Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2015/01/04

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive January 4th, 2015
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

저작권을 침해해서 그렇습니다 Soo9819 (talk) 05:44, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 11:06, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by KHETESH PATEL

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, source Trustable (talk) 12:05, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 16:57, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

a person of unknown notability, no full name, unused Pibwl (talk) 12:27, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: As per nom and as part of cleanup russavia (talk) 14:20, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I cannot find this exact size image on the British Monarchy Flickr account but a cropped version is here and is tagged All rights reserved and is also attributed © Press Association. Ww2censor (talk) 14:31, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 00:20, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP#France. According to French law, it is not allowed to publish picture whose the main subject is an original creation until 70 years after the death of its author. Unless prior authorization by the author or his heirs. Civa (talk) 22:09, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Delete per nom and as part of cleanup russavia (talk) 22:14, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inconsistent EXIF data (Nikon D3 instead of Canon 500D), which also shows a different author. Yann (talk) 17:03, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Original. Lupo 11:39, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 11:55, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Permission from Razim Saidov is needed. Yann (talk) 17:08, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed. Original.  Delete unless release from Razim is received. Lupo 11:47, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 11:59, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 22:07, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 12:42, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 22:09, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 12:42, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 22:10, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 12:42, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 22:11, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 12:42, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 22:12, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 12:42, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 22:13, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 12:42, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 22:14, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 12:42, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 22:15, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 12:43, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 22:16, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 12:43, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 22:17, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 12:48, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 22:18, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 12:50, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 22:19, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 12:50, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 22:20, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 12:50, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo (la brune de droite on peut la garder) Guiggz (talk) 22:21, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 12:50, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 22:22, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 12:50, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 22:57, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My example of COM:DM > File:Jean-Guy Wallemme - PFC.jpg (copyrighted logos of Paris FC on crest & Nike on arm but bad quality picture, we don't really see brands or logos). Here, we can really see brands or logos. Other example for sport people > (Good Leo Messi without brands/logos) & (Bad Leo Messi with brands/logos)--Guiggz (talk) 10:07, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Denniss (talk) 12:43, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 22:24, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 12:51, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 22:26, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 12:51, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 22:27, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 12:51, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 22:27, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 12:51, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 22:28, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 12:51, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 22:29, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 12:51, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 22:31, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 12:51, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 22:32, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 12:51, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 22:33, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 12:51, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 22:33, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 12:52, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 22:34, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 12:52, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 22:35, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 12:51, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 22:38, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 12:52, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 22:39, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 12:52, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 22:43, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 13:35, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 22:44, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My example of COM:DM > File:Jean-Guy Wallemme - PFC.jpg (copyrighted logos of Paris FC on crest & Nike on arm but bad quality picture, we don't really see brands or logos). Here, we can really see brands or logos. Other example for sport people > (Good Leo Messi without brands/logos) & (Bad Leo Messi with brands/logos)--Guiggz (talk) 10:12, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Denniss (talk) 13:35, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 22:45, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My example of COM:DM > File:Jean-Guy Wallemme - PFC.jpg (copyrighted logos of Paris FC on crest & Nike on arm but bad quality picture, we don't really see brands or logos). Here, we can really see brands or logos. Other example for sport people > (Good Leo Messi without brands/logos) & (Bad Leo Messi with brands/logos)--Guiggz (talk) 10:12, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Denniss (talk) 13:35, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 22:47, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My example of COM:DM > File:Jean-Guy Wallemme - PFC.jpg (copyrighted logos of Paris FC on crest & Nike on arm but bad quality picture, we don't really see brands or logos). Here, we can really see brands or logos. Other example for sport people > (Good Leo Messi without brands/logos) & (Bad Leo Messi with brands/logos)--Guiggz (talk) 10:12, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Denniss (talk) 13:35, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 22:48, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My example of COM:DM > File:Jean-Guy Wallemme - PFC.jpg (copyrighted logos of Paris FC on crest & Nike on arm but bad quality picture, we don't really see brands or logos). Here, we can really see brands or logos. Other example for sport people > (Good Leo Messi without brands/logos) & (Bad Leo Messi with brands/logos)--Guiggz (talk) 10:11, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Denniss (talk) 13:35, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 22:49, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My example of COM:DM > File:Jean-Guy Wallemme - PFC.jpg (copyrighted logos of Paris FC on crest & Nike on arm but bad quality picture, we don't really see brands or logos). Here, we can really see brands or logos. Other example for sport people > (Good Leo Messi without brands/logos) & (Bad Leo Messi with brands/logos)--Guiggz (talk) 10:11, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Denniss (talk) 13:35, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 22:50, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My example of COM:DM > File:Jean-Guy Wallemme - PFC.jpg (copyrighted logos of Paris FC on crest & Nike on arm but bad quality picture, we don't really see brands or logos). Here, we can really see brands or logos. Other example for sport people > (Good Leo Messi without brands/logos) & (Bad Leo Messi with brands/logos)--Guiggz (talk) 10:11, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Denniss (talk) 13:35, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 22:51, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My example of COM:DM > File:Jean-Guy Wallemme - PFC.jpg (copyrighted logos of Paris FC on crest & Nike on arm but bad quality picture, we don't really see brands or logos). Here, we can really see brands or logos. Other example for sport people > (Good Leo Messi without brands/logos) & (Bad Leo Messi with brands/logos)--Guiggz (talk) 10:10, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Denniss (talk) 13:35, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 22:51, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My example of COM:DM > File:Jean-Guy Wallemme - PFC.jpg (copyrighted logos of Paris FC on crest & Nike on arm but bad quality picture, we don't really see brands or logos). Here, we can really see brands or logos. Other example for sport people > (Good Leo Messi without brands/logos) & (Bad Leo Messi with brands/logos)--Guiggz (talk) 10:10, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Denniss (talk) 13:35, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 22:52, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 13:35, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 22:53, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 13:35, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 22:54, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 13:36, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 22:55, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My example of COM:DM > File:Jean-Guy Wallemme - PFC.jpg (copyrighted logos of Paris FC on crest & Nike on arm but bad quality picture, we don't really see brands or logos). Here, we can really see brands or logos. Other example for sport people > (Good Leo Messi without brands/logos) & (Bad Leo Messi with brands/logos)--Guiggz (talk) 10:09, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Denniss (talk) 13:36, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 22:55, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My example of COM:DM > File:Jean-Guy Wallemme - PFC.jpg (copyrighted logos of Paris FC on crest & Nike on arm but bad quality picture, we don't really see brands or logos). Here, we can really see brands or logos. Other example for sport people > (Good Leo Messi without brands/logos) & (Bad Leo Messi with brands/logos)--Guiggz (talk) 10:08, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Denniss (talk) 13:36, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 22:56, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My example of COM:DM > File:Jean-Guy Wallemme - PFC.jpg (copyrighted logos of Paris FC on crest & Nike on arm but bad quality picture, we don't really see brands or logos). Here, we can really see brands or logos. Other example for sport people > (Good Leo Messi without brands/logos) & (Bad Leo Messi with brands/logos)--Guiggz (talk) 10:10, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Denniss (talk) 13:37, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 22:57, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My example of COM:DM > File:Jean-Guy Wallemme - PFC.jpg (copyrighted logos of Paris FC on crest & Nike on arm but bad quality picture, we don't really see brands or logos). Here, we can really see brands or logos. Other example for sport people > (Good Leo Messi without brands/logos) & (Bad Leo Messi with brands/logos)--Guiggz (talk) 10:08, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Denniss (talk) 13:37, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 22:57, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My example of COM:DM > File:Jean-Guy Wallemme - PFC.jpg (copyrighted logos of Paris FC on crest & Nike on arm but bad quality picture, we don't really see brands or logos). Here, we can really see brands or logos. Other example for sport people > (Good Leo Messi without brands/logos) & (Bad Leo Messi with brands/logos)--Guiggz (talk) 10:07, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Denniss (talk) 13:37, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 22:58, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My example of COM:DM > File:Jean-Guy Wallemme - PFC.jpg (copyrighted logos of Paris FC on crest & Nike on arm but bad quality picture, we don't really see brands or logos). Here, we can really see brands or logos. Other example for sport people > (Good Leo Messi without brands/logos) & (Bad Leo Messi with brands/logos)--Guiggz (talk) 10:06, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Denniss (talk) 13:37, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 22:58, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 13:37, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 22:59, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My example of COM:DM > File:Jean-Guy Wallemme - PFC.jpg (copyrighted logos of Paris FC on crest & Nike on arm but bad quality picture, we don't really see brands or logos). Here, we can really see brands or logos. Other example for sport people > (Good Leo Messi without brands/logos) & (Bad Leo Messi with brands/logos)--Guiggz (talk) 10:06, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Denniss (talk) 13:37, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 23:00, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 13:37, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 23:00, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My example of COM:DM > File:Jean-Guy Wallemme - PFC.jpg (copyrighted logos of Paris FC on crest & Nike on arm but bad quality picture, we don't really see brands or logos). Here, we can really see brands or logos. Other example for sport people > (Good Leo Messi without brands/logos) & (Bad Leo Messi with brands/logos)--Guiggz (talk) 10:06, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Denniss (talk) 13:37, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 23:01, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My example of COM:DM > File:Jean-Guy Wallemme - PFC.jpg (copyrighted logos of Paris FC on crest & Nike on arm but bad quality picture, we don't really see brands or logos). Here, we can really see brands or logos. Other example for sport people > (Good Leo Messi without brands/logos) & (Bad Leo Messi with brands/logos)--Guiggz (talk) 10:05, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Denniss (talk) 13:44, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 23:01, 4 January 2015 (UTC

My example of COM:DM > File:Jean-Guy Wallemme - PFC.jpg (copyrighted logos of Paris FC on crest & Nike on arm but bad quality picture, we don't really see brands or logos). Here, we can really see brands or logos. Other example for sport people > (Good Leo Messi without brands/logos) & (Bad Leo Messi with brands/logos)--Guiggz (talk) 10:05, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Denniss (talk) 13:44, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 23:02, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My example of COM:DM > File:Jean-Guy Wallemme - PFC.jpg (copyrighted logos of Paris FC on crest & Nike on arm but bad quality picture, we don't really see brands or logos). Here, we can really see brands or logos. Other example for sport people > (Good Leo Messi without brands/logos) & (Bad Leo Messi with brands/logos)--Guiggz (talk) 10:04, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Denniss (talk) 13:44, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 23:03, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My example of COM:DM > File:Jean-Guy Wallemme - PFC.jpg (copyrighted logos of Paris FC on crest & Nike on arm but bad quality picture, we don't really see brands or logos). Here, we can really see brands or logos. Other example for sport people > (Good Leo Messi without brands/logos) & (Bad Leo Messi with brands/logos)--Guiggz (talk) 10:04, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Denniss (talk) 13:44, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 23:03, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My example of COM:DM > File:Jean-Guy Wallemme - PFC.jpg (copyrighted logos of Paris FC on crest & Nike on arm but bad quality picture, we don't really see brands or logos). Here, we can really see brands or logos. Other example for sport people > (Good Leo Messi without brands/logos) & (Bad Leo Messi with brands/logos)--Guiggz (talk) 10:03, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Denniss (talk) 13:44, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 23:04, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My example of COM:DM > File:Jean-Guy Wallemme - PFC.jpg (copyrighted logos of Paris FC on crest & Nike on arm but bad quality picture, we don't really see brands or logos). Here, we can really see brands or logos. Other example for sport people > (Good Leo Messi without brands/logos) & (Bad Leo Messi with brands/logos)--Guiggz (talk) 09:57, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Denniss (talk) 13:44, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 23:05, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My example of COM:DM > File:Jean-Guy Wallemme - PFC.jpg (copyrighted logos of Paris FC on crest & Nike on arm but bad quality picture, we don't really see brands or logos). Here, we can really see brands or logos. Other example for sport people > (Good Leo Messi without brands/logos) & (Bad Leo Messi with brands/logos)--Guiggz (talk) 10:02, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Denniss (talk) 13:44, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 23:05, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 13:44, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 23:06, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My example of COM:DM > File:Jean-Guy Wallemme - PFC.jpg (copyrighted logos of Paris FC on crest & Nike on arm but bad quality picture, we don't really see brands or logos). Here, we can really see brands or logos. Other example for sport people > (Good Leo Messi without brands/logos) & (Bad Leo Messi with brands/logos)--Guiggz (talk) 10:01, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Denniss (talk) 13:44, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 23:07, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My example of COM:DM > File:Jean-Guy Wallemme - PFC.jpg (copyrighted logos of Paris FC on crest & Nike on arm but bad quality picture, we don't really see brands or logos). Here, we can really see brands or logos. Other example for sport people > (Good Leo Messi without brands/logos) & (Bad Leo Messi with brands/logos)--Guiggz (talk) 09:59, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Denniss (talk) 13:44, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 23:07, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 13:45, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 23:09, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My example of COM:DM > File:Jean-Guy Wallemme - PFC.jpg (copyrighted logos of Paris FC on crest & Nike on arm but bad quality picture, we don't really see brands or logos). Here, we can really see brands or logos. Other example for sport people > (Good Leo Messi without brands/logos) & (Bad Leo Messi with brands/logos)--Guiggz (talk) 10:01, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Denniss (talk) 13:45, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 23:09, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My example of COM:DM > File:Jean-Guy Wallemme - PFC.jpg (copyrighted logos of Paris FC on crest & Nike on arm but bad quality picture, we don't really see brands or logos). Here, we can really see brands or logos. Other example for sport people > (Good Leo Messi without brands/logos) & (Bad Leo Messi with brands/logos)--Guiggz (talk) 10:02, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Denniss (talk) 13:45, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 22:23, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: COM:DM Esby (talk) 09:36, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, as unused personal image. Commons is not Facebook. Stuchka (talk) 16:33, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Besides copyvio: http://shivagroup.org.in/ Anna (Cookie) (talk) 01:52, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, as unused personal image. Commons is not Facebook. Stuchka (talk) 16:41, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Found on https://plus.google.com/111086738544486204995/posts/YjWZWXownvr?pid=6099429875331422866&oid=111086738544486204995 Anna (Cookie) (talk) 02:01, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, as unused personal image. Commons is not Facebook. Stuchka (talk) 16:32, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Found on http://shivagroup.org.in/shivagrouppages/shiva-content/about-us/vision Anna (Cookie) (talk) 02:15, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, as unused personal image. Commons is not Facebook. Stuchka (talk) 16:33, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Found on https://plus.google.com/111086738544486204995/posts/YjWZWXownvr?pid=6099429873109448770&oid=111086738544486204995 Anna (Cookie) (talk) 02:04, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I would like to delete this file because I am not going to use it. I did upload it for my write up on the Mitsubishi Sigma, but I don't use it. Melvin Sylvester (talk) 00:01, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:01, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Deejay Qasim (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos, out of project scope.

Jianhui67 talkcontribs 05:53, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Deejay Qasim (talk · contribs)

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 05:39, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:04, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo, outo of scope C messier (talk) 10:16, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Edgar Cerecedo

[edit]

Small, lack exif (maybe copyright violations), also, possibly out of scope, none is used, for most of them I can not think of an educational use.

Files uploaded by Asociasionmexicana (talk · contribs)

Files uploaded by Jose antonio estrada (talk · contribs)

There are also some bad quality photos of various vehicles, but there can be some kind of educational use.

They have been deleted again Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Edgar cerecedo --C messier (talk) 10:48, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ninilala (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not really useful for educational purposes, out of project scope.

Jianhui67 talkcontribs 14:54, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ernesto Lopez Villasmil (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal-use-only images (as made clear by description), but not used for that purpose and out of scope anyway. These are user's only remaining contributions to Commons (a previously-uploaded image was deleted as out of scope).

Ubcule (talk) 15:17, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal picture of dirty loo; overlaid text spoils any marginal documentary usefulness this might otherwise have had. Also inappropriate title. Lupo 15:27, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Michelle Richter (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Near certain copyvio, as (i) Images look professionally shot, (ii) actor that died in 2002, (iii) despite this, little background or context provided as one might have expected (a typical copyvio warning flag), (iv) User has been repeatedly warned about other copyvios which were deleted, and even been banned on this basis.

Taking that last point into account, it's very unlikely that user owned and/or had right to upload these, and they should be deleted on Precautionary principle.

(Note; these are the only remaining uploads from this user).

Ubcule (talk) 15:30, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal picture. Besides, looks like a different person than on File:Lloyd Williams at The Arms Park 2013-10-21 18-03.jpg. Lupo 15:30, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SVRouss (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of user's own work on any of these files. Probable COM:COPYVIOs.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:12, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. INeverCry 21:42, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal graphics. Lupo 15:31, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kaustubh chandra joshi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be replaced by wiki-text and SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Kaustubh chandra joshi (talk · contribs)

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be replaced by wiki-text and SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:13, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Kaustubh chandra joshi (talk · contribs)

Out of COM:SCOPE: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be replaced by wiki-text and SVG if useful.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:36, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial GIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved to relevant project as wiki-text if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved to relevant project as wiki-text if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of a photo behind glass. Unclear who this is, and who owns the copyright on the original photo. Lupo 15:41, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

too unsharp to be useful. Lupo 15:47, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

too unsharp to be useful. Lupo 15:53, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Chalitas123 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal and/or out-of-scope images from uploader with captions emphasising their pointlessness "X is a porno star", "Y is a national idol", uh... *sure*.

Ubcule (talk) 16:09, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal picture. Very unsharp, too. Misleading title: this is not an "athlete", it's a boy jumping maybe 1ft high: not enough for a real slam dunk. Maybe in 10 years... Lupo 16:12, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal picture. Lupo 16:14, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by NeurotoxBand (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Notability of band unclear; apparently doesn't have its own article on any language Wikipedia, and own site (Neurotox.de) not ranked within 100,000 on Alexa). Unclear what copyright status is (particularly with Neutotox Band.jpg). None of images in use anywhere.

Ubcule (talk) 16:15, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope and probable copyvio -- stated author is not uploader. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:16, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope and probably copyvio -- stated author is not uploader. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:18, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ramanjaneyulu bejagam (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All apparently self images of the uploader (none in use). Uploader has not contributed any other material to Commons. Commons is not your personal webhost.

Ubcule (talk) 16:19, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Synozins (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These appear to be personal art from a not-notable artist and are therefore out of scope. Commons is not Flickr and hosts only images that are useful for an educational purpose.

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:20, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by RiteshHGupta (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal images only, had attempted use on en.wikipedia, which was also being misused as a personal webhost (content now removed from en.wikipedia for that reason). These out-of-scope images are user's only Commons "contribution".

Ubcule (talk) 16:26, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User's only "contribution" to Commons are these out-of-scope unused personal images.

Ubcule (talk) 16:28, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no description, not in use, outside of COM:SCOPE and possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:29, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality image of partially unclothed human, out of COM:SCOPE Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:32, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused self-created symbol with no obvious educational value on Commons. Ubcule (talk) 16:33, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal logo. Lupo 16:33, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Emploi india (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Both files were used on user page with intentions to promote a company. Apparently, no educational purpose.

Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 16:34, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo - This file cannot be considered free - maybe be in Fair Use Ldorfman (talk) 00:05, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size image, with no indication of user's own work, no metadata etc., possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:18, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work, no metadata, possible COM:COPYVIO Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:21, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-notable text-only document: unsuitable for Commons. -- Tuválkin 00:25, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-notable text-and-images document: unsuitable for Commons. Doubtul own work, esp. the images. -- Tuválkin 00:26, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image same as found http://www.parroquiasanpedro.com/hermandades/JesusCaido.html, with a different background color, probable COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:46, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of Smurfette, copyrighted till 2063! Ras67 (talk) 00:46, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There are uncropped versions of this photo ([1], [2]), and they are non-free. Juggler2005 (talk) 00:49, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of Papa Smurf, copyrighted till 2063! Despite Panorama of Freedom in Spain the work "may not be so interpreted that they could be applied in a manner capable of unreasonably prejudicing the legitimate interests of the author or adversely affecting the normal exploitation of the works to which they refer." Ras67 (talk) 01:35, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this should be deleted, then the photo File:Barrufets a la festa major de Sants.jpg should be deleted as well. --DeeMusil (talk) 09:44, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
File:Barrufets a la festa major de Sants.jpg and all other from that event could be a copyright violation too. I've added {{FoP-Spain}}, but i don't know, how permanent was that installation to fall in Spain's panorama of freedom. --Ras67 (talk) 12:44, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I've made a DR for all of the pictures. --Ras67 (talk) 18:34, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in the U.S. for artworks. Ras67 (talk) 01:39, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The smurfs are protected till 2063. Ras67 (talk) 01:41, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The smurfs are protected till 2063. Ras67 (talk) 01:44, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The smurfs are protected till 2063. Ras67 (talk) 01:45, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The smurfs are protected till 2063. Ras67 (talk) 01:45, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Smurfs are copyrighted till 2063! Ras67 (talk) 01:57, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo is a smaller version of one I found at http://www.imagefap.com/photo/1044490789/ which was uploaded there before this one was uploaded here. There is no sign of a license on ImageFAP. FredWalsh (talk) 01:57, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a Smurf, copyrighted till 2063! Could be eligible for Commons due to Panorama of Freedom, when we know where it is. Ras67 (talk) 02:18, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Belgium. Ras67 (talk) 02:35, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope personal image borrowing upon copyrighted elements of the logo for Manchester United. Fry1989 eh? 02:52, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image was originally created in 1935-36 for an exposition. The PD-1923 license is completely wrong because that is for images from before 1923. FredWalsh (talk) 03:07, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out-of-scope and/or unused personal (self-promotional) image. Ubcule (talk) 16:35, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy here. direct link. See also Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Building of the Union of Architects of Azerbaijan.jpg. Yann (talk) 16:36, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Check this:User talk:Urek Meniashvili, how about a massive nomination? -- RTA 12:13, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also from the same source:
 Delete all three. Lupo 12:34, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, as unused personal image. Commons is not Facebook. Stuchka (talk) 16:40, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Asan00 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Assumed copyright violations. Images credited to various sites, but no evidence at any of these source pages that images are free, nor that permission was given.

(Google translations into Russian and Kazakh. Unclear which- if either- is uploader's native language.)

Предполагаемые нарушения авторского права. Изображения зачислены на различных сайтах, но никаких доказательств какой-либо из этих страниц источника, что изображения являются свободными, ни того, что разрешение было дано.

Авторлық құқық бұзушылықтарды Болжанған. Суреттер түрлі сайттар көлемінде, бірақ суреттер тегін осы көзі беттердің кез келген ешқандай дәлел де, сол рұқсат берілді.

Ubcule (talk) 16:40, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sushil hansda (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal images; see our project scope.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:29, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo was originally posted on other websites like ImageFAP where it was uploaded on 2011-11-07 compared to 2013-04-28 on Commons. There is no CC license on the ImageFAP page. This file is not likely to be the uploaders own work. FredWalsh (talk) 20:30, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal picture. Lupo 20:33, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal picture. Lupo 20:33, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hamipaper (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope / copyright violations

Didym (talk) 21:56, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Goldencenturypictures (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Non-notable person, personal photos, out of scope.

Thibaut120094 (talk) 22:45, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo, unused, user's sole contribution Pibwl (talk) 22:45, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Selfie, out of scope. Thibaut120094 (talk) 22:52, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo of a person, unused, not known notability, no cat. Pibwl (talk) 22:52, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

some kid sports team of unknown notability, unused. Same for File:ENPPI team U-11.jpg Pibwl (talk) 22:53, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope. Thibaut120094 (talk) 22:56, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope, vandalize articles on the French Wikipedia with his photo [3]. Thibaut120094 (talk) 23:10, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unauthorised scan of an album cover. Trizek from FR 23:12, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of video, probably copyvio. Thibaut120094 (talk) 23:13, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Probably a screenshot of [4] Thibaut120094 (talk) 23:15, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal(?) photo, user's sole upload Pibwl (talk) 23:15, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-promotion.

Thibaut120094 (talk) 23:21, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Published in 1965 != Published 60 years ago. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:22, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo of some blurred painiting, unused, sole upload Pibwl (talk) 23:25, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Worship revival church (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Advertising.

Thibaut120094 (talk) 23:35, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, Out of scope. Thibaut120094 (talk) 23:36, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nomination, overlaid text. Tony Webster (talk) 01:48, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Vandalism, out of scope (translation: "Hello everybody"). ErikvanB (talk) 23:54, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Category:Parada Smerfów (Warszawa)

[edit]

The smurfs are protected till 2063, FoP-Poland is not eligible, because it is a procession and not "permanently exhibited on a publicly accessible road". --Ras67 (talk) 03:17, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Research paper of someone. Original Research. Vigyani (talk) 03:45, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING, the Smurfs are protected till 2063 Ras67 (talk) 04:24, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence uploader owns license to original creative work here or that it is free-licensed: {{FoP-India}} does not apply to 2D works, and the apparent painting of the person is not a trivial/incidental part of this work. DMacks (talk) 04:33, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence uploader owns license to original creative work here or that it is free-licensed: {{FoP-India}} does not apply to 2D works, and the apparent painting of the person is not a trivial/incidental part of this work. DMacks (talk) 04:34, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no longer comfortable with my username on the image Charlesdysinger (talk) 04:36, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Not a valid reason for deletion. INeverCry 00:50, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image. Out of project scope. Eurodyne (talk) 05:10, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:48, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo is a much smaller version of a photo at pubsys.kooper.se FredWalsh (talk) 05:15, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:48, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly unfree PDF and out of project scope. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 05:45, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:48, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is of much too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose. It's out of project scope. Ies (talk) 07:15, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:48, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no Freedom of Panorama in Kazakhstan. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:50, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:48, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no Freedom of Panorama in Kazakhstan. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:50, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:48, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously published elsewhere, e.g., http://www.kosmo.com.my/kosmo/content.asp?y=2011&dt=1030&pub=Kosmo&sec=Hiburan&pg=hi_04.htm --ghouston (talk) 08:51, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:48, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, no description, unclear what educational use it would have. --ghouston (talk) 08:54, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:48, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, no educational use. --ghouston (talk) 08:57, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:48, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

obvious copyvio of famous person DHN (talk) 09:24, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:48, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, Out of scope. Thibaut120094 (talk) 09:47, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:48, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo, out of scope C messier (talk) 10:03, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Trolling, bares no resemblace to Doug or Tegan Bollinger C messier (talk) 10:06, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXIF with correct geolocation at an album cover? C messier (talk) 10:09, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 10:20, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted content Steinsplitter (talk) 10:28, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo, unused, one of user's 2 uploads Pibwl (talk) 11:11, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, promo shot, no EXIF data, permission or original high resolution needed. Yann (talk) 12:06, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promotion Bazj (talk) 12:15, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Being published on Facebook doesn't mean that the file is available under CC0. If the uploader has the permission to copy the photo on Wikimedia Commons, he/she should provide evidence of such a permission to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Gyrostat (talk) 12:19, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File description indicates that this file is copyrighted by Phil Velasquez of the Chicago Tribune. Also, Flickr user John is listed here. 61.245.26.2 12:26, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of scope. Yann (talk) 12:34, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fazilmir (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope. User blocked on en:wp as only here for self-promotion.

JohnCD (talk) 13:06, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation (image from 1978 movie) Culex (talk) 13:26, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparent selfie of uploader, out of scope and not in personal use. User's only contribution to project. Ubcule (talk) 13:38, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work Fetx2002 (talk) 13:39, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation (image taken from a blog which itself took it from a movie under copyright) Culex (talk) 13:48, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation (image from movie under copyright) Culex (talk) 13:50, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I call bullshit on own work - this looks too professional for a drive-by uploader. -mattbuck (Talk) 13:53, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible Copyright Infringement: Image owned by Apple Daily Hong Kong, per http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/realtime/news/20141024/53055956 Sanford.poon (talk) 14:11, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out-of-scope spam. Ubcule (talk) 14:29, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

just a photo of a girl Alaexis (talk) 14:44, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ramsesteam (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be uploader's own creation to relicense in first place (as claimed). Whether or not these fall below the threshold of originality is also open to question, as the logo is more than a simple rendering of a predefined font, and must also be freely usable in both US and original jurisdictions to be allowable on Commons; so which country do these "belong" to originally, and are they exempt from copyright there?

Ubcule (talk) 14:52, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-promotional material, limited in-scope use due to processing and text. Ubcule (talk) 15:13, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, could be found on other web sites. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:19, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope:unused personal picture. Also: would need a release from the photographer (see watermark). Lupo 15:20, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No results of note after Googling, apparently not a major company or organisation. Out of scope. Ubcule (talk) 15:20, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Would definitely be below threshhold of (copyrightable) originality in US, but this is a Belgian company and am not clear as to situation there (since it also has to be free in country of origin). Ubcule (talk) 15:22, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused; text only. Lupo 15:23, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope and possible copyvio. Ubcule (talk) 15:34, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved to relevant project as wiki-text if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From what I can tell from translation and finding similar images online, this is a screenshot of a televison programme (probably copyrighted or not freely usable). Appears to be from Iran (IRIB, Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting).

(Persian translation by Google Translate: از آنچه که من می تواند از ترجمه و پیدا کردن تصاویر مشابه آنلاین بگویم، این است که یک تصویر از یک برنامه televison (احتمالا حق کپی رایت و یا آزادانه قابل استفاده نیست) است. به نظر می رسد از ایران (صدا و سیما، سازمان صدا و سیمای جمهوری اسلامی ایران) باشد.)

Ubcule (talk) 15:38, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Radioaref (talk · contribs)

[edit]

By US standards, these would *possibly*(?) fall below the threshold of originality. Since they seem to originate from Iran- (which Commons:Threshold_of_originality doesn't cover)- does anyone know the situation, since they also have to be free for inclusion on Commons. (Note; uploader did not provide correct rationale as to why these images are free- as they ought to- so it may make sense to err on side of caution here and delete).

(Google Translate into Persian: طبق استانداردهای آمریکا، این را * * * * * * * * احتمالا (؟) کمتر از آستانه اصالت. از آنجا که آنها به نظر می رسد از ایران سرچشمه (که کامنز: Threshold_of_originality تحت پوشش قرار نمی) - آیا کسی می دانم وضعیت، از آنجایی که آنها نیز به رایگان برای گنجاندن در عوام داشته باشد. (توجه داشته باشید. آپلود به منطق درست به همین دلیل این تصاویر آزاد هستند فراهم نیست به عنوان آنها باید گرفته پس از آن ممکن می شود بر سر جانب احتیاط گمراه اینجا و حذف).)

Ubcule (talk) 15:44, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Indostars (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyright violations and/or out of scope. "Martin Carter" appears to be an Indonesian actor, but it's unclear how famous he is- there's no entry under that name on id.wikipedia.org , and the uploader "Indostars" provides no context as to where these profesionally-shot-looking images come from (they were photographed on a high end Nikon D600, so they likely *are* professional).

(Google translation into Indonesian language: Pelanggaran hak cipta yang mungkin dan / atau keluar dari ruang lingkup. "Martin Carter" tampaknya menjadi aktor Indonesia, tapi tidak jelas bagaimana dia terkenal adalah-tidak ada entri di bawah nama pada id.wikipedia.org, dan uploader "Indostars" tidak memberikan konteks ke mana ini-secara profesional-shot melihat gambar berasal dari (mereka difoto pada high end Nikon D600, sehingga mereka cenderung * profesional *).).

Ubcule (talk) 16:06, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal picture. Lupo 16:21, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, low resolution, no metadata, probable COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:22, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image obviously cut from another image in some form of photo editing software (or perhas scissors) and rephotographed as shown on metadata. No indication that original image was own work of uploader and possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:24, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, as unused personal image. Commons is not Facebook. Stuchka (talk) 16:42, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:56, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems it comes from here. Yann (talk) 16:44, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:56, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems it comes from here. Yann (talk) 16:47, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:56, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no EXIF data, several smaller copies on the Net. Yann (talk) 16:50, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:56, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXIF data shows a different author. Yann (talk) 16:51, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete [5]. Farik Khayrulin is an Azerbajdjani photographer. See his website at www.khayrulin.az. Lupo 11:26, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:56, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

and File:Miri Yusif.JPG

Inconsistent EXIF data with the other uploads, smaller copies on the Net. Yann (talk) 16:56, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Two different cameras, and the first one is also available here posted on July 1, 2013 (half a year before the upload here) and is credited to Лала Гулиева. Lupo 11:19, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:56, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused advertisement. Lupo 17:05, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:57, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Another web sourced image with no licence Andy Dingley (talk) 17:16, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:57, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope:unused personal picture based on a background image that is widely available on the Internet and for which there is no evidence of any free license. Lupo 17:16, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:57, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

One of three related images from this uploader with unknown source (others are web grabs) and so no valid licence Andy Dingley (talk) 17:17, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Don't believe this is the uploader's own work - it's a 1960s promo photo by Ford (or a recreation thereof) and the uploader has a poor track record of understanding image copyright Andy Dingley (talk) 17:19, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, as unused personal image. Commons is not Facebook. Stuchka (talk) 17:36, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

English:This image was scanned from a book (unknown). The page is semi-transparent, you can see a different image on the back. Italiano: L'immagine è trasparente ed è visibile il retro della pagina del libro da cui è stata scannerizzata. Fabuio (talk) 17:39, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, as unused personal image. Commons is not Facebook. Stuchka (talk) 17:42, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal photo. Lupo 17:45, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

English:This image was scanned from a book (unknown). The page is semi-transparent, you can see a different image on the back. Italiano: L'immagine è trasparente ed è visibile anche il retro della pagina del libro da cui è stata scannerizzata. Fabuio (talk) 17:46, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source seems to be here. Yann (talk) 17:47, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

English:This image was scanned from a book (unknown). The page is semi-transparent, you can see a different image on the back. Italiano: L'immagine è trasparente ed è visibile anche il retro della pagina del libro da cui è stata scannerizzata. Fabuio (talk) 17:47, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Older but smaller copy here. Yann (talk) 17:48, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

English:This image was scanned from a book (unknown). The page is semi-transparent, you can see a different image on the back. Italiano: L'immagine è trasparente ed è visibile anche il retro della pagina del libro da cui è stata scannerizzata. Fabuio (talk) 17:48, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope:unused personal picture. Lupo 17:49, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

English:This image was scanned from a book (unknown). The page is semi-transparent, you can see a different image on the back. Italiano: L'immagine è trasparente ed è visibile anche il retro della pagina del libro da cui è stata scannerizzata. Fabuio (talk) 17:49, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:59, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

too unsharp to be useful. Lupo 17:49, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:59, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXIF data shows a different author. Yann (talk) 17:50, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:59, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The copyright of Jenna Harrington on Facebook does not allow for copying onto Wikimedia Commons NearEMPTiness (talk) 17:50, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:59, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source seems to be here. Yann (talk) 17:52, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:59, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXIF data shows a different author. Yann (talk) 17:53, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:59, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no EXIF data, user with many copyvios. Yann (talk) 17:54, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:59, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy here credited to a different name. Yann (talk) 17:58, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:59, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no copyright - taken from a website (sorry, I do not know the correct way to handle it) Cholo 3 (talk) 18:05, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:59, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no EXIF data, user with many copyvios. Yann (talk) 18:13, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:59, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused private image - out of scope, only edit of this user Cholo 3 (talk) 18:23, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:00, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of this copyrighted photo. Lupo 18:58, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:00, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo is a smaller version of a full size photo which was uploaded to ImageFAP several months before this file was uploaded here. There is no CC license on the ImageFAP page. Also this extracted file:

FredWalsh (talk) 19:25, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:00, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture was downloaded from Martin's site and no OTRS permission was received Ldorfman (talk) 19:34, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:01, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, as unused personal image. Commons is not Facebook. Stuchka (talk) 19:48, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:01, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See COM:PENIS. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:56, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:01, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same photo (but worse quality) as File:PortraitGirl2005-1a.jpg Alvesgaspar (talk) 00:34, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:09, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

some family album photo, unused Pibwl (talk) 20:13, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:02, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo (the only activity was to create a user page on en-wiki, without a photo, though) Pibwl (talk) 20:16, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:02, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo was originally posted on other websites like ImageFAP where it was uploaded on 2011-05-12 compared to 2013-04-28 on Commons. There is no CC license on the ImageFAP page. This file is not likely to be the uploaders own work. FredWalsh (talk) 20:21, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:02, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promotion Bazj (talk) 20:23, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:02, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, as unused personal image. Commons is not Facebook. Stuchka (talk) 20:40, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:02, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, as unused personal image. Commons is not Facebook. Stuchka (talk) 20:40, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:02, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, as unused personal image. Commons is not Facebook. Stuchka (talk) 20:40, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:02, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, as unused personal image. Commons is not Facebook. Stuchka (talk) 20:41, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:02, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

some person of unknown notability, no name, unused. Same for their logo File:Jupitersports.jpg Pibwl (talk) 20:43, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:03, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a modern building and there is no FoP in Greece, sorry. Jebulon (talk) 20:56, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not so sure. The legal situation with respect to FoP in Greece is neither black nor white, rather grey. According to https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Greece:
"occasional/casual reproduction and communication by the mass media of images of architectural works, fine art works, photographs or works of applied art, which are sited permanently in a public place, shall be permissible, without the consent of the author and without payment."
Since the motif of the photo is not a top tourist attraction but a primary school of a village in the inland of a small greek island, if anything, only occasional reproduction and communication is to be expected, which would be in line with greek law. -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 09:39, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I hope so.--Jebulon (talk) 13:59, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's a common design of schools in Greece dating from the beginning of the 20th century. It looks new because it is freshly painted (I think). According to the school's web page (in greek), it was built in 1900. --C messier (talk) 16:44, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks to Ανδρέας Συγγρός-Κωνσταντινούπολη and C messier. I  I withdraw my nomination my nomination for deletion.--Jebulon (talk) 17:20, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 01:03, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, as unused personal image. Commons is not Facebook. Stuchka (talk) 20:57, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:03, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photoshopped photo; inclusion in sq:Letërsia romantike shqiptare appears to be vandalism. Lupo 21:11, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:03, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal screenshot. Lupo 21:12, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:04, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, single contribution Pibwl (talk) 21:18, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:04, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 21:18, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:04, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, as unused personal image. Commons is not Facebook. Stuchka (talk) 21:21, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:04, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: nothing recognizeable here. Also inappropriate title. Lupo 21:21, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:04, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, as unused personal image. Commons is not Facebook. Stuchka (talk) 21:24, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:04, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

person of unknown notability, unused, no cat, one of user's 2 uploads Pibwl (talk) 21:26, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:04, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lisa Simpson is copyrighted. Also, you will see, at the bottom left corner of the image, the words "Matt Groening" in black. This is unlikely to be the uploader's "own work". DLindsley Need something? 21:28, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:04, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

description: "iam nur majdi, and this is my picture." Unknown notability Pibwl (talk) 21:33, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:05, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo Pibwl (talk) 21:33, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:05, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There's no source, publication date, etc so the actual copyright status is a complete unknown. russavia (talk) 21:45, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:05, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 21:47, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:05, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP#France. According to French law, it is not allowed to publish picture whose the main subject is an original creation until 70 years after the death of its author. Unless prior authorization by the author or his heirs. Civa (talk) 22:07, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:05, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermark with mention Copyright Paris Par Rues Méconnues Civa (talk) 22:15, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:05, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermark with mention Copyright Paris Par Rues Méconnues Civa (talk) 22:26, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:06, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermark with mention Copyright Paris Par Rues Méconnues ; the buildings of the bibliothèque Francois Mitterand are not free of rights. Civa (talk) 22:28, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:06, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermark with mention Copyright Paris Par Rues Méconnues Civa (talk) 22:29, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:06, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermark with mention Copyright Paris Par Rues Méconnues ; the Zenith building is not free of rights Civa (talk) 22:30, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:06, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermark with mention Copyright Paris Par Rues Méconnues Civa (talk) 22:30, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:06, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermark with mention Copyright Paris Par Rues Méconnues Civa (talk) 22:31, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:06, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermark with mention Copyright Paris Par Rues Méconnues Civa (talk) 22:33, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:06, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope. Thibaut120094 (talk) 22:41, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:06, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermark with mention Copyright Paris Par Rues Méconnues ; the drawings by Miss Tic are copyrighted Civa (talk) 22:41, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:07, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This almost certainly *isn't* the uploader's "own work" as claimed, but appears to be logo of 2014 version of software by RailWorks ([6]). Do rendering and 3D effects push this above the threshold of (simple text) originality? Ubcule (talk) 22:42, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:07, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused family photo Pibwl (talk) 22:44, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:07, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermark with mention Copyright Paris Par Rues Méconnues Civa (talk) 22:44, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:07, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermark with mention Copyright Paris Par Rues Méconnues Civa (talk) 22:45, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:07, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of copyrighted website, contain copyrighted stock photos. Thibaut120094 (talk) 23:40, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:07, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Low_Tide_At_Battery.jpg MelissaFa2009 (talk) 00:57, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Low_Tide_At_Battery.jpg MelissaFa2009 (talk) 00:58, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request Ymblanter (talk) 20:54, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Alan Liefting as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Probably a copy vio and it is promotional Yann (talk) 16:05, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: In any case, out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 20:58, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect source, author and license. Screen capture from television. . HombreDHojalata.talk 19:18, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Per COM:FU and the nomination. Screenshots of copyrighted material on television are not permitted here on Wikimedia Commons. DLindsley Need something? 22:13, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
No problem.The questioned image appears on Globo/TV Bahia - Wiki entry (Portuguese).Grande lotus (talk) 23:10, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: derivative of copyrighted work Ymblanter (talk) 21:24, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non free logo. See andb.es 31.4.221.12 21:06, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: likely copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 21:32, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Blindfoes (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - promotional images

INeverCry 22:52, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 21:35, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mianasad777 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 22:55, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 21:37, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused image of plain text INeverCry 23:01, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 21:35, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:07, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 21:36, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by HenningJensens (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - promotional images

INeverCry 23:03, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 23:27, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Juancarloshenriquezm (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 23:05, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 23:26, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vicovo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyright violations - small sizes - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful

INeverCry 23:16, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 23:25, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:17, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 23:24, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Guillemago (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - promotional images

INeverCry 23:22, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 23:24, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:23, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 23:23, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Naveenkumarbarrodia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 23:30, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 23:23, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo of unnamed person, no ency value, unused Pibwl (talk) 23:31, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 23:22, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:33, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 23:22, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:34, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 23:22, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:35, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 23:21, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sandeeprahar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 23:37, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 23:21, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jackthomas321 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyright violations - small sizes - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful

INeverCry 23:40, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Per nomination. DLindsley Need something? 00:01, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Images reverse to athlete Shane Watson, File:ShaneRwatson2.jpg is found on several news and gossip sites, credited to an Australian newspaper. Tony Webster (talk) 01:18, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Didym (talk) 23:21, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope INeverCry 23:42, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 23:20, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:45, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 23:19, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work, possibly old enough, but without more information, incorrect license and possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:39, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:41, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work, small size, no metadata - looks like an old photo but without more information, probable COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:40, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:41, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work for this old photograph pair, possibly old enough but without additional information, possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:44, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:41, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sunset_at_Henlopen_State_Park_3.jpg MelissaFa2009 (talk) 00:54, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Which is the reason for deletion? --C messier (talk) 18:18, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason to delete. Yann (talk) 14:27, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sailing_in_the_Bay.jpg MelissaFa2009 (talk) 00:56, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason to delete. Yann (talk) 14:27, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Lonely_Tree_in_the_Middle_of_a_Field.jpg MelissaFa2009 (talk) 00:58, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason to delete. Yann (talk) 14:28, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Barn_with_Turkey_Vultures.jpg MelissaFa2009 (talk) 00:59, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason to delete. Yann (talk) 14:28, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Historic_New_Castle2.jpg MelissaFa2009 (talk) 01:00, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason to delete. Yann (talk) 14:28, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Chimney_Bluff.jpg MelissaFa2009 (talk) 01:01, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason to delete. Yann (talk) 14:28, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Aged_Fences_2.jpg MelissaFa2009 (talk) 01:01, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason to delete. Yann (talk) 14:28, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Blue_Morning_at_Rehoboth.jpg MelissaFa2009 (talk) 01:02, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason to delete. Yann (talk) 14:29, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Winter_at_Breck%27s_Mill.jpg MelissaFa2009 (talk) 01:02, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason to delete. Yann (talk) 14:29, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sunset_at_Bowers_Beach.jpg MelissaFa2009 (talk) 01:03, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason to delete. Yann (talk) 14:29, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Specks_of_sunshine.jpg MelissaFa2009 (talk) 01:03, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason to delete. Yann (talk) 14:29, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Aged_Barn_along_the_NY_State_Country_Side.jpg MelissaFa2009 (talk) 01:04, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason to delete. Yann (talk) 14:30, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Seagull_in_Flight_at_the_Jersy_Shore.jpg MelissaFa2009 (talk) 01:04, 4 January 2015 (UTC) Which is the reason for deletion? --C messier (talk) 18:18, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason to delete. Yann (talk) 14:30, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Double_Crested_Cormorant_in_the_Sunset.jpg MelissaFa2009 (talk) 01:05, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Which is the reason for deletion? --C messier (talk) 18:19, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason to delete. Yann (talk) 14:30, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Swedish Film Institute appears to be a private organization, not a government agency. Documents are not copyright-free under the claimed licence merely because they are sent to government agencies. Note that the Swedish version of the article does not categorize the SFI as a governmental agency. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 01:18, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

SFI is a foundation that is run and funded jointly by the Swedish government and the film industry. It is not a "private organization". It's not a public agency (myndighet) per se, but for purposes of the Principle of Public Access (offentlighetsprincipen) as defined in the Freedom of the Press Act (Tryckfrihetsförordningen) of the Swedish constitution, it is considered equivalent to a public agency. According to the complimentary Public Access to Information and Secrecy Act (Offentlighets- och sekretesslagen), all activities of SFI except for administration of financial support in accordance to the Film Agreement (Filmavtalet) are considered to be equivalent to that of a government agency and falls under the jurisdiction of the the Principle of the Public Access.
The list of non-agencies is specified in an appendix of that act. The full text in Swedish can be found here.[7] Just search for "Filminstiutet".
Peter Isotalo 04:37, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 14:31, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality unused image with lots of better analogs (Category:Lunar eclipse of 2011 December 10) Stas (talk) 01:29, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • No objection to deletion. My sole involvement with this image was moving it here from Wikipedia. It was in use there at the time, but appears to no longer be. BD2412 T 01:17, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • I have no claims to you, I just want to clean categories from the lowest-quality photos:) The message on your talk page was generated automatically by script, you can delete and forget it. And thank you for your work of moving the images. Stas (talk) 02:39, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:31, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of the Smurfs, copyrighted till 2063! No de minimis, no FOP as it is in a building. Ras67 (talk) 02:12, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest a crop that preserves the Gegants removing the annoying Smurfs. José Luiz disc 03:07, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I totally agree with Jbribeiro. Let's crop so that we can preserve the "Gegants de Sant Josep Calassanç" giants. I have done it now. And I have also uploaded the file "Gegants de Sant Josep Calassanç - Capgròs català - cropped.jpg".--Jordiferrer (talk) 23:05, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Dear Admin, please make a revision deletion until the last one. Thank you. --Ras67 (talk) 16:48, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 14:33, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ELECTROMOTOR 900 CC2 92.80.5.170 12:13, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep No reason to delete, correct licence, no violation of personal rights, nothing to complain about. the photo is used in any wiki projects. --Randy43 (talk) 13:50, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep What's wrong with this file? The deletion request does not give any reason for what this file should be deleted. Therefore, the deletion request should be removed asap. --MartinHansV (talk) 14:54, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No reason to delete. Should be speedy kept. Yann (talk) 14:36, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doublon avec cette photo https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Villabe_IMG_8459.JPG Poudou99 (talk) 15:06, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:38, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Falscher Dateiname Waldkatze (talk) 15:23, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Was genau ist falsch an dem Dateinamen? --Sebari (talk) 00:13, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No reason to delete. Yann (talk) 14:39, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be replaced with wiki-table. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep until the wiki-table exists. In use, and the horizontal text on the right side might be tricky (i.e., I'd have no clue how to create the wiki-table, let alone in a way working with "any" browser fresher than IE6.) –Be..anyone (talk) 09:35, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: In use. Yann (talk) 14:39, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Are clip creator is also composer of music used in it? EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, i am creator of this clip & also composer of music that used in it. Asd1374 (talk) 15:50, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 14:41, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kovu007 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

In the case of three of the four images (i.e. those of the screenshots themselves), the copyrighted screenshot is clearly the main subject (i.e. *not* de minimis). Some may argue that the screenshot content is simple enough to fall below the threshold of originality, but I'm not convinced that's the case (this last part also applies to the image of the cards).

Ubcule (talk) 15:55, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If it is the case, that the content of my images specifically the homescreen, Logos and the Cards from Nintendo are protected by copyright, Feel free to delete those images. I am a bit surprised that the discussion about that is starting 2 years later. But again, if the Content is protected by Copyright, I'm not going to argue for having those on Wikipedia.

--Kovu007 (talk) 04:31, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If I'm wrong, and the screenshots aren't copyrightable, then I've no problem with keeping them.
Most of the trademarks themselves are (oddly) not a problem, just the graphics. [Nintendo logo] (for example) is on Commons, because it's too simple to be copyrighted under US law. But it's still a trademark, so it's not usable for many free purposes...
Commons allows non-copyrightable trademarks because (AFAICT) almost anything could be a trademark in a certain context, so there's no point in restricting images on that basis. But I'm still not too keen on (e.g.) very restricted trademarks appearing on a free site. That's just my opinion.
Anyway, as I said, it's the *copyrightable* aspects of the screenshots that are the problem, not the trademarks. Ironically... Ubcule (talk)

Deleted: Not de minimis, and above threshold of originality. Yann (talk) 14:46, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

May have been re-photographed by uploader, but clearly a straight copy of a screenshot they don't own and have no right to relicense. The only question is as to whether this falls below the threshold of originality or not? Ubcule (talk) 16:00, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:DW, no permission. Yann (talk) 14:46, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Si mettono in dubbio le mie dichiarazioni e quindi i miei file non sono nel sito adatto! Vergaro 2 (talk) 17:41, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep No specific reason has been given for deletion. The date is credible and with the photographer unknown (only the business named on the frame) PD-old-70 ought to apply. -- (talk) 06:05, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kept.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:22, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Although I closed this as a Keep above, that appears now to be wrong. First, the image is from around 1900 and has a photographer's signature. Therefore, it cannot be anonymous, and 1900 is too recent to assume that the photographer died before 1945. Second, Google does not know any notable Anna Garbrecht, so that even if not a copyvio, this appears to be out of scope. It is unused. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:28, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Check Flickr found with query "möhlen garbrecht", same photo uploaded to flickr three weeks ago with all rights reserved. "Studio Möhlen & Knirim" (Hannover) leads to an apparently famous w:de:Alexander Möhlen, therefore we'd want to keep the photo if Möhlen was the photographer and died soon enough.  Keep with better info until at least the date of death is clear, –Be..anyone (talk) 11:09, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You did not address the fact that it is out of scope. We do not keep images hoping that a date of death will somehow turn up -- we delete them if they are later than 1885 and from pma 70 countries. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:15, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
How is 1885 calculated, or is there a documented consensus relating to it? -- (talk) 11:59, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
We'll find an educational category better than 4715, or ask this expert in finding scopes out of thin air. Her dress is peculiar, maybe some "German women in the 1900s" category exists. For starters I added +[[Category:Alexander Möhlen]]<!-- needs verification or a subcategory for his photo studio --> –Be..anyone (talk) 17:15, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Concerning the out of scope argument: I think high-quality vintage photos showing period dresses are not out of scope. --Sebari (talk) 00:23, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Clearly in scope. 1882 is old enough. Regards, Yann (talk) 14:52, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, as unused personal image. Commons is not Facebook. Stuchka (talk) 17:09, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Per COM:SCOPE, "by custom the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page of another project is allowed". I don't come on Commons much, usually just to move over images from enwp. I've put a note on the enwp page asking them to hold off on deleting the image. Cheers, Lixxx235 (talk) 17:17, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Also noting that this image is currently used in an enwp Articles for Creation submission. Cheers, Lixxx235 (talk) 17:42, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: in use. Yann (talk) 14:54, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Web sourced, no credible licence Andy Dingley (talk) 12:21, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: likely copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 20:11, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Another one - see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Essex V4.jpg that's just a web download with no attempt at a licence. Andy Dingley (talk) 17:15, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Per nomination. The uploader is definitely failing to understand copyright laws. DLindsley Need something? 21:44, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:57, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

apparently family photo, no educational value, unused Pibwl (talk) 22:47, 4 January 2015 (UTC) Seems, that it is some movie club, but I can't find an encyclopedical value in this photo and other uploads of this user (lacking a category). There are descriptions in Japanese only.[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:00, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Screen Shot 2015-01-04 at 11.33.20 AM.png Thibaut120094 (talk) 23:14, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:04, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope (some promo?), unused, as well as other uploads:


Deleted: Copyvios and/or out of scope. Yann (talk) 15:07, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sinineburx (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyright violations - small sizes - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful

INeverCry 23:26, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Milan come from here. With the 2nd Milan all pics are later uploaded than ours. The RPG could come from here.--Sanandros (talk) 02:43, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:10, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright issues (with the software used to display time) and out of scope. I guess it has something to do with this discussion, no more needed (not then was used). C messier (talk) 10:12, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The time is definitely pd-simple, it's just time, no creativity put into it. The three as well as the text can be a problem, but in this case are probably de-minimis. However, a significantly better image can be created very easily if needed to show how the time is shown on contemporary computers. This is not a vote one way or another however, just an opinion.

The time of course has no copyright... Just the layout of the Windows, and the way it was designed that may be copyrighted. The text is available with CC-BY-SA, so no problem from there. --C messier (talk) 14:56, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Unused, bad quality, out of scope. --Sebari (talk) 20:40, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Out of scope. Green Giant (talk) 23:07, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

logo - R, TM Pibwl (talk) 12:38, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{PD-textlogo}}, but might be out of scope. Yann (talk) 14:36, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Out of scope. Green Giant (talk) 23:09, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of muntiple comyright protected posters. not DM. Steinsplitter (talk) 10:26, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment I would consider those banners to be below the threshold of originality and/or de minimis, except maybe the lowest one. --Sebari (talk) 17:08, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: The banner nearest the camera is not free of copyright nor TOO Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:53, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self-portrait, unused, unknown notability, one of user's 5 uploads. Same for other paintings out of scope: File:1night.preview.JPG, File:Lemon.preview.jpg, File:1sp.JPG, File:Appearance.jpg Pibwl (talk) 11:05, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:26, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

some company logo, unused, unknown notability Pibwl (talk) 12:40, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:26, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

text element in screenshot is cut, File:Cdex-1.76.png is better Kopiersperre (talk) 13:49, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:27, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No proof is given, that the author allows anyone to use the photo for any purpose. The photo can be in public domain in some other reason, for example US-1977, but source and correct explanation must be given. Uploader and photographer are different. This is the uploader's only contribution, so I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 16:11, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jan 4, 2014: The photographer took the photo for CBC who gave written permission for it to be used with the attached credit, as did the photographer Robert Ragsdale, who is still alive in Toronto and listed in the phone book if you want to call him yourself. - Maggie Morris's daughter

I do not make a phone call, because I live in Europe and I have not the phone book. But can you send an OTRS-permission? (Sorry, US-1977 is not applicable, because this is Canadian, not US photo.) Taivo (talk) 18:24, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: file upload template states "Copyright Robert Ragsdale/CBC Still Photo Collection" Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:28, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

some logo (of some company?), unused, unknown encyclopedic value (same for other uploads: File:God logo.png, File:G logo.PNG, File:Map god.png, File:G map.png Pibwl (talk) 20:11, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused logos Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:32, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused award logo, of unknown notability and usage (and rights to use). Same for unused trivial graphic File:Services.jpg (there is used File:Birlasoft Offerings.jpg) Pibwl (talk) 20:52, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No valid source, other images were promotional Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:36, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

logo of some company of unknown notability, unused (same for other 2 uploads without much value: File:Fachada Loyalty.jpg, File:Arquivos da Loyalty.jpg) Pibwl (talk) 21:08, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: professional product shots with and including logo, no indication of own work, and unused. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:37, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Article [8] says it is a work by Homeless Cop aka Jason Fennell, while the uploader, claiming to be an author, has a nick DrewWasserman. He is also an author of a photo of File:Homeless Cop.jpg, so he can't be an author of his works. Same for other works: File:Victory Monday.jpg and File:Come At Me Bro.jpg Pibwl (talk) 21:15, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: works by living artist & a "red carpet" style shot, not own work of uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:40, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo of some company, unused, no cat., possibly autopromotion. Same for File:Precious Myanmar Official Signage.png, File:Logo of Precious Myanmar Professional Systems Supply.gif, File:Precious Myanmar Company Logo.jpg, File:The Logo of Paing Soe Oo.PNG, File:Apparent Myanmar Company Logo.gif of the same user. Pibwl (talk) 21:40, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No sources on any image Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:43, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I really don't know how the uploader could be the photographer of such an old black and white image, so the "own work" claim is not possible, unless permission is given for this image. DLindsley Need something? 21:58, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This photo belongs to the Estate of Ellis Rubin and this post is authorized and made on behalf of the Estate of Ellis Rubin.

RRPoster


Deleted: Ownership of a print is not the same thing as ownership of the copyright. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:33, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Really don't know how the uploader could have been the photographer of such an old image. The "own work" claim does not sound possible, unless permission is given. DLindsley Need something? 22:00, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Old news photo. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:34, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

de begin ' is fout Marcel coenders (talk) 22:19, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no source Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:44, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 22:41, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Crop from same image as on this page: [9], although our version is higher resolution and includes parts not in the other image. No other versions found. --Sebari (talk) 21:27, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: © L'Opinion 2015 / Bey Médias Presse & Internet - at source Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:47, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Although simple shapes, its combination and layout is not trivial Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 22:55, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:48, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I can't find an educational value in this portrait (however I gave it a category), maybe someone else can. Pibwl (talk) 23:05, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Delete Google image search claims this is Tameka "Tiny" Cottle. TinEye finds [10] this link (from 2010) among others. While our image is larger than most copies found on the net, ours seems to be scaled up. Copyvio. --Sebari (talk) 21:46, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:48, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

suspected own work of a singer, user's sole upload, used only in his sandbox in April (being his only contribution) Pibwl (talk) 23:08, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Image of Emediong Okon. Posted here before, two days before being uploaded here. Copyvio. --Sebari (talk) 21:50, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:49, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 23:11, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Copyvio. Several other hits on Google Images, among them this one, which is larger and older. --Sebari (talk) 21:55, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Depicted person is Jesus Adrian Romero. --Sebari (talk) 21:56, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:49, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pajero club in Rossia meeting - no educational value Pibwl (talk) 23:14, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: also, logos on banners being held by people in group shot. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:49, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

some logo, unused, sole upload Pibwl (talk) 23:26, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:50, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

yanlış bilgi girildiği için söz konusu görselin kaldırılmasını talep ediyorum. Yekmekci (talk) 23:45, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Found at http://orenyeri.net/nevsehir-ilceleri/ 3243 × 1361 - Jan 4, 2015 -, which is same day as this upload, but Larger. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:52, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo, unused, his only activity was to create a userpage on en-wiki (without a photo though) Pibwl (talk) 17:56, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



 Kept, Use found on tl.wiki. EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!) 01:46, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It has no description. It is in a low resolutions. There are thousands of images of mountains. It has no reallistically educational purpose that can not be found in a better image of a mountain. Bestiasonica (talk) 15:15, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:40, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope?, unused, no cat. Pibwl (talk) 22:46, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Deleted by User:Ellin Beltz. EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!) 01:48, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW Steinsplitter (talk) 10:25, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Possibly FoP applies. --Sebari (talk) 17:11, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:39, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sergey.molyanov (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The coins are OK, but the pictures may not be.

Yann (talk) 15:52, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep It has always been the opinion of Wikimedia foundation's lawyers, that the process of digitising PD does not generate new copyright. Unless i'm missing something. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.158.7.213 (talk • contribs)
Actually it depends how the pictures were made. With a scanner, it would be OK, but with a camera, not. I am ready to assume the former. Regards, Yann (talk) 11:18, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:39, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work, possible rephotograph of older image, but still COM:COPYVIO without accurate information. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:21, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:39, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not free for commercial use, see http://www.hathitrust.org/access_use#pd-google "Public Domain or Public Domain in the United States, Google-digitized: In addition to the terms for works that are in the Public Domain or in the Public Domain in the United States above, the following statement applies: The digital images and OCR of this work were produced by Google, Inc. (indicated by a watermark on each page in the PageTurner). Google requests that the images and OCR not be re-hosted, redistributed or used commercially. The images are provided for educational, scholarly, non-commercial purposes. Note: There are no restrictions on use of text transcribed from the images, or paraphrased or translated using the images." Smial (talk) 18:14, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The digitization itself should not lead to a new copyright claim, so it is bogus. If the book's copyright was now renewed it should be {{PD-US-not renewed}}. --Sebari (talk) 00:38, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:44, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of this photo used here and here. Does the OTRS ticket also cover this photo? Lupo 18:52, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:40, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of this photo. Does the OTRS ticket also cover the photo? Lupo 19:05, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:40, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivatve work of this photo (used at [11]). Does the OTRS ticket also cover that photo? Lupo 19:10, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:40, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most probably a derivative work of one or of some video stills from this interview. (Admittedly I didn't watch the whole thing; just enough to see that general posture often was very similar, and the jacket, tie and checkered shirt matched.) Lupo 19:18, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:40, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of this photo used at [12] and credited there "Andreas Truxa/Archiv". Does the OTRS ticket also cover this photo? Lupo 19:29, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:40, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of this photo by Jan Woitas / Uni Leipzig. Does the OTRS ticket cover that photo, too? Lupo 19:40, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:40, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work from this video; I'd say at about 0:32. The video evidently is already a copyvio; the TV station's logo has been blurred; and I don't think the OTRS ticket covers this video/TV broadcast anyway. Lupo 19:45, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:40, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

de begin ' is fout Marcel coenders (talk) 22:20, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:44, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

de begin ' is fout Marcel coenders (talk) 22:20, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:44, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

de begin ' is fout Marcel coenders (talk) 22:21, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:44, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

de begin ' is fout Marcel coenders (talk) 22:21, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:44, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

suspected own authorship of a football team's photo, user's sole contribution Pibwl (talk) 20:05, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No hits on Google image search or TinEye. --Sebari (talk) 21:18, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Looks like a scan Natuur12 (talk) 18:49, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

de begin ' is fout Marcel coenders (talk) 22:19, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:48, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

de begin ' is fout Marcel coenders (talk) 22:20, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:48, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This appears to be a 2D image of Henry VIII, not subject to the Right of Panorama in the UK or under US law, and almost certainly under copyright by the artist concerned. Hchc2009 (talk) 22:20, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:48, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This appears to be a 2D image of Queen Elizabeth I, not subject to the Right of Panorama in the UK or under US law, and almost certainly under copyright by the artist concerned. Hchc2009 (talk) 22:31, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:48, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This appears to be a 2D image of a coat of arms, not subject to the Right of Panorama in the UK or under US law, and almost certainly under copyright by the artist concerned. Hchc2009 (talk) 22:31, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:48, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This appears to be a 2D image of a swan, not subject to the Right of Panorama in the UK or under US law, and almost certainly under copyright by the artist concerned. Hchc2009 (talk) 22:32, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

from UKIWS. Yes, it is a rather elegant pub sign which overlooks the main village street. The photo was taken by me in the summer of 2014. From what you say above, are all photos of signs like this to be excluded on grounds of "Artist's Copyright"? What if I stand back a bit and the picture has the house behind as well as the sign, is that covered by "Right of Panorama"? The same comment applies to your other three deletions of the other pub signs in Sutton Valence. What a pity, though, with pictures of Henry VIII, Elizabeth I and the Clothmakers Arms, they made a fascinating addition to the words about the village pubs. 5 Jan 2015

Artists in the UK do have copyright over their works, yes, and taking a photograph of them doesn't give the photographer the right to then freely release the artist's design or work for anyone else to use. Hchc2009 (talk) 18:18, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:48, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnamed person (sports commentator), unused, user's sole contribution Pibwl (talk) 23:04, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The depicted person seems to be "V1lat", alias Vitalii Volochai, an Ukrainian Dota 2 commentator for Star Ladder. In-scope. The same photo is used at [13], although in a smaller resolution. All other hits are also smaller. --Sebari (talk) 21:40, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: As above Natuur12 (talk) 18:47, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#France: 1951 monument; the sculptor died less than 70 years ago. Eleassar (t/p) 08:56, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: As per nom and as part of cleanup. Sculptor died in 1944, so undelete in 2015. russavia (talk) 03:20, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France. Ras67 (talk) 00:53, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The sculptor died in 1944, so it is now PD as of 1 January. Ras67 what makes you think 2063 is the undeletion date? russavia (talk) 06:23, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The category itself until you have it removed. --Ras67 (talk) 13:14, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Ras67 I don't know upon what basis Zolo determined "These works or works by this artist may not be in the public domain, because the artist has not been dead for at least 2063 years." Read it very closely :) russavia (talk) 14:24, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, i've read this carefully, but the only error of Zolo was that he thought the parameter of {{NoUploads|2063}} means the expiration of copyright, but the date is nevertheless correct. Robert Wlérick, died in 1944, had begun the statue, his pupil Raymond Martin, died in 1992, finished it. So the correct date of PD is 2063! --Ras67 (talk) 21:40, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per discussion. --Krd 15:46, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was uploaded to Commons a few months after a similar sized photo at ImageFAP. There is no CC license on that page. This is not likely to be the uploaders own work. FredWalsh (talk) 19:59, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:Aassddww's uploads are certainly suspicious, but the link you provided does not seem to be anything connected with the original photographer. AnonMoos (talk) 12:10, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The file at Commons was uploaded at 2013-04-28 and is larger than the image at ImageFAP, uploaded 2013-11-12. That said, I agree that the uploads are fairly suspicious. All images without EXIF data, different qualities, different locales, different styles, same subject matter. --Sebari (talk) 21:12, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
With these kinds of photos it is difficult to work out the original photographer but there seems to be a set of similar photos (no.11 to14) on brain parking although I'm not sure these are originals either. FredWalsh (talk) 11:00, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Actually, it's already deleted rubin16 (talk) 11:10, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:GALLERY and Gallery pages don't lend themselves to small collections of images. Two is a small number. Alan Liefting (talk) 01:49, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not a very "wikimedian" DR in any way, if I may say...
COM:GALLERY is not a mandatory neither a rule.
Where do you see that COM:GALLERY does not allow a gallery with only two pictures ?
For a visitor, a gallery is better than a category, because of an easier access in research.
A gallery is, for now, the only way to show that a picture is awarded (VI, FP or QI). Little seals are not visible elsewhere.
Therefore  Keep, of course.--Jebulon (talk) 13:10, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Some points:
    • This gallery is not the only place where the VI, FP or QI can be indicated.
    • It is not a good gallery since it is virtually the same as the category. Galleries need more than just images.
    • Creating this gallery is putting the cart before the horse. Where is the French artists gallery, the Artists gallery, the Statues gallery? Sure, Commons is a work in progress but we should get the basics done before the specifics.
Not sure what you mean by not being Wikimedian DR. Pursuing the goal of a quality educational and informational resource is what a Wikimedian should be doing. Alan Liefting (talk) 19:00, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Some points too:
    • Please show me where else the seals can be visible ?
    • What do you want more than images in galleries ?
    • I disagree basically with you about what must be a gallery in "Commons".
As for me, I think that a good wikimedian way to do could have been first a call on my talk page. Second, ask for a destruction is not educational neither informational, therefore not wikimedian. Let's see now what kind of decision we will have. Best regards, --Jebulon (talk) 22:41, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • And some counter points:
    • VI, FP or QI status is seen on the actual image page and the seals can be used on any gallery page.
    • I want more than images in a gallery because that is what would be expected by those who use Wikimedia Commons. Sure, a picture says a thousand words but a gallery page needs to have information in it. THere is all sorts of information that can be added. As well as being sorted into themes/subjects/topics etc information such as the creator, date, location, description, etc. The Commons:Gallery guideline suggest a number of things a gallery should have.
    • You and I may disagree but what does the community say? The gallery at present has less information than a category. There is no descriptions of the images. There is only a VI icon. It can be expanded of course but why don't we do the more important stuff first?
You were notified of this discussion. That is sufficient. Given your strident desire to keep this gallery and given human nature in general (especially the desire to keep something that we have made) here was no point notifying you alone. We need to get third party opinions (which we are yet to get). Finally, to call a deletion request as "destruction" is a bit strong. It is only a gallery with two images in it. It was easily created. It is not as if huge amounts of work went into creating it. Alan Liefting (talk) 22:36, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Frankly, I don't understand your strident desire of destruction of informations. I'll add some precisions on the gallery page. Did you start other similar DR? Let's wait what others say (nobody seems to be interested, that's a clue that your DR is not very relevant IMO). I've nothing more to say, so EOD for me, thanks. Regards,--Jebulon (talk) 23:20, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
As I have said, to call it destruction of information completely overstates the case. Alan Liefting (talk) 00:00, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Of course, I repeated this word on purpose.-- Jebulon (talk) 13:27, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The Commons database grows daily. If we do not organize images we lose the majority. The galleries have been created for this. It is strongly recommended to create and maintain the gallery. Even for a gallery two images is useful. Destroy a gallery shows ignorance of how a database, and disregard the work done. When we complain of a lack of interest they wikis We have to show a different image of ourselves, by working together. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:19, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I am all for organising images but I want it to happen in an organised fashion. Creating a gallery of two images of paintings from a minor artist before creating all of the more important stuff is not an organised fashion. Also, it is grossly overstating the case by saying that "destroying" this gallery show ignorance of database operation and disregard for the work done. On the contrary, creating this gallery show an ignorance of how the Commons database should be developed, i.e. systematically and organised. And don't forget that it is only two images without captions. Very little had to be done to create the gallery page. In deletion discussions editors should not consider the amount of work that had been done but focus on its use to the project. If I were to spend huge amounts of time developing a Commons page that was not suitable I would expect it to be deleted. That is why we should be doing what to have to do rather than what we want to do. Unfortunately, as volunteers, that takes the fun out of it for us. Alan Liefting (talk) 19:11, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep As creator and maintainer of galleries myself, I am much better to think about how to develop this gallery or any other gallery that to make them more relevant, interesting and attractive. Wikimedia is much more a constructive project rather than a destruction project, enriching wikimedia comes from the sum of all the work and not from the deconstruction. I do not see that the removal of this gallery would bring to commons, it will just be frustrating for some useful users who spend graciously their time. Apparently this gallery is important and relevant for Jebulon so please keep this gallery. I do not see how this gallery may prevent you to make improvements in wikimedia, if only for the pleasure of sweep. I see nothing in COM:GALLERY that said this gallery must be deleted. This DR is totaly out of scope and even is totally unproductive in the measure insofar as it disturb experimented people of good will. If you do not like the galleries, nothing forces you to take an interest. -- ChristianFerrer 22:19, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Earlier this month I threw together Commons:WikiProject Gallery pages. I was surprised that it did not exist since it is a necessary forum to coordinate the creation of galleries. Commons has now been operating for over ten years but, quite frankly, it is a chaotic mess. Sure, we are all volunteers but we really need to up our game. Large numbers of reputable organisations have donated images to Commons but we are making an embarrassing mess of curating them.
That is a little background. As for the gallery in question I fail to see why you think it is destruction. As I have already said creating this very basic gallery was not a particularly time consuming exercise. And whether this gallery is important to Jebulon is completely irrelevant. The edits we do here are to work towards the goal of the project and not for personal edification. As for work being "destroyed" take a look at the huge number of page deletions that take place every day. Thousands upon thousands of pages are deleted because they do not fit in with what Commons is about.
I have had a reread of COM:GALLERY and you seem to be right. Nothing in it says that this gallery needs deletion. Mind you the guideline is basically saying that anything goes. There should be some prescriptive stuff in it IMO.
I am fully aware that I do not need to take an interest in galleries. I don't have to take an interest in Commons for that matter. But I am actually very interested in galleries. They are the visual equivalent to articles in Wikipedia and we should develop a full compliment of gallery pages. It is an important part of Commons but development of galleries is languishing. Alan Liefting (talk) 06:37, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Question It would be useful to have a template indicating that the gallery is a blank, we could put to incite supplement. Anyone know he do it?--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:43, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why would a gallery page be blank? Blank gallery pages should not exist. Alan Liefting (talk) 07:53, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry for my english exotic, a "ébauche" in French. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:09, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Ah. After checking what ébauche means I now understand. A more appropriate word to use here would be placeholder and I am very supportive of the use of placeholders as a temporary measure before a fully fledged page is created. However, given the slow progress in developing even the most basic gallery pages this gallery would be an outlier, an odd one out, for quite a long time. We may in fact never get to the stage of having gallery pages for painters with the low level of notability of Charles-Arthur Bourgeois. Alan Liefting (talk) 18:58, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I'm afraid Charles-Arthur Bourgeois was a sculptor, not a painter. He won the en:Prix de Rome, and has 4 articles in different wikipedias. Low level of notability ?--Jebulon (talk) 20:39, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Ooops, yes he is a sculptor but my assessment of him as having low notability still stands. Having articles in four Wikipedias could be used as a measure of notability but only being in four and without an English Wikipedia article suggests low notability. He is not as well known as w:Michelangelo but more well known than w:Sam Mahon! Alan Liefting (talk) 04:56, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Your point is very significant. You do not understand the interest of wikimedia. Our job is to promote knowledge. We must defend the small grade without those who make the richness of our world. Michel angel does not need us to exist, the others do. There is no small subjects, nor small gallery. Your time would be better spent to build. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Strictly speaking our job is not to directly promote knowledge (but that is splitting hairs). Our job is to create an educational resource and the information that we supply spreads knowledge.
Commons does not have a notability policy or guideline so we can have files and pages that are of very little use. However, from a practical point of view we should at the very least get the more popular topics covered before moving onto the more obscure ones such as this one. By the way, why is there no Charles-Arthur Bourgeois gallery yet we have one for "Le Chasseur de crocodile"?
Finally, I agree that my time, as well as yours, is best spent building up Commons, but as a volunteer we do what we want to do rather than what we should do. We need editors that do the stuff that should be done but that is another story. Anyway, I am comfortable with my editing history on Commons. As well as uploading files I help with maintenance, building the infrastructure, fixing errors, etc. Alan Liefting (talk) 07:07, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Wow ! May I disagree with "only being in four and without an English Wikipedia article suggests low notability" ? With all due respect, I find this a bit arrogant (sorry). English wikipedia is not the "Alpha" and "Omega" of knowledge and notability, sorry. All the wikipedias are equal, and Wikimedia is a multilingual project. Moreover, on the same subject you have very good articles in other-than-english wp, which are very bad in english...--Jebulon (talk) 09:44, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see it as arrogant. And I know full well that the English Wikipedia "is not the "Alpha" and "Omega" of knowledge and notability". And I know that all Wikpedias are equal. And I know that Wikimedia Commons is multilingual. Anyway, the facts speak for themselves. English is one of the most commonly used languages which is one of the reasons why the English Wikipedia is the largest of the Wikipedias. The English Wikipedia is edited by both native and non-native English speakers. This means that it gets good coverage (but by no means complete) of different countries and cultures. I guess instead of saying that Charles-Arthur Bourgeois has low notability I could say he has insufficient notability for him to have someone do an article for the English Wikipedia.
Anyway, this is all getting too far from the reason why I put the gallery up for deletion. I could rephrase my deletion rationale as: "A gallery with only two images in it, without any captions, and in the absence of a gallery for the artist himself". Alan Liefting (talk) 05:16, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
If you're shocked by this finding of two possible attitudes; If you demand desturction, positive you put in place the elements that seem to you to be missed. Why follow the negative way? --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:04, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I think I see the point you are making. Firstly, I am not so much "shocked" by anything discussed here but I do despair about how some editors fail to look at the bigger picture and carry out edits that are needed rather than those that they want to do. This is not a criticism. We are all volunteers and editing would be less enjoyable if we had to edits that we don't want to do. This leads to one of the reasons why I have not added the missing page. I have neither the time, inclination, or the knowledge to add large amounts of galleries. Besides, to get the requisite number of gallery pages to make this one that I put up deletion into a part of a coherent sequence would require thousands of hours of work, which is more than I am able to give.
Please don't look at this deletion as a negative thing. Deletion is a small positive step towards tidying up Commons and improving the database. Alan Liefting (talk) 08:13, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion Krd 14:25, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The images aren't strategically organized, which is the primary if not sole purpose of a gallery. Thus, this gallery is inferior to the category  — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  06:11, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --JuTa 04:35, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not a true svg Antemister (talk) 13:16, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I would hardly call it useless for not being SVG. Fry1989 eh? 17:23, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
As a PNG exists, we do not need the same file with an *.svg, as long it is also only a raster image.--Antemister (talk) 17:49, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I created this file. File formats are not among my areas of expertise. I wanted to display this flag in a userbox using Template:Uir on English Wikipedia. The template looks for a *.svg file by default, but that can be overridden. When I saw the *.png file in the Commons, it had a tag asking to help Wikimedia by uploading a *.svg version. I searched online and found a conversion tool and used it to create this file from a public domain *.png version. I thought I was helping. It would have been much easier to override the file used in my template. Now, it seems my help has only created a controversy. I really have no idea what makes this or anything else a true *.svg file. As the person who created the file and as one truly out of his element with respect to this issue, I think it is best that I not vote to keep or delete. But I do think the decision ought to be based on a few things unknown to me: 1) Is the quality of this file better than the *.png that exists? 2) Would keeping this file cause a true *.svg version to never be uploaded, because it will not be obvious that one is needed? Conversely, can this file be marked as not a true *.svg in a manner similar to the way the *.png I found was marked to let those who really know what they are doing that help is needed in creating a true *.svg? 3) Would it be more constructive for someone who knows what they're doing to just create a true *.svg and replace this apparently flawed one rather than discuss the merits of keeping the one that's there now? Taxman1913 (talk) 17:32, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It's not really a problem or a controversy. SVGs can embed raster images (bitmaps) in the form of very long data:...123456abcdef5555555aaaaaa... lines (data: URL). If that's all what the SVG does, and the bitmap is available here, the SVG is pointless for most purposes (excl. your template trick.) Something in this direction can also happen with a TIFF consisting only of one embedded JPEG, or a PDF consisting only of one embedded image, no text or meta data or anything else with a potential value.
Quick sanity test, while looking at the SVG in your browser press Ctrl-U (or whatever is needed for "show source".) If you see lots of geeky pseudo-English code it's a "real" SVG. If you see lots of lines in the same length consistsing only of letters and numbers and beginning with data: in the first line it's an embedded raster image. And if you don't know what's going on just upload it anyway, and let others figure out if it's a redundant dupe of a raster image, or maybe a brilliant SVG-illustration based on a raster image. –Be..anyone (talk) 09:08, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination Krd 14:27, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"This flag is fictitious or proposed...." why not delete it? Allsan44 (talk) 11:54, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. @Allsan44: The file should not be deleted because it's in use all over the place, from ace:Surakarta to zh:印度尼西亚各省人类发展指数列表. As a matter of policy, Commons leaves defers to other projects in matters of inclusion: since those projects are using the file, Commons should keep it. See COM:NPOV for the official statement of this. The previous deletion request for this file was closed Kept for this reason. --bjh21 (talk) 12:43, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep: I have suffciently argued for the case in the Wikipedia Talk page of Allen Istalaksana. Austronesier (talk) 13:36, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep: Not a valid rationale. The flag is in use, and looks well made. --Auric (talk) 13:58, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deleting the file in use. --whym (talk) 03:49, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not a true svg, only a raster file Antemister (talk) 13:16, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I would hardly call it useless for not being SVG. Fry1989 eh? 17:23, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
As a PNG exists, we do not need the same file with an *.svg, as long it is also only a raster image.--Antemister (talk) 17:49, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I created this file. File formats are not among my areas of expertise. I wanted to display this flag in a userbox using Template:Uir on English Wikipedia. The template looks for a *.svg file by default, but that can be overridden. When I saw the *.png file in the Commons, it had a tag asking to help Wikimedia by uploading a *.svg version. I searched online and found a conversion tool and used it to create this file from a public domain *.png version. I thought I was helping. It would have been much easier to override the file used in my template. Now, it seems my help has only created a controversy. I really have no idea what makes this or anything else a true *.svg file. As the person who created the file and as one truly out of his element with respect to this issue, I think it is best that I not vote to keep or delete. But I do think the decision ought to be based on a few things unknown to me: 1) Is the quality of this file better than the *.png that exists? 2) Would keeping this file cause a true *.svg version to never be uploaded, because it will not be obvious that one is needed? Conversely, can this file be marked as not a true *.svg in a manner similar to the way the *.png I found was marked to let those who really know what they are doing that help is needed in creating a true *.svg? 3) Would it be more constructive for someone who knows what they're doing to just create a true *.svg and replace this apparently flawed one rather than discuss the merits of keeping the one that's there now? Taxman1913 (talk) 17:37, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination Krd 14:27, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not a true SVG, svg that is not more than a raster file is useless Antemister (talk) 13:18, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I would hardly call it useless for not being SVG. Fry1989 eh? 17:23, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
As a PNG exists, we do not need the same file with an *.svg, as long it is also only a raster image.--Antemister (talk) 17:49, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I created this file. File formats are not among my areas of expertise. I wanted to display this flag in a userbox using Template:Uir on English Wikipedia. The template looks for a *.svg file by default, but that can be overridden. When I saw the *.png file in the Commons, it had a tag asking to help Wikimedia by uploading a *.svg version. I searched online and found a conversion tool and used it to create this file from a public domain *.png version. I thought I was helping. It would have been much easier to override the file used in my template. Now, it seems my help has only created a controversy. I really have no idea what makes this or anything else a true *.svg file. As the person who created the file and as one truly out of his element with respect to this issue, I think it is best that I not vote to keep or delete. But I do think the decision ought to be based on a few things unknown to me: 1) Is the quality of this file better than the *.png that exists? 2) Would keeping this file cause a true *.svg version to never be uploaded, because it will not be obvious that one is needed? Conversely, can this file be marked as not a true *.svg in a manner similar to the way the *.png I found was marked to let those who really know what they are doing that help is needed in creating a true *.svg? 3) Would it be more constructive for someone who knows what they're doing to just create a true *.svg and replace this apparently flawed one rather than discuss the merits of keeping the one that's there now? Taxman1913 (talk) 17:38, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination Krd 14:27, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of model release or OTRS Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:58, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Withdrawn by nominator. -mattbuck (Talk) 20:18, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo is also found at http://www.clubropemarks.com/models/model.php?id=12 which has all rights reserved but no CC license. FredWalsh (talk) 16:30, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • The fact the image is also at DeviantArt does not automatically make the license legitimate. Maybe I've missed it but I see no links from Ropemarks website to indicate that there is a linked account at DeviantArt - see the links page. I'm not saying the DeviantArt account definitely isn't the same person but we have no evidence to show that it is a legitimate account anymore than the Commons uploader. I believe this needs some confirmation from the copyright holder e.g. through OTRS. Contrary to the above assumptions that it "appears to be the clubropemarks admin (or similar)" the only assumption we can make is that Ropemarks is unaware of the images uploaded at DeviantArt. It is entirely possible that a paid-up member of the website could copy over hi-res photos without the knowledge or express permission of the copyright holder. FredWalsh (talk) 12:00, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept as before. --Krd 14:30, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously trimmed from another image, not sourced, probable COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:30, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Vk}}, in use, tineye doesn't know the 270 KB thumb of this alleged source=own work, and I see no obvious trims, all parts of the beast are visible. The contributor celebrated New Year with three related edits. –Be..anyone (talk) 11:25, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment If you look at the animals rear right foot, the photoshop cutting is obvious. This image is most likely a scan or rephotograph of a display and then cut out. Uploader could convince me of own work with a larger and higher quality copy of this image. And in use because uploader put it in use, is incredibly common. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:47, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, when I download the full size and look at the right foot with zoom 500% something is odd above the left toe. Not exactly "obvious" for my eyes, and I don't know what photoshop does with images. But "in use because the uploader wanted it" is indeed more on the side of "too obvious" than "policy". :tongue:Be..anyone (talk) 18:11, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, not big file, no metadata, the uploader's only contribution. In such circumstances I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 15:39, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused private image - out of scope - unusable for the commons Cholo 3 (talk) 17:17, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

hm, I just see: it is from the Ludibreizh (?!) festival in France - no idea, if this festival is relevant, maybe it is. --Cholo 3 (talk) 17:42, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, useless without desciption Krd 14:31, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image has been replaced with an updated version. The new version is an SVG file, the old one is an PNG file. Raw data for the SVG chart is given in the information template, thus allowing the creation of this file anytime if so need. SVG version of the file is: File:Demographic Evolution of Munkkivuori by Age Groups 1962-2014 en.svg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Siipikarja (talk • contribs) 2015-01-04T17:53:00‎ (UTC)


 Deleted, uploader's request, unused duplicate. Taivo (talk) 15:31, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image has been replaced with an updated version. The new version is an SVG file, the old one is an PNG file. Raw data for the SVG chart is given in the information template, thus allowing the creation of this file anytime if so need. SVG version of the file is: File:Demographic Evolution of Munkkivuori by Age Groups 1962-2014 fi.svg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Siipikarja (talk • contribs) 2015-01-04T17:47:14‎ (UTC)


 Deleted, uploader's request, unused duplicate. Taivo (talk) 15:33, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Urek Meniashvili (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyright violation

Ray Garraty (talk) 11:34, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, all this pictures was given to me by one of my virtual friends. I knew that he is author of all this pictures. I'm sorrying...----Urek (talk) 23:50, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Why in the metadata of more than 400 your files is written "by Hajizade"? These are your photos? I think it is better to remove them if they are not yours.--Ray Garraty (talk) 19:34, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Missing adequate evidence of permission. If you are the uploader, and are authorized to upload these files to Commons, please email COM:OTRS -FASTILY 08:54, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Urek Meniashvili (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Tagged "by Hajizade" in the metadata. Maybe the same virtual friend.

Ray Garraty (talk) 20:15, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Here I see many images of the paintings, engravings and carpets from the Art Museum of Azerbaijan. I think they must be kept under the "PD-Art" and "PD-old-100" license like photographic reproduction of an original two-dimensional work of art. --Interfase (talk) 03:56, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is not the type of license. It is suspected that these photos do not belong to him.--Ray Garraty (talk) 05:21, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
All those pictures were shot by myself. Nobody gave me them, this is my own work. ----Urek (talk) 10:49, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The metadata of your photos contain the following information: Camera model - Canon EOS 500D; Author - by Hajizade. I also found that the metadata of images User:Gulustan contain identical information:Camera model - Canon EOS 500D; Author - by Hajizade. For example File:Qiz QalasiBaki01.JPG. How can you explain this?--Ray Garraty (talk) 06:04, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
User:Gulustan and me have known each other and we work together. We use the same camera to make photos. That's why the photos uploaded by us were taken with the same camera. I hope i could explain it to you, so that it's clear for you. Regards --Urek (talk) 15:57, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I know this user, he's my workmate and sometimes uses my camera to take pictures, with my consent. -- Gulustan 13:09, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. I belive that Urek Meniashvili is the author of these photos. He just use another camera. It's normal. User Gulustan whom this camera is belonged also confirmed that. --Interfase (talk) 16:20, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment I have actually found 1022 images tagged with "by Hajizade" in the database, all uploaded by Urek and Gulustan. Is that maybe a camera setting, so this was a previous camera owner? Nikola (talk) 10:55, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Missing adequate evidence of permission. If you are the uploader, and are authorized to upload these files to Commons, please email COM:OTRS -FASTILY 08:54, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Urek Meniashvili (talk · contribs)

[edit]

EXIF data says author is Emil Khalilov. No permission.

Yann (talk) 18:16, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I just sent a message via http://www.emilkhalilov.com/blog/contact/ asking for clarification. --Sebari (talk) 21:01, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Just as an update: I got a preliminary reply a few days ago. I will send the conversation OTRS as soon as I get the final reply and update this DR. --Sebari (talk) 19:20, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, the request has been open for whole month. If the OTRS-permission arrives, then the files can be restored. Taivo (talk) 15:43, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Urek Meniashvili (talk · contribs)

[edit]

After yesterday identifying +/- 30 more files as copyvio it´s difficult to believe that these remaining files would be own work: IMHO untrusted user uploading a bunch of copyrighted material (small/inconsistent resolutions, missing exif) so these ones (per COM:PRP). See also the previous mass deletion requests above. The files were stolen from all kind of sources: Flickr/Panoramio/500px/official sites/social media/blogs/skyscrapercity etc. and in some cases they were photoshopped: cropping (removing watermarks), resizing, adjusting colors, etc. (details at user talk or below), where 75 kb of all kind of copyright notices are stored). I am nomintaing all problematic files which I found so far surfing through his upload stream, but there might be more to clear.

Related: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Square of State Flag in Baku.jpg.

Show cases and living examples

just to indicate to the criminal bandwith in non-respecting copyrights, already demonstrated by this user before and below

Considering also:

Most likely grabbed somewhere from social media
PD-old-fails
CC or whatever fails
Derivated works (COM:FOP#Azerbaijan-fails (✘) / not own works, missing permissions and/or further details
Small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, most likely derivated (cropped/resized/photoshopped/etc.) & grabbed from Internet.
Mysterioulsy watermarked (small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF)
Different digicams and/or authors
Photo manipulation & grabbed from Internet
The "+994557945054" case

Gunnex (talk) 15:41, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, user has a history of uploading photos without permission and lying about it. In my opinion, we can not trust any uploaded files by that user. --Sebari (talk) 16:19, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Com:PCP Probably all uploads not own work. Too many warnings ignored. Account blocked. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:19, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is routine request for small photo without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Can you upload a bigger version, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload a version with EXIF data? Can you describe the file correctly? This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 18:19, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, in use, and d:Q4104911 is meta data for the subject. All those questions are good, but unlikely to produce a result for an account used once three years ago to upload this photo as own work. BTW, there is some exif data. –Be..anyone (talk) 11:42, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Unclear copyright status FASTILY 02:15, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly a derivative work of this photo used on that page. Does the OTRS ticket also cover that photo? Lupo 18:45, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: FASTILY 02:15, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]