Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2013/09/22
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_2013-09-21_20-22.jpg){kind=link}
_(1).jpg){kind=link}
2.jpg){kind=link}
_Sketched_By_Khurram_Irshad_Chattha.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_logo.svg){kind=link}
copyright violation: http://bc-teatr.com/?p=4432 アンタナナ 12:30, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- and these ones as well:
- --アンタナナ 12:43, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvios Anatoliy (talk) 13:46, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Permission comes from subject, photographer is not even mentioned in the ticket. Jcb (talk) 14:05, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- The permission was updated and stated that Rana Mitter himself is the author. --Ecce Ralgis (háblame) 14:30, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- He told it was his camera. I sent him a mail to ask who operated it. To be continued. Jcb (talk) 14:42, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Per ticket Jcb (talk) 15:11, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
blatant copyvio DHN (talk) 06:18, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: yep. JuTa 22:23, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
There is no freedom of panorama in Morocco. See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Hassan II Mosque and Category:Moroccan FOP cases. . HombreDHojalata.talk 08:37, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nom and as part of cleanup russavia (talk) 16:20, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No FOP in Azerbaijan, this is an image of the newly built Flaming towers, while the mosque takes a tertiary position. There are other pictures of the mosque that don't include the towers.
- Clearly the photographer was more concerned about getting a picture of the towers, because he missed the lower half of this building. Other pictures of the building are available.
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fortifications_of_the_Shirvanshah%27s_Palace_in_Baku.jpg
- There is a giant tree blocking the building in question, while the towers are visible. There are other pictures of Shirvanshahs Palace Mosque available.
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Palace_Mosque_in_Baku_2.jpg
- Again a tree is blocking the view of the building in question, while the towers are visible. Other images are available, that don't have the towers, or the tree blocking the view.
46.70.85.19 12:10, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Keep. The Flame Towers aren't the main object of this photo. Here we can see mostly old buildings of Baku, including the mosque of the 17th century. Actually we already had a discussion according that general views should be kept. --Interfase (talk) 12:29, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Mass deletion nominations by sockpuppet as an attempt at harassment. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:51, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Mass deletion nominations by sockpuppet as an attempt at harassment. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:52, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
No FOP in Azerbaijan 46.70.85.19 12:36, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Keep. This photo doesn't show this architectural work. The main purpose of the photo is to show the fans of the 'Karabakh' football club, not the building. --Interfase (talk) 12:40, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Mass deletion nominations by sockpuppet as an attempt at harassment. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:52, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
FOP in Azerbaijan does not allow commercial use of images of copyrighted works including architectural works 46.70.85.19 12:42, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Keep. This photo doesn't show this architectural work. The main purpose of the photo is to show the field, players, and the fans of the national team, not the building. --Interfase (talk) 12:47, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Mass deletion nominations by sockpuppet as an attempt at harassment. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:52, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
FOP in Azerbaijan does not allow commercial use of images of copyrighted works including architectural works 46.70.85.19 12:43, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Keep. This photo doesn't show this architectural work. The main purpose of the photo is to show the moment of the game, not the building. --Interfase (talk) 12:47, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Mass deletion nominations by sockpuppet as an attempt at harassment. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:52, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
FOP in Azerbaijan does not allow commercial use of images of copyrighted works including architectural works 46.70.85.19 12:44, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Keep. This photo doesn't show this architectural work. The main purpose of the photo is to show the fans of the national team and the resul on the board, not the building. --Interfase (talk) 12:47, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Mass deletion nominations by sockpuppet as an attempt at harassment. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:52, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
Lower picture. FOP in Azerbaijan does not allow commercial use of images of copyrighted works including architectural works 46.70.85.19 12:45, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Keep. All buildings in this image were built until 19th century. Their architects already died before 1944. --Interfase (talk) 12:50, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Mass deletion nominations by sockpuppet as an attempt at harassment. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:52, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
FOP in Azerbaijan does not allow commercial use of images of copyrighted works including architectural works 46.70.85.19 12:44, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Keep. This photo doesn't show this architectural work. The main purpose of the photo is to show the field, players, and the fans of the national team, not the building. --Interfase (talk) 12:48, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Mass deletion nominations by sockpuppet as an attempt at harassment. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:52, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
FOP in Azerbaijan does not allow commercial use of images of copyrighted works including architectural works 46.70.85.19 12:45, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Keep. At this photo we see general view. Actually we already had a discussion according that general views should be kept. By the way this image was extracted from this already kept image. --Interfase (talk) 12:52, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Mass deletion nominations by sockpuppet as an attempt at harassment. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:52, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
FOP in Azerbaijan does not allow commercial use of images of copyrighted works including architectural works 46.70.85.19 12:47, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Keep. At this photo we see general view. Actually we already had a discussion according that general views should be kept. --Interfase (talk) 12:52, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Mass deletion nominations by sockpuppet as an attempt at harassment. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:52, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
FOP in Azerbaijan does not allow commercial use of images of copyrighted works including architectural works 46.70.85.19 12:58, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Keep. Those are not architectural works. Also this is general view. --Interfase (talk) 13:02, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Mass deletion nominations by sockpuppet as an attempt at harassment. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:52, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
FOP in Azerbaijan does not allow commercial use of images of copyrighted works including architectural works 46.70.85.19 12:59, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Mass deletion nominations by sockpuppet as an attempt at harassment. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:52, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
FOP in Azerbaijan does not allow commercial use of images of copyrighted works including architectural works 46.70.85.19 12:59, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Keep. All buldings on this image aren't copyrighted works. They were built untill 20th century. Architects of these works were died before 1944. --Interfase (talk) 13:04, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Mass deletion nominations by sockpuppet as an attempt at harassment. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:52, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
FOP in Azerbaijan does not allow commercial use of images of copyrighted works including architectural works 46.70.85.19 13:00, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Keep. Not copyrighted architectural work. Architect of this building of an Oil Academy is Joseph Gosławski. This building was built in 1900. --Interfase (talk) 13:06, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Mass deletion nominations by sockpuppet as an attempt at harassment. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:52, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
FOP in Azerbaijan does not allow commercial use of images of copyrighted works including architectural works 46.70.85.19 13:02, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Keep. Not copyrighted architectural work. Architect of this building of an Oil Academy is Joseph Gosławski. This building was built in 1900.
Kept: Mass deletion nominations by sockpuppet as an attempt at harassment. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:52, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
FOP in Azerbaijan does not allow commercial use of images of copyrighted works including architectural works 46.70.85.19 13:03, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Mass deletion nominations by sockpuppet as an attempt at harassment. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:51, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
FOP in Azerbaijan does not allow commercial use of images of copyrighted works including architectural works 46.70.85.19 13:03, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Mass deletion nominations by sockpuppet as an attempt at harassment. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:51, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
There is unfurtunately no freedom of panorama in Azerbaijan. Ymblanter (talk) 15:42, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:29, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
FOP in Azerbaijan does not allow commercial use of images of copyrighted works including architectural works 46.70.85.19 13:06, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Keep. Doesn't show architectural work. Only fans and stage. --Interfase (talk) 13:10, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Mass deletion nominations by sockpuppet as an attempt at harassment. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:51, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
FOP in Azerbaijan does not allow commercial use of images of copyrighted works including architectural works 46.70.85.19 13:04, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Keep. Not copyrighted architectural work. Architect of this building of an Oil Academy is Joseph Gosławski. This building was built in 1900. --Interfase (talk) 13:11, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Mass deletion nominations by sockpuppet as an attempt at harassment. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:51, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
FOP in Azerbaijan does not allow commercial use of images of copyrighted works including architectural works 46.70.85.19 12:59, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Keep. This photo doesn't show architectural works. The main purpose of this photo is to show fans, stage and performers. --Interfase (talk) 13:13, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Mass deletion nominations by sockpuppet as an attempt at harassment. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:52, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
FOP in Azerbaijan does not allow commercial use of images of copyrighted works including architectural works 46.70.85.19 12:59, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Keep. This photo doesn't show architectural work. The main purpose of this photo is to show fans, stage and JL. --Interfase (talk) 13:18, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Mass deletion nominations by sockpuppet as an attempt at harassment. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:47, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
FOP in Azerbaijan does not allow commercial use of images of copyrighted works including architectural works 46.70.85.19 13:02, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Keep. Not copyrighted architectural work. Architect of this building of an Oil Academy is Joseph Gosławski. This building was built in 1900. --Interfase (talk) 13:20, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Mass deletion nominations by sockpuppet as an attempt at harassment. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:47, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
FOP in Azerbaijan does not allow commercial use of images of copyrighted works including architectural works 46.70.85.19 13:09, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Keep. This photo doesn't show architectural work. The main purpose of this photo is to show fans, stage and performer. --Interfase (talk) 13:16, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Mass deletion nominations by sockpuppet as an attempt at harassment. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:47, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
FOP in Azerbaijan does not allow commercial use of images of copyrighted works including architectural works 46.70.85.19 13:09, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Keep. This photo doesn't show architectural works. The main purpose of this photo is to show fans and stage. --Interfase (talk) 13:16, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Keep. Interior of a sports arena filled with people during a musical performance is a work of art or architecture!? The photo has a clear intent to identify a specific performer during a specific performance. No art or architecture here.Zvonko (talk) 22:49, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Mass deletion nominations by sockpuppet as an attempt at harassment. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:47, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
FOP in Azerbaijan does not allow commercial use of images of copyrighted works including architectural works 46.70.85.19 13:04, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Mass deletion nominations by sockpuppet as an attempt at harassment. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:47, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
FOP in Azerbaijan does not allow commercial use of images of copyrighted works including architectural works 46.70.85.19 13:04, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Keep. General view of the street. --Interfase (talk) 13:12, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Mass deletion nominations by sockpuppet as an attempt at harassment. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:47, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
FOP in Azerbaijan does not allow commercial use of images of copyrighted works including architectural works 46.70.85.19 13:02, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Keep. This photo doesn't show architectural work. The main purpose of this photo is to show fans, stage and JL. --Interfase (talk) 13:17, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Mass deletion nominations by sockpuppet as an attempt at harassment. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:46, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
FOP in Azerbaijan does not allow commercial use of images of copyrighted works including architectural works 46.70.85.19 13:09, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Keep. This photo doesn't show architectural work. The main purpose of this photo is to show fans and green room. --Interfase (talk) 13:17, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Mass deletion nominations by sockpuppet as an attempt at harassment. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:46, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
FOP in Azerbaijan does not allow commercial use of images of copyrighted works including architectural works 46.70.85.19 13:01, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Keep. This photo doesn't show architectural work. The main purpose of this photo is to show fans, stage and JL. --Interfase (talk) 13:23, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Mass deletion nominations by sockpuppet as an attempt at harassment. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:46, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
FOP in Azerbaijan does not allow commercial use of images of copyrighted works including architectural works 46.70.85.19 13:22, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Keep. I don't see here any architectural work. The main purpose of this photo is to show fans and performers on the stage. I see here mostly people. --Interfase (talk) 13:42, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: Mass deletion nominations by sockpuppet as an attempt at harassment. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:45, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
FOP in Azerbaijan does not allow commercial use of images of copyrighted works including architectural works 46.70.85.19 13:23, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Keep. I don't see here any architectural work. The main purpose of this photo is to show journalists. I see here mostly people on press conference. --Interfase (talk) 13:24, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Mass deletion nominations by sockpuppet as an attempt at harassment. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:45, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
FOP in Azerbaijan does not allow commercial use of images of copyrighted works including architectural works 46.70.85.19 14:04, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Keep. Architectural work is not the main object of this photo. --Interfase (talk) 14:09, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Mass deletion nominations by sockpuppet as an attempt at harassment. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:45, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
FOP in Azerbaijan does not allow commercial use of images of copyrighted works including architectural works 46.70.85.19 14:12, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Mass deletion nominations by sockpuppet as an attempt at harassment. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:45, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
FOP in Azerbaijan does not allow commercial use of images of copyrighted works including design works. 46.70.85.19 14:16, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Mass deletion nominations by sockpuppet as an attempt at harassment. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:45, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
FOP in Azerbaijan does not allow commercial use of images of copyrighted works including design works. 46.70.85.19 14:17, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Keep. This is general view. Any design work is not the main object of this photo. --Interfase (talk) 14:24, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Mass deletion nominations by sockpuppet as an attempt at harassment. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:45, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
FOP in Azerbaijan does not allow commercial use of images of copyrighted works including design works. 46.70.85.19 14:19, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Keep. This is general view. Design work is not the main object of this photo. Actually we already had a discussion according that general views should be kept. --Interfase (talk) 14:24, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Mass deletion nominations by sockpuppet as an attempt at harassment. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:44, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
FOP in Azerbaijan does not allow commercial use of images of copyrighted works including design works. 46.70.85.19 14:20, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Keep. This is general view. Design work is not the main object of this photo. --Interfase (talk) 14:25, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Mass deletion nominations by sockpuppet as an attempt at harassment. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:44, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
FOP in Azerbaijan does not allow commercial use of images of copyrighted works including design works. 46.70.85.19 14:18, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Keep. This is general view. Design work is not the main object of this photo. Actually we already had a discussion according that general views should be kept. --Interfase (talk) 14:27, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- What is the main object of this photo? --46.70.85.19 14:32, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- Boulevard, port, people, shore, sea, duck. Many things. --Interfase (talk) 14:36, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Mass deletion nominations by sockpuppet as an attempt at harassment. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:42, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
FOP in Azerbaijan does not allow commercial use of images of copyrighted works including design works. 46.70.85.19 14:18, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Keep. This is general view. Design work is not the main object of this photo. Actually we already had a discussion according that general views should be kept. --Interfase (talk) 14:25, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Mass deletion nominations by sockpuppet as an attempt at harassment. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:44, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
FOP in Azerbaijan does not allow commercial use of images of copyrighted works including design works. 46.70.85.19 14:18, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Keep. This is general view. Design work is not the main object of this photo. --Interfase (talk) 14:26, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Mass deletion nominations by sockpuppet as an attempt at harassment. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:06, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
FOP in Azerbaijan does not allow commercial use of images of copyrighted works including memorials 46.70.85.19 14:24, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Mass deletion nominations by sockpuppet as an attempt at harassment. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:44, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
FOP in Azerbaijan does not allow commercial use of images of copyrighted works including design works. 46.70.85.19 14:22, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Keep. This is general view. Design work is not the main object of this photo. Actually we already had a discussion according that general views should be kept. --Interfase (talk) 14:26, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Mass deletion nominations by sockpuppet as an attempt at harassment. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:44, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
FOP in Azerbaijan does not allow commercial use of images of copyrighted works including design works. 46.70.85.19 14:22, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Keep. This is general view. Design work is not the main object of this photo. Actually we already had a discussion according that general views should be kept. --Interfase (talk) 14:26, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Mass deletion nominations by sockpuppet as an attempt at harassment. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:44, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
FOP in Azerbaijan does not allow commercial use of images of copyrighted works including design works. 46.70.85.19 14:17, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Mass deletion nominations by sockpuppet as an attempt at harassment. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:45, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Azerbaijan and the photo violates sculptor's copyright. Taivo (talk) 08:29, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 18:23, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
FOP in Azerbaijan does not allow commercial use of images of copyrighted works including memorials 46.70.85.19 14:28, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Keep. They are not copyrighted works. --Interfase (talk) 14:30, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Mass deletion nominations by sockpuppet as an attempt at harassment. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:43, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
FOP in Azerbaijan does not allow commercial use of images of copyrighted works including architectural works. 46.70.85.19 14:21, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Keep. This is general view. Any architectural work is not the main object of this photo. Actually we already had a discussion according that general views should be kept. --Interfase (talk) 14:26, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Mass deletion nominations by sockpuppet as an attempt at harassment. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:44, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
How is this freely licensed? The painter died in 1980, therefore derivative works should be copyrighted until 2051. I see no evidence that the Bundesarchiv has the required permissions from the artist's estate to release this under a CC license. 84user (talk) 15:48, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Derivative work. Painter died in 1980 Raymond 20:00, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Demande du contributeur Lev. Anthony (talk) 18:45, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: copyright violation Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 12:47, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
Quasi a duplicate of File:FDP Landtage.svg. The latter file is continously updated after elections were held. It is unclear what exactly is shown in this file. Rosenzweig τ 22:16, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: uncontested DR McZusatz (talk) 18:54, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
Unverifiable source and permission. I could not locate this file on the source page that was given and highly doubt that it would be released under a free license if it ever was there. darkweasel94 22:55, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom McZusatz (talk) 18:54, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
Rendering of Space Shuttle Challenger. This appears to have been taken from http://www.meshweaver.com/gallery/shuttle.jpg, which has a copyright notice at the bottom. Neither name listed looks anything like the uploaders username, which makes this appear to be a copyright violation. — Huntster (t @ c) 23:58, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: not from nasa, needs permission McZusatz (talk) 18:52, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
Not an official en:General Staff of the Ukrainian Armed Forces social media account. VoidWanderer (talk) 15:48, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:52, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
False authorship claims. Found at http://sakurababashrimp.at.webry.info/theme/77e6b34a1e.html in an entry posted a year and a half before it was uploaded here. While en:File:Acdc logo band.svg might be covered by {{PD-textlogo}}, this is more complex. —LX (talk, contribs) 15:37, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:36, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
False authorship claims. Found at http://www.taringa.net/comunidades/leyendasdelrock/5719151/Almafuerte---Discografia-Completa-320-kbps-MF.html in an entry posted more than a year before it was uploaded here. The textures make it too complex for {{PD-textlogo}}. —LX (talk, contribs) 15:40, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Delete Only the texture background makes this logo above the ToO. Fma12 (talk) 12:38, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:35, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Copyright infringement. Photo is credited to Getty Images, i.e. here: http://www.transfermarkt.de/de/arif-ekin/profil/spieler_156730.html Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 01:57, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:43, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
We would need a license for the foto itself as this is a 3D object. {{PD-art}} not realy applies here. JuTa 09:36, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
- PS: I changed it to {{PD-art-3d}}. --JuTa 10:37, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
- I think this should be PD-self.--Avron (talk) 12:02, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: fixed FASTILY 09:49, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Sorry, now we have the same problem like before: The image (not the object) is NOT more than 100 years old. We still need a license for the IMAGE JuTa 10:33, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- KeepYes I noticed this too, I left the uploader a message in April, but it seems he is no longer an active contributor. Yes the licence PD-Art is the wrong one, but it was the one added by the author at the time of upload, which means that it was his intenion to license it as PD, given that can we not agree that changing the licence on his behalf is legitimate?--KTo288 (talk) 00:34, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Flagged nld. Someone should add a new license asap -FASTILY 06:27, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, no educational value, belongs on facebook Mjrmtg (talk) 02:58, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:42, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Screenshot of non-free video game. Youtube users cannot issue valid licenses to someone else's work. —LX (talk, contribs) 15:17, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:38, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
out of COM:SCOPE, as image is completely unfocussed and thereby useless. -- Túrelio (talk) 15:07, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:38, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: This file (derivated from http://www.panoramio.com/photo/4153990, 2007, all rights reserved by junior.prc = uploader Junior.prc?) seems to be a photo of a photo (see reflections of something that appears to be a building (interior?)) with unknown copyright status. Gunnex (talk) 07:42, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:43, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Sorry, but this is likely a recent and thereby copyrighted statue, which seems to be located in Lithuania. Regrettably, Lithuania has no freedom-of-panorama exemption from copyright. -- Túrelio (talk) 15:21, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Same problem with:
Deleted: INeverCry 06:36, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Ugly picture ob little old man penis. We have actually more than enough much better of them... Marcus Cyron (talk) 11:13, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:34, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Ugly picture ob little old man penis. We have actually more than enough much better of them... Marcus Cyron (talk) 11:14, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:34, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
We thank Interfase for taking the time to upload these videos, because the underlying work (the music and songs) are copyrighted, they unfortunately need to be deleted. Pristurus (talk) 19:22, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
Keep. What a music? There are only cheers. --Interfase (talk) 08:13, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
Keep. Agree with the author of the file that there is no music during this file. --Mheidegger (talk) 18:27, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Kept: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:53, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
FOP in Azerbaijan does not allow commercial use of images of copyrighted works including architectural works 46.70.85.19 13:06, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Keep. This photo doesn't show architectural works. The main purpose of this photo is to show fans. --Interfase (talk) 13:16, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Mass deletion nominations by sockpuppet as an attempt at harassment. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:55, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
Identifiable person, no assertion of consent for publishing. Pleclown (talk) 16:33, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Comment Part of series of photos (some much more explicit) on the Flickr photographer's stream featuring this woman, who user describes as "my live in slave". -- Infrogmation (talk) 21:27, 22 September 2013 (UTC)- Delete Unless we get OTRS confirmation that there are indeed no problems regarding copyright or personality rights with this image. --Conti|✉ 13:13, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:35, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Ugly picture ob little old man penis. We have actually more than enough much better of them... Marcus Cyron (talk) 11:13, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:34, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Ugly picture ob little old man penis. We have actually more than enough much better of them... Marcus Cyron (talk) 11:13, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:34, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Obvious copyright violation NawlinWiki (talk) 13:00, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:40, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
no evidence that the uploader has a permission 91.66.153.214 13:56, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:40, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
may be not own work, no metadata, slow resolution Ezarateesteban 14:28, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
- Photo was modified. --Interfase (talk) 14:36, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
Kept. Martin H. (talk) 20:53, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
FOP in Azerbaijan does not allow commercial use of images of copyrighted works including architectural works 46.70.85.19 14:04, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Keep. Architectural work is not the main object of this photo. --Interfase (talk) 14:10, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept - mass deletion as an attempt to harass the uploader by a sockpuppet. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:05, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
File:Ignacy Sachs. Foto Ubirajara Machado. Portal do Ministério do Desenvolvimento Agrário.jpg
[edit]
Upload from 2007. {{Agência Brasil}}-fail as this file is coming from (unrelated) http://www.mda.gov.br/portal/noticias/item?item_id=3560537 (and not http://agenciabrasil.ebc.com.br). http://www.mda.gov.br/ itself is licensed with CC BY-NC 2.5 BR. Gunnex (talk) 09:23, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:43, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
_2013-09-21_20-22.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2013-09-21_20-22.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
URV von: [1] Mauerquadrant (talk) 08:38, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
_2013-09-21_20-22.jpg){kind=link}
_2013-09-21_20-22.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
no permission & del on DE Nolispanmo 10:01, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio Dschwen (talk) 21:51, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
Ask to delete because there was a file with the same name in Japanese wikipedia. 流しのインストーラ (talk) 12:41, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: The local file should instead be renamed. INeverCry 06:45, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 03:12, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:42, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
unused low quality logo McZusatz (talk) 10:57, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:34, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Apparently a portrait of the user , not used. 91.66.153.214 11:59, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:39, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 03:05, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:42, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 03:03, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:42, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
blurry unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 14:25, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:41, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:38, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Doubt claim of authorship, user made multiple other uploads with false authorship claims. Photo seen multiple places online, including [2]. Infrogmation (talk) 21:21, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:42, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 02:59, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:42, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Unusable for Wikimedia projects. A.Savin 11:38, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:34, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Unusable for Wikimedia projects. A.Savin 11:37, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:34, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Probably a copyright violation from http://sobory.ru/photo/?photo=141649 A.Savin 10:33, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:34, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
out of COM:SCOPEas image is blurry/unfocussed and thereby unusable. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:00, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:40, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
out of COM:SCOPE as image is blurry/unfocussed and as we have enough better image of this sculpture. - Túrelio (talk) 13:56, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:40, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Uploaded in 08.2012. Unclear copyright status: Most likely cropped from (somewhere at) http://cafe.themarker.com/user/80339/ = http://cafe.themarker.com/media/t/414/865/file_0_big.jpg (last modified: 2008) and similar to what was published in (example) 2011 via http://www.inn.co.il/Besheva/Article.aspx/11270 = http://a7.org/Resizer.ashx?save=1&source=album&album=6&image=32899&a=455&b=1500 Gunnex (talk) 21:02, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:42, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jvv110687
[edit]- File:GEDC0139.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:GEDC0141.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:GEDC0143.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:GEDC0144.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:GEDC0145.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:GEDC0146.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:GEDC0147.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:GEDC0148.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:GEDC0160.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:GEDC0161.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:GEDC0162.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:GEDC0164.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
Jvv110687 (talk · contribs) uploaded a series of images of electronics that are blurry/unfocused, have bad flash reflection and/or do not fall with the scope of Commons (not to mention have default titles). --Yarnalgo (talk) 22:31, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
Info The only one I have not nominated is File:GEDC0138.JPG because it seems like it could be used, but it can also be deleted if necessary. --Yarnalgo (talk) 23:00, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
Kept. most images are in use so in our scope Huib talk 16:46, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:Bikram d.jpg
- File:Bikram 1 (7).jpg
- File:Bikram 1 (4).jpg
- File:Bikram 1 (6).jpg
- File:Bikram 1 (5).jpg
- File:Bikram 1 (3).jpg
- File:Bikram 1 (2).jpg
- File:Bikram 1 (1).jpg
- File:Rahul001.jpg
- File:Rahul (3).jpg
- File:Rahul (2).jpg
- File:J3.jpg
- File:Rahul (1).jpg
- File:J2d.jpg
- File:J d.jpg
- File:Imagde053.jpg
- File:Imagde045.jpg
- File:Bik (15).jpg
- File:Bik (14).jpg
- File:Bik (13).jpg
- File:Bik (11).jpg
- File:Bik (12).jpg
- File:Bik (10).jpg
- File:Bik (9).jpg
- File:Bik (8).jpg
- File:Bik (7).jpg
- File:Bik (4).jpg
- File:Bik (6).jpg
- File:Bik (1).jpg
- File:Bik (3).jpg
- File:Bik (2).jpg
- File:Bikram Singh.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:38, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jairo N Rodrigues (talk · contribs)
[edit]Looks like collection of fan/promo photos, not own work. Or no evidence of permission(s).
- File:Gisele Hora.jpg
- File:Gisele IDC.jpg
- File:Gisele Distinção Câmara PoA.jpg
- File:Gisele Flores Pilota.jpg
- File:Capa SC.jpg
- File:Gisele Mangá by desconhecido.jpg
- File:Gisele1 by Matheus DK.jpg
- File:Gisele by Matheus DK.jpg
- File:Gigi-by-Alessandro-Maciel.jpg
- File:Capa by Alessandro Maciel.jpg
- File:Gisele e Fogaça.jpg
- File:Gisele e Valter.jpg
- File:Gisele e Ana Amélia.jpg
- File:Gisele e Paim.jpg
- File:Gisele e Gessinger.jpg
- File:GiseleFlores 2.jpg
- File:Alex Barros.jpg
- File:Giseleflores.jpg
- File:Gisele e Romero Britto.jpg
- File:Gisele e Emerson.jpg
- File:Gisele e Valentino Rossi.jpg
- File:Gisele com Yeda Crusius.jpg
- File:Gisele Flores e Marco Luque.jpg
- File:Gisele e Jaime na Sobremotos.jpg
- File:Gisele Abraciclo.jpg
- File:Gisele Delegada.jpg
- File:Gisele e a Borboleta.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:36, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jaiwikijai (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Kuthukkal in movie 2013-09-22 20-21.jpg
- File:Aish.JPG
- File:Pond in kk valasai.jpg
- File:Western ghat Courtallam.jpg
- File:View of western ghats from kk valasai.jpg
- File:Tenkasi temple.jpg
- File:Roadway.jpg
- File:Kuthukalvalasai land.jpg
- File:Kuthukalvalasai windmill.jpg
- File:Kuthukalvalasai map.JPG
- File:Kuthukalvalasai rock குத்துக்கல்வலசை பெருங்கல்.JPG
- File:Kuthukalvalasai rock.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:15, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:38, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Unauthentic colours, no possibility to use it in Wikimedia projects.
- File:Канал Адмиралтейства.jpg
- File:Гавань.jpg
- File:Собор Спас на-Крови.jpg
- File:Петропавловская крепость на Неве.jpg
- File:Петропавловка на Неве.jpg
- File:Казанский собор на Невском.jpg
- File:В Петропавловке.jpg
- File:Ворота в Новой Голландии.jpg
A.Savin 12:03, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:39, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mahadevsapte (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo/drawing album. Not used.
- File:Ro-Drawing-MAHADEV SAPTE-ART.jpg
- File:Pincel drawing.mahadev sapte.mahadev.jpg
- File:Maratha-Drawing-Tattoo-Style-Art-mahadev sapte...jpg
- File:Maratha-Collar-Tattoo-Style-Art-Mahadev Sapte..jpg
- File:-mahadev-art-mahadev sapte.-.jpg
- File:3D-NATURE-DRAWING-MAHADEV SAPTE -.jpg
- File:39-Skull drawing-mahadev sapte..jpg
- File:Tondale-village-ganapati.jpg
- File:Sunflower-in-(Tondale-Man)-by-Mahadev-Sapte..jpg
- File:NYCT-TONDALE-MAN-SATARA-MAHARASHTRA-INDIA...jpg
- File:NYCT,GRUP,TONDALE-MAHADEV SAPTE..jpg
- File:Nehru-Yuva-Club-Tondale(NYCT)-By-Mahadev Sapte.jpg
- File:MI SATARKAR-MAHADEV-SAPTE..jpg
- File:Kiran-Shinde.jpg
- File:Creative-Tondale-mahadev sapte.jpg
- File:Copy of GANAPATI TONDALE VILLAGE.jpg
- File:03-Mahadev-Sapte-.jpg
- File:02-Man taluka dushkal-mahadev sapte..jpg
- File:02-MAHADEV-SAPTE.jpg
- File:Mahadev-Sapte-(Tondale-Man-Satara).jpg
- File:02-Mahadev-Sapte-Video-Shoot.jpg
- File:01-Mahadev-Sapte-Video-Shooting-.jpg
-by-Mahadev-Sapte..jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-By-Mahadev_Sapte.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:38, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mahadevsapte (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: Commons is not Facebook.
- File:Mahadev Sapte ® .jpg
- File:Mahadev Sapte ® 2.jpg
- File:001- Mahadev Sapte ®.jpg
- File:Mahadev Sapte.jpg
- File:Mahadev Sapte - Pratapgad.jpg
- File:Mahadev Sapte .jpg
- File:Mahabaleshwar Edited Photo By-Mahadev Sapte.jpg
- File:Mahadev Sapte & Thoseghar Waterfall.jpg
- File:Mahadev Sapte & Lord Ganesha.jpg
- File:Mahadev Sapte ®.jpg
- File:Mahadev Sapte - Take In - Mahabaleshwar.jpg
Leyo 20:36, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:Denniss. --JuTa 02:45, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mahadevsapte (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - promotion/big watermarks/altered photos - no educational value
- File:About Mahadev Sapte logo icon.jpg
- File:Tondale, Tondale Village Video & Photo Uplod By- Mahadev Sapte.jpg
- File:Dahiwadi Area - Man - Tondale - Satara.jpg
- File:Mahadev Sapte Logo - Tondale ,Tal- Man, Dist-Satara.jpg
- File:NYC-TONDALE-GREEN-LOGO-MAHADEV-SAPTE-.jpg
- File:Mudhoji-College-Phaltan-by-Mahadev-Sapte.jpg
- File:Man taluka dushkal-take by-mahadev sapte..jpg
- File:MAHADEV-SAPTE-HOME-TONDALE-MAN-SATARA.jpg
- File:MAHADEV SAPTE-MANGO-TREE-IN-TONDALE-.jpg
- File:Home2-mahadev sapte.jpg
- File:Copy of Main gate-Tondale-School-Mahadev-Sapte..jpg
- File:Copy of Lonavala-Accident-Mahadev-Sapte-and-Kiran-Shinde..jpg
- File:Copy of BVT-SCHOOL.jpg
- File:BVT2-PHOTO-MAHADEV SAPTE.2.jpg
INeverCry 03:55, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope --George Chernilevsky talk 04:57, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mahadevsapte (talk · contribs)
[edit]Per COM:SCOPE -> selfies and self-promotion
- File:Rainy Season Kaas Kathar Satara, Mahadev Sapte.jpg
- File:Mahadev Sapte 2017 Images.jpg
- File:Mahadev Sapte My Favourite place Kaas Pathar,Satara.jpg
- File:Kas Pathar Flowers Kaas Pathar in Satara.jpg
- File:Save Tree Save Nature By-Kaas Pathar Satara.jpg
- File:Kaas Plateau, Satara (Kaas Pathar) By-Mahadev Sapte.jpg
- File:Kaas Pathar Satara PhotoGraphy-Mahadev Sapte.jpg
- File:Mahadev Sapte Rainy season kaas pathar satara.jpg
- File:Kaas pathar in rainy season mahadev sapte.jpg
- File:Mahadev Sapte.jpg
_By-Mahadev_Sapte.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Takeaway (talk) 04:35, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:03, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
I doubt that these ads are all own work by the uploader.
- File:Colageno en la Casa del diabético Vidabetic.jpg
- File:La casa del diabético - Vidabetic.jpg
- File:Chia en la Casa del diabético Vidabetic.jpg
- File:Ubica a Vidabetic y como llegar.jpg
- File:Visitanos en Vidabetic.jpg
- File:Medias para diabeticos.jpg
- File:Medias plata 10.jpg
- File:Hipoglucemia.jpg
- File:Glucometro-y-cetona15.jpg
- File:Folleto-del-Glucometro-Nova-Max-Plus--Mejor-Medidor-de-Glucosa-1.jpg
Leyo 11:57, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:40, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Yone Fernandes (talk · contribs)
[edit]- File:Marcosfreire.gif + File:Lysâneas Maciel.jpg (uploaded in 09.2013) = Without further details and evidences (date taken, photographer etc.) unlikely "a work published or commissioned by a Brazilian government (federal, state, or municipal) prior to 1983" as suggested via {{PD-BrazilGov}}. Additionally: Just because the photos appeared on a governmental page this does not necessarily mean that they were taken by governmental personnel.
- File:Chico Mendes.jpg (high wiki use, uploaded in 09.2007) = per http://web.archive.org/web/20070810222359/http://www.radiobras.gov.br/especiais/Chico%20Mendes/chico_audio.htm (08.2007) and (as indicated as source) http://web.archive.org/web/20070401114232im_/http://www.radiobras.gov.br/especiais/Chico%20Mendes/Mat_chico_close.jpg unlikely {{Cc-by-3.0-br}} via {{Agência Brasil}} as - per wayback - this file was licensed with "© Agência Brasil - Todas as matérias poderão ser reproduzidas desde que citada a fonte" (All materials may be reproduced if source is acknowledged) which allows only reproduction but does not clarify about adaption and commercial use of the work. Strictly seen, it fails also {{Cc-by-3.0-br}} as the author is (as indicated) unknown.
Gunnex (talk) 10:20, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:44, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ларисаульянова (talk · contribs)
[edit]Extremely low resolution, unused -> out of COM:SCOPE
- File:Белокаменные стражи России. Свято-Юрьев Монастырь.Новгород.jpg
- File:Svjato-jurjev monstr.Novgorod.jpg
- File:Благославенная земля!.jpg
A.Savin 10:35, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:34, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jvv110687
[edit]- File:GEDC0139.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:GEDC0141.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:GEDC0143.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:GEDC0144.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:GEDC0145.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:GEDC0146.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:GEDC0147.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:GEDC0148.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:GEDC0160.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:GEDC0161.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:GEDC0162.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:GEDC0164.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
Jvv110687 (talk · contribs) uploaded a series of images of electronics that are blurry/unfocused, have bad flash reflection and/or do not fall with the scope of Commons (not to mention have default titles). --Yarnalgo (talk) 22:31, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
Info The only one I have not nominated is File:GEDC0138.JPG because it seems like it could be used, but it can also be deleted if necessary. --Yarnalgo (talk) 23:00, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
Kept. most images are in use so in our scope Huib talk 16:46, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jvv110687
[edit]- File:GEDC0139.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:GEDC0141.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:GEDC0143.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:GEDC0144.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:GEDC0145.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:GEDC0146.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:GEDC0147.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:GEDC0148.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:GEDC0160.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:GEDC0161.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:GEDC0162.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:GEDC0164.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
Jvv110687 (talk · contribs) uploaded a series of images of electronics that are blurry/unfocused, have bad flash reflection and/or do not fall with the scope of Commons (not to mention have default titles). --Yarnalgo (talk) 22:31, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
Info The only one I have not nominated is File:GEDC0138.JPG because it seems like it could be used, but it can also be deleted if necessary. --Yarnalgo (talk) 23:00, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
Kept. most images are in use so in our scope Huib talk 16:46, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
Unused near duplette of Methan Keilstrich.svg. Yikrazuul (talk) 17:51, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused file with multiple existing equivalents. Ed (Edgar181) 19:18, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
Unused near duplette of Methan Lewis.svg (and with background). Yikrazuul (talk) 17:53, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete There are even more near dupes in Category:Methane. --Leyo 07:03, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused file with multiple existing equivalents. Ed (Edgar181) 19:17, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
Near duplicate of Butane simple.svg (and btw not pentane). Yikrazuul (talk) 17:59, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused file with multiple existing equivalents. Name and chemical structure don't match either. Ed (Edgar181) 19:18, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
Near duplicate of Pentane-2D-Skeletal.svg (and with background) Yikrazuul (talk) 18:02, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused file with multiple existing equivalents. Ed (Edgar181) 19:18, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
Unused image of unknown(?) person- apparent personal image, typical "account with single upload" case(!) Ubcule (talk) 16:04, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Blurry low res orphan "selfie" with no indication of compensating in scope usefulness. -- Infrogmation (talk) 21:24, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:14, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
Incorrect Page number and file name — Ineuw 17:24, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
- Comment: Please do not misuse other people’s time and effort with frivolous, clueless deletion requests. If there’s something wrong in the filename, initiate a renaming request instead; if there’s something wrong in the file page, edit it instead. Please.
- Also, this file page File:Nfnz d108 meterosideros florida.jpg is a redirect to File:Nfnz d109 meterosideros florida.jpg. Two issues:
- Unused redirects created to fix renamed files due to typos, should be either left over if the typo is likely to be repeated, or (like in this case) {{Speedy}} deleted as such.
- It is still wrong: The proper spelling is "Metrosideros" not *"Meterosideros", it struck me immediately even though I’m litterally across the world from NZ. You’d know that if you’d tried to add some more categories to these images.
- These are some excellent illustrations, too. Thanks for woking on them, anyway! -- Tuválkin ✉ 07:20, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete: Unused redirect — should be {{Speedy}}. -- Tuválkin ✉ 07:20, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:00, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
Incorrect Page number and file name — Ineuw 17:24, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete: Unused redirect — should be {{Speedy}}. -- Tuválkin ✉ 07:28, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:01, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
Incorrect Page number and file name — Ineuw 17:24, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete: Unused redirect — should be {{Speedy}}. -- Tuválkin ✉ 07:28, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:01, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
Incorrect Page number and file name — Ineuw 17:24, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete: Unused redirect — should be {{Speedy}}. -- Tuválkin ✉ 07:28, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:01, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
Incorrect Page number and file name — Ineuw 17:23, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete: Unused redirect — should be {{Speedy}}. -- Tuválkin ✉ 07:28, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:01, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
Incorrect Page number and file name — Ineuw 17:23, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete: Unused redirect — should be {{Speedy}}. -- Tuválkin ✉ 07:28, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:02, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
Incorrect Page number and file name — Ineuw 17:23, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete: Unused redirect — should be {{Speedy}}. -- Tuválkin ✉ 07:28, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:02, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
Incorrect Page number and file name — Ineuw 17:23, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete: Unused redirect — should be {{Speedy}}. -- Tuválkin ✉ 07:28, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:02, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
Incorrect Page number and file name — Ineuw 17:22, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete: Unused redirect — should be {{Speedy}}. -- Tuválkin ✉ 07:29, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:02, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
Incorrect Page number and file name — Ineuw 17:22, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete: Unused redirect — should be {{Speedy}}. -- Tuválkin ✉ 07:29, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:02, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
Incorrect Page number and file name — Ineuw 17:22, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete: Unused redirect — should be {{Speedy}}. -- Tuválkin ✉ 07:29, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:02, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
Incorrect Page number and file name — Ineuw 17:21, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete: Unused redirect — should be {{Speedy}}. -- Tuválkin ✉ 07:29, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:03, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
Misspelled file name. — Ineuw 09:18, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete: Unused redirect — should be {{Speedy}}. -- Tuválkin ✉ 07:29, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:03, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
Incorrect Page number and file name — Ineuw 17:21, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete: Unused redirect — should be {{Speedy}}. -- Tuválkin ✉ 07:29, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:03, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
Incorrect Page number and file name — Ineuw 17:18, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete: Unused redirect — should be {{Speedy}}. -- Tuválkin ✉ 07:29, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:03, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
Incorrect page number in Wikisource project. — Ineuw 03:44, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete: Unused redirect — should be {{Speedy}}. -- Tuválkin ✉ 07:29, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:03, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
Incorrect Page number and file name — Ineuw 17:21, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete: Unused redirect — should be {{Speedy}}. -- Tuválkin ✉ 07:29, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:03, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
Incorrect Page number and file name — Ineuw 17:20, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete: Unused redirect — should be {{Speedy}}. -- Tuválkin ✉ 07:29, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:03, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
Incorrect Page number and file name — Ineuw 17:20, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete: Unused redirect — should be {{Speedy}}. -- Tuválkin ✉ 07:29, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:03, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
Incorrect Page number and file name — Ineuw 17:20, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete: Unused redirect — should be {{Speedy}}. -- Tuválkin ✉ 07:29, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:03, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
Incorrect file name. — Ineuw 12:49, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete: Unused redirect — should be {{Speedy}}. -- Tuválkin ✉ 07:29, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:03, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
Incorrect Page number and file name — Ineuw 17:19, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete: Unused redirect — should be {{Speedy}}. -- Tuválkin ✉ 07:29, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:03, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
Incorrect file name. — Ineuw 12:50, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete: Unused redirect — should be {{Speedy}}. -- Tuválkin ✉ 07:29, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:03, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
Incorrect Page number and file name — Ineuw 17:19, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete: Unused redirect — should be {{Speedy}}. -- Tuválkin ✉ 07:29, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:04, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
Incorrect file name. — Ineuw 12:52, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete: Unused redirect — should be {{Speedy}}. -- Tuválkin ✉ 07:29, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:04, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
Incorrect Page number and file name. — Ineuw 13:55, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete: Unused redirect — should be {{Speedy}}. -- Tuválkin ✉ 07:29, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:04, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
Incorrect Page number and file name. — Ineuw 13:53, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete: Unused redirect — should be {{Speedy}}. -- Tuválkin ✉ 07:29, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:04, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
Incorrect Page number and file name — Ineuw 17:25, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete: Unused redirect — should be {{Speedy}}. -- Tuválkin ✉ 07:29, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:04, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
Incorrect file name, corrected by uploader - links were redirected. — Ineuw 03:39, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete: Unused redirect — should be {{Speedy}}. -- Tuválkin ✉ 07:29, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:04, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jvv110687
[edit]- File:GEDC0139.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:GEDC0141.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:GEDC0143.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:GEDC0144.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:GEDC0145.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:GEDC0146.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:GEDC0147.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:GEDC0148.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:GEDC0160.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:GEDC0161.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:GEDC0162.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:GEDC0164.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
Jvv110687 (talk · contribs) uploaded a series of images of electronics that are blurry/unfocused, have bad flash reflection and/or do not fall with the scope of Commons (not to mention have default titles). --Yarnalgo (talk) 22:31, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
Info The only one I have not nominated is File:GEDC0138.JPG because it seems like it could be used, but it can also be deleted if necessary. --Yarnalgo (talk) 23:00, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
Kept. most images are in use so in our scope Huib talk 16:46, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
Maybe a English wikipedia user’s sandbox is the proper place for puerile utopian fictional encyclopedia entries (as opposed to hosting it in, say, Wikia.com?), but surely Commons should not host tongue-in-cheek slashed images that are unusable nowhere else? Maybe this user could illustrate his sandbox with proper images of each of these subjects instead?
- File:Treeeeeeee.png
- File:Alphhhhhhh.png
- File:Dayyyyyyy.png
- File:Seeddddddd.png
- File:Plataaaaaaaa.png
-- Tuválkin ✉ 13:36, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- Comment: Also, all but File:Alphhhhhhh.png seem to be copyvios. -- Tuválkin ✉ 14:14, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:10, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
Screenshot from a Teen Wolf promo; unlikely that uploader is copyright holder bobrayner (talk) 01:30, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: agreed 99of9 (talk) 13:08, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
Maybe copyright infringement Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 01:32, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing -- Steinsplitter (talk) 14:12, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
Copyright infringement. Possible taken from here: http://www.agitototal.com/2012/03/todo-romantismo-de-cristiano-neves-no.html Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 01:37, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation -- Steinsplitter (talk) 14:14, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
Copyright infringement. Flickr says: All rights reserved Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 01:39, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 14:14, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
Image found on http://www.vivaleon.com/las_medulas_leon.htm without free license "Todos los derechos reservados" is probaly "All rights reserved". The uploader claims to be the author which is not likely to be true. Pyfisch (talk) 06:50, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete It also appears on a few other websites, including one crawled by archive.org back in August 2007,[3] well before our copy was uploaded to WV-shared in September 2008. --Avenue (talk) 13:12, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation -- Steinsplitter (talk) 14:15, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jvv110687
[edit]- File:GEDC0139.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:GEDC0141.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:GEDC0143.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:GEDC0144.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:GEDC0145.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:GEDC0146.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:GEDC0147.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:GEDC0148.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:GEDC0160.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:GEDC0161.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:GEDC0162.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:GEDC0164.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
Jvv110687 (talk · contribs) uploaded a series of images of electronics that are blurry/unfocused, have bad flash reflection and/or do not fall with the scope of Commons (not to mention have default titles). --Yarnalgo (talk) 22:31, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
Info The only one I have not nominated is File:GEDC0138.JPG because it seems like it could be used, but it can also be deleted if necessary. --Yarnalgo (talk) 23:00, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
Kept. most images are in use so in our scope Huib talk 16:46, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jvv110687
[edit]- File:GEDC0139.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:GEDC0141.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:GEDC0143.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:GEDC0144.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:GEDC0145.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:GEDC0146.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:GEDC0147.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:GEDC0148.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:GEDC0160.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:GEDC0161.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:GEDC0162.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:GEDC0164.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
Jvv110687 (talk · contribs) uploaded a series of images of electronics that are blurry/unfocused, have bad flash reflection and/or do not fall with the scope of Commons (not to mention have default titles). --Yarnalgo (talk) 22:31, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
Info The only one I have not nominated is File:GEDC0138.JPG because it seems like it could be used, but it can also be deleted if necessary. --Yarnalgo (talk) 23:00, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
Kept. most images are in use so in our scope Huib talk 16:46, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
Derivatives of a sculpture erected in 1964. No FoP in Russia.
- File:Astronautics museum moscow.jpg
- File:Memorial Museum of Space Exploration (Мемориальный музей космонавтики) (5586384328).jpg
- File:Monument to the Conquerors of Space (2011).JPG
- File:Monumento dei cosmonauti 2.JPG
- File:Monumento dei cosmonauti 3.JPG
- File:Monumento dei cosmonauti 4.JPG
- File:Moscow Memorial Museum of Astronautics monument.JPG
- File:Moscow Russia Cosmonaut Misslie Statue.jpg
- File:Moscow Russia Cosmonaut Space Monument.jpg
- File:Památník pokořitelů kosmu.JPG
- File:Rocket vdnx sep 2008.jpg
- File:Space Obelisk, Moscow (149189057).jpg
- File:Space Obelisk, Moscow (149189058).jpg
- File:Space Obelisk, Moscow (149189059).jpg
- File:Аллея Космонавтов.JPG
- File:ВДНХ Ракета.jpg
- File:Монумент «Покорителям космоса» (Москва) 001.jpg
- File:На входе перед ВДНХ.JPG
- File:Основание монумента «Покорителям космоса».jpg
- File:ЭВМ на горельефе монумента Покорителям космоса.JPG
_(5586384328).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_001.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
A.Savin 12:09, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. But we have to try and ascertain a possible date of undeletion. one designer died in 1967, another in 1976. Do we know when А. Н. Колчин died? russavia (talk) 16:24, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry for delay. Yes, it would make sense. According to [4], Kolchin was still alive in 2009; unfortunately, more precise info on this person I couldn't find. --A.Savin 09:10, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom High Contrast (talk) 17:11, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia for non-architecture. No known date of undeletion.
- File:Monument to the Conquerors of Space (11396760404).jpg
- File:Monument to the Conquerors of Space (11410203933).jpg
- File:Monument to the Conquerors of Space.jpg
- File:Памятник покорителям космоса.jpg
- File:Памятник Ракета.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
russavia (talk) 18:33, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted as per all above. russavia (talk) 18:35, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
No COM:FOP in Russia for artwork. Abzeronow (talk) 19:10, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
Obvious cases (under review)
[edit]- File:1 DSC 0194.jpg
- File:Szovjetunió, Moszkva, a Világűr Meghódítása emlékmű. - Fortepan 30384.jpg
- File:Laika ac Laika (6849528374).jpg
- File:Laika ac Monument to the Conquerors of Space (6995636623).jpg
- File:Launch Pad (49547902).jpeg
- File:Memorial Museum of Cosmonautics. July 2014. - Мемориальный музей космонавтики. Июль 2014. - panoramio.jpg
- File:Memorial Museum of Cosmonautics.jpg
- File:Monument to the Conquerors of Space, Moscow (31208924774).jpg
- File:Monument to the Conquerors of Space, Moscow (31674892840).jpg
- File:Monument to the Conquerors of Space, Moscow (32010756036).jpg
- File:Monument to the Conquerors of Space, Moscow (32010760076).jpg
- File:Monument to the Conquerors of Space, Moscow, Russia, 2016 01.jpg
- File:Monument to the Conquerors of Space, Moscow, Russia, 2016 02.jpg
- File:Monument to the Conquerors of Space, Moscow, Russia, 2016 04.jpg
- File:Monument to the Conquerors of Space, Moscow, Russia, 2016 06.jpg
- File:Monument to the Conquerors of Space, Moscow, Russia, 2016 07.jpg
- File:Monument to the Conquerors of Space, Moscow, Russia, 2016 08.jpg
- File:Monument to the Conquerors of Space, Moscow, Russia, 2016 11.jpg
- File:Monument to the Conquerors of Space, Moscow, Russia, 2016 13.jpg
- File:Monument to the Conquerors of Space, Moscow, Russia, 2016 14.jpg
- File:Monument to the Conquerors of Space, Moscow, Russia, 2016 19.jpg
- File:Monument to the Conquerors of Space, Moscow, Russia, 2016 20.jpg
- File:Monument to the Conquerors of Space, Moscow, Russia, 2016 21.jpg
- File:Monument to the Conquerors of Space, Moscow, Russia, 2016 26.jpg
- File:Monument to the Conquerors of Space, Moscow, Russia, 2016 28.jpg
- File:Monument to the Conquerors of Space, Moscow, Russia, 2016 29.jpg
- File:Monument to the Conquerors of Space, Moscow, Russia, 2016 31.jpg
- File:Monument to the Conquerors of Space, Moscow, Russia, 2016 32.jpg
- File:Monument to the Conquerors of Space, Moscow, Russia, 2016 34.jpg
- File:Monument to the Conquerors of Space, Moscow, Russia, 2016 35.jpg
- File:Monument to the Conquerors of Space, Moscow, Russia, 2016 36.jpg
- File:Monument to the Conquerors of Space, Moscow, Russia, 2016 37.jpg
- File:Monumento a los Conquistadores del Espacio.jpg
- File:Monumentos a los Conquistadores del Espacio 04.JPG - This seems to be a poem, no-FoP also applies?
- File:Ostankinsky District, Moscow, Russia - panoramio (318).jpg
- File:Ostankinsky District, Moscow, Russia - panoramio (388).jpg
- File:Ostankinsky District, Moscow, Russia - panoramio (456).jpg
- File:Soviet space monument - panoramio.jpg
- File:Вднх.jpg
- File:Мемориал Покорителям космоса (ВДНХ).jpg
- File:Мемориал Покорителям космоса 01.JPG
- File:Мемориал Покорителям космоса 02.JPG
- File:Мемориал Покорителям космоса Москва.jpg
- File:Монуме́нт Покори́телям ко́смоса.jpg
- File:Монуме́нт Покори́телям ко́смоса.png
- File:Монумент в честь покорителей космоса. Обелиск 01.JPG
- File:Монумент в честь покорителей космоса. Обелиск 02.JPG
- File:Монумент в честь покорителей космоса. Обелиск 03.JPG
- File:Монумент в честь покорителей космоса. Обелиск Москва 01.JPG
- File:Монумент в честь покорителей космоса. Обелиск Москва 02.JPG
- File:Обелиск в честь покорителей космоса.jpg
- File:Обелиск, вднх.jpg
- File:Памятник К.Э.Циолковскому.jpg
- File:Памятник1.JPG
- File:Памятник2.JPG
- File:Памятник3.JPG
- File:Памятник4.JPG
- File:Памятники Покорителям Космоса, м.ВДНХ, Москва, Россия. - panoramio - Oleg Yu.Novikov (14).jpg
- File:Памятники Покорителям Космоса, м.ВДНХ, Москва, Россия. - panoramio - Oleg Yu.Novikov (15).jpg
- File:Памятники Покорителям Космоса, м.ВДНХ, Москва, Россия. - panoramio - Oleg Yu.Novikov (17).jpg
- File:Памятники Покорителям Космоса, м.ВДНХ, Москва, Россия. - panoramio - Oleg Yu.Novikov (3).jpg
- File:Памятники Покорителям Космоса, м.ВДНХ, Москва, Россия. - panoramio - Oleg Yu.Novikov (6).jpg
- File:Памятники Покорителям Космоса, м.ВДНХ, Москва, Россия. - panoramio - Oleg Yu.Novikov (8).jpg
- File:Памятники Покорителям Космоса, м.ВДНХ, Москва, Россия. - panoramio.jpg
- File:Покорители космоса весна.JPG
- File:Покорителям космоса - panoramio (2).jpg
- File:Покорителям космоса - panoramio (3).jpg
- File:Покорителям космоса - panoramio.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Possibly de minimis
[edit]- File:Laika ac Sputnik Gate (6849506776).jpg
- File:Memorial Museum of Space Exploration (Мемориальный музей космонавтики) (5585734101).jpg
- File:Monument to the Conquerors of Space, Moscow (31208917234).jpg
- File:Monument to the Conquerors of Space, Moscow (32049727085).jpg
- Steve Makin (SteveInLeighton), that is author of these photos, is not a Russia citizen, and Russian Laws is not applicable to him. --Kaganer (talk) 20:50, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(5585734101).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- But the photo was taken in Russia. DS (talk) 18:55, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
- File:Памятники Покорителям Космоса, м.ВДНХ, Москва, Россия. - panoramio - Oleg Yu.Novikov (5).jpg
- File:Памятник и Останкинская башня - panoramio.jpg ? can also be cropped to the tower building at the side.
- File:Монумент в честь покорителей космоса 01.JPG
- File:Монумент в честь покорителей космоса 02.JPG
- File:Монумент в честь покорителей космоса 03.JPG
- File:Мемориал Покорителям космоса.JPG
- File:МетроВДНХ - panoramio.jpg
- File:ИГЛЫвНЕБО - panoramio.jpg
- File:Monument to the Conquerors of Space, Moscow, Russia, 2016 12.jpg
- File:VDNH 402 (10656734033).jpg
- File:В небо - panoramio.jpg
- File:Moscow, VDNKh, view south from the Main Gate (10656846773).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Possibly below ToO
[edit]- File:Monument to the Conquerors of Space, Moscow, Russia, 2016 03.jpg The elements shown in detail possibly are below ToO
- File:Monument to the Conquerors of Space, Moscow, Russia, 2016 22.jpg Nothing copyrightable here, apparently
- File:Monument to the Conquerors of Space, Moscow, Russia, 2016 23.jpg Nothing copyrightable here, apparently
- File:Monument to the Conquerors of Space, Moscow, Russia, 2016 24.jpg Possibly PD-text
- File:Monument to the Conquerors of Space, Moscow, Russia, 2016 25.jpg Possibly PD-text
- File:Monument to the Conquerors of Space, Moscow, Russia, 2016 27.jpg Nothing copyrightable here, apparently
- File:Monument to the Conquerors of Space, Moscow, Russia, 2016 30.jpg Possibly PD-text
- File:Monument to the Conquerors of Space, Moscow, Russia, 2016 33.jpg Nothing copyrightable here, apparently
Can be cropped and used
[edit]- File:Покорителям космоса - panoramio (1).jpg (useful after crop to illustrate the construction of the twin high-rises in the low right corner)
- File:Памятники Покорителям Космоса, м.ВДНХ, Москва, Россия. - panoramio - Oleg Yu.Novikov (9).jpg Still useful after cropping out the copyrightable parts, as shown in file history.
- File:Памятники Покорителям Космоса, м.ВДНХ, Москва, Россия. - panoramio - Oleg Yu.Novikov (19).jpg Still useful after cropping out the copyrightable parts, as shown in file history.
- File:Памятники Покорителям Космоса, м.ВДНХ, Москва, Россия. - panoramio - Oleg Yu.Novikov (13).jpg Still useful after cropping out the copyrightable parts, as shown in file history.
- File:Памятник покорителям космоса - panoramio.jpg Still useful after cropping out the copyrightable parts, as shown in file history.
- File:Музей космонавтики в Москве.png Still useful after cropping out the copyrightable parts, as shown in file history.
- File:Музей космонавтики, ракета.jpg Still useful after cropping out the copyrightable parts, as shown in file history.
- File:Небо-The cold sky - panoramio.jpg Still useful after cropping out the copyrightable parts, as shown in file history.
- File:Monument to the Conquerors of Space, Moscow, Russia, 2016 05.jpg Still useful after cropping out the copyrightable parts, as shown in file history.
- File:Монумент «Покорителям космоса» (14006733426).jpg Still useful after cropping out the copyrightable parts, as shown in file history.
- File:Monument to the Conquerors of Space, Moscow, Russia, 2016 17.jpg Still useful after cropping out the copyrightable parts, as shown in file history.
- File:Monument to the Conquerors of Space, Moscow, Russia, 2016 18.jpg Still useful after cropping out the copyrightable parts, as shown in file history.
- File:Ostankinsky District, Moscow, Russia - panoramio (474).jpg Maybe can be cropped and used to illustrate the skylight on first plan?
- File:Ostankinsky District, Moscow, Russia - panoramio (459).jpg Maybe can be cropped so that the remaining parts became de minimis (see file history).
- File:Monument to the Conquerors of Space, Moscow, Russia, 2016 38.jpg Still useful after cropping out the copyrightable parts, as shown in file history.
- File:Ostankinsky District, Moscow, Russia - panoramio (386).jpg Maybe can be cropped so that the remaining parts became de minimis (with a more aggressive crop than what can be seen in the file history).
- File:Monument to the Conquerors of Space.jpg - Maybe can be cropped so that the remaining parts became de minimis (see file history). Could be used to illustrate the skylights.
- File:Monument to the Conquest of Space... Up up and away - panoramio.jpg Still useful after cropping out the copyrightable parts, as shown in file history.
- File:Ostankinsky District, Moscow, Russia - panoramio (315).jpg Maybe can be cropped so that the remaining parts became de minimis (see file history).
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Other cases
[edit]- File:Monument to Tsiolkovsky.jpg Not sure this file is related to this case. Sculptor apparently died in 1952, so a different undeletion date would probably be needed, in any case.
Suggestions of undelections
[edit]- File:Astronautics museum moscow.jpg - Can be restored and cropped to illustrate the museum
- File:Monument to the Conquerors of Space (2011).JPG - same as above, for the stairs and part of the building
- File:Moscow Memorial Museum of Astronautics monument.JPG possibly de minimis, but can be cropped and still produce an useful photo of the buildings behind
- File:Moscow Russia Cosmonaut Space Monument.jpg Good photo of a panoramic, seems too prominent to be de minimis, but either the monument can be removed or the image can be cropped
- File:Аллея Космонавтов.JPG can be cropped so that whatever remains gets de minimis, and used to illustrate the place
- File:ВДНХ Ракета.jpg Possibly de minimis
- File:На входе перед ВДНХ.JPG Good photo of a panoramic, seems too prominent to be de minimis, but either the monument can be removed or the image can be cropped
Discussion
[edit]- @Abzeronow: I've been cropping the museum tower out of the images, but if I well understood, if it's part of the building, it's OK under FOP-Russia. Do you know if that tower is a building, as it seems to be? If this is the case, Keep for all the remaining files (and I'll possible do less aggressive crops in some of the images I've cropped).-- Darwin Ahoy! 04:58, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- Not an expert, but I think we can Keep the remaining files. Abzeronow (talk) 05:03, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- @DarwIn: , what was the point of trimming the photos like here? Most of the structure is still there, it's still recognizable ("I know it when I see it"), so the bulk of "copyrightable parts" was unchanged. But now the photographer looks like someone who couldn't frame a simple snapshot and the snapshot itself became unusable. So, even if commons policy says that cutting out one small part is enough (does it?), it's worse than deletion. Retired electrician (talk) 11:08, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Retired electrician: The tower seems to be part of the building of the museum, so the only issue would be the spacecraft at the top, which would turn the whole building into a big sculpture, so I tried that approach to keep the file, as the rest of the artworks in that photo seems to be de minimis. the fact is that initially this looked like a clearcut case of no-FoP violation, with a lot of new uploads to clean, and I started doing the task, until I realized that the whole thing is a building, a museum. If this is correct, I believe we must reevaluate not only these pictures, but the ones that were deleted before, since apparently what we are seeing is the tower of a building with a sculpture at the top (possibly de minimis?). Anyay, sorry for the (well intended) mess, I'll start reverting the speedy eliminations. -- Darwin Ahoy! 15:32, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- Not an expert, but I think we can
Apparently the tower is indeed a sculpture, and the museum building below is accessory to it, so it can't be kept as architecture. I'll try to separate this DR into the obvious cases that can be deleted without much issue, and the ones that can be evaluated separately as de minimis, that can be saved by cropping out copyrighted parts, etc.-- Darwin Ahoy! 15:46, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
@A.Savin: Restored them all, and reverted my crops, so that the people at Wikivoyage can easily transfer them to there. I've also separated the obvious cases from other cases that may be covered by our policies here and kept, and also added some suggestions of files that can be restored and adapted accordingly.-- Darwin Ahoy! 21:35, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- @A.Savin: @DarwIn: Is there much point saving them for wikivoyage? because each picture has to be actually illustrated on a page directly related to it in order to be fair use. I'm not saying mine's the best one or anything, but clearly we can't have all of them on wikivoyage, is my reading of the usage protocol there, what do we think? --E.3 (Talk to Dr Peter James Chisholm). I sometimes don't understand rules, and I think abstractly. [5] 06:52, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
- I don't know what files they wanted to transfer (probably not all), maybe Atsirlin or Ymblanter know more --A.Savin 12:47, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
- Yes, indeed, we only transfer those which can immediately be used in articles and lists of cultural heritage (typically one per monument, two in exceptional cases if both could be used).--Ymblanter (talk) 12:53, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
- My suggestion would be to keep the one from the 1970s for wikivoyage, but only because I'm quite clearly a bit of fan of heritage work --E.3 (Talk to Dr Peter James Chisholm). I sometimes don't understand rules, and I think abstractly. [6] 06:58, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
- Namely, this one. --E.3 (Talk to Dr Peter James Chisholm). I sometimes don't understand rules, and I think abstractly. [7] 07:00, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
- @A.Savin: @DarwIn: Is there much point saving them for wikivoyage? because each picture has to be actually illustrated on a page directly related to it in order to be fair use. I'm not saying mine's the best one or anything, but clearly we can't have all of them on wikivoyage, is my reading of the usage protocol there, what do we think? --E.3 (Talk to Dr Peter James Chisholm). I sometimes don't understand rules, and I think abstractly. [5] 06:52, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 15:21, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Possibly a copyright infringement. Photo might be taken from here: http://indiancountrytodaymedianetwork.com/article/award-winning-osage-poet-elise-paschen-will-read-at-the-mitchell-museum-of-the-american-indian-139575 Photo of the same series is credited to "Jennifer Girard" here: http://www.elisepaschen.com/ Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 01:51, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Permission was granted by Jennifer Girard Dear Elise, License Specifications: Rights Granted: Elise Paschen owns the copyright to all the images that were done by Jennifer Girard at Jennifer Girard Photography. Thanks you, Jennifer Girard
JENNIFER GIRARD PHOTOGRAPHY
Deleted -FASTILY 20:16, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
_(1).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(1).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Image not needed, better image at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Blick_auf_Pressig_%28Standort_oberhalb_von_Brauersdorf%29_%282%29.jpg Mfiedler87 (talk) 05:36, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
_(1).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted -FASTILY 20:15, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
_(1).jpg){kind=link}
It's a derivative works of a copyrighted badge by the nature reserve Białowieża Forest Evil Russian (talk) 05:48, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:15, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Błędny tytuł pod zdjęciem, prześlę ten sam z prawidłowym opisem. Krygor (talk) 07:51, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:15, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Do usunięcia ponieważ plik się powtarza Krygor (talk) 07:53, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:18, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 颐园新居 as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: 请求删除，原因：低质量（没有对焦）比较模糊不清，已有分类“Chiwan station (Shekou Line)”中的媒体文件可替代
Converted by me to DR, as file is on Commons since 20011 and as uploader hadn't been notified. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:08, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:18, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 颐园新居 as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: 请求删除，原因：低质量（没有对焦）模糊不清，已有分类“Gangxia North station”中的媒体文件可替代
Converted by me to DR, as file is on Commons since 20011 and as uploader hadn't been notified. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:08, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:18, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 颐园新居 as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: 请求删除，原因：低质量（没有对焦）比较模糊不清，已有分类“Hongshuwan station (Shekou Line)”中的媒体文件可替代
Converted by me to DR, as file is on Commons since 20011 and as uploader hadn't been notified. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:08, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:18, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
2.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Aeou as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: No freedom of pnorama in Ukraine. Architect Myron Vendzylovych died in 1992 (see uk:Вендзилович Мирон Дем'янович).
Converted by me to DR, as it should be discussed whether this building is above threshold of originality to be copyrightable at all.-- Túrelio (talk) 08:14, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
2.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted -FASTILY 20:17, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
2.jpg){kind=link}
Dieses Bild ist nicht vom Urheber Pedelecs hochgeladen. Das Original ist in Wekimedia unter "File:Rathaus Bremen 116thd.jpg" zu finden Pedelecs (talk) 09:05, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:16, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Recent sculpture. No FoP in France. And probable copyvio for the background : see this picture found on the web TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 09:20, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:18, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Salavat as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyrighted logo owned by the Croatian Pure Party of Rights
Converted by me to DR, as logo might not reach threshold-of-originality to be copyrightable. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:54, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:16, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Les auteurs de ce monument − Antoine Sartorio et Gaston Castel − sont mort respectivement en 1988 et en 1971. Ce monument ne sera donc pas dans le domaine public avant 2059 ; de plus, il n'y a pas de liberté de panorama en France. VIGNERON (talk) 09:54, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:17, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Monument aux morts de l'Armée d'Orient et des terres lointaines.jpg, as sculpture and monument are still in copyright. Túrelio (talk) 16:20, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
Same problem with:
- File:20211113.Monument aux morts d'Orient (Marseille).-014.jpg
- File:Monument Aux Morts Des Orients.jpg
- File:Marseille 115DSC 0485a (49241568911).jpg
.-014.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Undelete in 2059. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:31, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Bild wurde nicht vom Urheber hochgeladen. Das Original mit höherer Auflösung ist in "File:Mainz Stadtbrücke Schloss Nacht 395.jpg" zu finden. Pedelecs (talk) 10:06, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:18, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
How shall this removal by the uploader be interpreted? A user request for deletion? Leyo 11:42, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:16, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Contemporary sculpture, erected in 1994 [8], no FoP in Russia. A.Savin 11:55, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:18, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Soviet sculpture made in the 1930s or later, no FoP in Russia. A.Savin 11:56, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:18, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
it's not in use, no need to keep it Taz666 (talk) 12:24, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:18, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Plik powtarza się Krygor (talk) 12:43, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:17, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Dubious "own work" (with watermark) 91.66.153.214 13:45, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:16, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
All previous uploads of this user were copy vios, this picture is small and has no metadata, so it's possibly an internet image too. CennoxX (talk) 13:45, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:17, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
esta ddplicado Marita75 (talk) 15:09, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:17, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
La personne n'a pas donnée sont authorisation Nenesse61 (talk) 15:50, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:15, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Ubcule as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: Not reasonably usable; Very blurry (would be borderling acceptable even after sharpening on this basis alone), but detail also significantly cut off at top and bottom. We already have numerous better iPhone images. INeverCry 18:13, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:16, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Ubcule as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: Apparent personal image of a (self-declared?) "cute boy" not currently used anywhere, thus out of scope. INeverCry 18:15, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:16, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 79.70.205.187 as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: Personal image not used on any project INeverCry 18:17, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:16, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Photo of Soviet sculpture (made after WWII), no FoP in Russia. A.Savin 19:54, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:17, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
author&uploader request: poor quality, replaced by File:Eglise d'Eysines.jpg PA (talk) 20:56, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:16, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
François Brochet (1925 - 2001) is not in public domain. No freedom of panorama in France. 90.2.103.99 21:24, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:15, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
_Sketched_By_Khurram_Irshad_Chattha.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Sketched_By_Khurram_Irshad_Chattha.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No encyclopaedic use Syed Wamiq Ahmed Hashmi (talk) 21:31, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
_Sketched_By_Khurram_Irshad_Chattha.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted -FASTILY 20:15, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
_Sketched_By_Khurram_Irshad_Chattha.jpg){kind=link}
Useless, unencyclopaedic sketch Syed Wamiq Ahmed Hashmi (talk) 21:34, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:15, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Copyright violation Syed Wamiq Ahmed Hashmi (talk) 21:36, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:17, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Self-promo... No use whatsoever Syed Wamiq Ahmed Hashmi (talk) 21:39, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:15, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Useless photograph Syed Wamiq Ahmed Hashmi (talk) 21:40, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:17, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Useless sketch Syed Wamiq Ahmed Hashmi (talk) 21:41, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:17, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Commons is not a gallery for displaying Chattha's drawings Syed Wamiq Ahmed Hashmi (talk) 21:44, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:17, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Useless self-promo Syed Wamiq Ahmed Hashmi (talk) 21:45, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:16, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Useless: no encyclopaedic puropse Syed Wamiq Ahmed Hashmi (talk) 21:48, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:15, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Commons is not an exhibition for sketches Syed Wamiq Ahmed Hashmi (talk) 21:51, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:15, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Utterly useless sketch Syed Wamiq Ahmed Hashmi (talk) 21:53, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:15, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Self-promo Syed Wamiq Ahmed Hashmi (talk) 21:54, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:17, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Useless file Syed Wamiq Ahmed Hashmi (talk) 21:54, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:17, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Useless sketch Syed Wamiq Ahmed Hashmi (talk) 21:55, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:18, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Useless file Syed Wamiq Ahmed Hashmi (talk) 21:56, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:17, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Useless cartoon Syed Wamiq Ahmed Hashmi (talk) 21:57, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:18, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Not the right place for hoisting a notebook sketch Syed Wamiq Ahmed Hashmi (talk) 21:58, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:18, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Useless sketch Syed Wamiq Ahmed Hashmi (talk) 21:59, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:17, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Nothing allows to assert that the bartender is the owner of the copyright of the picture and therefore can grant anything. Nevertheless, the permission has not been properly handled Stromare (talk) 22:22, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:16, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Where is this artwork located? In which country? In/Outsite a building? This needs to be clarified to be able to decide if COM:FOP applies or not. JuTa 23:45, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:18, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
I've noticed there is a duplicate of this file - File:Proces metropolity weniamina.jpg, which is also of better quality. Very trivial (talk) 08:23, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 14:45, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
No FOP in Azerbaijan 46.70.85.19 12:31, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Keep. The Flame Towers aren't the main object of this photo. Here we can see general view. Actually we already had a discussion according that general views should be kept. --Interfase (talk) 12:41, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete To say these aren't the main object of this photo is bizarre and demonstrably wrong. Size isn't the only consideration; one has to consider intent. Per the guidelines at COM:DM:
- 1) the file is in use to illustrate X: Yes - w:Flame Towers
- 2) the file is categorised in relation to X: Yes - in Category:Flame Towers
- 3) X is referenced in the filename: Yes
- 4) X is referenced in the description: Yes
- 5) X cannot be removed from the file without making the file useless: Yes - just an nondescript city setting otherwise. Эlcobbola talk 22:13, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 14:45, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
The image on flickr is copyright, therefore this image is not suitable for Wikimedia Commons. MTLskyline (talk) 18:11, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete ARR license --Leoboudv (talk) 21:11, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi all, I apologize for this. If it is not suitable for the Commons, please have it deleted. FRE1991DDIE.
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 14:46, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
A pesar de que se trate de una empresa estatal, en la página de donde se sacó (http://www.sofse.gob.ar) dice "Todos los derechos reservados © copyright 2011" Mega-buses (talk) 03:00, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- Sumo a la propuesta a la siguiente imagen:
--Mega-buses (talk) 03:09, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 10:54, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
- Previous discussion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Taurens coopinus.jpg
Renominating for deletion as copyvio. The uploader uploaded it solely to place the image in a hoax article about a fictitious kind of spider (see en:Wikipedia:List of hoaxes on Wikipedia/Taurens), and therefore is untrustworthy - we shouldn't believe their claim that it's their own work, especially with no EXIF data and no other uploads, under the circumstances. I realise that conventionally we trust claims of own work, but I don't think we should where the user has demonstrably engaged in deceptive behaviour. (Strangely, it appeared later on /r/spiders May 2nd of this year, with description "Found this jumper on my shed in Hampshire, GB", but this can't be the source since it happened later). Dcoetzee (talk) 04:28, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- Comment. To make this even stranger than it already was: this is an old photo of mine that I took with my first camera, I might still have the original somewhere. It was only ever posted to a few private places, so whoever uploaded it must have taken it from there. Do whatever with the image, I see hardly any educational value with it, being out of focus. If there's actually any reason to keep it, I have no problem with it staying under the current license it's been claimed to be under. Lewis Hulbert (talk) 21:25, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
- Keep; assuming the above information is correct & this is the author, then that clears up the copyvio issue, & the file is actually IN USE here [9], so it would be good & useful to keep the pic for that purpose, as a matter of record.
- also, it's not a bad photo artistically; it could be used to illustrate something about "fear of spiders", dreams/nightmares, or etc. or just as a general "a spider" illustration.
- Request withdrawn. I've updated the author per the above. I'm kind of amazed that the original author happened to stumble across this discussion, but they seem like a trustworthy user with quite a lot of contributions, and they created their account several weeks before this discussion began. Dcoetzee (talk) 11:36, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
- I was indeed very surprised when scanning through Category:Salticus scenicus and seeing my own photo. My first thoughts were "Jesus Christ, is that my photo?" so I clicked on the thumbnail, and it turned out to be so. It's safe to say this may be one of the strangest deletion requests yet. Lewis Hulbert (talk) 16:58, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn FASTILY 10:54, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
PD-textlogo does not apply. Krd 07:32, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Besides the text, there are just parallelograms, or if you see "cubes", they are still simple geometry shapes. --UAwiki (talk) 00:35, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: pd simple apparently FASTILY 10:54, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
This is a lot more complex than the logo at the bottom of page 1 of http://www.ipmall.info/hosted_resources/CopyrightAppeals/2006/CCC%20Logo.pdf where adding a simple border was enough to make a logo protected by copyright. The file is additionally an SVG file, so we need to identify where the source code comes from and obtain a licence from the coder. Stefan4 (talk) 21:12, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, copyright infringementYmblanter (talk) 12:04, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Antonsusi as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: No longer used in Wikipedia. The page of the German WP listed is only an archive of a talkpage and doesn't matter. Antonsusi (talk) 21:19, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Converted by me to DR, as this file is on Commons since 2006 and as uploader hadn't been notified about DR. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:58, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- Note: File:Führt kein Wappen.svg is a derivative work of this file. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 12:37, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 10:55, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Doppelte Datei, die nicht vom Urheber hochgeladen wurde. Das Original mit höherer Auflösung ist in "File:Schloss Vollrads 043-Vh.jpg" zufinden. Pedelecs (talk) 09:46, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete per nom (except that it doesn't matter if it was uploaded directly by the author). Not quite an exact scaled-down duplicate (slightly wider crop), or I'd speedy delete it. --Avenue (talk) 12:45, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 10:55, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
A joke from a user or a copyright violation or both? 91.66.153.214 09:47, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- Appears to be an unencyclopedic derivative work. Delete. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 12:44, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 10:55, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
by owner request. File to be removed from Wikipedia immediately. Gmeulendijks (talk) 10:13, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete - Used for self-promotion article on nl-wiki. ErikvanB (talk) 12:11, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- also copyvio, see http://www.dewachterkronieken.nl . CaAl (talk) 18:39, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 10:55, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
by owner request. File to be removed from Wikipedia immediately. Gmeulendijks (talk) 10:14, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete - Used for self-promotion article on nl-wiki. ErikvanB (talk) 12:11, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 10:55, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
not a permanently in a public place situated object, so it doesn't fall under Freedom of Panorama CennoxX (talk) 13:09, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
The usual Commons copyright paranoia. Only a quite small part of that photograph is copyrightable at all. Keep. --AndreasPraefcke (talk) 15:51, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
- The only reason to use this picture, is the copyrightable small part of that photography.--CennoxX (talk) 21:26, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: derivatives of non-free content are forbidden on Commons FASTILY 10:56, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Screenshot of Italian television talk show "Niente di Personale". Writer Cinzia Giorgio, which is portrayed, is not the author or the copyright holder of it so the OTRS permission does not seem to be relevant. Jaqen (talk) 13:31, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- She can also be barely recognized in such an image. Quality alone should be enough for this file to be deleted, unfortunately. --Elitre (talk) 13:49, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 10:56, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
The copyright notice from the Flickr file description seems self-contradictory and contrary to Commons' requirements. The assertions here on Commons that the photo is covered by the terms of the Creative Commons Attributions 2.0 license and that the Flickr uploader is the author appear to be false.
Copyright note: This photo has been released to the Public Domain, or it is licensed under Creative Commons, or it falls under the doctrine of Fair Use as of United States copyright law, or I have received written consent by the author, rights owner, licensed source, or otherwise authorized by source to republish photos without any limitations.
Well, which is it? It can't be both in the public domain (i.e. not protected by copyrigh) and covered by a Creative Commons license (of which there are many, only some of which are appropriate for Wikimedia Commons). Non-free "fair use" content is not permitted on Commons, and permission for someone else to republish is not the same as permission for anyone to modify and use the file for any purpose. Those are very, very different scenarios as far as Commons is concerned. Waving one's hands and saying it's one of them isn't good enough. In any case...
In any case it is widely posted in the Internet at large. Therefore, anyone can republish this photo anywhere else in the Internet or any other publication in accordance to the legal copyright status of the photo.
Uh... no. Try again?
This photo has been published exclusively for non-commercial didactical and historical purposes
Oh, well. Too bad we don't host content restricted to {{Noncommercial}} uses.
to illustrate the inalienable Right of Return of the Palestinians to their 1948 lands and homes in Palestine. Disemination of such didactical illustration is not only allowed, but also encouraged.
By whom? According to which copyright law? Are we invoking fair use again? That's still not applicable on Commons. Try again?
At the very least, you are free to copy/link this photo as long as you recognize the source.
That's not really how copyright works. And what is the source, anyway?
Please contact me through flickrmail should you feel you retain legal copyright rights to this photo to accommodate all your requirements.
Source: www.palestineremembered.com
It doesn't actually appear anywhere on that page. Even if it appears somewhere on the site, that's not the original source.
—LX (talk, contribs) 15:11, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- Speedy delete until permissions verified through OTRS or the image is found to be obviously released under a compatible license. Sadly, this is one of those cases where Copyright policy dictates that the image be deleted until the copyright issue is settled. The only reason to discuss this is to see if there is prima facia evidence of a compatible license. A cursory inspection shows there is no such license, so the image must be deleted first then the copyright issues cleared up, then it can be re-uploaded. The proper venue is through Commons:OTRS. Davidwr (talk) 01:29, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 10:57, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
File:A serviceman accesses social media channels using a smart phone, outside MOD Main Building in London MOD 45156046.jpg
[edit]
Same for
- File:A serviceman accesses social media channels using an iPad, outside MOD Main Building in London MOD 45156042.jpg
- File:A serviceman accesses social media channels using an iPad, outside MOD Main Building in London MOD 45156043.jpg
- File:A serviceman accesses social media channels using an iPad, outside MOD Main Building in London MOD 45156044.jpg
- File:A serviceman accesses social media channels using an iPad, outside MOD Main Building in London MOD 45156052.jpg
- File:A serviceman accesses social media channels, using a desktop computer. MOD 45156050.jpg
- File:A serviceman accesses social media channels, using a desktop computer. MOD 45156051.jpg
- File:A serviceman accesses social media channels, using a desktop computer. MOD 45156053.jpg
Commons:Derivative work from web site screenshot. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:08, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- Keep What you can see on the screens in some of these shots could be rationalized under De minimis, however even if that fails, the embedded website images and illustrations are MOD property and have been correctly released by the MOD under the OGL. There is no copyright reason I can see to delete these images and they are in-scope as good quality images to illustrate media and technology topics. --Fæ (talk) 15:57, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: probably okay, no consensus to delete FASTILY 10:58, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Sorry, but this is obviously a recent and thereby copyrighted statue, which seems to be located in Lithuania. Regrettably, Lithuania has no freedom-of-panorama exemption from copyright. -- Túrelio (talk) 15:20, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- (Sorry for my poor English) It is possible (Look Commons:Freedom of panorama):
"'Lithuania: Not OKLimited freedom of panorama in Lithuania is granted by article 28 ("Limitations to Copyright in Works of Architecture and Sculptures") of the Law Amending the Law on Copyright and Related Rights. This allows a photographer to make and publish pictures of sculptures and works of architecture that are permanently located in public places (excluding works presented in museums and exhibitions), but they cannot be used commercially in any form. In Wikipedia photo using is NOT COMMERCIAL. So, it is possible to use not only my own, but another persons publicated photo of this this statue too.--Makshes 15:59, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- Hi Makshes, it does not matter that Wikipedia per se is not commercial, as per Commons' policy all uploads must be free for any kind of use, including commercial use. You might check whether your Wikipedia has an exemption policy allowing such kind of images. --Túrelio (talk) 17:49, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- Dear Turelio, I am not a big specialist in all law's knowledge, I am only studing; may be it is possible to change just for this file license to a siutable, which forbid commercial use of this controversial file ? In order not to delete it. If You can change it, I'll be very thankful. With respect, --Makshes 18:58, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- No, I am sorry. That is a fundamental WMF policy, something none of us on Commons can simply change. --Túrelio (talk) 19:16, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- What is necessary to do for me in order to leave this file ? Please, help me. Thank You. --Makshes 08:12, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- You need 1) to find out who is the sculptor. 2) if he is still living, you might try to contact him and explain him the problem. If he agrees to give a permission that this photo of his work is put under a free license, which would allow any kind of use, then you should prepare a valid permission text, send it to him, ask him to sign it and to sent it back to OTRS. If he is already dead, then it gets complicated as you need to obtain the permission from his heir(s). --Túrelio (talk) 09:02, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- Ok. The sculpto is Romualdas Kvintas. I'll try ti contact him. How much time I have to try to save this photo ?--Makshes 12:05, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- That is not a problem. Even if the image would be deleted, any admin can un-delete with 2 clicks.
- In order to prepare a valid permission, please see Commons:OTRS (also in other languages, but not in Lithuanian) and OTRS#Declaration of consent for all enquiries. You need to adapt the permission text a bit, as Mr. Kvintas is not the creator of the photo, but of the depicted sculpture. So, the permission must contain the statements 1) that he is the creator of the original sculpture "..." (official name of sculpture) and 2) that he does consent that this photo http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Romain_Gary.jpg of his sculpture is released under a free license, which allows any kind (including derivative and commercial use) of the named photography. If Mr. Kvintas does not understand english, you might translate the english text into Lithuanian. If Mr. Kvintas is very old and does not use email, you could print the permission text on paper, send the paper to him and ask him to date it, sign and send it back to you. You can then scan it and email the scan to OTRS. --Túrelio (talk) 12:59, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- Ok. The sculpto is Romualdas Kvintas. I'll try ti contact him. How much time I have to try to save this photo ?--Makshes 12:05, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- You need 1) to find out who is the sculptor. 2) if he is still living, you might try to contact him and explain him the problem. If he agrees to give a permission that this photo of his work is put under a free license, which would allow any kind of use, then you should prepare a valid permission text, send it to him, ask him to sign it and to sent it back to OTRS. If he is already dead, then it gets complicated as you need to obtain the permission from his heir(s). --Túrelio (talk) 09:02, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- What is necessary to do for me in order to leave this file ? Please, help me. Thank You. --Makshes 08:12, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- No, I am sorry. That is a fundamental WMF policy, something none of us on Commons can simply change. --Túrelio (talk) 19:16, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- Dear Turelio, I am not a big specialist in all law's knowledge, I am only studing; may be it is possible to change just for this file license to a siutable, which forbid commercial use of this controversial file ? In order not to delete it. If You can change it, I'll be very thankful. With respect, --Makshes 18:58, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
I shall be in Vilnius in the begining of November. Hope Till November this photo will be not deleted. --Makshes 13:18, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: There is no FOP in Lithuania FASTILY 10:58, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in USA. Stefan4 (talk) 16:48, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- Comment I don't see any FOP problem - the visible sign seems a combination of simple text and an outline map of the State of Alaska, neither of which is copyrightable. However I'm not sure of the in scope usefulness of this photo at this resolution and with the digital watermark. -- Infrogmation (talk) 21:31, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope FASTILY 10:58, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Not the uploader's own work; seems to be a derivative work/exact copy/scan of a postcard High Contrast (talk) 16:51, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
It is a scan of a postcard, freely in the public domain. Correction made. (User talk:Harvey Milligan) 20:34, 23 September 2013 (G.M.T.)
- No, it is not in the public domain because this image is definately not ineligible for copyright. Your argument is completely wrong. Who is the copyright holder of it? --High Contrast (talk) 12:57, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: FASTILY 10:59, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Ubcule as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: Very poor quality image, due to both blurring and poor composition. This image taken at the same time serves the purpose far better. INeverCry 18:12, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 11:01, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Complex British logo, see COM:TOO#United Kingdom. Stefan4 (talk) 18:14, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- You need a better case than that imo. How is the work copyrighted? And therefore too complex? Flickrworker (talk) 20:27, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- It contains letters and lines arranged in a way which is more complex than the "E" in w:File:EDGE magazine (logo).svg which a British court found was sufficiently complex for copyright protection. --Stefan4 (talk) 20:30, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for that the link you gave is a bit rubbish for the UK. Just a bunch of red links for what you're not meant to do and no examples which are allowable. So the clarification is helpful. Flickrworker (talk) 20:45, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- It contains letters and lines arranged in a way which is more complex than the "E" in w:File:EDGE magazine (logo).svg which a British court found was sufficiently complex for copyright protection. --Stefan4 (talk) 20:30, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
This image only consists of simple geometric shapes and/or text. It does not meet the threshold of originality needed for copyright protection, and is therefore in the public domain.--EEIM (talk) 03:10, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- As stated in the nomination, it does not only consist of simple geometric shapes and/or text, per COM:TOO#United Kingdom. --Stefan4 (talk) 14:08, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: not simple text FASTILY 11:02, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
The old revision of the file is not simple at all and needs to be deleted. Stefan4 (talk) 18:15, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Too simple, {{PD-textlogo}} - Fma12 (talk) 12:39, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
- The old revision is definitely not simple. There's no evidence that it satisfies COM:TOO#Colombia. --Stefan4 (talk) 19:34, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 11:01, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Doesn't look simple. Compare with Commons:Deletion requests/File:BF-Schriftzug.png. Stefan4 (talk) 18:16, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
This image only consists of simple geometric shapes and/or text. It does not meet the threshold of originality needed for copyright protection.--EEIM (talk) 03:50, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- The textures are not simple. --Stefan4 (talk) 14:02, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 11:01, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Hungarikusz Firkász as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: The author of the image (Eugene Ujfalusi Nemeth) is not the same one who commented on the picture of the license (Pataki Márta). The image must be enabled. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 10:04, 15 September 2013 (UTC) INeverCry 18:18, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 11:01, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Two images in one. One is completely unsourced and the second is just sourced to Flickr which doesn't tell where the image comes from. There is no evidence that the photographer is anonymous and there is no information about the age of the image at all. Stefan4 (talk) 18:27, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
please read:--EEIM (talk) 03:45, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
{{PD-Colombia}}
The author and the work source must be acknowledged when reused in Colombia, except if the author is unknown.
--EEIM (talk) 03:47, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- The requirement to attribute the author isn't the only problem. You must also make sure that the author died more than 80 years ago, unless the author is anonymous. There is no evidence that the author is anonymous. This looks like a scan of some kind of publication, and then you do at least have to check whether there is some image caption in that publication before you can claim that the author is anonymous. Also, you must include sufficient information about how to find the publication so that anyone else can check this too. --Stefan4 (talk) 14:04, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
photo took before jun-1888, is Enough!? whats the date today, octubre 1913 ,oh sorry octubre 2013 --EEIM (talk) 06:08, 2 October 2013 (UTC)ref:http://www.cucutanuestra.com/temas/fotos_cucuta/1800/cucuta_1800.htm
- Many people who were alive in 1888 were still alive in 1933. If it was taken at the age of 20 and the photographer died at the age of 80, then the photographer died less than 80 years ago. --Stefan4 (talk) 14:37, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Unclear copyright status. Unless we have definitive, explicit written and/or textual, tangible evidence from a credible, verifiable source naming this file as freely licensed under a Commons compatible license, we simply cannot host it on Commons FASTILY 11:01, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
The logo isn't simple. Stefan4 (talk) 18:31, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
why not,word and squares, wow what an originality.--EEIM (talk) 03:43, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: not a simple logo FASTILY 11:01, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
The uploader lists the photographer's name as "Juank bustos" (which looks like a typo). There is no evidence that this person died before 1933. Stefan4 (talk) 18:42, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
please take a min. and read.bout source.--EEIM (talk) 03:27, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
{{PD-Colombia}}
The author and the work source must be acknowledged when reused in Colombia, except if the author is unknown.--EEIM (talk) 03:39, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, but the copyright expires 80 years after the death of the author unless the author is anonymous. Anonymous is not the same thing as unknown and there is no evidence that the author is anonymous. --Stefan4 (talk) 14:10, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
photo took 1910, is Enough!? whats the date today, octubre 1913 ,oh sorry octubre 2013--EEIM (talk) 06:13, 2 October 2013 (UTC) .http://www.cucutanuestra.com/temas/fotos_cucuta/1900_1930/cucuta_1900_1930.htm
- Many people who were alive in 1910 were still alive in 1933. If it was taken at the age of 20 and the photographer died at the age of 80, then the photographer died less than 80 years ago. --Stefan4 (talk) 14:37, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Unclear copyright status. Unless we have definitive, explicit written and/or textual, tangible evidence from a credible, verifiable source naming this file as freely licensed under a Commons compatible license, we simply cannot host it on Commons FASTILY 11:01, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
This was still copyrighted in Colombia on the URAA date and is therefore copyrighted in USA. There is also too little information about the image to verify whether the anonymous claim is correct or not. Stefan4 (talk) 18:50, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
this file is 86 years old,is long time,copyright has expired.--EEIM (talk) 02:56, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
please take a min. and read.--EEIM (talk) 03:26, 23 September 2013 (UTC) {{PD-Colombia}}
This image is free in its home country, Colombia.--EEIM (talk) 04:02, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- In USA, the copyright expires 95 years after publication, and this can impossibly have been published more than 95 years ago as it wasn't even taken more than 95 years ago. There is also no evidence that any of the points in {{PD-Colombia}} applies. --Stefan4 (talk) 13:49, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Unclear copyright status. Unless we have definitive, explicit written and/or textual, tangible evidence from a credible, verifiable source naming this file as freely licensed under a Commons compatible license, we simply cannot host it on Commons FASTILY 10:59, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Questionable that uploader is actual copyright holder. Ebyabe (talk) 19:16, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Without evidence to the contrary, the presence of the logo in the corner suggests that copyright does not belong to uploader. Also, photo has no value to project, as its only evident purpose has been a now-deleted vanity autobiography on enwiki. --99.118.34.43 20:29, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete as uneducational and a likely copyvio. Jackmcbarn (talk) 21:35, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 10:59, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
probably copyvio, mention copyright, uploader is not copyrightholder Havang(nl) (talk) 19:37, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
-2013-09-22T19:37:00.000Z-File:Achterkamer.jpg){kind=link}
probably copyvio, mention copyright, uploader is not copyrightholder Havang(nl) (talk) 19:38, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 10:59, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
In every sense an inferior version of File:Klemens_von_Metternich_by_Lawrence.jpg. Jarry1250 (talk) 22:40, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Still in use and also the hair is better visible. --McZusatz (talk) 18:55, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry, yes, I should have chosen File:Metternich by Lawrence.jpeg, which is simarily chosen but larger, not awkwardly cropped, better coloured, higher resolution and so forth. Jarry1250 (talk) 22:44, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Superseded by File:Metternich by Lawrence (cropped).jpeg --McZusatz (talk) 17:04, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
Deleted: FASTILY 11:00, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Double - doppelt mit: File:Rathaus Bremen 116thd.jpg - Dieses Bild wurde inzwischen überarbeitet. Pedelecs (talk) 14:38, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Not exact duplicate PierreSelim (talk) 07:08, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Dieses Bild ist nicht vom Urheber Pedelecs hochgeladen. Das Original ist in Wekimedia unter "File:Rathaus Bremen 116thd.jpg" zu finden Pedelecs (talk) 08:24, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 10:55, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Files from user:José Andrés de Vera y Paysal
[edit]I list here the pictures and reasons to delete.
- File:Ezequiel Jose Andres de Vera y Paysal.jpg - All data are "unknown". I think it's a sort of self interpretation, but remains unclear. No exif, no higher resolution
- File:Zorrilla General Jose Artigas 1949.gif - Black and White picture, apparently scanned from a book. No exif, no higher resolution
- File:Zorrilla Tumba de Monseñor Mariano Soler 1930 1.jpg - No higher resolution, no exif
- File:Zorrilla Tumba de Monseñor Mariano Soler 1930 2.jpg - Exif looks like this is a scanned picture; no higher resolution
- File:José Belloni.jpg - not own work, not source cited
- File:Zorrilla La fuente de los atletas 1923.jpg - Very unlikely own work, apparently scanned from a book. No exif, no higher resolution. Font looks new, not in place (see i.e. File:FuenteAtletas01.JPG
Thanks. --Ganímedes (talk) 20:27, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Most likely extracted from internet or scanned from books.--Zeroth (talk) 01:21, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 10:59, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
It's arguable that all of these files are under the threshold of originality
- File:El chavo animado logo.png
- File:Tron 1982 logo.PNG
- File:Tronlogo.png
- File:Titanic 1997.jpg
- File:Air-China logo.png
- File:Iberia air logo.png
- File:Liat logo.png
- File:BWIA logo.png
- File:Caribbean Airlines logo.png
- File:Qatar Airways Logo.png
- File:Toyota logo.png
- File:Discovery logo.png
- File:Icloud logo.PNG
- File:DB z.png
- File:DB gt.png
- File:Disney-ABC.png
- File:Dropbox logo.png
- File:The avengers logo.png
- File:Disney amigos del mundo.png
- File:BellSouth logo.png
- File:Directv HD logo.png
- File:Claro.svg.png
- File:AFC Logo.png
- File:Embraer logo.png
- File:Hd dvd logo.png
- File:Reebok logo 2.png
- File:HBO family logo.png
- File:Golden logo.png
- File:De pelicula logo.png
- File:Discovery kids logo.png
- File:The Hub logo.png
- File:HD Theater logo.png
- File:BBC Food logo.png
- File:Football club barcelona television.png
- File:Pes 2013 logo.png
- File:Pes 2012 logo.PNG
- File:Logo brand Adidas.png
- File:ESPN Classic.png
- File:Military Channell.png
- File:Fox Sports Australia.png
- File:Olimpica stereo logo.png
- File:Logo aeropuerto el dorado.png
- File:Bigcola.png
- File:Discovery Familia.png
- File:Logo violetta.png
- File:Bluradio logo.png
- File:Logo tv3x.png
- File:Logo de Avatar la leyenda de Aang.png
- File:The DirecTV logo.png
- File:Caracol HD.jpg
- File:Logo canal caracol.jpg
- File:Logo fox sports 2012.png
- File:Escobar novela.PNG
- File:The Film Zone logo.PNG
- File:Blu ray logo.png
- File:Logo del canal rcn.JPG
- File:Youkux.JPG
- File:Speed's logo.JPG
- File:Discovery-max.jpg
- File:Bomerang ch.JPG
- File:Tierra la lelicula del planeta.JPG
- File:Casi discovery military.JPG
- File:Casi discovery familia.JPG
- File:E-a sporsss.JPG
- File:E t bogota.JPG
Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 21:47, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
- Comment: This is a very broad nomination. It would be better if these were split up by country or something. I don't have time to comment on each right now, but some obvious ones:
- File:Discovery logo.png is already nominated for deletion. Now it has two nominations at the same time! Is that even allowed?
- Keep File:Discovery Familia.png and File:Military Channell.png: U.S. works, pretty clearly text and simple shapes.
- Delete File:Casi discovery military.JPG and File:Casi discovery familia.JPG: not copyrightable, but deletable per COM:SCOPE as poor quality alternatives of existing files.
- Delete File:BBC Food logo.png: conversely, the UK has a very low threshold of originality per Commons:Deletion requests/Two British logos.
- Some of these are from Columbia. It would be nice if there was some discussion of what the threshold of originality is for Columbia. --Closeapple (talk) 12:22, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
- Comment: This is a very broad nomination. It would be better if these were split up by country or something. I don't have time to comment on each right now, but some obvious ones:--EEIM (talk) 19:58, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
- Comment: some logos like this was upload beacuse on english wikipedia says :and I quote: This is a candidate to be copied to Wikimedia Commons. Freely licensed or public domain media are more accessible to other Wikimedia projects if placed on Commons. Any user may perform this move—please see Moving images to the Commons for more information please won't put this information again ,so you make me waste my time.--EEIM (talk) 19:58, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
this got over the discussion.
most of logos are too simple example--EEIM (talk) 20:14, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
This first statement is more of a caution to EEIM and other persons who transfer files from other projects to here; there are many times images are marked for transfer but may not actually be able to be moved. So the responsibility is yours to decide if a move is good or not. Anyways, I agree with the deletion of File:Casi discovery military.JPG because it is very low quality version (like an Inkscape trace) and it is unused. I am going to look at the other files and write down my thoughts on them. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 22:38, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
- Delete for File:E-a sporsss.JPG for being unused, low-quality image replaced by File:Ea Sports.svg (but I agree with it being PD-Text and too simple for copyright). User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 23:05, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
- Delete for File:Reebok logo 2.png because, as established in Britain (before it was made a part of the German ADIDAS), it would have had copyright protection in the UK since their TOO is very low according to Commons:TOO#United_Kingdom. Most logos from the UK have to go. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 23:05, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
- Delete for File:Air-China logo.png since, according to this New China article (ZH), calligraphy is copyrighted in China and logos that have such creative elements are copyrighted. The Air China logo was written by hand by former CPC Leader Deng Xiaoping. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 23:14, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
- For File:Toyota logo.png, File:DB z.png and File:DB gt.png we need a Japanese user look at http://www.kls-law.org/cce.top.html and see if this meets the threshold in Japan or not. The plain text by itself is OK, but with the logo on the side, I am not certain. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 00:08, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
Alot of these are too simple, they should have been done in groups or individually, not all together. File:The DirecTV logo.png is definitely a Keep Fry1989 eh? 03:57, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
- Keep all of them. --Simon Le Bon (talk) 23:12, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
- Comment: I don't agree upload images with just words,a lot of companies have logos without (take out) image,for exemple Qatar foundation is a sponsor F.C. Barcelona and on t shirt says qatar fountation non-tree.
I don't agree with fair use ,it's an illegal way to be legal, but it will do on englishwiki,because wikipedia from usa and americans (from usa) have paid this project,at least the most or half.
For us (wikipedia commons) free images,thereby ,i delete copyright and left image free, see even at airports ,tv,magazines,etc,we see that logos,and everybody know them
Kept: Some of these should be deleted, but a mass DR that crosses countries is beyond our ability to handle. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:00, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
Sourced to Flickr which doesn't tell where the images come from. There is no evidence that the photographers are anonymous and there is no information about the age of the images at all.
- File:Panorámica antigua de Cúcuta.PNG
- File:Ferrocarril cucuta-puert.PNG
- File:Puente san rafel cucuta.PNG
- File:Puente sobre el rio pamplonita.PNG
Stefan4 (talk) 18:49, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
these files,is long time,copyright has expired. author is unknown.--EEIM (talk) 03:24, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
the copyright holder most likely they are dead.is too difficult say the source. is pd old,at Flickr anyone upload files,in this case copyright has expired,and they uploaded,i cant say is mine,and i put as source Flickr.--EEIM (talk) 03:20, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
please read:and notice last point --EEIM (talk) 03:22, 23 September 2013 (UTC) {{PD-Colombia}}
These images are free in its home country, Colombia.--EEIM (talk) 04:04, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- How can you tell that the photos are old enough, when the source doesn't even say how old they are? --Stefan4 (talk) 13:47, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
Answer:reading --EEIM (talk) 06:18, 2 October 2013 (UTC)http://www.cucutanuestra.com/temas/fotos_cucuta/1900_1930/cucuta_1900_1930.htm
- The page [10] is useless for determining the copyright status of the images since the page appears to contain images from various sources without telling where the images come from. You need to check that website's sources too. --Stefan4 (talk) 13:51, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
you're right but just in one delete this took in 1952.--EEIM (talk) 06:28, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status. Unless we have definitive, explicit written and/or textual, tangible evidence from a credible, verifiable source naming these files as freely licensed under a Commons compatible license, we simply cannot host them on Commons -FASTILY 11:00, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering recently "enlarged" User talk:EEIM (Panoramio/etc. grabber). File:Valle de Cúcuta.jpg with exif: Canon PowerShot A640 --> mysteriously only 1 time used in his X k uploads.
Gunnex (talk) 13:12, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: likely not own work, COM:PRP. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:22, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
Logos above COM:TOO. For Discovery Channel cf. Commons:Deletion requests/File:DiscoveryChannel logo.png, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Discovery-Channel-logo.png, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Casi discovery hd.JPG and so on.
- File:Olympic Committee (Colombia) logo.svg
- File:AZ Corazón logo.svg
- File:AZ Tv De Paga logo.svg
- File:AZ Click! logo.svg
- File:Discovery Channel en Español logo.svg
- File:Inter-american Development Bank logo.svg
- File:Discovery Channel 1995 - 2000 logo.svg
- File:Colombia National Civil Registry logo.svg
- File:Discovery Channel logo.svg
- File:Farc Colombia Party logo.svg
- File:Piedmont Airlines logo.svg
_logo.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Sealle (talk) 15:45, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
Keep File:Olympic Committee (Colombia) logo.svg image only consists of simple geometric shapes or text. image shows a flag, a coat of arms, a seal or some other official insignia. Is in the public domain, because It is a public entity owned by the government of Colombia
File:Colombia National Civil Registry logo.svg is in the public domain, because It is a public entity owned by the government of Colombia. Image shows a flag, a coat of arms, a seal or some other official insignia.
File:AZ Corazón logo.svg and others are image only consists of simple geometric shapes or text. Simple logo
File:Piedmont Airlines logo.svg image only consists of simple geometric shapes or text. Simple logo
File:Discovery Channel logo.svg is a simple logo of official logo . this has copyright.
File:Discovery Channel 1995 - 2000 logo.svg simple logo with map. map have copyright?.
File:Farc Colombia Party logo.svg looks like OK, but Im not sure. --EEIM (talk) 01:16, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
- Keep for File:Olympic Committee (Colombia) logo.svg which is in the public domain since it is a public entity in Colombia. No copyright is infringed in any way and the logo can be uploaded on Commons with no probs. Keep also for File:AZ Corazón logo.svg which its vector variant was made from scratch and it is not eligible for copyright. The same applies for File:AZ Tv De Paga logo.svg and File:AZ Click! logo.svg which were also made from scratch and can't be copyrighteable. For File:Discovery Channel en Español logo.svg, I give it a keep since the world icon on the channel's logo is not elaborate enough to be claimed as WP:TOO, and thus it stays. It is also the case for File:Inter-american Development Bank logo.svg. However, for File:Discovery Channel 1995 - 2000 logo.svg, the world icon is a bit complex for a simple image, but I would still give it a pass. File:Colombia National Civil Registry logo.svg itself is a public insignia, not eligible for copyright regardless of how complex it is, according to Colombian laws. File:Discovery Channel logo.svg is not complex enough to be labelled as WP:TOO, so it passes anyway. For File:Farc Colombia Party logo.svg, the logo is in the public domain for being a political party's insignia, not eligible for copyright either. File:Piedmont Airlines logo.svg consists on simple geometric lines, not compatible with the threshold for originality, so the image stays. --Bankster (talk) 16:24, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
- Keep for File:Olympic Committee (Colombia) logo.svg because it is a public entity in Colombia. The logo doesn't infringe a copyright infringement and can be uploaded in commons. File:Colombia National Civil Registry logo.svg is in the public domain, because It is a public entity owned by the government of Colombia. File:AZ Corazón logo.svg image only consists of simple geometric shapes or text. File:Piedmont Airlines logo.svg image only consists of simple image and text. File:Discovery Channel logo.svg the world icon on the channel's logo is not elaborated enough to be claimed as WP: TOO, and thus it stays, the same goes for File:Discovery Channel 1995 - 2000 logo.svg. Finally, File:Farc Colombia Party logo.svg the logo is in the public domain for being a political party's insignia, and doesn't have copyrights. Futbolero44 (talk) 06:33, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
- Delete for File:Farc Colombia Party logo.svg. Should be a speedy deletion actually, since it is a recreation of deleted content. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:FARC party logo.png for the most recent nomination and links to past uploads before that. Bankster's comment above about this logo being "in the public domain for being a political party's insignia, not eligible for copyright either". This is not true. There is no copyright exemption in the US or Colombia for "political party insignia", nor any suggestion that political parties cannot be holders of intellectual property/copyrights. In fact, the party that created this logo releases all of their material under a CC no-derivatives license. seb26 (talk) 22:32, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
- Keep File:Piedmont Airlines logo.svg as {{PD-US-no notice}}. http://www.airliners.net/photo/Piedmont-Airlines/Boeing-737-247/658504 shows the Piedmont logo on the plane livery in public in January 1976. That's at least one pre-1978 display without copyright notice. (This logo existed by August 1974, as seen in pi740801.jpg via http://www.airtimes.com/cgat/usc/piedmont.htm and also at eBay item 232700995590. I don't know if the timetables had a copyright message or not, but apparently not on the covers.) --Closeapple (talk)
Deleted: most per nomination, kept one for being below TOO. --Jcb (talk) 14:26, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sonu singh shaheed (talk · contribs)
[edit]Appears this user uploaded a batch of images grabbed from the internet one day in 2011 (Special:Log/Sonu singh shaheed), 7 have been deleted as copyvios. Of the remaining three, one is watermarked and the other two have no metadata, I would suggest deletion per COM:PRP.
January (talk) 06:21, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 10:54, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
images of Böhlke
[edit]- File:Norbert_Böhlke.jpg
- File:Norbert_Böhlke_6.jpg
- File:Norbert_Böhlke_7.jpg
- File:Norbert_Böhlke_8.jpg
- File:Norbert_Böhlke_9.jpg
- File:Norbert_Böhlke_14.jpg
- File:Norbert_Böhlke_17.jpg
- File:Norbert_Böhlke_19.jpg
Norbert Böhlke hasn´t consented to the publication of this images --Jean11 (talk) 12:04, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 10:55, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
British logo. This is more complex than the EDGE logo and is therefore copyrighted in the source country. Unlicensed SVG adaptation previously posted at w:File:Commonwealth Games Federation Logo.svg. Stefan4 (talk) 17:41, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- Ok A) How is the CGF British? B)It has a PD licence. C)How is the letters CFG, three black lines and three coloured lines above the originality threshold and fall foul of British law? Flickrworker (talk) 20:34, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- As an aside it's been incorrectly moved from en wiki so the comments maybe valid but I still think a better argument needs to be presented. Same with the 2014 file. Flickrworker (talk) 20:37, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- See w:Commonwealth Games: "Headquarters: London, England, UK". Making a logo like this is more creative than drawing a diagonal line instead of a vertical one, which was recently found to be copyrightable by a British court.[11] Compare with COM:SIG#United Kingdom which makes it impossible to accept images of British signatures unless the signatory has been dead for at least 70 years. --Stefan4 (talk) 20:40, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- As an aside it's been incorrectly moved from en wiki so the comments maybe valid but I still think a better argument needs to be presented. Same with the 2014 file. Flickrworker (talk) 20:37, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
This image only consists of simple geometric shapes and/or text. It does not meet the threshold of originality needed for copyright protection--EEIM (talk) 03:59, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- It does indeed meet the threshold of originality in the United Kingdom. The file is additionally computer software; see w:Adobe Systems, Inc. v. Southern Software, Inc. --Stefan4 (talk) 14:00, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- Comment A derivative PNG of just 'the bar' itself is also present on Commons. Thank you. Malpass93 (talk) 11:39, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
- That one will also have to be deleted, then. --Stefan4 (talk) 11:44, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
- Comment A derivative PNG of just 'the bar' itself is also present on Commons. Thank you. Malpass93 (talk) 11:39, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
- Comment How about File:Juegoscommonwealth.png? This picture is clearly a derivative work of the CGF logo... --Taichi (talk) 07:14, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
- Not strictly British, not complicated enough for copyright. Keep Fry1989 eh? 16:23, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
- British organisation & besides former British colonies typically keep whatever law the UK was using when at independence, so most countries in the British Commonwealth probably have the same threshold of originality as the UK. Clearly a lot more complex than the EDGE logo. --Stefan4 (talk) 22:32, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
- What a delightful oversimplification and lack of understanding. Copyright law various extensively across the Commonwealth and no, this is not a British organization any more than the United Nations is an "American organization" because the General Assembly is HQ'd in the US. What you're suggesting is a bygone era. Fry1989 eh? 00:44, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
- In either case, you will need to show evidence that the logo is below the threshold of originality in its source country. All you have stated is that the source country possibly isn't the United Kingdom but some other Commonwealth country, without showing which country. By that argument, COM:PRP would require us to assume that the source country is the Commonwealth country with the lowest threshold of originality. --Stefan4 (talk) 13:40, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
- In either case your claim that this is a British organisation is patently false, just like many other statements you claim to get things deleted. Fry1989 eh? 19:01, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
- [citation needed] --Stefan4 (talk) 14:53, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
- I don't have to cite anything, in several DRs now I've caught you saying things which are at minimum dishonest and at worst outright lies. To call the modern Commonwealth a staunchly "British organisation" is to call the United Nations an "American organisation" because the General Assembly is in New York, to call the ICAO a "Canadian organisation" because it's HQ'd in Montreal, and to call the IOC a "Swiss organisation" because it's based in Lausanne. It's a stupid oversimplification of what are truly international organisations with no one host country holding the ultimate authority over them. You say these things all the time to support your DRs but they are dishonest and really unhelpful because then I have to correct you and it makes you look foolish. Fry1989 eh? 18:22, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
- [citation needed] --Stefan4 (talk) 14:53, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
- In either case your claim that this is a British organisation is patently false, just like many other statements you claim to get things deleted. Fry1989 eh? 19:01, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
- In either case, you will need to show evidence that the logo is below the threshold of originality in its source country. All you have stated is that the source country possibly isn't the United Kingdom but some other Commonwealth country, without showing which country. By that argument, COM:PRP would require us to assume that the source country is the Commonwealth country with the lowest threshold of originality. --Stefan4 (talk) 13:40, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
- What a delightful oversimplification and lack of understanding. Copyright law various extensively across the Commonwealth and no, this is not a British organization any more than the United Nations is an "American organization" because the General Assembly is HQ'd in the US. What you're suggesting is a bygone era. Fry1989 eh? 00:44, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
- British organisation & besides former British colonies typically keep whatever law the UK was using when at independence, so most countries in the British Commonwealth probably have the same threshold of originality as the UK. Clearly a lot more complex than the EDGE logo. --Stefan4 (talk) 22:32, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Kept: probably okay. borderline case: no clear consensus that this file exceeds TOO FASTILY 00:28, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
_logo.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_logo.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
A lot more complex than w:File:Australian Aboriginal Flag.svg which an Australian court found to be copyrighted.[12] Stefan4 (talk) 18:11, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
_logo.svg){kind=link}
This image only consists of simple geometric shapes and/or text. It does not meet the threshold of originality needed for copyright protection, and is therefore in the public domain.
But your example is awfully good.--EEIM (talk) 03:56, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
_logo.svg){kind=link}
- This does not only consist of "simple geometric shapes" as w:File:Australian Aboriginal Flag.svg consists of more than simple geometric shapes according to an Australian court. Or rather: images consisting purely of simple geometric shapes and/or text are copyrightable in Australia. --Stefan4 (talk) 14:01, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- The copyright status of the Aboriginal Flag is an anomaly, no doubt due to the sensitive history and nature of aboriginal relations. It is not a standard by which threshold is held in Australia. This is simple shapes and text. Keep Fry1989 eh? 20:07, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
- Please provide a source for your claim. The aboriginal flag ruling is similar to the British EDGE logo ruling, and the Australian copyright is similar to the British one. --Stefan4 (talk) 14:23, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
- I don't have to, we have many images from Australia (not just logos) which are far more complicated than the Aboriginal Flag and we've generally agreed they're all too simple and that the flag in question is an abrogation of the norm. Fry1989 eh? 23:16, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
- Did you see Special:PermanentLink/103956087#Category Deletion Requests? --Stefan4 (talk) 09:56, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
- Which is completely unrelated to this. Fry1989 eh? 15:09, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
- Did you see Special:PermanentLink/103956087#Category Deletion Requests? --Stefan4 (talk) 09:56, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
- I don't have to, we have many images from Australia (not just logos) which are far more complicated than the Aboriginal Flag and we've generally agreed they're all too simple and that the flag in question is an abrogation of the norm. Fry1989 eh? 23:16, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
- Please provide a source for your claim. The aboriginal flag ruling is similar to the British EDGE logo ruling, and the Australian copyright is similar to the British one. --Stefan4 (talk) 14:23, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
Kept: probably okay. borderline case: no clear consensus that this file exceeds TOO FASTILY 00:28, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
_logo.svg){kind=link}