Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2013/11/16

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive November 16th, 2013
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User who's only uploaded copyright violations; no EXIF data; web resolution; I doubt s/he took this photograph. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:14, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom Tabercil (talk) 04:19, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparent copyright violation; ]http://www.nogizaka46.com/member/senbatsu_archive3.php#pagetop source website] has a copyright notice and uploader seems unlikely to be the owner... bobrayner (talk) 11:37, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 13:33, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image was apparently uploaded from somebody else's photo album for use on an attack page on ru.wikipedia. "Одна из дочерей Светланы - Евгения Оклей. В ихнем семейном фотоальбоме можно найти и более откровенные фото" bobrayner (talk) 11:48, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Attack image Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 13:46, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Uploaded as "own work" but actually copied from [1] bobrayner (talk) 11:52, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violation Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 13:46, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from www.wearehairy.com pornsite, which is "© 2009 - 2013 WeAreHairy.com All Rights Reserved". No evidence that Anon111112 is the site owner or has permission. bobrayner (talk) 12:24, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 13:53, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image is copyrighted: http://www.jcstaff.co.jp/sho-sai/sy-shokai/sy-shokai.htm Niklem (talk) 11:40, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

本圖是某組織、物品,或活動、事件、比賽等的標誌(logo)或商標(trademark),受到版權法和商標法的保護。版權和商標極可能屬於製作本圖的公司或機構。有鑑及本圖: 只用於該圖像所代表的組織、物品,或活動、事件、比賽等條目; 可以合理的預期,目前不可能存在或創建版權自由的作品; 儲存於美國伺服器、由非牟利的維基媒體基金會營運的中文維基百科; 使用本圖的維基百科編輯者相信,可以根據美國版權法或當地版權法的「合理使用」(fair use)原則而使用低解像度的標誌圖像。 在維基百科或其他場合,以其他原因使用本圖,均可能構成侵犯版權。以商業原因使用本圖也可能構成商標侵權。詳細請見Wikipedia:合理使用和Wikipedia:標誌。使用本標誌並不代表維基百科或維基媒體基金會支持或認同標誌所屬機構;亦不代表該機構支持或認同維基百科或維基媒體基金會。 (talk) 11:54, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

According to the U.S. copyright law, Fair use of low quality of Logo can be fine. As the logo is only used for represent the certain organization , product, activities, event or competition. For expected reasonable use of Logo, currently it doesn't exist copyright works.(talk) 12:17, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Fair use shizhao (talk) 00:55, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User contributions in spanish is only in her user page. Self promotion, low image quality, non enciclopedic value The Photographer (talk) 13:20, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Personal image of poor quality, and not used. Yann (talk) 13:38, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotion (contributions in spanish is only for her user page), low image quality. The Photographer (talk) 13:25, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 13:38, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:01, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of missing information Yükseliş (talk) 14:34, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader request. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:10, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's copyrighted and not owned by the uploader as they state. FruitMonkey (talk) 15:45, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Speedy deleted as copyvio. January (talk) 16:39, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Urheberrechtsverletzung 188.104.98.218 19:53, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Blatant copyright violation High Contrast (talk) 21:39, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is my picture and I want to withdraw it from Wikimedia GuidoGY (talk) 22:47, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Bad faith nomination. Please read Commons:Ownership of pages and files. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:04, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is my picture and I want to withdraw it from Wikimedia GuidoGY (talk) 22:47, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Bad faith nomination. Please read Commons:Ownership of pages and files. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:04, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is my picture and I want to withdraw it from Wikimedia GuidoGY (talk) 22:47, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Bad faith nomination. Please read Commons:Ownership of pages and files. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:04, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is my picture and I want to withdraw it from Wikimedia GuidoGY (talk) 22:48, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Bad faith nomination. Please read Commons:Ownership of pages and files. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:04, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is my picture and I want to withdraw it from Wikimedia GuidoGY (talk) 22:48, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Bad faith nomination. Please read Commons:Ownership of pages and files. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:04, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is my picture and I want to withdraw it from Wikimedia GuidoGY (talk) 22:48, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Bad faith nomination. Please read Commons:Ownership of pages and files. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:04, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyvio (low res, no exif, facebook filename) russavia (talk) 00:51, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 08:22, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyvio (low res, no exif, facebook filename) russavia (talk) 00:51, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Denniss (talk) 08:25, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ugly Yoga Satriya (talk) 13:22, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: kept for now but marked as "no license" JuTa 21:18, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

privacy reasons Electra1002 (talk) 19:11, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Unconsistent request. It's about a well known person in public place SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 11:06, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pardon my skepticism, but this photograph shows up all over Google Images. Can the uploader provide some sort of proof that he shot this photograph? Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:28, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete This is an image of the brazilian singer Paula Fernandes, but as said in the description in "Paula em DVD" or in english " Paula in DVD", this same image was used in a dvd cover and the source is stated as being the facebook of this singer. Tm (talk) 17:38, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by Denisss Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:30, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Will be replaced by a better one Movietech (talk) 11:53, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep This file is in use on multiple sister projects. The nominator hasn't uploaded any images, but if they are in possession of superior file they can just upload it as a new file and mark this one with the {{Superseded}} template and edit project pages to use the new image. —RP88 16:48, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Not an acceptable reason for deletion Sreejith K (talk) 20:39, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader seems not comfortable sharing his picture on grounds of privacy. I think it is a valid reason. The image is unused as well, so I believe we should honor his request. Sreejith K (talk) 15:21, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: I withdraw nomination. File in use. --Sreejith K (talk) 15:22, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Back of image not provided by the underlying source. Source noted that there was a "work sticker" on the back; a copyright notice might have been included on the sticker or otherwise noted on the reverse side. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 17:49, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The front of the photo includes all the authorship details and a printed description, which is where any notice would have been included.--Light show (talk) 18:15, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Uploader has to prove his claims but failed to do so, image does not comply with license -> gone Denniss (talk) 10:49, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of date or manner of publication, or even that publication occurred. Back of image not provided by source. This is simply an undated promotional image with no other information provided, and that is not a satisfactory basis from which to infer PD status. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 17:56, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is a publicity photo by a talent agency, normally included with press kits, and sent to the mass media to copy and freely use any of the information they want, including photos. The front of the photo includes a printed description of the subject and full agency authorship information, including their street address, which is naturally where any copyright notice would be printed.
U.S. Copyright Office definition of publication implies that the hard copy of the photo made for publicity purposes is thereby considered publication. Note also that such publicity photos, being intended to be freely copied, "have traditionally not been copyrighted." It would make little sense to send out such press kits with the hope that the media would reproduce them and then require that they first seek permission to reprint such a photo. Talent agencies are in the business of promoting their clients, not in selling photos to the press. --Light show (talk) 19:01, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Usual Wikiwatcher1 blurb, incomplete image so impossible to verify date and no notice claim Denniss (talk) 10:47, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyvio (low res, no exif, facebook filename) russavia (talk) 00:51, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 14:10, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyvio (low res, no exif, facebook filename) russavia (talk) 00:50, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 14:10, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyvio (low res, no exif, facebook filename) russavia (talk) 00:50, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 14:10, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyvio (low res, no exif, facebook filename) russavia (talk) 00:49, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 14:10, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyvio (low res, no exif, facebook filename) russavia (talk) 00:49, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 14:10, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal picture no educational value Wer?Du?! (talk) 00:49, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 14:09, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, and possible copyvio (the file name is in FB format) russavia (talk) 00:47, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nominator PierreSelim (talk) 09:01, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyvio (low res, no exif, facebook filename) russavia (talk) 00:49, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nominator PierreSelim (talk) 09:01, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

advertisement, low res, linkspam in en wikipedia Wer?Du?! (talk) 01:13, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 09:33, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Claimed as own work, but this is very unlikely; pic has been doing the rounds on the internet for a while... here it's "© 2013 The Interpretation of Dreams" bobrayner (talk) 12:37, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 09:32, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded as "own work" but actually copied from this site which is "© 2013 HUMAN RIGHTS AND SOCIAL JUSTICE MISSION" bobrayner (talk) 12:55, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Indeed Ymblanter (talk) 11:24, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's not "own work", it's a press photo copied from [2] with the copyright notice still on the bottom. bobrayner (talk) 12:55, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: all rights reserved Ymblanter (talk) 11:32, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotion.Non enciclopedical value The Photographer (talk) 16:01, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


  •  Comment Self-shots or personal photos are not "promotion" as covered by Commons:What Commons is not. The nomination is incorrect to identify this personal photo as such. "Encyclopaedic value" is a guideline on the English Wikipedia, but not on Commons, a nomination on this basis is incorrect. -- (talk) 16:19, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Personal photo, not used, out of scope. Yann (talk) 10:00, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low image quality, self promotion and non enciclopedic value The Photographer (talk) 16:23, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 09:57, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As this is a photograph of a screenshot at Comic Con, this is a derivative work Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:14, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per Derivative work without permission PierreSelim (talk) 09:05, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If you put the copyright sign, then it can't be used in Wikipedia Edgars2007 (talk) 22:35, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Needs a permission. Yann (talk) 09:58, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per source[3]: (C) Dan and Corina Lecca. Thereby the PD-USGov claim seems questionable. -- Túrelio (talk) 23:12, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Image comes from a blacklisted account according to flickr review bot. --Leoboudv (talk) 01:22, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Deleted by Fastily PierreSelim (talk) 09:04, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm sorry, but this is not covered by COM:FOP#Japan. JuTa 19:15, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. whym (talk) 02:55, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Useless redirect - file renamed --Rabanus Flavus (talk) 20:14, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 17:32, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect Page number reference. It should have been D369. — Ineuw 01:34, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 17:44, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Was missing djvu page number. Corrected by uploaded. — Ineuw 22:10, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 17:48, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

redirect page — Preceding unsigned comment added by Manojk (talk • contribs) 2013-11-15T18:18:36‎ (UTC)

 Comment: This redirect is still in use on ml:തൃക്കുറ്റിശ്ശേരി. --JuTa 20:23, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: unused now Denniss (talk) 17:50, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Imagen Privada. Promoción — ♫♫ Leitoxx   The Police ♪♪ — 11:56, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:16, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of svg Antemister (talk) 22:48, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: duplicate of svg  Ronhjones  (Talk) 01:21, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is my picture and I want to withdraw it from Wikimedia GuidoGY (talk) 22:46, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Bad faith nomination. Please read Commons:Ownership of pages and files. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:04, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is my picture and the person who refused my perfectly reasonable request (allowed under your own rules) to remove it did so clearly out of vindictiveness as I challenged him over the deletion of one of my other pics GuidoGY (talk) 00:48, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept Contrary to the assertion above, we do not, as a general rule, allow uploaders to have their images deleted. In this case, the image is in use, so our rules actually forbid deletion except for copyvio. Please do not nominate this again. Given the tone of your comments above, I also warn you that any action against this image, either here or on WP:EN will be treated as vandalism and may result in your being blocked from editing. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:11, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded as "own work". It seems extremely unlikely that Pitkin482 created Coventry United's logo. bobrayner (talk) 11:59, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Not "own work"  Ronhjones  (Talk) 01:13, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by JuTa as no license. The uploader added {{PD-USGov}} later. Is a diagram created by a private company used in an US patent realy a work of the US goverment? JuTa 10:37, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:14, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

advertisement, low res Wer?Du?! (talk) 01:06, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:10, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most likely fake license. The city authorities should be a copyright owner, not the uploader. Niklem (talk) 10:49, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:14, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright vio. Rapsar (talk) 09:44, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio  Ronhjones  (Talk) 01:11, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This edit is totally bogus: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Hhesse.png&diff=109789942&oldid=109715359. Assuming the source and author are correct, presumably only Jorma Komulainen can grant such rights to use this image, and there is no evidence that he has. Jmabel ! talk 19:00, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Hi, Jmabel,

now I had a look at your user-page and it is quite impressive really, especially there are some very good panoramic views. It makes my own stuff look pale in fact, because you have so much excellent content there. But it is also kind of boring, because there is no sex at all and I want to tell you plainly, that I am not interesten in you personally. So please respect users, that are lower in the wiki-hierarchy than yourself and stand off from vandalizing their pages. OK ? I use hugin to make panoramas by the way. It is not completely free software, but involves patent-protected technology. You use some commercial software on MacOS-X, I guess.

Lots of cheers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aglaeser (talk • contribs)

  • No, I use Hugin also to make my panoramas, and I do not own a Mac. But what does any of this have to do with this deletion request? And what did I do that you consider to be vandalizing a page? That's quite a charge. - Jmabel ! talk 07:56, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Jmabel, My experience withh CreativeCommons so far tells me, that content needs to have been published before elsewhere, so it can be re-published under a CC-license. This is the case here. The pictures from that more than 30 years old book would probably be in the public domain normally, because the GDR does not exist anymore and it is doubtful if the author of the work is still alive. So when I publish the pictures under CC, they authorship is honoured more than it would be the case in the public domain. This is why I feel there is no copyright-violation at all and you are trying to vandalize my online-appearence here. Kind regards Gläser

Holder of the copyright of the book was "(c) VEB Fotokinoverlag Leipzig 1977". This was a people-, i.e. state-owned company in the GDR, so the works really would be in the public domain today by any means. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aglaeser (talk • contribs)

Sehr geehrte Frau/Herr Gläser, wenn das Buch 1977 veröffentlicht wurde und Hermann Hesse in alten Jahren zeigt, ist es mit großer Wahrscheinlichkeit weder public domain noch gemeinfrei; in Deutschland ist üblicherweise der Urheber auch der Rechteinhaber; nach dem Tode des Urhebers werden große Teile vererbt und der Urheberrechtsschutz gilt in D. normalerweise für einen Zeitraum von 70 Jahren nach Tod des Urhebers. Ich bin kein Jurist, deshalb kann ich dazu auch nicht mehr sagen. Wenn Sie jedoch dieses Urheberrecht nicht geerbt haben, können Sie das Foto auch nicht unter einer freien Lizenz zur Verfügung stellen. Eine Lizenz (Nutzungsgenehmigung) kann nur der/die RechteinhaberIn ausstellen. Dieser Löschantrag bezieht sich ausschließlich auf urheberrechtliche Bedenken und hat nichts mit persönlichen Befindlichkeiten zu tun. Für Fragen stehen wir gern zur Verfügung.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen Rillke(q?) 18:40, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Rights probably belong to the photographer's heirs -- they last for 70 years after the death of the photographer. Nothing is PD just because the DDR is gone -- copyright in works made by the DDr government now are owned by the government of Germany, other works by their creators, or their heirs, according to German law. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:21, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad quality, not used and proposed by the créator Gratus (talk) 14:57, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

English: Bad quality, not used and deletation proposed by the créator
Français : Mauvaise qualité, non tilisé et suppression proposé par l'importateur.
--Gratus (talk) 14:55, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Should be typeset, not an image .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:09, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Wer?Du?! (talk) 01:04, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:10, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

advertisement, low res Wer?Du?! (talk) 01:06, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:10, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, screenshot fron u-tube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nl6tuXMsUJ4 Wer?Du?! (talk) 01:39, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:10, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Image copied from BBC; uploader does not appear to be BBC and does not appear to have permission from them... bobrayner (talk) 11:41, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright BBC - no permission  Ronhjones  (Talk) 01:12, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Image copied from BBC; uploader does not appear to be BBC and does not appear to have permission from them... bobrayner (talk) 11:40, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright BBC - no permission  Ronhjones  (Talk) 01:12, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This work is not in the public domain in the United States because its copyright in the U.S. was restored by the URAA as it was still copyrighted in its source country on the URAA date (January 1 1996 in most cases but see Wikipedia:Non-U.S. copyrights for details). In most cases, it is copyrighted in the U.S. until 95 years after the year in which it was initially published (exceptions are works published after 1977; see Commons:Hirtle chart).

Images whose copyright was restored in the U.S. by the URAA are no longer accepted at Wikimedia Commons. New files should not be uploaded with this tag, or they will be deleted. A review of files is currently underway to verify that this template has been applied correctly to existing files. Files that are copyrighted in the US and that have not been released under a free license will be deleted. If you are the copyright holder of this file, and do not wish to have it hosted on Commons, please contact our designated agent or nominate the file for deletion, explaining the situation.

I'm the uploader, so I ask for its deletion.--Roblespepe (talk) 16:41, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:22, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Usunięcie fotografii na prośbę autora. Cezary Milos (talk) 11:14, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: We do not generally remove images at the request of the uploader -- the license is forever. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:15, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Niniejszy plik narusza wizerunek firmy. Prośbę o usunięcie zgłasza autor zdjęcia. Cezary Milos (talk) 11:11, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: We do not remove images at the request of the subject. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:15, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am sending file which I haven't permission to publish. I do not have copyright. Ich habe keine Urheberrechte — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cezary Milos (talk • contribs) 2013-12-09T00:32:16‎ (UTC)


Deleted: per COM:PRP. INeverCry 18:05, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by JuTa as no license. The uploader added {{PD-USGov}} later. Is a diagram created by a private company used in an US patent realy a work of the US goverment? JuTa 10:38, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:14, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted: as per [4]. Yann (talk) 20:17, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is not useful Marquishaj (talk) 05:33, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:12, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

derivative of the lower photo on the display/board. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:08, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What? What you mean? I took this picture when I was in Greece. Proudbolsahye (talk) 09:16, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The photo on the display is obviously recent and thereby still copyrighted. Greece has no exemption from copyright for public works. Thereby, your photo violates the copyright of the photographer who created the photo on the display. --Túrelio (talk) 09:19, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:13, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The painter died in 1982[5] whereby his works are still copyrighted (til 2052). In addition, this photo is said to have been shot in 1935, whereby the uploader can hardly be the photographer. -- Túrelio (talk) 19:43, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Same problem with:


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:22, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probably derivative of copyrighted work 4ing (talk) 19:52, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Derrivitive of http://www.lacrememagazine.co.uk/2011/10/sir-paul-mccartney-marries-nancy-shevell/  Ronhjones  (Talk) 01:18, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio; photo of copyrighted poster Sushiya (talk) 05:06, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:11, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by JuTa as no license. The uploaded added {{PD-USGov}} later. Is a diagram created by a private company used in an US patent realy a work of the US goverment? JuTa 10:34, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:13, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted: as per [6]. Yann (talk) 20:17, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by JuTa as no license. The uploadedr added {{PD-USGov}} later. Is a diagram created by a private company used in an US patent realy a work of the US goverment? JuTa 10:36, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:14, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyvio (low res, no exif) russavia (talk) 00:50, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:10, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by JuTa as no license. The uploaded added {{PD-USGov}} later. Is a diagram created by a private company used in an US patent realy a work of the US govermnt? JuTa 10:28, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:13, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted: as per [7]. Yann (talk) 20:17, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Andreas.zei (talk · contribs)

[edit]

As photos of 3-dimensional artwork, permission from the artist to release the photos under a Commons-compatible license is required. Please have the artist submit permission through Commons:OTRS within a reasonable period of time to avoid having these deleted.

Davidwr (talk) 01:55, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:11, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zhdl889 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

very likely copyvio, "source: internet"...

Wer?Du?! (talk) 01:00, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvios PierreSelim (talk) 09:01, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded as "own work", but seems to be copied from [8] which is "© COPYRIGHT 2013, TERRA NETWORKS BRASIL S.A." bobrayner (talk) 12:31, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 11:22, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Although the uploader says he is a poet and writer, Google does not come up with any relevant hits. Therefore I think that the gallery and all the images should be deleted. Commons is not Facebook.

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:45, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, Arthur Panov it's poet and writer, but he famous only in Ukraine and Russia, therefore unlikely you will be able to find something about him to foreign sites. Ladypank (talk) 13:33, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

We're surprisingly good at using Google Translate and using our Russian and Ukranian speaking community members. Please show us proof of notability in Ukraine and Russia. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 13:39, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
http://cyclowiki.org/wiki/Артур_Алексеевич_Панов, http://www.stihi.ru/avtor/arthurpanov, http://vsevesti.com/go/ru/article/id/1172902/artur-panov-ne-nado-zhiti-mechtami.html, http://nastasya94.livejournal.com/598.html - I will soon add more links. Ladypank (talk) 17:40, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
http://www.inter-view.org/man/4002.htm, http://lyricstranslate.com/en/concrete-angel-истинный-ангел.html Ladypank (talk) 20:00, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps I am too cynical, but all of the links above-- translated by Google -- look to me like promotion of a 15 year old boy and not independent reviews and indications of notability.
Our uploader has singlehandedly created an article in WP:UK on the subject. That article is tagged for deletion, but the Google translation of the discussion is not useful. I have asked the person who tagged it to comment here (he shows EN-2). It seems to me that if WP:UK does not want an article on the subject, then Commons need not keep images of him. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:14, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure about Commons, but Arthur Panov exactly does not meet in Ukrainian Wikipedia. Links given by Ladypank are mostly blogs and wiki sites (for example, cyclowiki.org which even allows create articles without notability criteria), I (as uk-N speaker) do not see any reliable sources, any proof of notability in Ukraine and especially in Russia. --Aced (talk) 22:53, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

https://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/Артур_Панов - If it is fair, I generally mistakenly added on Coomons this page because I thought that it is required for each person whether it be a writer or a musician, etc. Ukrainian Wikipedia article on about the person needs to be improved. Still have moment, but I do not want to specify in the article. Arthur is a relative Svetlana Oakley - https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Оклей,_Светлана_Викторовна. Ladypank (talk) 11:40, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Clearly needs to be deleted, but it is may be reasonable to wait until the Ukrainian Wikipedia article gets deleted (it is well on their way with eight deletes and one keep, unsurprisingly by Ladypank).--Ymblanter (talk) 11:20, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It was already deleted at sr: sr:Артур Панов. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:29, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 20:33, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and superseded by better-quality File:Aiga groundtransportation inv.svg. Alkari (?), 16 November 2013, 21:48 UTC 21:48, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:45, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and superseded by better-quality File:Aiga taxi inv.svg. Alkari (?), 16 November 2013, 21:46 UTC 21:46, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:45, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo Sreejith K (talk) 15:56, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:41, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User contributions is only in his user page. Self promotion The Photographer (talk) 18:51, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:42, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User contributions is only in his user page. Self promotion The Photographer (talk) 18:51, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:42, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotion, low quality image, non encyclopedic value. Commons is not Facebook The Photographer (talk) 18:47, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:42, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotion, low quality image, non encyclopedic value. Commons is not Facebook The Photographer (talk) 18:47, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:42, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I doubt the uploader created this image Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:10, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:40, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo, outside scope of project Mercurywoodrose (talk) 18:45, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:42, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio: http://www.klammehand.be/leuven/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=6&Itemid=18 EvilFreD overleg 18:38, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:43, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded as "own work" but apparently copied from this site which is "Copyright © Madison Solutions 2011-2013. All Rights Reserved." bobrayner (talk) 13:01, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:36, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation: http://www.studyblue.com/notes/note/n/late-antiquity/deck/6112851. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:04, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:39, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of COM:SCOPE; unused self-portrait of user. -- Túrelio (talk) 23:14, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:45, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sef promotion, non enciclopedic value The Photographer (talk) 16:05, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 20:41, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very likely not User:Rathish Ravi's own work High Contrast (talk) 21:48, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:45, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Empty, useless image Torsch (talk) 17:13, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:43, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low image quality The Photographer (talk) 18:41, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:43, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Null enciclopedic value The Photographer (talk) 12:12, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:34, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Imagen privada. Posible promoción — ♫♫ Leitoxx   The Police ♪♪ — 11:57, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:34, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very low qualiyt, not in use Antemister (talk) 16:33, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:41, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo, out of scope Mercurywoodrose (talk) 19:01, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:43, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo, out of scope Mercurywoodrose (talk) 19:02, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:43, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no fop in italy FunkMonk (talk) 13:44, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:39, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no fop in italy FunkMonk (talk) 13:43, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:39, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

On the picture is not Gideon Defoe: http://www.zimbio.com/photos/Gideon+Defoe/Pirates+Adventure+Scientists+UK+Premiere/kv7JJVHjZVW Carniolus (talk) 15:01, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:40, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotion, low image quality, commons is not facebook The Photographer (talk) 18:42, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:43, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded as "own work" but apparently copied from this site which is © 2013 Todos los derechos reservados. bobrayner (talk) 12:59, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:35, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality artwork, out of scope. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 19:02, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:43, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is not User:JuergenBeer's own work - maybe some PD license applies? High Contrast (talk) 21:56, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:45, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons is not Facebook. self promotion The Photographer (talk) 16:25, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:41, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Professional portrait, no EXIF, copies on the web (but smaller). Yann (talk) 13:38, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:39, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User contributions is only his user page. Self promotion The Photographer (talk) 13:10, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:37, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, useless, no cat, no encyclopedic value, etc F (talk) 20:31, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:44, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded as "own work" but appears to be a professional photo from here, which is "©2013 Sarkaritel.com" bobrayner (talk) 12:43, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:35, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons is not facebook. Self promotion and low image quality (cut, and not shap) The Photographer (talk) 13:35, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:39, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo, out of scope (and why do people place images in Category:Biographies?) Mercurywoodrose (talk) 18:58, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:42, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional photo for non-notable actor, which makes these images beyond Commons:Project scope. The en.wiki article for Matt Kohler has been deleted 3 times, with the most recent AFD not even close. Thus, these promotional photos are essentially personal imags, and Commons is not flickr. --GrapedApe (talk) 14:07, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:40, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

something went wrong with the upload, please delete the file CFCF (talk) 18:52, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:42, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file must be deleted because is protected by copyright. The author, Luis Moglia Barth died in 1984.--Roblespepe (talk) 15:06, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:44, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons is not facebook. Self promotion and low image quality The Photographer (talk) 13:34, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:39, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotion, low image quality (motion blur and cut), Commons is not facebook The Photographer (talk) 13:23, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:38, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotion, low quality image and non enciclopedic value The Photographer (talk) 14:07, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:40, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, no educational value Torsch (talk) 17:15, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:43, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded as "own work" but apparently copied from this site which is Copyright © 2013 — Tehelka.com. All Rights Reserved bobrayner (talk) 13:08, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:37, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out scope, not an 'own work'. Abiyoyo (talk) 17:23, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Out of score. St1995 23:31, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 20:43, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotion, commons is not facebook The Photographer (talk) 18:45, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:43, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Dominican Republic. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:42, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:43, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotion, low image quality, Commons is not Facebook The Photographer (talk) 18:44, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:43, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low image quality, self promotion and non enciclopedic value The Photographer (talk) 16:06, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:41, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low image quality and Self promotion The Photographer (talk) 18:40, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:43, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non encyclopedic value. Low image quality. Commons is not Facebook The Photographer (talk) 18:39, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:43, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotion, low quality image, non enciclopedic value The Photographer (talk) 13:13, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:38, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotion, low quality image The Photographer (talk) 13:22, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:38, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The same as File:Sanitätsakademie.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.104.49.210 (talk • contribs) 2013-11-13T18:49:26‎ (UTC)

That's correct - delete -- L' empereur Charles (talk) 09:20, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 20:42, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotion, non enciclopedic value. The Photographer (talk) 13:18, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:38, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality image, self promotion, non enciclopedic value The Photographer (talk) 13:06, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:37, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Uploaded 4 months ago, still no use. Yann (talk) 13:29, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:39, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non enciclopedic value, self promotion The Photographer (talk) 13:06, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:37, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation . Not the uploaders work 188.104.98.218 13:22, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:38, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This seems to be a "legacy upload" of 2005 with insufficient permission. Uploader wrote "Dieses Gruppenbild wurde der Wikipedia freundlicherweise von Volker Reiche persönlich zur Verfügung gestellt" - i.e. that Volker Reiche (the artist) has given permission for Wikipedia, but there's no proof that he agreed to release his work under a free license (such as the GFDL chosen by the uploader) allowing (commercial) re-use, derivative works etc. Gestumblindi (talk) 23:47, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:45, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

extremely blurred image => useless Torsch (talk) 17:16, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:43, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Empty, useless image Torsch (talk) 17:16, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:43, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparent copyright violation; uploaded as "own work" but seems to be copied from here, which is "© This Website belongs to Rajbhawan Uttarakhand (India)" bobrayner (talk) 12:45, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:35, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparent copyright violation; uploaded as "own work" but appears to be copied from here, which is "© 2013 Greynium Information Technologies Pvt. Ltd." bobrayner (talk) 12:46, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:35, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotion, low quality image, non enciclopedic value The Photographer (talk) 13:13, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:38, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry, can't be used —Justin (koavf)TCM 18:10, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:43, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture uploaded without permission of Deutsche Fotothek. The pic is copyright protected and not part of the co-operation of Commons and Deutsche Fotothek. See disk on de.wp - https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benutzer_Diskussion:Drdoht#Foto_Walter_K.C3.B6nig for a similar case with request of uploader to delete the pic. Paulae (talk) 11:18, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:34, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotion, non enciclopedic value The Photographer (talk) 13:27, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:39, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotion, low quality image, non enciclopedic value The Photographer (talk) 13:15, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:38, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotion, low quality image, non enciclopedic value The Photographer (talk) 13:13, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:38, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality image, self promotion The Photographer (talk) 13:11, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:38, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotion, low quality image and non enciclopedic value The Photographer (talk) 14:08, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 20:40, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotion, low quality image and non enciclopedic value The Photographer (talk) 14:09, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 20:40, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotion, low quality image and non enciclopedic value The Photographer (talk) 14:09, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 20:40, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotion and low quality image The Photographer (talk) 13:03, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:36, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotion, Commons is not facebook and non enciclopedic value The Photographer (talk) 14:08, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:40, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotion, low image quality. Non enciclopedic value The Photographer (talk) 16:02, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:41, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality image (over exposed) and self promotion The Photographer (talk) 13:02, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:36, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotion and non enciclopedic value The Photographer (talk) 13:04, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:36, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotion, low quality image, non enciclopedic value The Photographer (talk) 13:15, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:38, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons is not facebook. Self promotion and low image quality The Photographer (talk) 13:35, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:39, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotion, low quality image and non enciclopedic value The Photographer (talk) 14:08, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:40, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotion, null enciclopedic value. The Photographer (talk) 13:18, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:38, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotion, low quality image, non enciclopedic value The Photographer (talk) 13:13, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:38, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spanish contributions is only for his user page (self promotion in use page). Self promotion and low image quality, non enciclopedic value The Photographer (talk) 13:38, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:39, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality image. Self promotion, non enciclopedic value The Photographer (talk) 13:01, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:36, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotion, low quality image, non enciclopedic value The Photographer (talk) 13:13, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:38, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons is not facebook. Self promotion and low image quality The Photographer (talk) 13:37, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:39, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotion, low quality image, non enciclopedic value The Photographer (talk) 13:15, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:38, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User contributions is only his user page. Self promotion The Photographer (talk) 13:10, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:38, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User contributions is only his user page. Self promotion The Photographer (talk) 13:09, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:37, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

his person d'ont autorize this photo — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.161.121.110 (talk • contribs) 2013-11-13T13:09:12‎ (UTC)


Deleted -FASTILY 09:04, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate file Antemister (talk) 12:52, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 09:04, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low-quality version Antemister (talk) 12:54, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 09:04, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate file Antemister (talk) 12:53, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 09:04, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ist kein Ginko - Trompetenbaum nach Hinweis von user! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Geri-oc (talk • contribs) 2013-11-10T08:29:58‎ (UTC)

Bitte komplette Seite (Datei) löschen - neu unter File:Trompetenbaum im Heilsberger Park Freital-Hainsberg.jpg!--Geri-oc (talk) 14:00, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 09:04, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Soy el autor del archivo y solicito su eliminación. Rod6807 (talk) 19:24, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 09:04, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no source given. As it is unlikely that the Mali empire had a modern-Style flag, one can assume that this image was entirely created by the uploader. Any use of it is misleading Antemister (talk) 12:41, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 09:04, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate file Antemister (talk) 12:51, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 09:04, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate file Antemister (talk) 12:53, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 09:04, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate file, not in use... Antemister (talk) 12:50, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 09:04, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

as an exact duplicate Antemister (talk) 12:47, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 09:04, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate file Antemister (talk) 13:05, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 09:04, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no cultural heritage; uploaded before the start of the competition — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kiril Simeonovsk (talk • contribs) 2013-11-07T00:11:59‎ (UTC)


Deleted -FASTILY 09:05, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bild ist noch nicht gemeinfrei, da der Maler noch nicht 70 Jahre tot ist--Michael Sander (Diskussion) 20:30, 3 November 2013 (UTC)


Deleted -FASTILY 09:05, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Other Wiki user loaded same file with better media and info (see: File:Karl Witkowski - Guarding the flower basket.jpg) Mopialex (talk) 13:33, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Now redirect. Yann (talk) 14:03, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no source given. As it is unlikely that the Mali empire had a modern-Style flag, one can assume that this image was entirely created by the uploader. Any use of it is misleading Antemister (talk) 12:40, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 09:05, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no source given. As it is unlikely that the Mali empire had a modern-Style flag, one can assume that this image was entirely created by the uploader. Any use of it is misleading Antemister (talk) 12:40, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 09:05, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

miscolored duplicate Antemister (talk) 12:42, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 09:05, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The portrait represents Charles Couperin, see http://www.artchive.com/web_gallery/C/Claude-Lefebvre/Portrait-of-Charles-Couperin-1638-79-and-the-Daughter-of-the-Artist-1665-79.html, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Claude_Lefebvre_1632-1675,_Charles_II_Couperin,_organiste,_et_la_fille_de_Claude_Lefebvre._Versailles_et_Trianon.jpg and https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Lefebvre_Charles_Couperin.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fabio Matteo (talk • contribs) 2013-11-12T17:07:02‎ (UTC)


Deleted -FASTILY 09:05, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of the svg Antemister (talk) 16:34, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 09:05, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This logo as it is here is copyrighted. No fair use on the Commons as far as i know 188.104.98.218 13:24, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Too complex for PD-textlogo. Yann (talk) 14:04, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate file Antemister (talk) 12:51, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 09:05, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

soem duplicate of File:Nr Tumoujgha.gif, which does not have a source Antemister (talk) 12:44, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:33, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no source given. As it is unlikely that the Mali empire had a modern-Style flag, one can assume that this image was entirely created by the uploader. Any use of it is misleading Antemister (talk) 12:41, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Fry1989 eh? 22:03, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Why?--Antemister (talk) 22:49, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per nom. INeverCry 03:33, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no source given. As it is unlikely that the Mali empire had a modern-Style flag, one can assume that this image was entirely created by the uploader. Any use of it is misleading Antemister (talk) 12:41, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

National flags as we think of them today barely existed before the late 18th century, yet there were abundant naval ensigns, military banners, and royal standards... AnonMoos (talk) 13:17, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: In use. INeverCry 03:31, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

someone re-added this flag to one article after I removed it. Both duplicate were deleted as purely fictional flags Antemister (talk) 17:27, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't give any evidence that the flag was fictional before... AnonMoos (talk) 22:41, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Djibril Tamsir Niane, Recherches sur l'Empire du Mali au Moyen Age, Recherches africaines . No. 1, janvier 1959. p. 6-56 - «Les couleurs de ce Sultan, dit Ibn Hadjib, informateur d'Ibn Fal Al Omari, sont jaunes sur fond rouge. Quand il est à cheval, on fait flotter sur sa tête les étendards royaux qui sont de grands drapeaux » (Al Omari, page 72). Translation (approximatly) : The colors of this Sultan, says Ibn hadjib, who informs Fal Ibn Al Omari, are yellow on red background. When he rides his horse, he has on his head, two larges flags with these royal colors.. Another flag, with more sources, was already removed form French Wikipedia because the file was removed from Wikimedia Commons. Mali is a French-speaking country, please look at the French WP before remove a file linked to a French article. I don't have enough time to replace the destroyed work.--Monsieur Fou (talk) 12:34, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
But that were, in fact, the colors of the sultan, and not the "Flag of mali empire". And there war no source. Admins, please delete this file and restore File:Drapeau imperial du mali 1.svg. Monsieur Fou, please then add this article as source there. Is there only this verbal description, or also an image?--Antemister (talk) 13:05, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Dude, look above -- there were hardly any national flags as we know them today before the late 18th century. There has never really been an official law declaring the Union Jack to be the national flag of the UK on land ("No law has been passed making the Union Jack the national flag of the United Kingdom") -- does that mean that File:Flag of the United Kingdom.svg should be renamed "Naval Jack of the United Kingdom.svg", and be deleted from all Wikipedia articles in all non-naval contexts?? -- AnonMoos (talk) 09:36, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, and  Keep in light of Monsieur_Fou's comments... AnonMoos (talk) 09:40, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, unused fictional flag -- out of scope. If someone finds a use for it however, I'll restore the svg version on request -FASTILY 08:06, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please delete this page. I am a video editor and I have tested one of my client's video on this page. And now, my client, the real owner of this video, ask me to delete this video from wiki commons. Thank you for help. Freeryde007 (talk) 17:02, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please delete this page. I am a video editor and I have tested one of my client's video on this page. And now, my client, the real owner of this video, ask me to delete this video from wiki commons. Thank you for help. William billy boy (talk) 05:09, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Assume good faith and accept the uploader's request. The Yeti 15:38, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Suspect behavior by nominator, possibly a spurious DR. I propose further investigation of the issue. The Yeti 00:14, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete And block this user for a while to give him spare time enough to read the conditions that must be met upon uploading. -- Tuválkin 12:16, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for deletion of video. Freeryde007 23:14, 21 November 2013

Deleted: INeverCry 03:30, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Null enciclopedic value The Photographer (talk) 12:15, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

How illustrate an article with a blank wall?. It is the only picture of the category not get to read anything. --The Photographer (talk) 14:14, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per nom, it's a blank wall. INeverCry 03:31, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User contributions is only his user page. Self promotion The Photographer (talk) 13:10, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Also, this: File:PendienteChe.jpg. -- Tuválkin 13:33, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 03:34, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicity to Category:Waldstätten family. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jid (talk • contribs) 2013-11-16T19:08:18‎ (UTC)

Please empty this category, so it can be deleted. Yann (talk) 14:05, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Empty cat now Bonkers The Clown (talk) 03:40, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Related file: File:Harut sassounian.pdf

The copyright holder of this file seems to be Erol Gurian (http://www.gurian.de/) as the exif says. I contacted him and he replied "hello - yes i own the copyright to this image". JKadavoor Jee 15:08, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Update: Erol agreed to provide permission through COM:OTRS. So please do the necessary steps. JKadavoor Jee 15:41, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, that's funny, I had contacted him too this morning and asked him to reply to OTRS. --Túrelio (talk) 16:42, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It is an FPC at EN now, so no wonder if it attracts more eyes. And it seems this is the first upload from the uploader claiming "own work". :) JKadavoor Jee 17:03, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Missing permission. If you are the uploader, please email OTRS FASTILY 09:52, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Several photographs appear in this collage. The source and author information of every image used in this collage is missing or is insufficient. High Contrast (talk) 22:09, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment See the annotations in the image. You did not given any info about the smaller images used in the Wiki Ball. --High Contrast (talk) 22:59, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You are right. I will ask roni in He:wiki. Hanay (talk) 12:00, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Please provide source and license for each of the images included. If not done, then delete. Thanks, Yann (talk) 14:06, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: It's been two weeks, and we still don't have sufficient source information. FASTILY 09:53, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]