Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2015/03/24
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
![115 File:"Lo que yo quiero de ti y lo que tú quieres de mí".png](#File:"Lo_que_yo_quiero_de_ti_y_lo_que_tú_quieres_de_mí".png){kind=link}
아프리카_정규1집.JPG){kind=link}
아프리카_정규2집.JPG){kind=link}
,_Maxine_Albro,_date_unknown.jpg){kind=link}
![215 File:"We have a situation!" Eindhoven 2013.png](#File:"We_have_a_situation!"_Eindhoven_2013.png){kind=link}
.gif){kind=link}
herror en subida Bot-contacto (talk) 04:35, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:Denniss. JuTa 19:05, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
non-fair use Davaplayboi (talk) 01:55, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. INeverCry 08:44, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Dateibezeichnung entspricht nicht realen Gegebenheiten Pmuehlich (talk) 21:17, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
I have to apologize. Instead of setting up a deletion request on Produktion Balaenenweg Aarau.JPG, I caught this site. --Pmuehlich (talk) 21:57, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
Kept. Jcb (talk) 14:18, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
Ich möchte das selbe Bild in SVG-Format hochladen Sonneninfo (talk) 17:44, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Keep Obviously an error with deletion request. (Translation: "I want to upload the file in svg") --Indeedous (talk) 18:04, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept as above. Yann (talk) 12:00, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
ORDAT FOSS Teilsysteme.jpg Doktor Wegel (talk) 08:02, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Obviously an error with deletion request. Raymond 08:29, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Ersatz durch eine korrekte Datei desselben Autors Klaumich49 (talk) 20:20, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --shizhao (talk) 09:02, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
ich will es so haben danke Remisxanto (talk) 21:12, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 21:20, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
Die Interessensgemeinschaft, die dort abgebildet ist, möchte dieses von mir erstellte Bild nicht mehr sehen. Dory171 (talk) 10:52, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: obvious error. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 09:51, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
self promotion Fixertool (talk) 05:16, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 12:18, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
I don't want random people to download and copyright this Thefrozenflintdoctor (talk) 05:18, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 12:20, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
ششششذدذدذذذذ 105.104.8.143 11:33, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Spedy kept: Vandalism. File widely in use. --Amitie 10g (talk) 14:38, 24 March 2015 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)
Exclusive use of en:Wikipedia. There are copyrights. License not free. Yanguas (talk) 01:45, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 21:17, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
speedyDelete|junk file Rahulazm (talk) 10:29, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 22:18, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
speedyDelete|personal junk Rahulazm (talk) 11:18, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 22:25, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
speedyDelete|personal junk Rahulazm (talk) 11:18, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 22:22, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
speedyDelete|personal junk Rahulazm (talk) 11:18, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 22:23, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
speedyDelete|personal junk Rahulazm (talk) 11:19, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 22:24, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
speedyDelete|personal junk Rahulazm (talk) 11:19, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 22:23, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
speedyDelete|personal junk Rahulazm (talk) 11:19, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 22:22, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
speedyDelete|personal junk Rahulazm (talk) 11:20, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 22:21, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
speedyDelete|personal junk Rahulazm (talk) 11:20, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 22:21, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
speedyDelete|personal junk Rahulazm (talk) 11:21, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 22:20, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
speedyDelete|personal junk Rahulazm (talk) 11:21, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 22:19, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
speedyDelete|personal junk Rahulazm (talk) 11:21, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 22:24, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
copyright violation Wikifido (talk) 13:37, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 21:16, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
File:Alicia Kozakiewicz at the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, Alexandria, VA.png
[edit]
COM:COPYVIO. Derivative work of the poster on the wall, not user's own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:40, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Copied from the Internet. Yann (talk) 21:41, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Derivative work Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 21:10, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- Support - as uploader. Ali Fazal (talk) 21:11, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader request of recent upload/DW. INeverCry 22:33, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
File description page for file that does not exist. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:38, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Created again, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nl-.ogg. Probably this should be salted. GZWDer (talk) 05:09, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted by INeverCry (unsuccessful upload or just junk? Are problems with VicuñaUploader?) --Amitie 10g (talk) 03:35, 25 March 2015 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)
Derivative work Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 21:10, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- Support - as uploader. Ali Fazal (talk) 21:11, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:26, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by FarhodShaymanov (talk · contribs)
[edit]A series of football (soccer) logos claimed as "own work" but which aren't. Probable COM:COPYVIOs without more information on sources/licenses.
- File:Soʻgʻdiyona FK.gif
- File:Shoʻrtan FK.png
- File:Qizilqum FK.png
- File:Olmaliq futbol klubi.jpg
- File:Olmaliq FK.png
- File:Nasaf Qarshi FK.jpg
- File:Metallurg Bekobod FK.png
- File:Mashʼal logo.png
- File:Lokomotiv Toshkent logo.png
- File:Samarqand Dinamo FK 3.gif
- File:Samarqand Dinamo FK 2.gif
- File:Dinamo Samarqand FK.jpg
- File:Buxoro PFK 2.png
- File:Buxoro PFK 1.gif
- File:Buxoro PFK.jpg
- File:Andijon PFK logotipi (eski).gif
- File:Andijon PFK logotipi 1.png
- File:Andijon PFK logotipi.gif
- File:Qoʻqon 1912 (....-2014).png
- File:Qoʻqon 1912 emblemasi.png
- File:Beijing Guoan.jpg
- File:Beijing Guoan FC.jpg
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:21, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Non-trivial logos. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
This is small photo without metadata. No proper source, no proper author. It was transferred from pl.wiki, where original uploader got blocked for copyright violations and all his uploads are now there deleted. Probably this is also copyvio. Taivo (talk) 20:28, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:17, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Unused file of not notable person Dudek1337 (talk) 20:49, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:16, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Not un use, self promotion : http://www.karsten-ulstrup.dk/ -- Christian Ferrer 20:53, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:16, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
not an Own work -- Christian Ferrer 21:09, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:16, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
not an Own work IMO -- Christian Ferrer 21:10, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:16, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
not in use, self promotion -- Christian Ferrer 21:11, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:15, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Upscaled, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 21:12, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:15, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
certainly not an Own work, too small for to be used -- Christian Ferrer 21:12, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:15, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
It seems to be from Facebook. Yann (talk) 21:36, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:14, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MarhallGuzmanP (talk · contribs)
[edit]Small size, no EXIF data, all other uploads are copyvios, unlikely to be own works.
- File:ITESM Monterrey NL.jpg
- File:Obispado Monterrey.jpg
- File:Monterrey City.jpg
- File:Macroplaza y faro del comercio.jpg
- File:Parque fundidora.jpg
- File:Edificios de Monterrey.jpg
- File:Edificios Corporativos.jpg
- File:Edificios hoteleros..jpg
- File:Cerro de las mitras..jpg
- File:CerrodeLasila.jpg
- File:Valle Oriente desde hotel.jpg
- File:Valle Oriente 2.jpg
- File:Valle Oriente.jpg
- File:Plaza-san-aguitin-700x280.jpg
- File:Palacio Mucnicipal.jpg
- File:Turismo Monterrey.jpg
- File:EconomiaMonterrey.jpg
- File:NieveSobreLaSierra.jpg
- File:MonterreyCatedral.jpg
- File:UniversidadRegiomontana.jpg
- File:ObispadoMTY.jpg
- File:TecdeMonterrey.jpg
- File:ITESM.jpg
- File:MonterreyNoche.jpg
- File:Corporativo.jpg
- File:Fundidora de Noche.jpg
- File:Montemorelos-692x360.jpg
- File:Centro Historico de Monterrey.png
- File:Zona San Geronimo.jpg
- File:Corporativo cemex.png
- File:Edificios financieros.jpg
- File:Economia en Monterrey.jpg
- File:Monterrey Poblado.jpg
- File:Bosques en Nuevo Leon.png
- File:AMM De Monterrey.jpg
- File:Sierra Madre en Invierno.jpg
- File:Catedral en la Macroplaza.jpg
- File:Panoramica de Monterrey desde el Obispado.png
- File:Itesm.jpg
- File:Torre Ciudadana de Monterrey.jpg
- File:Nuevo Estadio+.jpg
- File:Monterrey de Noche.png
- File:Monterreeyy.jpg
- File:Monterrey.jpg
- File:Mtyyyy.jpg
- File:Mtyyy.png
- File:Mty2.jpg
- File:Mty3.png
- File:Mty1.jpg
Yann (talk) 21:52, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:13, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by JuanEzequielMartinez (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal pictures. Out of scope
Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 22:08, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:10, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by UnHombreSoloConGuitarra (talk · contribs)
[edit]Self-promotional pictures. Non notable guy
Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 22:13, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:09, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
This file is a downsized duplicate of this wallpapers-hdr.com file, marked there as "Copyright: This wallpaper is property of its respective owner. You can use it only for personal purpose as your personal desktop theme, you can not use it for any other purpose". The fotopedia source URL is dead and its claim of CC-BY license cannot be verified. MPF (talk) 22:52, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Available via internet archive [1], file was uploaded there in 1/2009, claimed source site has 9/2014 as upload date. The claimed copyright violation is the other way round or they bought the right from the original author. BTW: HDR wallpapers on this site are collected from various sources: own free wallpapers, Internet sites and some are submitted by site visitors - hardly a reputable source for copyright claims.--Denniss (talk) 23:11, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep: per Denniss; besides, this upload was reviewed by Natuur12, as stated in the file page. (What’s the template to mark mislicensed reuses found elsewhere?) -- Tuválkin ✉ 01:29, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Didym (talk) 00:08, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused test image - no educational value INeverCry 23:25, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:07, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:27, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:06, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:29, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:06, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:29, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:06, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:30, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:06, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gulrej khan king (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 23:40, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:06, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by TodoCoolTv (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal image and logos of no notability
- File:Todo Cool Entertainment.png
- File:Logo Del Programa.png
- File:Héctor José Lugo.png
- File:Logo Programa De Tv (Todo Cool).png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
INeverCry 23:42, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:05, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:45, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:04, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:46, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:04, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:46, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:04, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:47, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:04, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal images/artworks
INeverCry 23:48, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:04, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image/artwork INeverCry 23:49, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:03, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Scoala nitchidorf (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused files with no sources given for pieces of the collage.
- File:Nițchidorf-L'ombelico del mondo-Master of puppets.jpg
- File:Nițchidorf-Satul Nițchidorf.jpg
- File:Nițchidorf-Biserica catolică.jpg
- File:Nițchiforf-Herta Müller..jpg
McZusatz (talk) 23:50, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:03, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:51, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:02, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ben camarillo lugo (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images/drawings
INeverCry 23:53, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:02, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 23:53, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:02, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:55, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:02, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope INeverCry 23:57, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:01, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:58, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:01, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
A modern portrait fantasy. Likely copyrighted. Ghirlandajo (talk) 00:11, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
out of scope, no educational value Oursana (talk) 00:32, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
This photo is non free, according to the Flickr bot. Opps, I honestly did not know. Please delete the photo, because this Flickr user is Flick washing, CookieMonster755 (talk) 01:23, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused personal files. Commons is not Facebook.
- File:Mina gonzalez 22.jpg
- File:Mina gonzalez 21.jpg
- File:Mina gonzalez 20.jpg
- File:Mina gonzalez 19.jpg
- File:Mina gonzalez 18.jpg
- File:Mina gonzalez 17.jpg
- File:Mina gonzalez 16.jpg
- File:Mina gonzalez 15.jpg
- File:Mina gonzalez 14.jpg
- File:Mina gonzalez 13.jpg
- File:Mina gonzalez 12.jpg
- File:Mina gonzalez 11.jpg
- File:Mina gonzalez 10.jpg
- File:Mina gonzalez 9.jpg
- File:Mina gonzalez 8.jpg
- File:Mina gonzalez 7.jpg
- File:Mina gonzalez 6.jpeg
- File:Mina gonzalez 5.jpg
- File:Mina gonzalez 4.jpg
- File:Mina gonzalez 3.jpg
- File:Mina gonzalez 2.jpg
- File:Mina gonzalez1.jpg
- File:Mina gonzalez.jpg
- File:Mina Gonzalez.jpg
Stefan4 (talk) 01:34, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Well, at least the uploader was not trying to deceive anyone since he/she provided detailed information, including the owner of the picture. The problem is that if you did not take a picture, it is not "own work". Permission must be sought for release under a free license, which is very difficult to obtain from Getty Images. Please read this before you upload a picture again: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:UploadWizard Dontreader (talk) 03:10, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Comment I found it on the web anyway, so this almost certainly confirms what the uploader wrote. A good-faith upload, but a copyright violation. Dontreader (talk) 03:14, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
As the uploader wrote, it's an album cover of a group called "Los Poetas". It can be found on the web. Almost certainly not "own work". Dontreader (talk) 03:37, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Comment I meant to include this example: http://www.techniciansmusic.com/ Dontreader (talk) 03:38, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Picture collection must collect from local picture from Commons, please upload first every picture to Commons and then collect it from those. Please take a look at File:Collage Rome.jpg as an example how to do it. See Commons:Collages for details. Motopark (talk) 04:09, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
The uploader has to prove that this is his/her "own work" since I found this image on her Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10151846460212965&set=pb.624777964.-2207520000.1427171203.&type=3&theater If the author of the picture is someone else (instead of the uploader), permission is needed. Dontreader (talk) 04:30, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
The picture is unused. I don't see a Wikipedia article for this person (for this name, yes, but different article). I think it's promotional (running for office, it seems). Dontreader (talk) 04:35, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
The owner of the picture is the photographer, not the subject (Jesús Marruecos). He must get permission from the photographer. Mensaje para Jesús Marruecos: ten en cuenta que si logras que esta foto sea aceptada aqui, no solo es para Wikipedia. Lee aqui: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Email_templates#Declaration_of_consent_for_all_inquiries Dice: "I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites." Decide si aceptas eso. Dontreader (talk) 04:50, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Permission must be obtained from the owner of the picture. Claiming "own work" is not proof, plus it appears here: http://www.onscreenasia.com/article/uefa-awards-european-qualifiers-media-rights-in-japan-to-mp-silva/15386 Dontreader (talk) 05:24, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
No article exists with this person's name. The description doesn't look serious. Seems out of scope to me. Dontreader (talk) 05:30, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
There's no reason to believe that this work belongs to the uploader. Proof is required. The picture is here: http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1083404/ Dontreader (talk) 05:58, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Comment I couldn't get the speedy deletion tag to work. This image is a copyvio. The author from Getty Images can be found here: http://www.imdb.com/media/rm1598792192/nm1083404?ref_=nm_ov_ph Dontreader (talk) 06:08, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mikeywalshweb (talk · contribs)
[edit]Two personal, unused images, one is bigger than the other and B&W, otherwise, same image. Out of COM:SCOPE must be realistically useful for educational purposes.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:13, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
other copies of this image (without the photoshopping) all over the internet Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:16, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Derivative work without license for depicted work. Kelly (talk) 06:19, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sergioogonzalz (talk · contribs)
[edit]Four of the same image (diferent sizes) and one closer; but all four are unused and Commons is not social media, facebook or twitter.
- File:(Juan Medrano).png
- File:Juan Medrano..png
- File:Juan Medrano.jpg
- File:Juan Medrano, agente de futbolistas.png
- File:JuanMedrano.png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:26, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
No indication of user's own work on this small, blurry thumbnail sized image, probable COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:27, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Song art covers cannot be freely licensed. Additionally, this is a fanmade cover. SNUGGUMS (talk) 07:06, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Invalid Djvu. If somebody can upload the complete file from the source please remove the nomination 217.21.43.64 07:09, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Support. Delete, I reload by File:Harecki 1.djvu--Хомелка (talk) 08:46, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
There is a better version (File:Heisenberg 10.jpg) with a proper title, description, etc. Juggler2005 (talk) 07:26, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Использован неверный формат файла. ЗАО ТК "Яршинторг" (talk) 07:40, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
![07:40, 24 March 2015 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2015/03/24#c-ЗАО_ТК_"Яршинторг"-2015-03-24T07:40:00.000Z-File:Legeartis.png){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Использован неверный формат файла. ЗАО ТК "Яршинторг" (talk) 07:43, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
![07:43, 24 March 2015 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2015/03/24#c-ЗАО_ТК_"Яршинторг"-2015-03-24T07:43:00.000Z-File:V8_лого.png){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Использован неверный формат файла. ЗАО ТК "Яршинторг" (talk) 07:43, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
![07:43, 24 March 2015 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2015/03/24#c-ЗАО_ТК_"Яршинторг"-2015-03-24T07:43:00.000Z-File:YST.png){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Использован неверный формат файла. ЗАО ТК "Яршинторг" (talk) 07:44, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
![07:44, 24 March 2015 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2015/03/24#c-ЗАО_ТК_"Яршинторг"-2015-03-24T07:44:00.000Z-File:Cross_Street_Wheels.png){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Использован неверный формат файла. ЗАО ТК "Яршинторг" (talk) 07:45, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
![07:45, 24 March 2015 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2015/03/24#c-ЗАО_ТК_"Яршинторг"-2015-03-24T07:45:00.000Z-File:Логотип_НЗ.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Использован неверный формат файла. ЗАО ТК "Яршинторг" (talk) 07:45, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
![07:45, 24 March 2015 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2015/03/24#c-ЗАО_ТК_"Яршинторг"-2015-03-24T07:45:00.000Z-File:Логотип_требл.png){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Использован неверный формат файла. ЗАО ТК "Яршинторг" (talk) 07:45, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
![07:45, 24 March 2015 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2015/03/24#c-ЗАО_ТК_"Яршинторг"-2015-03-24T07:45:00.000Z-File:Логотип_алькаста.png){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Использован неверный формат файла. ЗАО ТК "Яршинторг" (talk) 07:46, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
![07:46, 24 March 2015 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2015/03/24#c-ЗАО_ТК_"Яршинторг"-2015-03-24T07:46:00.000Z-File:Лого_Х-race.png){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Использован неверный формат файла. ЗАО ТК "Яршинторг" (talk) 07:46, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
![07:46, 24 March 2015 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2015/03/24#c-ЗАО_ТК_"Яршинторг"-2015-03-24T07:46:00.000Z-File:Лого_Ёката.png){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Photo of modern sculptural work. No FOP for sculptural works in Russia. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 08:10, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status and unlikely ({{PD-textlogo}}, considering the non-trivial, sophisticated logos of Brazilian TV broadcasters (File:Rede Record.png + File:Rede TV HD 3D logo.jpg) and/or TV programs (mostly telenovelas). Ignore the {{Cc-by-sa-2.0}}-license. Permissions from the related broadcasters needed. Related Commons:Deletion requests/File:New logo Rede Record.png.
- File:Aquele Beijo.jpg
- File:Rede Record.png
- File:Celebridade (telenovela).jpg
- File:Nova Geração de Televisão.jpg
- File:Mulheres Apaixonadas.jpg
- File:Tieta (telenovela).jpg
- File:Rede TV HD 3D logo.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Gunnex (talk) 09:06, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Dubious authorship. File:Jorge Carpizo Mac Gregor.JPG has been taken from a web site, without any CC licensing evidence. File:SergioGarcíaRamírez.jpg gives 'Other' as author. File:Doctor Lorenzo Cordova Vianello UNAM.jpg provides IIJ UNAM as author
- File:Jorge Carpizo Mac Gregor.JPG
- File:SergioGarcíaRamírez.jpg
- File:Doctor Lorenzo Cordova Vianello UNAM.jpg
Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 10:36, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Wrong version with a white stripe below Marco Terzino (talk) 10:56, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:ABOUTAMRITA
[edit]- File:MMS - Ep - 10 - Seg. 1 - Mix Master.mxf snapshot 09.16 (2015.01.03 22.37.15).jpg
- File:Amrita Nayak playback singer.JPG
- File:Amrita Performing On a Concert.jpg
- File:Amrita On the set of Music Mahasangram.jpg
- File:Amrita Nayak.JPG
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
These images were uploaded to support a recently created Wikipedia article created by probably a COI editor. 2 or 3 are TV screenshots but are released as CC-BY-SA, own work. This is dubious and they are probably copyright violations. The others seem like official photographs for which the uploader may or may not have permission, but based on the other photos and with a lack of information, we should apply the precautionary principle. --BethNaught (talk) 11:43, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be self made -- Deadstar (msg) 12:01, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
keine freie Lizenz auf der Quellseite erkennbar Ralf Roleček 12:50, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of scope -- Deadstar (msg) 15:51, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:33, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Personal image - want to be deleted. Itzike (talk) 16:01, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
- I think it is fair to consider such requests - I have no objection to delete the photo. Chenspec-WMIL (talk) 11:25, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:33, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Obvious derivative work. No evidence of permission Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 16:50, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:31, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
File:US Navy 100705-N-4135M-077 Lt. Cmdr. Eugene Trelles, from Ft. Myers, Fla., reads a book to his three-year old twins while participating in the United Through Reading program.jpg
[edit]
this is personal information shared without my consent 73.171.213.160 18:01, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Delete The image at the source link is no longer available. Instead an error message is given: The file you have requested is not currently available. Apparently this was taken down. I think that we should delete this file out of courtesy in respect of COM:PEOPLE. --AFBorchert (talk) 18:31, 24 March 2015 (UTC)- Keep nope, it's still on the navy site AFBorchert, but nobody bothered to run a bot yet to fix the links. Multichill (talk) 22:03, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Another US military public domain image deletion request with no indication the original will be deleted. Actually this could well be quite a useful image. We could rename the file but, even then, the original could still be found. Ww2censor (talk) 00:05, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Didym (talk) 00:30, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
fait use material
- File:Printer ribbons.jpg
- File:All tapes.jpg
- File:Printing Media 4.jpg
- File:IJC Refill 3.jpg
- File:Group Picture TTR.jpg
Motopark (talk) 18:15, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:28, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
magazine pages, posters and other fair use material
- File:Μια ταινία από ρύζι.jpg
- File:Θητεία Γράμματα.jpg
- File:Δυο Κριτ. Πετροχημ..jpg
- File:Επος αγροτων.jpg
- File:Παρασκήνιο, ΜΚ.jpg
- File:SK, Our African explorer.jpg
- File:Σινεμα και δεινόσαυροι.jpg
- File:ΠΕΤΡ-Θανάτου.jpg
- File:Mε τη Τζοαν Βαεζ.jpg
- File:Έλληνες με σχέδια.jpg
- File:IΓια το βιβλίο Σινεμά και Δεινόσαυροι..jpg
- File:Τεταρτο Περιοδικό.jpg
- File:CARTOON aid granted.jpg
- File:EXOFYLLO STIXOI copy τραγούδια για BIOGR ΕΝΑ ΛΕΥΕΡ.jpg
- File:Για το Βιβλίο Σινεμά και Δεινόσαυροι.jpg
- File:Keratea-provoli.jpg
- File:Balkan fish.jpg
Motopark (talk) 18:18, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:28, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Thith Codava (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:COPYVIOs, Promotional uploads, some overprinted, some posters, all claimed as 'self" with promotional/self-promotional titles and descriptions. Out of scope for promotion, but copyvios because of the various sizes, cameras, styles, white balance, and etc.
- File:Future leader.jpg
- File:Moonad unit 2.jpg
- File:Protest against Yethinahole.jpg
- File:Lie sure and travel.JPG
- File:Winning Ceremony.JPG
- File:Inaugural of Yuva Bharath.JPG
- File:Save Hindu.JPG
- File:Modelling Traditional Youth Icon.jpg
- File:Speech of impact.JPG
- File:Election Campaign in SAC.jpg
- File:In Thinking.JPG
- File:Future MLA of Kodagu.jpg
- File:Yuva Codava Team.jpg
- File:With MLC of Mangalore.jpg
- File:Icym.jpg
- File:Sac rally.JPG
- File:Kodava attire.JPG
- File:NEstudents.JPG
- File:Kodava Katte.jpg
- File:Speech as President.jpg
- File:Yuva Codava President.jpg
- File:Oath as President.jpg
- File:Adventure love.jpg
- File:Speech for election.jpg
- File:Campaign for elections.jpg
- File:Kodava II Flag.JPG
- File:Yuva Codava Contact.jpg
- File:Yuva Codava Flag.jpg
- File:Yuva Codava.jpg
- File:Flying Kodava Flag (Coorg Flag).jpg
- File:Youth face of Kodagu Politics.png
- File:Prathik Ponnanna.JPG
- File:Kodava Coat of Arms.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:23, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Delete File:Protest against Yethinahole.jpg even has a watermark on it and can be found at http://www.daijiworld.com/news/printer.asp?nid=219205 . Obvious copyvio, and that makes it likely that the same goes for the rest, especially because of the different cameras etc. Sjö (talk) 08:37, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
Comment Some other files that I found using Google Images and that appear to be copyright violations:
- File:Winning Ceremony.JPG http://www.daijiworld.com/news/printer.asp?nid=178388
- File:Future MLA of Kodagu.jpg Photoshopped, background found at http://www.sigmobile.org/mobihoc/2013/aboutbangalore.html and other websites
- File:Icym.jpg http://www.daijiworld.com/news/printer.asp?nid=191888
- File:Sac rally.JPG http://www.mangalorean.com/news.php?newstype=broadcast&broadcastid=461871
- File:NEstudents.JPG http://www.mangalorean.com/news.php?newstype=broadcast&broadcastid=458745
- File:Speech for election.jpg http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-features/tp-metroplus/feeling-empowered/article4886620.ece
Sjö (talk) 17:19, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:26, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
No indication of user's own work, various sources - none seem to have permissions. The one from YouTube is clearly a screen cap from SkyNews, etc. Small, some claims of self, when clearly not and a variety of official looking templates all indicative of COM:COPYVIOs and gaming the system.
- File:Suheil Al Hassan.jpg
- File:Abdullah Mahmoud al-Khalidi.jpg
- File:Adnan Omran.jpg
- File:Ali Abdullah Ayyoub.jpg
- File:Abdul-Ilah al-Bashir al-Noeimi.jpg
- File:Bashar al-Zoubi.png
- File:Jamil Hassan.jpg
- File:Hussein Isaac.jpg
- File:Hassan Abdullah Al-Ibrahim.jpg
- File:Issa al-Khouli.jpg
- File:Jameh Jameh.jpg
- File:Mohammed Ezz al-Din Khalouf.jpg
- File:Ali Mamlouk.jpg
- File:Abdulaziz Al-Shalal.jpg
- File:Mustafa Al-Sheikh.jpg
- File:Abdo Khedr Tellawi.jpg
- File:Manaf Tlass.jpg
- File:Ziad Fahd.png
- File:General Issam Zahreddine.jpg
- File:Zubaida al-Meeki.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:27, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:23, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
personal photo Mrutyunjaya Kar (talk) 19:07, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:19, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
violates copyright laws and no permission from the person in the picture Shrikanthv (talk) 09:38, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:40, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
The portrait is recent and copyrighted. Ghirlandajo (talk) 13:22, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. I was somewhat misled when I uploaded the file. --Семён Семёныч (talk) 20:32, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Bordeaux Bombers TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 13:39, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
This is derivative work of copyrighted painting. The artist Hal Bevan-Petman must send OTRS-permission. Otherwise, it is copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 13:54, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- And the same goes for file:Hal Bevan-Petman.jpg from the same painter. Taivo (talk) 13:56, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Derivative photo of 2D artwork, previously deleted as photo subject lacked permission. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:12, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:11, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Image of a modern sculpture -- Deadstar (msg) 14:05, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
![14:05, 24 March 2015 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2015/03/24#c-Deadstar-2015-03-24T14:05:00.000Z-File:"Lo_que_yo_quiero_de_ti_y_lo_que_tú_quieres_de_mí".png){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
![00:33, 31 March 2015 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2015/03/24#c-INeverCry-2015-03-31T00:33:00.000Z-File:"Lo_que_yo_quiero_de_ti_y_lo_que_tú_quieres_de_mí".png){kind=link}
image used only in promotional page deleted off enwiki DS (talk) 14:06, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
wrestling poster - not self made -- Deadstar (msg) 14:12, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Municipality has been dissolved on 1 jan 2015, so there cannot be any buildings in it. Cycn (talk) 14:11, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Municipality has been dissolved on 1 jan 2015, so there cannot be any churches in it. Cycn (talk) 14:12, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Municipality has been dissolved on 1 jan 2015, so there cannot be any monuments in it. Cycn (talk) 14:11, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Municipality has been dissolved on 1 jan 2015, so there cannot be any memorials in it. Cycn (talk) 14:22, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Municipality has been dissolved on 1 jan 2015, so there cannot be any reliefs in it. Cycn (talk) 14:22, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Municipality has been dissolved on 1 jan 2015, so there cannot be any monuments in it. Cycn (talk) 14:11, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Municipality has been dissolved on 1 jan 2015, so there cannot be any sculptures in it. Cycn (talk) 14:21, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Municipality has been dissolved on 1 jan 2015, so there cannot be any statues in it. Cycn (talk) 14:23, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
keine Lizenz Pölkkyposkisolisti (talk) 14:23, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Delete Copyright violation. The image shows the author of the photo at the bottom: Daniel Schwinn. Here's a link as a reference just in case the uploader decides to crop the picture next time: http://www.planespotters.net/Aviation_Photos/photo.show?id=572655 Dontreader (talk) 22:42, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
Comment I mixed this picture with another one. I thought "own work" had been stated. The uploader made a good-faith mistake by providing the author and the source (vaguely). The source should be changed specifically to http://www.planespotters.net/Aviation_Photos/photo.show?id=572655 on the file page (click on edit). The uploader also must obtain permission from Daniel Schwinn to release the photo under a free license. Good luck. Dontreader (talk) 22:49, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:46, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Russia for sculptures. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Not own works, copyrighted book covers.
- File:МОРИС ЛЕЛУАР-ИЛЛЮСТРАЦИЯ.jpg
- File:МОРИС ЛЕЛУАР-ИЛЛЮСТАЦИЯ.jpg
- File:ТРИУМФ И ТРАГЕДИЯ.jpg
- File:Знак книжной серии-4.jpg
- File:ЗНАК КНИЖНОЙ СЕРИИ-.jpg
- File:СЕРИЯ ПИОНЕР - ЗНАЧИТ ПЕРВЫЙ.jpg
- File:ТОДЫКОВ-ХАКАССКИЕ СКАЗКИ-ХУДОЖНИК2.jpg
- File:ТОДЫКОВ-ХАКАССКИЕ СКАЗКИ-ХУДОЖНИК.jpg
- File:ЧЕПОКОВ-ТАРАКАЙ-ОБЛОЖКА АЛЬБОМА.jpg
- File:КОНЮХОВ П МЫ ШЛИ РЯДОМ СО СМЕРТЬЮ.jpg
- File:КОНЮХОВ П СИБИРСКИЙ ПЕРЕХОД.jpg
Sealle (talk) 14:54, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:08, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
- File:Колпаков Влас Иванович -1-й секр Хакасского обкома КПСС-.JPG
- File:РЕРИХ КОНСТ ФЁДОРОВИЧ-ВИКИ-.jpg
- File:ВЯТКИН ГЕННАДИЙ АФРИКАНОВИЧ-.jpg
- File:СОЛОВЬЕВ-ОРИГИНАЛ-ДЛЯ КНИГИ--Scan-120731-0001.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted. INeverCry 00:36, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
%EC%95%84%ED%94%84%EB%A6%AC%EC%B9%B4_%EC%A0%95%EA%B7%9C1%EC%A7%91.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
%EC%95%84%ED%94%84%EB%A6%AC%EC%B9%B4_%EC%A0%95%EA%B7%9C1%EC%A7%91.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unlikely this album cover is self made -- Deadstar (msg) 14:37, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
아프리카_정규1집.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
아프리카_정규1집.JPG){kind=link}
%EC%95%84%ED%94%84%EB%A6%AC%EC%B9%B4_%EC%A0%95%EA%B7%9C2%EC%A7%91.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
%EC%95%84%ED%94%84%EB%A6%AC%EC%B9%B4_%EC%A0%95%EA%B7%9C2%EC%A7%91.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unlikely this album cover is self made -- Deadstar (msg) 14:38, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
아프리카_정규2집.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
아프리카_정규2집.JPG){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Alejandro nicolas cuello suarez (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Juvenalius6000 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:Snapshot 20150119 47.JPG
- File:Snapshot 20150119 51.JPG
- File:Snapshot 20150119 46.JPG
- File:Snapshot 20150119 44.JPG
- File:Snapshot 20150119 40.JPG
- File:Snapshot 20150119 32.JPG
- File:Snapshot 20150119 30.JPG
- File:Snapshot 20150119 27.JPG
- File:Snapshot 20150119 23.JPG
- File:Snapshot 20150119 16.JPG
- File:Snapshot 20150119 13.JPG
- File:Snapshot 20150119 6.JPG
- File:Snapshot 20150119 5.JPG
- File:Snapshot 20150119 3.JPG
- File:Pizap.com14154188831301.jpg
- File:Photocat.jpg
- File:Photocat 13.jpg
- File:Photocat 12.jpg
- File:Photocat 10.jpg
- File:Photocat 8.jpg
- File:Photocat 7.jpg
- File:Photocat 6.jpg
- File:Photocat 5.jpg
- File:Photocat 4.jpg
- File:Photocat 3.jpg
- File:Photocat 2.jpg
- File:Juvenalius aka Tiger Prince15.jpg
- File:Juvenalius aka Tiger Prince14.jpg
- File:Juvenalius aka Tiger Prince13.jpg
- File:Juvenalius aka Tiger Prince12.jpg
- File:Juvenalius aka Tiger Prince11.jpg
- File:Juvenalius aka Tiger Prince10.jpg
- File:Juvenalius aka Tiger Prince9.jpg
- File:Juvenalius aka Tiger Prince16.jpg
- File:Juvenalius aka Tiger Prince2.jpg
- File:Juvenalius aka Tiger Prince3.jpg
- File:Juvenalius Meshack 1.jpg
- File:Juvenalius.jpg
- File:JUVENALIUS - GAY PORN MODEL FACEBOOK.jpg
- File:Juvenalius aka Tiger Prince1.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. -Lewis Hulbert (talk) 16:20, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:38, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal file, no description -- Deadstar (msg) 14:48, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:35, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Unused file of a tree, no description, I can't see this is in scope. -- Deadstar (msg) 14:50, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:35, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Screenshot -- Deadstar (msg) 14:51, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:35, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Invalid permission. Natuur12 (talk) 15:04, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Invalid permission statement and the characters in the video are copyrighted as well Natuur12 (talk) 15:07, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Invalid permission statement Natuur12 (talk) 15:08, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Image is a photograph of product pagacking and therefore a COM:DW of a copyrighted design. ColonialGrid (talk) 15:08, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Invalid permisison statement Natuur12 (talk) 15:08, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
com:DW of a file with an invalid permisison statement Natuur12 (talk) 15:09, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Looks like copyvio from http://www.planespotters.net/Aviation_Photos/photo.show?id=522351 DR (talk) 15:13, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Missing evidence of permission and/or invalid release.
- File:Dipsy Doodle 1.jpg
- File:Dipsy Doodle 2.jpg
- File:Galaxy Joyland 4.jpg
- File:Galaxy Joyland 5.jpg
- File:Galaxy Joyland 1 .jpg
- File:Galaxy Joyland 3.jpg
- File:Galaxy Joyland 2.jpg
- File:Mad Mouse 4.jpg
- File:Mad Mouse 3.jpg
- File:Mad Mouse 2.jpg
- File:Mad Mouse 1.jpg
- File:Podium RockstarsThe Battle .jpg
Natuur12 (talk) 15:13, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Invalid permisison statement Natuur12 (talk) 15:14, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
invalid permission statement Natuur12 (talk) 15:15, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Invalid permission statement Natuur12 (talk) 15:15, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Invalid permission statement Natuur12 (talk) 15:16, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Invalid permission statament Natuur12 (talk) 15:16, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Invalid permission statement Natuur12 (talk) 15:17, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Invalid permission statement Natuur12 (talk) 15:17, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Invalid permission statement Natuur12 (talk) 15:17, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Invalid permission statement Natuur12 (talk) 15:17, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Invalid permission statement Natuur12 (talk) 15:17, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Invalid permission statement Natuur12 (talk) 15:17, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Invalid permisison statement Natuur12 (talk) 15:20, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely this aerial shot is self made & Google finds this on the company website grupodomingoalonso.com -- Deadstar (msg) 15:22, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
copyright [2] Uğurkent (talk) 17:08, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
copyright [3] Uğurkent (talk) 17:09, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
copyright [4] Uğurkent (talk) 17:09, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
copyright [5] Uğurkent (talk) 17:09, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
I opened terms of use in source site http://www.rightlivelihood.org/36.html and found the license "may be freely copied and distributed". What about derivative works? I'm afraid, that this is not enough free license. Taivo (talk) 18:39, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Looks like flickr washing. No evidence that this photo was offered under CC by the copyright owner. The flickr account 85013738@N00 seems to be placing bogus CC tags on unlicensed images taken from various sources. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Afghanistan 2009.jpg for a similar previous case. -- Asclepias (talk) 18:48, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
no offense please, but watermark-ed as xxx.blogspot.com, Roland zh (talk) 18:53, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Superior SVG available as File:Flag of South Korea.svg. Fry1989 eh? 18:55, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Very low quality version of File:Coat of arms of United Arab Emirates (1973-2008).png. Fry1989 eh? 18:59, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
out of project scope Mrutyunjaya Kar (talk) 19:22, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. OOS. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:26, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 08:07, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
Looks like double flickr washing (!). The flickr account put a CC-by-sa tag on the image, which it copied from another flick account, who had put a CC-by-NC-sa tag on it, but who puts CC tags on unlicensed images it copies from various sources. Actually, this image is by a photographer from the Canadian military [6] and there is no evidence that the copyright owner offered it under a free license. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Afghanistan 2009.jpg for a similar previous case. -- Asclepias (talk) 19:30, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Looks like flickr washing. No evidence that this photo was offered under CC by the copyright owner. The flickr account seems to be placing bogus CC tags on unlicensed images taken from various sources. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Afghanistan 2009.jpg for a similar previous case. -- Asclepias (talk) 19:40, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Looks like flickr washing. No evidence that this photo was offered under CC by the copyright owner. The flickr account seems to be placing bogus CC tags on unlicensed images taken from various sources. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Afghanistan 2009.jpg for a similar previous case. -- Asclepias (talk) 19:47, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Doubtful "own work", no EXIF data and tagged as {{PD-AR-Photo}} (if this really is an own work, why it was licensed as a previously published photo?); in this case, file source is not properly indicated. Fma12 (talk) 19:55, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
François-xavier Lalanne is dead in 2008. No freedom of panorama in France. 82.124.53.189 21:15, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
François-xavier Lalanne is dead in 2008. No freedom of panorama in France. 82.124.53.189 21:16, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
No evidence that the subject consented to having photos of her vagina published on the Internet. No evidence the subject is old enough to consent to having photos of her vagina published on the Internet. Uploaded by an account tat has done nothing else but upload photos of his own cock (oh, and of himself wanking, because we really need ore of those), which should send up all manner of red flags to any right-thinking editor. Entirely replaceable with much safer images—ie uploaded by editors with a longer track record and who have shown an interest in Commons as something other than an amateur porn site (eg File:Vaginal_opening_description.jpg, which is used on the enwiki article). The obvious problem of somebody focused exclusively on uploading photos of his own genitalia suddenly uploading photos of somebody else's should cause enough concern to delete the image immediately. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:28, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
- This also applies to all derivatives of this image:
- File:Vagina ultra02.JPG
- File:Vagina ultra03.JPG
- File:Vagina ultra04.JPG
- File:Anatomical description - human vulva.jpg
- File:Clitoris y vulva.jpg
- File:Wikipedia Vagina.jpg. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:31, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
- What are the relevant policies in play for this request? You are completely right about his work being solely uploading genitalia. To make a note: he has been around since 2011. Nothing else. It's a given that he won't reply here. But does that matter? Not that I oppose, by the way. --DawnDusk (talk) 03:00, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. INeverCry 00:43, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
- Restored: as per [7]. Yann (talk) 12:41, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
It's being used only on a user page. Seems like a clear case of Commons:Deletion_policy#Out_of_scope Dontreader (talk) 05:11, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:50, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Bogus copyright tag. The list can probably be extended quite a lot.
- File:Bangladesh road sign A12.svg
- File:Bangladesh road sign A6.svg
- File:Bangladesh road sign A7.svg
- File:Bangladesh road sign A9.svg
- File:Bangladesh road sign C18.svg
- File:Bangladesh road sign C19.svg
- File:Bangladesh road sign D25.svg
Stefan4 (talk) 01:22, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep A12 is a derivative of File:UK traffic sign 619.1.svg which is under a copyrighted free license and therefore ineligible (and most other Bangladeshi signs are also DWs of British road signs). The others which are not DWs of British signs, I drew myself and therefore I hold my own rights to these images. I also believe the timing of this nomination makes this is a retributive response to my pointing out Stefan4's history of highly questionable TOO comparisons, such as basic text (which any idiot can put together) with hand-drawing signatures (which are inherently unique from person to person), and here where Stefan4 claims that a simple circle border around the Republican Elephant symbol is equal in complexity to the w:File:Prince logo.svg. I think this clearly qualifies for a speedy keep. Fry1989 eh? 01:37, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- So if these are derivative works, then why aren't the original sources clearly indicated? --Stefan4 (talk) 02:05, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- Because I chose not to, that's why. As the uploader, I have the right to license my images as I choose. If it really matters to you so much, I'll point out to you one by one which images are DWs of British signs and which ones I drew myself. Fry1989 eh? 02:07, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- As stated at COM:EVID, you always have to provide evidence that a file is freely licensed. If you choose not to provide such evidence, you should expect that the file will be nominated for deletion. Also, {{PD-ineligible}} is not a licence but a different kind of copyright tag, so I am not sure what you are referring to when you are talking about licensing your images. --Stefan4 (talk) 02:24, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- Perhaps, but not from someone who only an hour earlier I pointed out is making disingenous comparisons under TOO. Fry1989 eh? 02:25, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- As stated at COM:EVID, you always have to provide evidence that a file is freely licensed. If you choose not to provide such evidence, you should expect that the file will be nominated for deletion. Also, {{PD-ineligible}} is not a licence but a different kind of copyright tag, so I am not sure what you are referring to when you are talking about licensing your images. --Stefan4 (talk) 02:24, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- Because I chose not to, that's why. As the uploader, I have the right to license my images as I choose. If it really matters to you so much, I'll point out to you one by one which images are DWs of British signs and which ones I drew myself. Fry1989 eh? 02:07, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep: These SVG representations of road signs seems to be mostly International rather than from the Bangladesg Government only. Most of these signs (or its variations) are used over the world, and then, {{PD-Ineligible}} applies here. --Amitie 10g (talk) 01:59, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- No, {{PD-ineligible}} doesn't magically apply only because a sign might be used in several countries. --Stefan4 (talk) 02:05, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- because it consists entirely of information that is common property and contains no original authorship. Sounds like it to me. Fry1989 eh? 02:15, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- No, material is not 'common property' only because road agencies in various countries use the material. Besides, in most countries, then copyright tag {{PD-ineligible}} is about originality, not about some unspecific 'common property'. --Stefan4 (talk) 02:24, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- Well, if I make in a Cycle rickshaw (basically a generic bicycle) with and adult with a child silhouette, with a light blue background in Inkscape, is a copyvio? All the files that you're nominated are just SVGs that are not 100% accurate representations of Bangladesh signs (most of them consisted in generic shapes used arround the world with some variants), and therefore no copyvio.
- And finally, {{PD-ineligible}} is not a Copyright tag, is a Public Domain tag. --Amitie 10g (talk) 04:09, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- PD tags are an indication of a file's 'copyright status' (i.e. not under copyright). The very first section of Commons:Copyright tags is 'Public Domain'. Meaningless quibble.
- Not saying this is the case with these (though Fry1989 seems to admit it above), but if you create a derivative of a copyrighted work, all that you are able to license is your contributions to the final work. Unless the original is actually in the Public Domain (and I mean, actually in the public domain, not under a 'public domain license' like CC0) you MUST indicate the copyright status of the original work, as you are not able to 'relicense' the original. To indicate that a derivative of a copyrighted work, even a freely licensed copyrighted work, is completely in the public domain IS a copyright violation. A derivative work only creates a new copyright claim (that can be licensed or released to the public domain) in the original aspects of the derivative.
- That being said, to request the deletion of a 'public domain' derivative of a freely licensed copyrighted work is pure silliness. Just fix the licensing. Use {{Infosplit}}. Revent (talk) 20:02, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- No, material is not 'common property' only because road agencies in various countries use the material. Besides, in most countries, then copyright tag {{PD-ineligible}} is about originality, not about some unspecific 'common property'. --Stefan4 (talk) 02:24, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- because it consists entirely of information that is common property and contains no original authorship. Sounds like it to me. Fry1989 eh? 02:15, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- No, {{PD-ineligible}} doesn't magically apply only because a sign might be used in several countries. --Stefan4 (talk) 02:05, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: as per Fry1989 and Amitie 10g above. Let's be reasonable. Yann (talk) 21:02, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
COM:Redundant with and Template:Superseded by File:Meyers b11 s0476a.jpg. This is a manipulated version of the original 4th edition of the Meyers Konversationslexikon map. The hues in the original map are completely different, and it does not contain any such smudge effect. The text also appears to have been blurred in certain areas. Soupforone (talk) 02:42, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- Derivatives of Commons works are permitted. This one is also in use across a number of WPs. In what way is it thus "redundant"? Andy Dingley (talk) 19:30, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- Those maps were added just yesterday in place of the original map. Derivatives are permitted if they add encylopedic value, otherwise they are merely COM:Redundant and/or Template:Superseded. This map certainly does not add encylopedic value. Its hues relative to the original map are false, smudging has been apparently added in certain areas, and some of the text is now illegible. Soupforone (talk) 05:49, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
- "This map certainly does not add encylopedic value."
- That's your opinion. Others seem to be making use of it, in an encyclopedia.
- Also COM:SCOPE is deliberately broader than "add encylopedic value". This is Commons, not Wikipedia. Andy Dingley (talk) 11:10, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
- The other in this instance is the uploader himself. Even if things had been different, others also often make use of copyrighted files contra policy - that doesn't validate those files either. Commons is the file repository for Wikipedia. As such, files must have encylopedic value. This misleading map, however, certainly does not possess that. It is instead both COM:Redundant with and Template:Superseded by the original File:Meyers b11 s0476a.jpg. Soupforone (talk) 03:23, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
- Those maps were added just yesterday in place of the original map. Derivatives are permitted if they add encylopedic value, otherwise they are merely COM:Redundant and/or Template:Superseded. This map certainly does not add encylopedic value. Its hues relative to the original map are false, smudging has been apparently added in certain areas, and some of the text is now illegible. Soupforone (talk) 05:49, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: In use. Yann (talk) 21:09, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. PD-Textlogo? Amitie 10g (talk) 05:04, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: still no license. JuTa 21:16, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Political self promotion Fixertool (talk) 05:25, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Keep Seems to be a politician from one of the Mexico main political parties: en:Party of the Democratic Revolution. I might be relevant and therefore no need to delete his picture from commons. --Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 15:54, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Whether the image has been uploaded for promotional purposes is not relevant provided that the image is in scope. The subject of the picture is a politician that belongs to one of the three main Mexican political parties and therefore, the picture is in scope. --Discasto talk 11:28, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep, per Discasto. -- Tuválkin ✉ 11:38, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 21:09, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Likely copyright violation - seemingly from the same photoshoot as File:GAMALIEL GUTIÉRREZ ROMERO.jpg (note what looks like a reflector above his left shoulder), but uploaded by a different user. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 13:11, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
Kept, this file does have metadata which suggests that the uploader is the original photographer. De728631 (talk) 17:46, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope: Commons is not the place for personal resumes Basvb (talk) 02:15, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope George Chernilevsky talk 12:38, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
junkfile Rahulazm (talk) 10:43, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Closed: Nominated and tagged for Speedy. Anyway, file outside the Project scope. --Amitie 10g (talk) 14:43, 24 March 2015 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)
File:Kimiko Ishizaka - Bach- Well-Tempered Clavier, Book 1 - 20 Fugue No. 10 in E minor, BWV 855.flac
[edit]wrong license, see http://music.kimiko-piano.com/track/fugue-no-10-in-e-minor-bwv-855 Piano12 (talk) 11:35, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- Speedy keep. There's definitely no reason to delete it. The license that appears at http://music.kimiko-piano.com/track/fugue-no-10-in-e-minor-bwv-855 is cc-by-3.0, which is still free enough for Commons. And if you download the complete package, it comes with a PDF that says that it's CC-0. So there's an inconsistency in licensing on the site, but all of them are free and compatible with commons. The whole point of the Open Well-Tempered Clavier project was to release it is as public domain, so these deletions requests are wrong. --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 11:42, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- Where can I download the complete package? So far no evidence for CC-zero. --Piano12 (talk) 12:09, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- The info template at all the files points you to http://welltemperedclavier.org/ . Click the big "Download" button there and follow the instructions. --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 12:35, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- And here's the explanation from the files' author: https://twitter.com/robertDouglass/status/580697762418835456 .
- Can this deletion request be closed, please? --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 11:50, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
- The info template at all the files points you to http://welltemperedclavier.org/ . Click the big "Download" button there and follow the instructions. --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 12:35, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- Where can I download the complete package? So far no evidence for CC-zero. --Piano12 (talk) 12:09, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: resolved Ymblanter (talk) 18:55, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
File:Kimiko Ishizaka - Bach- Well-Tempered Clavier, Book 1 - 43 Prelude No. 22 in B-flat minor, BWV 867.flac
[edit]wrong license, see http://music.kimiko-piano.com/track/prelude-no-22-in-b-flat-minor-bwv-867 Piano12 (talk) 11:36, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- Speedy keep. There's definitely no reason to delete it. The license that appears at http://music.kimiko-piano.com/track/fugue-no-10-in-e-minor-bwv-855 is cc-by-3.0, which is still free enough for Commons. And if you download the complete package, it comes with a PDF that says that it's CC-0. So there's an inconsistency in licensing on the site, but all of them are free and compatible with commons. The whole point of the Open Well-Tempered Clavier project was to release it is as public domain, so these deletions requests are wrong. --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 11:42, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- Where can I download the complete package? So far no evidence for CC-zero. --Piano12 (talk) 12:09, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- The info template at all the files points you to http://welltemperedclavier.org/ . Click the big "Download" button there and follow the instructions. --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 12:35, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- And here's the explanation from the files' author: https://twitter.com/robertDouglass/status/580697762418835456 .
- Can this deletion request be closed, please? --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 11:50, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
- Maybe we should insert a template, note or something, to make sure that a generation after us doesn't delete it due to its licence.--CennoxX (talk) 09:34, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
- The info template at all the files points you to http://welltemperedclavier.org/ . Click the big "Download" button there and follow the instructions. --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 12:35, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- Where can I download the complete package? So far no evidence for CC-zero. --Piano12 (talk) 12:09, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- Twitter isn't enough I guess (who is "robertDouglass"?). Maybe it would be the best, if Kimiko Ishizaka sent the permission (Commons:Email templates). --тнояsтеn ⇔ 14:17, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
- Robert Douglass is the project's producer. I am not citing Twitter as a source, but only as an explanation about the confusion.
- In any case, all the information about the license is available at the website that is cited as the source on all the files in the category - including why is it public domain, who is Robert Douglass, and so on. There is no imaginable reason to ever delete these files, because both CC-0 and CC-BY are compatible with Commons. --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 14:17, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: resolved Ymblanter (talk) 18:56, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Duplicate of SVG image. Fry1989 eh? 14:55, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- عکس مشابه
عکس مشابه این عکس را به من بدهید و این عکس را حذف کنید.--Rasoolaeg66 (talk) 19:05, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:12, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Also File:1405738037586a.jpg and File:1405738037872a.jpg This looks like an advert for children's clothes (?), and is websized. Unlikely to be own work. -- Deadstar (msg) 15:39, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:14, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
This is a copy of File:Corradini - Sopra le vie del nuovo impero, 1912.djvu. Federicor (talk) 16:00, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:15, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Part of the "semi-figurative" registered trademark n°3886544, registered on 2012-01-19 by Didier Thuillier, published in BOPI 2012-06 [8], above the threshold of originality in France — Racconish 📥 16:22, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: A trademark is not a copyright. Yann (talk) 21:16, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
"Semi-figurative" registered trademark n°3886544, registered on 2012-01-19 by Didier Thuillier, published in BOPI 2012-06 [9]. The design of the "T" is above the threshold of originality in France — Racconish 📥 16:27, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: A trademark is not a copyright. Yann (talk) 21:16, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
"Semi-figurative" registered trademark n°3886544, registered on 2012-01-19 by Didier Thuillier, published in BOPI 2012-06 [10]. The design of the "T" is above the threshold of originality in France — Racconish 📥 16:27, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: A trademark is not a copyright. Yann (talk) 21:16, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
"Semi-figurative" registered trademark n°3886544, registered on 2012-01-19 by Didier Thuillier, published in BOPI 2012-06 [11]. The design of the "T" is above the threshold of originality in France — Racconish 📥 16:28, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: A trademark is not a copyright. Yann (talk) 21:17, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Part of the "semi-figurative" registered trademark n°3886544, registered on 2012-01-19 by Didier Thuillier, published in BOPI 2012-06 [12]. The design of the "T" is above the threshold of originality in France — Racconish 📥 16:28, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: A trademark is not a copyright. Yann (talk) 21:17, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
"Semi-figurative" registered trademark n°3886544, registered on 2012-01-19 by Didier Thuillier, published in BOPI 2012-06 [13]. The design of the "T" is above the threshold of originality in France — Racconish 📥 16:29, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: A trademark is not a copyright. Yann (talk) 21:17, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
I can't find the stylized elephant silhouette within the catalog of 'simple shapes'. It's not simple at all. It can't be argued it's below the threshold of originality, but not it comprising 'simple shapes' Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 16:39, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- Comment: If the file is actually above the COM:TOO in the US, please ask the en:Wikipedia admin that deleted the file there. If actually, is recommended to reupload to en:Wikipedia as Fair use in order to don't get unlinked in articles by CommonsDelinker. --Amitie 10g (talk) 16:46, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Why is such guy's opinion important for commons? Not a experienced user at all, BTW. Furthermore, what we should do is discussing whether this specific file is above or below the TOO. A crystal clear statement is that it's not comprised by 'simple shapes'. --Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 18:34, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep There was already a DR and an unDR about this logo, it was found to be free with notice. Fry1989 eh? 20:36, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Given license is wrong, this is {{PD-US-no-notice}} as determined at the UnDR Fry1989 linked above (not 'free with notice', but PD because of a publication without notice, prior to the end of that requirement). Will change tagging thus, as this makes the 'threshold of originality' argument irrelevant... failure to comply with the formalities trumps mere 'copyrightability'. Revent (talk) 21:14, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 21:18, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Simple diagram, but must be converted to SVG. Amitie 10g (talk) 05:05, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
,_Maxine_Albro,_date_unknown.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Maxine_Albro,_date_unknown.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Artist died in 1966. I'm not sure why this wouldn't be under copyright. Sorry. Themightyquill (talk) 19:13, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
,_Maxine_Albro,_date_unknown.jpg){kind=link}
I am the owner of this painting and of this image. Wikisi117 (talk) 16:23 24 March 2015 (EST)
- Like with the other image, I'm not sure that ownership of the art grants you the right to release it from the artist's copyright. Commons:Copyright_rules_by_subject_matter#Art_.28copies_of.29. Maybe someone else around here with more knowledge can help? - Themightyquill (talk) 07:44, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
,_Maxine_Albro,_date_unknown.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: No permission from artist. If you have a permission, please see COM:OTRS, then the file can be restored. Yann (talk) 21:19, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
,_Maxine_Albro,_date_unknown.jpg){kind=link}
this is an old photo Bentojustin (talk) 19:52, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
Kept: No valid reason for deletion JurgenNL (talk) 10:05, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
its an old picture Bentojustin (talk) 19:14, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- Hi Bentojustin - "its an old picture" is not a good reason for it to be deleted. "Old pictures" can show history. If it looks different now, upload a new picture. Also, do NOT upload new pictures over old ones (as you have done with many of your uploads) as they are all good and usable - one is not better than the other. Admins: File:Puthenthope.jpg was deleted with the same request though (was it a montage?). Some of user's other uploads have multiple good images in the history which should be split out, unless it is a case that authorship is disputed. Thanks. -- Deadstar (msg) 12:46, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 21:20, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
this is an old image Bentojustin (talk) 21:41, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
- Hi again and please see my comment above. There is no reason to delete this image. Thanks -- Deadstar (msg) 08:53, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sreejith K (talk) 14:26, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
This is an old picture of me, I don't want people to see it. Roger federer 1990 (talk) 20:01, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Poor quality, not used. User request. Yann (talk) 21:25, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
François-xavier Lalanne is dead in 2008. Copyright violation. 82.124.53.189 21:14, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- it's forniture, industrial design, reproducible, so no speciale concern about copyright of design reproducer. Read here. --Sailko (talk) 21:33, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete One could also argue that this goes beyond utilitarian objects and crosses the threshold of originality becoming an artwork. To me this looks original enough to be copyrighted. De728631 (talk) 19:45, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: No permission from the artist. Yann (talk) 21:26, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
{{BadJPG}}, replaced by File:Non-Linear Effects on Enantioselectivity.svg. Leyo 01:48, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- I'm confused by the provenance-trail and licensing. Nom'ed image is [Acc. Chem. Res. 2000, 33, 402-411 doi:10.1021/ar990083s]. Replacement is [J. Am. Chem. Soc., Vol. 119, No. 52, 1997 doi:10.1021/ja973049m], both of which are non-free. It looks like the images themselves are taken directly from the sources rather than recreated from scratch using the underlying data? For a vector format, there is a lot of jagginess in the graph lines, as if it was simply tracing a lower-quality image. DMacks (talk) 15:29, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- I would say that the graph is below the COM:TOO anyway. --Leyo 17:11, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- Looks like they are plots of a mathematical function. The Acc Chem Res article cites it as an example of the work of:
- (5) (a)Puchot,C.;Samuel,O.;Dun ̃ach,E.;Zhao,S.;Agami,C.;Kagan, H. B. Nonlinear Effects in Asymmetric Synthesis. Examples in Asymmetric Oxidations and Aldolization Reactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 2353-2357. (b) Guillaneux, D.; Zhao, S. H.; Samuel, O.; Rainford, D.; Kagan, H. B. Nonlinear Effects in Asymmetric Catalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 9430-9439.
- Kagan appears to be a key underlying source of the whole en:Non-linear effects article for which User:Kr.schaefer has uploaded a bunch of images that appear to be taken from various sources. Possibly not up to COM:TOO, but most appear to be pretty poor quality due to the cut'n'paste, even if the totality are not strictly licensing violation. But they are tagged with various non-PD licenses, which is a license violation if uploader is asserting a license himself of not-his-own-work. DMacks (talk) 03:23, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
- That ref 5a, doi:10.1021/ja00100a004, has essentially the same graph, so we might as well pull from the more-original source than the reprinting/reuse (none of these would be actual SVG, and ray-tracing a low-res curve just makes a high-quality-jagginess, not an actual high-quality curve). But it also has the equations that can generate these types of families of curves...eq 2 and eq 3, with manually chosen values of K and g (and has some sample values that look similar). But the article suggests that the image being discussed is a artistically created or representative of the idea rather than being specific data or formula with identified constants. To me that makes it "creative" rather than "fact of nature" even if it is designed to look like a fact of nature. Using the equations, one could generate a clean "fact of nature" (mathematical graph). DMacks (talk) 03:52, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
- Looks like they are plots of a mathematical function. The Acc Chem Res article cites it as an example of the work of:
Deleted: Redundant Natuur12 (talk) 15:41, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
The images in this noticeboard may be copyrighted Rodrigolopes (talk) 02:18, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- That would really be pushing it. It's a church noticeboard on public display, and the images are poor quality. SlimVirgin (talk) 22:06, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: com:DW and even poor quality images can be copyrighted Natuur12 (talk) 15:42, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
Would be detrimental to Argentina–Germany relations. 84.61.189.193 09:12, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Sadly, while this image has probably zero scope, the nomination is completely invalid. Fry1989 eh? 19:31, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
- But not being within COM:SCOPE is a reason to delete. Keφr (keep talk here) 05:32, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
- Perhaps, but that is not why it was nominated. Fry1989 eh? 17:22, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
- Whether it was or not, the file may be deleted for that reason too. Keφr (keep talk here) 20:14, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
- Perhaps. Fry1989 eh? 20:56, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
- And as for your edit summary: files are deleted on their merits, not to "reward" or "spite" the nominator. Keφr (keep talk here) 09:23, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
- If those merits (or lack of) are not properly asserted as a reason to delete, we don't reward bad DRs. Fry1989 eh? 17:52, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
- And as for your edit summary: files are deleted on their merits, not to "reward" or "spite" the nominator. Keφr (keep talk here) 09:23, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
- Perhaps. Fry1989 eh? 20:56, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
- Whether it was or not, the file may be deleted for that reason too. Keφr (keep talk here) 20:14, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
- Perhaps, but that is not why it was nominated. Fry1989 eh? 17:22, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
- But not being within COM:SCOPE is a reason to delete. Keφr (keep talk here) 05:32, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted as out of scope Natuur12 (talk) 15:43, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
Wurde durch die Datei "File:01-Pi-Strecke-100-Nachkommastellen-als-Strecke.gif " ersetztwird auf keiner Seite verwendet Petrus3743 (talk) 11:05, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:43, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
This logo is not up-to-date anymore 118.69.35.22 11:13, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:43, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:Dutch provinces elections 2015
[edit]The photographs photographed here need to be blurred out in order to compy with copyright restrictions.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Vera (talk) 14:07, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- two questons: 1. where can I read about this blurring guideline? 2. What about all the other similar pictures? There are very many in the various election categories. Actually, because I saw some of these I went out to make these pictures of the recent elections in the Netherlands. Elly (talk) 08:50, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keeping photo's of election posters that invringe on copyright off of 'Commons is an uphill battle. You can't point to other violations as a defence. See File:2010 election posters doetinchem.JPG for an example of where the copyvio's have been blurred out. The poster of the SP and PvdA had been cleared for publication under a free license. See COM:Casebook#Posters for why FOP doesn't apply to posters. --Vera (talk) 15:23, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: I'm sorry Elly but Vera is correct. Those images are derivatives of non-free content. And if you find other images which contain copyrighted posters which are not com:DM please nominate them. Natuur12 (talk) 15:45, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:Dutch provinces elections 2015
[edit]The photographs photographed that are owned by CDA and VVD need to be blurred out because they're derivative work
- File:Johan van der Dong Verkiezingen Grijpskerk.JPG
- File:Provinciale Statenverkiezingen Grijpskerk 2015.jpg
Vera (talk) 15:42, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 00:58, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
Screengrab includes copyrighted images -- Deadstar (msg) 14:08, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
![14:08, 24 March 2015 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2015/03/24#c-Deadstar-2015-03-24T14:08:00.000Z-File:"We_have_a_situation!"_Eindhoven_2013.png){kind=link}
- i've replaced the file with a similar image where the shell logo is not fully visible. is this ok? Frockit (talk) 15:22, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- Hi and thanks for your edit - this is a lot better already as (in my eyes) the main problem image has been covered over. However, are you the photographer of all the other photos used in the image? If not, you cannot use the "self made" license applied to the image (as although you took the screenshot, you are not the author of the content). Do you know where the photos were taken from/how they are licensed at their source? And who created the people icons? The licensing question might be answered in the software notes? Thanks again.
- (Note to admin: Please remove first version of the file if the second one is kept). -- Deadstar (msg) 09:42, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Atribution is missing Natuur12 (talk) 15:46, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
![15:46, 12 April 2015 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2015/03/24#c-Natuur12-2015-04-12T15:46:00.000Z-File:"We_have_a_situation!"_Eindhoven_2013.png){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Military insignia of Pakistan are probably work of Pakistani government. Work of Pakistani government falls into publis domain, if it is older than 50 years. Proof: {{PD-Pakistan}}. These are younger:
*file:II Corp (Pakistan).gif (1971)
*file:IV Corps (Pakistan).gif (1975)
*file:X Corps (Pakistan).gif (1974)
*file:XI Corps (Pakistan).gif (1975) Does not surpass threshold of originality
*file:XII Corps (Pakistan).gif (1985)
*file:XXX Corps (Pakistan).gif (1987)
*file:XXXI Corps (Pakistan).gif (1988). Taivo (talk) 15:33, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif){kind=link}
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:47, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
.gif){kind=link}
Derivative work of this Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 22:06, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- both are derivatives from a 1940 magazine illustration. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vfdb34 (talk • contribs)
- Comment Spanish laws state that a work does not enter into the public domain until 80 years pma. --Discasto talk 22:16, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:45, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo, the rights belongs to Evolución Política political party or their respective owners. Also, the licence used by Churrasco italiano is wrong, because there's no text in the logo, and aren't simple shapes. Sfs90 (talk) 22:11, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- Though the image is alike the logo of "Evópoli", really it is only a sketch of two interlaced wings, which I did with my publisher, so that the copyright are mine, because I drew the image, and I have given him my rights to the Foundation Wikimedia. Kind regards. Churrasco italiano (talk) 22:51, 24 March 2015 (UTC).
- The problem here it's that the logo is not too simple to have a free licence. And in other way, the political party have the copyright over their logo, so it doesn't matter if anyone created by himself, it's not a simple shape (or a text-only logo; it would be different if the logo were made only by circles, squares, or non-complicated geometric shapes, which it's not the case). Sorry. --Sfs90 (talk) 23:05, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- An image of two intertwined wings do not reach the minimum threshold of originality to be protected by copyright: it's too basic. Kind regards. Churrasco italiano (talk) 15:58, 25 March 2015 (UTC).
- I don't think so. A wing, with all their curves and angles, it's not a simple shape and it's not too basic for anyone to create it. Sorry. --Sfs90 (talk) 22:37, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete not simple- --Diego Grez return fire 18:12, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Unfortunately it does not meet the criteria of threshold of originality. --Warko (talk) 20:40, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:45, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
This file is PD-Italy according to it's source but we don't know when this work was published or even when it was created. Without this information we can't hoste this file. Natuur12 (talk) 11:37, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Dit bestand stond op de Italiaanse versie van hetzelfde onderwerp op de wikipedia. Er vanuitgaande dat wij hetzelfde onderwerp hanteren, dan mogen wij toch de foto gebruiken? Het klopt inderdaad dat er geen datum is opgegeven waarop deze foto gemaakt is, maar deze kon ik helaas ook niet vinden. UU-ITA-SeBr
- Different projects have different policy's. Commons requires evidence that a file is the public domain in both the United States and the country of origen. That evidence is missing. Natuur12 (talk) 17:25, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- Dear Natuur12, I added a link involving copyright about the United States. I got this link off the Italian page of Renzo De Felice. Could you please confirm if this will suffice in keeping the file uploaded? UU-ITA-SeBr
- We need to know when the file has been published for the first time and that information is still missing. Natuur12 (talk) 22:19, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- Dear Natuur12, I added a link involving copyright about the United States. I got this link off the Italian page of Renzo De Felice. Could you please confirm if this will suffice in keeping the file uploaded? UU-ITA-SeBr
Deleted, the local copy of the file in it.wiki is marked as "Do not transfer the file into Commons". Taivo (talk) 11:50, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Artist died in 1966. I'm not sure why this wouldn't be under copyright. Maybe I'm misunderstanding the licence template? Sorry. Themightyquill (talk) 19:15, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
I conferred with the Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco, and they said via email that they do grand permission to use this image, provided that they are given proper attribution. Wikisi117 (talk) 16:22 24 March 2015 (EST)
I'm no expert, so you could very well be right, but I'm not sure that's good enough. I mean, I'm not sure if the museum has the right to release the image from copyright, if they don't own the copyright. See Commons:Copyright_rules_by_subject_matter#Art_.28copies_of.29. Maybe someone else around here with more knowledge can help? - Themightyquill (talk) 07:42, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
- Comment This might be {{PD-US-no notice}} or {{PD-US-not renewed}}. Otherwise, a permission from the artist is needed. @Clindberg: , could you help please? Regards, Yann (talk) 21:22, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: The minimum notice requirement in the USA before the 1978 law for works other than literary, musical, or dramatic works was the author's name and the © symbol or "copyright" The date was not required. There's no © here, so PD-no-notice applies. Attribution is not required -- the museum is overstating its rights. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:23, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
