Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2014/03/25
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
_2.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(5338734363).jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_1.JPG){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_bright.png){kind=link}
No indication that uploader is copyright owner. discospinster (talk) 02:41, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: unfree file taken from the internet Martin H. (talk) 02:48, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
copyright violation / violación de derechos de autor http://www.socialiteen.com/cine/danna-paola-hara-pelicula-en-hollywood/ Vichock (talk) 05:15, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 05:28, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
1. source = youtubetoo low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose. It's out of project scope. Ies (talk) 15:54, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: clear copyright violation. JuTa 23:36, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Artistic image with no major educational use, so not within Commons' educational scope. Ubcule (talk) 23:14, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: clear copyright violation. JuTa 23:37, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Artistic image with no major educational use, so not within Commons' educational scope. Ubcule (talk) 23:14, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: clear copyright violation JuTa 23:38, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Artistic image with no major educational use, so not within Commons' educational scope. Ubcule (talk) 23:14, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: clear copyright violation JuTa 23:38, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Since a representative of the person whose autograph is featured is averse to its release under CC-by-SA license and fears identity theft. Muzammil (talk) 14:48, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
- Please refer to the following on the discussion page of this DR:
- My response email after the email from the person's rep concerning this autograph
- The email from the person's rep concerning this autograph
(not included are email-ids and other contact details)
Regards, --Muzammil (talk) 09:12, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: I am going to delete this autograph based upon the request from the representatives of Abdul Halim Jaffer Khan. russavia (talk) 10:25, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
It isnt usefull or up to date anymore. There is no need in the future of this pic. Also the person which is in der picture would like the picture to be deleted. Thank you :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brainmandolo (talk • contribs) 2014-03-23T21:01:31 (UTC)
Deleted: This file has never existed. JuTa 21:03, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
_2.jpg){kind=link}
Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 17:33, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Upload by enwiki vandal. Out of scope Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 16:25, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
z<x<zx<x<zx<<x<x<x<zx<x<zx 190.137.112.134 20:55, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Keep –Be..anyone (talk) 03:47, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense request. JuTa 08:26, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
IMHO too complex, not PD. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:40, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Non-trivial logo. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alejandra bernal (talk · contribs)
[edit]taken from internet
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
INeverCry 01:03, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 22:09, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
{{PD-Brazil-media}}-fail (only for audiovisual and photographic works), considering artwork (drawing) by en:Nair de Tefé (1886—1981), a Brazilian cartoonist. Copyrighted till the end of 2051. Gunnex (talk) 07:14, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 18:24, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
no encyclopedic use. belongs to a small non notable german company, deleted on de-wp Hyperdieter (talk) 22:37, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:50, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
Plain commercial advertisement, out of project scope (Examples of files that are not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Advertising or self-promotion.) Ies (talk) 16:14, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:48, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
Plain commercial advertisement, out of project scope (Examples of files that are not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Advertising or self-promotion.) Ies (talk) 16:14, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:47, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
Plain commercial advertisement, out of project scope (Examples of files that are not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Advertising or self-promotion.) Ies (talk) 16:12, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:46, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
Plain commercial advertisement, out of project scope (Examples of files that are not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Advertising or self-promotion.) Ies (talk) 16:10, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:42, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
Plain commercial advertisement, out of project scope (Examples of files that are not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Advertising or self-promotion.) Ies (talk) 16:16, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:48, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
Plain commercial advertisement, out of project scope (Examples of files that are not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Advertising or self-promotion.) Ies (talk) 16:09, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:41, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
Plain commercial advertisement, out of project scope (Examples of files that are not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Advertising or self-promotion.) Ies (talk) 16:12, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:44, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
Plain commercial advertisement, out of project scope (Examples of files that are not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Advertising or self-promotion.) Ies (talk) 16:13, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:46, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
Plain commercial advertisement, out of project scope (Examples of files that are not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Advertising or self-promotion.) Ies (talk) 16:16, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:48, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
The "source" location does not state that this art is copyleft or free. The locations from where it's linked, http://www.blabbermouth.net/news/demon-hunter-lyric-video-for-new-song-i-will-fail-you/ http://www.blabbermouth.net/news/demon-hunter-lyric-video-for-new-song-the-last-one-alive/ and http://www.blabbermouth.net/news/demon-hunter-lyric-video-for-new-song-artificial-light/ don't stipulate this either. Clearly a copyright violation. Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:32, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
The "source" location does not state that this art is copyleft or free. The locations from where it's linked, http://www.blabbermouth.net/news/demon-hunter-lyric-video-for-new-song-i-will-fail-you/ http://www.blabbermouth.net/news/demon-hunter-lyric-video-for-new-song-the-last-one-alive/ and http://www.blabbermouth.net/news/demon-hunter-lyric-video-for-new-song-artificial-light/ don't stipulate this either. Clearly a copyright violation. Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:34, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: likely copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 18:16, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
Plain commercial advertisement, out of project scope (Examples of files that are not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Advertising or self-promotion.) Ies (talk) 16:10, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:42, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
Plain commercial advertisement, out of project scope (Examples of files that are not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Advertising or self-promotion.) Ies (talk) 16:15, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:48, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
Plain commercial advertisement, out of project scope (Examples of files that are not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Advertising or self-promotion.) Ies (talk) 16:09, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:41, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
Plain commercial advertisement, out of project scope (Examples of files that are not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Advertising or self-promotion.) Ies (talk) 16:11, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:44, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
Plain commercial advertisement, out of project scope (Examples of files that are not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Advertising or self-promotion.) Ies (talk) 16:08, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Delete no way to be in scope. Kathisma (talk) 17:47, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope, advertisement George Chernilevsky talk 16:41, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
Plain commercial advertisement, out of project scope (Examples of files that are not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Advertising or self-promotion.) Ies (talk) 16:14, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:48, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
Private image which is not used on any Wikimedia project - very likely not useful for educational purposes. See also Commons:What Commons is not#Commons is not your personal free web host. High Contrast (talk) 15:14, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:40, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
Personal photo, unused, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 07:04, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:26, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
Personal photo, unused, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 07:04, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:25, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
Zdjęcie jest nieaktualne i niepożądane przeze mnie Matimistico (talk) 16:16, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:49, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
Personal photo, unused, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 07:04, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:26, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Anuj Sakore (talk · contribs)
[edit]Spam (w:Special:Undelete/User:SyStos Technology).
MER-C 11:30, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:30, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
Painting by artist ru:Хаджибаронов, Сергей Павлович according to that article. Painter died 1994. This means the uploaders claim - own work - is obviously untrue, the upload is a copyright violation because the paintings are still copyrighted (untill 1994+70(+1)=January 1 2065)
- File:Zagorsk76.jpg
- File:Kanakulenin.jpg
- File:Neva nab.jpg
- File:Isaak alex.jpg
- File:Nezhd zima.jpg
- File:Peter lenin.png
Martin H. (talk) 13:09, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
: I'm son of ru:Хаджибаронов, Сергей Павлович and hence I own the copyright of his work. Hereby I did not mislead Wiki when uploading these images. - Gkhadz 13:18, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Uploaded by copyright owner George Chernilevsky talk 16:33, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
test uploads, out of scope
- File:Первый лауреат.png
- File:Лента народный создатель статей.jpg
- File:Народный Создатель статей.jpg
- File:Заслуженный Создатель статей 2.jpg
- File:Заслуженный Создатель статей.png
/St1995 09:51, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:29, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
folder too big, automatically generated by commonist, not needed Gerd Leibrock (talk) 01:37, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: user's request Ymblanter (talk) 18:17, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:Gujjar on babusar top.jpg
- File:Gujjar in naran valley.jpg
- File:Most famous Gujjar.jpg
- File:Best Gujjar.jpg
- File:Gujjar in action.jpg
- File:Gujjar the Great.jpg
- File:Chaudhry Zafar Habib.jpg
- File:Chaudhry Zafar Habib Gujjar.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:39, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
Personal unused images outside the scope. Also, some have been categorized under the ethnic group and caste category of Category:Gurjar. Thought we are not Wikipedia to follow the BLP rules, we should not categorize in this manner is what I suppose. Some images are also Urdu-script texts and posters which are unencyclopedic.
- File:Gujjar00 (20).jpg
- File:Gujjar00 (14).jpg
- File:Gujjar00 (18).jpg
- File:Gujjar (24).jpg
- File:Nagar-Gujjar.jpg
- File:Gujjar logo.jpg
- File:Gujjar (4).jpg
- File:Gujjar-1.jpg
- File:Zafar gujjar.jpg
- File:Gujjar history.jpg
- File:دبنگ ہیں ہم گجر ہیں ہم.jpg
- File:Some gujjar words.jpg
- File:Gujjar the great.jpg
- File:Zafar Gujjar.jpg
- File:Gujjar youth-2.jpg
- File:The sin of choudhary rahmat ali.jpg
- File:Waiting for food in jaglot zh.gujjar.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 09:41, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination --Krd 15:46, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:Gujjar Style.jpg
- File:Dr Nafees Sadiq Kissana .jpg
- File:Shabir gujjar.jpg
- File:Ch Shabbir Gujjar.jpg
- File:Gujjar best.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:19, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
File needs an OTRS ticket --91.64.240.231 11:02, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
I put there a license template. I cannot understand what is the problem with license there. Please be more explicit. The picture belongs to Balazs Marton Erno, as I specified already into the template. He gave me the approval for publish it. This is enough?
{{Own work by original uploader}}— Preceding unsigned comment added by LiaVeja (talk • contribs) 06:41, March 29, 2014 (UTC)
- Please read OTRS and work with the nice editors over there to get a proper license for this picture. "He gave me the approval" is not sufficient license, sorry! Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:44, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Needs OTRS. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:45, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
the notorious exhibitionistic nonsense 88.130.133.82 18:38, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:54, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
name with error AMY (talk) 10:14, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Housekeeping only: file was previously deleted by another. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:34, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
unused forwarding Der Buckesfelder Talk Evaluation E-Mail commons 17:10, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Housekeeping: Image was deleted/moved by another. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:53, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
It seems a printscreen from a magazine Kippelboy (talk) 16:39, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:53, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
isnt used anymore, no need in the future as well as in the past, bad quality Brainmandolo (talk) 08:23, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
[[Category:{{subst:delete2|image=File:2012-06-23 Gegen ESM-Demo München Karina Reisenegger (Partei der Vernunft).jpg]]
Deleted: poor quality. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:40, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Housekeeping, image was previously deleted by another editor. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:40, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely authorship claims. Appears to be a satellite photo or high-altitude aerial photograph. —LX (talk, contribs) 19:41, 25 March 2014 (UTC) User CherocreekNation was unaware at the moment google maps were copyrighted, they would like to change copyright setting or delete image but am aware on how to do so--CherOCreekBandOfIndians (talk) 20:26, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:57, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
File is now redundant/obsolete since File:Dawson 1863 air breathers.png has been uploaded which is much larger and better resoluted. Hence, there is no need to keep the present image any longer. Gretarsson (talk) 18:35, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. As the uploader of the original file, I see no problem in replacing it with a larger, higher-resolution one. Cheers.--Leptictidium (talk) 18:05, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
- Thanx! :) Cheers! --Gretarsson (talk) 23:42, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:54, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
"own work", stolen from http://www.piperbeverages.com/category/liqueur/ 91.64.240.231 08:13, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:36, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
the notorious exhibitionistic nonsense 88.130.133.82 18:39, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:54, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
the notorious exhibitionistic nonsense 88.130.133.82 18:41, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:55, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Plain commercial advertisement, out of project scope (Examples of files that are not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Advertising or self-promotion.) Ies (talk) 16:08, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:52, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Screenshot form google maps, possibly copyviol Ciaurlec (talk) 22:38, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:00, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
dubious "own work", see http://www.piperbeverages.com/category/liqueur/ 91.64.240.231 08:18, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:36, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Image watermarked with "AFP" at source website, indicating that this image came from Agence France-Presse, not VOA. Wylve (talk) 11:50, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:46, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Doubtful "own work": the image has the "Ferrovías" (the company that managed the railway line) logo as a watermark. The photo has also other details that indicates it may have been published before (for example, the red and black box sorrounding the photo). - Fma12 (talk) 20:32, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:58, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
the notorious exhibitionistic nonsense 88.130.133.82 18:41, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:55, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
This file is a PNG version of the original svg i.e. File:IndoGreekKingdomAndCampaigns.svg. It was uploaded because the orignial svg wasn't renderring correctly. Now that a working version of svg is uploaded, this PNG file is redundant and not needed. Fasi100 (talk) 13:22, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete inferior duplicate. -- Perhelion (talk) 11:08, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:49, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
redundant to File:Darkglass.svg, which was uploaded by the same person Rybec (talk) 09:04, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:41, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Image is copyrighted. See http://leen.de/leen-netzwerke/auf-einen-blick/ Tetris L (talk) 17:06, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:53, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
{{PD-Art}}-fail as the claim that the author of this work died more than 70 years ago is not supported. This painting may be (as indicated) attributed to Peruvian painter "Germán Suárez Vértiz", who lived - per http://holismoplanetario.wordpress.com/2009/07/25/german-suarez-vertiz-1897-1975/ - 1897—1975. Peru has 70 pma. Copyrighted till the end of 2045. Gunnex (talk) 11:37, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:45, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Unused inferior duplicate of File:Stadtwappen Demmin.PNG Perhelion (talk) 10:59, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. Kathisma (talk) 17:50, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:44, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Sofia Golovkina died in 2004 aged 88. In this photograph Golovkina appears about 60 to 70 years old, making this photo likely to have been taken within the last 40 years. The photographer is declared as unknown so no valid rationale for the licence has been provided and unless a source or better provenance can be given, this fails to meet the requirement of Commons:Licensing. INeverCry 23:45, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
- Totally agree. The author is unknown yet release is claimed. That is impossible to be true. Should be speedied. PumpkinSky talk 23:48, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per INC's nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:01, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Google maps scrrenshot, possibly copyviol Ciaurlec (talk) 22:44, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Housekeeping: Image was deleted by another. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:00, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
the notorious exhibitionistic nonsense 88.130.133.82 18:40, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:55, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
_(5338734363).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(5338734363).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope: too blurred. Eleassar (t/p) 22:41, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
_(5338734363).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:00, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
_(5338734363).jpg){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
derivative work: has some packaged food as its subject, and the artwork on the packaging doesn't seem to be de minimis Rybec (talk) 05:45, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:34, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
the notorious exhibitionistic nonsense 88.130.133.82 18:39, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:55, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Useless screenshot of German Wikipedia screeshot; no need to keep this crap 88.64.112.219 21:22, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
- Sure. I stated back in 2011 in the comment section that the file can be deleted 1 month after first upload. Alexpl (talk) 23:10, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:59, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Roland zh as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: imho it may by doubted to be 'own work', imho may be a scan, Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:48, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:31, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
book under copyright. Yiyi (talk) 12:08, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:47, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
the notorious exhibitionistic nonsense 88.130.133.82 18:43, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:55, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by JEET AWASTHI (Hyd) (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons:Derivative works from photos, posters, diploma.
- File:HYDERABAD METRO BRAND AMBASSADORS-7.jpg
- File:HYDERABAD METRO BRAND AMBASSADORS-6.jpg
- File:HYDERABAD METRO BRAND AMBASSADORS-4.jpg
- File:HYDERABAD METRO BRAND AMBASSADORS-3.jpg
- File:HYDERABAD METRO BRAND AMBASSADORS-5.jpg
- File:HYDERABAD METRO BRAND AMBASSADORS-1.JPG
- File:HYDERABAD METRO BRAND AMBASSADORS-2.jpg
- File:HYDERABAD METRO BRAND AMBASSADORS.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:50, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Unused inferior afterwards copy of a SVG file:Wappen des Landkreises Vorpommern Rügen.svg. Perhelion (talk) 00:43, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. Kathisma (talk) 17:52, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:30, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
google maps screnshot: possibly a copyviol; out of scope Ciaurlec (talk) 23:00, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:00, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unused inferior afterwards copy of a SVG file:Wappen des Landkreises Vorpommern Rügen.svg (including earlier versions). Perhelion (talk) 00:43, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. Kathisma (talk) 17:50, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:30, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Unused inferior copy of a SVG file:Wappen Neustadt an der Weinstrasse.svg. Fränsmer (talk) 11:50, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
It is not a copy of the SVG. There is no reason to delete this version. --AndreasPraefcke (talk) 15:15, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. Kathisma (talk) 17:53, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Much lower quality than the SVG image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:46, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:José Sabogal
[edit]Artworks by en:José Sabogal (1888—1956), a Peruvian painter. Peru has +70 pma. Copyrighted till the end of 2026. Both files uploaded by Chegian (talk · contribs) in 2012.
Gunnex (talk) 12:29, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:47, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
derivative work: has a packaged product as its subject Rybec (talk) 05:40, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:33, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Truenature12 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:51, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:51, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Doubtful "own work": the image has the "Ferrovías" (the company that managed the railway line) logo as a watermark. The photo has also other details that indicates it may have been published before (for example, the red and black box sorrounding the photo). - Fma12 (talk) 20:32, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:58, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Looks like non-used personal image, maybe not notable person. (Also other image of the same person in same place exists: File:Chornobyl DSC 0278 39.JPG.) And we have many pictures of this ferris wheel without random person in this category. Kulmalukko (talk) 14:44, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
- we usually take pictures of wikipedians that take part in the expedition (as well as wikimeetups). they are usually used in the blog posts, annual reports etc. that's a former chair of the Wikimedia Ukraine board --アンタナナ 14:49, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Per above Natuur12 (talk) 11:35, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
depicted person seems to be unknown to google 91.64.240.231 08:46, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:52, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
File needs an OTRS ticket 91.64.240.231 08:32, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:53, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
In my opinion this logo is over the threshold of originality. Jespinos (talk) 23:19, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:28, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
depicted person seems to be unknown to google 91.64.240.231 10:46, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:50, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Per COM:DW. Jespinos (talk) 23:05, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:28, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Blanca Stella Mejia, claimed author, is visible on the original image herself. FDMS 4 13:27, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
- Yes. But it does not matter. She is the copyright holder.--Carniolus (talk) 13:36, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
- Why do you think so? We need evidence for that claim, many Flickr users consider everything that comes from their camera automatically their own work ... FDMS 4 13:45, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
- Until it is proven otherwise, there is no other option than to "believe" the uploader. Authors being visible on their own photos was never a problem in the past. For example, Alan Light is present on many of his photos, but the authorship was never questioned.--Carniolus (talk) 14:42, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
- Why do you think so? We need evidence for that claim, many Flickr users consider everything that comes from their camera automatically their own work ... FDMS 4 13:45, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
- Keep -The quality of the image tells me it was uploaded to twitter first (https://twitter.com/micaminar/status/447810686492876800) and thus i believe that this should be kept even though twitter has no "copyright allocations" for images, since it was uploaded to flickr on a free licence by the same person, it should be allowed....same goes for the other image...--Stemoc (talk) 04:33, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Permission from the photographer is missing. He is the copyrightholder not the subject. Natuur12 (talk) 11:39, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
uploader is not the author 91.64.240.231 07:59, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:53, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Out of project scope (w:Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:DistrictEmpire). MER-C 13:10, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:43, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Yann as no license. Well there is a {{PD-URAA-Simul|Egypt|URAA not known|unidentified}}. But why this image is in public domain in Egypt? JuTa 23:21, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:27, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Unused inferior copy of a SVG file:Wappen Battenberg Pfalz.svg. Fränsmer (talk) 12:01, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. Kathisma (talk) 17:47, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:45, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
It's a scan of an old image when he was playing, 1957-1966, not photographed today as claimed Jimfbleak (talk) 19:47, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:31, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
It is not clear as to whether the OTRS ticket for the photo also covers the Darth Vader mask design. In addition, it is not clear that the balloon is permanently located (as opposed to temporarily placed) as required under UK FOP. Gazebo (talk) 08:27, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:53, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Copyrighted design on the wrapper Gazebo (talk) 08:36, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:53, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Claims to be a map of the Cheyenne language, but it's actually the state of Montana. There is no previous version to revert to. Kwamikagami (talk) 22:10, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Kept: In use/ Natuur12 (talk) 11:29, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
no permission from the photographer 91.64.240.231 07:57, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:53, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#France: the fresque from a monastery that was founded in 2002; missing evidence that it is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 11:47, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:46, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#France: the fresque from a monastery that was founded in 2002; missing evidence that it is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 11:47, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:46, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Doubtful "own work": the image has the "Ferrovías" (the company that managed the railway line) logo as a watermark. The photo has also other details that indicates it may have been published before (for example, the red and black box sorrounding the photo). - Fma12 (talk) 20:32, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:58, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Copy of http://engelaere-editions.com/blog/ Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:27, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
I'm not agree to erase this file as long as there is no decision for the text in relation Woodywood (talk) 09:55, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Complex logo. Should have been speedied as a pure copyvio. Kathisma (talk) 17:49, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: No evidence that this file is available under a free license. Natuur12 (talk) 11:45, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
dulpicat of the File:File:Bautzen Schiller Gymnasium 01.JPG Fiver, der Hellseher (talk) 22:23, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:28, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:35, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Painting by Günther Rittner (* 1927). Fust (talk) 13:05, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:43, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Text document which should be replaced with wiki-table. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:35, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Attribution-NonCommercial license Michiel TM (talk) 13:14, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyfraud by the rijksvoorlichtingsdienst. Natuur12 (talk) 11:41, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Cropped from here. Copyright violation,. Rapsar (talk) 08:43, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:52, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
There is no evidence that this image was drawn by a US Navy employee 88.64.112.219 21:18, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
- The document source is given in the file desc.. There is no hint in that document that points to somebody not working for the US Navy beeing the artist. Same with almost every other US Gov document beeing that old. Alexpl (talk) 23:06, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Per above Natuur12 (talk) 11:30, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
duplicate of svg Antemister (talk) 15:41, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Kept: In use Natuur12 (talk) 11:34, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
duplicate of File:Flag of Cameroon.svg, no usage. Ceahjlazco1882 (talk) 14:02, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
- Keep - It's not an exact duplicate. --The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 13:29, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: not a duplicate. --Strakhov (talk) 18:47, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
incorrectly claimed as own work, copyrighted image. http://www.alibaba.com/product-detail/Air-Ion-Tester_233359393/showimage.html 203.42.209.116 23:52, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
My own work, low quality, no purpose/usage. --Nicereddy (talk) 05:22, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
My own work, low quality, no purpose/usage. --Nicereddy (talk) 05:22, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:27, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Painting by Günter Rittner (* 1927). Fust (talk) 13:07, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:43, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Painting by Magda Bittner-Simmet (died in 2008). Fust (talk) 13:09, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:43, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work, considering also user page: born in Lima in 1973 (?). Most likely scanned from (as indicated) "Biblioteca Nacional del Perú". Peru has +70 pma or +70 since publication for simple/anonymous/collective works. Not taken in 2010, as Juan Gonzalo Rose died in 1983. May be in PD by other means but relevant info must be provided. Gunnex (talk) 10:23, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:50, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Painting by Claus Grimm painted in 2006. Fust (talk) 13:06, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:43, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Questionable authorship claims. The only other file uploaded by User:Lazour was a copyright violation from Getty Images with false authorship claims. —LX (talk, contribs) 20:24, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
- I work at O&M Co., the Broadway publicity firm in New York City that personally represents Joel Grey. These were photos given to me directly by Joel Grey himself. I uploaded these at his request. If it is required that I give any other information re this issue, please let me know. I would also appreciate if you let me know how to enter this information into Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.89.243.92 (talk • contribs) 20:28, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
- (I must say I'm a little surprised that a representative of a publicity firm would think it's okay to take a photo from Getty Images and claim to have created that photo personally.) What's required is that you obtain permission from the legitimate copyright holder to publish the photo under a copyright license that allows anyone to use the photo in modified or unmodified form for any purpose, including commercial purposes. You then need to send in evidence of that permission to our permission archive. The copyright holder is normally the author, which means the photographer, rather than you or the subject of the photo. Only the legitimate copyright holder can issue a valid copyright license. —LX (talk, contribs) 22:21, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Please send evidence of permission to com:OTRS Natuur12 (talk) 11:30, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Sadly, I think the posters (presumably copyrighted) feature too prominently in this image and raise copyright concerns. Possibly this could be heavily cropped to show just the musicians and a minimal amount of the background, and that could be kept.. Jmabel ! talk 05:02, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
File:Le groupe Kalffa avec la pochette de l'album "Terre de Légendes".jpg seems to raise the same issues (plus the file seems to have problems). - Jmabel ! talk 05:15, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:54, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
superseeded, not used anymore Antemister (talk) 15:42, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
- I do not understand the nomination. If the intention is to point out it duplicates a better file, then that falls under {{Duplicate}} and can be redirected. If this is to point out that the flag is no longer in use, then this is a fact that can be added to the description but does not make it out of scope for this project as we have a mission to preserve human knowledge. --Fæ (talk) 10:36, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
- I added {{Badjpg}} and {{Vva}} to the page; I think that’s what the nominator meant. -- Tuválkin ✉ 20:23, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete: There’s no reason to keep this file: The available (also, older in Commons) File:Flag of Tanzania.svg is a much better rendering for a flat flag image such as this; there is nothing vexillologically worth keeping in this JPG file (unlike if it were a scan from a documented source, f.i.). -- Tuválkin ✉ 20:23, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:34, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
erroneous shape : in Belgium, the crown is depicted with angulous arches, like on this official paper header : http://1.1.1.5/bmi/91.120.238.234/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/belgique.jpg 80.215.135.84 13:54, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Has been superseded and is not in use. I'm the uploader, and the author has stated to always support deletion requests of his files. Lemmens, Tom (talk) 12:58, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Not in use, erroneous and superseded. Kathisma (talk) 17:39, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader agrees with the filebeing deleted Natuur12 (talk) 11:35, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Has no source, possibly not simple enough to be in public domain. Ralgis (talk) 19:51, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:31, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#France: an icon from a monastery that was founded in 2002; missing evidence that it is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 11:48, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:46, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
{{PD-ineligible}}-fail. Peruvian work. Undated. Portrayed is de:José María Arguedas who lived 1911—1969. Peru has +70 pma or +70 since publication for simple photographs/anonymous & collective works. Without further infos most likely still copyrighted. Gunnex (talk) 10:57, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:48, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Painting by Toni Oberniedermayr (* 1929). Fust (talk) 13:08, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:43, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Участник, загрузивший этот файл, загрузил в Рувику несколькой изображений от разных авторов, без их разрешения на свободное лицензирование Dogad75 (talk) 11:01, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:47, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Painting by olf von Akerhielm Kommer (1910-1991). Undelete in 2062. Fust (talk) 13:11, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:43, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Painting by Ernst Müller-Gräfe. (1879-1954). Undelete in 2025. Fust (talk) 13:10, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:43, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Painting by olf von Akerhielm Kommer (1910-1991). Undelete in 2062. Fust (talk) 13:12, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:43, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Previously published via (example) http://web.archive.org/web/20020205192811/http://www.traficoperu.com/espanol/ciud1.htm (2002) = (lower res) http://www.traficoperu.com/images/ciudades/apurimac5.jpg or http://lindoapurimac.blogspot.de/2007/10/cautivadora-apurimac-peru.html (2007) Gunnex (talk) 10:35, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:50, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
I uploaded the picture. It is not used and German Wikipedia authors prefer an other visualization. So, I request deletion. BrunosapiJens (talk) 01:01, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:54, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
{{PD-Brazil-media}}-fail (only for audiovisual and photographic works), considering artwork (drawing) by en:Millôr Fernandes (1923—2012), a Brazilian cartoonist. Copyrighted till the end of 2082. Gunnex (talk) 08:55, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:52, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Unused inferior copy of a SVG file:Wappen Hayna.svg. Fränsmer (talk) 12:03, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. Kathisma (talk) 17:51, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:45, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama for sculptures in Norway (only for buildings) 4ing (talk) 22:19, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:28, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Painting by Hans Jakob Mann (1887-1963) Fust (talk) 13:09, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:43, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
No licence given, copyvio Alinea (talk) 09:42, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: No evidence of permission Natuur12 (talk) 11:50, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
{{PD-old}}-fail (since upload 2007). Reproduction of artwork by pt:Antonio Rocco (1880—1944), a Brazilian/Italian painter. Created (as indicated) in 1910, per ptwiki "Em 1913 veio para o Brasil" / In 1913 he came to Brazil, source country eventual Italy (Italy and Brazil have +70 pma). Copyrighted till the end of 2014. Gunnex (talk) 19:17, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:32, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Appears to be a derivative of an unsourced photo of a bison, which has to be presumed to be non-free unless the uploader can demonstrate otherwise. —LX (talk, contribs) 19:40, 25 March 2014 (UTC) This flag was created including the bison using the users personally owned photoshop program, and I am that user--CherOCreekBandOfIndians (talk) 20:24, 25 March 2014 (UTC)100% of this art is CherocreekNations own art, created using their own computer and photoshop program copyright is correct Cherocreek Band Of Indians is correct--CherOCreekBandOfIndians (talk) 20:29, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:32, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Freedom of Panorama in the US does not apply to sculptures. Sculptures are the subject of the photo and not de minimis. Unlikely that sculptor has been dead for 70 years, however we might be able to keep this if it could be shown that the sculpture was erected before 1977. Storkk (talk) 13:44, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:36, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
This appears to have been made with an avatar creator software. No evidence that the image can be sublicensed. Jespinos (talk) 23:01, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:28, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
copyvio of 2d artwork not covered by fop in the uk Oxyman (talk) 22:13, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:28, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Going by quality, appears to be taken from a photocopy. User's only other upload was of (PD) AIGA symbols- also apparently from a photocopy- claimed as "own work". That wasn't, and this probably isn't either, except that in this case the icons *don't* clearly come from a set in the public domain. These may be flat, but they still required artistic input and skill to create, so I don't think they can be claimed as free on the "simple shapes" basis either. Ubcule (talk) 23:06, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:28, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Unused inferior copy of a SVG file:Wappen Hayna.svg. Fränsmer (talk) 12:05, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. Kathisma (talk) 17:51, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:45, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Unused inferior duplicate of a SVG file:Wappen Obersülzen.svg. Fränsmer (talk) 11:58, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. Kathisma (talk) 17:53, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:45, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Unused inferior copy of a SVG file:Wappen Landkreis Neustadt Weinstraße.svg. Fränsmer (talk) 12:00, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. Kathisma (talk) 17:51, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:45, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Probably not own work, all other uploads deleted as copyvios. Yann (talk) 05:42, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Comment Google didn't find anything (//u.to/2qu9Bg), but it can be scan. /St1995 10:03, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:53, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
There is no evidence that uploader is the copyright holder of the images.
- File:Great Catch Prechae Rodriguez - CFL Hamilton Tiger Cats.jpg
- File:WR Prechae Rodriguez - Orlando Predators.jpg
- File:Prechae Rodriguez.jpg
Jespinos (talk) 23:30, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:27, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Нет подтверждения заявленной свободной лицензии, в Рувике автор указан Nikodim Dogad75 (talk) 11:27, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:47, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
no descriptions, no sources. All files are "own works".
- File:Märta Elvira von Unge.jpg
- File:Nils Paco von Unge.jpg
- File:Sigrid Katarina Elisabet-Harleman.jpg
- File:Amelie Carolina.jpg
- File:Engel schenström.jpg
- File:Catharina Salmonia.jpg
- File:Carl-Fredrik Stenhagen.jpg
- File:Carl Stenhagen.jpg
91.64.240.231 09:22, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:52, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Possibly out of project scope.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Jespinos (talk) 23:09, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:28, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work 151.247.191.209 09:28, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:51, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Questionable authorship claims based on the low resolution, lack of metadata, and the fact that all other uploads by User:Gasthon have been copyright violations with false authorship claims.
—LX (talk, contribs) 17:14, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:33, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
نام مناسب نیست Sushyant.zavarzadeh (talk) 11:34, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:47, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sandra Oehleen (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope (educational use?), personality rights problems regarding the depicted kids.
- File:Her er Piwiene våre❤️ 2014-03-25 13-25.jpg
- File:Her er Junior-laget til SCT-Vipers 2014-03-25 13-24.jpg
ireas (talk) 23:52, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:27, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Orphaned files of low quality in Category:Borylation
[edit]These files in Category:Borylation are orphaned/replaced and of low quality.
- File:Aliphatic C-H borylation-2.jpg
- File:Aliphatic C-H borylation.jpg
- File:Meta functionalization of arenes through C-H borylation.jpg
- File:Miyaura Borylation.jpg
- File:Utility of organoboron compounds-2.jpg
- File:Utility of organoboron compounds.jpg
Leyo 22:05, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:29, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Afrahgarun (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely authorship claims based on the low/inconsistent resolutions, inconsistent/missing metadata, the nature of the images, and the uploader's history.
- File:Garun5.jpg
- File:OSMAN HAJI MOHAMED AFRAH.jpg
- File:Garun Real Estate.jpg
- File:GENERAL SALAAD-1.jpg
- File:General Salaad Gabeyre Kediye-1.jpg
- File:General salaad gabeyre-3.jpg
—LX (talk, contribs) 19:15, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:32, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Copyright ? ---> http://fashion.telegraph.co.uk/news-features/TMG9927652/Zahia-Dehar-interview-from-sex-scandal-to-Paris-Haute-Couture.html Arroser (talk) 22:48, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:28, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Supporterhéninois (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons:Derivative works from posters.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:49, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:Josué Sánchez
[edit]Reproductions of artworks by en:Josué Sánchez (1945—), a Peruvian painter. Permission needed. All files uploaded by ReservoirHill (talk · contribs) (" Hugh Pickens") in 2010. File:Josue Sanchez Chongos Altos.jpg is - per image caption enwiki - "a photo of a detail of the mural by Josue Sanchez taken inside the church at Chongos Altos, Peru in 1974." and may not be covered by COM:FOP#Peru, concerning indoor shots.
- File:Josue 1970.jpg
- File:Josue 1970s.jpg
- File:Josue 1978.jpg
- File:Josue Sanchez Chongos Altos.jpg
- File:Josue Sanchez Paintings.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 13:02, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
One of the Photos is an Interior Shot in the Church in Chongos Altos. The others are Not
[edit]The photo File:Josue Sanchez Chongos Altos.jpg is an interior shot taken inside the church at Chongos Altos in 1970.
The other four files are photos of paintings that I purchased from Sanchez in the 1970's and are currently hanging on the wall in my study in the USA.
Best Regards,
Hugh Pickens— Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.18.52.235 (talk • contribs)
- Yes, you bought the paintings, but you didn't buy the copyright. The images have to be deleted if you cannot provide a written permission by the artist (or his heirs in case an artist should not be alive anymore) to license them with a free license. --AndreasPraefcke (talk) 17:56, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
I'm not going to contact Sanchez after 45 years.
[edit]When he sees they are missing from his wikipedia article, he can upload photos of his paintings to Wikimedia himself if he wants them on Wikipedia.
Best Regards,
Hugh Pickens
Deleted: Permission from the artist ismissing Natuur12 (talk) 11:44, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
It is a private picture, without any educative content; I just made a mistake, sorry. Satay82 (talk) 14:26, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted; Blurry low res penis snapshot; request of uploader. -- Infrogmation (talk) 20:57, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 17:19, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Personal image ; No notability ; No use : Commons is not a private photo album Civa (talk) 22:19, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: as above.
Doubtful "own work": the image has the "Ferrovías" (the company that managed the railway line) logo as a watermark. The photo has also other details that indicates it may have been published before (for example, the red and black box sorrounding the photo). - Fma12 (talk) 20:32, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:58, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
{{PD-old-50}}-fail as this photo (taken in 1944) is most likely a Brazilian work (which has 70 pma). Most likely a private photo which - configured alternatively with {{PD-Brazil-media}} (+70 +1 years disclosure) - would be copyrighted at least till the end of 2014 (+COM:URAA-problem). Eventual also {{PD-BrazilGov}} ("published or commissioned by a Brazilian government (...) prior to 1983") but no evidence available to support this claim. Source is a random blog. Original disclosure date is unknown. Gunnex (talk) 07:27, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
- Unfortunate, but I agree - Delete and Undelete in January per {{PD-Brazil-media}}. Photo was made on April 28th 1944, disclosure can probably be assumed to be during 1944. It would be nice if we could find that it was an official war photographer's photograph, and {{PD-BrazilGov}} might apply, but I can't find any evidence of that, or even who the photographer was. Storkk (talk) 15:09, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion Krd 17:45, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Doubtful "own work": the image has the "Ferrovías" (the company that managed the railway line) logo as a watermark. The photo has also other details that indicates it may have been published before (for example, the red and black box sorrounding the photo). - Fma12 (talk) 20:32, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:58, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Doubtful "own work": the image has the "Ferrovías" (the company that managed the railway line) logo as a watermark. The photo has also other details that indicates it may have been published before (for example, the red and black box sorrounding the photo). - Fma12 (talk) 20:32, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:58, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Doubtful "own work": the image has the "Ferrovías" (the company that managed the railway line) logo as a watermark. The photo has also other details that indicates it may have been published before (for example, the red and black box sorrounding the photo). - Fma12 (talk) 20:32, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:58, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Doubtful "own work": the image has the "Ferrovías" (the company that managed the railway line) logo as a watermark. The photo has also other details that indicates it may have been published before (for example, the red and black box sorrounding the photo). - Fma12 (talk) 20:32, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:58, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Doubtful "own work": the image has the "Ferrovías" (the company that managed the railway line) logo as a watermark. The photo has also other details that indicates it may have been published before (for example, the red and black box sorrounding the photo). - Fma12 (talk) 20:32, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:58, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Doubtful "own work": the image has the "Ferrovías" (the company that managed the railway line) logo as a watermark. The photo has also other details that indicates it may have been published before (for example, the red and black box sorrounding the photo). - Fma12 (talk) 20:32, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:58, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Doubtful "own work": the image has the "Ferrovías" (the company that managed the railway line) logo as a watermark. The photo has also other details that indicates it may have been published before (for example, the red and black box sorrounding the photo). - Fma12 (talk) 20:32, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:58, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Doubtful "own work": the image has the "Ferrovías" (the company that managed the railway line) logo as a watermark. The photo has also other details that indicates it may have been published before (for example, the red and black box sorrounding the photo). - Fma12 (talk) 20:32, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:58, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Doubtful "own work": the image has the "Ferrovías" (the company that managed the railway line) logo as a watermark. The photo has also other details that indicates it may have been published before (for example, the red and black box sorrounding the photo). - Fma12 (talk) 20:32, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:58, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Doubtful "own work": the image has the "Ferrovías" (the company that managed the railway line) logo as a watermark. The photo has also other details that indicates it may have been published before (for example, the red and black box sorrounding the photo). - Fma12 (talk) 20:32, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:58, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Doubtful "own work": the image has the "Ferrovías" (the company that managed the railway line) logo as a watermark. The photo has also other details that indicates it may have been published before (for example, the red and black box sorrounding the photo). - Fma12 (talk) 20:32, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:58, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Doubtful "own work": the image has the "Ferrovías" (the company that managed the railway line) logo as a watermark. The photo has also other details that indicates it may have been published before (for example, the red and black box sorrounding the photo). - Fma12 (talk) 20:32, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:58, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Doubtful "own work": the image has the "Ferrovías" (the company that managed the railway line) logo as a watermark. The photo has also other details that indicates it may have been published before (for example, the red and black box sorrounding the photo). - Fma12 (talk) 20:32, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:58, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Doubtful "own work": the image has the "Ferrovías" (the company that managed the railway line) logo as a watermark. The photo has also other details that indicates it may have been published before (for example, the red and black box sorrounding the photo). - Fma12 (talk) 20:32, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:58, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Doubtful "own work": the image has the "Ferrovías" (the company that managed the railway line) logo as a watermark. The photo has also other details that indicates it may have been published before (for example, the red and black box sorrounding the photo). - Fma12 (talk) 20:32, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:58, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Doubtful "own work": the image has the "Ferrovías" (the company that managed the railway line) logo as a watermark. The photo has also other details that indicates it may have been published before (for example, the red and black box sorrounding the photo). - Fma12 (talk) 20:32, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:58, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Doubtful "own work": the image has the "Ferrovías" (the company that managed the railway line) logo as a watermark. The photo has also other details that indicates it may have been published before (for example, the red and black box sorrounding the photo). - Fma12 (talk) 20:32, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:58, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Doubtful "own work": the image has the "Ferrovías" (the company that managed the railway line) logo as a watermark. The photo has also other details that indicates it may have been published before (for example, the red and black box sorrounding the photo). - Fma12 (talk) 20:32, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:58, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Doubtful "own work": the image has the "Ferrovías" (the company that managed the railway line) logo as a watermark. The photo has also other details that indicates it may have been published before (for example, the red and black box sorrounding the photo). - Fma12 (talk) 20:32, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:58, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Doubtful "own work": the image has the "Ferrovías" (the company that managed the railway line) logo as a watermark. The photo has also other details that indicates it may have been published before (for example, the red and black box sorrounding the photo). - Fma12 (talk) 20:32, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:58, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Doubtful "own work": the image has the "Ferrovías" (the company that managed the railway line) logo as a watermark. The photo has also other details that indicates it may have been published before (for example, the red and black box sorrounding the photo). - Fma12 (talk) 20:32, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:58, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Doubtful "own work": the image has the "Ferrovías" (the company that managed the railway line) logo as a watermark. The photo has also other details that indicates it may have been published before (for example, the red and black box sorrounding the photo). - Fma12 (talk) 20:32, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:58, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Doubtful "own work": the image has the "Ferrovías" (the company that managed the railway line) logo as a watermark. The photo has also other details that indicates it may have been published before (for example, the red and black box sorrounding the photo). - Fma12 (talk) 20:32, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:58, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Doubtful "own work": the image has the "Ferrovías" (the company that managed the railway line) logo as a watermark. The photo has also other details that indicates it may have been published before (for example, the red and black box sorrounding the photo). - Fma12 (talk) 20:32, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:58, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Doubtful "own work": the image has the "Ferrovías" (the company that managed the railway line) logo as a watermark. The photo has also other details that indicates it may have been published before (for example, the red and black box sorrounding the photo). - Fma12 (talk) 20:32, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:58, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Doubtful "own work": the image has the "Ferrovías" (the company that managed the railway line) logo as a watermark. The photo has also other details that indicates it may have been published before (for example, the red and black box sorrounding the photo). - Fma12 (talk) 20:32, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:58, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Doubtful "own work": the image has the "Ferrovías" (the company that managed the railway line) logo as a watermark. The photo has also other details that indicates it may have been published before (for example, the red and black box sorrounding the photo). - Fma12 (talk) 20:32, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:58, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
no permission. Author: ca:Oleguer Junyent i Sans (1876 – 1956). 91.64.240.231 08:07, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Comment I've tagged the image as {{PD-Art|PD-1923}} as it was published in 1917 - so it's PD in the US, but it seems not PD in country of origin (Spain).
Unfortunately, looks like {{Vd}} and Undelete in 2027.Storkk (talk) 10:35, 2 April 2014 (UTC)Switching to {{Vk}}- apparently there is an exception to the rules that images must be free in both the US and the country of origin: Commons:Policy_on_photographs_of_old_pictures#Other_countries. Storkk (talk) 10:44, 2 April 2014 (UTC) - Comment In fact the policy refers to "faithful reproductions of two-dimensional public domain works (...) considering that "a mere mechanical reproduction of some other image, such as an unmodified photocopy or scan of a drawing, cannot attract additional copyright protection over and above that of the original, as it lacks originality: it is a bare copy, no more." The original is not yet in public domain in it's source country and appears to be still copyrighted (70 pma) till the end of 2026. Gunnex (talk) 08:05, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
- I think I have to agree, having read it for the fifth time. I was misled by the summary: "Nevertheless, under Commons rules the {{PD-Art}} tag can be used for "faithful reproduction" photographs of 2D public domain works of art even where copyright might be asserted under local law in the source country." In my view, that is not the most accurate representation. Storkk (talk) 16:00, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Not in the PD in country of origin. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 09:31, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
_1.JPG){kind=link}
_1.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
同じ内容でより質の高いファイルが存在するため Tokumeigakarinoaoshima (talk) 01:05, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
_1.JPG){kind=link}
- Delete I tend to agree in that it was superseded by File:Osaka_Mode_(HAL_Osaka)_2.JPG and has no other use. A similar but improved angle, and better quality in general. whym (talk) 07:32, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
_2.JPG){kind=link}
Kept: This file isn't that bad and the other file is not necessarily better. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 09:20, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
_1.JPG){kind=link}
Doubtful "own work": the image has the "Ferrovías" (the company that managed the railway line) logo as a watermark. The photo has also other details that indicates it may have been published before (for example, the red and black box sorrounding the photo). - Fma12 (talk) 20:32, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:58, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by JeremyIons as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Article which this image was used in has been deleted on grounds of self promotion, this image also serves no other purpose on wikipedia than self promotion and is used no where else. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:56, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
- CommentThe file is in use, there's an article on czwiki. IMHO the source / (c) status is in question. Staged photo in own house. Only one edit from uploader User:Xenonage.
Kept: In use, therefore in scope. Low resolution but no other indication that this is not own work, does not look like a professional promo shot. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 09:24, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Doubtful "own work": the image has the "Ferrovías" (the company that managed the railway line) logo as a watermark. The photo has also other details that indicates it may have been published before (for example, the red and black box sorrounding the photo). - Fma12 (talk) 20:32, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:58, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Doubtful "own work": the image has the "Ferrovías" (the company that managed the railway line) logo as a watermark. The photo has also other details that indicates it may have been published before (for example, the red and black box sorrounding the photo). - Fma12 (talk) 20:32, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:58, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Doubtful "own work": the image has the "Ferrovías" (the company that managed the railway line) logo as a watermark. The photo has also other details that indicates it may have been published before (for example, the red and black box sorrounding the photo). - Fma12 (talk) 20:32, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:58, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Doubtful "own work": the image has the "Ferrovías" (the company that managed the railway line) logo as a watermark. The photo has also other details that indicates it may have been published before (for example, the red and black box sorrounding the photo). - Fma12 (talk) 20:32, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:58, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
use the svg Antemister (talk) 11:17, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 06:32, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
replaced... Antemister (talk) 15:58, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:37, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
use the svg Antemister (talk) 11:28, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted -FASTILY 06:33, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
not in use anymore Antemister (talk) 15:44, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
kept: In use Natuur12 (talk) 18:36, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
Unused inferior copy of a SVG File:Wappen Neustadt an der Weinstrasse.svg. Fränsmer (talk) 11:49, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
- Even if it is no longer needed, I am unsure here, I do not think so.--Perhelion (talk) 12:25, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
- Das wundert mich jetzt. Was ist hier anders als bei deinen Löschvorschlägen zum Landkreis Vorpommern-Rügen? Fränsmer (talk) 13:35, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
- (Oh* Ich sehe grad mein erster Satz ist verschwunden. :-() This is not a copy of a SVG, this is a scan of a book.
-- Perhelion (talk) 15:42, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Kept: No consensus for deletionb Natuur12 (talk) 18:35, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
_bright.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_bright.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
use the svg Antemister (talk) 11:30, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
_bright.png){kind=link}
Deleted -FASTILY 06:32, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
_bright.png){kind=link}
_bright.png&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
replaced... Antemister (talk) 16:00, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:37, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
use the svg Antemister (talk) 11:25, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 06:33, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
replaced... Antemister (talk) 15:57, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:36, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
Doubtful "own work": the image has the "Ferrovías" (the company that managed the railway line) logo as a watermark. The photo has also other details that indicates it may have been published before (for example, the red and black box sorrounding the photo). - Fma12 (talk) 20:32, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:58, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Doubtful "own work": the image has the "Ferrovías" (the company that managed the railway line) logo as a watermark. The photo has also other details that indicates it may have been published before (for example, the red and black box sorrounding the photo). - Fma12 (talk) 20:32, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:58, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Doubtful "own work": the image has the "Ferrovías" (the company that managed the railway line) logo as a watermark. The photo has also other details that indicates it may have been published before (for example, the red and black box sorrounding the photo). - Fma12 (talk) 20:32, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:58, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#United_Kingdom does not apply to two-dimensional artwork, unfortunately. Storkk (talk) 18:40, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Keep This is a three-dimensional work. It is not a painting; the paste is built-up from the paper surface.Wmpearl (talk) 06:14, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
Question It would be good if we could get some guidance on how three-dimensional a three-dimensional work has to be to be covered by FOP in the UK. For example, a glued collage of photos would seem "more three-dimensional" than this looks - would that be covered by FOP UK? Most oil paintings would also fall into that category, it seems to me. Storkk (talk) 13:34, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FOP in the UK does not apply to 2D works FASTILY 09:06, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
use the svg Antemister (talk) 11:28, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 06:33, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
replaced... Antemister (talk) 15:57, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:05, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
use the svg Antemister (talk) 11:25, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 06:33, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
replaced... Antemister (talk) 15:58, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:05, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
Doubtful "own work": the image has the "Ferrovías" (the company that managed the railway line) logo as a watermark. The photo has also other details that indicates it may have been published before (for example, the red and black box sorrounding the photo). - Fma12 (talk) 20:32, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:58, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:Darth Vader
[edit]Derivative works of the copyrighted Darth Vader character shown.
- File:Adidas Darth Vader Superstar side.JPG
- File:Atlanta - generic 26.JPG
- File:Atlanta - generic 27.JPG
- File:Balloons 2.jpg (The Vader balloon is not that visible; the artistic aspects of the barn-shaped balloon may be more of a problem.)
- File:Cameron Balloons Darth Vader-105 SS MRD-1.jpg (it appears that the photo is covered by an OTRS ticket, but it is not clear that the ticket covers the Darth Vader character)
- File:Darth Vader Graffito NYC, December 2013.JPG
- File:Darth vader grotesque.jpg
- File:DarthVader-Inside.jpg
- File:Jamming Troopers on TT-303 Bass Bot.jpg
- File:Luke and his dad - geograph.org.uk - 1379674.jpg (see COM:Cosplay)
- File:Muyayo001.jpg (the tattoos likely include an implied license with regard to public display, but it is not clear that this extends to photographic reproductions)
- File:Secombe Filoni Rose Sansweet.JPG
- File:Vader-statue-of-liberty.jpg
- File:WonderCon 2012 (6856132444).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Gazebo (talk) 07:09, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. Aside from annoying m:copyright paranoia mentality shown here, this nom bundles images that may fall under Commons:Freedom of panorama, Commons:Fan art, Commons:De minimis (File:Balloons 2.jpg), COM:GRAFFITI, and others. Please relist as individual noms, and we will discuss it there. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 08:49, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Procedural close. These should be nominated for deletion individually -FASTILY 08:19, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:Darth Vader
[edit]Derivative works of the Darth Vader character mask.
In the case of File:Muyayo001.jpg, though tattoos may come with an implied license that allows public display, it is not clear that photographic reproductions are permitted.
Gazebo (talk) 08:21, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:05, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:Darth Vader
[edit]Per COM:TOYS and COM:DW. COM:FOP does not seem to apply to any of the cases
- File:Anime Expo 2011 - Darth Vader and Pikachu (5893317644).jpg
- File:Darth Vader (10585267443) B.jpg
- File:Darth Vader (10585267443).jpg
- File:Darth Vader und imperiale Sturmtruppen (10585314963).jpg
- File:Darth Vader wearing traditional ukrainian clothes (cropped).jpg
- File:Darth Vader wearing traditional ukrainian clothes.jpg
- File:Traje Darth Vader.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_B.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 11:42, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
- It's a little unfortunate that you didn't seem to look at Commons:Image_casebook#Costumes_and_cosplay. That would seem to save File:Darth Vader wearing traditional ukrainian clothes.jpg at least... AnonMoos (talk) 09:59, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
- No, I looked at it. I understand your comment, but the point here is that, although the overall "costume" in the Ukrainian case can be regarded as a "modified or original representation of a character" the issue here is in the Darth Vader mask. It's copyrighted, it's covered by COM:TOYS and cannot be regarded as a de minimis element within the picture. On the contrary. The picture is of course a modified representation, but keeps unmodified prominent elements of the original copyrighted element. I do acknowledge it's a border case, but not unfounded at all. --Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 16:24, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
- If it's being actively worn by a person in a manner like an article of clothing, then: 1) It's a little dubious whether it can be called a "toy" in the most useful meaning of the word. 2) Its "utilitarian" function is specifically not copyrightable under United States law. The image may end up needing to be deleted in the end, but I wish you would stop throwing the word "toy" around, because I don't think that it clarifies any issues in this case. AnonMoos (talk) 00:53, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
- Good point, but don't blame on me but on COM:TOYS. It explicitly mentions the Darth Vader example. If the Darth Vader mask is a "utilitarian" object, then it should be discussed there and not here, I guess. --Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 08:44, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete all. According to [1], Stormtrooper helmets are copyrighted artworks in the United States (but ineligible for copyright as utilitarian objects in the United Kingdom). As the helmets are unfree in the United States, we can't host any pictures of them. --Stefan4 (talk) 11:55, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
___________________
Deleted - Darth Vader masks are copyright. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:50, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:Darth Vader
[edit]COM:DW of copyrighted character.
Yuraily Lic (talk) 04:42, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:19, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Darth Vader
[edit]COM:DW of copyrighted characters or copyrighted works.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Keep Freedom of panorama in Spain. --Cody escadron delta (d) 13:18, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
- Keep this one, it's a fan creation of Darth Vader. This is not a photo of a product manufacturer. --Clodion (talk) 10:19, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Keep According to Mike Godwin's mails. --Cody escadron delta (d) 09:38, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
- Keep According to Mike Godwin's mails. --Cody escadron delta (d) 09:38, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
_01.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Keep According to Mike Godwin's mails. --Cody escadron delta (d) 09:38, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Keep According to Mike Godwin's mails. --Cody escadron delta (d) 09:38, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Keep According to Mike Godwin's mails. --Cody escadron delta (d) 09:38, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Keep According to Mike Godwin's mails. --Cody escadron delta (d) 09:38, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Keep According to Mike Godwin's mails. --Cody escadron delta (d) 09:38, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep
Freedom of panorama in Canada. --Cody escadron delta (d) 13:18, 15 September 2019 (UTC)According to Mike Godwin's mails. --Cody escadron delta (d) 09:38, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Freedom of panorama in Hungary. --Cody escadron delta (d) 13:18, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Keep According to Mike Godwin's mails. --Cody escadron delta (d) 09:38, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
- Keep According to Mike Godwin's mails. --Cody escadron delta (d) 09:38, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
- Keep According to Mike Godwin's mails. --Cody escadron delta (d) 09:38, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
- Keep According to Mike Godwin's mails. --Cody escadron delta (d) 09:38, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
- Keep According to Mike Godwin's mails. --Cody escadron delta (d) 09:38, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
- Keep According to Mike Godwin's mails. --Cody escadron delta (d) 09:38, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
- Keep According to Mike Godwin's mails. --Cody escadron delta (d) 09:38, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
- Keep According to Mike Godwin's mails. --Cody escadron delta (d) 09:38, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
- Keep According to Mike Godwin's mails. --Cody escadron delta (d) 09:38, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
- Keep According to Mike Godwin's mails. --Cody escadron delta (d) 09:38, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
- Keep According to Mike Godwin's mails. --Cody escadron delta (d) 09:38, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
- File:Star Wars and the Power of Costume July 2018 56 (Darth Vader's costume and cape from Episode III).jpg
- File:Star Wars Celebration Orlando EFX Chrome Darth Vader Helmet 1.jpg
- File:Star Wars Celebration Orlando EFX Chrome Darth Vader Helmet 2.jpg
- File:Star Wars Celebration Orlando EFX Darth Vader Helmet 1.jpg
- File:Star Wars Celebration Orlando EFX Darth Vader Helmet 2.jpg
- File:Star Wars Weekends 2011 (5749714998).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Keep According to Mike Godwin's mails. --Cody escadron delta (d) 09:38, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Keep According to Mike Godwin's mails. --Cody escadron delta (d) 09:38, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
- File:SWCA - Darth Vader helmet off statue (16580453314).jpg
- File:SWCA - Slideshow Darth Vader statue (17015354510).jpg
- File:VADER 1 (3343456101).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Keep Freedom of panorama in Spain. --Cody escadron delta (d) 13:18, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Keep Freedom of panorama in Spain. --Cody escadron delta (d) 13:18, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Keep this one.This is a photo taken during a promotional show with Bob Iger and George Lucas. This event was free. The photo must be too. --Clodion (talk) 10:40, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
- Keep According to Mike Godwin's mails. --Cody escadron delta (d) 09:38, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Keep According to Mike Godwin's mails. --Cody escadron delta (d) 09:38, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
_(33102448243).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Keep According to Mike Godwin's mails. --Cody escadron delta (d) 09:38, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
Yuraily Lic (talk) 06:24, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Also, I think it's time that the category be salted, and that we develop a means of preventing uploads of well-known copyrighted characters/works. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 06:33, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
- The diagram on Derivative works explains that a picture taken in country where the freedom of panaorama is allowed can be uploaded under a free licence. Yuraily Lic should check each picture before proposing a whole category to the deletion. --Cody escadron delta (d) 13:24, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
- Cody escadron delta, the creators of the characters have copyrights. It doesn't matter where photos were taken. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 15:05, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
- Sure it matters, please read Commons:Freedom of panorama. --Cody escadron delta (d) 16:12, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
- According to Christian Ferrer (an administrator), "FoP could apply if it was the first publication/creation, however the person who made the graffiti made a DW of a copyrighted character, the owner of the former character still have rights on it" from Com:Deletion_requests/File:Mazinger_Z_Sabadell.jpg. Therefore, these are files to deletion as COM:DW of copyrighted characters. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 03:08, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
- Yes because the graffiti is a DW, but for example, the picture File:Gateway to space 2016, Budapest, Darth Vader.jpg was taken during a Star Wars exhibition. So the Darth Vader costume here is not a DW, it is an original copyrighted costume and mask, so it is a 3D artwork, like a statue. So the FoP must be applied here. --Cody escadron delta (d) 12:35, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
- According to Christian Ferrer (an administrator), "FoP could apply if it was the first publication/creation, however the person who made the graffiti made a DW of a copyrighted character, the owner of the former character still have rights on it" from Com:Deletion_requests/File:Mazinger_Z_Sabadell.jpg. Therefore, these are files to deletion as COM:DW of copyrighted characters. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 03:08, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
- Sure it matters, please read Commons:Freedom of panorama. --Cody escadron delta (d) 16:12, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
- Cody escadron delta, the creators of the characters have copyrights. It doesn't matter where photos were taken. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 15:05, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
- These are not on permanent public display. FOP is not applied to them. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 07:22, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for the copy/paste answer, it's always a pleasure to speak with a robot! Anyway "mass deletion request" are meaningless, most of these pictures, 24 exactly are in the same case than the spiderman costume : Commons:Deletion requests/Images of costumes tagged as copyvios by AnimeFan/Mike Godwin mail. The answer of the lawyer Mike Godwin is clear : "Suppose someone dresses up as, say, Spider-Man, and has a photo taken. The photo is neither a copyright violation nor a trademark violation.", if we change spider-man by darth vader, we got the same case. Please make individual request and be sure you are not in a FoP or Spider-man case.
- According to [2], Ellin Beltz (an administrator) concluded "Darth Vader masks are copyright". --Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:54, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
- Spider-man mask is copyrighted too and according to the wikimedia fondation's lawyer "the photo is neither a copyright violation nor a trademark violation". It seems the pictures deleted by Ellin Beltz showed toys and not a person "dresses up as" Darth Vader. Do not forget that an administrator can be wrong, they are not all-knowing. --Cody escadron delta (d) 05:47, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
- According to [2], Ellin Beltz (an administrator) concluded "Darth Vader masks are copyright". --Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:54, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for the copy/paste answer, it's always a pleasure to speak with a robot! Anyway "mass deletion request" are meaningless, most of these pictures, 24 exactly are in the same case than the spiderman costume : Commons:Deletion requests/Images of costumes tagged as copyvios by AnimeFan/Mike Godwin mail. The answer of the lawyer Mike Godwin is clear : "Suppose someone dresses up as, say, Spider-Man, and has a photo taken. The photo is neither a copyright violation nor a trademark violation.", if we change spider-man by darth vader, we got the same case. Please make individual request and be sure you are not in a FoP or Spider-man case.
- Here another mail by Mike Godwin about costume :
- “I do not see a legal justification for removing the images we are discussing here. It is common for photographers to take pictures of people in costumes of copyrighted and/or trademarked characters. In general, such photographs are understood as lawful.
- I believe the deletion of the photographs you were talking about was unnecessary, and that this represents a too-conservative worldview with regard to the applicability of copyright and other intellectual property theory.
- Feel free to reproduce this e-mail on-wiki.”
- The mail can be found here : Commons:Deletion requests/Images of costumes tagged as copyvios by AnimeFan#Comment by Mike Godwin.
- So every pictures that are showing a costume, or somebody wearing a costume, should not be deleted because it is not a copyright violation. It is a different case for pictures that are showing statues or toys.
- --Cody escadron delta (d) 20:26, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter#Costumes and cosplay. Mike Godwin's email is clearly marked as obsolete everywhere it's quoted. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 11:08, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
Doubtful "own work": the image has the "Ferrovías" (the company that managed the railway line) logo as a watermark. The photo has also other details that indicates it may have been published before (for example, the red and black box sorrounding the photo). - Fma12 (talk) 20:32, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:58, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Doubtful "own work": the image has the "Ferrovías" (the company that managed the railway line) logo as a watermark. The photo has also other details that indicates it may have been published before (for example, the red and black box sorrounding the photo). - Fma12 (talk) 20:32, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:58, 2 April 2014 (UTC)