Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2012/12/09

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive December 9th, 2012
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author "Rede Globo" (it is a network!) and "source" "Insensato Coração" (a soap-opera!) (http://tvg.globo.com/novelas/insensato-coracao/index.html) are not Commons licensed sites, they are trademark ones. Yanguas (talk) 00:52, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyright violation. Érico Wouters msg 01:24, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Remix" of Mona Lisa from http://canv.as/p/vxdty. Photo of added face most likely a copyvio, whole "remix" out of project scope because realistic usefulness for an educational purpose is doubtful. Rosenzweig τ 03:55, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 07:33, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/Commons:Sandbox

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Credited here to someone named Rex ~ [ Scott M. Howard ] ~ [ Talk ]:[ Contribs ] ~ 06:16, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 07:27, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Not public domain, as claimed in the invalid license. Warhol died in 1987, which is considerably less than 70 years ago. XARAdNAM • MAИbAЯAX 10:51, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Clear copyvio. -mattbuck (Talk) 10:54, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermarked FARS News agency, Photo: Mahdi Marizad. MKFI (talk) 13:18, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: File uploaded by one of the photo stealing sockpuppets of User: The soso Martin H. (talk) 15:14, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: Per UDR request. {{Fars}} --Majora (talk) 16:39, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Claimed own work, but multiple copies exist in web. here is one from 2009. MKFI (talk) 13:20, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: File uploaded by one of the photo stealing sockpuppets of User: The soso Martin H. (talk) 15:14, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The same file exists on commons with higher resolution as File:Grand-canyon-watchtower-D4325.JPG, which is the name it is used on Wikovyage as. Wrh2 (talk) 22:14, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: next time tag as duplicate Denniss (talk) 22:34, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermark says the file is by ISNA and Vahid Alaee Techman224Talk 00:20, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 13:12, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermark says the file is by ISNA and Vahid Alaee Techman224Talk 00:21, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 13:12, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong category Zac Allan (talk) 03:21, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 13:12, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not the french wikipedia. CoveyHill (talk) 17:16, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 13:12, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This drawing is from a book called "Fifty Drawings by Aubrey Beardsley" (here is an ebay listing for the book which has a scan of the drawing[1]) by HS Nichols, which the Library of Congress says is a forgery of drawings [2]. This is not a drawing by Aubrey Beardsley and several people have noticed some of the drawings on here are forgeries from this book. --Turn685 (talk) 00:06, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep If these forgeries are confusing people, arguably it makes more sense to keep and correctly label them as forgeries, than to delete. In this case the file would need to be renamed. Rd232 (talk) 18:47, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I agree too actually. I didn't know you could rename pages here. I'd rename it to "Oscar Wilde by HS Nichols" and then says why it's referred to as a Beardsley drawing in the description. --Turn685 (talk) 22:57, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 00:45, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Œuvre dérivée de Les Deux Plateaux de Daniel Buren, toujours en vie en 2012. Voir Commons:Liberté_de_panorama#France Tiraden (talk) 14:15, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Consensus on De minimis. However I would like to point out Jastrow's opinion on the crop. PierreSelim (talk) 06:51, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File can be found on many places on the internet, also before it was uploaded to Commons. Likely not the own work of the uploader. User:Armbrust (Local talk - en.Wikipedia talk) 00:12, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:04, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PDF file with a biographical text in Spanish. Not a media file, no allowable PDF content, thus out of project scope. Rosenzweig τ 00:40, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:02, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The site where purportedly a permission is to be found has none and says instead "© 2012 NBCUniversal, Inc.". Rosenzweig τ 00:43, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:02, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photograph is likely not the uploader's own work High Contrast (talk) 01:40, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:02, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - promotional - unused logo - single upload of user INeverCry 02:57, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:59, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - promotional - unused text logo - single upload of user INeverCry 02:57, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:59, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - promotional - unused text logo - single upload of user INeverCry 03:03, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:00, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - unused text logo INeverCry 03:05, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:00, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 03:06, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:00, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 03:08, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:00, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - promotional - unused text logo INeverCry 03:09, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:00, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:15, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:01, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to have incorrect (or deceptive) geometry at the Co atoms of the bridged form: they should be octahedral, but are illustrated apparently planar (see File:Dicobcalt-octacarbonyl-from-xtal-3D-balls.png for literature verifiability); Have File:Co2(CO)8.png as replacement that uses that geometry. DMacks (talk) 03:17, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:06, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - unused text logo INeverCry 03:17, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:01, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:22, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:01, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 03:25, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:01, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - unused personal image/artwork INeverCry 03:31, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:01, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - promotional - unused text logo INeverCry 03:36, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:01, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - promotional - unused logo INeverCry 03:37, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:01, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 03:42, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:02, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 03:43, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:02, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:49, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:02, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Project scope because not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Rosenzweig τ 03:50, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:02, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 04:02, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:03, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 04:03, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:03, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 04:04, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:03, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 04:06, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:03, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 04:09, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:03, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 04:36, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:03, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 04:36, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:03, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 04:37, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:03, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 04:38, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:03, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused duplicate of File:My logo.png INeverCry 04:40, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:04, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused duplicate of File:Bpce Logo.png INeverCry 04:47, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:04, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused duplicate of File:Bpce2 Schriftbild der BMW Peugeot Citroën Electrification.png INeverCry 04:48, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:04, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - promotional image/logo INeverCry 04:52, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:04, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Includes poster that are fairuse Motopark (talk) 04:56, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:04, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 04:57, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:04, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 05:07, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:06, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope INeverCry 05:09, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:57, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 05:10, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:57, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope INeverCry 05:12, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:06, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - unused text logo INeverCry 05:24, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:06, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - promotional - unused logo - single upload of user INeverCry 05:25, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:06, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - promotional - unused logo INeverCry 05:27, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:07, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 05:28, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:07, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 05:31, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:07, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 05:32, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:07, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 05:35, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:07, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 05:36, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:07, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This scan of a print ad is unlikely to be the uploader's work. Poccil (talk) 05:39, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:13, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This scan of a print ad is unlikely to be the uploader's work. Poccil (talk) 05:39, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:14, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright held by Walter Bird, not uploader (Laidlaw). Uploader cannot release into PD. Bkwillwm (talk) 06:12, 9 December 2012 (UTC) You are correct, apparently in UK "Photographs are protected for 70 years after the death of the photographer." I know Walter Bird was alive in 1975, so it will be many years before copyright expires. Sorry. (No that was Dr Marcus Bird, born 1901, who was alive in 1975. I see that Walter Bird died in 1969. I confused them. Dr M Bird was school friend of Dr R.K. Callow, which is why I confused them.) I had no idea that Walter Bird was famous photographer, so thank you.[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:20, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright Violation: Many sources ~ [ Scott M. Howard ] ~ [ Talk ]:[ Contribs ] ~ 06:14, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete, obvious {{Copyvio}} like all other "contributions" by this user. LX (talk, contribs) 11:03, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:07, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks useless Poccil (talk) 06:32, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:20, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Zero value whatsoever, uploader blocked at enwiki for vandalism. 72.191.37.46 07:21, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:20, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because I, as the author, wants to delete it. Devilreborn (talk) 08:45, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:14, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo of a football club. It consists more than simple geometric shapes and text. Rapsar (talk) 09:49, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:09, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo of a football club. Rapsar (talk) 09:49, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:09, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo of a web site. Rapsar (talk) 09:49, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:09, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo of a football club. Rapsar (talk) 09:49, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:09, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is this in scope? McZusatz (talk) 11:01, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:09, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm sorry, but this is not covered by COM:FOP#Japan. JuTa 11:53, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely own ohoto by the uploader: low resolution, missing EXIF, uploaded second time after being deleted due to missing license, the previous upload refered to www.kabikov.org as source of the photo. A.Savin 13:02, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Œuvre dérivée de Les Deux Plateaux de Daniel Buren, toujours en vie en 2012. Voir Commons:Liberté_de_panorama#France Tiraden (talk) 14:14, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Œuvre dérivée de Les Deux Plateaux de Daniel Buren, toujours en vie en 2012. Voir Commons:Liberté_de_panorama#France Tiraden (talk) 14:14, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nothing to indicate this is public domain. Ships of Calmac website says all material is copyright. Vclaw (talk) 14:37, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo of user, not in use on a userpage, not in scope of Commons. Commons:Project scope. Martin H. (talk) 14:56, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal picture of user, not in use anywhere, out of project scope. Commons:Project scope. Martin H. (talk) 15:32, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non libre, c'est marqué dessus ... Tiraden (talk) 15:50, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False PD rationale. This is clearly a photo of a three-dimensional object, not a reproduction of a two-dimensional object. LX (talk, contribs) 15:51, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:16, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused user image, out of scope Aa1bb2cc3dd4ee5 (talk) 15:54, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:07, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, and therefore no evidence that the author of this photograph died more than 70 years ago. (Obviously, the Smithsonian Institution did not create the photo.) LX (talk, contribs) 15:55, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:07, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, and therefore no evidence that the author of this photograph died more than 70 years ago. The subject was born just over 80 years ago and appears to be a great deal over ten years old in the photo, so even if the photographer died just after taking the photo, 70 years would not have passed yet. LX (talk, contribs) 16:01, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:07, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused user image, out of scope Aa1bb2cc3dd4ee5 (talk) 16:03, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:07, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that this photograph was taken by an employee of the US federal government. The New Jersey Department of the Treasury is obviously not part of the US federal government, but the government of the state of New Jersey. LX (talk, contribs) 16:04, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:08, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo of an Indian medical college. Certainly not the work of the uploader. User:Armbrust (Local talk - en.Wikipedia talk) 16:05, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to swap in an otrs pending template as I've asked the uploader to send in permission. Objections? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 02:21, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No. User:Armbrust (Local talk - en.Wikipedia talk) 01:51, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Okay. I uploaded it to enwp: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:R.C.S.M._Govt_Medical_College_and_CPR_Hospital,_Kolhapur_logo.jpg because the creators say they've donated it to the university. To be on the safe side, let's call it non-free and let this commons version be deleted. Thanks for your efforts. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 20:04, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False PD rationale. This is clearly a photo of a three-dimensional object, not a reproduction of a two-dimensional object. LX (talk, contribs) 16:06, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:15, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False PD rationale. Obviously not a reproduction of an old painting, but a recent portrait photo. The subject was born in 1930, so this obviously was not created by an author who died more than 70 years ago. LX (talk, contribs) 16:12, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:15, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False PD rationale. This is a photograph, not a law, court decision, other administrative text; not a flag, emblem or other symbol of state; and not information about events. The source website contains a clear Ministry of Defense copyright notice. LX (talk, contribs) 16:18, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:15, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False PD rationale. This is a photograph, not a law, court decision, other administrative text; not a flag, emblem or other symbol of state; and not information about events. The source website contains a clear Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources copyright notice. LX (talk, contribs) 16:19, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:15, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused user image, out of scope Aa1bb2cc3dd4ee5 (talk) 16:32, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:15, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Aa1bb2cc3dd4ee5 (talk) 16:34, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:15, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused user image, out of scope Aa1bb2cc3dd4ee5 (talk) 16:41, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:12, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Current {{Copyrighted free use}} is incorrect, as User:Loscha is not copyright holder: "scanned from original Microbee document". In my opinion too complex for {{PD-textlogo}}. MKFI (talk) 16:51, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Further comment: this upload is from 2005, Commons rules may have been less strict at the time; certainly PD-textlogo did not exist back then. MKFI (talk) 16:53, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo appears to be the work of the Public Safety Dept. of Dade County, Florida. This is not an agency of the US Federal Government, and therefore the PD-USGov tag is incorrect. No evidence this image is in the public domain. – Wdchk (talk) 17:09, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:11, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo appears to be the work of the Albuquerque Police Department, New Mexico. This is not an agency of the US Federal Government, and therefore the PD-USGov tag is incorrect. No evidence given that this image is in the public domain. File:Bill Gates mugshot.png is a better version of the same image without the www.mugshots.org watermark and with a more plausible description of permission. – Wdchk (talk) 17:19, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:11, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo appears to be the work of a law enforcement agency in Rhode Island, not an agency of the US Federal Government, in which case the PD-USGov tag is incorrect. No evidence given that this image is in the public domain. – Wdchk (talk) 17:30, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The picture is in the public domain but the sketch itself is copyrighted => copyvio Remi Mathis (talk) 18:02, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is not the structure of Neuromedin N. It is not even close. Stonepoint (talk) 18:05, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work. No meta data. See Google and http://www.tonyschocolonely.com/onze-chocolade/ Wouter (talk) 18:11, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:13, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work in my opinion. Copyright. No meta data. Many hits on Google images Wouter (talk) 18:17, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:13, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work in my opinion. Copyright. No meta data. Many hits on Google images Wouter (talk) 18:18, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:13, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work in my opinion. Copyright. No meta data. Low resolution which indicates that it has been copied from internet Wouter (talk) 18:21, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:13, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused personal image Wiki13 18:36, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:12, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright? Cover of CD see e.g. http://unseen.bigcartel.com/product/mint-julep-save-your-season-cd-pre-order Is Brooke Shade indeed the source and OK with it? Wouter (talk) 18:47, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Whilst the original photo is surely {{PD-old-100-1923}}, I don't know if the 1952 sketch attracts an independent copyright. COM:PRP I think says delete. Rd232 (talk) 20:22, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:12, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Country_specific_consent_requirements#United_Kingdom, subject consent is needed in the UK. Rd232 (talk) 20:42, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:11, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No details or plausible reasoning for CC-by license provided Uwe (talk) 20:46, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:12, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The author of this photo is not Elvira, Munich but Ferd. Urbahns in Kiel. His photos are not yet PD in Germany. Second the coloration is not properly licensed. Ras67 (talk) 21:52, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 22:04, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:09, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope/promotional. Érico Wouters msg 22:05, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:10, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 22:06, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:10, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 22:06, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:10, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 22:07, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:10, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 22:08, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:10, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 22:09, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:10, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 22:11, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:10, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 22:15, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:10, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 22:15, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:10, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 22:15, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:10, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

text contribution, out of scope of Commons. Commons:Project scope#Excluded educational content. Martin H. (talk) 22:22, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photograph is apparently from Poland. They have freedom of panorama. Is this in violation of Commons:Image casebook#Comic and action figures then? --|EPO| da: 14:24, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. It is presumably not permanently installed in a public place. --Stefan4 (talk) 22:40, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:08, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I think this is out of scope: not likely to serve an educational purpose. Poccil (talk) 22:46, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:08, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably refringement of copyright; obviously taken from there: http://news.xinhuanet.com/world/2011-12/20/c_122453094.htm 84.153.196.52 23:16, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:07, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably infringement of copyright; obviously taken from there: http://www.prezident.sk/?prezident&stranka=6 84.153.196.52 23:19, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:07, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably infringement of copyright; obviously taken from there: http://img.radio.cz/pictures/prezidenti/husak_gustav2.jpg 84.153.196.52 23:22, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:07, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably infringement of copyright; obviously taken from there: http://dejak-osobnosti.webnode.cz/vaclav-havel/ 84.153.196.52 23:26, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:07, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photographers are Reichard & Lindner, not Kralj Alexander. It is doubtful, that Kralj Alexander gave a licence for the coloring of this picture. Ras67 (talk) 23:47, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If the image is a contemporary chromolithograph, the deletion request is not tenable. But is it? IMHO the colors and gradation are too fine for 1898. --Ras67 (talk) 18:10, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:07, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

For basically the same reasons as at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Flag-map of Greater Germany.svg, except substitute "Switzerland and Austria" for Germany... AnonMoos (talk) 05:24, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. King of 19:02, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Œuvre dérivée de Les Deux Plateaux de Daniel Buren, toujours en vie en 2012. Voir Commons:Liberté_de_panorama#France Tiraden (talk) 14:15, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per COM:DM. King of 19:06, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file, although it is old enough to be in the public domain, was taken directly from the UMass Special Collections, which maintains jurisdiction over its usage. It does not fall under public domain for this reason, and is not considered fair use because other photographs portraying the subject's likeness exist in the public domain. -Simtropolitan (talk) 18:52, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: The official position of the WMF is that as long as the original 2D work is in the public domain, any reproductions of it do not produce new copyright. Therefore the UMass restrictions are baseless. King of 19:08, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 65.128.235.13 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: This is a photo (derivative work) of a three dimensional sculpture without any permission for use of the sculpture. I have been to this museum and this is, at the oldest, from 1994 when the Oriental Pearl Tower was built. The photo's Flickr permission does not cover the sculpture.
Converted by me to DR, as this might need some discussion, though the rationale seem plausible to me. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:01, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No indoor COM:FOP in China. King of 19:09, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The authors likely did not have the right to release this video under CC BY 2.5. I have requested clarification. Daniel Mietchen - WiR/OS (talk) 23:25, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Daniel's suspicion was confirmed in the clarification. 99of9 (talk) 10:51, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The authors likely did not have the right to release this video under CC BY 2.5. I have requested clarification. Daniel Mietchen - WiR/OS (talk) 23:25, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Daniel's suspicion was confirmed in the clarification. 99of9 (talk) 10:50, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted text. copyvio as literature work, Fair use. Vantey (talk) 05:55, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


copyrighted text. copyvio as literature work, Fair use. Tokumeigakarinoaoshima (talk) 09:21, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted picture from anime. copyvio as drawing work, Fair use. Vantey (talk) 05:57, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

copyrighted picture from anime. copyvio as drawing work, Fair use. Tokumeigakarinoaoshima (talk) 09:17, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:14, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted picture from anime. copyvio as drawing work, Fair use. Vantey (talk) 05:57, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

copyrighted picture from anime. copyvio as drawing work, Fair use. Tokumeigakarinoaoshima (talk) 09:17, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:14, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted text. copyvio as literature work, Fair use. Vantey (talk) 05:55, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


copyrighted text. copyvio as literature work, Fair use. Tokumeigakarinoaoshima (talk) 09:21, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Schätzungsweise eine Urheberrechtsverletzung. Weite Verbreitung im Internet, Wasserzeichen, kein OTRS-Ticket,... Pilettes (Diskussion) 11:07, 9 December 2012 (UTC)


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 20:14, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If it is a personal image, it is out of scope. If it is a corporate image, it is probably a copyvio      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:09, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: (not by me) Jcb (talk) 23:53, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File:My image.jpg

screenshot of non-free software Aa1bb2cc3dd4ee5 (talk) 16:55, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete On the one hand, I am not at all sure that there is anything here that is not de minimis or ineligible for copyright, so I don't think copyright is a problem, but that is moot, because I also don't see any educational value to this image. Out of scope -- delete. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:05, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User page file (en.wiki), no other edits by this user. Out of scope. GeorgHHtalk   19:42, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:44, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a non-free screenshot depicting trademarked Logos. You can't just license it CC-0. Matt (talk) 11:23, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:30, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File:Screenshot.Smartphone.Shopping-Apps.PNG

I don't agree that this is ineligible for copyright. Some of the logos are ineligible for copyright, but not the background. Stefan4 (talk) 21:05, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I do not really understand the different copyrights and there are contradictions in the formerly posted reasons ! Please switch to any copy right licence which would be possible and legal - I do not mind which one it is. Otherwise, please tell me which one I should use to avoid a deletion of the file. Thank you in advance. --Bautsch (talk) 10:50, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You need to obtain written permission from the person who drew the background and from several of the logo designers. Otherwise, the image has to be deleted. See COM:OTRS. --Stefan4 (talk) 10:54, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: King of 19:10, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hai Vung Lian (talk · contribs)

[edit]

PDF files with texts in English about some attractions. Not the content allowed in PDF files, thus out of project scope.

Rosenzweig τ 00:27, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Also:

--Rosenzweig τ 04:01, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:02, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photos uploaded by Pilkarz210

[edit]

Low resolution photos, without original EXIF, unlikely an own work. I found evedence that two other photos File:Wojciech Borecki ŁKS Łódź.jpg and File:Trener_ŁKS_Borecki.jpg, uploaded at the same time by this user, was taken from web --Oleola (talk) 00:23, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:02, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Firzafp (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images taken from all over the web and perhaps other sources. No evidence of the uploader being the author or having permission to upload here under the licenses given.

Rosenzweig τ 00:57, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:05, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(Another) files uploaded by Firzafp (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All of these images are clearly taken from other sites, without permission to upload here with license given, and uploader claimed this to be his/her own work. 2 files are illegally taken from a forum.

Sabung.hamster (talk) 03:03, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete and block the user, who has uploaded nothing but copyright violations. LX (talk, contribs) 15:00, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted and blocked. --Alan (talk) 00:30, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by

[edit]

Those files are screenshots of test cards for different stations. I'm not sure it's in PD or not, but it definitely is not a "own work". Also, some of them have non-free logo in it. Mys 721tx (talk) 01:19, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:04, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Metz Lorraine (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope - promotional images

INeverCry 03:00, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:01, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files by User:Gorjiha

[edit]

Old photographes uploaded by new user. Unlikely own work. --Geagea (talk) 03:04, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:02, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Musica3eso (talk · contribs)

[edit]

possible copyvios - small sizes - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful

INeverCry 03:35, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:01, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jeroensunabru (talk · contribs)

[edit]

possible copyvios - small sizes - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful - some of these are sourced to websites and atleast one image has a website watermark

INeverCry 03:41, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:05, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Milram2010 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

possible copyvios - small sizes - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful

INeverCry 03:53, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:05, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mackie.ocampo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

possible copyvios - small sizes - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful - quite a few of these are sourced to facebook

INeverCry 03:56, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:18, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Superplezier1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope - promotional images

INeverCry 04:06, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:03, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tativar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 04:07, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:03, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Afrilife (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope - unused personal/promotional images

INeverCry 05:04, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:05, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Juancpin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope - no educational value

INeverCry 05:06, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:06, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Егор=Мегион (talk · contribs)

[edit]

possible copyvios - small sizes - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful

INeverCry 05:07, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:06, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Meggren (talk · contribs)

[edit]

possible copyvios - own work claim doubtful

INeverCry 05:38, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:07, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:FOP#Italy. 84.61.133.39 11:01, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is an interested edge case. The casino is indeed in Italy, albeit an enclave entirely surrounded by Switzerland. However I took the photograph from a Swiss registered boat in Swiss waters. And the architect is Swiss. Italy does not have FoP for buildings; Switzerland does. I don't know which one is relevant. -- Chris j wood (talk) 10:46, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Retain: Actually, COM:FOP answers my above question, with the following Since the question of choice of law with regard to freedom of panorama cases is unsettled, current practice on Commons is to retain photos based on the more lenient of the country in which the object is situated and the country in which the photo is taken. In this case, Swiss law is the more lenient, and should therefore be used. The picture should be retained. -- Chris j wood (talk) 11:02, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  2. I didn't take these others photographs, but by the look of they I would say they were taken from Switzerland (or Swiss waters). In which case, COM:FOP says Since the question of choice of law with regard to freedom of panorama cases is unsettled, current practice on Commons is to retain photos based on the more lenient of the country in which the object is situated and the country in which the photo is taken. In this case, Swiss law has FoP and is therefore the more lenient, and should therefore be used, and the picture should be retained. However I guess we need the author to confirm where it was taken from. -- Chris j wood (talk) 11:02, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  1.  Keep Applies the Switzerland freedom of panorma (see {{FoP-Switzerland}} and FOP#Choice of law) because the photo (of italian building) was taken by Switzerland. Raoli ✉ (talk) 15:29, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: We typically use the more liberal of the two countries' policies in such a case. King of 19:03, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jmarincr (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images used in these files are unlikely to be the uploader's own work, and they seem grabbed from the internet. See also this DR.

Savhñ 11:32, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:08, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Karnataka ka (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:35, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:15, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Karnataka ka (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:00, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:20, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Waelation (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:48, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:12, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cornouaille

[edit]

On my talkpage a user said that possibly this uploaders files are copyright violations, File:Abauer.jpg even has a caption at the side. I agree, possible copyright violations.

Martin H. (talk) 22:16, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:10, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal pictures - out of scope.

--XXN, 15:25, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:47, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PD-polish licence is for photos and probably for that photo it's okay. The text of the article doesn't fall under that licence so I think it might be copyvio. Plushy (talk) 17:00, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per uncontested DR. MBisanz talk 18:01, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mgervais (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope - promotional - unused text logos

INeverCry 05:22, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:06, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mgervais (talk · contribs)

[edit]

possibly out of scope - large collection of unused logos - perhaps a few of these are in scope but I don't think multiple copies of each logo are needed - the Debian logo has 8 variants and several others have multiple variants - none in use

INeverCry 20:00, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


deleted: Out of scope + possible licence violation of debian logo --PierreSelim (talk) 23:34, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This pic was taken in Germany in WW2. The museum cannot be the copyright holder, neither the uploader on Flickr can be the copyright holder. JuergenKlueser (talk) 08:52, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: available on San Diego Air and Space Museum's Flickr account under Flickr No Known Copyright Morning (talk) 05:54, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Refer to discussion on using pics from Flickr JuergenKlueser (talk) 22:23, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:45, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This pic was taken in Germany in WW2. The museum cannot be the copyright holder, the uploader on Flickr can be the copyright holder. JuergenKlueser (talk) 08:53, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: available on San Diego Air and Space Museum's Flickr account under Flickr No Known Copyright Morning (talk) 05:54, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Refer to discussion on using pics from Flickr JuergenKlueser (talk) 22:24, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:44, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This pic was taken in Germany in WW2. The museum cannot be the copyright holder, the uploader on Flickr also can not be the copyright holder. JuergenKlueser (talk) 08:54, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: available on San Diego Air and Space Museum's Flickr account under Flickr No Known Copyright Morning (talk) 05:55, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Refer to discussion on using pics from Flickr JuergenKlueser (talk) 22:24, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:44, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This pic was taken in Germany in WW2. The museum cannot be the copyright holder, the uploader on Flickr also can not be the copyright holder. JuergenKlueser (talk) 08:56, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: available on San Diego Air and Space Museum's Flickr account under Flickr No Known Copyright Morning (talk) 05:55, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Refer to discussion on using pics from Flickr JuergenKlueser (talk) 22:25, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:43, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This pic was taken in Germany in WW2. The museum cannot be the copyright holder, the uploader on Flickr also can not be the copyright holder. JuergenKlueser (talk) 08:56, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: available on San Diego Air and Space Museum's Flickr account under Flickr No Known Copyright Morning (talk) 05:55, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Refer to discussion on using pics from Flickr JuergenKlueser (talk) 22:25, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:43, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This pic was taken in Germany in WW2. The museum cannot be the copyright holder, the uploader on Flickr also can not be the copyright holder. JuergenKlueser (talk) 08:57, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: available on San Diego Air and Space Museum's Flickr account under Flickr No Known Copyright Morning (talk) 05:55, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Refer to discussion on using pics from Flickr JuergenKlueser (talk) 22:26, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:43, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Refer to discussion on using pics from Flickr JuergenKlueser (talk) 22:28, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:42, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Does this logo meet the threshold of originality? After a discussion on IRC, it was reported the left red part of the logo could meet threshold, and so be a creative word, as (i) it's drilled by two ovales (ii) the bottom right corner is squared, the others are round-shaped. Uploader doesn't share this view and wonder if this red part couldn't be view as a 8, but especially strongly insists there are simple shapes. He were able to recreate the logo using the character 8 from the font embedded in the source document Dereckson (talk) 22:38, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-textlogo. Yann (talk) 11:34, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

kind of an experimental svg of File:Liwa-e-Ahmadiyya 1-2.svg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ceddyfresse (talk • contribs) 2012-12-06T00:06:30‎ (UTC)

It can be deleted as Ceddyfresse says. --Ahmadi (talk) 05:32, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 23:19, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Reasons for deletion request -Mkummerer (talk) 16:46, 7 December 2012 (UTC) Bin mir wegen des Markenrechtes nicht im klaren!--Mkummerer (talk) 16:50, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 23:19, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]