Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2014/05/07
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
Aashiqui 2 Poster is copyright violation AntonTalk 12:41, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted McZusatz (talk) 20:58, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope, IMHO. Uplodaded by new user without any further edits. Jcornelius (talk) 19:18, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Delete unused personal picture -Pete F (talk) 00:30, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 20:43, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
In my opinion very dubious claim of copyright ownership, OTRS permission might be necessary. FDMS 4 13:13, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: com:otrs McZusatz (talk) 20:57, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
- Droit de reproduction interdite sans autorisation de l'auteur, ce qui est contraire aux règles de Commons [1] --Lomita (talk) 13:06, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files of User:KIKIRPA -- Asclepias (talk) 14:55, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Requête traitée sur Commons:Deletion requests/Files of User:KIKIRPA Dereckson (talk) 21:05, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi, I just uploaded this myself, but now I am aseriosuly doubting that it was me who took this picture. (We all took similar pictures at the time the chimpanzee did this, but this particular picture is very likely not by me). So; I am very sorry, but could this please be deleted quickly? Many thanks! I will try to find my own version of the pic and upload that then. C Tennie (talk) 23:07, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete unused file per uploader request -Pete F (talk) 15:36, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Jarekt (talk) 18:48, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
File:Popocatépetl & Cd de México.jpg is delete or banned Violog (talk) 23:41, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
Info + File:CentroFinancieroSantaFe.jpg = copyvio via Google Street View. Gunnex (talk) 08:26, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
File 8 is delete. 189.232.102.247 06:31, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:34, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
- Droit de reproduction interdite sans autorisation de l'auteur, ce qui est contraire aux règles de Commons [2] --Lomita (talk) 13:06, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files of User:KIKIRPA -- Asclepias (talk) 14:56, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Requête traitée sur Commons:Deletion requests/Files of User:KIKIRPA Dereckson (talk) 21:05, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope, IMHO. Uplodaded by new user without any further edits. Jcornelius (talk) 19:22, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 20:41, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Wrong file size Jubilom (talk) 16:46, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted McZusatz (talk) 20:53, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Extremely low resolution, created in 1981. Own work claim seems unlikely to me. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 21:45, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 20:38, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Flickrwash. That Flickr user's stream is full of images taken from elsewhere. This one appears to come originally from here. Lupo 15:42, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: just noticed that this Flickr user is already on our blacklist, so I'm speedyying this. Lupo 15:48, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope. Irfan shafiq khan is unknown, not important, irrelevant. Jcornelius (talk) 19:24, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 20:41, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
IMHO out of scope, user without any further edits. Jcornelius (talk) 19:25, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 20:40, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:30, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 20:40, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope, IMHO. Uplodaded by new user without any further edits. Jcornelius (talk) 19:21, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 20:42, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Blurry tiny duplicate. Flag of Gibraltar is on Commons in SVG. Fry1989 eh? 19:14, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
[[Category:Sorry i am new to wikipedia and want a small flag for the nationality of the players if there is a better one can someone edit the page for me? J92uk (talk) 14:52, 8 May 2014 (UTC)]]
- What page do you want edited? I can do it for you. Fry1989 eh? 17:53, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 20:44, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
IMHO out of scope, user without any further edits. Jcornelius (talk) 19:25, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 20:40, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:30, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 20:40, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
IMHO out of scope, user without any further edits. Jcornelius (talk) 19:25, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 20:41, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Self-promotion by single-purpose account Fixertool (talk) 21:23, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Out of scope. --Taichi (talk) 20:20, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 20:39, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
gefällt mir nicht 2A02:810D:A080:520:8DCA:AE72:690D:D768 13:56, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- Und? Wer bist Du? Löschgrund ist das jedenfalls keiner. --Tsui (talk) 07:17, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Kept: McZusatz (talk) 20:54, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
- Droit de reproduction interdite sans autorisation de l'auteur, ce qui est contraire aux règles de Commons [3] --Lomita (talk) 13:06, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files of User:KIKIRPA -- Asclepias (talk) 14:56, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Requête traitée sur Commons:Deletion requests/Files of User:KIKIRPA Dereckson (talk) 21:05, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Requête traitée sur Commons:Deletion requests/Files of User:KIKIRPA Dereckson (talk) 21:05, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope, IMHO. Uplodaded by new user without any further edits. Jcornelius (talk) 19:21, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 20:42, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
File:Myselfeliz playing GuitarListening tô IT ,Make some people feel Good,people already cryed in 2 shows,i did not of- Sandes---That My way tô pass some Good felinos- 2014-05-06 13-23.jpg
[edit]Out of scope, IMHO. Uplodaded by new user without any further edits. Jcornelius (talk) 19:21, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 20:42, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope, IMHO. Uplodaded by new user without any further edits. Jcornelius (talk) 19:20, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 20:42, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
I uploaded the file with the wrong licensing information. I do not own this image, but am allowed to use it. Vonkurthausen (talk) 20:34, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted McZusatz (talk) 20:39, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
multiplied wrong answer should be 10000010 not 1000010 1sfoerster (talk) 12:18, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Keep in mind you can also easily upload a new version of the file McZusatz (talk) 20:59, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope, IMHO. Uplodaded by new user without any further edits. Jcornelius (talk) 19:19, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 20:42, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
- Droit de reproduction interdite sans autorisation de l'auteur, ce qui est contraire aux règles de Commons [4] --Lomita (talk) 13:06, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files of User:KIKIRPA -- Asclepias (talk) 14:57, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Requête traitée sur Commons:Deletion requests/Files of User:KIKIRPA Dereckson (talk) 21:05, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
screenshot from en:Rise of Nations Knochen ﱢﻝﱢ 18:51, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 20:51, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
screenshot from en:Rise of Nations Knochen ﱢﻝﱢ 18:49, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- Wo liegt das problem? User:Mr757Freak
- Hallo,in Commons:SS#Software steht sinngemäß auf deutsch:
- In den meisten Fällen können Screenshots von Computer-Software(Programme, Videospiele, Betriebssysteme) nicht auf Commons hochgeladen werden, es sei denn die Software steht unter einer freien Software-Lizenz ... oder es gibt eine formale Genehmigung.
- In der englischen Wikipedia ist das anders, da werden screenshotsmit der en:Template:Non-free video game screenshot und en:Template:Non-free use rationale lizenziert - sihe en:File:Rise of Nations scene.jpg. Auf commons und in der deutschen Wikipedia geht das soweit ich weiß nicht. --Knochen ﱢﻝﱢ 20:21, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 20:51, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Looks a lot like a promo shot, unlikely own work claim. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 21:46, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 20:38, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope, IMHO. Uplodaded by new user without any further edits. Jcornelius (talk) 19:20, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 20:42, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Own work seems very dubious. -mattbuck (Talk) 15:14, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 20:53, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Own work seems a bit dubious to me. -mattbuck (Talk) 15:13, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 20:53, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
only file left of the uploader, might be a copyright violation as well FDMS 4 13:20, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: (c)vio via:https://www.google.com/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZisMbmiG9pWoi3RQYo4sR-JVUSuajYw2ccJJpiTWYpiwwgt6MTjpG9ZPHwHcjHqLrdQboz06qoYofLTWbDs_1RQT8aBwWt19Gz_17bHQ2TKlXzafX0DK-H_1nTPtlfo2Z9tEQPi-E7R6NTAyjlCNDUw3lSj_16MAsxoHROnPviFh--1PSa9TyjgetqGOoSXAyPL5-yLiH1f99cr83z9j6tbJH6ygvA0npI9z2TdJVrqZR8NMgniJRu8vwmMBhVJZPset9PMKbkKGNr9FGEQpUNAH_1XPOU8YiUfCdEn-F3tQTg8KrLlKNGrkMaZSuF1HHwIyciDNcD1ymqBsCL8YMfEIAGewcNwxAbOheHIHajeM4Gkqo-JdXmRQPKKvhZ-TD4X2nvPlKqV-Hh6rlDuy-YwapEvtS23YVxhOpxWRQJ2CPKX8SW4maSZdsqf22ZI8GruDytEQRijEihVh8pBHThazT5lskP4PslgCJNcMgiM_1mG6c33ovJp8im_1bZIPaPMP_1XiYiu1rRlKjnDGB5UAM4hvObarNjnP4sZYgKT5nNRDOH6AjPjBN65Sujuv-KJyYnj_1ud1D-ZO_1C5K-Q8nSQRhYe756sG6VRBU3Kg4wblMBy_1E2pDVmojJ_15eZ4NNFIyzYNKpAHz-HW_1oyYTrmhWxFmx3FO_1SqmNXJExd0pjisegBBX0zx9hA7NGfnRbKNhht-xCiIlJiwnZr6aVfxyLl0YPxqY7xiZnJoxaeuuMzTEX2a6Dk3uSpqraDAUf5JYfnXbxIVOiYPiauc_1GK-tK2S0Tpi8OfT1WgAR3Qoceurv4EFF0wuI0m2gGQDk5nDu0tdIqMuSPAhaLtQIdVmbX4Loq_1SBAUBUssO5cQOSGxsMiW9w-cBEbYoTEQd8HXJORYqFYflYvuPdMZaVVrnRqMeJhBeJa1wsPeNb5f5pRQmgHM0_1Y_1y1ljL-oMa-ud-GEicfUZ4XP4lBeq3ZQGeatpSDxbcz_1N-SykI4qY1kC9xMCfbqjNtwAB5y-oEq6G31ssS8LxeuCXvEgciy1bAA_1nLnv-wJM0eGJhSgj6QNVM8l0h5NfcbC-4_1Y1QvIxFt0ACBeXWgfL-FciFfTE-F-ZqB8CPjUBhRFnqwfdHwsD6jUwrBtOx3b2MQBEdyiiI4qd88jXLDp69BYw-2c4bZ4oAZTKdnvbEabR5p0LRhPIZqfEPe0HF_1DFsfYToKz-YqxtRRHpqEU0zsLybJN_1xkKf7t-F8v8owB51x9fUga9zdWZTLY08_1M8gmLr-p8Dd0-UHxMxIHo1sz90kYRQl0aPd8pTH0casy0aPjCXejNtLlV8G-qB3hY3JgDIp6LtShD3Hp1P3UtRCLsapFYouWBY_1VUoZUes_1NQ9XOSjy4-0-lsbgqHejqwM15mmpWo19dWzXhNmOOzSf3Of2CRIPuxvfcc25QUq4ftSei4eihZcMceiWxXdzfhZLi_1FIItX0xW2WczwYATK8YhfcS3C6GThD_1FDur-WXfJZSw Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:49, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
Looks like a screen to me, therefore this image is a derivative work. FDMS 4 12:26, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Info: Added File:UW-stratford-image-2.jpg to this RFD. FDMS 4 12:28, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: com:dw McZusatz (talk) 21:01, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Headshot of a member of a theater troup. Unlikely own work claim. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 21:47, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 20:38, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
File:WilliamPaul Lewis is an island boy born and raised on the island of Guam- -Born March,19,1994--Graduated from Southern high School- He loves to meet new people and watch the newest movies- -He has superb skill 2014-05-07 01-47.jpg
[edit]Out of scope, IMHO. Uplodaded by new user without any further edits. Jcornelius (talk) 19:19, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 20:43, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope, IMHO. Uplodaded by new user without any further edits. Jcornelius (talk) 19:18, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 20:43, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope, IMHO. Uplodaded by new user without any further edits. Jcornelius (talk) 19:18, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 20:43, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope, IMHO. Uplodaded by new user without any further edits. Jcornelius (talk) 19:19, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 20:43, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Facucaldo123 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 20:54, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Facucaldo123 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Set of stuff grabbed from the web, long history of (c)vios
- File:Logo bon o bon.jpg
- File:Productos Águila.jpg
- File:Barritas de chocolate Águila.jpg
- File:Logotipo Águila.png
- File:Tofi.jpg
- File:Logo Tofi 25 años.jpg
- File:Atracciones Parque de la Costa.jpg
- File:Cartel Biblioteca Popular Mariano Moreno (Humberto Primo).jpg
- File:Monumento alegórico fiesta de la bagna cauda.jpg
- File:Logotipo Cine-Teatro Sociedad Italo Argentina Nueva Roma.jpg
- File:Escudo Comuna de Humberto Primo, Santa Fe.jpg
- File:Escudo Actual Argentino Foot Ball Club.png
- File:Panorámica Parroquia Santa Margarita.jpg
- File:ConstruirTV.png
- File:Monumento al Centenario, Humberto Primo.JPG
- File:Construcción Sociedad Italo-Argentina Nueva Roma.jpg
- File:Monumento Al centenario Humberto Primo.jpg
- File:Parroquia Santa Margarita Humberto Primo.JPG
Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:31, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
Keep File:Parroquia_Santa_Margarita_Humberto_Primo.JPG, found in Panoramio as All rights reserved, but consider if facuc417 at Panoramio is actually Facucaldo123 (that is very likely); uploader could probe that with OTRS. FOP in Argentina.- Keep File:Cartel_Biblioteca_Popular_Mariano_Moreno_(Humberto_Primo).jpg, Google Image search gives Commons as the only source found.
- Keep File:Logo_bon o bon.jpg, maybe {{PD-textlogo}}
- Weak keep File:Logo Tofi 25 años.jpg, could be considered bellow the TOO?
- Keep File:Construcción Sociedad Italo-Argentina Nueva_Roma.jpg, 1928 photo, {{PD-Argentina}} applies.
- Delete the rest.
- --Amitie 10g (talk) 04:22, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 07:38, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
Professional images, with larger versions available on another website. If the uploader really is the copyright holder he has to send permission to OTRS.
FDMS 4 21:38, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete These were part of a COI article draft for an apparently non-notable musical group on English Wikipedia. I've blanked the user draft page there. -Pete F (talk) 00:35, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 20:39, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal images of bad quality. I would like to nominate File:Jaskaran S. Dhillon Photo.jpg too but it is in use on an en.WP AFC talkpage …
FDMS 4 13:26, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: clearly out of scope. not notable. McZusatz (talk) 20:57, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Those files seems to copyrighted by IDF and no apparent permission was granted to upload them under free license.
- File:תאל מאיר אוחנה.jpg
- File:תאל רוני בני.jpg
- File:תאל מיקי בראל.jpg
- File:תאל יורם צחור.JPG
- File:תאל ניר עם גולדברום.jpg
- File:תאל אמיל אלימלך.JPG
- File:תא"ל מוטי בירן.jpg
- File:תא"ל מאיר גבע.jpg
- File:תא"ל ברוך ארבל ז"ל.jpg
- File:תא"ל בנימין ענבר ז"ל.jpg
- File:תא"ל זלמן ורדי זל.jpg
- File:אלוף רפאל ורדי ז"ל.jpg
- File:אל"ם צבי שמעון שפיר ז"ל.jpg
- File:אל"ם ברוך יצהר ז"ל.jpg
- File:אל"ם יוסף פרסמן ז"ל.jpg
matanya • talk 06:43, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 21:03, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Steviee1313 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal, unused and mostly redundant images of bad quality.
- File:MartinDeakin4.jpg
- File:2011 0208maerini0004-montage2 copy.jpg
- File:MartinDeakin2.jpg
- File:Martini.JPG
FDMS 4 13:05, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 20:58, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by کربلایی علی احمدی (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal unused photo. Out of scope.
- File:کربلایی علی احمدی محرم92.JPG
- File:کربلایی علی احمدی شلمچه.JPG
- File:کربلایی علی احمدی در سفر کربلا با هیئت دلسوختگان حضرت زهرا سلام الله علیها.JPG
- File:کودکی کربلایی علی احمدی.jpg
- File:مراسم عزاداری شهادت امام رضا ع در منزل کربلایی علی احمدی.JPG
- File:کلب اباعبدالله ع کربلایی علی احمدی.JPG
- File:کلب آستان علی ابن موسی الرضا علیه السلام کربلایی علی احمدی.jpg
- File:کربلایی علی احمدی سفر مشهد با هیئت فاطمیون خرم آباد.jpg
- File:کربلایی علی احمدی.JPG
- File:کربلایی علی احمدی کربلا المقدسه.JPG
- File:علی احمدی.jpg
- File:کربلایی علی احمدی ضریح آقا امیرالمومنین علی بن ابی طالب علیه السلام.jpg
- File:کربلایی علی احمدی ضریح آقا امیر المومنین علی بن ابی طالب علیه السلام.jpg
- File:کربلایی علی احمدی سفر کربلا.jpg
- File:کربلایی علی احمدی سفر نجف.JPG
- File:عکس کربلایی علی احمدی.jpg
Meisam (talk) 12:11, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 21:02, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:25, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:52, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
Low quality nonsense image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:41, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:50, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
not own work Fetx2002 (talk) 05:44, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 10:04, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
Permission is disputed. Zero evidence that this is an "own work" image. Bars and graininess indicate this is a screen shot of some sort. 99.118.34.43 03:54, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Delete In addition to the copyright concerns, this file has a description that is not especially meaningful, and no categories. It's hard to see how it could be put to an educational use. -Pete F (talk) 15:32, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 10:04, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
not own work Fetx2002 (talk) 05:37, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 10:04, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
not own work Fetx2002 (talk) 05:47, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 10:03, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
not own work Fetx2002 (talk) 05:33, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 10:04, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
not own work SuZumiya (talk) 03:51, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:21, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
not own work Fetx2002 (talk) 05:32, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 10:04, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
Derivative work (retouched version) of File:Geneve.jpg which was deleted in 2012 per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Geneve.jpg on grounds of doubting "own work" (uploader stated picture was taken in 1992, but the Libyan flag in the picture was not used from 1970 to 2011). In addition to what was said there, the original uploader of Geneve.jpg also uploaded a self-portrait dated 2003 where he looks too young to be able to have taken this picture in the 1960's. Gestumblindi (talk) 22:05, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:49, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope Jackmcbarn (talk) 03:33, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 10:09, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Denniss as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: The naming of disputed map as "neutral" is POV-pushing. Map names should not be tagged as "correct", "right" or "neutral". The correct naming for this file is perhaps "Israel location map (1949 cease fire borders)" Denniss (talk) 08:40, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- Speedy keep. So, as I understand, the nominator does not propose deletion, but renaming of the file. If the title is the only issue, then the file should be kept, and a move proposal should be made. Vanjagenije (talk) 13:53, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- If you have a proper name on hand please tag it for renaming and I close this here. I just restored a speedy tag (that was reverted) and opened this DR for discussion.--Denniss (talk) 15:24, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- Speedy keep. As admin NordNordWest states "An inappropriate name of a file is no reason for deletion.". This map is currently used by the main Israel map template at en.wiki and that template can only be edited by admins. User Greyshark09 is trying to delete the map on en.wiki though the current RFC is not going his way so he came here to try to supercede en.wiki by deleting it here. If the rules of commons demands a name change, I don't know commons rules, then please let me know before hand so I can notify an admin and perhaps we could duplicate the map for a day then delete this one so that we do not have template problems on en.wiki as it takes time to update. Sepsis II (talk) 17:40, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- Also, the suggested name of 1949 ceasefire borders would be incorrect as the map shows current boundaries including the 1980 annexation of EJ. Sepsis II (talk) 19:57, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- Color of Huleh valley and southern Tiberias should be changed to white - Syria has very little claim there; the colors of annexed areas (EJ and Western Golan) should be hatched or colored differently to represent Israeli annexation, which is not recognized by UN; Judea and Samaria Area (area C of the West Bank) should be also decided whether to color it - it is under semi-military Israeli rule since 1982 (Israeli military occupation was abolished in 1982 as a result of Egypt peace accords); inclusion of Gaza Strip and whole West Bank under Israel at same color should not be presented, but anyway that wasn't the original situation at File:Location map Israel.svg.Greyshark09 (talk) 16:18, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
- Also, the suggested name of 1949 ceasefire borders would be incorrect as the map shows current boundaries including the 1980 annexation of EJ. Sepsis II (talk) 19:57, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete or rename to "location map Israel (1949 cease fire borders)" - current naming is inappropriate, because there is no such a thing as "neutral" map, especially when speaking of disputed regions.Greyshark09 (talk) 18:32, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Unless someone knows of a good reason not to, I'll move the map to the title "Israel proper location map" shortly. Sepsis II (talk) 01:20, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
- Keep, it is a neutral and more accurate map then the one used created by NordNordWest. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 03:47, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete or Rename -- but the word "proper," proposed above by @Sepsis II: above, is no better than "neutral." -Pete F (talk) 00:11, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
- You forgot to state which policy you are following for your delete vote. Also what is wrong with this map of Israel proper being called Israel proper location map? Sepsis II (talk) 02:09, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
- Ah, I see -- there are multiple possible meanings of "proper." Perhaps you are thinking of a different meaning. See wiktionary:en:proper#adjective. The way I read this, the word would indicate this is the "correct" border of Israel, which -- per Denniss' nomination -- is not a good way to name a file. Where a border is in dispute, or has changed over time, it's better to name it in a way which reflects what point of view it represents, rather than indicating it is the "neutral" or "proper" or "correct" point of view. -Pete F (talk) 02:15, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
- You forgot to state which policy you are following for your delete vote. Also what is wrong with this map of Israel proper being called Israel proper location map? Sepsis II (talk) 02:09, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Comment Renaming of this file is a must to keep it, the name has to be changed from a PoV name to a NPoV name. So what exactly is this map showing? --Denniss (talk) 08:17, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
- The map is showing 1949 cease fire borders (also called the "Green Line") - this is what the map should be titled.Greyshark09 (talk) 16:08, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep as per Vanjagenije. The original map File:Israel location map.svg was used for locations outside Israel, and colouring distinguished areas extraterritorial to Israel, but occupied by Israel, differently from the other neighbouring countries in the region. In that sense the original map was not only Israel, but Israel/Areas Occupied by Israel. Sepsis rightly corrected that. If one challenge the 'neutral' description, you must likewise challenge the File:Israel location map.svg title or colour-shading which very subtly insinuates that Israel and its Occupied Territores are qualitatively offset from neighbouring countries. A POV-map, in short, generated a counter POV-map and we question the neutrality of the latter endeavour to fix the mess, without addressing the primary issue, which is the first map. Greyshark himself admits that “there is no such a thing as "neutral" map” , and this applies to the original map Sepsis tried to correct. Until this is resolved, there should be no deletion, and both should be accorded equal functional status. 'Israel proper' is perfectly neutral.Nishidani (talk) 13:41, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
- Suggestion. Sepsis. Other than neutral, can you think of any other alternative term for the map? Like 'current map of Israel'/'Map of Israel as currently defined'? Nishidani (talk) 13:49, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
- Comment - Why in Sepsis II's map the Syrian occupation of Huleh valley and southern part of Tiberias Lake (1948-1967) is shown as not part of Israel, even though Syria has very dim claim to this area (Syrian claim to this area is no different than Israeli claim to Western Golan - both originated in occupation). Sepsis II's map represents 1949 borders - one of the possible versions for Israeli borders and unsurprisingly the mainstream position of the Arab League; As far as i know Huleh valley and southern Tiberias are included as part of Israel (or hatched) in other maps; while Golan and East Jerusalem are added to Israel in others - the areas are not under military occupation since 1982, but rather annexed (recognition is another matter); Some maps which represent Israeli views are including also the West Bank in same color, but that one can be dismissed as more radical representation together with the 1949 version of Sepsis II. The problem is however mainly that there was no discussion on what is the neutral map - Sepsis II decided this himself by changing the location map template, later suspiciously protected for editors (system gaming?) and for some reason Sepsis II is demanding his rights even though he violated WP:BRD and WP:CIVIL on the way. If one is seeking neutrality Sepsis II is the last person to consult, given the fact he is on the brink of being topic banned from ARBPIA over POV-editing pattern [5].Greyshark09 (talk) 16:06, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
- Comment
- the areas (East Jerusalem) are not under military occupation since 1982
- Good grief, if that is the state of your knowledge, perhaps you'd better take a stroll down the central souq in East Jerusalem and ask yourself, as Palestinians do, what on earth all of those young girls in military fatigues and touting Uzis are doing patrolling that area. Or ask Christians why Israel imposes so many restrictions on them at Easter at the Church of the Holy Sepulchre, or Muslims why none of their children can go with them to say prayers on the Dome of the Rock (because the occupying authority refuses them that right, even though they are 'annexed Jerusalemites', a right given to every Jewish child in the world to visit unhampered the Western Wall nearby. 'Annexation' in one party's POV, Greyshark, does not cancel the fact that those areas are, under international law, 'occupied', and if you cannot understand that, then charging that Sepsis is a POV-pusher is rather comical. Nishidani (talk) 18:40, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
given the fact he is on the brink of being topic banned from ARBPIA over POV-editing pattern
- I strongly suggest also that you either rephrase that or strike it out, since the link does not give warrant to your present tenses, or your crystal-gazing prediction.Nishidani (talk) 18:48, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
- Comment
Kept: No vald reason. Pleas use the relevant talkpage to discuss about a new filename. -- Steinsplitter (talk) 10:00, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope: photo of non-notable individual Jackmcbarn (talk) 03:44, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 10:32, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
Personal unused photo. Out of scope. Meisam (talk) 12:17, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:52, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
not own work Fetx2002 (talk) 05:33, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 10:04, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
not own work Fetx2002 (talk) 05:35, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 10:04, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
not own work Fetx2002 (talk) 05:40, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 10:04, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
not own work Fetx2002 (talk) 05:37, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 10:04, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope: photo of non-notable individual Jackmcbarn (talk) 03:44, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 10:32, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
not own work Fetx2002 (talk) 05:34, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 10:04, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope: photo of non-notable individual Jackmcbarn (talk) 03:44, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 10:32, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
Too blurry to identify what the picture is of Jackmcbarn (talk) 03:38, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 10:11, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
not own work Fetx2002 (talk) 05:46, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 10:04, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
not own work Fetx2002 (talk) 05:41, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 10:04, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
not own work Fetx2002 (talk) 05:32, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 10:04, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
Personal unused photo. Out of scope. Meisam (talk) 12:08, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:52, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gaurav Rauniyar (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal picture , out of Project Scope.
Amitie 10g (talk) 03:37, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 10:09, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
All files uploaded in 05.2014. Unclear copyright status and {{PD-Art}}-fails. Multiple copyright issues. Historical photos may be in public domain but relevant info must be provided. Most of the files configured with "[my] personal collection" and authored with "Christopher Hegle". File:Dillinger en route from tucson to chicago.jpg is per http://www1.topfoto.co.uk/gallery/JohnDillinger/ppages/ppage19.html = http://www1.topfoto.co.uk/gallery/JohnDillinger/images/prevs/RV1663-5.jpg (last modified: 2009) attributed to Roger-Viollet = fr:Roger-Viollet, famous Parisian photography agency. File:Art oleary 1934.jpg + File:Arthur oleary 1934.jpg, previously published via http://reocities.com/Athens/olympus/4172/gallery.html = http://reocities.com/Athens/olympus/4172/images/oleary.jpg (last modified: 2009), attributed to "Chris Hegle Collection". File:Probasco2.jpg, previously published via http://www.nprobasco.com/interesting_probasco_info.htm = http://www.nprobasco.com/images/jamesjprobascob1869.jpg (last modified: 2011), attributed to © Bettmann/CORBIS, etc.
- File:Louis piquett in court.jpg
- File:Dillinger en route from tucson to chicago.jpg
- File:Probasco2.jpg
- File:Frechette and dillinger 1934.jpg
- File:Dr wilhelm loeser.jpg
- File:Art oleary 1934.jpg
- File:Arthur oleary 1934.jpg
- File:Dr clayton may.jpg
- File:Tommy carroll mug shots from 1933.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 20:43, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Nominating also:
- File:Biograph map july 22 1934.jpg --> no source
- File:Biograph map july 22 1934.jpg --> no source/Google Earth
- File:Lincoln court interior.jpg --> "police photo from 1934, commonly used.", authored with "Christopher Hegle"
- File:Lincoln court exterior.jpg + File:Lincoln court exterior2.jpg --> per above, unlikely "own work"
Gunnex (talk) 20:52, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
All photos except "Lincoln Court exterior" (which I photographed myself and Photoshopped it to age it) and the Biograph map (made myself in Photoshop and collected over years from FBI documents) have been in my collection for over 25 years. The photos are all at least 81 years old. Many of them are from defunct newspapers. I believe all the photographs can be found in a matter of seconds with a quick Google search. They're everywhere already. They are not rare or one-of-a-kind. They're very common photos. People already can easily download them. Wouldn't it be better to have the photos put in historical context? I believe so. Thank you.
Bluesfog
Deleted: Unclear copyright status. Unless we have definitive, explicit written and/or textual, tangible evidence from a credible, verifiable source naming these files as freely licensed under a Commons compatible license, we simply cannot host them on Commons FASTILY 09:14, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
The fair use rationale for these images is that one is an official mugshot (Tommy Carroll) of a non-living person from law enforcement agency. Such mugshots are generally considered acceptable for fair use unless they are replacable. However, since Carroll is deceased, this photo is not replaceable. All other photos were easily obtained on Google Images. All such persons are long deceased. All photos are believed to be public domain.
Bluesfog 5-18-14
Personal unused photo. Out of scope. Meisam (talk) 12:08, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:52, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
Personal unused photo. Out of scope. Meisam (talk) 12:08, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:52, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by HBO Executives (talk · contribs)
[edit]These look like promotional images and are of low image quality. Only uploads by a new user, unlikely own work claim.
- File:Quentin speaking at the day 1 of the winter tour- 2014-05-04 21-15.JPG
- File:Quentin Schaffer 2014-05-04 21-08.png
ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 22:24, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 09:15, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
File:Black Howard- -Born 19 fish and chips -Former nhl referee fired for disallowing 35 goals in the 1983 nhl playoffs--Having a strong need for control he soon went into politics to fill this need--Was made a coun 2014-04-25 21-08.png
[edit]copyright image from website, phone screenshot? Mjrmtg (talk) 11:30, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Almost certainly a copyright violation, among other problems (crazy file name...) -Pete F (talk) 00:26, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 22:15, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
very small photo Mjrmtg (talk) 11:27, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 22:16, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
Looks like something out of a video game. Might not be own work. If it is: where is the educational value? ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 22:21, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 22:04, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
Too low quality (particularly due to the huge watermark) to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 15:53, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete no obvious educational use for this low quality and poorly described file -Pete F (talk) 00:27, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 22:10, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:33, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 22:15, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
falsches bild hochgeladen Claudiafischer319 (talk) 16:16, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 22:09, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
clean up own pictures, zwll12 (talk) 11:33, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Kept: no reason for deletion Didym (talk) 22:14, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
Want to upload it in my new account User:Nummer 12 Zwll12 (talk) 22:08, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
Kept: In Use --Captain-tucker (talk) 10:37, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
Private image with seemingly offending meaning, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:28, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete attack image -Pete F (talk) 00:28, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 22:09, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
this pic has a mark evilmilk.com and is all over the internet. Quite obvious copyright violation. A mobile upload lacking exif metadata Atlasowa (talk) 22:36, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 22:03, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
File:O espetacular homem aranha 2 teve a participação de um dos grandes vilões após a ser mordido por uma aranha geneticamente modificada, ele luta com um lagarto imenso, agora no espetacular homem aranha 2 te 2014-05-04 22-19.jpeg
[edit]Looks like a promotional image for Spider Man movie. Unlikely own work claim. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 22:20, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 22:04, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Recession Proof Holdings, LLC (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promotional content, no educational value.
- File:This is a great photo of the most important businessman this day! 2014-05-06 16-43.jpg
- File:Recession Proof Holdings, LLC is based out of Westchester, IL-, just minutes from Downtown Chicago- Clients, property owners and investors can reach us by phone- Please call 800-692-3218 pager, 630-258-0966 ce 2014-05-06 16-36.png
ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 22:35, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 22:04, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
selfies at WLE
[edit]Out of the scoop, personal photos... I think that the "Coordinator" have to do a better job in orientation, because this type a photo do not below here...
- File:Amanhecer amazonica.JPG
- File:988843 10200929204271665 1739697747602975158 n.jpg
- File:A Exploração florestal.JPG
- File:Rio Itaguari 06.jpg
- File:Exploração florestal.JPG
Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton (talk) 17:51, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 22:07, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope Blue Elf (talk) 18:17, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 22:06, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
Абсолютно лишнее Higimo (talk) 09:10, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- See: [6] --ze-dan (talk) 10:53, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: copyright violation. Niklem (talk) 13:52, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
Не нужная картинка Higimo (talk) 09:11, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: copyright violation Niklem (talk) 13:51, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
Tiny blurry duplicate of SVG flag. Fry1989 eh? 19:14, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
[[Category:Is there a picture of a similar small size that i can use? J92uk (talk) 14:48, 8 May 2014 (UTC)]]
- What page do you want edited? I can do it for you. Fry1989 eh? 17:53, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
Kept: redirected to .svg Denniss (talk) 21:32, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
Lack of notoriety of "Cantogalo FC". Corresponding article deleteted from WP:PT deleted for that reason.[7] OAlexander (talk) 07:05, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
no educational purpose. use of commons as repository. "Limão Cravo Estudio Criativo" deleted at ptwiki as non encyclopedic. OTAVIO1981 (talk) 10:07, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
no educational purpose. use of commons as repository. "Limão Cravo Estudio Criativo" deleted at ptwiki as non encyclopedic. OTAVIO1981 (talk) 10:07, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
to complex Rickvdgronde (talk) 11:36, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:59, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
posible violación del copyright desde http://www.comibam.org/que-es-comibam/ Tarawa1943 (talk) 14:38, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Levin01 is not the author of the image --Gampe (talk) 04:58, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: modern architecture. Eleassar (t/p) 19:22, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: unfortunately dated to 1934 (inscription on the right medaillon), no evidence that the sculptor died before 1945. Eleassar (t/p) 19:20, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
posible violación del copyright desde http://www.comibam.org/que-es-comibam/ Tarawa1943 (talk) 14:37, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status and unlikely to be own work of uploader 1-upload user Pouillieute (talk · contribs), considering exif-infos = "photographer = Stanislas Liban, copyrights: (C) Stanislas Liban" who is a professional photographer from France. May be a work for hire but relevant info or permission must be provided. Gunnex (talk) 16:40, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:01, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Redundant file, wrong description. It is not, as stated here, the coat of arms of Răuseni commune, but an improper variant of the coat of arms of Romania (with some differences in the shield). It was never adopted as a coat of arms of Răuseni by any Romanian Government resolution. —Andrei S. Talk 09:06, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:01, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Foto with poor exposure of a refrigerator with some magnbets on it. Delete, alternatively I can upload more of this type. C:Scope, C:EDUSE. OAlexander (talk) 08:48, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
no educational purpose. use of commons as repository. "Limão Cravo Estudio Criativo" deleted at ptwiki as non encyclopedic. OTAVIO1981 (talk) 10:07, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
not my own picture, from a other photographer Zwll12 (talk) 11:39, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:01, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
no educational purpose. use of commons as repository. "Limão Cravo Estudio Criativo" deleted at ptwiki as non encyclopedic. OTAVIO1981 (talk) 10:06, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
This isn't art this is a fan drawing - won't be used in any articles Lady Lotus (talk) 12:49, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:01, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
This person who uploaded did not properly state the source of the work, using bogus and ambiguous terms like "Wikicommons", therefore providing no proof that any of the images he used are even free. Also, his image looks freakishly identical to the one I created here, which kind of hints that he just downloaded my image without sourcing me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PacificWarrior101 (talk • contribs) 2014-04-28T04:20:41 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:01, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Image sourced to official school website (www.nhsd.net), no evidence of claimed {{Cc-zero}} license GrapedApe (talk) 02:22, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:01, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
no educational purpose. use of commons as repository. "Limão Cravo Estudio Criativo" deleted at ptwiki as non encyclopedic. OTAVIO1981 (talk) 10:08, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Derivative work: all of the pictures should be credited and properly licensed. Ciell (talk) 16:16, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
No FOP for artworks in the US. Derivative work of copyrighted mural. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 21:44, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Modern sculpture in US - No FoP in US. Ronhjones (Talk) 19:36, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Photo is from the late 1940s, wrong license, no permission from school, IP removed tag with "It's public domain so it doesn't need permission. See the terms of the license it's tagged with." Jaranda wat's sup 20:46, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:01, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Author requested the deletion. GabbielSan (talk • contribs) 14:32, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
File:Sabrina Perugini (right) being interviewed at Raul Gil, a Brazilian TV show- 2014-05-06 14-44.jpeg
[edit]Low res image appears to be TV screen shot, and not an original photo taken by the uploader, which would surely be higher resolution/quality than this. Rob (talk) 02:06, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:01, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Almost-identical png copy of a jpeg at File:Zoo_Leipzig_-_Chinesisches_Ohrenschuppentier.jpeg HYanWong (talk) 20:03, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:01, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
looks strongly like a TV screenshot or similar and not like own work of the uploader as stated. JuTa 18:26, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:01, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
online at http://s.mcstatic.com/thumb/10811964/28217761/4/flash_player/0/1/29_quotes_by_vijay_batra.jpg, on lifepositive.com, http://s1.dmcdn.net/CQ_HG/526x297-5cD.jpg and other places Peripitus (talk) 10:53, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:01, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
GEBCO data is not available with a Commons-compatible license. Only non-commercial reuse permitted. See: http://www.bodc.ac.uk/projects/international/gebco/gebco_digital_atlas/copyright_and_attribution/ AHeneen (talk) 10:13, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:01, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
This is a screenshot from the copyright-protected game. 46.188.29.58 16:43, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:01, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
This is a screenshot from the copyright-protected game. 46.188.29.58 16:43, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:01, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, cropped from (example, unknown upload date) http://www.desicomments.com/janmashtami/happy-janmastami-4/ = http://www.desicomments.com/dc3/05/248285/248285.jpg Gunnex (talk) 07:32, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:01, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
GEBCO data is not available with a Commons-compatible license. Only non-commercial reuse permitted. See: http://www.bodc.ac.uk/projects/international/gebco/gebco_digital_atlas/copyright_and_attribution/ AHeneen (talk) 10:12, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:01, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
GEBCO data is not available with a Commons-compatible license. Only non-commercial reuse permitted. See: http://www.bodc.ac.uk/projects/international/gebco/gebco_digital_atlas/copyright_and_attribution/ AHeneen (talk) 10:12, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:01, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
File:Skiss av Axel Einar Hjorth till bord, modell utö, i syrabetsad furu- Modellen formgiven 1932 2014-01-08 20-27.jpg
[edit]Drawing by sv:Axel Einar Hjorth, died 1959. Not PD-old, derivative of a copyrighted work. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 21:50, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:01, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
gezeigtes Werk Pölkkyposkisolisti (talk) 01:43, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- Keep No reason for deletion. russavia (talk) 03:23, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- You don't have the right of the shown video. --Pölkkyposkisolisti (talk) 09:25, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- Right, but this is de minimis in this instance, in that the inclusion of the video in the background is incidental to the actual subject of the photo. Also, in future, please do one bulk nomination instead of several nominations. russavia (talk) 13:44, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- You don't have the right of the shown video. --Pölkkyposkisolisti (talk) 09:25, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 16:35, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
gezeigtes Werk Ralf Roleček 19:18, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted There is no indication of who took the video in the background which is not de minimus as it fills more than 70% of the frame. At concerts the film and video rights do not belong to anyone sitting in audience snapping away with a cellphone. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:09, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
No permission in OTRS. Uploader notified (cs:Diskuse_s_wikipedistou:Wašek). Miraceti (talk) 07:44, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
The uploader says "the permission should be sent soon." Miraceti (talk) 13:50, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:37, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
Not sure I believe own work. The file is tiny, there's no EXIF - looks like it was copied from the web to me. -mattbuck (Talk) 15:14, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- mattbuck, I understand your skepticism. I notified the original uploader. Maybe they can help to clarify the situtation. If not, Delete. –ireas (talk) 15:22, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 22:17, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
Looks like a lowres copvio of part of album cover seen at http://zonadictoz.biz/musica/189899/diana-vargas-sin-conflictos-2014.html Rob (talk) 01:55, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per copyvio. Also uploaded File:Diana 2014a.jpg, with better resolution. --Taichi (talk) 07:26, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
La fotografia Diana2014a.jpg me fue enviada por Diana Vargas. Es una adaptación de su portada de disco, la cual es libre de copiar en google. Vea, por ejemplo, http://zonadictoz.biz/musica/189899/diana-vargas-sin-conflictos-2014.html por lo cual no hay ningún problema de copyright. La adaptación que me envió puede ser mejorada en su resolución y no contiene NINGUNA alusión a su obra musical o disco. Por lo cual creo que no hay razón para haber borrado la página. Incluso pueden comprobar que Diana Vargas tiene su propia pagina para promocionar su disco (www.dianavargas.co)y no necesita la Wikipedia para este fin. Lo que se desea es escribir la biografía de esta mujer que es la pionera en la revolución femenina de la Salsa.
Saludos y gracias.
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:37, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
better pic in File:Guilbeaux155 pdf.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Goesseln (talk • contribs) 2014-05-06T20:04:46 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:40, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
gezeigtes Werk Pölkkyposkisolisti (talk) 01:41, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- Keep No reason for deletion. russavia (talk) 03:33, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- You don't have the right of the shown video. --Pölkkyposkisolisti (talk) 09:23, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 16:34, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
gezeigtes Werk Ralf Roleček 19:16, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted There is no indication of who took the video in the background which is not de minimus as it fills more than 70% of the frame. At concerts the film and video rights do not belong to anyone sitting in audience snapping away with a cellphone. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:15, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
gezeigtes Werk Pölkkyposkisolisti (talk) 01:41, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- Keep No reason for deletion. russavia (talk) 03:33, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- You don't have the right of the shown video. --Pölkkyposkisolisti (talk) 09:24, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 16:34, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
gezeigtes Werk Ralf Roleček 19:17, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted There is no indication of who took the video in the background which is not de minimus as it fills more than 70% of the frame. At concerts the film and video rights do not belong to anyone sitting in audience snapping away with a cellphone. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:16, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
old logo, it has bee updated Pratikmishra29 (talk) 16:17, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Arguably superseded by File:IIIT-Bhubaneswar Logo.PNG, but logos of universities are not own work and the logo surpasses threshold of originality. They both should be deleted due to copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 16:46, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 22:14, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 22:15, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
gezeigtes Werk Pölkkyposkisolisti (talk) 01:43, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- Keep No reason for deletion. russavia (talk) 03:24, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- You don't have the right of the shown video. --Pölkkyposkisolisti (talk) 09:25, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- Right, but this is de minimis in this instance, in that the inclusion of the video in the background is incidental to the actual subject of the photo. Also, in future, please do one bulk nomination instead of several nominations. russavia (talk) 13:43, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- You don't have the right of the shown video. --Pölkkyposkisolisti (talk) 09:25, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 16:35, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
gezeigtes Werk Ralf Roleček 19:17, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted There is no indication of who took the video in the background which is not de minimus as it fills more than 70% of the frame. At concerts the film and video rights do not belong to anyone sitting in audience snapping away with a cellphone. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:10, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
gezeigtes Werk Pölkkyposkisolisti (talk) 01:42, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- Keep No reason for deletion. russavia (talk) 03:30, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- You don't have the right of the shown video. --Pölkkyposkisolisti (talk) 09:24, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- Right, but this is de minimis in this instance, in that the inclusion of the video in the background is incidental to the actual subject of the photo. Also, in future, please do one bulk nomination instead of several nominations. russavia (talk) 13:43, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- You don't have the right of the shown video. --Pölkkyposkisolisti (talk) 09:24, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 16:35, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
gezeigtes Werk Ralf Roleček 19:17, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted There is no indication of who took the video in the background which is not de minimus as it fills more than 70% of the frame. At concerts the film and video rights do not belong to anyone sitting in audience snapping away with a cellphone. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:11, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
gezeigtes Werk Pölkkyposkisolisti (talk) 01:42, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- Keep No reason for deletion. russavia (talk) 03:32, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- You don't have the right of the shown video. --Pölkkyposkisolisti (talk) 09:24, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- Right, but this is de minimis in this instance, in that the inclusion of the video in the background is incidental to the actual subject of the photo. Also, in future, please do one bulk nomination instead of several nominations. russavia (talk) 13:43, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- You don't have the right of the shown video. --Pölkkyposkisolisti (talk) 09:24, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- Best to Crop and revision-delete to reduce the amount of video depicted, so that the claim to de minimis is stronger. My vote applies to all related nominations. -Pete F (talk) 00:07, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 16:34, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
gezeigtes Werk Ralf Roleček 19:17, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted There is no indication of who took the video in the background which is not de minimus as it fills more than 70% of the frame. At concerts the film and video rights do not belong to anyone sitting in audience snapping away with a cellphone. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:18, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
old logo, has been updated with new file Pratikmishra29 (talk) 16:17, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Arguably superseded by File:IIIT-Bhubaneswar Logo.PNG, but logos of universities are not own work and the logo surpasses threshold of originality. They both should be deleted due to copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 16:47, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 22:14, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 22:15, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
gezeigtes Werk Pölkkyposkisolisti (talk) 01:44, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- Keep No reason for deletion. russavia (talk) 03:22, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- You don't have the right of the shown video. --Pölkkyposkisolisti (talk) 09:24, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- Right, but this is de minimis in this instance, in that the inclusion of the video in the background is incidental to the actual subject of the photo. Also, in future, please do one bulk nomination instead of several nominations. russavia (talk) 13:43, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- You don't have the right of the shown video. --Pölkkyposkisolisti (talk) 09:24, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 16:35, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
gezeigtes Werk Ralf Roleček 19:18, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- Speedy keep: Second DR with the same arguments. No reason for deletion. The video in the background is actually the same presentatin from other angle. --Amitie 10g (talk) 22:33, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted There is no indication of who took the video in the background which is not de minimus as it fills more than 70% of the frame. At concerts the film and video rights do not belong to anyone sitting in audience snapping away with a cellphone. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:08, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
gezeigtes Werk Pölkkyposkisolisti (talk) 01:42, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- Keep No reason for deletion. russavia (talk) 03:25, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- You don't have the right of the shown video. --Pölkkyposkisolisti (talk) 09:24, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- Right, but this is de minimis in this instance, in that the inclusion of the video in the background is incidental to the actual subject of the photo. Also, in future, please do one bulk nomination instead of several nominations. russavia (talk) 13:43, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- You don't have the right of the shown video. --Pölkkyposkisolisti (talk) 09:24, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 16:35, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
gezeigtes Werk Ralf Roleček 19:17, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted There is no indication of who took the video in the background which is not de minimus as it fills more than 70% of the frame. At concerts the film and video rights do not belong to anyone sitting in audience snapping away with a cellphone. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:13, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
I had just uploaded that until getting to convert the SVG (File:Tocantinopolis EC.svg) from CDR to SVG format (which sometimes can take a while). Apart from that it is the wrong shade of green. OAlexander (talk) 08:35, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:37, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status. 2 files uploaded 08.2012, sourced with a inaccessible Facebook source copyrighted by McKoy R. Paler, licensed with a {{PD-Philippines}}-fail (actual photos). File:Lacus Cabalian.jpg (due to res) not from Facebook. https://www.facebook.com/mckoy.paler/photos_albums: nothing found. Permission and/or further details needed.
Gunnex (talk) 09:56, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:37, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
GEBCO data is not available with a Commons-compatible license. Only non-commercial reuse is permitted. See: http://www.bodc.ac.uk/projects/international/gebco/gebco_digital_atlas/copyright_and_attribution/ AHeneen (talk) 10:11, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. The user who uploaded this lives in the United States, and the Wikimedia servers are in the US as well, so I believe copyright status under US law is the only one that applies (even though the original file was apparently produced in the UK). According to my reading of Commons:Derivative works#Maps, this map, which reflects only factual data, is not subject to copyright under US law. -Pete F (talk) 00:20, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Map is a derivative work of the underlying data. Since all organisations providing data license that data the general consensuns seems to be that this data is copyrightable. Therefore this is a derivative work of copyrighted data. Permission by the data's copyright holder required. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 23:09, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
No reason Zwll12 (talk) 17:19, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
Kept: no deletion reason specified Jcb (talk) 15:10, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
not my own picture, from a other photographer Zwll12 (talk) 11:38, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted. Picture cotains meta data from original artist. Possibly not own work. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 23:15, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
GEBCO data is not available with a Commons-compatible license. Only non-commercial reuse permitted. See: http://www.bodc.ac.uk/projects/international/gebco/gebco_digital_atlas/copyright_and_attribution/ AHeneen (talk) 10:13, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- oppose. wp:commons is non-commercial 109.40.164.80 16:43, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
- Wrong. Per Commons:Licensing#Acceptable licenses: "Commercial use of the work must be allowed." AHeneen (talk) 20:34, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Map is a derivative work of the underlying data. Since all organisations providing data license that data the general consensuns seems to be that this data is copyrightable. Therefore this is a derivative work of copyrighted data. Permission by the data's copyright holder required. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 23:09, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
Wrong date and most probably wrong license (own work?) 2A02:810D:10C0:6F4:C475:763A:75E9:DF32 18:34, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- Due to the user a scan of an old family photo. What to do? --Sebastiano Mugnaio (talk) 19:17, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- It really is a scan of an old family photo. The picture is from the 1920's, so it is part of the public domain. -- Michael Scheck 16:00, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: 1920s is very much too late to assume that this is PD. We usually use 1885 as a cutoff for such assumptions. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:10, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
Political propaganda montage, highly POVed, with only a personal message. Poeticbent talk 14:30, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- Keep No valid Commons deletion rational. – Nicoli Maege (talk) 15:12, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- No! We have a policy for this sort of thing. It's called: "file is not realistically useful for an educational purpose" (end of quote). See also: Commons:Project scope. I don't even mention the criptic name. Thanks, Poeticbent talk 17:46, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- If you believe the image is not realistically educationally useful, or our of scope you should have stated that in the deletion request. You stated in the original post that the image is POV and Propaganda which is in this project scope. See Category:Government propaganda. – Nicoli Maege (talk) 14:33, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
- No! We have a policy for this sort of thing. It's called: "file is not realistically useful for an educational purpose" (end of quote). See also: Commons:Project scope. I don't even mention the criptic name. Thanks, Poeticbent talk 17:46, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Personal art, out of scope. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:06, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
Sorry, but there is no FoP in Russia. Dura lex, sed lex. 84.61.148.133 11:18, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
What FoP means? This is my own work. WTF? --Aborisov (talk) 16:46, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
“FoP” is an abbreviation for “freedom of panorama”. --84.61.148.133 21:35, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
- Статья 1276. Свободное использование произведения, постоянно находящегося в месте, открытом для свободного посещения
Допускается без согласия автора или иного правообладателя и без выплаты вознаграждения воспроизведение, сообщение в эфир или по кабелю фотографического произведения, произведения архитектуры или изобразительного искусства, которые постоянно находятся в месте, открытом для свободного посещения, за исключением случаев, когда изображение произведения таким способом является основным объектом этого воспроизведения, сообщения в эфир или по кабелю либо когда изображение произведения используется в коммерческих целях. --Moscvitch (talk) 20:27, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
- Again, why are you calling commons policy a "law"? It's a house rule, nothing more. As for your frivolous statements, you had to make some research before - like identifying all the authors of this 1928 edifice and confirming the dates of their deaths (a thorough review will take more than this, but unfortunately the real law prohibits searching past their deaths). NVO (talk) 19:54, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
Kept. Jcb (talk) 01:52, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
No FOP in Russia, should be moved to national wikis. SkyBon (talk) 03:14, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- Comment FOP will be available in October 2014 (see COM:FOP#Russia). Should we delete this until then and restore in October? Is there already a list for such files? Regards, --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 23:00, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted until October. "Yes" to your question -- it's Category:Russian FOP cases/deleted, which I have added. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:05, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Túrelio as no source (No source since) ... which is correct. I received late correspondence from a Wiki sysop asking to be able to view this file again in an effort to provide proper information. I am changing the "no source" to this nomination to get more time for the sysop to find the source & licensing information for it, if possible. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:05, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- Hi, and thanks a lot for your help. The file was uploaded by the students of a school which is enrolled in a Wikiproject, and I am judging some of the pages they created so I wanted to know if I had to penalize them for copyvio or not ;). Since the photo was taken around 1960 (here the source, I would suggest to use {{PD-Italy}} and {{PD-1996}}.
- I am not very confident about "PD-Italy" images on Commons, so I am waiting for your feedback.--DoppioM 20:43, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- Keep I am by no means expert on Italian copyright, but it seems to me that {{PD-Italy}} fits -- it was created before 1976, so it passes the twenty-years-from-creation rule of Italy and was PD in Italy on the URAA date (which we may or may not apply anyway). It needs some categories, the license changed, and the "Permission" line corrected. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:48, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
Kept: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:07, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
Images non libres de droit, l'ayant-droit n'ayant pas expressément mis le film sous licence libre. Sammyday (talk) 21:18, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- Le contributeur qui a placé ces photos sur Commons a confirmé que celles-ci étaient sous licence libre (voir fr:Discussion utilisateur:Jxdelestrade#La Disparition), la suppression n'est donc plus nécessaire.--Sammyday (talk) 18:40, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Sorry, but it is not that easy. In order to keep these, we will permission from the actual photographer of each image, using the procedure at Commons:OTRS. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:13, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
Images non libres de droit, l'ayant-droit n'ayant pas expressément mis le film sous licence libre. Sammyday (talk) 21:19, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- Le contributeur qui a placé ces photos sur Commons a confirmé que celles-ci étaient sous licence libre (voir fr:Discussion utilisateur:Jxdelestrade#La Disparition), la suppression n'est donc plus nécessaire.--Sammyday (talk) 18:42, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Sorry, but it is not that easy. In order to keep these, we will permission from the actual photographer of each image, using the procedure at Commons:OTRS. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:14, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
Images non libres de droit, l'ayant-droit n'ayant pas expressément mis le film sous licence libre. Sammyday (talk) 21:19, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- Le contributeur qui a placé ces photos sur Commons a confirmé que celles-ci étaient sous licence libre (voir fr:Discussion utilisateur:Jxdelestrade#La Disparition), la suppression n'est donc plus nécessaire.--Sammyday (talk) 18:42, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Sorry, but it is not that easy. In order to keep these, we will permission from the actual photographer of each image, using the procedure at Commons:OTRS. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:14, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
Images non libres de droit, l'ayant-droit n'ayant pas expressément mis le film sous licence libre. Sammyday (talk) 21:19, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- Le contributeur qui a placé ces photos sur Commons a confirmé que celles-ci étaient sous licence libre (voir fr:Discussion utilisateur:Jxdelestrade#La Disparition), la suppression n'est donc plus nécessaire.--Sammyday (talk) 18:42, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Sorry, but it is not that easy. In order to keep these, we will permission from the actual photographer of each image, using the procedure at Commons:OTRS. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:14, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
Images non libres de droit, l'ayant-droit n'ayant pas expressément mis le film sous licence libre. Sammyday (talk) 21:19, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- Le contributeur qui a placé ces photos sur Commons a confirmé que celles-ci étaient sous licence libre (voir fr:Discussion utilisateur:Jxdelestrade#La Disparition), la suppression n'est donc plus nécessaire.--Sammyday (talk) 18:42, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Sorry, but it is not that easy. In order to keep these, we will permission from the actual photographer of each image, using the procedure at Commons:OTRS. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:14, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
Images non libres de droit, l'ayant-droit n'ayant pas expressément mis le film sous licence libre. Sammyday (talk) 21:19, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- Le contributeur qui a placé ces photos sur Commons a confirmé que celles-ci étaient sous licence libre (voir fr:Discussion utilisateur:Jxdelestrade#La Disparition), la suppression n'est donc plus nécessaire.--Sammyday (talk) 18:42, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Sorry, but it is not that easy. In order to keep these, we will permission from the actual photographer of each image, using the procedure at Commons:OTRS. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:14, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
{{Anonymous-EU}}-fails or - regarding File:Saadallah Wannous.jpeg - {{PD-1996}}-fail (not a license) + {{PD-Art}}-fail. Considering also the license chaos at File:Kalila-wa-Dimna 1.jpg all files most likely copyrighted.
- File:Tawfiq al-hakim.jpg
- File:Mutanabi.jpg
- File:Salah abdelsabour.jpg
- File:M-chaker.jpg
- File:Al-Jahiz2.jpg
- File:Al-Jahiz.jpg
- File:Saadallah Wannous.jpeg
- File:Kalila-wa-Dimna 1.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 21:29, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- Keep on the last one (File:Kalila-wa-Dimna 1.jpg) - it's a page of a book from 1220, so public domain. --GRuban (talk) 19:49, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:16, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
Commons:Licensing/pt-br (2) the return!
[edit]As you can see Commons:Deletion requests/Commons:Licensing/pt-br I already asked for this deletion, and this was created again, and, as you can see, most of that are outdated, or in English, and redundant, as before. And no editions since 2013 oct, this was deleted set 2013 (totally incorrect creation..) so pleas delete that, and block the recreation, -Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton (talk) 15:16, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete, per nom. -- Tuválkin ✉ 19:17, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Kept: pt-br is like de-at (own dialect), it is a accepted language on all Wikiemdia wikis becouse (&it it enabled in the translate extension). --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:33, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
The bottle label fails COM:DM. -mattbuck (Talk) 16:48, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- Label fails, so you delete the image ?
- I suppose it's just a joke?
- Ludo (talk) 10:17, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
- What I mean is that the label is copyrighted, and it is a significant aspect of the image. Thus the image is a derivative work of a copyrighted work, and is thus not suitable for hosting on Commons. Please read COM:DM for more information. -mattbuck (Talk) 12:41, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
- On Wikimedia Commons, we have a lot of images as this one ; images of bottle beers. Please, have a more global discussion. You can't delete this one, without a global discussion. Ludo (talk) 17:48, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
- You'd think that, and I have tried that, and everyone just says "this can't be done in a mass discussion", and it just ends up in another "everyone call mattbuck rude words" game. Besides, that other stuff exists is in no way an argument on copyright grounds. -mattbuck (Talk) 18:31, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
- On Wikimedia Commons, we have a lot of images as this one ; images of bottle beers. Please, have a more global discussion. You can't delete this one, without a global discussion. Ludo (talk) 17:48, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
- What I mean is that the label is copyrighted, and it is a significant aspect of the image. Thus the image is a derivative work of a copyrighted work, and is thus not suitable for hosting on Commons. Please read COM:DM for more information. -mattbuck (Talk) 12:41, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: This label definatly has a copyright. Natuur12 (talk) 17:30, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
Files on User:Martin H./World War I posters in the Library of Congress for jpg file matches to "Rehse-Archiv"
[edit]As pointed out in User_talk:Fæ/2014#File:Das_ist_der_Weg_zum_Frieden_-_die_Feinde_wollen_es_so.21_Darum_zeichne_Kriegsanleihe.21_LCCN2004665832.tif: The complete bot upload of Category:World War I posters in the Library of Congress is erroneous. The author is described as unknown but in fact the author is given at the Library of Congress catalog or the author is identifiable via other libraries (even online). Files from the Rehse-Archiv für Zeitgeschichte und Publizistik form a part of Category:World War I posters in the Library of Congress, those files (see list below) originate from Germany and Austria. In many cases the author is not dead >70 years, the files therefore fail Commons:Licensing. I hope the list is complete, the bot operator did not stop the upload after notification nor does he offer a satisfying sollution now to correct this failed batch upload [8].
Martin H. (talk) 22:19, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- Note - rather than duplicating the long list, the list of files has been converted to a table and had known artists identified by checking current Library of Congress website data. --Fæ (talk) 23:40, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
Break
[edit]- Comment The nomination appears an unnecessarily pointy representation of events. The images were uploaded between 12th to the 20th April, and Martin raised no issue with me until 20th April, when most of these uploads had been available for several days. As can be seen on my talk page archive, I responded to questions the same day, despite this being raised on an Easter weekend and paused the project the same day, as I confirmed by saying "In the meantime I'll pause this work until after investigation." I am hardly a rogue bot operator and I do not appreciate being unfairly characterized as such. In addition, I made the effort to create this list of potential matches as a backlog to check. I have never claimed to be an expert in World War I, nor German poster artists who were contracted to the government to produce propaganda at that time, hence I was the one that proposed creating this DR to facilitate wider views and discussion.
- All of the photographs are offered as public domain by the Library of Congress and have been made on commission to the German war-time government up until 1919.
- Taking a random sample, LCCN2004665803 is by the war time artist Lucian Bernhard. Bernhard died in 1972. There is another of his wartime posters (sourced to the Library of Congress) at File:So hilft dein Geld.jpg where it is a Featured Picture and was a Picture of the Day last year. With this precedent, it would be reasonable to host any contested file on the English Wikipedia as public domain there, if it was felt there was sufficient doubt to not host them on Commons. --Fæ (talk) 06:57, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
- I have added artist names to the list of files. The files have been initially sorted in the table by upload date/time. Where no artist is known, these are public domain under the 70 year default. Where artists are confirmed to have been dead for more than 70 years, these are also public domain by default.
- Faebot has been asked to populate author fields for the entire WWI collection of posters in addition to those listed here, based on which artists are shown as known in the Library of Congress catalogue. This means over 1,200 posters with around twice that many Commons files as most exist in both tiff and jpeg format. --Fæ (talk) 08:43, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
- Comment I don't understand why the 70 year rule (not applicable in the USA, where these images were created) would apply? What am I missing here? These (or at least some of these) were first published in the USA before 1923, weren't they? -Pete F (talk) 15:41, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
- Ah, maybe I have found the answer to my own question, explained in this English Wikipedia template: w:en:Template:PD-US-1923-abroad -Pete F (talk) 15:44, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Thanks, Fæ, for adding the authors to the list. I inserted a column 'death year' and will try to remove some of the question marks in that column by adding a 4th column 'Discussion' and adding information if I find something. --Martin H. (talk) 13:24, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
- The German Wikipedia seems to be a good source for death dates of these artists. Equivalent articles are less frequent in en.wp. --Fæ (talk) 13:26, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
- I know it's stretching a little, but can't we argue that these are all government propaganda, a sort of "official decree" and therefore {{PD-GermanGov}}? . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:22, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
- I am bound to be partial, as the uploader, however I don't think it is much of a stretch. We should be looking for "significant doubt" rather than "hypothetical doubt" and in the absence of the estate of any artist pursuing copyright on government commissioned WWI propaganda in the past 100 years, any doubt looks to be easily within the "non-significant" end of things. There will never be no doubt, even after 170 years. I doubt many people are going to chip in on this page, perhaps as this is a topic that could do with a more definitive consensus, should we take this DR as an example to start a thread on the copyright noticeboard for a wider community view? --Fæ (talk) 13:37, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
- I know it's stretching a little, but can't we argue that these are all government propaganda, a sort of "official decree" and therefore {{PD-GermanGov}}? . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:22, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
Kept: There don't seem to be any obvious copyright problems here that can be adequately addressed with a mass-DR. Any files with copyright issues should be nominated individually at DR, or discussed at COM:VPC FASTILY 10:32, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Second nomination
[edit]Renominating all files whose author died after 1943 and those files with unclear year of death. List of affected files below. The situation is absolutely clear, the law gives copyright protection to this files. The argumentation above is against Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle, hypothetically emphasizing that a poster artist who created propaganda will unlikely enforce theire rights (although some of this isn’t propaganda but announcements for charity organizations or private organizations in the post-war time or advertisements for private banks in the wartime). That doesnt matter. A poster artists works has the same rights like any other painter or more known artist whose work isn’t public domain yet and not accepted on Commons. Files that are not public domain in the country of first publication shouldnt be uploaded to Commons. --Martin H. (talk) 13:06, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
- File:Heraus mit unsern Gefangenen! Tretet alle dem Volksbund zum Schutze der deutschen Kriegs- u. Zivilgefangenen bei! LCCN2004665995.jpg
- File:Gib zur Bayer. Grenz-Spende LCCN2004665996.jpg
- File:Die Kunst im Krieg LCCN2004666123.jpg
- File:Zeichnet Kriegsanleihe! LCCN2004666201.jpg
- File:Kolonial-Krieger-Spende. Von Lettow-Vorbeck LCCN2004665887.jpg
- File:Was England will! LCCN2004666106.jpg
- File:Der Wahlsturm fegt durch's Land! Bayerisch-Weissblau gegen Russisch-Rot! Bayerische Volkspartei LCCN2004666127.jpg
- File:Bayerische Volkspartei. Christliches Volk! Darf Spartakus deine Kirchen niederreissen? Gib Antwort am Wahltag! LCCN2004666128.jpg
- File:Zeichnet die siebente Kriegsanleihe LCCN2004666155.jpg
- File:Zeichnet achte Kriegsanleihe LCCN2004666161.jpg
- File:Zeichnet achte Kriegsanleihe LCCN2004666162.jpg
- File:Willst du den Frieden ernten, musst du säen - darum zeichne 8. Kriegsanleihe LCCN2004666168.jpg
- File:Bulgaren-Held; Zigarettenfabrik Menes, Wiesbaden LCCN2004665951.jpg
- File:Der grosse Krieg, (von) Hanns von Zobeltitz, mit zahlreichen Abbildungen und Karten LCCN2004665952.jpg
- File:Volkspende für die deutschen Kriegs-und Zivil-Gefangenen LCCN2004665953.jpg
- File:Rote Kreuz-Sammlung 1914. Sammlung zugunsten der Freiwilligen Krankenpflege im Kriege LCCN2004665956.jpg
- File:Ludendorff-Spende für Kriegsbeschädigte LCCN2004665957.jpg
- File:Volkspende für die deutschen Kriegs-und Zivil-Gefangenen LCCN2004665958.jpg
- File:Wahr dich, Wehr dich, Wach auf. Melde dich zur Bayr. Reichswehr LCCN2004665968.jpg
- File:Tonhalle ... Ausstellung von Arbeiten der in der Schweiz internierten deutschen Kriegsgefangenen LCCN2004665971.jpg
- File:Historisches Konzert ... zu gunsten der Witwen u. Waisen LCCN2004666153.jpg
- File:Kriegsbilder - Ausstellung LCCN2004666200.jpg
- File:Sammelt Brennesseln, die deutsche Baumwolle! LCCN2004666104.jpg
- File:Kriegsausstellung Wien 1916 LCCN2004666190.jpg
- File:Ober-Schlesien, Mittel-Schlesien, Nieder-Schlesien, Deutschland ist unsere gemeinsame Muttererde LCCN2004665978.jpg
- File:Opfertag in Bayern, 1916 LCCN2004665981.jpg
- File:Spendet Geld u. Liebesgaben für's Rote Kreuz LCCN2004665985.jpg
- File:So sehen die polnischen Auswanderer aus, und so werdet Ihr auch aussehen, wenn Schlesien zu Polen kommt. Oberschleisier! Bleibt beim neuen Deutschland! LCCN2004665991.jpg
- File:Um einen Besatzungsoldaten gut zu ernähren, müssen vier deutsche Kinder hungern! LCCN2004666108.jpg
- File:Weichnachts Sammlung des bayerischen Roten Kreuzes für die Feldgrauen LCCN2004666146.jpg
- File:Elend und Untergang folgen der Anarchie LCCN2004665874.jpg
- File:Erwürgt nicht die junge Freiheit durch Unordnung und Brudermord; sonst verhungern Eure Kinder LCCN2004666180.jpg
- File:Deutsche Luftskriegsbeute Ausstellung München 1918 LCCN2004665969.jpg
- File:Gold zerschlächt Eisen. Bringt eurer Gold zur Goldankaufstelle LCCN2004665824.jpg
- File:Bauern, tut eurer Pflicht! Die Städte hungern LCCN2004666210.jpg
- File:Ludendorff-Spende für Kriegsbeschädigte LCCN2004665890.jpg
- File:Ausstellung der gewerbl. Kriegsinvaliden Schulen LCCN2004666164.jpg
- File:Und eure Pflicht? Zeichnet Kriegsanleihe LCCN2004665965.jpg
- File:Bolshewismus bringt Krieg, Arbeitslosigkeit und Hungersnot. Vereinigung zur Bekämpfung des Bolshewismus LCCN2004666101.jpg
- File:Anarchie ist Helfer der Reaktion und Hungersnot LCCN2004666102.jpg
- File:Zeichnet 7. Kriegsanleihe! LCCN2004666154.jpg
- File:Altona's Opfertag, 18. Januar 1916 LCCN2004665808.jpg
- File:Altonaer Kriegshilfe Blumentag LCCN2004665819.jpg
- File:Sammelt Bucheln! LCCN2004665850.jpg
- File:Deutsche Luftkriegsbeute Ausstellung, München, 1918 LCCN2004665862.jpg
- File:Deutsche Luftkriegsbeute Ausstellung, München, 1918 LCCN2004665870.jpg
- File:Bolschewismus bringt Krieg, Arbeitslosigkeit und Hungersnot LCCN2004665871.jpg
- File:Auch du sollst beitreten zur Reichswehr LCCN2004665873.jpg
- File:Helft, dass wir den Siegeslorbeer erringen. Zeichnet die Kriegsanleihe LCCN2004665892.jpg
- File:Deutsche Kriegs-Ausstellung ... Leipzig 1916-17 LCCN2004665893.jpg
- File:Für die Kriegsanleihe! LCCN2004666144.jpg
- File:Sammelt die Obstkerne LCCN2004665875.jpg
- File:Sammelt die Obstkerne und schickt sie durch Eure Kinder in die Schule oder an die nächsten Sammelstelle! LCCN2004665877.jpg
- File:Sammelt Obstkerne zur Ölgewinnung; nächste Sammelstelle LCCN2004665878.jpg
- File:Reichswehr Brigade 25 (Deutsche Schutzdivision). Freiwillige melden sich LCCN2004665883.jpg
- File:Wollt Ihr Oel, dann sammelt Bucheckern! Kriegsausschuss für Oele und Fette LCCN2004665884.jpg
- File:Pflanzt Öl! Pflanzt Sonneblumen und Mohn, ihr schafft dann Deutsches öl und dient dem Vaterland! LCCN2004665885.jpg
- File:Kanin-felle abliefern! an Händler und Zuchtvereine. Das Heer braucht sie! LCCN2004665889.jpg
- File:Gold gab ich zur Wehr, Eisen nahm ich zur Ehr LCCN2004665894.jpg
- File:Deutsche Ausstellung, Sparsame Baustoffe. Ausstellungshallen am Zoo, 16. November bis 22 Dezbr LCCN2004665896.jpg
- File:Wolt Ihr Oel, dann sammelt Bucheckern! Kriegsauschuss für Oele und Fette LCCN2004665884.jpg
- File:Milliarden VII Kriegsanleihe, millionen Kriegsanleihe Versicherung LCCN2004666174.jpg
- File:8. Kriegsanleihe LCCN2004666175.jpg
- File:Warmes Herz, offene Hand unsern Kriegsbeschädigten! Gib zur Ludendorff-Spende! LCCN2004665802.jpg
- File:Zeichne die Kriegsanleihe! Heer und Flotte erwarten es von dir! LCCN2004665803.jpg
- File:Bis zum letzten Hauch LCCN2004665809.jpg
- File:Warmes Herz, offene Hand unsern Kriegsbeschädigten! Gib zur Ludendorff-Spende! LCCN2004665810.jpg
- File:Denkt an die Ludendorff-Spende für Kriegsbeschädigte! LCCN2004665811.jpg
- File:Zeichtnet die Neunte! Es geht un Alles was wir lieben! LCCN2004665812.jpg
- File:Achte Kriegs-Anleihe- je gewaltiger das Ergebnis, desto früher ein guter Frieden! LCCN2004665813.jpg
- File:Schluss der Zeichnung auf Kriegsanleihe LCCN2004665814.jpg
- File:Spare Seife! ... aber wie? LCCN2004665817.jpg
- File:Jeder trage heute die Ludendorff-Nadel für Kriegsbeschädigte LCCN2004665820.jpg
- File:Hausrat auch gegen Teilzahlung LCCN2004665827.jpg
- File:Annahmestelle der Ludendorff-Spende LCCN2004665828.jpg
- File:Ohne Ordnung kein Brot - unordnung bringt Hungersnot! LCCN2004665836.jpg
- File:Erklärung der Parteiführer des Reichstags LCCN2004665837.jpg
- File:Spar-Prämienanleihe- 10 mal 1,000,000 jährl. Hauptgewinne! LCCN2004665839.jpg
- File:Nur noch bis Mittwoch, 10. Dez., kann die Deutsche Spar-Prämien-Anleihe gezeichnet werden LCCN2004665840.jpg
- File:So hilft dein Geld dir kämpfen! In U-Boote verwandelt ... zeichne Kriegsanleihe! LCCN2004665842.jpg
- File:Schützt die Heimat! LCCN2004665844.jpg
- File:Die Ludendorff-Spende ist der Dank-Altar das deutschen Volkes! LCCN2004665845.jpg
- File:Gib zur Ludendorff-Spende für Kriegsbeschädigte! Für dich haben sie geblutet! LCCN2004665846.jpg
- File:Tretet ein in den Grenzschutz Ost! Schütz die Heimat gegen Bolschewismus! LCCN2004665847.jpg
- File:Das Gold den Vaterland! LCCN2004665849.jpg
- File:Die neue Kriegsanleihe muss erfolgreich sein, sonst ermutigen wir England weiterzukämpfen! LCCN2004665975.jpg
- File:Frauen! Sorget für Frieden und Brot! Wählet und werbt für die Wahl! LCCN2004666107.jpg
- File:Schon nach wenigen Tagen! ... Einigkeit! LCCN2004666114.jpg
- File:Zeichnet 8. Kriegsanleihe LCCN2004666156.jpg
- File:Zeichnet 8. Kriegsanleihe LCCN2004666157.jpg
- File:Kunst- u. Figurinenausstellung LCCN2004666202.jpg
- File:Brüder, meldet euch zur Reichswehr LCCN2004665970.jpg
- File:Marine-schauspiel in der Kriegsausstellung LCCN2004666158.jpg
- File:Allgemeine Wäschesammlung 1917 LCCN2004666169.jpg
- File:Marine-schauspiel 1918 ... vollständig neues Programm LCCN2004666170.jpg
- File:3 Worte- ungestörte Demobilmachung; Aufbau der Republic; Frieden LCCN2004666184.jpg
- File:Zeichnet Kriegsanleihe LCCN2004666136.jpg
- File:Die Fahrt der Deutschland von Paul König LCCN2004665800.jpg
- File:Deutsche Volksspende zum Ankauf von Lesestoff für Heer und Flotte LCCN2004665804.jpg
- File:Not, Elend, Hunger, Zerstörung bringt der Bolschewismus LCCN2004665816.jpg -- according to [26] by "Monogrammist MK"; according to [27], item #93, by Manfred Kassin (no life dates found; exhibited at the Grosse Berliner Kunst-Ausstellung 1906[28]).
- File:Artillerie-Stellungen LCCN2004665818.jpg
- File:Berlin, halt ein! Besinne dich. Dein Tänzer ist der Tod LCCN2004665821.jpg
- File:Ausstellung Kriegerehrungen LCCN2004665831.jpg
- File:Hungersnot bedeutet der Verlust der Ostprovinzen! ... Deutsche! Rettet den Osten! Freiwillige vor! LCCN2004665838.jpg
- File:Leset die Asuw! LCCN2004665853.jpg
- File:Deutscher Heimatbund Posener Flüchtlinge. Befreit die Heimat von polnischer Willkürherrschaft LCCN2004665856.jpg
- File:Sammelt Brennessel! Wenn ihr Kleidung und Faden wollt! LCCN2004665876.jpg
- File:Gesellige Vereinigung Münchner Künstler e.v. Weihnachts Ausstellung zu gunsten der Kriegsinvaliden, für sorge ins besonders Erblindeter LCCN2004665879.jpg
- File:Leiht euer Geld für der Heimat Schutz und Wehr! Zeichnet Kriegsanleihe! LCCN2004665880.jpg
- File:Braunschweiger Windelwoche, 12.-18. Mai, ein Notruf an die Braunschweiger Frauen LCCN2004665891.jpg
- File:Helft! Ostpreussen schützt eure Heimat. Zentralausschuss für den Ostdeutschen Heimatdienst, Landesverband Ostpreussen LCCN2004665895.jpg
- File:Die Heimat ist in Gefahr! LCCN2004665898.jpg -- Viktor Arnaud (1890–1958), from Sigmaringen.
- File:Zeichnet die 7. Kriegsanleihe LCCN2004665954.jpg
- File:Ausstellung für Kriegsfürsorge, Cöln, August-September 1916; Kriegsbeschädigten-fürsorge, Berufs-Ausbildung und Umbildung LCCN2004665955.jpg
- File:Willst Du dies? Vereinigung zur Bekämphung des Bolschewismus LCCN2004665961.jpg
- File:Deutschlands ideale Zukunft unter der Herrschaft des Bolschewisten LCCN2004665972.jpg
File:Zum Kampf auf's Letzte sind wir herausgefordert! LCCN2004665973.jpg-- de:Anton Hoffmann, 1863–1938- File:Zeichnet die 8. Kriegsanleihe LCCN2004665979.jpg
- File:Ich gehe hinaus an die Front. Hast du die 6. Kriegsanleihe schon gezeichnet? LCCN2004665993.jpg
- File:Zum Besten der Kriegsnotspende ... drei mittelalterliche Volksspiele ... Spiel vom Sündenfalle, Totentanz, Theophilus der Urfaust LCCN2004665994.jpg -- Herbert Lehmann (1890–1956)
- File:Lasst Euch nichts vormachen, bleibt bei Deutschland! LCCN2004665997.jpg
File:Nur noch kurze Zeit. Deutsche Luftkriegsbeute Ausstellung LCCN2004666100.jpg-- Max Mandl, 1864 - c. 1937- File:Der eiserner Wehrmann, Königsberg 1915 LCCN2004666103.jpg
- File:Blockade-brecker LCCN2004666115.jpg
- File:Zeitung der 10. Armee LCCN2004666117.jpg -- A. Paul Weber (1893 – 1980). I hate it when the guys at the LoC can't even read the signature.
- File:Alte Frontsoldaten ... Das Vaterland is in Gefahr! Eile tut not! LCCN2004666121.jpg
- File:Feist-Feldgrau, Sektkellerei Frankfurt a.M. A.G LCCN2004666122.jpg -- according to [29], probably Hermann Karl Roth (1873 - 1955)
- File:Der Feind ist im Land! So wehr' dich der Schand, Wie Lautet des Feldgeschrei- Bayerische Volkspartei! LCCN2004666125.jpg
- File:Bayern, der Bolshewik geht um! Hinaus mit ihm am Wahltag! LCCN2004666126.jpg
- File:Bayerische Volkspartei, ein starkes Bayern in einem einigen Deutschland LCCN2004666129.jpg
- File:Protest der deutschen Frauen gegen die farbige Besatzung am Rhein LCCN2004666132.jpg
- File:Der Wutschrei der Feinde, wenn die 8. Kriegsanleihe ein neuer Milliardensieg wird LCCN2004666133.jpg -- Karl Sigrist died 1986, at the age of 101!
- File:Es gilt die letzen Schläge, den Sieg zu vollenden! Zeichnet Kriegsanleihe! LCCN2004666141.jpg
- File:Deutsche Kriegsausstellung Hamburg LCCN2004666142.jpg -- monogram "E.P" in upper right corner, better visible at [30]
- File:Gib für unsere Helden LCCN2004666143.jpg
- File:Ständige Kunst Ausstellung des Feldgrauen Künstler-Bundes LCCN2004666148.jpg -- signed "Philippi, München": possibly Peter Philippi (1866–1958); Rothenburg o.d.T.
- File:Jeder zeichne 7. Kriegsanleihe LCCN2004666159.jpg
- File:Zeichnet 8 Kriegsanleihe LCCN2004666163.jpg -- Alfred Offner died 1947 according to [31]
- File:Bolschewismus heisst die Welt im Blut ersäufen LCCN2004666185.jpg
- File:Landes-Kriegsfürsorge-Ausstellung LCCN2004666189.jpg
--Martin H. (talk) 13:06, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
- Info These are public domain in the US and the country I am uploading in (the UK). These may or may not fail PRP on Commons depending on whether you believe this hypothetical interpretation of 100 year old government commissioned works is "significant doubt" or not, given the complete absence of any legal cases or case law in the past 100 years.
- Should these be deleted from Commons, I ask that the deleting admin consider arranging them to be mass hosted on the English Wikipedia, where they are within policy for that Wikimedia project (as US PD rather than fair use). --Fæ (talk) 13:21, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
- You will not find case law for other works by Max Pechstein because germany is not a common law country... or maybe im wrong with this and you will indeed find cases where the artists of a work not died >70 years ago and heirs claim copyright. Is that the case you ask for? --Martin H. (talk) 13:36, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
- Yes. An example legal case where the estate of an artist commissioned by the government during WWI, has made a claim of copyright to an artwork under that commission. Other circumstances, such as works "re-used" by the German government, or works under other or no commission, have parallel cases of a similar date that could be quoted as a rationale for deletion (I do not have these to hand, but I have little doubt that an IP lawyer in Germany could produce such a rationale). In the UK, "case law" is simply the distinction that a judge has made a ruling that sets an intentional precedent for future cases in an area that statuary law may not be sufficiently specific by itself. I would expect that Germany has similar language, but IANAL (
). --Fæ (talk) 14:24, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
- There is no copyright transfer in Germany, therefore I fail to see any reason why you argue in this direction. Judges only interpret and apply the existing law to the facts before them, thats something you can do too, the burdon of proof that the law is wrong or not applicable in this cases is with you, the uploader. The court LG München I mentioned in ER I Gs 558/09 that the copyright in articles in government magazines would be still intact if the publication wasnt anonymous. Copyright infringement however is an Antragsdelikt in criminal law and public law decission are rarely published if a court is even involved, cases will likely end in settlement. So ignoring the law and strictly demanding court decisions in a non-case-law country is absurd.
- Second, you are quick in concluding that this are government commissioned works. Although it doesnt matter for copyright - no transfer as said before - I would be interested in hering of some sources for your information. I worked some time now with this files and a lot of them is obviously not related to the government and not published by government bodies.
- Third you conclude that the posters are PD in the UK, you base this assumption on their status as government comissioned works in WWI and therefore seized enemy property. Thats not true for some files: some are not from the government, some are from the post-WWI time (labled at the LoC as such, but this information got lost in this LoC fork).
- --Martin H. (talk) 15:12, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
- I do not understand your point about Germany not having case law. Could you provide a link to somewhere that explains this, I have difficulty believing that all interpretations of the German legislative corpus require an act to recognize them?
- As for your other points, (a) surely there is copyright/IP transfer in Germany as in any EU country, otherwise the music and film industries would break down (b) I have made a point about Government commissioned works, some are, and some are not (c) if the LoC are mis-identifying material then we need to have volunteers do a bit of "triage" this end to establish their status, this need not happen in a DR considering the age of the material and a lack of any current claim of copyright or challenge over the past 100 years.
- P.S. my original comment here was marked as Info I have not expressed a keep or delete opinion, please keep this in mind. --Fæ (talk) 05:32, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
- I don't think the LoC had mis-identified these. But the LoC only cares about the copyright status in the U.S., where these, having been published prior to 1923, are indeed PD. The Commons, however, cares about the copyright status in the U.S. and in the source country, and as far as I know, in the source country these are not PD. So, whenever you take a non-US work from the LoC, you have to question any statements the LoC may make about copyright and evaluate the copyright status in the source country yourself. Lupo 08:35, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
- It also doesn't matter whether these were commissioned or not. Copyright in Germany and Austria (and the EU in general) runs for a term based on the death year of the artist(s), even if the economic rights had been "transferred" or exclusively licensed to a third party. The initial copyright holder is the physical person creating the artwork, even if the work is created as part of a contract (such as commission or employment) and the economic rights are then immediately signed over to the commissioning body/employer. There is no special term for "works made for hire"; in fact, this concept is unknown in continental European copyright laws. There is no "transfer" of copyright; continental European droits d'auteur differ from U.S. copyright. You can't sign away the moral rights, you can only exclusively license the economic rights via a contract. Lupo 08:49, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
- Can you provide a source for your claim that in "continental European copyright" (presumably that excludes the UK, Ireland and Malta) there can be no lawful transfer of copyright by contract? Note that living the the UK, I operate under EU law, so it is news to me that Germany might be considered to operate under a different kind of EU law.
- With regard to moral rights, this is not an issue here, if we know the artist they can be credited, and if there are no other rights apart from the moral right of attribution, then they are suitable to be hosted on Commons. --Fæ (talk) 09:49, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
- I wrote "continental European copyright" because I'm not sure about the UK. For a source, see e.g. [32]. You cannot transfer the "copyright" ("Urheberrecht") except by inheritance; you can only license exploitation rights ("Nutzungsrechte"). See also UrhG §28ff: "Das Urheberrecht ist vererblich." (§28), "Das Urheberrecht ist nicht übertragbar, ..." (§29, except in things dealing with inheritance), "Der Urheber kann einem anderen das Recht einräumen, das Werk auf einzelne oder alle Nutzungsarten zu nutzen (Nutzungsrecht)" (§31, licensing exploitation rights). Lupo 10:23, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
- BTW, UK copyright law is indeed different, see Copyright Act, chapter V, §90. In the UK, one can transfer copyright. But anyway, this is getting off-topic for this DR. Lupo 10:27, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
- Yes. An example legal case where the estate of an artist commissioned by the government during WWI, has made a claim of copyright to an artwork under that commission. Other circumstances, such as works "re-used" by the German government, or works under other or no commission, have parallel cases of a similar date that could be quoted as a rationale for deletion (I do not have these to hand, but I have little doubt that an IP lawyer in Germany could produce such a rationale). In the UK, "case law" is simply the distinction that a judge has made a ruling that sets an intentional precedent for future cases in an area that statuary law may not be sufficiently specific by itself. I would expect that Germany has similar language, but IANAL (
.jpg){kind=link}
_Dirk_Bach.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
![104 File:Czech soldier from compagnie "Nazdar".jpg](#File:Czech_soldier_from_compagnie_"Nazdar".jpg){kind=link}
_(3598313549).jpg){kind=link}
_(3598325823).jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_being_interviewed_at_Raul_Gil,_a_Brazilian_TV_show-_2014-05-06_14-44.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Dirk_Bach.jpg){kind=link}
_Dirk_Bach.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_Dirk_Bach.jpg){kind=link}
_Dirk_Bach.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
![04:58, 7 May 2014 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2014/05/07#c-Gampe-2014-05-07T04:58:00.000Z-File:Czech_soldier_from_compagnie_"Nazdar".jpg){kind=link}
![09:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2014/05/07#c-Fastily-2014-05-16T09:00:00.000Z-File:Czech_soldier_from_compagnie_"Nazdar".jpg){kind=link}
_(3598313549).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(3598313549).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_(3598313549).jpg){kind=link}
_(3598313549).jpg){kind=link}
_(3598325823).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(3598325823).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_(3598325823).jpg){kind=link}
_(3598325823).jpg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_being_interviewed_at_Raul_Gil,_a_Brazilian_TV_show-_2014-05-06_14-44.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_being_interviewed_at_Raul_Gil,_a_Brazilian_TV_show-_2014-05-06_14-44.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
._Freiwillige_melden_sich_LCCN2004665883.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Hanns_von_Zobeltitz,_mit_zahlreichen_Abbildungen_und_Karten_LCCN2004665952.jpg){kind=link}
_Division_LCCN2004665960.jpg){kind=link}
_LCCN2004666135.jpg){kind=link}
- I see nothing in the sources you have given that makes it unlikely that artists contracted or conscripted by the German government in WWI would have given all rights in their artworks, possibly retaining their right of attribution alone. Such a work would be suitable to be hosted on Commons (as we give attribution where known). During WWI/WWII governments exercised special powers to seize assets, I would be surprised if the German government in WWI did not use emergency powers with regard to property law. --Fæ (talk) 10:36, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
- This is irrelevant. Copyright exists, even if the economic rights should have been licensed to a German/Austrian governmental entity. Please give a source for your claim "Such a work would be suitable to be hosted on Commons (as we give attribution where known)". Additionally, please show a reliable source that if so, the copyright in Germany and Austria on these items was no longer in effect. Lupo 12:56, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
- If it is irrelevant, I am unclear why you raised it. What we see is that in Germany, based on the law you have referenced above, an artist can licence all economic rights but normally retains a right of attribution. This is very similar to the Open Government Licence which licences material for free reuse but requires attribution with no expectation of economic rights.
- Nobody has found a source that clarifies the IP status of WWI works commissioned by the German government (such as war loan posters). An example contract would be nice to find, there probably are examples in historic war archives.
- Again, I have not said that all of these should not be deleted from Commons, on the basis that we cannot dot the i's or cross the t's to satisfy every possible hypothetical scenario, which is how PRP seems to be interpreted for 100 year old posters right now. However, if these are removed, they should all be transferred on the English Wikipedia as public domain. That way, if someone, such as an interested archivist, can clarify the status with relevant legal cases or historic German contracts in the WWI period we can arrange to move them back here, thereby meeting the aims of this project to preserve and provide free access to this high quality educational material. --Fæ (talk) 13:59, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
- The source that clarifies the IP status of WWI works commissioned by the German government is the law, there is no easy to find source that disproves your idea because the idea simply not exists. If the government gets a license from the author then this means the government can use the work. It does not mean that you can do something with the work or anyone else who is not a license party. But the basic concept of Commons is that content is free for use by anyone.
- Making a transfer to wp cant be seen as conditional for the closure of this request. The material is still availiable at LoC, Commons is not the primary source of publication, so with deleting here nothing is lost. And if a transfer is required I think you would be the most qualified to do it since you did this import from LoC here too. --Martin H. (talk) 14:38, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
- Closing Admin please note. I'll think about it as I may have to raise a request at the en.wp Bot Approval Group and then go cap in hand to Arbcom to get Faebot unblocked for the job. It will also be a lot easier to transfer from Commons before deletion, rather than do a new creation on en.wp from scratch. If someone has a standard transfer bot that can do Commons→en.wp, it may be easier to pump the above list through it. --Fæ (talk) 14:53, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
- Hm. Isn't there some fair-use-move-back-to-en-wp bot that could be pressed into doing the job? Or is that your Faebot? Lupo 15:17, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
- I don't know of any, it is a question to raise on the bot noticeboard. I could do it, but it would be original scripting re-using some of my uploading/reading routines and customizing for en.wp templates. --Fæ (talk) 15:26, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
- Looks like User:Commons fair use upload bot could do this, if the images are tagged correctly. Lupo 16:34, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
- Hm. Isn't there some fair-use-move-back-to-en-wp bot that could be pressed into doing the job? Or is that your Faebot? Lupo 15:17, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
- Closing Admin please note. I'll think about it as I may have to raise a request at the en.wp Bot Approval Group and then go cap in hand to Arbcom to get Faebot unblocked for the job. It will also be a lot easier to transfer from Commons before deletion, rather than do a new creation on en.wp from scratch. If someone has a standard transfer bot that can do Commons→en.wp, it may be easier to pump the above list through it. --Fæ (talk) 14:53, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
- This is irrelevant. Copyright exists, even if the economic rights should have been licensed to a German/Austrian governmental entity. Please give a source for your claim "Such a work would be suitable to be hosted on Commons (as we give attribution where known)". Additionally, please show a reliable source that if so, the copyright in Germany and Austria on these items was no longer in effect. Lupo 12:56, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
- I see nothing in the sources you have given that makes it unlikely that artists contracted or conscripted by the German government in WWI would have given all rights in their artworks, possibly retaining their right of attribution alone. Such a work would be suitable to be hosted on Commons (as we give attribution where known). During WWI/WWII governments exercised special powers to seize assets, I would be surprised if the German government in WWI did not use emergency powers with regard to property law. --Fæ (talk) 10:36, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
- Fae, please provide the sources I asked for. Otherwise further discussion is futile. Ans since you now claim that licensing economic rights to the German government was "very similar to the Open Government Licence", provide a source for that, too. Lupo 14:45, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
- I already referred to the sources you quoted, I just read the text of the legislation as written, the summaries are quite short and simple. If you wish to compare to {{OGL}}, the links are in the template.
- Just to clarify the parallel, it seems obvious to me but I have worked with military material for a while. Crown Copyright has been moving over to Open Government Licences as part of Open Government initiatives. OGL was specially introduced as a means for the Government, its departments and agents, to release material produced for the public benefit without the complexity of Crown Copyright which may not be free to reuse. The artists retain moral rights in the work and attribution may be specified explicitly on release. In all other regards the material is public domain. The parallel for DE Government material from WWI is that the government would have commissioned the works with full rights to the state, though from the descriptions in the Civil Code, it seems that moral rights would have invariably stayed with the artist (unless anonymous). We are in the situation where DE Gov rights have long since expired (100 years having passed) and we can presume all financial claims along with them. The estates of any artists that died less than 70 years ago might pursue the moral right of attribution, but it seems highly unlikely that any case could be made to pursue financial rights (for example against the Library of Congress or institutions that republish that material). Where Commons gives an attribution to the Artist, we can demonstrate we have made reasonable effort to comply with moral rights claims, and there is nothing else we need to do to avoid the significant doubt that PRP is there to address. --Fæ (talk) 14:53, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
- There is no parallel. You're fabricating theories out of thin air. Where do you now get the 100 years from? Copyright runs in Germany and Austria and the EU until 70 years after the artist(s) death. Period. Even if the artists licensed some or all economic rights to a governmental agency, you'd then still have to show (a) that they did so, and (b) that these rights had expired (they have not, since they are based on the lifetime of the artist), or (c) that the government subsequently waived the rights it had been licensed and put the items under something resembling a free license. So, sources for (a), (b), (c), please. Lupo 15:14, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
- Okay, consider 100 years to be written as 70 years. With regard to (c) and (b) this means that the German state had no financial rights on the posters since at least 1990, they have no right to waive, the 70 years has passed for the "institution". If (with regard to (a), the point made several times already is that this is an if, we lack evidence apart from the fact that why would anyone work for the state unless they were on contract or conscripted?) the artist was on contract the state and passing all financial rights under contract, then from 1990 or earlier neither the artist nor their estate were in a position to make any financial claim of right, though they may have made a case for moral rights. Again, this is in the sources that you provided. --Fæ (talk) 15:22, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
- Where do you get 1990 from? The copyright duration does not change if rights are licensed. It is still based on the lifetime of the artist, plus those 70 years. If you think otherwise, then please provide precise sources backing up your claims. Lupo 16:38, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
- 1990 = 1920 + 70. The economics rights transferred by contract to an institution would exist for 70 years as, by definition, they were transferred and are no longer held by the artist. I saw noticed nothing in the references you provided to govern this otherwise, indeed it would be oddly haphazard, as the purchasing company/body would then be gambling on the artist living as long as possible, as this would extend the period by which they could make a profit from their financial rights and would put them off ever purchasing rights from older artists. The moral rights are, under the law you have referenced, a separable property. --Fæ (talk) 16:54, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
- I don't see anything in these laws that would say that one could license rights only for a period of 70 years. Note: it's not transferred; it's licensed. §33 even explicitly says that the license remain valid even if the copyright owner changes (for instance, when he dies). What's your source for the claim that one cannot license rights for more than 70 years? Point me to a reliable external source that says so. Lupo 17:06, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
- 1990 = 1920 + 70. The economics rights transferred by contract to an institution would exist for 70 years as, by definition, they were transferred and are no longer held by the artist. I saw noticed nothing in the references you provided to govern this otherwise, indeed it would be oddly haphazard, as the purchasing company/body would then be gambling on the artist living as long as possible, as this would extend the period by which they could make a profit from their financial rights and would put them off ever purchasing rights from older artists. The moral rights are, under the law you have referenced, a separable property. --Fæ (talk) 16:54, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
- Where do you get 1990 from? The copyright duration does not change if rights are licensed. It is still based on the lifetime of the artist, plus those 70 years. If you think otherwise, then please provide precise sources backing up your claims. Lupo 16:38, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
- Okay, consider 100 years to be written as 70 years. With regard to (c) and (b) this means that the German state had no financial rights on the posters since at least 1990, they have no right to waive, the 70 years has passed for the "institution". If (with regard to (a), the point made several times already is that this is an if, we lack evidence apart from the fact that why would anyone work for the state unless they were on contract or conscripted?) the artist was on contract the state and passing all financial rights under contract, then from 1990 or earlier neither the artist nor their estate were in a position to make any financial claim of right, though they may have made a case for moral rights. Again, this is in the sources that you provided. --Fæ (talk) 15:22, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
- There is no parallel. You're fabricating theories out of thin air. Where do you now get the 100 years from? Copyright runs in Germany and Austria and the EU until 70 years after the artist(s) death. Period. Even if the artists licensed some or all economic rights to a governmental agency, you'd then still have to show (a) that they did so, and (b) that these rights had expired (they have not, since they are based on the lifetime of the artist), or (c) that the government subsequently waived the rights it had been licensed and put the items under something resembling a free license. So, sources for (a), (b), (c), please. Lupo 15:14, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
- Fae, please provide the sources I asked for. Otherwise further discussion is futile. Ans since you now claim that licensing economic rights to the German government was "very similar to the Open Government Licence", provide a source for that, too. Lupo 14:45, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
- I'm going by your sources, so you may be right here, though it seems illogical to purchase economic rights of indeterminate duration. I am confused by http://www.fotorecht.de/publikationen/kug.html which would indicate that the artworks were produced under Kunsturhebergesetz, KUG 1907, and so there may be more complex calculations for copyright expiry dates than the modern life+70 that you have linked to. As I am not a German speaker, this level of detail is beyond me. --Fæ (talk) 17:27, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
- That's an important distinction to make here; one that may not be clear to people more accustomed to the different copyright tradition of the UK or the USA: According to German law, there is no such thing as copyright transfer except through inheritance. The "Urheberrecht" (which is not exactly the same thing as "copyright", though often translated as such) always remains with the creator or their heirs, and its duration is always determined by the creator's year of death. Even if a work is committed by the state and the state gets an exclusive licence, the work is still protected for 70 years after the death of the creator. - That said, I don't know whether the KUG of 1907 may be still of some relevance for older works. Gestumblindi (talk) 21:05, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
- I'm going by your sources, so you may be right here, though it seems illogical to purchase economic rights of indeterminate duration. I am confused by http://www.fotorecht.de/publikationen/kug.html which would indicate that the artworks were produced under Kunsturhebergesetz, KUG 1907, and so there may be more complex calculations for copyright expiry dates than the modern life+70 that you have linked to. As I am not a German speaker, this level of detail is beyond me. --Fæ (talk) 17:27, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete those where the artist is known and died less than 70 years ago, or where the artist is known, but his death year is not. In the source country (Germany/Austria) the first group is copyrighted, plain and simple; and those of the second group (unknown death year of artist) should go per COM:PCP. They may be PD in the US all right, thus transferring them to en-WP as {{PD-1923-abroad}} (where applicable, or other applicable tags) would evidently be OK. Lupo 15:42, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
- Fully agree with Lupo, Delete "those where the artist is known and died less than 70 years ago, or where the artist is known, but his death year is not" - for the reasons given by Lupo resp. Commons:Licensing: Files must be freely licensed or in the public domain "in at least the United States and in the source country of the work." Where an artist from Germany is known and died less then 70 years ago, the file is clearly not PD in the source country of the work - so I see no way of keeping such a file here. If PD in the US, transferring to en-WP seems possible. Gestumblindi (talk) 23:15, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete full acknowledgement to Lupo and Gestumblindi for the reasons stated above. Yellowcard (talk) 18:17, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
- Comment To clarify for whoever closes this: "those where the artist is known and died less than 70 years ago, or where the artist is known, but his death year is not" includes all those listed by Martin in this second nomination. Lupo 06:54, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
- The 2nd nomination also includes 9 files where the artist is not given, but I doubt that the artist of any of this works is realy unknown (anonymous publication). One of that 9 files from not yet researched artists is File:Die Kriegsgefangenen kommen! ... Lassen wir sie nicht im Stich! LCCN2004666182.jpg which might be ineligible for copyright. I indented this 9 files. The 2nd nomination also includes 5 files where I already found authors or hints to the author in other online archives. Regretably I have no access to offline / print collections of this posters although such collections exist. And I have not much literature about propaganda in WWI, Novemberrevolution or local elections 1918/1919 and the propaganda of the various lobbies involved there - parties and organizations such as the Antibolschewistische Liga. --Martin H. (talk) 10:38, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for the info; I'll take a look at those. Maybe I see something more. BTW, the corresponding TIFF files, where they exist, are included in this DR. Otherwise, this whole exercise makes no sense. Lupo 10:47, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
- The 2nd nomination also includes 9 files where the artist is not given, but I doubt that the artist of any of this works is realy unknown (anonymous publication). One of that 9 files from not yet researched artists is File:Die Kriegsgefangenen kommen! ... Lassen wir sie nicht im Stich! LCCN2004666182.jpg which might be ineligible for copyright. I indented this 9 files. The 2nd nomination also includes 5 files where I already found authors or hints to the author in other online archives. Regretably I have no access to offline / print collections of this posters although such collections exist. And I have not much literature about propaganda in WWI, Novemberrevolution or local elections 1918/1919 and the propaganda of the various lobbies involved there - parties and organizations such as the Antibolschewistische Liga. --Martin H. (talk) 10:38, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
- I have supplied the author information we collected on this page on all the file description pages so that it remains available after a transfer to the English Wikipedia. I have also, as a trial balloon, tagged File:Heraus mit unsern Gefangenen! Tretet alle dem Volksbund zum Schutze der deutschen Kriegs- u. Zivilgefangenen bei! LCCN2004665995.jpg (and its TIFF) with {{PD-US-1923-abroad-delete}}. Let's see whether User:Commons fair use upload bot is still active, and what exactly it does with these two files... Lupo 12:22, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
- All right, that bot is still active and works, too. The files transferred will need a little post-editing, but otherwise it's fine. Lupo 13:55, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Krd 18:41, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
- Restored 3 files as per [33]. Yann (talk) 11:31, 6 December 2018 (UTC)