Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2015/03/19
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
This photo is no longer Creative Commons 108.245.209.175 02:50, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Passed license review long ago - free license is irrevocable. INeverCry 02:56, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
jjjjjjjjjoi 117.243.180.43 10:03, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Speedily kept, nonsense nomination Jianhui67 talk★contribs 10:05, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
it's my picture i wanted to detete it Hoseinmajlesi (talk) 06:32, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 11:47, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
License only under NC Centenier (talk) 10:56, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 10:56, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
COM:DW, magazine covers are copyrighted, missing EXIF, low resolution Jianhui67 talk★contribs 10:01, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Olämplig Lars (Lon) Olsson (talk) 15:43, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: by User:Krd. JuTa 08:10, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Infringing copyrighted work of the Government of the Republic of Korea - The original source of this photograph is The Government of the Republic of Korea Internet portal, however, that user uploaded "my picture". Request deletion of copyright infringement. Ysjbserver (talk) 04:50, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
- User:-revi has deleted this file. --Ysjbserver (talk) 10:21, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted by Revi. --Amitie 10g (talk) 18:16, 19 March 2015 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)
Infringing copyrighted work of the Government of the Republic of Korea - The original source of this photograph is The Government of the Republic of Korea Internet portal main menu, however, that user uploaded "my picture". Request deletion of copyright infringement. Ysjbserver (talk) 04:48, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
- User:-revi has deleted this file. --Ysjbserver (talk) 10:20, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Obvious copyvios. Already nuked. — regards, Revi 04:27, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Territorio Antartico Argentino 200.114.158.157 20:23, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Speedy kept: Vandalical DR, no reason for deleting a legitime User page. --Amitie 10g (talk) 03:52, 20 March 2015 (UTC) (non-admin closure)
Small images related to football, no EXIF data, user with bad history, unlikely to be own works.
- File:RSL - LL13.jpg
- File:RSL - GF13.jpg
- File:RSL - GF14.jpg
- File:RSL - FC14.jpg
- File:RSL - FC13.jpg
- File:RSL - CC14.jpg
- File:Foundation Cup Trophy.jpg
- File:Grand Final Trophy.jpg
- File:Handicap Cup Trophy.jpg
- File:RSL - NYF15.jpg
- File:Harry and ron thanks.jpg
- File:Harry and ron.jpg
Yann (talk) 21:52, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Small images related to football, no EXIF data, user with bad history, unlikely to be own works.
Yann (talk) 11:43, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
I appreciate that I have a bad history with uploading items. But I can GUARENTEE that all of the above files have been created by myself
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:33, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
Very poor quality and possibly a piss-take Guy 22:41, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
- Note: For reference, file was previously up for deletion on the English Wikipedia; resulted in no consensus. ~Kevin Payravi (talk) 01:31, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Keep The "poor quality" has been debated at length on the talk page of the Bhutanese passport article, and the consensus has been to keep it as a part of the article. If editors voted to keep it a part of the article, deleting it wouldn't make much sense.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Et0048 (talk • contribs) 04:20, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Its entirely possible its not intentionally trying to be weird, considering the speaker's native language is Dzongka, and it really does sound like this at times since it is a tonal language. Vowel intonation and length are incredibly important and its difficult for someone that learns non-tonal languages later on in life to completely ignore the urge. Though trying to explain this to most English speakers is sort of like trying to explain color to blind people, most of you simply won't get it.--Aionlux (talk) 05:50, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Sound file might be humorous, but the guy who reads it is literally the only native bhutanese audio file maker on the english wikipedia, as far as I can tell. Keep!--Shibbolethink (talk) 05:55, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep I know that it sounds funny to English speakers, but it is not okay to take down this man's work on the basis that you find his accent funny. It is understandable, comprehensive and useful - we should not judge users by their accent. Keep!--LordManley (talk) 13:14, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep There is no license issue on this file, and the decision on Wikipedia EN was to keep it. There is no reason to delete a file just because someone has a funny accent. Khoyobegenn (talk) 16:37, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
There's also a heavy autotune+reverb effect on his voice, which kind of reenforces the possibility of it being a joke, that's not something someone genuinely reading in their natural accent would do. Having said that, even if it is joke, if it's the only legit audio version of the page, then I guess it makes sense to keep--Manekdsilva (talk) 19:11, 20 March 2015 (UTC).
Delete Too much autotune and reverb effect to be "natural". And even if it is the only audio version of the page, it is probably better to have no audio version at all, than a version the Internet is using since months to mock us (Imgur 1, 2, 3, and even Youtube). I'd like also to hear from the original uploader @KuchenZimjah: about his reading. Sannita - not just another it.wiki sysop 23:16, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep I perceive it to be the case, judging by the sources provided by Sannita, that this sound-file not only provides an engaging and comprehensible audio version of the soundfile by a native Bhutanese citizen, but it's also provoked interest in Bhutan by many users of the internet. I therefore ask, doesn't that commend the file more than it condemns it? I do however echo Sannita's petition for a discussion with the original file uploader. He could provide some valuable context and insight on the matter. Kapitulasjon (talk) 09:24, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep It is a legitimate recording made with someone who has an accent. It would be nice if the creator didn't use voice-masking, but it is an understandable reading of the article. Removing the file because "it sounds funny" is childish and a bit racist.
—Kanegasi ☺C00:24, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep It was already marked for deletion and survived the discussion, therefore it has already been "proven" to be legitimate. This file is the best thing we have for this article; and unless someone procures a reasonable replacement, I think it should stay. Hipufiamiumi (talk) 06:29, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep As explained above BabyJonas (talk) 06:49, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Agreed with above. It has been nominated for deletion in the past, there's no reason to delete it now without a replacement. --Thayora (talk) 08:10, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Seems like the uploader was having some fun with the audio, in his expressiveness. And some people are linking to this article online and having fun at his expense, but it remains a faithful reproduction of the article as it stood at the time of creation, and I see no reason for deletion. Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 14:53, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep This is a good quality audio file, it should not be deleted. The Rim of the Sky (talk) 01:21, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Not because of the accent, but because of the quality of the recording. PlantRunner (talk) 02:37, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete The speaker seems to have pronounced certain words in a comical manner intentionally, even if you take an accent into account. Now that a replacement is available below, this file can be replaced. Yogirox234 (talk) 12:03, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete I can't believe people are sticking up for this. Don't say "oh it's his accent" because it's clearly a joke recording. He's probably reading all this and laughing at how much he's worked us all up. Please delete it, it's an embarrassment to have it on that page. And does such a small article even need a reading? Honestly. TravellerQLD (talk) 12:44, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete There is now a good quality recording, use that instead of this file. --Ojan (talk) 13:07, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete This is absolutely made for fun. Please delete it. -Abhilashkrishn (talk) 16:05, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete This was made for fun, it was obviously not read seriously. KungFuBeta (talk) 16:12, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Wikipedia, which is an international site and a proven standard platform to gather knowledge must have standard quality articles/files/images etc., in it's articles. This audio file which some may suggest as accent of the particular person is clearly an intention to make fun. Accent doesn't make the same word sound differently the second time! And people who can understand vocal English will probably understand written English. And one won't be in a deliberate state to understand this article just by hearing this funny audio. If an audio is to be included compulsorily in this article(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bhutanese_passport) then there are many people who can speak good standard English! (If no one else is willing, I will) But please don't include this audio in the above article! And till a decision is taken on the fate of this audio, please don't include the audio... Jaaron95 (talk) 16:37, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep. The file is of poor quality and I have argued against including it in the article on en.wp. Nevertheless, a significant number of editors on en.wp think that it should be included, and this demonstrates that it has educational value. —Mr. Granger (talk · contribs) 17:22, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete This file's just bringing troll people, and it's getting viral, should be replaced for Macusercom's version. - MrcRjs (talk) 17:35, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete This is autotune. Someone made fun of this. I've recorded an alternative in order to finally remove this sound file. Take a look: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Buthanese_Passport.ogg - Macusercom 21:24, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep The alternative version does not use the proper tones for Bhutanese words. Thus, the argument for replacing the original recording with the new one on the basis of the former's intonation sounding odd to speakers of Northern American and British varieties of English is self-defeating. - Heilige Krieger (talk) 13:37, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- Show me a Bhutanese person who speaks like that, and who has an autotuned voice naturally. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 17:42, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. No educational value. Unless somebody can tell how that is going to be used for educational purposes, I see no reason to keep it. For now, that has the only purpose of making fun of something.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 20:40, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - No educational value, the file is nowhere near an acceptable quality. It has no place on an encyclopedia whatsoever, and the arguments of pretty much every keep voter on enwp fell into "no other text-to-speech version exists" (obviously wrong), or even weaker rubbish. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 22:05, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Low quality recording due to echo. This was likely recorded using a low quality headset with the speakers on. This created an echo effect that makes the voice recording inaudible. Dillard421 (talk) 22:41, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep although it's clearly a joke recording, but this is commons not wikipedia, the main purpose is: free content? or not. So if someone upload a funny image or sound file as own work, could we delete this file? of course not--Ibrahim.ID ♒ 03:26, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- Not exactly. Being free is not enough. Please, read "Commons:Project scope". Regards.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 03:32, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep: Here's an educational purpose: it will educate others on how not to do a Spoken Wikipedia article. Plus we could probably find some place in the humor sections for it. ViperSnake151 (talk) 06:49, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Redo it Could not a native speaker redo this recording and have this moved to humor section (which I was not aware of). Also, this is really not matter of the consensus - the recording is of poor quality, it should not remain. --RockyMM (talk) 11:46, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Such things should belong to JokePedia, WikiJoke or something like that. It does not have Educational Value nor does it show professionalism. Funkyspyspy (talk) 14:44, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- Strong Keep The way I see it, if this person has made this file as a legitimate contribution and not a joke, then deleting it would be unproductive as this could just be the way he talks, and we could be shooing away one of the few Bhutanese users among us. I don't think the user is trying to vandalise the project as the user page doesn't seem out of the ordinary (even if this is vandalism, it's not too bad as nothing was deleted, only added). Everyone's main problem is with the way the person speaks (which admittedly is somewhat strange), but the content is there, giving it an educational aspect. Hshook (talk) 05:08, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
- Also, if it's bringing lots of people here from other sites, a lot of whom wouldn't know anything about the subject presumably, then it is educating them in some way about the topic. So that could be another educational reason to keep it Hshook (talk) 05:13, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Poor quality file, pratically unusable for the encyclopedia scope. Superseded by File:Buthanese Passport.ogg. SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 08:38, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
This is unsourced, and includes fictional people; family trees are taken care of with templates in WP Zoupan (talk) 00:57, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
A selfie is not permitted on Commons. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 00:59, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep. Yes it is — when it is in use, as this one is, at least, for sure. -- Tuválkin ✉ 11:46, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: In use. INeverCry 00:19, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Selfie, no educational value. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 01:13, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Low quality image, unlikely yo prove useful to the project. OSX (talk • contributions) 01:18, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:20, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
commons:SELFIE, no educational value — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 01:27, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted. INeverCry 00:21, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope. Likely personality rights issue as well. P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:50, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Purely promotional graphic, out of scope. Unusable and uneducational. P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:51, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Unusable tiny photo. Many better photos of trees. P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:52, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Unused purely promotional image, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:54, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:56, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Text only, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:58, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Text only, personal resume, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:59, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Purely promotional, predominantly text-only file, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:09, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 20:18, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:32, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company INeverCry 20:19, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:32, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vermex Van Croix (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 20:21, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:32, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 20:24, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:32, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 20:26, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:30, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope INeverCry 20:27, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:30, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal drawings
- File:Mountain Picture Happyland.png
- File:Merry Christmas CBeebies!.png
- File:Stewie.png
- File:CBeebies2.png
INeverCry 20:29, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:30, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Khushnawaji (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 20:31, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:29, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Silviaabella (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal drawings
- File:Saltando Itziar Okariz.JPG
- File:Irrintzi.JPG
- File:Itziar okariz.JPG
- File:Mear en espacio público itziar okariz.JPG
INeverCry 20:33, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:29, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 20:34, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:28, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 20:35, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:27, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Perez-Sepulveda (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope
INeverCry 20:36, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:27, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 20:37, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:27, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 20:38, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:26, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 20:40, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:26, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
unused logo of dubious notability, sole autopromo upload Pibwl (talk) 21:02, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:25, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
useless advert logo, sole upload from a globally blocked user Pibwl (talk) 21:03, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:25, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
copyrighted (on page 2) pdf file, out of scope. Rest of uploads are also out of scope pdf's:
- File:Tipos de normas internacionales sobre sistemas de la calidad.pdf,
- File:Norma ASTM.pdf,
- File:Norma ASME..pdf,
- file:NORMA ANSI.pdf.
Pibwl (talk) 21:05, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:26, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
out of scope pdf file, sole upload Pibwl (talk) 21:09, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:23, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
doesn't seem to be in scope (if it is anonymous user's own work indeed). Sole upload. Pibwl (talk) 21:11, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:23, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
out of scope promo, sole upload Pibwl (talk) 21:11, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:22, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
advert, sole upload Pibwl (talk) 21:16, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:22, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:28, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:21, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Unused and unusable personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:30, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:21, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:31, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:21, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Unused promotional image or personal artwork, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:34, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:21, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Most likely taken from internet, copyright violation. P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:36, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:20, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Unused and unusable promotional image, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:38, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:19, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Predominantly text, with unusable fuzy image, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:41, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:19, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Text only, more suitable at Wikisource. No evidence that uploader is author. P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:42, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:19, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Text only, more suitable at Wikisource. No evidence that uploader is author. P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:44, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:18, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Weird, unlikely and contradictory claims and no evidence to support the PD rationale. 2013 is not prior to 1923. The depicted person was born in 1906, so would have been in his teens in 1923, but appears significantly older in the photo. The author field lists two names: the subject of the photo and a French translator; it's unlikely that either of them created this photo (which does not appear to be a selfie) and even more unlikely that they pressed the shutter release button together. It also seems unlikely that the United States is the country of origin. —LX (talk, contribs) 21:44, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:18, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Likely copyright violation: no evidence that uploader is author or has permission. P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:46, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:17, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
No source, no proof of a free license, no permission. Yann (talk) 21:46, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:17, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Likely copyright violation: no evidence that uploader is author or has permission. P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:47, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:17, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Likely copyright violation: no evidence that uploader is author or has permission. P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:48, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:17, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Likely copyright violation: no evidence that uploader is author or has permission. P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:48, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:16, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
No source, no description, could be made with LaTeX. Yann (talk) 21:58, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:16, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
This isn't the own work of any user, but the cover of one of popular Russian magazines, protected by copyright. Wanwa (talk) 22:03, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:16, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Album cover, no permission. Yann (talk) 22:05, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:15, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 18:44, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:47, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Promotional image for non-notable restaurant. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:44, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:47, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal artwork or promotional image, out of scope. 68.5.163.53 18:51, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:47, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 18:50, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:47, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 18:53, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:47, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope. Personal photo and signature, uploaded for deleted self-promoting autobio en:Rahul Srinivasan by author of one self-published book.
JohnCD (talk) 18:57, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:46, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope INeverCry 19:11, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:46, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope INeverCry 19:12, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:46, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:13, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:46, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:15, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:46, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:17, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:46, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:19, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:46, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:20, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:45, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:21, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:44, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image/artwork INeverCry 19:23, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:44, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
File:Digital micro imaging adaptor with Mr. Sachin G Lokapure (born Oct 11, 1986) indian inventor.jpg
[edit]picture collection needs local picture as source Motopark (talk) 19:32, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:44, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:39, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:44, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused image of non-notable person INeverCry 19:42, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:41, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope INeverCry 19:45, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:41, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Richarderari (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
- File:Richard Erari at Grasberg Surface mine PT.Freeport McMoRan with background The Big Minning Truck 797 and Shovel.JPG
- File:Rambut Kribo ( Richard Erari ).jpg
INeverCry 19:47, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:40, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:49, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:41, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:50, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:40, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sebacordero (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal/self-promotional images
INeverCry 19:52, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:39, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused image of non-notable person INeverCry 19:54, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:43, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope INeverCry 19:55, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:38, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:55, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:39, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Unclear how the uploader could be the copyright holder of this photo as claimed, it dates from c. 1938 (from the age of the person depicted) so it is unlikely that the uploader is the photographer. January (talk) 19:57, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:37, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
possible copyvio - old professional school portrait - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 19:59, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:37, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 20:02, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:36, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 20:06, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:36, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope INeverCry 20:07, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:36, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope INeverCry 20:07, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:36, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 20:08, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:36, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Possible copyright violations - small sizes - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful
INeverCry 20:09, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:34, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 20:11, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:34, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 20:13, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:34, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 20:14, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:34, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope INeverCry 20:15, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:33, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Niki.sendu (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal image and logo
INeverCry 20:16, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:33, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:10, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:48, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:12, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:48, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal artwork or promotional image, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:17, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:48, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Unused and unusable personal artwork, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:18, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:48, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Text only, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:19, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:48, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Text only, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:19, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:48, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Text only, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:20, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:48, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
unusable image Takeaway (talk) 04:23, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:49, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Miss-universo-paulina-vega-07 copyviolo no licensing EEIM (talk) 04:38, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:49, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Commons isn't used for advertising Missvain (talk) 04:57, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:49, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Commons is not to be used for advertising. Missvain (talk) 04:57, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:49, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Commons is not to be used for advertising or as an image host. Missvain (talk) 04:58, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:49, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Commons is not to be used for advertising or as an image host. Missvain (talk) 04:58, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:49, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Photo of picture of copyrighted fictional character. Copyvio. Vantey (talk) 06:02, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 06:05, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:49, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 06:05, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Patricia M. Shippee (talk) 15:33, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:49, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 06:06, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
The name of the REDIRECT is confusing and misleading; see File talk:Wolfgang Seidel.jpg. Michael Bednarek (talk) 06:46, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
This is clearly marked Visiting card - effectively his business card which is advertising IMO and out of scope Gbawden (talk) 08:28, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Hardly user's own work, watermarked, missing EXIF/permission, low resolution Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:35, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work given that there is missing EXIF/permission Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:44, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work, missing EXIF/permission, found on many websites Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:51, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
unused personal file 37.5.4.147 09:53, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Unused text document of questionable notability, out of scope, should be converted to wikitext and transferred to relevant project if useful Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:56, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Thedude0025 (talk · contribs)
[edit]See COM:PENIS, out of scope
Jianhui67 talk★contribs 10:00, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
dubious "own work", first published in 2012 [1] or before 37.5.4.147 10:00, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
unused personal file 37.5.4.147 10:34, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
There is no Freedom of Panorama in Russia for plaques. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 10:38, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Photomontage with unfree parts (13 results on TinEye) 37.5.4.147 10:39, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
No permission (9 results on TinEye) 37.5.4.147 10:42, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Useless without a description (Perhaps a self portrait of a flickr user?) 37.5.4.147 10:50, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
This group seems to be unknown to google 37.5.4.147 11:00, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Source does not include the rear of the image, and so no lack of copyright notice can be ascertained. The episode itself was registered for copyright, and it's quite possible that film stills were too. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:00, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Statue of copyrighted fictional character. COM:CHARACTER. Vantey (talk) 11:05, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
COM:CHARACTER. Sculpture of copyrighted fictional characters. Copyvio. Vantey (talk) 11:13, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:21, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:31, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Image not found from source, software not under GPL. Siyuwj (talk) 11:31, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:32, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Image not found from source, software not under GPL. Siyuwj (talk) 11:34, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope. Selfie uploaded for deleted jokey autobio en: Eleven Amanda Daryn. JohnCD (talk) 11:37, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
As per COM:FOP#Japan, artwork located outside in Japan may be reproduced only for non-commercial purposes, so cannot be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons. -- DAJF (talk) 11:47, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Logo of a sport club/team. No proof it can be used freely. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 11:48, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
A larger version of the same image was published here in 2011. -- DAJF (talk) 11:50, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:53, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:54, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - personal photos. Any of these that were used were in deleted article en:Harry Dillon McLean and abandoned draft en:Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Harry Dillon McLean.
- File:Signature of Harry McLean.jpg
- File:Harry and Travis Outside Bar.jpg
- File:Harry McLean NZCF Community Service Award.jpg
- File:HMdance promotional video capture.jpg
- File:Harry McLean on Rippa Island.jpg
- File:Harry McLean at Super Ceroc.jpg
JohnCD (talk) 11:59, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:56, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope. Uploaded for repeatedly-deleted en:Anass Maksi. JohnCD (talk) 12:02, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:56, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
1) Possibly out of scope so this drawing has not been used by the club as a commemorative emblem as the uploader stated; 2) Not own work so the image was published on "Fotolog" (See) 6 years ago . Fma12 (talk) 12:07, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:01, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
no image due to incorrect upload? Takeaway (talk) 12:08, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Comment: Why don't try to upload a new version again?
- I'm not the uploader. - Takeaway (talk) 18:26, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:01, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Unused, and categorized by uploader as in Category:Non-free screenshots Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 07:28, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:53, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope. Uploaded by one of many sockpuppets of the subject, see en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Khursheed Khan Pictures/Archive. JohnCD (talk) 12:09, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted. INeverCry 01:02, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Unused male face image more suitable for social media - please see description - out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:27, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:50, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:15, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
A series of promotional/ self-promotional uploads, see repeating name in file names and biographical information with the headshot. No indication of user's own work on the images on the packages, the awards, or the portrait, more likely COM:COPYVIOs.
- File:Awards of Anuradha Prabhudesai4.jpg
- File:Awards of Anuradha Prabhudesai3.jpg
- File:Anuradha prabhudesai.jpg
- File:Awards of Anuradha Prabhudesai2.jpg
- File:Awards of Anuradha Prabhudesai1.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:29, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:50, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Primkopau rentcar (talk · contribs)
[edit]A series of pictures of cars of variable sizes & quality; no indication of user's own work, and apparently also promotional due to the uploader having "Rentcar" in name. COM:COPYVIOs and possible misuse of uploading name for self-promotional/promotional purposes.
- File:JASA TRANSPORTASI DAN PENYEWAAN MOBIL DIBANDARA BANJARMASIN.JPG
- File:Primkopau Rent Car Banjarmasin 06.jpg
- File:Primkopau Rent Car Banjarmasin 05.JPG
- File:Primkopau Rent Car Banjarmasin 04.jpg
- File:Primkopau Rent Car Banjarmasin 03.jpg
- File:Primkopau Rent Car Banjarmasin 02.jpg
- File:Primkopau Rent Car Banjarmasin 01.jpg
- File:Jasa Transportasi dan Penyewaan Mobil di Bandara Syamsuddin Noor Banjarmasin.jpg
- File:Rental di Banjarmasin Kalimantan Selatan.jpg
- File:Rental mobil Primkopau Banjarmasin.jpg
- File:Rental Mobil Banjarmasin.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:32, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:49, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by La sentimental (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 17:49, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:48, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
I am nominating this for deletion based on the fact that the information supplied by the uploader is incorrect and that the image is now no longer used. I feel that the uploader, who has historally had problems using {{Self}} to avoid having to find proof that image are Public Domain, simply claimed that it was created by Heatherly McClellan and was public Domain. This isn't proof per Evidence Required. It took me 5 minutes to find the photo that he claimed was used to create this drawing, but he claimed was destroyed. (see File:Louis-Auguste Bertrand.jpg). Additionally, as the real photo of the guy is avaible, I feel that this image is not realistically useful for an educational purpose, being of such a low quality. Why would it ever be used? --ARTEST4ECHO talk 12:23, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:06, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 12:29, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. There's also an exact duplicate at File:Just fuck my shit up.jpg. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 05:23, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:09, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 12:34, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:09, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
spam, del. on DE Nolispanmo 12:41, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:09, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
No COM:FOP#Japan for modern 3D artwork in Japan. Vantey (talk) 13:12, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:09, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Copied from this page: [2], with original web address on the photo frame. SElefant (talk) 13:13, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:09, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Copied from this page:[3], the original web address is still on the watermark. SElefant (talk) 13:15, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:09, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
No COM:FOP#Japan for modern 2D artwork in Japan and copyvio as drawing work. Vantey (talk) 13:15, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:09, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Most of the photos uploaded by this user were stolen from somewhere else. It's logical to assume all his uploading files are copyright violated without clear explanation where, how, when he took the photo. SElefant (talk) 13:18, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:09, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Copied from the official school website [4] SElefant (talk) 13:20, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:09, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
The most main subjects on this photo are non-free pictures. Copyvio. Vantey (talk) 13:21, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:09, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
This is a trademark of an existing private company: www.poya.com.tw SElefant (talk) 13:23, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:09, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Almost all of the photos uploaded by this specific user were copied from somewhere else. It's logical to assume all his uploading files are copyright violated without clear explanation where, how, when he took the photo. SElefant (talk) 13:25, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:09, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lovinachristy (talk · contribs)
[edit]These images are found in various online source and no EXIF too.
- File:Pastor sam teaching in bible college.jpg
- File:Pastor sam on stage.jpg
- File:Pastor sam's preaching.jpg
AntonTalk 14:06, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:10, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Uploaded from flickr in good faith, but the image is a derivative work of a copyrighted mural (or stairal? I have no idea what you call a mural on stairs) UserB (talk) 14:09, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Sorry my mistake in marking it. The UK does not have FOP for 2D art. --Leoboudv (talk) 04:50, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:11, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete It's a spam, see previously deleted files from same {socks} user here User:Aldnonymous/RD_and_Speedy#March_2015.--AldNonUcallin?☎ 16:16, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:11, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
self-promotion, no value for the Wikimedia projects C3r4 (talk) 14:20, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:12, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:12, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Uploaded in good faith from flickr. This image depicts a sculpture on display at the en:Doha Corniche in Qatar and the flickr user that uploaded it is the official flickr account of a major Qatari sports magazine called "Doha Stadium Plus Qatar". Unfortunately, there is no freedom of panorama in Qatar and no indication that the magazine had the sculptor's permission for their derivative work, so we cannot use it as free content. UserB (talk) 14:21, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:12, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Copyright medigames.com Remy34 (talk) 14:22, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom. Also doesn't appear to be compatible with project scope. Uploader also seems to have uploaded other potentially copyrighted images. Guliolopez (talk) 20:52, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:12, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope: photo of non-notable persons. Ymblanter (talk) 14:24, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
- This one is in use on English Wikipedia (as w:File:Amby and Chloe at the staircase of Our Lady of Fatima University 2 February 2015 .jpg). --Stefan4 (talk) 21:13, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks, this is still the same user. Nominated for speedy deletion.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:19, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:12, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 14:24, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:13, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope: photo of non-notable person. Ymblanter (talk) 14:25, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:13, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope: photo of non-notable person. Ymblanter (talk) 14:25, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:13, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:13, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope: photo of non-notable persons. Ymblanter (talk) 14:26, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:13, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Promo photo. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:13, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:13, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:13, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Collection of promo photos. No evidence of permissions.
- File:5 star akil.jpg
- File:5 star akil 2.jpg
- File:5 star akil thankful for life.png
- File:Island adventure Youtube.jpg
- File:Toni Oliver Talent Finals.jpg
- File:Toni Oliver Photoshoot with Dash.jpg
- File:Toni Oliver Miss Jamaica.jpg
- File:Toni Oliver Photoshoot.jpg
- File:Toni Oliver Miss Jamaica Elimination.jpg
- File:Toni Oliver Miss Ja Swimsuit.JPG
- File:Toni Oliver Tales of a Wonder.jpg
- File:Toni Oliver wins Masters Degree.jpg
- File:Toni Oliver for Miss Jamaica World.jpg
- File:Toni Oliver Pageant Collage.jpg
- File:Toni Oliver.jpg
- File:Toni Oliver at FlexWeek Launch.jpg
- File:Toni Oliver Dash Productions photoshoot.jpg
- File:Toni Oliver Miss Jamaica World Finals.JPG
- File:Toni Oliver YUTE Upliftment Program Mentor.jpg
- File:ChampionDino.jpg
- File:My new friend.jpg
- File:DinoOlympians.jpg
- File:DinoMills.jpg
- File:DinoMoscowTrials.jpg
- File:DinoJARelay.jpg
- File:DinoGermany.jpg
- File:DinoChild.jpg
- File:DinoBrussels.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:14, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused logo of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:14, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by รัชฎาภรณ์ โหยกระโทก (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:Kukaminsomsak.jpg
- File:Somsakkamin.jpg
- File:Tik.jpg
- File:Somsak.jpg
- File:แอ้.jpg
- File:รัชฎาภรณ์.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:15, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be replaced with wiki-table. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:15, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photos.
Buxtehude (talk) 14:46, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:15, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 15:03, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:15, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused file, advertising or self-promotion (http://www.jxnhiphopscene.com/about-us.html) BrightRaven (talk) 15:08, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:15, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Otto HdeMontserrat (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused files, self-created artworks, advertising or self-promotion (http://marcaillou.over-blog.com/)
BrightRaven (talk) 15:12, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:15, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
This picture was surely not taken by the Uploader / no camera-information / seems to be a copy of someone others photograpy Les Meloures (talk) 15:36, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
- OTRS-permisson received. Please close the deletion request. // Martin K. (talk) 09:27, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
At first, so small photos (128×96 pixels) tend to be out of project scope due to bad quality. This file is also unused. At second, there is no freedom of panorama in France. The house can be in public domain due to age, but architect's name (or at least year of building) must be given. Taivo (talk) 15:42, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:16, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal files are out of project scope. Also, for collages author, source and license must be given for every single image. Taivo (talk) 15:47, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
- Image copied from here so it can be deleted as copyvio. -- Tegel (talk) 16:23, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:16, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Newlifebaby (talk · contribs)
[edit]Small size, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.
- File:照片翻攝自古正良臉書.jpg -> from facebook
- File:古正良檔案.jpg -> from facebook
- File:古正良.jpg
- File:李光耀.jpg
- File:Greg -Taiwan.jpg
- File:古正良-台灣.jpg
- File:Ku Cheng Liang.jpg
Yann (talk) 16:28, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete File:李光耀.jpg – photograph of a copyrighted waxwork model. — SMUconlaw (talk) 12:04, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:17, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Small size, no EXIF data, user with bad history, unlikely to be own works.
Yann (talk) 16:56, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:17, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
watermarked picture see right lower corner possible copyvio Motopark (talk) 17:22, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Photo copyright: Birds Eye Studio, Old Lyme, CT 2006
If this is not satisfactory, please eliminate the photo from the file.
Deleted: INeverCry 01:17, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 23:29, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:16, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
out of scope and unused game screenshots - same for rest of user's uploads: File:GxObjects6.jpg, File:GxObjects5.jpg, File:GxObjects4.jpg, File:GxObjects3.jpg, File:GxObjects2.jpg, file:GxObjects1.jpg, and out of scope File:Skeenky123.jpg Pibwl (talk) 17:24, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:18, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Duplicate of SVG file. Fry1989 eh? 17:28, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:18, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
This is small photo without metadata. I do not believe own work and suspect copyright violation. I deleted all user's other uploads speedily (screenshot, poster, fair use) and I warn him.
Я думаю, что это не своя работа, а нарушение авторских прав истинного фотографа. Taivo (talk) 17:31, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
- Just one of examples of the same photo - http://www.whatsupiran.com/Profile/Abbas-Amiri - so together with other uploader's copyviolations - it's pretty definite.
Deleted: INeverCry 01:18, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
[www.youtube.com/watch?v=qN2ifOhy7tM copyright] Uğurkent (talk) 17:59, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:19, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Images of the Sibelius Monument 3
[edit]- File:The J. Sibelius portrait monument - panoramio.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:The Sibelius Monument - panoramio - Aulo Aasmaa.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:The Sibelius Monument - panoramio.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:The Sibelius portrait monument - panoramio.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
Derivative work of the Sibelius Monument, a 1967-sculpture by Eila Hiltunen (1922–2003), not in Public Domain yet. FOP in Finland for buildings only. Previous cases:
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:SIBELIUS MONUMENT, HELSINKI, FINLAND.jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/Images of the Sibelius Monument
- Commons:Deletion requests/Images of the Sibelius Monument 2
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jean Sibelius (100505764).jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sibeliuksenpääsibeliuspuistossa.JPG
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sibelius monument 2.jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sibelius monument Helsinki.jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sibelius Monument in Helsinki.JPG
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sibelius monument.jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sibeliusmonumentti2005.jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:The Sibelius Monument (100484627).jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sibelius park3.jpg
––Apalsola t • c 18:19, 19 March 2015 (UTC) –– (reasoning) Apalsola t • c 18:29, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:19, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Derivative work of Marsalkka Mannerheimin ratsastajapatsas, a 1960-statue by Aimo Tukiainen (1917–1996), not in public domain yet. FOP in Finland for buildings only. Apalsola t • c 18:31, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
- A previous case: Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Mannerheim ratsastajapatsas.jpg. ––Apalsola t • c 18:31, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:19, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
seems to be a scan of a picture / the uploader seems not to be the photograph, there is no camera information Les Meloures (talk) 18:41, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:20, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Sorry, there is no COM:FOP in Belarusia JuTa 19:29, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:20, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Various images that are either low quality or lack sufficient context or explanation to render them useful in a manner compatible with Commons' educational purpose.
- File:Fig6-a.jpg - Apparently an assembly language debugger running under MS-DOS, but no context to make it more useful than that. We already have two similar in-use uploads of the same debugger by the same person, and this one doesn't add anything to them. Red box suggests that there was originally a specific purpose to this image, but there's no explanation here.
- File:Fig5-b.jpg - Same image without the red box; may be a good reason or context for it, but since uploader couldn't be bothered explaining that or providing a meaningful filename, that's irrelevant.
- File:Fig4-a.jpg - Looks like a diagram of a computer real-time clock, but no explanation given, so potential educational use limited.
- File:Fig2-b.jpg - Low-quality image of a BIOS setup screen. We already have similar better-quality images elsewhere, e.g. File:Award BIOS setup utility.png
- File:Fig1-b.jpg - Too low-resolution to read the writing on the chip beyond "Intel". Categorised by someone as a "BIOS chip", but no more info than that, and we have lots of better quality images of BIOS chips.
- File:Fig1.jpg - Ditto; "AWARD" only just legible, nothing else.
Ubcule (talk) 19:41, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:20, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Verschieberest Bibonius (talk) 19:50, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
- Useful redirect after file move. (Translation of DR: "leftover after file move") Yellowcard (talk) 10:54, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:20, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Appears to be a photo of a photo, original photo would date from 1951 or earlier from the event depicted so it is unlikely that the uploader is the original photographer. January (talk) 19:52, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:20, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
In addition to questions over the source of the image, no background explanation as to what this is (and hence, how it might be useful within Commons' educational scope). Ubcule (talk) 19:53, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:20, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
No COM:FOP#Japan for modern 2D artwork in Japan and copyvio. Vantey (talk) 21:00, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:21, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
out of scope, as well as File:Postcards mendip.JPG Pibwl (talk) 21:01, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:21, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Superseded by File:William-Adolphe Bouguereau - L'été (ca.1880).jpg A1AA1A (talk) 21:04, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:21, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
No COM:FOP#Japan and copyvio as photography work of others. Vantey (talk) 21:19, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:21, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
No evidence to support the claim that this was created by an officer or employee of the United States Federal Government. The source link does not work; presumably it's the same page that is now at http://www.southalabama.edu/mccallarchives/html/exhibit/crm/crmexhibit.htm. Dave Hamby, who is named as the author here, is named as the author of a different photo on that page (and there is no evidence that he is or was an officer or employee of the of the United States Federal Government). On the source page, this photo is attributed to Azalea City News, a publication by Easter Publishing Company, which does not appear to be a part of the US Federal Government. —LX (talk, contribs) 21:21, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:21, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
No evidence to support the claim that this was created by an officer or employee of the US Federal Government. The authorship information "Загрузка... Не удалось загрузить изображение.Посмотреть на сайте" translates to "Loading ... Failed to load image. View Online" – what kind of authorship information is that?! —LX (talk, contribs) 21:30, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:21, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Superseded Microsoft Cortana logos
[edit]Superseded by File:Microsoft Cortana light.svg. The two SVGs actually have embedded PNG data.
Ricordisamoa 21:56, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:21, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Likely false PD claims. Content on Flickr is user-generated and not authored by Flickr.com itself, as claimed by the uploader. Releasing photos into the public domain is not an option offered to regular Flickr users. The photo no longer exists on Flickr, but all other photos by the same Flickr user are marked "© All Rights Reserved". The permission field states that the file was "found on image search engine" – which is obviously not evidence of permission to release it into the public domain. —LX (talk, contribs) 21:58, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:22, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
File:28 Jacopo di Cione Triptych of the Virgin and Child Enthroned with Saints 1370-80 (76.5 x 69.2 cm) National Gallery of Canada, Ot.jpg
[edit]This fails the third bullet point under Commons:When to use the PD-Art tag#When should the PD-Art tag not be used? which cannot easily be fixed because of the triptych nature of the work. —LX (talk, contribs) 22:02, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:22, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
This fails the third bullet point under Commons:When to use the PD-Art tag#When should the PD-Art tag not be used? which cannot easily be fixed because of the shape of the frame. —LX (talk, contribs) 22:03, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:22, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
This looks like a scan from a printed publication, e. g. a newspaper. It is improbable that the photo was taken by the uploader. Robert Weemeyer (talk) 22:09, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:23, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
No evidence to support the claim that works of the Arizona state government are exempt from copyright protection. en:Copyright status of work by U.S. subnational governments does not contain any information that would support the assertion. —LX (talk, contribs) 22:19, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:23, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Unsufficient description, low resolution, out of Commons scope. Robert Weemeyer (talk) 22:26, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:23, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
No COM:FOP#Japan and copyvio as photography work of others. Vantey (talk) 23:24, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:24, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Non-free creative text. No COM:FOP#Japan and copyvio as literary work. Vantey (talk) 23:28, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:24, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Request from the artist. His email for confirmation: info[AT]antonioalonsomartinez.com 414mqk (talk) 01:22, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: No permission. Single photo in the Flickr account. -- Geagea (talk) 08:50, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
some data is wrong Ambrishseo (talk) 10:43, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. The watermark says www.mapsofworld.com and the link espanol.mapsofworld.com -- Geagea (talk) 09:24, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Low-quality version of File:George_Charles_Beresford_-_Virginia_Woolf_in_1902.jpg, we should really encourage usage of the high-res version. If there's good reason to keep this, though, speak up. Adam Cuerden (talk) 21:06, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete, though I do not think File:George_Charles_Beresford_-_Virginia_Woolf_in_1902.jpg is the same image. Rather File:Woolf by Beresford 2.jpg. — Racconish 📥 21:17, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
- why don't you curate all the versions including File:George_Charles_Beresford_-_Virginia_Woolf_in_1902.jpg; File:Woolf by Beresford 2.jpg. where is the original archival source? could it be [5] you might want a hi res tiff, and a low res jpg, in accordance with the versions guideline, to allow people to "improve" the non-archival version. Slowking4 ♡ Farmbrough's revenge 04:35, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
- Not sure I expressed myself clearly enough : File:George_Charles_Beresford_-_Virginia_Woolf_in_1902.jpg and File:Virginia Woolf by George Charles Beresford (1902).jpg are two different pictures. Though File:George_Charles_Beresford_-_Virginia_Woolf_in_1902.jpg has a better resolution, it does not have the textural quality one would expect from a platinium print. File:Woolf by Beresford 2.jpg is more pictorialist and arguably more suggestive and File:Woolf by Beresford b.jpg has a higher resolution without artefacts hiding the platinium grain. Cheers, — Racconish 📥 07:36, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
- There are actually a number of photographs Beresford took in the same session. The NPG website refers to "a sequence of four from this sitting owned by the National Portrait Gallery". The most famous, reproduced on a UK stamp, is File:Woolf by Beresford.jpg ; the most charming, IMO, File:Woolf by Beresford 2.jpg due to the 3/4 position of the model; and, still IMO, File:George_Charles_Beresford_-_Virginia_Woolf_in_1902.jpg is less "ethereal" (to use NPG's term) one, partly due to the treatment of the image and partly to the position of the model in the picture. In any case, to clarify the matter, see below a gallery of the 6 different shots existing on Commons.— Racconish 📥 09:45, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
- Well, in any case, the one under discussion seems fairly low quality compared to Woolf by Beresford 2. I think all the remainder should be kept, though.
- Agreed. — Racconish 📥 17:00, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
- Well, in any case, the one under discussion seems fairly low quality compared to Woolf by Beresford 2. I think all the remainder should be kept, though.
- why don't you curate all the versions including File:George_Charles_Beresford_-_Virginia_Woolf_in_1902.jpg; File:Woolf by Beresford 2.jpg. where is the original archival source? could it be [5] you might want a hi res tiff, and a low res jpg, in accordance with the versions guideline, to allow people to "improve" the non-archival version. Slowking4 ♡ Farmbrough's revenge 04:35, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_indian_inventor.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_National_Gallery_of_Canada,_Ot.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Olsson-2015-03-19T15:43:00.000Z-File:Sugar_&_spice_&_tobacco.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_indian_inventor.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_indian_inventor.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_National_Gallery_of_Canada,_Ot.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_National_Gallery_of_Canada,_Ot.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep. Photo from 1902 by British studio photographer. I prefer to keep the low resolution photos of him unless it is a low resolution duplicate of the same photo.-- Geagea (talk) 09:35, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, it is a low resolution duplicate of File:Woolf by Beresford 2.jpg. — Racconish 📥 14:48, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per discussion. -- Geagea (talk) 15:01, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
unclear permission Zoupan (talk) 00:55, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
- 1910... More than 100 years. Станоје Станојевић died in 1937. More than 70 years. --Pauk (talk) 08:19, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
- The source of this version is Stanoje's, but this is not his work, but "downloaded from www.njegos.org"; unclear permission.--Zoupan (talk) 18:57, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: OK for me. Yann (talk) 19:49, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Request from the artist. His email for confirmation: info[AT]antonioalonsomartinez.com 414mqk (talk) 01:18, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: No permission. Yann (talk) 19:49, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
The claim of ineligibility for copyright protection is clearly incorrect. This image has very well passed the threshold of originality. Codename Lisa (talk) 02:57, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Two circles and a musical note is above TOO? Really? Gradients don't count under US law and Apple is an American company, this is PD. Fry1989 eh? 03:37, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 19:50, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
no need it any more 2601:3C1:4000:1BC0:5470:1821:B917:812D 08:38, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per COM:SCOPE as it is used on 23 sister projects and its use is well within the criteria of our policy. Codename Lisa (talk) 09:18, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Just an ASCII screen, may be bellow the COM:TOO. Amitie 10g (talk) 03:31, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: The site does not have a free license Ymblanter (talk) 19:52, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Bellow the COM:TOO in Germany? Amitie 10g (talk) 03:33, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo. Yann (talk) 19:51, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Copyright on the painting just expired in Europe, but in the US it is still copyrighted (that darned URAA again). — Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:55, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
- I'm definitely not an expert, neither on the URAA issue nor on WMF policies on the subject. What do you do of m:Legal/Wikimedia Server Location and Free Knowledge and Commons:Massive restoration of deleted images by the URAA? --Eusebius (talk) 06:51, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
- COM:URAA says that this should be evaluated carefully. Since the PD status of the painting in France didn't occur until the beginning of 2015, well after the URAA was instated in 1996, I doubt there's much doubt. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:03, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
- Another element (not an argument though, I am definitely not competent here): Kandinsky died in 1944. The 70pma copyright duration was introduced in France only in 1997 (it was 50pma before that). Does it mean that from 1995 to 1997, Kandinsky's works were in the public domain in France, only to be protected again after that? I guess it is a classical, troll-prone issue and Kandinsky is not the only one impacted, but I have no idea about the interpretation in French law, let alone the impact on URAA. --Eusebius (talk) 15:52, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
- D'oh! I didn't realize that. That makes this free in the US, as the URAA was only applied once, in 1996 for France. If in France this was PD in 1996, then the URAA would not have been applied. It would not have been applied after French copyright was extended, either. Consider this withdrawn (though we should still note the copyright of the underlying work). — Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:15, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
- And I've added a note on the status of the painting. I am so happy to be wrong! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:23, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
- It's not even that simple I'm afraid: this law was partly retroactive. It was published in 1997, but its effects started on July 1st 1995. It states that works already in the public domain on July 1st 1995 (Kandinsky's work included) don't get protected again, unless they were already protected, before that date, in any country of the European Community... Is there a country of the CEE which had a protection duration longer than 50pma in 1995? No idea. --Eusebius (talk) 16:25, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
- I don't think that, from the US standpoint, the retroactive application of the 1997 law would have affected the URAA law. Either way, IMHO (and IANAL) there's not enough doubt that the image is free in the US to require deletion (the "significant doubt" part of COM:URAA). — Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:28, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
- COM:URAA has "in some cases countries have extended their copyright terms after the relevant URAA date; the copyright term in effect on the URAA date is the one that matters for working out whether a work was in copyright on that date", which... is actually ambiguous in this case, though I still think the current notice is correct. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:33, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
- And I've added a note on the status of the painting. I am so happy to be wrong! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:23, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
- Another element (not an argument though, I am definitely not competent here): Kandinsky died in 1944. The 70pma copyright duration was introduced in France only in 1997 (it was 50pma before that). Does it mean that from 1995 to 1997, Kandinsky's works were in the public domain in France, only to be protected again after that? I guess it is a classical, troll-prone issue and Kandinsky is not the only one impacted, but I have no idea about the interpretation in French law, let alone the impact on URAA. --Eusebius (talk) 15:52, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
- COM:URAA says that this should be evaluated carefully. Since the PD status of the painting in France didn't occur until the beginning of 2015, well after the URAA was instated in 1996, I doubt there's much doubt. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:03, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Ok for me. Yann (talk) 19:54, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Image is copyrighted Padenton (talk) 07:41, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep: Yes, si copyrighted, but bellow the COM:TOO, and therefore in the PD. --Amitie 10g (talk) 18:07, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo. Yann (talk) 19:58, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
This self-created map without any sources seems to be a fake. The principality had neither definite territory nor any borders. In literature there is no information about a concrete territory of this attempt of statehood. That’s why there also exist no map about the principality. It was the WP-author who "invents" this first map at all. --Otberg (talk) 08:50, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep. The image is currently in use on several projects, so it is automatically within scope per COM:INUSE. —Mr. Granger (talk · contribs) 11:35, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
- Do you realy like to keep a hoax map, just because it is in use somewhere? --Otberg (talk) 14:56, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
- Sorry but I'm not a hoaxer. You can easy verify my works since years, herr Otberg. In a first time, I have scan and upload the original map of 1942 but someone ask the deletion because the copyright problems. So, I draw this other map, but I'm agree with the deletion, but for two other reasons:
-The boundaries of this "Pindus principality" never have precisely fixed, so all maps (as the original of 1942) are approximative;
-The "Pindus principality" was a revendication recognised by anyone, not a real state de facto or de jure. Regards, --Spiridon Ion Cepleanu (talk) 17:48, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
- Sorry but I'm not a hoaxer. You can easy verify my works since years, herr Otberg. In a first time, I have scan and upload the original map of 1942 but someone ask the deletion because the copyright problems. So, I draw this other map, but I'm agree with the deletion, but for two other reasons:
- Do you realy like to keep a hoax map, just because it is in use somewhere? --Otberg (talk) 14:56, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
- Sorry, you are not a hoaxer, but the map is just fantasy. But some people thought it shows reality and put it in articles. --Otberg (talk) 18:28, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
- If you think that the other wikis should remove the map from the articles, I suggest that you (or other like-minded editors who speak the wikis' respective languages) start a discussion on each wiki to remove it. But as long as it is used in at least one wiki, it is automatically within scope on Commons.
- By the way, I notice that the fr.wikipedia article that uses this image says "Cet 'état' n'a jamais eu d'existence réelle sur le terrain et ses frontières n'ont jamais été clairement définies." They certainly don't seem to be presenting these borders as reality—indeed, they seem to agree with your statement above that "the principality had neither definite territory nor any borders." —Mr. Granger (talk · contribs) 18:42, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
- If you are concerned about Commons hosting an inaccurate map, rest assured that this would not be the only one. In fact, Commons has an entire category for inaccurate maps, including nine maps showing a single nonexistent river! —Mr. Granger (talk · contribs) 19:00, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
- The idea that commons spreads disinformation is suprising for me. --Otberg (talk) 19:13, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
- Not for me. A lot of pictures aren't authentic, made by persons not informed about the real context of a time or a domain, as [6] (unique source: Hancock's books, but in this time the roman script were not in use in Wallachia and the title is a calque from the english syntagma Gypsy slaves), or anachronic, as [7] (the border here showed in Bukovina as a 1918 claim of the WUPR were in the facts created June 28, 1940). And this pictures have a large utilisation, in many articles. This is for me an additional reason to be agree with the deletion, because even if my map isn't "just" fanatasy, it is approximative, and my duty isn't to add approximations in this "big building site" where we're working. --Spiridon Ion Cepleanu (talk) 09:02, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
- The idea that commons spreads disinformation is suprising for me. --Otberg (talk) 19:13, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
![[6]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sclavi_Tiganesti.jpg){kind=link}
![[7]](https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%97%D0%B0%D0%BF%D0%B0%D0%B4%D0%BD%D0%BE-%D0%A3%D0%BA%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B8%D0%BD%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%8F_%D0%9D%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B4%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%8F_%D0%A0%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%BF%D1%83%D0%B1%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B0#/media/File:West_ukraine.png){kind=link}
- Well, I don't think that's the most helpful way to look at it. Examples of incorrect information, assuming they're labeled as such, can be educationally useful for illustrating common misconceptions, historical understandings, or unrealized proposals. I do think that incorrect maps and other inaccuracies should be clearly labeled, though, to avoid misleading the reader. So maybe some edits to clarify the description of this file would be a good idea. —Mr. Granger (talk · contribs) 19:35, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
- The incorrect map is used in most language projects like being a correct one. It isn't possible to ensure correct use in all exotic language projects. The only way to avoid this disinformation is to delete it here. --Otberg (talk) 08:40, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
- Well, I don't think that's the most helpful way to look at it. Examples of incorrect information, assuming they're labeled as such, can be educationally useful for illustrating common misconceptions, historical understandings, or unrealized proposals. I do think that incorrect maps and other inaccuracies should be clearly labeled, though, to avoid misleading the reader. So maybe some edits to clarify the description of this file would be a good idea. —Mr. Granger (talk · contribs) 19:35, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
- Well, all of this discussion is really irrelevant—the fact is, the file is in use, so it is within scope per COM:INUSE, no questions asked. If you want to avoid misconceptions and make it clear that this place never had exact borders, I encourage you to edit the file's description. —Mr. Granger (talk · contribs) 10:34, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
- I can't believe that a discussion about a hoax in Wikipedia is irrelevant. Next time I create my own fantasy map, use it in some exotic projects where people don't care about, and then it's not allowed deleting this nonsense. Great --Otberg (talk) 11:23, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: In use. Yann (talk) 19:58, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
fictitious and erroneous map
I fully appreciate the work and the logic of the person who created the map, however, it is fictitious, since there was never such a territory and can create confusion, as it shows the non-existent principality as if it were a fourth entity in the occupied Greece during the 2d world war. --FocalPoint (talk) 09:49, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
- Keep. As pointed out in the above deletion discussion, this file was formerly in use on pages in several projects (see archive), and I notice that it was FocalPoint who removed it from several of those pages. Moreover, it is labeled with {{Fictitious map}} to prevent confusion. —Mr. Granger (talk · contribs) 10:19, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
- This is not "fictitious and erroneous" but a copy since an original map of 1942 (background : the Aromanian areas in Balkans and added, the claims of Alcibiades Diamandis). But I'm agree with the deletion, because the boundaries of this "Pindus principality" never have precisely fixed, so all maps (as the original of 1942) are approximative, and the "Pindus principality" was a revendication recognised by anyone, not a real state de facto or de jure. However a lot of other maps from Commons represents claimed boundaries or states as real countries, for example [8] or [9], and their creators aren't agree with deletions or even modifications. Wishes, --Spiridon Ion Cepleanu (talk) 10:45, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
![[8]](https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banat_historique#/media/File:Banat_republic.png){kind=link}
![[9]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:West_ukraine.png){kind=link}
_______________ Kept maps is labeled with correct tag. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:55, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
Geostron_logo.png ошибка при загрузке Geostron (talk) 11:50, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader's request Ymblanter (talk) 19:53, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
ошибка при загрузке Geostron (talk) 11:51, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader's request Ymblanter (talk) 19:52, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
error12345 Geostron (talk) 14:02, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader's request Ymblanter (talk) 19:53, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
PD-ineligible license cannot be applied to this image. 95.110.53.34 19:30, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep: Picture made (and presumably released) before 1939 in Bulgaria. PD-ineligible does not apply, but {{Anonymous-EU}}. --Amitie 10g (talk) 03:44, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
- Why do you think that this picture was made in Bulgaria? Article about him in russian wikipedia has nothing to suggest that he ever been there. 95.110.59.178 16:14, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Anonymous-EU is fine. Yann (talk) 20:01, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
flickr washing; acc. to exif: Verwendung bei Namensnennung ausschließlich fuer redaktionelle Nutzung. (only for editorial use) Herzi Pinki (talk) 23:21, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep This is Russavia. It is not Flickr washing, it is the official stream of the individual pictured. The CC licences were granted after I contacted them and asked them to CC licence. This overrides any other things which were in the EXIF previously. If this image is deleted, then dare I say it, most of Category:Files from Werner Faymann Flickr stream also needs to be deleted. 120.145.188.70 14:06, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination, thanks Russavia for that info. That is actually the first sound info on that topic. I started a question on VP with no result and mailed one of the photographers without any response. But if you are the only person knowing about this and your are continued to be nuked in the wikiverse, do you find a way to tell this to the support team? Although most of the images of that stream are cramp from the encyclopaedic point of view, it would be a pity to loose all of them. Loosing 90% of the images on the contrary will not do any harm. regards --Herzi Pinki (talk) 21:19, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawn. Yann (talk) 20:03, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
According to a message left on Polish Wikipedia this graphics is done by Piotr Bujas i Filip Suchoń and the copyright owner is Jerzy Sadowski and his INFORT publishing company. Jerzy Sadowski did not requested the deletion of the image only correction of the description, but the image can not stay unless he sends permission to OTRS. I will try to contact him. Jarekt (talk) 12:03, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per above. More than 2 weeks passed. Masur (talk) 07:48, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
Request from the artist. His email for confirmation: info[AT]antonioalonsomartinez.com 414mqk (talk) 01:16, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: We do not generally remove images at the request of the subject and never if the request is passed on by a third party. We may remove one or more of these if the subject himself writes to OTRS and gives a good reason. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:27, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
Request from the artist. His email for confirmation: info[AT]antonioalonsomartinez.com 414mqk (talk) 01:17, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: We do not generally remove images at the request of the subject and never if the request is passed on by a third party. We may remove one or more of these if the subject himself writes to OTRS and gives a good reason. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:28, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
Request from the artist. His email for confirmation: info[AT]antonioalonsomartinez.com 414mqk (talk) 01:19, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: We do not generally remove images at the request of the subject and never if the request is passed on by a third party. We may remove one or more of these if the subject himself writes to OTRS and gives a good reason. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:28, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
Request from the artist. His email for confirmation: info[AT]antonioalonsomartinez.com 414mqk (talk) 01:20, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: We do not generally remove images at the request of the subject and never if the request is passed on by a third party. We may remove one or more of these if the subject himself writes to OTRS and gives a good reason. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:28, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
Request from the artist. His email for confirmation: info[AT]antonioalonsomartinez.com 414mqk (talk) 01:21, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: We do not generally remove images at the request of the subject and never if the request is passed on by a third party. We may remove one or more of these if the subject himself writes to OTRS and gives a good reason. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:28, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
File:Photocopy of diagram (from Station 'L' office files, Portland, Oregon) General Electric Company pamphlet, c.1930 SECTIONAL ELEVATION OF THE 35,000 KW GENERATOR (BUILDING L5) - HAER ORE,26-PORT,12-54.tif
[edit]Possible copyright violation. This diagram was excerpted from a pamphlet, but the complete pamphlet is not available to determine whether it was published with a copyright notice. Burden is on the uploader to verify PD status. — Ipoellet (talk) 04:21, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
- All documents in the HAER collection are commissions for the U.S. National Parks Service, itself a bureau of the U.S. Department of the Interior. Errors can happen, however I would expect the NPS to withdraw this document from the HAER if it were not public domain, in the same way as I have seen the Department of Defense do, which has resulted in us deleting some content from Commons (rarely). --Fæ (talk) 06:45, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: "All documents in the HAER collection are commissions for the U.S. National Parks Service" is not correct -- the description on this file explicitly says that there are non Government documents on the site. The book was published by McGraw-Hill. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:33, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
Copyright violation. PD-US tag does not apply since this photo was taken in the late 1940s, well after 1923. The source publication gives no author, source, or license information. — Ipoellet (talk) 07:29, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep: Copyright expired because no copyright renovation were made. Here does not apply {{PD-US}} but {{PD-US-not renewed}}— Preceding unsigned comment added by Amitie 10g (talk • contribs) 11:11, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
- As far as I can tell, the 2011 newsletter referenced as the source of the photo is the first time the picture was published. It's the date of first publication that determines things like whether notice, registration, or renewal are necessary to maintain the copyright in the U.S., and 2011 they were not. Was the picture was actually published earlier? Since this poor girl's murder was in the news at the time, then the photo may have been in the newspapers...? — Ipoellet (talk) 21:07, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Without any evidence of publication before 1989 without notice, we must assume that the first publication was 2011 and it will be under copyright until 2068 . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:37, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
too private, no appropriate license Mehlauge (talk) 14:51, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: No evidence that the named photographer has licensed this. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:39, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
out of scope text image, same for File:Vrede.Vieren 2012 (liturgiekrant).png Pibwl (talk) 21:14, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
- Comment: The second image you mentioned, File:Vrede.Vieren 2012 (liturgiekrant).png is currently in use on w:nl:Vredesweek, and is therefore automatically within scope per COM:INUSE. Moreover, neither image is text-only. —Mr. Granger (talk · contribs) 23:53, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
- I must have overlooked this. But I wonder how about its copyright?.. Pibwl (talk) 22:25, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Probably in scope, but no evidence of a free license. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:42, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No evidence to support the PD rationale, and missing US PD rationale. —LX (talk, contribs) 22:06, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Conserver: Youra Livchitz a été fusillé en 1944, l'auteur de cette photo est inconnu. Cette image est libre de droit en Belgique. --Madelgarius (talk) 18:23, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
- On the file description, you're claiming (using {{PD-old}}) that the photographer has been dead for 70 years (while at the same time admitting that you don't know who he or she is or was). Now you seem to be saying that {{Anonymous-EU}} applies, which is a completely different rationale. What research have you done to show that the photographer was anonymous? (Finding a photo on Google and not bothering to look into who created it isn't the same as the photographer being anonymous.) And as I mentioned, content on Commons needs to be free not just in the source country, but in the United States as well. —LX (talk, contribs) 18:45, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
- The world is getting better due to your action, Thanks a lot. --Madelgarius (talk) 21:32, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
- I changed the license. --Madelgarius (talk) 21:35, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
- On the file description, you're claiming (using {{PD-old}}) that the photographer has been dead for 70 years (while at the same time admitting that you don't know who he or she is or was). Now you seem to be saying that {{Anonymous-EU}} applies, which is a completely different rationale. What research have you done to show that the photographer was anonymous? (Finding a photo on Google and not bothering to look into who created it isn't the same as the photographer being anonymous.) And as I mentioned, content on Commons needs to be free not just in the source country, but in the United States as well. —LX (talk, contribs) 18:45, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:43, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Aziznizamani1 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promotional content, out of scope
- File:Astrologer Gemloger Aftab Abassi.jpg
- File:Astrologer Aftab Abassi Mantra Amal.jpg
- File:Astrologer Aftab Abassi Providing Astro Consultation.jpg
- File:Astrologer Aftab Abassi Removing Balck Magic.jpg
- File:Astrologer Aftab Abassi Visit Link.jpg
- File:Astrologer Aftab Abassi With Snake Mantra.jpg
- File:Astrologer Aftab Abassi Future Consultation providing to the Clients.jpg
- File:Balck Magic Removal Astrologer Aftab abassi.jpg
- File:Astrologer Aftab Abassi Removing Black Magic Impacts.JPG
- File:Astrologer Aftab Abassi Lucky Birth Stones.jpg
— D Y O L F 77[Talk] 00:52, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
- I suggest we keep the following:
- These were provided by the “practitionner” himself and can be a useful tool for much needed educational efforts at debunking (and cathartic efforts at ridiculing). The rest is drivel and should be deleted; some of those include copyrighted elements, too. -- Tuválkin ✉ 11:42, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:35, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
File:Photocopy of diagram (from Bernhardt Skrotzki's Electric Generation-Steam Stations, New York, New York, 1956, figure I-1) THE GENERAL WAY IN WHICH ELECTRICITY IS CREATED THROUGH HAER ORE,26-PORT,12-26.tif
[edit]Copyright violation. Was uploaded on presumption that all HAER images were US Government works in the public domain. However the information page for this file gives the title, author, and year when this was previously published, most likely with the necessary copyright notice. — Ipoellet (talk) f.k.a. Werewombat 04:13, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
- All documents in the HAER collection are commissions for the U.S. National Parks Service, itself a bureau of the U.S. Department of the Interior. Errors can happen, however I would expect the NPS to withdraw this document from the HAER if it were not public domain, in the same way as I have seen the Department of Defense do, which has resulted in us deleting some content from Commons (rarely). --Fæ (talk) 06:44, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: PEr Fæ Natuur12 (talk) 11:36, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
File:Photocopy of diagram (from Station 'L' office files, Portland, Oregon) General Electric Company pamphlet, c.1925 SECTIONAL ELEVATION OF THE 20,000 KW GENERATOR (BUILDING L1) - HAER ORE,26-PORT,12-53.tif
[edit]Possible copyright violation. This diagram was excerpted from a pamphlet, but the complete pamphlet is not available to determine whether it was published with a copyright notice. Burden is on the uploader to verify PD status. — Ipoellet (talk) f.k.a. Werewombat 04:19, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
- All documents in the HAER collection are commissions for the U.S. National Parks Service, itself a bureau of the U.S. Department of the Interior. Errors can happen, however I would expect the NPS to withdraw this document from the HAER if it were not public domain, in the same way as I have seen the Department of Defense do, which has resulted in us deleting some content from Commons (rarely). --Fæ (talk) 06:45, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Per Fæ Natuur12 (talk) 11:36, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ANUSSA Event Planner (talk · contribs)
[edit]All images uploaded are logos for Cambodian event planning agencies. They are currently used in a gallery on en:Event Management In Cambodia. Given that the article lists all these companies as competitors, the uploader's claim that all of these logos are their own work seems highly suspect. It is likely that all are copyvios.
- File:Orange Logo.jpg
- File:AMB Logo.png
- File:Excel Events Logo.jpg
- File:Active Logo.jpg
- File:Mega Events Logo.jpg
- File:Kilat Logo.jpg
- File:RGEM Logo.jpg
- File:Red Dot Logo.jpg
- File:GetImage.aspx.jpg
- File:700x500 Untitled.png
- File:ANUSSA Logo.png
Nick (talk) 04:49, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep the images that are below the threshold of originality. In particular, File:Orange Logo.jpg, File:GetImage.aspx.jpg, and File:ANUSSA Logo.png are clearly {{PD-logo}}. —Mr. Granger (talk · contribs) 11:32, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
- Comment The page on enwiki has been deleted as advertising. I wouldn't object to tagging the images that fall below the threshold of originality as {{PD-logo}} if they would still be considered as being within COM:SCOPE. Several of these logos, however, appear to be above that threshold and subject to copyright. Nick (talk) 00:38, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Some are above TOO and th rest is out of scope Natuur12 (talk) 11:38, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
Missing legal info Fixertool (talk) 04:59, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Keep Legal info available. Authorship claimed as "own". I don't see any reason to question authorship. --Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 23:42, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Authorship claimed as "own"? Is it enough now? --Fixertool (talk) 16:14, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: No, not good enough Natuur12 (talk) 11:39, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
I do not find any fresco of Samo. No source. Zoupan (talk) 05:14, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
- not enough? Category:Frescos in the Rotunda of Saint Catherine (Znojmo). --Madelgarius (talk) 19:58, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
- That is not a source. If this depicts Samo, it should be stated somewhere. If Samo is going to be further improved, there is a need of reliably sourced images; if this indeed is Samo, this image should be used in that article.--Zoupan (talk) 12:16, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: No reason to delete Natuur12 (talk) 11:39, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
błędna nazwa, do poprawki grafiki (pasek na górze) Rosewood (talk) 10:07, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:47, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
Superseded by VIC_Legislative_Council_diagram.svg Hshook (talk) 14:32, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep file is still in COM:SCOPE. ColonialGrid (talk) 16:09, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 11:48, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
Superseded by VIC_Legislative_Council_diagram.svg Hshook (talk) 14:32, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep file is still in COM:SCOPE. ColonialGrid (talk) 16:09, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 11:48, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
Superseded by VIC_Legislative_Council_diagram.svg Hshook (talk) 14:33, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep file is still in COM:SCOPE. ColonialGrid (talk) 16:08, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 11:48, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
Superseded by VIC_Legislative_Council_diagram.svg Hshook (talk) 14:33, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep file is still in COM:SCOPE. ColonialGrid (talk) 16:08, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
- This image is part of a discussion about legislative diagrams in Australia on slashme's talk page and I would appreciate it if this image is kept. Shabidoo (talk) 18:19, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 11:48, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
Superseded by File:VIC_Legislative_Assembly_diagram.svg Hshook (talk) 14:41, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep file is still in COM:SCOPE. ColonialGrid (talk) 16:07, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 11:48, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
FLAC version available https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%22Call_to_Statesmanship%22_and_%22Presidential_Processional%22_%28FLAC%29.flac Igor523 (talk) 18:34, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: In use Natuur12 (talk) 11:48, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in France. Therefore, unless the architect provides a free license, we cannot keep this image on Commons. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:27, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
- Contact has been made with the architects' firm today. Permission will be sent shortly, via E.mail to Commons:Permissions.--DDupard (talk) 09:15, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
- E.mail from architects received today and forwarded to permissions-commons-fr@wikimedia.org --DDupard (talk) 12:36, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
- @Yann: could you have a look at the related ticket? ticket:2015032310017031. Natuur12 (talk) 11:46, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
- E.mail from architects received today and forwarded to permissions-commons-fr@wikimedia.org --DDupard (talk) 12:36, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
- The e-mail was forwarded -- it did not come directly from the architect as we prefer, so there is the possibility that the e-mail from the architect is a forgery. I am inclined, however, to believe that the permission is real.
- However, it is not at all clear what the permission covers. The person who sent the request to the architect referred only to use of the image in the WP:EN article Centre_commercial_Beaugrenelle and nowhere else. As we all know, both Commons and WP:EN require that images be free for all use, anywhere, including commercial use. The permission here falls short of that, saying only:
- "Nous vous confirmons par la présente notre autorisation pour la publication d’une photo représentant le bâtiment Centre Commercial Beaugrenelle dont l’agence Valode & Pistre est l’architecte."
- However, it is not at all clear what the permission covers. The person who sent the request to the architect referred only to use of the image in the WP:EN article Centre_commercial_Beaugrenelle and nowhere else. As we all know, both Commons and WP:EN require that images be free for all use, anywhere, including commercial use. The permission here falls short of that, saying only:
- . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:19, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
- I asked the architect to resend the permission with the complete text of the license. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:32, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: No permission outside Wikipedia or for a commercial use. Yann (talk) 14:15, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
