Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2013/06/03

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive June 3rd, 2013
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

album cover, copyvio? Mjrmtg (talk) 00:30, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Of course a copyvio. Dschwen (talk) 00:32, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image taken in France, which does not have FoP for 'recent' architectural works Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:08, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:55, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:PM.jpg copy right violation

[edit]

another pictute with the same name. Hanay (talk) 13:18, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:40, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In all probability not own work. Tekstman (talk) 14:41, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: As obvious copyvio rubin16 (talk) 19:01, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no description, no copyright info, unused, out of scope Pibwl (talk) 14:24, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violation, unfree file taken from the web. Martin H. (talk) 21:03, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

album cover copyvio Mjrmtg (talk) 11:57, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unfree CD cover, COM:CB#Album covers. Martin H. (talk) 19:58, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doubtful own work Pibwl (talk) 21:47, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 15:09, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

found on google? what's the license? Mjrmtg (talk) 22:23, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 14:12, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo of the MLS without a license – I guess this is not simple enough for {{PD-textlogo}}, right? El Grafo (talk) 10:54, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Not a simple logo. Taivo (talk) 08:46, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nom. JuTa 22:00, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

album cover copyvio Mjrmtg (talk) 11:13, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. JuTa 22:01, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

album cover, copyvio Mjrmtg (talk) 11:49, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. JuTa 21:54, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

text-only contribution Taivo (talk) 09:34, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File:NATIONAL LIBRARY OF BELARUS - MINSK.jpg

Text-only contribution, restored soon after deleting Taivo (talk) 07:48, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: --JuTa 20:04, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not CC-BY-SA, do not have permission to create derivative works. From http://www.3dflagsplus.com/2010/10/animated-waving-flags-with-shadow-of_2300.html : These animated flags may be freely used on commercial or personal Web Pages (with the exception that you cannot use them in your own collection of animation offered to the public). Not free license. --Insider (talk) 07:19, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, this mean that i can use it to upload here, but i can't make like this file is my own. Commons isn't my collelection, i don't use file like my own collection this file can use everyone, also the author is indicated so what you are doing is absolutely pointless! --Giorgi Balakhadze 09:14, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The only requirement is that you provide a clickable link to the 3dflagsplus.com homepage.“ text given from file usage page [1].--Giorgi Balakhadze 23:40, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
These animated flags may be freely used on commercial or personal Web Pages (with the exception that you cannot use them in your own collection of animation offered to the public). The only requirement is that you provide a clickable link to the 3dflagsplus.com homepage. This is CC-BY-SA.--Giorgi Balakhadze 10:47, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
You are wrong. CC-BY-SA does not impose restrictions on the use of images for any purpose, including for use in your own collection of animation offered to the public. Also there is no permission to create derivative works (ND).--Insider (talk) 10:58, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete The permission doesn't seem to be sufficient, for several reasons:
    1. The permission doesn't cover use on non-commercial websites, unless the website is a personal website. It must be possible to use an image for both commercial and non-commercial purposes. For example, Commons is neither commercial nor personal, so the use on Commons isn't covered by the licence.
    2. The permission only covers use on websites, but not on, say, postcards or t-shirts.
    3. It's not clear whether the permission allows derivative works or not. The wording "freely used" is a bit ambiguous.
    4. The permission doesn't allow you to use the image in certain collections. --Stefan4 (talk) 14:13, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • OK, I understand, it's already clear that this will be deleted, but some persons must be sure that я сам сделаю новый анимационный флаг Грузии и всё равно загружу здесь!--Giorgi Balakhadze 21:26, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:06, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No EXIF data, other files from the same user have been copyvios. Correcta-informacion (talk) 05:48, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:06, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

advertisement Wer?Du?! (talk) 00:04, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:06, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 00:35, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:08, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 00:37, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:08, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 00:41, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:08, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 00:44, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:07, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 00:47, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:07, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

joke photoshop photo, unused Mjrmtg (talk) 00:48, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:07, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 00:52, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:07, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably copyvio - why would the author post such a photo with little resolution? 82.154.184.100 00:56, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

how many photos of the same cat do we need? unused personal photo Mjrmtg (talk) 00:57, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

how many photos of the same cat do we need? unused personal photo Mjrmtg (talk) 00:57, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

how many photos of the same cat do we need? unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 00:58, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

how many photos of the same cat do we need? unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 00:59, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

how many photos of the same cat do we need? unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:00, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

how many photos of the same cat do we need? unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:00, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

how many photos of the same cat do we need? unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:01, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

how many photos of the same cat do we need? unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:03, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio. It is hardly "own work" (the author would be veryyyyy old) and we can't be sure that it is {{PD-old}}, unless the real author was already quite old when he took the photo. 82.154.184.100 01:03, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio. It is hardly "own work" (the author would be veryyyyy old) and we can't be sure that it is {{PD-old}}, unless the real author was already quite old when he took the photo. 82.154.184.100 01:04, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio. Why would the real author upload a photo with such little resolution? 82.154.184.100 01:04, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

how many photos of the same cat do we need? unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:04, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio. It is hardly "own work" (the author would be veryyyyy old) and we can't be sure that it is {{PD-old}}, unless the real author was already quite old when he took the photo. 82.154.184.100 01:05, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio. It is hardly "own work" (the author would be veryyyyy old) and we can't be sure that it is {{PD-old}}, unless the real author was already quite old when he took the photo. 82.154.184.100 01:05, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

how many photos of the same cat do we need? unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:06, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

how many photos of the same cat do we need? unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:06, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

how many photos of the same cat do we need? unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:07, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

how many photos of the same cat do we need? unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:07, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

how many photos of the same cat do we need? unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:08, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

how many photos of the same cat do we need? unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:08, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

how many photos of the same cat do we need? unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:09, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

how many photos of the same cat do we need? unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:09, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

how many photos of the same cat do we need? unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:10, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

how many photos of the same cat do we need? unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:11, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

how many photos of the same cat do we need? unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:11, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

how many photos of the same cat do we need? unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:12, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

how many photos of the same cat do we need? unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:12, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:14, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:15, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Possible defamation (see Gopnik). See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Gop3.jpg.--Iluvatar (talk) 09:21, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:18, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio. This image was taken by Shin Yamagishi (山岸伸). See also: Image in yourpedia, Yamagishi Shin & Miwa Komatsu - This is the "collaboration" in the blog of the staff member of Miwa Komatsu. Takabeg (talk) 01:34, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a copyrighted image. The URLs cited as indictaing that it is released to the public domain do not support this assertion. Orlady (talk) 02:03, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Reuploaded here on Wikipedia due fair use -"SimonOrJ" (U/T/C) 02:51, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Upload Canceled HappyHubie415 (talk) 04:43, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Uploader's request, duplicate Taivo (talk) 08:21, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Upload Canceled HappyHubie415 (talk) 04:45, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Uploader's request, duplicate Taivo (talk) 08:22, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Upload Canceled HappyHubie415 (talk) 04:46, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Uploader's request, duplicate Taivo (talk) 08:22, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Upload Canceled HappyHubie415 (talk) 04:52, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Uploader's request, duplicate Taivo (talk) 08:22, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted screenshot Taivo (talk) 08:15, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality RomanM82 (talk) 09:49, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Unusable. Taivo (talk) 15:28, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:20, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo of a browser game. Imho not simple enough for {{PD-textlogo}} – we need a permission from the copyright holder Kabam Inc. (via Commons:OTRS). El Grafo (talk) 10:50, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Not a simple logo. Taivo (talk) 08:46, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ponieważ narusza prawa autorskie. Lachims123456789 (talk) 11:00, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{PD-Art}} without any parameters won't do here. We need the copyright status of every single one of these posters. El Grafo (talk) 11:03, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:14, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:15, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FOP in Finland for buildings only, sculptor Väinö Rikhard Rautalin died in 1943 so not in public domain in Finland yet. Should not be undeleted in 2014 because COM:URAA restored its copyright in the US. A333 (talk) 11:19, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

album cover copyvio Mjrmtg (talk) 11:20, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

album cover copyvio Mjrmtg (talk) 11:22, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FOP in Finland for buildings only, sculptor Kari Juva still living so not public domain yet. A333 (talk) 11:25, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FOP in Finland for buildings only, sculptore Petri Kaverma still living so not public domain yet. The copyright status of the photograph is also not clear. A333 (talk) 11:28, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:28, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright of the statue in the US was restored by COM:URAA. A333 (talk) 11:36, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I, owner of the copyright, ask the deletion of this picture Gino il Pio (talk) 11:49, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Actually, bad picture. We can go without that. Taivo (talk) 09:22, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope, put it on facebook Mjrmtg (talk) 11:52, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FOP in Finland for buildings only, sculptor Jussi Mäntynen died in 1978 so not in public domain yet. A333 (talk) 11:53, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:56, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:58, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:59, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete So small photos are worthless. Taivo (talk) 09:31, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No proof of authorization TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 12:18, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, very poor quality .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:28, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FOP in Finland for buildings only, sculptor Viktor Jansson died in 1958. Should not be undeleted in 2029 since copyright in the US was restored by COM:URAA. A333 (talk) 12:29, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope -- we do not keep PDF articles on Commons. The text belongs on WP as text, not PDF. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:32, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FOP in Finland for buildings only, sculptor Emil Cedercreutz died in 1949 so not public domain yet. Should not be undeleted in 2020 because copyright in the US was restored by COM:URAA. A333 (talk) 12:36, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not undeleted in 2024: Put on public display in 1930. US copyright will expire in 2026 (1930 + 95 + 1). —RP88 (talk) 03:52, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FOP in Finland for buildings only, sculptor Viktor Jansson died in 1958. Should not be undeleted in 2029 since copyright in the US was restored by COM:URAA. A333 (talk) 12:38, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because sculptor Ville Vallgren died in 1940 and the statue was unveiled in 1927 copyright in the US was restored by COM:URAA A333 (talk) 12:42, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FOP in Finland for buildings only, sculptor Veikko Haukkavaara died in 2004 so not in public domain yet. A333 (talk) 12:46, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FOP in Finland for buildings only, sculptor Miina Äkkijyrkkä still living so not in public domain yet. A333 (talk) 12:48, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because sculptor Oskar Raja-aho died in 1932 and the statue was unveiled in 1930 copyright was restored by COM:URAA. A333 (talk) 12:55, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Upload Canceled HappyHubie415 (talk) 13:06, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Upload Canceled HappyHubie415 (talk) 13:07, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Upload Canceled HappyHubie415 (talk) 13:10, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Upload Canceled Happyhubie (talk) 13:16, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Uploader's request, duplicate Taivo (talk) 09:47, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FOP in Finland for buildings only, sculptor Kalervo Kallio died in 1969 so not in public domain yet. Should not be undeleted in 1940 because the statue was unveiled in 1959 so copyright in the US was restored by COM:URAA. A333 (talk) 13:27, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:01, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to the watermark, the image comes from F1 online, so there is probably a copyright infringement (additionnally, this image is probably out of scope). BrightRaven (talk) 13:32, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Out of scope. Taivo (talk) 09:48, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 01:01, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The logo is too complicated to not meet the threshold of originality 80.161.143.239 15:03, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Not a simple logo. Taivo (talk) 10:02, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 01:02, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private drawing album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:02, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clear textbook scan/copyright violation Wizardman 15:10, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:03, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No articles link to it. Neutralmonist (talk) 15:31, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete That's not a reason to delete, but this is artwork of Luke Chrisinger and Neutralmonist claims to be the copyright holder. Are we supposed to believe that? OTRS permission is needed, but Neutralmonist himself started the deletion request and therefore most probably we do not get permission. Taivo (talk) 10:12, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 01:04, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No articles link to it. Neutralmonist (talk) 15:32, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete That's not a reason to delete, but this is artwork of Luke Chrisinger and Neutralmonist claims to be the copyright holder. Are we supposed to believe that? OTRS permission is needed, but Neutralmonist himself started the deletion request and therefore most probably we do not get permission. Taivo (talk) 10:12, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 01:04, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private drawing album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Now it is used. Taivo (talk) 10:14, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nom. I checked just now, and the file wasn't in use. INeverCry 01:22, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:04, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be "own work": full resolution version here (direct link). El Grafo (talk) 16:03, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:04, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This looks very much like a scan of a figure from a scientific paper – probably copyrighted. El Grafo (talk) 16:19, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:04, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no indication or clear evidence that that award is a public domain or freely licenseable work of art (it is certainly not a utilitiarian object and thus doesn't qualify there). De minimus would not seem to apply here since the photo is all about the tourney and the award. While the photographer can release the photo of the award for free, it still remains a 2D photo of a copyrighted 3d work of art and thus not freely copyrighted. Masem (talk) 16:46, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:04, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

for File:Deepak-Tiwari.jpg and File:Deepak-tiwari.jpg : 'bad quality', no 'educational use', and not in use, i.e. imho "out of scope", Roland 17:17, 3 June 2013 (UTC) Roland 17:17, 3 June 2013 (UTC)


Deleted: INeverCry 01:19, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

for File:Deepak-Tiwari.jpg and File:Deepak-tiwari.jpg : 'bad quality', no 'educational use', and not in use, i.e. imho "out of scope", Roland 17:17, 3 June 2013 (UTC) Roland 17:17, 3 June 2013 (UTC)


Deleted: INeverCry 01:20, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

permission is not granted Gerd Leibrock (talk) 17:30, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:07, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

permission is not granted Gerd Leibrock (talk) 17:31, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:07, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

permission is not granted Gerd Leibrock (talk) 17:32, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:07, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

permission is not granted Gerd Leibrock (talk) 17:32, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:07, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

permission is not granted Gerd Leibrock (talk) 17:33, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:07, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

permission is not granted Gerd Leibrock (talk) 17:34, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:07, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

permission is not granted Gerd Leibrock (talk) 17:34, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:07, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

permission is not granted Gerd Leibrock (talk) 17:35, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:07, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

permission is not granted Gerd Leibrock (talk) 17:35, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:07, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

permission is not granted Gerd Leibrock (talk) 17:39, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:07, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

permission is not granted Gerd Leibrock (talk) 17:40, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:07, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

permission is not granted Gerd Leibrock (talk) 17:40, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:07, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

permission is not granted Gerd Leibrock (talk) 17:42, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:07, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

permission is not granted Gerd Leibrock (talk) 17:43, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:07, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

permission is not granted Gerd Leibrock (talk) 17:43, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:06, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

permission is not granted Gerd Leibrock (talk) 17:44, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:06, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

permission is not granted Gerd Leibrock (talk) 17:45, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:06, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

permission is not granted Gerd Leibrock (talk) 17:45, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:06, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

permission is not granted Gerd Leibrock (talk) 17:46, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:06, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

permission is not granted Gerd Leibrock (talk) 17:48, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:06, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

permission is not granted Gerd Leibrock (talk) 17:49, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:06, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

permission is not granted Gerd Leibrock (talk) 17:49, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:06, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

permission is not granted Gerd Leibrock (talk) 17:51, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:06, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

still protected tv program 91.65.68.214 17:52, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:18, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Identical with Morgenmöwe.jpg Hubertl (talk) 17:53, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:19, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

permission is not granted Gerd Leibrock (talk) 17:53, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:08, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

permission is not granted Gerd Leibrock (talk) 17:55, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:08, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No scope. Fry1989 eh? 18:21, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:08, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality picture, photoshopped version, we will have better versions example File:Carl Gustaf Emil Mannerheim.png, banned user uploaded this and now try add this picture with IP-edit to some pages. Motopark (talk) 18:22, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:09, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio table Svajcr (talk) 18:36, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:09, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a scan from Barbara Stratchey's "Journeys of Frodo" atlas, which isn't a free resource. Ælfgar (talk) 18:59, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:09, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

outside project scope, bad quality Isderion (talk) 19:38, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:09, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"own work" unlikely Isderion (talk) 19:41, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:09, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work. Copyright: Heirs of Manuel Colmeiro Guimarás (1901-1999). . HombreDHojalata.talk 20:20, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The author of this picture give it to my family, so I think that it doesn't have copyright. --JaviP96 20:23, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nom. INeverCry 01:17, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work. Copyright: Heirs of Manuel Colmeiro Guimarás (1901-1999). . HombreDHojalata.talk 20:29, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The author of this picture give it to my family, so I think that it doesn't have copyright. --JaviP96 20:31, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nom. INeverCry 01:17, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded a better version of this picture/building (File:1210 Gerichtsgasse 5.jpg) VIEX (talk) 20:56, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:18, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation du copyright de cette page Chollux (talk) 21:09, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:10, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXIF data suggest that uploader is not the photographer (said to be: Rodolfo Rafael Ortega Selva). Túrelio (talk) 21:20, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

To be more blunt: such a scenario is highly suggestive of a copyvio, especially as none of the 2 other remaining uploads[2] of this user has the same name in its EXIF data. Of course, it could also be a faked name in order to smear some other person by associating with this image. --Túrelio (talk) 06:21, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per COM:PRP. INeverCry 01:11, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No rationale why this stamp from the Slovene (!) Littoral would be PD-Croatia. It seems that the source country is Slovenia, where the works published in 1945 or later are still copyrighted. Eleassar (t/p) 21:48, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:17, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope (and doubtful authorship) Pibwl (talk) 21:53, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:12, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work (satellite image?). Per exif, scanned from unknown source with unknown copyright issue. Gunnex (talk) 22:08, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:12, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work (satellite image?). Apparently scanned from unknown source with unknown copyright issue. See also related (upload by same user): Commons:Deletion requests/File:Duplicação da Fernão Dias em Atibaia (1995).jpg. Gunnex (talk) 22:11, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:12, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:12, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:12, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - not every Vietnam veteran is encyclopedical, and there's no article about him Pibwl (talk) 22:14, 3 June 2013 (UTC). Same for File:Larry Lewis, a Vietnam War veteran assigned to the 4th Army, 1st Brigade, now a part of Golf Company, 180th Infantry Regiment, helps to fire a World War II-era cannon to initiate a Memorial Day observance 130527-Z-BI488-541.jpg[reply]

 Keep Commons' scope is not limited to photographs to illustrate specific English Wikipedia articles. Out of 17,000,000 photographs, Commons actually has fewer than 30 portraits identified as such of the estimated 1,000,000 Vietnam War veterans that are alive today. These photographs should also be considered more useful than most others available for educational purposes, as they are particularly high resolution with an excellent sharp focus, and hence suitable for quality hard copy printing reuse (or to zoom in to the full resolution and easily read "Semper Anticus" on his beret). -- (talk) 22:30, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Fae. INeverCry 01:13, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:14, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:15, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Pibwl (talk) 22:18, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:15, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

blurred, out of scope, no use Pibwl (talk) 22:19, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:15, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

commons is not a family album, not used, sole contribution Pibwl (talk) 22:20, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:15, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, no use Pibwl (talk) 22:20, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:15, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:21, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:15, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, sole contribution Pibwl (talk) 22:22, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:15, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

joke, out of scope Pibwl (talk) 22:23, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:15, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal image, out of project scope Isderion (talk) 22:56, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:15, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, previously circulating (even in lower res) via [3] = http://i103.photobucket.com/albums/m158/cacobianchi/Riviera1.jpg (last modified: 2006) or http://i776.photobucket.com/albums/yy50/nanizinha/untitled.jpg (last modified: 2010). Per file title, apparently grabbed from internet as wallpaper ("wallp") with unknown origin. Gunnex (talk) 23:40, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:16, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, personal pictures, unused Pibwl (talk) 23:50, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:16, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, personal picture, unused Pibwl (talk) 23:51, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:16, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, personal pictures, unused Pibwl (talk) 23:51, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:16, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, personal pictures, unused Pibwl (talk) 23:52, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:16, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal picture Pibwl (talk) 23:54, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:16, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal picture Pibwl (talk) 23:54, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:16, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal picture - several of them are the only user's contribution Pibwl (talk) 23:54, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:16, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - screen print Pibwl (talk) 23:59, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:16, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probably copyrighted material Pibwl (talk) 00:00, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:16, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free modern architecture; per COM:FOP#Slovenia. Eleassar (t/p) 07:36, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally, File:Celje Srednja ekonomska šola IMG 0350.JPG. --Eleassar (t/p) 07:37, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted bridge; per COM:FOP#Slovenia. Eleassar (t/p) 07:46, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The copyrighted monument in the background is just as much a key part of the composition of the image as the children. Nominated per COM:FOP#Slovenia. Eleassar (t/p) 09:57, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted information table; per COM:FOP#Slovenia. Eleassar (t/p) 19:30, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:09, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrightable work from 1940. No evidence that it would be free per COM:FOP#Slovenia. Eleassar (t/p) 20:14, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Also File:Kanal ob Soci Wasserkraftwerk Ajba 17072009 51.jpg. --Eleassar (t/p) 20:23, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:09, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

how many photos of the same cat do we need? unused personal photo Mjrmtg (talk) 00:57, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Good paw. I think we need that. Taivo (talk) 15:22, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per Taivo Alan (talk) 11:04, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Belarus Taivo (talk) 08:50, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Это собственное фото — Preceding unsigned comment added by Светлана Ворон (talk • contribs)
Я верю это. Но в Беларуси фотографии памятников являются несвободными, их нельзя здесь использовать. Только если скульптор умер больше чем 70 лет назад, но с памятниками Великой Отечественной Войны это, конечно, не случается. Taivo (talk) 16:18, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: COM:FOP Alan (talk) 11:04, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author of this sculpture is Jon Rafman, but uploader Emanuella Kant claims to be copyright holder. Taivo (talk) 08:56, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 11:05, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside COM:SCOPE: photographs of yourself and your friends. Eleassar (t/p) 10:00, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Also the following images:
--Eleassar (t/p) 10:02, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep They cannot be out of scope, because they are all used in sl.wiki. Taivo (talk) 08:33, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 I withdraw my nomination, except for File:Babno Polje Goricice 10.jpg. --Eleassar (t/p) 13:28, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Alan (talk) 11:06, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:26, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment The man in photo is cs:Tom Jasper and the photo can be used in that article. But the article itself seems self-promotional. Taivo (talk) 08:59, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Alan (talk) 11:09, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photograph for an article deleted in :es:Wikipedia Jordi Roqué (Discussió/Talk) 10:33, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 23:01, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not needed anymore, svg available: Maldi.svg 92.204.117.73 14:41, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 23:02, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be a blown-up, heavily edited version of this file from [4]. Simple enough to be PD? El Grafo (talk) 15:14, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 23:02, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture was ascribed to Staveley because of his staff uniform. New data shows this was wrong. Kjorford (talk) 21:11, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 23:02, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Chemical structures of xylitol

[edit]

None of these appear to be the correct chemical structure for xylitol. File:Xylitol (2).png and File:Xylitol-3D-balls.png are actually ribitol, not xylitol. (Compare with other images in Category:Xylitol and Category:Ribitol). File:Structure of Xylitol.png does not include stereochemistry and is therefore not distinguishable from any other five-carbon sugar alcohol. Alternatively, perhaps all three could be renamed instead of deleted. ChemNerd (talk) 19:39, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete File:Xylitol (2).png: File:Ribitol structure.png is of higher quality.
Rename File:Xylitol-3D-balls.png.
 Keep File:Structure of Xylitol.png: I added the missing stereochemistry including labels.
--Leyo 08:08, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Those actions (deleting File:Xylitol (2).png, renaming File:Xylitol-3D-balls.png to File:Ribitol-3D-balls.png, and keeping the now-fixed File:Structure of Xylitol.png) appear ideal to me. ChemNerd (talk) 18:40, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

One kept, one renamed, one deleted. ChemNerd (talk) 14:55, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

On work - not needed, made a better file — Ludopedia(Talk) 13:04, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

On work - not needed, made a better file — Ludopedia(Talk) 18:37, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader request. Alan (talk) 11:09, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Lbrunetto

[edit]

User Lbrunetto has uploaded these files:

They are little unused photos about non-notable persons and I do not see a possibility to use them. Taivo (talk) 13:56, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:00, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Lurulu

[edit]

User Lurulu uploaded these files:

Some of them are buildings, but there is no freedom of panorama in France. Some of them are posters, but posters are most probably also copyrighted. Taivo (talk) 09:49, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:20, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Miguel

[edit]

User Miguel has uploaded a lot of logos of football clubs and claimed to be copyright holder of all of them. The logos are not simple ones:

Taivo (talk) 11:25, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Ricodol74

[edit]

User Ricodol74 has uploaded, among others, these two photos:

They are very blurry images. Better versions are File:Gerbils.JPG and File:Gerbils1.JPG. Taivo (talk) 11:43, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

    • I do agree here with you they to blury so they can be removed, either by you or by myself

Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Zuluxsion

[edit]

User Zuluxsion has uploaded these photos:

Probably they are both copyright violations. Uploader's other contribution is also presented for deletion. All these photos come from a site, which name is in lower right corner, but no permission is given. Taivo (talk) 13:35, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:00, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dcrsgbd (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons is not your personal free web host, see also uploader's attempt in wikipedia, http://bn.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISMAIL_HOSSAIN_DINAR

Isderion (talk) 23:34, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:15, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Paye-Maye (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:04, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Willi imam k (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: personal, unused, photos

Steinsplitter (talk) 17:59, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:08, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probably out of scope, seems to be advertisement, maybe copyvio

Wer?Du?! (talk) 00:12, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Partly copyright violation (diploms), partly self-promo ... and some other images. I think we can  Delete all. But maybe somebody wants to reprieve some images, for example, the egg castle is quite cool. Taivo (talk) 15:20, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:08, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Neito statue

[edit]

Because sculptor Oskar Raja-aho died in 1932 and the statue was unveiled in 1930 copyright in the US was restored by COM:URAA --A333 (talk) 13:02, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Statue of Aleksis Kivi

[edit]

FOP in Finland for buildings only, sculptor Wäinö Aaltonen died in 1966 so not public domain yet. --A333 (talk) 11:44, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploads by User:Herzalo com

[edit]

Herzalo comm (talk · contribs) has an extensive history of copyright violations and the images below, all high-quality low rez images, have unhelpful source descriptions: Ytoyoda (talk) 14:43, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Not own work (files are grab from the internet such as [5]) PierreSelim (talk) 06:39, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am not really sure, if the stuffed tiger and at least the Cookie Monster shoes can be on commons with a free license. Funfood 15:16, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It is the mascot of the legal department of the WMF. They'll know whether its allowed or not. Just take the upload as an Office action. The next Admin closes this request please. -- Milad A380 (talk) 16:46, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
We don't allow uploads as office actions. Office images are as bound by our licensing rules as all others. We have deleted WMF images in the past, they do get stuff wrong. -mattbuck (Talk) 17:11, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Even if it's no office action, it was the legal department, they know about the Copyright situation, I think that a stuffed tiger and a cookie monster cannot be a copyright violation. -- Milad A380 (talk) 17:57, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
A cookie monster can be a copyright violation and in most cases it definitively is. IMHO it is in this case and I'd like more opinios, especially from other admins how to handle this one. Also look here --Funfood 22:23, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is an official logotype of the Swedish company ICA, see [6]. It is unlikely that Stastny is the creator of this work. Stigfinnare (talk) 14:58, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment What do you think, maybe it is too simple for copyright? Taivo (talk) 09:59, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete It is clearly a copyrighted logo. Even if the uploader is author, he has to prove it. Vanjagenije (talk) 09:41, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyrighted logo FASTILY 08:26, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Work by Maksim Gaspari (1883-1980) is copyrighted and not de minimis. Eleassar (t/p) 12:23, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment It is Maksim Gaspari in the picture, it is not his work. --Miha (talk) 13:08, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
They're both, and the latter is more prominent. --Eleassar (t/p) 14:47, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
? The description page itself says it's (photo) the work of Fran Vesel, who died before 1945. There are some other prints in photo, but those are de minimis. --Miha (talk) 17:28, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
? The problem is that the photo by F. Vesel depicts copyrighted works by M. Gaspari. The intent was to photograph him in his atelier with his works, so de minimis is not applicable. --Eleassar (t/p) 22:50, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
What he tried, what was his intent plays absolutely no role here. But even if so: It is not for a single Gaspari picture, which would be the main interest of this photo, but rather Gaspari in his atelier. Pictures were simply there and serve as a background / provide atmposphere. So I would go for  Keep --Miha (talk) 23:35, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Of course the intent has a prime role here. Per COM:De minimis: "if the photograph was taken deliberately to include the poster, there is likely to be copyright infringement." This photo was taken deliberately to include the works by Gaspari. It could have also been taken in some other place, from some other angle or with a blanket over them, so it was not unavoidable to photograph them. --Eleassar (t/p) 06:52, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Additionally, there is the problem of the publication rights, which per [7] make the image ineligible in any case, unless there is some evidence that the photo was published before 1995. It is part of Fran Vesel collection that has been kept in the archives and has been published online only recently. --Eleassar (t/p) 09:22, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Was the image ever published? If so, when? If unpublished, what do the Slovenian law say about unpublished works of someone who died in 1944. These are the relevant questions to be asked and answered.  — billinghurst sDrewth 03:22, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I cannot find information about pre 1995 legislation for Slovenia, but it would seem to be 25 or 50 years for photographic work PMA (Berne convention), which would mean that it came out of copyright at the end of 1994 at the latest. Unless someone can demonstrate that it was 70 years in 1995 in Slovenia.  — billinghurst sDrewth 03:34, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: author died 1944, within bounds of {{PD-Slovenia}}  — billinghurst sDrewth 04:35, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Renominating the file after this conversation. No evidence that the publication right has expired for this photograph, the first known publication of which is from 2003. The originating website states:[8] "Only for personal usage and the purposes of study. Reproduction forbidden." Per [9], it is not free for Commons. Eleassar (t/p) 21:30, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Apparently still copyrighted -FASTILY 08:26, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image of child, No information provided in summary to confirm a close connection of the uploader with photo subject or that they obtained the permission of a supervisory guardian or "appropriate" adult. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:43, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete' - Not because of rationale but because of this edit by the original uploader. Roughly translate to "she's a slut" or something like that. I don't believe the uploader is the copyright holder because of that. Looks like a plain vandalism account. Garion96 (talk) 20:43, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • I wonder if the nominator would care to point to an actual policy based reason to delete this image. I don't believe commons has a policy that there has to be permission from a parent to upload a picture of a baby, but if there is it would be helpful to get a link to it so that we can discuss wether or not this particualr image is in compliance with it. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:42, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
There is no specific policy that covers this, COM:PEOPLE establishes that "The subject's consent is usually needed for publishing a photograph of an identifiable individual taken in a private place,", with an image of an infant this consent would

need to be given by a parent, guardian or appropriate adult. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:56, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

So, by that logic we would need to establish that:
  • pictures of chubby little babies that look like every other chubby little baby are pictures of "identifiable individuals"
  • this was taken in a private location with an expectation of privacy which was violated by the person who took it and posted it to Commons
That first condition is rather more broad than this one deletion discussion and so is probably moot for the moment, the second one is basically impossible to establish as there is no context to the image, just a blank wall. It could be pretty much anywhere, and uploading this was the only thing that user ever did and that was six years ago (meaning, by the way, that this child would look completely different by now). I realize you think images like this are somehow harmful to children, but I don't believe the broader community either here or at en.Wikipedia agrees with that position. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:30, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: This needs OTRS permission for two reasons: a) it's missing adequate evidence of permission, b) images of children do require parental consent. If you are the uploader, please email COM:OTRS FASTILY 08:31, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Yet another penis picture. Slightly blurry which makes it unlikely to be used on Wikipedia given that we have better images in the same category and there's nothing special about this one. Tabercil (talk) 22:24, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Just another guy flashing us. Wknight94 talk 22:32, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete. Completely useless. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:37, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Leyo 23:21, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

maybe not bad penis picture, but without author nor copyright info Pibwl (talk) 14:42, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Alan -FASTILY 08:27, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality penis photo. Please also SALT the filename. -mattbuck (Talk) 01:03, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Not educationally useful. --Rsberzerker (talk) 03:03, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:43, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that this (architectural, sculptural) work from 1935 would be free per COM:FOP#Slovenia. Eleassar (t/p) 12:10, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The owner of this gravestone is no more Iván Persa? And Persa death in 1935 (78 years ago). Doncsecz (talk) 16:11, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is true. However, how can we know whether the author of the tombstone was originally anonymous or not? Commons:Anonymous works states: "the fact that you don't know who the author is doesn't make it an anonymous work. Reliable sources must be found that prove it was originally published anonymously." Therefore, in my opinion, it is best to delete it per COM:PRP as an orphan work. --Eleassar (t/p) 18:30, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The carver of the gravestones is anonym, as his signal is completely worn. Is not possible to determine who it was. I have not found signal in the gravestone. Doncsecz (talk) 07:48, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep PD-anonymous. Taivo (talk) 09:33, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Unclear copyright status. Unless we have clear, explicit written/textual, tangible evidence indicating that this file is indeed freely licensed under a Commons compatible license, we cannot host it on Commons FASTILY 08:30, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

looks like modern monument from 1984. No FoP in Slovenia. Warfieldian (talk) 17:54, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep too simple for copyright + statue is taken on border between Slovenia, Italy and Austria; it should be checked from which country this picture has been taken, and therefore which law applies (FOP in Austria) --Miha (talk) 13:33, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 17:35, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted monument from 1994; per COM:FOP#Slovenia. No evidence of any threshold of originality in Slovenia and no evidence that the photographer stood in Austria and not Slovenia or Italy. Eleassar (t/p) 10:20, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep It seems to me, that this monument consists of only simple geometrical figures and text and is thus not eligible for copyright. Of course, composition is quite bad, sitting humans spoil the picture and so deletion would not be big loss for wikipedia. Taivo (talk) 08:38, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The choice of material and the composition of the monument make it copyrightable. In addition, the text is not a list of facts, but an interpretation of the significance of peace and the symbolic meaning of the monument. --Eleassar (t/p) 11:12, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]



No FOP in Slovenia -FASTILY 08:29, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded as SPAM for Catalan Wikipedia. Original article deleted some time ago. Jordi Roqué (Discussió/Talk) 10:23, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • If there is a problem with licence, perhaps we can think about deletion ; for now,  Keep, no reason to delete (Commons is not Wikipedia, and the DR have very different rules here than on Wikipedias) ----MGuf (d) 17:35, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    • Sorry, I expressed myself incorrectly. There wasn't a (known) problem with the license. The original article was a hoax to promote a theater play. The character supposedly depicted in the photography had never existed. Jordi Roqué (Discussió/Talk) 17:48, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of scope, uploaded by vandal FASTILY 08:29, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I doubt, that an uploader made this WWII photo in 2013 Pibwl (talk) 14:50, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Снимок - иллюстрация обмундирования 20-й дивизии - сделан в Гатчине, 2 мая 2013 года на Фестивале ретро-техники и любителей военной истории. На снимке - Владимир Долгов, Гатчинский военно-исторический клуб. С помощью Фотошоп произведено старение снимка.

По Вашей логике потребуется удалить все рисунки знаков различия и символики Второй Мировой войны, так как они (рисунки) были созданы после 1945 года. Предоставите другие цветные изображения обмундирования эстонской дивизии СС - буду благодарен. Владимир Долгов. http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A3%D1%87%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%82%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BA:%D0%92%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B4%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B8%D1%80_%D0%94%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B3%D0%BE%D0%B2
Снимок с Фестиваля ретро-техники и любителей военной истории, Гатчина, 2 мая 2013 г. На снимке рядом - офицер СС и офицер НКВД в XXI веке.
I withdraw request - the uploader explained, that this is contemporary re-enactment photo.  Keep Pibwl (talk) 16:01, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn FASTILY 08:30, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by User:LANWANMAN

[edit]

User LANWANMAN uploaded these images:

File description pages say Photo courtesy of Ozilite Corporation, Brisbane, Queensland Australia and Manassas, Virginia USA. http://www.ozilite.com/element-lighter.html. There is no evidence that the copyright holder agreed to release these files under a Creative Commons license. While the logo might be simple enough for {{PD-textlogo}}, we need a permission filed via Commons:OTRS for the photographs. --El Grafo (talk) 13:20, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete all, not a simple logo. Taivo (talk) 09:51, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I've deleted the images as copyvios, but I'm not sure about the logo. It looks pretty simple. INeverCry 00:32, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted FASTILY 08:27, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Permission says (without evidence): "vom Staatsarchiv Bremen als Gemeinfrei erklärt" (declared to be in the Public Domain by the Staatsarchiv Bremen). Wróbel died in 1942, so {{PD-Old-70}} would apply for the EU, but – I hate to say it – what about the copyright status in the US? El Grafo (talk) 15:06, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Authority control

. --Bernd Schwabe in Hannover (talk) 06:31, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, he died in 1942, so the drawing went into the public domain in Europe in 2012 ({{PD-old-70}}). But we also need to have a Tag for the copyright status in the US (see Commons:PD). {{PD-US-no notice}} might apply if we could prove (not assume or guess) that it had been published in the US before 1977 without a copyright notice. Otherwise it would be {{Not-PD-US-URAA}} and would have to be deleted. I don't like it at all, but those are the rules … --El Grafo (talk) 08:47, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Die Uhrheberschutzgesetze wurden erlassen, um da geistiges Eigentum zu schützen. In diesem Fall sollte es keine Anwendung haben, weil der Autor es nicht als Werk im Sinne der Bildenden Kunst angefertigt hat und weil seine Eltern, die ja seine rechtlichen Nachfolger waren, die Arbeit zur Veröffentlichung frei gegeben haben. Diese Abbildung ist ein Dokument und nicht ein schützenswürdiges Werk, außerdem wurde es von den Erben freigegeben. Die Verwendung des Uhrheberschutzgesetzes, um diese Detei zu löschen, ist in meiner Überzeugung missbräuchlich, weil sie nichts mit dem Schutz des geistigen Eigentums zu tun hat.
Ich möchte mich nicht in juristische Haarspalterei verwickeln. Vielleicht ist das bestehende Gesetz nicht ganz gut oder vielleicht gibt es trotzdem keinen Konflikt zwischen der Existenz dieser Datei auf Commons und ihm. Auf jeden Fall Personen, die es anwenden wollen, sollten sein Wesen verstehen. Die Staatsanwälte, die de:Walerian Wróbel angeklagt haben und die Richter, die ihn verurteilt haben, haben ein Gesetz verwendet, aber ein von den Nationalsozialisten erlassenes falsches Gesetz, das wir heute ablehenen. Jeder soll also nachfragen, ob das Gesetz, was er anwenden möchte, wirklich so sinnvoll ist, ob es Bestand hat. --Mewa767 (talk) 21:31, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

English: Hi Mewa767, you say that his parents, being his heirs, "released" the drawing. Can you give us any more detail about that? Might be the solution to our problem …
Deutsch: Hallo Mewa767, du schreibst, die Eltern (=Erben) hätten das Werk freigegeben. Das ist ja schonmal ein guter Ansatz, aber wir bräuchten da schon ein paar mehr Details – hast du vielleicht eine Quelle für diese Aussage parat?
--El Grafo (talk) 12:17, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
If everything else fails, one could still crop out the drawing an only keep the text. That should be simple enough to be below the threshold of originality, right? --El Grafo (talk) 12:38, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Unclear copyright status. Unless we have clear, explicit written/textual, tangible evidence indicating that this file is indeed freely licensed under a Commons compatible license, we cannot host it on Commons FASTILY 19:32, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo is claimed to be anonymous and from 1945. Also, licence says, that author died before 1951. How do you know that if this is anonymous? The site itself has clear copyright notice: Все права защищены © 2009. Перепечатка информации разрешается и приветствуется при указании активной ссылки на источник. http://providenie.narod.ru/ Taivo (talk) 12:37, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The template sais: "This file is a Ukrainian or Ukrainian SSR work and it is presently in the public domain in Ukraine, because it was published before January 1, 1951, and the creator (if known) died before that date. The creater is unknown, therefore the important date is January 1, 1951. The file was published in 1945, so, before 1951. The site http://providenie.narod.ru/ have no rights to the old files, therefore the mentioned copyright is not related to this file. This file is free. --Yuriy Kvach (talk) 15:52, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
In that case, licence should be changed PD-anonymous? Taivo (talk) 09:36, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
May be we can find the better lycense, I am not sure. --Yuriy Kvach (talk) 17:22, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Did you meen this license: {{Anonymous work}}? Looks like better. --Yuriy Kvach (talk) 17:24, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Unclear copyright status. Unless we have clear, explicit written/textual, tangible evidence indicating that this file is indeed freely licensed under a Commons compatible license, we cannot host it on Commons FASTILY 19:31, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]