Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2014/11/24

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive November 24th, 2014
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a video game screenshot, where is your permission from Microsoft to use this file. Mlpearc (powwow) 02:06, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. INeverCry 02:51, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a video game screenshot, where is your permission from Microsoft to use this file. Mlpearc (powwow) 02:11, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. INeverCry 02:50, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a video game screenshot, where is your permission from Microsoft to use this file. Mlpearc (powwow) 02:12, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. INeverCry 02:50, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a video game screenshot, where is your permission from Microsoft to use this file. Mlpearc (powwow) 02:13, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. INeverCry 02:51, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 00:23, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. (also uploader req) — Revi 04:32, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The license at the bottom right of the source says "CC-BY-NC-ND-3.0" which is not compatible with Common's licensing policies. Leoboudv (talk) 06:27, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per num -- Geagea (talk) 07:15, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Already available through Institution:Niedersächsisches Landesmuseum. Christoph Braun (talk) 11:28, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Redirected the page Jarekt (talk) 13:17, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Already available through Institution:Niedersächsisches Landesmuseum. Christoph Braun (talk) 11:28, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: redirected the page Jarekt (talk) 13:18, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i did not like that 117.213.141.135 14:02, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept: Vandalical DR. --Amitie 10g (talk) 14:29, 24 November 2014 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

some homepafe material, promotional Motopark (talk) 15:24, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 19:10, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While on flickr, this file was called Fish Soup at the George Hotel West Bay. When imported into Commons, this image was renamed Marmite dieppoise and categorized as Seafood dishes of France. At best, this is rather misleading since an English soup is not a French fish stew, at worst, misrepresentation since Marmite dieppoise, a fish stew typical of Western France does not include tomatoes. A possible alternative could involve renaming this file to accurate reflect its true destination et re-categorizing it into Soups and stews of the United Kingdom. 204.27.56.170 19:14, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: not a reason for a DR, use image talk page or request a rename Denniss (talk) 20:09, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Orphan, one file moved to High Museum, Atlanta PKM (talk) 20:37, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Jarekt (talk) 21:10, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image. Not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No license since 18 November 2014. Green Giant (talk) 23:57, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation: the file has been scanned from http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_ymL3zW_EBQc/TH_Drr9R36I/AAAAAAAAGio/z3Y9fZbtwg0/s1600/escanear0002.jpg 83.34.159.243 12:58, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Para empezar ni siquiera sabía que existía la pagina de la que dicen que me he copiado y a parte de eso, lo único que he subido es un plano del recinto ferial, que puede conseguirse en cualquier folleto, al igual que el que sube el plano de los metros de las ciudades o de los autobuses (que esos no os atrevéis a borrarlos) --Josemamc (talk) 15:30, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
If you aren't the author of the "folleto", you can't upload it here as if you were the copyright holder of the work. The author is the only one who can do it. 83.41.149.205 22:37, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Es que ese "work" no tiene "copyright holder", y si lo quieres borrar, vosotros veréis, yo ya paso de discutir, y yo no tengo que demostrar mi inocencia, demostrad vosotros si podéis que soy culpable (y no podréis), o es que no has oído hablar de la expresión nadie es culpable mientras no se demuestre lo contrario --Josemamc (talk) 12:30, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This work has got a copyright holder. The copyright holder is the person who has draw the "folleto". You have said you have used a "folleto" as when people copy "plano de los metros", so I understand you aren't the author of this "folleto". If you want proofs, please watch both images -BlogSpot and Commons- and you'll see both images has got the same printing errors: small white stains in red background are on the same place. I'm not saying you have copied from BlogSpot, but both images are the same. 83.35.252.9 13:07, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Borrala!! --Josemamc (talk) 17:05, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion Krd 17:56, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ggfg - Copy - Copy (2).png 182.186.238.196 06:14, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

for some changes Pak Pakistan (talk) 04:55, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no license at all. JuTa 20:41, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. This logo might be below TOO in the US, which is the country of origin. BrightRaven (talk) 08:31, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no license at all, likely out of scope. JuTa 20:43, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Photograph shot in the US before 1907 (date of death of the subject). Would it qualify for PD-1923? BrightRaven (talk) 08:48, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: applied PD-1923. JuTa 20:22, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Photograph shot in the US before 1893 (when women were granted the right to vote in Colorado). Would it qualify for {{PD-1923}}? BrightRaven (talk) 09:44, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: applied {{PD-1923}}. JuTa 20:31, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free image from a news agency (screenshot?) De728631 (talk) 16:53, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear copyright violation. JuTa 20:44, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image Basvb (talk) 21:38, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Unfortunately no FOP in Belarus. Green Giant (talk) 12:26, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image Basvb (talk) 21:40, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 12:22, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"However, the monthly pass design is owned by York Region Transit. All Rights Reserved." Basvb (talk) 21:53, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 12:22, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope. Animalparty (talk) 21:56, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 12:20, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image Basvb (talk) 22:02, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 12:20, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused image of designer glasses unlike own work Basvb (talk) 22:05, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 12:20, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image Basvb (talk) 22:05, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 12:20, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal image with generic title which caused it's single usage by a vandal on enwiki Basvb (talk) 22:07, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 12:18, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"You are welcome to use the images in connection with publicity of The Docklands, as long as you enter the city of Aarhus as the source" is not a sufficient release under a free license or into the public domain, which is required on Commons.    FDMS  4    22:09, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 12:19, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality unused personal image Basvb (talk) 22:10, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 12:17, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image Basvb (talk) 22:11, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 12:17, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by GooseEggs (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal images only used on self promo sandbox article on enwiki

Basvb (talk) 22:14, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, out of scope. The jokey, facebook-style autobio en:User:GooseEggs/sandbox has been deleted as misuse of Wikipedia as a webhost. JohnCD (talk) 12:23, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom and JohnCD. Green Giant (talk) 12:16, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image Basvb (talk) 22:16, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 12:15, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

incorrect license on wikipedia logo, unused out of scope Basvb (talk) 22:17, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 12:15, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused low quality image with advertisement Basvb (talk) 22:18, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 12:13, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal image only used on self promo page on enwiki (no further edits) Basvb (talk) 22:21, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 12:13, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete the image is dominated by a copyright derivative image with no evidence of permission from the copyright holder Ww2censor (talk) 23:06, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. The poster is not de minimis. Green Giant (talk) 12:09, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete the image is dominated by a copyright derivative image with no evidence of permission from the copyright holder Ww2censor (talk) 23:07, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. The poster is not de minimis. Green Giant (talk) 12:09, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably a copyvio, as per http://www.jvat.org/content/19/1/34/comments . Daniel Mietchen (talk) 23:07, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unfortunately, the video is under a standard Youtube license which is not acceptable for Commons. Green Giant (talk) 12:07, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

SDASM is unlikely to be the copyright holder. Need more info on the actual source of this photo. Yet another problematic upload from the SDASM russavia (talk) 01:45, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:05, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. It's only use (and only plausible use) is in some silliness on enwiki. --Jakob (talk) 02:06, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:06, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Children's Peace Monument Motopark (talk) 02:24, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why exactly is the photo of the children's peace monument on request to be deleted? Is someone claiming copyright? If so, I can upload my own photo. I visit Hiroshima every year, so no problem. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chenmingyu (talk • contribs) 03:29, 24 November 2014‎ (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The photo (and any photo you might take) infringes on the sculptor's copyright and cannot be kept on Commons without a license from the sculptor. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:10, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

THIS IN MY OWN PHOTO AND I DO NOT WANT TO KEEP ON INTERNET, REQUEST YOU TO DELETE Rahulkansi (talk) 07:38, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In use on WP:EN. Cannot be deleted. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:12, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:CSD F10. Previous image discussion said "in use on enwiki" but it is only on use in the person's userpage (the userpage of the person who wanted it deleted anyway) Gnomingstuff (talk) 14:45, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not a Wikipedian either. 45.250.252.152 22:03, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:34, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by GaxarDok (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Uploaded in 07.-10.2014 all these files are sourced with http://www.governo.it and licensed with {{Attribution}} by uploader. Per related disclaimer available via http://www.governo.it/copyright/index.html = (Google translate) "The site's contents - (...) images (...) and any other information available in any form - are protected under the legislation on intellectual property. (...). For-profit organization is allowed to use, copy and distribute documents and images available on this site only after written permission". In other words: copyrighted and commercial use of the works is NOT allowed rsp. needing permission = failing COM:L (equivalent to the related Flickrstream https://www.flickr.com/photos/palazzochigi/, publishing all works under a CC BY-NC-SA 2.0-license, see some examples below).

File:Giorgio Napolitano a Monfalcone-6 luglio 2014.jpg is coming from http://www.quirinale.it where I couldn't find any evidence of a {{Attribution}}-license.

Gunnex (talk) 08:37, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:13, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution private image. Not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:09, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:00, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inaccurate identification as apsara Redtigerxyz (talk) 08:57, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:40, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused text logo of non-notable company - single upload of user INeverCry 09:09, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:41, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 09:11, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:41, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mcollier (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - promotional images

INeverCry 09:14, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:41, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tania DJ (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - promotional images

INeverCry 09:26, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:41, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 09:27, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:42, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope INeverCry 09:29, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:42, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 09:30, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:42, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ansedavi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - promotional images

INeverCry 09:40, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:53, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 09:44, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: table should be typeset, not images .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:53, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because my wiki page has been deleted. Mraiyme (talk) 09:44, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:54, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by LX as no permission (No permission since). Simple logo that might be below TOO. BrightRaven (talk) 10:04, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for giving us the chance to discuss this issue before the deletion of the file.
This logo is indeed that of Byblos Bank which I represent as an employee in the Communications department, which is in charge of publishing information and pictures of the Bank on the Internet and in the press.
We have no problem providing necessary documentation regarding the above, but we're still trying to figure out how to licence it without giving permission for people to change it.
Thanks in advance for anyone that could help with this!
@ByblosCom: Hello. If you have the permission to publish this logo, please send it following this procedure: COM:OTRS. This will make sure the file will not be deleted even if it is finally considered as too complex for COM:TOO. BrightRaven (talk) 10:34, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately, there is no entry on Commons:Threshold of originality for Lebanon (which I presume is this logos country of first publication). In most countries where the threshold of originality is established, this would be ineligible for copyright protection, and could easily have been kept with the current license tag replaced with {{PD-textlogo}}. However, this would be above the threshold of originality in the UK, and it is unknown what the threshold is in Lebanon. Therefore, I've simply taken your assertion that the logo is protected by copyright at face value. (A work that is below the threshold of originality – in other words: too simple for copyright protection – does not have a copyright holder and cannot be the subject of a copyright license.)
Now, you state that you wish to share the logo on Commons without giving permission for people to change it. That is not possible. The license that you have chosen does allow anyone to modify and redistribute the image, as is required for all files uploaded to Commons. Of course, if the logo is not eligible for copyright protection, you cannot use copyright as an argument to prohibit modifications either. That said, trademark rights may still prevent most or all undesired activities, so you may wish to add {{Trademark}} to the file description if it is kept.
Last but not least, you should probably read Commons:Guidance for paid editors. LX (talk, contribs) 11:20, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: requires OTRS .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:03, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by INeverCry as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COM:DW. FOP cases are dealt with through standard requests for deletion. Not clear wether this sign is in Argentina or in Chile. There is full FOP in Chile and only a limited FOP in Argentina. BrightRaven (talk) 10:12, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete This is in Mendoza, Argentina: see [[1]]. INeverCry 10:35, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:03, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable band - single upload of user INeverCry 10:49, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:03, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promo/unused personal photo. Juggler2005 (talk) 10:50, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:04, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 10:54, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:04, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of panorama in Azerbaijan. Kulmalukko (talk) 10:54, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:04, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 10:59, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:04, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 11:01, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:04, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, del on DE Nolispanmo 11:06, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:04, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious spam. MER-C 11:31, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:05, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant to Nitrile-group-2D.png. Yikrazuul (talk) 11:35, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:05, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality (private?) image. Not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 11:42, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:05, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image. Not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 11:46, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:05, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image. Not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 11:47, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:05, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image. Not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 11:59, 24 November 2014 (UTC) здесь нет никакой нарушение авторских прав, я могу предоставить вам оригинал фото![reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:05, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious sourcing. EXIF data shows that the actual image is in fact a thumbnail generated by gd (the PHP graphic library). The own work claim looks rather flimsy. —Andrei S. Talk 12:52, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:06, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in the US, where this statue is located.  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:04, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:06, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Jarekt (talk) 13:07, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:06, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

blurry image, clear image present File:East india company half anna coin 1616.jpg Bodhisattwa (talk) 13:11, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:06, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image. Not notable person. Not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:26, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:06, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by INeverCry as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: scan of photo - COM:DW. Not a clear copyright violation imho. Maybe out of scope too (unused picture of a non notable person, see en:User:Rpezer/Dubravka Janda). BrightRaven (talk) 13:30, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:07, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image. Not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:35, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:07, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry image, One comparatively clear image already present File:East india company half anna coin 1616.jpg Bodhisattwa (talk) 13:51, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:08, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of an unknown and obviously unimportant event, seems to be test upload, out of scope. Achim (talk) 14:24, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:09, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused private image, low quality, out of scope. Achim (talk) 14:39, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:10, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no evidence that this painting is out of copyright. There is no specific information on the author or age of the artwork at the source page. However, there is a general disclaimer at the website saying that all material is copyrighted and "many items are in use under licence." Add to that that the style of the painting suggests that is not a contemporary 18th-century depiction of Hussein Bey but a modern interpretation from a work treating the Hussainid dynasty (compare also the other depictions at the source page). De728631 (talk) 14:40, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Upon further research it turned out that this image and the following files were originally provided by Cartes-affiches.com and are attributed to a certain Nourredine Kayachi, "property of the State of Tunisia".

De728631 (talk) 15:02, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Noureddine Khayachi died in 1987 so his work is seemingly under copyright until 2038. Moumou82 (talk) 19:11, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:12, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Jameslwoodward: I just realized that File:Rachid Bey.jpg was missing from the list above but was included in the same request. Could you please take care? Moumou82 (talk) 17:38, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sou3918 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Songs. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:13, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rmikeru (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:13, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Text document of questionable notability. If usable should be replaced with wiki-text. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:13, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:13, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:13, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

performace/installation by artist Spencer Tunick. as a temporary art work it is not covered by freedom of panorama or any other exemption of copyright h-stt !? 15:39, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:13, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Book should be uploaded in PDF if in public domain. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:13, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Finance km (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Collection of private images, unused, no benefit, out of scope.

Achim (talk) 15:42, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:14, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused presentation of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:14, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparent BLP violation Andy Mabbett (talk) 15:49, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:14, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:14, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:14, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:14, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This does not look at all like "own work" (as it is claimed to be), but rather like a screenshot from a TV news broadcast. The file is this user's only upload and a mobile upload; it should be deleted per the precautionary principle. Rosenzweig τ 16:00, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:09, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

some homepage material, can be write to some wikipedia if needed Motopark (talk) 16:24, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:09, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused file, private image BrightRaven (talk) 16:27, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:09, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a passport front cover. Stefan4 (talk) 17:05, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:13, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to Commons:Licensing#Well-known licenses, Creative Commons No-Derivatives licenses are forbidden on Commons. It may only be used on Commons if the work is multi-licensed under at least one permitted license. Apalsola tc 17:09, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Have you read this discussion [2]--Motopark (talk) 18:02, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: The cited discussion is clear, as is Commons policy -- ND licenses are not permitted. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:15, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted map of Seinäjoki, Finland, not in public domain. FOP in Finland for buildings only. Apalsola tc 17:15, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:15, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Text document out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:39, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:15, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of user's own work, and that it was cut from background suggests it came from an unsourced image, probable COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:41, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image looks like it was copied from http://www.chemistry.illinois.edu/faculty/Gregory_Girolami.html Cmr08 (talk) 20:45, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:15, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:COPYVIO. Part of university slideshow, see here, not user's own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:42, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:15, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File not in use, some kind of personal drawing, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:42, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:16, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If this image had a "specific release" as implied in description, there would be an OTRS number right below it. As it is, it a COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:44, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: "Specifically released for use in Wikipedia." is not broad enough for use here or on WP -- an image must be resleased for all uses anywhere by anybody, including commerical use. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:17, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:COPYVIO: Promotional montage of various timepieces, with advertisement below. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:46, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:17, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Overprinting shows company name, unlikely to be own work of uploader, and instead COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:47, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:17, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Text document, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:49, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:17, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Between all the text and the images of Korean popstars, I'm not certain this is indeed user's own work, and instead more likely COM:COPYVIO for this "sample chapters of Korean textbooks"... with popstars. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:50, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:17, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Text document out of COM:SCOPE. If you want to publish an ebook, please visit Amazon or some other ebook publisher, Commons isn't social media, nor book host site. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:54, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:18, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Trifecta, no description; no source, no author... Text document, did not appear out of nowhere, likely COM:COPYVIO as well as being out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:57, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:18, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File has no metadata and shows guy in front of a lovely church. The image could be educational without Mr. Guy, but as it is, it's a holiday snap and out of COM:SCOPE. User has prior warnings about scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:00, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:18, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Graphic elements swiped from here and rearranged with new labels. Not user's own work but COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:03, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


The picture reported for deletion is my very own work. I created this picture on 23 NOV 2014 at GLIFFY. Here is the original picture's URL: ORIGINAL and this is my account id at [3] "3415779". Gliffy provide us with all such graphics to use them in our diagrams. Muhammad Usman 14:38, Wednesday, November 26, 2014 (EST)

Actually the GLIFFY website is quite clear that derivative works are not free of copyright, please see their Terms of Use, specifically
"2. SITE CONTENT.
"User should be aware that Content presented to you as part of the Services may be protected by intellectual property rights which are owned by the third parties who provide that Content to Gliffy (or by other persons or companies on their behalf). You may not modify, rent, lease, loan, sell, distribute or create derivative works based on this Content (either in whole or in part) unless you have been specifically told that you may do so by Gliffy or by the owners of that Content, in a separate agreement.
"The Site is protected by copyright as a collective work and/or compilation, pursuant to U.S. copyright laws, international conventions, and other copyright laws. User may not modify, publish, transmit, participate in the transfer or sale of, reproduce (except as provided in this section of the Agreement), create derivative works based on, distribute, perform, display, or in any way exploit, any of the Content (except as expressly permitted), software, materials, or Services in whole or in part. User shall abide by all copyright notices, information, and restrictions contained in any Content accessed through the Services." ( and etcetera following. ) Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:19, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:19, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No educational purpose, unused, out of COM:SCOPE Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:04, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:19, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Slideshow with multiple copyright image problems... various screenshots, etc. Perhaps the slide show is user's own work, but the illustrative images are not. COM:COPYVIO for the DW's. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:05, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:19, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Graphic elements from http://piktochart.com/, source page is marked © 2014 Piktochart Infographics. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:06, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:19, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Composite image of Miss Universe competitors, highly unlikely to be user's own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:07, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:19, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No metadata, small size, source "photo shoot" and no indication of user's own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:11, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:20, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ekft (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:COPYVIOs: All images swiped from "Extreme Kayak Fishing" magazine. Uploader name seems to have been picked to imply involvement in magazine.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:12, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I, Joesph Hector am the owner of Extreme Kayak Fishing Tournament Inc and the extreme kayak fishing magazine. My username is EKFT which stands for Extreme kayak fishing tournament. I am the owner of all these images listed above. My website is http://www.extremekayakfishingtournament.org Each image is license under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license. Please advise me if you need any more proof on my ownership of the company. Thank you, Joe Hector

The best thing to do would be to go to COM:OTRS and fill out their form. There are experienced volunteer administrators over there who can resolve issues such as this one. The site you mention above doesn't seem to have a readily available licensing page, or perhaps I'm just missing it. Can you point me to the page which contains the licenses for these images on the above site? That information would also be of use to the OTRS team. Thank you for your understanding that this is a process and not a judgement. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:46, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Don't bother witrh OTRS -- these are all SPAM that violate COM:ADVERT and will not be kept even if the copyright question is answered. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:22, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, bordered image, no indication of user's own work, possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:18, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:22, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nora Aunor and Ricky Lee at the 10th Cinemalaya Independent Film Festival.jpg

[edit]

Good Morning, I would like to inform you that the picture used is the work of my friend who asked me to upload it in Nora Aunor's wikipedia page. As a fan of Nora Aunor we believe that we should update the details of her wikipedia so that fans around the world would know the developments happening to their idol. So please kindly put it back. Thanks!

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is one of a series from a flickr account which seems to be a compilation of snaps from various photographers, compiled by the flickr user. I see that the license was checked, but I don't think the reviewer noticed that this image is part of a series, many of which have been uploaded to Commons, none of which appear to be the flickr user's own work. Nominated as COM:COPYVIO for the foregoing reasons. There are multiple other pictures from this series in use in the project. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:22, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:23, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sompat11 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:COPYVIOs. Two nearly identical images, only one of them has had the copyright statement cropped off.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:25, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:23, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is from here, it is one of the rotating banners at the top of the page. No indication of this user's own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:35, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:23, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not clear why it is in scope. Jonund (talk) 18:37, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No categories, no description, therefore not useful for any purpose. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:24, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not clear why it is in scope. Jonund (talk) 18:40, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No categories, no description, therefore not useful for any purpose. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:25, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, outside of COM:SCOPE. Commons is not a personal photo gallery or social media platform. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:44, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:27, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by King Muay Thai (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unconsistent or missing EXIF data, photoshopped promo images, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 18:44, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:26, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, low resolution, no metadata and user's other uploads were all swiped from a single metal-fabricating company's website, although I was unable to find this exact image. Probable COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:57, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:27, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cut out of images found all over internet note sloppy photoshop to remove background. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:57, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:27, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Halloween6 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyright violation if these fall above the threshold of originality. I appreciate that some may be on the borderline, but others (e.g.) like the 3D rendered logo of the new Robocop remake are (IMHO) definitely above it. (Google Translation: Possible violation de copyright si elles tombent au-dessus du seuil d'originalité. Je comprends que certains peuvent être à la limite, mais d'autres (par exemple) comme le rendu 3D logo du nouveau remake de Robocop sont (à mon humble avis) certainement au-dessus.).

Ubcule (talk) 19:46, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Also, if an admin is reading this, can you please fix the history of File:Colorado-Stanley Hotel.jpg? The original and current (reverted) versions are fine, but before it was reverted, a thumbnail (probable copyvio) taken from The Shining film was uploaded over the top of the original. Can you please remove that copyvio while leaving the original/current version intact? Thanks. Ubcule (talk) 20:16, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: All PD text logo .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:31, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely own work (other signature below painting) Basvb (talk) 20:59, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:37, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Needs correct licensing (and author) for the painting Basvb (talk) 21:01, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:37, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FAIRUSE, Fair use media is not allowed on Commons. Animalparty (talk) 21:03, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:37, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright and scope issues for this logo Basvb (talk) 21:07, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:37, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I see nothing but an empty svg Basvb (talk) 21:12, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:38, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo of poor quality. out of COM:SCOPE. Animalparty (talk) 21:15, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:38, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image. Not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:21, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:38, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The sculpture was designed by Валерий Кондратенко who is still alive, but there is no Freedom of panorama in Belarus. 195.50.31.213 21:39, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:40, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Low resolution personal image. Savhñ 23:57, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:40, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader does not seem to be the author of the logo Basvb (talk) 00:05, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 15:57, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image. Not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 00:11, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 15:57, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not focused. Maybe no educational value due to low quality. Kulmalukko (talk) 00:16, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 15:57, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image. Not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 00:23, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 15:57, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope personal image, heavily edited Basvb (talk) 00:24, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 15:57, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image without use and information template blanked by author after upload Basvb (talk) 00:31, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 15:58, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image. Not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 00:32, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 15:58, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image. Not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 00:35, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 15:58, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image. Not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 00:39, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 15:58, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image. Not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 00:41, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 15:58, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Maybe not educationally usable. Kulmalukko (talk) 00:43, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 15:58, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Google's website is copyrighted as far as I know. --Jakob (talk) 01:06, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 15:59, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

advertisement 99.237.109.45 02:48, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Krd 15:56, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

advertisement, bane uploader 99.237.109.45 02:51, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Krd 15:56, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

advertisement 99.237.109.45 02:52, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Krd 15:56, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

advertisment 99.237.109.45 02:53, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Krd 15:56, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

advertisment 99.237.109.45 02:55, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Krd 15:56, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

advertisment 99.237.109.45 02:56, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Krd 15:56, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

advertisment gif 99.237.109.45 02:58, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Krd 15:56, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

advertisment 99.237.109.45 03:01, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 16:00, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Published at least http://news.vse42.ru/feed/show/id/6942598 and several other pages on same domain; no evidence of claimed "own work"/authorship/right to release image under CC-BY-SA license Tatewaki (talk) 03:50, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 16:00, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, mysteriously watermarked with "Walter Nicoliello", per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Micaela Nahir. Gunnex (talk) 05:05, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 16:00, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no encyclopaedic value Edelseider (talk) 08:42, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 16:00, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope INeverCry 09:07, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 16:00, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Maybe no educational value. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:13, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Krd 15:56, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

span Sublime Ordem Rosas do Templo (talk) 23:03, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. The uploader is the one that have requested the deletion. Out of project scope, taken from orkut.com Lugusto 23:28, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused small image, dubious "own work" statement (larger versions on the web). Eusebius (talk) 09:27, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nomination --Krd 16:01, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image/logo INeverCry 09:34, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 16:01, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 09:39, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 16:01, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused logo with advertisement slogan Basvb (talk) 00:01, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 19:09, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image. Not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:10, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 18:16, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private image. Not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:15, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 18:16, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image. Not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:28, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 18:16, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gisell López (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - promotional images

INeverCry 09:32, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 20:44, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Нет разрешения автора Александра Руфа на публикацию фото в Википедии Dogad75 (talk) 12:01, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: OTRS needed Ymblanter (talk) 20:45, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Sealle (talk) 14:25, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 20:46, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

несовместимая лицензия (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/, см. http://www.anna-news.info/node/21595) kosun (talk) 14:43, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: license incompatible with Commons Ymblanter (talk) 20:48, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mardasadze (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Mardasadze. All files uploaded in 2014 and related to ru:Багаряков, Алексей Владимирович, a Russian politician. Additional infos:


Gunnex (talk) 05:52, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:13, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Ho3einhajy, uploaded in a row with 7 copyvios in 06.2014 (+2x copyvios in 08.2014). Gunnex (talk) 06:39, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:14, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Komnata (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Komnata.

Gunnex (talk) 07:54, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:14, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work, no permission Krd 18:48, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:14, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by GabryL91 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unfree logos, no permission

Krd 18:51, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:14, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jason Crew (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images copied from catalog of manufacturer "Steel Tailor" and repins and repostings of those images around the web (pinterest, etc.). Not user's own work. The final image "Ptable-cutting-sample" looks like it was edited from SteelTailor catalog, but is not exact copy. That last image nominated under COM:PRP.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:01, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:15, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bir soddadil Uzbek (talk · contribs)

[edit]

I looked up two of these files which seemed unlikely to be own work and in both cases found a copyright violation: Stoltenberg Rossiya haqida.jpg and Angela-merkel image.

Basvb (talk) 21:34, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User has 5 previous uploads from 2013 of diagrams, these didn't fit the pattern of the images uploaded 23 and 24 November. Mvg, Basvb (talk) 21:35, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:16, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by RuRomanov (talk · contribs)

[edit]

2 of the images are tv screenshots, 1 very likely tc sreenshot. Given the other 3 the last two images are likely to be a copyright violation as well

Basvb (talk) 21:50, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:16, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inappropriate licensing: This image was taken in 1914. Unless the uploader is well over 100 years old the source is not "Own work" as stated. However, it is not clear when the image was published, despite being taken in 1914. Assuming this picture was taken in the United States (it says "Bar Harbor, Maine") it is not in the public domain unless the author died before 1944 or it was published before 1923 or before 1977 without an indication of copyright. If it was never published and the author died after 1944 it is still under copyright. Ahecht (talk) 15:52, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Unclear copyright status. Deleted under as a precaution. Green Giant (talk) 17:00, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inappropriate licensing: This postcard is from 1937 and unlikely to be the "Own work" of the uploader as stated. However, it is not clear whether there is a copyright notice on the postcard (perhaps on the back), nor is it clear whether copyright was renewed. It is possible, if the copyright was registered and renewed, that this painting is still under copyright until 2032. Ahecht (talk) 15:56, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Unclear copyright status. Deleted as a precaution. Green Giant (talk) 17:01, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons out of scope, unused personal image Basvb (talk) 20:51, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:50, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons out of scope, unused personal image Basvb (talk) 20:51, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:50, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused low quality personal image with large watermarks Basvb (talk) 21:08, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:47, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality unused image Basvb (talk) 21:36, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:47, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image Basvb (talk) 21:37, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:46, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is not enough information to keep the file at Commons. It's taken from a US website, yet claimed to be British (why? Has Woolf never left the UK?), and nothing at all is mentioned about the author or the research carried out to determine this person, even though the license tag explicitly demands this. This seems to be a case of "not enough effort in researching author and date of photo" to me, and the file should be deleted per the precautionary principle. Rosenzweig τ 16:37, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is a picture from one of Virginia Woolf's own photo albums at Monk's House which were acquired at an auction at Sotheby's in 1982 (cf. Maggie Humm, Snapshots of Bloomsbury: The Private Lives of Virginia Woolf and Vanessa Bell, p. 187), gifted in 1983 by Frederick R. Koch to the Harvard Theater Collection, Houghton Libray, Harvard University, and afterwards scanned and uploaded by the library. A general description of this album is here. The photographs are collectively described as "snapshots possibly taken by Virginia Woolf or by her friends and family". When the Harvard librarians know who took the picture, they generally indicate it (e.g. Man Ray for this one). In the case of our picture, it is simply described as "Woolf Virginia [1927]". The verso of the photograph has been scanned and is available here : it bears no indication which allows an identification of the photographer, but simply indicates - faintly pencilled - the portrait has been made in London. The photograph is also reproduced here without any copyright indication and on the cover of Virginia Woolf and the Discourse of Science: The Aesthetics of Astronomy by Holly Henry (Cambridge University Press, 2003) with the following credit : "Studio photograph of Virginia Woolf (c. 1927) reprinted by permission of the Mortimer Rare Book Room, Smith College" (p. XII) [,the Smith College having been presented the Frances Hooper Collection which includes another print of the same picture]. The picture was "used for promotion" by Harcourt Brace, the publisher of the American version of To the Lighthouse in 1927. In Virginia Woolf Icon (University of Chicago Press, 1999), Brenda Silver describes the photograph as an "(unidentified) studio photograph" and comments it "appear[ed] in in an number of Harcourt Brace ads and articles about Woolf and/or her works in the States during the late 1920s ans the 1930s" (p. 132). It was in particular published with no copyright notice in a review of the book published by The New York Times on May 8, 1927 and another review published by The Bookshelf Review in June 1927. The photograph was exhibited in the show Virginia Woolf: Art, Life and Vision at the National Portrait Gallery in London in 2014 with the following caption : "by Unknown photographer, 1927. Courtesy of the Mortimer Rare Book Room, Neilson Library, Smith College, Northampton, Massachusetts".
Now you were perfectly right in commenting there was not enough information and I have added the above precisions to the file description. In view of the two US publications in 1927 with no copyright notice, I have added a {{PD-US-no notice}} template. I have also uploaded separetely the verso of the photograph (file:Virginia Woolf 1927 verso.png) and a detail of the latter (file:Virginia Woolf 1927 verso detail.png). Thanks, — Racconish 📥 17:13, 24 November 2014 (UTC) completed 10:53, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: {{PD-UK-unknown}} clearly OK. Please read the template before creating DR. Yann (talk) 09:22, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The copyright situation seems to be unclear. Please see Commons:Copyright rules by territory. Works by the French government are not automatically in the public domain. So as a French government work this passport would still be copyrighted. On the other hand, if one considers the place of origin, {{PD-PRC-exempt}} would now apply as the PRC is the successor country for this entity. De728631 (talk) 16:44, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see where is the problem. This administrative document was published 71 years ago. According to French copyright law it is no longer under copyright. If it falls under People's Republic copyright law (almost certainly the case since China is the successor state of the Shanghai French Concession), then article 5 says it is exempt from copyright ("laws; regulations; resolutions, decisions and orders of state organs; other documents of legislative, administrative and judicial nature").--Lubiesque (talk) 12:09, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The date of publication is irrelevant in French (and EU) copyright legislation when the copyright holder is known. Instead, the copyright term is based on the lifetime of the author plus 70 years. So, as this is an official document, the French government would still hold the copyright for this ID card even after 70 years. So we need to determine if French or Chinese copyright applies to this document. De728631 (talk) 15:21, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: {{PD-PRC-exempt}} might also be OK, but this is also PD in France 70 years after publication. Yann (talk) 09:24, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image taken from a blog that does not mention a Commons compatible license. Clearly it's not a PD-Self work Banfield - Amenazas aquí 16:47, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 09:24, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of own work on this tiny screenshot, possible COM:COPYVIOs on the icons and program screen. File is not in use outside of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:39, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 09:25, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work, blurry image and not large, probable COM:COPYVIO, but unused as well so out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:52, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 09:25, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i contributed this photo of myself few years ago, and it has no value to be kept on wikipedia. Now i have privacy concern on this photo being stored on wikipedia and its available publicly. Laucn (talk) 18:46, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 09:26, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Slick as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: looks like copyvio. not sure Krd 18:48, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 09:27, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Larger copy of this image in older pdf file here, possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:51, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 09:27, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded 08.2014. Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, previously published (even cropped) via Google. Gunnex (talk) 19:09, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 09:28, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:DW. Jespinos (talk) 19:17, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 09:29, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor resolution, better versions avaible in Category:Benzene. Leyo 19:48, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 09:29, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

missing permission Ronn (talk) 20:50, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 09:29, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very small & there are better ones (File:Tiabendazole2DACS.svg) Kopiersperre (talk) 21:12, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

don't care --Blech (talk) 22:31, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 09:30, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве, встречается в Интернете неоднократно, например, http://www.zvezdi.ru/news/11001 или http://ludi-pr.ru/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/4-1.jpg. Dogad75 (talk) 21:22, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 09:31, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии. Встречается неоднократно в Интернете, например, http://www.tele.ru/stars/encyclopedia/lera-kudryavtseva/photo/#prettyPhoto, где указано "Лера Кудрявцева - Фото: East News" или здесь http://fashionstylist.kupivip.ru/sites/fashion-kupivip/files/u78563/bb74576e806483d4ac398719f41cb248.jpg. Dogad75 (talk) 21:29, 24 November 2014 (UTC) + Ещё весь вклад участницы:[reply]

Все файлы встречаются в Интернете ранее загрузки на Викисклад. Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии.--Dogad75 (talk) 21:35, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Copyvios. Yann (talk) 09:32, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии. Автор - © РИА Новости, Владимир Федоренко (см. http://www.km.ru/stil/2012/02/01/aktery-i-aktrisy-rossiiskogo-kino/larisa-udovichenko-khranit-u-sebya-shanel-i-iv-sen) Dogad75 (talk) 21:39, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 09:34, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии. Встречается в Интернете ранее загрузки на Викисклад http://www.vokrug.tv/pic/product/1/b/4/6/1b46b26aab72616e325f44e2dbc23b70.jpeg Dogad75 (talk) 21:42, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 09:34, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии. Встречается в Интернете ранее загрузки на Викисклад http://a-kadr.ru/on-line/images/+actors/88C05FFC-6D3A-4AE1-9348-EC8E1DBC2FFA/01E4ECFF7B-BD53-44E4-8533-B6C0A26E1518/picture_E4ECFF7B-BD53-44E4-8533-B6C0A26E1518.jpg Dogad75 (talk) 21:44, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 09:34, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии. Встречается в Интернете ранее загрузки а Викисклад, вырезана из фото http://ambidexter.my1.ru/blog/elena_batinova_foto/2013-12-14-49# Dogad75 (talk) 22:46, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 09:35, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии. Встречается в Интернете ранее загрузки на Викисклад http://www.glamour.ru/g-point/sex/577138/#, где источник фото legion-media.ru Dogad75 (talk) 22:49, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 09:35, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии. Встречается в Интернете ранее загрузки на Викисклад http://andry-astashkin.livejournal.com/pics/catalog/421/340606, http://www.liveinternet.ru/tags/%C1%EE%E6%E5%ED%E0+%D0%FB%ED%F1%EA%E0/page2.html, http://www.woman.ru/stars/backstage/article/57982/?startLeaflet=2#2 Dogad75 (talk) 22:52, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 09:35, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии. Встречается в Интернете ранее загрузки на Викисклад и в большем качестве http://www.energyfm.ru/vardata/modules/musicdb/files/201210/ef43d81f60a3ff0fd44298c71c273d76.jpeg, http://www.guide-official.com/main/19982-sergey-lazarev-prezentoval-novyy-superhit-take-it-off.html, Dogad75 (talk) 23:04, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 09:35, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии. http://www.eg.ru/daily/cadr/30044/ - указано, что "Анна СНАТКИНА. Фото Бориса КУДРЯВОВА" Dogad75 (talk) 23:06, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 09:35, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии. Часто встречается в Интернете ранее загрузки на Викисклад http://www.glamour.ru/fashion/fashion_blog/979932/#gallery1/slide2d5f25c1ebcfa9217cf6326dee281917 (источник указан Legion Media; архив Glamour), http://www.tatler.ru/dress-kod_14/s_veshchami_na_vihod_27/286176_gq_chelovek_goda2013_luchshee_plate.php#p=286244; http://geometria.ru/blogs/fashion/64125 Dogad75 (talk) 23:13, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 09:35, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии. http://www.glamour.ru/g-point/sex/548499/ - указан источник: Ражден Dogad75 (talk) 23:17, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 09:35, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{Bad JPG}}, orphaned/replaced by File:NAD oxidation reduction.svg. Leyo 22:24, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: A suitable replacement exists, but if a close version is needed, it can be quickly created. Ed (Edgar181) 19:43, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality/resolution, replaced by e.g. File:Succinyl-CoA.svg. Leyo 22:31, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Ed (Edgar181) 19:41, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Stereochemistry missing; replaced by File:Tetrahydrobiopterin structure.png. Leyo 22:34, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Ed (Edgar181) 19:41, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Drawing a cat in a logo seems creative, thus meets the threshold of originality Basvb (talk) 00:07, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello / Goedendag Basvb, the file in question has superseded and was based on the JPG version File:Iffr-logo medium-1.jpg (which also has the license Copyright free use). I'm not sure what should be done with this and the original file as the "cat" in the picture seems to be too simple to be copyrighted. --Romain Rousseau (talk) 14:55, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Well the question whether the cat is creative enough or not in relation with the threshold of originality is the main question we can discuss (and disagree) about here (and I believe the other version also meets the threshold of originality). However there might be some different interpretations for this in the different jurisdictions (Netherlands, logo origin vs US, Commons). Mvg, Basvb (talk) 17:27, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Bas is correct. Natuur12 (talk) 18:46, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a work by Press Information Bureau, India and their license is ND. See early discussion and the status of PIB template. Jee 02:46, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Further, it may be wise to blacklist https://www.flickr.com/people/narendramodiofficial/ flickr stream since files hosted there are not own works. Jee 02:48, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Jkadavoor: Are you sure they have seen this page past in 2011..? Because it says Material featured on this website may be reproduced free of charge and there is no need for any prior approval for using the content. The permission to reproduce this material shall not extend to any third-party material. Is that applicable as free-PD? Please correct me if I am wrong..The Herald 12:39, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
It is not explicitly allowing to make modifications. See the linked discussion in VP earlier. It was discussed several times, earlier. (We can neglect the "The material must be reproduced accurately and not used in a derogatory manner or in a misleading context." part as it is more like a moral right claim.) Jee 12:52, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
But I haven't made any modification in the file. So is it allowed? The Herald 13:48, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
See Commons:Project_scope#Required_licensing_terms and en:Free content. Those freedoms are essential to host a file in Commons. Jee 14:53, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Jkadavoor: this file, though shown as of PBI has the author as Timothy A. Clary Shall I upload it or is it will have same fate..? The Herald 14:39, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
See this. Nowhere pib stated all works available there are their own works. Instead, "The permission to reproduce this material shall not extend to any third-party material. Authorisation to reproduce such material must be obtained from the departments/copyright holders concerned." Jee 15:30, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
So now the way left is OTRS from TIM..Right? If then, I have to go for this file, also as a possible FPC.. The Herald 12:25, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:49, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: {{GODL-India}} Yann (talk) 12:37, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no evidence at the source link that indicates that free use is allowed, nor evidence of it being licenced under a CC licence. russavia (talk) 06:01, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment The user who uploaded it made edits related to another AEI-related figure and nothing more. Is it possible the editor who uploaded this owns the rights to the image and was releasing it on a free license? Perhaps this point should be clarified.--The Devil's Advocate (talk) 06:30, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Wayback has this cache but I see no concept of a free license on that page, nor a similar approach with any current image on the main site. Original uploader only has that image to their name. --Masem (talk) 07:43, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
There is a general copyright page at AEI (Wayback), which does not allow free use of photographs. Maybe someone can request permission. 77.7.174.187 09:10, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
We should probably be safe and contact the AEI to see if we have access to the picture. I would recommend having a veteran editor do the contacting for this or perhaps someone with experience in these kinds of things. --74.106.11.4 11:42, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
What more experience you are expecting than the OP here? :) Jee 12:02, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: We need evidence of permission via OTRS. Natuur12 (talk) 18:51, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't see how this could be anything other than a photograph of a copyrighted statue. No freedom of panorama for statues in the United States. Jmabel ! talk 07:28, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:49, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Anyelo Cubillan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos.

Juggler2005 (talk) 09:49, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:53, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Weil sie wohl falsche Daten enthält. Die Temperaturverteilung ist sicher nur für die Nordhalbkugel OK. 79.215.244.98 11:49, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No valid reason for deletion. Natuur12 (talk) 18:54, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Agamitsudo as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: book cover: licence ok on flickr but should not be published initially on cc-by-sa. It does not seem to be the cover of Boyd's book. The Flickr licence seems to be valid (this account published many similar drawings there, so we can guess he is the author), but this picture is out of scope: unused file, self-created artwork. BrightRaven (talk) 13:36, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It will take me a bit to go through and tag everything, but this deletion request was covered in this thread. This drawing is from a private talk from Danah boyd at the Berkman Center for Internet & Society. Willowbl00 (talk) 14:16, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep educational value: visualisation of complex content. But when you delete them before others can find and use it... (also BrightRaven pls check your gender prejudices...) --.js (talk) 22:17, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please check your own prejudices, because I do not see anything gender-based here, except your post. BrightRaven (talk) 08:34, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: File is in use Natuur12 (talk) 18:56, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Maybe too dark to be usable. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:39, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:56, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Fma12 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Not own work, also far above the TOO - see logo at official web. Not sure it is above the threshold in the US and in Japan (see COM:TOO#Japan: "Logos composed merely of geometric shapes and texts are also not copyrightable in general"). A standard deletion request is more suitable than a speedy deletion. BrightRaven (talk) 13:42, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment I support my request based on the isologo is more complex than a "simple geometric shape". In fact, it is already placed as a rationale use image at English Wiki (see here) Fma12 (talk) 15:53, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:56, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by ZioNicco as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: trade mark registered at UIBM (http://www.uibm.gov.it/uibm/dati/) number MC2006C000203, orphan image |source= http://www.bancamacerata.it/ Simple logo that could be below COM:TOO. BrightRaven (talk) 13:46, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:56, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by ZioNicco as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: trade mark registered at UIBM (http://www.uibm.gov.it/uibm/dati/) number MC2006C000203, orphan image |source= http://www.bancamacerata.it/ Simple logo that could be below COM:TOO. BrightRaven (talk) 13:47, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:57, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant. Almost identical image is File:Hongan-ji National Treasure World heritage Kyoto 国宝・世界遺産 本願寺 京都32.JPG. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:48, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:57, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1947 year. Not {{PD-Ukraine}}. Insider (talk) 13:50, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep. It is indeed {{PD-Ukraine}}. I failed to find any source related to the date 1946, Ukrainian laws state that the only date having any effect is 1951 (2001 minus 50 years) for both public domain and URAA, see Template talk:PD-Ukraine. By the way it would be great if someone could finally close that discussion... — NickK (talk) 00:14, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Russian version of the template isn't equivalent to the english and ukrainian. But even if we take the English translation, it turns out that the file is not in public domain in the USA (1947 year). --Insider (talk) 09:45, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    All three versions (en, ru, uk) need synchronisation. As I have written at Template talk:PD-Ukraine, the interpretation related to the public domain in the USA is wrong: photos that were in public domain as of 1996 (this photo was in public domain at that time as 1947 + 25 years + 1 = 1973 per old Soviet copyright law) became subject to URAA only in 2001 together with retroactive application of 50 years copyright duration (1947 + 50 years + 1 = 1998) and non-retroactive application of 70 years copyright duration (thus all works published after 1951 getting copyright protection in the USA) — NickK (talk) 19:22, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per NickK Natuur12 (talk) 18:58, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Juggler2005 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: non-trivial logo. The coat of arms of the Dominicans is in the public domain due to its age, so I wonder whether the additional elements in this logo pass the TOO. BrightRaven (talk) 13:54, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:59, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 14:00, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:59, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Не та тема Miksam69 (talk) 15:20, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: File is in scope, no reason to delete. Natuur12 (talk) 19:00, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal artwork, or derivative of artwork of non-notable person. P 1 9 9   16:13, 24 November 2014 (UTC) LA[reply]

Anne-Marie Durou est citée dans la page fr:Fonds régional d'art contemporain de la région Aquitaine (cette page existe malgré la syntaxe rouge !!). La page du FRAC appartient à la catégorie fr:Catégorie:Fonds régional d'art contemporain. C'est une plasticienne qui vivante, qui produit toujours. Une commande publique : au Pôle Juridique et Judiciaire de Bordeaux. Une exposition au Frac Aquitaine en 2014 : voir ici : http://www.frac-aquitaine.net/la-grande-tourn-e-2014-avec-lartiste-anne-marie-durou.

Je ne trouve donc pas logique de supprimer ce fichier dont je possède les droits et que j'ai versé sur commons avec une licence libre.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Filca13 (talk • contribs) 13:19, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • (Links to French WP added). Anne-Marie Durou is only mentioned in the French article fr:FRAC Aquitaine, along with dozens of other red-link artists. She has no article on the French WP, so she is hardly notable. Also, you are not the artist, so this file is a derivative. There is no FOP in France, so a OTRS is needed. --P 1 9 9   17:23, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:01, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Diese Grafik hat als integrierte Quellenangabe "Karte: Heilbronner Stimme" (unten links). Der Scan oder die digitale Kopie durch Exicose sind also eine Urheberrechtsverletzung. Auch falls die Unwettersymbole nur nachträglich eingefügt wurden, darf die Landkarte dennoch nicht ohne Genehmigung des ursprünglichen Grafikers verwendet werden. De728631 (talk) 17:49, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:03, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ХЕндрюХ (talk · contribs)

[edit]

With the sources given going to a page marked " Copyright © 2013 ВГО "СВПССУ "ЗВИТЯГА" and with no sources showing that these are indeed PD from Ukraine, nominated as COM:COPYVIOs.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:28, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep. This website has indicated a source for these images: Наказ № 109 від 25 травня 1993 р. and has confirmed in text that those are official military insignia: данное заключение было прикреплено к проекту приказа, который и был подписан Командующим ВМС контр-адмиралом Кожиным у Министра обороны Морозова. (meaning that they where approved by Minister of Defence Morozov) — NickK (talk) 00:12, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

kept: as above. Natuur12 (talk) 19:10, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work and facebook 720px size, possible COM:COPYVIO without upload of larger size and hgiher resolution. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:32, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:04, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not clear why it is in scope. Jonund (talk) 19:00, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think that anybody who would check the useage of the file would find the answer as to why this is clearly in scope.

 I withdraw my nomination Excuse me, I forgot to check the usage! --Jonund (talk) 17:16, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: withdrawn Natuur12 (talk) 19:01, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fälschung. Orden wurde manipuliert. Rôtkæppchen68 20:34, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason to delete Natuur12 (talk) 19:04, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong focus Kopiersperre (talk) 20:51, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep - This is the only image we have of garlic ice cream. It works very well as a lead image at the top of the relevant Wikipedia article, and we have no images with which to replace it. That the image could have been of higher quality is not a sufficient reason for deletion. Neelix (talk) 22:44, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I would delete this -- although it is in use, that is only because the uploader, Neelix, inserted it in a WP:EN article and then re-inserted it after another editor deleted it for poor quality. Nonetheless, policy says that in use images cannot be deleted for quality reasons, so I hesitate to do so without another Admin agreeing. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:36, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The image was removed from the relevant Wikipedia article by the same user who nominated the image for deletion here. I see no reason to bypass policy simply because the nominator attempted to strengthen their position by removing the image from the relevant Wikipedia article. Neelix (talk) 02:38, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: If Lewis Hubert's comment is true we should keep the file but imho it should be deleted after we have a replacement since it is really low quality. Natuur12 (talk) 19:06, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image. Not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:36, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:06, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Durch das Vorhandensein der qualitativ besseren Datei ist diese Datei obsolet. Fränsmer (talk) 22:45, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:06, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Durch das Vorhandensein der qualitativ besseren Datei ist diese Datei obsolet. Fränsmer (talk) 22:47, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:06, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]