Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2013/05/16
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![17 File:Anthony Difebo "Capo-Antonio Giannini" 2013-05-16 08-57.jpg](#File:Anthony_Difebo_"Capo-Antonio_Giannini"_2013-05-16_08-57.jpg){kind=link}
_imzalı_çalışma..jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
![210 File:Conor McCreedy with "Elephant Bull".jpg](#File:Conor_McCreedy_with_"Elephant_Bull".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
I'm marking this page for deletion because this user name is in violation of COM:UPOLICY as it is a group name of a firm and either some admin needs to discuss with the user about changing the username or this account needs to be blocked. Sorry, but I could not find any other way to bring notice to this. Rahul Bott (talk) 11:20, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Please don't try to enforce a proposed guideline. Jcb (talk) 14:18, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyrighted information board. Per COM:FOP#Slovenia. Eleassar (t/p) 11:46, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Will close this as part of upload cleanup as per nom (weirdly my maintenance and Flickr categories were not added). russavia (talk) 11:48, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
As per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Tromostovje russavia (talk) 13:41, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Deleting as per cleanup russavia (talk) 13:41, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
.jpg-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
w:Ásmundur Sveinsson has not yet been dead for 70 years. Stefan4 (talk) 14:11, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Deleting as part of cleanup. Died in 1982, so undelete in 2053. russavia (talk) 14:20, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
The artist, Asmundur Sveinsson, died in 1982, so still within 70-years posthumous copyright duration of this artwork ([1] and [2]). No Commons-acceptable freedom of panorama in Iceland too. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:49, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as per first DR. --Túrelio (talk) 08:00, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
No sufficient evidence provided that this image is in the public domain. No evidence for PD-NASA High Contrast (talk) 18:53, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Keep Credit: NASA TV http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/station/expeditions/expedition25/p40_launch.html
Kept: evidence has been brought High Contrast (talk) 19:16, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
porque me equivoque al subirlo Florencialbamonte (talk) 22:26, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploaders request. --Martin H. (talk) 05:03, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
screenshot from the copyrighted videogame minecraft 89.249.2.53 09:22, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: no license at all. JuTa 07:51, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
i PUT IT UP AND I WANT IT DOWN IT IS USELESS RE DUNDANT DigDug66 (talk) 10:22, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Delete Uploaded May 12th by the nominator. Recent upload we can be courteous (even though we are being shouted at) and delete. Sinnamon Girl (talk) 02:58, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Douglas Smith 46 California.jpg -mattbuck (Talk) 09:45, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
IT USELESS AND I WOULD DELETE IT DigDug66 (talk) 10:24, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: User requested deletion of self-photo. -mattbuck (Talk) 09:44, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
No source, no permission, photo is younger than 70 years Taivo (talk) 12:49, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Nondescript unrecognisable and un-used extreme poor quality image. B.p. 06:15, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Unused personal image. The uploader's other contribution is also presented for deletion. Taivo (talk) 09:08, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Non-authorized caption from de film, licensed as "own work". Yanguas (talk) 02:23, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
this photo exists twice. this one isnt used... Badesalzloesung (talk) 15:27, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Useless, very low resolution version of the same artwork as File:Fregilupus varius - John Gerrard Keulemans improved.jpg. Uploaded with rather incorrect information (it says this is a specific duck, and was added to its articles in English and Portugues along with a series of other incorrect images), and no source info. —innotata 12:29, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Taivo (talk) 11:31, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Appears to be derivative work (photograph of a photograph - see cut off item in upper right, border on bottom, scratches, and other visual characteristics) Эlcobbola talk 16:58, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
![16:58, 16 May 2013 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2013/05/16#c-Elcobbola-2013-05-16T16:58:00.000Z-File:Anthony_Difebo_"Capo-Antonio_Giannini"_2013-05-16_08-57.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
![00:44, 23 May 2013 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2013/05/16#c-INeverCry-2013-05-23T00:44:00.000Z-File:Anthony_Difebo_"Capo-Antonio_Giannini"_2013-05-16_08-57.jpg){kind=link}
possibly out of com:scope 93.132.82.147 07:43, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Unused file with unknown purpose. Taivo (talk) 08:25, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Multiple errors in chemical structure. Pentavalent carbons, misplaced double bonds, misplaced atom labels, etc. Ed (Edgar181) 19:12, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Multiple errors in chemical structure. Pentavalent carbons, misplaced double bonds, misplaced atom labels, etc. Ed (Edgar181) 19:13, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Comment Do we have a better file? Taivo (talk) 14:01, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
- That does not matter: if the image of a wrong chemical structure is unused anyway, we can delete it. --Yikrazuul (talk) 20:37, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:48, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Copyvio, false licence information. The user does not respond to warnings or other attempts at communication on nowiki, so I just blocked the account on nowiki for one week. You can also speedydelete the user's other uploads, as these lack licence information entirely. Same goes for many of the uploads from User:Stikksag which is a blatant sockpuppet. Some of Stikksag's uploads are marked with {{PD-Textlogo}} by a different user. I have my doubts if this is really appropriate for all of these images, but IANAL. You might also want to take a look at the uploads of User:Kagooga. I have my doubt that File:Jula international.jpg is really CC. If this user account is also a sockpuppet, it matches the pattern of applying whatever template it takes to prevent the image from being deleted, regardless of the image's actual copyright status in the real world. - Soulkeeper (talk) 14:45, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
The architect of these buildings is Vadim Kibirev (2001). The houses themselves are erected in 2007 and 2009. There is no freedom of panorama in Russia. Taivo (talk) 11:03, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
No free license for this image, which isn't the uploader's own work. –moogsi (talk) 21:40, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
4 uploads = 3x copyvio (grabbed from different Panoramio-accounts) = per COM:PRP, IMHO untrusted user uploading a bunch of copyrighted material so this one can't be believed either. And who is author "jhe"? Gunnex (talk) 19:24, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Unused personal photo Taivo (talk) 10:41, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Chemical structure is incorrect (pentavalent carbon 6). Ed (Edgar181) 19:25, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete I can see the error. But do we have a better image? Taivo (talk) 14:19, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
- Category:DNA chemical structures and Category:Guanosine have plenty of options. Ed (Edgar181) 18:51, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
There is a double bond missing in the thymine group. Ed (Edgar181) 19:20, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete I can see the error. But do we have a better image? Taivo (talk) 14:09, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
- Category:DNA chemical structures has many options. Ed (Edgar181) 18:53, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
The chemical structure of deoxyribose units are incorrect. Ed (Edgar181) 19:19, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
The chemical structure of deoxyribose units are incorrect. Ed (Edgar181) 19:18, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Buggy SVG with many errors. Chemical structure of deoxyribose units are incorrect. Much of the image is cut off. Atom labels are misplaced. Ed (Edgar181) 19:17, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
The chemical structure of the deoxyribose units are incorrect. Ed (Edgar181) 19:18, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
The image is copyrighted and can be at best used as fair use for video game infobox cover on local projects, not on Commons. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK ▎enWiki 07:29, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Derivative work. Stefan4 (talk) 14:35, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- I wanted this converted to a DR to check the background of this poster, I have updated the credit on the image page as a result. I was a bit confused by the release by norden.org (the Nordic Council) and the release of the poster as part of the UN competition as I think these are not compatible. The Terms of the competition, did include a release from the poster creator, this is at http://www.dropbydrop.eu/en/rules-and-regulations_10398. The terms include the statement:
- Participants retain full ownership of their entry. Participants agree to grant UNRIC, competition media partners, UN Member States and the social initiatives that are associated with, and approved by, UNRIC an irrevocable, perpetual, non-exclusive, transferable, royalty-free, worldwide license to use, copy, exhibit, publicly display and distribute their submitted entry for any activity hosted by UNRIC or its partners. Every participant is granted and guaranteed the right to be credited every time their entry is published or displayed.
- The material may not be reproduced for the purpose of commercial or personal financial gain, nor may it be used in any manner which implies United Nations endorsement of the products or activities of a commercial enterprise. The United Nations does not assume any responsibility for the misuse of material in production, re-production and activities of the endorsed partners.
- Consequently, I think a (possibly unintended) consequence of this release wording is that though the Nordic Council have rights to use and publicly display this poster, they should have chosen a licence including a "-NC" component, rather than their default "CC-BY-dk". Consequently, sadly, I am opting to support Delete on Commons. --Fæ (talk) 14:56, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
This South African sculpture was made by Lippy Lipshitz, who died in 1980, so it will be copyrighted until 2030 in South Africa. Sadly, this photo is a derivative work and so is non-free; see Commons:Freedom of panorama#South Africa. – Quadell (talk) 19:18, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
This South African sculpture was made by Lippy Lipshitz, who died in 1980, so it will be copyrighted until 2030 in South Africa. Sadly, this photo is a derivative work and so is non-free; see Commons:Freedom of panorama#South Africa. – Quadell (talk) 19:18, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Two errors in chemical structure. Both palmitate and oleate have the wrong number of carbon atoms. Ed (Edgar181) 19:33, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:56, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Two errors in chemical structure. Both palmitate and oleate have the wrong number of carbon atoms. Ed (Edgar181) 19:35, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:56, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Two errors in chemical structure. Both palmitate and oleate have the wrong number of carbon atoms. Contains a misspelling too. Ed (Edgar181) 19:30, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
This page suggests that the statue was erected after the fall of the Soviet Union. Unfortunately, there is only non-commercial FOP in Lithuania. Stefan4 (talk) 13:23, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Good call, thanks. --Fæ (talk) 13:36, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Uploader is not the author. Probable copyright infringement comparable to File:Portrait_Yumiko_Seki.jpeg. — Racconish Tk 21:01, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Non-notable subject, only being used as vandalism Mattythewhite (talk) 19:24, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
There is a hydrogen atoms missing from carbons 2, 4, and 5 in the bottom structure. Ed (Edgar181) 19:31, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete I can see more than one error, and we have better images in Category:Glucose. Taivo (talk) 14:24, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
- Plenty of options in this category and corresponding subcategories. --Yikrazuul (talk) 20:39, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:56, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
There are hydrogen atoms missing from carbons 2, 4, and 5 in the bottom structure. Ed (Edgar181) 19:40, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete I can see more than one errot in this image and we have better images in Category:Glucose. Taivo (talk) 14:28, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:56, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
out of project scope Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:54, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
_imzal%C4%B1_%C3%A7al%C4%B1%C5%9Fma..jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_imzal%C4%B1_%C3%A7al%C4%B1%C5%9Fma..jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
possibly out of com:scope. Also possible copyvio 93.132.82.147 07:43, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
_imzalı_çalışma..jpg){kind=link}
- Delete Unused file with unknown purpose. Taivo (talk) 08:25, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
_imzalı_çalışma..jpg){kind=link}
Unidentified building, but it looks recent. Unless the architect has been dead for at least 70 years, the photo can't be kept. Stefan4 (talk) 14:06, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- The building is from 1992: w:Ráðhús Reykjavíkur. --Stefan4 (talk) 14:08, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete in line with the sad lack of FoP in Iceland and the precautionary principle. --Fæ (talk) 14:10, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 17:50, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 22:52, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:01, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
The present image is a cpvio of the conference/event poster in the background which is a 2D work. Perhaps we can do with cropping but the image is unused at any rate, and is, therefore, perhaps out of scope. In addition, it needs to be rotated and moved to a more descriptive filename. Rahul Bott (talk) 06:05, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE; unfocussed shot, non-notable. -- Túrelio (talk) 15:37, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted. Useless. --Dschwen (talk) 23:15, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Looks like promo picture. No source for cc-0 claim. There's even a copyright symbol in the file name... grillo (talk) 11:49, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- See Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by JJ4754. This can probably be closed for now. /grillo (talk) 12:01, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
The image is unused and, therefore, out of scope as Commons is not a private album hosting service. Rahul Bott (talk) 06:09, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
File:Klip fra filmen Thors Saga under debatarrangementet Thors Saga - hvordan kommer Island videre?.jpg
[edit]
Film screenshot. Stefan4 (talk) 14:56, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
No idea whether this counts as "buildings" or "artworks" per COM:FOP#Denmark. Stefan4 (talk) 14:57, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- Stefan, you do not recognize TOYS? Remember, Denmark is homeland of Lego! But the photo is so poor quality and unused, that I am inclined to say Delete. Taivo (talk) 12:03, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Copyvio: Unbelivable that all authors shall be dead for 70 years Karsten11 (talk) 13:53, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
L'Opinion is a French newspaper published under copyright. It is not possible to assume that it is under a creative commons licence. PAC2 (talk) 04:53, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal file SamuelFreli (talk) 03:29, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Clearly only to be used for vandalism. Mattythewhite (talk) 19:24, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
There is an error in the chemical structure of cholic acid - it is missing a methyl group. Ed (Edgar181) 19:37, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:56, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
out of scope INeverCry 22:31, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope PDF text file PierreSelim (talk) 06:27, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
If you follow the link for the source of this file, you will find that the Macedonian version of the image had no source information and was deleted. It should not exist here either without a valid source KDS444 (talk) 07:02, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Delete Appears to be a derivative of an image from this site. Note the Mary Monoplacophora connection. De728631 (talk) 13:23, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- That makes this an obvious copyright violation— the first admin who sees this shouldn't hesitate to delete. Well done, De728631. KDS444 (talk) 03:45, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
No evidence that the depicted image would be pd. Eleassar (t/p) 21:07, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Cool but probably not PD –moogsi (talk) 23:35, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Derivative work of cookie box. Slovenia was PD-old-70 on 1996 URAA date, and the boy's clothing style is from the 1950s, so this is very unlikely to be PD. Dcoetzee (talk) 18:29, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
I believe, that the image is copyrighted. Taivo (talk) 09:54, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
published by Medellin police not US gob 186.135.144.117 22:35, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:10, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
I don't think the given license is valid because the author of the atwork n:Chico Xavier died 2002. JuTa 07:46, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
The same applies, with different authors, for:
- File:Libertacao Capa do livro.jpg
- File:Nossolar.jpg
- File:Osmensageiros.jpg
- File:Missionariosdaluz.jpg
- File:Missionariosdaluz.jpg
- File:Nomundomaior.jpg
These book covors (or similar) looking not old enough for the license {{PD-Brazil-media}}. --JuTa 07:54, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal file SamuelFreli (talk) 03:29, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Friedrichstrasse as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: copyviol e licenza errata
Converted by me to DR, as the file is nearly 3 years on Commons. However, it's obviously a scan of a commercial map that doesn't seem to be old enough to be PD. -- Túrelio (talk) 12:31, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Unattributed derived work of File:Publicly Held Federal Debt 1790-2009.png. The graph is inaccurate and misleading, as the uploader just moved the 'actual' line 3 years forward without considering new data. LK (talk) 05:57, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Chemical structure of adenine is incorrect (pentavalent carbon 6) Ed (Edgar181) 19:24, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete I can see the error. But do we have a better image? Taivo (talk) 14:13, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
- Category:Adenine, Category:Purine, and Category:Guanine have plenty of options. Ed (Edgar181) 18:52, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
It doesn't say who the architect is. Per COM:FOP#Morocco, we can't keep the image unless the architect has been dead for at least 50 years. Stefan4 (talk) 21:22, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
1992 building, see w:Ráðhús Reykjavíkur. You have to wait until the architects (still alive) have been dead for at least 70 years until you can upload pictures of this building. Stefan4 (talk) 14:09, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Logo with unknown copyright status. 石 (talk) 09:21, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Incorrect: Hydrogen is missing (compare File:SarinGB.jpg). Leyo 09:12, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete and it's also not a "en:Lewis dot structure", per the description's comments of what this image is supposed to illustrate (missing lone-pairs on the oxygens). DMacks (talk) 15:30, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Incorrect file, superseded with correct one. Taivo (talk) 08:30, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
w:Ásmundur Sveinsson hasn't been dead for 70 years yet. Stefan4 (talk) 14:29, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Superiorly formatted flag at File:Syria-flag 1932-58 1961-63.svg. Fry1989 eh? 19:58, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- Agreed; this appears to be an auto-tracing of a raster image, while the older file has clean-looking outlines. Note that although File:Flag of Syria 2011, observed.svg is shown as a derivative, its content has since been overwritten (by the same user who uploaded File:Syria-flag 1932-58 1961-63.svg), so its attribution would only be relevant to the history, not the current version (which is also cleanly drawn, as one might expect).—Odysseus1479 (talk) 06:11, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
- As the author of the current edition, I vote for Delete. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 07:31, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete, I agree with above arguments. Speedy delete ? Zeugma fr (talk) 08:44, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:57, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
I'm not sure where to start with this one. There is text on this page. It seems to be a edited jpg screenshot of the infobox of w:nl:Wognum, which could be easily duplicated using markup. –moogsi (talk) 01:10, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
not own work, screenshot of website (which doesn't state any (c) restrictions) see here Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:15, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
not own work [3], notability? Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:19, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
not in use. collection of possible copyrighted icons. possibly not in com:scope McZusatz (talk) 13:12, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
A recent artistic work. No FOP in Ukraine. --Yuriy Kvach (talk) 12:22, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Appears to be product packaging or otherwise not the author's own work; uploaded in batch of copyvios (see uploader talk/contribs) related to beverage/food products Эlcobbola talk 16:57, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Alvar Aalto
[edit]Sorry, but Alvar Aalto hasn't been dead for 70 years yet. Per http://www.nordenshus.is/nordens-hus this building was made by him.
Stefan4 (talk) 15:32, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete --Fæ (talk) 09:17, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Icelandic Phallological Museum
[edit]No evidence that the sculptors, architects and sign makers have been dead for at least 70 years.
- File:2008 Iceland national handball team - phallic casts.jpg
- File:Iceland -- 2008-08-08 13-39-32.jpg
- File:Iceland -- 2008-08-08 13-39-41.jpg
- File:Phallus-Museum - Eingangsbereich.jpg
- File:Phallus-Museum - Fassade.jpg
- File:Phallus-Museum - Holzphallus.jpg
- File:Phallus-Museum - Steinphallus.jpg
Stefan4 (talk) 14:19, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and per COM:FAP - Alison ❤ 19:07, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Leifur Eiríksson
[edit]A sculpture by w:Alexander Stirling Calder (died in 1945). PD in USA (made by a sculptor from the United States, PD in Iceland on URAA date), no longer PD in Iceland due to changes made to the Icelandic copyright law in 1996.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Stefan4 (talk) 15:06, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Leifur Eiríksson
[edit]Per COM:FOP#Iceland: the memorial is work by Alexander Stirling Calder (d. 1945).
- File:Kvinnostrejk i Reaykjavik.jpg (only the uncropped version)
- File:Statue of Leif Ericson.jpg
Eleassar (t/p) 08:21, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- Keep File:Kvinnostrejk i Reaykjavik.jpg as I have digitally removed the statue. The photo seemed to have value as it was about a protest, not the statue. --Fæ (talk) 08:46, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- Agreed. Only the uncropped version needs to be deleted. --Eleassar (t/p) 09:15, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, one, kept one. Taivo (talk) 09:01, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:National Theatre of Iceland
[edit]Architect w:Guðjón Samúelsson hasn't been dead for 70 years yet.
Stefan4 (talk) 14:33, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Work of Ivan Zajec (1869-1952). Per COM:FOP#Slovenia, not free for Commons.
- File:Saint John the Evangelist Church, Krško 2.jpg
- File:Saint John the Evangelist Church, Krško 3.jpg
- File:Saint John the Evangelist Church, Krško 4.jpg
- File:Saint John the Evangelist Church, Krško 5.jpg
Eleassar (t/p) 10:31, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Files of User:Bardhyl222
[edit]
An inappropriate license is used in the above images, since there is no freedom of panorama in Albania (the statues are quite recent creations, erected in the Albanian capital & supposed to resemble Illyrian personalities). For similar cases see Commons:Panorama and especially the 'Category:Albanian FOP cases'. So the above unfortunately needs to be deleted until the works of art fall out of copyright, or law is changed. --Alexikoua (talk) 14:03, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Files of User:Intendanten
[edit]These files are uploaded in user Intendanten:
- File:INTENDANTEN-Bier2.jpg
- File:Talk im Tempel.jpg
- File:Intend3.jpg
- File:Verrückte Hühner und leckee Früchtchen.jpg
They are all unused personal photos. Taivo (talk) 09:00, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
PD-AR-Photo is exclusively for photos and NOT for drawings or other pieces of art
- File:Suboficial Principal Manuel Alberto Albelos.jpg
- File:Tripulacion learjeat T34.jpg
- File:Suboficial Mayor Júlio Jesús Lastra.jpg
- File:Mayor Rubén Héctor Martel.jpg
- File:Mayor Carlos Eduardo Krause.jpg
- File:Mayor Jorge Osvaldo García.jpg
- File:Mayor Fernando Juan Casado.jpg
- File:Suboficial Auxiliar Pedro Prudencio Miranda.jpg
- File:Fuerza Aérea Argentina -Direccion General de Salud.jpg
- File:Primer Teniente Jorge Eduardo Casco.jpg
- File:Capitán Daniel Fernando Manzotti.jpg
- File:Capitán José Leonidas Ardiles.jpg
- File:Mayor Hugo Ángel del Valle Palaver.jpg
- File:PrimerTeniente Daniel Antonio Jukic.jpg
- File:Vicecomodoro de la colina.jpg
- File:Comodoro Hugo Cesar Meinser.jpg
- File:Primer Teniente Jorge Alberto Bono.jpg
- File:Primer Teniente Juan Domingo Bernhardt.jpg
- File:Primer Teniente Pedro Ignacio Bean.jpg
- File:Primer Teniente Juan José Arraras.jpg
- File:Mayor Gustavo Argentino García Cuerva.jpg
- File:Vicecomodoro Juan José Falconier.jpg
- File:Capitan José Raúl Vázquez.jpg
- File:Capitan Omar Jesús Castillo.jpg
High Contrast (talk) 20:12, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:57, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Both files uploaded in 02.2008 but previously published (even in lower res) via (example) http://empreenderbvb.blogspot.de/2007/06/conhea-boa-vista-do-buric.html (2007, sourced with "Fonte : http://www.burica.com.br/") and apparently grabbed from burica.com.br (archive from 01.2008, with no "free" license visible), as stated also in File:BVBRS.jpg. burica.com.br is the official site of related Brazilian municipality. For File:BVBMAP.jpg, note additionally that http://web.archive.org/web/20080315185933/http://www.burica.com.br/fotoscidade.htm (03.2008) links to aerial photographs credited with "Fotos aéreas de Aloisio Antes - 2005". So, permission needed and/or (inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF) unlikely to be own work are:
Gunnex (talk) 17:41, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Promo pictures. No source indicates cc0, pd-self or art libre (applicable?). Note that several different photographers are credited in the file names.
- File:Jonna Lee 4.jpg
- File:Jonna Lee 3.jpg
- File:Jonna Lee 2.jpg
- File:Jonna Lee.jpg
- File:JL2byAnnaLindstrom©.jpg
- File:JL4byAnnaLindstrom©.jpg
- File:JL5byAnnaLindstrom©.jpg
- File:JonnaLee3byKarinNilsson.jpg
- File:Jonnalee2byKarinNilsson.jpg
- File:JonnaleebyKarinNilsson.jpg
grillo (talk) 12:00, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by LaMontagneSecreteCommon (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope - promotional images
- File:Applications numériques de La Montagne secrète.png
- File:Logo La Montagne secrète.png
- File:La Montagne secrète.jpg
INeverCry 21:53, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope PierreSelim (talk) 06:23, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused low-quality personal images
INeverCry 22:19, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused personal images PierreSelim (talk) 06:24, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Photos of objects uploaded by Oregonian2012 (talk · contribs)
[edit]After finding copyvios File:Dresden Ram.JPG, File:CB Santa Claus.JPG and File:CB Girl on Snowball.JPG I can conclude that the photos of ornaments and items uploaded by Oregonian2012 are all stolen from various websites (i.e. auctions) and uploaded here with false "own work" claims.
- File:Dresden Boat.JPG
- File:Dresden Elk.JPG
- File:Dresden Ram.JPG
- File:CB Santa Claus.JPG
- File:CB Girl on Snowball.JPG
- File:CB Santa.JPG
- File:CB Boy on Sled.JPG
- File:Dresden Bison.JPG
- File:Dresden Beach Chair.JPG
- File:Dresden Elf.JPG
- File:Dresden Lion.JPG
- File:Dresden Moon.JPG
- File:Dresden Goat.JPG
- File:Dresden Alligator.JPG
- File:Dresden Angel.JPG
- File:Dresden Box.JPG
Martin H. (talk) 18:55, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Versailles photo uploaded by Oregonian2012 (talk · contribs)
[edit]All stolen from the internet. See copyvio taggings (except 1 that I cant find atm, but uploaded together with the other copyvios).
- File:Versailles-hall-of-mirrors-people.jpg
- File:Versailles-hercules-room.jpg
- File:Hercules room 1.jpg
- File:Hercules room 3.jpg
- File:Hercules room 2.jpg
- File:Queens antechamber.JPG
Martin H. (talk) 19:14, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:48, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
possible copyvios - own work claim doubtful
- File:Pontage batterie.jpg
- File:Attention batterie.jpg
- File:Batterie spécifications.jpg
- File:Pontage batterie - déconnexion des câbles.jpg
INeverCry 21:55, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Source of the work is a copyvio [4] PierreSelim (talk) 06:22, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Advertisement of company with questionable notability. Also no evidence of permission.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Lollalita88
[edit]- File:Kk and pipi zohra tliche and hayet tayechi.jpg
- File:Toutou and zouzou.jpg
- File:Hayet tayechi.jpg
- File:Zohra tliche.jpg
- File:Besmellah.jpg
- File:Loooooooooool a 3 months's trash.jpg
- File:Oh my oh my.jpg
- File:Come eat with me.jpg
- File:Hey hey, zohra tliche's future husband anis bouchouicha must be proud of her.jpg
- File:Zohra tliche's underwear.jpg
- File:Hhhhhhh.jpg
- File:Zohra tliche's clothes.jpg
- File:Loooooooooooooool.jpg
- File:Breakfast table ;).jpg
- File:Hayet tayech and zohra tliche's trash.jpg
- File:Zohra tlich will cook you the best meals ever.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Out of scope. Scenes of kitchen-sink squalor, possibly intended as an attack on the person named in many of the titles. JohnCD (talk) 13:28, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete all. Taivo (talk) 11:32, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Images of User:Imparo
[edit]- File:Doug Elniski in 2008.jpg
- File:Carl Benito in 2008.JPG
- File:Kyle Fawcett in 2008.jpg
- File:Raj Sherman in 2008.jpg
- File:Lindsay Blackett in 2008.jpg
- File:Lee Richardson in 2008.JPG
- File:Alison Redford in 2008.jpg
- File:Alana DeLong in 2008.jpg
- File:Art Johnston in 2008.jpg
- File:Doug Griffiths in 2008.jpg
- File:David Hancock in 2008.jpg
- File:Dave Rodney on Everest.jpg
- File:Cal Dallas in 2008.jpg
- File:Broyce Jacobs in 2008.jpg
- File:Heather Forsyth in 2008.jpg
- File:Jonathan Denis in 2008.jpg
- File:Cindy Ady in 2008.jpg
- File:David Xiao in 2008.JPG
- File:Rob Anderson in 2008.jpg
- File:Alana DeLong at home.jpg
- File:Barry McFarland in 2008.jpg
- File:Arno Doerksen in 2008.jpg
- File:Doug Griffiths in 2011.jpg
Please see also en:Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_files/2013_May_14#All_uploads_from_Imparo. Some time ago, en:User:Imparo uploaded a large number of photos of Canadian politicians. Almost none of them make any claim as to the source or author of the photos. Most of them appear to be studio pictures taken against the same backdrop, although a few of them are from elsewhere. At File:David Hancock in 2008.jpg, Imparo said, "This image is part of the media package provided for each candidate of the Progressive Conservative Association of Alberta. It has been released into the public domain by the party and the candidates, who are now, subsequently, sitting MLAs. Permission to use said images has been granted by the individual." There is an OTRS ticket - 2008072910032107 - that concerns these images, and on the basis of that ticket, they have largely sat unmolested for five years. A few of them have been deleted here and there, including en:Wikipedia:Files_for_deletion/2012_September_22#File:Peter_Sandhu_in_2008.jpg (you can read Sven Manguard's characterization of the OTRS ticket at this discussion). I have been told that I can say of the ticket that it does not clearly state who the author/source is of the images, does not clearly assert ownership of the images, and does not state a license. I reached out to Imparo - both on his talk page and via email - but it has been a week and I have not heard back. These are all high quality photos and I would hate to lose them, but it's really hard to justify keeping them without some more information. The Creative Commons and GFDL licenses require attribution and we don't even know who the copyright holder is that we should be attributing. --UserB (talk) 03:44, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- Umm, I am an OTRS volunteer. --UserB (talk) 18:08, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete, then. 117Avenue (talk) 02:06, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
- Umm, I am an OTRS volunteer. --UserB (talk) 18:08, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. I checked a sample and most of them seem to have no author information at all (I checked deleted revisions on enwiki; it wasn't lost in the transfer), while others contain long explanations that they were released as part of a press pack etc. While I would be inclined to accept an OTRS ticket that just says "the licenses selected by the uploader are valid" (to paraphrase), I'm sceptical that these are all taken by the same photographer and that the OTRS customer owns them. They appear to be from a variety of sources, so they should be deleted until we can get proper permission from the respective copyright holders. It appears that in some cases the uploader has conflated being publicly available with being in the public domain for copyright purposes. (NB, I am an OTRS agent and an admin her and at enwiki, and I responded to a request at the OTRS noticeboard for comments). HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:58, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete - I read the ticket, which states totally nothing about source or license or understanding of copyright at all. It's more like some sort of blank cheque, identifying the uploader and stating that we just can trust whatever he does. Jcb (talk) 20:50, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Not a "textlogo", this is copyrighted by the Austral University of Argentina (See logo on official web). - Fma12 (talk) 04:49, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Not a simple logo. Taivo (talk) 11:37, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
- Keep It is a text logo. Hacastro22 (talk) 23:04, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
- Unverifiable: The page that has been referenced to support this decision does not state that the image is copyrighted. Hacastro22 (talk) 23:11, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
- The image that appears in the referenced site is different. Hacastro22 (talk) 15:52, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 06:50, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
screenshot from the copyrighted videogame minecraft Gajolen (talk) 09:25, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 06:48, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
I doubt the assertion that this is the uploader's own work. It appears to be a professional PR photo, and such a photo is usually stringently copyright protected. While it may be valid the uploader should provide proof that they are, indeed, the copyright owner. Timtrent (talk) 10:38, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- Comment Having inspected the file data, this is a photoshopped picture. This leads me to the believe that my original suspicions are correct and that, while the uploader may think that editing a picture with photoshop makes them the copyright owner, it just does not. I have now firmed up on my opinion that this is a copyright violation. Shame, really. She's a very good looking lady. The picture does her justice. Timtrent (talk) 15:21, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 06:49, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:09, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope PierreSelim (talk) 06:31, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Appeal - there are more then one image uploaded on that flickr account. It's a low resolution crest of a dissolved (amateur) football club, which former representatives have given me a green light to use.
- Delete This image File:Fcf rak.png is far too complex not to be copyrighted. Someone would have the copyright still even if the club is dissolved. --Leoboudv (talk) 08:27, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
- Well, as I already hinted, that I have talked with the club's former representatives and they gave me their verbal approval. They have nothing against sharing and using it.
And as the football club never had it's own homepage or place to storage their "history", then they even were interested that someone wrote an article about them on Wikipedia (and this crest helps to illustrate that article, because it very much is part of the football club's background). Sorry for my incompetent English (the main article is in Estonian). I hope it helps to clarify the situation. --Andres1221 13:42, 20 April 2013 (GMT +2)
- Delete license washing --Alan Lorenzo (talk) 16:08, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
- What? What do you mean by "license washing" and what makes you say so? --Andres1221 23:41, 20 April 2013 (GMT+2)
- Delete Kahjuks on see logo liiga keeruline. Ma mõtlen näiteks krooni. Commonsis tohib hoida üksnes kõige lihtsamaid logosid. Taivo (talk) 11:39, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 06:50, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
screenshot from the copyrighted videogame minecraft Gajolen (talk) 09:25, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 06:48, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
screenshot from the copyrighted videogame minecraft Gajolen (talk) 09:25, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 06:47, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
This is a copyright violation 188.104.109.217 09:46, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- Comment No proof about copyright violation is given, but the uploader is overall suspicious, so I do not know, what to do. Anyway, the same decision should be made for File:Leo canne 13.jpg also. Taivo (talk) 08:56, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 06:48, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
screenshot from the copyrighted videogame minecraft Gajolen (talk) 09:29, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- This is a screenshot from a game called Manic Digger, which is open-source... --Pierre Rudloff (talk) 09:39, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
screenshot from the copyrighted videogame minecraft Gajolen (talk) 09:29, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- This is a screenshot from a game called Manic Digger, which is open-source... --Pierre Rudloff (talk) 09:39, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
screenshot from the copyrighted videogame minecraft Gajolen (talk) 09:29, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- This is a screenshot from a game called Manic Digger, which is open-source... --Pierre Rudloff (talk) 09:39, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
screenshot from the copyrighted videogame minecraft Gajolen (talk) 09:29, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- This is a screenshot from a game called Manic Digger, which is open-source... --Pierre Rudloff (talk) 09:38, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
screenshot from the copyrighted videogame minecraft Gajolen (talk) 09:28, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- This is a screenshot from a game called Manic Digger, which is open-source... --Pierre Rudloff (talk) 09:39, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
screenshot from the copyrighted videogame minecraft Gajolen (talk) 09:28, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- This is a screenshot from a game called Manic Digger, which is open-source... --Pierre Rudloff (talk) 09:39, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
screenshot from the copyrighted videogame minecraft Gajolen (talk) 09:28, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- This is a screenshot from a game called Manic Digger, which is open-source... --Pierre Rudloff (talk) 09:39, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
screenshot from the copyrighted videogame minecraft Gajolen (talk) 09:28, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- This is a screenshot from a game called Manic Digger, which is open-source... --Pierre Rudloff (talk) 09:39, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- Shit, im sorry its my bad. I could really not see difference. Can you delete the deletion request i make to this game please? --Gajolen (talk) 10:27, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
screenshot from the copyrighted videogame minecraft 89.249.2.53 09:22, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- This is a screenshot from a game called Manic Digger, which is open-source... --Pierre Rudloff (talk) 09:38, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
The frame of the painting is still copyrighted; per COM:FOP#Slovenia. There are other photographs of the painting itself. Eleassar (t/p) 10:09, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
It was meant to present the interior of the chapel, not the picture of Virgin Mary. The chapel is too old to be copyrighted, but the interior designs indeed seems to be all modern. --Janezdrilc (talk) 21:28, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- The frame is very large and prominent. It was probably also part of the photographer's overall interest to depict the interior of the chapel, wasn't it? --Eleassar (t/p) 07:05, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Apparently still copyrighted FASTILY 06:50, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
screenshot from the copyrighted videogame minecraft 89.249.2.53 09:18, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Minecraft says at terms page: ...you're free to do whatever you want with screenshots and videos of the game, but don't just rip art resources and pass them around, that's no fun. I think that this is enough for wikimedia commons. --OI1A-salbidea (talk) 09:27, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- I think the don't just rip art resources and pass them around not are good enough to wikimedia commons im sorry. It have been discussed if we can use minecraft pictures here http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Minecraft_1.1_Title.png where the end of the discuss was a no.--Gajolen (talk) 10:35, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Minecraft images have a non-commercial restriction, and are not suitable for Commos FASTILY 06:47, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Glucose and galactose are each missing a hydroxyl group. The ring oxygen labels are incorrectly located outside of the intersections of chemical bonds. Monosaccharides is misspelled. Ed (Edgar181) 19:08, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- Comment Do we have a better file? Taivo (talk) 14:03, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
- Category:Monosaccharides and its subcategories have many options. Ed (Edgar181) 18:55, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Per discussion. Leyo 12:51, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Files from École Polytechnique
[edit]
Les photographies présentes sur ce site sont la propriété de l'Ecole Polytechnique qui les a réalisées à l'occasion des diverses manifestations organisées sur son site et dans ses locaux ou auxquelles ses élèves et personnels ont pu prendre part. Elles ne peuvent, conformément aux dispositions du Code de la propriété intellectuelle, être utilisées et reproduites sans autorisation expresse de l'Ecole. © Collections École Polytechnique Tiraden (talk) 17:04, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- File:Parcours La Courtine Polytechnique.jpg
- File:0001-conf-dfhm preview ecran.jpg
- File:0001 lsi 09092 preview ecran.jpg
- File:0001 psc 2012 preview ecran.jpg
- File:0041-14juillet preview ecran.jpg
- File:0119-14juillet preview ecran.jpg
- File:0483-14072010- preview ecran.jpg
- File:0539-14072010- preview ecran.jpg
- File:0008-14112011j preview ecran.jpg
- File:0016-alain-asp preview ecran.jpg
- File:0007-x2010 preview ecran.jpg
- File:0018-conferenc preview ecran.jpg
- File:0018-escrime-2 preview ecran.jpg
- File:0018-yamina-be preview ecran.jpg
- File:0031204408001 preview ecran.jpg
- File:0039-natation- preview ecran.jpg
- File:0044-escrime-2 preview ecran.jpg
- File:0059-master-st preview ecran.jpg
- File:0076-pad-2012 preview ecran.jpg
- File:0083-xforumjb preview ecran.jpg
Info Merged all the DRs into one, as the rationale was the same. Jean-Fred (talk) 21:44, 16 May 2013 (UTC)- Info An OTRS permission is being processed for 47 files of the category. We’re waiting for the copyright holder to get back to us. Jean-Fred (talk) 21:44, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- L'autorisation de publier les photos m'a été donné par leur auteur, Jérémy Barande (par mail, par téléphone et « IRL »). Apparemment il n'a pas encore envoyé la confirmation à Jean-Fred, j'irai le voir la semaine prochaine pour le lui rappeler. De plus je pense que seule l'autorisation de l'auteur compte, car la photothèque de l'École n'est qu'une base de données et le fait d'y placer un fichier ne donne pas à l'École la propriété sur ce fichier (malgré tout ce qu'ils peuvent dire). Cordialement, A455bcd9 (talk) 17:53, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
- Info Permission confirmed through OTRS (ticket #2013031910011511). Everything is in order. Jean-Fred (talk) 17:06, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
Permission recieved -FASTILY 06:52, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Sole contribution by user, no evidence the uploader is the copyright holder. Kelly (talk) 02:00, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- Comment The file is used in en.wiki and ko.wiki. Taivo (talk) 14:25, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 06:46, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
There are all kinds of errors in chemical structure. Ed (Edgar181) 19:10, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- Please explain. I am not a chemist and I have not learned it after secondary school, but I am a bit interested in chemistry. Try to explain and I will try to understand. Taivo (talk) 13:58, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
- The two thymine groups are each missing a nitrogen atom in the ring. The dashed red lines should be drawn as solid lines, the standard for covalent bonds, as drawn elsewhere in the structure. The purine rings are missing double bonds, nitrogen atoms, carbonyl groups, and amino groups. In the DNA backbone, the -CH2-O-P(O)(O-)-O- groups (phosphates) are drawn as two methylene groups. Ed (Edgar181) 18:48, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Per discussion. Leyo 12:53, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
screenshot from the copyrighted videogame minecraft 89.249.2.53 09:18, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 06:47, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Untuk menjaga keamanan file dari penyalahgunaan. 180.251.173.215 08:24, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
- Comment I do not understand Indonesian, but the file is used. Taivo (talk) 12:44, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
- FWIW Google Translate says “To maintain the security file from abuse.”—Odysseus1479 (talk) 02:34, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
Untuk menjaga keamanan file dari penyalahgunaan. 180.251.175.89 10:42, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Kept: wat FASTILY 06:49, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use; unclear what the deal with the last deletion request was Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:05, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:53, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Pobrežje cemetery
[edit]Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: no evidence that the author(s) of these works died before 1945.[5]
- File:Pobrežje cemetery 01.JPG
- File:Pobrežje cemetery 02.JPG
- File:Pobrežje cemetery 11.JPG
- File:Pobrežje cemetery 14.JPG
- File:Pobrežje cemetery 15.JPG
- File:Pobrežje cemetery 16.JPG
- File:Pobrežje cemetery 18.JPG
- File:Pobrežje cemetery 19.JPG
- File:Pobrežje cemetery 22.JPG
Eleassar (t/p) 08:42, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
For the chapel I am still in search for some literature. Number 18 I think it is not of artistic value, althou the entire architecture (two arcade buildings) are still copyrighted (Max Czeike, + 1945). --Janezdrilc (talk) 21:22, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- I've been thinking about No. 18, but in the end, it depicts a distinctive part of copyrighted architecture, and the plaque with gravestones seems a creative work too, particularly its upper third. --Eleassar (t/p) 08:22, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
The chapel was built in 1926 and designed by Rudolf Kiffman (Kiffmann?). Can you find the year of birth and death of him? --Janezdrilc (talk) 18:00, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
- I did find this information too, but have not been able to find the year of his death. However, per this source he was still alive in 1939, which makes it very possible that he died after 1944. --Eleassar (t/p) 19:41, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Unclear copyright status. Unless we have clear, explicit written/textual, tangible evidence indicating that these files are indeed freely licensed under a Commons compatible license, we cannot host them on Commons FASTILY 06:46, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Delphine751 (talk · contribs)
[edit]I believe people want these deleted due to personality rights?
-mattbuck (Talk) 16:54, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Question Mattbuck, I suspect that "people" would like these deleted because they lack any indication that the subject has consented to them. I see no reason not to apply it to the other uploads by this same user - why did you not include File:Vagindelphine.jpg and File:Hemorroides.jpg? Delicious carbuncle (talk) 17:19, 16 May 2013 (UTC)- Delete File:Fellation.jpg and File:Delphine5445.jpg. Keep File:Vagindelphine.jpg and File:Hemorroides.jpg as not identifiable. Sinnamon Girl (talk) 03:13, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
- Consent has nothing to do with whether or not you can identify the person. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 23:19, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
- According to statistics (and the fact that there are more atoms of oxygen in a breath than there are breathfulls in the atmosphere) this image has in it something that either was or will be a part of my body. I do not consent to its release, please delete it, and everything that was shot in the Earth's biosphere. Thanks in advance. Sinnamon Girl (talk) 04:24, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
- Consent has nothing to do with whether or not you can identify the person. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 23:19, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Plain COM:PORN images, nothing what we donna have already. Hence also no additional educational use. --Yikrazuul (talk) 10:53, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete, per analysis by Delicious carbuncle (talk · contribs), above. Cheers, -- Cirt (talk) 07:08, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 06:51, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Quicktime logos; nonsense license - Apple is author, not uploader; may, however, be below ToO - discussion needed
Эlcobbola talk 16:44, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 06:51, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 22:26, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused personal files PierreSelim (talk) 06:30, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
nombre erróneo Roderic uv (talk) 10:14, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: wrong name and possibly copyright violation Ezarateesteban 22:11, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
from 3 copyrighted video games where 1 is on facebook Gajolen (talk) 09:35, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: copyright violation of a screen Ezarateesteban 22:07, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
from 3 copyrighted games where 1 is from facebook Gajolen (talk) 09:36, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: copyright violation of a screen Ezarateesteban 22:08, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
COM:DW INeverCry 22:32, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nominator Lymantria (talk) 08:47, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
possible copyvio - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 22:40, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nominator Lymantria (talk) 08:38, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
Copyright of this work belongs to Marcel Michaud (died 1958) and Herbert Bayer (died 1985). Taivo (talk) 09:38, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: copyright violation (not 70 years of the death of the author) Ezarateesteban 22:10, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
screenshot from the copyrighted videogame minecraft Gajolen (talk) 09:25, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: copyright violation, screenshot of a copyright screen Ezarateesteban 22:07, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
The copyright listed here is incorrect. This is NOT a US government document but rather a carefully constructed hoax. As such, the copyright for the document is owned by the person who created the hoax and not the US government as herein listed. In order to use this image, we need to get permission from the person who created the document and therefore owns the copyright. Mj12hoaxwriter (talk) 00:29, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- Keep You have been all worked up about this subject on Wikipedia. It is not our fault if the creator of this misrepresents who the author is. This would be like the creator of something telling everybody that it was first published before 1977 without complying with formalities, when in reality it was published after 1977. In my opinion, the creator puts it into the public domain by saying that it is public domain(saying it was made by the president). Ramaksoud2000 (talk) 22:46, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- Keep due to Ramaksoud2000's analysis. Sinnamon Girl (talk) 02:53, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
Admin at en:wp doesn't like it on my userpage. This DR may help to keep it there. Canoe1967 (talk) 18:29, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- I dont think you should try to censor yourself. Keep the image --109.232.72.11 18:44, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- Admin at en.wp is uninterested by what happens at Pornopedia, sorry, Commons. Admin at en.wp removes inappropriate material - end of story. Black Kite (talk) 00:15, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete - It's just a jab at admins for no particular reason. They're just doing their jobs. –TCN7JM 01:57, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
- Keep In use on many of the users' pages on different Wikipedias. Sinnamon Girl (talk) 03:15, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
- They took it out of my page after I reverted them and now they locked my page. We may need input from all the projects if this is going to be common practice. Should we email the WMF for input on whether it is copyvio of their logo? We may wish Mr. Wales' input as well.
Does anyone know off hand who created the original globe or should I do a quick search?Paul Stansifer seems to have most credit.--Canoe1967 (talk) 05:50, 17 May 2013 (UTC)- As much as I agree that ENWP admins should be distrusted by default, in this particular case it seems that your page wasn't locked because of this image, but because you have urged people to vandalise the project with it. If you were to say "Use the photo of Bill Clinton to vandalise all the user talk pages" the effect would be the same. Also I do not feel that there is anything at all inappropriate with Wikipedia having a policy on notability, as long as they don't bring it to any broadly educational project like Commons. Sinnamon Girl (talk) 06:29, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
- Woah, woah, woah. "Distrusted by default"? Last I checked, the administrators were the trusted users. This is not the same as vandalizing with a Bill Clinton picture because it's a random, not-as-personal attack at sysops. –TCN7JM 12:42, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
- In my experience when I see an admin from German Wikipedia, Chinese Wikipedia, Wiktionary, Wikisource, etc. come to Commons, they are generally respectful and start with "Hello, I would like to help, please let me know how you do things around here." On the other hand many ENWP admins begin by "OK, this category, this gallery, and all these topics need to stop being uploaded; here are the rules that we passed on English WP to limit contributors, you must to implement them here too." Sinnamon Girl (talk) 13:42, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
- I cannot say I have had the same experiences, at least not as a first greeting or warning. Unless templated warnings are used, and I've only seen them used on vandals or other people who have no desire to contribute to the project, then admins are more courteous than they are given credit for. I am not saying they are all perfect, but making a generalization of over a thousand users is harsh. As a sidenote, the rules were not implemented to limit contributors, they were implemented to filter what belongs on this encyclopedia. Your definition of notable may not comply with that of the consensus, and if that happens then it is you who is wrong. –TCN7JM 20:27, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
- Another sidenote: It is not the job of a sysop to ask how a new user does things and try to adapt to their settings. Rather, it is the other way around. New contributors need to learn how to go about contributing to the encyclopedia in a helpful and beneficial way. –TCN7JM 20:30, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
- In my experience when I see an admin from German Wikipedia, Chinese Wikipedia, Wiktionary, Wikisource, etc. come to Commons, they are generally respectful and start with "Hello, I would like to help, please let me know how you do things around here." On the other hand many ENWP admins begin by "OK, this category, this gallery, and all these topics need to stop being uploaded; here are the rules that we passed on English WP to limit contributors, you must to implement them here too." Sinnamon Girl (talk) 13:42, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
- Woah, woah, woah. "Distrusted by default"? Last I checked, the administrators were the trusted users. This is not the same as vandalizing with a Bill Clinton picture because it's a random, not-as-personal attack at sysops. –TCN7JM 12:42, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
- As much as I agree that ENWP admins should be distrusted by default, in this particular case it seems that your page wasn't locked because of this image, but because you have urged people to vandalise the project with it. If you were to say "Use the photo of Bill Clinton to vandalise all the user talk pages" the effect would be the same. Also I do not feel that there is anything at all inappropriate with Wikipedia having a policy on notability, as long as they don't bring it to any broadly educational project like Commons. Sinnamon Girl (talk) 06:29, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
- I can see the diff that Sinnamon Girl brings up. I have seen article subjects ask about uploading new images at en:wp and at commons. Most times at en:wp they get slammed with a bunch of undue COI template crap. At commons the harshest we normally repond is "You uploaded as own work. If it is a timer or remote it should be fine, otherwise the photographer, producer, or another rights holder will need to either email OTRS or upload it themselves." Many subjects think that we are calling them liars and consider that as being harsh.--Canoe1967 (talk) 20:40, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
- So let me get this bluntly straight. You're saying you should be able to keep this attack file because you don't like the way sysops on enwp act? –TCN7JM 22:57, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
- We have many files that criticise WMF. See Category:Metapedianism, Category:Wikimedia image filter... etc. Sinnamon Girl (talk) 04:15, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
- So let me get this bluntly straight. You're saying you should be able to keep this attack file because you don't like the way sysops on enwp act? –TCN7JM 22:57, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
- I can see the diff that Sinnamon Girl brings up. I have seen article subjects ask about uploading new images at en:wp and at commons. Most times at en:wp they get slammed with a bunch of undue COI template crap. At commons the harshest we normally repond is "You uploaded as own work. If it is a timer or remote it should be fine, otherwise the photographer, producer, or another rights holder will need to either email OTRS or upload it themselves." Many subjects think that we are calling them liars and consider that as being harsh.--Canoe1967 (talk) 20:40, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
- That has nothing to do with the deletion discussion. The discussion is about sysops on enwp, not child porn on Commons. (Also, to be honest, most of the time the COI templates are used, they're used correctly. You are not to edit on behalf of a company or group of people, and the usernames and editing patterns of many new users violate that policy.) –TCN7JM 04:10, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
- I can understand if they are used properly but when they are used at help desk when someone is simply trying to find out how to add an image to their article they shouldn't be used. If they actually do other edits to an article then they can be used. Adding an image to an article that doesn't have one and jumping down their throats that they aren't allowed to is BS. The policy recommends that they shouldn't edit their own article but they are allowed certain edits. If they can provide a better image than we can then I see no reason why they shouldn't be able to add it themselves. I wouldn't recommend it to them as I have seen deletionists go through and butcher their pages out of spite. One was shaved from 16,000 bytes to 3,000 bytes because the sources weren't inline. It was later expanded back up with the sources moved from a list at the bottom to the main article and placed inline. I can understand deletionists doing what they do because they think all articles on people should be two sentences and a list of accolades. But when they get lazy like that and just remove material when the sources are right on the page that is total BS. They get all upset when the article is expanded again and then stalk the editors to other articles and butcher those. This see-saw crap is a huge waste of time and effort. Editors like myself like to expand human knowledge on en:wp and others just follow me around and revert my efforts. This image came up after I was trying to add another image to a very bad article there. It is 'owned' by a tight group of POV fans that got rather upset that I expanded the article with it. That article a huge and full of unsourced false material. I decided to walk away but since it was brought up at ANI then others joined in to fix it. I doubt it ever will be fixed as they will just spend all their time on the talk page arguing about it. If you want to put w:Talk:Cosplay on your watchlist then you can follow the digression over there. I decided to walk away from it as a lost cause. Once some deletionists notice it then it will probably end up far smaller than it is and far more factual. At that point my images may end up back in it as valid material, but I no longer care--Canoe1967 (talk) 16:09, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
- Short reply to your long argument: This does not give you the right to keep an attack file on the wiki. –TCN7JM 18:27, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
- I can understand if they are used properly but when they are used at help desk when someone is simply trying to find out how to add an image to their article they shouldn't be used. If they actually do other edits to an article then they can be used. Adding an image to an article that doesn't have one and jumping down their throats that they aren't allowed to is BS. The policy recommends that they shouldn't edit their own article but they are allowed certain edits. If they can provide a better image than we can then I see no reason why they shouldn't be able to add it themselves. I wouldn't recommend it to them as I have seen deletionists go through and butcher their pages out of spite. One was shaved from 16,000 bytes to 3,000 bytes because the sources weren't inline. It was later expanded back up with the sources moved from a list at the bottom to the main article and placed inline. I can understand deletionists doing what they do because they think all articles on people should be two sentences and a list of accolades. But when they get lazy like that and just remove material when the sources are right on the page that is total BS. They get all upset when the article is expanded again and then stalk the editors to other articles and butcher those. This see-saw crap is a huge waste of time and effort. Editors like myself like to expand human knowledge on en:wp and others just follow me around and revert my efforts. This image came up after I was trying to add another image to a very bad article there. It is 'owned' by a tight group of POV fans that got rather upset that I expanded the article with it. That article a huge and full of unsourced false material. I decided to walk away but since it was brought up at ANI then others joined in to fix it. I doubt it ever will be fixed as they will just spend all their time on the talk page arguing about it. If you want to put w:Talk:Cosplay on your watchlist then you can follow the digression over there. I decided to walk away from it as a lost cause. Once some deletionists notice it then it will probably end up far smaller than it is and far more factual. At that point my images may end up back in it as valid material, but I no longer care--Canoe1967 (talk) 16:09, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
Kept: do not open DRs to prove some point. Besides, the file is in use. Lupo 11:23, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
IMO this shot is a derivative of the on-screen content owned by German TV station Sat1 and violates their copyright. -- Túrelio (talk) 15:01, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- No it shows a Lenovo-screen with a Filezilla and Windows surface.--ChristosV (talk) 16:27, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- Aha, and because of that the filename is "Sat1-griechenlandberichterstattung" (engl.: Sat1 reporting about Greece). Really, try a bit more honesty. --Túrelio (talk) 07:57, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. File unused. Lupo 11:15, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
Deutscher WP-Artikel gelöscht. Sinnlos.--Mehlauge (talk) 00:34, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Possible copyvio, possible out of scope . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:20, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
German WP article deleted, useless.--Mehlauge (talk) 00:32, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: possible copyvio, possible out of scope . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:21, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
This is a low resolution copy of File:2007._Stamp_of_Belarus_22-2007-11-16-block.jpg.
Also this file has wrong name. This stamp was printed at 2007, not 2008.
(I uploaded new version with high resolution to File:2007._Stamp_of_Belarus_22-2007-11-16-block.jpg. If you look at previous version [6], then you will see that this is the exact copy.) -- Andrew Krizhanovsky (talk) 10:16, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
![[6]](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/8/80/20130516093057!2007._Stamp_of_Belarus_22-2007-11-16-block.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:23, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unverständliches Bild, sinnlos.--Mehlauge (talk) 00:43, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Kept: A strange angle to be sure, but that is no reason to delete it. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:26, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Copurighted toy. It should also be deleted from Wikipedia. FunkMonk (talk) 06:55, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
Kept: The "design" is multiple thousand years old Denniss (talk) 14:51, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
Copyrighted toy. Previous rationale "design is old" was improper. Age of the animal doesn't matter. A toy deer is just as copyrighted as this. FunkMonk (talk) 23:15, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete DW or a copyrighted toy. Sinnamon Girl (talk) 03:22, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted. The animal it represents may be extremely old, but as a commercial design it is in copyright. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 08:27, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
As a Star Trek fan, I hate to do this, but this photo is likely non-free, as there is no freedom of panorama in the USA. This photo should be moved back to en Wikipedia with a non-free use rationale. Kelly (talk) 23:14, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
From a fellow Star Trek fan, I have to refute your claim, as I don't see any evidence that the Smithsonian uses the model of the Enterprise for financial gain. Unless the model itself is a paid exhibit, and the image lacks a watermark, it likely qualifies as a public domain image. (from an Unregistered user)
Deleted: Really sorry to have to delete this, but the model is copyright-protected and we would need a licence from the copyright owners to host this image. That is so even though the model is on public display in the US: see Commons:Freedom of panorama#United States. MichaelMaggs (talk) 08:30, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Valentinian as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: Extremely far from being "free". Danish coats of arms are not exempt from copyright, but treated as all other works of creativity, in addition to additional legal restrictions (Danish crimininal code § 132 sections 1 and 2), which also covers derived works. This insignia and the drawing is created c. 2007 by a still-living artist.
Converted by me to DR, as this might merit a third opinion. The file is hosted at/sourced to the Danish State archives. I wonder whether it's above threshold-of-originality, provided that is relevant in Danish copyright law. -- Túrelio (talk) 12:36, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: The blazon (word description) of a CoA may or may not have a copyright, but each individual instance of the CoA definitely has one unless it has expired or otherwise PD for some special reason. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:00, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
Section K from http://www.governor.wa.gov/about/privacy.aspx (right at the bottom) gives conflicting information. It says most of the information is public domain (photos are not necessarily information), then it says they would appreciate acknowledgement (if photos are covered), and then it says that it is advisable to contact them before using photos, etc. What is needed here is COM:OTRS permission for this photo (and perhaps all their other works). russavia (talk) 11:47, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:32, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
We have various SVG stop signs. Fry1989 eh? 18:53, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Already deleted MichaelMaggs (talk) 08:25, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unbenutzt, sinnlos.--Mehlauge (talk) 00:47, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted -FASTILY 21:47, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deutscher WP-Artikel gelöscht. Sinnlos.--Mehlauge (talk) 00:19, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 21:47, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused image of non-notable people INeverCry 21:52, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 21:47, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Deutscher WP-Artikel gelöscht. Sinnlos.--Mehlauge (talk) 00:25, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
Deleted -FASTILY 21:47, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
Deutscher WP-Artikel gelöscht. Sinnlos.--Mehlauge (talk) 00:16, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 21:47, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 21:59, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 21:47, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
COM:FOP#United States only applies to architecture, not to literature. Stefan4 (talk) 22:45, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- Keep – This image of a sign (not artwork) clearly falls within {{PD-shape}} and {{PD-text}}. The image of text is not a “literary work”. Facts, data, and unoriginal information are common property without sufficiently creative authorship in a general typeface, and simple geometric shapes are not protected by copyright. The image consists entirely of information that is common property and contains no original authorship. Images of this same sign have appeared here (page 16) and here. If the Commonwealth of Kentucky logo presents a problem, then it can be blured, as suggested by Commons Administrator McZusatz (here (line 21).- Woodlot (talk) 21:10, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
- The sign shows creative skills such as choice of words and choice of word order. What you are saying about information mainly applies to information presented in tabular form, since that means just providing information and not choosing words or word order. --Stefan4 (talk) 21:41, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
- Since you are so confident in your assertion, why don't you move forward and nominate all of these images for deletion? -Woodlot (talk) 13:08, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
- Interesting category. Lots of those will have to be deleted. However:
- Signs set up before 1978 are fine unless there is a copyright notice. I see that this sign is from 2003, so no copyright notice was needed.
- Signs from California and Florida are fine if made by the state government. I'm not sure who's making these signs.
- Some signs might pass {{PD-text}}. --Stefan4 (talk) 15:52, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
- Interesting category. Lots of those will have to be deleted. However:
- Since you are so confident in your assertion, why don't you move forward and nominate all of these images for deletion? -Woodlot (talk) 13:08, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
- The sign shows creative skills such as choice of words and choice of word order. What you are saying about information mainly applies to information presented in tabular form, since that means just providing information and not choosing words or word order. --Stefan4 (talk) 21:41, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FOP applies to architecture only FASTILY 21:19, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
OB, replaced with File:Tata Marcopolo Green Chandigarh Ind.jpg which reduces file size significantly Polytope4d (talk) 14:48, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 21:47, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:03, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 21:47, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
Nichtssagend.--Mehlauge (talk) 00:53, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 21:48, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:08, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 21:47, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - low-quality image of non-notable person INeverCry 22:10, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 21:47, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 22:12, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 21:47, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
We have SVGs of this flag. Fry1989 eh? 18:52, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 21:48, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
Deutscher WP-Artikel gelöscht. Sinnlos.--Mehlauge (talk) 00:57, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 21:48, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
ファイル名に誤りがあり 河川一等兵 (talk) 16:17, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 21:48, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
Deutscher WP-Artikel gelöscht. Sinnlos.--Mehlauge (talk) 00:50, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 21:48, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
In deutscher WP für irrelevant befunden. Sinnlos und mäßige Bildqualität.--Mehlauge (talk) 23:56, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 21:48, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 22:15, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 21:48, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:14, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 21:48, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
Deutscher WP-Artikel gelöscht. Sinnlos.--Mehlauge (talk) 00:28, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 21:48, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 22:19, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 21:48, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
With the file name "Iceland's biggest church", I'm not sure if one could consider this as de minimis. Stefan4 (talk) 14:41, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 21:48, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
out of scope INeverCry 22:20, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 21:48, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
possible copyvio - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 22:21, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 21:48, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
Please delete this file. WMF refused us to use Wikipedia globe trade mark. See revised file here. -- Thuvack (talk) 22:17, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 21:20, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
Copyright tag looks invalid Mattythewhite (talk) 17:11, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 21:48, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. The text is in Slovene and is a permission for the reusage of several files "for honest purposes". Eleassar (t/p) 21:04, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 22:02, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image - looks like it might even be a screencap of some kind INeverCry 22:23, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 21:48, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional - unused text logo of non-notable company - single upload of user INeverCry 22:24, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 21:48, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
I think this is an absolutely useless file. If it were an ogg video with full length, great, but what we have here is a 0.2 sec gif of some guy jacking off which gives us nothing that is above and beyond what we already have. There's nothing educational in it at all. I think we need to look at the rest of our GIF files too, because given our video capability, they are somewhat redundant. russavia (talk) 20:23, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- Keep - While I understand what you mean, I don't think I agree. Let's face it, male masturbation is just 0.5s of action repeated over and over and over... -mattbuck (Talk) 20:51, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- Comment Maybe for you it is Mattbuck. I am sure if you peruse the rest of our collection here on Commons, you might be able to spice that 0.5s into something more varied and interesting. russavia (talk) 20:59, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- Keep - Lets be honest, this file represents just about everything that Commons has become. You delete this image and you might as well take down the entire site! Ottava Rima (talk) 03:12, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete COM:PORN, just have a "quick" look on this. --Yikrazuul (talk) 10:56, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
- Keep as per mattbuck. Quality is fine. GIFs are more useful than videos in certain contexts, since they automatically load in pages, loop, and load faster than videos generally. Handcuffed (talk) 05:19, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Kept: no consensus to delete FASTILY 21:17, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
possible copyvio - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 22:29, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 21:48, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 22:30, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 21:48, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
Unused small bad quality photo, we have enough better photos in Category:Miranda Cosgrove. Taivo (talk) 13:24, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 21:48, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
out of scope INeverCry 22:33, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 21:48, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, quite bad quality Taivo (talk) 12:41, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 21:48, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 22:35, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 21:48, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
It says that this image, sourced to what looks like a collection of unpublished family photos, is in the public domain because it was published before 7 November 1917. However, it doesn't say when or where it was published before 7 November 1917, so the claim can't be verified. Stefan4 (talk) 12:11, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- "It says that this image, sourced to what looks like a collection of unpublished family photos". Sorry, who "says"? The idea that this photoimage is "a collection of unpublished family photos" is nothing, but your imagination. HOBOPOCC (talk) 15:16, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- The statement that I quoted (that this is in the public domain as published before 7 November 1917) is clearly written in the licence template on the file information page. That template requires evidence of publication before 7 November 1917, which has not been provided. As I wrote, the page http://guardcrew.com/?q=node/255 looks like a collection of unpublished family photos. --Stefan4 (talk) 15:47, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- You are wrong. HOBOPOCC (talk) 20:10, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
- Then specify when and where this was published before 7 November 1917. --Stefan4 (talk) 14:25, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
- It's you who have to specify that it was published first after 1943 (i. e. still not 70 years ago). --HOBOPOCC (talk) 16:30, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
- See COM:PRP. If there is no way to tell whether a file is free or not (for example because it can't be verified whether it has been published or not), then it is deleted. Also, publication more than 70 years may not be enough as the source doesn't tell where the photo comes from. Maybe it comes from some place where the name of the photographer was clearly indicated. In that case, you additionally have to show that the photographer died more than 70 years ago. Also, depending on when it was first published, COM:URAA may be a problem. --Stefan4 (talk) 17:40, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
- It's you who have to specify that it was published first after 1943 (i. e. still not 70 years ago). --HOBOPOCC (talk) 16:30, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
- Then specify when and where this was published before 7 November 1917. --Stefan4 (talk) 14:25, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
- You are wrong. HOBOPOCC (talk) 20:10, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
- The statement that I quoted (that this is in the public domain as published before 7 November 1917) is clearly written in the licence template on the file information page. That template requires evidence of publication before 7 November 1917, which has not been provided. As I wrote, the page http://guardcrew.com/?q=node/255 looks like a collection of unpublished family photos. --Stefan4 (talk) 15:47, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 21:16, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
- File:Official Seal of Polangui, Albay.png
- File:Polangui, Albay.png
- File:Polangui Mini.png
- File:Polangui Official Seal.png
Uploaded multiple times. If it's PD (questionable), pick one and delete the others. Fry1989 eh? 17:36, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
The same goes for these files of same uploader:
- File:PGCHS Enrolment History.png
- File:PGCHS Enrolment 1948-1998.png
- File:PGCHS Enrolment 1948 to 1998.png
- File:PGCHS Enrolment 1948 to 1998 only.png
And also for these files:
And also for these files:
- File:Polangui Map (Barangays).png
- File:Map of Polangui Barangays.png
- File:Polangui Barangay Location Map.png
- File:Polangui Geographical and Political Boundaries.png
- File:Geographical and Political Boundaries of Polangui.png Taivo (talk) 13:41, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Deleted: FASTILY 21:18, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Reddogsix as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://www.broadjam.com/artists/home.php?artistID=59739
Simple text, so probably not a copyvio, but I don't see any indication of why this would be in scope. INeverCry 16:39, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 21:49, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
Beim Express steht, dass das Foto von der dpa kommt.[7] -Joe-Tomato (talk) 17:49, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 21:49, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
in fact a duplicate of the svg Antemister (talk) 21:16, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 21:49, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:02, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 21:49, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
Nicolaï is born in 1955. No freedom of panorama in France. Copyright violation. 83.204.145.168 22:09, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 21:49, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
The candles show a copyrighted portrait of the martyr (per COM:FOP#Slovenia); imo not de minimis. Eleassar (t/p) 22:13, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 21:49, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 石 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://www.cqvip.com/ INeverCry 16:42, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 21:49, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:AMC model cars
[edit]Derivative works of models or packaging (e.g., File:Jo-Han 1969 AMX SS scale model sealed.jpg). Scale models are eligible for copyright (see Visual Arts (VA) registration form, 17 U.S.C. § 101 and the explanation/case law/etc. at User:Elcobbola/Models.)
- File:1966 AMC Marlin promo scale model-RightSide.JPG
- File:Corgi Toys - two Rambler Marlin diecasts on a logo.JPG
- File:HPIM1717.JPG
- File:JLRebelMachine.jpg
- File:Jo-Han 1969 AMX SS scale model sealed.jpg
- File:Jo-Han 1969 AMX SS scale model started.jpg
- File:Metropolitan scale model police car Franklin Mint.jpg
Эlcobbola talk 20:29, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete all except possibly File:Corgi Toys - two Rambler Marlin diecasts on a logo.JPG if it is decided to be Commons:De minimis.--Canoe1967 (talk) 12:21, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 21:17, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Kigurumi
[edit]Unagappa is a copyrighted 2D character of Tajimi city, Japan. 3D costume designed based on the 2D copyrighted work is also considered copyrighted No FOP in the source country. Therefore copyvio.
Nightingale (talk) 12:26, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Info Copyright(c) Unagappa all rights reserved. see the bottom of http://www.unagappa.com/ --Nightingale (talk) 12:30, 16 May 2013 (UTC) link above edited --Nightingale (talk) 12:33, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 21:16, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Lojze Grozde
[edit]The permission received via OTRS (the correct ticket: 2012012710002351) allows for the usage of the photograph of the painting "for Wikipedia and other honest purposes". There is no permission from the painter Tomaž Perko.
Eleassar (t/p) 22:08, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- Additionally, the description of another file of the same photographer (File:Celje-Grozde relikvije.jpg) contains the explicit statement: "Brez mojega dovoljenja naj se ne izdeluje reprodukcij za prodajo!", which translates as: "Reproductions for sale shall not be made without my permission." I think this puts things in perspective. --Eleassar (t/p) 07:11, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 21:17, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
Highly unlikely that these images are the uploader's own work
- File:Braun Coffee Maker.jpg
- File:Braun Coffee Grinder - Austin Calhoon Photograph.jpg
- File:Braun Shaver - Austin Calhoon Photograph.jpg
- File:Braun Nizo 6080 Super 8 Camera - Austin Calhoon Phototgraphy.jpg
- File:Braun Nizo 6080 Super 8 Camera - Austin Calhoon Phototgraph.jpg
- File:Braun Measuring Spoon - Austin Calhoon Photograph.jpg
- File:Braun Mixer - Austin Calhoon Photograph.jpg
- File:Braun Dieter Rams Lighter Austin Calhoon Photograph.jpg
- File:Nikon 70-210mm f4 Austin Calhoon Photograph.jpg
- File:Nikon 50mm f1.8 Austin Calhoon Photograph.jpg
- File:Nikon N2020 Austin Calhoon Photograph.jpg
- File:Nikon F3 Giugiaro Camera Design Austin Calhoon Photograph.jpg
- File:Nikon 28ti camera Austin Calhoon Photograph.jpg
- File:Nikon 28ti Austin Calhoon Photograph.jpg
- File:Leica I Camera Austin Calhoon Photograph.jpg
- File:Bang Olufsen Beovision TV Avant mx5000 Austin Calhoon Photograph.jpg
- File:Bang Olufsen Beocom 1401 Telephone Austin Calhoon Photograph.jpg
- File:Crush Strawberry Soda Austin Calhoon Photograph.jpg
- File:Nikon F Black Motor Camera 50mm Austin Calhoon Photograph.jpg
- File:Nikon F FTN Camera Austin Calhoon Photograph.jpg
- File:Nikon F Motor Black Camera 50mm Austin Calhoon Photograph.jpg
- File:Pentax 6x7 Austin Calhoon Photograph front.jpg
- File:Pentax 6x7 Austin Calhoon Photograph top.jpg
- File:Pentax 6x7 Austin Calhoon Photograph back.jpg
- File:Pentax 6x7 Austin Calhoon Photograph side.jpg
- File:Nikon F4 F4s Austin Calhoon Photograph.jpg
- File:Nikon F4 Guigiaro Design Austin Calhoon Photograph.jpg
- File:Nikon F4 F4s Guigiaro Design Austin Calhoon Photograph.jpg
- File:Olivetti Lettera 32 Typewriter.jpg
- File:Olivetti Lettera 33 Ettorre Sottsass.jpg
- File:Olivetti Lettera 35i Mario Bellini.jpg
- File:Olivetti Lettera 36c Mario Bellini.jpg
- File:Olivetti Praxis 48 Ettorre Sottsass.jpg
- File:Olivetti Lettera 22 Typewriter Marcello Nizzoli.jpg
- File:Olivetti Lettra 22 Typewriter.jpg
High Contrast (talk) 13:17, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
These are in fact Atcace's work uploaded by Austin Calhoon which can be seen at www.austincalhoon.com. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Atcace (talk • contribs)
- No problem! We will figure it out. I have replied on my talk page. Regards, High Contrast (talk) 14:31, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Kept: I withdraw this DR; the uploader seems to be the author of these files High Contrast (talk) 15:34, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Totò Lucania (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope - artworks of non-notable artist
- File:Immaginario 52x21.jpg
- File:La mia terra 70x50.jpg
- File:Egizio 100x50.jpg
- File:Caos egiziano 60x40.jpg
- File:Riconquista 50x60.jpg
INeverCry 22:01, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 21:17, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
Unnessesery, translations now on translatewiki.net Milicevic01 (talk) 22:54, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 21:19, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
Probably a copyvio. Died 1988, upload 2011 as "own work". Same file as published in 2007 elsewhere: https://pemikiranislam.wordpress.com/2007/07/24/pemikiran-2/ Atlasowa (talk) 15:05, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Fazlur Rahman Malik.gif. --Atlasowa (talk) 15:13, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted per nom. -- Infrogmation (talk) 17:06, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Probably a copyvio. Died 1988, upload 2009 as "own work". Same file as published in 2007 elsewhere: https://pemikiranislam.wordpress.com/2007/07/24/pemikiran-2/ see also twin: File:Fazl_ur_Rahman_Dr..jpg Atlasowa (talk) 15:11, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Fazl ur Rahman Dr..jpg. --Atlasowa (talk) 15:14, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted per nom. -- Infrogmation (talk) 17:07, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Ha sido un error por pone a mi hija en ella. Ruego sea eliminada. Gracias 83.36.92.36 08:08, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Good picture. Shows also people, so it is easy to understand, how thick that column is. Taivo (talk) 08:52, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Ha sido un error subirla por contener personas 83.58.137.80 17:11, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Good picture. Shows also people, so it is easy to understand, how thick that column is. Taivo (talk) 13:16, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Promotional article in Microsoft Word format => not a media file, non-free format. Ilmari Karonen (talk) 11:18, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
- Delete All of these MS-word files with misleading file extensions. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 12:40, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. PeterSymonds (talk) 02:37, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
What is troll tennis? Anyway, the photo is not used and the uploader's other contribution is also presented for deletion. Taivo (talk) 13:33, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Potential DW or a copyrighted photo. Need OTRS. Sinnamon Girl (talk) 03:05, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
- also File:Gam riyandana.jpg
Unused personal photos, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 12:32, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:52, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
As this is a contemporary artwork by a living artist, located in a country without FOP exemption, the photo violates the copyright of the artist. -- Túrelio (talk) 21:03, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
![21:03, 16 May 2013 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2013/05/16#c-Túrelio-2013-05-16T21:03:00.000Z-File:Conor_McCreedy_with_"Elephant_Bull".jpg){kind=link}
- Yet the artist is located in the picture. Would the fact that he allowed such a picture to be taken be considered permission? I don't know. Delete it if you must. Mattpbarry (talk) 21:14, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- I assumed that already. However, no, I would not consider that as sufficient, as the current license for this image allows any kind of use, including commercial use, to which the artist may or may not agree. If you are in contact with him, would you consider asking him for permission? --Túrelio (talk) 21:17, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- Could it be re-licensed/deleted uploaded and under another? Mattpbarry (talk) 23:18, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- I don't understand your suggestion. The original work is copyright by the artist, which also goes for any reproductions or depictions of it. As SA has no FOP-exemption (see above), only the artist himself can give permission to distribute a depiction of his work under any license, the more if the license allows for commercial use. There is no by-pass to this, except a direct permission by the artist himself. --Túrelio (talk) 07:05, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
- I understand. I may be able to contact the artist but that may take some time. In the mean while do what you feel is best. Mattpbarry (talk) 18:40, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
- O.k. Even if the file is deleted in between, the moment we have a valid permission from the artist, it can be undeleted. --Túrelio (talk) 19:36, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
- I understand. I may be able to contact the artist but that may take some time. In the mean while do what you feel is best. Mattpbarry (talk) 18:40, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
- I don't understand your suggestion. The original work is copyright by the artist, which also goes for any reproductions or depictions of it. As SA has no FOP-exemption (see above), only the artist himself can give permission to distribute a depiction of his work under any license, the more if the license allows for commercial use. There is no by-pass to this, except a direct permission by the artist himself. --Túrelio (talk) 07:05, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
- Could it be re-licensed/deleted uploaded and under another? Mattpbarry (talk) 23:18, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- I assumed that already. However, no, I would not consider that as sufficient, as the current license for this image allows any kind of use, including commercial use, to which the artist may or may not agree. If you are in contact with him, would you consider asking him for permission? --Túrelio (talk) 21:17, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: If you are the uploader, please email COM:OTRS FASTILY 23:54, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
![23:54, 28 May 2013 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2013/05/16#c-Fastily-2013-05-28T23:54:00.000Z-File:Conor_McCreedy_with_"Elephant_Bull".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Stefan4 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: book cover
Converted by me to DR to allow for some discussion. IMO this should go by de minimis as the copyrightable part of the cover is out of focus in this photo, likely intentionally by the original photographer. -- Túrelio (talk) 15:36, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- The problem is that the entire purpose of the image is to show the book, so it can impossibly qualify for de minimis. --Stefan4 (talk) 15:37, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- O.k., may be "de minimis" was the wrong rationale. But what is copyrightable in the original cover is IMO only the drawing/photo on the right half, which is intentionally (likely) out-of-focus. --Túrelio (talk) 15:41, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- I'd be swayed by the purpose of this image. It is a nice photo, but I doubt its purpose would be for anything more than to illustrate the particular book. As the uploader I would lean to Delete and consider that the Nordic Council have not thought enough about the licence for these close up images where this is sufficient creative content to be worried about. --Fæ (talk) 15:48, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- "The drawing in the right half of the photo" is part of the drawing/painting covering the entire front cover. See the scan at the publisher's website: http://www.aschehoug.no/nettbutikk/dager-i-stillhetens-historie.html The entire cover looks copyrightable to me. --Stefan4 (talk) 15:50, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- O.k. I've no intent to fight over this. When I saw how the photographer had composed this shot, it was my impression that he had the derivative-question already in mind. Anyway, if the photo of this cover is needed, one might ask the photographer directly, who may eventually be in contact with the author of the book. --Túrelio (talk) 16:06, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- "The drawing in the right half of the photo" is part of the drawing/painting covering the entire front cover. See the scan at the publisher's website: http://www.aschehoug.no/nettbutikk/dager-i-stillhetens-historie.html The entire cover looks copyrightable to me. --Stefan4 (talk) 15:50, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- I'd be swayed by the purpose of this image. It is a nice photo, but I doubt its purpose would be for anything more than to illustrate the particular book. As the uploader I would lean to
- O.k., may be "de minimis" was the wrong rationale. But what is copyrightable in the original cover is IMO only the drawing/photo on the right half, which is intentionally (likely) out-of-focus. --Túrelio (talk) 15:41, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- weak Keep Taivo (talk) 12:57, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: possibly containing infringing material. Uploader has endorsed deletion FASTILY 23:55, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
derivative of wax sculptures, (also seems to fail FoP-Spain). Discussion started at Commons:Administrators/Requests/Alan 99of9 (talk) 15:44, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Neutral - I think this image is a replica in wax of a picture, thus Keep aplying COM:DW. But the replica is in 3D and picture 2D, exists difference. Derivative work? thus Delete as copyvio. The community opinion? --Alan (talk) 17:13, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Unclear copyright status. Unless we have clear, explicit written/textual, tangible evidence indicating that this file is indeed freely licensed under a Commons compatible license, we cannot host it on Commons FASTILY 23:53, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Martin1009 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unclear whether the LP cover is PD.
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-mattbuck (Talk) 16:54, 16 May 2013 (UTC) Hallo Mattbuck! Wenn PD nicht richtig ist kannst du das ändern?? - oder notfalls auch löschen, das ist kein Problem. Danke dir und einen schönen Abend----Martin der Ältere! 21:19, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 23:50, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Watermarked image, (C) claim in Watermark is not consistent with other source data given, needs clarification or OTRS Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:06, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Comment Discussion has already been underway with both David Plas and Philippe Molitor relating to some of the images for the last week. Just going through the fine points of licencing with them now. Shouldn't be too long before I finish this either way with them. russavia (talk) 17:32, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: It's been a little over two weeks now. This should be handled via OTRS anyways, and can be restored once permission is on file FASTILY 19:35, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}