Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2013/10/08

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive October 8th, 2013
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a new flickr account with 13 images but there is no camera metadata. Is this the flickr account owner's own work in this case? Leoboudv (talk) 05:40, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Stolen from http://www.pictaero.com/en/pictures/picture,156826. Lymantria (talk) 05:47, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Speedy deleted - copyvio Lymantria (talk) 05:48, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Work published in France from 1950-1955, in PD in France in 2032, in US in 2051 Dereckson (talk) 19:56, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: I opened the FoP/undelete date tracability. Treated as a speedy delete (uploader request, clear dates, FoP case) Dereckson (talk) 19:59, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 21:10, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 21:22, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused user image, out of project scope Didym (talk) 21:33, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Speedied as copyvio from https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=101088606736502&set=p.101088606736502&type=1&theater. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:15, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Huntster as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: This is not a Hubble Telescope image, and ESA's Planck images are copyrighted by default (no free licensing agreement exists as it does with Hubble pics). Dschwen (talk) 23:42, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This does seem to be a bit problematic. According to their Copyright Notice (emphasis by me):
ESA's Space in Images contains images used throughout the ESA Portal. The images are offered in this website in the highest resolution available.
Most images have been released publicly from ESA. You may use ESA images or videos for educational or informational purposes. The publicly released ESA images may be reproduced without fee, on the following conditions:
  • Credit ESA as the source of the images. Examples: Photo: ESA; Photo: ESA/Cluster; Image: ESA/NASA - SOHO/LASCO
  • ESA images may not be used to state or imply the endorsement by ESA or any ESA employee of a commercial product, process or service, or used in any other manner that might mislead.
  • If an image includes an identifiable person, using that image for commercial purposes may infringe that person‘s right of privacy, and separate permission should be obtained from the individual.
  • Some images contained in this website have come from other sources, and this is indicated in the Copyright notice. For re-use of non-ESA images contact the designated authority.
  • If ESA images are to be used in advertising or any commercial promotion, layout and copy must be submitted to ESA beforehand for approval to: spaceinimages@esa.int
For any enquiries concerning use of ESA images, please contact: spaceinimages@esa.int
This actually is a weak NC clause and not permitted in commons. --Dschwen (talk) 15:18, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Actually there are several precedents already: Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Hermes_Spaceplane_ESA.jpg Commons:Deletion_requests/Image:ESA_Columbus_module.jpg Commons:Deletion_requests/ESA_images. I'm deleting this as it does satisfy COM:SPEEDY. --Dschwen (talk) 15:21, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

P.S.: I have sent ESA a request to make this image available under a compatible CC license. But I'm not holding my breath. --Dschwen (talk) 15:33, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Actually got a quick reply: Image won't be released under a compatible license. --Dschwen (talk) 22:37, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: ESA images are essentially NC Dschwen (talk) 15:21, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio cover Mjrmtg (talk) 01:21, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, by Fastily. Taivo (talk) 14:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Reduntant (and a bit low quality). Same penis is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 07:50, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, we have enough penises. 320x400 px is not enough. Both are deleted. Taivo (talk) 14:53, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of scope. Ubcule (talk) 00:00, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, by Dschwen. Taivo (talk) 16:08, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurred and useless 210.3.2.5 02:29, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, out of scope. Taivo (talk) 13:04, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation; several of these logos look like they could pass the threshold of originality.  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:14, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 13:09, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Individual logos are copyrightable. Previously deleted as a copyvio.  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:39, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


deleted: per previous DR, copyrighted logos. --PierreSelim (talk) 07:07, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 13:14, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:23, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted / Out of scope. --Fanghong (talk) 01:35, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:27, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted / Out of scope. --Fanghong (talk) 01:36, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because I uploaded it wrong Alex0314 (talk) 03:46, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Good picture, but uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 14:32, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted / Uploader requested and unused. --Fanghong (talk) 01:42, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo Taivo (talk) 09:15, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope. --Fanghong (talk) 01:50, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non notable unidentified person Tekstman (talk) 11:40, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted / Out of scope. --Fanghong (talk) 02:07, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am the up-loader, please delete this pictures, because personality rights violation Texaner (talk) 12:05, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / uploader requested and unused. --Fanghong (talk) 02:10, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non notable person: https://www.hastac.org/users/lucyhaagen Tekstman (talk) 12:07, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope. --Fanghong (talk) 02:12, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non notable person, unidentified. Tekstman (talk) 12:26, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope. --Fanghong (talk) 02:15, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo is being used w/out Franc's permission. He has requested it be removed & is not happy with the posted image. I am his Personal Assistant & would be happy to provide another photo that is approved by Franc. Alisonhilyard (talk) 22:32, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Being used w/out Franc's permission. He has requested it be moved & is not happy with the photo being used. 70.98.123.90 20:53, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: We do not need the permission of the subject for a photo taken in public in the USA. We do not generally delete images at the subject's request, particularly when the image is the only one we have and is in use. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:07, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not use in any wiki article. auther claimed as self portrait. DreamLiner (talk) 02:53, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Maybe the nominator thought File:Yu Xiaohang.jpg‎, which is not used? Taivo (talk) 14:29, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, Fanghong deleted the other photo. Taivo (talk) 11:31, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo. Rapsar (talk) 09:04, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 13:11, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo. Rapsar (talk) 09:06, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 13:13, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal logo, out of scope. Rapsar (talk) 09:07, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 13:14, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo. Rapsar (talk) 09:08, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 13:15, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted image. Rapsar (talk) 09:09, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 13:17, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo. Rapsar (talk) 09:10, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 13:18, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal logo, out of scope. Rapsar (talk) 09:11, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 13:19, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I do not speak French, but seems to be an album cover. Uploader's other contribution was deleted due to copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:13, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, by Fastily. Taivo (talk) 11:37, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo. Rapsar (talk) 09:17, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 13:21, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not PD: Auguste Lumière died in 1954. Deletion request by uploader. — Racconish Tk 09:38, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 13:28, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: no evidence that the building is out of copyright. Eleassar (t/p) 10:49, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The building doesn't look like a work of art. The picture ist just an urban landscape with quite utilitarian building and utilitarian vehicles. Does such things qualify for copyright in Slovenia?--Pere prlpz (talk) 20:39, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Its side facade is quite original. --Eleassar (t/p) 20:41, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 13:32, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader should ask the depicted person for a permission. 91.66.153.214 11:31, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 13:34, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non notable person, see bio in description. Tekstman (talk) 12:24, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 13:35, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Test photo with no application to Wikimedia projects Pmsyyz (talk) 13:59, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 13:37, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Oppose The picture is own work. Small resolution is a result of saving source picture by a photo editor (for example Paintbrush). Missing EXIF is not a problem because there's a lot of pictures without EXIF, for example done by analog cameras. There's a lot of files/pictures that can be found on the web, although at the same time they can be found on wikimedia. Slamdank ru (talk) 18:30, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 CommentGiven that all your other uploads have been deleted as copyright violations, what makes you think your statement can be trusted? --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:00, 9 October 2013 (UTC)--Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:00, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Apart from that a picture can be done by analog camera, why I can trust all that supposed "copyright violation delete actions"? If something will be deleted by "copyright violation" please leave a message about what is the reason of the "copyright violation"? Slamdank ru (talk) 07:10, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Oppose I am strongly against the removal of the image cause I support the arguments of the owner. I think it's his own work. Supposed small resolution and missing EXIF in my opinion are not arguments to delete the picture. Moreover there are lots of images that can be found on the WWW, and at the same time they can be found on the "Wikimedia Commons". 80.228.112.34 08:26, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Oppose I think the picture provides no problem, s. above comments of the people who is against removal. So I support those who votes for the image. 178.130.37.241 08:51, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, if you made the photo yourself, please re-upload it with full resolution, using the same file name. Taivo (talk) 11:43, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Reduntant. Better view (clearer) of this penis is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 10:27, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 13:29, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ExL.Romantic (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Two problems:

Stefan4 (talk) 09:32, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 13:22, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused user image, out of scope Didym (talk) 20:21, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This would be in scope if Toppingboy used it on his user page. Toppingboy: use it or lose it. :-) -- (talk) 13:24, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:22, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio and/or unclear status. Unlikely to be uploader's own work as claimed (another version apparently from a book is here). Would have considered marking as "disputed", but user has already uploaded copyvios and use of nonsensical titles and descriptions for his/her files doesn't inspire confidence. Ubcule (talk) 21:06, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Several other nominated images by same user; see this entry onwards. Ubcule (talk) 21:18, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 13:24, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 20:29, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of COM:SCOPE -- Steinsplitter (talk) 08:53, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 20:39, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of COM:SCOPE -- Steinsplitter (talk) 08:54, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:11, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused user image, out of project scope Didym (talk) 20:38, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of COM:SCOPE -- Steinsplitter (talk) 08:55, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Out of Commons:Project scope -- Steinsplitter (talk) 08:45, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Does not appear to be true SVG. We do have the Diver Down flag in SVG elsewhere. Fry1989 eh? 19:31, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment: Why is it not SVG? And where is the other Diver Down Flag and by the way there are two flags in use in germany the alpha flag (which is the official one) and the michigan diver flag (which is more common). I couldnt find one of them in wikimedia. Heartographix (talk · contribs) 06:38, 9 October 2013‎
Because your file is an embedded raster graphic. The SVGs of both versions of the Diver Down flag exist as File:Diver Down Flag.svg and File:Alpha flag.svg. Fry1989 eh? 15:08, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:18, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused user image, out of project scope Didym (talk) 21:27, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of COM:SCOPE -- Steinsplitter (talk) 09:02, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused user image, out of project scope Didym (talk) 21:27, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of COM:SCOPE -- Steinsplitter (talk) 09:02, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused user image, out of project scope Didym (talk) 21:28, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of COM:SCOPE -- Steinsplitter (talk) 09:02, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:13, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused user image, out of project scope Didym (talk) 21:29, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of COM:SCOPE -- Steinsplitter (talk) 09:02, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused user image, out of project scope Didym (talk) 21:37, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of COM:SCOPE -- Steinsplitter (talk) 09:03, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused user image, out of project scope Didym (talk) 21:39, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of COM:SCOPE -- Steinsplitter (talk) 09:03, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very low quality, unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 21:42, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nom (pleas send premission to COM:OTRS) ---- Steinsplitter (talk) 09:04, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused user image, out of project scope Didym (talk) 21:40, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of COM:SCOPE -- Steinsplitter (talk) 09:03, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused user image, out of project scope Didym (talk) 21:47, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of COM:SCOPE -- Steinsplitter (talk) 09:04, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused user image, out of project scope Didym (talk) 22:12, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of COM:SCOPE -- Steinsplitter (talk) 09:09, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused user image, out of project scope Didym (talk) 22:13, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of COM:SCOPE -- Steinsplitter (talk) 09:09, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused user image, out of project scope Didym (talk) 22:30, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of COM:SCOPE -- Steinsplitter (talk) 09:10, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused user image, out of project scope Didym (talk) 22:30, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of COM:SCOPE -- Steinsplitter (talk) 09:10, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 22:33, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of COM:SCOPE -- Steinsplitter (talk) 09:12, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused user image, out of project scope Didym (talk) 22:34, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of COM:SCOPE -- Steinsplitter (talk) 09:12, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:08, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of Commons:Project scope -- Steinsplitter (talk) 08:44, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused user image, out of project scope Didym (talk) 22:36, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of COM:SCOPE -- Steinsplitter (talk) 09:13, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused user image, out of project scope Didym (talk) 22:37, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of COM:SCOPE -- Steinsplitter (talk) 09:13, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused user image, out of project scope Didym (talk) 22:39, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of COM:SCOPE -- Steinsplitter (talk) 09:13, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused user image, out of project scope Didym (talk) 22:39, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of COM:SCOPE -- Steinsplitter (talk) 09:13, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused user image, out of project scope Didym (talk) 22:46, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of COM:SCOPE -- Steinsplitter (talk) 09:14, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused user image, out of project scope Didym (talk) 22:46, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of COM:SCOPE -- Steinsplitter (talk) 09:14, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused user image, out of project scope Didym (talk) 22:59, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of COM:SCOPE -- Steinsplitter (talk) 09:14, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused user image, out of project scope Didym (talk) 23:05, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of COM:SCOPE -- Steinsplitter (talk) 09:15, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused user image, out of project scope Didym (talk) 23:06, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of COM:SCOPE -- Steinsplitter (talk) 09:15, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused user image, out of project scope Didym (talk) 23:07, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of COM:SCOPE -- Steinsplitter (talk) 09:15, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused user image, out of project scope Didym (talk) 23:07, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of COM:SCOPE -- Steinsplitter (talk) 09:15, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused user image, out of project scope Didym (talk) 23:12, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of COM:SCOPE -- Steinsplitter (talk) 09:16, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused user image, out of project scope Didym (talk) 23:19, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of COM:SCOPE -- Steinsplitter (talk) 09:17, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused user image, out of project scope Didym (talk) 23:23, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of COM:SCOPE -- Steinsplitter (talk) 09:17, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused user image, out of project scope Didym (talk) 23:23, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of COM:SCOPE -- Steinsplitter (talk) 09:17, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Graphics for "completely fictional" image board created by uploader- out of scope. Ubcule (talk) 22:18, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 13:38, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 23:35, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of COM:SCOPE -- Steinsplitter (talk) 09:17, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused user image, out of project scope Didym (talk) 23:42, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of COM:SCOPE -- Steinsplitter (talk) 09:18, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused user image, out of project scope Didym (talk) 23:42, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of COM:SCOPE -- Steinsplitter (talk) 09:18, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image. Ubcule (talk) 22:05, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of COM:SCOPE -- Steinsplitter (talk) 09:08, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope and/or unused personal image of uploader. Ubcule (talk) 22:07, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of COM:SCOPE -- Steinsplitter (talk) 09:08, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo of "fictional software company" created by uploader; no clear in-scope use. Ubcule (talk) 22:19, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 13:37, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope; video game it represents is "completely fictional", even the authors are made-up. Ubcule (talk) 22:20, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 13:36, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality image apparently of uploader; out of scope and no personal usage. Ubcule (talk) 22:10, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of COM:SCOPE -- Steinsplitter (talk) 09:09, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most likely an unauthorized derivative work rather than the uploader's own work. Looks like a photo of a poster or magazine page (note the edge at the right-hand side of the image and the washed-out color) rather than a photo of a live subject. LX (talk, contribs) 18:14, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:49, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If this has any in-scope use, uploader couldn't be bothered explaining it. Ubcule (talk) 20:52, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Several other nominated images by same user; see this entry onwards. Ubcule (talk) 21:18, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of COM:SCOPE -- Steinsplitter (talk) 08:58, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, not even really attempting to be. No personal usage. Ubcule (talk) 20:49, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Several other nominated images by same user; see this entry onwards. Ubcule (talk) 21:18, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of COM:SCOPE -- Steinsplitter (talk) 08:58, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, no personal usage. Ubcule (talk) 20:48, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Several other nominated images by same user; see this entry onwards. Ubcule (talk) 21:18, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of COM:SCOPE -- Steinsplitter (talk) 08:56, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, no personal use. (No, I don't know what the title or description says, but as it's clearly related to File:Image83humty dumpty sat on a waall he had a vaery gratae fall.jpg, I'm pretty suspicious. :-/ Ubcule (talk) 20:51, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Several other nominated images by same user; see this entry onwards. Ubcule (talk) 21:18, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of COM:SCOPE -- Steinsplitter (talk) 08:58, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probable out of scope. File:Dancer Karolina Rubensita.jpg, File:Karolina_Rubensita_Hot_Import_Nights.jpg and File:Karolina Rubensita Go-Go dancer.jpg are all duplicates of same image. Should we also consider other uploads from this user? Ubcule (talk) 22:34, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 13:45, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

8x8 pixels is quite too tiny Herzi Pinki (talk) 15:26, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:47, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional material with no clear in-scope use. Ubcule (talk) 22:04, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. -- Steinsplitter (talk) 09:08, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional poster, out of scope? Ubcule (talk) 22:02, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. -- Steinsplitter (talk) 09:07, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional poster, out of scope? Source of sub-images (and hence copyright status) unclear Ubcule (talk) 22:03, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. -- Steinsplitter (talk) 09:07, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope? Ubcule (talk) 22:03, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nominator -- Steinsplitter (talk) 09:07, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

quite blurry shot, we have a lot of much better images of the same subject at Category:Mozart monument, Salzburg, also rather small Herzi Pinki (talk) 21:37, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 13:28, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Arguably out of scope (and out of date). Copyright status of source images unclear. Ubcule (talk) 22:01, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. -- Steinsplitter (talk) 09:05, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It appears to be a manual screen capture of what I presume is a professionally made video. This would qualify as a derivative work, and thus not eligible for cc license. TeaDrinker (talk) 21:38, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 13:30, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Does not appear to be true SVG. We do have the Diver Down flag elsewhere in the SVG format. Fry1989 eh? 19:26, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"Why is it not svg? I saved it in ai as svg? And where is the Diver Down Flag? I searched for it and didnt find it. If it would be elsewhere then just give me the link than i can delete my painted one." (message posted by User:Heartographix, fixed broken format) GermanJoe (talk) 09:04, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Because your file is an embedded raster graphic. The SVGs of both versions of the Diver Down flag exist as File:Diver Down Flag.svg and File:Alpha flag.svg. Fry1989 eh? 15:08, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:16, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jespinos as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivatives of Barbie dolls Dschwen (talk) 20:58, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, look COM:TOYS. Taivo (talk) 12:27, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

logo or derivative work, presumed to be copyrighted. (was tagged as speedy by User:SpacemanSpiff) Dschwen (talk) 20:57, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:25, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparent out-of-scope image, not in use for personal purposes. Ubcule (talk) 20:39, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of COM:SCOPE -- Steinsplitter (talk) 08:55, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

He subido el archivo por error. I've upload this file by mistake. B25es (talk) 16:40, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file -- Steinsplitter (talk) 08:50, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This might (or might not) be a useful image if a description had been provided. Since it wasn't, all we can say is that it's a low resolution photo of what appears to be a field (not a rare subject). Ubcule (talk) 21:15, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Several other nominated images by same user; see this entry onwards. Ubcule (talk) 21:18, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 13:26, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Can barely see what this is- a heart with some grafitti on it and some lights? Likely out of scope, not helped by uploader not providing a description. Ubcule (talk) 20:56, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Several other nominated images by same user; see this entry onwards. Ubcule (talk) 21:18, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of COM:SCOPE -- Steinsplitter (talk) 08:58, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication that this has been released under CC-BY-SA by the author, and does not clearly qualify for PD-textlogo. Geen aanwijzingen dat dit door de auteur is vrijgegeven onder CC-BY-SA, en is niet overduidelijk PD-textlogo. Pbech (talk) 22:55, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 13:58, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

von mir gemacht, Beschreibung fehlt, wird neu mit richtigem Formular gemacht Werudolf (talk) 17:38, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Translation: «From my own making, description missing, done anew with correct form». (-- Tuválkin 18:05, 9 October 2013 (UTC))[reply]
  •  Comment: Bitte verlinken Sie auf der neu gemacht Datei Seite. Nächstes Mal bitte beheben Seite neu laden, und verschwenden keine Freiwilligen Editor Eingang frivol Löschanfragen. / Please link to the re-done file page. Next time please fix page, or re-upload, and do not waste volunteer editor input on frivolous Deletion Requests. -- Tuválkin 18:05, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:46, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dit is een WAV-file en kan niet gebruikt worden in wikitekst om te beluisteren Jaguaragd (talk) 18:26, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

translation: This file is in WAV-format and can not be used in WikiTxt to be heard. Edoderoo (talk) 14:18, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:14, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Motopark as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: text only Dschwen (talk) 19:58, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Some homepage material, can be deleted.--Motopark (talk) 01:04, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, upon closer inspection I agree  Delete. --Dschwen (talk) 03:37, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:21, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No description. 91.66.153.214 17:14, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep: Obvious description added — based on image, filename, and uploader’s user name. Also added categories. Now, go find some images which are really worth deleting, Mr. 91.66.153.214, this wasn’t so good: Go, fetch! -- Tuválkin 18:15, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment This is a blurry photograph of men in police uniforms. Do we need their permissions? Do we violate their privacy with this photo? Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:07, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I think COM:AGF says we can keep it, unless there’s some evidence this was taken with a hidden camera or something. So far looks like a genuine promo photo — your colones at work and all that. -- Tuválkin 19:42, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, Taivo (talk) 11:43, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

redundant to File:TWT 2011 IMG 3423.jpg darkweasel94 22:09, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, the photo is a bit cropped, but I do not see reason for cropping. Taivo (talk) 13:33, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, del on DE Nolispanmo 15:37, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of COM:SCOPE -- Steinsplitter (talk) 08:48, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, 3 times del on DE Nolispanmo 15:38, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of COM:SCOPE -- Steinsplitter (talk) 08:49, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Arjuncr (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused user images, out of project scope

Didym (talk) 21:48, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of COM:SCOPE -- Steinsplitter (talk) 09:05, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Brett2131 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused user images, out of project scope

Didym (talk) 23:08, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of COM:SCOPE -- Steinsplitter (talk) 09:16, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Brwaraniay (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused user images, out of project scope

Didym (talk) 23:10, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of COM:SCOPE -- Steinsplitter (talk) 09:16, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dmoreno1992 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope

Didym (talk) 20:27, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of COM:SCOPE -- Steinsplitter (talk) 08:53, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kingslove2013 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal/promotional images

lNeverCry 23:08, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:37, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MalMenace (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope

Didym (talk) 23:04, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of COM:SCOPE -- Steinsplitter (talk) 09:15, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SaXon (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:22, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shreyansh K Jain (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused user images, out of project scope

Didym (talk) 23:41, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Meanwhile this user uploaded many more private and out of scope images like

I suggest the check the check the complete uploads of this user. -- Ies (talk) 07:20, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: all uploads deleted, out of COM:SCOPE -- Steinsplitter (talk) 09:21, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wikipoker007 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused user images, out of project scope

Didym (talk) 20:37, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of COM:SCOPE -- Steinsplitter (talk) 08:56, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zsigmond (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Looks like collection of historical photos and paintings, not own work. Proper source information should be provided.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:04, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No proof of adequate permission to license the underlying image. Imzadi 1979  03:18, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 22:39, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Presumably a copyrightable sculpture, and not permanent so UK freedom of panorama doesn't apply. ghouston (talk) 05:09, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 22:38, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Presumably a copyrightable sculpture, and not permanent so UK freedom of panorama doesn't apply. ghouston (talk) 05:09, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 22:38, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be work of 20minutos.es (sourced with http://www.20minutos.es/noticia/128666/0/Jose/Toledo/mejor/ (no credits, normally: "Foto: 20minutos.es") = http://cdn.20minutos.es/img/2006/06/08/455683.jpg = last modified: 08.06.2006, see also file path) as it was previously published via http://mujer.terra.es/muj/articulo/html/mu22337.htm (2003, see also archive) = http://mujer.terra.es/addon/img/muj/19cc7e3josetoledop.jpg (last modified: 2003) Gunnex (talk) 06:59, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 22:38, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{Cc-by-sa-2.1-es}}-fail of 20minutos.es (sourced with http://www.20minutos.es/entrevistas/joan-lino/6/ (no images) = archive or http://www.20minutos.es/noticia/349055/0/joan/lino/pekin/ = http://cdn.20minutos.es/img/2008/02/18/766324.jpg = last modified: 18.02.2008, see also file path) as it was credited with "JORGE PARÍS".

Per http://web.archive.org/web/20080222023358/http://www.20minutos.es/licencia_20_minutos/: "Esta licencia no se aplica a los contenidos publicados por 20minutos procedentes de los terceros siguientes: Textos, gráficos, informaciones e imágenes que vayan firmados o sean atribuidos a Agencias, Reuters, Efe, Europa Press, Korpa, Atlas, France Press, AP, Lanetro, Meteotemp, TPI, J.M. Nieto o Jorge París." Gunnex (talk) 07:19, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 22:39, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be work of 20minutos.es (sourced with http://www.20minutos.es/noticia/309887/0/camera/cafe/fans/ = http://cdn.20minutos.es/img/2007/10/19/694218.jpg = last modified: 19.10.2007, see also file path) as it was previously published (although watermarked) via http://www.formulatv.com/fotos/carlos-chamarro-arturo-valls-luis-varela-camera-cafe/ (22.04.2007, credits: "Teresa Peyri"). Related: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Luis Varela.jpg. Gunnex (talk) 07:44, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 22:38, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be work of 20minutos.es (sourced with http://www.20minutos.es/imagen/713113 = http://cdn.20minutos.es/img/2007/11/20/713113.jpg = last modified: 20.11.2007, see also file path) as it was previously published (although watermarked) via (cropped) http://www.formulatv.com/fotos/carlos-chamarro-arturo-valls-luis-varela-camera-cafe/ (22.04.2007, credits: "Teresa Peyri"). Related: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Camera café.jpg. Gunnex (talk) 07:48, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 22:39, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be work of 20minutos.es (sourced with http://www.20minutos.es/imagen/717821 = http://cdn.20minutos.es/img/2007/11/27/717821.jpg = last modified: 27.11.2007, see also file path, ortiginal news: http://www.20minutos.es/noticia/313285/0/martina/klein/agencia/) as it was previously published via http://www.lavozdegalicia.es/tendencias/2007/09/12/00031189607618284273.htm (12.09.2007, credits: "Kai Försterling") = http://media.lavozdegalicia.es/default/2007/09/12/00121189607740661727/Foto/*DESARROLLO.jpg. "Kai Försterling" is a professional photographer from Germany. Gunnex (talk) 08:15, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 22:39, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be work of 20minutos.es (sourced with http://www.20minutos.es/imagen/794978 = http://cdn.20minutos.es/img/2008/04/11/794978.jpg = last modified: 11.04.2008, see also file path, original news: http://www.20minutos.es/noticia/368406/0/ya/te/vale/) as it was previously published (although watermarked) via http://www.formulatv.com/fotos/gemma-nierga-ya-te-vale/ (09.04.2008, credits: "RTVE") and most likley coming from RTVE´s related gallery via http://www.rtve.es/tve/b/yatevale/fotos.htm = http://img.irtve.es/tve/b/yatevale/album-fotos/grandes/4.jpg (exif available). Gunnex (talk) 08:41, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 22:39, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a simple logo / See ei ole lihtne logo Taivo (talk) 09:20, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 22:39, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non notable singer (no records) (see http://www.unsignedbandweb.com/music/bands/17541/ Tekstman (talk) 09:21, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 22:38, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Suspected copyvio (is this really own work?). Protrait of a well known Columbian actress Tekstman (talk) 09:28, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 22:38, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

De toute évidence le scan d'une carte postale des années 1970, trop récente pour être libre de droits. P.poschadel (talk) 12:04, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 22:38, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mistification! It's a fake meal, invemted by a jokester. Russian article has been deleted already. 91.210.4.1 12:06, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 22:39, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France M0tty (talk) 13:04, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 22:39, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be work of 20minutos.es (sourced with http://www.20minutos.es/imagen/881520 = http://cdn.20minutos.es/img/2008/10/15/881520.jpg = last modified: 15.10.2008, see also file path, original news: http://www.20minutos.es/noticia/419836/0/antonio/lobato/oferta/, republished via http://www.20minutos.es/noticia/424050/0/antonio/lobato/sexta/ on 29.10.2008) as it was previously published 1 day earlier via http://www.publico.es/164582/de-calvo-de-telecinco-a-calvo-de-la-sexta (14.10.2008, credits: "una imagen de archivo") = http://imagenes.publico.es/resources/archivos/2008/10/14/1223990290739lobato-detalledn.jpg (last modified: 14.10.2008). Gunnex (talk) 16:44, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 22:38, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be work of 20minutos.es (sourced with http://www.20minutos.es/imagen/88909/ = http://cdn.20minutos.es/img/2005/04/26/88909.jpg = last modified: 02.07.2005, most likely uploaded on 26.04.2005, see also file path, republished via http://www.20minutos.es/noticia/19418/0/chica/gusta/tele/ on 26.04.2005) as it was previously published via http://mariaadanezfans.creatuforo.com/posados-tema27.html (2007) = http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y4/MariaAdanez/Fotos%20de%20Maria%20Adanez/maria003.jpg (last modified: 06.03.2005). Gunnex (talk) 18:00, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 22:39, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be work of 20minutos.es (sourced with http://www.20minutos.es/imagen/88915/ = http://cdn.20minutos.es/img/2005/04/26/88915.jpg = last modified: 02.07.2005, most likely uploaded on 26.04.2005, see also file path, republished via http://www.20minutos.es/noticia/19418/0/chica/gusta/tele/ on 26.04.2005) as per http://carta-de-ajuste.blogspot.de/2012/11/ondas-para-igartiburu.html = http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-cEJG-KkD61o/UJuLNr-IfUI/AAAAAAAAJNc/f9HaiV7D4Hg/s1600/aigartiburu2.jpg exif-infos reveals "Copyright: TVE,S.A. Fotógrafo: Ricardo del Hoyo (..) Description: Anne Igartiburu, presentadora de "Corazón de Verano"".

"TVE" indicates to es:Televisión Española, the national state-owned public-service television broadcaster in Spain, which broadcasted the related TV-programm "Corazón de Verano" via channel La 1 and Anne Igartiburu (shown on this image) is the presenter since 1997. Gunnex (talk) 18:25, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 22:38, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be work of 20minutos.es (sourced with http://www.20minutos.es/imagen/675295 = http://cdn.20minutos.es/img/2007/09/13/675295.jpg = last modified: 13.09.2007, see also file path, original news: http://www.20minutos.es/noticia/276450/0/identity/comisario/audiencias/) as it was published on the same day via http://www.formulatv.com/fotos/josema-yuste-y-david-fernandez/ (13.09.2007, credits: "RTVE").

"RTVE" indicates to en:RTVE (a state-owned public corporation that assumed the indirect management of the Spanish public radio and television service) broadcasting (via channel TVE/La 1) the related TV-program es:Por fin has llegado, which aired for the 1st time a day later on 14.09.2007 with the presenter Josema Yuste (shown on this image) and David Fernández. The related RTVE press release from 13.09.2007 is available (altough without images: slow loading and/or broken links to further presentation material) via http://www.rtve.es/%27%29?go=eacaa4148f48af89730076a6669df2169fcb5b71e1aa29da0d0feffa157028c6da0ec799ab1a9d0b4ec8bfb19f04739a = http://img.irtve.es/files/74-80269-FOTO_NOTA_PRENSA_399/JOSEMA_YUSTE1Gest.jpg.

Related: Commons:Deletion requests/File:David Fernández.jpg. Gunnex (talk) 19:03, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 22:39, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be work of 20minutos.es (sourced with http://www.20minutos.es/imagen/675295 = http://cdn.20minutos.es/img/2007/09/13/675295.jpg = last modified: 13.09.2007, see also file path, original news: http://www.20minutos.es/noticia/276450/0/identity/comisario/audiencias/) as it was published on the same day via http://www.formulatv.com/fotos/josema-yuste-y-david-fernandez/ (13.09.2007, credits: "RTVE").

"RTVE" indicates to en:RTVE (a state-owned public corporation that assumed the indirect management of the Spanish public radio and television service) broadcasting (via channel TVE/La 1) the related TV-program es:Por fin has llegado, which aired for the 1st time a day later on 14.09.2007 with the presenter Josema Yuste and David Fernández (shown on this image). The related RTVE press release from 13.09.2007 is available (altough without images: slow loading and/or broken links to further presentation material) via http://www.rtve.es/%27%29?go=eacaa4148f48af89730076a6669df2169fcb5b71e1aa29da0d0feffa157028c6da0ec799ab1a9d0b4ec8bfb19f04739a = http://img.irtve.es/files/74-80269-FOTO_NOTA_PRENSA_399/JOSEMA_YUSTE1Gest.jpg

Related: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Josema Yuste.jpg. Gunnex (talk) 19:05, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 22:38, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status and - per COM:PRP - unlikely to be work of 20minutos.es (sourced with http://www.20minutos.es/imagen/897633 = http://cdn.20minutos.es/img/2008/11/20/897633.jpg = last modified: 20.11.2008, see also file path, credited with "Foto: Aaron García", normally: "Foto: 20minutos.es", original news: http://www.20minutos.es/noticia/430563/0/valladolid/soraya/triunfo/).

Even considering http://web.archive.org/web/20081116192133/http://www.20minutos.es/licencia_20_minutos/ (license archive from 11.2008) = "Esta licencia no se aplica a los contenidos publicados por 20minutos procedentes de los terceros siguientes: Textos, gráficos, informaciones e imágenes que vayan firmados o sean atribuidos a Agencias, Reuters, Efe, Europa Press, Korpa, Atlas, France Press, AP, Lanetro, Meteotemp, TPI, J.M. Nieto o Jorge París." ("Aaron García" is not listed), it is widely known that 20minutos.es is cheating massively copyrights configuring copyrighted images from numerous sources with a free license. The whole bandwith of copyright problems concerning 20minutos.es is available via Category:20minutos.es related deletion requests and the above list ("de los terceros siguientes" = from the following third parties) is surely imperfect & incomplete. Normally, images from 20minutos.es are - regardless who the real photographer was - configured with "Foto: 20minutos.es" and by unknown/unclear reasons especially this image is tagged with credit: "Foto: Aaron García". Gunnex (talk) 20:02, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 22:39, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be work of 20minutos.es (sourced with http://www.20minutos.es/imagen/923713 = http://cdn.20minutos.es/img/2009/01/29/923713.jpg = last modified: 29.01.2009, see also file path) as it was previously published via (examples):

Btw, once again an example of 20minutos.es´ ridiculous license "policy" as the 2nd part of the image concerning Amaia Salamanca was previously published via http://www.20minutos.es/noticia/414626/0/amaia/salamanca/sintetas/ (25.09.2008) configured with credits: "TELECINCO" and not - as above - "Foto: 20MINUTOS.ES"... Gunnex (talk) 21:36, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 22:39, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation from http://ukrslovo.net/planet/travel/14345.html / Можливе порушення авторських прав з http://ukrslovo.net/planet/travel/14345.html NickK (talk) 21:40, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 22:39, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be work of 20minutos.es (sourced with http://www.20minutos.es/imagen/924098 = http://cdn.20minutos.es/img/2009/01/30/924098.jpg = last modified: 30.012009, see also file path, original news: http://www.20minutos.es/noticia/446870/0/neus/asensi/llego/) as it was previously published (although watermarked) via http://www.formulatv.com/fotos/neus-asensi-a-ver-si-llego/ (26.01.2009, credits: "Teresa Peyri") or (cropped) via http://www.kane3.es/television/a-ver-si-llego-ay-dios-mio.php (on same day as 20minutos.es, credits: "© Teresa Peyri. Telecinco") = http://www.kane3.es/uploads/aver_sillego4.jpg. Gunnex (talk) 22:40, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 22:39, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be work of 20minutos.es (sourced with http://www.20minutos.es/imagen/931062 = http://cdn.20minutos.es/img/2009/02/17/931062.jpg = last modified: 17.02.2009, see also file path, original news: http://www.20minutos.es/noticia/450921/0/vuelta/mundo/directo/) as it was previously published (although watermarked) via http://www.formulatv.com/fotos/presentadores-vuelta-mundo-directo/ (06.02.2009, credits: "A3TV"). Gunnex (talk) 23:13, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 22:39, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Patrickfmeyer (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Various media files uploaded by Patrick Meyer to illustrate en:Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Patrick Meyer. There are two issues:

Dereckson (talk) 15:11, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, all are either copyright violations or out of scope. Taivo (talk) 09:22, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No reason to host this unused problematic duplicate of File:Reading comics.png. -- Tuválkin 08:39, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 13:45, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Lohangers

[edit]

User Lohangers has uploaded these photos:

These photos have bad quality. We have better porn here. Taivo (talk) 08:50, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 17:43, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused bad quality photos. Alex (talk) 14:20, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 11:26, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be work of 20minutos.es (sourced with http://www.20minutos.es/imagen/881901 = http://cdn.20minutos.es/img/2008/10/16/881901.jpg = last modified: 16.10.2008, see also file path, original news: http://www.20minutos.es/noticia/420070/0/triunfitos/actores/triunfo/) as it was previously published via http://www.formulatv.com/fotos/beth-lalola/ (03.07.2008, credits: "A3TV") = http://www.formulatv.com/images/fgaleria/4700/4709.jpg. "A3TV" indicates to es:Antena 3 (a Spanish terrestrial television channel) which broadcasted the related TV-serie "Lalola". Gunnex (talk) 17:01, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Related: File:Beth (singer).jpg, deleted in 2007 by similar problems. Gunnex (talk) 17:06, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Denniss (talk) 11:26, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

replaced by more precise:File:Condé inf 1734.png L' empereur Charles (talk) 10:39, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, there have been a lot of such deletion requests. Taivo (talk) 09:53, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused raw text, out of scope. Probably is better, when somebody, who understands Spanish, looks that file also. Taivo (talk) 08:19, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 11:23, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

replaced by more precise File:Noailles inf 1740.png L' empereur Charles (talk) 13:16, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, there have been a lot of such deletion requests. Taivo (talk) 11:31, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

replaced by more precise: File:Ouroy Inf 1734.png L' empereur Charles (talk) 11:04, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, there have been a lot of such deletion requests. Taivo (talk) 10:35, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

replaced by more precise File:Ouroy inf 1740.png L' empereur Charles (talk) 11:10, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, there have been a lot of such deletion requests. Taivo (talk) 11:06, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

replaced by more precise File:Du Perche inf 1734.png L' empereur Charles (talk) 12:57, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, there have been a lot of such deletion requests. Taivo (talk) 11:20, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

replaced by more precise File:Du Perche inf 1740.png L' empereur Charles (talk) 13:02, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, there have been a lot of such deletion requests. Taivo (talk) 11:24, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused raw text, out of scope. It is better, when somebody, who understands Spanish, will look at this also. Taivo (talk) 08:12, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 11:23, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

replaced by more precise File:Rouergue inf 1734.png L' empereur Charles (talk) 12:07, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, there have been a lot of such deletion requests. Taivo (talk) 11:16, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo Honza chodec, earlier known as Slfi (talk) 15:38, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. --ZooFari 00:34, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File:Tots.jpg

http://losre-sonators.blogspot.de/2013/07/los-re-sonators-en-la-sala-casino.html Túrelio (talk) 07:04, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Gone --Denniss (talk) 11:22, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

replaced by more precise File:Tournaisis inf 1734.png L' empereur Charles (talk) 14:32, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, there have been a lot of such deletion requests. Taivo (talk) 11:45, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is not a sports club named Ubon. Out of scope. Rapsar (talk) 09:07, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment That case, I must File:Ubon-Logo.gif also present for deletion. Taivo (talk) 15:16, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Denniss (talk) 11:24, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Floskating

[edit]

Here are all files, uploaded by user Floskating and not yet presented for deletion:

They have small/inconsistent resolution and no metadata. Copyright violation is suspected. Taivo (talk) 08:25, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 11:23, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Telisatel

[edit]

User Telisatel made 3 years ago such self-promo:

Unused advertisements. Taivo (talk) 08:55, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 11:23, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Vetbus

[edit]

User Vetbus has uploaded a lot of logos of the same organization and claimed to be the author of them all. These are not yet presented for deletion:

Copyright violation is suspected. Taivo (talk) 08:46, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 11:23, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Русич

[edit]

User Русич has uploaded these images:

The first is non-free logo from year 2006. The other is photo of modern building, but there is no freedom of panorama in Russia. Taivo (talk) 09:26, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 11:25, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Leoboudv as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Is the derivative projected image too big?
Converted by me to DR, as I am not sure whether the content of the background display is copyrightable. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:02, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep:The projected image is simply the Democratic Progressive Party's party flag plus its name in Chinese as that is this party's event. I don't think there is anything need to be protected in the picture. I also believe in keeping it is in accordance with this party's intention and interest.--Wildcursive (talk) 12:01, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep If we do not count text (only 3 hieroglyphes) and contour of island, which is not copyrightable, then remains only white cross on green background. This is ineligible for copyright. Taivo (talk) 14:45, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per Taivo I suppose. -mattbuck (Talk) 12:58, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

por que quiero 189.228.254.29 01:12, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I do not understand this language, but the file is used in es.wiki in article "Exploitation of children". Taivo (talk) 14:16, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No valid reason for deletion. -mattbuck (Talk) 12:58, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
  •  Delete Not realistic educational purpose. There is no useful information about where was the photo taken. In that case is not probable this file will be used in wikimedia foundation projects. Bestiasonica (talk) 23:43, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep: The filename states this is 国立競技場Ⅲ, i.e., National Stadium III. (Pro tip: Don’t know any Chinese, and cannot be bothered to learn or even to look it up? Cool, but leave media with Chinese filenames alone and focus your deletionist zeal somewhere else.) Some apt categorizong will hopefully put this file under the reach of people who can promptly identify the location based on its skyline and other details. -- Tuválkin 17:23, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment It's a nice point of view, but this file is of very poor quality, even if you want a photo of a sunset. Surely there are dozens of photographs about this National Stadium (problably in Tokyo, Japan) on wikimedia Commons, but this is surely the poorest one (darkish first plane, blurred background). There is a reasonable use of this file instead of better ones? I think not at all. --Bestiasonica (talk) 23:09, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Or maybe this photo, unsatisfying as it is, is the only one we have of this particular location, and as such it should be treasured for the time being. If you're so keen on having it deleted, go all the way and find in Commons those other much better photos of this same location. Once you’ve find them, voting delete for this photo will be trivial. -- Tuválkin 00:14, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment I’m pleased to note that Bestiasonica’s modified rationale is now «Ugly pic, delete!», departing from the initial «I cannot read squiggles, delete!» — an improvement I can only salute. -- Tuválkin 00:14, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Possibly useless, but who knows. -mattbuck (Talk) 13:08, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Extended content
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These files appear to violate COM:FOP#United States.

Stefan4 (talk) 21:02, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Same as the above.

Stefan4 (talk) 11:56, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Derivative works of copyrighted work PierreSelim (talk) 05:54, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Flickr images needing human review

Derivative work of images on a screen.

Stefan4 (talk) 09:15, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: The first projected image is simply four common Chinese words which means "criticizes the President and protects Taiwan". There is nothing need to be protected in the picture. For the second picture, you can see the two persons on the image are actually the two persons on the far right stage. This is a real time image (not designed image or media content) of what happened on the stage as some people in the back can not see the people on stage clear. It is just a larger size of what is already in the picture. Here is nothing to be protected either. I also believe in keeping them is in accordance with the host party's intention and interest.--Wildcursive (talk) 12:19, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Apart from the "嗆馬保台" text, there is also a background image of a thunderstorm. I don't know about the threshold of originality of the Republic of China, but a court in the People's Republic of China found the handwriting on this image to be a copyrighted artwork (see COM:TOO#China (PRC)). Also, live broadcasts are just as copyrighted as other broadcasts. --Stefan4 (talk) 12:41, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the reply! According to Article 9 of TAIWAN's Copyright Act: "The following items shall not be the subject matter of copyright: ... Slogans and common symbols, terms..." The main part on the screen is "the four words" which is simply a common political slogan. The minor part thunderstorm is not distinguished enough to claim copyright and I don't believe the host party or the team for the event will do so.
In addition, Taiwan (ROC) and China/PRC are two totally different sovereign states with different legal systems and practices. I can make sure their stuff has nothing to do with Taiwan. (I got a degree in law and had some legal experience.) However, I read the news about that transnational case in China. That's because a US businessman used a gift work from a calligrapher to be trademark of his own business. So the point is the context and situation are different. One is concerning almost the whole art work evolving financial interest and the picture I upload is just a very tiny part of a public political event.
--Wildcursive (talk) 02:02, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Nothing copyrightable here, does not surpass threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 15:48, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Could you provide a reference for your claim? There is no evidence that these things are below COM:TOO#Republic of China. Things like this are copyrightable in lots of countries. Compare for example with COM:TOO#United Kingdom or COM:TOO#Austria. --Stefan4 (talk) 18:03, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep The characters are in standard shapes (though tilted), not in handwritten forms, thus PD text logo would apply. As for the thunderstorm in the background, they are so tiny that we can probably count as COM:DM. --whym (talk) 13:35, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept - As noted, the first the screen is PDTEXT, in the second it's just real-time. -mattbuck (Talk) 13:03, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Flickr images needing human review

See COM:PACKAGING. The Flickr user is unlikely the person who made the packaging.

Stefan4 (talk) 22:09, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:32, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Flickr images needing human review

No freedom of panorama in Russia.

Stefan4 (talk) 14:44, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: The picture was taken in Vancouver, Canada at the 2010 Winter Olympics. See here. Sander.v.Ginkel (talk) 14:48, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hm, I assumed that the word "Sochi" meant that the photo was taken there. Still, there is no evidence that the poster is permanently installed. If it was taken down after the Winter Olympics, then it isn't permanently installed. Also, COM:FOP#Canada doesn't apply to 2D things like this. --Stefan4 (talk) 15:02, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Picture shows olympic logo, which is copyright protected. So not allowed deriviate work. Miho (talk) 22:28, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The Olympic logo was designed by fr:Pierre de Coubertin who died in 1937 and the logo was first published in 1912. The logo should therefore be in the public domain because of age in most countries of the world. It should also be below the threshold of originality of most countries. The problem is that this is a photograph of a photograph, and the photographer of the photographed photograph needs to give consent. --Stefan4 (talk) 23:26, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. There is no evidence that this image might be free. Even if one claimed that this image might be an incidental detail when included in the context of the larger photo of the building, the extraction of this image from its context removes any possibility of claiming that it is incidental in the context. It would be exactly an example of something that can't be done, as explained in the policy: Crops of de minimis images. -- Asclepias (talk) 03:40, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep:This image was originally posted to Flickr by waferboard. It was reviewed on 11 February 2014 by the FlickreviewR robot and was confirmed to be licensed under the terms of the cc-by-2.0.Now is original image,just logo and human plays is copyviolo but all structure is free ,example: Commons:Deletion requests/Image:PokemonJA8956.JPG --EEIM (talk) 05:39, 13 February 2014 (UTC).[reply]
  • Keep: Incidental inclusion. Sochi logo is {{Pd-textlogo}} by far, and as had been explained, this photo was taken in Vancouver (Canada, thankfully, has much better FOP than Russia) ViperSnake151 (talk) 23:59, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept as above. Yann (talk) 12:47, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Flickr images needing human review

The timetables might be considered as "databases" under the w:Database Directive. In that case, the timetables remain unfree until they are at least 15 years old.

Stefan4 (talk) 13:05, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - insufficient information to decide either way. Frankly, and I'm sick of pointing this out, Stefan4 needs to stop abusing Commons' deletion processes as some kind of free law school, where he gets to formulate and test out his pet theories by arguing with others about hyper-theoreticals. If he isn't actually sure whether or not a photograph of a UK bus timetable violates the Database Directive, he should find the money to pay for some professional tuition on the subject - as far as I'm concerned, any and all claims from this user that do not come with convincing proof, either in the form of incontrovertible legal text/analsyis, or convincing case law, should be summarily dismissed. Commons uploaders/re-users do not deserve to have their time wasted or their patience tested on these utterly speculative and completely uninformed nominations. Ultra7 (talk) 13:46, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note I've re-activated the AN/U that was previously filed over this issue - see 'Stefan4'. Ultra7 (talk) 15:00, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • What do you mean? According to w:Database Directive, databases are copyrighted in the European Union for 15 years. A database is a collection of many pieces of information, and a timetable is a collection of many departure or arrival times, i.e. pieces of information. It is the responsibility of the uploader to provide evidence that an uploaded file is in the public domain or freely licensed, and the uploader hasn't done this here. --Stefan4 (talk) 15:24, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    So as to not duplicate replies, I've responded at AN/U. Ultra7 (talk) 16:19, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Accordint to UK The Copyright and Rights in Databases Regulations 1997: 19. (1) A lawful user of a database which has been made available to the public in any manner shall be entitled to extract or re-utilise insubstantial parts of the contents of the database for any purpose. I think that timetable from a single station is an "insubstantial part" of the whole timetable database and "any purpose" include publishing its photo under a free license. However, it is my personal opinion only as I am not a lawyer. Ankry (talk) 16:22, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    • The timetable from a single station and the complete timetable of all buses are two separate databases. In this case, the entire "smaller database" is copied. Since the database right is exempt from the originality requirement, it seems that changing only one data point is sufficient to create a new database. --Stefan4 (talk) 18:23, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Notices with timetables may be copyrightable for various reasons, however the database directive is not the right area of IP law to quote here. -- (talk) 16:31, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    • Why do you think so? Also keep in mind that the United Kingdom has typographical copyright. I'm not sure if that applies here. --Stefan4 (talk) 18:23, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
      • No, typographical copyright is not relevant either. The relevant quote is that copyright exists "if, and only if, by reason of the selection or arrangement of the contents of the database the database constitutes the author's own intellectual creation". TfL timetables are *highly* constrained in arrangement, and are worked out and laid out by programming routines, not by people (I was involved in programming London Underground schedules, using control engineering methods, back in the 1980s). As I said, other areas of IP law may apply, but not the one that you are so keen to attempt to set a precedent for here. If you wish to discuss this in detail, then please use the copyright noticeboard, testing the boundaries by using deletion requests is unhelpful, and is likely to be seen as confrontational. -- (talk) 18:38, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Speedy keep per Ankry and . --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:51, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per Hedwig and others. Yann (talk) 06:07, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incomplete uploads. Please delete and/or reupload.

Ytoyoda (talk) 17:40, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 01:20, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ww2censor (talk) 17:08, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Ronhjones. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:09, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

incomplete uploads - let the uploaders do them again

Ww2censor (talk) 10:28, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Only Unfixed images deleted. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 22:41, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files seem to have been accidentally uploaded as a .jpg instead of as a video

Elisfkc (talk) 19:53, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Technical error, the pictures should be deleted. --Killarnee (T12) 20:17, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Killarnee: have you uploaded or will you upload these as videos? If not, I can work through at least some of them. I did File:2010 08 18 Grand Canyon Video Aerial (4908347418).jpg already (see File:2010 08 18 Grand Canyon Video Aerial (4908347418).webm), but I don't want to upload duplicates if someone else is already working on it. clpo13(talk) 00:22, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
You are welcome to upload the videos. Since mp4 is not allowed that would be too much effort for me, so I will not upload the videos. --Killarnee (T12) 00:30, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I'm in the process of uploading the videos now. I've marked which ones I've done already. clpo13(talk) 20:26, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Mixed close. Deleted those where video was uploaded. Kept those which are essentially links to the original videos. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:24, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshots of videos

-Killarnee (CTU) 13:26, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:20, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, useless screenshot of a video

-akko (talk) 12:27, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 01:22, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Useless screenshots of a video

-Killarnee (CTU) 19:03, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And how are they supposed to be useful? You can upload the complete videos, but only random snapshots of the videos (which, by the way, were probably not made on purpose but only for technical reasons, has already happened to me) are of little use in my opinion. But it's good that you at least removed the edges. 14:38, 5 January 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Killarnee (talk • contribs)
  • The matter in discussion is not whether the uploader of these three video snapshots could/should have uploaded better media from the same source but rather whether these three files should be deleted or not. -- Tuválkin 18:51, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I doubt to what extent these pictures have an educational or other purpose, and it would obviously be better to just upload the complete videos. But it is my opinion and since the pictures have no greater meaning for me than all the other pictures and I therefore do not want to dwell on this discussion, I ask you to accept this as my opinion and leave the final decision to an admin. And I kindly ask you, if you already bother to write me here, that you then bother to review the license of the pictures. -Killarnee (CTU) 20:08, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • You started a public discussion about the possibility of deleting these three images (favouring deletion), and I added my opinion to it (opposing deletion), fully within process. You decided to take expection at my disagreeing opinion, which is totally valid in itself, but it’s rich that you top your reaction to my vote with a plea for acceptance of your opinion — well, right back at you, Killarnee. An admin will close this request in either direction, taking in account the discussion — I expect no other outcome and never supported any different way of dealing with DRs.
As for the licence review, I did “bother” (lovely word choice, thanksverymuch) about it, several times, but sadly the gadget seems to be broken.
-- Tuválkin 21:46, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I am not saying that you have to agree and have to be of the same opinion, just that you have to accept and tolerate it as my opinion. I don't find anything "rich" about that at all. I really don't understand what you have, I do not really care if these pictures are deleted, there are so many things to do here, you are not allowed to linger on this few pictures. I'm just saying, yes, MAYBE these files would be fine, but as videos, not random screenshots. So end of the discussion, at least for me. Got better things to do than dwell on unimportant random images. -Killarnee (CTU) 22:42, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • The thread above is clear about who said what and when. And what’s rich is yourself, of course, for only a rich person can afford horses, although beating them is always reprehensible, even when they are bereft of life, as in the case at hand. -- Tuválkin 01:16, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
🙄😄 Oh man, you're really fighting for your pictures that look like they were created in an accident, as if the pictures were your babies. Joking aside, r u from Portugal and is your isp Netcabo? Just out of interest, you don't have to answer if you don't want to... -Killarnee (CTU) 01:55, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment: I reviewed the 3 images only because the copyright is secure and at least there is an educational purpose somewhere but the image title could be called 'rock fall' perhaps? I don't know. --Leoboudv (talk) 22:16, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You’re right about "Rock Fall" being a better name than "Rock Scaling" (which I first mistook for broken English influenced by Portuguse "escalada" = "climbing"), but I think that the current names are not wrong enough to warrant COM:FR.
-- Tuválkin 01:16, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Info @Tm: Regardless of the merits of this DR, or lack thereof, surely uploading the whole of the original video is a good idea: The whole scene, short as it is, presents a very interesting illustration of the process of cliff face stabilization for roadside safety, also suitable to illustrate the subject of infrastructure maintenance in the U.S., a matter of current events. -- Tuválkin 20:30, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep per Tuválkin & GRuban. I uploaded the video as File:Rock Scaling.webm using COM:V2C. Replacement filename suggestions appreciated.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 05:05, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: concensus is to keep. Agree that these are in scope. --P 1 9 9   04:24, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Giada Marini

[edit]

User Giada Marini has uploaded a lot of duplicates:

And more:

Taivo (talk) 08:32, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted the last four images since they are album covers etc. I don't belive it but maybe they are indeed own works. --D-Kuru (talk) 22:42, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Given the mixture of quality, filetypes and lack of metadata, I don't believe these are own work. -mattbuck (Talk) 13:16, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Pippigolightly

[edit]

User Pippigolightly has uploaded these images:

For me, it is a problem. These letters are written in 1915, but author himself died in 1959. The letters were published posthumously and I am not sure, that they were published at all before uploading into Commons. No good licence is given. Taivo (talk) 09:34, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

These letters are part of The State Library of Queensland's collection. If you go to the handle: http://hdl.handle.net/10462/eadarc/8217 You will see it is stated that these records are licenced under the creative commons act. Licensed under Creative Commons CC-BY http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/au These records have been uploaded as part of a State Library of QLD volunteer project: https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Wikisource:WikiProject_SLQ I am SLQ staff Pippigolightly (talk) 02:06, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept - I think we can assume that the library of Queensland knows what they're on about. -mattbuck (Talk) 13:14, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vedla77 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Modern art. I think painter identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:13, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The following files are my own work (it took the picture myself) and were never published on any website before:

For the others files, an authorization will be sent by Claude Stassart-Springer: she took the pictures and gave me the right to use them on wikipédia.

The two last files were already published on other websites, so they can be deleted:


Deleted: That you took photos of the paintings is neither here nor there - the copyright rests with the artist, and there has been no OTRS forthcoming. -mattbuck (Talk) 13:11, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Oregon 2003 license plates

[edit]

I think, that Oregon 2003 licence plates are too complicated for public domain:

Licence "Own work" does not apply. Taivo (talk) 10:14, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. -mattbuck (Talk) 13:07, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Leoboudv as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Projector image is much too dominant.
Converted by me to DR, as I am not sure whether the content of the background display is copyrightable. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:02, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep:The projected image is simply a light background showing part of the Democratic Progressive Party's party flag plus four common Chinese words (which means "Taiwan Spirit" in English) as that is this party's event. I don't think there is anything need to be protected in the picture. I also believe in keeping it is in accordance with this party's intention and interest.--Wildcursive (talk) 12:07, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep This is pure text, only 4 hieroglyphes. Nothing copyrightable here. Taivo (talk) 14:47, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: The flag is fair use at WP:EN, so at least some of our colleagues think it is under copyright. That makes the background here a problem. The argument about intention and interest violates COM:PRP. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:00, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]