Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2014/11/18
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
_01.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
2.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
{{Delete}} Altesse (talk) 16:06, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: uploaders request shortly after uploa. JuTa 19:22, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Not the real MBC logo, includes personal photo. Fry1989 eh? 01:06, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope, no license at all. JuTa 20:21, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Outside the Project Amitie 10g (talk) 16:03, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 03:21, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/User talk:TroyDevinny
Copy of http://fanpix.famousfix.com/picture-gallery/anissa-kate-picture-25078654.htm Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:07, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 17:37, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
No reason why this is in the public domain in the US given. It doesn't come under the standard pre-1923 rule, and it would be difficult to prove any other situation: first one would have to prove it was published under the definition of the law, then that it was either published without notice, or that it wasn't renewed (which is damn hard for photos, since only the renewal records for books and journals are readily available). Documentation is so minimal as to be almost worthless in establishing any of this. Adam Cuerden (talk) 00:07, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:45, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Used for advertisement - not a free picture Ldorfman (talk) 00:26, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:45, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Self-promotion Fixertool (talk) 01:03, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:45, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal image. Out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:30, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:45, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
File:AHR0cDovL3d3dy5mcmVlbG9nb3NlcnZpY2VzLmNvbS9hcGkvbWFpbi9pbWFnZXMvMWorb2psMUtPTWtYOVd5b2ZCZTQzRDZrai4uLk9KcWhaS21ScmJrbUF5SzNVYytBNW9rU1FyaFBwcDkuLi44PQ==.png
[edit]
Unidentified image; likely out of project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:32, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:45, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hatim EL Yamani (talk · contribs)
[edit]
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:34, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:46, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:36, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:46, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Shymikethebear (talk · contribs)
[edit]Please see our project scope. Commons is not for self-promotion where the subject is not yet notable.
- File:Freepressforyou shy mike.jpg
- File:Shy Mike I Am Your Master.jpg
- File:Shy Mike Love's Candy.jpg
- File:Shy Mike Love's You.jpg
- File:Shy Mike My Art.jpg
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:43, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:46, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Please see COM:EDUSE. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:46, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:46, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
self-promotion Fixertool ( talk) 02:15, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Delete [1] same picture deleted twice as copyvio Motopark (talk) 06:19, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:46, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Xchanging BM rgb.jpg Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:45, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:47, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope. Selfie with no use in any page. Kuailong (talk) 04:52, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:47, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope. Selfie with no use in any page. Kuailong (talk) 04:53, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:47, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
I made a mistake in uploading this. The wrapper is copyrighted. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:00, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:47, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Please help me to delete this. It is a Wikimedia error.
This is a jpg/JPG problem. Somehow I managed to upload a media file named "File:Trowulan Gate, East Java 1342.jpg" and another one named "File:Trowulan Gate, East Java 1342.JPG". The "jpg" file (lower case) is unusable, so I am requesting that it be deleted. Michael D. Gunther (talk) 05:39, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:48, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Stephan Kaefer (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unclear copyright status and unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. Uploaded by user Stephan Kaefer (talk · contributions · Statistics) (eventually de:Stephan Käfer himself) permission from the original photographers are needed, considering also:
- File:Stephan Kaefer.jpg (uploaded 02.2014) --> cropped from previously published http://www.iltablog.it/articoli/3867/stephan-kaefer-foto-il-peccato-e-la-vergogna/stephan-kaefer (01.2014) = (lower res, but full frame) http://www.iltablog.it/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/stephan-kaefer.jpg
- File:Stephan Kaefer attore "il peccato e la vergogna".jpg (uploaded 30.12.2013) --> cropped from previously published via http://www.stephankaefer.de/_gallery-set/gallery_en.php (official site) = http://www.stephankaefer.de/_gallery-set/images/set/stephankaefer20.jpg (last modified: 05.12.2013) which itself is a crop from (example) http://www.televisionando.it/foto/il-peccato-e-la-vergogna-2_6077_7.html (12.2013)
Gunnex (talk) 06:57, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:48, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Emilbustello (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. Set of photos related to en:Roland Leong, (1945—) an American drag racer, uploaded in a row on 24.02.2014 and mostly (if not all) grabbed from Internet. Examples:
- File:RolandLeong-1982-02-Pomona-.jpg --> taken from https://www.flickr.com/photos/9158786@N08/2263282184/ (2008, all rights reserved by " Racing Net Source")
- File:RolandLeongMikeSnively.jpg --> previously published via (example) http://www.jalopyjournal.com/forum/threads/drag-cars-in-motion-picture-thread.228509/page-739 (2010, by "Muttely") = http://i1046.photobucket.com/albums/b465/DragPhotos/RolandLeongMikeSnively.jpg~original
- File:Roland-Leong-Portrait.jpg --> previously published via (example) http://www.lvms.com/dragstrip/news/sunday-speedway-childrens-charities-track-walk-with-drag-racing-legend-roland-leong.html (2011, © 2013 Speedway Motorsports, Inc) = http://www.lvms.com/images/1419359_lg.jpg (last modified: 2011)
- etc.
- File:March-fuel-and-gas-championship.jpg + File:2014-march-meet-poster-300.jpg are poster of racing events, unlikely "own" works
- File:2014-march-meet-poster-300.jpg
- File:March-fuel-and-gas-championship.jpg
- File:Roland-Leong-Portrait.jpg
- File:RolandLeongMikeSnively.jpg
- File:RolandLeong-1982-02-Pomona-.jpg
- File:Roland-Leong-Hawaiian-Funny-Car-OCIR.jpg
- File:Roland-Leong-Don-Prudhomme-1965-Winternationals.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 07:48, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:49, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dodo Djuari (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Not affected: File:Dodo Djuari (1).JPG, used at id:Pengguna:Dodo Djuari (user page)
.JPG){kind=link}
- File:Dodo Djuari (9).JPG
- File:Dodo Djuari (10).JPG
- File:Dodo Djuari (6).jpg
- File:Dodo Djuari (8).JPG
- File:Dodo Djuari (7).JPG
- File:Dodo Djuari (4).JPG
- File:Dodo Djuari (5).JPG
- File:Dodo Djuari (3).JPG
- File:Dodo Djuari (2).JPG
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Gunnex (talk) 07:54, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:50, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope. Animalparty (talk) 07:58, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:50, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Publicity photo, French Wikiarticle deleted for copyright infringement Animalparty (talk) 08:29, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:50, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by VigezzinoConsapevole (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:VigezzinoConsapevole. All files uploaded on a row on 24.02.2014 and mostly related to it:Santa Maria Maggiore (Italia), a municipality in Italy. File:Parrocchialesantamariamaggioreinterno.jpg appears to be cropped from http://www.aereisentieri.it/gallerie/mz0210/index2.html (2010) = http://www.aereisentieri.it/gallerie/mz0210/23s.jpg (exif available).
- File:Chiesedicrana2.jpg
- File:PiodadiCranadallaPiana.jpg
- File:Santamariamaggioredavocogno.jpg
- File:Spazzacamino.jpg
- File:Sfilataspazzacamini.jpg
- File:Vecchiomunicipio.jpg
- File:Villaantonia.jpg
- File:Vigezzinainstazione.jpg
- File:Caprettotipico.jpg
- File:Parrocchialesantamariamaggioreinterno.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 08:37, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:51, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used.
- File:João Marcos Landim 2.jpg
- File:João Marcos Landim 3.jpg
- File:João Marcos Landim.jpg
- File:João Marcos Alves Landim.png
Gunnex (talk) 08:50, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:51, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Campojoão. Probadly grabbed from Facebook considering also exif FBMD.... Considering also File:Praça Doutor Marcelino Ribeiro e Igreja Matriz, Campo Alegre de Lourdes, Bahia, Brazil.jpg (11.03.2016) versus (example) https://www.facebook.com/calbhckebyo/photos/a.592656960803458.1073741825.592652200803934/829570183778800/?type=3&theater (2015). All files (as also the deleted ones) related to Brazilian municipality pt:Campo Alegre de Lourdes
- File:Emblema Oficial da Gestão 2013-2016, da cidade de Campo Alegre de Lourdes, Bahia, Brazil.png
- File:Morro Tuiuiú, Campo Alegre de Lourdes, Bahia, Brazil.jpg
- File:Praça Doutor Marcelino Ribeiro e Igreja Matriz, Campo Alegre de Lourdes, Bahia, Brazil.jpg
- File:Noite Comemorativa - 63 anos - Desfile Indepência do Município de Campo Alegre de Lourdes, Bahia, Brazil.jpg
- File:Estátua Padroeira Nossa Senhora de Lourdes - 64 anos - Desfile Indepência do Município de Campo Alegre de Lourdes, Bahia, Brazil.jpg
- File:Estátua Padroeira Nossa Senhora de Lourdes - 63 anos - Desfile Indepência do Município de Campo Alegre de Lourdes, Bahia, Brazil.jpg
- File:63 anos - Desfile Indepência do Município de Campo Alegre de Lourdes, Bahia, Brasil 04.jpg
- File:63 anos - Desfile Indepência do Município de Campo Alegre de Lourdes, Bahia, Brasil 02.jpg
- File:63 anos - Desfile Indepência do Município de Campo Alegre de Lourdes, Bahia, Brasil 03.jpg
- File:63 anos - Desfile Indepência do Município de Campo Alegre de Lourdes, Bahia, Brasil 01.jpg
- File:Inverno - Vilarejo Barra do Justino, Campo Alegre de Lourdes, Bahia, Brazil.jpg
- File:Centro de Lazer de Campo Alegre de Lourdes Bahia, Brazil.jpg
- File:Espaço de Show - Centro de Lazer de Campo Alegre de Lourdes, Bahia, Brazil.jpg
- File:Festa da Padroeira Nossa Senhora de Lourdes, Campo Alegre de Lourdes, Bahia Brazil.jpg
- File:Semana de Natal - Praça do Banco do Brasil, Av 7 de Setembro, Campo Alegre de Lourdes, Bahia, Brazil.jpg
- File:Centro de Lazer de Campo Alegre de Lourdes Bahia.jpg
- File:Espaço de Show - Centro de Lazer de Campo Alegre de Lourdes.jpg
- File:Centro de Lazer de Campo Alegre de Lourdes.jpg
- File:Morro Tuiuiú.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 07:06, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 21:57, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
out of COM:SCOPE Animalparty (talk) 08:54, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:51, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
unused photo out of COM:SCOPE. Animalparty (talk) 08:55, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:51, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work, ref. user's other deleted uploads 4ing (talk) 09:00, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:51, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Blurry photograph of an olive or grape- not realistically useful per COM:EDUSE Animalparty (talk) 09:08, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:51, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of COM:SCOPE. Animalparty (talk) 09:17, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:51, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be user's work: Low resolution, user's sole contribution, and image is signed Willy Gomez. Animalparty (talk) 09:30, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:51, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
This photograph was posted on flickr as all rights reserved. see here. Y.haruo (talk) 10:43, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:52, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nazar120487 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Newspaper scans.
Juggler2005 (talk) 11:50, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:53, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
False license. If В. В. Иванюк (V. V. Ivanyuk) is Vadim Vasilyevich Ivanyuk, then his works are not in the public domain, for the artist still alive [2]. Juggler2005 (talk) 12:22, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:53, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Personal photo out of scope Gbawden (talk) 12:44, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:53, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mr. Granger (talk · contribs)
[edit]The author of these files is claimed to be Paenigenome at English Wikipedia, but this is questionnable. The image descriptions also state that "The image was taken in Prof. Ben-Jacob's lab, Tel-Aviv University, Israel." Imho OTRS-ticket is necessary to prove authorship and permission. See also this discussion: User talk:Mr. Granger#File:Bacterial art.png
- File:P dendritiformis two colony.png (higher resolution: [3])
- File:Bacterial art.png
- File:P dendritiformis colony4.png (similar image published in May 2011: [4])
- File:P dendritiformis colony3.png (another version of this image is credited "Eshel Ben-Jacob/Rice University" [5])
- File:P dendritiformis colony2.png
BrightRaven (talk) 13:21, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:53, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal photo. Brateevsky {talk} 13:24, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:53, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal photo. Brateevsky {talk} 13:25, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:54, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
private photo Mitte27 (talk) 02:34, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:53, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
unused personal file 37.5.7.216 13:31, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:54, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
no sources 37.5.7.216 13:33, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:54, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
unused personal file 37.5.7.216 13:47, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:54, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 13:48, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:54, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
This file is about a non-pro basketball player. The article in the french Wikipedia has been deleted. Chris93 (talk) 13:52, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:54, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
irrelevant and unlinked TimCowley (talk) 13:59, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:54, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
irrelevant and unlinked TimCowley (talk) 14:00, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:54, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
irrelevant and unlinked TimCowley (talk) 14:01, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:54, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Dubious "own works" (small sizes, no metadata)
- File:BengalaElectronica1986.jpg
- File:Quadro Jaime Filipe.jpg
- File:JFilipe Optacon.jpg
- File:JFilipe ElevadorEscadas.jpg
- File:JFilipe Basil.jpg
- File:CamiloMendonca.jpg
- File:EngJaimeFilipe.JPG
- File:Rui B Godinho2.png
- File:RuiBGodinho.jpg
- File:Pai wikipedia.jpg
37.5.7.216 13:57, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:54, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
irrelevant and unlinked TimCowley (talk) 14:01, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:55, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
irrelevant and unlinked TimCowley (talk) 14:01, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:55, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
irrelevant and unlinked TimCowley (talk) 14:02, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:55, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
irrelevant and unlinked TimCowley (talk) 14:02, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:55, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
irrelevant and unlinked TimCowley (talk) 14:03, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:55, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
irrelevant and unlinked TimCowley (talk) 14:03, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:55, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused file, private image of a non-notable artist. See fr:Discussion:Caroline Vabre/Suppression. BrightRaven (talk) 14:05, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:55, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Very low resolution. Buxtehude (talk) 14:37, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:55, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 15:01, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:55, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Freedome of Panorama does not apply to works of art in public spaces. Ytoyoda (talk) 15:04, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:55, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 15:05, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:55, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Main focus of the image is the TV-screen. The image on the screen is most likely copyrighted, so COM:DW. Josve05a (talk) 15:05, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:55, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 15:11, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:56, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 15:12, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:55, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope advertisement and possible copyright violation. Deli nk (talk) 15:14, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:56, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 15:15, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:56, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Modern art. I think painter identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:16, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:56, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be replaced with wiki-table. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:56, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Modern art or Commons:Derivative works form it. I think authors identity/permission confirmations via Commons:OTRS is necessary.
- File:Aff Topor88 Humus.jpg
- File:Aff Humus Topor.jpg
- File:Aff Humus Willem.jpg
- File:Aff Humus Leiter.jpg
- File:Aff Humus JeanFontaine.jpg
- File:Aff Humus Albertine.jpg
- File:Eros thanatos.gif
- File:Finale3.jpg
- File:Finale2.JPG
- File:Finale1.JPG
- File:Logo humus.png
- File:Humus5.JPG
- File:Humus4.jpg
- File:Humus3.JPG
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:56, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Derivative work of copyrighted material. BrightRaven (talk) 15:52, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:56, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 16:13, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:57, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
_01.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_01.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No acceptable FOP in Iceland, meaning that the standard 70 year copyright term applies. The architect of this building, Alvar Aalto died in 1976. Snaevar (talk) 16:16, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
_01.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 02:57, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
_01.jpg){kind=link}
No acceptable FOP in Iceland, meaning that the standard 70 year copyright term applies. The architect of this building, Alvar Aalto died in 1976. Snaevar (talk) 16:18, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:57, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pedro Luis Naranjo Diaz (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused personal files
- File:En la U (1).JPG
- File:Snapshot 20140110.JPG
- File:Snapshot 20140110 2.JPG
- File:Snapshot 20140110 1.JPG
- File:En la U (15).jpg
- File:Los chamanes (5).jpg
- File:Los chamanes (4).jpg
- File:Los chamanes (1).jpg
- File:Guajiros (6).jpg
File:Guajiros (2).jpgused- File:Guajiros (4).jpg
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
37.5.7.216 16:25, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:57, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pedro Luis Naranjo Diaz (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused personal files
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
91.64.223.167 09:50, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:24, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
Dubious "own work". 10 Results on TinEye 37.5.7.216 16:40, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:57, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Uvaldin milagros (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope, unused personal images.
- File:Milagro-s.jpg
- File:Milagros......jpg
- File:Los chicos.jpg
- File:Adan y jesus.jpg
- File:Bella...jpg
- File:Lalala.jpg
- File:Carmen y mila.jpg
- File:Mimimi.jpg
- File:Presentación2.jpg
- File:Luz.mundo..jpg
- File:Presentación5.jpg
- File:Soy luz del mundo.jpg
- File:Www.luzdelmundo.jpg
- File:Obra luz del mundo.jpg
- File:Presentación8.jpg
- File:Presentación10.jpg
- File:Presentación9.jpg
- File:Luz del mundo.jpg
- File:Presentación6.jpg
- File:Presentación3.jpg
- File:Presentación11.jpg
- File:EL NUEVO LOOK.jpg
- File:Milagros Uvaldin "Mili".jpg
- File:Milagros Uvaldin.jpg
Jespinos (talk) 16:54, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Motopark (talk) 17:24, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Uvaldin milagros (talk · contribs)
[edit]Self-created artwork without obvious educational use.
Juggler2005 (talk) 11:06, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:58, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
unused personal file 37.5.7.216 17:17, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:59, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal file 37.5.7.216 17:42, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:59, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal vanity photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:46, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:59, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Delete: Flickrwashing - low quality image looks like a screenshot by a Flickr user with only 6 uploads all of which look suspicious. Ww2censor (talk) 18:11, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:00, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Considering that the composer is unknown, I do not know how the uploader knows that the composer has been dead for at least 70 years as claimed. According to ja:西サハラの国歌, the song was composed in 1979, so I would find it very remarkable if the composer has been dead for at least 70 years. There is also no information about the status of the performance rights and the sound recording rights. Stefan4 (talk) 18:17, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:00, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Twitter Bird is copyrighted. Fry1989 eh? 18:39, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Copyvio, nonsense description. ViperSnake151 (talk) 18:46, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:00, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Unused photo of non-notable person. outside of scope. Animalparty (talk) 19:02, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:00, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Unused promotional photograph, not realistically useful for educational purposes Animalparty (talk) 19:29, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:00, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely uploader owns copyright. IMDB image page states author as : Francesco Cura' - © Cura' Photography Animalparty (talk) 19:32, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:00, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Dubious own work claim. Credited to John Londono at this source : [6]. No evidence of permission. Possible copyvio. -- Asclepias (talk) 20:59, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:01, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
All categories whose calls this (expensive!) page monitors are now created, it is not needed anymore. -- Tuválkin ✉ 21:08, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:01, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
All categories whose calls this (expensive!) page monitors are now created, it is not needed anymore. -- Tuválkin ✉ 21:12, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:01, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
artwork “Red Square, White Letters“ of Sol LeWitt († 2007), on display in Museum Ludwig, Cologne. Copyvio, no permission, no FOP applicable Elya (talk) 21:14, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:02, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Exhibitionistic nonsense (should be deleted without discussion) ! 88.130.134.147 22:26, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:03, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Exhibitionistic nonsense (should be deleted without discussion) ! 88.130.134.147 22:27, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:03, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Exhibitionistic nonsense (should be deleted without discussion) ! 88.130.134.147 22:27, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:03, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Exhibitionistic nonsense (should be deleted without discussion) ! 88.130.134.147 22:26, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:03, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Exhibitionistic nonsense (should be deleted without discussion) ! 88.130.134.147 22:26, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:03, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope. Ganímedes (talk) 22:31, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:06, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Orphaned, no foreseeable use, seems to be out of scope. Stefan4 (talk) 22:56, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:06, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bayani nacion (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - promotional images - none in use
- File:EXCECUTIVE OFFICERS.jpg
- File:FETFI OFFICER.jpg
- File:TRAINING FACILITY.png
- File:FETFI OFFICE.jpg
- File:LOBBY 1.jpg
- File:FAR EAST TRIBUNE FOUNDATION, INC..jpg
- File:FAR EAST TRIBUNE FOUNDATION, INC. BUILDING.gif
- File:FAR EAST TRIBUNE BUILDING.png
- File:FAR EAST TRIBUNE FOUNDATION, INC.'S COAT OF ARMS.gif
INeverCry 01:56, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:09, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Imrankhan2601 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 02:00, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 18:50, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kristofmcking (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - promotional images
- File:Esidio Logo.png
- File:Lyonspaw Studios Logo.png
- File:LYONCUB Logo.jpg
- File:DrinkUP Logo.png
- File:Steve Lyons Profile.jpg
INeverCry 02:06, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope, possibly some of them also violate copyright Ymblanter (talk) 18:52, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image/logo INeverCry 02:10, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 18:52, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 02:12, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 18:53, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope INeverCry 02:27, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:12, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - no educational value - very low quality INeverCry 02:28, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:12, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Liiz xulee (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope
INeverCry 02:30, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:13, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
It is clearly that the licensing is false. This archive maybe is under reserved copyright. And Its usage could not be considered as "fair use" ΖῷονΠολιτικόν (talk) 00:00, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: copyrighted Ymblanter (talk) 18:54, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
possible copyvio - source is (c) ARR INeverCry 02:17, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 19:40, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused image of non-notable person - also possible copyvio - small/noEXIF/watermark INeverCry 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 19:40, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Aminelaye1306 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Possible copyright violations - small sizes - no EXIF - scans - own work claim doubtful
- File:Mausolée-limamoulaye.jpg
- File:Mame babacar.gif
- File:Empruntengor.jpg
- File:Seydina Madione.jpg
- File:Seydina Issa.jpg
- File:Abdoulaye.jpg
INeverCry 02:32, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 19:40, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Better version e. g. this available. Yikrazuul (talk) 11:09, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
methylether.png){kind=link}
Deleted: Better alternatives in Category:Chloromethyl methyl ether. Leyo 19:30, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Ohne Verwendung Petrus3743 (talk) 12:47, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Kept: kein Löschgrund Krd 19:41, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Ohne Verwendung Petrus3743 (talk) 12:48, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Kept: kein Löschgrund Krd 19:41, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
This involves an American team, and the copyright only works if it wasn't published in America within 30 days. Perhaps it wasn't, but that doesn't seem a safe bet without more information about how this was used, and such. Adam Cuerden (talk) 00:06, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Keep Well, we know the photos from this series are from Conn Smythe's personal collection, who was the principal owner of the Leafs at the time. Theoretically, any old photograph could have been published in the U.S. within 30 days, but there is no indication here (not even a hint) whatsoever of any American involvement with the photo itself that would even trigger COM:PCP. The great likelihood is that this photo was taken by the Leafs organization - possibly even for Smythe himself who was serving with the Canadian Army at the time and would have presumably been following the playoffs from afar. If the photo belonged to a news organization, I would have doubts (it might have been shared with other papers, although not sure photo newswires existed at the time), but a photos in the personal files of the Canadian owner of a Canadian team, notwithstanding the fact that some photos show games against U.S.-based teams, can be assumed to not have been published in other countries (absent some kind of hint otherwise). COM:PCP requires that there be "significant doubt", and while I normally interpret that threshold fairly conservatively (i.e. low), here any doubts are speculative. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 14:10, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
- Do we know the photographer? Because we don't know they're not news organization photographs that he got from them unless we know some basic facts about the photo: this is from the era where photographs could be distributed fairly easily. Adam Cuerden (talk) 15:21, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
- Conceivably, every old anonymous photograph on Commons, and every old photograph where we don't know the full backstory on the photographer, was possibly taken by or for an American news organization, or could have been published in the U.S within 30 days. It's always possible. If that's the standard, then we have hundreds of thousands (millions?) of images to nominate for deletion. But that isn't the standard. We need more than maybe, possibly, perhaps, could be, dunno - which is the basis for this nomination. We rarely know everything about an old photograph (even when we have the name of the photographer). But this photograph was in the collection of the principal owner of the Leafs, and it is therefore reasonable and safe to assume that its provenance is from the Leafs organization. The balance of probabilities in this case leans heavily towards what we know, not toward conjecture without any support. Absent some scintilla, or even a whisper, of evidence to the contrary, anything else is just making up hypotheticals. COM:PCP requires a lot more. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 13:58, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
- Do we know the photographer? Because we don't know they're not news organization photographs that he got from them unless we know some basic facts about the photo: this is from the era where photographs could be distributed fairly easily. Adam Cuerden (talk) 15:21, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Kept: as per Skeezix1000. Yann (talk) 16:31, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
Description contains racist slur, unused. Buxtehude (talk) 00:07, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
- Obvious keep.
- "Unused" is not valid grounds for deletion;
- The phrase that may have offended nominator was trimmed with trivial effort;
- I suggest all images from top secret torture camps should be considered in scope;
- The three dozen or so images uploaded by Cesar Monroy are particularly valuable. To the best of my knowledge they are the only non-official photos we have from the base during the years he was there, and they contain particularly valuable images, like the cliff where a Medal of Honor winner, and later murderer, disposed of the corpse of his victim; the capture a Cuban refugee; the culling of deer on the base. I believe it would only confuse viewers to delete some properly licensed, and completely in scope images, for frivolous reasons, given the explosive nature of other images. I suggest it would suggest to viewers they had been deleted under political pressure by the DoD. Geo Swan (talk) 14:22, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- I realise that the fact that the picture is not used on Wikipedia is not a ground for deletion, although if it were just an unused personal picture it would probably be out of scope. But the description strikes me as primarily a rant. Buxtehude (talk) 14:36, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- Are you talking about deleting the image or do you just want the quote neutralized? Do you want the entire text purged? Why don't you provide an option for us? Secondarywaltz (talk) 15:10, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- Just a suggestion: why not reinstate the original text, making clear that it was the original caption, like at File:Bullet hole from a GI shooting himself.jpg? I would be okay with that, as it best reflects the state of mind of the subject. (However, there may be a problem concerning the privacy of the other military personnel depicted in the series.) Buxtehude (talk) 15:16, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- I checked File:Bullet hole from a GI shooting himself.jpg, that caption was vandalized in 2012, without anyone noticing. We should probably check all his images to see if vandals edited those descriptions. Geo Swan (talk) 15:58, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- Just a suggestion: why not reinstate the original text, making clear that it was the original caption, like at File:Bullet hole from a GI shooting himself.jpg? I would be okay with that, as it best reflects the state of mind of the subject. (However, there may be a problem concerning the privacy of the other military personnel depicted in the series.) Buxtehude (talk) 15:16, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- In my opinion, if an image is otherwise in scope, the author's intent, isn't relevant. There have been some discussions of some images related to human sexuality where those favoring delete based their arguments on the author/uploader's description, asserting the author/uploader's intent was to be a showoff. And I argued that, if a sexual show-off uploads an image which, nevertheless, is useful in a clinical context, their intent is irrelevant.
- In the case of Sergeant Monroy's images, I suggest that, since they are themselves highly in-scope, it is not relevant in a deletion discussion what his intent was. We aren't obliged to include original captions, so long as we comply with the original license. If the description is a problem, change the description. Don't delete the image. Geo Swan (talk) 16:12, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- You are right about the caption being vandalised in 2012. The original caption was "A dumb-ass marine didn't want to be in cuba anymore, so he shot himself in the side of his stomach, the bullet (5.56) went through him, and through the wood of his post. This is the exit hole in the wood." I can see your point about the preservation of the integrity of the series, and the pictures can be viewed as a poignant illustration of life at Guantanamo Bay. Still, there remain some ethical issues because the pictures also involve other people. Buxtehude (talk) 16:17, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- If your ethical concern could be dealt with by placing {{Personality rights}} tag, please feel free to add that tag. Geo Swan (talk) 20:00, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- I have indeed placed the personality rights tag at the relevant pages. And though questions could still be raised about some of the photos, I withdraw my nomination for deletion for this image. Buxtehude (talk) 12:22, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
- You are right about the caption being vandalised in 2012. The original caption was "A dumb-ass marine didn't want to be in cuba anymore, so he shot himself in the side of his stomach, the bullet (5.56) went through him, and through the wood of his post. This is the exit hole in the wood." I can see your point about the preservation of the integrity of the series, and the pictures can be viewed as a poignant illustration of life at Guantanamo Bay. Still, there remain some ethical issues because the pictures also involve other people. Buxtehude (talk) 16:17, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination
Kept: Withdrawn. Yann (talk) 16:32, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
digital terrestrial television Luisfege (talk) 04:10, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Exists updated map: File:Digital broadcast standards.svg Luisfege (talk) 04:10, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Kept: In use. Yann (talk) 16:34, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Exists updated map File:Digital broadcast standards.svg Luisfege (talk) 04:41, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Kept: In use. Yann (talk) 16:36, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
du to the titleis wrong Abooo sooos (talk) 07:03, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: From Instagram, no permission. Yann (talk) 16:40, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 217.119.26.228 as Copyvio (copyvio) Krd 07:54, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Scan from a book, no permission. Yann (talk) 16:42, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
No file present? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:29, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete unless the page creator uploads the correspondient file. --Amitie 10g (talk) 15:52, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Empty. Yann (talk) 16:43, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
OTRS ticket required 37.5.7.216 09:31, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: No permission. Yann (talk) 16:44, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Es una foto tomada en una zona restringida al público durante un período de obras de acondicionamiento 5.10.200.222 10:25, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
- Keep This wouldn't raise any concern about copyright or Commons scope, even if it were true. It isn't a reason to delete.--Pere prlpz (talk) 09:40, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Kept: as per above. Yann (talk) 16:45, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
This is not the own work. OTRS-permission from auther is needed. see here. Y.haruo (talk) 00:01, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:03, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
The copyright holder of this photograph is PTI. OTRS-permission from Press Trust of India is needed. see here. Y.haruo (talk) 10:50, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
I noticed after having submitted a deletion request, the last deletion does not seem to be accomplished.--Y.haruo (talk) 11:14, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
I'm sorry. It was wrong. The newly same name file was uploaded after former file was deleted.--Y.haruo (talk) 11:21, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: No permission. Yann (talk) 16:47, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
Derivative work of deleted File:Haryana CM Manohar Lal Khattar meets PM Modi.jpg for copyright violation. Rahul Bott (talk) 21:01, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted on 5 October 2017 by: User:Hystrix. --Wdwd (talk) 11:39, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
The DigitalGlobe image usage info page is down, but based on the Google Cache version: commercial use is prohibited without express consent, alterations are prohibited and rights may be revoked at any time. Each of these violates Commons policies, I think. Quibik (talk) 11:38, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 16:49, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
Another photographer than stated, see http://gullanbornemark.se/pressbilder.htm Yger (talk) 11:49, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
- Sorry, my mistake. I've changed author from my name to photographer Anders Ebefeldt. Is it okay now? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sven Bornemark (talk • contribs)
- Actually no. If you don't own the rights to the photo, then you don't have the right to upload it and to release it under a free license. Only Anders Ebefeldt can do that. /ℇsquilo 15:01, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- Sven has today been advised of how to do this on his talk page on sv: Riggwelter (talk) 11:04, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
- Actually no. If you don't own the rights to the photo, then you don't have the right to upload it and to release it under a free license. Only Anders Ebefeldt can do that. /ℇsquilo 15:01, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: No permission. Yann (talk) 16:49, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
Outdated and poorer JPEG version of File:Landsat program timeline.png. Quibik (talk) 12:04, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 16:53, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
Logo is not free ابوهايدي (talk) 13:15, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
- It's not really copyrightable under United States copyright law -- a few short generic slogans (chanted a million times at various demonstrations) presented in a generic typeface... AnonMoos (talk) 02:47, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo. Yann (talk) 16:51, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
This file is a duplicate of File:A woman drying cow-dung to be used as fuel in Calcutta in 1945.jpg Co9man (talk) 14:45, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 16:58, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
© 2014 Active Network, LLC and/or its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved. 37.5.7.216 16:15, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
The files is on the page http://www.activenetwork.com/about-us/our-leaders which specifically says: "This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License"
Kept: Looks fine. Yann (talk) 16:59, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Discasto as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Posted to source as All Rights Reserved. Only free files are allowed on Commons. The sources says - All Rights Reserved. The prev disscussion ended when the user claimed it was CC-by-sa-4.0, but checking Web Archive (oct 26 2014 and Dec 10 2014) - the page is the same with all rights reserved. Ronhjones (Talk) 00:41, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:29, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
Though older in regard to the original creation date, Template:CategoryTOC is or has become better in all aspects (flexibility, localisation, translation, layout) and should supersede this one. Would be nice if a bot could replace the one by the other on all category pages. PanchoS (talk) 17:14, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Kept: In use. Yann (talk) 17:00, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
this photo is not real — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.250.116.165 (talk • contribs) 2014-11-18T14:59:47 (UTC)
Kept: In use. Yann (talk) 17:02, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
File:U.S. Air Force Liz Quintanar, the noncommissioned officer-in-charge of Customer Service-Acquisitions, checks a shelf for supplies at Craig Joint Theater Hospital at Bagram Airfield in Parwan province 140318-F-BJ707-245.jpg
[edit]
I do not want a picture of me online that has me in my uniform. 132.3.45.83 20:56, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
- I suggest you ask the DoD to take down the image first from their official sites. Once removed from DoD sources, the licence can be challenged on Commons (taking it down from Commons would not stop re-upload here and elsewhere in the future). Refer to http://www.dvidshub.net/image/1199779/craig-joint-theater-hospital-bagram as an example of where this is displayed and released.
- if the issue here is that you would prefer not to have your name in the image (either the page title or the text), this would be a simpler thing to put in place, though again having the DoD remove these details is the best starting point. --Fæ (talk) 21:25, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: as per request. Seems to be deleted at source. Little educational value anyway: no notable person, no special activity. Yann (talk) 17:06, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
Does not seem to qualify as "own work". Please consider reviewing. DLindsley (My talk page) 22:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
- Keep PD-Textlogo. Open and shut case. Why this was nominated for deletion is a mystery. Does the nominator not know what he/she is doing with regard to these sort of images? --207.207.28.130 23:46, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Kept: PD-Textlogo Yann (talk) 17:09, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
PD claim is invalid. Image is taken from the Dr Macro website, which does not provide the information required to determine the image's copyright status. Current rationale is unsupported boilerplate.The claim here is particulary bad, because a photo taken in 1923 plainly cannot have been taken before January 1, 1923; and because a photo from a London stage production may well have been published in the UK rather than the US. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 23:40, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 17:42, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
Russia does not have Freedom of Panorama for sculptures or monuments...such as this modern war monument. It only has FOP for modern buildings, bridges and dams. Leoboudv (talk) 02:55, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Delete Valid FOP objection, the photo title on Flickr indicates this is a '100th anniversary' monument, so obviously of very recent construction even without knowing the exact location. Also, the name of the photographer in the EXIF is not the same as that of the Flickr uploader, which makes it seem likely that person is only the author of the collage, not the original images, and thus the licencing is dubious. Revent (talk) 09:58, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nominator and Revent's points. Green Giant (talk) 21:44, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
Is this the same object (not necessarily photo) as that of a deleted file? If so, then sorry. Russian FOP for non-architecture is noncommercial which is 
Not OK. Permission from sculptor or his heirs is required. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:05, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Speedy delete Directly uploaded the same deleted file without COM:UNDEL process, if the uploader do so again and again, feel free to report the behaviors to COM:AN/U or COM:AN/V to ask for a block. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 12:35, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
- @Liuxinyu970226: the uploader of the file in question (Dimetrius2015) is not the uploader of the first deleted file (Бархударян). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:21, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
- But this may also caused by pre-downloading (before the last deletion), and intentionally uploaded it to make deletion semi-failure. In all ways, this file is not suitable for Commons. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 13:24, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:17, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
The New York government does not release its works as public domain. FOI != copyright. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:50, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Sorry, I don't know where you went to law school, but you are simply incorrect. See, e.g., Public Officers Law Section 84 "The legislature therefore declares that government is the public's business and that the public, individually and collectively and represented by a free press, should have access to the records of government in accordance with the provisions of this article." — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mstadtmauer (talk • contribs) 2014-11-18T16:49:05 (UTC)
- "Free access" is not the same thing as "public domain". "Free access" means that the government must provide you with a copy of the document if you ask the government to do so. It does not mean that you may distribute copies of the material in other situations. --Stefan4 (talk) 17:34, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Sorry, but that is plainly wrong as well. See, e.g., Comm on Open Gov't FOIL-AO-9874: "Copyright regarding government-produced record is superseded by Freedom of Information Law, particularly in view of expansive interpretations of Freedom of Information Law by Court of Appeals." --Mstadtmauer (talk) 19:12, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
That same Advisory Opinion also plainly states "In general, the recipient may do with a record disclosed under the Freedom of Information Law as he or she sees fit." See: http://docs.dos.ny.gov/coog/ftext/f9874.htm . Might I respectfully suggest that you do some research before leveling serious, but groundless, accusations? --Mstadtmauer (talk) 19:19, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
| “ | Citizens generally have the right to access many items in the government's public records, but this right to access does not include a right to republish or redistribute the works so accessed. | ” |
- That's all I'm going to post here at this point. FWIW, please be nice. Neither I nor anyone else is likely to engage with you if you're going to be nasty. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:00, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Mr. Ogre: The citation that you are referring to relies on Indiana law. While the link does not function, the underlying Opinion Letter is available at: http://www.in.gov/pac/informal/files/Lt.Governor_inquiry_by_Chad_Frahm_re_Tourism_photos.pdf and provides that, even under Indiana law "[The relevant agency of the State of Indiana] may not limit a person’s commercial use of an image [obtained under the Indiana Access to Public Records Act] in which [The relevant agency of the State of Indiana] owns the copyright." Regardless of what the law is in Indiana, what you are saying is plainly NOT the law in the State of New York. In New York, records released under the Freedom of Information Law are public and are NOT copyrighted. I apologize for getting upset, but it is clear that you do not have the legal training to be doing what you are doing. I would also respectfully (and nicely) point out that the unauthorized practice of law is a felony in New York. Even fooling around on the internet can have serious consequences.--Mstadtmauer (talk) 23:46, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
- Oh knock it off. We remove copyright violations, as is our right, and even obligation under many circumstances. That is not practicing law any more than asking the person in the passenger seat to put their seatbelt on is (or, for that matter, making vague legal threats in a deletion discussion). In any case, no, my text was not referring to just Indiana, it clearly stated that many states follow this precedent. Now please point to a specific source which shows that anyone can reuse New York's content without fear of copyright repurcussion. The advice of a single attorney which quotes no specific law holds some weight, but is by no means official. We have evidence that Florida and California follow this law; by all means, provide it for New York. And yes, the burden is on you to show it is free, not vice versa. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:40, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Sir: I disagree with you. The law that I quoted above is correct, binding, and directly applicable to the document that I posted which is free, public, and not subject to any copyright. Your reliance on that wikipedia article is misplaced both because you are not interpreting what you are seeing correctly and because the article that you rely on is, at a minimum, imprecisely written. In any event, the document that I posted was intended to show the dangers of the Cyclone roller coaster and, hopefully, prevent future injuries and death. If you (I assume that you have some authority and are not simply a vigilante) determine to take it down, then the injuries that may have been prevented will be on your conscious not mine.--Mstadtmauer (talk) 16:24, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Per Magog and Stefan's points. Mstadtmauer, if you have legal issues you wish to discuss, please direct your enquiries to legal@wikimedia.org. Green Giant (talk) 21:49, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by TheRedPenOfDoom as Copyvio (copyright) and the most recent rationale was: as per the initial upload comments, was not uploaded or released by the actual creator, only a "claimed" authorship by virtue of being the subject. Krd 08:06, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
- The subject also released the image on her own Flickr account under the CC-BY license. I'm taking that as Gavankar having permission to distribute under that license. --wL <speak·creatively> 07:25, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: The subject can claim personality rights, but the copyright belongs to the photographer, unless there is evidence of a transfer by contract. Publishing on Flickr does not prove that the subject owns the copyright. The only way to restore this file is OTRS. Green Giant (talk) 21:58, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
Files from meddlingwithnature.com
[edit]There are lot of files with uploaded by User:Bike756 from website http://meddlingwithnature.com/ All files on that website are licensed with CC-BY-NC which is not acceptable here. Example is File:Cicada-Killer Wasp Taxidermy.jpg --Smooth_O (talk) 10:26, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
I'm atually the administrator of that website. Meddling with Nature is the project of my partner and some of his collaborators. I have his full permission to share the files I've uploaded (and others that I will upload) under a license that is compatible with wikimedia. Is it a problem to have a file listed as available under two different licenses? I had just assumed that (if they found both sources) people would go with the less restrictive license for most purposes. Let me know if that's a problem, and I can do what I need to do :-)
Bike756 (talk) 23:07, 26 November 2014 (UTC) (Nate Wessel)
- Please either change the license at the source, or send a permission to COM:OTRS. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:46, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: The source page still has only CC-BY-NC 3.0, which is not free enough for Wikimedia Commons. 198 files deleted. Green Giant (talk) 22:37, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
i never opened this. my laptop has been hacked for about 6 months. police report made and currently under detective martinez. thanks.mrs francis 67.8.90.142 21:28, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Frivolous request, followed by vandalism. Green Giant (talk) 22:46, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
2.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
2.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
File difettoso Roberto.Amerighi (talk) 21:55, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
2.png){kind=link}
Deleted: Uploader requested within seven days of upload. Green Giant (talk) 23:05, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
2.png){kind=link}
See COM:TOO#United Kingdom Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:34, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. The file can be uploaded to English Wikipedia if necesssary. Green Giant (talk) 23:04, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
Error en Venezuela todavía evaluando, ademas de información falsa sobre normas en Africa (muchos paises no han tomado una decision al respecto) JorgeGG (talk) 15:05, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
Kept. In use. If there is an error, it can be corrected and uploaded over this version. –Tryphon☂ 08:56, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
Exists updated map File:Digital broadcast standards.svg Luisfege (talk) 04:27, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:16, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
Exists updated map File:Digital broadcast standards.svg Luisfege (talk) 04:29, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:16, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
Exists updated map File:Digital broadcast standards.svg Luisfege (talk) 04:44, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:16, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
Exists updated map File:Digital broadcast standards.svg Luisfege (talk) 05:11, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:17, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
Exists updated map File:Digital broadcast standards.svg Luisfege (talk) 05:13, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:17, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
Los cambios se deben realizar en el original para su referenciado automático Renatux (talk) 14:58, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
Kept, unclear deletion request. Kameraad Pjotr 20:31, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
Exists updated map File:Digital broadcast standards.svg Luisfege (talk) 05:16, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:18, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
Exists updated map File:Worldmap digital television transition.svg Luisfege (talk) 05:50, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:18, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
Exists updated map File:Mappa DTT Italia.svg Luisfege (talk) 06:17, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:18, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
ファイル名を変更したい オキシド (talk) 06:42, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:19, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Titancards as Copyvio (copyvio) Krd 07:45, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Appears everywhere on they internet. Natuur12 (talk) 15:20, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Titancards as Copyvio (copyvio) Krd 07:45, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Appears everywhere on they internet. Natuur12 (talk) 15:20, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Titancards as Copyvio (copyvio) Krd 07:45, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Appears everywhere on they internet. Natuur12 (talk) 15:21, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
A copyriighted derivative image (an advertisement) dominates the picture here. Leoboudv (talk) 09:08, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Comment: Maybe the ad can be cropped out? A suggestion. I will be signing out soon.--Leoboudv (talk) 09:09, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:22, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
de:Ngulu-Richtschwert (runder Ort) deleted; no further use WolfgangRieger (talk) 10:28, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:22, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
de:Konde-Kultmesser deleted; no further use WolfgangRieger (talk) 10:30, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
- Even if actually not used, I don't see no need for deletion.--Avron (talk) 16:33, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 15:22, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
Wrong CoA - correct is DEU Bechenheim COA.svg - source: http://bechenheim.de/startseite/ Juergenk59 (talk) 11:00, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
- That CoA has never been official. It is one of a series of proposed coat of arms from the 1950s. The fact, the towns did not adopt them is another reason to delete them. Fränsmer (talk) 14:25, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
- So it's certainly not PD. ↔ User: Perhelion (Commons: = crap?) 23:08, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:23, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
The author of the image is DLR: given image on their website. The relevant part of their terms of use states: "Images and videos by DLR not indicated 'CC-BY 3.0' are not licenced under the Creative Commons licence model. Permission of use for these images and videos is granted as follows:They may be used by press and other media, or for personal information or educational purposes. Commercial use is subject to DLR permission." This particular imge has no CC-BY tag, so without express permission this image can't be used for commercial purposes. Quibik (talk) 11:54, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:24, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
Low resolution duplicate of File:Domenichino - Portrait of Monsignor Giovanni Battista Agucchi - YORAG 787.jpg PatHadley (talk) 13:24, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:25, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
Wrong CoA - correct is DEU Hahnheim COA.svg - source:http://www.hahnheim.de/ Juergenk59 (talk) 14:38, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
- That CoA has never been official. It is one of a series of proposed coat of arms from the 1950s. Fränsmer (talk) 14:23, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
- So it's certainly not PD. ↔ User: Perhelion (Commons: = crap?) 23:06, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:25, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
According to the copyright tag, the author, who died in 2002, died more than 70 years ago. This is just pure nonsense. There is also no information about the copyright status of the performance rights and the rights to the sound recording. Stefan4 (talk) 18:10, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Stefan, the author is the man who wrote the song. Also, I know this song was performed by the Korean People's Army Song and Dance Ensemble. This audio was probably ripped from KCNA's website. --Kc9ydn (talk) 20:44, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
- Content on KCNA's website is usually copyrighted. See the copyright notice at the bottom: "조선중앙통신 Copyright © 2000-2013 by www.kcna.kp" (조선중앙통신 = KCNA / Chosŏn Chungang T'ongsin) --Stefan4 (talk) 22:54, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:25, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
This one contains subtitles in multipe languages, which aren't useful, because, they would not display all at once, I have started to create separate subtitles and starte with TimedText:Swiss_Psalm.ogg.de-ch.srt TheChampionMan1234 (talk) 19:48, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:29, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
Durch die neuangelegte Datei 
ist diese Datei obsolet. Fränsmer (talk) 20:57, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
- Problematik war, dass - zumindest an meinem PC - die GIF-Datei skaliert weiße Artefakte anzeigte. Ich hab die Datei daher - mit zusätzlichem Rand - im besseren PNG-Format neu hochgeladen und detaillierter (und letztlich der Originalquelle) beschrieben. Somit ist die GIF-Datei eigentlich nur ein schlechteres Duplikat der PNG und somit überflüssig. Fränsmer (talk) 15:58, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:30, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
I don't see how a person photographs himself while giving a guitar recital. Obviously not taken by him which makes me suspicious as to rights. Kotivalo (talk) 21:50, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:30, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
Obviously not taken by pkleemola2 since he is in the picture. Kotivalo (talk) 22:06, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:30, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
The photo can't be own work, obvious professional studio shoot. Kotivalo (talk) 22:07, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:30, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
Same problem as with other photos: do we have permission from the real photographer? Kotivalo (talk) 22:09, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
I am sorry but this is a typical problem when people do assumptions without knowing any backgrounds. I, Pkleemola2 (Petteri Kleemola) have taken the picture of my brother Patrik Kleemola performing at Temppeliaukio Church. Pkleemola2 01:01, 4 December 2014 (UTC+2)
Deleted: Please send evidence of permission to com:OTRS or upload the files in their original resolution if possible with valid EXIF data. Natuur12 (talk) 15:31, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
Tagged - wrong name - superseded by File:Federico Andreotti - The Serenade.jpg A1AA1A (talk) 22:36, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
- OK. You seem to be right - the author is mistaken and "your" version is of better resolution. Electron ツ ➧☎ 23:15, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:31, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Wrong name - Superseded by File:Federico Andreotti - The Serenade.jpg A1AA1A (talk) 22:38, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- OK. You seem to be right - the author is mistaken and "your" version is of better resolution. Electron ツ ➧☎ 23:16, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:31, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Superseded by File:Federico_Andreotti_-_A_new_basket_of_flowers.jpg A1AA1A (talk) 22:51, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:32, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
PD claim is invalid. Image is taken from the Dr Macro website, which does not provide the information required to determine the image's copyright status. Current rationale is unsupported boilerplate. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 23:05, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete: It's black and white, so it was taken before image color was first developed. However, I am supporting deletion because the year that this picture was taken is not described, which is why I can see what you are saying. We might want to consider asking the uploader if he has the year that this picture was taken. DLindsley (My talk page) 23:12, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
- Comment You've got to be joking, right? B/W film photography is still used today so why you spout BS as per the above demonstrates just how clueless you are on these matters, and therefore should resist the urge to comment. And no, the picture wasn't taken "before colour was developed". The picture was taken around the mid-40s (probably for "Salome Where She Danced" in 1945) as Ms DeCarlo was in her 20s in that shot. So it's very definitely taken prior to 1963. The copyright situation however is less quantifiable. Normally promo shots like this would have been taken by the studio, therefore they would hold the copyright. The question is, which studio? That leads to the question, does that studio still exist? And if it does, did they renew the copyright. I'll bet that the latter question is no, as most promo shots were taken then forgotten once the movie marketing was over. Around that time DeCarlo was working for Universal, so there's a good chance they hold the copyright, though whether that particular photo's copyright was renewed is open to question. I wouldn't say it's a slam-dunk obvious deletion, but then again it's not an obvious keep either. It is however a rather useful image to have in the library. --207.207.28.130 23:43, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
- You're certainly right that the B&W nature of the image is pretty much irrelevant to its date; such images are still circulated for use in newspapers, for example, where most photos are still not in color (both in advertising and editorial content). For images like this, we need to establish the date and jurisdiction of publication in order to determine its copyright status. Not every picture taken during a publicity session was actually published contemporaneously, too; some sat in files, unused, for years before surfacing. And if the photo was taken for a magazine or newspaper, its original publication was almost certainly copyrighted, and the copyright might or might not have been renewed - we just can't tell without knowing which periodical was involved. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 16:16, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:38, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
PD claim is invalid. Image is taken from the Dr Macro website, which does not provide the information required to determine the original publication lacked a copyright notice. Current rationale is unsupported boilerplate. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 23:09, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Keep This was a promo shot for the movie "Swamp Water" so is likely to have been taken circa 1940/41 and is easily prior to the 1963 cutoff. Generally speaking promo shots like this are left to to become PD after the relevant marketing campaign was finished, especially when they involved young, and at the time unknown/relatively unknown, actors/actresses. At that time 2oth Century Fox would have held the original copyright. --64.9.157.138 23:55, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:38, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
PD claim is invalid. Image is taken from the Dr Macro website, which does not provide the information required to determine the image's copyright status. Current rationale is unsupported boilerplate. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 23:11, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:38, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
PD claim is invalid. Image is taken from the Dr Macro website, which does not provide the information required to determine the original publication lacked a required copyright notice. Current rationale is unsupported boilerplate. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 23:18, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Keep This shot was taken somewhere between 1948-1955, before the 1963 cutoff. She was contracted to 20th Century Fox at that time so they would have held the original copyright. --64.9.157.138 00:06, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- But so what? None of that has any bearing on whether the original publication carried a required copyright notice. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 16:04, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:39, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
PD claim is invalid. Image is taken from the Dr Macro website, which does not provide the information required to determine the original publication lacked a required copyright notice. Current rationale is unsupported boilerplate. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 23:27, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:39, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
PD claim is invalid. Image is taken from the Dr Macro website, which does not provide the information required to determine the original publication lacked a required copyright notice. Current rationale is unsupported boilerplate. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 23:29, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:39, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
PD claim is invalid. Image is taken from the Dr Macro website, which does not provide the information required to determine the original publication lacked a required copyright notice. Current rationale is unsupported boilerplate. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 23:30, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:39, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
PD claim is invalid. Image is taken from the Dr Macro website, which does not provide the information required to determine the original publication lacked a required copyright notice. Current rationale is unsupported boilerplate. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 23:31, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:39, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
PD claim is invalid. Image is taken from the Dr Macro website, which does not provide the information required to determine the original publication lacked a required copyright notice. Current rationale is unsupported boilerplate. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 23:35, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:39, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
