Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2013/11/12

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive November 12th, 2013
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Delete as likely Flickrwashing: This Flickr user only has two uploads, both of which are here. I could be wrong but I've spent quite a while looking very carefully at the many different color specks (maybe washing drying or other material) and vegitation on both images for differences but I cannot see any between this image and another Flickr image that is "All rights reserved" http://www.flickr.com/photos/23617101@N07/5457982596/sizes/o/in/photostream/ except for the copping and digital colour and enlargment enhancements. Ww2censor (talk) 00:09, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 15:35, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Restored by Fastily - see COM:UNDEL --JuTa 22:00, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, and/or no source. -mattbuck (Talk) 01:14, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo about unidentified person. No description, unused, categorised into Category:Men. Taivo (talk) 10:42, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unsourced and unattributed. We do have the Royal Coat of Arms of the UK in SVG format. Fry1989 eh? 01:52, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 23:21, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted newspapers. küñall (nütramyen) 03:39, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, no permission from newspaper. Taivo (talk) 11:20, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private picture of user, out of project scope. Martin H. (talk) 03:55, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:07, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation; newspapers are copyrighted. küñall (nütramyen) 03:55, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:20, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted newspaper küñall (nütramyen) 03:56, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, no permission from newspaper. Taivo (talk) 11:22, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted newspapers. küñall (nütramyen) 03:56, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, no permission from newspaper. Taivo (talk) 11:24, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Belarus Altenmann (talk) 05:42, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is just a picture of a statue. There's no reason to remove it.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.10.166.171 (talk • contribs)


 Deleted, just a pictures of statues from Belarus are not allowed in Commons. Please look COM:FOP#Belarus. Taivo (talk) 11:29, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

por que solo estaba viendo como subir Aldo gamaliel (talk) 06:23, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, by Fastily. Taivo (talk) 11:46, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Iran. -- Dalba 07:08, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:17, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lower-resolution version of File:View of High Level Bridge, Edmonton, from Queen Elizabeth Park.jpg, seems identical otherwise. —Odysseus1479 (talk) 07:58, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:02, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Useless without a description. Probably a portrait of the uploader. 91.66.153.214 09:15, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, probably he is not Belgian F1 racer en:Patrick Néve. Taivo (talk) 11:37, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's a derivative work of an unpublished phograph by an unknown author from a family archive Evil Russian (talk) 09:26, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Согласен, фото ранее нигде не обнародовано, автор неизвестен, можно удалить быстро.--Dogad75 (talk) 10:25, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, cut out from 30-s newspaper. Taivo (talk) 12:29, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo about non-notable person (no mention in en.wiki), the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 09:36, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, there exists a world outside en.wiki and Commons. Taivo (talk) 12:18, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no permission, © 2013 Concejalía de Turismo 91.66.153.214 09:43, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:34, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No educational purpose. Use of commons as repository of personal photos. The team was deleted at ptwiki as non-notable. OTAVIO1981 (talk) 11:26, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:38, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No educational purpose. Use of commons as repository of personal photos. The team was deleted at ptwiki as non-notable. Low quality picture. OTAVIO1981 (talk) 11:28, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, awfully blurry. Taivo (talk) 11:58, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Es ist keine Zustimmung der abgebildeten Person zur Veröffentlichung des Fotos nachvollziehbar dargestellt. Die abgebildete Person ist keine Person des öffentlichen Lebens und somit verletzt die Veröffentlichung ohne nachvollziehbare Einwilligung das recht der abgebildeten Person am eigenen Bild. Weissbier (talk) 11:52, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, by Reinhard Kraasch. Taivo (talk) 12:02, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

user request ; {Superseded by Rapide Nord A4B4 LS.jpg Asp. (talk) 12:31, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:04, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The same as File:גלעד אפרת.JPG Hanay (talk) 12:34, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:07, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

What appears to be a low quality selfie Gbawden (talk) 12:35, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused distorted file (138×200 px). Exists bigger file without distortion (File:Picture of Ariel Marcelo.jpg). Taivo (talk) 12:11, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, the uploader's only contribution. But beautiful woman. Taivo (talk) 12:48, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No interest at all for the Wikimedia projects - uploaded for ego polishing reasons only MathsPoetry (talk) 15:44, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:51, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Russia. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:46, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, no freedom of panorama in Russia. Taivo (talk) 11:57, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Russia. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:47, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, no freedom of panorama in Russia. Taivo (talk) 12:12, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Russia. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:47, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, no freedom of panorama in Russia. Taivo (talk) 12:15, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Russia. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:48, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:19, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Deleted, clearly incorrect map. Taivo (talk) 12:12, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

JPG version uploaded at File:John Terry 18-10-2008 1.jpg. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:55, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 17:50, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture witch is probably copyvio see http://www.francoisloos.fr/ Mattho69 (talk) 00:21, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 10:38, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtful that user has copyright given that this is the same or equivalent photo as album cover: http://www.amazon.co.jp/gp/customer-media/product-gallery/B0038LAJOK/ref=cm_ciu_pdp_images_0?ie=UTF8&index=0&isremote=0 Michitaro (talk) 00:57, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 10:37, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, no feces Taivo (talk) 09:08, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 10:07, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo about non-notable person Taivo (talk) 09:24, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 10:40, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is copyrighted book cover. I am not sure, that the uploader Victor B. Larsson is author of the book or cover illustration. Taivo (talk) 09:32, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete - Copyright violation --Sreejith K (talk) 16:16, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 10:08, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused user portrait 91.66.153.214 09:37, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 10:08, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Motopark (talk) 14:30, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 10:44, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A a milf at it's finest !!!!! Out Of scope. Tarawneh (talk) 14:33, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 10:44, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web site. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:16, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 10:45, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

JPG version uploaded at File:Luiz Felipe Scolari 18-10-2008 1.jpg. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:58, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:22, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

JPG version uploaded at File:Afonso Alves 18-10-2008 2.jpg. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:09, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:24, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation - version of this image appears on the subject's website, low resolution, no EXIF, only upload, initial version an article about the guy. -mattbuck (Talk) 17:10, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 10:48, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

JPG version uploaded at File:John Johnson 18-10-2008 1.jpg. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:16, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:26, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that the cross is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 17:56, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Publicly used cross - set for Public veneration - in a public ceremony - in a public setting - upload stays. ΙΣΧΣΝΙΚΑ-888 (talk) 03:55, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Per COM:FOP#Canada, the depicted object must be on permanent display in a public space or a public building. There is no evidence that this cross meets this criterion. On the opposite, the image description says: "set for special veneration on the feast day." --Eleassar (t/p) 07:36, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It most definitely meets the criterion because it is permanently situated in a public place -- Per COM:FOP#Canada: "...is permanently situated in a public place or building". The parish is officially and legally a public place and the cross is publicly utilized there regularly every week. ΙΣΧΣΝΙΚΑ-888 (talk) 14:32, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 10:49, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo. No value for Commons 178.7.227.18 19:39, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 10:58, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very bad quality, unused, and no clue whether this is correct at all. Yikrazuul (talk) 20:53, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete Would be replaceable by en:File:Lincomycin synth.png as soon as it's copied from en.wp, which is higher quality and in use in the relevant en.wp article. Though both are incorrect for the methylthiolincosamide reactant (someone read dead-end bonds as C (and therefore methyl groups) following standard implicit structural rules rather than as "H" often used in Haworth projections). DMacks (talk) 22:22, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per discussion. Leyo 11:02, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unsuitable quality, better take this. Yikrazuul (talk) 21:00, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Leyo 11:03, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scan w/o permission, unused anyway. Yikrazuul (talk) 21:04, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom and the poor quality. Leyo 11:15, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scan w/o permission, unsued anyway. Yikrazuul (talk) 21:05, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom and the poor quality. Leyo 11:16, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio. Rezonansowy (talk) 22:08, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 11:00, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unuseful file Banfield - Amenazas aquí 23:46, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Fastily. Yann (talk) 11:00, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

combined copyright violation of three website logos Hindustanilanguage (talk) 15:46, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: These are all PD-text logo -- speedy keep.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 23:27, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unneded file mosaic. Rezonansowy (talk) 21:57, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Since we have {{Multiple image}}, we should avoid file mosaics like this. Especially, when are {{Bad JPG}}. --Rezonansowy (talk) 10:50, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. In English Wikipedia, yes, we have. Other wikis in which it is used, I don't know. Be that as it may, Commons cannot decide the fate of other wikis; cannot just ruin their article and leave them to vie for themselves. It is free, they are using it and there is no mandate on deleting what is perceived as low-quality. If they stop using it, that would be another matter. Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 12:03, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Just check its data item languages section. I've replaced this with template on one article. --Rezonansowy (talk) 15:51, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept This is in use, therefore it cannot be deleted except as a copyvio. This is a speedy keep. Certainly it would be better if everyone used {{Multiple image}} but we've all got better things to do than try to teach 25,000,000 users to do it our way. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:12, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

superseded by Meyrueis-15th century.jpg Delarb (talk) 07:45, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I corrected the filename. Taivo (talk) 11:56, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images depicting works of sculpture, buildings, or 2D artworks in Russia, which are still copyright protected. There is no Panorama Freedom in Russia.

A.Savin 18:09, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, Amen.Ymblanter (talk) 19:20, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-free logos which would likely meet COM:TOO in India, given that country's British legal system

russavia (talk) 05:37, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is not a simple logo. Taivo (talk) 11:26, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aichaaicha (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:17, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:37, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Akmal250 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 13:02, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alvaro Lepra (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 10:47, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by B Levin13 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

User already uploaded same images in SVG format.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:56, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Restored by Fastily per COM:UNDEL. --JuTa 22:03, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by B Levin13 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Hello, I am nominating these files for deletion because they did not render consistently or correctly. I uploaded these images as .svg images as they are preferred to .png, but the images in many cases do appear correctly. On a less but still important note, the images that are "correct" were not consistent in styling to the other images on the page. This lack of consistency made the page more difficult to read. These images will need to be replaced with .png or correct/consistent .svg.

B Levin13 (talk) 17:22, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Uploader requested -FASTILY 20:23, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Itallosouza2 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No educational purpose. Use of commons as repository of personal photos. The team was deleted at ptwiki as non-notable.

OTAVIO1981 (talk) 11:36, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of COM:SCOPE -- Steinsplitter (talk) 09:28, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Luciana Xavier Mathias (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. File:67114 176892872340290 240289 n (2).jpg (uploaded in 07.2013) available in b&w via http://danbenjamin.blogspot.de/2012/07/andressa-oliveira-by-daniel-benjamin.html (2012, credit: "by Daniel Benjamin") = http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-9uC0ElkNK8k/T_NysvBo-qI/AAAAAAAAAfo/ehb_fF1GquM/s1600/andressa1.jpg (exif available).

Gunnex (talk) 13:00, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 10:43, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by User:ELOYB

[edit]

Here are both files, uploaded by user ELOYB and not yet presented for deletion:

They are raw text files, out of scope. Taivo (talk) 09:40, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 10:09, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by User:MachucaStars

[edit]

Here are all files, uploaded by user MachucaStars and not yet presented for deletion:

They have all nonsense description and are unused and out of scope. Taivo (talk) 11:40, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:29, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by User:Mattythewhite

[edit]

User Mattythewhite has uploaded these photos:

There are better photos about both men. Taivo (talk) 11:50, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 10:42, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wlwatk (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not the uploader's own work as claimed. Non-free photos taken by various professional photographers, as evidenced by the files' metadata.

LX (talk, contribs) 19:20, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 10:57, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File states it was published in the La Tercera newspaper in August 1994. Copyvio. küñall (nütramyen) 03:51, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Ymblanter (talk) 13:43, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is still from an anime. I think, that this is copyrighted. Taivo (talk) 09:05, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Ymblanter (talk) 13:47, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: no evidence that this sculpture is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 16:07, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, strange sculpture, but I consider that nevertheless a sculpture. Taivo (talk) 11:49, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

JPG version uploaded at File:Ray Wilkins 18-10-2008 1.jpg. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:06, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:45, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unsuitable quality, better take this. Yikrazuul (talk) 21:02, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Seconded. -- Daniel Mietchen (talk) 22:00, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Ed (Edgar181) 16:44, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Title states it is an image from the La Tercera newspaper. Copyvio. küñall (nütramyen) 03:50, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:08, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

tell me it's not true: Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Janneken Pis :-( Madaiono (talk) 15:24, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand your comment. It seems contradictory all over.--Madaiono (talk) 18:37, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I misunderstood your sadness to be deploring that this image is hosted in Commons — because you expressed it by filing in a deletion request (this one). My apologies for that, but also my advice on not to present create a DR just to express a pooint. -- Tuválkin 11:39, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed when somebody stopped me when I was about to upload a third file of this object. This one was already there. But it seems I didn't succeed with the deletion requests for my two files - maybe someone can have a look. (Why is it so complicated?.. :-/ )--Madaiono (talk) 18:35, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I now understand that you were expressing your sadness over these files being deleted. Well, the problem here is not Mediawiki Commons’ licencing policies, but rather the Belgian copyright and freedom-of-panorama laws that prevent free use of photos showing artworks, even those on permanent public display, before 70 years after the death of the artist. I agree it is unfortunate, but we'll have to wait a few decades before these photos are in public domain. -- Tuválkin 11:39, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, no freedom of panorama in Belgium. Taivo (talk) 12:35, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No educational purpose. Use of commons as repository of personal photos. The team was deleted at ptwiki as non-notable. OTAVIO1981 (talk) 11:26, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Commons files do not necessarily depict notable figures. It is fine if it can illustrate people playing football in general. whym (talk) 03:05, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No sources are cited, no date of publication or author. File uploaded by a new puppet of a blocked user for repeated violations of copyright (Pablo.javier.milano.414) Banfield - Amenazas aquí 23:26, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by User:Denniss. whym (talk) 03:01, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No sources are cited, no date of publication or author. File uploaded by a new puppet of a blocked user for repeated violations of copyright (Pablo.javier.milano.414) Banfield - Amenazas aquí 23:26, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by User:Denniss. whym (talk) 03:01, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Recent artwork, No Freedom of Panorama in France Havang(nl) (talk) 13:35, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 23:51, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio? I am very curious as to why if it is the author's own work, he would need to upload it from a website? See his user talk page at E.wiki for other s like this. John from Idegon (talk) 05:42, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 23:49, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality. I uploaded better pictures. Hockei (talk) 17:29, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 23:51, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality. I uploaded better pictures. Hockei (talk) 17:30, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 23:51, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There's no evidence presented that the photographer was an employee of the US government. Neither of the websites cites as sources are official US government websites. Diannaa (talk) 20:48, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 23:52, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

looks like notification is required for any use outside of Wikipedia, which is incompatible with our licensing requirements. Liliana-60 (talk) 19:24, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 23:52, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of a non-free logo. Ymblanter (talk) 19:48, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 23:52, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

as for Commons:Deletion requests/File:Logo of Endemol N.V..png ghouston (talk) 03:28, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 23:48, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Claimed own work from seventies, but probably is not. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:14, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

193.147.209.16 10:14, 12 November 2013 (UTC)I scanned part of a photo that was given to me from a family album. Nobody knows where the original paper photo came from now. If this is not good enough, by all means delete it.[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 23:49, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Extraction from File:Flag of Munster.svg Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:21, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 23:48, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The description itself and image style indicates that this is not public domain. Picture was taken by the actor himself, but uploader is someone else purporting to have been given permission. We, of course, need Kohli's direct indication (OTRS) that this is intended for public domain release. Qwyrxian (talk) 23:45, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 23:53, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication the photograph has licensed this image under CC-BY-SA and it is doubtful the subject of the photograph is at the same time the author. Same issue with two other uploads of thesame contributor on the same subject. — Racconish Tk 09:25, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 23:49, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of publication prior to January 1 1987. Underlying lk (talk) 20:12, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 23:53, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality image. Non enciclopedic value and out of scope. The Photographer (talk) 23:43, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 23:53, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality image. Non enciclopedic value and out of scope The Photographer (talk) 23:42, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 23:53, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The claim that this is under the threshhold of originality for the US is questionable. The logo is designed to give a rounded 3D effect which would be something otherwise protected if this was a photograph, and thus probably can be claimed with some originality. Masem (talk) 18:29, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I agree, I think this image is above the threshold of originality in the US. It was originally uploaded to en.wp as a non-free logo, before being transferred to Commons. Assuming the consensus is to delete this file on Commons, do we have any admins on Commons who are also admins on en.wp? It would be great, if deleted on Commons, if the file was simultaneously undeleted on en.wp and the original non-free rationale was restored. —RP88 09:13, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Well I have restored it on en.Wikipedia because I think it has to go from commons. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 19:43, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Claiming this is PD is taking the threshold of originality way too far. The logo belongs in Wikipedia as fair use. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 19:51, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 23:51, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication the photograph has licensed this image under CC-BY-SA and it is doubtful the subject of the photograph is at the same time the author. Same issue with two other uploads of thesame contributor on the same subject. — Racconish Tk 09:21, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 23:48, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication the photograph has licensed this image under CC-BY-SA and it is doubtful the subject of the photograph is at the same time the author. Same issue with two other uploads of thesame contributor on the same subject. — Racconish Tk 09:26, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 23:49, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The sculptor Philippe Besnard is dead in 1971. No freedom of panorama in France. 90.2.32.212 22:36, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 23:52, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No educational purpose. Use of commons as repository of personal photos. The team was deleted at ptwiki as non-notable. OTAVIO1981 (talk) 11:31, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 23:50, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Restored, now on scope per https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikip%C3%A9dia:P%C3%A1ginas_para_eliminar/Talleres_de_C%C3%B3rdoba_Rugby_Club. -- Darwin Ahoy! 01:31, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No educational purpose. Use of commons as repository of personal photos. The team was deleted at ptwiki as non-notable. OTAVIO1981 (talk) 11:29, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 23:50, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Restored per https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikip%C3%A9dia:P%C3%A1ginas_para_eliminar/Talleres_de_C%C3%B3rdoba_Rugby_Club .-- Darwin Ahoy! 12:08, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused simple logo of non-notable team Taivo (talk) 09:28, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 23:49, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not useful for an educational purpose, see COM:SCOPE. Rezonansowy (talk) 23:30, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 23:53, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Four of currently six images here: the quality is so poor that there's simply no possibility to use them.

A.Savin 13:28, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 23:51, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Lina Gorobchenko

[edit]

Here are all files, uploaded by user Lina Gorobchenko and not yet presented for deletion:

They are all unused files, mostly out of scope, but also one copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 11:11, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 23:50, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Akshata Athawale (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Simple text, no need to upload text contributions in .png format. Please read en:Help:Table.

Martin H. (talk) 20:35, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 23:53, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by User:Cosmip2004

[edit]

User Cosmip2004 uploaded these files:

Two first photos are historical, so "own work" is dubious. (The uploader's "own work" from 1932 is deleted.) The others depict modern stadium, but there is no freedom of panorama in Romania. Taivo (talk) 10:57, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 23:50, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private memory pic, no description, unused. 91.66.153.214 10:09, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, the uploader's contributions were mostly out of scope. I presented them all (except 2) for deletion and they got deleted. Therefore I delete this also. Taivo (talk) 15:05, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Denniss as no permission, but I cant find an external source to doubt own work as stated. JuTa 10:04, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 09:04, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Denniss as no permission, but I cant find an external source to doubt own work as stated. JuTa 10:09, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 09:04, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Denniss as no permission, but I cant find an external source to doubt own work as stated. JuTa 10:10, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 09:04, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Denniss as no permission, but I cant find an external source to doubt own work as stated. JuTa 10:11, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 09:04, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Denniss as no permission, but I cant find an external source to doubt own work as stated. JuTa 10:12, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 09:04, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Denniss as no permission, but I cant find an external source to doubt own work as stated. JuTa 10:12, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 09:04, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has been superceded by File:Graph of Martin-Quinn Scores of Supreme Court Justices 1937-Now.png a version that includes 2012 data (and whose name is more amenable for updating). Randy Schutt (talk) 19:10, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 09:04, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

May need an OTRS permission, as the description says: "donated by grandson of Luis Pinto Rojo (member of the Caporales) from his personal archive"; and then it credits the La Tercera newspaper as the author. küñall (nütramyen) 03:53, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Resp: The original author is unknown because this was a promotional series of photos that Los Caporales made so they can use them as an a ilustrative accompaniment of press media, so the permission is due to Los Caporales to give, this particular photo was scanned from an article of La Tercera newspasper, but that doesn't make La Tercerra the right holder of this work


Deleted -FASTILY 09:05, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

JPG version uploaded at File:David Wheater 18-10-2008 1.jpg. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:11, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 00:46, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Es ist keine Erlaubnis zur Veröffentlichung ersichtlich. Verstoß gegen das Recht am eigenen Bild. Weissbier (talk) 11:53, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@Löschantrag durch User Weissbier

[edit]

Betrifft: "Weissbier hinterließ dir eine Nachricht auf Wikimedia Commons"

Nachricht ansehen:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Ulla_Schmitz#File:Dr-Hans-Peter-Schaub-zeigt-grauverlaufsfilter.jpg

Hochverehrter User Weissbier

können Sie sich vorstellen, dass ein professioneller Pressefotograf mit einem Menschen einen Interview-Termin verabredet nur zu dem Zweck, dass dabei Text- und Bildmaterial entsteht just zu dem Zwecke der Veröffentlichung? Das nennt man zum Beispiel "Pressefoto". Man stimmt sich als hauptberuflicher Journalist in aller Regel vor der Veröffentlichung des entsprechenden Fotomaterials noch einmal mit dem Abgebildeten ab, ob ein Foto für den vorgesehenen Zweck auch genehm ist. Und da diese Abstimmung heutigentags in der Regel per E-Mail erfolgt, liegt danach im Fotoarchiv des Pressefotografen ein archivfestes PDF mit diesem Modellrelease. Möchten Sie den Modellrelease zum Beispiel von Herrn Dr. Hans-Peter Schaub gerne per Privatmail einsehen? Oder fragen Sie doch direkt bei Herrn Dr. Schaub nach.

Hier zur Illustration für "Pressefotografie" der Link zu einem heute erstellten Pressefoto von Herrn Dr. Schaub und Kollegen. In diesem Fall bin ich nicht 600 Kilometer von Frankfurt nach Zingst gereist, um Herrn Schaub portraitieren zu können, wie im Fall des von Ihnen mit einem Löschantrag versehenen Wikipedia-Fotos, sondern ich bin am letzten Samstag nur 300 KM von Frankfurt nach Hamm gefahren, um eine Veranstaltung als Pressefotograf zu begleiten.

http://us-f.de/hamm/fotonetzwerker.jpg (12 MB)

Kurzum: Profis arbeiten professionell.

Das oben gesagte gilt übrigens für alle anderen Fotos von mir bei Wikimedia. Dies dürfte sich übrigens einem unbefangenen Auge auch unschwer aus dem jeweiligen Bildinhalt erschließen: Das sind ja alles keine Paparazzi-Schüsse, sondern Portrait-Sitzungen und inszenierte Bilder.

  • ad 1) man hat Ihnen bereits erklärt wie man signiert. Machen Sie es doch einfach.
  • ad 2) Sie können hier viel tippen - interessant das Gezeter, aber leider ohne Belang. Eine Mail an das Support-Team mit der Freigabe wäre der Weg der Wahl gewesen. Weissbier (talk) 05:21, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Erklaerung plausibel. Dschwen (talk) 23:29, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's not a simple geometric shape, and it may have been deleted before: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Logo Endemol.png ghouston (talk) 03:27, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment The logo is really once deleted, but I am not so sure, that the logo is not simple. It consists of 2 ellipses, 2 rings and 1 word. Maybe ellips is not considered a simple geometrical shape. I'd like somebody else to close this request. Taivo (talk) 11:04, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep It looks like simple text and shapes to me. Illegitimate Barrister (talk) 07:35, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per PRP Dschwen (talk) 23:25, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably copyrighted design. Мне кажется, что этот файл нарушает авторские права дизайнера этой банки. Нужно получить согласие дизайнера или компании. Taivo (talk) 09:21, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

А как же другие фото пивных банок и бутылок с этикетками? Например, вот это фото, которое используется в пяти статьях разных языковых разделов (использовалось в шести, пока я его в русской статье не заменил). С ними всё в порядке, разрешения есть? С уважением, Dm121 (talk) 05:56, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This file has the same problem. Ну, это фотография имеет точно такую же проблему. Taivo (talk) 12:08, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Получить согласие компании или дизайнера я не представляю возможным для себя, поэтому, если фотография нарушает правила -- действуйте в соответствии с правилами. Dm121 (talk) 14:01, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Copyrighted design, not de minimis. Dschwen (talk) 23:25, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

JPG version uploaded at File:Michael Mancienne 18-10-2008 1.jpg. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:13, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 00:46, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Jaguaragd

[edit]

Here are all images, uploaded by user Jaguaragd and not yet presented for deletion:

These are works by fr:Jean Droit, who died in 1961. They are still protected with copyright. Here are also listed some photos about him. These are younger than 70 years. Taivo (talk) 11:57, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Er is geen copyright op foto's of werken van Jean Droit. Alles wat we willen publiceren is in ons bezit. Kaften en affiches zijn public domein!Jaguaragd (talk) 16:01, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Posession of a photograph does not imply right to publish. Of course there is copyright on the pictures. If you inherited the rights you will need to send an email to the COM:OTRS team. --Dschwen (talk) 23:32, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 03:20, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by User:BillKenny14

[edit]

Here are all files, uploaded by user BillKenny14 and not yet presented for deletion:

They are all claimed own work, but actually none of them is. They origin from 1937–1978 and typically there is no metadata. Look his user page: a lot of his uploads are deleted one by one, here are all others. Taivo (talk) 09:48, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

All images are NOT my own work but are believed to be fair-use under United Sates copyright law. File:Bill Kenny, Maurice Pearson & Big Miller - Charity Event, Vancouver, BC 1963.jpg was supplied to me by Mr. Pearson himself who gave me verbal permission to share it publically. I'm unsure on how to change the copyright info and what the appropriate copyright tag would be. It would be the same as it is for File:Dylan_Thomas_photo.jpg. Any assistance in making the necessary corrections would be greatly appreciated. User:BillKenny14 (talk) 15:51, 12 November 2013‎
Sorry, fair use is not enough for Commons. -- Tuválkin 16:40, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
If fair use is not enough for Commons then why do I see so many images with a fair use tag? For example File:Dylan_Thomas_photo.jpg. User:BillKenny14 (talk) 17:06, 14 November 2013‎
Let me add that fair use is not enough for Commons. w:File:Dylan_Thomas_photo.jpg is hosted in the English Wikipedia with fair use restrictions, like many other such images which are not acceptable for Commons. (Pro tip: if you’re going to be blunt and smug, do it, by all means — I’m a great fan of being blunt and smug myself. But please, make sure you got your facts right before being blunt and smug. ’Cuz it backfires like a mofo.) -- Tuválkin 18:08, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
with the exception of 2 of these photos, the copyright information is non existent and the photographers are unknown/un-credited. User:BillKenny14 (talk) 17:06, 14 November 2013‎
Please read about copyright expiration (seee Commons:Copyrights#Material in the public domain). I think that in case of proven anonimity public domain is achieved 70 years after publication — but you should confirm that. -- Tuválkin 18:08, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Once again, I ask that someone help me insert the proper copyright tags for these images. User:BillKenny14 (talk) 17:06, 14 November 2013‎
Adding dated signatures would be a great first step. Try adding "~~~~" at the end of each post, it is litterally magic. (See?, smugness.) -- Tuválkin 18:08, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
File:Bill Kenny at Langara Golf Course - Vancouver BC 1965.jpg is Public Domain and Mr. Maurice Pearson has given permission to freely use File:Bill Kenny, Maurice Pearson & Big Miller - Charity Event, Vancouver, BC 1963.jpg. Please let me know what I need to do. Thank you. User:BillKenny14 (talk) 17:06, 14 November 2013‎
Please check COM:OTRS about any images for which you have a valid permission proof. -- Tuválkin 18:08, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No fair use on commons. Request undeletion if OTRS permission is ever sent. Dschwen (talk) 23:26, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture witch is probably copyvio see http://www.railpictures.net/viewphoto.php?id=412683&nseq=9 -Jnn (talk) 14:23, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've shot the picture my self! It's not the only picture i've loaded on railpictures.net and on Commons: see, for example, this one: http://www.railpictures.net/viewphoto.php?id=412610 NAC (talk) 16:33, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Should be confirmed through COM:OTRS. JuTa 21:35, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by User:Amarinsky

[edit]

User Amarinsky has uploaded these photos:

They are all out of scope. Probably a journalist has been in interesting places with her daughter. But here are too much father-daughter relationship and too few these interesting places. Taivo (talk) 11:20, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep It could be added to Category:Road signs of Australia. - Fma12 (talk) 03:10, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

kept most as in scope but deleted 2 as copyright violations. --JuTa 21:49, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work - the paintings fail COM:DM. -mattbuck (Talk) 22:40, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am somewhat irritated but perhaps I haven't understood the entire matter. When my photo fails because of de minime, how can at the same time the nomination of another photo with the pope's personal coat of arms persist? In my humble opinion, not the four visible drawings are the subject of my photo but the artist who is doing his artist work. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 11:05, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The coat of arms has now been deleted. -mattbuck (Talk) 13:43, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Weak  Keep This arguably passes COM:DM. Looking at it, it seems that the painter takes up more than half of the photograph. Can we give the uploader the benefit of doubt that the paintings were indeed not the focus of the photo? If not, would cropping out the large paintings suffice? Bonkers The Clown (talk) 13:40, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: but cropped out possibly copyrighted drawings an hided 1st version. JuTa 21:15, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Quality too poor to be of any use. Wizardman 20:05, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I agree that the resolution of the image is low. I vote to keep the image for the following reasons:

  • There is no other image of the subject (Lou Pote) on Wikimedia Commons (other than the original image it was cropped from), removing the picture would devoid any graphic representation of the subject on this site
  • Despite the low quality of the image, certain identifying details do exist that would, in my opinion, deem this image relevant to keep such as: uniform, pitching glove, and presence on a baseball field
  • Other low-resolution crops exist on Wikimedia such as:

Any constructive feedback is much appreciated, thank you.--Amineshaker (talk) 00:53, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: very low quality, true, but its in use. JuTa 20:45, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality images of well-known motives that have plenty of free licensed photographs of much better quality on Commons; extremely low-quality images that cannot be used anywhere for this fact; additionally, obvious out-of-scope images not depicting any cultural heritage monuments.

A.Savin 18:19, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Какой low-quality??? Много файлов имеют размер в несколько мегапикслей. Вполне нормальное качество.--Anatoliy (talk) 23:23, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Now I am deleting everything from this list which has FoP issues.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:58, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Kept most as not too bad quality, but deleted 9 as realy too bad quality, privat snapshots, copyright violations or obvious FOP problems. Other FOP issues previously deleted by Ymblanter. Some of the kept might get renominated by (not so obvious) FOP reason or similar. --JuTa 23:06, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Luckymelon

[edit]

User Luckymelon has uploaded these files:

There is no freedom of panorama in South Africa, but they are quite modern buildings. Taivo (talk) 11:31, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Copyright Act 1978 (No. 98 of 1978) defines works of architecture as artistic works
“artistic work” means, irrespective of the artistic quality thereof—
(b) works of architecture, being either buildings or models of buildings; or
and it defines infringing copies of artistic works as a copy of the work
“infringing copy”, in relation to—
(a) a literary, musical or artistic work or a published edition, means a copy thereof;
and copy is defined as
“copy” means a reproduction of a work, and, in the case of a literary, musical or artistic work, a cinematograph film or a computer program, also an adaptation thereof: Provided that an object shall not be taken to be a copy of a work of architecture unless the object is a building or a model of a building;
Since photos are neither buildings or models of buildings, photos of buildings are not copies of the artistic work and can not be infringing copies
--NJR_ZA (talk) 18:34, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Following COM:FOP#South Africa. JuTa 21:22, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]