User talk:Poleta33

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Image deletion warning Image:Toycvycxsv.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion.

Thuresson 10:51, 29 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Poleta33!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文(台灣)‎ | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−

No lower resolution

[edit]

I just crop the white border.--Marku1988 (talk) 08:20, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Calphotos

[edit]

Hi. The authorisation you give for the use of the pictures from Franco Andreone is not sufficient. Please use the OTRS system and send the authorisation there, or your uploads may have to be deleted. Thanks. Lycaon (talk) 00:28, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

hi I will try to find this mail... seems to be hard... Poleta33 (talk) 14:15, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
yoooahhhhhhhhhh ! Franco andreone sent me the email !..... waouhhhhhh ! Poleta33 (talk) 08:39, 14 November 2008 (UTC) (very happy !)[reply]
Bonne nouvelle. La seule chose que vous avez à faire maintenant est de l'envoyer à OTRS. Amicalement, Lycaon (talk) 09:28, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
je ne sais pas si j'ai bien compris la demarche : j'ai forwarde le mail a permissions-commons-fr[att]wikimedia.org... et j'attends toujours des nouvelles.... Poleta33 (talk) 10:31, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
T'as bien compris. Maintenant il faut attendre, ca peut prendre quelque temps... Lycaon (talk) 12:19, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
apparemment c'est le ticket 2008111410007833 : je fais quoi maintenant ? Poleta33 (talk) 09:15, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Now you will have to add {{PermissionOTRS|ticket=https://secure.wikimedia.org/otrs/index.pl?Action=AgentTicketZoom&TicketID=10007833}} to your images. Lycaon (talk) 08:22, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

avant de faire ca j'aimerais avoir confirmation que c'est bon parce que j'ai juste eu un vague mail qui me disait :
Les volontaires se chargeront de traiter votre courriel et de valider ou non la permission.
mais en fait rien ne me dit que c'est OK... Poleta33 (talk) 09:37, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Franco Andreone's pictures on calphotos have already been authorized ! --Esculapio (talk) 11:45, 22 November 2008 (UTC) {{PermissionTicket|id=2008111410007833}}[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Chunam_Tree_Frog.JPG. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. Lokal_Profil 15:29, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

pfff.... I will try to make my best to find the original authorization... Poleta33 (talk) 15:43, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Pay attention to copyright Image:Salamandra salamandra infraimmaculata03.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. For images, you may find Commons:Image casebook useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.


Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

-Túrelio (talk) 21:05, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

speedy delete asked because same image as Image:Salamandra salamandra infraimmaculata02.jpg Poleta33 (talk) 10:40, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright Image:Salamandra salamandra terrestris03.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. For images, you may find Commons:Image casebook useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.


Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

-Túrelio (talk) 21:06, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

speedy delete asked because same image as Image:Salamandra salamandra terrestris02.jpg Poleta33 (talk) 10:40, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

question on categorization

[edit]

Answered on my talk. Regards. Lycaon (talk) 15:42, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Poleta33,
to avoid unnecessary work in such cases as File:Scinax fuscovarius01c.jpg and the other frog, next time please use {{duplicate|name of better/correct version}}. Thanks.--Túrelio (talk) 13:21, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

sorry for wasting your time ! thanks for your advice ! thanks too for all your work ! Poleta33 (talk) 13:32, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

| in categories

[edit]

Hi Poleta33! I have seen you adding a "|" to categories, e.g. changing Category:Gephyromantis sculpturatus to Category:Gephyromantis|sculpturatus. Can you give me a hint what the | is doing? I guess it is explained somewhere but I can't find it. Thanks in advance, Axel Strauß (talk) 12:24, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi
it is just for sorting categories ;O) Poleta33 (talk) 12:43, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hm, what is it sorting? I can't see a difference between the "outcome" of using or not using it. But maybe the differnce is something I do not see but the systems recognises. Well, so in future I just place a | between genus and species name, even if I don't get what it is about. Thanks, Axel Strauß (talk) 12:51, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
sorry my english is really poor ! to sort = trier (in french)
without | the category is sorted under the G (G for Gephyromantis)
with the |sculpturatus the category is sorted under s (s for sculpturatus)
hope it is clearer now...
better explained here Poleta33 (talk) 14:00, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, cool. Now I got it. Thanks, Axel Strauß (talk) 14:11, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

frogs

[edit]

Hi Poleta33!

just in case you didn't notice, I answered you on my discussion page.

-- Amada44 (talk) 12:55, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

yeah I've seen : a big THANKS to you ! Poleta33 (talk) 14:21, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please help replace this outdated license

[edit]

Hello!

Thank you for donating images to the Wikimedia Commons. You have uploaded some images in the past with the license {{PD}}. While this was a license acceptable in the early days of Wikimedia, since January 2006, this license has been deprecated and since October 2008 no new uploads with this license was allowed.

The license on older images should be replaced with a better and more specific license/permissions and you can help by checking the images and adding {{PD-self}} if you are the author or one of the other templates that you can see in the template on the image page.

Thank you for your help. If you need help feel free to ask at Commons talk:Licensing or contact User:Zscout370.

The images we would like you to check are:

BotMultichillT 21:03, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

the original uploader was KlemensB at de.wikipedia Poleta33 (talk) 11:14, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Anaxyrus boreas

[edit]

Hi Poleta33; I'm not convinced that it is a good idea to move this genus on Commons.[1] Most of the sister projects have not done so and there is a troubling note on the Wikispecies page.[2] Have you reviewed the Pauly paper? Best wishes, Walter Siegmund (talk) 16:32, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Walter
IUCN and ASW agree with Anaxyrus
I think we should follow official sites... Poleta33 (talk) 16:44, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Categories on Commons help editors from our sister projects find media to illustrate articles. Consequently, it may be helpful to follow the lead of those editors. So far, only the French, Dutch and Serbian editors have adopted Anaxyrus boreas. When you do update a species name, please use the {{Synonyms}} tag to list the former names for the organism, move the gallery for the organism, and update the {{Taxonavigation}} fields.[3] Walter Siegmund (talk) 22:48, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
OK ! thanks Walter ! Poleta33 (talk) 07:19, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for updating the name of this species. That is important work and few have the knowledge and inclination to do it. I hope I didn't give the impression that it isn't appreciated. Walter Siegmund (talk) 13:01, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Bolitoglossa_pandi07.jpeg

[edit]
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Bolitoglossa_pandi07.jpeg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Bolitoglossa_pandi07.jpeg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Kam Solusar (talk) 17:58, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

cartes de repartition IUCN

[edit]

Bonjour,

Comme suite a la discussion du bistro, j'ai telechargé le fichier SHX Mammals - terrestrial et essaye de voir ce que je peux faire avec mon logiciel.

Je decouvre le truc en meme temps que je le fait, mon probleme pour l'instant, c'est de retrouver tous les contours d'une meme sorte (si j'ai tout compris, parametre bionominal).

En plus, comme le fichier est particulierement gros, ca rame, voir ca plante.

--Cqui (talk) 17:16, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

merci pour ses infos : est ce que tu peux me donner l'url que tu telecharges... je vais regarder aussi si je trouve des choses, je ne suis vriament pas un caid des manipulations des images, mais ca m'interesse beaucoup ! Poleta33 (talk) 20:19, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect

[edit]

Salut vieux.

Amitiés 14:49, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

salut Liné1 !
pour la 1 je ne connaissais pas en effet c'est mieux
pour 2 et 3, je n'ai jamais ajoute d'info avec WBR sur commons et je dois avouer que je n'y avais même pas pense !... pour moi commons c'est juste du stockage de fichiers mais bon je ferais attention la prochaine fois et je ferais marcher le merveilleux WBR !
++ Poleta33 (talk) 13:19, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
super, merci.
Tu as raison: commons est juste un stockage de média.
Mais bien sur il y a plein de soucis:
  • Comment éviter de créer plusieurs catégories pour des synonymes.
    • => Il faut fournir des références
  • comme on a pas l'identification de toutes les bététes => on a des catégories pour tous les rangs (genre, famille, ordre)
    • du coup en rentre de le délire de classer les catégories
      • mais quelle(s) classification(s) => Il faut fournir classification, sources, références ...
Ca suit la théorie de l'emmerde maximum ;-)
Amitiés Liné1 (talk) 13:17, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement

[edit]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Adelotus brevis distribution map.png

[edit]
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Adelotus brevis distribution map.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 01:42, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Mixophyes fleayi tadpole.JPG

[edit]
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Mixophyes fleayi tadpole.JPG, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 01:44, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Pseudophryne distribution.png

[edit]
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Pseudophryne distribution.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 01:45, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Assa darlingtoni distibution.png

[edit]
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Assa darlingtoni distibution.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 01:45, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Arenophryne rotunda distibution.PNG

[edit]
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Arenophryne rotunda distibution.PNG, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 01:45, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Alsodinae has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

  — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 16:17, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gonatodes albogularis02a.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:26, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]