Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2014/12/03
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
No Exif, the uploader committed other copyvios. I doubt it is own work. BrightRaven (talk) 15:35, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
- It is a clear copyvio actually: there is a watermark. It can be speedy deleted. BrightRaven (talk) 15:35, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: clear copyvio BrightRaven (talk) 15:36, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Stub with one file, now moved to Institution:Palazzo d'Arco (the Fondazione manages the Palazzo museum) PKM (talk) 23:24, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: unused template Jarekt (talk) 03:02, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ddddhadi.jpg
This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Yann (talk) 08:30, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: no date, no license. JuTa 23:53, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Yann (talk) 08:31, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: no date, no license. JuTa 23:46, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
Self-promo. Juggler2005 (talk) 04:15, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 03:13, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Juggler2005 (talk) 04:37, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 03:14, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ebrahimsadeghi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low res, missing EXIF.
Juggler2005 (talk) 04:45, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.Other used.--Fanghong (talk) 03:16, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 06:38, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 03:17, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
Uploaded by accident - there were two other (better) images I uploaded, and this one got caught up in the selection by accident. By the time I noticed it was there, I was too far through the multi-file Upload process to be able to remove it. Gronk Oz (talk) 07:16, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted / Uploader requested and unused.--Fanghong (talk) 03:19, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by BeLee-DAT 30504 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal images, not used, out of scope.
Yann (talk) 08:02, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 03:22, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Juggler2005 (talk) 09:56, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 03:27, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused file, private image BrightRaven (talk) 13:55, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 03:30, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 14:23, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 03:31, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 14:24, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 03:33, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 14:25, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 03:36, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
unused personal file 91.65.49.242 14:27, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 03:39, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 14:28, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 03:40, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 14:29, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 03:44, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 14:33, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 03:45, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
unused personal file 91.65.49.242 14:34, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 03:45, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 14:35, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 03:46, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bernard Shan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photos.
- File:S.H.A.N.jpg
- File:Trip.jpg
- File:Abs.jpg
- File:Mini cooper.jpg
- File:Simple look.jpg
- File:Bernard Shan.jpg
- File:Francis Anthony.jpg
Buxtehude (talk) 14:41, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 03:49, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 14:45, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 03:50, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 14:45, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 03:52, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
A portrait of the uploader? (unused) 91.65.49.242 14:46, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 03:54, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
unused personal file 91.65.49.242 15:15, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Delete --Achim (talk) 18:11, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 03:56, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
unused personal file 91.65.49.242 15:21, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 03:58, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dilkeshvarkumar.in (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 04:00, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
Obviously wrong license and bogus sources.
- File:Disney Channel 1997.svg.png
- File:DISNEYCHANNEL 2002.svg.png
- File:Logo DisneyChannel2010.png
- File:Disney Channel 2014 logo.png
Rillke(q?) 23:54, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete All files are copyrighted by ABC, Inc. and/or The Walt Disney Company. File:Disney Channel 2014 logo.png is a non-free logo in the English Wikipedia. --Mega-buses (talk) 22:13, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvios. Yann (talk) 08:31, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
Superseded by File:Sam Houston Tollway.svg, which is of superior quality and uses the correct color shades prescribed by the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices]] Imzadi 1979 → 01:00, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Kept: In use. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:13, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
File:Sam Houston Tollway.svg is a superior rendition of the marker with the correct shades of purple and yellow as specified in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Imzadi 1979 → 23:37, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
Comment: Not longer used rather than in some Commons namespaces (including discussions). So 
Weak keep. --Amitie 10g (talk) 03:19, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
- Delete I changed the two uses that were relevant. Now its only uses are on its creator's User page and in a request for its replacement by an SVG, neither of which qualify it for keeping here. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:31, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, thank you, Jim. Taivo (talk) 12:14, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
As per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bern 1954.jpg Schaack/Mattes ist auf dem Foto abgebildet. Also kann sie nicht die Fotografin sein. Ich fürchte das Bild muss gelöscht werden.
UK: I agree with the rationale in the earlier nomination - as Mattes is the model in the images, she is clearly not the photographer. Although it is great that she has cleared use of the images from the subject's perspective, we still need clearance from the actual photographer to have this on Commons. Mabalu (talk) 02:21, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:14, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
The license indicates CC Universal Public Domain but the source for this image provides no indication that it is released under that license, Whpq (talk) 02:25, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Source is (c) ARR . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:19, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
{{BadGIF}}--small size, have File:Bisacodyl skeletal.svg DMacks (talk) 04:06, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: / . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:20, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Flag of the Netherlands.svg. Fry1989 eh? 05:31, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: / . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:20, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
File is listed as a "Courtesy photo", not as a "US Air Force photo". No evidence that the (unknown) photographer has released this photograph under a free license. Revent (talk) 05:45, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
- See this photo's description page, as compared to this random photo, which is credited as a "US Air Force photo", and is thus in the public domain. There are other photos of the same event at http://www.amc.af.mil/news/story.asp?id=123429543 credited to a US Air Force photographer, but this one is not. Revent (talk) 06:00, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: / . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:21, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
This image was created by one of several sockpuppets for DisneyFXHD. The channel this depicts does not exist and was speedy deleted on Wikipedia for being a blatant hoax. I'll post the link to the AfD, but it's very clear that this is a hoax that one particular person is trying to perpetuate using Wikipedia and a few social media sites. I've e-mailed Disney to let them know about this, so hopefully they should step in soon with the social media sites. Until then, all I can do is ensure that they can't use Wikipedia to further the hoax. If you're interested, part of the reason this is a clear hoax is the lack of any coverage about this channel in reliable source. I can't see where FX and Disney ever teamed up to make a channel in India, let alone any coverage of them yanking the channel after only a few days. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 06:01, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
- Here is the link to the AfD page. All of the various sockpuppets have been blocked on Wikipedia, but I don't think that this translates into being blocked on WC, so they may need to be blocked on here as well. I do want to note that when the newest sockpuppet tried to re-create the page on the mainspace, they tried to assert that the channel closed due to copyright issues (if Disney had agreed to partner with FX then copyright issues would largely be a moot point) and that after the split the channel closed and re-opened as just FXHD. It also claims that it had a TRP of "96 Millions", which would suggest that there would be coverage somewhere if they did have that many viewers over its few days of being open. It's a pretty blatant hoax overall, to say the least. (This page shows that the top show in India as a whole received only about 10 million TRP, so....) I know that this sounds redundant, but I want to hammer home that this channel does not exist and never did. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 06:08, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
- It is ironic that all sorts of obscure stuff that nobody really cares about (including their creators) is speedy deleted every day, but uploading (with a clearly untrue self-created claim) the logo of a major corporation particularly noted for obsessively pursuing even the most trivial breaches of its IP, is allowed to stand for nearly a week after speedy is requested. SpinningSpark 09:26, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:22, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
The picture has three bookcover with copyright,I don't think it's appropriate. Cwek (talk) 07:16, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:23, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Small size, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 07:33, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:23, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Yann (talk) 07:44, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
This Picture is and has been in public domain. It can be found on Google and multiple other websites. It is a part of a school course page w:Draft:IGCSE_American_History-Corinth,_MS_Coursework_Help. It is essential for the completion of that page. That image cannot be substituted. Please do not delete it. Mdlou99
- Do not delete comment by others. You must provide a rationale, rather that simply saying it is in the public domain. When and where was it published? Who is the photographer? Regards, Yann (talk) 17:50, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
- The mention "unknown" for a source is not acceptable. Surely you know where you took this image. You must disclose your source. -- Asclepias (talk) 00:01, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
Didn't mean to delete. Sorry. I looked it up. It's a picture of President Roosevelt taken in 1934 by Frank Capra. Published in Nov. of 1934. Thanks. Mdlou99
- Care to provide a link, a reference, something? -- Asclepias (talk) 00:01, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
Both Author and Source have been input. https://englishtochinese.files.wordpress.com/2012/08/wiki-vestibuletrain.jpg And Mr. Asclepias, I was not alive in 1934 to take a picture of President Franklin Roosevelt. Mdlou99
- Let's see:
- 1. The Commons image File:Fdr train.jpg (600x454) is displayed in the en.wikipedia article Vestibule (architecture). Ok.
- 2. An external website [1] reused the en.wikipedia article, including the 600x454 image. Ok.
- 3. You copied the copy of the image from that external website. Ok.
- 4. You resized the 600x454 copy to 1014x765 and gave it a .png extension. (With no apparent advantage. A similar result could be obtained by displaying the original file as File:Fdr train.jpg|1014px.)
- 5. You uploaded that duplicate to Commons as File:President Roosevelt Cross-Country Train Tour.png.
- 6. You displayed the duplicate on the page Draft:IGCSE American History-Corinth, MS Coursework Help of the en.wikipedia as a 550px thumbnail.
- One might as well display the original Commons file in that page. Is there a reason to keep the stretched duplicate?
- A reference to Capra does not seem immediately obvious on the webpage you mentioned as the source. Can you please tell more precisely where it is?
- N.B.: Again, please stop deleting parts of other users' comments.
- -- Asclepias (talk) 04:28, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
Honest to God, no matter how nice you try to sound, to me, I feel that your a french speaking douche baguette with a fetish for following copyright laws. Sorry for all the trouble I've caused you. Let's See:
- 1. Cool.
- 2. Good for them.
- 3. Nice, didn't know. Are you sure that isn't a copyright infringement?
- 4. Cool right?
- 5. Very observant.
- 6. 600px*
- One might as well leave well enough alone.
- Reference to Capra: His name is in the source of the file on the file page. You might want to look him up as well. He's a pretty cool character and has done quite a few movies, but people that don't remember 1941 that well usually tend to not know his name.
- My delete key gets really sticky sometimes.
I have provided all the source and copyright information. Why is the deletion of this still being pursued? Mdlou99
Deleted: Duplicate of File:Fdr train.jpg . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:36, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Either commercial advertisement and out of project scope or copyright violation as all images are taken from http://www.nbdntools.com/ (and subpages).
- File:DN-D1007 13PC HARMONIC BALANCE AND PULLER TOOL.jpg
- File:DN-D1001-2 bearing puller 50-75mm.jpg
- File:DN-B1027-Mecpherson Spring Compressor.jpg
- File:DN-B1009 brake wind back tool set.jpg
- File:DN-A1013-23pc oil filter wrench.jpg
- File:Dn-a1019 screwdriver bit set.jpg
- File:DN-D1032 BALL JOINT REMOVAL TOOL KIT.jpg
- File:DN-A1006 Two Ways oil filter wrench.jpg
- File:Logo of DNT Tools.png
- File:DNT logo.jpg
Ies (talk) 08:55, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:39, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused file, advertising or self-promotion BrightRaven (talk) 09:06, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:39, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Repeatedly used to illustrate an article about a (possibly hoax) animated series on Wikipedia (see this sockpuppet investigation). If it's a real show then this logo shouldn't be on commons, if it's a hoax this image is of no use to the project. McGeddon (talk) 09:39, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete, this is also being used in vandalism articles where the text of another article is copy/pasted into a new article with a different name (Bajotz and variants). CrowTalk 21:18, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:40, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
This is a series of photografs that looks to be taken of a screen or something and therefor not free. They have been removed from flickr. The rest is here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ASearch&profile=default&search=Don+Giovanni+2014&fulltext=Search Hangsna (talk) 10:22, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
- Please delete. Bengt Nyman 213.113.16.173 10:49, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:42, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by TRANKILLLO (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused files, self-created artworks
- File:FRAME MIX.png
- File:FRAME RED.png
- File:FRAME BLUE.jpg
- File:FRAME DEEP BLUE.jpg
- File:LINEARITY BLUE.jpg
- File:LINEARITY GRAY.jpg
- File:LINEARITY.jpg
BrightRaven (talk) 10:48, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:43, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Logo of unidentified company. Unused on WMF wikis. This, that and the other (talk) 11:45, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:43, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
I can't read Cyrillic but I can tell that this is a logo of a non-notable entity. This, that and the other (talk) 11:49, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:43, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Apparent test upload. No use. This, that and the other (talk) 11:54, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:43, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Redrawn/traced from the map on page 80 (PDF page number 82) of this newsletter. The enwiki caption says as much, so it's clearly not "own work" as claimed. This, that and the other (talk) 11:58, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:43, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Utterly unneeded. This, that and the other (talk) 12:00, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:44, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Not own works, just derivatives.
- File:И каждый день как белый лист 1.jpg
- File:И каждый день как белый лист 2.jpg
- File:Джамиля апа.jpg
- File:Не прочитанная книга 2.jpg
- File:Не прочитанная книга 1.jpg
- File:Фото с детьми 6.JPG
- File:Фото с детьми 5.JPG
- File:DETAIL PICTURE 693402 95021368.jpg
Sealle (talk) 12:07, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:44, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
The dinosaur is 'art', at least in the minimal sense protected by the law, and as the Akron Fossils and Science Center where it is located was not established until after 2000, it is doubtful that it is a pre-1989 work. Since the US does not have Freedom of Panorama for art, and it's inclusion is obviously not de minimis since it is mentioned in the image caption, this photograph is a copyright violation. The public domain release on the source website is incorrect. Revent (talk) 12:20, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
- I'm the uploader. I can probably buy that logic... but can I have a link to what the definition of "'art', at least in the minimal sense protected by the law" is, to confirm? For next time, and similar images? For example, on the photo, there are also dinosaur targets. Are they also "art", or not, because they have a functional purpose (to be targets)? I admit I have never been in the playland, so there is some chance the dinosaur is meant to be climbed on or slid down or something, but for safety's sake we can hypothesize it's just decorative. For a more relevant example, though how about File:Garden_of_Eden.jpg - that's a museum exhibit, intended to be an instructive diagram - is it also "art" for our purpose? --GRuban (talk) 23:29, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
- To be honest, my statement about 'in the minimal sense' was meant more as an 'artistic critique' than an evaluation of how well it met the criteria. The actual 'definition' is honestly quite vague, and buried in Title 17, but here it is...
“Pictorial, graphic, and sculptural works” include two-dimensional and three-dimensional works of fine, graphic, and applied art, photographs, prints and art reproductions, maps, globes, charts, diagrams, models, and technical drawings, including architectural plans. Such works shall include works of artistic craftsmanship insofar as their form but not their mechanical or utilitarian aspects are concerned; the design of a useful article, as defined in this section, shall be considered a pictorial, graphic, or sculptural work only if, and only to the extent that, such design incorporates pictorial, graphic, or sculptural features that can be identified separately from, and are capable of existing independently of, the utilitarian aspects of the article.
- To be honest, my statement about 'in the minimal sense' was meant more as an 'artistic critique' than an evaluation of how well it met the criteria. The actual 'definition' is honestly quite vague, and buried in Title 17, but here it is...
- Basically, all that's required to be 'art' is to have a aspect of creativity in the design that goes beyond the purely functional, and meets the threshold of 'some minimal degree of originality'. Such works can only be portrayed in 'de minimis' cases, where they are not 'intentionally' included, but are a minimal part of the image that is incidentally included. As far as the "Garden of Eden" photo, I would call it art, in a way, but it's less clear cut since it appears to be a permanently installed part of the building, more along the lines of decor. Since it's not 'explicitly' intended as art, so I would say it falls under the exception that allows for photographs of buildings from 'public places', which includes parts of the interior that are open to the public. Revent (talk) 02:52, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
- Rereading, I missed what you said about the targets. If you took a photo specifically of them, from close enough that they were discernible, it would be an issue, but just as vague background elements in an image they are fine.. de minimis. If you were to crop the photo so that the dinosaur isn't in it, I would personally see nothing to complain about. Revent (talk) 03:07, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks. It's not a tremendously important picture, the article I uploaded it for has others, I won't bother cropping. Delete away. --GRuban (talk) 03:26, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks. It's not a tremendously important picture, the article I uploaded it for has others, I won't bother cropping.
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:45, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Plain commercial advertisement, out of project scope (Examples of files that are not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Advertising or self-promotion.) Ies (talk) 12:40, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:45, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Plain commercial advertisement, out of project scope (Examples of files that are not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Advertising or self-promotion.) Ies (talk) 12:40, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:46, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Plain commercial advertisement, out of project scope (Examples of files that are not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Advertising or self-promotion.) Ies (talk) 12:41, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:47, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
This is not my own work. This picture was the fist one I uploaded to Commons (I changed my account name from II...Richard...II to Archimëa). When I added it, I didn't knew anything about licences. I founded it on the web in a video game board thread or somewhere else. Simply delete it.
Please also delete what's redirect to it File:Cartoucheatomiswave.gif. Archimëa (talk) 12:45, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete As the uploader, because it's not used anymore. And the file is non-free rights. --Archimëa (talk) 14:16, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:48, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
low quality with multiple possible replacements Kopiersperre (talk) 12:54, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete As the uploader, because it's not used anymore. JackPotte (talk) 13:12, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:49, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
low quality with multiple possible replacements Kopiersperre (talk) 12:58, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete As the uploader, because it's not used anymore. JackPotte (talk) 13:12, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:49, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jeonorfolk 1
[edit]Copyright violations, not own work. Many taken from here, therefore the rest also likely taken from other websites. All images are without EXIF data. File:Sorsogon Street Scene 1905.jpg is also claimed to be "own work", but is a photo by Harry Fowler Woods who died in 1955, so not yet PD.
- File:Aerial View of Sorsogon City.jpg
- File:Grand Terminal Sorsogon.jpg
- File:Sorsogon Street Scene 1905.jpg
- File:Bigg's Diner Sorsogon pic.png
- File:Sorsogon Provincial Gymnasium.jpg
- File:Kasanggayahan Festival parade.jpg
- File:Pili Festival Street Dance Competition.jpg
- File:Pili Festival Dance Competition.jpg
- File:Girl Dancing During the Pili Festival.jpg
- File:Sorsogon Color Run with a Beat.jpg
- File:Sorsogon City Pili Fesitval.jpg
- File:Wind Speed Sorsogon.png
P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:41, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:50, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jeonorfolk (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos and maps. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
- File:Sorsogon City othophoto map.jpg
- File:Sorsogon Sea Level Rise.jpg
- File:Sorsogon City Topography map.jpg
- File:Sorsogon City Slope Map.jpg
- File:Sorsogon City Soil Map.jpg
- File:Sorsogon City Policy Zones.jpg
- File:Sorsogon City Multi Hazard Map.jpg
- File:Tsunami Map.jpg
- File:Sorsogon City Hazard Map.jpg
- File:Taft visiting Sorsogon.jpg
- File:Sorsogon 1900's.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: the first 9 files are clear copyright violations. The last two with a date of photography of 1905 are possibly in the public domain, but with the incorrect author and source claims this can not be verified. If those are reuploaded please provide the correct information.
Files uploaded by Jeonorfolk (talk · contribs)
[edit]Lacks of sources for these photomontages
- File:1200x1600.jpg
- File:1500x2000.jpg
- File:Sorsogon City Baywalk Fotor Collage 2.jpg
- File:Sorsogon City Hall and Park Fotor Collage.jpg
Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:58, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:29, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jeonorfolk (talk · contribs)
[edit]This gallery of images is composed of images with "FBMD" in the meta, images which are smaller than facebook but not marked, images which are even smaller than that, maps, and the only unifying theme is the town where the pictures come from. It's highly unlikely that any single person took these images - especially as there are no camera meta data and the ones I checked of the right sizes had "FBMD" in meta, it's more likely they're culled from internet than own work.
- File:Various Pictures around Sorsogon City.jpg
- File:Sorsogon City Fotor Collage.jpg
- File:Siama Hotel.jpg
- File:Mt. Pulog Bacon Sorsogon.png
- File:Rizal Street Sorsogon City 2.jpg
- File:Sorsogon City Hall and Park 2.jpg
- File:Rizal Street, Sorsogon City.jpg
- File:Sunset Sorsogon Rompeolas.jpg
- File:Poor Claire Monastery Sorsogon City.jpg
- File:Sorsogon City Traffic.jpg
- File:Sorsogon City Baywalk.jpg
- File:Sorsogon Provincial Capitol Park.jpg
- File:Sorsogon Bay 2.jpg
- File:Buhatan River.jpg
- File:Sorsogon City Business District.jpg
- File:Busay Falls.jpg
- File:Sorsogon Provincial Capitol 2.jpg
- File:Rompeolas 2.jpg
- File:Sorsogon City Plains.jpg
- File:Rompeolas 1.jpg
- File:Sorsogon City Districts.png
- File:Color Run PIli Festival.jpg
- File:Procession Sorsogon.jpg
- File:SPP Cathedral.png
- File:Biggs Sorsogon City.jpg
- File:Interior SPPC sorsogon.jpg
- File:Power Lines Sorsogon.jpg
- File:Sorsogon City Sunset at a bay.jpg
- File:Sorsogon National High School.jpg
- File:Sorsogon Rompeolas Baywalk.png
- File:Administrtative map.png
- File:Pili Nut.png
- File:Sorsogon City Fisherfolks Preparing for fishing.png
- File:Sorsogon Sunrise.png
- File:Sorsogon City Mini Fish Port.png
- File:Sorsogon City Terminal.png
- File:Rompeolas-Park.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:09, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:25, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
non-standard chemical formula drawing, unused Kopiersperre (talk) 13:42, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:50, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Dubious "own work" (14 KB, no metadata) 91.65.49.242 14:29, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:51, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Dubious "own work" 91.65.49.242 14:30, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:51, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Dubious "own work" (8 KB, no metadata) 91.65.49.242 14:32, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:51, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Derivative work of copyrighted sculpture Itkevä tyttö (1928) by Emil Cedercreutz (1879–1949). Not in public domain yet. FOP in Finland for buildings only. Apalsola t • c 14:34, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:51, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Derivative work of copyrighted sculpture Istuva poika (1959) by Kauko Räike (1923–2005). Not in public domain yet. FOP in Finland for buildings only. Apalsola t • c 14:36, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:52, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
No evidence of permission. Buxtehude (talk) 14:44, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:52, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal artwork. Buxtehude (talk) 14:46, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:52, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal artwork. Buxtehude (talk) 14:47, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:52, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
non free image, see source Yger (talk) 14:49, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:53, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
out of scope, del. on DE Nolispanmo 14:53, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:53, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Unknown author. Looks like a profesionnal shot. BrightRaven (talk) 15:04, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:53, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused file, self-created artwork BrightRaven (talk) 15:06, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:53, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Given the subject, this photograph was shot before 1940. Is it really own work? BrightRaven (talk) 15:12, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:53, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Collection of album covers and promo photos. I think copyrights holder permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.
- File:Pressagios - Eduardo Agni.jpg
- File:Layers of Now - Eduardo Agni.jpg
- File:Oriki - Eduardo Agni.jpg
- File:Um Outro Silencio - Eduardo Agni.jpg
- File:Agni recording 2.JPG
- File:Kronos - Eduardo Agni.jpg
- File:Agni recording 1.JPG
- File:Band kamp.jpg
- File:Sesc SJC.jpg
- File:Div 1.jpg
- File:Eduardo Agni.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:17, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:54, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
No exif, small size, looks like a promotional picture. I doubt it is own work. BrightRaven (talk) 15:18, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
- See also the copyvio record of the uploader. BrightRaven (talk) 15:40, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:54, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by HAL-Guandu (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text documents which could be replaced with wiki markup.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:19, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:54, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:54, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:21, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:54, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
OTRS ticket required 91.65.49.242 15:23, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:55, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:55, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
unused personal file 91.65.49.242 15:46, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 17:02, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 17:03, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 17:07, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
unused personal file 91.65.49.242 18:11, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by نور علي مجيد (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal files. There is only user contribution.
- File:أمير البرقعاوي.jpg
- File:أمير البرقعاوي 2.jpg
- File:صور الرادود أمير البرقعاوي 11.jpg
- File:صور الرادود أمير البرقعاوي 10.jpg
- File:صور الرادود أمير البرقعاوي 8.jpg
- File:صور الرادود أمير البرقعاوي 9.jpg
- File:صور الرادود أمير البرقعاوي 7.jpg
- File:صور الرادود أمير البرقعاوي 4.jpg
- File:صور الرادود أمير البرقعاوي 6.jpg
- File:صور الرادود أمير البرقعاوي 5.jpg
- File:صور الرادود أمير البرقعاوي 1.jpg
- File:صور الرادود أمير البرقعاوي 3.jpg
- File:صور الرادود أمير البرقعاوي 2.jpg
Ю. Данилевский (talk) 19:10, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Shamil Satheek (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope. Used only in Facebook-style user page deleted at en:Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Shamil Satheek
JohnCD (talk) 20:51, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kura9861433440 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope. Selfies used only in deleted autobiographical pages en:Kura mahapatro and en:User:Kura mahapatro.
JohnCD (talk) 20:57, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Conigliomannaro (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused copies of Wikipedia articles.
- File:Vitalizio del parlamentare - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Tradimento intergenerazionale - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Tiziano Treu - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Terzo pilastro della previdenza 2 - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Teoria del reddito differito nel diritto della previdenza sociale - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Teoria costituzionale nel diritto della previdenza sociale - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Teoria assicurativa nel diritto della previdenza sociale - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Tasso di sostituzione - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Tasso di rendimento apparente - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Tasso annuo di capitalizzazione per la rivalutazione del montante contributivo individuale nozionale - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Spoliazione legale differenze tra le versioni - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Spesa pensionistica in Italia - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Spesa corrente primaria - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Sostenibilità sociale del sistema pensionistico pubblico italiano - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Sostenibilità fiscale del sistema pensionistico pubblico italiano - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Sistemi pensionistici - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Sistema pensionistico senza patrimonio di previdenza - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Sistema pensionistico pubblico in Svizzera - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Sistema pensionistico pubblico in Italia - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Sistema pensionistico pubblico - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Sistema pensionistico privato in Italia - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Sistema pensionistico italiano - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Sicurezza sociale - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Sergio Rizzo - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Schema pensionistico con formula delle rendite predefinita - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Schema pensionistico con formula della rendita predefinita sulla contribuzione e la crescita e senza patrimonio di previdenza - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Saldo previdenziale - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Risparmio previdenziale - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Riserva legale - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Rischio politico (previdenza sociale) - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Rischio economico (previdenza sociale) - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Rischio di longevità - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Rischio demografico (previdenza sociale) - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Riforma previdenziale - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Riforma Monti del sistema pensionistico pubblico - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Riforma delle pensioni Fornero 2 - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Riforma Dini - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Remunerazione da crescita economica - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Redistribuzione intergenerazionale - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Redistribuzione intragenerazionale - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Regime pensionistico dei dipendenti della Regione siciliana - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Qualità della spesa pubblica - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Promessa pensionistica - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Principio della discriminazione generazionale 2 - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Principio della capitalizzazione integrale - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Principio del pro rata - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Principio del bilancio in cassa chiusa - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Prestazione previdenziale - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Primo pilastro della previdenza 2 - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Pressione fiscale legale - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Politiche di redistribuzione dei redditi - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Perequazione automatica delle pensioni - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Pensioni d'oro 2 - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Pensione minima - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Pensione gonfiata 2 - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Patto intergenerazionale - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Patrimonio di previdenza - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Patrimonio preda - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Nucleo di valutazione della spesa previdenziale - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Modello previdenziale corporativo fascista 2 - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Modello previdenziale corporativo - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Metodo di calcolo retributivo fascista - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Metodo di calcolo retributivo - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Metodo di calcolo misto - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Metodo di calcolo contributivo a capitalizzazione simulata sulla crescita - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Metodo Boffo - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Maturato previdenziale - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Mattia Persiani - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Mario Giordano - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Legge di capitalizzazione simulata sulla crescita - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Limite di sostenibilità - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Istituto nazionale di previdenza dei giornalisti italiani - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Indice di patrimonializzazione differenze tra le versioni - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Indice di beneficio relativo - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Gettito fiscale - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Gestione separata INPS - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Gennaro Migliore - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Fiscalizzazione degli oneri sociali - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Furto intergenerazionale - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Fiscalità generale - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Età per il pensionamento di vecchiaia - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Enti previdenziali - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Ente nazionale di previdenza ed assistenza dei veterinari - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Ente nazionale di previdenza e di assistenza farmacisti - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Ente nazionale di previdenza e assistenza per i consulenti del lavoro - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Diritti acquisiti - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Default dei sistemi pensionistici pubblici - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Decreto Poletti - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Decreto legislativo 30 giugno 1994, n 509.pdf
- File:Decreto legislativo 2 ottobre 1996, n 103.pdf
- File:Debito pensionistico latente - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Debito pubblico implicito - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Coorte (statistica) - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Contributo soggettivo - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Contributo integrativo - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Contributo di solidarietà - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Contributi obbligatori per le assicurazioni obbligatorie - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Contributi figurativi - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Conto economico consolidato delle amministrazioni pubbliche - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Consolidamento fiscale - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Conflitto intergenerazionale - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Coefficiente di trasformazione in rendita - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Cesare Damiano - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Cassa nazionale di previdenza ed assistenza a favore dei ragionieri e periti commerciali - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Coefficiente di rivalutazione dei redditi - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Cassa italiana di previdenza e assistenza dei geometri liberi professionisti - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Cassa nazionale del notariato - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Cassa nazionale di previdenza e assistenza dei dottori commercialisti - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Casellario centrale delle posizioni previdenziali attive - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Busta arancione - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Capitale nozionale - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Bolla previdenziale - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Associazione degli enti previdenziali privati - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Bilancio tecnico attuariale - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Assicurazioni sociali obbligatorie - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Assicurazioni sociali - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Assicurazione sociale per la vecchiaia - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Assicurazioni obbligatorie - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Assicurazione generale obbligatoria - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Anzianità contributiva - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Aliquota fiscale effettiva - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Aliquota fiscale totale - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Aliquota contributiva pensionistica effettiva - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Aliquota di rendimento - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Aliquota contributiva pensionistica di finanziamento - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Aliquota contributiva pensionistica di computo - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Aliquota contributiva pensionistica di equilibrio previdenziale - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Adeguatezza della prestazione pensionistica - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Riforma delle pensioni Fornero - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Terzo pilastro della previdenza - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Principio della discriminazione generazionale - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Primo pilastro della previdenza - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Pensioni d'oro - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Pensione gonfiata - Wikipedia.pdf
- File:Modello previdenziale corporativo fascista - Wikipedia.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Sono stampe delle voci di wikipedia, alcune già cancellate, come devo fare?--Conigliomannaro (talk) 17:02, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Il motivo per cui le ho inserite è perché in Italia wikipedia censura le leggi vigenti [2] e non voglio che spariscano da Wikipedia --Conigliomannaro (talk) 18:38, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Gli altri file invece servono per discutere le cancellazioni di voci di wikipedia che trovo del tutto pretestuose. [3]--Conigliomannaro (talk) 10:37, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: WMF archives everything that has ever appeared on WP and Commons, so separate archiving for personal purposes is not only a waste of time and computer resources, but it is contrary to policy, because it keeps things in view that have been deleted by community consent. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:02, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:05, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:05, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Viewpoint recovery centre (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text documents of questionable notability.
- File:Long-term treatment of addiction. by Viewpoint Recovery Centre.pdf
- File:Co-dependency and the family.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:05, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Not own work. Might be too simple for copyright, however It's an image and not suited to be a .pdf Josve05a (talk) 16:10, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:05, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Accidentally uploaded...didn't mean to upload. UOJComm (talk) 16:51, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:06, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Flickr-washing. Non-free images, taken from various sources and uploaded on Fickr with fake licenses. Sam Jones died in 1981 and the source uploaded in 2007. Anita O'Day - see original source: Stills from Jazz on a Summer's Day by Bert Stern, Bert Stern died in 2013. And so on and so on.
- File:Joshu Sasaki Roshi.jpg
- File:Sam Jones photo.jpg
- File:Sonny Cohn photo.jpg
- File:Lionel Hampton photo.jpg
- File:Joanne Brackeen photo.jpg
- File:Stan Getz photo.jpg
- File:Anita O'Day 1958 Newport Jazz 2.png
- File:Anita O'Day 1958 Newport Jazz.png
- File:John Brim performing.jpg
- File:Super Chikan (blues musician).jpg
- File:John Brim (blues musician).jpg
- File:Billy Branch (blues musician) 3.jpg
- File:Honeyboy Edwards (blues musician) 3.jpg
- File:Billy Branch (blues musician).jpg
- File:Muddy Waters (blues musician).jpg
- File:R.L. Burnside (blues musician) 2.jpg
- File:Arthur Big Boy Crudup (blues musician).jpg
- File:CeDell Davis (blues musician).jpg
- File:Honeyboy Edwards (blues musician).jpg
Sealle (talk) 16:53, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:07, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
No provided evidence that the uploader was the copyright holder nor that the composition or recording is in the public domain. I've reached out to the Singapore Wind Symphony's Percussion Ensemble about the matter, but have received no response. I JethroBT (talk) 16:57, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:07, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
There is already a file named "Flag of Albanian Provisional Government 1912-1914.svg" which has the same eagle. AceDouble (talk) 16:58, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:08, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 17:00, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:08, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Poor quality, unidentified subject. Buxtehude (talk) 17:01, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:08, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Copyvio (screenshot). Buxtehude (talk) 17:09, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:09, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Definitely a copyvio (non-free website claimed as PD). Also cannot be used as fair use on en.wp because it can replaced by an open source equivalent. ViperSnake151 (talk) 17:24, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:09, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING. Josve05a (talk) 17:24, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
- KeepLogo is old enough to be PD Commons:Image_casebook#Product_packaging (created in 1929) - Jiel (talk) 20:09, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
- Got any evidence of this, that the artist of the artwork has been done for more than 70 yrs? Josve05a (talk) 23:08, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
- Not but it is likely that the artwork has been done before World War II. Jiel (talk) 12:08, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
- Got any evidence of this, that the artist of the artwork has been done for more than 70 yrs? Josve05a (talk) 23:08, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: 1929 is 45 years too recent to assume that the artist has been dead for 70 years, as required in both France and Belgium. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:10, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Ida-Virumaa scans
[edit]For the following photos it seems to be the same case as with File:Ida3.jpg: scan from a tourist brochure, not own work.
Please clarify if any of these is really a scan of your own work. 193.40.10.180 17:22, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
- Indeed they are scans from brochure... Hugo.arg (talk) 09:43, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:11, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per Commons:Deletion requests/File:HK domestic refrigerator interior Baron Milk Chocolate bar n Nestle Drumstick Ice Cream n Suntory CC Lemon soft drink Sept-2013.JPG Josve05a (talk) 17:26, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:11, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING Josve05a (talk) 17:27, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:11, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING Josve05a (talk) 17:28, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:11, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING Josve05a (talk) 17:28, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:11, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING Josve05a (talk) 17:29, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:11, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING Josve05a (talk) 17:29, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:11, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING Josve05a (talk) 17:29, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:11, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING Josve05a (talk) 17:30, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
- Keep I think, The shot is not concentrated on a single packaging target. It belongs to shelf texture picture. --Benzoyl (talk) 00:58, 4 December 2014 (UTC) --Benzoyl (talk) 00:58, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: If there were a hundred items in the image, all different, then maybe Benzoyl's argument works, but there are only three, all plainily visible and all well beyond the ToO. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:13, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING Josve05a (talk) 17:31, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:13, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 17:31, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:13, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 17:31, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:13, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 17:32, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:13, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 17:32, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
- If File:Nutella-1.jpg doesn't make any problem but is used in many wikis, File:Datteln - KF2011 - Hafenstraße 10 ies.jpg shouldn't make any problem as well. -- Ies (talk) 17:46, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Both are problems. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:14, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 17:33, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
- Keep de minimis. --Ralf Roleček 22:37, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: De minimis?!? The only thing in the picture is a copyrighted package. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:15, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 17:33, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:15, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 17:33, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:15, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 17:33, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:15, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 17:34, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:15, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 17:34, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:16, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 17:35, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:16, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 17:35, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:16, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 17:35, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:16, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 17:35, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:16, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 17:35, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:16, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 17:36, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:16, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 17:38, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:16, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 17:38, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:16, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 17:38, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:16, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 17:38, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:16, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 17:38, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:16, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 17:39, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
- I went quickly over those two guidelines, and they do make sense to a certain point. Though, if we follow them strictly, how would it be possible to have pictures of such products at all, short of persuading their manufacturers / copyright owners into releasing them publicly (what will probably never happen)? At the same time, please keep in mind that this particular product comes from a country that has far, far less strict copyright laws than it's the case with the US copyright laws. Thoughts? — Dsimic (talk | contribs) 18:45, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: As a general rule, we cannot have images of modern packages on Commons, just as we cannot have pdf copies of books that are under copyright. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:18, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 17:39, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:18, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 17:39, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
- I'm not the original uploader, but I have uploaded two cropped versions that avoid the packaging to focus on the product itself. They should serve the same encyclopedic purpose. Regards, HaeB (talk) 11:12, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![243 File:Tarro de dulce de leche "La Fortinera" en Fortín Olavarría.jpg](#File:Tarro_de_dulce_de_leche_"La_Fortinera"_en_Fortín_Olavarría.jpg){kind=link}
![244 File:Tarro de dulce de leche "La Fortinera" para enviar.JPG](#File:Tarro_de_dulce_de_leche_"La_Fortinera"_para_enviar.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_3.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_3.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:18, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 17:40, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:19, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
too blurry; Ю. Данилевский (talk) 17:40, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Лягушки попали под сокращение
Что есть, то есть. Качеством не блещет. Против удаления не возражаю.--Сарапулов (talk) 17:40, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:19, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 17:41, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:19, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 17:41, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
- Keep This [4] is a Food- Packaging. But, This is useful and necessary paper. That is used to protect the hands from burger's liquid seasoning. --Benzoyl (talk) 23:44, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
- > ただ、肉汁が多いのと、包み紙に蒸されたせいか、
- > 肉汁が滝のように流れ出て、ジーンズを汚しちゃいました(^^;)。[5] --Benzoyl (talk) 00:04, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: It doesn't matter what it is -- we can't keep it without permission from the photographer of the woman shown on it. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:20, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 17:41, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:20, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 17:42, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:20, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 17:42, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Agreed. Clearly past the ToO. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:01, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:20, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 17:43, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:20, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 17:43, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:21, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 17:43, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:21, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 17:44, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:21, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 17:44, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:21, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 17:44, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:21, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 17:44, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:21, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 17:45, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:21, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 17:45, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:21, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 17:45, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:21, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 17:53, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:21, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 17:53, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:21, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
File:HK CWB Victoria Park seat Xin Wan Bao 新晚報 New Evening Newspaper free Sept-2013 VLT Vita Lemon Tea box n 陳振興 Chan Chun Hing.JPG
[edit]
Unclear copyright status // COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 17:53, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:22, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 17:54, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:22, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 17:55, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
- If File:Nutella-1.jpg doesn't make any problem but is used in many wikis, File:Datteln - KF2011 - Hafenstraße 09 ies.jpg shouldn't make any problem as well. -- Ies (talk) 18:11, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:22, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 17:55, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
- If File:Nutella-1.jpg doesn't make any problem but is used in many wikis, File:Herten - Kunsthandwerkermarkt 2011 21 ies.jpg shouldn't make any problem as well. -- Ies (talk) 18:12, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:26, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 17:55, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:26, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 17:55, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:26, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 17:56, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:26, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Dubious "own work" (13 KB, no metadata) 91.65.49.242 17:56, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:27, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 17:56, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:27, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 17:57, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:27, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 17:57, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination per COM:De minimis. Josve05a (talk) 18:36, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: How can something that is the only ting in the image, albeit six times, be de minimis? This is a clear DW of the package. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:28, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 17:57, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
- I'm confused about this. The image is not just of the artwork on the packaging, or even just the packaging itself, but of an open package displaying the contents. The illustration makes up a pretty small percentage of the image. Doesn't that count as de minimis? If not, then by all means delete it, but then a huge percentage of the images in Category:Candy (and Category:Beverages, and...) should also be deleted, not just the rare image that has been randomly placed in Category:Food packaging. I should also note that the deletion request above this one, File:Hopea Toffee.jpg, seems to meet criteria #2 (Images of logos too simple to allow copyright) in the boiler plate in Category:Food packaging. If these exceptions aren't actually legitimate, the boiler plate should be changed. Thanks for the clarification. - Illustratedjc (talk) 18:33, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
- Actually, even if that doesn't count as de minimis, then the image could be cropped instead of deleting, no? The same might apply to other images up for deletion here. File:Hanuta.jpg for example. Thanks. - Illustratedjc (talk) 18:38, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
- If you can crop it, and make it still be "educationally valuble", go ahead. Josve05a (talk) 19:20, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
- Actually, even if that doesn't count as de minimis, then the image could be cropped instead of deleting, no? The same might apply to other images up for deletion here. File:Hanuta.jpg for example. Thanks. - Illustratedjc (talk) 18:38, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Percentages aren't the issue -- the issue is, what is the principal subject of the image? If this image had only the open jar, without the lid, then it would OK from a copyright standpoint, but who would want to use it? . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:30, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 17:58, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:30, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 17:58, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:30, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 17:58, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:30, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
unused personal file 91.65.49.242 17:58, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:30, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW // Blurry Josve05a (talk) 17:59, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:30, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 18:00, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
- This is an old traditional product that's been around longer than a copyright could cover it, where is Josve05a's proof that this is currently under copyright? Cheers, Nesnad (talk) 18:15, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: On Commons the burden of proof is on the uploader to show that it is free, not the other way around. If you can show that this has been in use without change since around 1905 (Japan is p.m.a. 50), then it can be restored. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:40, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 18:00, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:41, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 18:00, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:41, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 18:00, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:41, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 18:00, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:41, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 18:01, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:41, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 18:02, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:41, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Copyright violations. The mentioned author link leads to a webpage that says "Copyright © 2014 mynewsdesk. Alle Rechte vorbehalten." What means: All rights reserved!
- File:Opel KARL (13).jpg
- File:Opel KARL (12).jpg
- File:Opel KARL (11).jpg
- File:Opel KARL (10).jpg
- File:Opel KARL (9) Interior.jpg
- File:Opel KARL (7).jpg
- File:Opel KARL (8) Interior.jpg
- File:Opel KARL (6) Interior.jpg
- File:Opel KARL (5).jpg
- File:Opel KARL (4) Interior.jpg
- File:Opel KARL (3) Interior.jpg
- File:Opel KARL (1).jpg
- File:Opel KARL (2).jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Interior.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Interior.jpg){kind=link}
_Interior.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Interior.jpg){kind=link}
_Interior.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Ies (talk) 18:03, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
- Keep @Ies: You have appearently never been at newnewsdesk. It is just like...flickr but for press releases. Where companies can add photos etc. under a CC-BY 3.0 licese (check the images, it is stated there) The (German version) saying "
Copyright © 2014 mynewsdesk. Alle Rechte vorbehalten." Basicly means that the text, interface etc. is copyrighted if nothing else is mentioned, just as Wikipedia is licensed under CC-BY-SA 3.0, but the images can have a compleatly different license. Also CC_licenses are non-revocable. Josve05a (talk) 18:07, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Kept: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:44, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 18:03, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:45, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 18:09, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:45, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
a portrait of the uploader? (unused) 91.65.49.242 18:09, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:45, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 18:09, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:45, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 18:10, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:44, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 18:10, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:44, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Dubious "own work" (17 KB, no metadata) 91.65.49.242 18:12, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:44, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 18:12, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:44, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 18:13, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
- May it help if I ask Loacker spa to provide the permission to use this picture? --MartinS (talk) 20:59, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Yes -- see OTRS. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:45, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 18:14, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:45, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 18:14, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:46, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 18:15, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:46, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 18:15, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:46, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 18:16, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:46, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 18:16, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:45, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 18:17, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
- Keep per this and that. Pinging the original photographer too for opinion. Jee 02:18, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: It's not up to the photographer -- only Ferrero, the manufacturers of Nutella, can give permission. . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:45, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW // COM:PERMISSION Josve05a (talk) 18:17, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:51, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 18:17, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:51, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 18:18, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:51, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 18:18, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:51, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 18:18, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:51, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 18:18, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:51, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 18:19, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:51, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 18:19, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:51, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 18:19, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:51, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 18:19, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:51, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 18:19, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:51, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 18:20, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:51, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 18:20, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:51, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 18:20, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:51, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 18:20, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:51, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 18:21, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:51, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 18:21, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:51, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 18:21, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:50, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 18:21, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: / . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:49, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 18:22, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: / . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:49, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 18:22, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: / . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:49, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 18:24, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: / . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:49, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 18:24, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: / . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:49, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 18:24, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: "In use" does not override copyvio. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:54, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 18:25, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:53, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 18:26, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:53, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 18:26, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:53, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 18:26, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:53, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 18:26, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:53, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 18:26, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:53, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 18:27, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:53, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 18:27, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:53, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Dubious "own work", also on this site http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=88578840 in 2008 91.65.49.242 18:16, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:53, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 18:28, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:53, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 18:28, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:53, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 18:28, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: 18:33, 3 December 2014 by Butko, closed by . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:52, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 18:29, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:55, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 18:29, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:55, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 18:29, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:55, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 18:29, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:55, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 18:30, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:55, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 18:30, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:55, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 18:30, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:55, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 18:30, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
![18:30, 3 December 2014 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2014/12/03#c-Josve05a-2014-12-03T18:30:00.000Z-File:Tarro_de_dulce_de_leche_"La_Fortinera"_en_Fortín_Olavarría.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:55, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
![13:55, 10 December 2014 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2014/12/03#c-Jameslwoodward-2014-12-10T13:55:00.000Z-File:Tarro_de_dulce_de_leche_"La_Fortinera"_en_Fortín_Olavarría.jpg){kind=link}
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 18:30, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
![18:30, 3 December 2014 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2014/12/03#c-Josve05a-2014-12-03T18:30:00.000Z-File:Tarro_de_dulce_de_leche_"La_Fortinera"_para_enviar.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:55, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
![13:55, 10 December 2014 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2014/12/03#c-Jameslwoodward-2014-12-10T13:55:00.000Z-File:Tarro_de_dulce_de_leche_"La_Fortinera"_para_enviar.JPG){kind=link}
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 18:31, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:55, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 18:31, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:55, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 18:31, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:55, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 18:32, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:55, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 18:32, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:55, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 18:32, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:55, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 18:33, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:55, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 18:33, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:55, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 18:36, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:55, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 18:36, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:55, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 18:37, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:54, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 18:37, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:54, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 18:37, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:54, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 18:37, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:54, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 18:39, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:54, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 18:39, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:54, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 18:39, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:54, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 18:41, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:54, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 18:41, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:54, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
No EXIF data, looks like a picture from the web. I think the original one is at http://www.espace-arcadien.fr/domaine.html (EXIF says it was taken in 2005). JeanBono (talk) 18:51, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:57, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 19:16, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:57, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 19:16, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:57, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 19:17, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:57, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 19:17, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:57, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 19:17, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:57, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
It's an ad! Hshook (talk) 09:19, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 19:17, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:59, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 19:20, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:59, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 19:20, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:59, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 19:20, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:59, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 19:25, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:59, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 19:26, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:59, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 19:26, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:59, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 19:27, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:59, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 19:27, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:59, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Per COM:DW. Jespinos (talk) 19:54, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:59, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Scaned. XOHANINHO in not the author. . HombreDHojalata.talk 20:03, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:59, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 19:18, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:01, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 19:18, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:01, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 19:20, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
- Yes but it is mostly text so I suggest COM:DM. --MGA73 (talk) 20:01, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: THe package as a whole has a copyright, and, of course, the text may have one also. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:00, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bassmentape (talk · contribs)
[edit]There is no evidence that uploader is the copyright holder of the images.
Jespinos (talk) 20:09, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:01, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Themistyperson (talk · contribs)
[edit]Mostly derivative works, no evidence of permissions.
- File:El pais.jpg
- File:Sky and Earth-tehran under missile attack.jpg
- File:Bam-Jassem.jpg
- File:The splendor of Iran.jpg
- File:Iran from the Sky.jpg
- File:Iranian House.jpg
- File:Time book.jpg
- File:Independent.jpg
- File:Time mag.jpg
- File:Jassem Ghazbanpour.jpg
- File:TisPublication.tif
- File:JassemGhazbanPoor.JPG
Jespinos (talk) 20:33, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:02, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tere.josue.cesar.sergio.ana (talk · contribs)
[edit]Images with uncertain copyright status.
- File:Ejercito-aleman-avanzando.jpg
- File:GUERRA PACIFICO DOS.jpg
- File:GUERRA MUNDIAL.jpg
- File:Fondoinstitucional.JPG
- File:TRATADO DE PAZ.jpg
- File:MUERTES.jpg
- File:JAPON.jpg
- File:HITLER.jpg
- File:Alemanes-segunda-guerra-mundial.jpg
- File:LA GUAERRA.jpg
Jespinos (talk) 20:50, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:03, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
There is no evidence that uploader is the copyright holder of the images.
- File:Halfgirl2.jpg
- File:Half Girlfriend Movie.jpg
- File:Premanuapedevaru.jpg
- File:Vanga srikanth2.jpg
- File:Vanga srikanth1.jpg
- File:Srikanth vanga.jpg
Jespinos (talk) 21:04, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:03, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
I want to take it off of Wikimedia Commons because it is a private logo. Stephanie at ElkayManufacturing (talk) 21:16, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Kept: THis is PD-Text Logo -- there is no copyright involved. The advice you got on WP:EN was bad, see my comment there. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:28, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Unused promotional logo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:04, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: in use now, withdrawn. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:21, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely authorship claims by likely sockpuppet of Mqbor, whose uploads have all been deleted.
- File:Gov. Quijano with President Magsaysay.jpg
- File:Gedeon and Eugenia Quijano.jpg
- File:Gardeopatra G Quijano.jpg
—LX (talk, contribs) 18:05, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
Mqbor is an old account for Mborromeo
I am requesting the following files not be deleted, because the copyright predates 1964, also these are my grandfathers pictures, in which, I've inherited these pictures.
- File:Gov. Quijano with President Magsaysay.jpg
- File:Gedeon and Eugenia Quijano.jpg
- File:Gardeopatra G Quijano.jpg
—Mborromeo (talk, contribs) 24:55, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
- Again, I do not believe that you are the author of these photos (as you have claimed on the file descriptions), and it seems unlikely that you are the copyright holder. The copyright is most likely held by the photographer or the photographer's heirs. —LX (talk, contribs) 07:04, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:29, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Not a free image Shev123 (talk) 21:31, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:30, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Source http://www.caocidadao.com.br/alexandre-e-estopinha/ is not a "public domain" or a GNU compatible site. Yanguas (talk) 21:40, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:31, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The Atomium is © SABAM/Waterkeyn's Heirs. The image violates COM:FOP#Belgium. 67.87.46.39 22:06, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:31, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Incorrect and badly drawn (my work) Maschen (talk) 22:15, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:31, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Apparently, the image is not licensed under the given license. On the top of that, the website owner is not the copyright holder of the image. Jespinos (talk) 22:19, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:32, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
This file is not own work. This file was deleted before. see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Pequeño Nicolas.jpg. Y.haruo (talk) 22:26, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:32, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Stub, duplicate of Institution:Palazzo d'Arco. Images moved to that template. PKM (talk) 22:46, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:32, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Ronhjones as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derrivitive of http://www.permaculturesydneywest.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/biofuel_conv_diagr1.jpg dated 17 September 2014 04:55:58 at http://www.permaculturesydneywest.org.au/why-use-bio-fuel-in-your-tractor/ Permaculture Sydney West 2014 - All Rights Reserved. Green Giant (talk) 07:31, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
From the file talk page @Ronhjones: I don't think it's copyrighted, because it's {{PD-USgov}} work according to ScienceDaily "Credit: Photo courtesy of U.S. Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute" Thibaut120094 (talk) 00:07, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by Fastily. Yann (talk) 16:27, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Plain commercial advertisement, out of project scope (Examples of files that are not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Advertising or self-promotion.) Ies (talk) 08:32, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by Steinsplitter. Yann (talk) 16:28, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
No evidence of permission. Buxtehude (talk) 14:34, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 16:29, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
and other uploads by KiranKunwar07 (talk · contribs). Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document and books with questionable copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by Krd. Yann (talk) 16:29, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
non free logo; copy from http://somoysangbad.com/ Aftab (talk) 14:42, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo. Yann (talk) 16:30, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:ADVERT PrayforLasVegas (talk) 20:53, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:48, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
wrong awry bond Kopiersperre (talk) 16:18, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Ed (Edgar181) 17:41, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
very small, better svg version (File:2,2,2-trichloroacetyl chloride 200.svg) Kopiersperre (talk) 16:21, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Ed (Edgar181) 17:41, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
very small, better svg version (File:Parafuchsin.svg) Kopiersperre (talk) 16:25, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Ed (Edgar181) 17:41, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal files. There is only user contribution.
Ю. Данилевский (talk) 16:50, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 16:46, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Badonviller - U.S. Marine Band.ogg, without description and with incorrect copyright information. Not nominated for speedy deletion because I can't say which file is technically superior. rimshottalk 18:47, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
- Dear Rimshot,
- Mmmm, I'm afraid there is another Naor active who has uploaded this particular file as I can't remember to have uploaded this one. Anyway, I'm not quite unfamiliar with the topic at hand (the Badenweiler) and even have a certain sympathy towards it, but as far as I'm entitled to an opinion because of the reasons mentioned before, I share your opinion that deletion is an option, as long as the ogg-file stays active. So, if the ogg-file has better credits and metadata, let's keep that one. I agree there is no real distinguishable difference in quality between the two. Hope I've been of some help... Naor (talk) 20:05, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Not the same format. Description and license fixed. Yann (talk) 16:47, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by PereslavlFoto as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: Low quality copy of File:P-bychkov-iv-6246-smile.jpg Yann (talk) 08:07, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
- This one is better. Yann (talk) 08:08, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Kept: in scope. Steinsplitter (talk) 19:39, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by PereslavlFoto as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: Low quality copy of File:P-kalyaev-ia-6363-smile.jpg Yann (talk) 08:07, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
- This one is better. Yann (talk) 08:08, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Kept: in scope Steinsplitter (talk) 19:39, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:NBC logos
[edit]These logos do not consist solely of simple geometric shapes. They contains complex shadings and bevels which are not present in the plain version of the NBC logo (previously discussed at Commons:Deletion requests/File:MSNBC 2008 logo.svg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:MSNBC logo.png) and which rise above the threshold of originality. They differ from File:NBC logo.svg in the same way that Windows logo - 2006.svg differs from Microsoft Windows logo (Pre-XP).svg.
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- File:27 KSNT logo.png – was clearly marked as non-free on English Wikipedia according to the original upload log, so it should never have been transferred here
- File:Beartooth NBC, Great Falls, MT.jpg – the non-free logo is the primary subject of this photo, and no freedom of panorama exception applies, so this is an unauthorized derivative of said non-free logo
- File:Nbcnewyourknewlogo2011.png – based on File:NBC logo 2011.png according to the file description page; that file has been deleted from Commons on copyright grounds
- File:NBCSN 2013 Trans.png – in addition to the copyright issues, this was a COM:OVERWRITE violation by Corkythehornetfan. Please retain the original version.
—LX (talk, contribs) 18:45, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 19:41, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:Aibo
[edit]The Aibo robotic toy dog, which is copyrightable in the US (where Commons is hosted), is shown prominently and is the main subject in these photos.
- File:Aibo (Ponferrada).jpg
- File:AIBO ERS-210.jpg
- File:AIBO ERS-7 with exposed internal circuitry.jpg
- File:AIBO ERS-7M3 (1).JPG
- File:AIBO ERS111 1.jpg
- File:AIBO ERS111 2.jpg
- File:AIBO ERS111 210.jpg
- File:AIBO ERS210 1.jpg
- File:AIBO ERS210 2.jpg
- File:Aibo img 0807 bg.jpg
- File:Aibo img 0807 transp.png
- File:Aibo img 0807.jpg
- File:Aibo img 0809.jpg
- File:Aibo img 0811.jpg
- File:Aibo img 0812.jpg
- File:Aibo img 0813.jpg
- File:AIBO Prototype.jpg
- File:Aibo-zoom.jpg
- File:AIBO.JPG
- File:Aibo1.jpg
- File:AiboKids.jpg
- File:Galileomobil Roboter1.jpg
- File:Robot dog.jpg
- File:Schuss!!.jpg
- File:WW Aibo.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Gazebo (talk) 09:18, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
This seems like a very silly deletion request. Antiquated mass market electronic appliances/toys are being flagged as if they were unique works of art. The same argument would apply to other good looking toys and appliances such as Apple II, Roomba, Treo, Furby etc etc Yet photos of all these are established as fair use in Wikis.
Kaffiend (talk)
- Well it does. See COM:TOYS. Rama (talk) 10:15, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks. That applies specifically to toys, so addresses the Furby case but not the others. Is Aibo a toy? Probably not. They were marketed as entertainment robots, and were not sold through toy distrubutors. They were also used extensively for robotics research, and their programming capability for consumers was a highprofile feature. Together, these suggest that they were represented by the maker as robotic appliances, not as toys. Is the initial request tied into the 'toy' argument? If so, that wasn't clear to me and I hope it is now addressed. 06:45, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
- Looking at IP Frontiers article cited in COM:TOYS, it seems a relevant aspect defining toys is that they are not "useful articles”, specifically "toys do not have an intrinsic function other than the portrayal of the real item and are therefore, not useful and are protectable by copyright". Under this criteria, Aibo is not a toy because it is a useful item and not merely a representation of one, and therefore it is not protected by copyright.
- This advice isn't documented or refers to applicable law. To browse texts to find excuses to keep the media, instead of performing an objective assessment of the situation, is probably one of the worst road we could take. The goal is not to keep images at all costs, but to warrant third party users we've done a maximum to ensure everything is in public domain or under free licenses, without infringing any rights. --Dereckson (talk) 08:33, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
- Looking at IP Frontiers article cited in COM:TOYS, it seems a relevant aspect defining toys is that they are not "useful articles”, specifically "toys do not have an intrinsic function other than the portrayal of the real item and are therefore, not useful and are protectable by copyright". Under this criteria, Aibo is not a toy because it is a useful item and not merely a representation of one, and therefore it is not protected by copyright.
- Thanks. That applies specifically to toys, so addresses the Furby case but not the others. Is Aibo a toy? Probably not. They were marketed as entertainment robots, and were not sold through toy distrubutors. They were also used extensively for robotics research, and their programming capability for consumers was a highprofile feature. Together, these suggest that they were represented by the maker as robotic appliances, not as toys. Is the initial request tied into the 'toy' argument? If so, that wasn't clear to me and I hope it is now addressed. 06:45, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
Kaffiend, I understand your desire to keep these images, and I truely sympathise. However, coming from the same spot as you, I would seriously advise against investing yourself emotionally in the defence of images in such situations. We have to make do with the US system of law, which is in some respect quite dysfunctional. This is a given against which there is nothing we can do, and we really are not the worst victims anyway. The silver lining is that this is a win-win situation for us: when the images are kept we are progressing in our aim of a Free encyclopedia and Free culture; when the images are deleted because of ridiculous laws, we are exposing the ridicule. The only bad outcome would be keeping images in spite of the law, as this would give credit to the notion that you can have a dysfunctional legal system without suffering consequences. Rama (talk) 08:48, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
The deletion request currently asserts copyright holds, but doesn't give any argument for that claim. The only argument put forward in these discussion so far is the TOY one, which doesn't seem relevant on close reading. Is there some other reason for believing copyright holds, or is there any belief by editors that TOY does hold? 10:35, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
- I believe, and I think that it is also the view of Gazebo, that the TOY thing applies. The main purpose of Aibo is amusement, arguably making it a toy; their use in research does not change that fact, a bit like Lego being used in research.
- Again, this state of affairs does not please me any more than you, but we have to deal with an essentially technical criterion as to whether a clause can apply or not -- not whether we think it should or is desirable. Rama (talk) 11:46, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
- Clearly COM:TOYS has to have limits so that we can decide what is a toy and what is not. Some things will be clearly toys, and some things like Aibo are less obvious. Our own gut feel about whether it is a toy seems irrelevant, and so does the assertion that "the main purpose of Aibo is amusement, arguably making it a toy". What we need is a definition that clarifies the importance of intended purpose, actual use, marketing and other criteria. In the absence of a clear line of reaosning that establishes Aibo as a toy, on such criteria, it is not appropriate to be destroying Wikicommons content of value to others. If there are deletion guidelines that recommend differently to that, please raise them. I did take the time to read the TOYS guidelines and the readily available sources and described what was found earlier, which seems to immediately dispel the TOYS argument. A counter argument needs to have similar or deeper foundations. 14:07, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
- I'd further note that the ONLY citation in COM:TOYS that seems to deal with a definition is one the one that I mentioned, and the one that would appear to categorically dispel any categorisation of AIBO as a toy (irrespective of our subjective views). To continue a quote on the relevant section 'The [relevant] case did not settle the usefulness issue for all toys. For example, toy stunt plane launchers were found “useful” by a district court because launchers launch toys into the air, which, this court reasoned, is a “use” beyond just portraying a real item'. Usefulness seems to immediately quash copyright in this one article which forms the basis for COM:TOYS, and clearly AIBO were functionality beyond portrayal, and had widespread use as programming tools, research units, home survellance devices etc 14:32, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
- You are quite right that it is not obvious and that our opinions are not central. The thing is that in such a case, the conjunction of COM:TOYS and Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle will have the files deleted by default. To retain them, we should be able to prove that the Aibo is not a toy, for which I am not optimistic. Rama (talk) 16:18, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
- Comment I can't say that I completely believe Aibo is not a toy. Just as uploader one of the images want to note that Aibo had significant scientific propose and it is what I know it for. Poster of Robocup 2006 competitions was mainly depicting an Aibo and Aibo was known for its programmability which I believe it makes it beyond being a toy. −ebraminiotalk 18:20, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
- Rama, I appreciate your engagement, but disagree with your current thinking. There doesn't seem to be an argument that Aibo is a toy in the meaning of US Copyright. At the moment having looked at the Wikipedia policy, and the cited article, Aibo doesn't fit into the definition, so the policy does not apply. There's no real ambiguity about that. Thank you for pointing me to the precautionary principle.
- Earlier, the argument is raised that the 'main purpose of Aibo is amusement'. That is not a criteria that seems to be relevant or even discussed in Wikipedia policy or its cited articles. If you believe it is a relevant criteria, then there should be a discussion at the policy page about why coverage should be extended, not on a specific outlying deletion request. It does seem that the policy is currently weak because of a lack of clear definition. Kaffiend (talk) 03:03, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Even if we say that the Aibo is not a toy, it still has a copyright as sculpture. The fact that a work may be useful does not preclude copyright for features that do not contribute to its usefulness. And, by the way, the USCO agrees with me. "Aibo robotic dog" appears as sculpture with registration number VA0000998988. Any discussion of a post 1978 mass produced object should always include a search at http://www.copyright.gov/records/, particularly in cases like this where the name is unusual enough so that only a limited number of records will appear. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:54, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Toys are generally seen as utilitarian objects by Japanese courts and are therefore usually ineligible for copyright in Japan. However, as seen in Hasbro Bradley, Inc. v. Sparkle Toys, Inc., U.S. courts pay no attention to this and Japanese toys are therefore copyrighted in the United States, where toys are not considered to be utilitarian objects. --Stefan4 (talk) 15:22, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete most of photos, but Keep File:AEC-robots.jpg, File:AIBO ERS-7 following pink ball held by child.jpg, and File:Aibos playing football at Robocup 2005.jpg per de minimis because there are people in the photos. I'm unsure about File:WW Aibo.jpg. --George Ho (talk) 01:16, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
- Stefan4: The guidelines and that case are that utilitarian toys are not 'toys' for the purpose of receiving copyright protection. That's different to what you wrote, that toys are not utilitarian objects and receive copyright protection. In this case, even if you think AIBO is a toy, it is a utilitarian toy, and therefore the TOYS argument for copyright is not relevant in this case. Kaffiend (talk) 10:51, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
- In terms of copyright as a sculpture, I think that is a very different argument for deletion than the TOYS argument that is this deletion request. Can I propose that we leave such other arguments for other deletion requests and focus on the TOYS argument in this one? It's already complicated enough with the overlap of Japanese and US jurisdiction, uncertainty about what constitutes a toy, and about what makes a toy utilitarian in terms of protection from copyright. I hope that we can conclude at this point that upon reading the TOYS guidelines, they are not relevant to this case, and no deletion should occur on that basis. Kaffiend (talk) 10:51, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
Kaffiend It takes a certain level of arrogance to come here with 49 edits on Commons and 349 on WMF as a whole and tell several highly experienced editors that they don't understand US copyright law. However, that arrogance rises to an extreme when you argue that the US Copyright Office was wrong when it registered this copyright. Do you really expect Commons to keep these images based on your opinion when it goes against the USCO registration?
You are also wrong to try to separate toys from sculpture. There are only eight categories of copyright in the USA, see 17 USC 102:
- (1) literary works;
- (2) musical works, including any accompanying words;
- (3) dramatic works, including any accompanying music;
- (4) pantomimes and choreographic works;
- (5) pictorial, graphic, and sculptural works;
- (6) motion pictures and other audiovisual works;
- (7) sound recordings; and
- (8) architectural works.
Just as computer software has copyright as "literary works", so toys have copyright as "pictorial, graphic, and sculptural works". Except for actual buildings, all 3D copyrighted works have copyright as sculpture.
Further, as I noted above, even works that are primarily utilitarian can have a copyright as sculpture if their shape is not an essential part of their utility.
- "Such works shall include works of artistic craftsmanship insofar as their form but not their mechanical or utilitarian aspects are concerned; the design of a useful article, as defined in this section, shall be considered a pictorial, graphic, or sculptural work only if, and only to the extent that, such design incorporates pictorial, graphic, or sculptural features that can be identified separately from, and are capable of existing independently of, the utilitarian aspects of the article." 17 USC 101
Clearly the stylized canine shape of the Aibo is separable from any utility it might have. That is, presumably, the basis of USCO decision to register the copyright. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:44, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
Jameslwoodward Jim, personal attacks are not welcome. I was invited to contribute, and claim only to have carefully read the the commons guidelines on toys. Commons policy does differentiate on the basis of toys, and that is the core of this deletion request. I don't claim to understand US copyright law, and I suspect few can make such a claim honestly. If you believe the commons guidelines are out of tune with US copyright law, which is what you seem to be saying, then argue for a change to the guidelines. A proposal to change the guidelines in the way you favour is sure to attract expertise, and you can engage and debate with experts. It is not cool to intimidate members of the broad user base who are making honest contributions and seeking to apply existing policy as it stands. If you believe there are reasons to delete these works other than because they are copyright according to the toys section, then go ahead and start another deletion request on that topic.
You also seem to have a difference of opinion with the US Copyright Office on what they do. Their view, described in Circular 1, is "copyright registration is a legal formality intended to make a public record of the basic facts of a particular copyright". They make no assessment, as you erroneously assert above. It also seems unclear to what extent a 1999 copyright for a robot dog would also cover subsequent model AIBOs, AIBO robot cats and so forth which are parts of this deletion request. Kaffiend (talk) 14:02, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
- Copyright is not subject to registration, it is an automatic right (per the Berne convention). In general, every time we have doubt on a point or when something is unclear, we are bound to assume the worse. Hence the cautious opinions you can see here. Rama (talk) 17:09, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
- Rama is entirely correct that copyright is automatic, and that registration is not required. It is, however desirable precisely because the Copyright Office does, in fact, assess the validity of every application for registration:
- "(a) When, after examination, the Register of Copyrights determines that, in accordance with the provisions of this title, the material deposited constitutes copyrightable subject matter and that the other legal and formal requirements of this title have been met, the Register shall register the claim and issue to the applicant a certificate of registration under the seal of the Copyright Office. The certificate shall contain the information given in the application, together with the number and effective date of the registration.
- (b) In any case in which the Register of Copyrights determines that, in accordance with the provisions of this title, the material deposited does not constitute copyrightable subject matter or that the claim is invalid for any other reason, the Register shall refuse registration and shall notify the applicant in writing of the reasons for such refusal." 17 USC 410
- Rama is entirely correct that copyright is automatic, and that registration is not required. It is, however desirable precisely because the Copyright Office does, in fact, assess the validity of every application for registration:
- I am sorry that you object to being called arrogant, but I object when someone who has little experience on Commons and who says "I don't claim to understand US copyright law" comes here and spends a great deal of our time defending images of objects that clearly are validly copyrighted as sculptures and which, in at least one case, have a registered copyright. You then went on to assert something that also was not correct -- the law clearly states that the Registrar of Copyrights makes a determination in every case. None of this is helpful.
- Again, the discussion of whether or not these are toys is completely irrelevant. Toys do not have copyrights as toys, they have copyrights as sculpture. Since the forms that Sony made for these works are clearly creative works -- stylized sculptured animals -- and the forms are clearly separable from their function as robots, the fact that they may or may not be useful as robots is entirely irrelevant. Their exterior appearance far exceeds the requirements for copyright and that is all that the Copyright Act requires -- see 17 USC 101 quoted above. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:33, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
- Jameslwoodward, you are not addressing the arguments I've made. You are simply (1) asserting that your own knowledge of US Copyright over-rides commons guidelines and (2) proposing new reasons to delete material that are beyond the scope of this deletion request. This claim is about COM:TOYS, the guidelines have a specific section on toys, and yet you write "discussion of whether or not these are toys is completely irrelevant." Unlike me, you have not addressed commons guidelines (only your own view law of practice), and you have not proposed a new deletion requst that is in accordance with commons guidelines and would allow a proper revew on the relevant criteria.
- It may be that your actions here are typically unreviewed, and it is only a small number of requests that are properly defended and subject to proper scrutiny. I think you should appreciate the time and effort from editors that are bold enough to take the time to uphold wiki principles and do so, and to give some consideration that arguments may be valid rather than play armchair expert, prosecutor and judge in one. Having attended Wikimania, I know contributions like mine are more than welcome to try to mitigate the problems identifed with current culture and practices.
- In terms of the Copyright Office claim, I am not convinced by what you write, but that is really not relevant to most of the material in discussion here. My reading agrees with Rama in that copyright exists independently of anything that happens at the copyright office. If you want to claim that a CO record is meaningful, I honestly think you should assert the importance of the CO for the guidelines and receive expert guidance. Kaffiend (talk) 02:52, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
- Sorry for interjecting again, but Kaffiend, you seem to put the burden of the proof on the side of image deletion; this reflex would be appropriate in the case of a criminal procedure, but this is not it. Here, the burden of proof is on the side of defence, and doubt is an argument for deletion. Our images are guilty until proven innocent; it is a bit disorienting at first, but the strength of Commons rests on this principle -- we want to offer the strongest possible guarantees to our users that they will not run into legal trouble for using our images. Rama (talk) 05:48, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks Rama Yes, the guidelines are clear with respect to the burden, as you say. I hope the burden of proof has been attained for these images with respect to the COM:TOYS argument.
- For other arguments, I'd like to have a fair chance to review the relevant guidelines and respond. It would make more sense for them to be in separate deletion requests rather than this one, in my opinion. They should also specify the concern with reference to the relevant guidelines. An argument on the basis of authority by an "experienced editor" or on the basis of US law, where such law has already been interpreted for the Wiki guidelines, is not helpful nor in the spirit of Wikis. Kaffiend (talk) 08:09, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
- In terms of the bigger picture and what will be achieved, I think there are several things. We have an inconsistency where other non-useless (utilitarian) robots of stylised design have unchallenged derivative works on the commons [[6]], [[7]], [[8]] and it will be helpful to establish why there is this differential status. It also appears there is live debate in the Wiki policy area on whether US copyright does apply across the commons. Should Commons policy change as the outcome of that debate, clarity of decision making now should help with reviewing the status of these images. Kaffiend (talk) 08:57, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
- Sorry for interjecting again, but Kaffiend, you seem to put the burden of the proof on the side of image deletion; this reflex would be appropriate in the case of a criminal procedure, but this is not it. Here, the burden of proof is on the side of defence, and doubt is an argument for deletion. Our images are guilty until proven innocent; it is a bit disorienting at first, but the strength of Commons rests on this principle -- we want to offer the strongest possible guarantees to our users that they will not run into legal trouble for using our images. Rama (talk) 05:48, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
- In terms of the Copyright Office claim, I am not convinced by what you write, but that is really not relevant to most of the material in discussion here. My reading agrees with Rama in that copyright exists independently of anything that happens at the copyright office. If you want to claim that a CO record is meaningful, I honestly think you should assert the importance of the CO for the guidelines and receive expert guidance. Kaffiend (talk) 02:52, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
I'm running out of steam here. I don't see how you can say:
- "In terms of the Copyright Office claim, I am not convinced by what you write"
I didn't write the law quoted above, Congress did. It's perfectly clear that a registered copyright is prima facie evidence that a copyright is valid. Copyright Basics, which you quoted above out of context, says exactly that on page seven.
As for the fact that you believe that the Commons guidelines (which ones, specifically?) don't deal correctly with the US law on this subject, please remember that the guidelines on whether or not something is copyrightable are written generally, to cover the law in all nations. The law on utilitarian objects varies widely from country to country. That's true in this case -- toys have no copyright in Japan. But even granting the guidelines are wrong, that is not a reason to ignore the law, as you seem to suggest. It may be a reason to change the guideline.
Your suggestion that somehow the issues here need a separate DR has no basis in Commons practice. A DR considers all of the aspects of an image. See COM:Deletion requests.
The concept of separability (see the quote from 17 USC 101 above) applies to two of the robots you mention and perhaps the third -- Roomba and Ultimaker do not have a copyright as sculpture because their shape is not clearly separable from their function. ASIMO is not as clear a case, but since it is intended to be a humanoid robot, I suspect that it, too, would not pass the separability test. On the other hand, the various shapes of Aibo are stylized animals and have nothing to do with their functions as robots.
Also, the fact that WP:Other stuff exists is never a valid argument on Commons. We have more than 24 million images here. My best guess is that at least one percent, almost a quarter of a million images, should be deleted for copyvio or other reasons, but we simply don't have enough volunteer staff to do the work. If you think that other images have the same problems as these, by all means tag them with {{Delete}}, but don't argue that they are a reason to keep these. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:21, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: As per Jim Natuur12 (talk) 21:50, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
Historical pictures with unclear copyright status. Not own work, of course.
- File:Мирон Черепанов.jpg
- File:Ефим Черепанов.jpg
- File:Довгопол В.И..jpg
- File:Ф. Р. Козлов. Вторая половина 1950-х годов.jpg
- File:Довгопол В.И. 1970-е гг..jpg
- File:Довгопол В.И. 1970 г..jpg
- File:Кириченко Алексей Илларионович.jpg
- File:Николаев Э.К..tif
- File:Борисов А.В.-2.TIF
- File:Мехренцев А.А..tif
- File:Минеев Б.И..tif
Juggler2005 (talk) 14:09, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
The user admitted that he neither the author nor the copyright holder of these pictures: [9] (in Russian). --Juggler2005 (talk) 11:23, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:46, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
Historical pictures with unclear copyright status. Dubious own work.
- File:Борисов А.В..TIF
- File:Власов В.М..tif
- File:Николаев К.К..tif
- File:Член Президиума ЦК КПСС Ф.Р. Козлов.jpg
- File:А. Б. Аристов. Вторая половина 1930-х гг..jpg
- File:Столяр А.Я..tif
- File:Кабаков И.Д..tif
- File:Чрезвычайный и полномочный посол А.Б. Аристов. Конец 1960-х гг..tif
- File:Аристов А.Б. 1957 г..jpg
Juggler2005 (talk) 09:24, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
The uploader said [10]:
"File:Мирон Черепанов.jpg, File:Ефим Черепанов.jpg, так и все остальные иллюстрации на странице "Историко-технический музей «Дом Черепановых»" находятся в распоряжении данного музея (были выполнены по заказу музея, либо самими сотрудниками музея), и переданы мне действующим директором данного музея Ставцевым Евгением Михайловичем специально для размещения в Википедии".
"File: Myron Cherepanov.jpg, File: Efim Cherepanov.jpg and all other images on the page w:ru:Историко-технический музей «Дом Черепановых» are at the disposal of the museum (they were executed by order of the museum or by employees of the museum) and given to me by the current director of the museum Stavtsev Evgeniy Mikhaylovich."
The authors of these photos are Stavtsev Evgeniy Mikhaylovich and/or employees of the museum, not the uploader.
- File:Телевизор КВН, 1949 г..jpg
- File:Радиола Урал-57, 1956 г..jpg
- File:Магнитофонная приставка МП-1, 1955 г..jpg
- File:Полевой телефонный коммутатор, 1960-70-е гг..jpg
- File:Фрагмент телефонного коммутатора, 1960-е гг..jpg
- File:Фонограф Эдисона, 1894 г. Фото Е.Ставцева.JPG
- File:Измерительные и чертёжные приборы XIX в. Фото Е.Ставцева.JPG
- File:Кабинет крепостного инженера XIX в. Фото Е.Ставцева.JPG
- File:Граммофон, 1890-е гг..jpg
- File:Модель паровой машины И.И.Ползунова.jpg
- File:Телеграфный аппарат системы Сименса, 1920-30-е гг..jpg
- File:Макет второго паровоза Черепановых.JPG
- File:Макет Уральской железной дороги. Станция. Автор В.Токарев.JPG
- File:Асторономические часы Е.Г.Кузнецова, 1775 г..jpg
- File:Макет первого паровоза Черепановых на усадьбе музея.jpg
- File:Дом Черепановых в Нижнем Тагиле.JPG
Juggler2005 (talk) 09:43, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 21:55, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
File:Causas de incendios investigados por las BRIPAS en el Principado de Asturias en el período 2002-2012.jpg
[edit]
No me gusta como ha quedado. Voy a añadir una versión mejorada Zamast (talk) 09:54, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader requested Natuur12 (talk) 22:09, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Nikthestunned as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: F4: Not a reviewer but this is under the CC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR license, per the linked page, which doesn't allow commercial use. : It also has CC BY tag: See also User talk:-revi#LR question — revimsg 11:52, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Kept: I'm keeping this for now since I'm familiar with the case, and it involves a large set of images, but if the blog owner doesn't remove the NC-ND soon, all of these images will have to be failed/deleted. INeverCry 03:02, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Josve05a as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Posted to source as cc-by-nc. Non-commercial restriction is not allowed on Commons. Josve05a (talk) 13:27, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete When I found this image it was licensed under CC-BY, but now the license of this image has been changed to as you said. I don't think to cross the blog owner's will. --Puramyun31 (talk) 15:00, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 21:56, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Andrei Marian Moga (talk · contribs)
[edit]These are the only uploads of this new user. There are three problems here.
- First, is he a notable artist or are the works out of scope? The only information on that is that the WP:RO page https://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artist_Andrei_Marian_Moga has been deleted for lack of notability.
- Second, is the uploader actually the artist and are all the paintings shown in all the images actually his own work?
- Third, two of the images have a young man in them, presumably the artist. If our uploader is, in fact, the artist, then he cannot be the photographer in those two cases and the two images cannot be "own work" as claimed.
Therefore, in order to keep these, we will first need evidence that the artist meets the WP standards for notability. That probably means that we should delete the images unless the WP:RO article is restored.
If we decide that these images are not out of scope for lack of notability, then we will need a free license from the artist using OTRS and a separate free license from the photographer of the two images that include the artist, also using OTRS.
- File:Expozitie.jpg
- File:Peisaj de toamna Romanian autumn landscape.jpg
- File:Catedrala din Timisoara The Cathedral from Timisoara.jpg
- File:Noua Ordine Globala New world order.jpg
- File:Catre targ Romanian theme trespassing.jpg
- File:La una din expozitii One of my exibition.jpg
- File:Pt site14.jpg
. Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:26, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 21:57, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
Is not the Coat of arms of Padrón.--Dodro (talk) 15:27, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Not a valid reason for deletion Natuur12 (talk) 21:58, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
Missing source link, no evidence of permission - source website thecompetitionworld.com operates under "all rights reserved", (also watermark needs removal after check) GermanJoe (talk) 14:09, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
- Image source is [11], which only allows "personal educational" aka non-commercial usage (thanks for the find, John). GermanJoe (talk) 16:01, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Kept: License OK at source now. Yann (talk) 09:54, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Uploader provided a de-watermarked version at File:Distribution of Local Winds over the world.gif. This file is an unused, exact obsolete copy of the map itself (cropped border, watermark). GermanJoe (talk) 16:31, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
- OK, not an "exact" copy, but all relevant elements of the old map are still included. GermanJoe (talk) 16:33, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Gaming the system. No reason to delete this file. Natuur12 (talk) 22:08, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
The previous "keep" was based on a misunderstanding. The copyright owner voluntarily removed the watermark and provided a new file (under a different name). This request does not infringe on his rights but is a simple cleanup. See User_talk:Natuur12#Your_comment_at_DR for more info. GermanJoe (talk) 23:25, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted. Just a simple misunderstanding. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 14:06, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
Missing source link, no evidence of permission - source website thecompetitionworld.com operates under "all rights reserved", (also watermark needs removal after check) GermanJoe (talk) 14:12, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
- Image source is [12], which only allows "personal educational" aka non-commercial usage (thanks for the find, John). GermanJoe (talk) 16:03, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Kept: License OK at source now. Yann (talk) 09:57, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Exact unused copy of de-watermarked new version File:Land and Sea Breezes.gif. GermanJoe (talk) 16:35, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Gaming the system. No reason to delete this file. Natuur12 (talk) 22:08, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
The previous "keep" was based on a misunderstanding. The copyright owner voluntarily removed the watermark and provided a new file (under a different name). This request does not infringe on his rights but is a simple cleanup. See User_talk:Natuur12#Your_comment_at_DR for more info. GermanJoe (talk) 23:26, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted. Just a simple misunderstanding. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 14:06, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
Violates copyright, see http://www.digitimes.com.tw/tw/showimg.asp?source=0000303849_JUP7TMCB5TBCGC81C03T6&filename=303849-1-C03T6.jpg&Sourcetype=1 578985s (talk) 16:41, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 22:06, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
I doubt very much that this is a selfie, so the claim of "own work" is probably not correct. This is the only upload of a new user who created a User page and gallery that both violated COM:ADVERT. They are now deleted. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:49, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
- This is a picture of me I paid to have taken. I was trying to attach it to my user name. Help me understand what I did incorrectly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2606:a000:eee1:b300:3057:c20:b542:903c (talk • contribs) 22:11, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
- Several things:
- First, you claimed that the image was "own work" when you admit above that it is not. While we generally assume good faith -- that users do not lie to us -- when it is obvious that a claim is not correct, we take action.
- Second, with both your User Page and the gallery you created, you tried to use Commons for self promotion, in direct violation of COM:ADVERT.
- In almost all countries, including the United States, paying for a portrait does not give you the copyright unless there is an explicit work for hire agreement. Most portrait photographers retain copyright because selling multiple copies is a way to make money. Unless you have purchased the copyright from the photographer in writing, in order to keep the image on Commons the photographer will have to license it, see OTRS.
- Of course, since both Commons and WP:EN prohibit self promotion, you may not want to bother to keep this image on Commons. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:48, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 21:58, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 78.192.100.247 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: As indicated by the absence of metadata However, lack of metadata is not a speedy deletion reason. However the small size indicates it may be a copy but I cannot find anything on Google. The image needs more discussion. Green Giant (talk) 21:57, 3 December 2014 (UTC) Also the following files uploaded by the same user and tagged as possible copyvios:
Kept: The nom (and with nom I don't mean Green Giant of course) has to provide some better argument. Natuur12 (talk) 22:00, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
This image was obviously not taken by the FBI as claimed since the FBI never had custody of Bin Laden. The FBI is well known to ignore copyright in using images of wanted people and this is certainly one of those cases. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:42, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
- It has been used by the U.S Department of Defense as far back as 2001, during the invasion of Afghanistan in the form of a leaflet [13], meaning that the U.S government undoubtedly have copyright over the image, being the first known and therefore original publishers. The FBI have used it since 1999. No copyright tag is even present on the image. StanTheMan87 (talk) 12:23, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
- That may well be, but governments are notorious for using whatever image they can get for wanted people. As I said, the FBI certainly didn't take this image and I doubt very much that any other Federal employee did. In order to keep it, you must show who actually took the photo and that he or she has licensed it appropriately. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:12, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
- I found this image on the Associated Press website [14], which is very similar to the FBI version [15] though the latter has been cropped, enhanced and de-colorized. The image was apparently taken in Afghanistan of April 1998 and the author is listed as "Anonymous". However, it is listed as being uploaded on the 2nd of May 2011, 12 years after the FBI first used it, and 9 years after the Department of Defense produced it in Afghanistan as a wanted poster. I also found the same image, this time with the color and enhancement, but it is cited as being from Reuters [16] and then the same image cited as being from the Associated Press [17]. It is clear that an Associate Press or Reuters photographer/journalist did not take this image, as it was obviously from some unknown al-Qaeda operative or associate to Osama bin Laden. If the image doesn't have a verifiable author and was taken in Afghanistan and first produced there, wouldn't that make in the the Public-Domain according to the United States? StanTheMan87 (talk) 10:43, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
- You are correct that if the image were taken in Afghanistan in the 1990s and first published there, that it would be PD. However, it is up to you to prove that that is the case. It seems to me much more likely that it was first published outside of Afghanistan. The fact that the author is unknown does not affect the copyright in the short term in most countries -- that is, in most countries an image with an unknown author may have a shorter copyright, but it will still be more than 15 or 20 years. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:05, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
- I wish the U.S could take pictures of everything, and then all images would be in the public domain. It appears that it was taken in Afghanistan, at least according to the Associated Press [18]. The U.S. did officially publish it in Afghanistan when they distributed the leaflets and posters with that image on it in September 2002, thereby making it accessible to the public for public use. Here is the proof [19]. To save you time from scrolling throughout the page, it's the 19th and 22nd image used by the U.S Department of Defense during Operation Enduring Freedom. StanTheMan87 (talk) 11:50, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
- While, as you say, the US apparently published it in Afghanistan in 2002, that does not say anything about when and where it was first published. That's the key to its copyright status. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:55, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
- I don't follow. I don't wish to sound ignorant, but I found another source which is easier to navigate [20]. This shows the leaflet containing the Osama bin Laden image in Afghanistan, and as stated, were held by an Afghan on November 27th 2001 which proves it was published there. StanTheMan87 (talk) 12:16, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
Keep- The image was first published in the country of origin, Afghanistan when the U.S Department of Defense produced material with that image printed on it for the civilian population of Afghanistan to use. The source [21] states it was held by an Afghan on November 27th 2001, which is the first recorded publishing of the image. The image was taken in April 1998, and Osama bin Laden was based out of Afghanistan during that period. The AP source [22], cites the location as Afghanistan, lists the photographer as anonymous and was only uploaded to the AP archive in 2009, in contrast to this photo which has been in use by the FBI since November 2001 [23] which was the month and year of first publication [24]. StanTheMan87 (talk) 11:18, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
Kept: No real doubt that it was first published in Afghanistan, probably by the US gov. Yann (talk) 15:33, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
No explanation as to what the statement "No real doubt that it was first published in Afghanistan" has to do with the copyright status. {{PD-Afghanistan}} requires publication more than 50 years ago. Where was this published more than 50 years ago? Stefan4 (talk) 01:48, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
- Again, you fail to demonstrate that you have even read the license in use. I suggest you start there, before listing the files I upload for deletion. StanTheMan87 (talk) 07:22, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Procedural closure. Reopening without new information. Yann (talk) 09:33, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
Found this image here on the Associated Press website which states that it was submitted in 1998 [25]. This is before the FBI used it in 1999. Unsure whether this constitutes as being 'published' material or not, However, it is blatantly obvious that the Associated Press did not take this image of bin Laden, but they must have got it from some source, some how, so I don't know if it is allowed on Commons. StanMan87 (talk) 00:02, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
- AP site was failing for me (from the UK), however this Archive version works. --Fæ (talk) 00:08, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
- Comment I have uploaded the uncropped version, thumbnail to the right. This was found by a Google image search based on the apparent original hosted by Associated Press. Whichever license the consensus judges to apply to the cropped version should apply to the original. Consequently I have linked this DR from the original version image page and the outcome of this DR should apply to it. --Fæ (talk) 00:29, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete It is apparent that my comment above about the status of this image is wrong. I was under the incorrect impression that all Afghan images before 2008 were PD. It is clear that we need a license from the photographer or a good reason why this should be PD. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:01, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
- Comment File:Osama bin Laden.jpg got the same DR. --JuTa 21:12, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: As per Jim and Stefan. Natuur12 (talk) 22:15, 11 December 2014 (UTC)