Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2014/06/24
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
사용하지 않는 파일입니다. 211.245.148.162 06:06, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Kept: GT: "File is not used". This is a userpage, not a file, and it is certainly in use. tsca (talk) 09:45, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Picture taken from a Facebook page, not meeting the license. Ribbon Salminen (talk) 13:05, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
There's no copyright violation .That picture is taken from Brandon Silvestry (Low Ki) personal and official facebook page.It's supposed to be free to everyone,there's no wrestling federations or tv companies involved.(talk) 15:54, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Please follow the procedure at COM:OTRS to submit permission. A volunteer will restore the image if everything is in order. Эlcobbola talk 16:05, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status, potentially out of Commons' SCOPE. FDMS 4 17:25, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
@AndreCarrotflower: Did you shoot all of your self-portraits yourself? FDMS 4 17:28, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
- @FDMS4 -
- As to the copyright status, I asked a close friend of mine to take this photograph for the explicit purpose of placing it on Wikimedia Commons, and received her verbal permission to do so. Commons:Copyright rules#Questionable, may or may not be OK states that "pictures of [the uploader him- or herself] taken by a third party" are "normally ok if it's a candid or casual shot made on [the uploader's] request."
- As to issues of scope, Commons:Project scope#File in use on Commons only states that "by custom the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page on a Wikimedia Foundation project is allowed." I have three self-portraits on Commons, which is a "small number" by any reasonable estimation, and I like to rotate between them on my Wikivoyage userpage from time to time. (Incidentally, by way of heading off future deletion requests, the other two photographs were also specifically commissioned by me for the explicit purpose of being placed on Commons.)
Withdrawn: Thanks for the first link. FDMS 4 14:23, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
Probably Flickr washing, photo from Getty Images according to Flickr page 4ing (talk) 18:19, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedily deleted by Túrelio. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 09:26, 25 June 2014 (UTC) (non-admin closure)
Wrong syntax (Categöry: instead of Category:). No use Tangopaso (talk) 22:51, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom, as creator Lymantria (talk) 10:14, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
This is a derivative work. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:39, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawn per clarification here Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:36, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
picture collection without source, includes email-address Motopark (talk) 03:39, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: No indication of consent by depicted person. Hoax, revenge or whatever. On top of that out of project scope. Rillke(q?) 14:13, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
This is not the coat of arms of Mittelhausen, the cigarette and American seal should make that clear. This is out of scope and not in use. Lemmens, Tom (talk) 21:05, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 09:57, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
اطلاعات شخصی Kharmagass (talk) 19:12, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
اطلاعات شخصی (maintenance on incomplete nomination) — billinghurst sDrewth 01:18, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
I think the file must be deleted.Kharmagass (talk) 04:47, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope Natuur12 (talk) 21:12, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
One of five that is likely a copyvio. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:40, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:12, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
One of five that is likely a copyvio. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:40, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:12, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
One of five that is likely a copyvio. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:40, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:12, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
One of five that is likely a copyvio. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:40, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:12, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
One of five that is likely a copyvio. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:40, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:12, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal image; see COM:SCOPE. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:17, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:12, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Found elsewhere online (http://www.cosmiq.de/qa/show/3176298/Guten-Morgen-ihr-Lieben-Redet-leise-wenn-ihr-von-Liebe-redet/); unlikely to be own work. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:18, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:12, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
out of scope, unknown person, no educational purpose — billinghurst sDrewth 05:27, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:13, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
out of scope, del on DE Nolispanmo 07:45, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:13, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 08:56, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:14, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work looks like a diagram from a magazine or book with header and footer printing. Possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:24, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:14, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Scan carte postale CFF. Fabienp (talk) 15:16, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Delete This is too bad -- it is a very nice pic, but it appears at http://sammas2250.blogspot.com/2013_11_01_archive.html and is, according to the uploader, a scan of a postcard. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:47, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:14, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE - unused personal photo with no realistic educational use Эlcobbola talk 15:29, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:15, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE - unused personal photo with no realistic educational use Эlcobbola talk 15:34, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:15, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE - unused personal photo with no realistic educational use
- File:Nayrovi Jimenez swag.jpg
- File:Nayrovi Jimenez tumblr.jpg
- File:Nayrovi Jimenez!.png
- File:Swag Nayrovi Jiménez.jpg
- File:Nayrovi Jiménez..jpg
- File:Nayrovi Jimenez*.jpg
- File:Nayrovi Jiménez ().jpg
- File:Nayrovi Jiménez 2013.jpg
- File:Nayrovi Jiménez.jpg
Эlcobbola talk 15:36, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:15, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata, extremely widely published online: uploader's assertion of {{Own}} work in doubt. Uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please confirm this via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 15:41, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:15, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata, looks professionally shot: uploader's assertion of {{Own}} work in doubt. Uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please confirm this via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 15:43, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:15, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata, looks professionally shot: uploader's assertion of {{Own}} work in doubt. Uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please confirm this via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 15:44, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:15, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata, looks professionally shot: uploader's assertion of {{Own}} work in doubt. Uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please confirm this via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 15:44, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:15, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Purportedly the OS symbol for "ios 8" (according to Google translate of the image description). If so, this would not be freely licensed. Storkk (talk) 15:46, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:15, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed," this is unused and therefore out of scope. Storkk (talk) 15:46, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:15, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata: uploader's assertion of {{Own}} work in doubt. Uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please confirm this via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 15:48, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:16, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed," this is unused and therefore out of scope. Storkk (talk) 15:48, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:16, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, too small to be realistically educationally useful. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed," this is unused and therefore out of scope. Storkk (talk) 15:49, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:16, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
File:Giovanni Redi -57 match -47 match vinti 3 pari 7 sconfitte-Campione italiano pro 2009 muay thai-Medaglia di bronzo 2010 Bangkok e 2011-Campione mondiale WTKA dilettante-Campione pro Wako pattaya muay thai -Cam 2014-06-03 00-20.jpg
[edit]Small size, no metadata, watermarked and looks professionally shot: uploader's assertion of {{Own}} work in doubt. Uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please confirm this via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 15:50, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:16, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
EXIF credits "Gabo Gomez - www.GaboGomez.com", but uploader is Ximenavasquez (talk · contribs). Probable copyright violation. Uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please follow the instructions on COM:OTRS to confirm this. Storkk (talk) 15:54, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:16, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed," this is unused and therefore out of scope. Storkk (talk) 15:55, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:16, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed," this is unused and therefore out of scope. Storkk (talk) 15:55, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:16, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata, looks professionally shot: uploader's assertion of {{Own}} work in doubt. Uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please confirm this via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 15:56, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:16, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
No metadata, looks professionally shot: uploader's assertion of {{Own}} work in doubt. Uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please confirm this via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 15:57, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:16, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
No metadata, watermarked "PERGE 2014", yet uploader is Ufika010 (talk · contribs): uploader's assertion of {{Own}} work in doubt. Uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please confirm this via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 15:57, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:16, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused test image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:34, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope, just a black image. Not even pure black, just an image taken in the dark. Lewis Hulbert (talk) 15:59, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete and protect. Too generic file name with more than one difefrent uploads. --Amitie 10g (talk) 18:28, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: --Steinsplitter (talk) 23:17, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Album cover - copyright not likely held by uploader. Uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please follow the instructions on COM:OTRS to confirm this. Storkk (talk) 16:08, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:19, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata: uploader's assertion of {{Own}} work in doubt. Uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please confirm this via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 16:09, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:19, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope Lewis Hulbert (talk) 16:09, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:19, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
personal unused file — Racconish ✉ 16:10, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:19, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused pure text PDF - out of scope. If the contents are in scope for a sister project, this should be recreated as text there. Storkk (talk) 16:12, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:19, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed," this is unused and therefore out of scope. Storkk (talk) 16:13, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:19, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Appears to be a scan of an old photo - copyright not obviously held by uploader. Uploader, if you are the original photographer, or otherwise know why this image is freely licensable, please follow the instructions on COM:OTRS to confirm this. Storkk (talk) 16:15, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:19, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
personal file, non encyclopedic — Racconish ✉ 16:15, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:19, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed," this is unused and therefore out of scope. Storkk (talk) 16:16, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:19, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata, looks professionally shot from a privileged position. Suspected copyright violation. Storkk (talk) 16:23, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:19, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata, looks professionally shot from a privileged position. Suspected copyright violation. Storkk (talk) 16:23, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:19, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed," this is unused and therefore out of scope. Storkk (talk) 16:25, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:19, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Commons - it's not hosting. This file it's variant of flag, author = downloader. - Максим Підліснюк (talk) 17:45, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete, I do not think that a fantasy flag of a fantasy state (i.e. a user's own vision of the flag of a state that has never ever existed) is of any use for Wikimedia projects — NickK (talk) 20:13, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete, this file is not only the creation of fantasy flag of a fantasy state (by the way, unknown), but also may be qualifed as a separatist-terroristic material. --Vlad Ukr (talk) 10:33, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:20, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
ununsed userpageimage -> out of scope. JuTa 18:08, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:21, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
unused userpageimage -> out of scope. JuTa 18:10, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:21, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused "fork" by blocked user who randomly reverted stuff. Lemmens, Tom (talk) 18:16, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:21, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
unused unknown logo -> out of scope. JuTa 18:31, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:21, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Low quality without any description or location, motif says nothing. No educational value.
A.Savin 19:13, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:21, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:2m solutions
[edit]Screenshots of an unknown software of an non notable company -> out of scope. Incorrect CC licenses used anyhow.
- File:Alterar-nome.png
- File:Coletas.png
- File:Destino reultados.png
- File:Documentacao.png
- File:Documentação1.png
- File:Icone-expertris.png
- File:Importacao.png
- File:Login-expertris.png
- File:Medico-solicitante.png
- File:Operadoras.jpg
- File:Pre-atendimento1.jpg
- File:Requisicao.png
- File:Senha-autorizacao.jpg
- File:Tela agendamento1.png
- File:Tela-agendamento1.png
- File:Telaprincipalexpertris.jpg
JuTa 19:57, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:22, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused, personal picture(s), out of Project Scope. Amitie 10g (talk) 20:38, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:22, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kollárovci (talk · contribs)
[edit]Self prommotional or spam picture(s), out of Project Scope.
Amitie 10g (talk) 20:40, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Голосование/Ballot
[edit]- Оставить все - Полная глупость, что изображения делают кому нибудь рекламу.--Toma646 (talk) 09:11, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
- Keep - Is stupidity, that this pictures do somebody advertising. On this pictures nothing advertising.--Toma646 (talk) 09:11, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:SCOPE & possible copyright violations. Steinsplitter (talk) 23:23, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kollárovci (talk · contribs)
[edit]Files uploaded again by a single-purpose account (the same files but different names). Notability of the band may be discussed.
Amitie 10g (talk) 05:56, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 10:21, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Smittyboyfloyd (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused, personal picture(s), out of Project Scope.
Amitie 10g (talk) 20:41, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:24, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE, unused personal image —Mono (how to reply) 20:47, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:24, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE, unused personal image —Mono (how to reply) 20:48, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Duplicate. --Principal adjoint (talk) 21:04, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Duplicate. --Principal adjoint (talk) 21:04, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Duplicate. --Principal adjoint (talk) 21:04, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:24, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:Podhu
[edit]All these diagrams looking to me like out of scope.
- File:Base of Magnet Electricity Light Gravity Solar-system Universe.png
- File:Electricity podhu.png
- File:Maiyam kudumbam.png
- File:Maiyam penyibu.png
- File:Maiyam ring.png
- File:Podhu elacricity.png
- File:Podhu maiyam-ring maiyam-bimbam.png
- File:Podhu.png
- File:Pole never reach the maiyam vio its own kay.png
- File:Reason for attraction.png
- File:Reason for repel.png
- File:We cannot create magnet without space for pol.png
JuTa 21:07, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:25, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
None of the links show this standard as official (only in the first shows it as a PROPOSAL). It has been added in few wikipedia pages as real. HansenBCN (talk) 01:44, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
- It is not officialized but not an invention
Royal Cadency of Spain-Standards. Blog de Heráldica Explanation of members of Spanish Royal Family schema with explanation of the Queen consort case
.jpg){kind=link}
-Allocolchicin.gif){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
_памятник_Ленину.jpg){kind=link}
_вид_№2.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Also always correct information has been provided at Infobox after the name of the file there is the expresion: Not officialized:
- In addition to this there is have a template avaible for these cases: Template:Fictional.--Heralder (talk) 23:37, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Unofficial status is not a reason for deletion. Fry1989 eh? 19:52, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
- Not official and also not even a definit design yet. As it is in use on some projects as official there should be a banner saying this isn't the official standard of Letizia, yet. Or this should be deleted as this is completly made up, but name and everything suggests this is official. On Wikipedia this would be removed as "fantasy", or own research (on Wikipedia also not allowed as there are no sources). Dqfn13 (talk) 16:21, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
- This is not Wikipedia and those rules do not apply here. I have no problem with using a banner to mark it fictional, but I see not reason to delete it, yet. Fry1989 eh? 18:20, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
- Not official and also not even a definit design yet. As it is in use on some projects as official there should be a banner saying this isn't the official standard of Letizia, yet. Or this should be deleted as this is completly made up, but name and everything suggests this is official. On Wikipedia this would be removed as "fantasy", or own research (on Wikipedia also not allowed as there are no sources). Dqfn13 (talk) 16:21, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
Kept: This file is used in multiple Wikipedia projects and thereby within COM:SCOPE. Please note your comments regarding its status in the description of the file and/or on its talk page. You are similarly free to discuss its usage in the individual projects. AFBorchert (talk) 06:08, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
Not an official coat of arms, only a proposal; no sources. HansenBCN (talk) 01:48, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Comment We have a template for that: Template:Fictional. Lemmens, Tom (talk) 08:46, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
- Always has been provided correct information at Infobox after the name of the file there is the expresion: Not officialized:
- It is not officialized but not an invention
- Escudos de Montalban:
- Blasón: Escudo ovalado de dama. A diestra el escudo de España con el escusón de los borbones en el abismo, ovalado. A siniestra las armas de Ortiz y de Rocasolano combinadas. Corona real y banda de la Orden de Carlos III.
- Reference to Queen’s arms at article as Princess’s arms proposal:
- Armas de Doña Leticia, Revista Internacional de Protocolo, ISSN 1135-9692, Number 33, 2004 , :::pp. 64-65
- Reference to Queen’s arms at article as Princess’s arms proposal:
- …conforme a los usos que en esta materia s han seguido por parte de las Reinas, Princesas e Infantas de España, los cuales desde la época medieval son constantes: las soberanas españolas parten simerpes sus armerías propias y familiares con las de su regio esposo, reservando a las de éste las de la mano principal de su escudo (Reference of the Queen’s consort arms)
- Escudo ovalado y partido:
- I cuartelado y entado en punta 1º de gules, con un castillo de oro, almenado, mazonado de sable y aclarado de azur, 2º de plata con un león rampante de púrpura coronado de oro, lampasado y armado de gules, 3º de oro, con cuatro palos de gules, 4º de gules, con una cadena de oro puesta en orla, en cruz y en aspa, con un punto de sinople en abismo, entado en punta, de plata, con una granada al natural rajada de gules, sostenida, tallada y hojada de dos hojas de sinople, Sobre el todo, un escusón de azur con tres flores de lis de oro, bordura de gules, el todo diferenciado con un lambel de azur de tres pies, que es del Príncipe de Asturias;
- II cuartelado, 1º y 4º de azur, con una estrella de oro de ocho puntas, bordura jaquelada de plata y gules que es de Ortiz, 2º y 3º de oro, con una rosa de gules botonada y hojada de sinople que es de Rocasolano.
- Al timbre una corona cerrada, que es un círculo de oro, engastado en piedras preciosas en sus colores, compuesto de ocho florones de hojas de acanto visibles cinco, interpolados de perlas en su color, de los que parten cuatro diademas de perlas, vistas tres, que convergen en un orbe azul, con el semimeridiano y el ecuador de oro, sumado de cruz de oro, la corona forrada de rojo. El escudo rodeado de la banda de la Gran Cruz de la orden de Carlos III.}}--Heralder (talk) 23:28, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Unofficial status alone is not a valid reason for deletion. Fry1989 eh? 19:51, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
Kept: This file is used on a huge number of Wikipedia projects and thereby within COM:SCOPE. Please note your comments in the file description and/or on its talk page. You are also free to discuss this in the individual projects that use this file. AFBorchert (talk) 06:09, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
image used only by promotional page deleted off enwiki DS (talk) 03:30, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Thank you for the notice: The associated article draft has been declined twice, the author has been indef'd at en-wp for being a promotional account. Any future use of this logo appears to be unlikely. AFBorchert (talk) 06:13, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
The flag is created without references. I do not see any proposal for Tamil language flag. It leads to false idea on Tamil language. If not, uploader should give valid source in order to claim illustration work. Dravidian yellow cannot be adding to Tamil flag since Tamil is unique language. Is there any official claim or valid reference? AntonTalk 05:27, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Delete This flag has no official or unofficial usage, just being created and propagated through Wikipedia/Commons. If that isn't a valid reason to delete, then it should be renamed to File:User designed flag for Tamil language.png so as to avoid any unnecessary confusion for editors and readers. —SpacemanSpiff 18:06, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: German flag upside down -> Tamil Language(!) flag? No proof that this is not a hoax. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:18, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: This is unused, it appears to be fictional and the file's description does not provide any references that would allow us to consider this file to be within COM:SCOPE. AFBorchert (talk) 06:27, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
Note that this case was concurrently closed by two admins (with the same outcome). --AFBorchert (talk) 06:30, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
The flag is created without references. I do not see any proposal for Tamil language flag. It leads to false idea on Tamil language. If not, uploader should give valid source in order to claim illustration work. Dravidian yellow cannot be adding to Tamil flag since Tamil is unique language. Is there any official claim or valid reference? AntonTalk 00:54, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
The content in the page name File:Tamil_language_flag.png is not fictional or self promoting propaganda, it is just the new version of the old tamil flag File:Tamil-flag.gif it was officially designed under the request of "Department of tamil development" in tamilnadu state government. the new flag is to be officially launch at the upcoming international Tamil conference. and they are taking steps to announce the "tamil language flag" as the iconic flag for tamil community all around the world. uploading/promoting the new flag design through Wikipedia/Commons is a part of our promotional plans, to reach the tamil people globally. YELLOW color was used because its related to our culture & was once used by one of the tamil dynasty called "pandiya dynasty" on their flag. as i am the designer of the flag, hope i have all the rights over it & i assure you that the design/promotional activity dose not mean to create any false idea on Tamil language or the tamilpeople. since i have upload the file under the legal copyright regulation, i request you to undo the deletion of File:Tamil_language_flag.png the related page. Thank you . —Anubes666 14:05, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
- Can you provide valid references including to file description? File description differs. English version says about Tamil and Tamil version says about Dravidian. It is better to upload once the flag was accepted. Or names it like "Tamil language flag of Department of tamil development" "Tamil language flag of tamilnadu", etc. There is no prove of so called new flag at the official site. --AntonTalk 11:56, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
- Btw, Is it Tamil language flag or Tamil flag? It sounds me like "draft version" since there is no final agreement on the flag. Therefore, it seems to me COM:NOTHOST and Artwork created by the uploader without obvious educational use. --AntonTalk 12:03, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
User:SpacemanSpiff Copyright is not the problem for flags. You can upload any falags here.
After the flag get official approval from all Tamil communties in the world we can undo the delete. It is better to request to undo the delete after the upcoming international Tamil conference.--தென்காசி சுப்பிரமணியன் (talk) 12:51, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
- TO clarify, I have not made the above comment. User:Anubes666 seems to have copied my signature and therefore it's showing as a message from me @தென்காசி சுப்பிரமணியன், Anton. I have now fixed it. —SpacemanSpiff 13:51, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Until such time that this becomes an official or commonly used unofficial flag, it shouldn't be here. Commons and the 'pedias should not be used as avenues to promote an agenda. —SpacemanSpiff 13:53, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
- Delete No clarification by uploader, just unproven statements. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:09, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
- Keep I see no harm in hosting this image. Fry1989 eh? 02:33, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
Anton No the descriptions are correct, both the english & tamil versions are talking about only the tamil, Tamils are also of part of the Dravidian family along with others like Telugu,Kannada & malayalam. as the proposal by the tamil development department for the new flag is still under concern along with the proposal for world tamil conference, we can't be sure about the govt, how long it will take to made decisions on the proposals. after seeing so many apposes here, i have made my mind to upload the flag after it get approved, with all the proper reference you need. until that am afraid the page should have to be exist in order to convince the officials to approve the flag. I intended to communicate the initiatives taken to share the information on the Tamil Language Flag. However, The word "Promotion" has been interpreted as "a marketing initiative". The actual usage of this word "promotion" in my content is to mean "GET TO KNOW/GIVING INFO" about the flag via wikipedia, who ever make a search under the name of tamil laguage flag. We hope to pass the information about the new flag and not into any commercial objective. hope you understand ... thankyou ... —Anubes666 16:43, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
User:SpacemanSpiff Thanks a lot. @தென்காசி சுப்பிரமணியன் —Anubes666 14:07, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
User:Fry1989 thank you for the support. —Anubes666 14:12, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
Anton can i change the title of my content to "user defined tamil language flag" .....??? —Anubes666 16:43, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
- I think that would be good idea. Even though, Artwork created by the uploader without obvious educational use could be deleted. Any idea from others? --AntonTalk 14:13, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
- That would in fact be a violation of COM:SCOPE, and given that the creator of this flag seems to now admit that this is user defined, there's all the more reason that Commons shouldn't be host to this. —SpacemanSpiff 05:12, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
User:SpacemanSpiff Oh! then tell me what would be non violation here ? Already i have mentioned that the flag is under proposal for the approval & not into any commercial objective. & by keep on giving DR on the design, now you guys made me to admit that the design is user defined one, in order to save it form deletion. i can see hell lot of fictional flags in commons which is not even in use, [1] now am just trying to add my design under the fictional category, but you still have problem in hosting the file !!! can you please tell me in what way i violate the rules ? —Anubes666 19:02, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
- It's not good justification to pointing finger to other flags. If you feel they were against policy, you can take necessary action. Btw, you are not provided valid reference yet rather than your own justification and strongly request to delete this file. You may upload once it approved from the relevant department. --AntonTalk 03:50, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
- Comment there is no requirement for a flag to be an official flag to be within scope, if it is not a fact, then it should be labelled as {{Fictional flag}}. Even if it is proposed that can make it within scope. I tend to keep, this is not WP, and if it is not factual, that means that the WP doesn't use it, not that it isn't hosted here. — billinghurst sDrewth 11:28, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
No clear consensus to delete -FASTILY 07:52, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
Clearly intended as spam, used only in advertisement articles (now deleted) on Wikipedia, spam description as well. Seraphimblade (talk) 05:46, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Ad, out of scope Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:25, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
I think I'm not able to provide sufficent copyright informations concerning this file. Beckanr1 (talk) 06:50, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
- Fontane's poem "Die Brück' am Tay" is in the public domain: Fontane died in 1898. Could Beckanr1 please name the author of the previous essay of which few sentences are shown on the page in question? Although it is hard to imagine that somebody who published in Die Gegenwart in 1880 should still have been alive in 1944. Otherwise one could try to delete his text from the pdf. --Vsop (talk) 09:39, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
I had not been aware that besides Erstdruck from Die Gegenwart the file contains 4 more pages with snippets from Vossische Zeitung. I shall try to find a suitable "license" for them. --Vsop (talk) 09:55, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Public domain Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:29, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
unused personal files, user art, advertisings
- File:Fondo de agua.jpg
- File:Diseño Designer.jpg
- File:Diseño de Foto Solida.jpg
- File:Diseño de Foto D.jpg
- File:Diseño de Foto.jpg
- File:Voy a la Apuesta.jpg
- File:Dios es Amor.jpg
- File:Daniel Tomas.jpg
- File:Diseño Daniel Tomas Daniel.jpg
37.5.4.188 08:08, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:34, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
own work ? 37.5.4.188 08:21, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:35, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
There is no indication that the Sydsvenska Dagbladet is a non-copyrighted newspaper, nor would freedom of panorama apply to this reproduction of the newspaper front page. As the image is in use, it would be worth checking if the local wikis allow fair use and if this is eligible under their policies. The photographer appears to have released his photograph, but the underpinning copyright of the newspaper has not been addressed. Fæ (talk) 09:13, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per Fae (no FU on svwiki btw) Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:37, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
Own work ? 37.5.4.188 09:30, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:38, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unclear copyright status.Taken from http://www.copa2014.gov.br/en/noticia/brazil-beat-croatia-world-cup-opening-match with a buggy & contradictory license. On one side we have a Cc-by-3.0-license for all content of http://www.copa2014.gov.br, on the other hand we have "Check out the photo galleries (they can be downloaded in high resolution and are free to use for editorial purposes)"my underline. Additional the photo itself is credited with "Foto: Vipcomm". Vipcomm is a Brazilian communication agency. The photo can be found on their website via http://www.vipcomm.com.br/buscar/fotos/sele%C3%A7%C3%A3o%20brasileira/16 = http://www.vipcomm.com.br/site/upload/sbcroacia_jb_12JUN14_716.jpg where the site states: "Atenção: As fotos da Vipcomm são de uso exclusivo editorial (reportagens de sites, jornais, blogs, revistas e redes sociais de veículos de mídia). É expressamente proibida a utilização para qualquer outro fim, com risco de penalizações previstas em lei." = Attention: The photos by VIPCOMM are for editorial use only (...). The use for any other purpose is expressly prohibited, with the risk of penalties provided by law.
Editorial imagery is for non-commercial, non-promotional use only which is not compatible with COM:L.
Nominating also the related crops:
- File:Thiago silva Brazil and Croatia match at the FIFA World Cup 2014-06-12 (57) (cropped).jpg
- File:Dani alves Brazil and Croatia match at the FIFA World Cup 2014-06-12 (57) (cropped).jpg
- File:Marcelo Brazil and Croatia match at the FIFA World Cup 2014-06-12 (57) (cropped).jpg
- File:Oscar Brazil and Croatia match at the FIFA World Cup 2014-06-12 (57) (cropped).jpg
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Gunnex (talk) 08:13, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Nominating additionally:
- File:Brazil and Croatia match at the FIFA World Cup 2014-06-12 (63).jpg --> per abvove, credited with "Foto: Vipcomm" = http://www.vipcomm.com.br/buscar/fotos/sele%C3%A7%C3%A3o%20brasileira/15 = http://www.vipcomm.com.br/site/upload/sbcroacia_jb_12JUN14_1033.jpg
- File:Brazil and Croatia match at the FIFA World Cup 2014-06-12 (62).jpg --> per abvove, credited with "Foto: Vipcomm" = http://www.vipcomm.com.br/buscar/fotos/sele%C3%A7%C3%A3o%20brasileira/15 = http://www.vipcomm.com.br/site/upload/sbcroacia_jb_12JUN14_1032.jpg
- File:Brazil and Croatia match at the FIFA World Cup 2014-06-12 (61).jpg --> per abvove, credited with "Foto: Vipcomm" = http://www.vipcomm.com.br/buscar/fotos/sele%C3%A7%C3%A3o%20brasileira/15 = http://www.vipcomm.com.br/site/upload/sbcroacia_jb_12JUN14_984.jpg
- File:Brazil and Croatia match at the FIFA World Cup 2014-06-12 (60).jpg --> per abvove, credited with "Foto: Vipcomm" = http://www.vipcomm.com.br/buscar/fotos/sele%C3%A7%C3%A3o%20brasileira/15 = http://www.vipcomm.com.br/site/upload/sbcroacia_jb_12JUN14_973.jpg
- File:Brazil and Croatia match at the FIFA World Cup 2014-06-12 (59).jpg --> per abvove, credited with "Foto: Vipcomm" = http://www.vipcomm.com.br/buscar/fotos/sele%C3%A7%C3%A3o%20brasileira/15 = http://www.vipcomm.com.br/site/upload/sbcroacia_jb_12JUN14_966.jpg
- File:Brazil and Croatia match at the FIFA World Cup 2014-06-12 (58).jpg --> per abvove, credited with "Foto: Vipcomm" = http://www.vipcomm.com.br/buscar/fotos/sele%C3%A7%C3%A3o%20brasileira/16 = http://www.vipcomm.com.br/site/upload/sbcroacia_jb_12JUN14_852.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Gunnex (talk) 08:49, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete (speedy) I agree. Portal de Copa changed the license of some images after publication. I'll check others now. --sasha (krassotkin) 09:02, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
- P.S. I checked. Others photos from the set than the above have the proper license now. --sasha (krassotkin) 09:38, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 08:43, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Doesn't depict the exact Escuda Halcon emblem Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:23, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Only the hawk somewhat resembles the logo, though the lines are a mess. Lemmens, Tom (talk) 10:23, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Kept: It is in use in several places and therefore cannot be deleted except for licensing reasons. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:25, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
Malformed emblem. It has to be a condor and not an eagle. No crescent with name and location Maxxl² - talk 08:42, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
- Why do u not ask someone to change that? It sounds for me as if it is the same reason as that from 5th June.--Sanandros (talk) 09:47, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
- The real version is File:Brigada Halcon escudo.svg is ready and has replaced the fantasy badge. -- Maxxl² - talk 09:59, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete A superior version has replaced this file, so it is no longer in use. The two instances on Commons can be solved by simply redirecting this filename to File:Brigada Halcon escudo.svg after deletion. Lemmens, Tom (talk) 10:29, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete The real version of the emblem is File:Brigada Halcon escudo.svg. This is only a fantasy logo with no resemblance to reality. - Fma12 (talk) 13:41, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:42, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
Error en la imagen Dhy (talk) 09:41, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
- Just upload the correct version of the picture or edit their description. --Amitie 10g (talk) 18:25, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 08:43, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Leo mohamed (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused user portraits
37.5.4.188 09:43, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 08:42, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
And also:
Derivative work of modern art, while no copyright info of the art provided: no evidece that the art is PD and definitely not own work of the photo author Ankry (talk) 10:33, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 08:42, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Flextimebeats (talk · contribs)
[edit]Newcomer label, currently not important, see http://www.musikerforum.de/showthread.php?30202-Wir-suchen-K%C3%BCnstler-aus-M%C3%BCnchen-f%C3%BCr-Flextimebeats
- File:Marvin B. bürgerlich Marvin Eckerle.JPG
- File:Widdow.jpg
- File:Project Life.jpg
- File:Music My Expression.jpg
- File:Flextimebeats logo.jpg
37.5.4.188 11:03, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 08:42, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Simon Thollot (talk · contribs)
[edit]Hi guys,
I hope you can help me a bit. Two years ago, I contributed to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, submitting around 40 pictures.
Since then, my knowledge of photography improved quite a lot, I started being really involved and creating my own photography sites. It was great helping wikimedia at my own scale, I think it is a remarkable tool, yet my contribution has now a negative impact on the rest of my work and of my humble artistic aspirations. See, these pictures (that are finally of poor quality compared to my work now) are the first ones popping up when typing my name in a search engines. I'm afraid it does not reflect my work as it is now at all, and does not make me very credible as an aspiring photographer. I must say it is quite frustrating, and I feel a bit trapped after this experience.
I would like to have these pictures deleted. I'm actually the only guy with this name worldwide, so I can't hide behing anyone else :-)
Hoping you can help me fix this situation ! What should I do ? Again, thanks a lot for all the hard work
- File:Golden Garden - Simon Thollot.JPG
- File:Allenby Street House - Simon Thollot.JPG
- File:Fredric R. Mann Auditorium - Square - Simon Thollot.JPG
- File:Fredric R. Mann Auditorium - Square II - Simon Thollot.JPG
- File:Nachlat Binyamin Street V - Simon Thollot.JPG
- File:מצודת עכו - Simon Thollot.JPG
- File:Safed Old City III - Simon Thollot.JPG
- File:Safed Old City IV - Simon Thollot.JPG
- File:Safed Old City II - Simon Thollot.JPG
- File:Safed Old City I - Simon Thollot.JPG
- File:Mount Zion II - Simon Thollot.JPG
- File:Mount Zion I - Simon Thollot.JPG
- File:Clock Square - Simon Thollot.JPG
- File:סביל סולימאן - Simon Thollot.JPG
- File:Jaffa Port II - Simon Thollot.JPG
- File:Jaffa Port I - Simon Thollot.JPG
- File:Old Jaffa IV - Simon Thollot.jpg
- File:Old Jaffa II - Simon Thollot.JPG
- File:Old Jaffa III - Simon Thollot.jpg
- File:Old Jaffa I - Simon Thollot.jpg
- File:Jaffa Flee Market III - Simon Thollot.JPG
- File:Jaffa Flee Market I - Simon Thollot.JPG
- File:Jaffa Flee Market II - Simon Thollot.JPG
- File:Nachlat Binyamin Street IV - Simon Thollot.JPG
- File:Nachlat Binyamin Street II - Simon Thollot.JPG
- File:Nachlat Binyamin Street I - Simon Thollot.jpg
- File:Nachlat Binyamin Street III - Simon Thollot.JPG
- File:Rotschild 5 - Simon Thollot.JPG
- File:Rotschild 4 - Simon Thollot.JPG
- File:Rotschild 3 - Simon Thollot.jpg
- File:Rotschild 2 - Simon Thollot.jpg
- File:Rotschild 1 - Simon Thollot.jpg
- File:Tel Aviv Port 2 - Simon Thollot.JPG
- File:Tel Aviv Port 1 - Simon Thollot.JPG
- File:Reading Power Station - Simon Thollot.JPG
- File:בית שמעון רוקח (בית השר) - Simon Thollot.jpg
- File:Dizengoff Square - Simon Thollot.JPG
_-_Simon_Thollot.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Simon Thollot (talk) 11:29, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 08:41, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
same photo as deleted here Ankry (talk) 12:15, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 07:53, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
While the photo may be the work of the US government, there is no indication the artwork is. Absent a licence for that this should be deleted. LGA talkedits 12:36, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
- And what is with FOP?--Sanandros (talk) 14:51, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
- An army base would not normally be "Open to the public" though. LGA talkedits 21:16, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 08:43, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Herooldmen (talk · contribs)
[edit]More or less a private album with a standard description in Vietnamese and without meaningful categories. Unused
- File:Nguyentuananh.edu.vn dien gia nguyen tuan anh quan tri cuoc doi kham pha ban thannguyentuananh.edu (22).jpg
- File:Nguyentuananh.edu.vn dien gia nguyen tuan anh quan tri cuoc doi kham pha ban thannguyentuananh.edu (21).jpg
- File:Nguyentuananh.edu.vn dien gia nguyen tuan anh quan tri cuoc doi kham pha ban thannguyentuananh.edu (23).jpg
- File:Nguyentuananh.edu.vn dien gia nguyen tuan anh quan tri cuoc doi kham pha ban thannguyentuananh.edu (19).jpg
- File:Nguyentuananh.edu.vn dien gia nguyen tuan anh quan tri cuoc doi kham pha ban thannguyentuananh.edu (20).jpg
- File:Nguyentuananh.edu.vn dien gia nguyen tuan anh quan tri cuoc doi kham pha ban thannguyentuananh.edu (18).jpg
- File:Nguyentuananh.edu.vn dien gia nguyen tuan anh quan tri cuoc doi kham pha ban thannguyentuananh.edu (17).jpg
- File:Nguyentuananh.edu.vn dien gia nguyen tuan anh quan tri cuoc doi kham pha ban thannguyentuananh.edu (16).jpg
- File:Nguyentuananh.edu.vn dien gia nguyen tuan anh quan tri cuoc doi kham pha ban thannguyentuananh.edu (15).jpg
- File:Nguyentuananh.edu.vn dien gia nguyen tuan anh quan tri cuoc doi kham pha ban thannguyentuananh.edu (14).jpg
- File:Nguyentuananh.edu.vn dien gia nguyen tuan anh quan tri cuoc doi kham pha ban thannguyentuananh.edu (13).jpg
- File:Nguyentuananh.edu.vn dien gia nguyen tuan anh quan tri cuoc doi kham pha ban thannguyentuananh.edu (12).jpg
- File:Nguyentuananh.edu.vn dien gia nguyen tuan anh quan tri cuoc doi kham pha ban thannguyentuananh.edu (9).jpg
- File:Nguyentuananh.edu.vn dien gia nguyen tuan anh quan tri cuoc doi kham pha ban thannguyentuananh.edu (10).jpg
- File:Nguyentuananh.edu.vn dien gia nguyen tuan anh quan tri cuoc doi kham pha ban thannguyentuananh.edu (11).jpg
- File:Nguyentuananh.edu.vn dien gia nguyen tuan anh quan tri cuoc doi kham pha ban thannguyentuananh.edu (8).jpg
- File:Nguyentuananh.edu.vn dien gia nguyen tuan anh quan tri cuoc doi kham pha ban thannguyentuananh.edu (7).jpg
- File:Nguyentuananh.edu.vn dien gia nguyen tuan anh quan tri cuoc doi kham pha ban thannguyentuananh.edu (6).jpg
- File:Nguyentuananh.edu.vn dien gia nguyen tuan anh quan tri cuoc doi kham pha ban thannguyentuananh.edu (5).jpg
- File:Nguyentuananh.edu.vn dien gia nguyen tuan anh quan tri cuoc doi kham pha ban thannguyentuananh.edu (4).jpg
- File:Nguyentuananh.edu.vn dien gia nguyen tuan anh quan tri cuoc doi kham pha ban thannguyentuananh.edu (3).jpg
- File:Diễn giả Nguyễn Tuấn Anh làm việc cùng đạo diễn Bùi Tuấn Dũng.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
37.5.4.188 13:29, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 08:40, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
No web hosting service, no social networking service (this is privat foto) GAndy (talk) 14:12, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 07:53, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
Appears to be screenshot of internet listing from http://www.ternelia.com/ Эlcobbola talk 14:53, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by Steinsplitter JurgenNL (talk) 07:54, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted map. FOP in Finland for buildings only. Apalsola t • c 14:56, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Not covered by Finland FOP. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 17:29, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 07:54, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
Derivative work of contemporary (1992 and 1993) art. Not permanently installed, so Brazilian FoP does not apply.
Эlcobbola talk 15:00, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 08:43, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
JPEG copy of an SVG flag. Fry1989 eh? 19:21, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Kept: please tag with {{SupersededSVG}} — billinghurst sDrewth 05:11, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Image does not qualify for VVA, it is an exact copy of our pre-existing SVG image and therefore has no potential future use. It is also lower-quality and slightly blurry. We delete images under this reasoning every day. [2], [3], [4] and many many more cases as proof. Fry1989 eh? 17:21, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
![[2]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Pitcairn_islands2.png){kind=link}
![[3]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Africa_somalia_flag.png){kind=link}
![[4]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Indonesia_re-upload.jpg.png){kind=link}
Deleted -FASTILY 08:38, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
JPEG copy of an SVG flag. Fry1989 eh? 19:22, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Kept: please tag with {{SupersededSVG}} — billinghurst sDrewth 05:11, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Image does not qualify for VVA, it is an exact copy of our pre-existing SVG image and therefore has no potential future use. It is also lower-quality and slightly blurry. We delete images under this reasoning every day. [5], [6], [7] and many many more cases as proof. Fry1989 eh? 17:21, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:38, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
JPEG copy of an SVG flag. Fry1989 eh? 19:22, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Kept: please tag with {{SupersededSVG}} — billinghurst sDrewth 05:11, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Image does not qualify for VVA, it is an exact copy of our pre-existing SVG image and therefore has no potential future use. It is also lower-quality and slightly blurry. We delete images under this reasoning every day. [8], [9], [10] and many many more cases as proof. Fry1989 eh? 17:21, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:38, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
-Allocolchicin.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-Allocolchicin.gif&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
superseeded by File:Allocolchicine.svg Kopiersperre (talk) 19:12, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
-Allocolchicin.gif){kind=link}
- Delete as soon as the methoxy at the bottom of the left-hand ring is repositioned in the replacement (@Yikrazuul: I marked it with an annotation on your image). DMacks (talk) 00:10, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks, I have fixed it. --Yikrazuul (talk) 16:39, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for the quick fix! DMacks (talk) 16:49, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 08:40, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
-Allocolchicin.gif){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
copy of image:Feral doves in kuwait by irvin calicut (11).JPG with lower quality Stas (talk) 23:17, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: FASTILY 08:39, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
version of image:Caterpillar heavy vechicle from kuwait.jpg with lower quality Stas (talk) 23:24, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: FASTILY 08:39, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
version of image:Caterpillar heavy vechicle from kuwait.jpg with lower quality Stas (talk) 23:26, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: FASTILY 08:39, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
version of image:Conocarpus in kuwait by irvin calicut (5).jpg with lower quality Stas (talk) 23:29, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: FASTILY 08:39, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
version of image:Dry rose by irvin calicut.jpg with lower quality Stas (talk) 23:30, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: FASTILY 08:39, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
version of image:Dry rose by irvin calicut.jpg with lower quality Stas (talk) 23:31, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: FASTILY 08:39, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
version of image:Golden whole leaf tea from cylon by irvin caicut.jpg with lower quality Stas (talk) 23:33, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: FASTILY 08:39, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
version of image:Golden whole leaf tea from cylon by irvin caicut.jpg with lower quality Stas (talk) 23:35, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: FASTILY 08:39, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
copy of image:Christmas light decoration from kuwait by irvin calicut (2).jpg with lower quality Stas (talk) 23:40, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: FASTILY 08:39, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
version of image:Sunsets from malaysia (17).JPG vith lower quality Stas (talk) 23:46, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: FASTILY 08:39, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
low quality; version of image:Rhinoceros bettle ariel view (7).jpg Stas (talk) 23:51, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: FASTILY 08:39, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
low-quality version of image:St.francis church bom jesus views (8).JPG Stas (talk) 23:54, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: FASTILY 08:39, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
подложная лицензия (fake licence) BelCorvus (talk) 10:53, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio Krd 16:37, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
Copy of http://www.beyondhollywood.com/oblivion-2013-movie-preview-images-and-videos/oblivion-2013-movie-title/ Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:32, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio Krd 16:37, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
es kann rückschlüsse zur idendität der personen gezogen werden Bladef3 (talk) 18:51, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request Krd 16:39, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
_%D0%BF%D0%B0%D0%BC%D1%8F%D1%82%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BA_%D0%9B%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BD%D1%83.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%D0%BF%D0%B0%D0%BC%D1%8F%D1%82%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BA_%D0%9B%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BD%D1%83.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative work of non-free monument. No FoP for sculptures in Russia. A.Savin 19:47, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 16:38, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
_%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4_%E2%84%962.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4_%E2%84%962.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative of non-free sculpture and no FoP in Russia A.Savin 19:55, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 16:38, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
Derivative of unfree sculpture, no FoP for sculptures in Russia A.Savin 21:08, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 16:39, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
© Craig McNitt Photography 50.100.192.245 23:13, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 16:38, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
Die Grafik wurde seinerzeit zwar selbst gezeichnet, jedoch nach einem Satellitenbild und nun bin ich mir nicht mehr sicher, ob dies in Ordnung ist? Da die Grafik aber ohnehin 1. nur schematisch und damit von geringer Qualität ist, 2. nur auf einer Seite verwendet wird und sich 3. auf dieser ohnehin ein Weblink zu einem viel genaueren, historischen Grundriss befindet, ist sie auch absolut entbehrlich.
Aus diesen Gründen ersuche ich um Löschung der Grafik. K-led88 (talk) 09:44, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Ich sehe hier keine Probleme, auf Wunsch des Uploaders dennoch ausnahmsweise gelöscht. Krd 17:05, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
Dubious "own work" 37.5.4.188 10:09, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 17:06, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
Appears to be a screenshot, not a photograph. Origin uncertain. Mosmof (talk) 11:39, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 17:09, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope. We do not keep images of text material that, if needed, can be typeset using ordinary Wiki markup. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:36, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 17:48, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
non-free image: [11] Capmo (talk) 18:29, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: OTRS needed in case the uploader is the author Ymblanter (talk) 17:50, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
Non-notable Indian baker who through IP edits on English Wikipedia repeatedly adds his name and photos to articles. Sam Sailor (talk) 18:39, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 17:10, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
Non-notable Indian baker who through IP edits on English Wikipedia repeatedly adds his name and photos to articles. Sam Sailor (talk) 18:40, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 17:10, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
Within scope ? 37.5.4.188 10:36, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:02, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
Bad and redundant shot. There are a lot of better files in the category, shot from the same angle. Lemmens, Tom (talk) 12:15, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:02, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Danutz as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of non-free content. This logo is used for the official national holyday "Limba noastră" in Moldova, however it does not contain the word "moldovenească" which is a deprecated political term formerly used to designate the Romanian language in Moldova. It is, on one side, a derivative work of non-free content, and on the other side, unecyclopedic. See for example File:Stamp of Moldova 413.gif where this logo is applied on stamps in Moldova without the word "moldovenească".
Converted by me to DR, as this merits a discussion due to the extensive use of this image. -- Túrelio (talk) 13:55, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Russian brainwashing propaganda about an invented "Moldavian language" (practically Romanian). Check the other activity of this user as well... Such as the unfree material File:Eu vorbesc limba moldovenească.jpg --Codrin.B (talk) 10:30, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
- Pro-Romanian stance! Keep --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 04:54, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
- Pro-Romanian stance!
- Delete. This version of image is a ”photoshoped” creation of some moldovenist people. I never saw this version of banner in reality in Chișinău (Moldova). A simple search on google for this image shows that all results are with word ”română” instead of ”moldovenească”. XXN (talk) 11:41, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:02, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
Appears not to be uploader's own work - part of this set? Эlcobbola talk 14:56, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:02, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
False authorship claims. Grabbed from http://www.shobdoneer.com/matrioshka/53121 (the file's timestamp on the server is 2013-09-22) with forged EXIF data, upscaling, modified colours and obvious cloning to remove the watermark in the lower left-hand corner. The original photo at https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10150362774835252 (uploaded 2011-01-14) shows what that area looks like naturally without cloning applied. —LX (talk, contribs) 15:02, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:02, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
missing permission; possible false claim to ownership per http://www.goodreads.com/author_blog_posts/4319593-casting-the-blood-and-tears-series-hell-patrol Lady Lotus (talk) 15:39, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:03, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
per http://www.imdb.com/media/rm975877376/nm3954183?ref_=nm_ov_ph Lady Lotus (talk) 15:47, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:03, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
Flickrwashing - image of book cover (see Amazon listing) Эlcobbola talk 15:59, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
- It's ok on Flickr, but not here, once again. Sorry. -- XoLm56 (talk) 19:24, 24 June 2014 (UTC).
- Strong delete.
- Alert.
- True Pov-Pushing from a Far-right contributor + copyvio. Almost pictures he has donned here are not free, for exemple all the photos coming from the site of "Radio Courtoisie" (a Far-right Radio) : "Radio Courtoisie" is not author of the pictures, the pictures come from no-credited photographers, that is a spoliation.
- XoLm56 goes the same way on commons, french wikipedia, wikiquote and wikibooks. It's a shame.
- Frenh wikipedia is lost : a lot of pages, few contributors, not enough to stop Far-right pov-pushers. French contributor are almost all very young, without capacities to do political analysis, very ignorant about History. Or agree with the extremist point of view.
- It's propaganda. The good place to go for XoLm56 is metapedia (black list on wikipedias's projects).
- Stop it, please.
- Look at the pictures coming from the flick of Far-right writer Renaud Camus : google.fr/search Renaud Camus flick on Commons.
- Also Delete :
- http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Couverture_de_France_suicide_d%E2%80%99une_nation.jpg?uselang=fr
- http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Le_Grand_Remplacement_et_discours_d%27Orange_-_couverture.jpg
- http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Renaud_Camus_-_Album_Le_Jour_ni_l%E2%80%99Heure_2012_et_recueil_Payages_pr%C3%A9posthumes.jpg
- http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Renaud_Camus_-_Les_Inh%C3%A9ritiers_-_Essai_de_couverture.jpg
- http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Renaud_Camus_-_NON_-_Journal_2013.jpg
- http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Renaud_Camus_-_Paysages_pr%C3%A9posthumes_-_2013.jpg
- http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tract_du_NON_pour_Jour_de_col%C3%A8re.jpg
- I only reply for pictures coming from "Radio Courtoisie" (which is not a far-right radio): this question has been examined by a trusted user, particularly for File:Dominique Venner.jpg and File:Philippe Conrad.jpg. The remainder is bullshit, and defamation. -- XoLm56 (talk) 13:24, 26 June 2014 (UTC).
- What a funny gag : Radio Courtoisie is not a far-wright radio ? XoLm56, je vous suggère de lire quelques auteurs académiques spécialisés dans le sujet avant d'écrire de telles âneries. Vous trouverez d'excellentes références sur Google Book (mots-clef : "radio courtoisie" far right) ou sur Google Scholar. Bonne lecture
- I only reply for pictures coming from "Radio Courtoisie" (which is not a far-right radio): this question has been examined by a trusted user, particularly for File:Dominique Venner.jpg and File:Philippe Conrad.jpg. The remainder is bullshit, and defamation. -- XoLm56 (talk) 13:24, 26 June 2014 (UTC).
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:03, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
Appears to be copied from here. Uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please follow the instructions on COM:OTRS to confirm this. Storkk (talk) 16:00, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
- I am the uploader of the image file in question. I am also the owner of the website spokanemidcentury.com which was identified as source of the image. The website exists to share images and background information of this architecturally important home. This is an authorized use of the image. The Joel E. Ferris, II House (subject of the image) is a better example of midcentury modern architecture than several of the example images uploaded by others to the article. The Ferris House has been featured in Sunset Magazine, Dwell Magazine, The New York Times, The Cultural Landscape Foundation website and many other websites, newspapers and magazines. It is also listed on the Spokane Register of Historic Places and has been honored by the American Institute of Architects. Thank you for not deleting the image. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ferris2 (talk • contribs) 23:34, 24 June 2014 (UTC) Copied from talk page by Storkk (talk) 09:20, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
- Hi @Ferris2: could you please follow the instructions on COM:OTRS to confirm this? Alternatively, you could provide a clear license on your website stating that content is under a license acceptable to commons. Please do this even if this file gets deleted, as it can be undeleted easily. Cheers, Storkk (talk) 09:24, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:03, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Patrick_Norguet,_Paris_october_2013.jpg Patrick Norguet (talk) 16:06, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:04, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
Looks like a non-authorized caption, probably from this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gpsUWO9OFs0 Yanguas (talk) 16:32, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
- Not a caption
This photo was taken during the performance the appointed video shows at Victoria House, a night club in Brasília. The exact moment the photo was taken, we don't see at the video, the same with the angle and the light, it's easy to check it. In case I have used this video, I could have chosen for sure a better Mariana Molina shot. I have a quarrel with Yanguas and he doesn't miss any chance to bother me. But if you intend to delete it, never mind, I don't care. --Olimor (talk) 18:51, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Please send evidence of permisison to com:OTRS Natuur12 (talk) 17:05, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
There is no VENA SUBCLAVIA DEXTER and VEANA SUBCLAVIA SINISTER at AORTA !!!!! 178.1.239.128 17:23, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
An der Aorta und den Halsschlagadern befinden sich keinen VENEN !!! Wie im Bild dargestellt und beschrieben. 178.1.239.128 17:25, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Kept: in use Natuur12 (talk) 17:05, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
replaced by LRO, 001.jpg Gerd Leibrock (talk) 17:31, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:05, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
replaced by LRO, 002.jpg Gerd Leibrock (talk) 17:31, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:05, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
unused private snapshow -> out of scope. JuTa 17:42, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:06, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
Unsed logo of unknown source -> out of scope. JuTa 17:44, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:06, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
Images of the altar piece at Keitele Church
[edit]
The photographs are derivative works of the copyrighted altar piece Jeesus ristillä at Keitele Church, painted by Ilmari Heinonen (1897–1968) in 1940/1941.[12] The painting is not in public domain yet. FOP applies to buildings only in Finland. However, de minimis may apply to these photographs. ––Apalsola t • c 17:48, 24 June 2014 (UTC) –– (fix) Apalsola t • c 17:49, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
- If deemed not to be de minimis, I support the deletion request. --Ainali (talk) 18:30, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:06, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused "fork" by blocked user who randomly reverted stuff. Lemmens, Tom (talk) 18:16, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:06, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Dubious "own work". First published in 2009 or before 37.5.4.188 18:20, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:06, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Image title suggests it is a screen shot from a copyrighted TV show. It may, however, just be a really poorly named image, so I think it best to discuss. ThaddeusB (talk) 18:21, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:07, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
unused user portrait 37.5.4.188 18:22, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:07, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
Dubious "own work" 37.5.4.188 18:24, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:07, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
missing permission, possible false claim to ownership Lady Lotus (talk) 18:29, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:07, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
missing permission, possible false claim to ownership; author has uploaded another picture of Stause without permissions Lady Lotus (talk) 18:29, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:07, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
The file is a promotional portrait copyrighted by Magenta Records in 1999. This file is a duplicate to the one uploaded to the English Wikipedia, Rodrigo Bueno.jpg. Nonetheless, the uploader lists a copyrighted file with a creative commons license. Rod840 (talk) 22:30, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:08, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
deleted. INeverCry 01:15, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
This image is blurred and has low definition. Wikimedia Commons has better images of the same subject. Motacilla (talk) 08:09, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:08, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Magog the Ogre as no license. Well there is a CC license an the youtube souce states Creative Commons license: Public Domain. But I don't think the youtube uploader has the right to replease this video under a free license. JuTa 10:08, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi, this clip is taken from a movie called "Breakfast in Hollywood." Here is a link from the Internet Archive that states towards the middle of the page that this movie has a Creative Commons license and is in the Public Domain:
https://archive.org/details/BreakfastInHollywood_961
Also, IMDB has a link to Internet Archive to show this movie for free on its popular website:
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0038382/
MiztuhX (talk) 05:33, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
Kept: apparently ok FASTILY 09:53, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Magog the Ogre as no license. Well there is a CC license an the youtube souce states Creative Commons license: Public Domain. But I don't think the youtube uploader has the right to replease this video under a free license. JuTa 10:09, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi, this clip is taken from a movie called "Breakfast in Hollywood." Here is a link from the Internet Archive that states towards the middle of the page that this movie has a Creative Commons license and is in the Public Domain:
https://archive.org/details/BreakfastInHollywood_961
Also, IMDB has a link to Internet Archive to show this movie for free on its popular website:
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0038382/
MiztuhX (talk) 05:32, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
Kept: apparently ok FASTILY 09:53, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
I am not sure this video is under the licence. See http://www.raspberrypi.org/creative-commons/ I open DR to check this. Slick (talk) 13:34, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 09:53, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
Reasons for deletion request (1) Source of data/color coding basis not provided; (2) According to UNICEF definition, informal union leading to teenage pregnancy is a form of child marriage (see here), this map misleads because informal union type child marriages are not "fully outlawed/abolished and criminalized" in EU and USA as alleged by the map; (3) Some countries marked red and brown are misleading as well; unless a reliable source for the data behind this map are provided by the map creator, it may be a violation of wikimedia's policy COM:GCSD #3 and #8. -M Tracy Hunter (talk) 17:18, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
- (1) Look for sources here [13] (2) We can change the map so it fits the UNICEF's definition. I don't like including informal unions but if we must include them maybe we can add a color for jurisdictions that don't fully criminalize informal unions. We can color all jurisdictions that allow marriage between people under 18 as red and color jurisdictions a different color if they allow it with exceptions. We could change the wording and maybe even the colors so then it makes sense. I definitely think this map has problems and the wording is definitely a huge one (which is why I put the template "clarification needed"). How's this for wording? "child marriage permitted; child marriage prohibited with exceptions; legal status unknown or ambiguous; child marriage prohibited." In conclusion, we don't necessarily have to delete the file; we should try to improve it first. --Prcc27 (talk) 18:55, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
- Umm... this file definitely does not violate COM:GCSD #3 and #8... --Prcc27 (talk) 19:35, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
- Wikipedia articles are not acceptable source/cites, see WPNOTRS. I checked sources cited in that wiki article for several countries. I see no mention of "child marriage" or the color code captions alleged in the map, for example "fully outlawed/abolished and criminalized". See the case of Kenya and Algeria for example - both coded brown/orange, but there is no support for "child marriage commonly practiced despite laws against it". Please provide a reliable published source for this map and claims alleged therein. M Tracy Hunter (talk) 19:50, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
- Prcc27 writes, "I definitely think this map has problems and the wording is definitely a huge one (which is why I put the template "clarification needed")."
- That is sufficient reason to delete this map. If you want to create a map on "marriage age", try creating a new one because legal age of marriage varies. This "child marriage" map with absurd claims deserves to be deleted, unless you can provide a reliable source for data and your proposed captions. M Tracy Hunter (talk) 20:00, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
- I think fixing the wording would improve the map enough. Furthermore, there's no good reason to delete it. Which is why I think it would be best to Keep it. Prcc27 (talk) 20:11, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
- I think fixing the wording would improve the map enough. Furthermore, there's no good reason to delete it. Which is why I think it would be best to
- You don't have a reliable source for the data in this map, the existing captions, or for your proposed "fixing the wording", do you? There is no rewording that can improve this map. Why keep a map that has no reliable published data source and whose color coding is very wrong? M Tracy Hunter (talk) 20:48, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
- I'm sure there're reliable sources out there; we just need to look harder. The Wikipedia article is a great starting place. Prcc27 (talk) 21:57, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
- You don't have a reliable source for the data in this map, the existing captions, or for your proposed "fixing the wording", do you? There is no rewording that can improve this map. Why keep a map that has no reliable published data source and whose color coding is very wrong? M Tracy Hunter (talk) 20:48, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Prcc27 - you have created three versions of this file. You must provide a source, not "we". Your map is unacceptable original research and without a non-wikipedia reliable published source. Even the wikipedia article you mention does not support this map, because the phrases "child marriage is outlawed/abolished" or "child marriage is criminalized" or etc is not used ever. This map is based on non-existent content. M Tracy Hunter (talk) 15:04, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
- One good model for creating this kind of thing is: (1) find reliable sources; (2) properly analyze sources to determine how to appropriately depict graphically what the source is describing in words/data; (3) create the image based on the sources and analysis, getting input as needed from others; (4) revise as needed based on post creation feedback. Right now you are doing this in reverse order, so naturally there are issues. I'd suggest going back to the drawing board (while letting this file be deleted) and following this process in your next attempt. -- 208.81.184.4 16:22, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
- This is not my map, I didn't create it. Like I said before, we don't have to use the wording, we can use different wording so then the Wikipedia article matches the map. --Prcc27 (talk) 07:01, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
- Tables on Wikipedia articles are used as sources for maps. For example: [14] [15] [16] and possibly [17]. As long as they have a source it's fine. We don't need to create a whole other map just to change the wording (which I think we should do). --Prcc27 (talk) 07:18, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
Your example map has two external reliable sources - Cornell University and National Conference of State Legislatures. This is lacking for File:Legality of child marriage.png, for original caption, or your "proposed rewording". The file name is also misleading - the word "legality" raises the question - "whose law?" and "which law" - a question this file does not answer or cite a source for.
If you want to recreate this file, as the editor at 208.81.184.4 suggests, first find an externally published reliable source. You have already created and uploaded three versions of this file (e.g. here). You obviously have the template already. Uploading a more accurate map with new file name and captions should be easy for you. Perhaps, in a new version, you may want to use the file name "Marriage age world map", color code it to specific ages, etc.
Wikipedia article is not acceptable as source for data or wiki content, see WPNOTRS. M Tracy Hunter (talk) 17:30, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: no global links, disputed accuracy without any credible third party references -> out of scope FASTILY 09:56, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
Потому что на нем представлена не объективная информация о распространении славянских языков, в частности, русского языка на территории Беларуси, Украины и Литвы Prasalovich (talk) 22:23, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
- в чем конкретно негбъективность? Не думаю, что стоит из за этого удалять: карта же сделана самими участниками, поэтому возможно, что она не идеальна. Лучше улучшать ее, чем удалять. Keep rubin16 (talk) 02:36, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
Kept: no consensus to delete FASTILY 09:54, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
