Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2014/05/19

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive May 19th, 2014


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private snapshot. Possible infringement on personality rights. OAlexander (talk) 08:56, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 00:16, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image.    FDMS  4    01:26, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 00:01, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ce fichier n'apporte aucune aide pour tout le site de Wikipedia... Je souhaiterais sa suppression définitive. Gildorack (talk) 15:36, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Uploader requested and unused.--Fanghong (talk) 00:44, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dr ozgh} mhmi raagsigacn dx.lgaz 125.160.108.27 03:46, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep and close promptly: disruptive nomination of an active project page.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 03:57, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jhrhhci civdpl 120.149.115.111 07:42, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no reason for deletion Anatoliy (talk) 09:30, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright issue Rakeshyashroy (talk) 14:52, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

copyright issues Rakeshyashroy (talk) 19:58, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:45, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright issue Rakeshyashroy (talk) 14:49, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

copright issues Rakeshyashroy (talk) 19:55, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:45, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright issue Rakeshyashroy (talk) 14:50, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

copyright issues Rakeshyashroy (talk) 19:56, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:45, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uneducational image with no foreseeable use. Text readers "Only idiots give up and let go of their princesses". May also be a copyright violation; watermark indicates graphic from tumblr with no concrete source for the image. ~Kevin Payravi (Talk) 04:39, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment File:Edgar no mires 012.JPG it's a Copyright violation. Don't need this requests for deletion ♫♫ Leitoxx ♪♪ 04:01, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, as a copyright violation; nominator withdrawing. ~Kevin Payravi (Talk) 06:14, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright issue Rakeshyashroy (talk) 14:51, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

copyright issues Rakeshyashroy (talk) 19:57, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:45, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image.    FDMS  4    00:53, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 23:53, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo with no educational value per COM:EDUSE. Green Giant (talk) 23:11, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: mistaken upload. out of scope matanya talk 06:50, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

برای انکه مزخرف است 37.254.202.239 12:52, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Und warum jetzt? --Mogelzahn (talk) 13:57, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment I don't speak any Farsi but Google Translate tells me that the reason for deletion is For that bullshit. Well, that's bullshit indeed. If no other "reason" is added please someone end this DR. NNW 13:58, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ich hab dann mal den Unsinn gelöscht. Grüße Lencer (talk) 08:44, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: yep. JuTa 18:53, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image – thank you very much, Mobile Web.    FDMS  4    00:54, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 23:54, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unauthorised photograph of me. This photograph has repeatedly been use to harass me and the UK police have been involved. Please can you remove it. 2.26.251.59 20:24, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope Jcb (talk) 21:10, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 17:11, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 00:49, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio|The architect Victor Horta died in 1947, less than 70 years ago Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 13:27, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Steinsplitter. JuTa 19:43, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright issue Rakeshyashroy (talk) 14:49, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

copyright issues Rakeshyashroy (talk) 19:54, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:45, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

too small picture to use, unsharp Motopark (talk) 17:28, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, scaled-down File:Primer Festival Folclorico Pura Cañita Juan VIñas 2014 30.jpg. Taivo (talk) 18:31, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unsharp picture Motopark (talk) 17:29, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, unusable due to bad quality. In addition, description (2nd anniversary?) is insufficient. The persons are unidentified, probably non-notable. Taivo (talk) 18:14, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality nonsense image ("Piss"), not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 17:58, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 00:54, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

too small picture to use, unsharp Motopark (talk) 17:28, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, scaled-down File:Primer Festival Folclorico Pura Cañita Juan VIñas 2014 32.jpg. Taivo (talk) 18:35, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright issues Rakeshyashroy (talk) 14:44, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

copyright issues Rakeshyashroy (talk) 19:51, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:44, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

too small picture to use Motopark (talk) 17:27, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, scaled-down File:Primer Festival Folclorico Pura Cañita Juan VIñas 2014 34.jpg. Taivo (talk) 18:38, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

imagem errada Monalisa Duarte dos Reis (talk) 00:52, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 09:38, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unsharp picture, out of project scope Motopark (talk) 17:24, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, unusable due to bad quality. In addition, description (2nd anniversary?) is insufficient. The persons are unidentified, probably non-notable. Taivo (talk) 18:16, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unsharp picture Motopark (talk) 17:30, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, scaled-down File:Primer Festival Folclorico Pura Cañita Juan VIñas 2014 32.jpg. Taivo (talk) 18:09, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low size, too small Motopark (talk) 17:25, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, scaled-down File:Primer Festival Folclorico Pura Cañita Juan VIñas 2014 01.jpg. Taivo (talk) 17:35, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 10:15, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 00:23, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image.    FDMS  4    00:52, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 23:51, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image (also missing permission, but I'm not going to ask the uploader to send permission to OTRS).    FDMS  4    00:01, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 23:50, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright issues Rakeshyashroy (talk) 14:48, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

copyright issues Rakeshyashroy (talk) 19:53, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:45, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

подложные данные, большинство жителей РФ это тюркские племена(этносы и целые республики), можно называть себя кем угодно, хоть нигерийцем, но это не значит. что таким являешься. 178.137.22.254 19:18, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, (NAC) So fix it! If you need to discuss the fix first, take the discussion to its talk page and invite the uploader and the interested parties to participate. Commons policy does not prescribe deletion for errors unless they are catastrophically severe and entail dire consequences. Codename Lisa (talk) 11:34, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no educational purpose. deleted at home wiki. OTAVIO1981 (talk) 11:26, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 00:38, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal images.

   FDMS  4    01:29, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 00:05, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 17:29, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 00:52, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image.    FDMS  4    01:28, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 00:02, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. See uploader's other files. - KDS444 (talk) 13:48, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: yep from i.e. http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_lpDsFht5Ww0/Se87JQ8OLFI/AAAAAAAABs0/AFk__GhK8dY/s400/ancash.jpg JuTa 20:29, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image with no education use. Also a likely copyright violation, assuming that the uploader took a screenshot of an incoming Snapchat taken by another person. ~Kevin Payravi (Talk) 04:33, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 00:06, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If anyone needs some black pixels: here you've got 9585216 of 'em! Lupo 08:24, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted / Corrupted.--Fanghong (talk) 00:14, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 11:14, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 00:36, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-promotion with unclear copyright status.    FDMS  4    01:20, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Captain-tucker (talk) 09:57, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-promotion outside the scope of Commons.    FDMS  4    01:25, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Captain-tucker (talk) 10:00, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Potentially out of SCOPE, useless without any categories.    FDMS  4    00:59, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Probable copyvio, as per COM:PRP Captain-tucker (talk) 09:47, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of SCOPE.    FDMS  4    00:58, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope Captain-tucker (talk) 09:44, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing legal information Fixertool (talk) 01:09, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No permission Captain-tucker (talk) 09:50, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyviol: scan from an article from National Geographic. Ciaurlec (talk) 23:12, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio Captain-tucker (talk) 11:45, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

includes web-address, promotional Motopark (talk) 09:00, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Already deleted by Fastily. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 09:40, 26 May 2014 (UTC) (non admin closure)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of SCOPE.    FDMS  4    00:55, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope Captain-tucker (talk) 09:44, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

includes web-address, promotional Motopark (talk) 09:01, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Already deleted by Fastily. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 09:42, 26 May 2014 (UTC) (non admin closure)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

includes web-address, promotional Motopark (talk) 09:00, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Already deleted by Fastily. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 09:36, 26 May 2014 (UTC) (non admin closure)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-promotion without notability and evidence of permission.    FDMS  4    01:05, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Info: Added File:Punjabikudi.png.    FDMS  4    01:11, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Captain-tucker (talk) 09:49, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously published elsewhere on the web (e.g. [1]), no evidence for permission HaeB (talk) 03:02, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Source = "Panamericana TV". Probably not copyright free MichaelMaggs (talk) 17:41, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

some homepage material, includes web-address Motopark (talk) 15:51, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Not copyright free, even if in scope MichaelMaggs (talk) 18:20, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File needs an OTRS ticket 37.5.5.27 09:37, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Image includes a copyright watermark MichaelMaggs (talk) 17:52, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

When you take the main part of this compilation from another artist, you have not created an "own work" 37.5.5.27 09:59, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Infringes copyright of the original painter MichaelMaggs (talk) 17:53, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(Quasi) unused personal image (no non-userspace edits on en.WP).    FDMS  4    01:13, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: See COM:PS: "by custom the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page of another project is allowed" MichaelMaggs (talk) 19:02, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Only used for userpage spam on enwiki. --Steinsplitter (talk) 19:37, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio from a video clip: http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/russia-terror/another-militant-threat-russia-winter-olympics-revealed-n15626 Prokurator11 (talk) 18:31, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and user warned on talk page regarding recent uploads MichaelMaggs (talk) 18:32, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:32, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Poor quality, but it is in use so cannot be deleted under the 'not realistically useful' criterion MichaelMaggs (talk) 18:08, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio: http://www.metransparent.com/spip.php?article15457&lang=ar&id_forum=24097/ Prokurator11 (talk) 18:24, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and user warned on talk page regarding recent uploads MichaelMaggs (talk) 18:34, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyviol:bingmaps screenshot Ciaurlec (talk) 11:09, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unfree map MichaelMaggs (talk) 17:59, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW. Uploader has no right to release under CC license ~ Nahid Talk 09:32, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Infringes copyright held by the original artist MichaelMaggs (talk) 17:50, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clear copyvio; image description is "Image from one of films of Badr at-Tawheed" Prokurator11 (talk) 18:26, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination MichaelMaggs (talk) 18:26, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyright violation. This file (as demonstrated by a search on tineye.com) has been in wide use on the Internet since at least 2008. This version was the only file uploaded by this user, in 2010. It's a low quality jpg (unlikely that an artist would choose to share a file showing compression artifacts, at low resolution.) Pete F (talk) 15:02, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violation MichaelMaggs (talk) 18:12, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:33, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Poor quality, but it is in use so cannot be deleted under the 'not realistically useful' criterion MichaelMaggs (talk) 18:10, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DW of Broadcast. LGA talkedits 23:21, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Not free MichaelMaggs (talk) 18:37, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ebraminio as no license. Well there is a CC license, but thats very unlikely the own work of the uploader as stated. JuTa 20:13, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Not own work. A copy of an old photo MichaelMaggs (talk) 18:50, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm sorry, but this does not looks like covered by COM:FOP#United States. JuTa 19:39, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No freedom of panorama in the US for sculptures MichaelMaggs (talk) 18:51, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Official photo from album cover (cf. [2]), no evidence that the uploader is the author as claimed. HaeB (talk) 03:07, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Not own work MichaelMaggs (talk) 17:43, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm sorry, but this does not looks like covered by COM:FOP#United States. JuTa 19:36, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No freedom of panorama in the US for sculptures MichaelMaggs (talk) 18:52, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Album cover (see e.g. [3]), no evidence that the uploader is the author as claimed. HaeB (talk) 03:04, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Not own work MichaelMaggs (talk) 17:42, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a magazine scan, and here it is used as an album cover. Unlikely to be own work by the uploader. Stefan2 (talk) 14:48, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:36, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per EXIF: NY Times says it was copyrighted. At [4], NYT says it was an AP photo, and AP indeed has it: [5]. U.S. photo taken March 31, 1948 according to AP. Photographer not given; publication & copyright registration history unknown. Lupo 14:31, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per Lupo MichaelMaggs (talk) 18:06, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio from the Islamic Jihad Union's website: http://www.uznews.net/en/politics/11394-islamic-jihad-union-mourns-leader Prokurator11 (talk) 18:23, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and user warned on talk page regarding recent uploads MichaelMaggs (talk) 18:34, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ebraminio as no license. Well there is a CC license, but thats very unlikely the own work of the uploader as stated. JuTa 20:14, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Probably {{PD-Iran}} could be applied here if uploader put valid license tag and source info. −ebraminiotalk 07:50, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Still no correct licence. It is incumbent on the uploader or anyone interested enough to keep the image to check and add an appropriate licence. MichaelMaggs (talk) 18:47, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be {{Own}} (small size, no metadata, looks professional), therefore if uploader has the copyright or legal ability to license this image, they need to follow the steps on COM:OTRS to confirm this. Storkk (talk) 17:26, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Not own work MichaelMaggs (talk) 18:24, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image appears to be a video screen shot from a video, and was not taken by uploader. Uploader literally could not created it in 2011 as claimed, since subject was in jail. Low resolution/quality suggests a screen shot, not a photograph. So, we would need source of video and evidence it was released appropriately. Rob (talk) 21:08, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination MichaelMaggs (talk) 18:42, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

some painting, copies can be founded with google, some kind of poster Motopark (talk) 16:30, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: If author is indeed 'Le Mirador Kempinski an OTRS permission would be needed MichaelMaggs (talk) 18:22, 27 May 2014 (UTC) [reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

only use on Wikipedia allowed, according to the license 4ing (talk) 13:31, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Invalid licence: Wikipedia only is not free enough MichaelMaggs (talk) 18:03, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

some painting, copies can be founded with google, some kind of poster Motopark (talk) 16:29, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: If author is indeed 'Le Mirador Kempinski an OTRS permission would be needed MichaelMaggs (talk) 18:22, 27 May 2014 (UTC) [reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

incorrect name Telligopop (talk) 09:30, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Telligopop: Please use {{Rename}} tag instead of deletion. ~ Nahid Talk 09:36, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Please request rename if needed MichaelMaggs (talk) 17:49, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source, Britain and Lesotho are very distant countries so it is unlikely the claim. Fry1989 eh? 20:53, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Appears to be a persoanl artwork that is not realistically useful for an educational purpose MichaelMaggs (talk) 18:45, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be {{Own}} (small size, no metadata, looks professional), therefore if uploader has the copyright or legal ability to license this image, they need to follow the steps on COM:OTRS to confirm this. Storkk (talk) 17:26, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Not own work MichaelMaggs (talk) 18:25, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No information about source, artist, or creation date. In other words, no way of know if the image is actually free or not.

Peter Isotalo 22:30, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: We cannot host this without some evidence that it is in the public domain or has been freely-licensed. Please request undeletion if you can provide such evidence MichaelMaggs (talk) 18:39, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copy violation: Google Maps screenshot. Ciaurlec (talk) 10:57, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It is not possible, but obsolutible a screenshot of Google Maps which I captured by FSCapture. It is not copy violation, because no one would make me suspect in court laws for uploading it. This is my badood faith. Thanks, Broster.
Relly Komaruzaman | Talk 15:31, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Infringes Google's copyright I am afraid, even if Google would not bother to take you to court for it MichaelMaggs (talk) 17:57, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry, unable to determine subject, no educational value Gbawden (talk) 11:13, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Test shot of no educational value MichaelMaggs (talk) 17:59, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per the VOA licensing tag: "Please note that the VOA republishes reporting from the Associated Press, Agence France-Presse and others. These are not in the public domain. Check the credit for any image or photo." This image clearly credits Reuters as the author of this file (see bottom left corner), and a Google reverse image search shows that versions of this image does exist without the VOA watermark. --benlisquareTalkContribs 15:03, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Clearly a Reuters image MichaelMaggs (talk) 18:15, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unknown landscape, poor quality since taken from a bus, seems like a vacation picture of some kind. Mippzon (talk) 11:03, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No realistic educational use, especially with no description MichaelMaggs (talk) 17:58, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like personal file, not notable magazine, out of scope, as it is a book cover, license/permission is unclear too TitoDutta 14:06, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Would need OTRS permission if this cover is really 'own work' as claimed MichaelMaggs (talk) 18:04, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio of 2d artwork not covered by fop in the UK and probable text copyvio Oxyman (talk) 19:43, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination MichaelMaggs (talk) 18:50, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copy violation: Google Maps screenshot. Ciaurlec (talk) 10:57, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It is not possible, but obsolutible a screenshot of Google Maps which I captured by FSCapture. It is not copy violation, because no one would make me suspect in court laws for uploading it. This is my badood faith. Thanks, Broster.
Relly Komaruzaman | Talk 15:33, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Infringes Google's copyright I am afraid, even if Google would not bother to take you to court for it MichaelMaggs (talk) 17:57, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FOP in Wales does not cover 2D items such as this notice. LGA talkedits 23:11, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Infringes the copyright of the original artist MichaelMaggs (talk) 18:37, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

already published at [6]. Besides, this looks like a photoshopping; certainly not like a poet of the 14th century or a painting of one! Lupo 08:19, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Not own original work MichaelMaggs (talk) 17:45, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of SCOPE.    FDMS  4    00:56, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Largely text: not valid for Commons MichaelMaggs (talk) 18:58, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not good (underexeposed), we have other very better in same and high resolution. There are too much picture of the same subject Pierpao.lo (listening) 14:47, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: File is in use MichaelMaggs (talk) 18:11, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Serial copyvio uploader; the source described as Reuters: http://www.historycommons.org/timeline.jsp?timeline=complete_911_timeline&warning_signs:_specific_cases Prokurator11 (talk) 18:38, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Not own work MichaelMaggs (talk) 18:27, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

British roadworks sign does not use an amber background. Fry1989 eh? 20:54, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Not realsitically useful for an educational purpoase MichaelMaggs (talk) 18:44, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Focus on background, too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:58, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Poor quality, but it is in use so cannot be deleted under the 'not realistically useful' criterion MichaelMaggs (talk) 18:12, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kenixho (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The Lee Kum Kee Plum/Hoisin sauce photographs are derivative works in that the labels are likely copyrighted. All 3 photos are likely the works of the company. Whilst we do welcome such images on Commons, we need an COM:OTRS release on these images.

russavia (talk) 12:22, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No evidence that these have been released under a free licence MichaelMaggs (talk) 18:01, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Film poster. Copyright unlikely to be held by uploader. Storkk (talk) 17:11, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination MichaelMaggs (talk) 18:23, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

droit d'auteur et d'image Semstag (talk) 07:13, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

droit a l'image 158.255.99.130 13:34, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Can't see any reason to delete a user talk page MichaelMaggs (talk) 17:45, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The statue is a work by sculptor Taiju Sasaki (佐々木 大樹, † 1978) and thus out of COM:FOP#Japan. Yasu (talk) 15:14, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No FoP in Japan unfortunately MichaelMaggs (talk) 18:16, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We have much better version on File:Das Wohltemperirte Clavier titlepage 2.jpg, please replace all linked media to it. Rezonansowy (talk) 09:23, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep – That other version is a completely different representation of the document, cleaned up beyond recognition and with little resemblance of the original document. It is disputable which one is "better". -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 09:34, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
PS: Wohltemperirte Clavier titlepage 2.jpg&diff=123971033&oldid=107783317 Overwriting on 14 May 2014 this version of File:Das Wohltemperirte Clavier titlepage 2.jpg with this should not have happened and ought to be reverted. The new file should be uploaded under a different name. See Commons:FAQ#How can I upload a new version of a file? and Commons:Overwriting existing files. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 09:51, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: They are different representations, and there is no reason why we should not keep both MichaelMaggs (talk) 17:47, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OK, second try. I've split up my upload in File:Das Wohltemperirte Clavier titlepage 2.jpg to a new file and the situation is different. Please compare these 2 images. The only thing which varies is a 5-10% different contrast. IMO Common's should not be a mess contacting such copies, especially if the format is wrong. It's not the exact duplicate, but a redundant file.

Regards, Rezonansowy (talk) 11:04, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know how the format of File:WK title.png is wrong. Anyway, to my eyes, they both look different but I can't say which one is unambiguously better. Both have co-existed since 2005, so I don't know why one has to be deleted now; I suspect there are more pressing issues at Commons. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 02:27, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Please see its resolution problems above, the compression makes image a little blurry. The JPG format is better for photographic-data like this one. I'm not a specialist but the opposite example is very well explained in {{BadJPEG}}. And IMO redundant files are big problem for Commons, that's why we have a policy for such things. --Rezonansowy (talk) 11:19, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I can see that File:WK title.png is a little blurry; that's why I said earlier that the two images are not identical, but I can't say which one is unambiguously better. I don't understand how {{BadJPEG}} is helpful in this discussion, and the 1st thing I see at Commons talk:Superseded images policy is "'This image has been superseded' is not a sufficient reason for deletion!". -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 02:12, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Blurriness is the effect of bad compression, not the image itself. And it's not only superseded, it's redundant so fits perfect to a deletion request. --Rezonansowy (talk) 06:11, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The "OK" thumbnail is better, maybe the result of some "enhance detail" filter. That could backfire in further modifications, and your File:Das Wohltemperirte Clavier titlepage.jpg is far better. Both versions are used, the in your opinion worst file recommends your better variant, what is the problem? –Be..anyone (talk) 14:09, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This is image is not longer needed if we have File:Das Wohltemperirte Clavier titlepage 2.jpg, it could be deleted per COM:Redundant and the specific reason is Bad format, worse quality, redundant to File:Das Wohltemperirte Clavier titlepage 2.jpg. It qualifies to deletion. --Rezonansowy (talk) 17:01, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
<shrug />, I'm not volunteering to fix those external uses. –Be..anyone (talk) 18:23, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Be..anyone: That's why we have CommonsDelinker for it :) (handy gadget)

@Be..anyone and Michael Bednarek: Comments? Can someone else comment? --Rezonansowy (talk) 08:31, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(responding to ping) I thought I made myself clear. I see no reason to delete – Oppose. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 09:45, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Why. It's reasonable per COM:Redundant. Where is it incorrect? --Rezonansowy (talk) 14:27, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: In use. Yann (talk) 21:22, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio: http://centralasiaonline.com/fa/articles/caii/features/main/2010/02/18/feature-01?change_locale=true Prokurator11 (talk) 18:33, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and user warned on talk page regarding recent uploads MichaelMaggs (talk) 18:33, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of SCOPE.    FDMS  4    01:23, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:29, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of SCOPE, potential copyright issues witht the background.    FDMS  4    01:27, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Scope probably given (needs some research), potential (c) problem -> Com:PCP Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:32, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like a user requested deletion to me; low quality, no categories.    FDMS  4    01:01, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete In this form useless. OAlexander (talk) 12:13, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Taken from Internet, (c)vio Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:28, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Typeset document with text and images; content possibly also off topic. -- Tuválkin 05:15, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:33, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be Own work, "Kopie" likely stands for copy.    FDMS  4    00:50, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Information received via eMail: This is a photograph of a map, and therefore the uploader calls it "Kopie". Also, the uploader shot the photo(s) visible himself. @Dulinko: Das Bild der Weltkarte selbst ist das Problem, es scheint mir von einem anderen Urheber zu stammen und nicht gemeinfrei zu sein.    FDMS  4    22:22, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of scope anyway. otherwise unclear (c) status. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:26, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sehr geehrtes Wikipedia-Team, ich beantrage die Löschung dieser Datei, da es sich bei dem Logo um einen Nachbau des offiziellen Logos der Animexx e.V.. Aus diesem Grund verstößt es gegen das Copyright. Aktuell wird intern im Verein geprüft, welches Copyright Recht das offizielle Logo besitzt und dies wird umgehend ausgetaucht, sofern an dieser Stelle ein Resultat gibt. Viele Grüße Johnny Ridden JohnnyRidden (talk) 18:34, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Aha, dafür sieht es dem Original aber ziemlich ähnlich um nicht zu sagen habe ich jetzt auf dem ersten Blick keinen Unterschied feststellen können. Falls Sie auf ein Copyright bestehen muss hier erwähnt werden, dass hier höchstwahrscheinlich keine Schöpfungshöhe gegeben ist, daher die gegebene Lizenz richtig ist. -- Perhelion 19:25, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Es sieht dem Original sehr ähnlich, dass stimmt ist aber nicht gleich (die Schriftart ist beim Orginal anders, wie am a und e gut zu erkennenpoist). Aber wie es schon in der Beschreibung des Bildes heißt: "Nachgestelltes Logo von Animexx – Verein der Anime- und Mangafreunde e.V.". Der Verein würde eben gern sein Logo (das Orginal) an dieser Stelle hochladen und kein Nachgestelltes. -- JohnnyRidden 12:45, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@JohnnyRidden Sie könnten einfach ihre "originale" Version hier drüberladen und dann die entsprechenden Informationen auf der Dateibeschreibungseite ändern. Das ist hier denke ich vollkommen legitim und die einfachste Lösung. -- Perhelion 19:40, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: apparently ok FASTILY 09:10, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 09:47, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 09:11, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope Ies (talk) 17:09, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:53, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 17:08, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:53, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 11:03, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: FASTILY 09:10, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright is not ok Conny sbg (talk) 13:44, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:53, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, merely personal shot of a likely non-notable person; unusable image. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:58, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sostituita da una mappa in formato svg in stile unificato (File:Bergamo, administrative divisions - Nmbrs - monochrome.svg) Friedrichstrasse (talk) 08:43, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Non mi sembra un motivo valido di cancellazione, le due immagini possono convivere tranquillamente. --Luigi Chiesa (talk) 16:29, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: FASTILY 09:11, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, merely personal shot of a likely non-notable person; unusable image. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:58, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No educational value/promotion ~ Nahid Talk 11:36, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most likely a copyright violation. Fry1989 eh? 18:51, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

com:DW McZusatz (talk) 15:53, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:53, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cameroonian flag is on Commons in SVG. Fry1989 eh? 20:56, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:53, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most likely a copyright violation. Fry1989 eh? 19:09, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope Ies (talk) 17:10, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 09:13, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most likely a copyright violation. Fry1989 eh? 18:50, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal photo. If it's not a personal photo, quality is still too poor to be in scope. Storkk (talk) 17:08, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:53, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused user portrait 37.5.5.27 11:07, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:53, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most likely a copyright violation. Fry1989 eh? 18:48, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused user portrait 37.5.5.27 11:05, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:53, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 09:47, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:53, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, merely personal shot of a likely non-notable person; unusable image. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:57, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 09:11, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo of ABC Kids channel will not be free in Australia due to almost zero COM:TOO. LGA talkedits 23:06, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 09:09, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, merely personal shot of a likely non-notable person; unusable image. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:01, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 09:11, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most likely a copyright violation. Fry1989 eh? 19:09, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most likely a copyright violation. Fry1989 eh? 18:48, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most likely a copyright violation. Fry1989 eh? 18:49, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:32, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 17:06, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 09:13, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most likely a copyright violation. Fry1989 eh? 18:47, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most likely a copyright violation. Fry1989 eh? 18:47, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most likely a copyright violation. Fry1989 eh? 18:51, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 11:04, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most likely a copyright violation. Fry1989 eh? 18:45, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most likely a copyright violation. Fry1989 eh? 18:45, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most likely a copyright violation. Fry1989 eh? 18:47, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most likely a copyright violation. Fry1989 eh? 18:49, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most likely a copyright violation. Fry1989 eh? 18:46, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most likely a copyright violation. Fry1989 eh? 18:49, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most likely a copyright violation. Fry1989 eh? 18:48, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most likely a copyright violation. Fry1989 eh? 18:51, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most likely a copyright violation. Fry1989 eh? 18:47, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXIF data states "All rights reserved". If uploader is Michael Banino, it would be good if he could follow the steps here to confirm this fact. Storkk (talk) 17:20, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most likely a copyright violation. Fry1989 eh? 18:48, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most likely a copyright violation. Fry1989 eh? 18:51, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most likely a copyright violation. Fry1989 eh? 18:51, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most likely a copyright violation. Fry1989 eh? 18:50, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most likely a copyright violation. Fry1989 eh? 18:46, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most likely a copyright violation. Fry1989 eh? 18:47, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio|The architect Victor Horta died in 1947, less than 70 years ago Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 13:26, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This picture is not about Horta's architecture but about the scandalous treatment of his ironwork and sculptures, dumped in a field near Brussels in the 1980's and stolen by a crook. This picture is a unique witness of the way Horta's masterworks have been treated. EmDee (talk) 16:26, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Tout comme le dispositif actionnant la sonnette de la maison de l'architecte Victor Horta de la rue Américaine, 25 à Saint-Gilles [[7]] dont vous avez demandé la suppression rapide, il s’agit bien ici d’un élément architectural dessiné et faisant partie de l’œuvre de Victor Horta. Vous le faites d’ailleurs remarquer dans votre commentaire susmentionné.

Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 21:32, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 09:12, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Gbawden (talk) 11:06, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image. Buxtehude (talk) 12:59, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, Twitter bird is copyrighted, clear copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 19:40, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope; not a selfie repository TJH2018talk 15:43, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:15, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Gbawden (talk) 11:08, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: FASTILY 09:10, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Gbawden (talk) 11:06, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 11:12, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:55, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image lacks correct source information; Uploader lists self as source, but provides insufficient information about the file to be the original creator. This applies to virtually all of the seven or eight images so far uploaded under this username. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KDS444 (talk • contribs) 2014-05-19T14:08:34‎ (UTC)


Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation from http://johnmichaeltalbot.com/tv. If not premission is provided, must be deleted. Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:55, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image submitted by official representative for John Michael Talbot, Michael Zabrocki. I am the photographer as well.

Then, Mr. Zabrocki, you need to send an email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org, as described in Commons:OTRS, from an official email address, saying as much. Thank you. --GRuban (talk) 01:05, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: If you are the uploader, please email COM:OTRS FASTILY 09:10, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Gbawden (talk) 11:08, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 11:11, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 09:12, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Das Bild ist veraltet, ich möchte ein neues hochladen. Wie kann ich die austauschen? 141.91.136.39 15:06, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:55, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

logo -> copyvio H4stings (talk) 21:45, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant. Similar image of this same paper is File:Maribor (8658204470).jpg, which is maybe a bit clearer. Kulmalukko (talk) 10:17, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 09:11, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Gbawden (talk) 11:07, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Gbawden (talk) 11:07, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 09:43, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: FASTILY 09:11, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Gbawden (talk) 11:07, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sostituita da una mappa in formato svg in stile unificato (File:Milan, administrative divisions - Nmbrs - colored.svg) Friedrichstrasse (talk) 08:44, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 09:11, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is dubious. 1) The original description was "Poster with Kerch bridge of 1944 and Joseph Stalin", but we, obviously, see Forth Bridge. 2) Latest source (and original source are not available now. 3) Sources are not reliable. 4) If this image was created in 1944 in Soviet Union, we can't use it with PD, because 70 years will expired only on 1 January 2015, even authors of image are not certained. Dinamik (talk) 05:45, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to be related to the proposed bridge from Russia to Crimea. Anyone with a little more knowledge about this poster? --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:40, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: FASTILY 09:11, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of permission from the author of this scale model. PereslavlFoto (talk) 19:00, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Useless mirrored version of http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Maria_Furtw%C3%A4ngler_Ausschnitt_2009.jpg 94.221.92.91 20:46, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope Ies (talk) 17:09, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:55, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Decisively non-notorious company. Not used. -- OAlexander (talk) 08:59, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unsharp picture Motopark (talk) 18:16, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:55, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: work by M. Fabiani (d. 1962).[8] Eleassar (t/p) 17:04, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. Fry1989 eh? 20:54, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:55, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image lacks correct source information; Uploader lists self as source, but provides insufficient information about the file to be the original creator. This applies to virtually all of the seven or eight images so far uploaded under this username. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KDS444 (talk • contribs) 2014-05-19T14:06:29‎ (UTC)


Deleted -FASTILY 08:55, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 11:12, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: FASTILY 09:12, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unneeded redirect. Allen4names (talk) 10:28, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 09:10, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Happasoba (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:DW of package

LGA talkedits 10:35, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 09:11, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 11:12, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:55, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. Fry1989 eh? 20:54, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:55, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. Fry1989 eh? 21:04, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:55, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of our SVG file. Fry1989 eh? 20:45, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:55, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a cropped version of the wallpaper available at Lake McDonald by Jason Absolom, one of the elementary OS Luna wallpapers Auric (talk) 21:32, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:55, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope Ies (talk) 17:09, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:55, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hoax photo - glasses are MSPAINTed on, wrinkles and beard also probably fake. Storkk (talk) 17:13, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:55, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mantonucci (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Some files need permissions from the copyright holders, all files need descriptions, categories...

37.5.5.27 09:52, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 09:11, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 11:12, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:55, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work. However, file has already on commons under the name File:The rest will follow (2010–2011 Arab world protests).jpg ~ Nahid Talk 11:27, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 09:10, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: non-free space invader; taken from a stream of space invaders, therefore not de minimis. Eleassar (t/p) 08:53, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:55, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No free license/wrong license information an no encylopedic use (Article deleted in de.WP) Hyperdieter (talk) 09:18, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:55, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unsuitable copyright conditions. Compare with linked Flickr page. OAlexander (talk) 09:06, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Both the Flickr page and the Commons file page are marked with the CC-BY license; which is allowed on Commons. The Commons file page's license has been reviewed correctly as well. Dainomite (talk) 19:06, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The creator clearly has manually marked the photo with

Lei do Direito Autoral nº 9.610, de 19 de Fevereiro de 1998: proibe a reprodução ou divulgação com fins comerciais ou não, em qualquer meio de comunicação, inclusive na Internet, sem prévia consulta e aprovação do autor.

Reproduction prohibited. © All rights reserved. Image protected by the Brazilian Copyright Law No. 9610 19/02/1998

Contato: (...)

In shortshrift this means, the express will of the author is, that he does not like commercial reproduction without express consent. The author is apparently a not an English speaker and so he might not have fully understood the licence he has formally agreed to. I am of the opinion that notwithstanding of any formal arguments the intentions of authors should be accommodated in the best possible way. That my personal opinion is that WP also should publish photos where commercial re-use is prohibited, as we should provide free and informative content rather than a free for all, to put it this way in brevity, is a different matter. I am also not saying that the licencence checking process has failed in any way: it even has transported the authors wishes into the file description. Cheers, OAlexander (talk) 21:36, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment In order to get optimal information, we should ask the flickr user. OAlexander, do you have a flickr account? --High Contrast (talk) 23:27, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unclear copyright status FASTILY 09:12, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [9]. Yann (talk) 09:35, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio|The architect Victor Horta died in 1947, less than 70 years ago Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 13:28, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This picture is not about Horta's architecture but about the scandalous treatment of his ironwork and sculptures, dumped in a field near Brussels in the 1980's and stolen by a crook. This picture is a unique witness of the way Horta's masterworks have been treated. EmDee (talk) 16:27, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Tout comme le dispositif actionnant la sonnette de la maison de l'architecte Victor Horta de la rue Américaine, 25 à Saint-Gilles [[10]] dont vous avez demandé la suppression rapide, il s’agit bien ici d’un élément architectural dessiné et faisant partie de l’œuvre de Victor Horta. Vous le faites d’ailleurs remarquer dans votre commentaire susmentionné.

Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 21:35, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

La représentation d'une oeuvre d'un artiste décédé il y a moins de 70 ans est bien visible sur cette photo, néanmoins il s'agit de bien moins d'un fragment de l'oeuvre en décomposition et l'intention de documenter la "conservation" d'une pièce d'art paraît plus forte que la volonté de reproduire une oeuvre unique. Olnnu (talk) 22:44, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Derivatives of non-free content are forbidden on Commons FASTILY 21:41, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [11]. Yann (talk) 14:41, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]