos by "Genaro Perez-Camara". Examples:
- File:Genaro perez camara 001.jpg --> https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=136338340303&set=pb.753715303.-2207520000.1432741097.&type=1&theater (2009)
- File:Genaro perez camara 008.jpg --> https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=136338395303&set=pb.753715303.-2207520000.1432741087.&type=1&theater (2009)
- File:Genaro perez camara 004.jpg --> https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=136338365303&set=pb.753715303.-2207520000.1432741097.&type=1&theater (2009)
- File:Genaro perez camara 006.jpg --> https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=136338380303&set=pb.753715303.-2207520000.1432741087.&type=1&theater (2009)
- etc.
Despite of having a similar username, the Facebook user is not necessarily the same person as the Commons user. A verifiable connection via COM:OTRS (or by other means) must be established. Additional all files above may be out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used.
- File:Genaro perez camara 010.jpg
- File:Genaro perez camara 007.jpg
- File:Genaro perez camara 009.jpg
- File:Genaro perez camara 008.jpg
- File:Genaro perez camara 006.jpg
- File:Genaro perez camara 005.jpg
- File:Genaro perez camara 004.jpg
- File:Genaro perez camara 002.jpg
- File:Genaro perez camara 001.jpg
- File:Genaro perez camara 003.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 15:45, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:03, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Copyright violation Shev123 (talk) 15:59, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:04, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Copyright violation and should be deleted on FlickR too... Shev123 (talk) 16:00, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:04, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Copyright violation Shev123 (talk) 16:04, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:04, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Copyright violation Shev123 (talk) 16:06, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:04, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Javiermurillocom (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unclear copyright status and unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, previously published on Flickr/Facebook, considering also User talk:Javiermurillocom + (especially) Commons:Deletion requests/File:ErnestoCorderoSHacienda.jpg and this false claim of authorship by uploader. All files related to es:Ernesto Cordero, a Mexican politician. Examples:
- File:ErnestoCorderoTecámac.jpg (22.05.2012) versus https://www.flickr.com/photos/ernestocordero/6763133823 (01.2012, © by "Ernesto Cordero")
- File:ErnestoJavierCorderoArroyo01.jpg (21.05.2012) versus https://www.flickr.com/photos/ernestocordero/6717203333 (01.2012, © by "Ernesto Cordero")
- File:ErnestoCorderoLiderazgosPAN.jpg (22.05.2012) versus official https://www.facebook.com/ernestocorderoarroyo/photos/a.311698362216114.105191.209029592482992/311698675549416/?type=1&theater (01.2012, no exif)
All files uploaded on 16.08.2012 were previously published (+/- 16h. earlier) via this album. The file...
- File:ErnestoCorderoOEA.jpg (22.05.2012)
is a living copyvio as the photo was grabbed from a different Flickr user = https://www.flickr.com/photos/oasoea/6473771241/ (2011, CC BY-NC-ND 2.0 by "OEA - OAS").
Per this comment by uploader ("I work for Ernesto Cordero and it's part of our photo log, please undelete.") the uploader might by related to above person but this does not necessary mean that he/she also took all these photos. Permissions and/or further details needed.
- File:SenadorErnestoCorderoReuniónTrabajo02.jpg
- File:SenadorErnestoCorderoReuniónTrabajo03.jpg
- File:SenadorErnestoCorderoReuniónTrabajo.jpg
- File:SenadorErnestoCorderoReuniónTrabajo04.jpg
- File:SenadorErnestoCorderoCoordinador.jpg
- File:SendadorErnestoCorderoCoordinadorLXII.jpg
- File:ErnestoCorderoConferencia.JPG
- File:ErnestoCorderoTimothyFranzGeithner.jpg
- File:ErnestoCorderoOEA.jpg
- File:ErnestoCorderoChristineLagarde2.JPG
- File:ErnestoCorderoSedesol.jpg
- File:ErnestoCorderoMatehuala.jpg
- File:ErnestoCorderoAguascalientes.jpg
- File:ErnestoCorderoTecámac.jpg
- File:ErnestoCorderoYucatán.jpg
- File:ErnestoCorderoCampeche.jpg
- File:ErnestoCorderoLiderazgosPAN.jpg
- File:ErnestoCorderoPre.jpg
- File:ErnestoJavierCorderoArroyo01.jpg
- File:ErnestoJavierCorderoArroyo.jpeg
Gunnex (talk) 18:38, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:05, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Sorry, but there is no FoP in the UAE. Dura lex, sed lex. 84.61.155.241 15:26, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
- That goes for finished architecture. This one is still under construction. --Nepenthes (talk) 11:49, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
Kept: FoP in the UAE only applies to finished architecture. James F. (talk) 09:16, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
no FoP in Abu Dhabi 109.45.52.176 20:26, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted. INeverCry 01:06, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
no FoP in Abu Dhabi 109.45.52.176 20:27, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:06, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
I uploaded this without realizing there was another file already made for the State House portrait of Arthur Fenner. This one should be deleted. - Kenneth C. Zirkel (talk) 23:06, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:08, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Uploader requesting deletion; not useful and not needed Jc86035 (talk • contributions • uploads) 11:16, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:07, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Copyight Maveron 2015 - http://www.maveron.com/blog/ incorrectly claimed as own work Flat Out (talk) 04:27, 18 May 2015 (UTC) Withdrawn by nominator - speedy instead Flat Out (talk) 04:31, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:07, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
I'm sorry, but thats not covered by COM:FOP#Japan. --Kh2K 16:36, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:09, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
It is Not public domain in South Korea where freedom of panorama doesn't exist. HappyMidnight (talk) 05:01, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:11, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
It is Not public domain in South Korea where freedom of panorama doesn't exist. HappyMidnight (talk) 04:58, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:11, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
It is Not public domain in South Korea where freedom of panorama doesn't exist. HappyMidnight (talk) 04:57, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:11, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
More images of Saudi Arabia
[edit]- File:Kaaba, Masjid Al Haram, Mecca.jpg
- File:Glass on Abraj Al Bait.JPG
- File:Makkah tower.jpg
- File:Aerial View of Abraj Al Bait Under Construction.jpg
- File:AbrajAlBaitin2011Makkah.JPG
No freedom of panorama allowed in Saudi Arabia. See COM:FOP#Saudi Arabia. --George Ho (talk) 16:53, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:11, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Iceland. Stefan4 (talk) 21:46, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:12, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status. Indoor shot derivated from a modern artwork by Mexican painter & sculptor "Juan Manuel Salazar" (1956—), failing (without providing further details) COM:FOP#Mexico ("made to be located permanently in public places") and COM:DM. Permission from "Juan Manuel Salazar" needed. Gunnex (talk) 22:17, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:12, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Duplicate of SVG file. Fry1989 eh? 22:45, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:12, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: No permission from artist. Yann (talk) 07:50, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
could this be usful for commons? Saqib (talk) 10:57, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep - sure it could. The image needs a more descriptive file name and the watermark and frame need to be removed (which I'll do I guess if this gets kept or maybe I'll just do it now before I forget), but the baby seems to be wearing traditional clothes and even if it isn't, is a picture such as this not useful? Why not? Seems to be in scope to me. Nesnad (talk) 11:25, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 07:50, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope Jianhui67 talk★contribs 12:37, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- The file is a homework assignment of our class for the German highschool student academy which I operate on the German wikiversity. Our students are unexperienced wiki users which is why the file is named badly and was uncategorized. Other than that wikimedia commons is the standard file repository for wikiversity thus project scope is in my oppinion given. I will ask to rename the file (and I have already added a category) --Renepick (talk) 15:19, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- The rename request was declined due to the ongoing deletion request c.f User:SteinsplitterBot/Recently_declined_rename_requests#File:Text1_Julia.pdf. I am supposed to make the rename request after deletion is being decided --Renepick (talk) 21:53, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 07:51, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Picture collection must collect from local picture from Commons, please upload first every picture to Commons and then collect it from those. Please take a look at File:Collage Rome.jpg as an example how to do it. See Commons:Collages for details. Motopark (talk) 13:29, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. No source, uncertain copyright. Yann (talk) 07:52, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Picture collection must collect from local picture from Commons, please upload first every picture to Commons and then collect it from those. Please take a look at File:Collage Rome.jpg as an example how to do it. See Commons:Collages for details. Motopark (talk) 13:30, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. No source, uncertain copyright. Yann (talk) 07:52, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
montage of Kochi city which is missing links to images used from Wikimedia Commons, hence, copyright issues, Roland zh (talk) 19:26, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:23, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Flickr source says: "Sometimes The Bikinis Come Off Particularly on the boat." So this was taken in a private place. Also, subject is not famous or anything, just a girl, image would have been deleted as "Commons is not for your vacation photos" if she had had some clothes on. 95.199.16.147 23:18, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
- Keep - this doesn't appear to have been taken on a boat to me, looks more like a lagoon. -mattbuck (Talk) 23:27, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
- Keep, agree that it indeed appears to be a lagoon. -- Cirt (talk) 02:04, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Seems to be an isolated place. I think the case could be made that there was an expectation of privacy, so it should be deleted in accordance with COM:PEOPLE. Handcuffed (talk) 01:50, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
- Comment - This is not offensive, seen worse on discovery channel. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.168.177.25 (talk • contribs)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 23:45, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
Photo d'un modèle potentiellement mineur (image à caractère pédophile) 2.5.229.82 14:13, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Image clearly of a adult, as you could saw if you werent trying to dig and find images to play the pedhopile card. Or you have a preverted mind (be it of religious extremism or any other extremism) to see pedhopile in a clearly adult nude model. Tm (talk) 15:58, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep There's not really any reason to think this young women is less than 18. And even if was the case, let's recall that underage nudity is not always a source of pedophilia (I'd also say there's some kind of perversion to think so). There are many examples of acceptable children nudity on Commons, especially when it comes to treat subjects like nudism, which is not a question of perversion nor pedophilia, or ethnographic subjects (yeah, let's not forget that nudity is a form of taboo in our occidental societies - and other societies like the arab-muslim world - but is considered differently by other cultures !). In this case, it's clearly an illustration of nudism. Therefore no problem. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 15:20, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 07:55, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from advertisement. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- this is freedom of panorama on a public place in Solingen, Wuppertaler Straße, public parking area, no advertisement. --Michael (talk) 10:47, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 08:05, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
What new could be added to collection of explicit images? EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Not explicit images (mere nudity is not explicit, at least by european standards) What brings of new? A good and another angle of comparision of female and male genitalia. Also what new arguments could be added, by you, to your DR related to collection of explicit images?
- Keep - Human genitals are like a rainbow, there are many sizes and shapes, don't see anything wrong with another example of the variety that makes us human. Why even nominate this for deletion? Nesnad (talk) 11:16, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 08:07, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Used for vandalism - Кронас (talk) 06:16, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 08:09, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
【【创建“Commons:Deletion requests/File talk:2010FR Donor survey report.pdf” 】--113.80.39.102 15:31, 26 April 2015 (UTC)】
Kept: No reason to delete. Yann (talk) 08:10, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Es una aproximación artistica del escudo real de Guardamar del Segura. Contiene los simbolos y colores pero el escudo oficial es estructuralmente distinto y esta aportación lleva a la confusión 80.24.99.232 19:03, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep: SVG representation of the blazon, heraldocally correct. --Amitie 10g (talk) 19:47, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Kept: No reason to delete. In use. Yann (talk) 08:18, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Reasons for deletion request -Start81 (talk) 12:16, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
Kept: No reason to delete. Yann (talk) 08:16, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
[[Creating Commons:Deletion requests/File talk:Project Leaflet WikiProject Medicine back and front v1.png ]--112.97.38.110 20:38, 19 April 2015 (UTC)]
Kept: No reason to delete. Yann (talk) 08:16, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Doppelt vorhanden Cinemagraph.expert (talk) 08:07, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader's request Ymblanter (talk) 18:11, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
from Category:Memorial wall signs in Moscow - part one.
[edit]content of category Memorial wall signs in Moscow
- File:Alexander Fadeyev Plaque.jpg
- File:Alexander Myasnikov Plaque.jpg
- File:Alexander Serafimovich Plaque.jpg
- File:Alexander Sveshnikov Plaque on House 9, Tverskaya str., Moscow.jpg
- File:Alexei Dikiy Plaque Detail.jpg
- File:Alexei Dikiy Plaque.jpg
- File:Alexey Maresyev Plaque.jpg
- File:Ammosov plaque.jpg
- File:Anatoly Lyapidevsky Plaque.jpg
- File:Anatoly Rybakov.jpg
- File:Andrei Burov Plaque.jpg
- File:Andrey Bochvar Plaque on House 9, Tverskaya str.,Moscow.jpg
- File:Aseev's Commemorative plaque.jpg
- File:Botkin-Plaque.jpg
- File:Bryusov-House-Pr Mira-30 (2).jpg
- File:Chaplygina 15, Badge of Politkatorzan 1200px.jpg
- File:Commemorative Plaque on Metropol hotel in Moscow.jpg
- File:Ekaterina Furtseva Plaque on House 9, Tverskaya str.,Moscow.jpg
- File:Emil Gilels Plaque-Moscow,1st Tverskaya-Yamskaya,25.jpg
- File:Firefighting (1)-Moscow-Durova.jpg
- File:Firefighting (2)-Moscow-Durova.jpg
- File:General Danilin.JPG
- File:Gennady Shpalikov Plaque.jpg
- File:Georgi Dimitrov Plaque.jpg
- File:Georgy Ushakov Plaque.jpg
- File:Glinishevsky5-7(Knipper-Tchekhova).jpg
- File:Glinishevsky5-7(Maretskaya).jpg
- File:Glinishevsky5-7(Moskvin).jpg
- File:Glinishevsky5-7(Nemirovich-Danchenko-2).jpg
- File:Glinishevsky5-7(Obraztsov).jpg
- File:Glinishevsky5-7(Prudkin).jpg
- File:Glinishevsky5-7(Smirnov).jpg
- File:Glinishevsky5-7(Toporkov).jpg
- File:Glinishevsky8(Cheremnykh).jpg
- File:GOELRO.jpg
- File:Gogol house plaque.jpg
All images contain an artwork that are protected by copyright. Not COM:FOP, see COM:FOP#Russia. Wrong licensing. OTRS is missing. See also discussion Commons:Форум/Архив/2014#Статус фотографий мемориальных досок (in Russian) --Andrey Korzun (talk) 20:25, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:18, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
Bonjour, je me permets de vous contacter pour vous demander la suppression du logo de notre revue qui figure sur votre site à cette page : https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fichier:Tell_mum_everything_is_ok_logo.jpg En effet, j'ai moi-même ajouté ce logo à une époque ou une page existait à propos du fanzine participatif que nous éditions. Cette page n'existant plus, je souhaiterai voir le logo disparaitre également. Si je vous écris aujourd'hui c'est parce que nous avons constaté l'utilisation à des fins commerciales, (purement mercantiles), de notre logo : http://www.ebay.fr/itm/Tell-MUM-EVERYTHING-is-OKAY-Mug-Design-11oz-Heavy-Ceramic-Novelty-Gift-coffee-/121635581052?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_3&hash=item1c520bac7c Ce logo est celui d'une revue, et quoi qu'en dise la page wikipédia qui ne lui attribue pas de copyright, le logo existe bien et vous pouvez en juger de vous mêmes en consultant les pages de notre revue : exemple n°3 = http://www.editionsfpcf.com/index.php/tellmumeverythingisok/tell-mum-3/ (l'antériorité du logo remonte à 2009 et est bel et bien associé à notre travail) J'espère que vous comprendrez notre demande. Il ne s'agit pas d'effacer du contenu mais plutôt d'éviter que notre travail soit terni par ce genre de pratiques. Pour info, nous sommes une maison d'édition associative, sans salariés. Notre travail est donc entièrement bénévole et chaque production finance la suivante. Quand on tombe sur ce genre de produit, on se doit de réagir. Merci encore et bonne fin de journée, Maxime Milanesi, Président de l'association Les Éditions FP&CF Victor Hassy (talk) 13:03, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
- @Victor Hassy: Bonjour,
- Supprimer ce logo de Commons aura peu d'incidence sur son utilisation ailleurs. Il ne peut pas être couvert par le droit d'auteur, il est trop simple pour cela. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 07:45, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
ce fichier doit etre supprimé car à l'époque il faisait partie d'une page qui a été supprimée. un modérateur s'était alors proposé de mettre le fichier ici mais aujourdh'uin nous constatons qu'il est utilisé à des fins commerciales, aussi je demande à c qu'il soit retiré définitivement. Merci Victor Hassy (talk) 19:30, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Ce texte simple ne peut pas être protégé par le droit d'auteur. PD-ineligible. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:06, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
One source picture deleted as copyvio, must create new collection. Picture collection must collect from local picture from Commons, please upload first every picture to Commons and then collect it from those. Please take a look at File:Collage Rome.jpg as an example how to do it. See Commons:Collages for details Motopark (talk) 13:32, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: one of the sources was deleted because copyvio, so COM:DW Ezarateesteban 00:10, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
What new could be added to collection of explicit images? EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Delete Per nom. Also, I don't know if this is the proper place to mention it, but this uploader and the uploader of this image are almost certainly the same person. Dontreader (talk) 21:26, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Keep Although the quality of the images might be a bit lacking, don't see anything wrong with having nude bodies on Commons. Nesnad (talk) 11:13, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
- Nesnad, I'm not an expert, but I think COM:PORN is probably enough to decide that the file should be deleted. Dontreader (talk) 11:26, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
- Dontreader, is this porn'? I don't know about you, but I don't think a naked bum automatically says "porn"? Where is the sexual act? Honestly curious to hear your thinking on this. Cheers, Nesnad (talk) 11:56, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
- I was wrong about that. However, please read Commons:Project_scope#Must_be_realistically_useful_for_an_educational_purpose. Especially this part:
- Files that add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject, especially if they are of poor or mediocre quality.
- I was wrong about that. However, please read Commons:Project_scope#Must_be_realistically_useful_for_an_educational_purpose. Especially this part:
- Dontreader, is this porn'? I don't know about you, but I don't think a naked bum automatically says "porn"? Where is the sexual act? Honestly curious to hear your thinking on this. Cheers, Nesnad (talk) 11:56, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
- If this file is kept, should every nude picture of at least average quality be kept? Should we have a hundred million nude pictures on Commons? Or billions? No. The same principle applies to all subjects, not just nudity. A line must be drawn. And as the nominator wrote, "What new could be added to collection of explicit images?" Cheers. Dontreader (talk) 12:51, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
- Hmm. I see your point, I mean, no reason to have a billion bums, but check the category that image is in "Rear views of nude or partially nude people". Not many other examples at all... The human body comes in many shapes and sizes, and to have anatomical nudity can be well within the scope I suppose? I'm curious why you don't want it? Is the nudity offensive to you? Nesnad (talk) 05:23, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
- Is nudity offensive to me? No. I'm 41. I used to watch excellent American soft porn (and some French porn) on cable on the weekends in my early 30s but sadly those happy days are over for me, at least for now. I even miss the music. By all means the second picture in that category (the very white girl - although even small tattoos turn me off) should be kept, as well as this one for sure. By the way, when I began to read the description of that picture of Natasha I hoped that it was an erotic story and I got all excited, but I was wrong and deeply disappointed. Nothing seems to go my way these days.
- Maybe the problem is that people create too many categories, which might explain why that one doesn't have many images. Anyway, to be honest with you, I'm very much a deletionist. I'm even cruel in that sense. I go through lists of recently uploaded files when I have the energy to do so, and I make lots of people upset because I nominate many files for deletion invoking the "out of scope" rationale sometimes. I'm convinced that some of the uploaders whose pictures I nominate for deletion proceed to use witchcraft against me because my health immediately goes down the drain each time. But I persevere because I donate money to the Wikimedia Foundation every year, and I suppose it costs money to host pictures. You can see in my most recent contributions that I spent a lot of time and energy on a group of pictures that were uploaded by a politician, and nominated for deletion (thank God). What a narcissistic idiot. The guy uploaded dozens of campaign pictures of himself. They all look the same to me. I wanted to vomit. Can't Latin American politicians come up with new ideas for campaigning? I guess not. It's probably like asking if a Latin American politician can be in office without being corrupt. Impossible. Particularly in Venezuela, where I grew up.
- But where was I? Oh, right. I was saying that since I donate money to the WMF, I am a deletionist since I suppose it costs money to host pictures here on Commons. If every uploader donated at least a dollar a year, then I wouldn't be such a son of a crazy bitch. Do you think I like to nominate pictures of beautiful female natural redheads for deletion, for example? I am fanatically attracted to natural redheads, especially if they have blue eyes. Yet I have nominated a couple of really hot redheads for deletion (after saving them to my computer, of course). Now please excuse me because I need to take my medication! Dontreader (talk) 06:46, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
- Hmm. I see your point, I mean, no reason to have a billion bums, but check the category that image is in "Rear views of nude or partially nude people". Not many other examples at all... The human body comes in many shapes and sizes, and to have anatomical nudity can be well within the scope I suppose? I'm curious why you don't want it? Is the nudity offensive to you? Nesnad (talk) 05:23, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
- If this file is kept, should every nude picture of at least average quality be kept? Should we have a hundred million nude pictures on Commons? Or billions? No. The same principle applies to all subjects, not just nudity. A line must be drawn. And as the nominator wrote, "What new could be added to collection of explicit images?" Cheers. Dontreader (talk) 12:51, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Not for the content but it's a collague without specify the sources Ezarateesteban 00:09, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
Historical painting. Cuadro perteneciente al RCAC Pavía n.º4. Obra de Felipe González Rojas, 1893-1895, España.
Deleted: not a valid reason for delete it Ezarateesteban 00:11, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
Hubo una equivocación al adjuntar el archivo, el formato no es el que deseaba subir. HistoriadoresdeSantaMarta (talk) 19:09, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request and out of scope Ezarateesteban 00:13, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
Craig only made his debut in 1951, so it's impossible for this image to have been created before 1946 (as would be required for the image to have been free in Australia at the date of the URAA) — Chris Woodrich (talk) 06:58, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- The cutoff date on the template used on the image is 1955. If the dates are wrong on the template, then the template should be amended. Neelix (talk) 19:43, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- The cutoff date for Australia itself is 1955; the template is correct. The cutoff date for the URAA (and thus for the US copyright on Australian images) is 1946, as shown on the English Wikipedia's template here. The issue is not Australian copyright, but the US one. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:23, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Need to know actual dates of creation and first publishing. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:25, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
Arquivo igual, com nome e informações corrigidas foi enviado. Rog 800 (talk) 12:14, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:02, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:Emelie von Walterstorff
[edit]Artist died in 1948, which is less than 70 years ago.
- File:Folkdräkt, barn. Sommarkolt för småkullor. Gagnefs socken, Dalarna. Emelie von Walterstorff - Nordiska Museet - NMA.0035328.jpg
- File:Folkdräkt, helgdagsdräkt, Ny socken, Värmland. Emelie von Walterstorff - Nordiska Museet - NMA.0027739.jpg
- File:Folkdräkt, högtidsdräkt. Gagnefs socken, Dalarna. Emelie von Walterstorff - Nordiska Museet - NMA.0027747.jpg
- File:Folkdräkt, söndagseftermiddagsdräkt, Ny socken, Värmland. Emelie von Walterstorff - Nordiska Museet - NMA.0027740.jpg
- File:Kvinnodräkt, Jämjö socken, Östra härad, Blekinge. Akvarell av Emelie von Walterstorff - Nordiska Museet - NMA.0035302.jpg
- File:Kvinnodräkt, Medelstads härad, Blekinge. Akvarell av Emelie von Walterstorff - Nordiska Museet - NMA.0035300.jpg
- File:Kvinnodräkt, Östra härad, Blekinge. Akvarell av Emelie von Walterstorff - Nordiska Museet - NMA.0035301.jpg
- File:Ung man iklädd folkdräkt, festdräkt, från Herrestads härad i Skåne. E. von Walterstorff - Nordiska Museet - NMA.0052802.jpg
Stefan4 (talk) 13:16, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
(Institution:Nordiska museet) owns the copyright since the works were commissioned by the museum. I'm changing the incorrect PD-mark to CC0 (as a representative of Nordiska museet). Is that sufficient action from our part? Ambrosiani (talk) 09:29, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Now OK. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:07, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
In Category:Unidentified biology diagrams, unused, useless title. Unless it can be identified what the picture shows, the picture doesn't seem to satisfy COM:EDUSE. Stefan4 (talk) 16:46, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep we have category:unidentified subjects in order to not delete unidentified pictures otherwise we should empty this category and its subcategories--Pierpao.lo (listening) 18:34, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Something medical, added medical diagrams. Somebody should be able to correctly identify this diagram. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:11, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
Low res, no exif, unlikely to be own work. Thibaut120094 (talk) 16:55, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- Bonjour, il s'agit d'une photo que j'ai prise personnellement de Pierre-André Hélène avec son accord, j'invite toute personne doutant de ma bonne foi à lui envoyé un mail pour avoir confirmation.Merci. Courtisane (talk) 20:01, 1 june 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: all other uploads (c)vios, removing of warnings on talk page. How can we trust that this is own work? Com:PCP Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:15, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope: unidentified woman. Stefan4 (talk) 17:18, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Useful to illustrate espresso drinking. In scope. --Fæ (talk) 17:40, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep As Fae moreover is a good pic--Pierpao.lo (listening) 18:30, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep @Stefan4: No valid reason. That's it. --Achim (talk) 20:42, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Kept: not a grrrreat photo but potentially useful. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:18, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
Poor quality, other images exist with a better, acceptable quality. ViperSnake151 (talk) 17:44, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- Had a go at countering softness, lack of contrast and sharpness- see new version to compare- but whether it's worth keeping is still a matter of opinion.
- This appears to be the only view of this particular branch, but whether that makes it worth keeping, I don't know. Ubcule (talk) 22:53, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
Kept: good enuf for me Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:22, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
Nudity and porn - ejaculation Smayer97 (talk) 17:47, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: just the daily peni pic Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:23, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
Jeyankondailai? Copyright of media star photograph? Hansmuller (talk) 18:20, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Own work doubtful. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:25, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
immagine non necessaria
Deleted: probably (c)vio, seems like a wtermark has been removed Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:38, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
Datei fehlerhaft Joergsam (talk) 21:55, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:47, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
Copyvio. Fry1989 eh? 22:51, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- "According to the Mexican copyright law (23-07-2003), Article 14, case 7 & 8: " "Copyright shall not apply to shields, flags or emblems of any country, state, municipality or political division; or names, acronyms, symbols or emblems of international governmental organisations, or any other organization officially recognized." Santos Laguna is an "other organization". Zerind (talk) 05:51, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
Keep Per Zerind. The Mexican act states: Las reproducciones o imitaciones, sin autorización, de escudos, banderas o emblemas de cualquier país, estado, municipio o división política equivalente, ni las denominaciones, siglas, símbolos o emblemas de organizaciones internacionales gubernamentales, no gubernamentales, o de cualquier otra organización reconocida oficialmente, así como la designación verbal de los mismos; --Discasto talk 08:36, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
- This is a private football club, it is questionable whether a government license can apply to it. Fry1989 eh? 17:12, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete unless there is evidence that the club is actually an "officially recognised organization". I would always recommend using the latest laws e.g. the 2014 law even though it pretty much says the same thing. To my mind that term ("officially recognized") would imply some sort of official announcement or document from the government. I might be wrong but I suspect the law refers to non-governmental organizations. Green Giant (talk) 14:11, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Per Fry1989. The Club Santos Laguna is a private sports club, and not covered by the exemption indicated on Mexican copyright law. Fma12 (talk) 17:49, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion above. sport logos covered by gov-license is stretching it a little too far. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:03, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
It is not range of balalaika. The Range of balalaika is 
ПростоУчастник (talk) 23:06, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- Comment I asked at the VP for an expert opinion. Commons:Village_pump#Music_expert_needed. Please keep open until resolved. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:43, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
- Comment I'm not a "music expert", let alone a balalaika expert, but I played piano for many years, I also played percussion (i.e. drums, timpani, marimba, xylophone etc) for around 6 years, played a little guitar too. Because of this I know how to read and understand music notation and instruments. From reading the Balalaika wiki article, there is no right/wrong answer per se. The three notes a player chooses to tune the 3 strings on the balalaika is a matter of preference. So if the player preferred to tune their 3 strings to the notes E, E and A then File:Balalaika Range2.svg would be correct, but if the player preferred to tune their 3 strings to D, E and A then File:Range balalaika.png would be correct. So in essence it is all up to preference of the particular balalaika player. Offnfopt(talk) 08:04, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
- ПростоУчастник is right. One can try to tune a 4-string balalaika like a violin or vice versa, but that would be extremely unusual. The tuning shown at File:Range balalaika.png is very unusual too and might be treated as a missed try of an amateur. So my opinion is Delete. --Achim (talk) 16:28, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
- ПростоУчастник is right. One can try to tune a 4-string balalaika like a violin or vice versa, but that would be extremely unusual. The tuning shown at File:Range balalaika.png is very unusual too and might be treated as a missed try of an amateur. So my opinion is
Deleted: per Achim. Thanks for the info! Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:11, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
Arquivo igual, com informações de cor corrigidas para o horário e realidade local foi enviado.
Arquivo correto, não necessita de mais correções. Grato.Rog 800 (talk) 12:15, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Arquivo repetido Rog 800 (talk) 12:18, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
arquivo repetido, errado Rog 800 (talk) 12:19, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Kept: . JuTa 07:23, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:Homo floresiensis models
[edit]No evidence these models are not copyrighted.
- File:Homo floresiensis - forensic facial reconstruction.png
- File:Homo floresiensis - steps of forensic facial reconstruction.png
- File:Homo floresiensis adult female - model of head - Smithsonian Museum of Natural History - 2012-05-17.jpg
- File:Homo floresiensis Restoration model.jpg
Eleassar (t/p) 09:20, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- The File:Homo floresiensis adult female - model of head - Smithsonian Museum of Natural History - 2012-05-17.jpg model was created by an employee/employees of the Smithsonian Institution, an agency of the U.S. federal government. Created by federal employees in the course of their federal employment, the model is therefore in the public domain. - Tim1965 (talk) 15:05, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- How can this be verified? What if it was created by an outside contractor? --Eleassar (t/p) 16:41, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- A search at the U.S. Copyright Office database shows artist John Gurche having formally copyrighted several books, but no works of art. No formal claim of copyright need be filed, but Gurche has done so in the past. At the Smithsonian's Human Origins web site, the Smithsonian claims copyright of its photograph of the reconstruction (which it would not have been able to do, had the reconstruction itself been copyrighted). The Smithsonian specifically omits any "courtesy of" statement, which is their standard practice when displaying images of copyrighted work. On his web site Gurche specifically copyrights his images only. All this supports a work-for-hire artwork whose copyright is owned by the Smithsonian (and hence now in the public domain). Ideally, the best support would be a statement from Gurche acknowledging his assignment of copyright to the Smithsonian, or a similar statement from the Smithsonian alleging they own the copyright. - Tim1965 (talk) 19:23, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
- Even considering you're correct here as much as it concerns other aspects, regarding the statement "All this supports a work-for-hire artwork whose copyright is owned by the Smithsonian (and hence now in the public domain)," I don't see why "hence now in the public domain" should follow from "All this supports a work-for-hire artwork whose copyright is owned by the Smithsonian". As far as I know and as it is written at en:Copyright status of work by the U. S. government, a work of the United States government is "a work prepared by an officer or employee [of the federal government] as part of that person's official duties," which is not the case here. --Eleassar (t/p) 06:41, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
- How can this be verified? What if it was created by an outside contractor? --Eleassar (t/p) 16:41, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete The Smithsonian was started by a trust from a will, and it's considered different. The US Copyright Office's most recent compendium of practices says they do register Smithsonian copyrights, and unless there's an intent from the WMF to fight the lawsuit, we should follow the Copyright Office here.--Prosfilaes (talk) 14:00, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:19, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
watermarked image claimed as "own work" EricEnfermero (talk) 10:09, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I watermarked the following image, because of the Buddha diffuser shown here is a make of Soulflower, so that there is not any controversy on the fact that I have uploaded there product without giving there name. If you want any more details, please reply. Thank you Vivek.bekhabar (talk)
- Credits for creators of items in photos should be credited in the author info, not on the image, since images are likely to be less usable due to watermarks, and there is no way to prevent some user from uploading a version with the watermark removed. The other big reason is that editors will think it's a copyviolation, as happened here. --Pitke (talk) 14:12, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, derivative work from copyrighted design. OTRS-permission from Soulflower as diffuser's designer is needed. Taivo (talk) 09:13, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
As per COM:CSCR#Japan, in Japan, consent is required for publishing photographs of identifiable persons even in public places. While the uploader does appear to have made an effort to blur out the person's face slightly, it is still clearly identifiable, and the fact that the subject is a minor and the photograph appears to have been taken from afar with a telephoto lens without the person's knowledge also raises privacy concerns. DAJF (talk) 10:16, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- I don't like the assumptions you made about me. I did not use a telephoto lens, it's just cropped from another picture I took because after reviewing the other photo I saw this person in uniform and I thought it would be useful as uniforms have changed a lot over the years, having a 2015 snapshot would be useful. I did more than "slightly" blur the face, it's quite blurred AND before blurring I smudged the face with GIMP to make sure even if someone applied photoshop sharpening skills or whatever to it they could not reconstruct the face of the person in question. I have respected COM:CSCR#Japan and there is no reason to delete this. Cheers, Nesnad (talk) 12:22, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- I'd like to say, I go out of my way to respect COM:CSCR#Japan, and although I am sure I have failed some times or whatever (only human) I think it is quite ironic that DAJF is fighting for the deletion of this when said user severely violates the same rule regularly. I am not fighting for the deletion of users content because they are quite good shots--- keep them, good in my opinion and a little bit of face never hurt anyone (it's just insanely hypocritical) but for example File:Tsuruse_Station_east_entrance_20150409.JPG clearly shows the faces of two minors (one boy is in school uniform so a minor without a doubt) and there was no attempt at all to blur the faces or anything. I don't know why you are going around trying to delete my images DAJF, but this needs to be closed and we need to end your vendetta against me. Call a peace summit? Cheers, Nesnad (talk) 08:05, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
- Comment My concern regarding this particular image is that the person is the sole subject of the photo and clearly recognisable, which is why I feel it falls foul of COM:CSCR#Japan. That's all. Certainly no vendetta involved, as I concentrate on problems with individual images rather than worrying about who uploaded them, and this one deletion nomination shouldn't be taken personally or detract from the credit you deserve for all the other useful photos of Japanese stations etc you have uploaded to Commons. I'm not aware of any photos I have uploaded that focus entirely on persons taken without their consent, but if any appear problematic, they should also be nominated for discussion/deletion. --DAJF (talk) 09:16, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
- Glad to hear it isn't a vendetta (that would suck) but if you read COM:CSCR#Japan you would know that technically you aren't suppose to have identifiable people in your in public shots, regardless if they are the only person (and in my photo there is a guy in the back too so not only person anyway) or not. In your photo, it clearly shows two faces at a small station, it would be quite easy to find out who those two people were from that photo if we were being anal about rules. In fact, tons of your other shots have clearly identifiable people. The one I linked is just the tip of your iceberg of hypocrisy. For example, File:Shinjuku-sanchome_Fukutoshin_Line_platforms_20131116.JPG the lady on the left is looking right at your lens and has a very clearly defined face. It goes on and on. I strongly suggest you retract this deletion request of yours as it is nonsense, and I am clearly putting more effort into following the rules than you are. Gosh. Salutations, Nesnad (talk) 10:25, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
- Comment - Can an admin come by and close this with a Keep already? DAJF's deletion request is baseless. The COM:CSCR#Japan page itself says that the page "illustrates standards or behaviors which most editors agree with in principle and generally follow." Notice the keywords "in principle" and "generally follow". They are guidelines, not laws of Commons. To respect Japanese Wikipedia it is considered good manners to blur out faces of private people in public. But it is not required, as can be seen in the same category that this image exists in. Click it. There are billions of Japanese school students without blurred faces in that category and in other parts of Wikimedia Commons. It is not a requirement on Wikimedia to blur the faces of private people in Japan, it is just good manners. And I did blur the face in this case. So hurry up and set this as keep and let's move on. I am kind of annoyed here. Cheers, Nesnad (talk) 10:57, 2 June 2015 (UTC) ADDENDUM: DAFJ said on her/his talk page that "blurring the image more" would ensure the file would be kept. If that is the only option, of course I would blur more so I don't know why this is up for deletion--- if that's what I had to do I would do it. I could easily blur it more. But more I am trying to make the point that trying to delete this image in the first place is baseless, and I wish I could hear from an admin on that. Cheers, Nesnad (talk) 17:21, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
Kept, I think, that the image is enough blurred. Taivo (talk) 09:28, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
ENG: This category, within a Cultural heritage category, has a unique element (also to be deleted), the picture of a contemporary building, far from being a patrimonial building, which is placed at the address of the formerly catalogued building, that was demolished.
CAT: Aquesta categoria, dins de categories de patrimoni cultural, sols té l'element d'informació (que també caldria esborrar o resituar) d'un edifici contemporani, lluny de ser patrimoni arquitectònic, que percisament ocupa l'espai d'un edifici catalogat enderrocat.
Question Anybody with more information around? --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:33, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
Kept, ca.wiki says, that the building is from XIX century. Probably it is in public domain due to age. More information about architect is needed for deletion, but for now photos are not deleted, category is not empty and will be kept. Taivo (talk) 09:35, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
Notice that the edges of this image have a thin black line, like a thin black frame. This happens (and with the same cropping) on this page. In my opinion this looks suspicious, as if the picture on Commons was taken from that page. I think the uploader should prove ownership by providing a version of this picture that doesn't have that black frame. Perhaps he or she could email an Administrator or an OTRS agent with the original file as an attachment, or use COM:CONSENT. That's my opinion. Dontreader (talk) 22:09, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- I sent an email out to clarify who did what and what not.
OTRS ticket 2015060910005798 .Please keep open for another 7 days. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:00, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.gif){kind=link}
.gif){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_element-s_Marikel_Lahana.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
skin_tags.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_1892.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.gif){kind=link}
.gif){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.gif){kind=link}
.gif){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_element-s_Marikel_Lahana.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_element-s_Marikel_Lahana.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_element-s_Marikel_Lahana.JPG){kind=link}
_element-s_Marikel_Lahana.JPG){kind=link}
_element-s_Marikel_Lahana.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
skin_tags.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
skin_tags.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
skin_tags.jpg){kind=link}
skin_tags.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-Moscow-Durova.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-Moscow-Durova.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, still no OTRS-permission. If the permission arrives, then the file is restored, but actually I do not believe own work. Taivo (talk) 09:41, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
Could someone explain to me why this can be in Commons. Aren't such mascots copyrighted ? Hektor (talk) 07:27, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, the mascots are copyrighted, but the stamps of Russia are not copyrighted. If you use a stamp as a whole, you can publish the stamp in Commons. But derivatives are, as a rule, forbidden. For example, you cannot cut a mascot out of the stamp. Dmitry Ivanov (talk) 08:18, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
- This sounds like a loophole to me. Hektor (talk) 06:52, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
- You can find explanation here. Laws are different in various jurisdictions, and there is nothing wrong about it. --Leonid Dzhepko (talk) 18:24, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
Kept: As per Dmitry Ivanov and Leonid Dzhepko russavia (talk) 07:06, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
Even though stamps are technically public domain in Russia, they still contain depictions of the Sochi mascots, which are a separate, trademarked and copyrighted work owned by Sochi's organizing committee. Thus, they are not fully free. ViperSnake151 (talk) 15:28, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Yes, in this case we have the restriction on the making of derivative works based upon this stamp: simply speaking, you cannot cut a mascot out of the stamp. From this point of view the stamp with the mascots of the Sochi Olympics is not fully free.
- At the same time the case of the stamps is not unique. There are the restrictions on the making of derivatives and/or on the fields of use applied to such things like state symbols (coats of arms, flags etc.), bank notes etc. The things like these are not fully free: for example, the commercial use of current national coats of arms is very restricted or forbidden.
- And the community of Commons has the consensus about these things: they can be uploaded.
- The same principle can be (and must be) applied to the stamps, including this souvenir sheet with the Sochi mascots.
- Yours respectfully, Dmitry Ivanov (talk) 19:25, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep, per previous DR and this comment by Dmitry. Although the characters are (C) and (R), Sochi 2014 Olympic and Paralympic Organizing Committee, owner of the rights of the characters, allowed the organisation that create such stamps to be released. As such, is was responsability of the SOPOC to know the laws of Russia for stamps. Tbhotch™ 23:30, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
- Commons requires content to be free in both the US and its source country. I think this would not apply to the former. ViperSnake151 (talk) 03:22, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
- I think ViperSnake151 is wrong here: the image of the Russian stamp will also be PD in the US, according to the general principle of the Convention. Please do not mix up different things: a stamp image and Olympic mascots themselves. Here we speak about deletion of a stamp image. --Leonid Dzhepko (talk) 07:32, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
- Commons requires content to be free in both the US and its source country. I think this would not apply to the former. ViperSnake151 (talk) 03:22, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep, per previous Dmitry Ivanov and ViperSnake151. This file is used in a way that is appropriate template {{PD-RU-exempt}}. --►Cekli829 08:30, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. Неважно, какое произведение воспроизводит почтовый блок. Весь блок является знаком почтовой оплаты. --Vizu (talk) 18:25, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 12:23, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
Mascots are a seperately copyrighted work that cannot be covered by the PD claim, per Commons:Deletion_requests/Azerbaijan_World_Chess_Championship_set, making the entire image non-free. ViperSnake151 (talk) 05:16, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Per aforesaid, and per a similar case: Commons:Deletion requests/File:1C PSE Russia 2008.jpg. To say the truth, the precedent of the Azerbaijan World Chess Championship cited by ViperSnake151, doesn’t look as an especially conclusive proof, this deletion has to be disputed. Dmitry Ivanov (talk) 18:53, 27 May 2015 (UTC).
- Comment The artwork depicted was pre-existing and is fully copyrighted; being published on a "public domain" stamp does not change the fact that there is a copyright on the character and its depictions. ViperSnake151 (talk) 04:08, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
- In this case: an exception to the copyrights {{PD-RU-exempt}} applies to stamps only (and other marks of postal payment). Any other mascots images would violate copyright. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 07:24, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep. The decision to delete Azerbaijan_World_Chess_Championship_set was absolutely wrong from legal standpoint, and should be reversed BTW. Wikimedia Foundation runs no legal risks in this instance, because Azerbaijani law is definite here: stamp images are not copyright protected, and so are not protected in the US as well. Mascots are mascots, and postage stamps are postage stamps; legal status of the two is different, and the protection they enjoy is different. Do not mix the two. Images of postage stamps as long as they are identifiable as such, i.e. in their entirety, are free. As soon as you separate a mascot image from the postage stamp image, it would forfeit its uncopyrightable status, therefore no derivative works are allowed with respect to postage stamp images. --Leonid Dzhepko (talk) 08:45, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
- Comment There is no denying that the stamp itself is PD. But the artwork contained within it is copyright Sochi Organizing Committee, and there are two distinct copyrights that have to be acknowledged; one has been waived per law, but the other is not. It is like a photo taken in a region where there is no Freedom of Panorama; the photographer still has rights to the rest of the photo, but it is still subject to the copyrights of the subject depicted. ViperSnake151 (talk) 00:13, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
- Disagree A) If the stamps in Russia are in PD under a normative act, therefore exceptions to the PD-status of the stamps have to be established by means of a normative act. But there are no exceptions to the PD-status of the stamps of Russia in normative acts. B) The rights of a copyright holder (the rights of the Olympic Committee in our case) are not trespassed, they are regulated by agreement between a copyright holder and the postal authorities: a copyright holder can prohibit the publication of a copyrighted work as a part of a PD-work or can permit to publish a copyrighted work as a part of a PD-work (for a compensation or without it). B) The similar situation is in “no-FoP-countries”: the sense of a “no-FoP-law” isn't in the prohibition on the publication of photos featuring architectural works, “no-FoP” means the necessity to come to an agreement between the author (publisher) of a photo featuring an copyrighted architectural work and the holder of the copyright. Dmitry Ivanov (talk) 08:36, 30 May 2015 (UTC).
- Keep, per Leonid Dzhepko and Dmitry Ivanov. --Michael Romanov (talk) 08:13, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
______ Kept. As above and prior keeps. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:45, 27 June 2015 (UTC)