Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2013/05/28
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
_2013-05-28_17-24.jpg){kind=link}
_2013-05-28_17-40.jpg){kind=link}
![64 File:Lycée "Le Likès".jpg](#File:Lycée_"Le_Likès".jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
Displayed Person asked for updated picture 83.236.156.218 10:20, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Kept: speedy kept, no one prevents you to upload a new image under a new name Denniss (talk) 10:29, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
WP:BIO Mrs. Bortenlaenger is no person of public interest Bahnmoeller (talk) 18:30, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- As former chaiwomen of the Bayerischen Börse AG and now Chair of the Deutsches Aktieninstitut e.V. a person of pubblich interest. --Lutheraner (talk) 19:54, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- I see articles in two WPs?! --E4024 (talk) 21:33, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- I don't get the "no person of public interest" part either as long as there are articles on her, but the copyright situation seems unclear to me. I don't know what the OTRS ticket says, but who is it that really has the copyright? According to this website, it's the Deutsches Aktieninstitut. So how can a user from Börse München upload this image and license it via OTRS ticket? --87.150.12.11 22:47, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Keep if the OTRS ticket is in order (could an OTRS agent please check?). de:Christine Bortenlänger used this photo until recently when it was removed from the article only because it was nominated for deletion here. I certainly can't follow the "no person of public interest" either if there are two Wikipedia articles about her. Gestumblindi (talk) 22:57, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:34, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
Low resolution, no metadata, all other user uploads have been copyvios (see talk/deleted contribs). DUCK copyvio. Эlcobbola talk 18:59, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Esto no es violación de derechos de autor...--Who's That Boy? 20:10, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
- Nominated for speedy; full image here. Эlcobbola talk 23:25, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Blatant copyright violation High Contrast (talk) 23:30, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
неудачное фото 78.24.24.124 20:51, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 20:54, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
OS is copyrighted. Fry1989 eh? 21:31, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: The screen content is unfree. And the whole photo is not self-created by the uploader but taken from e.g. http://www.amazon.com/SAMSUNG-Y-GALAXY-S-5360-Phone/dp/B0068PQZFK. Martin H. (talk) 22:18, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Taken from [1]. Uploaders username sugests a connection to that company, but we need a written permission for that file via an official e-mail-adress. Please refer to Commons:OTRS#Declaration_of_consent_for_all_enquiries for further instructions. El Grafo (talk) 09:25, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Kept: OTRS granted Sarah (talk) 15:09, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
While OTRS #2013041310011781 does cover this image, it comes from a hotmail account, which makes it suspicious, and does not give a general license, merely saying " I own the copyright to the above image to be uploaded onto my wiki page". It is clearly neither "own work" of our uploader. nor is Tricia Walsh-Smith the author as claimed. Unless we can get a valid license from the actual photographer using the procedure at Commons:OTRS, we cannot keep this. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:39, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
To further complicate this, the image was uploaded by User:Trooper001, who claims in the image description that she is Tricia Walsh-Smith. On my talk page, User:Whiterabbitinuk claims that she is Tricia Walsh-Smith. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:16, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello this is tricia walsh Smith re: my photpgraph. here are the links to my website and twitter page where the image is used.
http://www.triciawalshsmith.com/gallery3/gallery3.htm
https://twitter.com/tricia_dlicious
If you still want proof please email me through my website www.triciawalshsmith.com and I will reply personally. There is a ticket number and I have done this correctly through permissions at wikimedia. Tricia x — Preceding unsigned comment added by Whiterabbitinuk (talk • contribs) 19:26, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi James, I am a friend of Tricia's and she asked me to upload the jpeg for her. She was with me when I uploaded it. We're both not very wiki savvy, but I followed the instructions in an email she'd been sent. Her account is Whiterabbitinuk and mine is tcooper001. Please look at the discussion page. She's left a message there relating to this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tcooper001 (talk • contribs) 14:45, 30 May 2013 (UTC)77.103.95.34 16:12, 30 May 2013 (UTC)Tcooper001 (talk) 16:15, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
- So far we have a license at OTRS #2013041310011781 that covers use only on Wikipedia and comes from a hot-mail account. As I said at my talk page (and, in summary, above):
- "The fact that it appears in several places on the Web does not mean that Tricia Walsh-Smith owns the rights to license the image freely and, in fact, she has not done so. Commons gets about 8,000 new images every day. About 2,000 of those must be deleted, for various reasons, including lack of a license from the copyright owner. 75% of that work is done by 10 Administrators. We have procedures in place to try to deal with the great volume of work in an orderly fashion. As it says at the Deletion Request, the problem with this image can be solved only if we get a license from the actual photographer using the procedure at Commons:OTRS." . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:29, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
I am going around to Studio Venus tomorrow to get the photographer to sign the license even though I have emailed the permission from him. Whiterabbitinuk (talk)
- Again, the license (such as it is) from Studio Venus in OTRS ticket 2013041310011781 says "to produce the enclosed images in any format." It does not say anything about your ability to license the images generally, nor does it say anything about commercial use or derivative works. As described at COM:OTRS, the photographer must provide a standard license such as CC-BY, not a vague statement. It must include a license for general use, not just "the above image to be uploaded onto my wiki page" as you said in the e-mail. All of this must be from verifiable sources, not hotmail. The use of an e-mail address at hotmail when Tricia Walsh Smith owns the domain triciawalshsmith.com strongly suggests that the e-mail is not valid, which is why I started this DR. Please understand that we get a lot of fans who try to convince us that they are the famous person and, while you may actually be TWS, so far this has all the earmarks of a fake, including refusal to follow our standard process, conflicting claims of authorship, and OTRS e-mails from hotmail, not the famous person's own domain. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:17, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi Jim, Whilst Tricia is dealing with the license issue I just wanted to address your suspicions regarding her use of hotmail so I've left you a short message here on her website which I hope will allay your doubts: http://www.triciawalshsmith.com/html/messagetojim.htm Thanks. Tcooper001 (talk) 11:18, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you. That's a small step in the right direction. For the record, such a message appears on the subject website as I write this. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:26, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
Please sign your postings
[edit]
Kept: Permission granted. Sarah (talk) 15:52, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
This Wiki does not seem to give any information about the copyright status of its content. El Grafo (talk) 09:48, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: no license at all. JuTa 20:07, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
No license, no permission and probably copyrighted [2]. With the drawing also not simple enough for something like {{PD-simple}}. El Grafo (talk) 12:41, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. JuTa 20:10, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
Twitter bird is copyrighted. Fry1989 eh? 00:43, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted And it is not "xcb xccc" created by and with the copyright owned by the uploader. -- Infrogmation (talk) 20:19, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
Twitter bird is copyrighted. Fry1989 eh? 20:13, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
Since 16 October 2012, the licensing information of La Moncloa is no longer complatible with that of commons (see es:Plantilla:La Moncloa and attached discussion). This picture was taken after such date Kmeleon59 (talk) 16:28, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
- Deleted Anna (Cookie) (talk) 00:30, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Since 16 October 2012, the licensing information of La Moncloa is no longer complatible with that of commons (see es:Plantilla:La Moncloa and attached discussion). This picture was taken after such date Kmeleon59 (talk) 16:27, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
- Deleted Anna (Cookie) (talk) 00:29, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Since 16 October 2012, the licensing information of La Moncloa is no longer complatible with that of commons (see es:Plantilla:La Moncloa and attached discussion). This picture was taken after such date Kmeleon59 (talk) 16:26, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
- Deleted Anna (Cookie) (talk) 00:27, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
The category Category:Akkerman fortress is already created. The files are moved to this category. Yuriy Kvach (talk) 15:21, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
- Please, next time, insert {{Bad name|Akkerman fortress}} and it will go away with a clickable link in the deletion summary. --Foroa (talk) 15:52, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
- Thank You! --Yuriy Kvach (talk) 16:00, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:12, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Empty category. The files are moved to Category:Bolhrad. New category was created because the English spelling of the town is en:Bolhrad. Yuriy Kvach (talk) 14:57, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Official name of the city is en:Bilhorod-Dnistrovskyi. The files are moved to Category:Bilhorod-Dnistrovskyi Yuriy Kvach (talk) 15:21, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
- Please, next time, insert {{Bad name|Bilhorod-Dnistrovskyi}} and it will go away with a clickable link in the deletion summary. --Foroa (talk) 15:50, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:12, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
no homework / original research on commons Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:08, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:04, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Apart from the red circle, this is not "own work". We need the source of the photograph to determine whether it's free. El Grafo (talk) 10:25, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:07, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The image has a low pixel count and there are no valid EXIF information. It is highly likely not the uploader's own work. High Contrast (talk) 23:18, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This image has a higher-resolution version (see http://blog.asia.playstation.com/community/kr/games/ps3/blog/2012/02/24/2678) of itself. the higher-res version is attributed to Sony Computer Entertainment Asia. I'm going to upload a non-copyvio version image of Apink. Puramyun31 (talk) 16:32, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
A bunch of URLs wrapped into a PDF → Out of scope. El Grafo (talk) 12:39, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:08, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
No evidence of permission. Source at http://www.aimeefuller.co.uk/2013/01/29/10-page-whitelines-interview/ claims copyright. VQuakr (talk) 04:26, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Delete, {{Copyvio}}. Just another non-free Internet image with false licensing claims by copyvio-only uploader. —LX (talk, contribs) 06:05, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:05, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Obviously not "own work", copyright status unclear. El Grafo (talk) 13:32, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:10, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Delete: this is a colourised version of this 1948 portrait of Einstein by Yousef Karsch who died in 2002, so still in copyright until 2073. Ww2censor (talk) 22:57, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:45, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
Obviously not "own work", copyright status unclear. El Grafo (talk) 13:33, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:10, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 21:46, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:10, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 21:46, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:10, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
unused, personal file, no realistic educational use, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 16:31, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:14, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Probably not "own work" but grabbed from the web: [3], [4]. El Grafo (talk) 09:08, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:05, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
unused, personal file, no realistic educational use, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 16:33, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:14, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Recent building, no FOP in France. VIGNERON (talk) 12:40, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:08, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Low resolution file unlikely to be "own work", probably grabbed from the web [5]. El Grafo (talk) 09:05, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:05, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
This image is not created by acrofan but PlayXP (earlier posted date (PlayXP:2011-08-06, acrofan:2011-08-08) and higher resolution than acrofan version). see this link:http://www.playxp.com/news/read.php?news_id=3259556 Puramyun31 (talk) 16:28, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
- I take that picture from here but that article written by editorial department. Sorry for uploading copyright violation file. You can delete that file.--Altostratus (talk) 11:18, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope per [[6]]. El Grafo (talk) 12:35, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:08, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Not as stated Own work, it occurs here [7] and [8] Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 19:57, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
![[7]](http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.pusdikarhanud.mil.id/image/taruna%2520akmil.JPG&imgrefurl=http://ajilbab.com/pejabat/pejabat-akmil.htm&h=300&w=448&sz=85&tbnid=-bz9V8qADPTDnM&tbnh=184&tbnw=274&zoom=1&usg=__EuTCPE31zQgoTQwkSeZbqtjplN8=&sa=X&ei=WQulUaD2CIbM0AXH9IDAAQ&ved=0CFYQ8g0){kind=link}
![[8]](http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.pusdikarhanud.mil.id/image/taruna%2520akmil.JPG&imgrefurl=http://lampung.untukbangsa.com/tag/pembukaan-pendaftaran-taruna-akmil-2013&h=300&w=448&sz=85&tbnid=-bz9V8qADPTDnM&tbnh=184&tbnw=274&zoom=1&usg=__gJErBCkNcf0nuC2eXi4hzuNiR2g=&sa=X&ei=WQulUaD2CIbM0AXH9IDAAQ&ved=0CF4Q8g0){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Magazine cover. No proof that the cover is in a free license. Sreejith K (talk) 15:01, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Delete: with just three uploads this Flickr user likely does not own the copyright to this image. Ww2censor (talk) 12:31, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete FlickreviewR failed to verify the licence, so probably there is no other option than delete. Taivo (talk) 16:26, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Looks like a flickrwash. --Leoboudv (talk) 05:13, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF ze-dan (talk) 18:55, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
_2013-05-28_17-24.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2013-05-28_17-24.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
unused, personal file, no realistic educational use, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 16:31, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
_2013-05-28_17-24.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:15, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
_2013-05-28_17-24.jpg){kind=link}
_2013-05-28_17-40.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2013-05-28_17-40.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
unused, personal file, no realistic educational use, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 16:30, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
_2013-05-28_17-40.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
_2013-05-28_17-40.jpg){kind=link}
Copyrighted toy. FunkMonk (talk) 00:19, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:03, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
unused personal picture Pete F (talk) 21:49, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:09, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Obviously not "own work", copyright status unclear. El Grafo (talk) 13:32, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:10, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Obviously not "own work", copyright status unclear. El Grafo (talk) 13:32, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:10, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Copyrighted magasin 89.249.2.53 09:12, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:05, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
The Wisconsin state senate is not part of the US federal government, so {{PD-USGov}} does not apply. There is no explanation as to why the uploader thinks the photo is "not copyrighted that we know of" (whoever "we" are) or what the supposed "explicit permission" covers. Furthermore, the permission was supposedly obtained from the subject of the photo, who is unlikely to be the copyright holder. —LX (talk, contribs) 17:36, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:20, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
This seems too difficult for public domain, and I do not believe, that the uploader is copyright holder. The uploader's other contributions are also presented for deletion as suspected copyvios. Taivo (talk) 12:47, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:08, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
We have these signs in SVG. Fry1989 eh? 21:09, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
unused, personal file, no realistic educational use, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 16:34, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:13, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Non-free software ViperSnake151 (talk) 22:14, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
unused, personal file, no realistic educational use, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 16:32, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:14, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Recent architecture. No FoP in France. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 08:32, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:05, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope: Commons is no private photo album High Contrast (talk) 10:24, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:07, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
The page this screenshot was taken of is © 2012 DigitPA [9]. If the application shown here is free software, we need proof of it – unfortunately the link provided as a source just leads to the home page and not to page with the application. El Grafo (talk) 12:53, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France; copyright violation Pete F (talk) 15:26, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Derivative of File:Verón-calderón-06.jpg, which appears to have been deleted for missing verifiable source information. —LX (talk, contribs) 18:06, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:20, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
unused, personal file, no realistic educational use, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 16:34, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:13, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
unused, personal file, no realistic educational use, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 16:31, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:14, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Copyvio, this file is a reduced and edited version of: http://urngmaizvillanueva.blogspot.com/2011/05/frente-amplio-lanzara-campana.html. Fraudulent "Own work". —G. Coronades | Do you have a question? 18:40, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Not a simple logo. Taivo (talk) 19:29, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Copyvio, this file is a reduced version of: http://partidolider.blogspot.com/2011/07/plan-nacional-para-el-cambio-lider.html. Fraudulent "Own work". —G. Coronades | Do you have a question? 18:44, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Not a simple logo. Taivo (talk) 19:30, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Copyvio, this file is a reduced version of: http://edgarin.wordpress.com/2007/06/22/une-rumbo-al-poder/. Fraudulent "Own work". —G. Coronades | Do you have a question? 18:37, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Not a simple logo. Taivo (talk) 19:29, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
File:Loss of balance is useful in clearing the mind an helping with concentration--WARNING- SOME TEMPORAL SIDE EFFECTS WILL OCCUR 2013-05-28 18-11.jpg
[edit]
unused, personal file, no realistic educational use, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 16:30, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
no FOP in France / pas de liberté de panorama en France ; moreover it might be a copyvio / par ailleurs, peut-être violation de copyright Bzh-99 (talk) 17:21, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
![17:21, 28 May 2013 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2013/05/28#c-Bzh-99-2013-05-28T17:21:00.000Z-File:Lycée_"Le_Likès".jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 00:20, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
![00:20, 4 June 2013 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2013/05/28#c-INeverCry-2013-06-04T00:20:00.000Z-File:Lycée_"Le_Likès".jpg){kind=link}
copyright infringement RomanM82 (talk) 17:03, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:20, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Recent architecture. No FoP in France. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 08:32, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:05, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
unused, personal file, no realistic educational use, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 16:31, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:14, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Poor quality ({{BadJPG}}), replaced by File:Maltose & sucrose derivative.svg. Leyo 09:39, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:06, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Obviously not "own work", copyright status unclear. El Grafo (talk) 13:35, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:10, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
unused, personal file, no realistic educational use, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 16:31, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:15, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
unused, personal file, no realistic educational use, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 16:30, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Probable copyvio - no licence, no meta, low res. -mattbuck (Talk) 16:54, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:20, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Porque thumb es igual pero de mucha más calidad. Nachosan (talk) 23:30, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete As much as I understand, the nominated file is almost-duplicate with same size, but worse quality. Taivo (talk) 18:45, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Not Own work. Image not old enough to presume it is free Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 21:18, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Copyvio. This image was taken from a book that was published in 1973. {{PD-US}} is not valid. Takabeg (talk) 09:51, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:07, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Recent architecture. No FoP in France. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 08:32, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:05, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
redundant to File:Phil Woods1983.jpg Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:16, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Appears to be a photo of w:es:Pierina España. Low quality image appears to be downloaded from web; "own work" claim dubious. Likely copyright violation. Pete F (talk) 21:53, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Recent architecture. No FoP in France TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 08:30, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:05, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
unused personal picture Pete F (talk) 21:48, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:09, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Logo of the Gabala FK - protected by copyright Ray Garraty (talk) 18:14, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Not a simple logo. Taivo (talk) 19:26, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
While it's not impossible that it was actually taken by uploader it's in PD due to age, it has no source to verify. Saə (talk) 00:26, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:03, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Promotional content: Out of scope. Savhñ 20:12, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:10, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Grabbed from the web [10], unlikely to be "own work". El Grafo (talk) 09:33, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:06, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Not Own work, logo probably not free to use. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 21:16, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
unused personal picture Pete F (talk) 21:49, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:09, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
unused, personal file, no realistic educational use, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 16:31, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:15, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
unused, uncategorized personal pic; low quality, nonsense description Pete F (talk) 15:24, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
File:SloMo is a form of exercise guarenteed to actually make you younger- 2013-05-28 17-42.jpg
[edit]
unused, personal file, no realistic educational use, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 16:30, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:16, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
unused, personal file, no realistic educational use, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 16:30, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
File:SloMo should be performed on the slowest speed setting and the steepest gradient, and for the longest possible duration in a given Performance- 2013-05-28 18-00.jpg
[edit]
unused, personal file, no realistic educational use, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 16:30, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
File:SloMo should be performed on the slowest speed setting and the steepest gradient, and for the longest possible duration in a given Performance- 2013-05-28 18-00.jpg
[edit]
unused, personal file, no realistic educational use, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 16:30, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
unused, personal file, no realistic educational use, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 16:30, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
copy of an image in a book that has been released not more then 70 years ago. Dqfn13 (talk) 22:48, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
- This is a scan I made myself from an album that I own.--Johanlouwet78 (talk) 08:00, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
- And that's not allowed unless you have permission of the artist or publisher. Dqfn13 (talk) 19:36, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
unused, personal file, no realistic educational use, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 16:30, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:16, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Unused personal photo Taivo (talk) 10:26, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:07, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
unused, personal file, no realistic educational use, see COM:SCOPE, low quality Polarlys (talk) 16:33, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:13, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
File:This is my daughter Caryleene Magnolio Metagauling- She is 17 years old- I love her with my dear heart- 2013-05-27 15-29.jpg
[edit]
unused, personal file, no realistic educational use, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 16:34, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:13, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
unused, personal file, no realistic educational use, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 16:35, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:12, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
no FOP in France / pas de liberté de panorama en France Bzh-99 (talk) 17:11, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:20, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
low quality version of file:Autobiz hd rvb2.jpg Pete F (talk) 15:20, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:12, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
unused, personal file, no realistic educational use, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 16:31, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:14, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
I don't want this here anymore Victor Sasson (talk) 14:45, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
does not look like made wth a self-time, and likely out of scope. JuTa 22:48, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Unused photo, article was deleted from en.wiki due to non-notability. Taivo (talk) 19:33, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
A person of no notability. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 08:31, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:05, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:48, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:05, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:02, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:05, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Very low resolution, looks like it was grabbed from the web. However, I wasn't able to find the source of it. El Grafo (talk) 09:14, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:05, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Those windows seem to be the work of de:Adolf Saile, who died in 1994. So they are definitely still protected by copyright. They are in a German church, and freedom of panorama doesn't apply inside buildings in Germany.
- File:Gründelhardt Evangelische Kirche 1311.JPG
- File:Gründelhardt Evangelische Kirche 1312.JPG
- File:Gründelhardt Evangelische Kirche 70590.JPG
- File:Gründelhardt Evangelische Kirche 70591.JPG
- File:Gründelhardt Evangelische Kirche 70592.JPG
- File:Gründelhardt Evangelische Kirche 70593.JPG
- File:Gründelhardt Evangelische Kirche 70594.JPG
- File:Gründelhardt Evangelische Kirche 70599.JPG
- File:Gründelhardt Evangelische Kirche 70600.JPG
Rosenzweig τ 18:48, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Those windows seem to be the work of de:Valentin Peter Feuerstein, who died in 1999. So they are definitely still protected by copyright. They are in a German church, and freedom of panorama doesn't apply inside buildings in Germany.
- File:Grünsfeld St. Achatius 90600.JPG
- File:Grünsfeld St. Achatius 90601.JPG
- File:Grünsfeld St. Achatius 90602.JPG
- File:Grünsfeld St. Achatius 90603.JPG
- File:Grünsfeld St. Achatius 90604.JPG
- File:Grünsfeld St. Achatius 90605.JPG
- File:Grünsfeld St. Achatius 90606.JPG
- File:Grünsfeld St. Achatius 90607.JPG
- File:Grünsfeld St. Achatius 90608.JPG
- File:Grünsfeld St. Achatius 90609.JPG
- File:Grünsfeld St. Achatius 90610.JPG
- File:Grünsfeld St. Achatius 90611.JPG
Rosenzweig τ 18:53, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Files of User:Andrew.Kay
[edit]User Andrew.Kae has uploaded these images:
- File:Eyeforone.png (unused image about non-notable band, possibly copyright violation)
- File:Eyeforone logo.png (unused textlogo of non-notable band)
- File:Jim eyeforone band.gif (small photo about non-notable musician)
- File:John eyeforone band.gif (small photo about non-notable musician)
- File:Timtom eyeforone band.gif (small photo about non-notable musician)
His other contribution is also presented for deletion. Taivo (talk) 09:50, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:07, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Files of User:CMC++
[edit]User CMC++ has uploaded these images:
- File:Ipoh signature before highway exit 2013-05-23 06-24.jpg (very bad composition)
- File:Company original logo 2013-05-23 06-29.jpg (unused logo of non-notable company)
- File:KLCC twin tower 2013-05-23 06-29.jpg (bad composition and small, we have better photos about that building)
- File:Gigi creative imagination part 1 2013-05-23 06-32.jpg (unused personal image, worthless)
- File:Gigi creative imagination part 2 2013-05-23 06-33.jpg (unused personal image, worthless)
- File:Connecting the imagination world to the real world 2013-05-23 06-34.jpg (unused image, worthless) Taivo (talk) 09:26, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:06, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alysaleshcm (talk · contribs)
[edit]Looks like collection of advertisement, not own work.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by DamayantiDD (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:CathybrownPT.jpg
- File:CathyBrownBitchnew.jpg
- File:CathyBrownpunchNew.jpg
- File:CathyBrownnew.jpg
- File:CathyBrownFightNew.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Exxxxxploder (talk · contribs)
[edit]Looks like collection of album covers/promo photos, not own work. No evidence of permission.
- File:Matt moerdock d'art de ville.jpg
- File:Bienvenue à Hell's Kitchen 2012.jpg
- File:Street is Talking vol 1.jpg
- File:Matt Moerdock live with Afrosouliscious band in Paris.JPG
- File:Matt Moerdock live in Tabor.JPG
- File:Matt Moerdock "Red Mask".JPG
- File:Matt "Da Illest" Moerdock.jpg
- File:Matt Moerdock in Paris.jpg
- File:Matt Moerdock Live 2.jpg
- File:Matt Moerdock Live.jpg
- File:Matt Moerdock lively.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete all. Article was deleted from fr.wiki due to non-notability. Three first files are used in user talk page in fr.wiki, but I would call this improper use. Taivo (talk) 18:00, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Collection of promo photos. No evidence of permission.
- File:DJEECWXQOC8.jpg
- File:111цыы.jpg
- File:Negd Pul..jpg
- File:«М-29».jpg
- File:Union 7.62.jpg
- File:Negd Pul.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:59, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Comment They are used in ru.wiki, but the article is there presented for deletion due to non-notability. Taivo (talk) 18:22, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: no longer in use. INeverCry 00:15, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
No indication of user's own work on this gallery of images of "Negd Pul" ... all smaller than facebook.
- File:Nadeer (Negd Pul).jpg
- File:Negd Pul ft. Rido.jpg
- File:STUDIO M-29.jpg
- File:Nadeer.jpg
- File:Nadeer Baku.jpg
- File:ConcertNegd.jpg
- File:Negd Pul.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:51, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:26, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Voviklvivua (talk · contribs)
[edit]no notability, out of scope. own work claim probably not correct anyway.
Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:58, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:05, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
out of scope, no notability
- File:BernyFender.jpg
- File:BernyRoom.jpg
- File:Talent jpg.jpg
- File:Berny - Solo Auftritt im Pub "Estuary", Swords Irland, Oktober 2012.jpg
- File:Berny Portrait.jpg
- File:Z CAR M - 1982.jpg
Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:12, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:05, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
vollständiges und besseres Original verfügbar: Marie und Johannes Döhler.JPG Mehlauge (talk) 01:23, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 21:13, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Official logo, no evidence of release. Too complicated for PD status GrapedApe (talk) 03:12, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 21:13, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
No more used and better file available Mimich (talk) 09:35, 28 May 2013 (UTC) I agree with the deletion request.CristianChirita (talk)The only observation i have is that the most straightforward deletion is the overwriting of the file with the new version.
Deleted -FASTILY 21:13, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
No more used and better file (.svg) Mimich (talk) 09:36, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 21:13, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Poor quality, orphaned. Leyo 09:41, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
- Comment The quality is bad, but I looked at Category:Polysaccharides and I did not find better file about same substance. Do you mean File:Laminarin.svg? Taivo (talk) 14:33, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
- What about File:Heteropolysaccharide.svg?
- The image is not used anymore in Oligosaccharide nomenclature. --Leyo 15:22, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: poor quality, replaced FASTILY 21:17, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
The file is copied from lb.wikipedia where it is sourced to Commons. Sadly there is no link and I'm not able to find it anywhere on Commons. Unless someone can find the original file and the source is ok, then we should probably delete. MGA73 (talk) 10:40, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Delete It was the same for me, so sadly we will have to delete it. --Robby (talk) 18:11, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
- Keep The sculpture is obviously PD-old. Taivo (talk) 15:50, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Missing adequate Source information FASTILY 21:23, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:40, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 21:13, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:49, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 21:13, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, not a photo gallery, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:51, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 21:13, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, not a photo gallery, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:54, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 21:13, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Image appears here as well. No permission given by the original creator High Contrast (talk) 10:57, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
- Comment You did not nominate exact duplicate File:Kristian Aadnevik profile.jpg. Taivo (talk) 16:00, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you very much! Your support is highly appreciated! Regards, High Contrast (talk) 22:22, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: missing evidence of permission FASTILY 21:22, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, not a photo gallery, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:57, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
- Keep The subject is en:Jake Tilson and the photo can be used in this article. Taivo (talk) 16:16, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
This photo has been made available to Wikimedia Commons for use on the Wikipedia article Jake Tilson
unused personal photo, not a photo gallery, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:11, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 21:13, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
The subject is probably not the author of this image, as claimed. The owner of the copyright is almost certainly the actual photographer, not the estate of the subject. In order to keep this we will need a license from the photographer. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:43, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
- Der Fotograf ist Nadine Cetiner-Stöver (Schwiegertochter). Die Erlaubnis zur Veröffentlichung ist erteilt.
The photographer is Nadine Stoever-Cetina (daughter). Permission to publish is granted. -- Mgweb 23:27, 28 May 2013 (CET) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mgweb (talk • contribs) 21:29, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
- If you, Mgweb, are the photographer Nadine Stoever-Cetina, then you should change the source and author accordingly and claim "own work". If not, then we will require permission from the actual photographer using the procedure at COM:OTRS. In any case, you should correctly categorize the image.. Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:15, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: If you are the uploader, please email COM:OTRS FASTILY 21:21, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
The subject is certainly not the author of this image, as claimed. The owner of the copyright is almost certainly the actual photographer, not the estate of the subject. In order to keep this we will need a license from the photographer. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:44, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
- Der Fotograf ist Nadine Cetiner-Stöver (Schwiegertochter). Die Erlaubnis zur Veröffentlichung ist erteilt.
The photographer is Nadine Stoever-Cetina (daughter). Permission to publish is granted. -- Mgweb 23:27, 28 May 2013 (CET) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mgweb (talk • contribs) 21:30, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
- If you, Mgweb, are the photographer Nadine Stoever-Cetina, then you should change the source and author accordingly and claim "own work". If not, then we will require permission from the actual photographer using the procedure at COM:OTRS. In any case, you should correctly categorize the image.. Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:13, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: If you are the uploader, please email COM:OTRS FASTILY 21:21, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
File:Arbeitsmappe zur Vorbereitung des Besuchs der ehemaligen jüdischen Bürger in Mönchengladbach.pdf
[edit]I don't read German, so I may be missing something here, but we have a text document with no obvious author. The source is stated to be the estate of Helga Stover. If Stover wrote the document by herself, then it is likely that she owned the copyright. However, I doubt that her estate has the right to license it. Unless in her will she explicitly directed her executor to give away a free to license to this copyright, then her executor cannot give it away, but must pass it to her heir or heirs and let them license it if they wish. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:52, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
- Die Erben von Helga Stöver, das sind Nadine Cetiner-Stöver (Schwiegertochter) und Sait Stöver (Adoptivsohn), haben ihr Einverständnis für die Veröffentlichung gegeben.
The heirs of Helga Stoever, which are Nadine Stöver-Cetina (daughter-in-law) and Sait Stöver (adopted son), have given their consent for publication. -- Mgweb 23:13, 28 May 2013 (CET)
Deleted: If you are the uploader, please email COM:OTRS FASTILY 21:21, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Obviously, something went wrong here - image does not at all correpond to the description. El Grafo (talk) 13:34, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 21:13, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Worthless without description Taivo (talk) 14:20, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 21:13, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
This is not the picture of Heinonen but from an unknown person, see discussion Claude J (talk) 14:52, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 21:13, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
(c) modern.az Ray Garraty (talk) 15:07, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 21:13, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Derivative of File:St Basils Cathedral-500px.jpg, claimed to be "own work". Is there any use for this? El Grafo (talk) 15:16, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 21:18, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
File:Oficiální Logo Americko-Kolumbijské hudební skupiny Big Time Rush Která hraje rock a pop.jpg
[edit]
Logo of en:Big Time Rush → certainly not "own work". Looks too complex to me to be in the public domain because of simplicity. El Grafo (talk) 15:19, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 21:13, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
ما احوج الوطن العربي الى زمن الزعيم والزعماء العدل والعادل الصدق والمصداقية حين يسرق منا الحلم لتنطفىء الشمعة قبل ان تشتعل حينما نخط الاوراق البيضاء بعدم جدوى او اجابية السياسة العربية الخاصة منها والعامة 41.201.90.136 16:53, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- Comment I don't know what does the above say, but it's in use. Sinnamon Girl (talk) 17:58, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
- Comment This is an absolute non sense. The deletion template was removed as it has been added as an edit test. --Ciphers (talk) 20:28, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
Kept: ? FASTILY 21:20, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
imho that upload is a violation of privacy & personality rights of children / individuals not in public life respectively the parents/responsibles would not have been asked for permission to upload as Common Share-Alike, as well imho authorship not clear, as well see imho discriminating file discription and former categorisation as Poverty in India, i.e. imho "out of scope", Roland 18:07, 28 May 2013 (UTC) Roland 18:07, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
- Keep At first, the child is actually not recognizable. At second, clearly we have his/her parent permission to be photographed. Taivo (talk) 19:23, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
I am suspicous if this file is really taken by the uploader. The date is given as 2012-11-11 (upload date), but the ship (Oslo-class frigate Bergen) was decommissioned in 2005. MKFI (talk) 20:10, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
- Uploader was stationed in the Norwegian navy in 2000-2001. It's an old photo. --Peulle (talk) 00:29, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
- Ok, we can Keep the image then. You should update the date though to prevent similar problems in the future. If you don't remember the exact date you can just put down the year. MKFI (talk) 17:51, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
- I see what you mean; unless I specify a date, the upload date is automatically used as the date? Will remember in the future.--Peulle (talk) 18:50, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
- Ok, we can
no source 65.96.164.13 19:41, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- It comes from the Hoover Institution; feel free to add this information on the image page. However, I could not find the publication date nor the author's name. --Tryphon (talk) 20:58, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- This picture is old. Really old. I strongly doubt that the Hover foundation or anyone connected to the Hoover Institution took this picture. I'd say that this picture is public domain based on it's age! Also, as it is a picture of Joseph Stalin, I strongly doubt it was taken by anyone but a Soviet Photographer, employed by the Soviet Government, making it public domain. 67.244.223.68 18:40, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
- Probably PD on age.Mosedschurte (talk) 10:32, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
Kept. Source added. Yann (talk) 18:47, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
I reopen the DR: the author is Margaret Bourke-White, according to [11]. Yann (talk) 18:01, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delete The author died in 1971; the image will not be in the public domain for many years. The currently used license tag is invalid. Óðinn (talk) 07:10, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
- It looks like this file has to be deleted. Please then also delete the compilation File:AxisTalks Pent.png as it uses the image as well. There may be other compilations using this image. --Denniss (talk) 19:38, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
- This one as well: File:Joseph_Stalin_Colour.jpg. Óðinn (talk) 20:49, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
- OTRS confirmation - We have received an email from the son of Margaret Bourke-White who is the current copyright holder giving permission for the photograph to be used. Panyd (talk) 17:12, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
Kept. as per Panyd. Yann (talk) 17:43, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
The OTRS permission is nonsense. It comes from a g-mail account and says that the sender is the son of Bourke-White and that the photograph was taken by his father. It seems unlikely that Bourke-White's son does not know that his famous photographer parent was his mother, not his father.
However, the lack of knowledge displayed by her "son" is not surprising. Bourke-White did not have any children.
More to the point, according to this site, which Yann found above, the photograph was taken while on assignment for Life Magazine and therefore the family does not own the copyright. Since Time Inc. is presumably getting a royalty for its sale as a poster, it seems unlikely that we could get permission. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 23:41, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
- Delete OTRS is worthless, they are even worse than I thought was possible. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 23:48, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
- Delete per the nomination. Nick-D (talk) 00:28, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
- Delete per above. GreyHood Talk 18:04, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. per last nomination--Morning Sunshine (talk) 15:25, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
- Derivative File:Joseph Stalin Colour.jpg also deleted. --Mormegil (talk) 16:01, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
No idea why Hungarian copyright law should be relevant for this photograph. No author listed (and the given source is wrong, [12] was probably meant instead). Mormegil (talk) 13:00, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
- OK! Source: 6. page, and PD-old. Tambo (talk) 13:28, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
- PD-old? Who created the photograph so that you are sure he/she died before 1942? Or, do you mean something like {{PD-anon-70}} or {{Anonymous-EU}}? And you believe the author of an official photograph is unknown? (And see also Commons:URAA-restored copyrights.) --Mormegil (talk) 08:14, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
- Comment Most likely was made after 1942. Shoulder marks were made as Soviet army uniform at the end of 1942-beginning of 1943. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Points to consider:
- Note that this is not the same image as the Margaret Bourke White image deleted above.
- The source site has an explicit copyright notice (which may, of course, be copyfraud if the image is actually PD).
- The description given on the image is quoted from the source site and is clearly a copyvio, which suggests that our uploader does not understand copyright.
- Given the internal evidence that it was taken after 1942 it is still under copyright and will be until URAA runs out.
- . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:45, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete The page doesn't tell where the image comes from. For example, it might previously have been published in a book or a newspaper with a photo credit. For that reason, we can't tell whether it is anonymous or not, and we don't know whether the photographer died before 1943 or not. Also, COM:URAA requires that the photographer died before 1946, but we don't know whether this is the case either. --Stefan4 (talk) 14:09, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
- Comment We have two very different photos, one that was uploaded in 2008 and one that was uploaded just before this DR started. If the old one is the Margaret Bourke White image, then those images need deleted. Otherwise these need separated and handled separately.--Prosfilaes (talk) 23:07, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, per above. Unclear copyright status -FASTILY 21:15, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, not a photo gallery, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:50, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
- Comment The file is used in fr.wiki user page, but almost duplicate File:Les Lolies.jpeg is unused. Also, there is unused file (logo of non-notable group) File:Logo Les Lolies.png. All these files have the same uploader. Taivo (talk) 15:56, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Seems to a distorted photo. Probable copyvio FASTILY 06:11, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
Files of User:Lightmentor
[edit]User Lightmentor has uploaded a lot of files for promoting his/her christian organization:
- File:NCCP Letter.jpg
- File:OMJF.jpg
- File:OMHS SISTERS.jpg
- File:OMHS.jpg
- File:Logo of National Council of Churches in the Philippines.jpg
The user declared him/herself to be copyright holder of all these files. (S)he has stated so here, here and here. But we need better proof for that, for example OTRS permission. Taivo (talk) 13:51, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Also, please delete File:EDSA.jpg as duplicate of File:NSOIPB.jpg. Taivo (talk) 13:51, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
User Lightmentor re-uploaded these files after deleting from Commons, using clearly invalid licence:
- File:St. Maria Virginia Leonzon.jpg
- File:Nature's Basilica.jpg
- File:The Nature's Basilica.jpg
- File:His Holiness +John Florentine P.P..jpg
- File:Our Lady of Lourdes Grotto.jpg
- File:The OMHS Congregation.jpg. Taivo (talk) 09:22, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 21:19, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Manicrinopics (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
- Comment They have both metadata. Taivo (talk) 17:58, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 21:18, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
doubt own work, notability not in question afaik.
Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:16, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
- Comment I believe own work. But the notability is really problem. The first photo is used in ru.wiki, but this used does not seem very correct: the article is about chapel (or how do you call that), but photo is about the chapel's rock band. Taivo (talk) 13:47, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: copyright seems ok, but they are out of scope FASTILY 21:17, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Arsalan.Azarmi
[edit]OK, I think I'll better start a mass request for the rest of them. A bunch of files which are certainly not "own work" as claimed. Some might be old enough to be in the public domain, but since they show very famous people we'd probably already have high-resolution versions of those images. Then there are some book covers and other random stuff grabbed from the web.
- File:Babe Ruth Global Nav.jpg
- File:00364892-660331 catl 100.jpg
- File:Johann-Sebastian-Bach.jpg
- File:Synopsis.jpg
- File:Delicious12395935.gif
- File:Logo O' Musical ProjectZ.gif
- File:A album.gif
- File:NIKOLAY ANDREYEVICH RIMSKY-KORSAKOV.jpg
- File:Korsakov In Portrait.jpg → duplicate of File:Rimsky-Korsakov by Repin.jpg
- File:Allen Poe's Career.jpg
- File:He In Work.jpg
- File:Edgar Allen.Poe.jpg
Personally, I think it would be a waste of ressources trying to figure out what came from where etc. --El Grafo (talk) 13:48, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
- File:Johann-Sebastian-Bach.jpg seems to be a variation of the Bach-portraits by Creator:Elias Gottlob Haußmann → then it would be old enoug to keep. --El Grafo (talk) 14:04, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Unclear copyright status, and definietly not own work. FASTILY 21:20, 4 June 2013 (UTC)